Adalimumab for Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis: Immunogenicity and Clinical Relevance of Measuring Serum Drug Levels and Antidrug Antibodies

Risk factors for development of anti-adalimumab antibodies in non-infectious uveitis

Purpose

To evaluate risk factors associated with development of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) in patients with non-infectious uveitis treated with adalimumab.

Methods

A retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control study was done evaluating patients with non-infectious uveitis treated with adalimumab for at least 12 months and have undergone testing for AAA levels. Demographics, clinical characteristics, grading of ocular inflammation, and previous and concomitant immunomodulatory therapy were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were done to estimate odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals for the various risk factors.

Results

A total of 31 patients were included in the analysis, in which 12 patients who tested positive (Group 1) were matched with 19 patients who tested negative for AAA (Group 2). The groups differed significantly in terms of sex (female) (91.7% vs 52.6%, p = 0.046), presence of systemic disease (91.7% vs 42.1%, p = 0.008), and presence of anterior chamber inflammation at baseline (100% vs 63.2%, p = 0.026). A history of interruption in anti-TNF therapy prior to starting or restarting adalimumab was found to have an increased odds for development of AAA (OR 16.89 [2.92, 107.11], p = 0.008), as well as flare-ups (reactivation of disease) during adalimumab therapy (OR 6.77 [1.80, 61.80], p = 0.027). Weekly dosing of adalimumab was shown to decrease odds of AAA development (OR 0.34 [0.02, 0.70], p = 0.040), while concomitant anti-metabolite therapy was not shown to be a statistically significant protective factor (OR 2.22 [0.50, 9.96], p = 0.148).

Conclusions

History of interruption in anti-TNF therapy and flare during adalimumab were associated with development of AAA, while weekly dosing of adalimumab was protective against AAA. Identification of those with higher risk of developing AAA may guide in clinical decision making to optimize management for these patients.

Adalimumab for the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Real Life Experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis (NIU) in four Uveitis Units from tertiary Spanish hospitals.

METHODS

Multicenter and retrospective clinical cohort study including all patients with NIU treated with adalimumab from January 2012 to October 2022 in four uveitis units was performed. Efficacy was measured with the number of relapses, ocular inflammation and reduction in immunosuppression and corticosteroid dosage before and after adalimumab use. We collected data regarding adverse effects and examined the immunogenicity of adalimumab.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients (59% females), with a mean age of 48.6 years (SD = 14.8) accounting for 217 eyes were included. The majority (92.6%) were Caucasian. Uveitis analyzed were predominantly panuveitis (34.7%), bilateral (77.9%), acute (41.5%), and non-granulomatous (90%). Most of them were immune mediated (42.6%), and the main reason to initiate adalimumab was refractory disease (96.7%). The analysis was statistically significant due to the reduction in the number of immunosuppressive drugs as well as the dose of oral corticosteroids and the number of relapses during follow-up (p < 0.001). The decrease in ocular inflammation parameters and the improvement in visual acuity (p < 0.05) were also significant. There were no deaths due to the drug and only one reported case of serious infection. In total, 10.9% of 73 patients tested developed anti-adalimumab antibodies and 4.1% lupus-like.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider adalimumab as a leading drug in the treatment of NIU with high safety and efficacy.

Adalimumab Dose Reduction and Withdrawal in Stable Non-Infectious Pediatric Uveitis: An Open-Label, Prospective, Pilot Study

PURPOSES

This study investigated the feasibility of adalimumab (ADA) dose reduction and withdrawal strategy in children with stable pediatric non-infectious uveitis (PNIU).

METHODS

This open-label prospective pilot trial recruited 18 stable PNIU patients (33 eyes) between two and eighteen years old who were treated with standard doses of ADA (20/40 mg every 2 weeks) plus oral methotrexate. The interval of ADA injection was extended to 4 weeks and followed up for 24 weeks. If the uveitis remained stable, ADA was discontinued and followed up for another 24 weeks. ADA was considered successfully stopped if no relapse occurred during this period. The relapse-free survival rate, best corrected visual acuity (BVCA), anterior chamber cell (ACC), vitritis, macular thickness (MT), and serum ADA levels were evaluated. Approval Number: 2021KYPJ201. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05155592.

RESULTS

The relapse-free survival rate was 22.2% (4/18) at 48 weeks. 33.3% (6/18) of patients relapsed when ADA was given every 4 weeks, while 44.5% of patients (8/18) relapsed after ADA was stopped. The four patients successfully withdrawn from ADA were all diagnosed with BD. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in BCVA and MT between baseline and final follow-up. The proportion of ACC and vitritis exhibited an upward trend (p < 0.05) during follow-up. Serum ADA gradually decreased to zero during follow-up in both non-recurrence and recurrence groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In PNIU children who reached remission for 6 months, ADA dose reduction and withdrawal were associated with a high risk of inflammation recurrence. Timely adjustment of ADA to the last effective dosage frequency can regain control of the inflammation. Detection of ADA serum levels in patients with recurrence may help find the appropriate interval of ADA use.

