Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An update on the memorial sloan kettering cancer center experience and the role of premedication dental evaluation in prevention

Incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and associated antiresorptive drugs in adult Finnish population

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and associated antiresorptive drugs in the Finnish population. All adult patients (aged 18 years and older) who were prescribed with antiresorptive drugs (AR) during 2013-2015 were included in this study. A total of n = 58,367 patients met the inclusion criteria and were followed up until 2020. The outcome variable was the diagnosis of MRONJ during the study period. Patients' age, gender, type of AR prescribed, reason for using AR drugs, use of corticosteroids, use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors were used as covariates. The incidence of MRONJ was 0.3% in low-dose and 9.0% in high-dose AR recipients in this study population. The risk of developing MRONJ among denosumab users was 5 times higher in both low-dose and high-dose AR recipients compared to bisphosphonates users. Simultaneous use of corticosteroids in addition to AR drug increased the risk of developing MRONJ by 2 times in high-dose recipients and 6 times in low-dose recipients. In conclusion, male, denosumab, any type of cancer diagnosis, high dose of AR drug and simultaneous use of corticosteroids were the most noteworthy risk factors for MRONJ.

Management of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Multiple Myeloma Patients With Pentoxifylline and Tocopherol: Case Reports

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a well-known side effect of bone-modifying agents such as antiresorptive medications including pamidronic and zoledronic acids (intravenous bisphosphonates) and denosumab (anti-RANK ligand humanized monoclonal antibody). The major risk factor for the precipitation of MRONJ in a patient taking antiresorptive medication is dentoalveolar trauma such as dental extractions. Management of MRONJ in oncology patients is exceptionally challenging. In this report, two multiple myeloma patients with longstanding advanced-stage MRONJ were successfully managed with combined pentoxifylline-tocopherol treatment pre- and postextraction/sequestrectomy. In conclusion, based on this report and other published reports, it appears that the use of combined pentoxifylline-tocopherol protocol in the management of MRONJ is effective.

Teriparatide as an adjuvant therapy in the management of advanced-stage medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Teriparatide, recombinant human parathyroid hormone, is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug used for the treatment of osteoporosis in men and postmenopausal women. Recent studies have shown that it may promote bone healing in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). We describe a case of successful management of advanced-stage MRONJ with teriparatide therapy that was initially prescribed for osteoporosis. This case demonstrates that in patients with progressive MRONJ with significant pain and frequent flares of acute infection, teriparatide may be a viable adjunct in treating MRONJ, as well as helping alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol YEAR;VOL:page range).

Omega-3 attenuates the severity of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws in rats treated with zoledronate

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of ω-3 to modulate the tissue response in rats with MRONJ, focusing on histopathological and immunohistochemical parameters. Forty Wistar rats were subjected to bilateral ovariectomy and, three months later, the medication regimen with ZOL (100μg/kg; groups ZOL and ZOL-ω3) of vehicle (VEH and VEH-ω3) was initiated. Following 3 weeks of ZOL or VEH, experimental periodontitis was induced around the mandibular left first molars of all animals. Then, 14 days later (one day before tooth extraction), daily dietary supplementation with ω-3 was given to animals belonging to groups VEH-ω3 or ZOL-ω3. Euthanasia was performed 21 days after tooth extraction. Histologic, histometric (newly-formed bone tissue [NFBT] and non-vital bone tissue [NVBT]), and immunohistochemical (TNF-α, α-SMA, ALP, IL-1β, VEGF, OCN, and TRAP) analyses were performed. Dietary supplementation with ω-3 reduced the amount of NVBT and controlled the intensity and extension of the inflammatory infiltrate in ZOL-ω3, as compared with ZOL. Osteoclast and osteoblast activity were not statistically different between groups ZOL and ZOL-ω3. The structure of the epithelium and the underlining connective tissue were improved by the supplementation with ω-3 in animals under ZOL therapy. Oral supplementation with omega-3 controlled the inflammation and reduced the amount of non-vital bone at the tooth extraction site of ovariectomized rats treated with ZOL and attenuating the severity of MRONJ.

Medication related osteonecrosis (MRONJ) in the management of CTIBL in breast and prostate cancer patients. Joint report by SIPMO AND SIOMMMS

Background

Low-doses of bone modifying agents (LD-BMAs) compared to those used to treat bone metastases are used in breast or prostate cancer patients on adjuvant endocrine therapy to prevent Cancer Treatment Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL). Their use is associated with an increased risk of developing Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ). However, there is not clarity about strategies aimed to minimize the MRONJ risk in cancer patients at different conditions as low- vs high-doses of BMA. This joint report from the Italian Societies of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO) and of Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism and Skeletal Diseases (SIOMMMS) aims to define the dental management of breast and prostate cancer patients with CTIBL under LD-BMAs, to reduce their risk to develop MRONJ.

Methods

This interdisciplinary SIPMO-SIOMMMS Expert Italian Panel reviewed the available international scientific literature and developed a set of recommendations to implement strategies of MRONJ prevention in breast (BC) and prostate cancer (PC) patients undertaking LD-BMAs to prevent CTIBL.

Results

The Expert Panel, after addressing some introductive topics (i.e., CTIBL and its management, pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of BMAs, definition and diagnosis of MRONJ), developed a joint report on the following five issues: a) prevention and dental management in cancer patients candidates to LD-BMAs, or under LD-BMAs; b) prophylactic drug holiday; c) MRONJ treatment; d) LD-BMAs therapeutic drug holiday; and e) restart of LD-BMA treatment after successful healing of MRONJ.Finally, ten key questions with answers were prepared and placed at the end of the document.

Conclusions

Despite obvious weaknesses of the available international literature, the Expert Panel recognized the need to tailor separate MRONJ preventive approach for breast and prostate cancer patients on adjuvant endocrine therapy who begin low-dose BMA therapy to prevent CTIBL and provided this practical guidance for bone specialists and oral healthcare providers. In view of a MRONJ risk for BC and PC patients receiving low-dose BMAs, which approximates that of patients with osteoporosis and other non-malignant diseases undergoing similar treatment schedules, the SIPMO-SIOMMMS Expert Panel recognizes the need for less stringent preventive strategies than those already developed for BC or PC patients with bone metastases taking HD-BMAs.

