1
|
Chan JD, Scheffler CM, Munoz I, Sek K, Lee JN, Huang YK, Yap KM, Saw NYL, Li J, Chen AXY, Chan CW, Derrick EB, Todd KL, Tong J, Dunbar PA, Li J, Hoang TX, de Menezes MN, Petley EV, Kim JS, Nguyen D, Leung PSK, So J, Deguit C, Zhu J, House IG, Kats LM, Scott AM, Solomon BJ, Harrison SJ, Oliaro J, Parish IA, Quinn KM, Neeson PJ, Slaney CY, Lai J, Beavis PA, Darcy PK. FOXO1 enhances CAR T cell stemness, metabolic fitness and efficacy. Nature 2024; 629:201-210. [PMID: 38600376 PMCID: PMC11062918 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07242-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of haematological malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma1-4, but the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid tumours has been limited5. This is owing to a number of factors, including the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment that gives rise to poorly persisting and metabolically dysfunctional T cells. Analysis of anti-CD19 CAR T cells used clinically has shown that positive treatment outcomes are associated with a more 'stem-like' phenotype and increased mitochondrial mass6-8. We therefore sought to identify transcription factors that could enhance CAR T cell fitness and efficacy against solid tumours. Here we show that overexpression of FOXO1 promotes a stem-like phenotype in CAR T cells derived from either healthy human donors or patients, which correlates with improved mitochondrial fitness, persistence and therapeutic efficacy in vivo. This work thus reveals an engineering approach to genetically enforce a favourable metabolic phenotype that has high translational potential to improve the efficacy of CAR T cells against solid tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack D Chan
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christina M Scheffler
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Isabelle Munoz
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kevin Sek
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joel N Lee
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yu-Kuan Huang
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kah Min Yap
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole Y L Saw
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jasmine Li
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda X Y Chen
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cheok Weng Chan
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily B Derrick
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten L Todd
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Junming Tong
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Phoebe A Dunbar
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jiawen Li
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thang X Hoang
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria N de Menezes
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma V Petley
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joelle S Kim
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dat Nguyen
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patrick S K Leung
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joan So
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christian Deguit
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joe Zhu
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Imran G House
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lev M Kats
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin J Solomon
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon J Harrison
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Haematology and Centre of Excellence for Cellular Immunotherapies, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Oliaro
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian A Parish
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kylie M Quinn
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul J Neeson
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare Y Slaney
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Junyun Lai
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Paul A Beavis
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Phillip K Darcy
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
- Clinical Haematology and Centre of Excellence for Cellular Immunotherapies, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Immunology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giammarile F, Knoll P, Kunikowska J, Paez D, Estrada Lobato E, Mikhail-Lette M, Wahl R, Holmberg O, Abdel-Wahab M, Scott AM, Delgado Bolton RC. Guardians of precision: advancing radiation protection, safety, and quality systems in nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1498-1505. [PMID: 38319322 PMCID: PMC11043166 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06633-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the rapidly evolving field of nuclear medicine, the paramount importance of radiation protection, safety, and quality systems cannot be overstated. This document provides a comprehensive analysis of the intricate regulatory frameworks and guidelines, meticulously crafted and updated by national and international regulatory bodies to ensure the utmost safety and efficiency in the practice of nuclear medicine. METHODS We explore the dynamic nature of these regulations, emphasizing their adaptability in accommodating technological advancements and the integration of nuclear medicine with other medical and scientific disciplines. RESULTS Audits, both internal and external, are spotlighted for their pivotal role in assessing and ensuring compliance with established standards, promoting a culture of continuous improvement and excellence. We delve into the significant contributions of entities like the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and relevant professional societies in offering universally applicable guidelines that amalgamate the latest in scientific research, ethical considerations, and practical applicability. CONCLUSIONS The document underscores the essence of international collaborations in pooling expertise, resources, and insights, fostering a global community of practice where knowledge and innovations are shared. Readers will gain an in-depth understanding of the practical applications, challenges, and opportunities presented by these regulatory frameworks and audit processes. The ultimate goal is to inspire and inform ongoing efforts to enhance safety, quality, and effectiveness in nuclear medicine globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giammarile
- Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Peter Knoll
- Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jolanta Kunikowska
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Diana Paez
- Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Enrique Estrada Lobato
- Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Miriam Mikhail-Lette
- Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard Wahl
- Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Ola Holmberg
- Department of Nuclear Safety and Security, Radiation Safety and Monitoring Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging Section, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Roberto C Delgado Bolton
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital San Pedro and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), La Rioja, Logroño, Spain
- Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Santander, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sijmons D, Collett S, Soliman C, Guy AJ, Scott AM, Durrant LG, Elbourne A, Walduck AK, Ramsland PA. Probing the expression and adhesion of glycans involved in Helicobacter pylori infection. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8587. [PMID: 38615147 PMCID: PMC11016089 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59234-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori infects approximately half the human population and has an unusual infective niche of the human stomach. Helicobacter pylori is a major cause of gastritis and has been classified as a group 1 carcinogen by the WHO. Treatment involves triple or quadruple antibiotic therapy, but antibiotic resistance is becoming increasingly prevalent. Helicobacter pylori expresses certain blood group related antigens (Lewis system) as a part of its lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is thought to assist in immune evasion. Additionally, H. pylori LPS participates in adhesion to host cells alongside several adhesion proteins. This study profiled the carbohydrates of H. pylori reference strains (SS1 and 26695) using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and lectins, identifying interactions between two carbohydrate-targeting mAbs and multiple lectins. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) scans were used to probe lectin and antibody interactions with the bacterial surfaces. The selected mAb and lectins displayed an increased adhesive force over the surface of the curved H. pylori rods. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the ability of anti-carbohydrate antibodies to reduce the adhesion of H. pylori 26695 to human gastric adenocarcinoma cells via AFM. Targeting bacterial carbohydrates to disrupt crucial adhesion and immune evasion mechanisms represents a promising strategy for combating H. pylori infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sijmons
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Simon Collett
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Caroline Soliman
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Andrew J Guy
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- ZiP Diagnostics, Collingwood, VIC, 3066, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lindy G Durrant
- Scancell Limited, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
- Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, Nottingham, UK
| | - Aaron Elbourne
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Anna K Walduck
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
- Rural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia.
