Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery

Visual efficacy after implantation of monofocal intraocular lens on one eye and higher-order aspheric IOL on the other eye

PURPOSE

To compare visual and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction results after binocular cataract surgery with implantation of both TECNIS Eyhance ICB00 and TECNIS ZCB00 intraocular lenses in the same patient.

METHODS

One hundred twelve eyes from 56 patients who underwent intraocular lens implantation with Eyhance ICB00 and ZCB00 in the same patient were retrospectively enrolled. Pre-operative and post- operative uncorrected and corrected near (UNVA, CNVA), intermediate (UIVA, CIVA), distant (UDVA, CDVA) visual acuity, and depth of focus were analyzed. Satisfaction surveys were evaluated after cataract surgery.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the preoperative values between the Eyhance ICB00 and ZCB00 groups. At two months postoperatively, UNVA of the ZCB00 group (0.02 ± 0.03 logMAR) was significantly better than that of the Eyhance ICB00 group (0.05 ± 0.05) (P < 0.05). At one week, one month, and two months postoperatively, the UIVA of the Eyhance ICB00 was significantly better than that of the ZCB00 group (P < 0.05). At two months postoperatively, the UNVA of the Eyhance ICB00 was significantly better than that of the ZCB00 group (P < 0.05). In the satisfaction survey, daily activities were not limited by their vision or glare in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Inserting a high-aberration aspheric intraocular lens(IOL) in one eye rather than inserting a monofocal IOL in both eyes is better for improving distance, intermediate, and near vision. Furthermore, patients who have Eyhance ICB00 in one eye and a monofocal IOL in the other do not experience any difficulty in their daily lives.

Monovision versus multifocality for presbyopia during primary phacoemulsification: systematic review and network meta-analysis

This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) focuses on comparing monovision and bilateral multifocal lenses (bMFIOL) implantation methods in treating presbyopia, a common age-related condition often seen in post-cataract surgery patients. This review focuses on evaluating the efficacy, user satisfaction and limitations of these two approaches through direct or indirect comparison. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library, considering studies up to 15 July 2022, with direct or indirect comparisons between any monovision and bMFIOL implantation with bilateral cataract surgery. The study protocol has been published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42022340257). Thirty-two studies (3082 patients) were included in the NMA for the primary outcome, complete post-operative spectacle independence. NMA showed monovision to be inferior to bMFIOLs, as bMFIOL was more likely to provide complete spectacle independence (RR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.34 to 3.15, p = 0.002) compared to monovision. Monovision resulted in less glare compared to bMFIOL (RR = 0.343, 95% CI = 0.181 to 0.651, p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between monovision and bMFIOL for binocular unadjusted distance visual acuity (MD = 70.01, 95% CI = -19.88 to 4.60, p = 0.437) and binocular unadjusted near visual acuity (MD = 5.46, 95% CI = -5.24 to 10.94, p = 0.191). When compared to monovision, bMFIOL provided greater complete spectacle independence at the expense of greater glare. This study was limited by data heterogeneity, and further studies with standardized reporting would be useful.

Visual Outcome and Patient Satisfaction with Implantation of Trifocal Intraocular Lens After Radial Keratotomy

Objective

To investigate the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation after radial keratotomy (RK).

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review wherein we studied 14 eyes from 7 patients who had undergone cataract surgery and had trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia's King Fahd University Hospital and Kahhal private centre. Data such as demographic characteristics, the time between RK and cataract removal, intraoperative and postoperative complications, preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and refraction were evaluated. In addition, visual complaints and satisfaction were assessed through a questionnaire.

Results

All eyes included had 8 RK sections. The mean spherical equivalent was +1.81 ± 4.27 D preoperatively and was -0.41 ± 1.2 D at the last follow-up. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) increased from 0.32 ± 0.2 prior to surgery to 0.64 ± 0.2 following surgery. The mean efficacy index was 1.01 and a safety index was 1.26. In the last follow-up, 29% reported having 0.5 spherical equivalents, while 86% were within 1D. Improvement in cylindrical correction was noticed in the last follow-up with 36% not more than 0.5 D and 43% within 1D. In total, 80% of patients had a distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) of better than 20/40. The survey response rate was 100%, and two patients reported a lower degree of satisfaction. Glare and difficulty seeing at night were the most often reported complaints, with a mean of 2.86 ± 1.95 and 22 ± 1.9, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that implantation of a trifocal IOL is safe and effective in patients with previous RK. However, several factors, including the patient's preoperative expectations, glare testing, refractive error, number of cuts, optical zone size, and visual phenomena related to RK, should be considered before implantation.

Clinical Outcomes after Implantation of a Novel Binocular Complementary Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Compared to Bilateral Low Near-Add Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

INTRODUCTION

Nowadays, patients expect to be less spectacle dependent at all distances after cataract surgery. However, all intraocular lens (IOL) models that currently offer this function can also have negative visual effects. Aim of this study was therefore to compare the visual function performance of a novel and a conventional IOL solution for multifocality.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for bilateral cataract surgery were randomized to receive one of two different IOL combinations: either a binocular complementary extended depth-of-focus IOL set or a low near-add MIOL. Patients had visual acuity (VA) assessment at distance, intermediate, and near as well as evaluation of contrast sensitivity, halometry, and reading performance.

RESULTS

In total, 56 eyes of 28 patients were enrolled. At 6 months, there were no statistically significant differences in binocular VA between the ARTIS SYMBIOSE and the AT LARA. Contrast sensitivity, measured binocularly, at 1.5 cycles per degree under photopic conditions without glare was 1.54 logCS with the ARTIS SYMBIOSE and 1.43 logCS with the AT LARA (p = 0.046), under mesopic conditions with glare at 1.5 and 3 cycles per degree 1.31 logCS and 1.28 logCS with the ARTIS SYMBIOSE, respectively, compared to 0.58 logCS and 0.51 logCS with the AT LARA (p = 0.002; p = 0.006). Binocular halos and reading performance between both groups were similar.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences between both groups in VA at different distances, reading ability, or halometry. The contrast sensitivity at low spatial frequencies was better in the ARTIS SYMBIOSE group under photopic conditions without glare as well as mesopic conditions with glare, which could potentially improve quality of vision with these IOLs, especially under mesopic conditions.

Stereopsis Following Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Narrative Review

Recent advancements in cataract surgery have broadened its scope from mere vision restoration to include correction of refractive errors and presbyopia. This evolution has introduced multifocal and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs), allowing enhanced vision across multiple distances. However, the influence of these advanced IOLs on stereopsis remains controversial. Factors influencing stereopsis after surgery include visual acuity, interocular differences, residual astigmatism, and the type of IOL, etc. Binocular vision integration and neuroadaptation further affect stereopsis, especially in cases of presbyopia-correcting IOLs. It is widely acknowledged that bilateral implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs yield superior stereopsis compared to unilateral implantation. However, there remains no consensus on whether binocular implantation of multifocal or monofocal IOLs provides superior stereopsis. Most studies suggest no significant difference in stereopsis between these two types of implants. Among different types of multifocal IOLs, refractive multifocal IOLs may offer better stereopsis than diffractive multifocal IOLs when implanted bilaterally. Emerging EDOF and hybrid multifocal-EDOF IOLs also demonstrate promising postoperative stereopsis. Additionally, a mix-and-match strategy with different types of IOLs implanted in each eye may result in interocular differences in visual acuity at certain distances, potentially affecting stereopsis. Nevertheless, with appropriate selection, most patients can achieve satisfactory postoperative stereopsis. This review synthesizes current literature on the effects of presbyopia-correcting IOLs on postoperative stereopsis recovery following cataract surgery. Studies on stereopsis outcomes with different IOLs have yielded mixed results, urging further investigation for optimized surgical strategies and patient outcomes.

