1
|
Claydon J, James WRG, Clarke ADF, Hunt AR. The role of framing, agency and uncertainty in a focus-divide dilemma. Mem Cognit 2024; 52:574-594. [PMID: 37922110 PMCID: PMC11021327 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01484-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
How to prioritise multiple objectives is a common dilemma of daily life. A simple and effective decision rule is to focus resources when the tasks are difficult, and divide when tasks are easy. Nonetheless, in experimental paradigms of this dilemma, participants make highly variable and suboptimal strategic decisions when asked to allocate resources to two competing goals that vary in difficulty. We developed a new version in which participants had to choose where to park a fire truck between houses of varying distances apart. Unlike in the previous versions of the dilemma, participants approached the optimal strategy in this task. Three key differences between the fire truck version and previous versions of the task were investigated: (1) Framing (whether the objectives are familiar or abstract), by comparing a group who placed cartoon trucks between houses to a group performing the same task with abstract shapes; (2) Agency (how much of the task is under the participants' direct control), by comparing groups who controlled the movement of the truck to those who did not; (3) Uncertainty, by adding variability to the driving speed of the truck to make success or failure on a given trial more difficult to predict. Framing and agency did not influence strategic decisions. When adding variability to outcomes, however, decisions shifted away from optimal. The results suggest choices become more variable when the outcome is less certain, consistent with exploration of response alternatives triggered by an inability to predict success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Claydon
- School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UB, UK.
| | - Warren R G James
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Amelia R Hunt
- School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tumkaya S, Yücens B, Gündüz M, Maheu M, Berkovitch L. Disruption of consciousness depends on insight in OCD and on positive symptoms in schizophrenia. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.01.02.571832. [PMID: 38293050 PMCID: PMC10827121 DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.02.571832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Disruption of conscious access contributes to the advent of psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia but could also explain lack of insight in other psychiatric disorders. In this study, we explored how insight and psychotic symptoms related to disruption of consciousness. We explored consciousness in patients with schizophrenia, patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) with good vs. poor insight and matched controls. Participants underwent clinical assessments and performed a visual masking task allowing us to measure individual consciousness threshold. We used a principal component analysis to reduce symptom dimensionality and explored how consciousness measures related to symptomatology. We found that clinical dimensions could be well summarized by a restricted set of principal components which also correlated with the extent of consciousness disruption. More specifically, positive symptoms were associated with impaired conscious access in patients with schizophrenia whereas the level of insight delineated two subtypes of OCD patients, those with poor insight who had consciousness impairments similar to patients with schizophrenia, and those with good insight who resemble healthy controls. Our study provides new insights about consciousness disruption in psychiatric disorders, showing that it relates to positive symptoms in schizophrenia and with insight in OCD. In OCD, it revealed a distinct subgroup sharing neuropathological features with schizophrenia. Our findings refine the mapping between symptoms and cognition, paving the way for a better treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selim Tumkaya
- Department of Psychiatry, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
- Department of Neuroscience, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Bengü Yücens
- Department of Psychiatry, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Gündüz
- Department of Psychiatry, Government Hospital of Bolvadin, Bolvadin, Turkey
| | - Maxime Maheu
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, Center for Experimental Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Synaptic Physiology, Centre for Molecular Neurobiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lucie Berkovitch
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- University Department of Psychiatry, Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire Psychiatrie Paris 15, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris, Paris, France
- Saclay CEA Centre, Neurospin, Gif-Sur-Yvette Cedex, France
- Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lakhlifi C, Rohaut B. Heuristics and biases in medical decision-making under uncertainty: The case of neuropronostication for consciousness disorders. Presse Med 2023; 52:104181. [PMID: 37821058 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2023.104181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Neuropronostication for consciousness disorders can be very complex and prone to high uncertainty. Despite notable advancements in the development of dedicated scales and physiological markers using innovative paradigms, these technical progressions are often overshadowed by factors intrinsic to the medical environment. Beyond the scarcity of objective data guiding medical decisions, factors like time pressure, fatigue, multitasking, and emotional load can drive clinicians to rely more on heuristic-based clinical reasoning. Such an approach, albeit beneficial under certain circumstances, may lead to systematic error judgments and impair medical decisions, especially in complex and uncertain environments. After a brief review of the main theoretical frameworks, this paper explores the influence of clinicians' cognitive biases on clinical reasoning and decision-making in the challenging context of neuroprognostication for consciousness disorders. The discussion further revolves around developing and implementing various strategies designed to mitigate these biases and their impact, aiming to enhance the quality of care and the patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Lakhlifi
- Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Rohaut
- Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, APHP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, MIR Neuro, DMU Neurosciences, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee JK, Rouault M, Wyart V. Adaptive tuning of human learning and choice variability to unexpected uncertainty. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadd0501. [PMID: 36989365 PMCID: PMC10058239 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add0501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Human value-based decisions are notably variable under uncertainty. This variability is known to arise from two distinct sources: variable choices aimed at exploring available options and imprecise learning of option values due to limited cognitive resources. However, whether these two sources of decision variability are tuned to their specific costs and benefits remains unclear. To address this question, we compared the effects of expected and unexpected uncertainty on decision-making in the same reinforcement learning task. Across two large behavioral datasets, we found that humans choose more variably between options but simultaneously learn less imprecisely their values in response to unexpected uncertainty. Using simulations of learning agents, we demonstrate that these opposite adjustments reflect adaptive tuning of exploration and learning precision to the structure of uncertainty. Together, these findings indicate that humans regulate not only how much they explore uncertain options but also how precisely they learn the values of these options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junseok K. Lee
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France
- Département d’Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Marion Rouault
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France
- Département d’Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, Paris, France
| | - Valentin Wyart
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France
- Département d’Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, Paris, France
- Institut du Psychotraumatisme de l’Enfant et de l’Adolescent, Conseil Départemental Yvelines et Hauts-de-Seine, Versailles, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van den Brink RL, Hagena K, Wilming N, Murphy PR, Büchel C, Donner TH. Flexible sensory-motor mapping rules manifest in correlated variability of stimulus and action codes across the brain. Neuron 2023; 111:571-584.e9. [PMID: 36476977 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Humans and non-human primates can flexibly switch between different arbitrary mappings from sensation to action to solve a cognitive task. It has remained unknown how the brain implements such flexible sensory-motor mapping rules. Here, we uncovered a dynamic reconfiguration of task-specific correlated variability between sensory and motor brain regions. Human participants switched between two rules for reporting visual orientation judgments during fMRI recordings. Rule switches were either signaled explicitly or inferred by the participants from ambiguous cues. We used behavioral modeling to reconstruct the time course of their belief about the active rule. In both contexts, the patterns of correlations between ongoing fluctuations in stimulus- and action-selective activity across visual- and action-related brain regions tracked participants' belief about the active rule. The rule-specific correlation patterns broke down around the time of behavioral errors. We conclude that internal beliefs about task state are instantiated in brain-wide, selective patterns of correlated variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud L van den Brink
- Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Keno Hagena
- Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niklas Wilming
- Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter R Murphy
- Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland; Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
| | - Christian Büchel
- Institute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias H Donner
- Computational Cognitive Neuroscience Section, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee JL, Denison R, Ma WJ. Challenging the fixed-criterion model of perceptual decision-making. Neurosci Conscious 2023; 2023:niad010. [PMID: 37089450 PMCID: PMC10118309 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niad010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Perceptual decision-making is often conceptualized as the process of comparing an internal decision variable to a categorical boundary or criterion. How the mind sets such a criterion has been studied from at least two perspectives. One idea is that the criterion is a fixed quantity. In work on subjective phenomenology, the notion of a fixed criterion has been proposed to explain a phenomenon called "subjective inflation"-a form of metacognitive mismatch in which observers overestimate the quality of their sensory representation in the periphery or at unattended locations. A contrasting view emerging from studies of perceptual decision-making is that the criterion adjusts to the level sensory uncertainty and is thus sensitive to variations in attention. Here, we mathematically demonstrate that previous empirical findings supporting subjective inflation are consistent with either a fixed or a flexible decision criterion. We further lay out specific task properties that are necessary to make inferences about the flexibility of the criterion: (i) a clear mapping from decision variable space to stimulus feature space and (ii) an incentive for observers to adjust their decision criterion as uncertainty changes. Recent work satisfying these requirements has demonstrated that decision criteria flexibly adjust according to uncertainty. We conclude that the fixed-criterion model of subjective inflation is poorly tenable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Laura Lee
- *Correspondence address. Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, 4 Washington Pl, New York City, NY 10003, United States Tel: +212 992 6530. E-mails: ;
| | - Rachel Denison
- Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, 4 Washington Pl, New York City, NY 10003, United States
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, 64 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02139, United States
| | - Wei Ji Ma
- *Correspondence address. Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, 4 Washington Pl, New York City, NY 10003, United States Tel: +212 992 6530. E-mails: ;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Drevet J, Drugowitsch J, Wyart V. Efficient stabilization of imprecise statistical inference through conditional belief updating. Nat Hum Behav 2022; 6:1691-1704. [PMID: 36138224 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01445-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Statistical inference is the optimal process for forming and maintaining accurate beliefs about uncertain environments. However, human inference comes with costs due to its associated biases and limited precision. Indeed, biased or imprecise inference can trigger variable beliefs and unwarranted changes in behaviour. Here, by studying decisions in a sequential categorization task based on noisy visual stimuli, we obtained converging evidence that humans reduce the variability of their beliefs by updating them only when the reliability of incoming sensory information is judged as sufficiently strong. Instead of integrating the evidence provided by all stimuli, participants actively discarded as much as a third of stimuli. This conditional belief updating strategy shows good test-retest reliability, correlates with perceptual confidence and explains human behaviour better than previously described strategies. This seemingly suboptimal strategy not only reduces the costs of imprecise computations but also, counterintuitively, increases the accuracy of resulting decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Drevet
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France.
- Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, Paris, France.
| | - Jan Drugowitsch
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valentin Wyart
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France.
- Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ashinoff BK, Buck J, Woodford M, Horga G. The effects of base rate neglect on sequential belief updating and real-world beliefs. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1010796. [PMID: 36548395 PMCID: PMC9831339 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Base-rate neglect is a pervasive bias in judgment that is conceptualized as underweighting of prior information and can have serious consequences in real-world scenarios. This bias is thought to reflect variability in inferential processes but empirical support for a cohesive theory of base-rate neglect with sufficient explanatory power to account for longer-term and real-world beliefs is lacking. A Bayesian formalization of base-rate neglect in the context of sequential belief updating predicts that belief trajectories should exhibit dynamic patterns of dependence on the order in which evidence is presented and its consistency with prior beliefs. To test this, we developed a novel 'urn-and-beads' task that systematically manipulated the order of colored bead sequences and elicited beliefs via an incentive-compatible procedure. Our results in two independent online studies confirmed the predictions of the sequential base-rate neglect model: people exhibited beliefs that are more influenced by recent evidence and by evidence inconsistent with prior beliefs. We further found support for a noisy-sampling inference model whereby base-rate neglect results from rational discounting of noisy internal representations of prior beliefs. Finally, we found that model-derived indices of base-rate neglect-including noisier prior representation-correlated with propensity for unusual beliefs outside the laboratory. Our work supports the relevance of Bayesian accounts of sequential base-rate neglect to real-world beliefs and hints at strategies to minimize deleterious consequences of this pervasive bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon K. Ashinoff
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Justin Buck
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), New York, NY, United States of America
- Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Michael Woodford
- Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Guillermo Horga
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI), New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rouault M, Weiss A, Lee JK, Drugowitsch J, Chambon V, Wyart V. Controllability boosts neural and cognitive signatures of changes-of-mind in uncertain environments. eLife 2022; 11:75038. [PMID: 36097814 PMCID: PMC9470160 DOI: 10.7554/elife.75038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In uncertain environments, seeking information about alternative choice options is essential for adaptive learning and decision-making. However, information seeking is usually confounded with changes-of-mind about the reliability of the preferred option. Here, we exploited the fact that information seeking requires control over which option to sample to isolate its behavioral and neurophysiological signatures. We found that changes-of-mind occurring with control require more evidence against the current option, are associated with reduced confidence, but are nevertheless more likely to be confirmed on the next decision. Multimodal neurophysiological recordings showed that these changes-of-mind are preceded by stronger activation of the dorsal attention network in magnetoencephalography, and followed by increased pupil-linked arousal during the presentation of decision outcomes. Together, these findings indicate that information seeking increases the saliency of evidence perceived as the direct consequence of one's own actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Rouault
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France.,Institut Jean Nicod, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, France.,Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL University), Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Weiss
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France.,Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL University), Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Junseok K Lee
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France.,Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL University), Paris, France
| | - Jan Drugowitsch
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Valerian Chambon
- Institut Jean Nicod, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, France.,Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL University), Paris, France
| | - Valentin Wyart
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France.,Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL University), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stengård E, Juslin P, Hahn U, van den Berg R. On the generality and cognitive basis of base-rate neglect. Cognition 2022; 226:105160. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
11
|
Abstract
Deciding whether to forgo a good choice in favour of exploring a potentially more rewarding alternative is one of the most challenging arbitrations both in human reasoning and in artificial intelligence. Humans show substantial variability in their exploration, and theoretical (but only limited empirical) work has suggested that excessive exploration is a critical mechanism underlying the psychiatric dimension of impulsivity. In this registered report, we put these theories to test using large online samples, dimensional analyses, and computational modelling. Capitalising on recent advances in disentangling distinct human exploration strategies, we not only demonstrate that impulsivity is associated with a specific form of exploration—value-free random exploration—but also explore links between exploration and other psychiatric dimensions. The Stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 19/03/2021. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at 10.6084/m9.figshare.14346506.v1. Deciding between known rewarding options and exploring novel avenues is central to decision making. Humans show variability in their exploration. Here, the authors show that impulsivity is associated to an increased usage of a cognitively cheap (and sometimes sub-optimal) exploration strategy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Török B, Nagy DG, Kiss M, Janacsek K, Németh D, Orbán G. Tracking the contribution of inductive bias to individualised internal models. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1010182. [PMID: 35731822 PMCID: PMC9255757 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Internal models capture the regularities of the environment and are central to understanding how humans adapt to environmental statistics. In general, the correct internal model is unknown to observers, instead they rely on an approximate model that is continually adapted throughout learning. However, experimenters assume an ideal observer model, which captures stimulus structure but ignores the diverging hypotheses that humans form during learning. We combine non-parametric Bayesian methods and probabilistic programming to infer rich and dynamic individualised internal models from response times. We demonstrate that the approach is capable of characterizing the discrepancy between the internal model maintained by individuals and the ideal observer model and to track the evolution of the contribution of the ideal observer model to the internal model throughout training. In particular, in an implicit visuomotor sequence learning task the identified discrepancy revealed an inductive bias that was consistent across individuals but varied in strength and persistence. Instead of mapping stimuli directly to response, humans and other complex organisms are thought to maintain internal models of the environment. These internal models represent parts of the environment that are most relevant for deciding how to act in a given situation and therefore are key to explaining human behaviour. In behavioural experiments it is often assumed that the internal model in the subject’s brain matches the true model that governs the experiment. However this assumption can be violated due to a variety of reasons, such as insufficient training. Furthermore, the deviation of the internal model from the true model is not uniform across individuals, and therefore it summarizes the subjective beliefs of humans. In this paper, we provide a method to reverse engineer the internal model for individual subjects by analysing trial by trial behavioural measurements such as reaction times. We then track and analyse these reverse engineered models over the course of the experiment to see how participants trade off between an early inductive bias towards Markovian dynamics and the model that reflects the evidence that humans accumulate during learning about the actual statistics of the stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balázs Török
- Department of Computational Sciences, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
- Brain, Memory and Language Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| | - David G. Nagy
- Department of Computational Sciences, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute of Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mariann Kiss
- Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
- Brain, Memory and Language Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Karolina Janacsek
- Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
- Centre for Thinking and Learning, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dezső Németh
- Brain, Memory and Language Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
- Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Gergő Orbán
- Department of Computational Sciences, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lin CHS, Garrido MI. Towards a cross-level understanding of Bayesian inference in the brain. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2022; 137:104649. [PMID: 35395333 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Perception emerges from unconscious probabilistic inference, which guides behaviour in our ubiquitously uncertain environment. Bayesian decision theory is a prominent computational model that describes how people make rational decisions using noisy and ambiguous sensory observations. However, critical questions have been raised about the validity of the Bayesian framework in explaining the mental process of inference. Firstly, some natural behaviours deviate from Bayesian optimum. Secondly, the neural mechanisms that support Bayesian computations in the brain are yet to be understood. Taking Marr's cross level approach, we review the recent progress made in addressing these challenges. We first review studies that combined behavioural paradigms and modelling approaches to explain both optimal and suboptimal behaviours. Next, we evaluate the theoretical advances and the current evidence for ecologically feasible algorithms and neural implementations in the brain, which may enable probabilistic inference. We argue that this cross-level approach is necessary for the worthwhile pursuit to uncover mechanistic accounts of human behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Hsuan Sophie Lin
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Australian Research Council for Integrative Brain Function, Australia.