Potential role of comprehensive dental care in preventing medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a single centre study

OBJECTIVE

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw bones (MRONJ) is a well-known complication of antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs. Since the first report, more occurrences of MRONJ have been described worldwide. Dental extraction has been described by many studies as one of the risk factors for MRONJ. Comprehensive dental care (CDC) is a preventive dental method provided to patients prior to drug commencement. This study aims to determine the association between CDC and MRONJ.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 75 medical records of patients on antiresorptive and/or antiangiogenic drugs between February 2018 and May 2021. Demographics and clinical and radiographic data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with MRONJ.

RESULTS

Of the 75 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 11 (14.7%) developed MRONJ. Three out of 11 patients (27.2%) developed MRONJ spontaneously, while eight patients (72.8%) developed it after trauma from dentures or dental extractions. Following a binary logistic regression analysis, the lack of CDC was identified as a significant predictor of MRONJ. Patients who did not receive CDC had an odds ratio of 8.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-58.62, p = 0.03). However, dental extraction did not show a statistically significant association with MRONJ in both the univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

CDC before treatment with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs is a potentially effective preventive method for reducing MRONJ. Dental extraction was not a significant factor in relation to MRONJ.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) systemic review: mevalonate pathway mechanisms explored

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare, but devastating condition caused by bisphosphonates, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand inhibitors, anti-angiogenic medications, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. While the clinical spectrum of MRONJ has a wide range, there is a subgroup of patients that do not improve with antibiotics and conservative surgical debridement resulting in pathologic fractures, draining fistulas, and/or osteomyelitis. For the severely affected individuals, the only cure is surgical resection with micro-vascular free flap reconstruction. The etiology of MRONJ is unknown because of the lack of understanding of the biological underpinnings of the disorder connected to the mechanisms of action of the various medications. This limited knowledge has resulted in the classification of patients by clinical presentation rather than underlying pathology. Therefore, the aim of this article is to present a mechanistic framework of MRONJ through the mevalonate pathway in the context of the medications that are known to induce it and explore potential novel therapeutics.

Bridging the gap - Establishing a dental-oncology service in a cancer centre

Dental disease remains the most common non-communicable disease worldwide. It predisposes patients to significant morbidities following bone modifying agents or radiation therapy to the head and neck. Preventative dental regimes effectively reduce the risk of both medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in these patients. Co-ordination of routine dental care as a component of mainstream oncology treatment optimises long term outcomes for oncology patients. This case series offers insights into patient, institutional and social difficulties that challenge the dental-oncology interface. These obstacles and subsequent resolutions experienced whilst establishing a dental-oncology service in a cancer centre highlight the importance of effective multidisciplinary lead care for oncology patients. It reinforces the need for structured, supported dental pathways for these oncology patients.

Epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, and management of MRONJ: A European multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this European multicenter study was to describe the general characteristics and risk factors of MRONJ lesions as well as their clinical diagnosis and management at different European Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery centers, in order to minimize selections biases and provide information about the epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, and the current trends in the treatment of MRONJ across Europe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The following data were registered for each patient: gender; age at MRONJ diagnosis; past medical history; indication for antiresorptive or antiangiogenic therapy; type of antiresorptive medication; local risk factor for MRONJ; MRONJ Stage; anatomic location and symptoms; treatment; surgical complications; recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 537 patients (375 females, 162 males) with MRONJ were included. Statistically significant associations were found between patients with metastatic bone disease and recurrences (P < 0.0005) and between advanced MRONJ stages (stages 2 and 3) and recurrences (P < 0.005). Statistically significant associations were also found between male gender and recurrences (P < 0.05), and between MRONJ maxillary sites and recurrences (P < 0.0000005).

CONCLUSIONS

A longer mean duration of antiresorptive medications before MRONJ onset was observed in patients affected by osteoporosis, whereas a shorter mean duration was observed in all metastatic bone cancer patients, and in particular in those affected by prostate cancer with bone metastases or multiple myeloma. Surgery plays an important role for the management of MRONJ lesions.

Italian position paper (SIPMO-SICMF) on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ)

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to describe the 2023 update position paper on MRONJ developed by the Italian Societies of Oral Pathology and Medicine (SIPMO) and of Maxillofacial Surgery (SICMF).

METHODS

This is the second update following the 2013 and 2020 Italian position papers by the Expert panel, which is a representation of the two scientific societies (SIPMO and SICMF). The paper is based on an extensive analysis of the available literature from January 2003 to February 2020, and the subsequent review of literature conducted between March 2020 and December 2022 to include all new relevant published papers to confirm or modify the previous set of recommendations.

RESULTS

This position paper highlights the main issues of MRONJ on risk estimates, disease definition, diagnostic pathway, individual risk assessment, and the fundamental role of imaging in the diagnosis, classification, and management of MRONJ.

CONCLUSION

The Expert Panel confirmed the MRONJ definition, the diagnostic work-up, the clinical-radiological staging system and the prophylactic drug holiday, as recognized by SIPMO-SICMF; while, it presented novel indications regarding the categories at risk of MRONJ, the prevention strategies, and the treatment strategies associated with the therapeutic drug holiday.

How we manage medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) are integral to managing patients with advanced cancer. They improve quality of survival by reducing skeletal-related events, treating hypercalcaemia and chemotherapy-induced bone loss (Coleman in Clin Cancer Res 12: 6243s-6249s, 2006), (Coleman in Ann Oncol 31: 1650-1663, 2020). Two decades ago, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) was first reported following BMA therapy (Marx in J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61: 1115-1117, 2003). The risk of MRONJ extends over a decade following BMA treatment with bisphosphonates, complicating dental care such as extractions. In addition, MRONJ has been reported following additional therapies such as antiangiogenic agents, cytotoxic agents, immunotherapy, and targeted agents. The use of BMAs in the curative and adjuvant cancer setting is increasing, consequently the implication of MRONJ is growing. Over the past 20 years, the literature has consolidated major risk factors for MRONJ, the pathophysiology and management strategies for MRONJ. Our review aims to document the development of MRONJ preventative and management strategies in cancer patients receiving a BMA. The authors advocate the incorporation of dental oncology strategies into contemporary cancer care, to optimise long-term quality of survival after cancer treatment.

