1
|
Maier SH, Schönecker S, Anagnostatou V, Garny S, Nitschmann A, Fleischmann DF, Büttner M, Kaul D, Imhoff D, Fokas E, Seidel C, Hau P, Kölbl O, Popp I, Grosu AL, Haussmann J, Budach W, Celik E, Kahl KH, Hoffmann E, Tabatabai G, Paulsen F, Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Mansmann U, Corradini S, Belka C, Niyazi M, Bodensohn R. Dummy run for planning of isotoxic dose-escalated radiation therapy for glioblastoma used in the PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2024-01; AG-NRO-06). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100790. [PMID: 38765202 PMCID: PMC11101689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2024-01; AG-NRO-06; NCT05871021) is designed to determine whether a dose escalation with 75.0 Gy in 30 fractions can enhance the median overall survival (OS) in patients with methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor unmethylated glioblastoma compared to historical median OS rates, while being isotoxic to historical cohorts through the addition of concurrent bevacizumab (BEV). To ensure protocol-compliant irradiation planning with all study centers, a dummy run was planned and the plan quality was evaluated. Methods A suitable patient case was selected and the computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) contours were made available. Participants at the various intended study sites performed radiation planning according to the PRIDE clinical trial protocol. The treatment plans and dose grids were uploaded as Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files to a cloud-based platform. Plan quality and protocol adherence were analyzed using a standardized checklist, scorecards and indices such as Dice Score (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). Results Median DSC was 0.89, 0.90, 0.88 for PTV60, PTV60ex (planning target volume receiving 60.0 Gy for the standard and the experimental plan, respectively) and PTV75 (PTV receiving 75.0 Gy in the experimental plan), respectively. Median HD values were 17.0 mm, 13.9 mm and 12.1 mm, respectively. These differences were also evident in the volumes: The PTV60 had a volume range of 219.1-391.3 cc (median: 261.9 cc) for the standard plans, while the PTV75 volumes for the experimental plans ranged from 71.5-142.7 cc (median: 92.3 cc). The structures with the largest deviations in Dice score were the pituitary gland (median 0.37, range 0.00-0.69) and the right lacrimal gland (median 0.59, range 0.42-0.78). Conclusions The deviations revealed the necessity of systematic trainings with appropriate feedback before the start of clinical trials in radiation oncology and the constant monitoring of protocol compliance throw-out the study. Trial registration NCT05871021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian H. Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Vasiliki Anagnostatou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel F. Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcel Büttner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- Department of Radiotherapy of Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy of Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Hau
- Department of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Kölbl
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ilinca Popp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan Haussmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Eren Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CyberKnife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany
| | - Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hurkmans C, Bibault JE, Brock KK, van Elmpt W, Feng M, David Fuller C, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Korreman S, Landry G, Madesta F, Mayo C, McWilliam A, Moura F, Paul Muren L, El Naqa I, Seuntjens J, Valentini V, Velec M. A joint ESTRO and AAPM guideline for development, clinical validation and reporting of artificial intelligence models in radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2024:110345. [PMID: 38838989 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Artificial Intelligence (AI) models in radiation therapy are being developed with increasing pace. Despite this, the radiation therapy community has not widely adopted these models in clinical practice. A cohesive guideline on how to develop, report and clinically validate AI algorithms might help bridge this gap. METHODS AND MATERIALS A Delphi process with all co-authors was followed to determine which topics should be addressed in this comprehensive guideline. Separate sections of the guideline, including Statements, were written by subgroups of the authors and discussed with the whole group at several meetings. Statements were formulated and scored as highly recommended or recommended. RESULTS The following topics were found most relevant: Decision making, image analysis, volume segmentation, treatment planning, patient specific quality assurance of treatment delivery, adaptive treatment, outcome prediction, training, validation and testing of AI model parameters, model availability for others to verify, model quality assurance/updates and upgrades, ethics. Key references were given together with an outlook on current hurdles and possibilities to overcome these. 19 Statements were formulated. CONCLUSION A cohesive guideline has been written which addresses main topics regarding AI in radiation therapy. It will help to guide development, as well as transparent and consistent reporting and validation of new AI tools and facilitate adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coen Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Kristy K Brock
- Departments of Imaging Physics and Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mary Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Clifton David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Dept. of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Dept. of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stine Korreman
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, a Partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frederic Madesta
- Department of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Institute for Applied Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Center for Biomedical Artificial Intelligence (bAIome), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chuck Mayo
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, USA
| | - Alan McWilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Filipe Moura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ludvig Paul Muren
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network & Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael Velec
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Birimac NE, Willems YC, Zegers CM, Vaassen F, Hofstede D, Compter I, Jaspers J, Romero AM, Broen MP, Swinnen A, Schijns OE, Unipan M, Houben RM, van Elmpt W, Eekers DB. The existence of cranial bone flap displacement during brain radiotherapy. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100250. [PMID: 38681951 PMCID: PMC11053212 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
This retrospective study examined bone flap displacement during radiotherapy in 25 post-operative brain tumour patients. Though never exceeding 2.5 mm, the sheer frequency of displacement highlights the need for future research on larger populations to validate its presence and assess the potential clinical impact on planning tumour volume margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolina E. Birimac
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yves C.P. Willems
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Catharina M.L. Zegers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Femke Vaassen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - David Hofstede
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Inge Compter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jaap Jaspers
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands
| | - Alejandra Méndez Romero
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martinus P.G. Broen
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ans Swinnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Olaf E.M.G. Schijns
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Academic Center for Epileptology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University Maastricht (UM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirko Unipan
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruud M. Houben
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B.P. Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yilmaz MT, Kahvecioglu A, Yedekci FY, Yigit E, Ciftci GC, Kertmen N, Zorlu F, Yazici G. Comparison of different target volume delineation strategies based on recurrence patterns in adjuvant radiotherapy for glioblastoma. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:275-283. [PMID: 38737611 PMCID: PMC11085836 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) recommendations are commonly used guidelines for adjuvant radiotherapy in glioblastoma. In our institutional protocol, we delineate T2-FLAIR alterations as gross target volume (GTV) with reduced clinical target volume (CTV) margins. We aimed to present our oncologic outcomes and compare the recurrence patterns and planning parameters with EORTC and RTOG delineation strategies. Methods Eighty-one patients who received CRT between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. EORTC and RTOG delineations performed on the simulation computed tomography and recurrence patterns and planning parameters were compared between delineation strategies. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was utilized for statistical analyses. Results Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 21 months and 11 months, respectively. At a median 18 month follow-up, of the 48 patients for whom recurrence pattern analysis was performed, recurrence was encompassed by only our institutional protocol's CTV in 13 (27%) of them. For the remaining 35 (73%) patients, recurrence was encompassed by all separate CTVs. In addition to the 100% rate of in-field recurrence, the smallest CTV and lower OAR doses were obtained by our protocol. Conclusions The current study provides promising results for including the T2-FLAIR alterations to the GTV with smaller CTV margins with impressive survival outcomes without any marginal recurrence. The fact that our protocol did not result in larger irradiated brain volume is further encouraging in terms of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Tugce Yilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Alper Kahvecioglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fazli Yagiz Yedekci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ecem Yigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokcen Coban Ciftci