| | - Marta I Garrido
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Australian Research Council for Integrative Brain Function, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Efficient coding of numbers explains decision bias and noise. Nat Hum Behav 2022; 6:1142-1152. [DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01352-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
15
|
Rational arbitration between statistics and rules in human sequence processing. Nat Hum Behav 2022; 6:1087-1103. [PMID: 35501360 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01259-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Detecting and learning temporal regularities is essential to accurately predict the future. A long-standing debate in cognitive science concerns the existence in humans of a dissociation between two systems, one for handling statistical regularities governing the probabilities of individual items and their transitions, and another for handling deterministic rules. Here, to address this issue, we used finger tracking to continuously monitor the online build-up of evidence, confidence, false alarms and changes-of-mind during sequence processing. All these aspects of behaviour conformed tightly to a hierarchical Bayesian inference model with distinct hypothesis spaces for statistics and rules, yet linked by a single probabilistic currency. Alternative models based either on a single statistical mechanism or on two non-commensurable systems were rejected. Our results indicate that a hierarchical Bayesian inference mechanism, capable of operating over distinct hypothesis spaces for statistics and rules, underlies the human capability for sequence processing.
Collapse
|
16
|
Neural structure of a sensory decoder for motor control. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1829. [PMID: 35383170 PMCID: PMC8983777 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29457-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The transformation of sensory input to motor output is often conceived as a decoder operating on neural representations. We seek a mechanistic understanding of sensory decoding by mimicking neural circuitry in the decoder’s design. The results of a simple experiment shape our approach. Changing the size of a target for smooth pursuit eye movements changes the relationship between the variance and mean of the evoked behavior in a way that contradicts the regime of “signal-dependent noise” and defies traditional decoding approaches. A theoretical analysis leads us to propose a circuit for pursuit that includes multiple parallel pathways and multiple sources of variation. Behavioral and neural responses with biomimetic statistics emerge from a biologically-motivated circuit model with noise in the pathway that is dedicated to flexibly adjusting the strength of visual-motor transmission. Our results demonstrate the power of re-imagining decoding as processing through the parallel pathways of neural systems. Behavioral variation is thought to result from noise in sensory representations or final motor commands. In this study, the authors investigate variability in eye movements and model that variability as resulting from noisy sensorimotor transformations occurring in the middle temporal visual area.
Collapse
|
17
|
Salvador A, Arnal LH, Vinckier F, Domenech P, Gaillard R, Wyart V. Premature commitment to uncertain decisions during human NMDA receptor hypofunction. Nat Commun 2022; 13:338. [PMID: 35039498 PMCID: PMC8763907 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27876-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Making accurate decisions based on unreliable sensory evidence requires cognitive inference. Dysfunction of n-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors impairs the integration of noisy input in theoretical models of neural circuits, but whether and how this synaptic alteration impairs human inference and confidence during uncertain decisions remains unknown. Here we use placebo-controlled infusions of ketamine to characterize the causal effect of human NMDA receptor hypofunction on cognitive inference and its neural correlates. At the behavioral level, ketamine triggers inference errors and elevated decision uncertainty. At the neural level, ketamine is associated with imbalanced coding of evidence and premature response preparation in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. Through computational modeling of inference and confidence, we propose that this specific pattern of behavioral and neural impairments reflects an early commitment to inaccurate decisions, which aims at resolving the abnormal uncertainty generated by NMDA receptor hypofunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Salvador
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France
- Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Département de Psychiatrie, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Luc H Arnal
- Institut de l'Audition, Inserm unit 1120, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
| | - Fabien Vinckier
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Département de Psychiatrie, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France
- Équipe Motivation, Cerveau et Comportement, Institut du Cerveau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Domenech
- Équipe Neurophysiologie des Comportements Répétitifs, Institut du Cerveau, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Département Médico-Universitaire de Psychiatrie et d'Addictologie, CHU AP-HP Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Raphaël Gaillard
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Département de Psychiatrie, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Paris, France
- Unité de Neuropathologie Expérimentale, Département de Santé Globale, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France
| | - Valentin Wyart
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.
- Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Université PSL, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lange RD, Chattoraj A, Beck JM, Yates JL, Haefner RM. A confirmation bias in perceptual decision-making due to hierarchical approximate inference. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009517. [PMID: 34843452 PMCID: PMC8659691 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Making good decisions requires updating beliefs according to new evidence. This is a dynamical process that is prone to biases: in some cases, beliefs become entrenched and resistant to new evidence (leading to primacy effects), while in other cases, beliefs fade over time and rely primarily on later evidence (leading to recency effects). How and why either type of bias dominates in a given context is an important open question. Here, we study this question in classic perceptual decision-making tasks, where, puzzlingly, previous empirical studies differ in the kinds of biases they observe, ranging from primacy to recency, despite seemingly equivalent tasks. We present a new model, based on hierarchical approximate inference and derived from normative principles, that not only explains both primacy and recency effects in existing studies, but also predicts how the type of bias should depend on the statistics of stimuli in a given task. We verify this prediction in a novel visual discrimination task with human observers, finding that each observer's temporal bias changed as the result of changing the key stimulus statistics identified by our model. The key dynamic that leads to a primacy bias in our model is an overweighting of new sensory information that agrees with the observer's existing belief-a type of 'confirmation bias'. By fitting an extended drift-diffusion model to our data we rule out an alternative explanation for primacy effects due to bounded integration. Taken together, our results resolve a major discrepancy among existing perceptual decision-making studies, and suggest that a key source of bias in human decision-making is approximate hierarchical inference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D. Lange
- Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
- Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | - Ankani Chattoraj
- Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey M. Beck
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jacob L. Yates
- Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | - Ralf M. Haefner
- Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
- Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ghambaryan A, Gutkin B, Klucharev V, Koechlin E. Additively Combining Utilities and Beliefs: Research Gaps and Algorithmic Developments. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:704728. [PMID: 34658760 PMCID: PMC8517513 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.704728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Value-based decision making in complex environments, such as those with uncertain and volatile mapping of reward probabilities onto options, may engender computational strategies that are not necessarily optimal in terms of normative frameworks but may ensure effective learning and behavioral flexibility in conditions of limited neural computational resources. In this article, we review a suboptimal strategy - additively combining reward magnitude and reward probability attributes of options for value-based decision making. In addition, we present computational intricacies of a recently developed model (named MIX model) representing an algorithmic implementation of the additive strategy in sequential decision-making with two options. We also discuss its opportunities; and conceptual, inferential, and generalization issues. Furthermore, we suggest future studies that will reveal the potential and serve the further development of the MIX model as a general model of value-based choice making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anush Ghambaryan
- Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, HSE University, Moscow, Russia
- Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Boris Gutkin
- Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, HSE University, Moscow, Russia
- Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Vasily Klucharev
- Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, HSE University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Etienne Koechlin
- Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
The decisions we make are shaped by a lifetime of learning. Past experience guides the way that we encode information in neural systems for perception and valuation, and determines the information we retrieve when making decisions. Distinct literatures have discussed how lifelong learning and local context shape decisions made about sensory signals, propositional information, or economic prospects. Here, we build bridges between these literatures, arguing for common principles of adaptive rationality in perception, cognition, and economic choice. We discuss how a single common framework, based on normative principles of efficient coding and Bayesian inference, can help us understand a myriad of human decision biases, including sensory illusions, adaptive aftereffects, choice history biases, central tendency effects, anchoring effects, contrast effects, framing effects, congruency effects, reference-dependent valuation, nonlinear utility functions, and discretization heuristics. We describe a simple computational framework for explaining these phenomena. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Summerfield
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom;
| | - Paula Parpart
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Linear Integration of Sensory Evidence over Space and Time Underlies Face Categorization. J Neurosci 2021; 41:7876-7893. [PMID: 34326145 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3055-20.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual object recognition relies on elaborate sensory processes that transform retinal inputs to object representations, but it also requires decision-making processes that read out object representations and function over prolonged time scales. The computational properties of these decision-making processes remain underexplored for object recognition. Here, we study these computations by developing a stochastic multifeature face categorization task. Using quantitative models and tight control of spatiotemporal visual information, we demonstrate that human subjects (five males, eight females) categorize faces through an integration process that first linearly adds the evidence conferred by task-relevant features over space to create aggregated momentary evidence and then linearly integrates it over time with minimum information loss. Discrimination of stimuli along different category boundaries (e.g., identity or expression of a face) is implemented by adjusting feature weights of spatial integration. This linear but flexible integration process over space and time bridges past studies on simple perceptual decisions to complex object recognition behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although simple perceptual decision-making such as discrimination of random dot motion has been successfully explained as accumulation of sensory evidence, we lack rigorous experimental paradigms to study the mechanisms underlying complex perceptual decision-making such as discrimination of naturalistic faces. We develop a stochastic multifeature face categorization task as a systematic approach to quantify the properties and potential limitations of the decision-making processes during object recognition. We show that human face categorization could be modeled as a linear integration of sensory evidence over space and time. Our framework to study object recognition as a spatiotemporal integration process is broadly applicable to other object categories and bridges past studies of object recognition and perceptual decision-making.
Collapse
|
22
|
Balsdon T, Mamassian P, Wyart V. Separable neural signatures of confidence during perceptual decisions. eLife 2021; 10:e68491. [PMID: 34488942 PMCID: PMC8423440 DOI: 10.7554/elife.68491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Perceptual confidence is an evaluation of the validity of perceptual decisions. While there is behavioural evidence that confidence evaluation differs from perceptual decision-making, disentangling these two processes remains a challenge at the neural level. Here, we examined the electrical brain activity of human participants in a protracted perceptual decision-making task where observers tend to commit to perceptual decisions early whilst continuing to monitor sensory evidence for evaluating confidence. Premature decision commitments were revealed by patterns of spectral power overlying motor cortex, followed by an attenuation of the neural representation of perceptual decision evidence. A distinct neural representation was associated with the computation of confidence, with sources localised in the superior parietal and orbitofrontal cortices. In agreement with a dissociation between perception and confidence, these neural resources were recruited even after observers committed to their perceptual decisions, and thus delineate an integral neural circuit for evaluating perceptual decision confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarryn Balsdon
- Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs (CNRS UMR 8248), DEC, ENS, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles (Inserm U960), DEC, ENS, PSL UniversityParisFrance
| | - Pascal Mamassian
- Laboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs (CNRS UMR 8248), DEC, ENS, PSL UniversityParisFrance
| | - Valentin Wyart
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles (Inserm U960), DEC, ENS, PSL UniversityParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lyamzin DR, Aoki R, Abdolrahmani M, Benucci A. Probabilistic discrimination of relative stimulus features in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2103952118. [PMID: 34301903 PMCID: PMC8325293 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2103952118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
During perceptual decision-making, the brain encodes the upcoming decision and the stimulus information in a mixed representation. Paradigms suitable for studying decision computations in isolation rely on stimulus comparisons, with choices depending on relative rather than absolute properties of the stimuli. The adoption of tasks requiring relative perceptual judgments in mice would be advantageous in view of the powerful tools available for the dissection of brain circuits. However, whether and how mice can perform a relative visual discrimination task has not yet been fully established. Here, we show that mice can solve a complex orientation discrimination task in which the choices are decoupled from the orientation of individual stimuli. Moreover, we demonstrate a typical discrimination acuity of 9°, challenging the common belief that mice are poor visual discriminators. We reached these conclusions by introducing a probabilistic choice model that explained behavioral strategies in 40 mice and demonstrated that the circularity of the stimulus space is an additional source of choice variability for trials with fixed difficulty. Furthermore, history biases in the model changed with task engagement, demonstrating behavioral sensitivity to the availability of cognitive resources. In conclusion, our results reveal that mice adopt a diverse set of strategies in a task that decouples decision-relevant information from stimulus-specific information, thus demonstrating their usefulness as an animal model for studying neural representations of relative categories in perceptual decision-making research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry R Lyamzin
- RIKEN Center for Brain Science, RIKEN, Wako-shi 351-0198, Japan;
| | - Ryo Aoki
- RIKEN Center for Brain Science, RIKEN, Wako-shi 351-0198, Japan
| | | | - Andrea Benucci
- RIKEN Center for Brain Science, RIKEN, Wako-shi 351-0198, Japan;
- Department of Mathematical Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City 113-0032, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Adaptive circuit dynamics across human cortex during evidence accumulation in changing environments. Nat Neurosci 2021; 24:987-997. [PMID: 33903770 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-021-00839-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Many decisions under uncertainty entail the temporal accumulation of evidence that informs about the state of the environment. When environments are subject to hidden changes in their state, maximizing accuracy and reward requires non-linear accumulation of evidence. How this adaptive, non-linear computation is realized in the brain is unknown. We analyzed human behavior and cortical population activity (measured with magnetoencephalography) recorded during visual evidence accumulation in a changing environment. Behavior and decision-related activity in cortical regions involved in action planning exhibited hallmarks of adaptive evidence accumulation, which could also be implemented by a recurrent cortical microcircuit. Decision dynamics in action-encoding parietal and frontal regions were mirrored in a frequency-specific modulation of the state of the visual cortex that depended on pupil-linked arousal and the expected probability of change. These findings link normative decision computations to recurrent cortical circuit dynamics and highlight the adaptive nature of decision-related feedback to the sensory cortex.
