The amyloid-β degradation pattern in plasma—A possible tool for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

Mass spectrometric studies of the variety of beta-amyloid proteoforms in Alzheimer's disease

This review covers the results of the application of mass spectrometric (MS) techniques to study the diversity of beta-amyloid (Aβ) peptides in human samples. Since Aβ is an important hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is a socially significant neurodegenerative disorder of the elderly worldwide, analysis of its endogenous variations is of particular importance for elucidating the pathogenesis of AD, predicting increased risks of the disease onset, and developing effective therapy. MS approaches have no alternative for the study of complex samples, including a wide variety of Aβ proteoforms, differing in length and modifications. Approaches based on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight and liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization tandem MS are most common in Aβ studies. However, Aβ forms with isomerized and/or racemized Asp and Ser residues require the use of special methods for separation and extra sensitive and selective methods for detection. Overall, this review summarizes current knowledge of Aβ species found in human brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and blood plasma; focuses on application of different MS approaches for Aβ studies; and considers the potential of MS techniques for further studies of Aβ-peptides.

Navigating the Landscape of Plasma Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease: Focus on Past, Present, and Future Clinical Applications

As the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its impact on healthcare systems increase, developing tools for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression is a priority. Recent technological advancements have allowed for the development of blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) to aid in the diagnosis of AD, but many questions remain regarding the clinical implementation of these BBMs. This review outlines the historical timeline of AD BBM development. It highlights key breakthroughs that have transformed the perspective of AD BBMs from theoretically ideal but unattainable markers, to clinically valid and reliable BBMs with potential for implementation in healthcare settings. Technological advancements like single-molecule detection and mass spectrometry methods have significantly improved assay sensitivity and accuracy. High-throughput, fully automated platforms have potential for clinical use. Despite these advancements, however, significant work is needed before AD BBMs can be implemented in widespread clinical practice. Cutpoints must be established, the influence of chronic conditions and medications on BBM levels must be better understood, and guidelines must be created for healthcare providers related to interpreting and communicating information obtained from AD BBMs. Additionally, the development of BBMs for synaptic dysfunction, inflammation, and cerebrovascular disease may provide better precision medicine approaches to treating AD and related dementia. Future research and collaboration between scientists and physicians are essential to addressing these challenges and further advancing AD BBMs, with the goal of integration in clinical practice.

The early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Blood-based panel biomarker discovery by proteomics and metabolomics

Diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are increasingly pressing in the early stage of the disease because the biomarker-targeted therapies may be most effective. Diagnosis of AD largely depends on the clinical symptoms of AD. Currently, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and neuroimaging techniques are considered for clinical detection and diagnosis. However, these clinical diagnosis results could provide indications of the middle and/or late stages of AD rather than the early stage, and another limitation is the complexity attached to limited access, cost, and perceived invasiveness. Therefore, the prediction of AD still poses immense challenges, and the development of novel biomarkers is needed for early diagnosis and urgent intervention before the onset of obvious phenotypes of AD. Blood-based biomarkers may enable earlier diagnose and aid detection and prognosis for AD because various substances in the blood are vulnerable to AD pathophysiology. The application of a systematic biological paradigm based on high-throughput techniques has demonstrated accurate alterations of molecular levels during AD onset processes, such as protein levels and metabolite levels, which may facilitate the identification of AD at an early stage. Notably, proteomics and metabolomics have been used to identify candidate biomarkers in blood for AD diagnosis. This review summarizes data on potential blood-based biomarkers identified by proteomics and metabolomics that are closest to clinical implementation and discusses the current challenges and the future work of blood-based candidates to achieve the aim of early screening for AD. We also provide an overview of early diagnosis, drug target discovery and even promising therapeutic approaches for AD.

Gene-variant specific effects of plasma amyloid-β levels in Swedish autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease

BACKGROUND

Several blood-based biomarkers offer the opportunity of in vivo detection of brain pathology and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer disease with high specificity and sensitivity, but the performance of amyloid-β (Aβ) measurements remains under evaluation. Autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) with mutations in PSEN1, PSEN2 and APP can be studied as a model for sporadic Alzheimer disease. However, clarifying the genetic effects on the Aβ-levels in different matrices such as cerebrospinal fluid or plasma is crucial for generalizability and utility of data. We aimed to explore plasma Aβ concentrations over the Alzheimer disease continuum in a longitudinal cohort of genetic Alzheimer disease.

METHODS

92 plasma samples were collected from at-risk individuals (n = 47) in a Swedish cohort of ADAD, including 18 mutation carriers (13 APPswe (p.KM670/671NL) MC), 5 PSEN1 (p.H163Y) MC) and 29 non-carriers (NC) as the reference group. Concentrations of Aβ1-38, Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 were analyzed in plasma using immunoprecipitation coupled to tandem liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (IP-LC-MS/MS). Cross-sectional and repeated-measures data analyses were investigated family-wise, applying non-parametric tests as well as mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional analysis at baseline showed more than a 3-fold increase in all plasma Aβ peptides in APPswe MC, regardless of clinical status, compared to controls (p < 0.01). PSEN1 (p.H163Y) presymptomatic MC had a decrease of plasma Aβ1-38 compared to controls (p < 0.05). There was no difference in Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio between APPswe MC (PMC and SMC), PSEN1 MC (PMC) and controls at baseline. Notably, both cross-sectional data and repeated-measures analysis suggested that APPswe MC have a stable Aβ1-42/1-40 ratio with increasing age, in contrast to the decrease seen with aging in both controls and PSEN1 (p.H163Y) MC.

CONCLUSION

These data show very strong mutation-specific effects on Aβ profiles in blood, most likely due to a ubiquitous production outside of the CNS. Hence, analyses in an unselected clinical setting might unintentionally disclose genetic status. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the Aβ ratio might be a poor indicator of brain Aβ pathology in selected genetic cases. The very small sample size is a limitation that needs to be considered but reflects the scarcity of longitudinal in vivo data from genetic cohorts.

A streamlined, resource-efficient immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry method for quantifying plasma amyloid-β biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease

High-performance, resource-efficient methods for plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) quantification in Alzheimer's disease are lacking; existing mass spectrometry-based assays are resource- and time-intensive. We developed a streamlined mass spectrometry method with a single immunoprecipitation step, an optimized buffer system, and ≤75% less antibody requirement. Analytical and clinical performances were compared with an in-house reproduced version of a well-known two-step assay. The streamlined assay showed high dilution linearity (r2>0.99) and precision (< 10% coefficient of variation), low quantification limits (Aβ1-40: 12.5 pg/ml; Aβ1-42: 3.125 pg/ml), and high signal correlation (r2~0.7) with the two-step immunoprecipitation assay. The novel single-step assay showed more efficient recovery of Aβ peptides via fewer immunoprecipitation steps, with significantly higher signal-to-noise ratios, even at plasma sample volumes down to 50 pl. Both assays had equivalent performances in distinguishing non-elevated vs. elevated brain Aβ-PET individuals. The new method enables simplified yet robust evaluation of plasma Aβ biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.