Drug assumption and awareness about adverse drug reactions. The right to know. The case of the bone-modyfing agents: a systematic review

Introduction

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) is an adverse drug reaction that affects the mandible and maxilla of patients exposed to BMA and AA therapies, causing the progressive destruction and death of bone. To date, oral health preventive measures remain the most effective strategy to reduce MRONJ incidence, and, in this sense, the major goal is to diagnose, treat, and eradicate any oral diseases that could compromise oral health. The present systematic review aims to investigate the awareness of MRONJ among patients assuming BMAs.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed, selecting studies that concern the awareness of patients of the risk of MRONJ.

Results

Six studies were included in this review. In total, 483 patients were evaluated. Of the 483 included patients, 391 were not aware of the possibility of MRONJ onset (391/483, 81%) and 92 were aware of it (92/483, 19%).

Discussion

The problem of patient's lack of awareness with respect to MRONJ risk presents different layers of complexity ("what?", "who?", "where?", "when?" and "why?"). Among its causal factors, there are an inadequate level of communication with patients and the lack of collaboration between healthcare professionals, which is related to an individualistic view of liability and deontological duties. MRONJ is a drug adverse reaction that can greatly affect the quality of life of patients if not promptly diagnosed and treated. Therefore, patients must be fully aware of the risks of adverse and the importance of preventive measures, which imply effective and exhaustive communication by each member of the multidisciplinary team. Effective teamwork and collaborative care should be promoted to positively impact patients' awareness.

Clinical practice guidelines for full-cycle standardized management of bone health in breast cancer patients

Bone health management for breast cancer spans the entire cycle of patient care, including the prevention and treatment of bone loss caused by early breast cancer treatment, the adjuvant application of bone-modifying agents to improve prognosis, and the diagnosis and treatment of advanced bone metastases. Making good bone health management means formulating appropriate treatment strategies and dealing with adverse drug reactions, and will help to improve patients' quality of life and survival rates. The Breast Cancer Expert Committee of the National Cancer Center for Quality Control organized relevant experts to conduct an in-depth discussion on the full-cycle management of breast cancer bone health based on evidence-based medicine, and put forward reasonable suggestions to guide clinicians to better deal with health issues in bone health clinics.

Medical and Dental Professions' Varying Levels of Awareness Regarding Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Saudi Arabia? A Cross-sectional Study

AIMS

This study aimed to assess the awareness of the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) among general dental practitioners (GDPs) and primary care physicians (PCPs), focusing on the clinical implications and coordination of treating or identifying high-risk patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two Google Forms electronic questionnaires were distributed to 724 GDPs and 617 PCPs in primary care settings. One for PCPs with eight multiple choice questions and the other for GDPs with 10 multiple choice questions. A clinical case scenario and a section on open-ended comments were included in both questionnaires. The data obtained from each group were statistically analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 239 GDPs and 220 PCPs participated in the study, with a response rate of 34.23%. The mean age of participants was 29.5 years and 54.35% were females (51.2% and 57.5% in the GDPs and PCPs group, respectively). Most participants had graduated from Saudi Arabia. Almost all dentists were aware of osteonecrosis of the jaw (95.1%), 68.3% of them were aware of the guidelines regarding bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) and MRONJ, 60.5% rated their general knowledge about MRONJ as very poor to poor, and 91.8% did not know any guidelines regarding BRONJ or MRONJ. Among the participants, 75.3% did not know how MRONJ was present in the oral cavity. A total of 69.9% of participants were unaware of other factors associated with an increased risk of MRONJ.

CONCLUSION

MRONJ risk awareness varies greatly between dentists who diagnose and manage patients in dental clinics and physicians who write about medicines and therapies. Counseling sessions and greater coordination between dental and medical specialists are strongly suggested while prescribing antiresorptive drugs to prevent the consequent development of MRONJ.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study shows a significant lack of knowledge regarding MRONJ among GDPs and PCPs, which may affect the prevention and treatment of patients. Therefore, we urge GDPS and PCPs to take more information from scientific sources on this topic and more cooperation from specialties for the benefit of patients. How to cite this article: Aljohani MH, Aljohani AS, Aljohani RM, et al. Medical and Dental Professions' Varying Levels of Awareness Regarding Medication-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Saudi Arabia? A Cross-sectional Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(1):62-67.

The Role of Dental Practitioners in the Management of Oncology Patients: The Head and Neck Radiation Oncology Patient and the Medical Oncology Patient

This narrative review addresses the role of a dentist in the management of oncology patients, highlighting the oral complications that arise in head and neck radiation oncology patients and medical oncology patients. The prevention and management of these complications are discussed.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, a risk to reassess in osteoporotic patients

INTRODUCTION

The use of antiresorptive drugs concerns many medical specialties either in relation to their prescription for osteoporosis or cancer, or in relation to the treatment of their side effects. In the literature, less than 10% of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw are related to patients treated for osteoporosis, while 90% are found in patients treated for cancer. Despite the increasing number of osteoporotic patients taking high doses of antiresorptive drugs, only few studies describe this topic. The main aim of this study was to highlight the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporotic patients compared to cancer patients. The second aim was to highlight risk factors in the two groups, to try to understand the high number of osteoporotic patients in our population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted between December 2004 and March 2021 to identify all cases of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in our department with emphasis on the osteoporotic population. Demographic, systemic and local risk factors were collected as well as the type, dose and duration of the anti-resorptive drugs treatment. Evolution and follow-up were also recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty five patients presented with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, of whom 67 (40,6%) were osteoporotic. Seventeen (25,4%) patients were males and 50 females (74,6%). Risk factors were tobacco consumption (28,4%), anemia (20,9%), alcohol consumption (19,4%). Use of corticoids or anticoagulant/antithrombotic therapy was related in 20,9% and 16,4%, respectively. The mean age at MRONJ diagnosis was 74,4 (50-98). The mean follow up time was 23,7 months (1-110).

CONCLUSION

Unlike the literature where medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporotic patients represents less than 10%, the rate in our series was much higher and represents 40% of the patients. This highlights the importance of a complete dental examination before and during antiresorptive drugs treatment, even in the case of osteoporotic patients.

The preventive care of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): a position paper by Italian experts for dental hygienists

PURPOSE

The prevention and early diagnosis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is fundamental to reducing the incidence and progression of MRONJ. Many in the field believe that dental hygienists should play an integral role in primary and secondary MRONJ prevention. However, to date, very few publications in the literature have proposed standardised MRONJ protocols, which are dedicated to dental hygienists. The aim of this study was to provide guidance to the health care providers managing MRONJ.