Collapse
|
25
|
Pesnot Lerousseau J, Schön D. Musical Expertise Is Associated with Improved Neural Statistical Learning in the Auditory Domain. Cereb Cortex 2021; 31:4877-4890. [PMID: 34013316 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
It is poorly known whether musical training is associated with improvements in general cognitive abilities, such as statistical learning (SL). In standard SL paradigms, musicians have shown better performances than nonmusicians. However, this advantage could be due to differences in auditory discrimination, in memory or truly in the ability to learn sequence statistics. Unfortunately, these different hypotheses make similar predictions in terms of expected results. To dissociate them, we developed a Bayesian model and recorded electroencephalography (EEG). Our results confirm that musicians perform approximately 15% better than nonmusicians at predicting items in auditory sequences that embed either low or high-order statistics. These higher performances are explained in the model by parameters governing the learning of high-order statistics and the selection stage noise. EEG recordings reveal a neural underpinning of the musician's advantage: the P300 amplitude correlates with the surprise elicited by each item, and so, more strongly for musicians. Finally, early EEG components correlate with the surprise elicited by low-order statistics, as opposed to late EEG components that correlate with the surprise elicited by high-order statistics and this effect is stronger for musicians. Overall, our results demonstrate that musical expertise is associated with improved neural SL in the auditory domain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It is poorly known whether musical training leads to improvements in general cognitive skills. One fundamental cognitive ability, SL, is thought to be enhanced in musicians, but previous studies have reported mixed results. This is because such musician's advantage can embrace very different explanations, such as improvement in auditory discrimination or in memory. To solve this problem, we developed a Bayesian model and recorded EEG to dissociate these explanations. Our results reveal that musical expertise is truly associated with an improved ability to learn sequence statistics, especially high-order statistics. This advantage is reflected in the electroencephalographic recordings, where the P300 amplitude is more sensitive to surprising items in musicians than in nonmusicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniele Schön
- Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Prat-Carrabin A, Meyniel F, Tsodyks M, Azeredo da Silveira R. Biases and Variability from Costly Bayesian Inference. ENTROPY (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 23:603. [PMID: 34068364 PMCID: PMC8153311 DOI: 10.3390/e23050603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
When humans infer underlying probabilities from stochastic observations, they exhibit biases and variability that cannot be explained on the basis of sound, Bayesian manipulations of probability. This is especially salient when beliefs are updated as a function of sequential observations. We introduce a theoretical framework in which biases and variability emerge from a trade-off between Bayesian inference and the cognitive cost of carrying out probabilistic computations. We consider two forms of the cost: a precision cost and an unpredictability cost; these penalize beliefs that are less entropic and less deterministic, respectively. We apply our framework to the case of a Bernoulli variable: the bias of a coin is inferred from a sequence of coin flips. Theoretical predictions are qualitatively different depending on the form of the cost. A precision cost induces overestimation of small probabilities, on average, and a limited memory of past observations, and, consequently, a fluctuating bias. An unpredictability cost induces underestimation of small probabilities and a fixed bias that remains appreciable even for nearly unbiased observations. The case of a fair (equiprobable) coin, however, is singular, with non-trivial and slow fluctuations in the inferred bias. The proposed framework of costly Bayesian inference illustrates the richness of a 'resource-rational' (or 'bounded-rational') picture of seemingly irrational human cognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Prat-Carrabin
- Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA;
- Laboratoire de Physique de l’École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences & Lettres, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Florent Meyniel
- Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin Center, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France;
| | - Misha Tsodyks
- Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76000, Israel;
- The Simons Center for Systems Biology, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
| | - Rava Azeredo da Silveira
- Laboratoire de Physique de l’École Normale Supérieure, Université Paris Sciences & Lettres, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76000, Israel;
- Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
- Faculty of Science, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee DG, Daunizeau J. Trading mental effort for confidence in the metacognitive control of value-based decision-making. eLife 2021; 10:e63282. [PMID: 33900198 PMCID: PMC8128438 DOI: 10.7554/elife.63282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Why do we sometimes opt for actions or items that we do not value the most? Under current neurocomputational theories, such preference reversals are typically interpreted in terms of errors that arise from the unreliable signaling of value to brain decision systems. But, an alternative explanation is that people may change their mind because they are reassessing the value of alternative options while pondering the decision. So, why do we carefully ponder some decisions, but not others? In this work, we derive a computational model of the metacognitive control of decisions or MCD. In brief, we assume that fast and automatic processes first provide initial (and largely uncertain) representations of options' values, yielding prior estimates of decision difficulty. These uncertain value representations are then refined by deploying cognitive (e.g., attentional, mnesic) resources, the allocation of which is controlled by an effort-confidence tradeoff. Importantly, the anticipated benefit of allocating resources varies in a decision-by-decision manner according to the prior estimate of decision difficulty. The ensuing MCD model predicts response time, subjective feeling of effort, choice confidence, changes of mind, as well as choice-induced preference change and certainty gain. We test these predictions in a systematic manner, using a dedicated behavioral paradigm. Our results provide a quantitative link between mental effort, choice confidence, and preference reversals, which could inform interpretations of related neuroimaging findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas G Lee
- Sorbonne UniversityParisFrance
- Paris Brain Institute (ICM)ParisFrance
- Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council of ItalyRomeItaly
| | - Jean Daunizeau
- Paris Brain Institute (ICM)ParisFrance
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), ETHZurichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Interacting with volatile environments stabilizes hidden-state inference and its brain signatures. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2228. [PMID: 33850124 PMCID: PMC8044147 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22396-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Making accurate decisions in uncertain environments requires identifying the generative cause of sensory cues, but also the expected outcomes of possible actions. Although both cognitive processes can be formalized as Bayesian inference, they are commonly studied using different experimental frameworks, making their formal comparison difficult. Here, by framing a reversal learning task either as cue-based or outcome-based inference, we found that humans perceive the same volatile environment as more stable when inferring its hidden state by interaction with uncertain outcomes than by observation of equally uncertain cues. Multivariate patterns of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activity reflected this behavioral difference in the neural interaction between inferred beliefs and incoming evidence, an effect originating from associative regions in the temporal lobe. Together, these findings indicate that the degree of control over the sampling of volatile environments shapes human learning and decision-making under uncertainty. Here, the authors show that humans perceive uncertain environments as more stable when actively interacting with them than when observing them. Magnetoencephalographic signals in the temporal lobe were associated with the increased stability of beliefs during active sampling.