| | - Paul A Ramsland
- School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
- Department of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee ST, Kovaleva N, Senko C, Kee D, Scott AM. Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Transformation of Oncology: Melanoma and Skin Malignancies. PET Clin 2024; 19:231-248. [PMID: 38233284 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Skin cancers are the most common cancers, with melanoma resulting in the highest cause of death in this category. Accurate clinical, histologic, and imaging staging with fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) is most important to guide patient management. Whilst surgical excision with clear margins is the gold-standard treatment for primary cutaneous melanoma, targeted therapies have generated remarkable and rapid clinical responses in melanoma, for which FDG PET also plays an important role in assessment of treatment response and post-therapy surveillance. Non-FDG PET tracers, advanced PET technology, and PET radiomics may potentially change the landscape of the utilization of PET in the imaging of patients with cutaneous malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze-Ting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Natalia Kovaleva
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Clare Senko
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Damien Kee
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu B, Ma R, Shum E, Hormiz M, Lee ST, Poon AMT, Scott AM. FDG-PET/CT for investigation of pyrexia of unknown origin: a cost of illness analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1287-1296. [PMID: 38057651 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06548-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study aims to explore the current utilisation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the diagnostic pathway of pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) and associated cost of illness in a large tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. METHOD 1257 febrile patients between June 2016 and September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 57 patients who met the inclusion criteria of "classical PUO", of which FDG-PET/CT was performed in 31 inpatients, 15 outpatients and 11 inpatients did not have an FDG-PET/CT scan. The patient demographics, clinical characteristics and inpatient cost were analysed, together with the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT and impact on clinical management. RESULT The mean age, length of stay and total cost of admission were higher for inpatients who received FDG-PET/CT versus those who did not. The median cost per patient-bed-day did not differ between the two groups. Inpatients who received earlier FDG-PET/CTs (≤ 7 days from admission) had shorter length of stays and lower total cost compared to those who received a later scan. A negative FDG-PET/CT scan, demonstrating no serious or life-threatening abnormalities resulted in subsequent discharge from hospital or outpatient clinic in 7/10 (70%) patients. There were 11/40 (28%) scans where ancillary abnormalities were identified, requiring further evaluation. CONCLUSION FDG-PET/CT showed high diagnostic accuracy and significant impact on patient management in patients with PUO. FDG-PET/CT performed earlier in admission for PUO was associated with shorter length of stay and lower total cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnia Liu
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Ronald Ma
- Department of Finance, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Evonne Shum
- Department of General Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Maria Hormiz
- Department of General Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sze-Ting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Aurora M T Poon
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barry N, Koh ES, Ebert MA, Moore A, Francis RJ, Rowshanfarzad P, Hassan GM, Ng SP, Back M, Chua B, Pinkham MB, Pullar A, Phillips C, Sia J, Gorayski P, Le H, Gill S, Croker J, Bucknell N, Bettington C, Syed F, Jung K, Chang J, Bece A, Clark C, Wada M, Cook O, Whitehead A, Rossi A, Grose A, Scott AM. [18]F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine positron emission tomography for radiotherapy target delineation: Results from a Radiation Oncology credentialing program. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100568. [PMID: 38585372 PMCID: PMC10998205 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The [18]F-fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is an Australian prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET for newly diagnosed glioblastoma management. The Radiation Oncology credentialing program aimed to assess the feasibility in Radiation Oncologist (RO) derivation of standard-of-care target volumes (TVMR) and hybrid target volumes (TVMR+FET) incorporating pre-defined FET PET biological tumour volumes (BTVs). Materials and methods Central review and analysis of TVMR and TVMR+FET was undertaken across three benchmarking cases. BTVs were pre-defined by a sole nuclear medicine expert. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) confidence intervals (CIs) evaluated volume agreement. RO contour spatial and boundary agreement were evaluated (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC], Jaccard index [JAC], overlap volume [OV], Hausdorff distance [HD] and mean absolute surface distance [MASD]). Dose plan generation (one case per site) was assessed. Results Data from 19 ROs across 10 trial sites (54 initial submissions, 8 resubmissions requested, 4 conditional passes) was assessed with an initial pass rate of 77.8 %; all resubmissions passed. TVMR+FET were significantly larger than TVMR (p < 0.001) for all cases. RO gross tumour volume (GTV) agreement was moderate-to-excellent for GTVMR (ICC = 0.910; 95 % CI, 0.708-0.997) and good-to-excellent for GTVMR+FET (ICC = 0.965; 95 % CI, 0.871-0.999). GTVMR+FET showed greater spatial overlap and boundary agreement compared to GTVMR. For the clinical target volume (CTV), CTVMR+FET showed lower average boundary agreement versus CTVMR (MASD: 1.73 mm vs. 1.61 mm, p = 0.042). All sites passed the planning exercise. Conclusions The credentialing program demonstrated feasibility in successful credentialing of 19 ROs across 10 sites, increasing national expertise in TVMR+FET delineation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Barry
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin A. Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Roslyn J. Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Ghulam Mubashar Hassan
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Sweet P. Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark B. Pinkham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Pullar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Claire Phillips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Sia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Suki Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Jeremy Croker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Nicholas Bucknell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Catherine Bettington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane Womens Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Farhan Syed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Kylie Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Joe Chang
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrej Bece
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Clark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Mori Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Olivia Cook
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Angela Whitehead
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Alana Rossi
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Andrew Grose
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) Cancer Research, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pascual TNB, Paez D, Iagaru A, Gnanasegaran G, Lee ST, Sathekge M, Buatti JM, Giammarile F, Al-Ibraheem A, Pardo MA, Baum RP, De Bari B, Ben-Haim S, Blay JY, Brink A, Estrada-Lobato E, Fanti S, Golubic AT, Hatazawa J, Israel O, Kiess A, Knoll P, Louw L, Mariani G, Mirzaei S, Orellana P, Prior JO, Urbain JL, Vichare S, Vinjamuri S, Virgolini I, Scott AM. Guiding principles on the education and practice of theranostics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06657-2. [PMID: 38453729 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06657-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The recent development and approval of new diagnostic imaging and therapy approaches in the field of theranostics have revolutionised nuclear medicine practice. To ensure the provision of these new imaging and therapy approaches in a safe and high-quality manner, training of nuclear medicine physicians and qualified specialists is paramount. This is required for trainees who are learning theranostics practice, and for ensuring minimum standards for knowledge and competency in existing practising specialists. METHODS To address the need for a training curriculum in theranostics that would be utilised at a global level, a Consultancy Meeting was held at the IAEA in May 2023, with participation by experts in radiopharmaceutical therapy and theranostics including representatives of major international organisations relevant to theranostics practice. RESULTS Through extensive discussions and review of existing curriculum and guidelines, a harmonised training program for theranostics was developed, which aims to ensure safe and high quality theranostics practice in all countries. CONCLUSION The guiding principles for theranostics training outlined in this paper have immediate relevance for the safe and effective practice of theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Diana Paez
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Gopi Gnanasegaran
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedicine, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mike Sathekge
- Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa
- University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - John M Buatti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Francesco Giammarile
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Akram Al-Ibraheem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, Jordan
- School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Manuela Arevalo Pardo
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard P Baum
- Center for Advanced Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Curanosticum Wiesbaden, FrankfurtWiesbaden, Germany
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Simona Ben-Haim
- Department of Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
- University College London, London, UK
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medicine, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
- University Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Anita Brink
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Enrique Estrada-Lobato
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anja Tea Golubic
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Protection, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Kispaticeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jun Hatazawa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Tracer Kinetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ora Israel
- B. Rappaport School of Medicine, Israel Institute of Technology-Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ana Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter Knoll
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lizette Louw
- Center of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Johannesburg, South Africa
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Giuliano Mariani
- Regional Center of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Translational Research and Advanced Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Siroos Mirzaei
- Department of Nuclear Medicine With PET-Centre, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - John O Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Shrikant Vichare
- Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Science and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sobhan Vinjamuri
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morgan KA, Wichmann CW, Osellame LD, Cao Z, Guo N, Scott AM, Donnelly PS. Tumor targeted alpha particle therapy with an actinium-225 labelled antibody for carbonic anhydrase IX. Chem Sci 2024; 15:3372-3381. [PMID: 38425522 PMCID: PMC10901495 DOI: 10.1039/d3sc06365h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Selective antibody targeted delivery of α particle emitting actinium-225 to tumors has significant therapeutic potential. This work highlights the design and synthesis of a new bifunctional macrocyclic diazacrown ether chelator, H2MacropaSqOEt, that can be conjugated to antibodies and forms stable complexes with actinium-225. The macrocyclic diazacrown ether chelator incorporates a linker comprised of a short polyethylene glycol fragment and a squaramide ester that allows selective reaction with lysine residues on antibodies to form stable vinylogous amide linkages. This new H2MacropaSqOEt chelator was used to modify a monoclonal antibody, girentuximab (hG250), that binds to carbonic anhydrase IX, an enzyme that is overexpressed on the surface of cancers such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma. This new antibody conjugate (H2MacropaSq-hG250) had an average chelator to antibody ratio of 4 : 1 and retained high affinity for carbonic anhydrase IX. H2MacropaSq-hG250 was radiolabeled quantitatively with [225Ac]AcIII within one minute at room temperature with micromolar concentrations of antibody and the radioactive complex is stable in human serum for >7 days. Evaluation of [225Ac]Ac(MacropaSq-hG250) in a mouse xenograft model, that overexpresses carbonic anhydrase IX, demonstrated a highly significant therapeutic response. It is likely that H2MacropaSqOEt could be used to modify other antibodies providing a readily adaptable platform for other actinium-225 based therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Morgan
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
| | - Christian W Wichmann
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute Melbourne Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University Melbourne Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy Austin Health Melbourne Australia
| | - Laura D Osellame
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute Melbourne Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University Melbourne Australia
| | - Zhipeng Cao
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute Melbourne Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University Melbourne Australia
| | - Nancy Guo
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute Melbourne Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute Melbourne Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University Melbourne Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy Austin Health Melbourne Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
| | - Paul S Donnelly
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Owen CE, Poon AMT, Liu B, Liew DFL, Yap LP, Yang V, Leung JL, McMaster CR, Scott AM, Buchanan RRC. Characterising polymyalgia rheumatica on whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: an atlas. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2024; 8:rkae003. [PMID: 38375531 PMCID: PMC10876394 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkae003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The impact of modern imaging in uncovering the underlying pathology of PMR cannot be understated. Long dismissed as an inflammatory syndrome with links to the large vessel vasculitis giant cell arteritis (GCA), a pathognomonic pattern of musculotendinous inflammation is now attributed to PMR and may be used to confirm its diagnosis. Among the available modalities, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT is increasingly recognized for its high sensitivity and specificity, as well as added ability to detect concomitant large vessel GCA and exclude other relevant differentials like infection and malignancy. This atlas provides a contemporary depiction of PMR's pathology and outlines how this knowledge translates into a pattern of findings on whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT that can reliably confirm its diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E Owen
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aurora M T Poon
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bonnia Liu
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - David F L Liew
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lee Pheng Yap
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victor Yang
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica L Leung
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher R McMaster
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Russell R C Buchanan
- Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pathmaraj K, Welch J, Ng W, Lee D, Lee ST, Brink A, Dondi M, Paez D, Scott AM. A patient journey audit tool (PJAT) to assess quality indicators in a nuclear medicine service. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06627-8. [PMID: 38340206 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06627-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a nuclear medicine specific patient journey audit tool (PJAT) to survey and audit patient journeys in a nuclear medicine department such as staff interaction with patients, equipment, quality of imaging and laboratory procedures, patient protection, infection control and radiation safety, with a view to optimising patient care and providing a high-quality nuclear medicine service. METHODS The PJAT was developed specifically for use in nuclear medicine practices. Thirty-two questions were formulated in the PJAT to test the department's compliance to the Australian National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards, namely clinical governance, partnering with consumers, preventing and controlling health care infection, medication safety, comprehensive care, communicating for safety, blood management and recognising and responding to acute deterioration. The PJAT was also designed to test our department's adherence to diagnostic reference levels (DRL). A total of 60 patient journey audits were completed for patients presenting for nuclear medicine, positron emission tomography and bone mineral density procedures during a consecutive 4-week period to audit the range of procedures performed. A further 120 audits were captured for common procedures in nuclear medicine and positron emission tomography during the same period. Thus, a total of 180 audits were completed. A subset of 12 patients who presented for blood labelling procedures were audited to solely assess the blood management standard. RESULTS The audits demonstrated over 85% compliance for the Australian national health standards. One hundred percent compliance was noted for critical aspects such as correct patient identification for the correct procedure prior to radiopharmaceutical administration, adherence to prescribed dose limits and distribution of the report within 24 h of completion of the imaging procedure. CONCLUSION This PJAT can be applied in nuclear medicine departments to enhance quality programmes and patient care. Austin Health has collaborated with the IAEA to formulate the IAEA PJAT, which is now available globally for nuclear medicine departments to survey patient journeys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunthi Pathmaraj
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Level 1, Harold Stokes Building, Studley Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3084, Australia.