Efficacy, retention rate and safety of adalimumab treatment in patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis: a real-world, retrospective, single-centre study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of adalimumab (ADA) treatment of patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis, focusing on efficacy, retention rate, and safety.

METHODS

This retrospective, clinical cohort study included 62 patients (104 eyes) with active ocular inflammation treated with ADA. Primary outcomes were efficacy and cumulative drug retention rate (DRR) of ADA. The secondary outcomes included changes in ocular inflammatory parameters, changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT), corticosteroid-sparing effect, impact of concomitant use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and ADA as first or ≥2nd biotherapy line on DRR, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (72.6%) achieved inactive disease at the end of follow-up. DRR at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months was 96.8%, 89.2%, 63.1%, and 63.1%, respectively. Of the 18 patients whose bi-weekly ADA treatment was escalated to weekly ADA due to primary or secondary inefficacy, 10 patients had inactive disease finally. BCVA improved (p < 0.001) and CMT decreased (p < 0.001) significantly at 6, 12, and 24 months after ADA therapy compared to baseline. Percentage of patients treated with ≥10 mg/day corticosteroid (61.3% vs. 6.4%) and DMARDs combined with ADA (46.8% vs. 37.1%) were lower at 6 months than at baseline. Concomitant DMARDs (p = 0.579) and use of ADA as first or ≥2nd biotherapy line (p = 0.527) had no significant effect on DRR. Most common adverse event was tuberculosis-related infections.

CONCLUSIONS

ADA seems to be effective and safe with good DRR to control ocular inflammation. Escalation to weekly ADA treatment may be an effective option in patients with primary or secondary inefficacy.

Defining a therapeutic range for adalimumab serum concentrations in the management of pediatric noninfectious uveitis, a step towards personalized treatment

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is currently considered the most efficacious anti-TNFα agent for childhood noninfectious uveitis (NIU). The objective of this study was to define a therapeutic range for adalimumab trough levels in the treatment of childhood NIU.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, pilot study of 36 children with NIU aged < 18 years, treated with adalimumab. Serum adalimumab through levels and adalimumab anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were analysed at least 24 weeks after start adalimumab.

RESULTS

Adalimumab trough levels were significantly higher in complete responders 11.8 μg/mL (range 6.9-33.0) compared to partial or non-responders 9,2 μg/mL (range 0-13.6) (p = 0,004). Receiver-operator characteristics analyses with an area under the curve of 0,749 (95% CI, 0,561-0,937) defined 9.6 µg/mL as the lower margin for the therapeutic range. This cut-off corresponds with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 56% (positive predictive value, 85%; negative predictive value, 62.5%). A concentration effect curve defined 13 µg/mL as the upper margin. Approximately one-third (30.5%) of patients had an adalimumab trough concentration exceeding 13 µg/mL. Free ADA were observed in 2 patients (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A therapeutic range of adalimumab trough levels of 9.6 to 13 µg/mL, which corresponds with an optimal clinical effect, was identified. Therapeutic drug monitoring may guide the optimisation of treatment efficacy in children with NIU in the treat-to-target era.

Immunogenicity of Adalimumab in Patients with Non-Infectious- Uveitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for developing anti-drug antibodies (AAA) in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU) treated with Adalimumab (ADA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane, and medRxiv. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects.

RESULTS

Nine out of 2,373 studies were included. The prevalence of AAA in NIU patients treated with ADA was 9% (95% CI: 2% to 37%, I2 = 95% with a P<0.01), it was significantly higher in real-life scenarios (observational studies) than in clinical trials. The pooled incidence at 12 months was 27% (CI 95% 16%-42% I2 = 0%). Several factors have been associated with AAA generation in NIU patients, including the non-use of concomitant immunosuppressants, presence of autoimmune systemic disease, female gender, etc.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that AAA prevalence is higher in real-life scenarios compared to clinical trials. Further research is needed to elucidate the factors that trigger AAA generation in NIU patients.

Perspectives of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biological Agents in Non-Infectious Uveitis Treatment: A Review

Biological drugs, especially those targeting anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) molecule, have revolutionized the treatment of patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU), a sight-threatening condition characterized by ocular inflammation that can lead to severe vision threatening and blindness. Adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX), the most widely used anti-TNFα drugs, have led to greater clinical benefits, but a significant fraction of patients with NIU do not respond to these drugs. The therapeutic outcome is closely related to systemic drug levels, which are influenced by several factors such as immunogenicity, concomitant treatment with immunomodulators, and genetic factors. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug and anti-drug antibody (ADAbs) levels is emerging as a resource to optimise biologic therapy by personalising treatment to bring and maintain drug concentration within the therapeutic range, especially in those patients where a clinical response is less than expected. Furthermore, some studies have described different genetic polymorphisms that may act as predictors of response to treatment with anti-TNFα agents in immune-mediated diseases and could be useful in personalising biologic treatment selection. This review is a compilation of the published evidence in NIU and in other immune-mediated diseases that support the usefulness of TDM and pharmacogenetics as a tool to guide clinicians’ treatment decisions leading to better clinical outcomes. In addition, findings from preclinical and clinical studies, assessing the safety and efficacy of intravitreal administration of anti-TNFα agents in NIU are discussed.