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Neyran Kertmen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Faruk Zorlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lo SS, Tseng CL, Sahgal A. Target delineation for glioblastoma-Is it time to sever historical ties? Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:221-222. [PMID: 38737605 PMCID: PMC11085843 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Di Perri D, Hofstede D, Hartgerink D, Terhaag K, Houben R, Postma AA, Hoeben A, Anten M, Ackermans L, Compter I, Eekers DBP. Impact of clinical target volume margin reduction in glioblastoma patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:249-254. [PMID: 38737612 PMCID: PMC11085847 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is widely treated using large radiotherapy margins, resulting in substantial irradiation of the surrounding cerebral structures. In this context, the question arises whether these margins could be safely reduced. In 2018, clinical target volume (CTV) expansion was reduced in our institution from 20 to 15 mm around the gross target volume (GTV) (ie, the contrast-enhancing tumor/cavity). We sought to retrospectively analyze the impact of this reduction. Methods All adult patients with GBM treated between January 2015 and December 2020 with concurrent chemoradiation (60Gy/2Gy or 59.4Gy/1.8Gy) were analyzed. Patients treated using a 20 (CTV20, n = 57) or 15 mm (CTV15, n = 56) CTV margin were compared for target volumes, dose parameters to the surrounding organs, pattern of recurrence, and survival outcome. Results Mean GTV was similar in both groups (ie, CTV20: 39.7cm3; CTV15: 37.8cm3; P = .71). Mean CTV and PTV were reduced from 238.9cm3 to 176.7cm3 (P = .001) and from 292.6cm3 to 217.0cm3 (P < .001), for CTV20 and CTV15, respectively. As a result, average brain mean dose (Dmean) was reduced from 25.2Gy to 21.0Gy (P = .002). Significantly lower values were also observed for left hippocampus Dmean, brainstem D0.03cc, cochleas Dmean, and pituitary Dmean. Pattern of recurrence was similar, as well as patient outcome, ie, median progression-free survival was 8.0 and 7.0 months (P = .80), and median overall survival was 11.0 and 14.0 months (P = .61) for CTV20 and CTV15, respectively. Conclusions In GBM patients treated with chemoradiation, reducing the CTV margin from 20 to 15 mm appears to be safe and offers the potential for less treatment toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Di Perri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Hofstede
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dianne Hartgerink
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Terhaag
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud Houben
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Alida A Postma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ann Hoeben
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Anten
- Department of Neurology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Ackermans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Compter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cuccia F, Jafari F, D’Alessandro S, Carruba G, Craparo G, Tringali G, Blasi L, Ferrera G. Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence. J Pers Med 2024; 14:538. [PMID: 38793120 PMCID: PMC11122491 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence in glioblastoma lacks a standardized treatment, prompting an exploration of re-irradiation's efficacy. METHODS A comprehensive systematic review from January 2005 to May 2023 assessed the role of MRI sequences in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation. The search criteria, employing MeSH terms, targeted English-language, peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria comprised both retrospective and prospective studies, excluding certain types and populations for specificity. The PICO methodology guided data extraction, and the statistical analysis employed Chi-squared tests via MedCalc v22.009. RESULTS Out of the 355 identified studies, 81 met the criteria, involving 3280 patients across 65 retrospective and 16 prospective studies. The key findings indicate diverse treatment modalities, with linac-based photons predominating. The median age at re-irradiation was 54 years, and the median time interval between radiation courses was 15.5 months. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were favored for target delineation, with PET-imaging used in fewer studies. Re-irradiation was generally well tolerated (median G3 adverse events: 3.5%). The clinical outcomes varied, with a median 1-year local control rate of 61% and a median overall survival of 11 months. No significant differences were noted in the G3 toxicity and clinical outcomes based on the MRI sequence preference or PET-based delineation. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of recurrent glioblastoma, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were preferred for target delineation, allowing clinicians to deliver a safe and effective therapeutic option; amino acid PET imaging may represent a useful device to discriminate radionecrosis from recurrent disease. Future investigations, including the ongoing GLIAA, NOA-10, ARO 2013/1 trial, will aim to refine approaches and standardize methodologies for improved outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| | - Fatemeh Jafari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Teheran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran 1416634793, Iran
| | | | - Giuseppe Carruba
- Division of Internationalization and Health Research (SIRS), ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Livio Blasi
- Medical Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Desorgher L, Veres I, Bratel A, Landström E, Engwall E, Herrera FG, Ozsahin EM, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110177. [PMID: 38378075 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One proposed solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250 MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250 MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect. METHODS Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250 MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case. RESULTS Like TP, VHEE above 100 MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ± 20 %) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. Electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150 MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250 MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100 MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Izabella Veres
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roda D, Veiga P, Melo JB, Carreira IM, Ribeiro IP. Principles in the Management of Glioblastoma. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:501. [PMID: 38674436 PMCID: PMC11050118 DOI: 10.3390/genes15040501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma, the most aggressive and common malignant primary brain tumour, is characterized by infiltrative growth, abundant vascularization, and aggressive clinical evolution. Patients with glioblastoma often face poor prognoses, with a median survival of approximately 15 months. Technological progress and the subsequent improvement in understanding the pathophysiology of these tumours have not translated into significant achievements in therapies or survival outcomes for patients. Progress in molecular profiling has yielded new omics data for a more refined classification of glioblastoma. Several typical genetic and epigenetic alterations in glioblastoma include mutations in genes regulating receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/rat sarcoma (RAS)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), p53, and retinoblastoma protein (RB) signalling, as well as mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), methylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor vIII, and codeletion of 1p/19q. Certain microRNAs, such as miR-10b and miR-21, have also been identified as prognostic biomarkers. Effective treatment options for glioblastoma are limited. Surgery, radiotherapy, and alkylating agent chemotherapy remain the primary pillars of treatment. Only promoter methylation of the gene MGMT predicts the benefit from alkylating chemotherapy with temozolomide and it guides the choice of first-line treatment in elderly patients. Several targeted strategies based on tumour-intrinsic dominant signalling pathways and antigenic tumour profiles are under investigation in clinical trials. This review explores the potential genetic and epigenetic biomarkers that could be deployed as analytical tools in the diagnosis and prognostication of glioblastoma. Recent clinical advancements in treating glioblastoma are also discussed, along with the potential of liquid biopsies to advance personalized medicine in the field of glioblastoma, highlighting the challenges and promises for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domingos Roda
- Algarve Radiation Oncology Unit—Joaquim Chaves Saúde (JCS), 8000-316 Faro, Portugal;
| | - Pedro Veiga
- Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Cytogenetics and Genomics Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; (P.V.); (J.B.M.)