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Jessica Welch
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Level 1, Harold Stokes Building, Studley Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3084, Australia
| | - Wesley Ng
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Level 1, Harold Stokes Building, Studley Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3084, Australia
| | - Danny Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Level 1, Harold Stokes Building, Studley Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3084, Australia
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Level 1, Harold Stokes Building, Studley Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3084, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anita Brink
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maurizio Dondi
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Diana Paez
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Level 1, Harold Stokes Building, Studley Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3084, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Korde A, Patt M, Selivanova SV, Scott AM, Hesselmann R, Kiss O, Ramamoorthy N, Todde S, Rubow SM, Gwaza L, Lyashchenko S, Andersson J, Hockley B, Kaslival R, Decristoforo C. Position paper to facilitate patient access to radiopharmaceuticals: considerations for a suitable pharmaceutical regulatory framework. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2024; 9:2. [PMID: 38165504 PMCID: PMC10761641 DOI: 10.1186/s41181-023-00230-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nuclear medicine has made enormous progress in the past decades. However, there are still significant inequalities in patient access among different countries, which could be mitigated by improving access to and availability of radiopharmaceuticals. MAIN BODY This paper summarises major considerations for a suitable pharmaceutical regulatory framework to facilitate patient access to radiopharmaceuticals. These include the distinct characteristics of radiopharmaceuticals which require dedicated regulations, considering the impact of the variable complexity of radiopharmaceutical preparation, personnel requirements, manufacturing practices and quality assurance, regulatory authority interfaces, communication and training, as well as marketing authorisation procedures to ensure availability of radiopharmaceuticals. Finally, domestic and regional supply to ensure patient access via alternative regulatory pathways, including in-house production of radiopharmaceuticals, is described, and an outlook on regulatory challenges faced by new developments, such as the use of alpha emitters, is provided. CONCLUSIONS All these considerations are an outcome of a dedicated Technical Meeting organised by the IAEA in 2023 and represent the views and opinions of experts in the field, not those of any regulatory authorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Korde
- Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marianne Patt
- Section Radiopharmacy, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Svetlana V Selivanova
- Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Universite Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rolf Hesselmann
- Health Protection Directorate, Radiation Protection Division, Section for Research Facilities and Nuclear Medicine, Federal Office of Public Health, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Kiss
- Department of Targetry, Target Chemistry and Radiopharmacy, Institute for Radipopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Sergio Todde
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Tecnomed Foundation, Via Pergolesi, 33, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Sietske M Rubow
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Luther Gwaza
- Health Products Policy and Standards Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Serge Lyashchenko
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jan Andersson
- Edmonton Radiopharmaceutical Centre, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Brian Hockley
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ravindra Kaslival
- Office of New Drug Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, CDER, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Clemens Decristoforo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Albert NL, Galldiks N, Ellingson BM, van den Bent MJ, Chang SM, Cicone F, de Groot J, Koh ES, Law I, Le Rhun E, Mair MJ, Minniti G, Rudà R, Scott AM, Short SC, Smits M, Suchorska B, Tolboom N, Traub-Weidinger T, Tonn JC, Verger A, Weller M, Wen PY, Preusser M. PET-based response assessment criteria for diffuse gliomas (PET RANO 1.0): a report of the RANO group. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e29-e41. [PMID: 38181810 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00525-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) response criteria have been established and were updated in 2023 for MRI-based response evaluation of diffuse gliomas in clinical trials. In addition, PET-based imaging with amino acid tracers is increasingly considered for disease monitoring in both clinical practice and clinical trials. So far, a standardised framework defining timepoints for baseline and follow-up investigations and response evaluation criteria for PET imaging of diffuse gliomas has not been established. Therefore, in this Policy Review, we propose a set of criteria for response assessment based on amino acid PET imaging in clinical trials enrolling participants with diffuse gliomas as defined in the 2021 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. These proposed PET RANO criteria provide a conceptual framework that facilitates the structured implementation of PET imaging into clinical research and, ultimately, clinical routine. To this end, the PET RANO 1.0 criteria are intended to encourage specific investigations of amino acid PET imaging of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - John de Groot
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maximilian J Mair
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin and City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Brain Tumour Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Medical Delta, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Universitè de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center For Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Buteau JP, Joshua AM, Goh JC, Pattison DA, Tan TH, Kirkwood ID, Ng S, Francis RJ, Gedye C, Rutherford NK, Weickhardt A, Scott AM, Lee ST, Kwan EM, Azad AA, Ramdave S, Redfern AD, Macdonald W, Guminski A, Hsiao E, Chua W, Lin P, Zhang AY, Stockler MR, Williams SG, Martin AJ, Davis ID. Overall survival with [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): secondary outcomes of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:99-107. [PMID: 38043558 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00529-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The TheraP study reported improved prostate-specific antigen responses with lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. In this Article, we report the secondary outcome of overall survival with mature follow-up, and an updated imaging biomarker analysis. We also report the outcomes of participants excluded due to ineligibility on gallium-68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-[18F]FDG) PET-CT. METHODS TheraP was an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at 11 centres in Australia. Eligible participants had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel, and PET imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]FDG that showed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive disease and no sites of metastatic disease with discordant 2-[18F]FDG-positive and PSMA-negative findings. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (every 6 weeks for a maximum of six cycles; starting at 8·5 GBq, decreasing by 0.5 GBq to 6·0 GBq for the sixth cycle) versus cabazitaxel (20 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, maximum of ten cycles). Overall survival was analysed by intention-to-treat and summarised as restricted mean survival time (RMST) to account for non-proportional hazards, with a 36-month restriction time corresponding to median follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03392428, and is complete. FINDINGS 291 men were registered from Feb 6, 2018, to Sept 3, 2019; after study imaging, 200 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (n=99) or cabazitaxel (n=101). After completing study treatment, 20 (20%) participants assigned to cabazitaxel and 32 (32%) assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were subsequently treated with the alternative regimen. After a median follow-up of 35·7 months (IQR 31·1 to 39·2), 77 (78%) participants had died in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 group and 70 (69%) participants had died in the cabazitaxel group. Overall survival was similar among those assigned to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus those assigned to cabazitaxel (RMST 19·1 months [95% CI 16·9 to 21·4] vs 19·6 months [17·4 to 21·8]; difference -0·5 months [95% CI -3·7 to 2·7]; p=0·77). No additional safety signals were identified with the longer follow-up in this analysis. 80 (27%) of 291 men who were registered after initial eligibility screening were excluded after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and 2-[18F]FDG PET. In the 61 of these men with follow-up available, RMST was 11·0 months (95% CI 9·0 to 13·1). INTERPRETATION These results support the use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as an alternative to cabazitaxel for PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel. We did not find evidence that overall survival differed between the randomised groups. Median overall survival was shorter for men who were excluded because of low PSMA expression or 2-[18F]FDG-discordant disease. FUNDING Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Endocyte (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Movember, It's a Bloke Thing, CAN4CANCER, and The Distinguished Gentleman's Ride.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amir Iravani
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James P Buteau
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeffrey C Goh
- Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David A Pattison
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Specialised PET Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Thean Hsiang Tan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ian D Kirkwood
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Siobhan Ng
- Department of Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Craig Gedye
- Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie K Rutherford
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hunter New England Health, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Weickhardt
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sze-Ting Lee
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Arun A Azad
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shakher Ramdave
- Monash Health Imaging, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew D Redfern
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - William Macdonald
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Alex Guminski
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Wei Chua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Lin
- Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison Yan Zhang
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin R Stockler
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Scott G Williams
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew J Martin
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Eastern Health Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hegi-Johnson F, Rudd SE, Wichmann CW, Akhurst T, Roselt P, Sursock S, Trinh J, John T, Devereux L, Donnelly PS, Hicks RJ, Scott AM, Steinfort D, Fox S, Blyth B, Parakh S, Hanna GG, Callahan J, Burbury K, MacManus M. PD-L1 Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Preliminary Results of the ImmunoPET Phase 0 Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:675-682. [PMID: 37406824 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Hegi-Johnson