BCLA CLEAR presbyopia: Management with intraocular lenses

Cataract surgery including intraocular lens (IOL) insertion, has been refined extensively since the first such procedure by Sir Harold Ridley in 1949. The intentional creation of monovision with IOLs using monofocal IOL designs has been reported since 1984. The first reported implantation of multifocal IOLs was published in 1987. Since then, various refractive and or diffractive multifocal IOLs have been commercialised. Most are concentric, but segmented IOLs are also available. The most popular are trifocal designs (overlaying two diffractive patterns to achieve additional focal planes at intermediate and near distances) and extended depth of focus designs which leave the patient largely spectacle independent with the reduced risk of bothersome contrast reduction and glare. As well as mini-monovision, surgical strategies to minimise the impact of presbyopia with IOLs includes mixing and matching lenses between the eyes and using IOLs whose power can be adjusted post-implantation. Various IOL designs to mimic the accommodative process have been tried including hinge optics, dual optics, lateral shifts lenses with cubic-type surfaces, lens refilling and curvature changing approaches, but issues in maintaining the active mechanism with post-surgical fibrosis, without causing ocular inflammation, remain a challenge. With careful patient selection, satisfaction rates with IOLs to manage presbyopia are high and anatomical or physiological complications rates are no higher than with monofocal IOLs.

Impact of posterior vitreous detachment on visual acuity after the implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on visual acuity (VA) after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (mIOL).

SETTING

Eye Clinic, Okayama, Japan.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

This study evaluated 475 eyes of 475 patients who underwent cataract surgery with a TECNIS Multifocal ZLB00 lens implant between November 2017 and October 2019. Patient eyes were classified into the complete PVD group (PVD group) or the control group with no PVD/partial PVD (non-PVD group) and divided into 3 age categories: 65 to 69, 70 to 74, and 75 to 79 years. The postoperative VA of the PVD and non-PVD groups was compared between and within groups by age.

RESULTS

Distance-corrected near VA (DCNVA) was significantly worse in the PVD group than in the non-PVD group in all age categories ( P ≤ .029). In the PVD group, both corrected distance VA (CDVA) and DCNVA were significantly worse in the 75 to 79 years age group than in the 65 to 69 and 70 to 74 years age groups ( P ≤ .034). CDVA and DCNVA in the non-PVD group did not differ significantly between age categories.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that complete PVD worsens near VA in eyes with a diffractive mIOL. Furthermore, eyes with complete PVD may show an age-related decline in both CDVA and DCNVA. In particular, eyes ≥75 years of age with complete PVD have a poor visual prognosis and should be given careful consideration when deciding whether to implant a diffractive mIOL.

Characterizing glare effects associated with diffractive optics in presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To objectively quantify glare of intraocular lenses (IOLs) using a diffractive principle to extend the visual range and to identify models with increased susceptibility to inducing glare.

SETTING

David J Apple Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

DESIGN

Laboratory investigation.

METHODS

Glare was assessed by means of a straylight parameter with a standard C-Quant intended for 7 degrees. In addition, 2 C-Quant modifications were used to test lower angles (ie, 2.5 degrees and 3.5 degrees). The following IOL models were assessed: PanOptix, AT Lisa Tri, Synergy, and Triumf, the latter 2 with chromatic aberration correction at distance. Straylight from trifocal IOLs was compared against a monofocal W-60R lens. The C-Quant test was performed through the studied IOLs by using additional optical components attached to their ocular.

RESULTS

Straylight (deg 2 sr -1 ) of the control was <1 at all tested angles, with the trifocal models showing comparable straylight at 7 degrees. At 3.5 degrees, Triumf's straylight increased to 15.5 ± 0.6, followed by Synergy (6.2 ± 1.1), PanOptix (4.1 ± 0.3), and AT Lisa Tri (2.0 ± 0.8). The chromatic aberration-correcting models demonstrated correspondingly higher straylight (Synergy: 18.8 ± 1.3; Triumf: 17.3 ± 0.5) at 2.5 degrees compared with PanOptix (4.3 ± 0.4), AT Lisa Tri (2.1 ± 0.1), and monofocal IOLs yielding minimal or no increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Trifocal IOLs induced increased straylight, but it was limited to lower angles, which may cause difficulties detecting these effects using a standard clinical approach. The latest IOL designs featuring chromatic aberration correction at far focus seem more susceptible than the established trifocal IOLs to inducing a glare phenomenon.

Cataract surgery after corneal refractive surgery: preoperative considerations and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Corneal refractive surgery (CRS) is one of the most popular eye procedures, with more than 40 million cases performed globally. As CRS-treated patients age and develop cataract, the number of cases that require additional preoperative considerations and management will increase around the world. Thus, we provide an up-to-date, concise overview of the considerations and outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes with previous CRS, including surface ablation, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Challenges associated with accurate biometry in eyes with CRS have been mitigated recently through total keratometry, ray tracing, intraoperative aberrometry, and machine learning assisted intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas to improve prediction. Emerging studies have highlighted the superior performance of ray tracing and/or total keratometry-based formulas for IOL power calculation in eyes with previous SMILE. Dry eye remains a common side effect after cataract surgery, especially in eyes with CRS, though the risk appears to be lower after SMILE than LASIK (in the short-term). Recent presbyopia-correcting IOL designs such as extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs may be suitable in carefully selected eyes with previous CRS.

SUMMARY

Ophthalmologists will increasingly face challenges associated with the surgical management of cataract in patients with prior CRS. Careful preoperative assessment of the ocular surface, appropriate use of IOL power calculation formulas, and strategies for presbyopia correction are key to achieve good clinical and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction. Recent advances in CRS techniques, such as SMILE, may pose new challenges for such eyes in the future.

Quality of life assessment for nuclear, cortical, posterior subcapsular patients before and after cataract surgery

PURPOSE

The impact of visual outcomes of cataract surgery can be measured using a questionnaire. The aim of our study was to evaluate how patient quality of life changes after cataract surgery and if there are differences between the responses of patients with nuclear, cortical, and posterior subcapsular cataracts, which has not been studied before.

METHOD

We studied 210 cataract patients who were divided into 3 cataract groups based on their cataract type: nuclear (n = 80), cortical (n = 70), and posterior subcapsular (PSC) (n = 60). The patients completed the Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire before, 2 weeks and 1 month after bilateral cataract surgery. The results were analysed using one-way ANOVA (significance level 5 %) and were compared over time and between the cataract groups.

RESULTS

Before the cataract surgery, cortical cataract patients had the lowest questionnaire score compared to nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract groups (p = 0.08). After cataract surgery, cortical cataract patients experienced the greatest improvement in near distance daily activities, while PSC cataract patients experienced the greatest improvement in far distance daily activities (p = 0.38). Before surgery, nuclear cataract patients had the highest questionnaire scores compared to the other cataract groups (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

At the 1 month follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in questionnaire scores between the cataract groups for any of the questions. Overall, cortical cataract patients showed a trend to experience the greatest subjective improvement in quality of life after cataract removal, followed by nuclear and posterior subcapsular patients.

Effect of presbyopic correction lens on humphrey visual field testing in patients with multifocal intraocular lens

Most previous studies on the effects of multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL) on Humphrey visual field (HVF) used presbyopic corrective lens (PC). There has been insufficient data from patients with MIOL performing HVF with and without PC. This study aimed to determine the effect of PC on HVF testing in patients with MIOL. This was a prospective, comparative crossover study at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University between June 2015 and July 2018. Early-stage glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous pseudophakic patients with 2 models of MIOL completed HVF testing with and without PC. Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and reliability indices (fixation losses, false positives, and false negatives) were compared. Ninety-four eyes of 59 patients were enrolled. After excluding patients with confirmed unreliable visual field, 82 eyes of 51 patients (male, 22; female, 29) with a mean age of 65.4 years were included in the study. Forty-nine eyes were non-glaucoma and 33 eyes were early-stage glaucoma. Forty-four eyes received TECNIS ZM900 and 38 eyes received Acrysof IQ ReSTOR SN6AD1. The overall MD standard deviation was -3.5 (2.1) with PC and -3.1 (2.1) without PC (P = .01). The overall PSD standard deviation was 2.8 (1.5) with PC and 2.7 (1.5) without PC (P = .93). The reliability indices were not statistically significantly different with and without PC. There was a good intraclass correlation (ICC) of MD (ICC = 0.87) and PSD (ICC = 0.88) with and without PC. Eyes with TECNIS ZM 900 had significantly better MD when performing HVF without PC (mean difference -0.7, P < .01), but not with Acrysof IQ ReSTOR SN6AD1 (mean difference -0.1, P = .74). Pseudophakic eyes with MIOL may not require PC during HVF testing regardless of the MIOL model. Although eyes with TECNIS ZM900 performed HVF without PC resulted in a significantly better MD value compared with PC, the difference was not clinically significant.