| | - Joana Barbosa Melo
- Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Cytogenetics and Genomics Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; (P.V.); (J.B.M.)
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) and Center of Investigation on Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB) and Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Isabel Marques Carreira
- Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Cytogenetics and Genomics Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; (P.V.); (J.B.M.)
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) and Center of Investigation on Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB) and Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ilda Patrícia Ribeiro
- Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Cytogenetics and Genomics Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; (P.V.); (J.B.M.)
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) and Center of Investigation on Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
- Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB) and Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Achkasova K, Kukhnina L, Moiseev A, Kiseleva E, Bogomolova A, Loginova M, Gladkova N. Detection of acute and early-delayed radiation-induced changes in the white matter of the rat brain based on numerical processing of optical coherence tomography data. JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS 2024; 17:e202300458. [PMID: 38253332 DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202300458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Detection of radiation-induced changes of the brain white matter is important for brain neoplasms repeated surgery. We investigated the influence of irradiation on the scattering properties of the white matter using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Healthy Wistar rats undergone the irradiation of the brain right hemisphere. At seven time points from the irradiation procedure (2-14 weeks), an ex vivo OCT study was performed with subsequent calculation of attenuation coefficient values in the corpus callosum followed by immunohistochemical analysis. As a result, we discovered acute and early-delayed changes characterized by the edema of different severity, accompanied by a statistically significant decrease in attenuation coefficient values. In particular, these changes were found at 2 weeks after irradiation in the irradiated hemisphere, while at 6- and 12-week time points they affected both irradiated and contralateral hemisphere. Thus, radiation-induced changes occurring in white matter during the first 3 months after irradiation can be detected by OCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ksenia Achkasova
- Research Institute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Liudmila Kukhnina
- Research Institute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Alexander Moiseev
- Laboratory of Highly Sensitive Optical Measurements, Institute of Applied Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Elena Kiseleva
- Research Institute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Alexandra Bogomolova
- Research Institute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Maria Loginova
- Research Institute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Natalia Gladkova
- Research Institute of Experimental Oncology and Biomedical Technologies, Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Niitsu H, Fukumitsu N, Tanaka K, Mizumoto M, Nakai K, Matsuda M, Ishikawa E, Hatano K, Hashimoto T, Kamizawa S, Sakurai H. Methyl- 11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning for recurrent malignant glioma. Ann Nucl Med 2024; 38:305-314. [PMID: 38356008 PMCID: PMC10954960 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01901-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate differences in uptake regions between methyl-11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography (11C-MET PET) and gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their impact on dose distribution, including changing of the threshold for tumor boundaries. METHODS Twenty consecutive patients with grade 3 or 4 glioma who had recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy (RT) between April 2016 and October 2017 were examined. The study was performed using simulation with the assumption that all patients received RT. The clinical target volume (CTV) was contoured using the Gd-enhanced region (CTV(Gd)), the tumor/normal tissue (T/N) ratios of 11C-MET PET of 1.3 and 2.0 (CTV (T/N 1.3), CTV (T/N 2.0)), and the PET-edge method (CTV(P-E)) for stereotactic RT planning. Differences among CTVs were evaluated. The brain dose at each CTV and the dose at each CTV defined by 11C-MET PET using MRI as the reference were evaluated. RESULTS The Jaccard index (JI) for concordance of CTV (Gd) with CTVs using 11C-MET PET was highest for CTV (T/N 2.0), with a value of 0.7. In a comparison of pixel values of MRI and PET, the correlation coefficient for cases with higher JI was significantly greater than that for lower JI cases (0.37 vs. 0.20, P = 0.007). D50% of the brain in RT planning using each CTV differed significantly (P = 0.03) and that using CTV (T/N 1.3) were higher than with use of CTV (Gd). V90% and V95% for each CTV differed in a simulation study for actual treatment using CTV (Gd) (P = 1.0 × 10-7 and 3.0 × 10-9, respectively) and those using CTV (T/N 1.3) and CTV (P-E) were lower than with CTV (Gd). CONCLUSIONS The region of 11C-MET accumulation is not necessarily consistent with and larger than the Gd-enhanced region. A change of the tumor boundary using 11C-MET PET can cause significant changes in doses to the brain and the CTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikaru Niitsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan.
| | - Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe Proton Center, 1-6-8, Minatoshima-Minamimachi, Kobe, 650-0047, Japan
| | - Keiichi Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Masahide Matsuda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Eiichi Ishikawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kentaro Hatano
- Department of Applied Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hashimoto
- Department of Radiology, AIC Imaging Center, 2-1-16 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0005, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kamizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 2-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barry N, Koh ES, Ebert MA, Moore A, Francis RJ, Rowshanfarzad P, Hassan GM, Ng SP, Back M, Chua B, Pinkham MB, Pullar A, Phillips C, Sia J, Gorayski P, Le H, Gill S, Croker J, Bucknell N, Bettington C, Syed F, Jung K, Chang J, Bece A, Clark C, Wada M, Cook O, Whitehead A, Rossi A, Grose A, Scott AM. [18]F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine positron emission tomography for radiotherapy target delineation: Results from a Radiation Oncology credentialing program. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100568. [PMID: 38585372 PMCID: PMC10998205 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The [18]F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is an Australian prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET for newly diagnosed glioblastoma management. The Radiation Oncology credentialing program aimed to assess the feasibility in Radiation Oncologist (RO) derivation of standard-of-care target volumes (TVMR) and hybrid target volumes (TVMR+FET) incorporating pre-defined FET PET biological tumour volumes (BTVs). Materials and methods Central review and analysis of TVMR and TVMR+FET was undertaken across three benchmarking cases. BTVs were pre-defined by a sole nuclear medicine expert. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) confidence intervals (CIs) evaluated volume agreement. RO contour spatial and boundary agreement were evaluated (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], Jaccard index [JAC], overlap volume [OV], Hausdorff distance [HD] and mean absolute surface distance [MASD]). Dose plan generation (one case per site) was assessed. Results Data from 19 ROs across 10 trial sites (54 initial submissions, 8 resubmissions requested, 4 conditional passes) was assessed with an initial pass rate of 77.8 %; all resubmissions passed. TVMR+FET were significantly larger than TVMR (p < 0.001) for all cases. RO gross tumour volume (GTV) agreement was moderate-to-excellent for GTVMR (ICC = 0.910; 95 % CI, 0.708-0.997) and good-to-excellent for GTVMR+FET (ICC = 0.965; 95 % CI, 0.871-0.999). GTVMR+FET showed greater spatial overlap and boundary agreement compared to GTVMR. For the clinical target volume (CTV), CTVMR+FET showed lower average boundary agreement versus CTVMR (MASD: 1.73 mm vs. 1.61 mm, p = 0.042). All sites passed the planning exercise. Conclusions The credentialing program demonstrated feasibility in successful credentialing of 19 ROs across 10 sites, increasing national expertise in TVMR+FET delineation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Barry
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin A. Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Roslyn J. Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Ghulam Mubashar Hassan
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Sweet P. Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark B. Pinkham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Pullar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Claire Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Sia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Suki Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Jeremy Croker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Nicholas Bucknell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Catherine Bettington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Farhan Syed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Kylie Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Joe Chang
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrej Bece
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Clark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Mori Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Olivia Cook
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Angela Whitehead
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Alana Rossi
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Andrew Grose
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pöhlmann J, Weller M, Marcellusi A, Grabe-Heyne K, Krott-Coi L, Rabar S, Pollock RF. High costs, low quality of life, reduced survival, and room for improving treatment: an analysis of burden and unmet needs in glioma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1368606. [PMID: 38571509 PMCID: PMC10987841 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1368606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are a group of heterogeneous tumors that account for substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs to patients and healthcare systems globally. Survival varies considerably by grade, histology, biomarkers, and genetic alterations such as IDH mutations and MGMT promoter methylation, and treatment, but is poor for some grades and histologies, with many patients with glioblastoma surviving less than a year from diagnosis. The present review provides an introduction to glioma, including its classification, epidemiology, economic and humanistic burden, as well as treatment options. Another focus is on treatment recommendations for IDH-mutant astrocytoma, IDH-mutant oligodendroglioma, and glioblastoma, which were synthesized from recent guidelines. While recommendations are nuanced and reflect the complexity of the disease, maximum safe resection is typically the first step in treatment, followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy using temozolomide or procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine. Immunotherapies and targeted therapies currently have only a limited role due to disappointing clinical trial results, including in recurrent glioblastoma, for which the nitrosourea lomustine remains the de facto standard of care. The lack of treatment options is compounded by frequently suboptimal clinical practice, in which patients do not receive adequate therapy after resection, including delayed, shortened, or discontinued radiotherapy and chemotherapy courses due to treatment side effects. These unmet needs will require significant efforts to address, including a continued search for novel treatment options, increased awareness of clinical guidelines, improved toxicity management for chemotherapy, and the generation of additional and more robust clinical and health economic evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Marcellusi
- Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA)-Centre for Economic and International Studies (CEIS), Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Silvia Rabar
- Covalence Research Ltd, Harpenden, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tseng CL, Zeng KL, Mellon EA, Soltys SG, Ruschin M, Lau AZ, Lutsik NS, Chan RW, Detsky J, Stewart J, Maralani PJ, Sahgal A. Evolving concepts in margin strategies and adaptive radiotherapy for glioblastoma: A new future is on the horizon. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S3-S16. [PMID: 38437669 PMCID: PMC10911794 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment after maximal safe resection for glioblastoma (GBM). Despite advances in molecular profiling, surgical techniques, and neuro-imaging, there have been no major breakthroughs in radiotherapy (RT) volumes in decades. Although the majority of recurrences occur within the original gross tumor volume (GTV), treatment of a clinical target volume (CTV) ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 cm beyond the GTV remains the standard of care. Over the past 15 years, the incorporation of standard and functional MRI sequences into the treatment workflow has become a routine practice with increasing adoption of MR simulators, and new integrated MR-Linac technologies allowing for daily pre-, intra- and post-treatment MR imaging. There is now unprecedented ability to understand the tumor dynamics and biology of GBM during RT, and safe CTV margin reduction is being investigated with the goal of improving the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this review is to discuss margin strategies and the potential for adaptive RT for GBM, with a focus on the challenges and opportunities associated with both online and offline adaptive workflows. Lastly, opportunities to biologically guide adaptive RT using non-invasive imaging biomarkers and the potential to define appropriate volumes for dose modification will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Liang Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Program, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angus Z Lau
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalia S Lutsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Rachel W Chan