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Stacey E Rudd
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christian W Wichmann
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Akhurst
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Roselt
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sandra Sursock
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenny Trinh
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas John
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Devereux
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul S Donnelly
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Central Medical School, Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Steinfort
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Respiratory Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Fox
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Anatomical Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin Blyth
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sagun Parakh
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason Callahan
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael MacManus
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Barry N, Francis RJ, Ebert MA, Koh ES, Rowshanfarzad P, Hassan GM, Kendrick J, Gan HK, Lee ST, Lau E, Moffat BA, Fitt G, Moore A, Thomas P, Pattison DA, Akhurst T, Alipour R, Thomas EL, Hsiao E, Schembri GP, Lin P, Ly T, Yap J, Kirkwood I, Vallat W, Khan S, Krishna D, Ngai S, Yu C, Beuzeville S, Yeow TC, Bailey D, Cook O, Whitehead A, Dykyj R, Rossi A, Grose A, Scott AM. Delineation and agreement of FET PET biological volumes in glioblastoma: results of the nuclear medicine credentialing program from the prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) study-TROG 18.06. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3970-3981. [PMID: 37563351 PMCID: PMC10611835 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06371-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) trial is an Australian prospective, multi-centre study evaluating FET PET for glioblastoma patient management. FET PET imaging timepoints are pre-chemoradiotherapy (FET1), 1-month post-chemoradiotherapy (FET2), and at suspected progression (FET3). Before participant recruitment, site nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) underwent credentialing of FET PET delineation and image interpretation. METHODS Sites were required to complete contouring and dynamic analysis by ≥ 2 NMPs on benchmarking cases (n = 6) assessing biological tumour volume (BTV) delineation (3 × FET1) and image interpretation (3 × FET3). Data was reviewed by experts and violations noted. BTV definition includes tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) threshold of 1.6 with crescent-shaped background contour in the contralateral normal brain. Recurrence/pseudoprogression interpretation (FET3) required assessment of maximum TBR (TBRmax), dynamic analysis (time activity curve [TAC] type, time to peak), and qualitative assessment. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed volume agreement, coefficient of variation (CoV) compared maximum/mean TBR (TBRmax/TBRmean) across cases, and pairwise analysis assessed spatial (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]) and boundary agreement (Hausdorff distance [HD], mean absolute surface distance [MASD]). RESULTS Data was accrued from 21 NMPs (10 centres, n ≥ 2 each) and 20 underwent review. The initial pass rate was 93/119 (78.2%) and 27/30 requested resubmissions were completed. Violations were found in 25/72 (34.7%; 13/12 minor/major) of FET1 and 22/74 (29.7%; 14/8 minor/major) of FET3 reports. The primary reasons for resubmission were as follows: BTV over-contour (15/30, 50.0%), background placement (8/30, 26.7%), TAC classification (9/30, 30.0%), and image interpretation (7/30, 23.3%). CoV median and range for BTV, TBRmax, and TBRmean were 21.53% (12.00-30.10%), 5.89% (5.01-6.68%), and 5.01% (3.37-6.34%), respectively. BTV agreement was moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63-0.97) with good spatial (DSC = 0.84 ± 0.09) and boundary (HD = 15.78 ± 8.30 mm; MASD = 1.47 ± 1.36 mm) agreement. CONCLUSION The FIG study credentialing program has increased expertise across study sites. TBRmax and TBRmean were robust, with considerable variability in BTV delineation and image interpretation observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Barry
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia.
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia.
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia
| | - Ghulam Mubashar Hassan
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
| | - Jake Kendrick
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia
| | - Hui K Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sze T Lee
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bradford A Moffat
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Greg Fitt
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - David A Pattison
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Tim Akhurst
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ramin Alipour
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Geoffrey P Schembri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Lin
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Tam Ly
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - June Yap
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Kirkwood
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Wilson Vallat
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Shahroz Khan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canberra Hospital, Woden, ACT, Australia
| | - Dayanethee Krishna
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canberra Hospital, Woden, ACT, Australia
| | - Stanley Ngai
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Chris Yu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Scott Beuzeville
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Tow C Yeow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Dale Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine 7 Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Olivia Cook
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Angela Whitehead
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael Dykyj
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Alana Rossi
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Grose
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maniya NH, Kumar S, Franklin JL, Higginbotham JN, Scott AM, Gan HK, Coffey RJ, Senapati S, Chang HC. Detection of EGFR and its Activity State in Plasma CD63-EVs from Glioblastoma Patients: Rapid Profiling using an Anion Exchange Membrane Sensor. bioRxiv 2023:2023.10.16.562628. [PMID: 37905113 PMCID: PMC10614888 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.16.562628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
We present a novel quantitative immunoassay for CD63 EVs (extracellular vesicles) and a constituent surface cargo, EGFR and its activity state, that provides a sensitive, selective, fluorophore-free and rapid alternative to current EV-based diagnostic methods. Our sensing design utilizes a charge-gating strategy, with a hydrophilic anion exchange membrane and a charged silica nanoparticle reporter. With sensitivity and robustness enhancement by the ion-depletion action of the membrane, this hydrophilic design with charged reporters minimizes interference from dispersed proteins and fluorophore degradation, thus enabling direct plasma analysis. With a limit of detection of 30 EVs/μL and a high relative sensitivity of 0.01% for targeted proteomic subfractions, our assay enables accurate quantification of the EV marker, CD63, with colocalized EGFR by an operator/sample insensitive universal normalized calibration. Glioblastoma necessitates improved non-invasive diagnostic approaches for early detection and monitoring. Notably, we target both total and "active" EGFR on EVs; with a monoclonal antibody mAb806 that recognizes a normally hidden epitope on overexpressed or mutant variant III EGFR. This approach offers direct glioblastoma detection from untreated human patient samples. Analysis of glioblastoma clinical samples yielded an area-under-the-curve (AUC) value of 0.99 and low p-value of 0.000033, significantly surpassing the performance of existing assays and markers.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vail ME, Farnsworth RH, Hii L, Allen S, Arora S, Anderson RL, Dickins RA, Orimo A, Wu SZ, Swarbrick A, Scott AM, Janes PW. Inhibition of EphA3 Expression in Tumour Stromal Cells Suppresses Tumour Growth and Progression. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4646. [PMID: 37760615 PMCID: PMC10527215 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumour progression relies on interactions with untransformed cells in the tumour microenvironment (TME), including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which promote blood supply, tumour progression, and immune evasion. Eph receptor tyrosine kinases are cell guidance receptors that are most active during development but re-emerge in cancer and are recognised drug targets. EphA3 is overexpressed in a wide range of tumour types, and we previously found expression particularly in stromal and vascular tissues of the TME. To investigate its role in the TME, we generated transgenic mice with inducible shRNA-mediated knockdown of EphA3 expression. EphA3 knockdown was confirmed in aortic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which displayed reduced angiogenic capacity. In mice with syngeneic lung tumours, EphA3 knockdown reduced vasculature and CAF/MSC-like cells in tumours, and inhibited tumour growth, which was confirmed also in a melanoma model. Single cell RNA sequencing analysis of multiple human tumour types confirmed EphA3 expression in CAFs, including in breast cancer, where EphA3 was particularly prominent in perivascular- and myofibroblast-like CAFs. Our results thus indicate expression of the cell guidance receptor EphA3 in distinct CAF subpopulations is important in supporting tumour angiogenesis and tumour growth, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E. Vail
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Rae H. Farnsworth
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Linda Hii
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Stacey Allen
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Sakshi Arora
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Robin L. Anderson
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Ross A. Dickins
- Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Akira Orimo
- Department of Pathology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
| | - Sunny Z. Wu
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and School of Clinical Medicine, University of NSW, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Alexander Swarbrick
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and School of Clinical Medicine, University of NSW, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Peter W. Janes