Comparison of binocular visual quality in six treatment protocols for bilateral cataract surgery with presbyopia correction: a prospective two-center single-blinded cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the postoperative binocular visual quality in six treatment protocols for bilateral age-related cataract surgery with presbyopia correction for clinical decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective two-center single-blinded cohort study, participants from North or South China who underwent bilateral phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were divided into six protocols: monovision, diffractive bifocal, mixed, refractive bifocal, trifocal, and micro-monovision extended range of vision (EROV). Binocular visual quality was evaluated at 3 months postoperatively, including binocular uncorrected full-range visual acuity, binocular defocus curves (depth of focus [DoF] and area under the curve [AUC]), binocular visual function (fusion function and stereopsis), binocular subjective spectacle independence rates, visual analog scale (VAS) of overall satisfaction, 25-item visual function questionnaire (VFQ-25), and binocular dysphotopsia symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 300 enrolled patients, 272 (90.7%; 544 eyes) were analyzed. The trifocal protocol showed excellent binocular full-range visual acuity and the best performance for most DoFs and AUCs. The monovision protocol presented the worst binocular visual quality in most perspectives, especially in convergence, distance, and near stereopsis (p < 0.001). The full-range subjective spectacle independence rates were sorted from highest to lowest as follows: trifocal (84.8%), refractive bifocal (80.9%), EROV (80.0%), mixed (73.3%), diffractive bifocal (65.2%), and monovision (32.6%) protocols, with no statistically significant differences between the former five protocols (p > 0.05). The EROV protocol achieved the highest VAS and VFQ-25 scores. The incidence of postoperative binocular dysphotopsia symptoms was comparable in all protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

The trifocal protocol showed the best performance, and the monovision protocol presented the worst performance in most perspectives of binocular visual quality for presbyopia correction. The refractive bifocal, mixed, or EROV protocols can provide an approximate performance as a trifocal protocol. Ophthalmologists can customize therapies using different protocols.

Distance spectacle-wearing habits in older patients in England

PURPOSE

To report the proportion of older people in England who wear distance spectacles full time, part time and rarely, and to investigate factors that influence how much the distance vision (DV) correction is worn.

METHODS

A two-part questionnaire investigating the spectacle-wearing habits of older people was developed and completed by 322 participants (age 72 years ±7.7, range 60-94). A subcohort of 209 DV correction wearers with a mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of <±4.00DS was selected for a logistic regression to investigate which factors influence how much the DV correction is used.

RESULTS

In total, 43% of emmetropic, and 55% of pseudophakic, DV spectacle wearers wear their correction full time. Lens type, MSE and the age that participants first wore a DV correction significantly predicted DV correction wearing habit (adjusted R2  = 0.36), with lens type being the strongest predicting factor and progressive users wearing their spectacles 37% more than those using single vision lenses.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients appear to consider convenience more important than being spectacle independent at distance, with lens type the most significant influencing factor of how much those with low/moderate refractive error wear their distance correction. Many emmetropes and pseudophakes choose to wear their progressive or bifocal spectacles full time, and the emmetropia provided by cataract surgery does not provide independence from full-time spectacle wear for many patients. The optometrist has a key role in discussing both choice of spectacle lens correction and the refractive outcome options of cataract surgery with patients.

Results of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in the Second Eye of Monofocal Pseudophakic Patients: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the visual results and patient satisfaction after implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) in the second eye of patients implanted previously with a monofocal IOL in the first eye.

METHODS

The medical records and self-reported questionnaires from patients who were implanted with monofocal IOLs in the first eye and EDOF IOLs in the second eye (group A) and from patients implanted bilaterally with EDOF IOLs (group B) were compared for visual acuity (VA), spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, and photic phenomena.

RESULTS

Group A (23 eyes of 23 patients) had similar distance uncorrected VA and intermediate uncorrected VA compared with group B (72 eyes of 36 patients) (0.03±0.05 vs. 0.04±0.16; P =0.136 and 0.660, respectively). There was a tendency toward a better near uncorrected VA in group A compared with group B (0.15±0.14 vs. 0.23±0.17; P =0.074). Patients' perception of their VA was similar between groups. Spectacle independence for distance vision was reported by 16/17 (94.1%) and 35/36 (97.2%) patients ( P =0.543), 13/17 (76.5%) and 32/36 (88.9%) patients ( P =0.252) for intermediate vision, and 4/17 (23.6%) and 22/36 (61.1%) patients for near vision ( P =0.011), in groups A and B, respectively. There was no difference in complaints of photic phenomena between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients previously implanted with a monofocal IOL in 1 eye who are interested in improving their spectacle independence can be considered for an EDOF IOL implantation in the second eye and may have similar results to those implanted bilaterally with EDOF IOLs.

Evaluating Changes in Apparent Chord Mu after Pharmacological Pupil Dilatation

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative measurements of apparent chord mu length above 0.6 mm have been associated with higher risks for photic phenomena after cataract surgery with multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients scheduled for elective cataract surgery at a single tertiary medical center between 2021 and 2022. Pupil diameter and apparent chord mu length were analyzed for eyes with biometry measurements from IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, AG) under photopic light conditions, before and after pharmacological pupil dilatation. Exclusion criteria were visual acuity worse than 20/100, prior intraocular surgery, refractive surgery, iris-related procedures, or pupil abnormalities affecting dilatation. Apparent chord mu lengths before and after pupil dilatation were compared. In addition, multivariate linear regression analysis, using a stepwise method, was conducted to assess possible predictors of apparent chord values.

RESULTS

Included were 87 eyes of 87 patients. Mean chord mu length increased after pupillary dilatation from 0.32 ± 0.17 mm to 0.41 ± 0.17 mm for right eyes (p < 0.001) and from 0.29 ± 0.16 mm to 0.40 ± 0.22 mm for left eyes (p < 0.001). Seven eyes (8.0%) had an apparent chord mu of 0.6 mm and above pre-dilatation. Fourteen eyes (16.1%) with an apparent chord mu under 0.6 mm pre-dilatation had apparent chord mu of 0.6 mm or above post-dilatation.

CONCLUSION

Apparent chord mu length significantly increases after pharmacological pupillary dilatation. Pupil size and dilatation status should always be considered during patient selection for a planned MFIOL using apparent chord mu length as a reference marker.

Ten-year outcomes of pseudophakic mini-monovision correction of hyperopic presbyopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, and spectacle independence after the treatment of hyperopic presbyopia with pseudophakic mini-monovision using standard monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) after bilateral cataract surgery.

SETTING

Private practice in Barcelona, Spain.

DESIGN

Retrospective, noncomparative case series.

METHODS

Patients with hyperopic presbyopia underwent bilateral cataract surgery with pseudophakic mini-monovision using standard monofocal IOLs between 2008 and 2018. Main outcomes analyzed were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near distance visual acuity (UNVA), and rates of spectacle independence at postoperative day 1 (POD1), months 1, 6 and 12, and at 5 and 10 years (Y10) postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 463 patients. Both UDVA and UNVA significantly improved postoperatively ( P < .05). The mean binocular UDVA improved from 0.47 ± 0.3 logMAR preoperatively to 0.096 ± 0.14 at POD1 to 0.16 ± 0.2 at Y10 ( P = .0033). The binocular UNVA was 0.05 logMAR at Y10, whereas in preoperative visits, all patients needed spectacles. The mean UDVA for the dominant eye ≤0.20 logMAR was achieved in 84.29% at the Y10. Self-reported and measured complete spectacle independence for near vision was achieved in 79.61% of patients at POD1 and 71.92% at Y10 postoperatively. For distance, respectively, in 86.29% of patients at POD1 and 78.43% at Y10. The achieved results were stable. No serious events were reported, as well as no photic phenomena.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudophakic mini-monovision in hyperopic presbyopes is a safe, effective, and low-cost approach for the long-term correction of presbyopia. It significantly reduces spectacle dependence and fulfils patients' expectations after bilateral cataract surgery.

Comparison of dynamic defocus curve on cataract patients implanting extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lens

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the dynamic defocus curve on patients post-implantation of the extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) and monofocal intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

A total of 62 age-related cataract patients receiving phacoemulsification with implantation of TECNIS Symfony (ZXR00) or monofocal IOLs were enrolled. The binocular static and dynamic defocus curves with corrected distance visual acuity were evaluated at one month postoperatively.