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman J Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Breen WG, Aryal MP, Cao Y, Kim MM. Integrating multi-modal imaging in radiation treatments for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S17-S25. [PMID: 38437666 PMCID: PMC10911793 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in diagnostic and treatment technology along with rapid developments in translational research may now allow the realization of precision radiotherapy. Integration of biologically informed multimodality imaging to address the spatial and temporal heterogeneity underlying treatment resistance in glioblastoma is now possible for patient care, with evidence of safety and potential benefit. Beyond their diagnostic utility, several candidate imaging biomarkers have emerged in recent early-phase clinical trials of biologically based radiotherapy, and their definitive assessment in multicenter prospective trials is already in development. In this review, the rationale for clinical implementation of candidate advanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers to guide personalized radiotherapy, the current landscape, and future directions for integrating imaging biomarkers into radiotherapy for glioblastoma are summarized. Moving forward, response-adaptive radiotherapy using biologically informed imaging biomarkers to address emerging treatment resistance in rational combination with novel systemic therapies may ultimately permit improvements in glioblastoma outcomes and true individualization of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Madhava P Aryal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bodensohn R, Fleischmann DF, Maier SH, Anagnostatou V, Garny S, Nitschmann A, Büttner M, Mücke J, Schönecker S, Unger K, Hoffmann E, Paulsen F, Thorwarth D, Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Corradini S, Tabatabai G, Belka C, Niyazi M. Dosimetric feasibility analysis and presentation of an isotoxic dose-escalated radiation therapy concept for glioblastoma used in the PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2022-12). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100706. [PMID: 38116137 PMCID: PMC10726217 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The PRIDE trial (NOA-28; ARO-2022-12; NCT05871021) is scheduled to start recruitment in October 2023. Its primary objective is to enhance median overall survival (OS), compared to historical median OS rates, in patients with methylguanine methlyltransferase (MGMT) promotor unmethylated glioblastoma by incorporating isotoxic dose escalation to 75 Gy in 30 fractions. To achieve isotoxicity and counteract the elevated risk of radiation necrosis (RN) associated with dose-escalated regimens, the addition of protective concurrent bevacizumab (BEV) serves as an innovative approach. The current study aims to assess the dosimetric feasibility of the proposed concept. Materials and methods A total of ten patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were included in this dosimetric analysis. Delineation of target volumes for the reference plans adhered to the ESTRO-EANO 2023 guideline. The experimental plans included an additional volume for the integrated boost. Additionally, the 60 Gy-volume was reduced by using a margin of 1.0 cm instead of 1.5 cm. To assess the risk of symptomatic RN, the Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) was calculated and compared between the reference and experimental plans. Results Median NTCP of the reference plan (NTCPref) and of the experimental plan (NTCPex) were 0.24 (range 0.11-0.29) and 0.42 (range 0.18-0.54), respectively. NTCPex was a median of 1.77 (range 1.60-1.99) times as high as the NTXPref. In a logarithmic comparison, the risk of RN is enhanced by a factor of median 2.00 (range 1.66-2.35). The defined constraints for the organs at risk were feasible. Conclusion When considering the potential protective effect of BEV, which we hypothesized might reduce the risk of RN by approximately two-fold, achieving isotoxicity with the proposed dose-escalated experimental plan for the PRIDE trial seems feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel F. Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian H. Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Vasiliki Anagnostatou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcel Büttner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Mücke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Kristian Unger
- Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich Germany
| | - Elgin Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ramesh P, Ruan D, Liu SJ, Seo Y, Braunstein S, Sheng K. Hypoxia-informed RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:2320-2333. [PMID: 38345134 PMCID: PMC10940223 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models in treatment planning have been proposed to optimize the therapeutic ratio of proton therapy. It has been reported that proton RBE decreases with increasing tumor oxygen level, offering an opportunity to address hypoxia-related radioresistance with RBE-weighted optimization. PURPOSE Here, we obtain a voxel-level estimation of partial oxygen pressure to weigh RBE values in a single biologically informed beam orientation optimization (BOO) algorithm. METHODS Three glioblastoma patients with [18 F]-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO)-PET/CT images were selected from the institutional database. Oxygen values were derived from tracer uptake using a nonlinear least squares curve fitting. McNamara RBE, calculated from proton dose, was then weighed using oxygen enhancement ratios (OER) for each voxel and incorporated into the dose fidelity term of the BOO algorithm. The nonlinear optimization problem was solved using a split-Bregman approach, with FISTA as the solver. The proposed hypoxia informed RBE-weighted method (HypRBE) was compared to dose fidelity terms using the constant RBE of 1.1 (cRBE) and the normoxic McNamara RBE model (RegRBE). Tumor homogeneity index (HI), maximum biological dose (Dmax), and D95%, as well as OAR therapeutic index (TI = gEUDCTV /gEUDOAR ) were evaluated along with worst-case statistics after normalization to normal tissue isotoxicity. RESULTS Compared to [cRBE, RegRBE], HypRBE increased tumor HI, Dmax, and D95% across all plans by on average [31.3%, 31.8%], [48.6%, 27.1%], and [50.4%, 23.8%], respectively. In the worst-case scenario, the parameters increase on average by [12.5%, 14.7%], [7.3%,-8.9%], and [22.3%, 2.1%]. Despite increased OAR Dmean and Dmax by [8.0%, 3.0%] and [13.1%, -0.1%], HypRBE increased average TI by [22.0%, 21.1%]. Worst-case OAR Dmean, Dmax, and TI worsened by [17.9%, 4.3%], [24.5%, -1.2%], and [9.6%, 10.5%], but in the best cases, HypRBE escalates tumor coverage significantly without compromising OAR dose, increasing the therapeutic ratio. CONCLUSIONS We have developed an optimization algorithm whose dose fidelity term accounts for hypoxia-informed RBE values. We have shown that HypRBE selects bE:\Alok\aaeams better suited to deliver high physical dose to low RBE, hypoxic tumor regions while sparing the radiosensitive normal tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavitra Ramesh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Dan Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - S. John Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Youngho Seo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Ke Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kawamura M, Kamomae T, Yanagawa M, Kamagata K, Fujita S, Ueda D, Matsui Y, Fushimi Y, Fujioka T, Nozaki T, Yamada A, Hirata K, Ito R, Fujima N, Tatsugami F, Nakaura T, Tsuboyama T, Naganawa S. Revolutionizing radiation therapy: the role of AI in clinical practice. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:1-9. [PMID: 37996085 PMCID: PMC10803173 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
This review provides an overview of the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiation therapy (RT) from a radiation oncologist's perspective. Over the years, advances in diagnostic imaging have significantly improved the efficiency and effectiveness of radiotherapy. The introduction of AI has further optimized the segmentation of tumors and organs at risk, thereby saving considerable time for radiation oncologists. AI has also been utilized in treatment planning and optimization, reducing the planning time from several days to minutes or even seconds. Knowledge-based treatment planning and deep learning techniques have been employed to produce treatment plans comparable to those generated by humans. Additionally, AI has potential applications in quality control and assurance of treatment plans, optimization of image-guided RT and monitoring of mobile tumors during treatment. Prognostic evaluation and prediction using AI have been increasingly explored, with radiomics being a prominent area of research. The future of AI in radiation oncology offers the potential to establish treatment standardization by minimizing inter-observer differences in segmentation and improving dose adequacy evaluation. RT standardization through AI may have global implications, providing world-standard treatment even in resource-limited settings. However, there are challenges in accumulating big data, including patient background information and correlating treatment plans with disease outcomes. Although challenges remain, ongoing research and the integration of AI technology hold promise for further advancements in radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kamomae