METHODS

The expert opinion in this study was developed by dental hygienists from the main Italian technical-scientific associations (Italian Dental Hygienists Association, AIDI and National Union of Dental Hygienists, UNID) and authors of the latest Italian recommendations regarding MRONJ from the field of dentistry and maxillofacial surgery.

RESULTS

The oral care protocol outlined in this position paper is focused on the role of dental hygienist in patients at risk or affected by MRONJ, and it regards 3 main issues: primary prevention, secondary prevention and supporting the treatment of MRONJ. Each issue contains easy-to-apply indications and procedures, as described by the authors, regarding the role of the dental hygienist.

CONCLUSION

Referring to the main issues under consideration (primary prevention, secondary prevention and the treatment of MRONJ), a clinical examination of periodontal tissue is critical in preventing MRONJ. It is the opinion of the authors of this study that the application of a periodontal screening score is fundamental in defining personalised strategies for patients at risk of MRONJ. By means of these basic procedures, a protocol for assisting the health care provider and the presentation of a practical approach for patients at risk or affected by MRONJ are described in this study.

Influence of alcohol sensitivity on bone metastases and skeletal-related events in primary operable breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Bone metastases in breast cancer patients are a common concern for medical doctors and dentists. Bone-modifying agents, which are necessary to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs), are associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw as an adverse side effect. Hypersensitivity to alcohol is an unfavorable response caused by deficiency of aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) activity. Inactive ALDH2 is associated with osteoporosis, but its influence on bone metastases is unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of alcohol sensitivity on bone metastases and SREs in primary operable breast cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who were administered docetaxel, an anti-tumor agent, for histologically diagnosed breast cancer between April 2004 and September 2015. Alcohol sensitivity was assessed based on medical records of hypersensitivity to alcohol. The primary endpoint was time to bone metastases and the secondary endpoint was time to first SRE from the initial docetaxel administration. Data were stratified by alcohol sensitivity and tumor stages, and differences were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic risk factors were analyzed by the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The median follow-up period of patients with high sensitivity to alcohol (n = 45) was 54 months and that for those with low sensitivity (n = 287) was 64 months. Stratification by alcohol sensitivity revealed that tumor stage exhibited significant correlations with the cumulative incidence of bone metastases in low-sensitivity patients; however, no differences were found in high-sensitivity patients. In multivariate analysis, alcohol sensitivity was a significant prognostic risk factor for bone metastases (HR 2.721, 95% CI 1.268–5.841, P = 0.010).

Conclusion

Alcohol sensitivity may be a prognostic risk factor for bone metastases. More detailed genetic investigations and metabolic analyses are needed.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Dental Practice: A Retrospective Analysis of Data from the Milan Cohort

A retrospective analysis was performed with the aim of understanding whether the risk factors showed in the literature for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in cancer patients are also relevant in osteoporotic patients taking antiresorptive drugs (ARDs). Data were retrospectively pooled from health records of patients on ARDs who requested a dental visit between January 2006 and April 2020 in the Dental Unit at Fondazione Ca’ Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan. A total of 434 patients were included. The following variables were collected: sex, age, smoking habit, type of ARD, duration of treatment, route of administration, therapeutic indication, concurrent systemic therapies and pathologies. Statistical analysis confirmed the relevance of chemotherapy, smoking, and immunosuppressive drugs as risk factors. In addition, a higher frequency of MRONJ in osteoporotic patients was reported in our cohort in association with an immunodeficiency disorder of variable origin. In conclusion, the identification of individual risk-profile before dental treatments is crucial for prevention. Anamnesis should include main risk factors, such as immunosuppression, dental extractions, smoking, trauma, and poor dental health. Nevertheless, our suggestion for dental professionals is to conduct a complete medical history of patients who mention long-term per oral therapies with ARDs for osteoporosis. Osteoporotic, as well as cancer patients, may also benefit from periodic monitoring of the ARDs therapy in order to prevent MRONJ.

Oral Complications in Cancer Patients–Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ)

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) was first reported in 2003. Despite the progress in the understanding of this oral complication in cancer patients for the past 18 years, there is still discussion about the best way to define MRONJ, prevent the complication, how to diagnose, and the options of treatment available. The initial reports associated MRONJ to bisphosphonates and denosumab, medications that work as bone-modifying agents. Later, other agents such as the antiangiogenics, have also been reported to cause the oral complication, either alone or in combination with antiresorptives. Initially, these medications were prescribed to patients with osteoporosis and cancers patients with bone metastasis. Today, because of the effect of the medications in the bone remodeling system, patients with several other diseases such as giant cell tumors, rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease of bone, fibrous dysplasia, osteogenesis imperfecta, are managed with these medications, significantly increasing the population of individuals at risk for developing MRONJ. This mini review focused on the cancer patient. It updates the dental clinician on the recent scientific literature about MRONJ and provides information on how to diagnose and manage patients being treated with these medications, suggests protocols to prevent the development of MRONJ, and present ways to manage those patients who develop the oral complication.

Multiple myeloma masquerading as mandibular medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a case report

This is a unique case report of a 67-year-old female diagnosed with multiple myeloma and extensive use of intravenous bisphosphonate, whose clinical and radiographic presentation of an oral lesion made it challenging to confirm its definitive diagnosis. This patient was referred to the dental service for a suspected medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Clinically, the lesion was located underneath a fixed partial denture in the left posterior mandible. There was a purulent swelling on the lingual side of the fixed partial denture, and a hyperplastic exophytic lesion on the buccal side of the bridge. Panoramic radiograph showed a well circumscribed radiolucent lesion in the left mandible. A biopsy of the gingival lesion on the buccal aspect was inconclusive. As the positron emission tomography scan showed lytic lesions, oral manifestation of multiple myeloma could not be ruled out. A computed tomography-guided biopsy of the left mandible showed plasma cell neoplasm in the histological analysis. Upon confirmed diagnosis, the patient was treated with 20Gy to the left mandible and subsequent debridement of the loose necrotic bone. Following treatment, this gingival lesion resolved completely, and the tumour has remained stable till date.

Clinical application of double-layer soft tissue closure technology based on pedicled buccal fat pad in repairing maxillary defects after medication-related osteonecrosis of jaw surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the clinical application effect of the double-layer soft tissue closure technique (DLST) based on pedicled buccal fat pad in repairing maxillary defects after medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) surgery.

