1
|
Brivio D, Liles A, Gagne M, Sajo E, Zygmanski P. Toward a multi-layer micro-structured detector for high-energy electron radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38772041 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of electron beams has been rekindled by the advent of ultra-high-dose rate radiotherapy (FLASH) and very high energy electrons (VHEE). The need for development of novel technology for beam monitoring and dosimetry of such beams is of paramount importance prior to their clinical translation. PURPOSE In this work we explore the potential of a multi-layer nanoporous aerogel High-Energy-Current (HEC) detector as a dosimeter for electron beam. The detector does not suffer from radiation damage or signal saturation, making it suitable for very-high-dose-rate applications. Standard dose rates and energies are used to establish reference for FLASH and VHEE. We explore detector response to electron energy and residual range both experimentally and computationally. METHODS Multilayer HEC detectors were constructed using 1×-10× basic modules of Aluminum(Al)_aerogel(A)_Tantalum(Ta) with 10-70 µm layer thicknesses. Signals are collected from all electrodes (3-21, depending on module multiplicity) with zero external voltage bias. Measurements are acquired as a function of depth(z) in water equivalent plastic using Varian TrueBeam for energies E = 6,9,12,15 MeV (SAD = 105 cm, 6 × 6 cone, 1000 MU/min). Computational simulations of identical detector geometries are performed using the 1D deterministic code CEPXS/ONEDANT. Additionally, percent-depth-doses PDD(z), measured with diode in water, are used to explore the response of HEC for various energies and residual ranges. RESULTS The current measured from Ta electrodes resembles the shape of deposited charges in water and it is proportional to the derivative of the clinical PDD corrected for contribution from photon contamination. The signal is positive on the surface, and it decreases with depth reaching a negative local minimum at z = R50, before increasing again, reaching zero at about the practical range z = Rp. In contrast, the signal from Al electrodes is shaped like the electron PDD(z) shape but with lower signal at the surface and higher bremsstrahlung tail. By subtracting the signal from Ta and Al electrodes we obtained a curve resembling PDD(z,E) after Bremsstrahlung contamination correction. CONCLUSIONS Multi-layer HEC sensors exhibit characteristic responses to electron beams that are unlike responses of ion chambers or diodes. Since the sensor structures are sensitive to electronic disequilibrium, high-Z electrodes give a signal proportional to the charge deposition pattern and can be modeled using the derivative of PDD(z).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Brivio
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Arianna Liles
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Gagne
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
- RayWatch Inc., Hopkinton, Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erno Sajo
- Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Piotr Zygmanski
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Desorgher L, Veres I, Bratel A, Landström E, Engwall E, Herrera FG, Ozsahin EM, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110177. [PMID: 38378075 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One proposed solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250 MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250 MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect. METHODS Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250 MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case. RESULTS Like TP, VHEE above 100 MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ± 20 %) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. Electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150 MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250 MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100 MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Izabella Veres
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu K, Waldrop T, Aguilar E, Mims N, Neill D, Delahoussaye A, Li Z, Swanson D, Lin SH, Koong AC, Taniguchi CM, Loo BW, Mitra D, Schüler E. Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.04.19.590158. [PMID: 38712109 PMCID: PMC11071383 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.19.590158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Background The understanding of how varying radiation beam parameter settings affect the induction and magnitude of the FLASH effect remains limited. Purpose We sought to evaluate how the magnitude of radiation-induced gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (RIGIT) depends on the interplay between mean dose rate (MDR) and dose per pulse (DPP). Methods C57BL/6J mice were subjected to total abdominal irradiation (11-14 Gy single fraction) under conventional irradiation (low DPP and low MDR, CONV) and various combinations of DPP and MDR up to ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) beam conditions. The effects of DPP were evaluated for DPPs of 1-6 Gy while the total dose and MDR were kept constant; the effects of MDR were evaluated for the range 0.3- 1440 Gy/s while the total dose and DPP were kept constant. RIGIT was quantified in non-tumor-bearing mice through the regenerating crypt assay and survival assessment. Tumor response was evaluated through tumor growth delay. Results Within each tested total dose using a constant MDR (>100 Gy/s), increasing DPP led to better sparing of regenerating crypts, with a more prominent effect seen at 12 and 14 Gy TAI. However, at fixed DPPs >4 Gy, similar sparing of crypts was demonstrated irrespective of MDR (from 0.3 to 1440 Gy/s). At a fixed high DPP of 4.7 Gy, survival was equivalently improved relative to CONV for all MDRs from 0.3 Gy/s to 104 Gy/s, but at a lower DPP of 0.93 Gy, increasing MDR produced a greater survival effect. We also confirmed that high DPP, regardless of MDR, produced the same magnitude of tumor growth delay relative to CONV using a clinically relevant melanoma mouse model. Conclusions This study demonstrates the strong influence that the beam parameter settings have on the magnitude of the FLASH effect. Both high DPP and UHDR appeared independently sufficient to produce FLASH sparing of GI toxicity, while isoeffective tumor response was maintained across all conditions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cengel KA, Kim MM, Diffenderfer ES, Busch TM. FLASH Radiotherapy: What Can FLASH's Ultra High Dose Rate Offer to the Treatment of Patients With Sarcoma? Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:218-228. [PMID: 38508786 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
FLASH is an emerging treatment paradigm in radiotherapy (RT) that utilizes ultra-high dose rates (UHDR; >40 Gy)/s) of radiation delivery. Developing advances in technology support the delivery of UHDR using electron and proton systems, as well as some ion beam units (eg, carbon ions), while methods to achieve UHDR with photons are under investigation. The major advantage of FLASH RT is its ability to increase the therapeutic index for RT by shifting the dose response curve for normal tissue toxicity to higher doses. Numerous preclinical studies have been conducted to date on FLASH RT for murine sarcomas, alongside the investigation of its effects on relevant normal tissues of skin, muscle, and bone. The tumor control achieved by FLASH RT of sarcoma models is indistinguishable from that attained by treatment with standard RT to the same total dose. FLASH's high dose rates are able to mitigate the severity or incidence of RT side effects on normal tissues as evaluated by endpoints ranging from functional sparing to histological damage. Large animal studies and clinical trials of canine patients show evidence of skin sparing by FLASH vs. standard RT, but also caution against delivery of high single doses with FLASH that exceed those safely applied with standard RT. Also, a human clinical trial has shown that FLASH RT can be delivered safely to bone metastasis. Thus, data to date support continued investigations of clinical translation of FLASH RT for the treatment of patients with sarcoma. Toward this purpose, hypofractionated irradiation schemes are being investigated for FLASH effects on sarcoma and relevant normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania..
| | - Michele M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric S Diffenderfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Theresa M Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaulfers T, Lattery G, Cheng C, Zhao X, Selvaraj B, Wu H, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Lin H, Simone CB, Hasan S, Kang M, Chang J. Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Bragg Peak Conformal FLASH in Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:798. [PMID: 38398188 PMCID: PMC10886659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy (RT) uses a distal tracking method to eliminate exit doses and can achieve superior OAR sparing. This study explores the application of this novel method in stereotactic body radiotherapy prostate FLASH-RT. An in-house platform was developed to enable intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) planning using a single-energy Bragg peak distal tracking method. The patients involved in the study were previously treated with proton stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique to 40 Gy in five fractions. FLASH plans were optimized using a four-beam arrangement to generate a dose distribution similar to the conventional opposing beams. All of the beams had a small angle of two degrees from the lateral direction to increase the dosimetry quality. Dose metrics were compared between the conventional PBS and the Bragg peak FLASH plans. The dose rate histogram (DRVH) and FLASH metrics of 40 Gy/s coverage (V40Gy/s) were investigated for the Bragg peak plans. There was no significant difference between the clinical and Bragg peak plans in rectum, bladder, femur heads, large bowel, and penile bulb dose metrics, except for Dmax. For the CTV, the FLASH plans resulted in a higher Dmax than the clinical plans (116.9% vs. 103.3%). For the rectum, the V40Gy/s reached 94% and 93% for 1 Gy dose thresholds in composite and single-field evaluations, respectively. Additionally, the FLASH ratio reached close to 100% after the application of the 5 Gy threshold in composite dose rate assessment. In conclusion, the Bragg peak distal tracking method can yield comparable plan quality in most OARs while preserving sufficient FLASH dose rate coverage, demonstrating that the ultra-high dose technique can be applied in prostate FLASH SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Kaulfers
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
| | - Grant Lattery
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Xingyi Zhao
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Balaji Selvaraj
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Hui Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China;
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Jehee Isabelle Choi
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Minglei Kang
- New York Proton Center, 225 E 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA; (X.Z.); (B.S.); (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (H.L.); (S.H.)
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549, USA; (T.K.); (G.L.)