Collapse
|
29
|
Feltgen Q, Daunizeau J. An Overcomplete Approach to Fitting Drift-Diffusion Decision Models to Trial-By-Trial Data. Front Artif Intell 2021; 4:531316. [PMID: 33898982 PMCID: PMC8064018 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2021.531316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Drift-diffusion models or DDMs are becoming a standard in the field of computational neuroscience. They extend models from signal detection theory by proposing a simple mechanistic explanation for the observed relationship between decision outcomes and reaction times (RT). In brief, they assume that decisions are triggered once the accumulated evidence in favor of a particular alternative option has reached a predefined threshold. Fitting a DDM to empirical data then allows one to interpret observed group or condition differences in terms of a change in the underlying model parameters. However, current approaches only yield reliable parameter estimates in specific situations (c.f. fixed drift rates vs drift rates varying over trials). In addition, they become computationally unfeasible when more general DDM variants are considered (e.g., with collapsing bounds). In this note, we propose a fast and efficient approach to parameter estimation that relies on fitting a "self-consistency" equation that RT fulfill under the DDM. This effectively bypasses the computational bottleneck of standard DDM parameter estimation approaches, at the cost of estimating the trial-specific neural noise variables that perturb the underlying evidence accumulation process. For the purpose of behavioral data analysis, these act as nuisance variables and render the model "overcomplete," which is finessed using a variational Bayesian system identification scheme. However, for the purpose of neural data analysis, estimates of neural noise perturbation terms are a desirable (and unique) feature of the approach. Using numerical simulations, we show that this "overcomplete" approach matches the performance of current parameter estimation approaches for simple DDM variants, and outperforms them for more complex DDM variants. Finally, we demonstrate the added-value of the approach, when applied to a recent value-based decision making experiment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Q. Feltgen
- Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - J. Daunizeau
- Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Perception is often described as probabilistic inference requiring an internal representation of uncertainty. However, it is unknown whether uncertainty is represented in a task-dependent manner, solely at the level of decisions, or in a fully Bayesian manner, across the entire perceptual pathway. To address this question, we first codify and evaluate the possible strategies the brain might use to represent uncertainty, and highlight the normative advantages of fully Bayesian representations. In such representations, uncertainty information is explicitly represented at all stages of processing, including early sensory areas, allowing for flexible and efficient computations in a wide variety of situations. Next, we critically review neural and behavioral evidence about the representation of uncertainty in the brain agreeing with fully Bayesian representations. We argue that sufficient behavioral evidence for fully Bayesian representations is lacking and suggest experimental approaches for demonstrating the existence of multivariate posterior distributions along the perceptual pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ádám Koblinger
- Center for Cognitive Computation, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Hungary
| | - József Fiser
- Center for Cognitive Computation, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Hungary
| | - Máté Lengyel
- Center for Cognitive Computation, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Hungary
- Computational and Biological Learning Lab, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Talluri BC, Urai AE, Bronfman ZZ, Brezis N, Tsetsos K, Usher M, Donner TH. Choices change the temporal weighting of decision evidence. J Neurophysiol 2021; 125:1468-1481. [PMID: 33689508 PMCID: PMC8285578 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00462.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Many decisions result from the accumulation of decision-relevant information (evidence) over time. Even when maximizing decision accuracy requires weighting all the evidence equally, decision-makers often give stronger weight to evidence occurring early or late in the evidence stream. Here, we show changes in such temporal biases within participants as a function of intermittent judgments about parts of the evidence stream. Human participants performed a decision task that required a continuous estimation of the mean evidence at the end of the stream. The evidence was either perceptual (noisy random dot motion) or symbolic (variable sequences of numbers). Participants also reported a categorical judgment of the preceding evidence half-way through the stream in one condition or executed an evidence-independent motor response in another condition. The relative impact of early versus late evidence on the final estimation flipped between these two conditions. In particular, participants' sensitivity to late evidence after the intermittent judgment, but not the simple motor response, was decreased. Both the intermittent response as well as the final estimation reports were accompanied by nonluminance-mediated increases of pupil diameter. These pupil dilations were bigger during intermittent judgments than simple motor responses and bigger during estimation when the late evidence was consistent than inconsistent with the initial judgment. In sum, decisions activate pupil-linked arousal systems and alter the temporal weighting of decision evidence. Our results are consistent with the idea that categorical choices in the face of uncertainty induce a change in the state of the neural circuits underlying decision-making.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The psychology and neuroscience of decision-making have extensively studied the accumulation of decision-relevant information toward a categorical choice. Much fewer studies have assessed the impact of a choice on the processing of subsequent information. Here, we show that intermittent choices during a protracted stream of input reduce the sensitivity to subsequent decision information and transiently boost arousal. Choices might trigger a state change in the neural machinery for decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharath Chandra Talluri
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne E Urai
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Noam Brezis
- School of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Konstantinos Tsetsos
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marius Usher
- School of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Tobias H Donner
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Brain and Cognition Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Findling C, Wyart V. Computation noise in human learning and decision-making: origin, impact, function. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
33
|
Jang AI, Sharma R, Drugowitsch J. Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior. eLife 2021; 10:e63436. [PMID: 33769284 PMCID: PMC8064754 DOI: 10.7554/elife.63436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Traditional accumulation-to-bound decision-making models assume that all choice options are processed with equal attention. In real life decisions, however, humans alternate their visual fixation between individual items to efficiently gather relevant information (Yang et al., 2016). These fixations also causally affect one's choices, biasing them toward the longer-fixated item (Krajbich et al., 2010). We derive a normative decision-making model in which attention enhances the reliability of information, consistent with neurophysiological findings (Cohen and Maunsell, 2009). Furthermore, our model actively controls fixation changes to optimize information gathering. We show that the optimal model reproduces fixation-related choice biases seen in humans and provides a Bayesian computational rationale for this phenomenon. This insight led to additional predictions that we could confirm in human data. Finally, by varying the relative cognitive advantage conferred by attention, we show that decision performance is benefited by a balanced spread of resources between the attended and unattended items.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony I Jang
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Ravi Sharma
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaUnited States
| | - Jan Drugowitsch
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Ullsperger
- Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. .,Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Human visual motion perception shows hallmarks of Bayesian structural inference. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3714. [PMID: 33580096 PMCID: PMC7881251 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82175-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Motion relations in visual scenes carry an abundance of behaviorally relevant information, but little is known about how humans identify the structure underlying a scene's motion in the first place. We studied the computations governing human motion structure identification in two psychophysics experiments and found that perception of motion relations showed hallmarks of Bayesian structural inference. At the heart of our research lies a tractable task design that enabled us to reveal the signatures of probabilistic reasoning about latent structure. We found that a choice model based on the task's Bayesian ideal observer accurately matched many facets of human structural inference, including task performance, perceptual error patterns, single-trial responses, participant-specific differences, and subjective decision confidence-especially, when motion scenes were ambiguous and when object motion was hierarchically nested within other moving reference frames. Our work can guide future neuroscience experiments to reveal the neural mechanisms underlying higher-level visual motion perception.
Collapse
|
36
|
Kafashan M, Jaffe AW, Chettih SN, Nogueira R, Arandia-Romero I, Harvey CD, Moreno-Bote R, Drugowitsch J. Scaling of sensory information in large neural populations shows signatures of information-limiting correlations. Nat Commun 2021; 12:473. [PMID: 33473113 PMCID: PMC7817840 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20722-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
How is information distributed across large neuronal populations within a given brain area? Information may be distributed roughly evenly across neuronal populations, so that total information scales linearly with the number of recorded neurons. Alternatively, the neural code might be highly redundant, meaning that total information saturates. Here we investigate how sensory information about the direction of a moving visual stimulus is distributed across hundreds of simultaneously recorded neurons in mouse primary visual cortex. We show that information scales sublinearly due to correlated noise in these populations. We compartmentalized noise correlations into information-limiting and nonlimiting components, then extrapolate to predict how information grows with even larger neural populations. We predict that tens of thousands of neurons encode 95% of the information about visual stimulus direction, much less than the number of neurons in primary visual cortex. These findings suggest that the brain uses a widely distributed, but nonetheless redundant code that supports recovering most sensory information from smaller subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna W Jaffe
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Selmaan N Chettih
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ramon Nogueira
- Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iñigo Arandia-Romero
- ISAAC Lab, Aragón Institute of Engineering Research, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
- IAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country, UPV-EHU, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | | | - Rubén Moreno-Bote
- Center for Brain and Cognition and Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- Serra Húnter Fellow Programme and ICREA Academia, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jan Drugowitsch
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Optimal utility and probability functions for agents with finite computational precision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:2002232118. [PMID: 33380453 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002232118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
When making economic choices, such as those between goods or gambles, humans act as if their internal representation of the value and probability of a prospect is distorted away from its true value. These distortions give rise to decisions which apparently fail to maximize reward, and preferences that reverse without reason. Why would humans have evolved to encode value and probability in a distorted fashion, in the face of selective pressure for reward-maximizing choices? Here, we show that under the simple assumption that humans make decisions with finite computational precision--in other words, that decisions are irreducibly corrupted by noise--the distortions of value and probability displayed by humans are approximately optimal in that they maximize reward and minimize uncertainty. In two empirical studies, we manipulate factors that change the reward-maximizing form of distortion, and find that in each case, humans adapt optimally to the manipulation. This work suggests an answer to the longstanding question of why humans make "irrational" economic choices.