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yanagawa
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Daiju Ueda
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Fushimi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Fujioka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan
| | - Taiki Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Akira Yamada
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Kenji Hirata
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita15, Nishi7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Rintaro Ito
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Fujima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita15, Nishi7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Fuminari Tatsugami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakaura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuboyama
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumaicho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Buti G, Ajdari A, Hochreuter K, Shih H, Bridge CP, Sharp GC, Bortfeld T. The influence of anisotropy on the clinical target volume of brain tumor patients. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10.1088/1361-6560/ad1997. [PMID: 38157552 PMCID: PMC10863979 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad1997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Current radiotherapy guidelines for glioma target volume definition recommend a uniform margin expansion from the gross tumor volume (GTV) to the clinical target volume (CTV), assuming uniform infiltration in the invaded brain tissue. However, glioma cells migrate preferentially along white matter tracts, suggesting that white matter directionality should be considered in an anisotropic CTV expansion. We investigate two models of anisotropic CTV expansion and evaluate their clinical feasibility.Approach.To incorporate white matter directionality into the CTV, a diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) atlas is used. The DTI atlas consists of water diffusion tensors that are first spatially transformed into local tumor resistance tensors, also known as metric tensors, and secondly fed to a CTV expansion algorithm to generate anisotropic CTVs. Two models of spatial transformation are considered in the first step. The first model assumes that tumor cells experience reduced resistance parallel to the white matter fibers. The second model assumes that the anisotropy of tumor cell resistance is proportional to the anisotropy observed in DTI, with an 'anisotropy weighting parameter' controlling the proportionality. The models are evaluated in a cohort of ten brain tumor patients.Main results.To evaluate the sensitivity of the model, a library of model-generated CTVs was computed by varying the resistance and anisotropy parameters. Our results indicate that the resistance coefficient had the most significant effect on the global shape of the CTV expansion by redistributing the target volume from potentially less involved gray matter to white matter tissue. In addition, the anisotropy weighting parameter proved useful in locally increasing CTV expansion in regions characterized by strong tissue directionality, such as near the corpus callosum.Significance.By incorporating anisotropy into the CTV expansion, this study is a step toward an interactive CTV definition that can assist physicians in incorporating neuroanatomy into a clinically optimized CTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Buti
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Biophysics, 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Ali Ajdari
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Biophysics, 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Kim Hochreuter
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Biophysics, 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
- Aarhus University Hospital, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 99, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 82, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Helen Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Christopher P Bridge
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, 149 Thirteenth St, Charlestown, MA 02129, United States of America
| | - Gregory C Sharp
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Biophysics, 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Biophysics, 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nabian N, Ghalehtaki R, Zeinalizadeh M, Balaña C, Jablonska PA. State of the neoadjuvant therapy for glioblastoma multiforme-Where do we stand? Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae028. [PMID: 38560349 PMCID: PMC10981465 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite several investigations in this field, maximal safe resection followed by chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields remains the standard of care with poor survival outcomes. Many endeavors have failed to make a dramatic change in the outcomes of GBM patients. This study aimed to review the available strategies for newly diagnosed GBM in the neoadjuvant setting, which have been mainly neglected in contrast to other solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naeim Nabian
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehdi Zeinalizadeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Carmen Balaña
- B.ARGO (Badalona Applied Research Group of Oncology) Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology Badalona, Badalona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Niyazi M, Bendszus M, Minniti G. Response to the letter to the editor by Macià i Garau et al. regarding the article "ESTRO-EANO guideline on target delineation and radiotherapy details for glioblastoma" by Niyazi et al. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109965. [PMID: 37922992 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen, a partnership between DKFZ and University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ryan J, Hardcastle N, Francis R, Ferjančič P, Ng SP, Koh ES, Geso M, Kelly J, Ebert MA. The impact of fluorine-18-fluoroethyltyrosine positron emission tomography scan timing on radiotherapy planning in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100536. [PMID: 38303922 PMCID: PMC10831153 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Glioblastoma is one of the most common and aggressive primary brain tumours in adults. Though radiation therapy (RT) techniques have progressed significantly in recent decades, patient survival has seen little improvement. However, an area of promise is the use of fluorine-18-fluoroethyltyrosine positron-emission-tomography (18F-FET PET) imaging to assist in RT target delineation. This retrospective study aims to assess the impact of 18F-FET PET scan timing on the resultant RT target volumes and subsequent RT plans in post-operative glioblastoma patients. Materials and Methods The imaging and RT treatment data of eight patients diagnosed with glioblastoma and treated at a single institution were analysed. Before starting RT, each patient had two 18F-FET-PET scans acquired within seven days of each other. The information from these 18F-FET-PET scans aided in the creation of two novel target volume sets. The new volumes and plans were compared with each other and the originals. Results The median clinical target volume (CTV) 1 was statistically smaller than CTV 2. The median Dice score for the CTV1/CTV2 was 0.98 and, of the voxels that differ (median 6.5 cc), 99.7% were covered with a 5 mm expansion. Overall organs at risk (OAR) and target dosimetry were similar in the PTV1 and PTV2 plans. Conclusion Provided the 18F-FET PET scan is acquired within two weeks of the RT planning and a comprehensive approach is taken to CTV delineation, the timing of scan acquisition has minimal impact on the resulting RT plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Ryan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne 3800, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Radiations Department, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne 3083, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Grattan St, Melbourne 3000, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roslyn Francis
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Ferjančič
- Department of Medical Physics, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison 53705, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Heidelberg, Melbourne 3084, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney 2170, New South Wales, Australia
- South West Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Sydney 2170, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Moshi Geso
- Medical Radiations Department, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne 3083, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer Kelly