- Northwell, 2000 Marcus Ave, Suite 300, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miles D, Sforza D, Wong J, Rezaee M. Dosimetric characterization of a rotating anode x-ray tube for FLASH radiotherapy research. Med Phys 2024; 51:1474-1483. [PMID: 37458068 PMCID: PMC10792113 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Most current research toward ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiation is conducted with advanced proton and electron accelerators, which are of limited accessibility to basic laboratory research. An economical alternative to charged particle accelerators is to employ high-capacity rotating anode x-ray tubes to produce kilovoltage x-rays at FLASH dose rates at short source-to-surface distances (SSD). This work describes a comprehensive dosimetric evaluation of a rotating anode x-ray tube for potential application in laboratory FLASH study. METHODS AND MATERIALS A commercially available high-capacity fluoroscopy x-ray tube with 75 kW input power was implemented as a potential FLASH irradiator. Radiochromic EBT3 film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to investigate the effects of SSD and field size on dose rates and depth-dose characteristics in kV-compatible solid water phantoms. Custom 3D printed accessories were developed to enable reproducible phantom setup at very short SSD. Open and collimated radiation fields were assessed. RESULTS Despite the lower x-ray energy and short SSD used, FLASH dose rates above 40 Gy/s were achieved for targets up to 10-mm depth in solid water. Maximum surface dose rates of 96 Gy/s were measured in the open field at 47 mm SSD. A non-uniform high-to-low dose gradient was observed in the planar dose distribution, characteristic of anode heel effects. With added collimation, beams up to 10-mm diameter with reasonable uniformity can be produced. Typical 80%-20% penumbra in the collimated x-ray FLASH beams were less than 1 mm at 5-mm depth in phantom. Ramp-up times at the maximum input current were less than 1 ms. CONCLUSION Our dosimetric characterization demonstrates that rotating anode x-ray tube technology is capable of producing radiation beams in support of preclinical FLASH radiobiology research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devin Miles
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21231 MD, USA
| | - Daniel Sforza
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21231 MD, USA
| | - John Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21231 MD, USA
| | - Mohammad Rezaee
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, 21231 MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Esplen N, Egoriti L, Planche T, Rädel S, Koay HW, Humphries B, Ren X, Ford N, Hoehr C, Gottberg A, Bazalova-Carter M. Dosimetric characterization of a novel UHDR megavoltage X-ray source for FLASH radiobiological experiments. Sci Rep 2024; 14:822. [PMID: 38191885 PMCID: PMC10774358 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50412-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
A first irradiation platform capable of delivering 10 MV X-ray beams at ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) has been developed and characterized for FLASH radiobiological research at TRIUMF. Delivery of both UHDR (FLASH mode) and low dose-rate conventional (CONV mode) irradiations was demonstrated using a common source and experimental setup. Dose rates were calculated using film dosimetry and a non-intercepting beam monitoring device; mean values for a 100 μA pulse (peak) current were nominally 82.6 and 4.40 × 10-2 Gy/s for UHDR and CONV modes, respectively. The field size for which > 40 Gy/s could be achieved exceeded 1 cm down to a depth of 4.1 cm, suitable for total lung irradiations in mouse models. The calculated delivery metrics were used to inform subsequent pre-clinical treatments. Four groups of 6 healthy male C57Bl/6J mice were treated using thoracic irradiations to target doses of either 15 or 30 Gy using both FLASH and CONV modes. Administration of UHDR X-ray irradiation to healthy mouse models was demonstrated for the first time at the clinically-relevant beam energy of 10 MV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nolan Esplen
- Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada
| | - Luca Egoriti
- TRIUMF, Vancouver, V6T 2A3, Canada
- Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z1, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Xi Ren
- Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z1, Canada
| | - Nancy Ford
- Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z1, Canada
- Oral Biological and Medical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z1, Canada
| | - Cornelia Hoehr
- Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada
- TRIUMF, Vancouver, V6T 2A3, Canada
| | - Alexander Gottberg
- Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, V8P 5C2, Canada
- TRIUMF, Vancouver, V6T 2A3, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Chung C, Fuller D, Tanadini-Lang S, Jaffray DA. The Future of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:135-144. [PMID: 38105088 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) is a relatively new technology that has already shown outcomes benefits but that has not yet reached its clinical potential. The improved soft-tissue contrast provided with MR, coupled with the immediacy of image acquisition with respect to the treatment, enables expansion of on-table adaptive protocols, currently at a cost of increased treatment complexity, use of human resources, and longer treatment slot times, which translate to decreased throughput. Many approaches are being investigated to meet these challenges, including the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to accelerate and automate much of the workflow and improved technology that parallelizes workflow tasks, as well as improvements in image acquisition speed and quality. This article summarizes limitations of current available integrated MRIgRT systems and gives an outlook about scientific developments to further expand the use of MRIgRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland..
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Chung
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dave Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David A Jaffray
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Trojan A, Lone YC, Briceno I, Trojan J. Anti-Gene IGF-I Vaccines in Cancer Gene Therapy: A Review of a Case of Glioblastoma. Curr Med Chem 2024; 31:1983-2002. [PMID: 38031775 DOI: 10.2174/0109298673237968231106095141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Vaccines for the deadliest brain tumor - glioblastoma (GBM) - are generally based on targeting growth factors or their receptors, often using antibodies. The vaccines described in the review were prepared to suppress the principal cancer growth factor - IGF-I, using anti-gene approaches either of antisense (AS) or of triple helix (TH) type. Our objective was to increase the median survival of patients treated with AS and TH cell vaccines. METHODOLOGY The cells were transfected in vitro by both constructed IGF-I AS and IGF-I TH expression episomal vectors; part of these cells was co-cultured with plant phytochemicals, modulating IGF-I expression. Both AS and TH approaches completely suppressed IGF-I expression and induced MHC-1 / B7 immunogenicity related to the IGF-I receptor signal. RESULTS This immunogenicity proved to be stronger in IGF-I TH than in IGF-I AS-prepared cell vaccines, especially in TH / phytochemical cells. The AS and TH vaccines generated an important TCD8+ and TCD8+CD11b- immune response in treated GBM patients and increased the median survival of patients up to 17-18 months, particularly using TH vaccines; in some cases, 2- and 3-year survival was reported. These clinical results were compared with those obtained in therapies targeting other growth factors. CONCLUSION The anti-gene IGF-I vaccines continue to be applied in current GBM personalized medicine. Technical improvements in the preparation of AS and TH vaccines to increase MHC-1 and B7 immunogenicity have, in parallel, allowed to increase in the median survival of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle Trojan
- INSERM UMR 1197, Cancer Center & University of Paris / Saclay, PO Box: 94802 Villejuif, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Cartagena, PO Box: 130014 Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
| | - Yu-Chun Lone
- INSERM UMR 1197, Cancer Center & University of Paris / Saclay, PO Box: 94802 Villejuif, France
- CEDEA / ICGT - Center of Oncological Diseases Diagnosis, PO Box: 110231 Bogota, Colombia
| | - Ignacio Briceno
- Faculty of Medicine, University of La Sabana, PO Box: 250008 Chia, Colombia
| | - Jerzy Trojan
- INSERM UMR 1197, Cancer Center & University of Paris / Saclay, PO Box: 94802 Villejuif, France
- CEDEA / ICGT - Center of Oncological Diseases Diagnosis, PO Box: 110231 Bogota, Colombia
- National Academy of Medicine - ANM, PO Box: 75272 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ronga MG, Deut U, Bonfrate A, De Marzi L. Very high-energy electron dose calculation using the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple scattering and a simplified pencil beam model. Med Phys 2023; 50:8009-8022. [PMID: 37730956 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Very high-energy electrons (VHEE) radiotherapy, in the energy range of 100-200 MeV is currently considered a promising technique for the future of radiation therapy and could benefit from the promises of ultra-high dose rate FLASH therapy. However, to our knowledge, no analytical calculation models have been tested for this type of application and the approximations proposed for multiple scattering with electron beams have not been extensively evaluated at these high energies. PURPOSE In this work, we discuss the derivation of a simple and fast algorithm based on the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple Coulomb scattering for fast dose calculation for VHEE beams (up to 200 MeV). Similar to the Gaussian pencil beam models used for electron or proton beams, this pencil beam kernel is separated into a central and an off-axis term. Monte Carlo simulations are performed to compare the analytical calculations with simulations and to determine the parametrizations used in the model at the highest electron energies. METHODS The normalized electron planar fluence distribution is described in water according to the Fermi-Eyges theory of multiple Coulomb scattering and a double Gaussian distribution model. The main quantities used in the model and their calculation (mass angular scattering power, mean energy, range straggling) are discussed and tested for electron energies up to 200 MeV. The TOPAS/Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) toolkit is used to compare analytical calculations with MC simulations for a theoretical pencil beam irradiation and to find the best parameters describing the range straggling. The model is then tested on a realistic simulation of a pencil beam scanning beamline with treatment field dimensions up to 15 × 15 cm2 and for deep-seated targets. RESULTS Radial dose distributions of a pencil beam in water were calculated with the model and compared with the results of a complete Monte Carlo simulation. A good agreement (within 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate superior to 90%, and a mean deviation between calculated and simulated pencil beam radial spread smaller than 0.6 mm) was observed between analytical dose distributions and simulations for energies up to 200 MeV and field sizes up to 15 × 15 cm2 . CONCLUSIONS A parameterization of an electron source and an analytical pencil beam model were proposed in this work, thereby allowing a suitable reproduction of the lateral fluence of a VHEE beam and good agreement between calculations and simulated data. Further improvement of the method would require the consideration of a model describing the large-angle scattering of the electrons. The results of this work could support future research into VHEE radiotherapy and might be of interest for use together with VHEE broad beams produced by scanned narrow pencil beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grazia Ronga
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France
- Thales Avionics, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
| | - Umberto Deut
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France
| | - Anthony Bonfrate
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tan Y, Zhou S, Haefner J, Chen Q, Mazur TR, Darafsheh A, Zhang T. Simulation study of a novel small animal FLASH irradiator (SAFI) with integrated inverse-geometry CT based on circularly distributed kV X-ray sources. Sci Rep 2023; 13:20181. [PMID: 37978269 PMCID: PMC10656503 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47421-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy (RT) or FLASH-RT can potentially reduce normal tissue toxicity. A small animal irradiator that can deliver FLASH-RT treatments similar to clinical RT treatments is needed for pre-clinical studies of FLASH-RT. We designed and simulated a novel small animal FLASH irradiator (SAFI) based on distributed x-ray source technology. The SAFI system comprises a distributed x-ray source with 51 focal spots equally distributed on a 20 cm diameter ring, which are used for both FLASH-RT and onboard micro-CT imaging. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to estimate the dosimetric characteristics of the SAFI treatment beams. The maximum dose rate, which is limited by the power density of the tungsten target, was estimated based on finite-element analysis (FEA). The maximum DC electron beam current density is 2.6 mA/mm2, limited by the tungsten target's linear focal spot power density. At 160 kVp, 51 focal spots, each with a dimension of [Formula: see text] mm2 and 10° anode angle, can produce up to 120 Gy/s maximum DC irradiation at the center of a cylindrical water phantom. We further demonstrate forward and inverse FLASH-RT planning, as well as inverse-geometry micro-CT with circular source array imaging via numerical simulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuewen Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Shuang Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Jonathan Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Qinghao Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Thomas R Mazur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Arash Darafsheh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Tiezhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Horváth D, Grittani G, Precek M, Versaci R, Bulanov SV, Olšovcová V. Time dynamics of the dose deposited by relativistic ultra-short electron beams. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:22NT01. [PMID: 37797651 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad00a3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Ultra-short electron beams are used as ultra-fast radiation source for radiobiology experiments aiming at very high energy electron beams (VHEE) radiotherapy with very high dose rates. Laser plasma accelerators are capable of producing electron beams as short as 1 fs and with tunable energy from few MeV up to multi-GeV with compact footprint. This makes them an attractive source for applications in different fields, where the ultra-short (fs) duration plays an important role. The time dynamics of the dose deposited by electron beams with energies in the range 50-250 MeV have been studied and the results are presented here. The results set a quantitative limit to the maximum dose rate at which the electron beams can impart dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Horváth
- ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - G Grittani
- ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - M Precek
- ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - R Versaci
- ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - S V Bulanov
- ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - V Olšovcová
- ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Za Radnicí 835, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
No HJ, Wu YF, Dworkin ML, Manjappa R, Skinner L, Ashraf MR, Lau B, Melemenidis S, Viswanathan V, Yu ASJ, Surucu M, Schüler E, Graves EE, Maxim PG, Loo BW. Clinical Linear Accelerator-Based Electron FLASH: Pathway for Practical Translation to FLASH Clinical Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:482-492. [PMID: 37105403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrahigh-dose-rate (UHDR) radiation therapy (RT) has produced the FLASH effect in preclinical models: reduced toxicity with comparable tumor control compared with conventional-dose-rate RT. Early clinical trials focused on UHDR RT feasibility using specialized devices. We explore the technical feasibility of practical electron UHDR RT on a standard clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). METHODS AND MATERIALS We tuned the program board of a decommissioned electron energy for UHDR electron delivery on a clinical LINAC without hardware modification. Pulse delivery was controlled using the respiratory gating interface. A short source-to-surface distance (SSD) electron setup with a standard scattering foil was configured and tested on an anthropomorphic phantom using circular blocks with 3- to 20-cm field sizes. Dosimetry was evaluated using radiochromic film and an ion chamber profiler. RESULTS UHDR open-field mean dose rates at 100, 80, 70, and 59 cm SSD were 36.82, 59.52, 82.01, and 112.83 Gy/s, respectively. At 80 cm SSD, mean dose rate was ∼60 Gy/s for all collimated field sizes, with an R80 depth of 6.1 cm corresponding to an energy of 17.5 MeV. Heterogeneity was <5.0% with asymmetry of 2.2% to 6.2%. The short SSD setup was feasible under realistic treatment conditions simulating broad clinical indications on an anthropomorphic phantom. CONCLUSIONS Short SSD and tuning for high electron beam current on a standard clinical LINAC can deliver flat, homogenous UHDR electrons over a broad, clinically relevant range of field sizes and depths with practical working distances in a configuration easily reversible to standard clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunsoo Joshua No
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Yufan Fred Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Michael Louis Dworkin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rakesh Manjappa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lawrie Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - M Ramish Ashraf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Brianna Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Stavros Melemenidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Vignesh Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Amy Shu-Jung Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Edward Elliot Graves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Peter Gregor Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jo HJ, Oh T, Lee YR, Kang GS, Park HJ, Ahn GO. FLASH Radiotherapy: A FLASHing Idea to Preserve Neurocognitive Function. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2023; 11:223-231. [PMID: 37953445 PMCID: PMC10641319 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2023.0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH RT) is a technique to deliver ultra-high dose rate in a fraction of a second. Evidence from experimental animal models suggest that FLASH RT spares various normal tissues including the lung, gastrointestinal track, and brain from radiation-induced toxicity (a phenomenon known as FLASH effect), which is otherwise commonly observed with conventional dose rate RT. However, it is not simply the ultra-high dose rate alone that brings the FLASH effect. Multiple parameters such as instantaneous dose rate, pulse size, pulse repetition frequency, and the total duration of exposure all need to be carefully optimized simultaneously. Furthermore it is critical to validate FLASH effects in an in vivo experimental model system. The exact molecular mechanism responsible for this FLASH effect is not yet understood although a number of hypotheses have been proposed including oxygen depletion and less reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by FLASH RT, and enhanced ability of normal tissues to handle ROS and labile iron pool compared to tumors. In this review, we briefly overview the process of ionization event and history of radiotherapy and fractionation of ionizing radiation. We also highlight some of the latest FLASH RT reviews and results with a special interest to neurocognitive protection in rodent model with whole brain irradiation. Lastly we discuss some of the issues remain to be answered with FLASH RT including undefined molecular mechanism, lack of standardized parameters, low penetration depth for electron beam, and tumor hypoxia still being a major hurdle for local control. Nevertheless, researchers are close to having all answers to the issues that we have raised, hence we believe that advancement of FLASH RT will be made more quickly than one can anticipate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-Ju Jo
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Taerim Oh
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ye-Rim Lee
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi-Sue Kang
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Joon Park
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - G-One Ahn
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Petoukhova A, Snijder R, Vissers T, Ceha H, Struikmans H. In vivodosimetry in cancer patients undergoing intraoperative radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:18TR01. [PMID: 37607566 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf2e4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
In vivodosimetry (IVD) is an important tool in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to detect major errors by assessing differences between expected and delivered dose and to record the received dose by individual patients. Also, in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), IVD is highly relevant to register the delivered dose. This is especially relevant in low-risk breast cancer patients since a high dose of IORT is delivered in a single fraction. In contrast to EBRT, online treatment planning based on intraoperative imaging is only under development for IORT. Up to date, two commercial treatment planning systems proposed intraoperative ultrasound or in-room cone-beam CT for real-time IORT planning. This makes IVD even more important because of the possibility for real-time treatment adaptation. Here, we summarize recent developments and applications of IVD methods for IORT in clinical practice, highlighting important contributions and identifying specific challenges such as a treatment planning system for IORT. HDR brachytherapy as a delivery technique was not considered. We add IVD for ultrahigh dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy that promises to improve the treatment efficacy, when compared to conventional radiotherapy by limiting the rate of toxicity while maintaining similar tumour control probabilities. To date, FLASH IORT is not yet in clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Petoukhova
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Medical Physics, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Snijder
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Medical Physics, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Vissers
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Medical Library, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen Ceha
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Radiation Oncology, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Struikmans
- Haaglanden Medical Centre , Department of Radiation Oncology, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Traneus E, Vallet V, Desorgher L, Ozsahin EM, Bochud F, Bourhis J, Moeckli R. 3D-conformal very-high energy electron therapy as candidate modality for FLASH-RT: A treatment planning study for glioblastoma and lung cancer. Med Phys 2023; 50:5745-5756. [PMID: 37427669 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-clinical ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron irradiations on time scales of 100 ms have demonstrated a remarkable sparing of brain and lung tissues while retaining tumor efficacy when compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. While clinically-used gantries and intensity modulation techniques are too slow to match such time scales, novel very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) radiotherapy (RT) devices using 3D-conformed broad VHEE beams are designed to deliver UHDR treatments that fulfill these timing requirements. PURPOSE To assess the dosimetric plan quality obtained using VHEE-based 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT) for treatments of glioblastoma and lung cancer patients and compare the resulting treatment plans to those delivered by standard-of-care intensity modulated photon RT (IMRT) techniques. METHODS Seven glioblastoma patients and seven lung cancer patients were planned with VHEE-based 3D-CRT using 3 to 16 coplanar beams with equidistant angular spacing and energies of 100 and 200 MeV using a forward planning approach. Dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, coverage (V95% ) and homogeneity (HI98% ) for the planning target volume (PTV), as well as near-maximum doses (D2% ) and mean doses (Dmean ) for organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated and compared to clinical IMRT plans. RESULTS Mean differences of V95% and HI98% of all VHEE plans were within 2% or better of the IMRT reference plans. Glioblastoma plan dose metrics obtained with VHEE configurations of 200 MeV and 3-16 beams were either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the clinical IMRT reference plans. All OAR plan dose metrics evaluated for VHEE plans created using 5 beams of 100 MeV were either not significantly different or within 3% on average, except for Dmean for the body, Dmean for the brain, D2% for the brain stem, and D2% for the chiasm, which were significantly increased by 1, 2, 6, and 8 Gy, respectively (however below clinical constraints). Similarly, the dose metrics for lung cancer patients were also either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the reference plans for VHEE configurations with 200 MeV and 5 to 16 beams with the exception of D2% and Dmean to the spinal canal (however below clinical constraints). For the lung cancer cases, the VHEE configurations using 100 MeV or only 3 beams resulted in significantly worse dose metrics for some OAR. Differences in dose metrics were, however, strongly patient-specific and similar for some patient cases. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based 3D-CRT may deliver conformal treatments to simple, mostly convex target shapes in the brain and the thorax with a limited number of critical adjacent OAR using a limited number of beams (as low as 3 to 7). Using such treatment techniques, a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of standard-of-care IMRT can be achieved. Hence, from a treatment planning perspective, 3D-conformal UHDR VHEE treatments delivered on time scales of 100 ms represent a promising candidate technique for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Veronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jaffray DA, Knaul F, Baumann M, Gospodarowicz M. Harnessing progress in radiotherapy for global cancer control. NATURE CANCER 2023; 4:1228-1238. [PMID: 37749355 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00619-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
The pace of technological innovation over the past three decades has transformed the field of radiotherapy into one of the most technologically intense disciplines in medicine. However, the global barriers to access this highly effective treatment are complex and extend beyond technological limitations. Here, we review the technological advancement and current status of radiotherapy and discuss the efforts of the global radiation oncology community to formulate a more integrative 'diagonal approach' in which the agendas of science-driven advances in individual outcomes and the sociotechnological task of global cancer control can be aligned to bring the benefit of this proven therapy to patients with cancer everywhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Jaffray
- Departments of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Felicia Knaul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Clements N, Esplen N, Bazalova-Carter M. A feasibility study of ultra-high dose rate mini-GRID therapy using very-high-energy electron beams for a simulated pediatric brain case. Phys Med 2023; 112:102637. [PMID: 37454482 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s), spatially-fractionated minibeam GRID (mini-GRID) therapy using very-high-energy electrons (VHEE) was investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Multi-directional VHEE treatments with and without mini-GRID-fractionation were compared to a clinical 6 MV volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for a pediatric glioblastoma patient using dose-volume histograms, volume-averaged dose rates in critical patient structures, and planning target volume D98s. Peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs) and dose rates in organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated due to their relevance for normal-tissue sparing in FLASH and spatially-fractionated techniques. Depths of convergence, defined where the PVDR is first ≤1.1, and depths at which dose rates fall below the UHDR threshold were also evaluated. In a water phantom, the VHEE mini-GRID treatments presented a surface (5 mm depth) PVDR of (51±2) and a depth of convergence of 42 mm at 150 MeV and a surface PVDR of (33±1) with a depth of convergence of 57 mm at 250 MeV. For a pediatric GBM case, VHEE treatments without mini-GRID-fractionation produced 25% and 22% lower volume-averaged doses to OARs compared to the 6 MV VMAT plan and 8/9 and 9/9 of the patient structures were exposed to volume-averaged dose rates >40 Gy/s for the 150 MeV and 250 MeV plans, respectively. The 150 MeV and 250 MeV mini-GRID treatments produced 17% and 38% higher volume-averaged doses to OARs and 3/9 patient structures had volume-averaged dose rates above 40 Gy/s. VHEE mini-GRID plans produced many comparable dose metrics to the clinical VMAT plan, encouraging further optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Clements