METHODS

Ten patients with maxillary MRONJ were diagnosed and treated via DLST based on pedicled buccal fat pad. Partial maxillary resection was conducted to remove the MRONJ lesion, and the inflammatory soft tissue in the maxillary sinus cavity was removed but the maxillary sinus mucosa was retained. Patients also underwent resection of the lower segment of the sphenoid pterygoid process. A pedicled buccal fat pad was used to line the maxillary sinus floor and oral mucosa to achieve double-layer soft tissue closure of the wound. The characteristics of the medication for the primary disease, the clinical characteristics and imaging characteristics of osteonecrosis, the surgical treatment effects, pain score, and functional status evaluation of the 10 patients were all reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 10 patients, there were 5 cases of breast cancer, 2 cases of lung cancer, 1 case of prostate cancer, 1 case of multiple myeloma, and 1 case of kidney cancer. All 10 patients received zoledronic acid, and the average time of application of zoledronic acid was 34 months. Six patients had upper jaw exposure, and 4 patients had gingival soft tissue fistula; the average time to clinical symptoms was 5.6 months. Among them, 5 patients had a history of tooth extraction, 3 patients with apical periodontitis, 1 patient with periodontitis, and 1 patient with spontaneous teeth loss. The lesions of 10 patients were all located in the maxillary posterior area. CT images can often show sequestration near the maxillary sinus floor, and the maxillary sinus cavity was full of soft tissue inflammation in most patients. During the follow-up period, 8 patients healed by the first intention, and the other patient had partial liquefaction of the buccal fat pad 2 weeks after the operation, and the oral mucosa fistula closed 1 month after the operation. In another patient, MRONJ symptoms recurred 2 months after the operation, and the surgical site occasionally swelled and discharged pus. The patient's symptoms were completely relieved after another operation. The patient's pain and functional status improved significantly after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Maxillary MRONJ is commonly found in the posterior area. The buccal fat pad-based DLST is used to repair the defect after maxillary resection, which is beneficial to seal the oral-maxillary sinus fistula and improve the clinical symptoms of patients with MRONJ.

Risk evaluation of denosumab and zoledronic acid for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with bone metastases: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients with cancer who received denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA) for treating bone metastasis.

METHODS

The medical records of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not undergo a dental examination at baseline were excluded. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the risk of developing MRONJ between the denosumab and ZA groups. Propensity score matching was used to control for baseline differences between patient characteristics and compare outcomes for both groups.

RESULTS

Among the 799 patients enrolled, 58 (7.3%) developed MRONJ. The incidence of MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the ZA group (9.6% [39/406] vs. 4.8% [19/393], p = 0.009). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that denosumab treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-5.25; p < 0.001) and tooth extraction after starting ZA or denosumab (HR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.38-7.44; p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for MRONJ. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed that the risk of developing MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the ZA group (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.17-5.01; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that denosumab poses a significant risk for developing MRONJ in patients treated for bone metastasis, and thus these patients require close monitoring.

CD34 and CD105 Microvessels in Resected Bone Specimen May Implicate Wound Healing in MRONJ

Clinical treatment outcome of MRONJ (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw) surgery despite radical osseous removal and primary closure healing still shows differences in terms of outcome and disease recurrence. The study aims to assess the rate of angiogenesis of MRONJ lesions in order to understand the impact of angiogenesis and neoangiogenesis status on MRONJ surgical treatment outcome. This is the first study correlating microvessel density with prognosis in MRONJ surgically-treated patients. The immunohistochemical expression of CD34 and CD105 in MRONJ specimens obtained from surgically-treated patients was evaluated. The most vascularized areas detected by CD34 and CD105 were selected and the microvessel density value of the samples was registered. Samples were retrospectively divided according to the clinical outcome of MRONJ surgical treatment, dividing patients into two groups, “healed” and “not healed”. Statistical analysis was performed to assess if neovessels could influence treatment outcome in patients undergoing radical surgery. In the examined cohort, this value was highly predictive of better treatment outcome after radical surgery of MRONJ. Understanding of angiogenesis-dependent factors deserves further attention as a future target for MRONJ prevention and therapies.

Cancer Patients at Risk for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw. A Case and Control Study Analyzing Predictors of MRONJ Onset

The goal of this investigation was to identify potential risk factors to predict the onset of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Through the identification of the multiple variables positively associated to MRONJ, we aim to write a paradigm for integrated MRONJ risk assessment built on the combined analysis of systemic and local risk factors. The characteristics of a cohort of cancer patients treated with zoledronic acid and/or denosumab were investigated; beyond the set of proven risk factors a new potential one, the intake of new molecules for cancer therapy, was addressed. Registered data were included in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in order to individuate significant independent predictors of MRONJ; a propensity score-matching method was performed adjusting by age and sex. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant effect of the parameters number of doses of zoledronic acid and/or denosumab (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01–1.05; p = 0.008) and chemotherapy (OR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.17–0.71; p = 0.008). The multiple logistic regression model showed that breast, multiple myeloma, and prostate cancer involved a significantly higher risk compared to lung cancer; a significant effect of the combined variables number of doses of zoledronic acid and/or denosumab (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01–1.06); p-value = 0.03) and exposure to novel molecule treatment (OR = 34.74; 95% CI = 1.39–868.11; p-value = 0.03) was observed. The results suggest that a risk assessment paradigm is needed for personalized prevention strategies in the light of patient-centered care.

Jaw osteonecrosis in patients treated with denosumab 120 mg with regular dental monitoring: 4-year retrospective study

Background: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an expected, but rare adverse effect of denosumab. There are few data denosumab 120 mg related MRONJ occurrence when regular dental monitoring is planned. International and French recommendations do not detail the schedule of the follow-up visits, allowing local interpretations. Methods: The aim of this retrospective study was to describe our local experience of regular dental monitoring in patients receiving denosumab 120 mg. We included all ≥18-year-old patients exposed to denosumab 120 mg, bisphosphonate- and denosumab-naive, and with regular dental monitoring (pre-treatment and every 4 months after denosumab initiation) at the University Hospital Center, France, from 2015 to 2019. The crude incidence of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw was estimated per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval). Results: During the study period, 251 patients were included, of whom 77 did not attend the 1st follow-up visit at 4 months. Almost all patients had osteonecrosis of the jaw risk factors. Ten MRONJ cases were reported (four stage 0 and six stage 1). The crude incidence rate was 5.1 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 1.9–8.2). Denosumab was stopped in all patients who developed MRONJ, with favorable outcome for 3 cases and stabilization in 4 cases after osteonecrosis of the jaw management. Conclusion: This study suggested that a regular dental follow-up every 4 months may be a suitable option for prevention and early detection/treatment of MRONJ. A randomized study should be performed to determine the best dental monitoring schedule.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Critical Narrative Review