Antidrug Antibodies to Tumor Necrosis Factor α Inhibitors in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis

Importance

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) can induce antidrug antibody (ADA) formation and loss of therapeutic response. However, the utility of ADA testing and the association between ADAs and treatment response in patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is not well understood.

Objective

To assess the frequency of ADAs and their association with drug levels and clinical response in patients with NIU treated with adalimumab or infliximab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with NIU who received adalimumab or infliximab and underwent testing for serum drug level and ADAs at the National Eye Institute from September 2017 to July 2021.

Exposures

Serum drug level testing with reflex testing for ADA levels was performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was the association between drug levels and ADAs, clinical response, and concurrent antimetabolite use in patients treated with TNFis for NIU.

Results

Of 54 patients included in the study, 42 received adalimumab (mean [SD] age, 43.6 [19.6] years; 25 [59.5%] female) and 12 received infliximab (mean [SD] age, 42.7 [20.4] years; 7 [58.3%] male). In the adalimumab group, mean (SD) drug level was 9.72 (6.82) μg/mL, mean (SD) ADA level was 84.2 (172.9) arbitrary units/mL, and ADA frequency was 35.7% (15 of 42 patients). Mean drug level was lower in those with ADAs compared with those without ADAs (mean [SD], 2.8 [2.6] μg/mL vs 13.6 [5.2] μg/mL; difference: 10.8 μg/mL; 95% CI, 8.3-13.2 μg/mL; P < .001). There was a higher mean drug level with concurrent antimetabolite use compared with monotherapy (mean [SD], 11.0 [7.3] μg/mL vs 6.8 [4.5] μg/mL; difference: -4.2 μg/mL; 95% CI, -8.7 to 0.2 μg/mL; P = .06). Multivariable modeling showed that a 1-arbitrary unit increase in ADAs was associated with a -0.02 μg/mL (95% CI, -0.01 to -0.34 μg/mL) difference in mean drug level (P < .001). Favorable clinical response was associated with a threshold drug level above 2.7 μg/mL or an antibody level below 15.2 μg/mL. The mean (SD) drug level in the infliximab group was 27.02 (18.15) μg/mL, and no ADAs were detected.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, 35.7% of adalimumab-treated patients with NIU had ADAs. The presence of ADAs was associated with lower drug levels, and higher ADA levels were associated with increased risk of TNFi treatment failure. Although limited by the retrospective design, our results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered among patients experiencing therapy failure to help exclude ADAs as a potential cause of treatment failure.

Anti-adalimumab Antibodies in Patients with Non-infectious Ocular Inflammatory Disease: A Case Series

PURPOSE

To report the clinical course of patients with ocular inflammatory disease treated with adalimumab in whom anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) were detected.

METHODS

Single center case series.

RESULTS

Eight patients with initial response to adalimumab developed a disease flare associated with positive AAA testing after 5 to 76 months of therapy. Six patients were receiving no concurrent antimetabolite therapy at the time of AAA diagnosis and four had a temporary lapse in adalimumab therapy prior to AAA discovery. AAA resulted in undetectable drug levels in five of the seven patients for whom data were available, and adalimumab was discontinued in six of the eight patients. Of two patients continued on adalimumab, one maintained detectable serum adalimumab despite AAA and one had a low AAA titer.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients receiving adalimumab for ocular inflammatory disease, a disease flare in the setting of previously well-controlled disease should prompt consideration of AAA testing.

Anti-infliximab antibodies and clinical response in noninfectious uveitis and scleritis patients treated with infliximab: A retrospective review

Purpose

To investigate the clinical response to infliximab in ocular inflammation patients who develop anti-infliximab antibodies (AIA) vs. those patients who do not develop AIA.

Observations

A retrospective review was performed of patients treated with infliximab for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) or scleritis. Clinical response was determined as a composite clinical endpoint and classified as complete, partial, or absent. Nine of 32 infliximab-treated patients (28%) were found to develop AIA. Among the AIA-positive patients, clinical response was complete in 7 patients (78%) and partial in 2 patients (22%). Among the AIA-negative patients, clinical response was complete in 15 patients (65%), partial in 6 patients (26%) and absent in 2 patients (9%). Serum infliximab levels tended to decrease with appearance of AIA but rarely became undetectable.

Conclusions and Importance

In this pilot study, AIA-positive patients did not have diminished clinical response to infliximab when compared with AIA-negative patients. There was a high rate of complete clinical response to infliximab in this group of NIU and scleritis patients. Approximately a quarter of patients developed AIA. AIA-positive patients did not have diminished rates of clinical response when compared with AIA-negative patients. This suggests that routine AIA monitoring may not be clinically useful, although validation of this finding in larger cohorts is necessary.