Collapse
|
38
|
Pisupati S, Chartarifsky-Lynn L, Khanal A, Churchland AK. Lapses in perceptual decisions reflect exploration. eLife 2021; 10:55490. [PMID: 33427198 PMCID: PMC7846276 DOI: 10.7554/elife.55490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Perceptual decision-makers often display a constant rate of errors independent of evidence strength. These ‘lapses’ are treated as a nuisance arising from noise tangential to the decision, e.g. inattention or motor errors. Here, we use a multisensory decision task in rats to demonstrate that these explanations cannot account for lapses’ stimulus dependence. We propose a novel explanation: lapses reflect a strategic trade-off between exploiting known rewarding actions and exploring uncertain ones. We tested this model’s predictions by selectively manipulating one action’s reward magnitude or probability. As uniquely predicted by this model, changes were restricted to lapses associated with that action. Finally, we show that lapses are a powerful tool for assigning decision-related computations to neural structures based on disruption experiments (here, posterior striatum and secondary motor cortex). These results suggest that lapses reflect an integral component of decision-making and are informative about action values in normal and disrupted brain states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sashank Pisupati
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States.,CSHL School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States
| | - Lital Chartarifsky-Lynn
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States.,CSHL School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States
| | - Anup Khanal
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
When facing ambiguous images, the brain switches between mutually exclusive interpretations, a phenomenon known as bistable perception. Despite years of research, a consensus on whether bistability is driven primarily by bottom-up or top-down mechanisms has not been achieved. Here, we adopted a Bayesian approach to reconcile these two theories. Fifty-five healthy participants were exposed to an adaptation of the Necker cube paradigm, in which we manipulated sensory evidence and prior knowledge. Manipulations of both sensory evidence and priors significantly affected the way participants perceived the Necker cube. However, we observed an interaction between the effect of the cue and the effect of the instructions, a finding that is incompatible with Bayes-optimal integration. In contrast, the data were well predicted by a circular inference model. In this model, ambiguous sensory evidence is systematically biased in the direction of current expectations, ultimately resulting in a bistable percept.
Collapse
|
40
|
Beierholm U, Rohe T, Ferrari A, Stegle O, Noppeney U. Using the past to estimate sensory uncertainty. eLife 2020; 9:54172. [PMID: 33319749 PMCID: PMC7806269 DOI: 10.7554/elife.54172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
To form a more reliable percept of the environment, the brain needs to estimate its own sensory uncertainty. Current theories of perceptual inference assume that the brain computes sensory uncertainty instantaneously and independently for each stimulus. We evaluated this assumption in four psychophysical experiments, in which human observers localized auditory signals that were presented synchronously with spatially disparate visual signals. Critically, the visual noise changed dynamically over time continuously or with intermittent jumps. Our results show that observers integrate audiovisual inputs weighted by sensory uncertainty estimates that combine information from past and current signals consistent with an optimal Bayesian learner that can be approximated by exponential discounting. Our results challenge leading models of perceptual inference where sensory uncertainty estimates depend only on the current stimulus. They demonstrate that the brain capitalizes on the temporal dynamics of the external world and estimates sensory uncertainty by combining past experiences with new incoming sensory signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrik Beierholm
- Psychology Department, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Rohe
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuernberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ambra Ferrari
- Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Cognitive Robotics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Stegle
- Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany.,European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Genome Biology Unit, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Computational Genomics and Systems Genetics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uta Noppeney
- Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Cognitive Robotics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Visual search, the task of detecting or locating target items among distractor items in a visual scene, is an important function for animals and humans. Different theoretical accounts make differing predictions for the effects of distractor statistics. Here we use a task in which we parametrically vary distractor items, allowing for a simultaneously fine-grained and comprehensive study of distractor statistics. We found effects of target-distractor similarity, distractor variability, and an interaction between the two, although the effect of the interaction on performance differed from the one expected. To explain these findings, we constructed computational process models that make trial-by-trial predictions for behavior based on the stimulus presented. These models, including a Bayesian observer model, provided excellent accounts of both the qualitative and quantitative effects of distractor statistics, as well as of the effect of changing the statistics of the environment (in the form of distractors being drawn from a different distribution). We conclude with a broader discussion of the role of computational process models in the understanding of visual search.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Calder-Travis
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.,
| | - Wei Ji Ma
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.,Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.,
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The role of sensory uncertainty in simple contour integration. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16:e1006308. [PMID: 33253195 PMCID: PMC7728286 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Perceptual organization is the process of grouping scene elements into whole entities. A classic example is contour integration, in which separate line segments are perceived as continuous contours. Uncertainty in such grouping arises from scene ambiguity and sensory noise. Some classic Gestalt principles of contour integration, and more broadly, of perceptual organization, have been re-framed in terms of Bayesian inference, whereby the observer computes the probability that the whole entity is present. Previous studies that proposed a Bayesian interpretation of perceptual organization, however, have ignored sensory uncertainty, despite the fact that accounting for the current level of perceptual uncertainty is one of the main signatures of Bayesian decision making. Crucially, trial-by-trial manipulation of sensory uncertainty is a key test to whether humans perform near-optimal Bayesian inference in contour integration, as opposed to using some manifestly non-Bayesian heuristic. We distinguish between these hypotheses in a simplified form of contour integration, namely judging whether two line segments separated by an occluder are collinear. We manipulate sensory uncertainty by varying retinal eccentricity. A Bayes-optimal observer would take the level of sensory uncertainty into account—in a very specific way—in deciding whether a measured offset between the line segments is due to non-collinearity or to sensory noise. We find that people deviate slightly but systematically from Bayesian optimality, while still performing “probabilistic computation” in the sense that they take into account sensory uncertainty via a heuristic rule. Our work contributes to an understanding of the role of sensory uncertainty in higher-order perception. Our percept of the world is governed not only by the sensory information we have access to, but also by the way we interpret this information. When presented with a visual scene, our visual system undergoes a process of grouping visual elements together to form coherent entities so that we can interpret the scene more readily and meaningfully. For example, when looking at a pile of autumn leaves, one can still perceive and identify a whole leaf even when it is partially covered by another leaf. While Gestalt psychologists have long described perceptual organization with a set of qualitative laws, recent studies offered a statistically-optimal—Bayesian, in statistical jargon—interpretation of this process, whereby the observer chooses the scene configuration with the highest probability given the available sensory inputs. However, these studies drew their conclusions without considering a key actor in this kind of statistically-optimal computations, that is the role of sensory uncertainty. One can easily imagine that our decision on whether two contours belong to the same leaf or different leaves is likely going to change when we move from viewing the pile of leaves at a great distance (high sensory uncertainty), to viewing very closely (low sensory uncertainty). Our study examines whether and how people incorporate uncertainty into contour integration, an elementary form of perceptual organization, by varying sensory uncertainty from trial to trial in a simple contour integration task. We found that people indeed take into account sensory uncertainty, however in a way that subtly deviates from optimal behavior.
Collapse
|
43
|
Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency. Trends Cogn Sci 2020; 25:12-23. [PMID: 33214066 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Confidence judgments are typically less informative about one's accuracy than they could be; a phenomenon we call metacognitive inefficiency. We review the existence of different sources of metacognitive inefficiency and classify them into four categories based on whether the corruption is due to: (i) systematic or nonsystematic influences, and (ii) the input to or the computation of the metacognitive system. Critically, the existence of different sources of metacognitive inefficiency provides an alternative explanation for behavioral findings typically interpreted as evidence for domain-specific (and against domain-general) metacognitive systems. We argue that, contrary to the dominant assumption in the field, metacognitive failures are not monolithic and suggest that understanding the sources of metacognitive inefficiency should be a primary goal of the science of metacognition.