Advances in Blood Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Ultra-Sensitive Detection Technologies and Impact on Clinical Diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease has escalated into a critical public health concern, marked by its neurodegenerative nature that progressively diminishes cognitive abilities. Recognized as a continuously advancing and presently incurable condition, AD underscores the necessity for early-stage diagnosis and interventions aimed at delaying the decline in mental function. Despite the proven efficacy of cerebrospinal fluid and positron emission tomography in diagnosing AD, their broader utility is constrained by significant costs and the invasive nature of these procedures. Consequently, the innovation of blood biomarkers such as Amyloid-beta, phosphorylated-tau, total-tau et al, distinguished by their high sensitivity, minimal invasiveness, accessibility, and cost-efficiency, emerges as a promising avenue for AD diagnosis. The advent of ultra-sensitive detection methodologies, including single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, has revolutionized the detection of AD plasma biomarkers, supplanting previous low-sensitivity techniques. This rapid advancement in detection technology facilitates the more accurate quantification of pathological brain proteins and AD-associated biomarkers in the bloodstream. This manuscript meticulously reviews the landscape of current research on immunological markers for AD, anchored in the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association AT(N) research framework. It highlights a selection of forefront ultra-sensitive detection technologies now integral to assessing AD blood immunological markers. Additionally, this review examines the crucial pre-analytical processing steps for AD blood samples that significantly impact research outcomes and addresses the practical challenges faced during clinical testing. These discussions are crucial for enhancing our comprehension and refining the diagnostic precision of AD using blood-based biomarkers. The review aims to shed light on potential avenues for innovation and improvement in the techniques employed for detecting and investigating AD, thereby contributing to the broader field of neurodegenerative disease research.

Combining plasma Aβ and p-tau217 improves detection of brain amyloid in non-demented elderly

BACKGROUND

Maximizing the efficiency to screen amyloid-positive individuals in asymptomatic and non-demented aged population using blood-based biomarkers is essential for future success of clinical trials in the early stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we elucidate the utility of combination of plasma amyloid-β (Aβ)-related biomarkers and tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (p-tau217) to predict abnormal Aβ-positron emission tomography (PET) in the preclinical and prodromal AD.

METHODS

We designed the cross-sectional study including two ethnically distinct cohorts, the Japanese trial-ready cohort for preclinica and prodromal AD (J-TRC) and the Swedish BioFINDER study. J-TRC included 474 non-demented individuals (CDR 0: 331, CDR 0.5: 143). Participants underwent plasma Aβ and p-tau217 assessments, and Aβ-PET imaging. Findings in J-TRC were replicated in the BioFINDER cohort including 177 participants (cognitively unimpaired: 114, mild cognitive impairment: 63). In both cohorts, plasma Aβ(1-42) (Aβ42) and Aβ(1-40) (Aβ40) were measured using immunoprecipitation-MALDI TOF mass spectrometry (Shimadzu), and p-tau217 was measured with an immunoassay on the Meso Scale Discovery platform (Eli Lilly).

RESULTS

Aβ-PET was abnormal in 81 participants from J-TRC and 71 participants from BioFINDER. Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and p-tau217 individually showed moderate to high accuracies when detecting abnormal Aβ-PET scans, which were improved by combining plasma biomarkers and by including age, sex and APOE genotype in the models. In J-TRC, the highest AUCs were observed for the models combining p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio, APOE, age, sex in the whole cohort (AUC = 0.936), combining p-tau217, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, APOE, age, sex in the CDR 0 group (AUC = 0.948), and combining p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio, APOE, age, sex in the CDR 0.5 group (AUC = 0.955), respectively. Each subgroup results were replicated in BioFINDER, where the highest AUCs were seen for models combining p-tau217, Aβ42/40 ratio, APOE, age, sex in cognitively unimpaired (AUC = 0.938), and p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio, APOE, age, sex in mild cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.914).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of plasma Aβ-related biomarkers and p-tau217 exhibits high performance when predicting Aβ-PET positivity. Adding basic clinical information (i.e., age, sex, APOE ε genotype) improved the prediction in preclinical AD, but not in prodromal AD. Combination of Aβ-related biomarkers and p-tau217 could be highly useful for pre-screening of participants in clinical trials of preclinical and prodromal AD.

Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Analysis Using Targeted Mass Spectrometry

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by several neuropathological changes, mainly extracellular amyloid aggregates (plaques), intraneuronal inclusions of phosphorylated tau (tangles), as well as neuronal and synaptic degeneration, accompanied by tissue reactions to these processes (astrocytosis and microglial activation) that precede neuronal network disturbances in the symptomatic phase of the disease. A number of biomarkers for these brain tissue changes have been developed, mainly using immunoassays. In this review, we discuss how targeted mass spectrometry (TMS) can be used to validate and further characterize classes of biomarkers reflecting different AD pathologies, such as tau- and amyloid-beta pathologies, synaptic dysfunction, lysosomal dysregulation, and axonal damage, and the prospect of using TMS to measure these proteins in clinical research and diagnosis. TMS advantages and disadvantages in relation to immunoassays are discussed, and complementary aspects of the technologies are discussed.

Targeted protein quantitation in human body fluids by mass spectrometry

Human body fluids (biofluids) contain various proteins, some of which reflect individuals' physiological conditions or predict diseases. Therefore, the analysis of biofluids can provide substantial information on novel biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and prognosis. In the past decades, mass spectrometry (MS)-based technologies have been developed as proteomic strategies not only for the identification of protein biomarkers but also for biomarker verification/validation in body fluids for clinical applications. The main advantage of targeted MS-based methodologies is the accurate and specific simultaneous quantitation of multiple biomarkers with high sensitivity. Here, we review MS-based methodologies that are currently used for the targeted quantitation of protein components in human body fluids, especially in plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and saliva. In addition, the currently used MS-based methodologies are summarized with a specific focus on applicable clinical sample types, MS configurations, and acquisition modes.

Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Current state and future use in a transformed global healthcare landscape

Timely detection of the pathophysiological changes and cognitive impairment caused by Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly pressing because of the advent of biomarker-guided targeted therapies that may be most effective when provided early in the disease. Currently, diagnosis and management of early AD are largely guided by clinical symptoms. FDA-approved neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers can aid detection and diagnosis, but the clinical implementation of these testing modalities is limited because of availability, cost, and perceived invasiveness. Blood-based biomarkers (BBBMs) may enable earlier and faster diagnoses as well as aid in risk assessment, early detection, prognosis, and management. Herein, we review data on BBBMs that are closest to clinical implementation, particularly those based on measures of amyloid-β peptides and phosphorylated tau species. We discuss key parameters and considerations for the development and potential deployment of these BBBMs under different contexts of use and highlight challenges at the methodological, clinical, and regulatory levels.

Plasma Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of Available Assays, Recent Developments, and Implications for Clinical Practice

Recently, low-sensitive plasma assays have been replaced by new ultra-sensitive assays such as single molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Simoa), the Mesoscale Discovery (MSD) platform, and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) with higher accuracy in the determination of plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite the significant variability, many studies have established in-house cut-off values for the most promising available biomarkers. We first reviewed the most used laboratory methods and assays to measure plasma AD biomarkers. Next, we review studies focused on the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers to identify AD cases, predict cognitive decline in pre-clinical AD cases, and differentiate AD cases from other dementia. We summarized data from studies published until January 2023. A combination of plasma Aβ_42/40 ratio, age, and APOE status showed the best accuracy in diagnosing brain amyloidosis with a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) assay. Plasma p-tau217 has shown the best accuracy in distinguishing Aβ-PET+ from Aβ-PET-even in cognitively unimpaired individuals. We also summarized the different cut-off values for each biomarker when available. Recently developed assays for plasma biomarkers have undeniable importance in AD research, with improved analytical and diagnostic performance. Some biomarkers have been extensively used in clinical trials and are now clinically available. Nonetheless, several challenges remain to their widespread use in clinical practice.