Long-Term Follow-up of Patients With Uveitis Treated With Adalimumab: Response Rates and Reasons for Discontinuation of Therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation including the side effect profiles of adalimumab in a real-world setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

METHODS

A medical chart review of clinical practice in 2 tertiary eye care services in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, was performed Data were collected from May 1, 2004, through September 1, 2020. Patients with noninfectious uveitis treated with adalimumab (n = 341; 633 affected eyes) were included. The primary outcome was the effectiveness of adalimumab, measured by the number of patients achieving inactive disease, remission, and relapse-free survival. The secondary outcomes were the reasons for discontinuation, including side effects, and the number of patients who developed antibodies.

RESULTS

In total, 341 patients were treated with adalimumab between May 2004 and September 2020. The uveitis recurrence-free survival interval was 3.4 years (range, 0-13 years). Adalimumab had an acceptable side effect profile. A total of 178 patients achieved inactive disease while continuing adalimumab, and 51 patients maintained remission after discontinuing adalimumab. Reasons for discontinuation of adalimumab were no response, relapse, or reasons unrelated to the effectiveness of treatment. Adalimumab antibodies were present in 40 of 115 patients (35%). Antibodies were associated with lower adalimumab levels, and antibodies were observed more often in patients on adalimumab monotherapy (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab is effective for patients with noninfectious uveitis, with an acceptable side effect profile. Although relapses can occur, the majority of the patients achieved inactive disease or remission after cessation of adalimumab, without other systemic immunosuppressive medication.

Clinical Characteristics and Efficacy of Adalimumab and Low-Dose Methotrexate Combination Therapy in Patients With Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease

This retrospective study investigated the clinical characteristics and efficacy of adalimumab and low-dose methotrexate combination therapy in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease who were treated at Hiroshima University from February 2012 to May 2021. The patients' demographics, clinical features at administration of immunosuppressive therapy, steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy, side effects, and relapses were recorded. The efficacies of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy (methotrexate, cyclosporine A, adalimumab, and adalimumab and methotrexate combination therapy) were analyzed. Among 62 patients, the median age at diagnosis was 47 years and the median duration of uveitis was 51 months. Systemic corticosteroid therapy was administered to 93.5% of patients (n = 58). Thirty-four patients (54.8%) were treated with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy. Methotrexate and cyclosporine A were administered to 12 and 22 patients, respectively; relapse occurred in 50.0% and 22.7% of the patients, respectively. Discontinuation of cyclosporine A was required in 63.6% of patients because of side effects. Adalimumab was administered to 14 patients. Recurrence occurred in 11 patients, requiring methotrexate concomitantly. The mean dose of methotrexate at inflammatory quiescence after side effect-related dose decrease was 8.0 mg/week (0.13 mg/kg). The median duration of combination therapy without recurrence was 20 months. There were no serious adverse events during adalimumab therapy. A high relapse rate was observed in patients receiving methotrexate; a high rate of side effects requiring discontinuation was observed in patients receiving Cyclosporine A. Patients with late-stage Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease may achieve better control with adalimumab and methotrexate combination therapy.

HLA-B27 assoziierte anteriore Uveitis: Herausforderung für eine interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit

Die akute anteriore Uveitis (AAU) ist die häufigste Form intraokularer Entzündungen, die v. a. Personen im erwerbsfähigen Alter betrifft und mit erheblichen sozioökonomischen Auswirkungen verbunden ist. Etwa die Hälfte der AAU-Patienten sind HLA-B27 positiv und teilen ein hohes Risiko zu HLA-B27-assoziierten Erkrankungen, insbesondere zur Spondyloarthritis (SpA). Sowohl die SpA als auch die AAU sind komplexe entzündliche Erkrankungen, deren genaue Pathogenese unbekannt ist. Da bei bis zu 40% der AAU-Patienten eine nicht diagnostizierte SpA vorliegt, bietet die AAU die Möglichkeit einer frühzeitigen Erkennung der zugrundeliegenden rheumatologischen Erkrankung. Die klinische Präsentation der AAU bei SpA weist eine Reihe typischer Augenbefunde auf, die diagnostisch wegweisend sind und auf eine systemische Grunderkrankung hindeuten können. Daher ist eine abgestimmte Überweisungsstrategie zur zügigen Diagnostik und Behandlung notwendig. Dieser Beitrag fokussiert daher auf die interdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit und bietet gleichzeitig Hinweise für die differentialdiagnostische Abklärung.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressant Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To analyze efficacy and safety of immunosuppressant therapy for noninfectious uveitis.

Methods

A network search of PubMed, ResearchGate, and EMBASE databases was conducted for relative literature and studies from the inception of each database to April 2021. Primary outcomes were efficacy and time to treatment failure of immunosuppressant for noninfectious uveitis. Secondary outcome was incidence of adverse events (AEs). Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk of bias of included studies. Fixed effects model or random effects model was implemented to assess statistical heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was employed to analyze heterogeneous sources.

Results

Eight studies were deemed eligible for inclusion with a total of 848 patients. Six studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among them, a single-blind RCT had relatively high measurement bias and performance bias. Immunosuppressant presented favorable efficacy for noninfectious uveitis than placebo, and RR was 1.43 (95% CI: 1.12-1.82). Immunosuppressant for noninfectious uveitis prolonged the time before failure, and HR was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.54). AEs increased after immunosuppressant was applied. Compared with immunosuppressant, RR of AEs with placebo was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-1.08).