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Noelle RJ, Lines JL, Lewis LD, Martell RE, Guillaudeux T, Lee SW, Mahoney KM, Vesely MD, Boyd-Kirkup J, Nambiar DK, Scott AM. Clinical and research updates on the VISTA immune checkpoint: immuno-oncology themes and highlights. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1225081. [PMID: 37795437 PMCID: PMC10547146 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1225081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoints limit the activation of the immune system and serve an important homeostatic function but can also restrict immune responses against tumors. Inhibition of specific immune checkpoint proteins such as the B7:CD28 family members programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) has transformed the treatment of various cancers by promoting the anti-tumor activation of immune cells. In contrast to these effects, the V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T-cell activation (VISTA) regulates the steady state of the resting immune system and promotes homeostasis by mechanisms distinct from PD-1 and CTLA-4. The effects of VISTA blockade have been shown to include a decrease in myeloid suppression coupled with proinflammatory changes by mechanisms that are separate and distinct from other immune checkpoint proteins; in some preclinical studies these immune effects appear synergistic. Given the potential benefits of VISTA blockade in the context of cancer therapy, the second Annual VISTA Symposium was convened virtually on September 23, 2022, to review new research from investigators and immuno-oncology experts. Discussions in the meeting extended the knowledge of VISTA biology and the effects of VISTA inhibition, particularly on cells of the myeloid lineage and resting T cells, as three candidate anti-VISTA antibodies are in, or nearing, clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randolph J. Noelle
- ImmuNext Inc., Lebanon, NH, United States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - J. Louise Lines
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Lionel D. Lewis
- Section of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Dartmouth Cancer Center, Hanover, NH, United States
| | - Robert E. Martell
- Curis, Inc., Lexington, MA, United States
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Sam W. Lee
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Mahoney
- Department of Medical, Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Matthew D. Vesely
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | - Dhanya K. Nambiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Koh ES, Gan HK, Senko C, Francis RJ, Ebert M, Lee ST, Lau E, Khasraw M, Nowak AK, Bailey DL, Moffat BA, Fitt G, Hicks RJ, Coffey R, Verhaak R, Walsh KM, Barnes EH, De Abreu Lourenco R, Rosenthal M, Adda L, Foroudi F, Lasocki A, Moore A, Thomas PA, Roach P, Back M, Leonard R, Scott AM. [ 18F]-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) in glioblastoma (FIG) TROG 18.06 study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre PET/CT trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071327. [PMID: 37541751 PMCID: PMC10407346 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive primary central nervous system cancer in adults characterised by uniformly poor survival. Despite maximal safe resection and postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy, tumours inevitably recur. Imaging with O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to impact adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning, distinguish between treatment-induced pseudoprogression versus tumour progression as well as prognostication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The FET-PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, phase II study across 10 Australian sites and will enrol up to 210 adults aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. FET-PET will be performed at up to three time points: (1) following initial surgery and prior to commencement of chemoradiation (FET-PET1); (2) 4 weeks following concurrent chemoradiation (FET-PET2); and (3) within 14 days of suspected clinical and/or radiological progression on MRI (performed at the time of clinical suspicion of tumour recurrence) (FET-PET3). The co-primary outcomes are: (1) to investigate how FET-PET versus standard MRI impacts RT volume delineation and (2) to determine the accuracy and management impact of FET-PET in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true tumour progression. The secondary outcomes are: (1) to investigate the relationships between FET-PET parameters (including dynamic uptake, tumour to background ratio, metabolic tumour volume) and progression-free survival and overall survival; (2) to assess the change in blood and tissue biomarkers determined by serum assay when comparing FET-PET data acquired prior to chemoradiation with other prognostic markers, looking at the relationships of FET-PET versus MRI-determined site/s of progressive disease post chemotherapy treatment with MRI and FET-PET imaging; and (3) to estimate the health economic impact of incorporating FET-PET into glioblastoma management and in the assessment of post-treatment pseudoprogression or recurrence/true progression. Exploratory outcomes include the correlation of multimodal imaging, blood and tumour biomarker analyses with patterns of failure and survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol V.2.0 dated 20 November 2020 has been approved by a lead Human Research Ethics Committee (Austin Health, Victoria). Other clinical sites will provide oversight through local governance processes, including obtaining informed consent from suitable participants. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results of the FIG study (TROG 18.06) will be disseminated via relevant scientific and consumer forums and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ANZCTR ACTRN12619001735145.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eng-Siew Koh
- Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hui K Gan
- Austin Health, Department of Medical Oncology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare Senko
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Martin Ebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Department of Neurosurgery and Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dale L Bailey
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bradford A Moffat
- Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Greg Fitt
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert Coffey
- Epithelial Biology Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Roel Verhaak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kyle M Walsh
- Department of Neurosurgery and Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth H Barnes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Rosenthal
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lucas Adda
- The Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (COGNO) Consumer Advisor Panel, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arian Lasocki
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul A Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paul Roach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Leonard
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Al-Ibraheem A, Scott AM. 161Tb-PSMA Unleashed: a Promising New Player in the Theranostics of Prostate Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 57:168-171. [PMID: 37483873 PMCID: PMC10359225 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-023-00804-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotheranostics with 177Lu-PSMA have changed the treatment paradigm in patients with prostate cancer, becoming the new standard in certain settings. Terbium-161 (161Tb) has been recently investigated as a potential radionuclide for radiotheranostics in various types of cancer, including metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The nuclear medicine team at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) in Amman, Jordan, recently published the first-in-human SPECT/CT imaging results following a well-tolerated dose of 161Tb-PSMA radioligand therapy with no treatment-related adverse events, adding to the potential of radiotheranostics in prostate cancer. Two clinical trials for 161Tb-PSMA radioligand therapy in prostate cancer are currently underway and will provide valuable insights. This review will shed light on the expanding field of radiotheranostics in prostate cancer, which is not without challenges, and will discuss how the introduction of a new therapeutic option like 161Tb-PSMA may help to combat these challenges and build on the proven success of 177Lu-PSMA-based radiotheranostics for the benefit of prostate cancer patients worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akram Al-Ibraheem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), P.O. Box 1269, Al-Jubeiha, Amman, 11941 Jordan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, 11942 Jordan
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gan HK, Parakh S, Osellame LD, Cher L, Uccellini A, Hafeez U, Menon S, Scott AM. Antibody drug conjugates for glioblastoma: current progress towards clinical use. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2023; 23:1089-1102. [PMID: 37955063 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2282729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are now a proven therapeutic class for many cancers, combining highly specific targeting with the potency of high effective payloads. This review summarizes the experience with ADCs in brain tumors and examines future paths for their use in these tumors. AREAS COVERED This review will cover all the key classes of ADCs which have been tested in primary brain tumors, including commentary on the major trials to date. The efficacy of these trials, as well as their limitations, will put in context of the overall landscape of drug development in brain tumors. Importantly, this review will summarize key learnings and insights from these trials that help provide the basis for rational ways in which these drugs can be effectively and appropriate developed for patients with primary brain tumors. EXPERT OPINION ADC development in brain tumors has occurred in two major phases to date. Key learnings from previous trials provide a strong rationale for the continued development of these drugs for primary brain tumors. However, the unique biology of these tumors requires development strategies specifically tailored to maximize their optimal development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui K Gan
- Cancer Therapies and Biology Group, Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Tumours, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sagun Parakh
- Cancer Therapies and Biology Group, Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Tumours, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Laura D Osellame
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Agriculture, Biomedicine and Environment, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lawrence Cher
- Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Umbreen Hafeez
- Cancer Therapies and Biology Group, Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Tumours, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Siddharth Menon
- Cancer Therapies and Biology Group, Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Tumours, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
- La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tremblay S, Alhogbani M, Weickhardt A, Davis ID, Scott AM, Hicks RJ, Metser U, Chua S, Davda R, Punwani S, Payne H, Tunariu N, Ho B, Young S, Singbo MNU, Bauman G, Emmett L, Pouliot F. Influence of molecular imaging on patient selection for treatment intensification prior to salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a post hoc analysis of the PROPS trial. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:57. [PMID: 37291656 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00570-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of molecular imaging (MI) on patient management after biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy has been described in many studies. However, it is not known if MI-induced management changes are appropriate. This study aimed to determine if androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) management plan is improved by MI in patients who are candidates for salvage radiation therapy. METHODS Data were analyzed from the multicenter prospective PROPS trial evaluating PSMA/Choline PET in patients being considered for salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with BCR after prostatectomy. We compared the pre- and post-MI ADT management plans for each patient and cancer outcomes as predicted by the MSKCC nomogram. A higher percentage of predicted BCR associated with ADT treatment intensification after MI was considered as an improvement in a patient's management. RESULTS Seventy-three patients with a median PSA of 0.38 ng/mL were included. In bivariate analysis, a positive finding on MI (local or metastatic) was associated with decision to use ADT with an odds ratio of 3.67 (95% CI, 1.25 to 10.71; p = 0.02). No factor included in the nomogram was associated with decision to use ADT. Also, MI improved selection of patients to receive ADT based on predicted BCR after sRT : the predicted nomogram 5-year biochemical-free survivals were 52.5% and 43.3%, (mean difference, 9.2%; 95% CI 0.8 to 17.6; p = 0.03) for sRT alone and ADT±sRT subgroups, while there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups before MI. CONCLUSIONS PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT before sRT can potentially improve patient ADT management by directing clinicians towards more appropriate intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew Weickhardt
- Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Ur Metser
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sue Chua
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Bao Ho
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Glenn Bauman
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wichmann CW, Poniger S, Guo N, Roselt P, Rudd SE, Donnelly PS, Blyth B, Van Zuylekom J, Rigopoulos A, Burvenich IJG, Morandeau L, Mohamed S, Nowak A, Hegi-Johnson F, MacManus M, Scott AM. Automated radiosynthesis of [ 89Zr]Zr-DFOSq-Durvalumab for imaging of PD-L1 expressing tumours in vivo. Nucl Med Biol 2023; 120-121:108351. [PMID: 37224789 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2023.108351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 89Zr-labelled proteins are gaining importance in clinical research in a variety of diseases. To date, no clinical study has been reported that utilizes an automated approach for radiosynthesis of 89Zr-labelled radiopharmaceuticals. We aim to develop an automated method for the clinical production of 89Zr-labelled proteins and apply this method to Durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 immune-checkpoint protein. PD-L1 expression is poorly understood and can be up-regulated over the course of chemo- and radiotherapy treatment. The ImmunoPET multicentre study aims to examine the dynamics of PD-L1 expression via 89Zr-Durvalumab PET imaging before, during, and after chemoradiotherapy. The developed automated technique will enable reproducible clinical production of [89Zr]Zr-DFOSq-Durvalumab for this study at three different sites. METHODS Conjugation of Durvalumab to H3DFOSqOEt was optimized for optimal chelator-to-antibody ratio. Automated radiolabelling of H3DFOSq-Durvalumab with zirconium-89 was optimized on the disposable cassette based iPHASE technologies MultiSyn radiosynthesizer using a modified cassette. Activity losses were tracked using a dose calibrator and minimized by optimizing fluid transfers, reaction buffer, antibody formulation additives and pH. The biological profile of the radiolabelled antibody was confirmed in vivo in PD-L1+ (HCC827) and PD-L1- (A549) murine xenografts. Clinical process validation and quality control were performed at three separate study sites to satisfy clinical release criteria. RESULTS H3DFOSq-Durvalumab with an average CAR of 3.02 was obtained. Radiolabelling kinetics in succinate (20 mM, pH 6) were significantly faster when compared to HEPES (0.5 M, pH 7.2) with >90 % conversion observed after 15 min. Residual radioactivity in the 89Zr isotope vial was reduced from 24 % to 0.44 % ± 0.18 % (n = 7) and losses in the reactor vial were reduced from 36 % ± 6 % (n = 4) to 0.82 % ± 0.75 % (n = 4) by including a surfactant in the reaction and formulation buffers. Overall process yield was 75 % ± 6 % (n = 5) and process time was 40 min. Typically, 165 MBq of [89Zr]Zr-DFOSq-Durvalumab with an apparent specific activity of 315 MBq/mg ± 34 MBq/mg (EOS) was obtained in a volume of 3.0 mL. At end-of-synthesis (EOS), radiochemical purity and protein integrity were always >99 % and >96 %, respectively, and dropped to 98 % and 65 % after incubation in human serum for 7 days at 37 °C. Immunoreactive fraction in HEK293/PD-L1 cells was 83.3 ± 9.0 (EOS). Preclinical in vivo data at 144 h p.i. showed excellent SUVmax in PD-L1+ tumour (8.32 ± 0.59) with a tumour-background ratio of 17.17 ± 3.96. [89Zr]Zr-DFOSq-Durvalumab passed all clinical release criteria at each study site and was deemed suitable for administration in a multicentre imaging trial. CONCLUSION Fully automated production of [89Zr]Zr-DFOSq-Durvalumab for clinical use was achieved with minimal exposure to the operator. The cassette-based approach allows for consecutive productions on the same day and offers an alternative to currently used manual protocols. The method should be broadly applicable to other proteins and has the potential for clinical impact considering the growing number of clinical trials investigating 89Zr-labelled antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian W Wichmann
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
| | - Stan Poniger
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; iPHASE technologies Pty Ltd, Rowville, VIC 3178, Australia
| | - Nancy Guo
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Peter Roselt
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Stacey E Rudd
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Paul S Donnelly
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Benjamin Blyth
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | | | - Angela Rigopoulos
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Ingrid J G Burvenich
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Laurence Morandeau
- Department of Medical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Shifaza Mohamed
- Department of Medical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Anna Nowak
- Office of Deputy Vice Chancellor (Research), University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Fiona Hegi-Johnson
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Michael MacManus
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sugiyama MG, Brown AI, Vega-Lugo J, Borges JP, Scott AM, Jaqaman K, Fairn GD, Antonescu CN. Confinement of unliganded EGFR by tetraspanin nanodomains gates EGFR ligand binding and signaling. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2681. [PMID: 37160944 PMCID: PMC10170156 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-38390-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a central regulator of cell physiology. EGFR is activated by ligand binding, triggering receptor dimerization, activation of kinase activity, and intracellular signaling. EGFR is transiently confined within various plasma membrane nanodomains, yet how this may contribute to regulation of EGFR ligand binding is poorly understood. To resolve how EGFR nanoscale compartmentalization gates ligand binding, we developed single-particle tracking methods to track the mobility of ligand-bound and total EGFR, in combination with modeling of EGFR ligand binding. In comparison to unliganded EGFR, ligand-bound EGFR is more confined and distinctly regulated by clathrin and tetraspanin nanodomains. Ligand binding to unliganded EGFR occurs preferentially in tetraspanin nanodomains, and disruption of tetraspanin nanodomains impairs EGFR ligand binding and alters the conformation of the receptor's ectodomain. We thus reveal a mechanism by which EGFR confinement within tetraspanin nanodomains regulates receptor signaling at the level of ligand binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G Sugiyama
- Department of Chemistry and Biology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aidan I Brown
- Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jesus Vega-Lugo
- Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jazlyn P Borges
- Program in Neuroscience and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Khuloud Jaqaman
- Department of Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Gregory D Fairn
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Costin N Antonescu
- Department of Chemistry and Biology, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Urbain JL, Scott AM, Lee ST, Buscombe J, Weston C, Hatazawa J, Kinuya S, Singh B, Haidar M, Ross A, Lamoureux F, Kunikowska J, Wadsak W, Dierckx R, Paez D, Giammarile F, Lee KH, Hyun O J, Moshe M, Louw L, More S, Nadel H, Lee D, Wahl R. Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals: A Universal Challenging Educational Paradigm in Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.123.265603. [PMID: 37142302 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Luc Urbain
- Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Reston, Virginia;
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine, Vermont South, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Buscombe
- British Society for Nanomedicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jun Hatazawa
- Asia Oceania Federation of Nuclear Medicine and Biology, Osaka, Japan
| | - Seigo Kinuya
- Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Andrew Ross
- Canadian Association of Nuclear Medicine, Rosemère, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Rudi Dierckx
- European Association of Nuclear Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | - Diana Paez
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Kyung-Han Lee
- Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and
| | - Joo Hyun O
- Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and
| | - Modiselle Moshe
- South African Society of Nuclear Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lizette Louw
- South African Society of Nuclear Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Stuart More
- South African Society of Nuclear Medicine, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Helen Nadel
- Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Reston, Virginia
| | - Daniel Lee
- Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Reston, Virginia
| | - Richard Wahl
- Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Reston, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Meyran D, Zhu JJ, Butler J, Tantalo D, MacDonald S, Nguyen TN, Wang M, Thio N, D'Souza C, Qin VM, Slaney C, Harrison A, Sek K, Petrone P, Thia K, Giuffrida L, Scott AM, Terry RL, Tran B, Desai J, Prince HM, Harrison SJ, Beavis PA, Kershaw MH, Solomon B, Ekert PG, Trapani JA, Darcy PK, Neeson PJ. T STEM-like CAR-T cells exhibit improved persistence and tumor control compared with conventional CAR-T cells in preclinical models. Sci Transl Med 2023; 15:eabk1900. [PMID: 37018415 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abk1900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells that are enriched in memory T cells exhibit better disease control as a result of increased expansion and persistence of the CAR-T cells. Human memory T cells include stem-like CD8+ memory T cell progenitors that can become either functional stem-like T (TSTEM) cells or dysfunctional T progenitor exhausted (TPEX) cells. To that end, we demonstrated that TSTEM cells were less abundant in infused CAR-T cell products in a phase 1 clinical trial testing Lewis Y-CAR-T cells (NCT03851146), and the infused CAR-T cells displayed poor persistence in patients. To address this issue, we developed a production protocol to generate TSTEM-like CAR-T cells enriched for expression of genes in cell replication pathways. Compared with conventional CAR-T cells, TSTEM-like CAR-T cells had enhanced proliferative capacity and increased cytokine secretion after CAR stimulation, including after chronic CAR stimulation in vitro. These responses were dependent on the presence of CD4+ T cells during TSTEM-like CAR-T cell production. Adoptive transfer of TSTEM-like CAR-T cells induced better control of established tumors and resistance to tumor rechallenge in preclinical models. These more favorable outcomes were associated with increased persistence of TSTEM-like CAR-T cells and an increased memory T cell pool. Last, TSTEM-like CAR-T cells and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) treatment eradicated established tumors, and this was associated with increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+CAR+ T cells producing interferon-γ. In conclusion, our CAR-T cell protocol generated TSTEM-like CAR-T cells with enhanced therapeutic efficacy, resulting in increased proliferative capacity and persistence in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Meyran