Identification of the Aβ37/42 peptide ratio in CSF as an improved Aβ biomarker for Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Identifying CSF-based biomarkers for the β-amyloidosis that initiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) could provide inexpensive and dynamic tests to distinguish AD from normal aging and predict future cognitive decline.

METHODS

We developed immunoassays specifically detecting all C-terminal variants of secreted amyloid β-protein and identified a novel biomarker, the Aβ 37/42 ratio, that outperforms the canonical Aβ42/40 ratio as a means to evaluate the γ-secretase activity and brain Aβ accumulation.

RESULTS

We show that Aβ 37/42 can distinguish physiological and pathological status in (1) presenilin-1 mutant vs wild-type cultured cells, (2) AD vs control brain tissue, and (3) AD versus cognitively normal (CN) subjects in CSF, where 37/42 (AUC 0.9622) outperformed 42/40 (AUC 0.8651) in distinguishing CN from AD.

DISCUSSION

We conclude that the Aβ 37/42 ratio sensitively detects presenilin/γ-secretase dysfunction and better distinguishes CN from AD than Aβ42/40 in CSF. Measuring this novel ratio alongside promising phospho-tau analytes may provide highly discriminatory fluid biomarkers for AD.

A Review of Application of Aβ42/40 Ratio in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

The number of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and non-Alzheimer’s disease (non-AD) has drastically increased over recent decades. The amyloid cascade hypothesis attributes a vital role to amyloid-β protein (Aβ) in the pathogenesis of AD. As the main pathological hallmark of AD, amyloid plaques consist of merely the 42 and 40 amino acid variants of Aβ (Aβ 42 and Aβ 40). The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker Aβ 42/40 has been extensively investigated and eventually integrated into important diagnostic tools to support the clinical diagnosis of AD. With the development of highly sensitive assays and technologies, blood-based Aβ 42/40, which was obtained using a minimally invasive and cost-effective method, has been proven to be abnormal in synchrony with CSF biomarker values. This paper presents the recent progress of the CSF Aβ 42/40 ratio and plasma Aβ 42/40 for AD as well as their potential clinical application as diagnostic markers or screening tools for dementia.

Associations of plasma phosphorylated tau181 and neurofilament light chain with brain amyloid burden and cognition in objectively defined subtle cognitive decline patients

AIMS

There is increasing evidence that plasma biomarkers are specific biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology, but their potential utility in Obj-SCD (objectively defined subtle cognitive decline) remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 234 subjects, including 65 with brain amyloid beta (Aβ) negative normal cognition (Aβ- NC), 58 with Aβ-positive NC (Aβ+ NC), 63 with Aβ- Obj-SCD, and 48 with Aβ+ Obj-SCD were enrolled. Plasma Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181), neurofilament light chain (NfL), and total tau (T-tau) were measured using Simoa assays. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between plasma biomarkers and brain amyloid, cognition, and imaging measures adjusting for age, sex, education, APOE ε4 status, and vascular risk scores. Receiver operating characteristics were used to evaluate the discriminative validity of biomarkers.

RESULTS

After adjustment, only plasma p-tau181 and NfL were significantly elevated in Aβ+ Obj-SCD participants compared to Aβ- NC group. Elevated p-tau181 was associated with brain amyloid accumulation, worse cognitive performance (visual episodic memory, executive function, and visuospatial function), and hippocampal atrophy. These associations mainly occurred in Aβ+ individuals. In contrast, higher NfL was correlated with brain amyloid burden and verbal memory decline. These associations predominantly occurred in Aβ- individuals. The adjusted diagnostic model combining p-tau181 and NfL levels showed the best performance in identifying Aβ+ Obj-SCD from Aβ- NC [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.814], which did not differ from the adjusted p-tau181 model (AUC = 0.763).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight that plasma p-tau181, alone or combined with NfL, contributes to identifying high-risk AD populations.

Clinical relevance of biomarkers, new therapeutic approaches, and role of post-translational modifications in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that causes progressive loss of cognitive functions like thinking, memory, reasoning, behavioral abilities, and social skills thus affecting the ability of a person to perform normal daily functions independently. There is no definitive cure for this disease, and treatment options available for the management of the disease are not very effective as well. Based on histopathology, AD is characterized by the accumulation of insoluble deposits of amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Although several molecular events contribute to the formation of these insoluble deposits, the aberrant post-translational modifications (PTMs) of AD-related proteins (like APP, Aβ, tau, and BACE1) are also known to be involved in the onset and progression of this disease. However, early diagnosis of the disease as well as the development of effective therapeutic approaches is impeded by lack of proper clinical biomarkers. In this review, we summarized the current status and clinical relevance of biomarkers from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), blood and extracellular vesicles involved in onset and progression of AD. Moreover, we highlight the effects of several PTMs on the AD-related proteins, and provide an insight how these modifications impact the structure and function of proteins leading to AD pathology. Finally, for disease-modifying therapeutics, novel approaches, and targets are discussed for the successful treatment and management of AD.

[Blood Based Biomarker for Optimization of Early and Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia]

AIM

Dementia in Alzheimer´s disease is a global challenge. There is growing evidence that investigating blood biomarkers to diagnose Alzheimer´s disease is a promising fast, minimally invasive, and less costly method. The aim of this study was to review available studies on promising biomarkers for Alzheimer´s disease.

METHOD

The latest studies were collated for this review.

RESULTS

Immunoassays followed by mass spectrometry and immunomagnetic reduction were reported to be highly relevant methods for detecting amyloid-ß 42 (Aß42) and amyloid-ß 40 (Aß40) to calculate the Aß42/Aß40 ratio, thereby improving the early diagnosis of Alzheimer´s disease. Amyloid-ß (Aß) peptides in blood plasma were considered as potential markers, as they correlated with the brain's Aß pathology. Phosphorylated tau protein 181 (p-tau181), phosphorylated tau protein 217 (p-tau217) and phosphorylated tau protein 231 (p-tau231) in blood samples assessed via Simoa technology served as parameters for the early and differential diagnosis of AD, and were markers of tau pathology in the brain. Neurofilament light chain (Nfl) and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) were additional markers possibly facilitating the assessment of axonal and astroglial brain damage in Alzheimer´s disease. GFAP in blood was useful as an additional marker to detect early and to predict the time course of Alzheimer´s disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Determining blood biomarkers represents less invasive and less costly diagnostics for Alzheimer´s disease. The investigation of blood biomarkers such as the Aß42/Aß40 ratio, p-tau217, p-tau231, Nfl and GFAP have been promising in establishing the AT(N) classification for Alzheimer´s disease. High-throughput methods should be evaluated in large patient cohort studies and via meta-analyses of studies. Consensus criteria with standard protocols for measuring these biomarkers while considering ethical issues and Alzheimer´s phenotype should unify normative values from different laboratories. The AT(N) classification of Alzheimer´s disease in blood would be a key element towards the implementation of minimally-invasive precision medicine.

Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers Revisited From the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis Standpoint

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease worldwide. Amyloid beta (Aβ) is one of the proteins which aggregate in AD, and its key role in the disease pathogenesis is highlighted in the amyloid cascade hypothesis, which states that the deposition of Aβ in the brain parenchyma is a crucial initiating step in the future development of AD. The sensitivity of instruments used to measure proteins in blood and cerebrospinal fluid has significantly improved, such that Aβ can now successfully be measured in plasma. However, due to the peripheral production of Aβ, there is significant overlap between diagnostic groups. The presence of pathological Aβ within the AD brain has several effects on the cells and surrounding tissue. Therefore, there is a possibility that using markers of tissue responses to Aβ may reveal more information about Aβ pathology and pathogenesis than looking at plasma Aβ alone. In this manuscript, using the amyloid cascade hypothesis as a starting point, we will delve into how the effect of Aβ on the surrounding tissue can be monitored using biomarkers. In particular, we will consider whether glial fibrillary acidic protein, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2, phosphorylated tau, and neurofilament light chain could be used to phenotype and quantify the tissue response against Aβ pathology in AD.

Biomarkers used in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis, treatment, and prevention

Alzheimer's disease (AD), being the number one in terms of dementia burden, is an insidious age-related neurodegenerative disease and is presently considered a global public health threat. Its main histological hallmarks are the Aβ senile plaques and the P-tau neurofibrillary tangles, while clinically it is marked by a progressive cognitive decline that reflects the underlying synaptic loss and neurodegeneration. Many of the drug therapies targeting the two pathological hallmarks namely Aβ and P-tau have been proven futile. This is probably attributed to the initiation of therapy at a stage where cognitive alterations are already obvious. In other words, the underlying neuropathological changes are at a stage where these drugs lack any therapeutic value in reversing the damage. Therefore, there is an urgent need to start treatment in the very early stage where these changes can be reversed, and hence, early diagnosis is of primordial importance. To this aim, the use of robust and informative biomarkers that could provide accurate diagnosis preferably at an earlier phase of the disease is of the essence. To date, several biomarkers have been established that, to a different extent, allow researchers and clinicians to evaluate, diagnose, and more specially exclude other related pathologies. In this study, we extensively reviewed data on the currently explored biomarkers in terms of AD pathology-specific and non-specific biomarkers and highlighted the recent developments in the diagnostic and theragnostic domains. In the end, we have presented a separate elaboration on aspects of future perspectives and concluding remarks.

Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) represent a mounting public health challenge. As these diseases are difficult to diagnose clinically, biomarkers of underlying pathophysiology are playing an ever-increasing role in research, clinical trials, and in the clinical work-up of patients. Though cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET)-based measures are available, their use is not widespread due to limitations, including high costs and perceived invasiveness. As a result of rapid advances in the development of ultra-sensitive assays, the levels of pathological brain- and AD-related proteins can now be measured in blood, with recent work showing promising results. Plasma P-tau appears to be the best candidate marker during symptomatic AD (i.e., prodromal AD and AD dementia) and preclinical AD when combined with Aβ42/Aβ40. Though not AD-specific, blood NfL appears promising for the detection of neurodegeneration and could potentially be used to detect the effects of disease-modifying therapies. This review provides an overview of the progress achieved thus far using AD blood-based biomarkers, highlighting key areas of application and unmet challenges.

Development of molecular tools for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease that are based on detection of amyloidogenic proteins

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia that usually occurs among older people. AD results from neuronal degeneration that leads to the cognitive impairment and death. AD is incurable, typically develops over the course of many years and is accompanied by a loss of functional autonomy, making a patient completely dependent on family members and/or healthcare workers. Critical features of AD are pathological polymerization of Aβ peptide and microtubule-associated protein tau, accompanied by alterations of their conformations and resulting in accumulation of cross-β fibrils (amyloids) in human brains. AD apparently progresses asymptomatically for years or even decades before the appearance of symptoms. Therefore, development of the early AD diagnosis at a pre-symptomatic stage is essential for potential therapies. This review is focused on current and potential molecular tools (including non-invasive methods) that are based on detection of amyloidogenic proteins and can be applicable to early diagnosis of AD.Abbreviations: Aβ - amyloid-β peptide; AβO - amyloid-β oligomers; AD - Alzheimer's disease; ADRDA - Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association; APH1 - anterior pharynx defective 1; APP - amyloid precursor protein; BACE1 - β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1; BBB - brain blood barrier; CJD - Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; CRM - certified reference material; CSF - cerebrospinal fluid; ELISA - enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FGD - 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose (2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose); IP-MS - immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry assay; MCI - mild cognitive impairment; MDS - multimer detection system; MRI - magnetic resonance imaging; NIA-AA - National Institute on Ageing and Alzheimer's Association; NINCDS - National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke; PEN2 - presenilin enhancer 2; PET - positron emission tomography; PiB - Pittsburgh Compound B; PiB-SUVR - PIB standardized uptake value ratio; PMCA - Protein Misfolding Cycling Amplification; PrP - Prion Protein; P-tau - hyperphosphorylated tau protein; RMP - reference measurement procedure; RT-QuIC - real-time quaking-induced conversion; SiMoA - single-molecule array; ThT - thioflavin T; TSEs - Transmissible Spongiform Encephslopathies; T-tau - total tau protein.

Blood-based high sensitivity measurements of beta-amyloid and phosphorylated tau as biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: a focused review on recent advances

Discovery and development of clinically useful biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias have been the focus of recent research efforts. While cerebrospinal fluid and positron emission tomography or MRI-based neuroimaging markers have made the in vivo detection of AD pathology and its consequences possible, the high cost and invasiveness have limited their widespread use in the clinical setting. On the other hand, advances in potentially more accessible blood-based biomarkers had been impeded by lack of sensitivity in detecting changes in markers of the hallmarks of AD, including amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides and phosphorylated tau (P-tau). More recently, however, emerging technologies with superior sensitivity and specificity for measuring Aβ and P-tau have reported high concordances with AD severity. In this focused review, we describe several emerging technologies, including immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS), single molecule array and Meso Scale Discovery immunoassay platforms, and appraise the current literature arising from their use to identify plaques, tangles and other AD-associated pathology. While there is potential clinical utility in adopting these technologies, we also highlight the further studies needed to establish Aβ and P-tau as blood-based biomarkers for AD, including validation with existing large sample sets, new independent cohorts from diverse backgrounds as well as population-based longitudinal studies. In conclusion, the availability of sensitive and reliable measurements of Aβ peptides and P-tau species in blood holds promise for the diagnosis, prognosis and outcome assessments in clinical trials for AD.

Mass spectrometry-based methods for robust measurement of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in biological fluids

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia affecting 60%-70% of people afflicted with this disease. Accurate antemortem diagnosis is urgently needed for early detection of AD to enable reliable estimation of prognosis, intervention, and monitoring of the disease. The National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association sponsored the 'Research Framework: towards a biological definition of AD', which recommends using different biomarkers in living persons for a biomarker-based definition of AD regardless of clinical status. Fluid biomarkers represent one of key groups of them. Since cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is in direct contact with brain and many proteins present in the brain can be detected in CSF, this fluid has been regarded as the best biofluid in which to measure AD biomarkers. Recently, technological advancements in protein detection made possible the effective study of plasma AD biomarkers despite their significantly lower concentrations versus to that in CSF. This and other challenges that face plasma-based biomarker measurements can be overcome by using mass spectrometry. In this review, we discuss AD biomarkers which can be reliably measured in CSF and plasma using targeted mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography (LC/MS/MS). We describe progress in LC/MS/MS methods' development, emphasize the challenges, and summarize major findings. We also highlight the role of mass spectrometry and progress made in the process of global standardization of the measurement of Aβ42/Aβ40. Finally, we briefly describe exploratory proteomics which seek to identify new biomarkers that can contribute to detection of co-pathological processes that are common in sporadic AD.