Conclusion

Immunosuppressant contributed to controlling progression of noninfectious uveitis to some extent. Compared with placebo, it increased incidence of AEs. More studies with low heterogeneity are warranted for stronger evidence in clinical.

Pediatric uveitis: A comprehensive review

Pediatric uveitis accounts for 5-10% of all uveitis. Uveitis in children differs from adult uveitis in that it is commonly asymptomatic and can become chronic and cause damage to ocular structures. The diagnosis might be delayed for multiple reasons, including the preverbal age and difficulties in examining young children. Pediatric uveitis may be infectious or noninfectious in etiology. The etiology of noninfectious uveitis is presumed to be autoimmune or autoinflammatory. The most common causes of uveitis in this age group are idiopathic and juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. The stepladder approach for the treatment of pediatric uveitis is based on expert opinion and algorithms proposed by multidisciplinary panels. Uveitis morbidities in pediatric patients include cataract, glaucoma, and amblyopia. Pediatric patients with uveitis should be frequently examined until remission is achieved. Once in remission, the interval between follow-up visits can be extended; however, it is recommended that even after remission the child should be seen every 8-12 weeks depending on the history of uveitis and the medications used. Close follow up is also necessary as uveitis can flare up during immunomodulatory therapy. It is crucial to measure the impact of uveitis, its treatment, and its complications on the child and the child's family. Visual acuity can be considered as an acceptable criterion for assessing visual function. Additionally, the number of cells in the anterior chamber can be a measure of disease activity. We review different aspects of pediatric uveitis. We discuss the mechanisms of noninfectious uveitis, including autoimmune and autoinflammatory etiologies, and the risks of developing uveitis in children with systemic rheumatologic diseases. We address the risk factors for developing morbidities, the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) criteria for timing and anatomical classifications, and describe a stepladder approach in the treatment of pediatric uveitis based on expert opinion and algorithms proposed by multi-disciplinary panels. In this review article, We describe the most common entities for each type of anatomical classification and complications of uveitis for the pediatric population. Additionally, we address monitoring of children with uveitis and evaluation of Quality of Life.

Therapeutic drug monitoring guides the management of patients with chronic non-infectious uveitis treated with adalimumab: a retrospective study

AIM

To assess the relevance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of adalimumab (ADA) treatment for the control of intraocular inflammation and treatment adjustment in chronic non-infectious uveitis (CNIU).

METHODS

Retrospective study of CNIU patients treated with ADA and for whom at least one dosage of serum ADA level and an antibodies against ADA (AAA) serology were performed, between June 2003 and July 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 44 ADA-treated patients benefited from a TDM. A total of 48/79 (61%) TDM were performed in responders, 11/79 (14%) in primary non-responders, and 20/79 (25%) in secondary non-responders. Responders had significantly higher ADA levels than non-responders (p=0.0004). AAA were detectable in six patients, they were primary non-responders (n=2), secondary non-responders (n=3) or responders (n=1). In the five non-responders and immunised patients, ADA was switched (to golimumab or methotrexate). Among non-responders, TDM led to an increased frequency of injections 12/31 (38%), increased dose 1/31 (3%) and switch of treatment 10/31 (32%) (one missing data). No modification of biotherapy was performed 7/31 (22%) and only local or oral corticotherapy was adjusted. In 24/31 cases of therapeutic adjustment in non-responders, an improvement was observed in 87% of cases. Among responders for whom the ADA level was above the efficacy threshold, the frequency of injections was decreased for 15/31 (48.4%) cases and no relapse was observed in 12/15 (80%) cases.

CONCLUSION

TDM of ADA treatment proved relevant to provide CNIU patients with a personalised and optimised treatment course (in terms of frequency and type of drug).

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab Therapy for the Treatment of Non-infectious Uveitis: Efficacy comparison among Uveitis Aetiologies

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab treatment in patients with Non-infectious uveitis.Methods: This was a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with active Non-infectious uveitis who had received adalimumab in Japan. Outcome variables included change in systemic immunosuppressive treatment, intraocular inflammation, visual acuity, and relapse rate.Results: In total, 48 patients were included. After the initiation of adalimumab, more than 80% of the patients received systemic corticosteroid ≤5 mg from 3 months onwards. Intraocular inflammation, relapse rate, and visual acuity showed persistent improvement. Adalimumab and methotrexate combination therapy was required in 71.4% of the patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease/sympathetic ophthalmia, whereas it was required in only 18.0% of the patients with Behçet's disease. There were no serious side effects that required discontinuation of adalimumab.Conclusion: Adalimumab is efficacious and safe for the treatment of patients with Non-infectious uveitis. Differences in the efficacy of adalimumab treatment may exist between patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease/sympathetic ophthalmia and patients with Behçet's disease.

Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis

ABSTRACT

The management of noninfectious uveitis is constantly evolving. A new "biologic era" in treatment began after the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking drugs was demonstrated in rheumatologic inflammatory diseases. The goal of specific immunomodulation with a biologic drug is to target inflammation at the molecular level with a low rate of serious adverse events. The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge of biologic drugs in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis by describing clinical studies and recent pharmacological developments.

Biotherapies in Uveitis

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) represents one of the leading causes of blindness in developed countries. The therapeutic strategy aims to rapidly control intra-ocular inflammation, prevent irremediable ocular damage, allow corticosteroid sparing and save the vision, and has evolved over the last few years. Anterior NIU is mostly managed with topical treatment in adults. However, for intermediate, posterior and pan-uveitis, notably when both eyes are involved, systemic treatment is usually warranted. Biotherapies are recommended in case of inefficacy or non-tolerance of conventional immunosuppressive drugs in non-anterior NIU. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents are by far the most widely used, especially adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX). In case of sight-threatening uveitis in Behçet's disease or in case of risk of severe recurrences, respectively IFX and ADA may be recommended as first-line therapy. Many questions are left unanswered; how long to treat NIU, how to discontinue anti-TNF-α agents, what biologic to use in case of anti-TNF-α failure? The objective of this review is to present an updated overview of knowledge on the use of biological treatments in NIU.

Adalimumab in Elderly Patients with Non-Infectious Uveitis. Safety and Efficacy

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in elderly patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

An observational, retrospective, multicenter study was done. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), inflammatory activity parameters, central retinal thickness (CRT), and the occurrence of adverse events (AE) developed during follow-up were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 82 eyes from 41 patients 60 years of age and older with noninfectious uveitis treated with adalimumab were included. A significant improvement in BCVA (71.5 to 75.4 letters, p = .001) and in CRT (311.1 μm to 265 μm, p = .001) was observed. Moreover, a significant decrease from baseline in the rate of patients with anterior chamber cell (ACC) >0+ (34.6% to 5.7%, p = <0.001) or vitreous haze>0+ (21.3% to 4.3%, p = .002) was determined. AEs were observed in 11 patients (26.8%).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab can be safe and efficacious for the treatment of NIU in patients 60 years of age and older.

Escalation to Weekly Adalimumab for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation

Purpose: To report the outcomes of the escalation of adalimumab (ADA) dose for refractory ocular inflammatory diseases.Methods: A retrospective case series of 15 patients (29 eyes) diagnosed with ocular inflammatory disease, including uveitis and scleritis, which was not adequately controlled with standard, every other week ADA dosing, leading to an escalation to weekly dosing.Results: Ten of fifteen patients escalated to weekly ADA achieved control of their inflammation; neither of the two patients increased for control of cystoid macular edema (CME) had resolution and required regional corticosteroids. One patient discontinued weekly ADA due to serious infection. The median length of follow up was 12 months.Conclusion: Our series suggests that the escalation of ADA can be a useful strategy for treating recalcitrant ocular inflammation, but may not be adequate to treat refractory CME.

Tocilizumab in patients with anti-TNF refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (APTITUDE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a cause of major ocular morbidity. A substantial proportion of children are refractory to systemic methotrexate and TNF inhibitors. Our aim was to study the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis refractory to both methotrexate and TNF inhibitors.

METHODS

This multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial was done following a Simon's two-stage design at seven tertiary hospital sites in the UK. Patients aged 2-18 years with active juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis were eligible. All patients had been on a stable dose of methotrexate for at least 12 weeks and had not responded to treatment with a TNF inhibitor. Patients weighing 30 kg or more were treated with 162 mg subcutaneous tocilizumab every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, and participants weighing less than 30 kg were treated with 162 mg every 3 weeks for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was treatment response defined as a two-step decrease, or decrease to zero, from baseline in the level of inflammation (anterior chamber cells) at week 12, per the standardisation of uveitis nomenclature criteria. A phase 3 trial would be justified if more than seven patients responded to treatment. An interim analysis was planned to assess whether the trial would be stopped for futility, with futility defined as two or fewer treatment responses among ten participants. Adverse events were collected up to 30 calendar days after treatment cessation. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and the safety analysis was done in all patients who started the treatment. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry (ISRCTN95363507) and EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2015-001323-23).

FINDINGS

22 participants were enrolled to the trial between Dec 3, 2015, and March 9, 2018, and 21 participants received treatment. One participant was found to be ineligible immediately after enrolment and was therefore withdrawn. Seven of 21 (median unbiased estimate of proportion 34% [95% CI 25-57]) responded to treatment (p=0·11). Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of tocilizumab.

INTERPRETATION

The primary endpoint was not met, and thus the results do not support a phase 3 trial of tocilizumab in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Importantly, data on the use of tocilizumab in clinical practice is now captured in national registries. Despite this trial not meeting the threshold required to justify a larger phase 3 trial, several patients responded to treatment; as such, tocilzumab might still be a therapeutic option in some children with uveitis refractory to anti-TNF drugs, given the absence of other treatment options.

FUNDING

Versus Arthritis and the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network: Children.