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Université de Paris, Inserm, U976 HIPI Unit, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Paris F-75010, France
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Joe Jiang Zhu
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Jeanne Butler
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Daniela Tantalo
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Sean MacDonald
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Thu Ngoc Nguyen
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Minyu Wang
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Niko Thio
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Criselle D'Souza
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Vicky Mengfei Qin
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Clare Slaney
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Aaron Harrison
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Kevin Sek
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Pasquale Petrone
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Kevin Thia
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Lauren Giuffrida
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumor Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
| | - Rachael L Terry
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 1466, Australia
| | - Ben Tran
- Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Jayesh Desai
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - H Miles Prince
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Simon J Harrison
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Paul A Beavis
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Michael H Kershaw
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Ben Solomon
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Paul G Ekert
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 1466, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 1466, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Joseph A Trapani
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Phillip K Darcy
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Paul J Neeson
- Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Manos K, Chong G, Keane C, Lee ST, Smith C, Churilov L, McKendrick J, Renwick W, Blombery P, Burgess M, Nelson NE, Fancourt T, Hawking J, Lin W, Scott AM, Barraclough A, Wight J, Grigg A, Fong CY, Hawkes EA. Immune priming with avelumab and rituximab prior to R-CHOP in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the phase II AvR-CHOP study. Leukemia 2023; 37:1092-1102. [PMID: 36906715 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-01863-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
Immune evasion, due to abnormal expression of programmed-death ligands 1 and 2 (PD-L1/PD-L2), predicts poor outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has limited efficacy at relapse but may sensitise relapsed lymphoma to subsequent chemotherapy. ICI delivery to immunologically intact patients may thus be the optimal use of this therapy. In the phase II AvR-CHOP study, 28 patients with treatment-naive stage II-IV DLBCL received sequential avelumab and rituximab priming ("AvRp;" avelumab 10 mg/kg and rituximab 375 mg/m2 2-weekly for 2 cycles), R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone for 6 cycles) and avelumab consolidation (10 mg/kg 2-weekly for 6 cycles). Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 11%, meeting the primary endpoint of a grade ≥3 irAE rate of <30%. R-CHOP delivery was not compromised but one patient ceased avelumab. Overall response rates (ORR) after AvRp and R-CHOP were 57% (18% CR) and 89% (all CR). High ORR to AvRp was observed in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (67%; 4/6) and molecularly-defined EBV-positive DLBCL (100%; 3/3). Progression during AvRp was associated with chemorefractory disease. Two-year failure-free and overall survival were 82% and 89%. An immune priming strategy with AvRp, R-CHOP and avelumab consolidation shows acceptable toxicity with encouraging efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Manos
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Chong
- Ballarat Regional Integrated Cancer Centre, Ballarat Central, VIC, Australia
| | - Colm Keane
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Sze-Ting Lee
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Charmaine Smith
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Leonid Churilov
- Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Piers Blombery
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Tineke Fancourt
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne Hawking
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Wendi Lin
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Joel Wight
- Townsville University Hospital, Douglas, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew Grigg
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Chun Yew Fong
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Eliza A Hawkes
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute at Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dickmann CGF, McDonald AF, Huynh N, Rigopoulos A, Liu Z, Guo N, Osellame LD, Gorman MA, Parker MW, Gan HK, Scott AM, Ackermann U, Burvenich IJG, White JM. Bromodomain and extraterminal protein-targeted probe enables tumour visualisation in vivo using positron emission tomography. Chem Commun (Camb) 2023; 59:3126-3129. [PMID: 36809538 DOI: 10.1039/d2cc04813b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) proteins, a family of epigenetic regulators, have emerged as important oncology drug targets. BET proteins have not been targeted for molecular imaging of cancer. Here, we report the development of a novel molecule radiolabelled with positron emitting fluorine-18, [18F]BiPET-2, and its in vitro and preclinical evaluation in glioblastoma models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine G Fitzgerald Dickmann
- Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. .,Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia. .,Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Alexander F McDonald
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia. .,Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Nhi Huynh
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Angela Rigopoulos
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Zhanqi Liu
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Nancy Guo
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Laura D Osellame
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Michael A Gorman
- Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - Michael W Parker
- Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. .,ACRF Facility for Innovative Cancer Drug Discovery, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.,ACRF Rational Drug Discovery Centre, St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, VIC 3065, Australia
| | - Hui K Gan
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia.
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia. .,Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Uwe Ackermann
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia. .,Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Ingrid J G Burvenich
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia.
| | - Jonathan M White
- Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ackermann U, Jäger L, Rigopoulos A, Burvenich IJG, O'Keefe GJ, Scott AM. 18F-labeling and initial in vivo evaluation of a Hitomi peptide for imaging tissue transglutaminase 2. Nucl Med Biol 2023; 116-117:108308. [PMID: 36502585 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tissue transglutaminase 2 (TG2) is a calcium-dependent enzyme which cross-links proteins. It is overexpressed in many diseases and plays a key role in tissue remodeling, including cell adhesion and migration. Overexpression of TG2 in breast cancer is a marker for patients at risk of recurrence. Non-invasive imaging of TG2 can therefore play an important role in patient management. TG2 probes labeled with the positron emitters 11C and 18F have thus far not found widespread application due to purity and metabolism issues. Our approach was to radiolabel a TG2 selective, 13-mer amino acid peptide, which was modified with a 5-azidopentanoic acid group at the N-terminus via a copper free click chemistry approach. METHODS Radiochemistry was performed and fully automated using an iPhase FlexLab module. We produced the radiolabeling synthon [18F]FBz-DBCO from [18F]SFB and DBCO-amine. After HPLC purification, [18F]FBz-DBCO was reacted with the modified peptide and the putative radiotracer purified by HPLC. In vivo imaging using the radiolabeled amine was performed in mice bearing either TG2 expressing MDA-MB-231 or non-TG2 expressing MCF-7 xenografts as negative control. Expression of the target was confirmed using immunohistochemistry and western blot techniques. RESULTS We obtained 9 ± 2 GBq of the radiolabeled peptide from 55 ± 5 GBq of fluorine-18 in an overall synthesis time of 160 min from end of bombardment (EOB), including HPLC purification and reformulation. Small animal PET/MR imaging showed that visualization of MDA-MB-231 tumors using the radiolabeled peptide could only be achieved due to differences in clearance between tumor and surrounding tissue. In the MCF-7 xenograft model, radiotracer clearance from tumor and surrounding tissue occurred at a similar rate, thus making it impossible to visualize MCF-7 tumors. The presence of TG2 in MDA-MB-231 tumors and absence in MCF-7 tumors was confirmed by immunohistochemistry staining and western blot analysis. CONCLUSION A fully automated synthesis of a TG2 selective, 13-amino-acid peptide modified with 5-azido pentynoic acid at the N-terminal was established using [18F]FBzDBCO as a prosthetic group. Although our results show that radiolabeled peptides have potential as imaging agents for TG2, more research needs to be performed to improve radiotracer kinetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Ackermann
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Luise Jäger
- Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Graeme Joseph O'Keefe
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hegi-Johnson F, Rudd SE, Wichmann C, Akhurst T, Roselt P, Trinh J, John T, Devereux L, Donnelly PS, Hicks R, Scott AM, Steinfort D, Fox S, Blyth B, Parakh S, Hanna GG, Callahan J, Burbury K, MacManus M. ImmunoPET: IMaging of cancer imMUNOtherapy targets with positron Emission Tomography: a phase 0/1 study characterising PD-L1 with 89Zr-durvalumab (MEDI4736) PET/CT in stage III NSCLC patients receiving chemoradiation study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056708. [PMID: 36400733 PMCID: PMC9677006 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ImmunoPET is a multicentre, single arm, phase 0-1 study that aims to establish if 89Zr-durvalumab PET/CT can be used to interrogate the expression of PD-L1 in larger, multicentre clinical trials. METHODS The phase 0 study recruited 5 PD-L1+ patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received 60MBq/70 kg 89Zr-durva up to a maximum of 74 MBq, with scan acquisition at days 0, 1, 3 or 5±1 day. Data on (1) Percentage of injected 89Zr-durva dose found in organs of interest (2) Absorbed organ doses (µSv/MBq of administered 89Zr-durva) and (3) whole-body dose expressed as mSv/100MBq of administered dose was collected to characterise biodistribution.The phase 1 study will recruit 20 patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC. Patients will have 89Zr-durva and FDG-PET/CT before, during and after chemoradiation. In order to establish the feasibility of 89Zr-durva PET/CT for larger multicentre trials, we will collect both imaging and toxicity data. Feasibility will be deemed to have been met if more than 80% of patients are able complete all trial requirements with no significant toxicity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This phase 0 study has ethics approval (HREC/65450/PMCC 20/100) and is registered on the Australian Clinical Trials Network (ACTRN12621000171819). The protocol, technical and clinical data will be disseminated by conference presentations and publications. Any modifications to the protocol will be formally documented by administrative letters and must be submitted to the approving HREC for review and approval. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian Clinical Trials Network ACTRN12621000171819.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Hegi-Johnson