RESULTS

The ZXR00 group achieved significantly better intermediate (P = 0.044) and near (P = 0.017) visual acuity (VA) than the monofocal group. Two groups had similar uncorrected and corrected distance VA (P > 0.05, respectively). The dynamic defocus curve revealed a smoother decline from 0.0 D to - 2.0 D in the ZXR00 group. Defocused dynamic VA in the ZXR00 group was significantly better (P < 0.05) except at 0.0 D (P = 0.724) and - 0.5 D (P = 0.176). The area under the curve (P = 0.002) and corrected dynamic vision accommodation (P = 0.001) derived from the dynamic defocus curves were better in the ZXR00 group. A positive correlation was observed between defocused dynamic and static VA in both groups (P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that defocused static VA and corrected dynamic vision accommodation were significant influential factors for the defocused dynamic VA from - 1.0 D to - 3.0 D (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The EDOF IOL provided similar distance vision, better intermediate and near vision, and a better overall dynamic defocus curve than the monofocal IOL. The dynamic defocus curve may be comprehensively applied to evaluate the all-distance dynamic visual performance post-cataract surgery.

Clinical outcomes of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is considered a contraindication for the implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, without sufficient corroborating evidence. A Retrospective, case-control study. Nineteen eyes of ten patients with grade 2-5 FECD (study group) and 57 healthy eyes of 57 patients (control group) who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, at the Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, were included. The target refraction was emmetropia for both groups. Two subgroups of IOLs were analyzed separately: extended depth of focus (EDOF), (9 eyes of FECD patients and 27 eyes of control patients) and multifocal IOLs (10 eyes of FECD patients and 30 eyes of control patients). Main outcome measures were visual acuity and refraction 6 weeks after the surgery. Secondary outcomes were patient perceptions of visual acuity, spectacle independence, photic phenomena and satisfaction scores, reported in a self-assessment questionnaire. FECD patients in the EDOF IOL subgroup had inferior uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = 0.007) and better uncorrected near visual acuity (P = 0.001) compared to the controls. They had less spectacle independence for the intermediate range (P = 0.01) and overall (P = 0.006). However, they did not have more photic phenomena. In the multifocal IOL subgroup, no significant differences were found between the FECD and the control group in visual acuity for all ranges and in spectacle independence. FECD patients had more photic phenomena than the controls (P = 0.006), but it did not interfere with daily life activities. There was no difference in post-operative mean spherical equivalent, patient reported visual perception, and general satisfaction between FECD and control patients in both groups. Our results suggest that presbyopia-correcting IOLs can be carefully considered in patients with grade 2-5 FECD, with slightly inferior results compared with healthy eyes.

The evidence of implanting a different intraocular lens in each eye

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the growing body of evidence investigating implanting a different intraocular lens (IOL) in each eye.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many surgeons have turned to the mix-and-match approach of implanting two different types of IOLs with the goal of achieving an improved range of distances. A number of studies have compared different types of mix-and-match IOL approaches, with promising results that seem to show maintenance of excellent vision at all distances, and high levels of spectacle independence.

SUMMARY

The mix-and-match IOL approach appears to be a promising option for patients, maintaining good vision at all distances, especially near and intermediate, which is highly desired by patients. Few studies also showed intriguing secondary endpoints such as decreased unwanted visual phenomena using this method.

Visual and Refractive Efficacy of Panoptix Toric Intraocular Lens in a Clinical Setting

Purpose

Trifocal Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) were developed to provide patients with effective near, intermediate and distance vision, thus minimizing spectacle dependency. Residual astigmatism has previously been shown to impact unaided visual acuity across all distances; therefore, to optimise the expected outcomes, consideration of preoperative corneal astigmatism is essential. The purpose of this study was to provide a real-world, multi-site review of visual and refractive outcomes in eyes undergoing implantation with the Panoptix Trifocal toric IOL platform.

Patients and Methods

This study represents a two-fold approach. Patients who had previously undergone routine cataract removal and IOL insertion with the Panoptix Toric IOL were retrospectively analysed for routine efficacy and safety endpoints ("Retrospective Cohort"). Data was retrieved from the preoperative, surgical and postoperative visits (range 2-6 weeks). A further subset of patients undergoing lens removal and bilateral Panoptix Toric IOL insertion were identified at surgery ("Qualitative Cohort"). These patients underwent additional testing inclusive of quality of vision questionnaire and bilateral defocus curve.

Results

A total of 466 eyes of 254 patients were included in the retrospective cohort. Between 91% and 98% of eyes, respectively, were within 0.50D and 1.00D of target. Mean absolute difference from Spherical Equivalent (SE) target was 0.22 ± 0.24Ds. Following surgery, 94% of eyes demonstrated a refractive astigmatism of 0.50D or less. Further, 61% eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better, increasing to 94% achieving 20/32 or better. Seventy percent of eyes unilaterally achieved N5 unaided and 66.0% achieved N8 or better at intermediate. In the qualitative cohort, no patient described any symptom as significant or requested explant.

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, the PanOptix toric trifocal IOL continues to demonstrate refractive accuracy and good visual performance at all focal distances. This IOL also exhibited good quality of vision, with minimally bothersome visual disturbances or photic phenomena.

Visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of pseudophakic mini-monovision using a new monofocal intraocular lens

Modified monovision-or "mini-monovision"-is an alternative method to multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for treating presbyopia. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the new enhanced monofocal Tecnis Eyhance (ICB00) IOLs with the mini-monovision technique to improve near vision. In this retrospective case series, the medical records of 50 patients (100 eyes) who underwent bilateral cataract surgery were reviewed. Patients were divided into the Emmetropia and Mini-monovision groups based on the postoperative spherical equivalent and residual myopia. The binocular visual acuity for far (4 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) distances, binocular defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, visual symptoms, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction rates were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. The binocular uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, incidence of photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, the binocular uncorrected near visual acuities and spectacle independence rates were significantly better in the Mini-monovision group (p < 0.001). Conclusively, the pseudophakic mini-monovision technique using enhanced monofocal IOLs may be a promising option for presbyopia correction in patients unsuitable for multifocal IOLs.

Vitrectomy Improves Contrast Sensitivity in Multifocal Pseudophakia With Vision Degrading Myodesopsia

PURPOSE

Multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOL) are associated with degradation in contrast sensitivity function (CSF); yet the contribution of vitreous is not known, nor is the benefit of vitrectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized clinical study.

METHODS

A total of 180 eyes of 180 patients (55 MFIOL, 60 monofocal intraocular lenses [MIOL], 65 phakic) with symptomatic vitreous opacities were enrolled. Vitreous structure was assessed with quantitative ultrasonography (QUS). Vision was evaluated with visual acuity and CSF measurements.

RESULTS

Vitreous echodensity was the same in all lens cohorts, yet CSF was worse in MFIOL eyes (P < .001). In 86 patients who elected vitrectomy, there was 68% greater vitreous echodensity and 31% worse CSF than in observation controls (P < .0001 for each). Preoperatively, CSF was 25% worse in MFIOL than in MIOL (P = .014). Postoperatively, vitreous echodensity decreased by 55%, 51%, and 52%, whereas CSF improved by 37% 48% in and 43% in MFIOL, MIOL, and phakic eyes, respectively (P < .0001 for each). NEI Visual Function Questionnaire analyses showed improved visual well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with vision degrading myodesopsia who elected vitrectomy had greater vitreous echodensity and worse CSF than controls, but no other differences in age, sex, or myopia. MFIOL eyes had worse CSF than MIOL and phakic eyes, very possibly due to combined effects of the MFIOL and vitreous opacification. Limited vitrectomy reduced vitreous echodensity and improved CSF in all eyes. All patients with CSF-degrading vitreous opacities benefited from limited vitrectomy, including those with MFIOL. As MFIOL eyes had 37% improvement in CSF, patients with MFIOL and vision degrading myodesopsia merit consideration of vitrectomy.

Cost-Effectiveness of Presbyopia Correction Among Seven Strategies of Bilateral Cataract Surgery Based on a Prospective Single-Blind Two-Center Trial in China

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore a method to rank the cost-effectiveness of presbyopia correction in diverse strategies of bilateral cataract surgery to provide references for healthcare policymakers in rationalizing resource utilization and surgeons in customizing patient management.