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| | - Nolan Esplen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zou W, Zhang R, Schüler E, Taylor PA, Mascia AE, Diffenderfer ES, Zhao T, Ayan AS, Sharma M, Yu SJ, Lu W, Bosch WR, Tsien C, Surucu M, Pollard-Larkin JM, Schuemann J, Moros EG, Bazalova-Carter M, Gladstone DJ, Li H, Simone CB, Petersson K, Kry SF, Maity A, Loo BW, Dong L, Maxim PG, Xiao Y, Buchsbaum JC. Framework for Quality Assurance of Ultrahigh Dose Rate Clinical Trials Investigating FLASH Effects and Current Technology Gaps. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:1202-1217. [PMID: 37121362 PMCID: PMC10526970 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT), delivered with ultrahigh dose rate (UHDR), may allow patients to be treated with less normal tissue toxicity for a given tumor dose compared with currently used conventional dose rate. Clinical trials are being carried out and are needed to test whether this improved therapeutic ratio can be achieved clinically. During the clinical trials, quality assurance and credentialing of equipment and participating sites, particularly pertaining to UHDR-specific aspects, will be crucial for the validity of the outcomes of such trials. This report represents an initial framework proposed by the NRG Oncology Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology FLASH working group on quality assurance of potential UHDR clinical trials and reviews current technology gaps to overcome. An important but separate consideration is the appropriate design of trials to most effectively answer clinical and scientific questions about FLASH. This paper begins with an overview of UHDR RT delivery methods. UHDR beam delivery parameters are then covered, with a focus on electron and proton modalities. The definition and control of safe UHDR beam delivery and current and needed dosimetry technologies are reviewed and discussed. System and site credentialing for large, multi-institution trials are reviewed. Quality assurance is then discussed, and new requirements are presented for treatment system standard analysis, patient positioning, and treatment planning. The tables and figures in this paper are meant to serve as reference points as we move toward FLASH-RT clinical trial performance. Some major questions regarding FLASH-RT are discussed, and next steps in this field are proposed. FLASH-RT has potential but is associated with significant risks and complexities. We need to redefine optimization to focus not only on the dose but also on the dose rate in a manner that is robust and understandable and that can be prescribed, validated, and confirmed in real time. Robust patient safety systems and access to treatment data will be critical as FLASH-RT moves into the clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paige A Taylor
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Eric S Diffenderfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ahmet S Ayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Manju Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shu-Jung Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Walter R Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Julianne M Pollard-Larkin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eduardo G Moros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - David J Gladstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen F Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amit Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pennock M, Wei S, Cheng C, Lin H, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Bakst RL, Kabarriti R, Simone II CB, Lee NY, Kang M, Press RH. Proton Bragg Peak FLASH Enables Organ Sparing and Ultra-High Dose-Rate Delivery: Proof of Principle in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3828. [PMID: 37568644 PMCID: PMC10417542 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH plans were created via the highest beam single energy, range shifter, and range compensator, and were compared to PBS transmission FLASH plans for 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction in eight recurrent head and neck patients originally treated with quad shot reirradiation (14.8/3.7 CGE). The 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction plans were also created using conventional-rate intensity-modulated proton therapy techniques. PBS Bragg peak FLASH, PBS transmission FLASH, and conventional plans were compared for OAR sparing, FLASH dose rate coverage, and target coverage. All FLASH OAR V40 Gy/s dose rate coverage was 90-100% at 6 GyE and 10 GyE for both FLASH modalities. PBS Bragg peak FLASH generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) like those of conventional therapy and demonstrated improved OAR dose sparing over PBS transmission FLASH. All the modalities had similar CTV coverage. PBS Bragg peak FLASH can deliver conformal, ultra-high dose rate FLASH with a two-millisecond delivery of the minimum MU per spot. PBS Bragg peak FLASH demonstrated similar dose rate coverage to PBS transmission FLASH with improved OAR dose-sparing, which was more pronounced in the 10 GyE/fraction than in the 6 GyE/fraction. This feasibility study generates hypotheses for the benefits of FLASH in head and neck reirradiation and developing biological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pennock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Shouyi Wei
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Richard L. Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology—Radiation Oncology Associates, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Charles B. Simone II
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Minglei Kang
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Robert H. Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Flannigan DJ, VandenBussche EJ. Pulsed-beam transmission electron microscopy and radiation damage. Micron 2023; 172:103501. [PMID: 37390662 DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2023.103501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
We review the use of pulsed electron-beams in transmission electron microscopes (TEMs) for the purpose of mitigating specimen damage. We begin by placing the importance of TEMs with respect to materials characterization into proper context, and we provide a brief overview of established methods for reducing or eliminating the deleterious effects of beam-induced damage. We then introduce the concept of pulsed-beam TEM, and we briefly describe the basic methods and instrument configurations used to create so-called temporally structured electron beams. Following a brief overview of the use of high-dose-rate pulsed-electron beams in cancer radiation therapy, we review historical speculations and more recent compelling but mostly anecdotal findings of a pulsed-beam TEM damage effect. This is followed by an in-depth technical review of recent works seeking to establish cause-and-effect relationships, to conclusively uncover the presence of an effect, and to explore the practicality of the approach. These studies, in particular, provide the most compelling evidence to date that using a pulsed electron beam in the TEM is indeed a viable way to mitigate damage. Throughout, we point out current gaps in understanding, and we conclude with a brief perspective of current needs and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Flannigan
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Minnesota Institute for Ultrafast Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| | - Elisah J VandenBussche
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Avenue SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Minnesota Institute for Ultrafast Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dillon O, Reynolds T, O'Brien RT. X-ray source arrays for volumetric imaging during radiotherapy treatment. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9776. [PMID: 37328551 PMCID: PMC10275902 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36708-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This work presents a novel hardware configuration for radiotherapy systems to enable fast 3D X-ray imaging before and during treatment delivery. Standard external beam radiotherapy linear accelerators (linacs) have a single X-ray source and detector located at ± 90° from the treatment beam respectively. The entire system can be rotated around the patient acquiring multiple 2D X-ray images to create a 3D cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) image before treatment delivery to ensure the tumour and surrounding organs align with the treatment plan. Scanning with a single source is slow relative to patient respiration or breath holds and cannot be performed during treatment delivery, limiting treatment delivery accuracy in the presence of patient motion and excluding some patients from concentrated treatment plans that would be otherwise expected to have improved outcomes. This simulation study investigated whether recent advances in carbon nanotube (CNT) field emission source arrays, high frame rate (60 Hz) flat panel detectors and compressed sensing reconstruction algorithms could circumvent imaging limitations of current linacs. We investigated a novel hardware configuration incorporating source arrays and high frame rate detectors into an otherwise standard linac. We investigated four potential pre-treatment scan protocols that could be achieved in a 17 s breath hold or 2-10 1 s breath holds. Finally, we demonstrated for the first time volumetric X-ray imaging during treatment delivery by using source arrays, high frame rate detectors and compressed sensing. Image quality was assessed quantitatively over the CBCT geometric field of view as well as across each axis through the tumour centroid. Our results demonstrate that source array imaging enables larger volumes to be imaged with acquisitions as short as 1 s albeit with reduced image quality arising from lower photon flux and shorter imaging arcs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Dillon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Image X Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2015, Australia.
| | - Tess Reynolds
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Image X Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2015, Australia
| | - Ricky T O'Brien
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, Medical Imaging Facility, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, 3083, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Armstrong CM, Snively EC, Shumail M, Nantista C, Li Z, Tantawi S, Loo BW, Temkin RJ, Griffin RG, Feng J, Dionisio R, Mentgen F, Ayllon N, Henderson MA, Goodman TP. Frontiers in the Application of RF Vacuum Electronics. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES 2023; 70:2643-2655. [PMID: 37250956 PMCID: PMC10216895 DOI: 10.1109/ted.2023.3239841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The application of radio frequency (RF) vacuum electronics for the betterment of the human condition began soon after the invention of the first vacuum tubes in the 1920s and has not stopped since. Today, microwave vacuum devices are powering important applications in health treatment, material and biological science, wireless communication-terrestrial and space, Earth environment remote sensing, and the promise of safe, reliable, and inexhaustible energy. This article highlights some of the exciting application frontiers of vacuum electronics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma C Snively
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | | | | | - Zenghai Li
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Sami Tantawi
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Bill W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
| | - Richard J Temkin
- Department of Physics and the Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
| | - Robert G Griffin
- Department of Chemistry and the Francis Bitter Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
| | - Jinjun Feng
- Beijing Vacuum Electronics Research Institute, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Roberto Dionisio
- RF Equipment and Technologies Section, European Space Agency (ESA), NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Felix Mentgen
- RF Equipment and Technologies Section, European Space Agency (ESA), NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Natanael Ayllon
- RF Equipment and Technologies Section, European Space Agency (ESA), NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Mark A Henderson
- United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Culham Science Centre, OX14 3DB Abingdon, U.K
| | - Timothy P Goodman
- Swiss Plasma Center, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cooper CR, Jones DJL, Jones GDD, Petersson K. Comet Assay Profiling of FLASH-Induced Damage: Mechanistic Insights into the Effects of FLASH Irradiation. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:7195. [PMID: 37108360 PMCID: PMC10138874 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24087195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated the normal tissue-sparing effects of ultra-high dose rate 'FLASH' irradiation in vivo, with an associated reduction in damage burden being reported in vitro. Towards this, two key radiochemical mechanisms have been proposed: radical-radical recombination (RRR) and transient oxygen depletion (TOD), with both being proposed to lead to reduced levels of induced damage. Previously, we reported that FLASH induces lower levels of DNA strand break damage in whole-blood peripheral blood lymphocytes (WB-PBL) ex vivo, but our study failed to distinguish the mechanism(s) involved. A potential outcome of RRR is the formation of crosslink damage (particularly, if any organic radicals recombine), whilst a possible outcome of TOD is a more anoxic profile of induced damage resulting from FLASH. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to profile FLASH-induced damage via the Comet assay, assessing any DNA crosslink formation as a putative marker of RRR and/or anoxic DNA damage formation as an indicative marker of TOD, to determine the extent to which either mechanism contributes to the "FLASH effect". Following FLASH irradiation, we see no evidence of any crosslink formation; however, FLASH irradiation induces a more anoxic profile of induced damage, supporting the TOD mechanism. Furthermore, treatment of WB-PBLs pre-irradiation with BSO abrogates the reduced strand break damage burden mediated by FLASH exposures. In summary, we do not see any experimental evidence to support the RRR mechanism contributing to the reduced damage burden induced by FLASH. However, the observation of a greater anoxic profile of damage following FLASH irradiation, together with the BSO abrogation of the reduced strand break damage burden mediated by FLASH, lends further support to TOD being a driver of the reduced damage burden plus a change in the damage profile mediated by FLASH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian R. Cooper
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Donald J. L. Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
| | - George D. D. Jones
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK; (D.J.L.J.); (G.D.D.J.)