Background: Nearly two decades have passed since a paradoxical reaction in the orofacial region to some bone modifying agents and other drugs was recognized, namely medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Purpose: The aim of this manuscript was to critically review published data on MRONJ to provide an update on key terminology, concepts, and current trends in terms of prevention and diagnosis. In addition, our objective was to examine and evaluate the therapeutic options available for MRONJ. Methods: The authors perused the most relevant literature relating to MRONJ through a search in textbooks and published articles included in several databases for the years 2003–2021. Results and conclusions: A comprehensive update of the current understanding of these matters was elaborated, addressing these topics and identifying relevant gaps of knowledge. This review describes our updated view of the previous thematic blocks, highlights our current clinical directions, and emphasizes controversial aspects and barriers that may lead to extending the accumulating body of evidence related to this severe treatment sequela.

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) in urological malignancies: a multi-center retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the incidence and risk factors for antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) in prostate and kidney cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 547 patients from 13 hospitals. Prostate and kidney cancer patients with bone metastases who were treated with a bone-modifying agent (BMA) between January 2012 and February 2019 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were BMA use for hypercalcemia, a lack of clinical data, a follow-up period of less than 28 days and a lack of evaluation by dentists before BMA administration. The diagnosis and staging of ARONJ were done by dentists.

RESULTS

Two-hundred eighteen patients were finally enrolled in the study, including 168 prostate cancer patients and 50 kidney cancer patients. Of them, 49 (29%) prostate cancer patients and 18 (36%) kidney cancer patients needed tooth extraction prior to BMA initiation. The mean follow-up period after BMA initiation was 552.9 ± 424.7 days (mean ± SD). In the cohort, 23% of the patients were diagnosed with ARONJ in the follow-up period. The 1-year cumulative incidences of ARONJ were 9.4% and 15.4% in prostate and kidney cancer patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that kidney cancer, tooth extraction before BMA and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² were significant predictors for ARONJ.

CONCLUSION

ARONJ is not a rare adverse event in urological malignancies. Especially, kidney cancer, high BMI patients and who needed tooth extraction before BMA were high risk for developing ARONJ.

Oral health condition in cancer patients under bisphosphonate therapy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of oral health condition with the occurrence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in a cancer population.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted with cancer patients exposed to bisphosphonates for at least 7 months. Dental and periodontal conditions were assessed by epidemiological indices.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 80 patients under bisphosphonate therapy, nine of which were allocated to group 1 (with MRONJ) and 71 to group 2 (without MRONJ). Osteonecrosis cases presented 19 decayed, missing, and filled teeth on average. Moderate gingival inflammation was noted in both groups and together with severe inflammation exceeded 50% of the groups. The presence of dental calculus was detected in about half of the individuals in both groups. Shallow periodontal pockets were detected in about 25% of both groups. Deep periodontal pockets were more prevalent among patients with osteonecrosis. Regular oral hygiene was detected in approximately 25% of individuals in both groups. There was a strong positive correlation between the clinical staging of osteonecrosis and decayed, missing, and filled teeth index (DMFTI).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients had a poor oral health condition. All but one osteonecrosis case had no previous history of tooth extraction; oral infections seemed to play a major role in the development of bone necrosis. Advanced osteonecrosis stages were associated with a higher DMFTI.

Associated characteristics and treatment outcomes of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving denosumab or zoledronic acid for bone metastases

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the association between clinical characteristics and development of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients who underwent dental examinations before the initiation of treatment with denosumab or zoledronic acid, which are bone-modifying agents (BMAs), for bone metastases. Additionally, the clinical outcomes of patients who developed MRONJ were evaluated along with the time to resolution of MRONJ.

Methods

The medical charts of patients with cancer who received denosumab or zoledronic acid for bone metastases between January 2012 and September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo a dental examination at baseline.

Results

Among the 374 included patients, 34 (9.1%) developed MRONJ. The incidence of MRONJ was significantly higher in the denosumab group than in the zoledronic acid (27/215 [12.6%] vs 7/159 [4.4%], P = 0.006) group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that denosumab treatment, older age, and tooth extraction before and after starting BMA treatments were significantly associated with developing MRONJ. The time to resolution of MRONJ was significantly shorter for patients who received denosumab (median 26.8 months) than for those who received zoledronic acid (median not reached; P = 0.024).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that treatment with denosumab, age > 65 years, and tooth extraction before and after starting BMA treatments are significantly associated with developing MRONJ in patients undergoing treatment for bone metastases. However, MRONJ caused by denosumab resolves faster than that caused by zoledronic acid.

New-generation anticancer drugs and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ): Late onset 3 years after ipilimumab endovenous administration with a possible role of target therapy

Association of immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy, in sequence or as single therapies, may induce osteonecrosis of the jaw. Multidisciplinary team management of these patients should be provided.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws and CDK4/6 Inhibitors: A Recent Association

The purpose of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors use among cancer patients from the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) cohort of the University of Messina. We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with either intravenous bisphosphonates or denosumab-related MRONJ reported in the electronic health records of the Unit of Oral Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Messina between the first quarter of 2018 and the first quarter 2020 to identify eligible patients. We observed six cases of MRONJ associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors concomitantly with intravenous bisphosphonates and/or denosumab in breast cancer patients. The CDK4/6 inhibitors registered were palbociclib (n = 5) and abemaciclib (n = 1). Data of cancer patients diagnosed with MRONJ in the same period (n = 10) were extracted for comparison. The comparative assessment with this group of patients showed a similar distribution of MRONJ stage ranged and clinical course after treatment. The degree of risk for osteonecrosis in patients taking these new classes of drugs is uncertain but warrants awareness and close monitoring. The role of premedication dental evaluation as a prevention strategy has been acknowledged for cancer patients about to initiate intravenous bisphosphonates and/or denosumab for treatment of bone metastasis, but additional attention should be paid to whom are assuming CDK4/6 inhibitors because of their oral adverse events.

Porphyromonas, Treponema, and Mogibacterium promote IL8/IFNγ/TNFα-based pro-inflammation in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Objective: Refractory infection is an important factor affecting the progression of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) from clinical stage I to stage II/III. The aim of this study was to explore the distribution of bacteria and their association with the inflammatory pathway of stage II/III MRONJ.

