Assessing sociodemographic differences in human papillomavirus vaccine impact studies in the United States: a systematic review using narrative synthesis

The Effects of Human Papillomavirus Infection and Vaccination on Cardiovascular Diseases, NHANES 2003-2016

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been proposed to be an unconventional risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. We investigated the association between HPV infection and cardiovascular diseases among women with or without HPV vaccination.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 9,353 women aged between 20 to 59 years old who were tested for vaginal HPV DNA in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-2016. Cardiovascular diseases were defined as the presence of self-reported coronary heart diseases, heart attacks, angina pectoris, and stroke. The association between HPV and cardiovascular diseases was studied using logistic regression, with adjustment for the potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 40.8% of women were HPV DNA positive; 3.0% had cardiovascular diseases; and 9.0% of women received the HPV vaccine. The presence of vaginal HPV infection was associated with cardiovascular diseases (odd ratio [OR] = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.16), which remained significant (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.15-2.08) after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle behaviors, medical history, family history of cardiovascular diseases, and antihypertensive drugs. The association was absent among those who were vaccinated against HPV (OR= 0.50, 95% CI 0.07-3.51) but present among those who were not (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.18-2.25).

CONCLUSIONS

There was an association between HPV infection and cardiovascular diseases. This association was not significant among women vaccinated against HPV. The effect of HPV vaccination on cardiovascular diseases requires further investigation.

Pediatric COVID-19 Health Disparities and Vaccine Equity

While most children with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) experience mild illness, some are vulnerable to severe disease and develop long-term complications. Children with disabilities, those from lower-income homes, and those from racial and ethnic minority groups are more likely to be hospitalized and to have poor outcomes following an infection. For many of these same children, a wide range of social, economic, and environmental disadvantages have made it more difficult for them to access COVID-19 vaccines. Ensuring vaccine equity in children and decreasing health disparities promotes the common good and serves society as a whole. In this article, we discuss how the pandemic has exposed long-standing injustices in historically marginalized groups and provide a summary of the research describing the disparities associated with COVID-19 infection, severity, and vaccine uptake. Last, we outline several strategies for addressing some of the issues that can give rise to vaccine inequity in the pediatric population.

Trends in Precancerous Cervical Lesions by Area-Based Measures of Poverty, Race, and Ethnicity, Connecticut, 2008-2018

OBJECTIVES

Trends in the incidence of precancerous cervical lesions can be monitored to evaluate the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether declines in precancerous cervical lesions varied by area-based measures of poverty, race, and ethnicity.

METHODS

We analyzed 11 years of incidence data (2008-2018) from a statewide active surveillance system of precancerous cervical lesions in Connecticut. We divided area-based measures of poverty, race, and ethnicity (percentage of the population in a census tract who were living below the federal poverty level, who were Black, and who were Hispanic) at the census-tract level into 4 groups (<5.0%, 5.0%-9.9%, 10.0%-19.9%, ≥20.0%) using recommended cut points from the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. We estimated incidence rates and average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) stratified by age and each area-based measure using Joinpoint regression software. We used total population and estimated screened population as denominators for each age group to calculate rates and AAPCs.

RESULTS

During 2008-2018 in Connecticut, 18 878 women aged 21-39 were diagnosed with precancerous cervical lesions. After adjusting for screening, the largest declines occurred among women aged 21-24 (AAPC = -11.5%; 95% CI, -13.6% to -9.4%). We found significant and similar annual declines (~10%-12%) in this age group across all 4 levels of poverty, race, and ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating the positive impact of population-level HPV vaccination among young women that appears similar across area-based measures of sociodemographic characteristics. Monitoring is necessary to ensure the continuation of this progress in all communities.

High prevalence of anal high-risk HPV infection among transwomen: estimates from a Brazilian RDS study

INTRODUCTION

As the leading sexually transmitted infection worldwide, human papillomavirus (HPV) may disproportionately affect transwomen. We aimed to estimate anal HPV prevalence, especially focusing on high-risk (hr)-HPV types and evaluate their associated factors among transwomen living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

METHODS

Transwomen enrolled in a respondent-driven sampling (RDS)-based survey conducted between August 2015 and January 2016 self-collected anal samples, which were promptly stored at minus 80°C. After DNA extraction, HPV detection and genotyping were performed using the PapilloCheck test. We estimated HPV prevalences and evaluated the correlates of anal hr-HPV infection using a regression logistic model.

RESULTS

Out of 345 transwomen, 272 (78.8%) were included in this analysis (122 [44.9%] HIV-positive). No participant had ever received HPV vaccination. Among participants enrolled, 212 (77.9%) were positive for any anal HPV type and 165 (60.7%) for hr-HPV. Most common hr-HPV were as follows: HPV16 (17.6%), HPV68 (14.7%), HPV39 (14.3%), HPV56 (12.5%), HPV51 (11.4%) and HPV52 (11.0%). HIV-positive transwomen had three times the odds of having an hr-HPV compared to HIV-negative transwomen. Participants who had a current rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection had 3.7 times the odds of being coinfected with hr-HPV. Among HIV-positive transwomen, neither antiretroviral therapy use, undetectable viral load, current and nadir CD4 counts were associated with anal hr-HPV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian transwomen in our study exhibit some of the highest population-specific rates of HPV and hr-HPV. There is an urgent need to elucidate the burden of HPV infection, prevalence of HPV-related diseases and access to and uptake of HPV vaccination among transwomen, especially from low- and middle-income settings.

Monitoring HPV vaccine impact on cervical disease: Status and future directions for the era of cervical cancer elimination

Post-licensure monitoring of the impact of HPV vaccines is critical to track the progress being made toward cervical cancer elimination and to identify areas where further progress can accelerate the achievement of this important public health goal. Over the past decade, a large body of evidence has revealed convincing benefits of HPV vaccination in preventing cervical infections and precancers at the individual-level (i.e., direct effectiveness) as well as in reducing the population-level burden of disease (i.e., overall effectiveness). At this time, effectiveness of the vaccines on preventing cervical cancer is just beginning to emerge given that there is a prolonged latency period for invasive disease. As we enter the era of cervical cancer elimination, these early and promising results may be expected in other countries in the near future. Thus, monitoring the direct and overall effectiveness for cervical cancer is an urgent research priority. In this article, we summarize what is known about the effectiveness of HPV vaccines on precancerous outcomes, and we highlight considerations for continuing these important public health activities going forward to monitor progress toward cervical cancer elimination.

Disparities in the Epidemiology of Anal Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Time Series

Purpose: To assess the trends and sociodemographic disparities of anal cancer.

Methods: For this time series, billing claims were reviewed for all encounters between 2007 and 2011 in the Yale New Haven Health System.

Results: There were 80 new cases identified. Decreasing trends were seen in women and increasing trend in men (−30.1% and 27.3%). Diagnoses were more common in areas with the highest proportion of racial minorities (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.75; p≤0.01) and poverty (IRR=1.72; p=0.04).

Conclusions: Anal cancer continues to rise in men during the postvaccine era. Communities with the highest proportion of poverty and racial/ethnic minority groups bear the highest burden of disease.