Transitioning from cerebrospinal fluid to blood tests to facilitate diagnosis and disease monitoring in Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly prevalent worldwide, and disease-modifying treatments may soon be at hand; hence, now, more than ever, there is a need to develop techniques that allow earlier and more secure diagnosis. Current biomarker-based guidelines for AD diagnosis, which have replaced the historical symptom-based guidelines, rely heavily on neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling. While these have greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy of AD pathophysiology, they are less practical for application in primary care, population-based and epidemiological settings, or where resources are limited. In contrast, blood is a more accessible and cost-effective source of biomarkers in AD. In this review paper, using the recently proposed amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration [AT(N)] criteria as a framework towards a biological definition of AD, we discuss recent advances in biofluid-based biomarkers, with a particular emphasis on those with potential to be translated into blood-based biomarkers. We provide an overview of the research conducted both in CSF and in blood to draw conclusions on biomarkers that show promise. Given the evidence collated in this review, plasma neurofilament light chain (N) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau; T) show particular potential for translation into clinical practice. However, p-tau requires more comparisons to be conducted between its various epitopes before conclusions can be made as to which one most robustly differentiates AD from non-AD dementias. Plasma amyloid beta (A) would prove invaluable as an early screening modality, but it requires very precise tests and robust pre-analytical protocols.

Refining the amyloid β peptide and oligomer fingerprint ambiguities in Alzheimer's disease: Mass spectrometric molecular characterization in brain, cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and plasma

Since its discovery, amyloid-β (Aβ) has been the principal target of investigation of in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Over the years however, no clear correlation was found between the Aβ plaque burden and location, and AD-associated neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Instead, diagnostic potential of specific Aβ peptides and/or their ratio, was established. For instance, a selective reduction in the concentration of the aggregation-prone 42 amino acid-long Aβ peptide (Aβ42) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was put forward as reflective of Aβ peptide aggregation in the brain. With time, Aβ oligomers-the proposed toxic Aβ intermediates-have emerged as potential drivers of synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration in the disease process. Oligomers are commonly agreed upon to come in different shapes and sizes, and are very poorly characterized when it comes to their composition and their "toxic" properties. The concept of structural polymorphism-a diversity in conformational organization of amyloid aggregates-that depends on the Aβ peptide backbone, makes the characterization of Aβ aggregates and their role in AD progression challenging. In this review, we revisit the history of Aβ discovery and initial characterization and highlight the crucial role mass spectrometry (MS) has played in this process. We critically review the common knowledge gaps in the molecular identity of the Aβ peptide, and how MS is aiding the characterization of higher order Aβ assemblies. Finally, we go on to present recent advances in MS approaches for characterization of Aβ as single peptides and oligomers, and convey our optimism, as to how MS holds a promise for paving the way for progress toward a more comprehensive understanding of Aβ in AD research.

The validation status of blood biomarkers of amyloid and phospho-tau assessed with the 5-phase development framework for AD biomarkers

PURPOSE

The development of blood biomarkers that reflect Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology (phosphorylated tau and amyloid-β) has offered potential as scalable tests for dementia differential diagnosis and early detection. In 2019, the Geneva AD Biomarker Roadmap Initiative included blood biomarkers in the systematic validation of AD biomarkers.

METHODS

A panel of experts convened in November 2019 at a two-day workshop in Geneva. The level of maturity (fully achieved, partly achieved, preliminary evidence, not achieved, unsuccessful) of blood biomarkers was assessed based on the Biomarker Roadmap methodology and discussed fully during the workshop which also evaluated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers.

RESULTS

Plasma p-tau has shown analytical validity (phase 2 primary aim 1) and first evidence of clinical validity (phase 3 primary aim 1), whereas the maturity level for Aβ remains to be partially achieved. Full and partial achievement has been assigned to p-tau and Aβ, respectively, in their associations to ante-mortem measures (phase 2 secondary aim 2). However, only preliminary evidence exists for the influence of covariates, assay comparison and cut-off criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the relative infancy of blood biomarkers, in comparison to CSF biomarkers, much has already been achieved for phases 1 through 3 - with p-tau having greater success in detecting AD and predicting disease progression. However, sufficient data about the effect of covariates on the biomarker measurement is lacking. No phase 4 (real-world performance) or phase 5 (assessment of impact/cost) aim has been tested, thus not achieved.

A multicentre validation study of the diagnostic value of plasma neurofilament light

Increased cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light (NfL) is a recognized biomarker for neurodegeneration that can also be assessed in blood. Here, we investigate plasma NfL as a marker of neurodegeneration in 13 neurodegenerative disorders, Down syndrome, depression and cognitively unimpaired controls from two multicenter cohorts: King’s College London (n = 805) and the Swedish BioFINDER study (n = 1,464). Plasma NfL was significantly increased in all cortical neurodegenerative disorders, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and atypical parkinsonian disorders. We demonstrate that plasma NfL is clinically useful in identifying atypical parkinsonian disorders in patients with parkinsonism, dementia in individuals with Down syndrome, dementia among psychiatric disorders, and frontotemporal dementia in patients with cognitive impairment. Data-driven cut-offs highlighted the fundamental importance of age-related clinical cut-offs for disorders with a younger age of onset. Finally, plasma NfL performs best when applied to indicate no underlying neurodegeneration, with low false positives, in all age-related cut-offs.

Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light (NfL) is a biomarker for neurodegeneration that can also be assessed in blood. Here the authors show in a validation study the potential for plasma NfL as a biomarker for several neurodegenerative diseases.

Amyloid Metabolism and Amyloid-Targeting Blood-Based Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease

Amyloid-β (Aβ) is a key protein in Alzheimer's disease (AD) in that its accumulation induces complex pathological changes. Although there has been extensive research on the metabolism of Aβ in AD, new compelling results have recently emerged. Historically, the production and clearance of Aβ have been thought to originate in the central nervous system (CNS). However, recent evidence suggests that the production and clearance of Aβ can also occur in the peripheral system, and that the peripherally driven Aβ migrates to the CNS and induces amyloidopathy with subsequent AD pathologic changes in the brain. This concept implies that AD is not restricted to the CNS but is a systemic disease instead. As such, the development of blood-based biomarkers targeting Aβ is of great interest. Central and peripheral Aβ are both active contributors to the pathology of AD and interact bidirectionally. Measuring peripheral Aβ is not just observing the reflection of the residual Aβ removed from the CNS but also tracking the ongoing process of AD pathology. Additionally, blood-based biomarkers could be a more accessible tool in clinical and research settings. Through arduous research, several blood-based biomarker assays have demonstrated notable results. In this review, we describe the metabolism of Aβ and the amyloid-targeting blood-based biomarkers of AD.