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness analysis based on a prospective single-blind two-center clinical trial included seven strategies in bilateral cataract surgery: monofocal, monovision, diffractive bifocal, blended, refractive bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus (EDOF) strategies. The effectiveness according to the objective spectacle independence rate (hereafter "rate", a novel indicator defined as the proportion of patients with binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity all better than 0.1 logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), costs, average cost-effectiveness ratios (ACERs, $/1% rate), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs, $/1% incremental rate) were estimated.

RESULTS

In 194 participants (388 eyes), the trifocal strategy achieved the highest rate [93.10% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83.8-102.35%)]. The refractive bifocal strategy had the minimum ACER [$45.54/1% rate (95% CI 34.57-56.50)], followed by the blended [$59.10/1% rate (95% CI 31.72-86.48)], diffractive bifocal [$69.06/1% rate (95% CI 30.89-107.21)], EDOF [$72.85/1% rate (95% CI 52.02-93.70)], trifocal [$93.01/1% rate (95% CI 83.23-102.79)], monovision [$136.83/1% rate (95% CI - 55.40 to 329.14)], and monofocal [$264.45/1% rate (95% CI - 97.45 to 626.55)] strategies. Compared with the refractive bifocal strategy, the probabilities that the trifocal strategy (ICER $289.74/1% incremental rate) is very cost-effective and cost-effective were 81.7% and 93.2%, respectively, at the wiliness-to-pay threshold of one and three times China's annual disposable income per capita in 2021 per 10% incremental rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost-effectiveness analysis with ACER and ICER according to objective spectacle independence rate is a helpful tool to identify highly cost-effective presbyopia-correcting strategies in cataract surgery for clinical and policy decisions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04265846).

Rethinking presbyopia: results of bilateral refractive lens exchange with trifocal intraocular lenses in 17 603 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of bilateral refractive lens exchange (RLE) with trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) as the surgical treatment of presbyopia.

SETTINGS

Memira AS. Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

DESIGN

Multicentric retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

17 603 consecutive patients submitted to bilateral presbyopic RLE with trifocal IOLs from 2013 to 2019. The main outcomes were manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), uncorrected distance (UDVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), vision gain/loss, safety and efficacy indices, IOL power calculation accuracy and rate of excimer laser enhancements.

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, the mean MRSE was 0.00±0.40 diopters (D), mean binocular UDVA was -0.03±0.09, with 14 470 patients (82.2%) with combined binocular UDVA and UNVA equal or better than 0.00 and Jaeger 3. Approximately 86% (n=30.124) of the eyes were within 0.50D of MRSE. Enhancement surgery was performed in 5810 eyes (16.5%). IOL power calculation refining improved accuracy and reduced enhancements rate from 20% in 2013 to 12% in 2019. Safety and efficacy indices were 0.98±0.11 and 0.85±0.18, respectively. Myopic eyes presented significant higher safety (1.00±0.19) and efficacy indices (0.87±0.19), with p<0.005. Approximately 0.38% (n=130) of the eyes lost two or more lines of CDVA, with cystoid macular oedema (n=53, 40.8%) and posterior capsular opacification (n=35, 26.9%) as the main causes. After proper care, the final incidence of two or more lines of vision loss was 0.08% (28 eyes).

CONCLUSIONS

Presbyopic RLE with trifocal IOL is a safe and effective modality of treatment for patients with presbyopia.

Cases of replacing diffractive bifocal intraocular lens with extended depth of focus intraocular lens due to waxy vision

Purpose

To investigate the postoperative course of patients who explanted a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens (IOL) due to waxy vision and implanted with an extended depth of focus IOL.

Methods

This study evaluated 29 eyes of 25 patients who underwent diffractive bifocal IOL explantation followed by TECNIS Symfony^® implantation because of dissatisfaction due to waxy vision at the Takabatake West Eye Clinic between January 2018 and November 2019. The indication criteria for this surgery were patients with uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0.05 logMAR or better, without eye diseases that may affect visual function, and no dissatisfactions about photic phenomena. We investigated patient demographics, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, subjective symptoms, time to IOL explantation, explanted IOL type, and spectacle independence.

Results

The time to the IOL exchange after the initial IOL implantation was 55.3 ± 50.4 days (range: 14–196 days). The logMAR corrected distance visual acuity before and after IOL exchange were −0.13 ± 0.06 and −0.14 ± 0.06, respectively (p = 0.273). After IOL exchange surgery, the area under log contrast sensitivity function increased significantly from 1.07 ± 0.12 to 1.21 ± 0.12 (p < 0.001), and the waxy vision symptoms improved. The spectacle independence rate at the last visit was 88.0%.

Conclusion

For patients who complain of waxy vision despite good visual acuity after diffractive bifocal IOL implantation, exchange to extended depth of focus IOL was considered one of the useful surgical options.

Diffractive Optic IOL Exchange: Indications and Outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess indications for and outcomes of surgical exchange of diffractive optic multifocal and extended depth of focus IOLs in favor of monofocal IOLs.

SETTING

Private Practice, Los Angeles, CA.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

All cases of diffractive optic IOL exchange between June 2007 and October 2020 for diffractive optic dysphotopsia (DOD) (light induced concentric circles, spider web patterns, etc.), poor visual quality, or night vision symptoms were evaluated retrospectively regarding surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical methods, surgical complications and visual outcomes. Ocular surface disease and ametropia were managed prior to consideration of IOL exchange.

RESULTS

The charts of 64 eyes of 46 patients were included. 53/64 (83%) had DOD, 50/64 (78%) experienced reduced quality of vision and 12/64 (19%) complained of night vision difficulties. 27/64 (42%) of eyes had no ocular comorbidities; 15/64 (23%) of eyes had more than one comorbid condition and 12/64 (19%) were post laser refractive surgery. Laser posterior capsulotomy had been performed in 15/64 (23%) of eyes. There were a variety of inciting diffractive optic IOLs and various monofocal exchange lenses and fixation techniques were used based on symptoms, comorbidities, and status of the posterior capsule. Following IOL exchange all eyes were relieved of DOD and all eyes had improved or unchanged CDVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Diffractive Optic IOLS may induce unsatisfactory visual outcomes. However, in this large series of IOL exchanges, diffractive optic dysphotopsia and reduced visual function can be overcome with exchange for a monofocal IOL, despite comorbidities or an open posterior capsule.

Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Bilateral Sequential Implantation of a Capsular Bag IOL and a Supplementary Sulcus-Fixated Trifocal IOL

PURPOSE

To assess visual and refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral sequential implantation of a primary capsular bag intraocular lens (IOL) and a supplementary sulcus-fixated trifocal IOL.

METHODS

All patients had bilateral implantation of a mono-focal IOL in the capsular bag followed by a supplementary trifocal IOL (Sulcoflex 703F, Rayner Intraocular Lenses Limited) in the sulcus. Patients were evaluated for monocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, binocular uncorrected and corrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, visual symptoms, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction at 1 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty eyes of 20 patients were evaluated. Six months after surgery, mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity was -0.07 ± 0.06 logMAR for distance vision (range: -0.2 to 0.0 logMAR), -0.03 ± 0.17 logMAR for intermediate vision (range: -0.1 to 0.6 logMAR), and 0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR for near vision (range: -0.1 to 0.2 logMAR). All patients reported full spectacle independence after 6 months and no adverse events were reported for any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential implantation of a monofocal IOL in the capsular bag and a supplementary trifocal IOL in the sulcus provides a safe and effective choice for patients who desire spectacle independence after cataract surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):105-111.].

Visual function and subjective perception of vision after bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal IOLs: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To examine monocular and binocular visual function and patient-reported outcomes after implantation of multifocal IOLs (mIOLs) or monofocal IOLs, using a rigorous series of clinical assessments.

SETTING

BMI Southend Hospital, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial.

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomized for bilateral implantation of either a Bi-Flex 677MY mIOL or a Bi-Flex 677AB IOL and were assessed at 3 to 6 months (V1) and 12 to 18 months (V2). Primary outcomes included distance, intermediate, and near logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuities (VAs) and defocus curve profile assessment. Secondary outcomes included reading speed, contrast sensitivity (CS), and the subjective perception of quality of vision.