Collapse
|
44
|
Dotan D, Eliahou O, Cohen S. Serial and syntactic processing in the visual analysis of multi-digit numbers. Cortex 2020; 134:162-180. [PMID: 33279810 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The visual analysis of letter strings and digit strings is done by two separate cognitive processes. Recent studies have hypothesized that these processes are not only separate but also qualitatively different, in that they may encode information specific to numbers or to words. To examine this hypothesis and to shed further light on the visual analysis of numbers, we asked adults to read aloud multi-digit strings presented to them for brief durations. Their performance was better in digits on the number's left side than in digits farther to the right, with better performance in the two outer digits than their neighbors. This indicates the digits were processed serially, from left to right. Visual similarity of digits increased the likelihood of errors, and when a digit migrated to an incorrect position, it was most often to an adjacent location. Interestingly, the positions of 0 and 1 were encoded better than the positions of 2-9, and 2-9 were identified better when they were next to 0 or 1. To accommodate these findings, we propose a detailed model for the visual analysis of digit strings. The model assumes imperfect digit detectors in which a digit's visual information leaks to adjacent locations, and a compensation mechanism that inhibits this leakage. Crucially, the compensating inhibition is stronger for 0 and 1 than for the digits 2-9, presumably because of the importance of 0 and 1 in the number system. This sensitivity to 0 and 1 makes the visual analyzer specifically adapted to numbers, not words, and may be one of the brain's reasons to implement the visual analysis of numbers and words in two separate cognitive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dror Dotan
- Mathematical Thinking Lab, School of Education and School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
| | - Ofir Eliahou
- Mathematical Thinking Lab, School of Education and School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Sharon Cohen
- Mathematical Thinking Lab, School of Education and School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Imprecise neural computations as a source of adaptive behaviour in volatile environments. Nat Hum Behav 2020; 5:99-112. [PMID: 33168951 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-00971-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
In everyday life, humans face environments that feature uncertain and volatile or changing situations. Efficient adaptive behaviour must take into account uncertainty and volatility. Previous models of adaptive behaviour involve inferences about volatility that rely on complex and often intractable computations. Because such computations are presumably implausible biologically, it is unclear how humans develop efficient adaptive behaviours in such environments. Here, we demonstrate a counterintuitive result: simple, low-level inferences confined to uncertainty can produce near-optimal adaptive behaviour, regardless of the environmental volatility, assuming imprecisions in computation that conform to the psychophysical Weber law. We further show empirically that this Weber-imprecision model explains human behaviour in volatile environments better than optimal adaptive models that rely on high-level inferences about volatility, even when considering biologically plausible approximations of such models, as well as non-inferential models like adaptive reinforcement learning.
Collapse
|
46
|
Hierarchical structure is employed by humans during visual motion perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:24581-24589. [PMID: 32938799 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2008961117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In the real world, complex dynamic scenes often arise from the composition of simpler parts. The visual system exploits this structure by hierarchically decomposing dynamic scenes: When we see a person walking on a train or an animal running in a herd, we recognize the individual's movement as nested within a reference frame that is, itself, moving. Despite its ubiquity, surprisingly little is understood about the computations underlying hierarchical motion perception. To address this gap, we developed a class of stimuli that grant tight control over statistical relations among object velocities in dynamic scenes. We first demonstrate that structured motion stimuli benefit human multiple object tracking performance. Computational analysis revealed that the performance gain is best explained by human participants making use of motion relations during tracking. A second experiment, using a motion prediction task, reinforced this conclusion and provided fine-grained information about how the visual system flexibly exploits motion structure.
Collapse
|
47
|
Lee D, Coricelli G. An Empirical Test of the Role of Value Certainty in Decision Making. Front Psychol 2020; 11:574473. [PMID: 33192874 PMCID: PMC7605174 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Most contemporary models of value-based decisions are built on value estimates that are typically self-reported by the decision maker. Such models have been successful in accounting for choice accuracy and response time, and more recently choice confidence. The fundamental driver of such models is choice difficulty, which is almost always defined as the absolute value difference between the subjective value ratings of the options in a choice set. Yet a decision maker is not necessarily able to provide a value estimate with the same degree of certainty for each option that he encounters. We propose that choice difficulty is determined not only by absolute value distance of choice options, but also by their value certainty. In this study, we first demonstrate the reliability of the concept of an option-specific value certainty using three different experimental measures. We then demonstrate the influence that value certainty has on choice, including accuracy (consistency), choice confidence, response time, and choice-induced preference change (i.e., the degree to which value estimates change from pre- to post-choice evaluation). We conclude with a suggestion of how popular contemporary models of choice (e.g., race model, drift-diffusion model) could be improved by including option-specific value certainty as one of their inputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Lee
- Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yeon J, Rahnev D. The suboptimality of perceptual decision making with multiple alternatives. Nat Commun 2020; 11:3857. [PMID: 32737317 PMCID: PMC7395091 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17661-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
It is becoming widely appreciated that human perceptual decision making is suboptimal but the nature and origins of this suboptimality remain poorly understood. Most past research has employed tasks with two stimulus categories, but such designs cannot fully capture the limitations inherent in naturalistic perceptual decisions where choices are rarely between only two alternatives. We conduct four experiments with tasks involving multiple alternatives and use computational modeling to determine the decision-level representation on which the perceptual decisions are based. The results from all four experiments point to the existence of robust suboptimality such that most of the information in the sensory representation is lost during the transformation to a decision-level representation. These results reveal severe limits in the quality of decision-level representations for multiple alternatives and have strong implications about perceptual decision making in naturalistic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiwon Yeon
- School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Dobromir Rahnev
- School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
de Gee JW, Tsetsos K, Schwabe L, Urai AE, McCormick D, McGinley MJ, Donner TH. Pupil-linked phasic arousal predicts a reduction of choice bias across species and decision domains. eLife 2020; 9:e54014. [PMID: 32543372 PMCID: PMC7297536 DOI: 10.7554/elife.54014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Decisions are often made by accumulating ambiguous evidence over time. The brain's arousal systems are activated during such decisions. In previous work in humans, we found that evoked responses of arousal systems during decisions are reported by rapid dilations of the pupil and track a suppression of biases in the accumulation of decision-relevant evidence (de Gee et al., 2017). Here, we show that this arousal-related suppression in decision bias acts on both conservative and liberal biases, and generalizes from humans to mice, and from perceptual to memory-based decisions. In challenging sound-detection tasks, the impact of spontaneous or experimentally induced choice biases was reduced under high phasic arousal. Similar bias suppression occurred when evidence was drawn from memory. All of these behavioral effects were explained by reduced evidence accumulation biases. Our results point to a general principle of interplay between phasic arousal and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Willem de Gee
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
- Department of Psychology, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children’s HospitalHoustonUnited States
| | - Konstantinos Tsetsos
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Lars Schwabe
- Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Universität HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Anne E Urai
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
- Department of Psychology, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
- Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryCold Spring HarborUnited States
| | - David McCormick
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of OregonEugeneUnited States
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Matthew J McGinley
- Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUnited States
- Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children’s HospitalHoustonUnited States
- Department of Neuroscience, Yale UniversityNew HavenUnited States
| | - Tobias H Donner
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
- Department of Psychology, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
- Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bayesian regression explains how human participants handle parameter uncertainty. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16:e1007886. [PMID: 32421708 PMCID: PMC7259793 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Accumulating evidence indicates that the human brain copes with sensory uncertainty in accordance with Bayes’ rule. However, it is unknown how humans make predictions when the generative model of the task at hand is described by uncertain parameters. Here, we tested whether and how humans take parameter uncertainty into account in a regression task. Participants extrapolated a parabola from a limited number of noisy points, shown on a computer screen. The quadratic parameter was drawn from a bimodal prior distribution. We tested whether human observers take full advantage of the given information, including the likelihood of the quadratic parameter value given the observed points and the quadratic parameter’s prior distribution. We compared human performance with Bayesian regression, which is the (Bayes) optimal solution to this problem, and three sub-optimal models, which are simpler to compute. Our results show that, under our specific experimental conditions, humans behave in a way that is consistent with Bayesian regression. Moreover, our results support the hypothesis that humans generate responses in a manner consistent with probability matching rather than Bayesian decision theory. How do humans make prediction when the critical factor that influences the quality of the prediction is hidden? Here, we address this question by conducting a simple psychophysical experiment in which participants had to extrapolate a parabola with an unknown quadratic parameter. We show that in this task, humans perform in a manner consistent with the mathematically optimal model, i.e., Bayesian regression.
Collapse
|