Plasma amyloid-β ratios in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease: the influence of genotype

In-vitro studies of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease implicate longer amyloid-beta peptides in disease pathogenesis, however less is known about the behaviour of these mutations in-vivo. In this cross-sectional cohort study, we used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to analyse 66 plasma samples from individuals who were at-risk of inheriting a mutation or were symptomatic. We tested for differences in amyloid-beta42:38, 42:40 and 38:40 ratios between presenilin1 and amyloid precursor protein carriers. We examined the relationship between plasma and in-vitro models of amyloid-beta processing and tested for associations with parental age at onset. 39 participants were mutation carriers (28 presenilin1 and 11 amyloid precursor protein). Age- and sex-adjusted models showed marked differences in plasma amyloid-beta between genotypes: higher amyloid-beta42:38 in presenilin1 versus amyloid precursor protein (p < 0.001) and non-carriers (p < 0.001); higher amyloid-beta38:40 in amyloid precursor protein versus presenilin1 (p < 0.001) and non-carriers (p < 0.001); while amyloid-beta42:40 was higher in both mutation groups compared to non-carriers (both p < 0.001). Amyloid-beta profiles were reasonably consistent in plasma and cell lines. Within presenilin1, models demonstrated associations between amyloid-beta42:38, 42:40 and 38:40 ratios and parental age at onset. In-vivo differences in amyloid-beta processing between presenilin1 and amyloid precursor protein carriers provide insights into disease pathophysiology, which can inform therapy development.

Biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease

Background

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. AD is the main cause of dementia worldwide and aging is the main risk factor for developing the illness. AD classical diagnostic criteria rely on clinical data. However, the development of a biological definition of AD using biomarkers that reflect the underling neuropathology is needed.

Content

The aim of this review is to describe the main outcomes when measuring classical and novel biomarkers in biological fluids or neuroimaging.

Summary

Nowadays, there are three classical biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD: Aβ42, t-Tau and p-Tau. The diagnostic use of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers is limited due to invasive collection by lumbar puncture with potential side effects. Plasma/serum measurements are the gold standard in clinics, because they are minimally invasive and, in consequence, easily collected and processed. The two main proteins implicated in the pathological process, Aβ and Tau, can be visualized using neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography.

Outlook

As it is currently accepted that AD starts decades before clinical symptoms could be diagnosed, the opportunity to detect biological alterations prior to clinical symptoms would allow early diagnosis or even perhaps change treatment possibilities.

Plasma metabolomics of presymptomatic PSEN1-H163Y mutation carriers: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

PSEN1-H163Y carriers, at the presymptomatic stage, have reduced ¹⁸ FDG-PET binding in the cerebrum of the brain (Scholl et al., Neurobiol Aging 32:1388-1399, 2011). This could imply dysfunctional energy metabolism in the brain. In this study, plasma of presymptomatic PSEN1 mutation carriers was analyzed to understand associated metabolic changes.

METHODS

We analyzed plasma from noncarriers (NC, n = 8) and presymptomatic PSEN1-H163Y mutation carriers (MC, n = 6) via untargeted metabolomics using gas and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry, which identified 1199 metabolites. All the metabolites were compared between MC and NC using univariate analysis, as well as correlated with the ratio of Aβ_{1-42/A β 1-40} , using Spearman's correlation. Altered metabolites were subjected to Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).

RESULTS

Based on principal component analysis the plasma metabolite profiles were divided into dataset A and dataset B. In dataset A, when comparing between presymptomatic MC and NC, the levels of 79 different metabolites were altered. Out of 79, only 14 were annotated metabolites. In dataset B, 37 metabolites were significantly altered between presymptomatic MC and NC and nine metabolites were annotated. In both datasets, annotated metabolites represent amino acids, fatty acyls, bile acids, hexoses, purine nucleosides, carboxylic acids, and glycerophosphatidylcholine species. 1-docosapentaenoyl-GPC was positively correlated, uric acid and glucose were negatively correlated with the ratio of plasma Aβ_1-42 /Aβ_1-40 (P < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

This study finds dysregulated metabolite classes, which are changed before the disease symptom onset. Also, it provides an opportunity to compare with sporadic Alzheimer's Disease. Observed findings in this study need to be validated in a larger and independent Familial Alzheimer's Disease (FAD) cohort.

Quantification of Amyloid-β in Plasma by Simple and Highly Sensitive Immunoaffinity Enrichment and LC-MS/MS Assay

Background

Numerous immunoassays have been developed to quantify amyloid β1-40 (Aβ40) and amyloid β1-42 (Aβ42). Nevertheless, given the low concentration of Aβ and the high levels of interfering factors in plasma, quantification of plasma Aβ is still challenging. To overcome the problems related to the specificity of Aβ immunoassays, this study aimed to develop an immunoaffinity enrichment and LC-MS/MS (IA-MS) assay.

Methods

We developed an IA-MS assay using antibody-labeled magnetic beads for purification and LC-MS/MS for Aβ quantification. To avoid the loss of Aβ due to aggregation in acidic buffer, we used alkaline elution buffer for immunoaffinity enrichment. The concentrations of the Aβs in plasma samples were measured, and the correlation between the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was also evaluated.

Results

The intensities of the Aβ mass peaks were significantly higher with the alkaline elution buffer than with the acidic elution buffer (Aβ40: 3.6-fold, Aβ42: 5.4-fold). This assay exhibited high reproducibility (intra-assay and inter-assay precision, %CV &lt;15), and the working ranges of Aβ40 and Aβ42 were determined to be 21.7 to 692.8 pg/mL and 5.6 to 180.6 pg/mL, respectively. The concentrations of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in plasma were measured by IA-MS, and the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was correlated with the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (rs = 0.439, P &lt; 0.01).

Conclusions

The IA-MS assay has sufficient analytic performance for measuring endogenous Aβ40 and Aβ42 in plasma. This assay can lead to new lines of clinical discovery related to amyloid pathology.

Significance of Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Sensitivity, Specificity and Potential for Clinical Use

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, affecting more than 5 million Americans, with steadily increasing mortality and incredible socio-economic burden. Not only have therapeutic efforts so far failed to reach significant efficacy, but the real pathogenesis of the disease is still obscure. The current theories are based on pathological findings of amyloid plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles that accumulate in the brain parenchyma of affected patients. These findings have defined, together with the extensive neurodegeneration, the diagnostic criteria of the disease. The ability to detect changes in the levels of amyloid and tau in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) first, and more recently in blood, has allowed us to use these biomarkers for the specific in-vivo diagnosis of AD in humans. Furthermore, other pathological elements of AD, such as the loss of neurons, inflammation and metabolic derangement, have translated to the definition of other CSF and blood biomarkers, which are not specific of the disease but, when combined with amyloid and tau, correlate with the progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD dementia, or identify patients who will develop AD pathology. In this review, we discuss the role of current and hypothetical biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease, their specificity, and the caveats of current high-sensitivity platforms for their peripheral detection.

A Review on MS-Based Blood Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia and there is no cure to date. Biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are already included in the diagnostic work-up of symptomatic patients but markers for preclinical diagnosis and disease progression are not available. Furthermore, blood biomarkers are highly appreciated because they are minimally invasive and more accessible in primary care and in clinical studies. Mass spectrometry (MS) is an established tool for the measurement of various analytes in biological fluids such as blood. Its major strength is the high selectivity which is why it is also preferred as a reference method for immunoassays. MS has been used in several studies in the past for blood biomarker discovery and validation in AD using targeted MS such as multiple/selected reaction monitoring (MRM/SRM) or unbiased approaches (proteomics, metabolomics). In this short review, we give an overview on the status of current MS-based biomarker candidates for AD in blood plasma and serum.Plain Language Summary: Plain language summary available for this article.