RESULTS

Forty-seven subjects with monofocal IOL and 43 mIOL subjects completed the study. Uncorrected (mIOL: 0.10 ± 0.09 logMAR; IOL: 0.09 ± 0.11 logMAR) and corrected (mIOL: 0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR; IOL: 0.01 ± 0.07 logMAR) distance VAs were comparable (P > .05). Uncorrected near VA (mIOL: 0.23 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.55 ± 0.20 logMAR, P < .001) and distance-corrected near VA (mIOL: 0.24 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.54 ± 0.17 logMAR, P < .001) were significantly improved with mIOLs. There was no significant difference in distance-corrected intermediate VA (mIOL: 0.38 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.39 ± 0.13 logMAR, P = .431). Defocus curves demonstrated an increased range-of-focus among mIOLs (mIOL: 4.14 ± 1.10 diopter [D]; IOL: 2.57 ± 0.77 D). Pelli-Robson CS was different at V1 (P < .001) but similar by V2 (P = .059). Overall satisfaction was high (>90%) in both groups for distance tasks whereas significantly different for near tasks (mIOL, 18.45 ± 16.53 logUnits; IOL, 55.59 ± 22.52 logUnits).

CONCLUSIONS

Uncorrected near visual acuity was demonstrably better with mIOLs and there was greater subjective satisfaction with quality of near vision. Halos reported by the mIOL group were significant compared with the IOL group but did not show an adverse effect on overall satisfaction.

Visual outcomes and safety of the TECNIS Symfony intraocular lens: results of a pivotal clinical trial

Randomized comparison of the TECNIS Symfony (ZXR00) and the TECNIS 1-piece monofocal (ZCB00) intraocular lenses in cataract surgery demonstrates improved intermediate and near vision with TECNIS Symfony.

To compare the effectiveness and safety of the TECNIS Symfony intraocular lens (IOL; ZXR00) with the TECNIS 1-piece monofocal IOL (ZCB00).

Visual function, spectacle independence, and patients' satisfaction after cataract surgery- a study in the Central Region of Ghana

Background

Reduced visual function is associated with diminished quality of life as well as decreased physical and mental health. Poor visual function related to cataracts is also a risk factor for falls and traffic accidents, which may lead to hospital admissions and limit independence.

Objective

To evaluate patients' satisfaction, visual functions and spectacle independence among patients in the Central Region of Ghana who had cataract surgery in one eye.

Methods

A hospital-based prospective cohort study was carried out on 146 patients booked for cataract surgery: 16 were lost through follow-ups whilst 130 completed the study. Visual functions including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereopsis and colour vision were assessed before and after a month of cataract surgery. Objective and subjective refractions were performed to determine the post-surgery refractive status of the participants. Participants completed the NEI-VFQ 25 questionnaire and the scores obtained were used as a construct of their satisfaction.

Results

The NEI-VFQ 25 questionnaire scores indicated patients' satisfaction was high with an average quality of life score of 77.46. Patients satisfaction was strongly correlated with contrast sensitivity (r=0.653, p<0.001) but moderately correlated with visual acuity (r=-0.554, p<0.001), stereopsis (r=0.490, p<0.001) and colour vision (r=0.466, p<0.001). Contrast sensitivity was a better predictor of patients' satisfaction than visual acuity and stereopsis. Spectacle independence at distance was achieved in only 44.6% of the participants and 5.4% at near. There was a significant (p>0.001) association between spectacle independence and the two types of cataract surgery performed which included Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) and Extracapsular Cataract Extraction (ECCE). Among those who were spectacle independent, 53.4% of them were low vision patients.

Conclusion

Satisfaction of patients after cataract surgery was high but was greatly influenced by visual functions with contrast sensitivity being a better predictor of satisfaction than visual acuity and stereopsis. Spectacle independence after cataract surgery was low at distance and extremely low at near. The type of cataract surgery performed influenced thespectacle independence.

Crossed versus conventional pseudophakic monovision for high myopic eyes: a prospective, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND

Aiming at spectacle independence, conventional pseudophakic monovision has been widely used in myopia patients with bilateral monofocal intraocular lens implantation. However, the crossed monovision, which is to correct the dominant eye for near vision and the non-dominant eye for distant vision, has been mentioned preferable for high myopic cataract patients by some studies. We have conducted this study to compare clinical results to assess the feasibility of conventional and crossed monovision for high myopic pseudophakic patients by comparing patient satisfaction, visual function and spectacle independence.

METHOD

Forty-sixth high myopia patients were divided into two groups: 22 in crossed monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to - 2.00 diopters (D) in the dominant eye and - 0.50D in the non-dominant eye; 24 in conventional monovision group with patients whose refraction targeted to - 0.50D in the dominant eye and - 2.00D in the non-dominant eye. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (BUDVA), binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (BUNVA), binocular corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), binocular corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), contrast visual acuity and stereoacuity were examined at postoperative 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months. Questionnaires were completed by patients 3 months after binocular surgery to evaluate patients' satisfaction and spectacle independence.

RESULTS

The conventional monovision and the crossed monovision group showed no significant differences of mean BUDVA, BUNVA, BCDVA, BCNVA 2 weeks, 1 month or 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the bilateral contrast sensitivity or stereoscopic function between the convention conventional and crossed monovision groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction with near and distant vision, as well as spectacle dependence did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Crossed pseudophakic monovision exhibited similar visual function when compared with conventional monovision technique, which indicates that it is an effective option to improve the visual functionality and quality of life for high myopic patients who considering bilateral cataract surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Institutional Review Board and Ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. The trial registration was submitted in September 2018 and passed on March 18, 2020, and the registration number is: ChiCTR2000030935 .

Multifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in 2020

Ophthalmic surgeons have been overwhelmed by the influx of multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) options in recent years, with close to 100 IOLs on the market in 2020. This practical and technical update on a representative group of established as well as newly launched multifocal IOLs on the market focuses on multifocal IOLs, including extended depth-of-focus lenses. We also describe the optical basis of lens platforms used and thorough preoperative planning to aid decision making. This allows the surgeon the knowledge base to deliver the required relative customized spectacle independence with the least photic phenomenon and loss of contrast possible while achieving high individual patient satisfaction. Data of reviewed IOLs displayed in tabular format include mean monocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), with standard deviations and ranges where available. The range of vision targeted, pupil dependence, toric availability, as well as type of optical platform, are provided as a practical guide to demystify existing terminology on the market that may create interest around a seemingly new design that is actually not novel at all. Halos and glare experienced, levels of patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence achieved also are summarized. A wide range of multifocal IOLs options are available on the market to surgeons. Comprehensive patient selection and examination, combined with knowledge of the most recent options and adequate patient counseling, including neuroadaptation, can avoid dissatisfaction. Many recently available IOLs are awaiting formal results, but the methods by which we label and compare these types of IOLs must also be standardized.

Matching the Patient to the Intraocular Lens: Preoperative Considerations to Optimize Surgical Outcomes

The intraocular lens (IOL) selection process for patients requires a complex and objective assessment of patient-specific ocular characteristics, including the quality and quantity of corneal astigmatism, health of the ocular surface, and other ocular comorbidities. Potential issues that could be considered complications after surgery, including dry eye disease, anterior or epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, Salzmann nodular degeneration, and pterygium, should be addressed proactively. Aspheric IOLs are designed to eliminate the positive spherical aberration added by traditional IOLs to the pseudophakic visual axis. Spherical aberration may be a consideration with patient selection. Patient desire for increased spectacle independence after surgery is one of the main drivers for the development of multifocal IOLs and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs. However, no one single multifocal or EDOF IOL suits all patients' needs. The wide variety of multifocal and EDOF IOLs, their optics, and their respective impact on patient quality of vision have to be understood fully to choose the appropriate IOL for each individual, and surgery has to be customized. Patients who have undergone previous LASIK or who have radial keratotomy and ocular pathologic features, including glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and epiretinal membrane, require specific considerations for IOL selection. Subjectively, patient-centered considerations, including visual goals, lifestyle, personality, profession, and hobbies, are key elements for the surgeon to assess and factor into an IOL recommendation. This holistic approach will help surgeons to achieve optimal surgical outcomes and to meet (and exceed) the high expectations of patients.