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schulte R, Johnstone C, Boucher S, Esarey E, Geddes CGR, Kravchenko M, Kutsaev S, Loo BW, Méot F, Mustapha B, Nakamura K, Nanni EA, Obst-Huebl L, Sampayan SE, Schroeder CB, Sheng K, Snijders AM, Snively E, Tantawi SG, Van Tilborg J. Transformative Technology for FLASH Radiation Therapy. APPLIED SCIENCES (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 13:5021. [PMID: 38240007 PMCID: PMC10795821 DOI: 10.3390/app13085021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
The general concept of radiation therapy used in conventional cancer treatment is to increase the therapeutic index by creating a physical dose differential between tumors and normal tissues through precision dose targeting, image guidance, and radiation beams that deliver a radiation dose with high conformality, e.g., protons and ions. However, the treatment and cure are still limited by normal tissue radiation toxicity, with the corresponding side effects. A fundamentally different paradigm for increasing the therapeutic index of radiation therapy has emerged recently, supported by preclinical research, and based on the FLASH radiation effect. FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) is an ultra-high-dose-rate delivery of a therapeutic radiation dose within a fraction of a second. Experimental studies have shown that normal tissues seem to be universally spared at these high dose rates, whereas tumors are not. While dose delivery conditions to achieve a FLASH effect are not yet fully characterized, it is currently estimated that doses delivered in less than 200 ms produce normal-tissue-sparing effects, yet effectively kill tumor cells. Despite a great opportunity, there are many technical challenges for the accelerator community to create the required dose rates with novel compact accelerators to ensure the safe delivery of FLASH radiation beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhard Schulte
- Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA
| | - Carol Johnstone
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510, USA
| | - Salime Boucher
- RadiaBeam Technologies, LLC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Eric Esarey
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | | | | | - Sergey Kutsaev
- RadiaBeam Technologies, LLC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Billy W. Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - François Méot
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | | | - Kei Nakamura
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Emilio A. Nanni
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | | - Stephen E. Sampayan
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
- Opcondys, Inc., Manteca, CA 95336, USA
| | | | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | | | - Emma Snively
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | - Sami G. Tantawi
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Verhaegen F, Butterworth KT, Chalmers AJ, Coppes RP, de Ruysscher D, Dobiasch S, Fenwick JD, Granton PV, Heijmans SHJ, Hill MA, Koumenis C, Lauber K, Marples B, Parodi K, Persoon LCGG, Staut N, Subiel A, Vaes RDW, van Hoof S, Verginadis IL, Wilkens JJ, Williams KJ, Wilson GD, Dubois LJ. Roadmap for precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:06RM01. [PMID: 36584393 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acaf45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This Roadmap paper covers the field of precision preclinical x-ray radiation studies in animal models. It is mostly focused on models for cancer and normal tissue response to radiation, but also discusses other disease models. The recent technological evolution in imaging, irradiation, dosimetry and monitoring that have empowered these kinds of studies is discussed, and many developments in the near future are outlined. Finally, clinical translation and reverse translation are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Verhaegen
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- SmART Scientific Solutions BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karl T Butterworth
- Patrick G. Johnston, Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony J Chalmers
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, United Kingdom
| | - Rob P Coppes
- Departments of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems, Section Molecular Cell Biology and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
| | - John D Fenwick
- Department of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering University College LondonMalet Place Engineering Building, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Mark A Hill
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, ORCRB Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Kirsten Lauber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU München, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Germany
| | - Brian Marples
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching b. Munich, Germany
| | | | - Nick Staut
- SmART Scientific Solutions BV, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
| | - Rianne D W Vaes
- MAASTRO Clinic, Radiotherapy Division, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ioannis L Verginadis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Germany
- Physics Department, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Kaye J Williams
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - George D Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, MI, United States of America
- Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Ludwig J Dubois
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lyu Q, Neph R, Sheng K. Tomographic detection of photon pairs produced from high-energy X-rays for the monitoring of radiotherapy dosing. Nat Biomed Eng 2023; 7:323-334. [PMID: 36280738 PMCID: PMC10038801 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-022-00953-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Measuring the radiation dose reaching a patient's body is difficult. Here we report a technique for the tomographic reconstruction of the location of photon pairs originating from the annihilation of positron-electron pairs produced by high-energy X-rays travelling through tissue. We used Monte Carlo simulations on pre-recorded data from tissue-mimicking phantoms and from a patient with a brain tumour to show the feasibility of this imaging modality, which we named 'pair-production tomography', for the monitoring of radiotherapy dosing. We simulated three image-reconstruction methods, one applicable to a pencil X-ray beam scanning through a region of interest, and two applicable to the excitation of tissue volumes via broad beams (with temporal resolution sufficient to identify coincident photon pairs via filtered back projection, or with higher temporal resolution sufficient for the estimation of a photon's time-of-flight). In addition to the monitoring of radiotherapy dosing, we show that image contrast resulting from pair-production tomography is highly proportional to the material's atomic number. The technique may thus also allow for element mapping and for soft-tissue differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qihui Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Neph
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu F, Shi J, Zha H, Li G, Li A, Gu W, Hu A, Gao Q, Wang H, Zhang L, Liu J, Liu Y, Xu H, Tang C, Chen H. Development of a compact linear accelerator to generate ultrahigh dose rate high-energy X-rays for FLASH radiotherapy applications. Med Phys 2023; 50:1680-1698. [PMID: 36583665 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent years, the FLASH effect, in which ultrahigh dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy (RT) can significantly reduce toxicity to normal tissue while maintaining antitumor efficacy, has been verified in many studies and even applied in human clinical cases. This work evaluates whether a room-temperature radio-frequency (RF) linear accelerator (linac) system can produce UHDR high-energy X-rays exceeding a dose rate of 40 Gy/s at a clinical source-surface distance (SSD), exploring the possibility of a compact and economical clinical FLASH RT machine suitable for most hospital treatmentrooms. METHODS A 1.65 m long S-band backward-traveling-wave (BTW) electron linac was developed to generate high-current electron beams, supplied by a commercial klystron-based power source. A tungsten-copper electron-to-photon conversion target for UHDR X-rays was designed and optimized with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using Geant4 and thermal finite element analysis (FEA) simulations using ANSYS. EBT3 and EBT-XD radiochromic films, which were calibrated with a clinical machine Varian VitalBeam, were used for absolute dose measurements. A PTW ionization chamber detector was used to measure the relative total dose and a plane-parallel ionization chamber detector was used to measure the relative normalized dose of each pulse. RESULTS The BTW linac generated 300-mA-pulse-current 11 MeV electron beams with 29 kW mean beam power, and the conversion target could sustain this high beam power within a maximum irradiation duration of 0.75 s. The mean energy of the produced X-rays was 1.66 MeV in the MC simulation. The measured flat-filter-free (FFF) maximum mean dose rate of the room-temperature linac exceeded 80 Gy/s at an SSD of 50 cm and 45 Gy/s at an SSD of 67.9 cm, both at a 2.1 cm depth of the water phantom. The FFF radiation fields at 50 cm and 67.9 cm SSD at a 2.1 cm depth of the water phantom showed Gaussian-like distributions with 14.3 and 20 cm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) values, respectively. CONCLUSION This work demonstrated the feasibility of UHDR X-rays produced by a room-temperature RF linac, and explored the further optimization of system stability. It shows that a simple and compact UHDR X-ray solution can be facilitated for both FLASH-RT scientific research and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Focheng Liu
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaru Shi
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Zha
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Guohua Li
- Department of Linac, Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, China
| | - An Li
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Weihang Gu
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ankang Hu
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Gao
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Haokun Wang
- Department of Linac, Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- Department of Linac, Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, China
| | - Jinsheng Liu
- Department of Linac, Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, China
| | - Yaohong Liu
- Department of Linac, Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, China
| | - Huijun Xu
- Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General of Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chuanxiang Tang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Huaibi Chen
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Particle and Radiation Imaging of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mali SB, Dahivelkar S. Flash radiotherapy-gateway to promised land or another mirage. Oral Oncol 2023; 139:106342. [PMID: 36821983 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy damages cancer cells with ionizing radiation, leading to their death. However, radiation‑induced toxicity limits the dose delivered to the tumor, thereby constraining the control effect of radiotherapy n tumor growth. In addition, the delayed toxicity caused by radiotherapy significantly harms the physical and mental health of patients. FLASH‑RT, an emerging class of radiotherapy, causes a phenomenon known as the 'FLASH effect', which delivers radiotherapy at an ultra‑high dose rate with lower toxicity to normal tissue than conventional radiotherapy to achieve local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shrikant B Mali
- MDS Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Mandir's Dental College and Hospital Nashik, India.