Plasma Biomarkers: Potent Screeners of Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD), a neurological disorder, is as a complex chronic disease of brain cell death that usher to cognitive decline and loss of memory. Its prevalence differs according to risk factors associated with it and necropsy performs vital role in its definite diagnosis. The stages of AD vary from preclinical to severe that proceeds to death of patient with no availability of treatment. Biomarker may be a biochemical change that can be recognized by different emerging technologies such as proteomics and metabolomics. Plasma biomarkers, 5-protein classifiers, are readily being used for the diagnosis of AD and can also predict its progression with a great accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. In this review, upregulation or downregulation of few plasma proteins in patients with AD has also been discussed, when juxtaposed with control, and thus serves as potent biomarker in the diagnosis of AD.

Fluid biomarker-based molecular phenotyping of Alzheimer's disease patients in research and clinical settings

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is very difficult to diagnose on pure clinical grounds, especially in the earlier phases of the disease. At the same time, lessons from recent clinical trials suggest that treatments have to be initiated very early, to have a chance to show clinical efficacy. Therefore, biomarkers reflecting core AD pathophysiology have a key position in clinical trials and clinical management. The core AD cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker toolbox include amyloid β (Aβ42 and the Aβ42/40 ratio) reflecting brain amyloidosis, total tau (T-tau) reflecting neurodegeneration intensity, and phosphorylated tau (P-tau) that is related to tau pathology. These CSF biomarkers have very consistently been found to have high diagnostic accuracy, also in earlier disease stages. Importantly, CSF Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratio show excellent agreement with amyloid PET readouts, indicating that these biomarker tests can be used interchangeably. Intense collaborative standardization efforts have given Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) to harmonize assay formats for CSF Aβ42, the most central AD biomarker, and CRMs for Aβ40 are under development. The core AD biomarkers are today available on high-precision fully automated analytical platforms, which will serve to introduce uniform cut-off levels and enable the large-scale introduction of CSF biomarkers for routine disease diagnosis. Of novel biomarker candidates, synaptic proteins, such as the dendritic protein neurogranin, show promise as tools to monitor synaptic degeneration, an important aspect of AD pathophysiology. Recent studies show that the core AD biomarkers also can be measured in blood samples. Ultra-sensitive assays that allow for quantification of neuronal proteins, such as tau and neurofilament light (NFL) in blood samples. Further, plasma Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 show high concordance with brain amyloidosis evaluated by PET scans. In the future, blood biomarkers may have value as screening tools, especially to rule out patients without biomarker evidence of AD pathology.

A simplified and sensitive immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry protocol for the analysis of amyloid-beta peptides in brain tissue

In the field of Alzheimer's disease, there is an urgent need for novel analytical tools to identify disease-specific biomarkers and to evaluate therapeutics. Preclinical trials commonly employ amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide signatures as a read-out. In this paper, we report a simplified and detailed protocol for robust immunoprecipitation of Aβ in brain tissue prior to mass spectrometric detection exemplified by a study using transgenic mice. The established method employed murine monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal antibodies and was capable of yielding well-reproducible peaks of high intensity with low background signal intensities corresponding to various Aβ forms.

The Past and the Future of Alzheimer's Disease Fluid Biomarkers

Following the development of the first methods to measure the core Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers total-tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau (P-tau) and the 42 amino acid form of amyloid-β (Aβ₄₂), there has been an enormous expansion of this scientific research area. Today, it is generally acknowledged that these biochemical tests reflect several central pathophysiological features of AD and contribute diagnostically relevant information, also for prodromal AD. In this article in the 20th anniversary issue of the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, we review the AD biomarkers, from early assay development to their entrance into diagnostic criteria. We also summarize the long journey of standardization and the development of assays on fully automated instruments, where we now have high precision and stable assays that will serve as the basis for common cut-off levels and a more general introduction of these diagnostic tests in clinical routine practice. We also discuss the latest expansion of the AD CSF biomarker toolbox that now also contains synaptic proteins such as neurogranin, which seemingly is specific for AD and predicts rate of future cognitive deterioration. Last, we are at the brink of having blood biomarkers that may be implemented as screening tools in the early clinical management of patients with cognitive problems and suspected AD. Whether this will become true, and whether it will be plasma Aβ₄₂, the Aβ_42/40 ratio, or neurofilament light, or a combination of these, remains to be established in future clinical neurochemical studies.

Aβ34 is a BACE1-derived degradation intermediate associated with amyloid clearance and Alzheimer's disease progression

The beta-site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) is known primarily for its initial cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), which ultimately leads to the generation of Aβ peptides. Here, we provide evidence that altered BACE1 levels and activity impact the degradation of Aβ40 and Aβ42 into a common Aβ34 intermediate. Using human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, we show that Aβ34 is elevated in individuals with mild cognitive impairment who later progressed to dementia. Furthermore, Aβ34 levels correlate with the overall Aβ clearance rates in amyloid positive individuals. Using CSF samples from the PREVENT-AD cohort (cognitively normal individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s disease), we further demonstrate that the Aβ34/Aβ42 ratio, representing Aβ degradation and cortical deposition, associates with pre-clinical markers of neurodegeneration. We propose that Aβ34 represents a marker of amyloid clearance and may be helpful for the characterization of Aβ turnover in clinical samples.

Aβ34 is generated from degradation of Aβ40 and Aβ42 by β-secretase. Here, the authors show that Aβ34 is a marker for amyloid clearance and is elevated in the CSF of patients that go on to convert from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting it may be a useful biomarker.

Long-Term Storage Effects on Stability of Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, and Total Tau Proteins in Human Plasma Samples Measured with Immunomagnetic Reduction Assays

BACKGROUND

The stability of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers in plasma, measured by immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) after long-term storage at -80°C, has not been established before.

METHOD

Ninety-nine human plasma samples from 53 normal controls (NCs), 5 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and 41 AD patients were collected. Each plasma sample was aliquoted and stored as single-use aliquots at -80°C. The baseline measurements for Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42, and total Tau protein (T-Tau) concentrations for each sample were done within 3 months of blood draw by IMR. They are referred to as baseline concentrations. A separate aliquot from each sample was assayed with IMR to assess the stability of the measured analytes during storage at -80°C between 1.1 and 5.4 years. This is referred to as a repeated result.

RESULTS

IMR shows that plasma levels of Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 exhibit stability over 5-year storage at -80°C and that plasma levels of T-Tau are less stable (approximately 1.5 years).

CONCLUSION

Although the measured concentrations of T-Tau in human plasma may alter during storage, the diagnostic utility of the results are only slightly affected when the product of Aβ1-42 and T-Tau concentrations are used. The results show that the overall agreement between baseline and repeated measurements in the ability of discriminating NCs from aMCI/AD patients is higher than 80%.