Monovision with a Bifocal Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens in Presbyopic Patients: A Prospective, Observational Case Series

PURPOSE

We report the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a bifocal diffractive intraocular lens with monovision.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational case series.

METHODS

Twenty-one subjects underwent cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange with bilateral implantation of the ZMB00 intraocular lens, with the dominant eye and nondominant eye targeted for plano and -1.25 to -1.00 diopters, respectively. Postoperative assessments included visual acuity (VA) at various distances under photopic and mesopic conditions; defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis; and Visual Function Questionnaire-25 and supplementary questionnaire.

RESULTS

Mean binocular uncorrected VA at distance, intermediate (67 cm), and near (30 cm) were -0.03 ± 0.06, 0.12 ± 0.18, and 0.11 ± 0.05, respectively. No eyes lost >1 line of corrected distance VA. Binocular intermediate VA was significantly better in the uncorrected condition (P = .004) whereas binocular distance VA was better in the distance-corrected condition (P = .014). Near VA was similar in both conditions (P > .05). Stereoacuity and contrast sensitivity were within normal limits. All subjects had a composite score of ≥90 for vision-targeted items in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. Halos, glare, and starbursts occurred in 52%, 29%, and 24% of subjects, respectively. All subjects reported a satisfaction score of ≥3.5 of 5 and required no spectacles postoperatively. No intraocular lens exchange was required.

CONCLUSIONS

Monovision with bilateral bifocal multifocal intraocular lens was safe and provided satisfactory vision at various distances, with good stereopsis and contrast sensitivity. Complete spectacle independence and high satisfaction score were achieved. In comparison with bilateral emmetropic bifocal multifocal intraocular lens, it provided better vision at intermediate and at very near distances without inducing more dysphotopsia.

Outcomes in randomised controlled trials of multifocal lenses in cataract surgery: the case for development of a core outcome set

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To describe and summarise the outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery.

METHODS

We identified all randomised controlled trials of multifocal versus monofocal lenses in a Cochrane review (last search date June 2016). We extracted and summarised data on all outcomes reported using the framework of domain, measurement, metric and method of aggregation.

RESULTS

All studies collected data on distance and near visual acuity but there was considerable variation in the measures used and whether these outcomes were unaided or best corrected. Most studies reported final value measurements, rather than change from baseline. Approximately half of the studies reported data as a continuous measure only, one-third reported both continuous and categorical measures and a minority reported categorical measures only. There was little consensus as to cut-points. Although a majority of studies included one or more patient-reported outcome measures, none of the studies reported patient involvement in the choice of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The collection and analysis of data on outcome measures in studies of multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery are complicated. As a result, there is considerable heterogeneity in collection and reporting in the medical literature. This makes it difficult to synthesise such data to provide robust estimates of effect and is a potential source of research waste. Investigators in this field must produce a core outcome set that is informed by patients' views and we propose an initial set of outcomes on which these could be based.

Multifocal intraocular lenses and retinal diseases

Purpose

Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) are often discouraged in patients with or at risk of retinal disorders (including diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and epiretinal membranes), as MIOLs are believed to reduce contrast sensitivity (CS). Concerns with MIOLs have also been raised in individuals with visual field defects, fixation instability or eccentric preferred retinal locations. The aim of this study is to review the influence of MIOL on quality of vision in patients with retinal diseases.

Methods

We reviewed the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies using the following keywords: multifocal intraocular lens, cataract surgery, cataract extraction, lens exchange, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and contrast sensitivity.

Results

Studies evaluating CS in MIOLs present conflicting results: MIOLs either did not influence CS or resulted in worse performance under low-illuminance conditions and higher spatial frequencies when compared to monofocal IOLs. Nevertheless, MIOLs preserved CS levels within the age-matched normal range. Two studies reported that patients with concurrent retinal diseases receiving a MIOL, both unilaterally and bilaterally, reported a significant improvement in visual-related outcomes. Individuals with a monofocal IOL in one eye and a MIOL in the fellow eye reported greater subjective satisfaction with the MIOL.

Conclusion

We were unable to find evidence suggesting that patients with retinal diseases should be advised against MIOLs. Nevertheless, more research is needed to address the aforementioned concerns and to optimize the use of MIOLs in eyes with retinal disease.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00417-020-04603-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction for Trifocal, Extended Depth of Focus and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE

To assess visual outcomes and patient satisfaction for trifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) compared to monofocal IOLs with and without monovision.

METHODS

Consecutive patients underwent bilateral cataract extraction surgery and implantation of either monofocal IOLs, monofocal IOLs using monovision, EDOF IOLs, or trifocal IOLs. Patients with preoperative biometric data, postoperative refraction, and visual acuity who completed a questionnaire regarding satisfaction and side effects were included. Visual outcome, spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, and subjective photic phenomena were assessed.

RESULTS

Each group comprised 50 patients (100 eyes). The mean postoperative uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities (logMAR) were: 0.17 ± 0.14 (Snellen 20/30), not applicable, and not applicable for monofocal; 0.08 ± 0.12 (Snellen 20/24), not applicable, and 0.07 ± 0.12 (Snellen 20/23) for monovision; 0.03 ± 0.08 (Snellen 20/21), 0.08 ± 0.12 (Snellen 20/24), and 0.23 ± 0.17 (Snellen 20/34) for EDOF; 0.07 ± 0.09 (Snellen 20/23), 0.08 ± 0.11 (Snellen 20/24), and 0.02 ± 0.06 (Snellen 20/21) for trifocal. Spectacle independence was reported by 36%, 70%, 74%, and 92% of patients, respectively. Postoperative halos and/or glare were experienced by 2%, 6%, 14%, and 38%, respectively, of which 2%, 0%, 6%, and 10%, respectively, were functionally disturbing. A total of 64%, 72%, 78%, and 76%, respectively, would choose the same IOL again.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction rates were high in all groups. Trifocal IOLs were more effective in improving unaided whole range of vision, but were associated with a higher rate of photic phenomena. The EDOF IOL and monovision provided partial spectacle independence with less photic phenomena. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(7):434-440.].

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared to Monofocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) compared to that of monofocal IOLs from a societal and health care sector perspective.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed that simulated patients who received either multifocal or monofocal IOLs during cataract surgery. Postoperatively, patients could experience spectacle dependence, glare, and haloes. Cost-effectiveness was determined by measuring the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as the incremental cost in dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Treatments with an ICER below the standard willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY were considered cost effective. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate model sensitivity to cost, utilities, and other model inputs.

RESULTS

Multifocal IOLs were associated with a 0.71 QALY increase at an increased cost of $3,415 compared with monofocal IOLs, leading to an ICER of $4,805/QALY from the societal and health care sector perspectives. The cost-effectiveness model was most sensitive to patient age, probability of spectacle dependence with multifocal IOLs and monofocal IOLs, and the disutility of glasses. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found multifocal IOLs to be the cost-effective option compared with monofocal IOLs 99.9% of the time at a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

From a societal and health care perspective, multifocal IOLs would be considered a cost-effective strategy compared to monofocal IOLs for patients who desire a higher chance to be spectacle-free. However, more studies need to be conducted to further evaluate the efficacy of multifocal IOLs.

Personalized aspheric intraocular lens implantation based on corneal spherical aberration: a review

With the evolution of cataract surgery from visual rehabilitation to refractive surgery, aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) are being increasingly used in the field of ophthalmology. This increased use can be attributed to negative or zero spherical aberrations with unique optical designs, which counteract some of the positive spherical aberrations of the cornea. These alterations reduce the total spherical aberration of human eyes and improve the visual acuity in patients with cataract postoperatively. At present, various types of aspheric IOLs are used worldwide. Although the implantation of aspheric IOL is beneficial to the patients who need correction of spherical aberrations, much controversy is still associated with ocular residual spherical aberrations that facilitate the best visual quality for patients postoperatively. In order to provide reference for future clinical work and scientific research, this report reviews the relationship between the ocular residual spherical aberration of human eyes and visual quality.