| | - Sachinkumar Dahivelkar
- MDS Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Mahatma Gandhi Vidya Mandir's Dental College and Hospital Nashik, India.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rosenstrom A, Leitner MS, Rokni SH, Shumail M, Tantawi S, Dewji S, Loo BW. Monte Carlo simulation of shielding designs for a cabinet form factor preclinical MV-energy photon FLASH radiotherapy system. Med Phys 2023; 50:3055-3065. [PMID: 36780153 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A preclinical MV-energy photon FLASH radiotherapy system is being designed at Stanford and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory. Because of the higher energy and dose rate compared to conventional kV-energy photon laboratory-scale irradiators, adequate shielding in a stand-alone cabinet form factor is more challenging to achieve. We present a Monte Carlo simulation of multilayered shielding for a compact self-shielding system without the need for a radiation therapy vault. METHODS A multilayered shielding approach using multiple alternating layers of high-Z and low-Z materials is applied to the self-shielded cabinet to effectively mitigate the secondary radiation produced and to allow the device to be housed in a Controlled Radiation Area outside of a radiation vault. The multilayered shielding approach takes advantage of the properties of high-Z and low-Z radiation shielding materials such as density, cross-section, atomic number of the shielding elements, and products of radiation interactions within each layer. The Monte Carlo radiation transport code, FLUKA, is used to simulate the total effective dose produced by the operation. RESULTS The multilayered shielding designs proposed and simulated produced effective dose rates significantly lower than monolayer designs with the same total material thickness at the regulatory boundary; this is accomplished through the manipulation of the locations where secondary radiation is produced and reactions due to material properties such as neutron back reflection in hydrogen. Borated polyethylene at five weight percent significantly increased the shielding performance as compared to regular polyethylene, with the magnitude of the reduction depending upon the order of the shielding material. CONCLUSIONS The multilayered shielding provides a path for shielding preclinical FLASH systems that deliver MV-energy bremsstrahlung photons. This approach promises to be more efficient with respect to the shielding material mass and space claim as compared to shielded vaults typically required for clinical radiation therapy with MV photons. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Rosenstrom
- Nuclear & Radiological Engineering & Medical Physics Programs, Georgia Institute of Technology, North Ave NW, Atlanta, GA, United States Of America.,Radiation Protection Department, SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, United States Of America
| | | | - Sayed H Rokni
- Radiation Protection Department, SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, United States Of America
| | - Muhammad Shumail
- Technology Innovation Department, SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, United States Of America
| | - Sami Tantawi
- Technology Innovation Department, SLAC, Menlo Park, CA, United States Of America
| | - Shaheen Dewji
- Nuclear & Radiological Engineering & Medical Physics Programs, Georgia Institute of Technology, North Ave NW, Atlanta, GA, United States Of America
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States Of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Whelan B, Trovati S, Wang J, Fahrig R, Maxim PG, Hanuka A, Shumail M, Tantawi S, Merrick J, Perl J, Keall P, Loo BW. Bayesian optimization to design a novel x-ray shaping device. Med Phys 2022; 49:7623-7637. [PMID: 35904020 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In radiation therapy, x-ray dose must be precisely sculpted to the tumor, while simultaneously avoiding surrounding organs at risk. This requires modulation of x-ray intensity in space and/or time. Typically, this is achieved using a multi leaf collimator (MLC)-a complex mechatronic device comprising over one hundred individually powered tungsten 'leaves' that move in or out of the radiation field as required. Here, an all-electronic x-ray collimation concept with no moving parts is presented, termed "SPHINX": Scanning Pencil-beam High-speed Intensity-modulated X-ray source. SPHINX utilizes a spatially distributed bremsstrahlung target and collimator array in conjunction with magnetic scanning of a high energy electron beam to generate a plurality of small x-ray "beamlets." METHODS A simulation framework was developed in Topas Monte Carlo incorporating a phase space electron source, transport through user defined magnetic fields, bremsstrahlung x-ray production, transport through a SPHINX collimator, and dose in water. This framework was completely parametric, meaning a simulation could be built and run for any supplied geometric parameters. This functionality was coupled with Bayesian optimization to find the best parameter set based on an objective function which included terms to maximize dose rate for a user defined beamlet width while constraining inter-channel cross talk and electron contamination. Designs for beamlet widths of 5, 7, and 10 mm2 were generated. Each optimization was run for 300 iterations and took approximately 40 h on a 24-core computer. For the optimized 7-mm model, a simulation of all beamlets in water was carried out including a linear scanning magnet calibration simulation. Finally, a back-of-envelope dose rate formalism was developed and used to estimate dose rate under various conditions. RESULTS The optimized 5-, 7-, and 10-mm models had beamlet widths of 5.1 , 7.2 , and 10.1 mm2 and dose rates of 3574, 6351, and 10 015 Gy/C, respectively. The reduction in dose rate for smaller beamlet widths is a result of both increased collimation and source occlusion. For the simulation of all beamlets in water, the scanning magnet calibration reduced the offset between the collimator channels and beam centroids from 2.9 ±1.9 mm to 0.01 ±0.03 mm. A slight reduction in dose rate of approximately 2% per degree of scanning angle was observed. Based on a back-of-envelope dose rate formalism, SPHINX in conjunction with next-generation linear accelerators has the potential to achieve substantially higher dose rates than conventional MLC-based delivery, with delivery of an intensity modulated 100 × 100 mm2 field achievable in 0.9 to 10.6 s depending on the beamlet widths used. CONCLUSIONS Bayesian optimization was coupled with Monte Carlo modeling to generate SPHINX geometries for various beamlet widths. A complete Monte Carlo simulation for one of these designs was developed, including electron beam transport of all beamlets through scanning magnets, x-ray production and collimation, and dose in water. These results demonstrate that SPHINX is a promising candidate for sculpting radiation dose with no moving parts, and has the potential to vastly improve both the speed and robustness of radiotherapy delivery. A multi-beam SPHINX system may be a candidate for delivering magavoltage FLASH RT in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Whelan
- ACRF Image-X Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Stefania Trovati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Jinghui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Rebecca Fahrig
- Innovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.,Department of Computer Science 5, Friedrich-Alexander Universitat, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Adi Hanuka
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Muhammad Shumail
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Sami Tantawi
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Julian Merrick
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Joseph Perl
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Paul Keall
- ACRF Image-X Institute, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ramesh P, Gu W, Ruan D, Sheng K. Dose and dose rate objectives in Bragg peak and shoot-through beam orientation optimization for FLASH proton therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:7826-7837. [PMID: 36222217 PMCID: PMC9829523 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The combined use of Bragg peak (BP) and shoot-through (ST) beams has previously been shown to increase the normal tissue volume receiving FLASH dose rates while maintaining dose conformality compared to conventional intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) methods. However, the fixed beam optimization method has not considered the effects of beam orientation on the dose and dose rates. To maximize the proton FLASH effect, here, we incorporate dose rate objectives into our beam orientation optimization framework. METHODS From our previously developed group-sparsity dose objectives, we add upper and lower dose rate terms using a surrogate dose-averaged dose rate definition and solve using the fast-iterative shrinking threshold algorithm. We compare the dosimetry for three head-and-neck cases between four techniques: (1) spread-out BP IMPT (BP), (2) dose rate optimization using BP beams only (BP-DR), (3) dose rate optimization using ST beams only (ST-DR), and (4) dose rate optimization using combined BP and ST (BPST-DR), with the goal of sparing organs at risk without loss of tumor coverage and maintaining high dose rate within a 10 mm region of interest (ROI) surrounding the clinical target volume (CTV). RESULTS For BP, BP-DR, ST-DR, and BPST-DR, CTV homogeneity index and Dmax were found to be on average 0.886, 0.867, 0.687, and 0.936 and 107%, 109%, 135%, and 101% of prescription, respectively. Although ST-DR plans were not able to meet dosimetric standards, BPST-DR was able to match or improve either maximum or mean dose in the right submandibular gland, left and right parotids, constrictors, larynx, and spinal cord compared to BP plans. Volume of ROIs receiving greater than 40 Gy/s ( V γ 0 ) ${V_{\gamma 0}})$ was 51.0%, 91.4%, 95.5%, and 92.1% on average. CONCLUSIONS The dose rate techniques, particularly BPST-DR, were able to significantly increase dose rate without compromising physical dose compared with BP. Our algorithm efficiently selects beams that are optimal for both dose and dose rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavitra Ramesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Wenbo Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Faillace L, Alesini D, Bisogni G, Bosco F, Carillo M, Cirrone P, Cuttone G, De Arcangelis D, De Gregorio A, Di Martino F, Favaudon V, Ficcadenti L, Francescone D, Franciosini G, Gallo A, Heinrich S, Migliorati M, Mostacci A, Palumbo L, Patera V, Patriarca A, Pensavalle J, Perondi F, Remetti R, Sarti A, Spataro B, Torrisi G, Vannozzi A, Giuliano L. Perspectives in linear accelerator for FLASH VHEE: Study of a compact C-band system. Phys Med 2022; 104:149-159. [PMID: 36427487 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In order to translate the FLASH effect in clinical use and to treat deep tumors, Very High Electron Energy irradiations could represent a valid technique. Here, we address the main issues in the design of a VHEE FLASH machine. We present preliminary results for a compact C-band system aiming to reach a high accelerating gradient and high current necessary to deliver a Ultra High Dose Rate with a beam pulse duration of 3μs. METHODS The proposed system is composed by low energy high current injector linac followed by a high acceleration gradient structure able to reach 60-160 MeV energy range. To obtain the maximum energy, an energy pulse compressor options is considered. CST code was used to define the specifications RF parameters of the linac. To optimize the accelerated current and therefore the delivered dose, beam dynamics simulations was performed using TSTEP and ASTRA codes. RESULTS The VHEE parameters Linac suitable to satisfy FLASH criteria were simulated. Preliminary results allow to obtain a maximum energy of 160 MeV, with a peak current of 200 mA, which corresponds to a charge of 600 nC. CONCLUSIONS A promising preliminary design of VHEE linac for FLASH RT has been performed. Supplementary studies are on going to complete the characterization of the machine and to manufacture and test the RF prototypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Faillace
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Italy.