Current state of Alzheimer's fluid biomarkers

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with a complex and heterogeneous pathophysiology. The number of people living with AD is predicted to increase; however, there are no disease-modifying therapies currently available and none have been successful in late-stage clinical trials. Fluid biomarkers measured in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood hold promise for enabling more effective drug development and establishing a more personalized medicine approach for AD diagnosis and treatment. Biomarkers used in drug development programmes should be qualified for a specific context of use (COU). These COUs include, but are not limited to, subject/patient selection, assessment of disease state and/or prognosis, assessment of mechanism of action, dose optimization, drug response monitoring, efficacy maximization, and toxicity/adverse reactions identification and minimization. The core AD CSF biomarkers Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau are recognized by research guidelines for their diagnostic utility and are being considered for qualification for subject selection in clinical trials. However, there is a need to better understand their potential for other COUs, as well as identify additional fluid biomarkers reflecting other aspects of AD pathophysiology. Several novel fluid biomarkers have been proposed, but their role in AD pathology and their use as AD biomarkers have yet to be validated. In this review, we summarize some of the pathological mechanisms implicated in the sporadic AD and highlight the data for several established and novel fluid biomarkers (including BACE1, TREM2, YKL-40, IP-10, neurogranin, SNAP-25, synaptotagmin, α-synuclein, TDP-43, ferritin, VILIP-1, and NF-L) associated with each mechanism. We discuss the potential COUs for each biomarker.

Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: current status and prospects for the future

Accumulating data from the clinical research support that the core Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid-β (Aβ42), total tau (T-tau), and phosphorylated tau (P-tau) reflect key elements of AD pathophysiology. Importantly, a large number of clinical studies very consistently show that these biomarkers contribute with diagnostically relevant information, also in the early disease stages. Recent technical developments have made it possible to measure these biomarkers using fully automated assays with high precision and stability. Standardization efforts have given certified reference materials for CSF Aβ42, with the aim to harmonize results between assay formats that would allow for uniform global reference limits and cut-off values. These encouraging developments have led to that the core AD CSF biomarkers have a central position in the novel diagnostic criteria for the disease and in the recent National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association biological definition of AD. Taken together, this progress will likely serve as the basis for a more general introduction of these diagnostic tests in clinical routine practice. However, the heterogeneity of pathology in late-onset AD calls for an expansion of the AD CSF biomarker toolbox with additional biomarkers reflecting additional aspects of AD pathophysiology. One promising candidate is the synaptic protein neurogranin that seems specific for AD and predicts future rate of cognitive deterioration. Further, recent studies bring hope for easily accessible and cost-effective screening tools in the early diagnostic evaluation of patients with cognitive problems (and suspected AD) in primary care. In this respect, technical developments with ultrasensitive immunoassays and novel mass spectrometry techniques give promise of biomarkers to monitor brain amyloidosis (the Aβ42/40 or APP669-711/Aβ42 ratios) and neurodegeneration (tau and neurofilament light proteins) in plasma samples, but future studies are warranted to validate these promising results further.

Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: mapping the road to the clinic

Biomarker discovery and development for clinical research, diagnostics and therapy monitoring in clinical trials have advanced rapidly in key areas of medicine - most notably, oncology and cardiovascular diseases - allowing rapid early detection and supporting the evolution of biomarker-guided, precision-medicine-based targeted therapies. In Alzheimer disease (AD), breakthroughs in biomarker identification and validation include cerebrospinal fluid and PET markers of amyloid-β and tau proteins, which are highly accurate in detecting the presence of AD-associated pathophysiological and neuropathological changes. However, the high cost, insufficient accessibility and/or invasiveness of these assays limit their use as viable first-line tools for detecting patterns of pathophysiology. Therefore, a multistage, tiered approach is needed, prioritizing development of an initial screen to exclude from these tests the high numbers of people with cognitive deficits who do not demonstrate evidence of underlying AD pathophysiology. This Review summarizes the efforts of an international working group that aimed to survey the current landscape of blood-based AD biomarkers and outlines operational steps for an effective academic-industry co-development pathway from identification and assay development to validation for clinical use.

Resveratrol Sustains Insulin-Degrading Enzyme Activity toward Aβ42

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common cause of dementia in the elderly, is the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. We hypothesize that the impaired clearance of Aβ42 from the brain is partly responsible for the onset of sporadic AD. In this work, we evaluated the activity of insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) toward Aβ42 in the presence of resveratrol, a polyphenol found in red wine and grape juice. By liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, we identified initial cleavage sites in the absence and presence of resveratrol that carry biological relevance connected to the amyloidogenic properties of Aβ42. Incubation with resveratrol results in a substantial increase in Aβ42 fragmentation compared to the control, signifying that the polyphenol sustains IDE-dependent degradation of Aβ42 and its fragments. Our findings suggest that therapeutic and/or preventative approaches combining resveratrol and IDE may hold promise for sporadic AD.

Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease-An update

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are in clinical use in many parts of the world and show good to excellent diagnostic accuracy in regards to identifying cerebral amyloid β (Aβ) and tau pathology irrespective of the clinical stage of the disease. However, CSF sampling is more difficult than a blood draw and a procedure only rarely performed by general practitioners. Since AD is such a common disease and since intense research on novel treatments that hopefully will be directed against underlying pathologies is moving forward, it would be excellent if the CSF tests for AD could be transformed into blood tests, as well as if novel blood biomarkers could be discovered. Brain-derived molecules are, however, present at much lower concentrations in blood than in CSF, which poses an analytical challenge. There are also additional issues with blood as a biofluid in which to measure biomarkers for central nervous system disease. Nevertheless, the past few years have seen an enormous development in the field of ultrasensitive measurement techniques. There is also much better availability of deeply phenotyped clinical cohorts for biomarker discovery and validation. This review gives an updated account of the current state of research on blood biomarkers for AD and related neurodegenerative dementias with special emphasis on findings that have been replicated by more than one research group.

Biology/Disease-Driven Initiative on Protein-Aggregation Diseases of the Human Proteome Project: Goals and Progress to Date

The Biology/Disease-driven (B/D) working groups of the Human Proteome Project are alliances of research groups aimed at developing or improving proteomic tools to support specific biological or disease-related research areas. Here, we describe the activities and progress to date of the B/D working group focused on protein aggregation diseases (PADs). PADs are characterized by the intra- or extracellular accumulation of aggregated proteins and include devastating diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease and systemic amyloidosis. The PAD B/D working group aims for the development of proteomic assays for the quantification of aggregation-prone proteins involved in PADs to support basic and clinical research on PADs. Because the proteins in PADs undergo aberrant conformational changes, a goal is to quantitatively resolve altered protein structures and aggregation states in complex biological specimens. We have developed protein-extraction protocols and a set of mass spectrometric (MS) methods that enable the detection and quantification of proteins involved in the systemic and localized amyloidosis and the probing of aberrant protein conformational transitions in cell and tissue extracts. In several studies, we have demonstrated the potential of MS-based proteomics approaches for specific and sensitive clinical diagnoses and for the subtyping of PADs. The developed methods have been detailed in both protocol papers and manuscripts describing applications to facilitate implementation by nonspecialized laboratories, and assay coordinates are shared through public repositories and databases. Clinicians actively involved in the PAD working group support the transfer to clinical practice of the developed methods, such as assays to quantify specific disease-related proteins and their fragments in biofluids and multiplexed MS-based methods for the diagnosis and typing of systemic amyloidosis. We believe that the increasing availability of tools to precisely measure proteins involved in PADs will positively impact research on the molecular bases of these diseases and support early disease diagnosis and a more-confident subtyping.