Disruptive Innovation and Refractive IOLs: How the Game Will Change With Adjustable IOLs

The light-adjustable lens is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved product from an entirely new category of intraocular lenses (IOLs). The 3-piece foldable silicone light-adjustable lens is implanted through a small incision after phacoemulsification. A slit-lamp-based digital light delivery device is used to adjust and then lock-in the IOL power during the first postoperative month. Up to 4.5 diopters (D) of cylindrical or spherical adjustment can be achieved. This should offer significant advantages in difficult IOL power calculation cases, such as postrefractive eyes. In addition to achieving better refractive accuracy, an adjustable IOL will now allow patients to test and elect a different refractive target postoperatively. This paradigm shift will change how cataract patients choose their refractive objectives, and how ophthalmologists will be able to achieve them. For example, adjustable IOLs may increase the popularity of pseudophakic monovision and bilateral same-day sequential surgery. For those electing adjustable IOL, preoperative patient counseling will change and certain pre- and intraoperative technologies, such as intraoperative aberrometry and digital astigmatic axis marking, would become superfluous.

Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens

Purpose

To assess spectacle independence and patient satisfaction with pseudophakic mini-monovision in patients undergoing routine bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of an aspherical aberration-free intraocular lens (Akreos AO, Bausch and Lomb, USA).

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis that included 60 eyes of 30 consecutive patients between 2016 and 2018. The included patients had undergone sequential bilateral routine phacoemulsification after choosing the mini-monovision option. Test for ocular dominance was done using a sighting test. Emmetropia was aimed at in the dominant eye, while in the non-dominant eye the aim was myopia between -1 D and -1.5 D. The main outcome parameters were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and data reported from a questionnaire given to the patients at 3 months postoperative visit.

Results

The study included 60 eyes of 30 consecutive patients. The mean binocular UDVA was 0.09 ± 0.07 logMAR. Twenty-eight patients (93%) had binocular UDVA of 0.2 logMAR or better. The mean binocular uncorrected intermediate distance visual acuity (at 65 cm) was 0.16 ± 0.12 logMAR. Twenty-six patients (87%) had binocular uncorrected intermediate distance visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR or better. The mean binocular UNVA (at 35 cm) was 0.30 ± 0.21 logMAR. Fourteen patients (47%) had binocular UNVA of 0.2 logMAR or better. The patients score in the questionnaire was significantly higher in far and intermediate vision than near vision (p = 0.022). The patients score was significantly higher in day vision than night vision (p = 0.031). The mean overall patient satisfaction was good (9.1 ± 1.54). Twenty-eight patients (93%) reported high spectacle independence for far vision (score 8, 9, or 10).

Conclusion

Pseudophakic mini-monovision shows good results for spectacle independence and high patient satisfaction. It is a safe and inexpensive option after bilateral cataract surgery for correcting distance and intermediate vision. However, it might show lower results with near and night vision which is generally acceptable. Using aberration-free monofocal IOL allows for the residual normal positive corneal aberration that may augment the effect of monovision.

Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual performance of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) for patient selection.

METHODS

This prospective non-comparative case series evaluated fifty-two eyes (26 patients) after bilateral implantation of the Tecnis Symfony IOL. Exclusion criteria were previous ocular surgeries, corneal astigmatism of >1.5 diopter, and ocular pathologies or corneal abnormalities. Uncorrected (UCVA) and distance-corrected (DCVA) visual acuity (VA) in 4 m, 80 cm, 60 cm and 40 cm (logMAR), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (CS) and a questionnaire on subjective quality of vision (QoV) were assessed after 3 months.

RESULTS

UCVA was -0.02 ± 0.071 logMAR at 4 m, 0.01 ± 0.077 logMAR at 80 cm, 0.08 ± 0.187 logMAR at 60 cm and 0.22 ± 0.153 logMAR at 40 cm. Defocus curve testing showed a flat VA range from 0.00 to -1.50 D (-0.05-0.02 logMAR). At near distance from -2.0 to -2.5 D a dip of DCVA was observed (0.14-0.28 logMAR). CS under photopic and mesopic conditions without and with glare was 1.56 logCS, 0.86 logCS, 0.78 logCS, respectively. Spectacle independence was achieved in 100% for distance and intermediate vision and 71% of patients at near distance.

CONCLUSION

This EDOF IOL provides excellent intermediate and far (<0.1 logMAR) and acceptable near UCVA (<0.3 logMAR). Defocus curve testing confirmed an EDOF between far and intermediate distance and showed a dip at near distance. It provides good QoV, CS, high spectacle independence, perception of few optical phenomena, and particularly good night-driving capabilities.

Refractive corneal inlay for presbyopia in emmetropic patients in Asia: 6-month clinical outcomes

Background

To evaluate the 6-month clinical outcomes of Flexivue Microlens refractive corneal inlay in emmetropic patients in Asia for the surgical compensation of presbyopia.

Methods

In this retrospective study, corneal inlay implantation was done using a femtosecond laser. The follow-up period was 6 months. Near/intermediate/distant visual acuities, refraction, keratometry, defocus curve, wavefront aberrations, contrast sensitivity, Scheimpflug corneal scanning, endothelial cell density, dry eye test, confocal microscopy scanning, and patient questionnaires were evaluated.

Results

The inlay implantation was performed in 21 eyes from June 2015 to April 2017. 6 months after surgery, the uncorrected near visual acuity of the operated eyes increased significantly from 0.55 ± 0.22 logMAR preoperatively to 0.25 ± 0.15 logMAR (p < 0.05) but mean bilateral uncorrected distant visual acuity did not change significantly (p = 0.90). Total higher-order aberration and spherical aberration increased, and the contrast sensitivity of the operated eyes decreased. Endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness did not change from preoperative values. Patient satisfaction for near vision was increased 6 months after implantation, and 50.0% of patients were independent of near spectacles. Explantation was done in 2 cases.

Conclusion

The Flexivue Microlens refractive corneal inlay was effective for improving near visual acuity at 6 months follow-up But proportion of spectacle independency and patient satisfaction were lower in this Korean population than in previous reports. Further study with a longer follow-up period is needed.

Binocular Visual Function With Staged Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses With Three Add Powers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the binocular visual function and depth of focus after staged implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) with 3 different add powers following cataract removal.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative case series.

METHODS

Setting: Institutional.

STUDY POPULATION

Both eyes of 56 patients that underwent staged implantation of bifocal IOLs.

INTERVENTION

In the first eye, MIOLs with a +4.0-diopter (D) add power were implanted. Based on outcomes at 1 week postoperatively and patient preference for near vision, 1 of 3 near add powers-+4.0 D (group MM), +3.25 D (group ML), or +2.75 D (group MK)-was implanted in the fellow eye.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Three months postoperatively, the binocular uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuities (BUCVA and BDCVA, respectively) at 5.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.4, and 0.3 meters; binocular defocus curves; contrast sensitivity; and near stereopsis were measured.

RESULTS

The MM, ML, and MK groups included 21, 18, and 17 patients, respectively. The mean BUCVA in the MM group was significantly (P = .003) worse than that in the MK group at 0.5 meter. The BDCVAs at 0.5 meter in the ML and MK groups were significantly (P < .02) better than that in the MM group. The defocus curves with the -2.0 D refraction differed significantly (P < .001) between the MM and MK groups. The binocular contrast sensitivity and stereopsis values did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Staged implantation of different add powers obtained better binocular intermediate visual acuity without degradation of visual function.

Methods for evaluating quality of life and vision in patients undergoing lens refractive surgery

PURPOSE

Cataract surgery has evolved into a procedure that generally yields the best postoperative refractive result attainable. Patients with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) present higher rates of spectacle independence, although reduced intermediate vision, dysphotopsias, and a loss of image quality might also be experienced. The aim of the study was to review the methods for assessing quality of life and vision in patients undergoing lens refractive surgery in randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We reviewed the PubMed web platform to identify relevant studies using the following keywords: quality of life, quality of vision, lens surgery, lens exchange, refractive lens exchange, cataract, cataract surgery, intraocular lens, IOL, multifocal, and monovision.

RESULTS

An increasing number of studies have focused on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Only a few of the available visual function questionnaires can be regarded as useful in lens refractive surgery with multifocal IOL implantation. Many self-developed questionnaires have emerged that have not been adequately validated or found to feature properly evaluated repeatability, hampering the possibility of comparing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review describes the existing PROs instruments and informs the choice of an appropriate measure in lens refractive surgery. Rasch-developed tools should be utilized for measuring quality of life and vision in patients undergoing lens refractive surgery and there is a number of highly robust tools available.