The Effect of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitors on Uveitis in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (TNFis), which are the main treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), have been reported not only to reduce the incidence of anterior uveitis (AU) but also to induce it, and these effects differ among the various types of TNFis in clinical use. The present study investigated the effect of TNFis on uveitis by analyzing the long-term clinical course of AU in AS patients treated with TNFi therapy.

METHODS

Patients treated with at least one TNFi between January 2007 and July 2017 were reviewed, and 54 patients with at least one episode of AU were included in this study. The TNFis included anti-TNF-α antibodies (adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab), and a soluble TNF receptor molecule (etanercept). The effect of prevention of AU, the likelihood of new-onset uveitis after the initiation of TNFi therapy, and the effects of drug switching and dose escalation were assessed.

RESULTS

The first uveitis flare was observed before TNFi therapy in 39 patients and after TNFi therapy in 15 patients. Anti-TNF-α antibodies were more efficacious in decreasing the recurrence of AU than etanercept. Among patients in which uveitis first occurred after beginning TNFi therapy, patients on etanercept tended to first develop AU less than 1 year after starting the drug, and their AS tended to be well-controlled at the time of uveitis flares. Patients with a uveitis flare before their medication was switched did not recur afterwards, and five of eight patients showed no relapse after dose escalation.

CONCLUSION

TNFis have various effects on AU. TNFis, particularly anti-TNF-α antibodies, should be considered in patients with AS and frequent AU relapse. Additionally, clinicians should consider whether AU is due to an absence of a therapeutic response of AS to TNFi treatment or to TNFi treatment itself, and appropriate treatment changes should be made accordingly.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis

Introduction: Uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment and a significant burden of blindness. Although corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents have been successfully used, these are non-specific, and their long-term use may induce significant adverse effects. Areas covered: This article discusses existing local and systemic applied treatments for ocular inflammation including corticosteroids, non-biologic, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). Potential drugs being studied in clinical trials are introduced for both local and systemic use. Expert opinion: Treatment options for uveitis continue to expand. Still, more efforts and research are needed to better understand the mechanisms potentially leading to clinical trials.

Drug monitoring in long-term treatment with adalimumab for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis

OBJECTIVES

Assessing influence of anti-adalimumab (ADA) antibodies (AAA) on serum trough ADA levels and uveitis activity in long-term ADA treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

This prospective observational study included 20 patients from a single centre treated with ADA for active uveitis refractory to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. AAA, serum ADA trough levels and uveitis activity were evaluated at regular intervals up to 6 years.

RESULTS

AAA were detected in nine patients (45%). Permanent AAA in seven were associated with undetectable ADA trough levels and loss of response (LOR). Transient AAA were detected in four with measurable ADA trough levels and response of uveitis to treatment, followed in two by permanent AAA associated with LOR. Use of concomitant immunosuppression was significantly higher in patients without AAA (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

AAA-associated LOR frequently occurs in long-term treatment with ADA for JIA-associated uveitis. Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy significantly reduces the risk of LOR due to AAA.

Adalimumab Accounts for Long-Term Control of Noninfectious Uveitis Also in the Absence of Concomitant DMARD Treatment: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Objective

This study was aimed at assessing the long-term ocular control of adalimumab (ADA) in a large real-world population with noninfectious primary or secondary uveitis, focusing on the steroid-sparing effect and on disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) cotreatment.

Methods

In this retrospective, multicenter study, the efficacy of ADA was evaluated in terms of ocular control, changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corticosteroid-sparing effect, and drug retention rate, overall and stratified according to DMARD cotreatment.

Results

106 patients were included. 88.7% had an associated systemic disease. After 6 and 12 months, proportions of patients with effective ocular control were 83.7% and 83.3%, respectively. At last the follow-up, 94.6% of patients had satisfactory ocular control. No difference in terms of ocular control at all time points emerged among patients starting ADA for ocular vs. systemic involvements. Patients with poor baseline BCVA remained stable or improved, while those with good BCVA hardly worsened. At 6 and 12 months, the median dose of prednisone significantly reduced to 5 mg/day (0-5) and 2.5 mg/day (0-5) (p < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 36 months, 38 subjects discontinued ADA treatment. Mild to moderate side effects were reported in 7 patients (6.6%). ADA ocular control, corticosteroid-sparing effect, and drug retention rate were not influenced by the concomitant use of DMARDs.

Conclusion

The long-term ocular control of ADA in noninfectious primary or secondary uveitis is confirmed, also for BCVA preservation. Concomitant use of DMARDs does not provide additional benefits to ADA alone in terms of ocular control, steroid spare, and drug retention rate.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize updated evidences on the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in the treatment of patients with non-infectious uveitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic search between January 2000 and September 2017 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries. We investigated control of inflammation, improvement of visual acuity (VA), corticosteroid-sparing effect, and adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events.