| | - D Alesini
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Italy
| | - G Bisogni
- INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy; Department of Physics, University of Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - F Bosco
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - M Carillo
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - P Cirrone
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy
| | - G Cuttone
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy
| | - D De Arcangelis
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - A De Gregorio
- INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy; Department of Physics, Sapienza University, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - F Di Martino
- U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - V Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, INSERM U1021/UMR3347, Orsay, France
| | - L Ficcadenti
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - D Francescone
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - G Franciosini
- INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy; Department of Physics, Sapienza University, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - A Gallo
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Italy
| | - S Heinrich
- Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, PSL Research University, INSERM U1021/UMR3347, Orsay, France
| | - M Migliorati
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - A Mostacci
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - L Palumbo
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - V Patera
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - A Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - J Pensavalle
- INFN Sezione di Pisa, Italy; Department of Physics, University of Pisa, 56127 Pisa, Italy
| | - F Perondi
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - R Remetti
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - A Sarti
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| | - B Spataro
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Italy
| | - G Torrisi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy
| | - A Vannozzi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Italy
| | - L Giuliano
- SBAI Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; INFN Sezione di Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lomax T, Psoroulas S. To FLASH or to Fractionate? That is the question. Z Med Phys 2022; 32:387-390. [PMID: 36328860 PMCID: PMC9948873 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
35
|
Vozenin MC, Bourhis J, Durante M. Towards clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:791-803. [DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00697-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
36
|
Gao Y, Liu R, Chang C, Charyyev S, Zhou J, Bradley JD, Liu T, Yang X. A potential revolution in cancer treatment: A topical review of FLASH radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13790. [PMID: 36168677 PMCID: PMC9588273 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (RT) is a novel technique in which the ultrahigh dose rate (UHDR) (≥40 Gy/s) is delivered to the entire treatment volume. Recent outcomes of in vivo studies show that the UHDR RT has the potential to spare normal tissue without sacrificing tumor control. There is a growing interest in the application of FLASH RT, and the ultrahigh dose irradiation delivery has been achieved by a few experimental and modified linear accelerators. The underlying mechanism of FLASH effect is yet to be fully understood, but the oxygen depletion in normal tissue providing extra protection during FLASH irradiation is a hypothesis that attracts most attention currently. Monte Carlo simulation is playing an important role in FLASH, enabling the understanding of its dosimetry calculations and hardware design. More advanced Monte Carlo simulation tools are under development to fulfill the challenge of reproducing the radiolysis and radiobiology processes in FLASH irradiation. FLASH RT may become one of standard treatment modalities for tumor treatment in the future. This paper presents the history and status of FLASH RT studies with a focus on FLASH irradiation delivery modalities, underlying mechanism of FLASH effect, in vivo and vitro experiments, and simulation studies. Existing challenges and prospects of this novel technique are discussed in this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Chih‐Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Serdar Charyyev
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jeffrey D. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hageman E, Che PP, Dahele M, Slotman BJ, Sminia P. Radiobiological Aspects of FLASH Radiotherapy. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12101376. [PMID: 36291585 PMCID: PMC9599153 DOI: 10.3390/biom12101376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the primary treatment modalities for cancer patients. The clinical use of RT requires a balance to be struck between tumor effect and the risk of toxicity. Sparing normal tissue is the cornerstone of reducing toxicity. Advances in physical targeting and dose-shaping technology have helped to achieve this. FLASH RT is a promising, novel treatment technique that seeks to exploit a potential normal tissue-sparing effect of ultra-high dose rate irradiation. A significant body of in vitro and in vivo data has highlighted a decrease in acute and late radiation toxicities, while preserving the radiation effect in tumor cells. The underlying biological mechanisms of FLASH RT, however, remain unclear. Three main mechanisms have been hypothesized to account for this differential FLASH RT effect between the tumor and healthy tissue: the oxygen depletion, the DNA damage, and the immune-mediated hypothesis. These hypotheses and molecular mechanisms have been evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the effect of ultra-high dose rate radiation with extremely short delivery times on the dynamic tumor microenvironment involving circulating blood cells and immune cells in humans is essentially unknown. Therefore, while there is great interest in FLASH RT as a means of targeting tumors with the promise of an increased therapeutic ratio, evidence of a generalized FLASH effect in humans and data to show that FLASH in humans is safe and at least effective against tumors as standard photon RT is currently lacking. FLASH RT needs further preclinical investigation and well-designed in-human studies before it can be introduced into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline Hageman
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pei-Pei Che
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max Dahele
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J. Slotman
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Sminia
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Radiation Oncology, Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Peiris GS, Pawiro SA, Kasim MF, Sheehy SL. Failure modes and downtime of radiotherapy LINACs and multileaf collimators in Indonesia. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 24:e13756. [PMID: 36001392 PMCID: PMC9859980 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The lack of equitable access to radiotherapy (RA) linear accelerators (LINACs) is a substantial barrier to cancer care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These nations are expected to bear up to 75% of cancer-related deaths globally by 2030. State-of-the-art LINACs in LMICs experience major issues in terms of robustness, with mechanical and electrical breakdowns resulting in downtimes ranging from days to months. While existing research has identified the higher failure frequency and downtimes between LMICs (Nigeria, Botswana) compared to high-income countries (HICs, the UK), there has been a need for additional data and study particularly relating to multileaf collimators (MLCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study presents for the first time the analysis of data gathered through a dedicated survey and workshop including participants from 14 Indonesian hospitals, representing a total of 19 LINACs. We show the pathways to failure of radiotherapy LINACs and frequency of breakdowns with a focus on the MLC subsystem. RESULTS This dataset shows that LINACs throughout Indonesia are out of operation for seven times longer than HICs, and the mean time between failures of a LINAC in Indonesia is 341.58 h or about 14 days. Furthermore, of the LINACs with an MLC fitted, 59 . 02 - 1.61 + 1.98 $59.02_{ - 1.61}^{ + 1.98}$ % of all mechanical faults are due to the MLC, and 57 . 14 - 1.27 + 0.78 $57.14_{ - 1.27}^{ + 0.78}$ % of cases requiring a replacement component are related to the MLC. CONCLUSION These results highlight the pressing need to improve robustness of RT technology for use in LMICs, highlighting the MLC as a particularly problematic component. This work motivates a reassessment of the current generation of RT LINACs and demonstrates the need for dedicated efforts toward a future where cancer treatment technology is robust for use in all environments where it is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Supriyanto Ardjo Pawiro
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesUniversitas IndonesiaDepok CityIndonesia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rahman M, Trigilio A, Franciosini G, Moeckli R, Zhang R, Böhlen TT. FLASH radiotherapy treatment planning and models for electron beams. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:210-221. [PMID: 35964763 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s) compared to conventional dose rate (∼0.1 Gy/s) irradiation while maintaining tumour control and has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy (RT). UHDR high-energy electron (HEE, 4-20 MeV) beams are currently a mainstay for investigating the clinical potential of FLASH RT for superficial tumours. In the future very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) UHDR beams may be used to treat deep-seated tumours. UHDR HEE treatment planning focused at its initial stage on accurate dosimetric modelling of converted and dedicated UHDR electron RT devices for the clinical transfer of FLASH RT. VHEE treatment planning demonstrated promising dosimetric performance compared to clinical photon RT techniques in silico and was used to evaluate and optimise the design of novel VHEE RT devices. Multiple metrics and models have been proposed for a quantitative description of the FLASH effect in treatment planning, but an improved experimental characterization and understanding of the FLASH effect is needed to allow for an accurate and validated modelling of the effect in treatment planning. The importance of treatment planning for electron FLASH RT will augment as the field moves forward to treat more complex clinical indications and target sites. In this review, TPS developments in HEE and VHEE are presented considering beam models, characteristics, and future FLASH applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubur Rahman
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Antonio Trigilio
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Franciosini
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rothwell B, Lowe M, Traneus E, Krieger M, Schuemann J. Treatment planning considerations for the development of FLASH proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:222-230. [PMID: 35963397 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
With increasing focus on the translation of the observed FLASH effect into clinical practice, this paper presents treatment planning considerations for its development using proton therapy. Potential requirements to induce a FLASH effect are discussed along with the properties of existing proton therapy delivery systems and the changes in planning and delivery approaches required to satisfy these prerequisites. For the exploration of treatment planning approaches for FLASH, developments in treatment planning systems are needed. Flexibility in adapting to new information will be important in such an evolving area. Variations in definitions, threshold values and assumptions can make it difficult to compare different published studies and to interpret previous studies in the context of new information. Together with the fact that much is left to be understood about the underlying mechanism behind the FLASH effect, a systematic and comprehensive approach to information storage is encouraged. Collecting and retaining more detailed information on planned and realised dose delivery as well as reporting the assumptions made in planning studies creates the potential for research to be revisited and re-evaluated in the light of future improvements in understanding. Forward thinking at the time of study development can help facilitate retrospective analysis. This, we hope, will increase the available evidence and accelerate the translation of the FLASH effect into clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Rothwell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Matthew Lowe
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Miriam Krieger
- Varian Medical Systems Particle Therapy GmbH & Co. KG, Troisdorf, Germany
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Division of Physics, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Esplen N, Egoriti L, Paley B, Planche T, Hoehr C, Gottberg A, Bazalova-Carter M. Design optimization of an electron-to-photon conversion target for ultra-high dose rate x-ray (FLASH) experiments at TRIUMF. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac5ed6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. To develop a bremsstrahlung target and megavoltage (MV) x-ray irradiation platform for ultrahigh dose-rate (UHDR) irradiation of small-animals on the Advanced Rare Isotope Laboratory (ARIEL) electron linac (e-linac) at TRIUMF. Approach. An electron-to-photon converter design for UHDR radiotherapy (RT) was centered around optimization of a tantalum–aluminum (Ta–Al) explosion-bonded target. Energy deposition within a homogeneous water-phantom and the target itself were evaluated using EGSnrc and FLUKA MC codes, respectively, for various target thicknesses (0.5–1.5 mm), beam energies (E
e− = 8, 10 MeV) and electron (Gaussian) beam sizes (
2
σ
= 2–10 mm). Depth dose-rates in a 3D-printed mouse phantom were also calculated to infer the compatibility of the 10 MV dose distributions for FLASH-RT in small-animal models. Coupled thermo-mechanical FEA simulations in ANSYS were subsequently used to inform the stress–strain conditions and fatigue life of the target assembly. Main results. Dose-rates of up to 128 Gy s−1 at the phantom surface, or 85 Gy s−1 at 1 cm depth, were obtained for a 1 × 1 cm2 field size, 1 mm thick Ta target and 7.5 cm source-to-surface distance using the FLASH-mode beam (E
e− = 10 MeV, 2
σ
= 5 mm, P = 1 kW); furthermore, removal of the collimation assembly and using a shorter (3.5 cm) SSD afforded dose-rates >600 Gy s−1, albeit at the expense of field conformality. Target temperatures were maintained below the tantalum, aluminum and cooling-water thresholds of 2000 °C, 300 °C and 100 °C, respectively, while the aluminum strain behavior remained everywhere elastic and helped ensure the converter survives its prescribed 5 yr operational lifetime. Significance. Effective design iteration, target cooling and failure mitigation have culminated in a robust target compatible with intensive transient (FLASH) and steady-state (diagnostic) applications. The ARIEL UHDR photon source will facilitate FLASH-RT experiments concerned with sub-second, pulsed or continuous beam irradiations at dose rates in excess of 40 Gy s−1.