Materials and Methods: Nine specimens of fresh inflammation tissue, located next to the necrotic bone or sequestrum, were collected from MRONJ patients. Nine specimens from normal oral mucosa were collected from healthy patients. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing method was used to determine the distribution characteristics of the bacterial colony. The protein microarray analysis was used to detect the expression of inflammatory cytokines.

Results: The average relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Synergistetes, and Tenericutes was higher, while Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were lower in the MRONJ group. Most pro-inflammatory cytokines were up-regulated in the MRONJ group; yet, only IFNγ, TNFα, and IL8 showed statistical differences (P < 0.05). Porphyromonas and Treponema were positively correlated with IL8, and Mogibacterium was positively correlated with IFNγ and TNFα.

Conclusions: IL8/IFNγ/TNFα pro-inflammatory effect caused by Porphyromonas, Treponema, and Mogibacterium may be the leading cause of advancing MRONJ and thus may be used as a new target for infection control.

Changing face of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Sheba Medical Center experience-fifteen years

INTRODUCTION

Our aim is to track the development of the epidemiological characteristics in patient populations diagnosed with MRONJ at the Sheba Medical Center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The files of patients diagnosed with MRONJ from 2003 until December 2017 were retrieved. Data on demographics, medical background, type and duration of drug use and triggering events at presentation was collected.

RESULTS

The study included 448 patients, 336 females and 112 males. A decrease in the proportion of multiple myeloma patients (p < 0.05) and an increase in the proportion of patients with bone metastases of solid tumors has been observed recently. An increase in the proportion of cases in osteoporosis patients compared with oncology patients is evident (p < 0.01). Overtime a higher proportion of patients presented at an earlier stage of MRONJ (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of changes in treatment protocols and increased awareness of oncology caregivers, including referral and consultation with Oral Medicine specialists, there has been a change in the demographics and presentation of the disease.

Retrospective analysis of bacterial colonization of necrotic bone and antibiotic resistance in 98 patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ)

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to describe microbial flora associated with MRONJ and characterize the susceptibility of pathogens to help guide an effective empiric antibiotic treatment in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, single-center analysis was performed, using 116 bone samples from 98 patients. The bone samples were homogenized and subjected to routine culture methods. Growing bacteria were differentiated to the species level using whole-cell mass spectrometry and subjected to susceptibility testing.

RESULTS

A highly diverse microbial flora was detected in necrotic bone, with a simultaneous presence of two or more bacterial species in 79% of all patients. In at least 65% of samples, gram-negative isolates were detected. Therefore, bacterial species resistant against β-lactamase inhibitors were present in at least 70% of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The empiric choice of antibiotics in MRONJ patients should consider the high rate of gram-negative bacteria and resistance against β-lactam antibiotics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

According to recent guidelines and recommendations, systemic antibiotic treatment is a key component in the treatment of all stage 2 and 3 MRONJ patients. We recommend using fluoroquinolones for empiric treatment and emphasize the use of bacterial cultivation and susceptibility testing to enable an effective antibiotic treatment.

Bone Health Management After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An Expert Panel Opinion from the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Bone health disturbances commonly occur after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with loss of bone mineral density (BMD) and avascular necrosis (AVN) foremost among them. BMD loss is related to pretransplantation chemotherapy and radiation exposure and immunosuppressive therapy for graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and results from deficiencies in growth or gonadal hormones, disturbances in calcium and vitamin D homeostasis, as well as osteoblast and osteoclast dysfunction. Although the pathophysiology of AVN remains unclear, high-dose glucocorticoid exposure is the most frequent association. Various societal treatment guidelines for osteoporosis exist, but the focus is mainly on menopausal-associated osteoporosis. HCT survivors comprise a distinct population with unique comorbidities, making general approaches to bone health management inappropriate in some cases. To address a core set of 16 frequently asked questions (FAQs) relevant to bone health in HCT, the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy Committee on Practice Guidelines convened a panel of experts in HCT, adult and pediatric endocrinology, orthopedics, and oral medicine. Owing to a lack of relevant prospective controlled clinical trials that specifically address bone health in HCT, the answers to the FAQs rely on evidence derived from retrospective HCT studies, results extrapolated from prospective studies in non-HCT settings, relevant societal guidelines, and expert panel opinion. Given the heterogenous comorbidities and needs of individual HCT recipients, answers to FAQs in this article should be considered general recommendations, with good medical practice and judgment ultimately dictating care of individual patients. Readers are referred to the Supplementary Material for answers to additional FAQs that did not make the core set.

Preventing, identifying, and managing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a practical guide for nurses and other allied healthcare professionals

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an infrequent, but potentially serious, adverse event that can occur after exposure to bone-modifying agents (BMAs; e.g., bisphosphonates, denosumab, and antiangiogenic therapies). BMAs are typically used at higher doses to prevent skeletal-related events in cancer patients and at lower doses for osteoporosis/bone loss. MRONJ can cause significant pain, reduce quality of life, and can be difficult to treat, requiring a multiprofessional approach to care.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature and guidelines to summarize a practical guide on MRONJ for nurses and other allied healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

While there is a risk of MRONJ with BMAs, this should be considered in relation to the benefits of treatment. Nurses and other allied healthcare professionals can play a key role alongside physicians and dentists in assessing MRONJ risk, identifying MRONJ, counseling the patient on the benefit-risk of BMA treatment, preventing MRONJ, and managing the care pathway of these patients. Assessing patients for MRONJ risk factors before starting BMA treatment can guide preventative measures to reduce the risk of MRONJ. Nurses can play a pivotal role in facilitating multiprofessional management of MRONJ by communicating with patients to ensure compliance with preventative measures, and with patients' physicians and dentists to ensure early detection and referral for prompt treatment of MRONJ.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarizes current evidence on MRONJ and provides practical guidance for nurses, from before BMA treatment is started through to approaches that can be taken to prevent and manage MRONJ in patients receiving BMAs.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with intravitreal administration of ranibizumab

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a well-known complication that, in the majority of cases, is related to antiresorptive agents. Numerous articles have described cases of MRONJ in bisphosphonate-naïve patients treated with anti-angiogenic agents administered via various routes. A single case of MRONJ after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab has been reported. We report a case of MRONJ after intravitreal injection of a different anti-angiogenic agent - ranibizumab - for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration, in a bisphosphonate-naïve patient. Although it may be a rare complication, patients treated with multiple doses of anti-angiogenic agents should be monitored for the possible early diagnosis of MRONJ.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in cancer patients treated with denosumab VS. zoledronic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The aim of the present study was to analyse the incidence, risk ratio (RR) and prognoses of two types of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ): denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (DRONJ) and Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (BRONJ) in cancer patients under treatment with denosumab or zoledronic acid (ZA).