- Medical Radiations Department, RMIT University, Bundoora, Melbourne 3083, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Department of Medical Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, 6009, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, and Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brighi C, Waddington DEJ, Keall PJ, Booth J, O’Brien K, Silvester S, Parkinson J, Mueller M, Yim J, Bailey DL, Back M, Drummond J. The MANGO study: a prospective investigation of oxygen enhanced and blood-oxygen level dependent MRI as imaging biomarkers of hypoxia in glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1306164. [PMID: 38192626 PMCID: PMC10773871 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1306164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive type of brain cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of ~5% and most tumours recurring locally within months of first-line treatment. Hypoxia is associated with worse clinical outcomes in GBM, as it leads to localized resistance to radiotherapy and subsequent tumour recurrence. Current standard of care treatment does not account for tumour hypoxia, due to the challenges of mapping tumour hypoxia in routine clinical practice. In this clinical study, we aim to investigate the role of oxygen enhanced (OE) and blood-oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MRI as non-invasive imaging biomarkers of hypoxia in GBM, and to evaluate their potential role in dose-painting radiotherapy planning and treatment response assessment. Methods The primary endpoint is to evaluate the quantitative and spatial correlation between OE and BOLD MRI measurements and [18F]MISO values of uptake in the tumour. The secondary endpoints are to evaluate the repeatability of MRI biomarkers of hypoxia in a test-retest study, to estimate the potential clinical benefits of using MRI biomarkers of hypoxia to guide dose-painting radiotherapy, and to evaluate the ability of MRI biomarkers of hypoxia to assess treatment response. Twenty newly diagnosed GBM patients will be enrolled in this study. Patients will undergo standard of care treatment while receiving additional OE/BOLD MRI and [18F]MISO PET scans at several timepoints during treatment. The ability of OE/BOLD MRI to map hypoxic tumour regions will be evaluated by assessing spatial and quantitative correlations with areas of hypoxic tumour identified via [18F]MISO PET imaging. Discussion MANGO (Magnetic resonance imaging of hypoxia for radiation treatment guidance in glioblastoma multiforme) is a diagnostic/prognostic study investigating the role of imaging biomarkers of hypoxia in GBM management. The study will generate a large amount of longitudinal multimodal MRI and PET imaging data that could be used to unveil dynamic changes in tumour physiology that currently limit treatment efficacy, thereby providing a means to develop more effective and personalised treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Brighi
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David E. J. Waddington
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul J. Keall
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeremy Booth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Shona Silvester
- Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathon Parkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Marco Mueller
- Siemens Healthcare Pty Ltd, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jackie Yim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dale L. Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - James Drummond
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Brain Cancer Group Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Department of Neuroradiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim N, Lee J, Nam DH, Lee JI, Seol HJ, Kong DS, Choi JW, Chong K, Lee WJ, Chang JH, Kang SG, Moon JH, Cho J, Lim DH, Yoon HI. Impact of boost sequence in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy on newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 2023; 165:261-268. [PMID: 37861921 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04465-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is maximal surgical resection followed by conventional fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with a total dose of 60 Gy. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal boost technique for CCRT in GBM. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 398 patients treated with CCRT between 2016 and 2021, using data from two institutional databases. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving sequential boost (SEB, N = 119) and those receiving simultaneous integrated boost (SIB, N = 279). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To minimize differences between the SIB and SEB groups, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 18.6 months. Before PSM, SEB showed better OS compared to SIB (2-year, 55.6% vs. 44.5%, p = 0.014). However, after PSM, there was no significant difference between two groups (2-year, 55.6% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.300). The boost sequence was not associated with inferior OS before and after PSM (all p-values > 0.05). Additionally, the rates of symptomatic pseudo-progression were similar between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.75, p = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS This study found no significant difference in OS between SEB and SIB for GBM patients treated with CCRT. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to determine the optimal boost techniques for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Joongyo Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Do-Hyun Nam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Il Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Jun Seol
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo-Sik Kong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Won Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyuha Chong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Jae Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Tumor Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Gu Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Hyung Moon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Brain Tumor Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeho Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Hoon Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hong In Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vamsi VS, Lukacova S, Dahlrot RH, Guldberg TL, Korshøj AR, Muhic A, Trip AK. The impact of short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy on multimodality treatment utilisation, compliance, and outcome in glioblastoma patients: a Danish patterns of care study. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1511-1519. [PMID: 37558643 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2238884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this retrospective registry-based Danish patterns of care study was (1) to evaluate the real-world utilisation of short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients over time, and (2) to evaluate the impact of short-course HFRT by assessing trends in multimodality treatment utilisation, compliance, and outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of all adults with newly diagnosed pathology-confirmed GBM between 2011 and 2019 were extracted from the nationwide Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry. Short-course HFRT was defined as a fraction size of > 2 Gy to a planned dose of > 30 Gy. Patterns of care were assessed. To analyse trends in the assignment to short-course HFRT, and in radiotherapy (RT) compliance, multivariable logistic regression was applied. To analyse trends in survival, multivariable Cox regression was used. RESULTS In this cohort of 2416 GBM patients, the utilisation of short-course HFRT significantly increased from ca. 10% in 2011 to 33% in recent years. This coincided with the discontinued use of palliative regimens and a decreased use of conventional fractionation. The proportion of patients proceeding to RT remained stable at ca. 85%. The proportion of patients assigned to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remained stable at ca. 60%; the use of short-course hypofractionated CRT increased with ca. 10%, while the use of conventionally fractionated CRT decreased with ca. 10%. Compliance with conventionally fractionated and short-course HFRT was respective 92% and 93%, and significantly increasing in recent years. In the complete cohort, the median overall survival remained stable at ca. 11 months. Assignment to short-course HFRT was independently associated with shorter survival. CONCLUSION In Denmark, the use of short-course HFRT significantly increased in recent years. Nonetheless, the overall utilisation of RT and chemotherapy did not increase on a population level. Nor did survival change. In contrast, compliance with both conventionally fractionated RT and short-course HFRT increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnuga Sivarasah Vamsi
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Slavka Lukacova
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rikke Hedegaard Dahlrot
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Anders Rosendal Korshøj
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Aida Muhic
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anouk Kirsten Trip