RESULTS

Three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 20 non-RCTs were included and analyzed. The pooled proportions of inflammation control were 74% (95% CI 64%-82%) and 79% (95% CI 69%-87%) in groups of ≤6- and ≥12-months follow-up durations. No significant difference was found between the two groups (χ2 = 0.920, p = 0.337). Analysis of subgroups classified by degree of being treatment-naïve for anti-TNFα agents showed the inflammation control reached a high of 87% (95% CI 80%-92%) when subjects were "almost naïve" to anti-TNFα before ADA treatment. VA was improved by three or more lines in 41.3% (52/126) eyes, and was equal to or better than the baseline in 88.8% (142/160) eyes. Corticosteroid sparing was observed in 82.0% (91/111) of the patients; among them, 48.8% (40/82) discontinued use of corticosteroid completely. Minor drug-related adverse events were reported. The treatment effects of ADA were generally consistent in the three RCTs, and ADA reduced the risk of treatment failure by 43%-75%.

CONCLUSION

The current review provided evidences that ADA might be a promising choice in reducing inflammatory activity, gaining VA, and sparing corticosteroid use with minor AEs when applied in treating non-infectious uveitis.

Ocular, Auricular, and Oral Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is primarily a disease of the gastrointestinal tract, though it can often affect other organ systems. These extraintestinal manifestations occur in a quarter to one-third of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. While musculoskeletal and dermatologic manifestations are the most common, it is also important to be cognizant of head, eye, ear, nose, and throat (HEENT) manifestations and educate IBD patients about them. Here we review the ocular manifestations in conjunction with the lesser-known but increasingly recognized ENT manifestations. Considering the lack of randomized controlled trials in treating HEENT manifestations of IBD, this review is primarily based on case reports, case series, and expert opinion with a particular focus on the newer literature supporting use of anti-TNF agents.

Small molecules as therapy for uveitis: a selected perspective of new and developing agents

INTRODUCTION

Intraocular inflammation (uveitis) remains a significant burden of legal blindness. Because of its immune mediated and chronic recurrent nature, common therapy includes corticosteroids, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and more recently biologics as immune modulatory agents. The purpose of this article is to identify the role of new treatment approaches focusing on small molecules as therapeutic option in uveitis. Areas covered: A MEDLINE database search was conducted through February 2017 using the terms 'uveitis' and 'small molecule'. To provide ongoing and future perspectives in treatment options, also clinical trials as registered at ClinicalTrials.gov were included. Both, results from experimental as well as clinical research in this field were included. Since this field is rapidly evolving, a selection of promising agents had to be made. Expert opinion: Small molecules may interfere at different steps of the inflammatory cascade and appear as an interesting option in the treatment algorithm of uveitis. Because of their highly targeted molecular effects and their favorable bioavailability with the potential of topical application small molecules hold great promise. Nevertheless, a careful evaluation of these agents has to be made, since current experience is almost exclusively based on experimental uveitis models and few registered trials.

Adalimumab for the treatment of uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab, an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), is the only systemic non-corticosteroid agent which has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. Areas covered: The aim of this review is to summarize the research which demonstrated the effectiveness of adalimumab in the treatment of intraocular inflammation and helped to establish its side effect profile, ultimately leading to its FDA approval. Expert commentary: Adalimumab is a useful second-line agent in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis. While it is only approved in the United States for use in intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis in adults, I find it to be effective in off-label treatment of pediatric uveitis and scleritis as well.

Recent advances in managing and understanding uveitis

Uveitis is a sight-threatening disease entity with intraocular inflammation that arises from various causes. It mainly affects working-age individuals and may lead to irreversible visual loss if not treated properly in a timely manner. This article reviews recent advances in the management and understanding of uveitis since 2014, including treatment with new immunosuppressive therapies that use biological agents, local therapy with steroid implants, and imaging studies for the evaluation of uveitis.

An Update on Treatment of Pediatric Chronic Non-Infectious Uveitis

There are no standardized treatment protocols for pediatric non-infectious uveitis. Topical corticosteroids are the typical first-line agent, although systemic corticosteroids are used in intermediate, posterior and panuveitic uveitis. Corticosteroids are not considered to be long-term therapy due to potential ocular and systemic side effects. In children with severe and/or refractory uveitis, timely management with higher dose disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic agents is important. Increased doses earlier in the disease course may lead to improved disease control and better visual outcomes. In general, methotrexate is the usual first-line steroid-sparing agent and given as a subcutaneous weekly injection at >0.5 mg/kg/dose or 10-15 mg/m2 due to better bioavailability. Other DMARDs, for instance mycophenolate, azathioprine, and cyclosporine are less common treatments for pediatric uveitis. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents, primarily infliximab and adalimumab are used as second line agents in children refractory to methotrexate, or as first-line treatment in those with severe complicated disease at presentation. Infliximab may be given at a minimum of 7.5 mg/kg/dose every 4 weeks after loading doses, up to 20 mg/kg/dose. Adalimumab may be given up to 20 or 40 mg weekly. In children who fail anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents, develop anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies, experience adverse effects, or have difficulty with tolerance, there is less data available regarding subsequent treatment. Promising results have been noted with tocilizumab infusions every 2-4 weeks, abatacept monthly infusions and rituximab.