Collapse
|
42
|
Poirier Y, Xu J, Mossahebi S, Therriault‐Proulx F, Sawant A. Technical note: Characterization and practical applications of a novel plastic scintillator for on‐line dosimetry for ultra‐high dose rate (FLASH). Med Phys 2022; 49:4682-4692. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.15671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Poirier
- University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21201
- McGill University Montreal QC H3A 2T5 Canada
| | - Junliang Xu
- University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21201
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21201
| | | | - Amit Sawant
- University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21201
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cavallone M, Jorge PG, Moeckli R, Bailat C, Flacco A, Prezado Y, Delorme R. Determination of the ion collection efficiency of the Razor Nano Chamber for ultra-high dose-rate electron beams. Med Phys 2022; 49:4731-4742. [PMID: 35441716 PMCID: PMC9539950 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ultra‐high dose‐rate (UHDR) irradiations (>40 Gy/s) have recently garnered interest in radiotherapy (RT) as they can trigger the so‐called “FLASH” effect, namely a higher tolerance of normal tissues in comparison with conventional dose rates when a sufficiently high dose is delivered to the tissue. To transfer this to clinical RT treatments, adapted methods and practical tools for online dosimetry need to be developed. Ionization chambers remain the gold standards in RT but the charge recombination effects may be very significant at such high dose rates, limiting the use of some of these dosimeters. The reduction of the sensitive volume size can be an interesting characteristic to reduce such effects. Purpose In that context, we have investigated the charge collection behavior of the recent IBA Razor™ Nano Chamber (RNC) in UHDR pulses to evaluate its potential interest for FLASH RT. Methods In order to quantify the RNC ion collection efficiency (ICE), simultaneous dose measurements were performed under UHDR electron beams with dose‐rate‐independent Gafchromic™ EBT3 films that were used as the dose reference. A dose‐per‐pulse range from 0.01 to 30 Gy was investigated, varying the source‐to‐surface distance, the pulse duration (1 and 3 μs investigated) and the LINAC gun grid tension as irradiation parameters. In addition, the RNC measurements were corrected from the inherent beam shot‐to‐shot variations using an independent current transformer. An empirical logistic model was used to fit the RNC collection efficiency measurements and the results were compared with the Advanced Markus plane parallel ion chamber. Results The RNC ICE was found to decrease as the dose‐per‐pulse increases, starting from doses above 0.2 Gy/pulse and down to 40% of efficiency at 30 Gy/pulse. The RNC resulted in a higher ICE for a given dose‐per‐pulse in comparison with the Markus chamber, with a measured efficiency found higher than 85 and 55% for 1 and 10 Gy/pulse, respectively, whereas the Markus ICE was of 60 and 25% for the same doses. However, the RNC shows a higher sensitivity to the pulse duration than the Advanced Markus chamber, with a lower efficiency found at 1 μs than at 3 μs, suggesting that this chamber could be more sensitive to the dose rate within the pulse. Conclusions The results confirmed that the small sensitive volume of the RNC ensures higher ICE compared with larger chambers. The RNC was thus found to be a promising online dosimetry tool for FLASH RT and we proposed an ion recombination model to correct its response up to extreme dose‐per‐pulses of 30 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Cavallone
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, 91898, France.,Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée, ENSTA Paris, École Polytechnique, CNRS-UMR7639, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau Cedex, 91762, France
| | | | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Flacco
- Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée, ENSTA Paris, École Polytechnique, CNRS-UMR7639, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Palaiseau Cedex, 91762, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France
| | - Rachel Delorme
- University of Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LPSC-IN2P3, Grenoble, 38000, France.,Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, F-91400, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jin JY. Prospect of radiotherapy technology development in the era of immunotherapy. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
45
|
Kim MM, Darafsheh A, Schuemann J, Dokic I, Lundh O, Zhao T, Ramos-Méndez J, Dong L, Petersson K. Development of Ultra-High Dose-Rate (FLASH) Particle Therapy. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022; 6:252-262. [PMID: 36092270 PMCID: PMC9457346 DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2021.3091406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Research efforts in FLASH radiotherapy have increased at an accelerated pace recently. FLASH radiotherapy involves ultra-high dose rates and has shown to reduce toxicity to normal tissue while maintaining tumor response in pre-clinical studies when compared to conventional dose rate radiotherapy. The goal of this review is to summarize the studies performed to-date with proton, electron, and heavy ion FLASH radiotherapy, with particular emphasis on the physical aspects of each study and the advantages and disadvantages of each modality. Beam delivery parameters, experimental set-up, and the dosimetry tools used are described for each FLASH modality. In addition, modeling efforts and treatment planning for FLASH radiotherapy is discussed along with potential drawbacks when translated into the clinical setting. The final section concludes with further questions that have yet to be answered before safe clinical implementation of FLASH radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arash Darafsheh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 222, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olle Lundh
- Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - José Ramos-Méndez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Oncology, The Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy is a novel technique that has been shown in numerous preclinical in vivo studies to have the potential to be the next important improvement in cancer treatment. However, the biological mechanisms responsible for the selective FLASH sparing effect of normal tissues are not yet known. An optimal translation of FLASH radiotherapy into the clinic would require a good understanding of the specific beam parameters that induces a FLASH effect, environmental conditions affecting the response, and the radiobiological mechanisms involved. Even though the FLASH effect has generally been considered as an in vivo effect, studies finding these answers would be difficult and ethically challenging to carry out solely in animals. Hence, suitable in vitro studies aimed towards finding these answers are needed. In this review, we describe and summarise several in vitro assays that have been used or could be used to finally elucidate the mechanisms behind the FLASH effect.
Collapse
|
47
|
Schwarz M, Traneus E, Safai S, Kolano A, van de Water S. Treatment planning for Flash radiotherapy: general aspects and applications to proton beams. Med Phys 2022; 49:2861-2874. [PMID: 35213040 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The increased radioresistence of healthy tissues when irradiated at very high dose rates (known as the Flash effect) is a radiobiological mechanism that is currently investigated in order to increase the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy treatments. To maximize the benefits of the clinical application of Flash, a patient-specific balance between different properties of the dose distribution should be found, i.e. Flash needs to be one of the variables considered in treatment planning. We investigated the Flash potential of three proton therapy planning and beam delivery techniques, each on a different anatomical region. Based on a set of beam delivery parameters, on hypotheses on the dose and dose rate thresholds needed for the Flash effect to occur, and on two definitions of Flash dose rate, we generated exemplary illustrations of the capabilities of current proton therapy equipment to generate Flash dose distributions. All techniques investigated could both produce dose distributions comparable with a conventional proton plan and reach the Flash regime, to an extent that was strongly dependent on the dose per fraction and the Flash dose threshold. The beam current, Flash dose rate threshold and dose rate definition typically had a more moderate effect on the amount of Flash dose in normal tissue. A systematic estimation of the impact of Flash on different patient anatomies and treatment protocols is possible only if Flash-specific treatment planning features become readily available. Planning evaluation tools such as a voxel-based dose delivery time structure, and the inclusion in the optimization cost function of parameters directly associated with Flash (e.g. beam current, spot delivery sequence and scanning speed), are needed to generate treatment plans that are taking full advantage of the potential benefits of the Flash effect. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Schwarz
- Proton therapy Department, Trento Hospital and TIFPA-INFN, Trento, Italy
| | - Erik Traneus
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm SE-103 65, Sweden
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Anna Kolano
- Advanced Oncotherapy plc, London, England - Application of Detectors and Accelerators to Medicine(ADAM), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Steven van de Water
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hu A, Qiu R, Wu Z, Zhang H, Li J. CPU-GPU coupling independent reaction times method in NASIC and application in water radiolysis by FLASH irradiation. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac52d9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The mechanism of the FLASH effect remains unclear and could be revealed by studying chemical reactions during irradiation. Monte Carlo simulation of the radiolytic species is an effective tool to analyze chemical reactions, but the simulation is limited by computing costs of the step-by-step simulation of radiolytic species, especially when considering beam with complex time structure. The complexity of the time structure of beams from accelerators in FLASH radiotherapy requires a high-performance Monte Carlo code. In this work, we develop a CPU-GPU coupling accelerating code with the independent reaction times (IRT) method to extend the chemical module of our nanodosimetry Monte Carlo code NASIC. Every chemical molecule in the microenvironment contains time information to consider the reactions from different tracks and simulate beams with complex time structures. Performance test shows that our code significantly improved the computing efficiency of the chemical module by four orders of magnitude. Then the code is used to study the oxygen depletion hypothesis in FLASH radiotherapy for different conditions by setting different parameters. The transient oxygen consumption rate values in the water are calculated when the pulses width ranges from 2 ps to 2 μs, the total dose ranges from 0.5 Gy to 100 Gy and the initial oxygen concentration ranges from 0.1% to 21%. The time evolution curves are simulated to study the effect of the time structure of an electron linear accelerator. Results show that the total dose in several microseconds is a better indicator reflecting the radiolytic oxygen consumption rate than the dose rate. The initial oxygen greatly affects the oxygen consumption rate because of the reaction competition. The diffusion of oxygen determined by the physiological parameters is the key factor affecting oxygen depletion during the radiation using electron linear accelerators. Our code provides an efficient tool for simulating water radiolysis in different conditions
Collapse
|
49
|
Guerrieri P, Jacob NK, Maxim PG, Sawant A, Van Nest SJ, Mohindra P, Dominello MM, Burmeister JW, Joiner MC. Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: FLASH radiotherapy needs ongoing basic and animal research before implementing it to a large clinical scale. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13547. [PMID: 35104025 PMCID: PMC8992943 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Guerrieri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bon Secours Mercy Health, Youngstown, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Peter G Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Amit Sawant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Samantha J Van Nest
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Jay W Burmeister
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Gershenson Radiation Oncology Center, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael C Joiner
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sarti A, De Maria P, Battistoni G, De Simoni M, Di Felice C, Dong Y, Fischetti M, Franciosini G, Marafini M, Marampon F, Mattei I, Mirabelli R, Muraro S, Pacilio M, Palumbo L, Rocca L, Rubeca D, Schiavi A, Sciubba A, Tombolini V, Toppi M, Traini G, Trigilio A, Patera V. Deep Seated Tumour Treatments With Electrons of High Energy Delivered at FLASH Rates: The Example of Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 11:777852. [PMID: 35024354 PMCID: PMC8744000 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.777852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Different therapies are adopted for the treatment of deep seated tumours in combination or as an alternative to surgical removal or chemotherapy: radiotherapy with photons (RT), particle therapy (PT) with protons or even heavier ions like 12C, are now available in clinical centres. In addition to these irradiation modalities, the use of Very High Energy Electron (VHEE) beams (100–200 MeV) has been suggested in the past, but the diffusion of that technique was delayed due to the needed space and budget, with respect to standard photon devices. These disadvantages were not paired by an increased therapeutic efficacy, at least when comparing to proton or carbon ion beams. In this contribution we investigate how recent developments in electron beam therapy could reshape the treatments of deep seated tumours. In this respect we carefully explored the application of VHEE beams to the prostate cancer, a well-known and studied example of deep seated tumour currently treated with high efficacy both using RT and PT. The VHEE Treatment Planning System was obtained by means of an accurate Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of the electrons interactions with the patient body. A simple model of the FLASH effect (healthy tissues sparing at ultra-high dose rates), has been introduced and the results have been compared with conventional RT. The study demonstrates that VHEE beams, even in absence of a significant FLASH effect and with a reduced energy range (70–130 MeV) with respect to implementations already explored in literature, could be a good alternative to standard RT, even in the framework of technological developments that are nowadays affordable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Sarti
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy
| | - Patrizia De Maria
- Scuola post-laurea in Fisica Medica, Dipartimento di Scienze e Biotecnologie medico-chirurgiche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Battistoni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Micol De Simoni
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Cinzia Di Felice
- Unità di Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy
| | - Yunsheng Dong
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Fischetti
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy
| | - Gaia Franciosini
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Michela Marafini
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy.,Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "E. Fermi", Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche e Anatomo Patologiche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mattei
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mirabelli
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Silvia Muraro
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Pacilio
- Unità di Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy
| | - Luigi Palumbo
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy
| | - Loredana Rocca
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Damiana Rubeca
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Angelo Schiavi
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy
| | - Adalberto Sciubba
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione dei Laboratori di Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche e Anatomo Patologiche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Toppi
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione dei Laboratori di Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Giacomo Traini
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy
| | - Antonio Trigilio
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy.,Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Patera
- Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy.,Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Roma I, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|