Material and Methods

An electronic and manual search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until May 2019. Assessment of the identified studies, risk of bias and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The incidence of DRONJ and BRONJ and the RR to develop MRONJ were calculated at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years of exposure. It was also calculated the odds ratio (OR) of their respective prognoses. They were calculated normalizing the values of the individual studies to 1 year, 2 years or 3 years when necessary through robust regression models using a statistical program.

Results

From 1.277 references identified, 8 RCTs were included, which comprised a total of 13.857 patients with a variety of neoplasms. The incidence of DRONJ in cancer patients under treatment with denosumab ranged from 0.5 to 2.1% after 1 year, 1.1 to 3.0% after 2 years, and 1.3 to 3.2% after 3 years of exposure. The incidence of BRONJ in cancer patients under treatment with ZA ranged from 0.4 to 1.6% after 1 year of exposure, 0.8 to 2.1% after 2 years, and 1.0 to 2.3% after 3 years of exposure. Statistically significant differences were found between denosumab and ZA in the risk of developing MRONJ after 1, 2 and 3 years of exposure. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in terms of patient prognosis.

Conclusions

Denosumab is associated with a significantly higher risk of developing MRONJ compared to ZA. Nevertheless, no differences were found in its prognoses.

Key words:Denosumab, zoledronic acid, bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the Jaws, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws, neoplasms.

Bone metastases in thyroid cancer

•

Osseous metastases (OMs) occur in only 4% of all thyroid cancer patients but are associated with greatly increased morbidity and mortality.

•

OMs are about twice as frequent in follicular, hurthle cell, and medullary thyroid cancers as compared to papillary thyroid cancers.

•

OMs are often lytic, triggered via activation of osteoclasts by tumor cells in a “vicious cycle”.

•

OMs are often initially asymptomatic, but associated with eventual skeletal related events in >75%.

•

Early identification of OMs, preemptive treatment with antiresorptive agents, and aggressive treatment of focal lesions before crisis are key.

Whereas preemptive screening for the presence of lymph node and lung metastases is standard-of-care in thyroid cancer patients, bone metastases are less well studied and are often neglected in thyroid cancer patient surveillance. Bone metastases in thyroid cancer are, however, independently associated with poor/worse prognosis with a median overall survival from detection of only 4 years despite an otherwise excellent prognosis for the vast majority of thyroid cancer patients. In this review we summarize the state of current knowledge as pertinent to bony metastatic disease in thyroid cancer, including clinical implications, impacts on patient function and quality of life, pathogenesis, and therapeutic opportunities, proposing approaches to patient care accordingly. In particular, bone metastasis pathogenesis appears to reflect cooperatively between cancer and the bone microenvironment creating a “vicious cycle” of bone destruction rather than due exclusively to tumor invasion into bone. Additionally, bone metastases are more frequent in follicular and medullary thyroid cancers, requiring closer bone surveillance in patients with these histologies. Emerging data also suggest that treatments such as multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) can be less effective in controlling bone, as opposed to other (e.g. lung), metastases in thyroid cancers, making special attention to bone critical even in the setting of active MKI therapy. Although locoregional therapies including surgery, radiotherapy and ablation play important roles in palliation, antiresorptive agents including bisphosphonates and denosumab appear individually to delay and/or lessen skeletal morbidity and complications, with dosing frequency of every 3 months appearing optimal; their early application should therefore be strongly considered.

Incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw in Japanese osteoporosis patients taking minodronic acid

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) associated with bisphosphonate therapy is a rare but severe side effect in osteoporosis patients. Recently, the number of osteoporosis patients with ONJ has dramatically increased in Japan. This has contributed to an increase in the number of patients avoiding extractions. However, there has been no prospective study providing definitive incidence data for ONJ in Japanese patients. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the true as well as suspected incidence of ONJ. A total of 3229 subjects (1612 subjects in the minodronic acid group and 1617 subjects in the raloxifene group) in the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 participated in this study. ONJ was diagnosed by experienced dentists. Suspected Stage 0 and 1 (bone exposure of the jaw) ONJ was assessed by a structured questionnaire at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. No established ONJ cases were diagnosed during the study. The incidence of suspected Stage 0 and/or Stage 1 ONJ was 6.14 per 1000 patient-years in the minodronic acid group and 3.38 per 1000 patient-years in the raloxifene group [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.82 (0.84-3.93), P = 0.13]. Approximately 50-60% of bone exposures that appeared during the study had disappeared at the next observation. Although the subjects in this study may have developed a greater interest in the health of the oral cavity, the incidence of ONJ after minodronic acid treatment would be lower than the expected incident rate.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Patients Receiving Anti-Angiogenic Drugs and Chemotherapeutics: Literature Review and Case Reports

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a relatively rare but serious pathology associated with the use of bisphosphonates (BPs) and antiresorptive drugs in patients with bone metastases, multiple myeloma and osteoporosis. Various cases of patients with jaw bone necrosis due to BPs have recently been reported in the literature. Anti-angiogenic drugs are novel anticancer agents prescribed to patients with renal carcinoma, lung carcinoma, soft tissue metastases, etc. Anti-angiogenic drugs target the vascular endothelial growth factor’s (VEGF) signaling pathways via different mechanisms and thus inhibit tumor cell proliferation, neoangiogenesis and tumor growth. Several reports have suggested a higher incidence of MRONJ in patients treated with BPs in combination with anti-angiogenic drugs. However, there is currently no sufficient data in the literature about the risk of ONJ in patients taking anti-angiogenic drugs or cancer chemotherapy alone. We present two clinical cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with chemotherapy, but no history of BPs. In the first case the necrosis is related to the anti-angiogenic agent sunitinib in a patient with lung metastases and in the second case- to complex chemotherapy in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. We recommend conservative treatment with antibiotics in both cases, together with antiseptics and surgical removal of the necrotic bone following total demarcation of the sequesters.