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nahar Metu CL, Sutihar SK, Sohel M, Zohora F, Hasan A, Miah MT, Rani Kar T, Hossain MA, Rahman MH. Unraveling the signaling mechanism behind astrocytoma and possible therapeutics strategies: A comprehensive review. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 6:e1889. [PMID: 37675821 PMCID: PMC10598261 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A form of cancer called astrocytoma can develop in the brain or spinal cord and sometimes causes death. A detailed overview of the precise signaling cascade underlying astrocytoma formation has not yet been revealed, although various factors have been investigated. Therefore, our objective was to unravel and summarize our current understanding of molecular genetics and associated signaling pathways with some possible therapeutic strategies for astrocytoma. RECENT FINDINGS In general, four different forms of astrocytoma have been identified in individuals, including circumscribed, diffuse, anaplastic, and multiforme glioblastoma, according to a recent literature review. All types of astrocytoma have a direct connection with some oncogenic signaling cascade. Common signaling is MAPK cascade, including Ras-Raf-ERK, up-regulated with activating EGFR/AKT/PTEN/mTOR and PDGFR. Recent breakthrough studies found that BRAF mutations, including KIAA1549: BRAF and BRAF V600E are responsible for astrocytoma progression. Additionally, cancer progression is influenced by mutations in some tumor suppressor genes, such as the Tp53/ATRX and MGMT mutant. As synthetic medications must cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), modulating signal systems such as miRNA is the primary option for treating patients with astrocytoma. However, available surgery, radiation therapy, and experimental therapies such as adjuvant therapy, anti-angiogenic therapy, and EGFR-targeting antibody drug are the usual treatment for most types of astrocytoma. Similar to conventional anticancer medications, some phytochemicals slow tumor growth by simultaneously controlling several cellular proteins, including those involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, metastatic spread, tyrosine kinase, growth factor receptor, and antioxidant-related proteins. CONCLUSION In conclusion, cellular and molecular signaling is directly associated with the development of astrocytoma, and a combination of conventional and alternative therapies can improve the malignancy of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chowdhury Lutfun Nahar Metu
- Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyBangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology UniversityGopalganjBangladesh
| | - Sunita Kumari Sutihar
- Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyBangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology UniversityGopalganjBangladesh
| | - Md Sohel
- Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyMawlana Bhashani Science and Technology UniversityTangailBangladesh
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyPrimeasia UniversityDhakaBangladesh
| | - Fatematuz Zohora
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of DhakaDhakaBangladesh
| | - Akayed Hasan
- Department of PharmacyMawlana Bhashani Science and Technology UniversityTangailBangladesh
| | - Md. Thandu Miah
- Department of PharmacyMawlana Bhashani Science and Technology UniversityTangailBangladesh
| | - Tanu Rani Kar
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyPrimeasia UniversityDhakaBangladesh
| | - Md. Arju Hossain
- Department of Biotechnology and Genetic EngineeringMawlana Bhashani Science and Technology UniversityTangailBangladesh
| | - Md Habibur Rahman
- Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIslamic UniversityKushtiaBangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hannisdal MH, Goplen D, Lundervold A, Chekenya M. Exploiting Deep Learning to Enhance Tumour-conformed Delineation and Reduced Isotropic Margin in Radiotherapy: Updated ESTRO-EANO Guidelines. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e636-e638. [PMID: 37516592 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M H Hannisdal
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - D Goplen
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - A Lundervold
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Radiology, Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - M Chekenya
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Poel R, Kamath AJ, Willmann J, Andratschke N, Ermiş E, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Reyes M. Deep-Learning-Based Dose Predictor for Glioblastoma-Assessing the Sensitivity and Robustness for Dose Awareness in Contouring. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4226. [PMID: 37686501 PMCID: PMC10486555 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy requires a sophisticated and laborious planning procedure. To improve the efficiency and quality of this procedure, machine-learning models that predict these dose distributions were introduced. The most recent dose prediction models are based on deep-learning architectures called 3D U-Nets that give good approximations of the dose in 3D almost instantly. Our purpose was to train such a 3D dose prediction model for glioblastoma VMAT treatment and test its robustness and sensitivity for the purpose of quality assurance of automatic contouring. From a cohort of 125 glioblastoma (GBM) patients, VMAT plans were created according to a clinical protocol. The initial model was trained on a cascaded 3D U-Net. A total of 60 cases were used for training, 15 for validation and 20 for testing. The prediction model was tested for sensitivity to dose changes when subject to realistic contour variations. Additionally, the model was tested for robustness by exposing it to a worst-case test set containing out-of-distribution cases. The initially trained prediction model had a dose score of 0.94 Gy and a mean DVH (dose volume histograms) score for all structures of 1.95 Gy. In terms of sensitivity, the model was able to predict the dose changes that occurred due to the contour variations with a mean error of 1.38 Gy. We obtained a 3D VMAT dose prediction model for GBM with limited data, providing good sensitivity to realistic contour variations. We tested and improved the model's robustness by targeted updates to the training set, making it a useful technique for introducing dose awareness in the contouring evaluation and quality assurance process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Poel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Amith J. Kamath
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ekin Ermiş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M. Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mauricio Reyes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
- ARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McDonald F, Belka C, Hurkmans C, Alicja Jereczek-Fossa B, Poortmans P, van de Kamer JB, Azizaj E, Franco P. Introducing the ESTRO Guidelines Committee, driving force for the new generation of ESTRO guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2023:109724. [PMID: 37244357 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona McDonald
- Lung Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Radiotherapy & Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Coen Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jeroen B van de Kamer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eralda Azizaj
- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dejonckheere CS, Thelen A, Simon B, Greschus S, Köksal MA, Schmeel LC, Wilhelm-Buchstab T, Leitzen C. Impact of Postoperative Changes in Brain Anatomy on Target Volume Delineation for High-Grade Glioma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2840. [PMID: 37345177 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade glioma has a poor prognosis, and radiation therapy plays a crucial role in its management. Every step of treatment planning should thus be optimised to maximise survival chances and minimise radiation-induced toxicity. Here, we compare structures needed for target volume delineation between an immediate postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a radiation treatment planning MRI to establish the need for the latter. Twenty-eight patients were included, with a median interval between MRIs (range) of 19.5 (8-50) days. There was a mean change in resection cavity position (range) of 3.04 ± 3.90 (0-22.1) mm, with greater positional changes in skull-distant (>25 mm) resection cavity borders when compared to skull-near (≤25 mm) counterparts (p < 0.001). The mean differences in resection cavity and surrounding oedema and FLAIR hyperintensity volumes were -32.0 ± 29.6% and -38.0 ± 25.0%, respectively, whereas the mean difference in midline shift (range) was -2.64 ± 2.73 (0-11) mm. These data indicate marked short-term volumetric changes and support the role of an MRI to aid in target volume delineation as close to radiation treatment start as possible. Planning adapted to the actual anatomy at the time of radiation limits the risk of geographic miss and might thus improve outcomes in patients undergoing adjuvant radiation for high-grade glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anja Thelen
- Faculty of Medicine, University Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Birgit Simon
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Mümtaz Ali Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|