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stacey E Rudd
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christian Wichmann
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tim Akhurst
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Roselt
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenny Trinh
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas John
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Devereux
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul S Donnelly
- School of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rod Hicks
- The Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Department of Medicine, Central Medical School, the Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, The University of Melbourne Medicine at Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel Steinfort
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Respiratory Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Fox
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Anatomical Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin Blyth
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sagun Parakh
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason Callahan
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Burbury
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael MacManus
- Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Buteau JP, Martin AJ, Emmett L, Iravani A, Sandhu S, Joshua AM, Francis RJ, Zhang AY, Scott AM, Lee ST, Azad AA, McJannett MM, Stockler MR, Williams SG, Davis ID, Hofman MS, Akhurst T, Alipour R, Azad AA, Banks P, Beaulieu A, Buteau JP, Chua W, Davis ID, Dhiantravan N, Emmett L, Ford K, Hofman MS, Francis RJ, Gedye C, Goh JC, Guminski A, Hamid A, Haskali MB, Hicks RJ, Hsiao E, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Kirkwood ID, Kong G, Kwan EM, Langford A, Lawrence N, Lee ST, Lewin J, Lin P, Martin AJ, McDonald W, McJannett MM, Moodie K, Murphy DG, Ng S, Pattison DA, Pokorski I, Ramdave S, Ravi Kumar AS, Redfern AD, Rutherford NK, Saghebi J, Sandhu S, Scott AM, Spain L, Stockler MR, Subramaniam S, Tan TH, Thang SP, Tran B, Wallace R, Weickhardt A, Williams SG, Yip S, Zhang AY. PSMA and FDG-PET as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in patients given [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a biomarker analysis from a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1389-1397. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00605-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
32
|
Daly RJ, Scott AM, Klein O, Ernst M. Enhancing therapeutic anti-cancer responses by combining immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibition. Mol Cancer 2022; 21:189. [PMID: 36175961 PMCID: PMC9523960 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-022-01656-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been established as the standard of care for many types of cancer, but the strategies employed have continued to evolve. Recently, much clinical focus has been on combining targeted therapies with ICI for the purpose of manipulating the immune setpoint. The latter concept describes the equilibrium between factors that promote and those that suppress anti-cancer immunity. Besides tumor mutational load and other cancer cell-intrinsic determinants, the immune setpoint is also governed by the cells of the tumor microenvironment and how they are coerced by cancer cells to support the survival and growth of the tumor. These regulatory mechanisms provide therapeutic opportunities to intervene and reduce immune suppression via application of small molecule inhibitors and antibody-based therapies against (receptor) tyrosine kinases and thereby improve the response to ICIs. This article reviews how tyrosine kinase signaling in the tumor microenvironment can promote immune suppression and highlights how therapeutic strategies directed against specific tyrosine kinases can be used to lower the immune setpoint and elicit more effective anti-tumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger J Daly
- Cancer Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, 23 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia. .,Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Monash University, 23 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Monash University, 23 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne-Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.,Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne-Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Oliver Klein
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne-Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Matthias Ernst
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Monash University, 23 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia. .,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne-Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kiamanesh Z, Ayati N, Sadeghi R, Hawkes E, Lee ST, Scott AM. The value of FDG PET/CT imaging in outcome prediction and response assessment of lymphoma patients treated with immunotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:4661-4676. [PMID: 35932329 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05918-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment strategies of lymphoid malignancies have been revolutionized by immunotherapy. Because of the inherent property of Hodgkin lymphoma and some subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma as a highly FDG-avid tumor, functional 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is already embedded in their routine care. Nevertheless, the question is whether it is still valuable in the context of these tumors being treated with immunotherapy. Herein, we will review the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging lymphoid tumors treated with immunotherapy regimens. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed database was conducted on the value of the 18F-FDG PET/CT for immunotherapy response monitoring of patients with malignant lymphoma. The articles were considered eligible if they met all of the following inclusion criteria: (a) clinical studies on patients with different types of malignant lymphoma, (b) treatment with anti-CD20 antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors or immune cell therapies, (c) and incorporated PET/CT with 18F-FDG as the PET tracer. RESULTS From the initial 1488 papers identified, 91 were ultimately included in our study. In anti-CD20 therapy, the highest pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of baseline, early, and late response monitoring parameters for progression-free survival (PFS) belong to metabolic tumor volume (MTV) (3.19 (95%CI: 2.36-4.30)), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (3.25 (95%CI: 2.08-5.08)), and Deauville score (DS) (3.73 (95%CI: 2.50-5.56)), respectively. These measurements for overall survival (OS) were MTV (4.39 (95%CI: 2.71-7.08)), DS (3.23 (95%CI: 1.87-5.58)), and DS (3.64 (95%CI: 1.40-9.43)), respectively. Early and late 18F-FDG PET/CT response assessment in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and immune cell therapy might be an effective tool for prediction of clinical outcome. CONCLUSION For anti-CD20 therapy of lymphoma, the MTV as a baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived parameter has the highest HRs for PFS and OS. The DS as visual criteria in early and late response assessment has higher HRs for PFS and OS compared to the international harmonization project (IHP) visual criteria in anti-CD20 therapy. Early changes in 18F-FDG PET parameters may be predictive of response to ICIs and cell therapy in lymphoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Kiamanesh
- Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Narjess Ayati
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasound & PET, Sydney Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ramin Sadeghi
- Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Eliza Hawkes
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology & Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,School of Public Health & Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia. .,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bodei L, Herrmann K, Schöder H, Scott AM, Lewis JS. Radiotheranostics in oncology: current challenges and emerging opportunities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:534-550. [PMID: 35725926 PMCID: PMC10585450 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00652-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Structural imaging remains an essential component of diagnosis, staging and response assessment in patients with cancer; however, as clinicians increasingly seek to noninvasively investigate tumour phenotypes and evaluate functional and molecular responses to therapy, theranostics - the combination of diagnostic imaging with targeted therapy - is becoming more widely implemented. The field of radiotheranostics, which is the focus of this Review, combines molecular imaging (primarily PET and SPECT) with targeted radionuclide therapy, which involves the use of small molecules, peptides and/or antibodies as carriers for therapeutic radionuclides, typically those emitting α-, β- or auger-radiation. The exponential, global expansion of radiotheranostics in oncology stems from its potential to target and eliminate tumour cells with minimal adverse effects, owing to a mechanism of action that differs distinctly from that of most other systemic therapies. Currently, an enormous opportunity exists to expand the number of patients who can benefit from this technology, to address the urgent needs of many thousands of patients across the world. In this Review, we describe the clinical experience with established radiotheranostics as well as novel areas of research and various barriers to progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Bodei
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason S Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY, USA.
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yan H, Vail ME, Hii L, Guo N, McMurrick PJ, Oliva K, Wilkins S, Saha N, Nikolov DB, Lee FT, Scott AM, Janes PW. Preferential Antibody and Drug Conjugate Targeting of the ADAM10 Metalloprotease in Tumours. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133171. [PMID: 35804938 PMCID: PMC9264901 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
ADAM10 is a transmembrane metalloprotease that sheds a variety of cell surface proteins, including receptors and ligands that regulate a range of developmental processes which re-emerge during tumour development. While ADAM10 is ubiquitously expressed, its activity is normally tightly regulated, but becomes deregulated in tumours. We previously reported the generation of a monoclonal antibody, 8C7, which preferentially recognises an active form of ADAM10 in human and mouse tumours. We now report our investigation of the mechanism of this specificity, and the preferential targeting of 8C7 to human tumour cell xenografts in mice. We also report the development of novel 8C7 antibody–drug conjugates that preferentially kill cells displaying the 8C7 epitope, and that can inhibit tumour growth in mice. This study provides the first demonstration that antibody–drug conjugates targeting an active conformer of ADAM10, a widely expressed transmembrane metalloprotease, enable tumour-selective targeting and inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hengkang Yan
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (H.Y.); (M.E.V.); (N.G.); (F.-T.L.)
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Mary E. Vail
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (H.Y.); (M.E.V.); (N.G.); (F.-T.L.)
| | - Linda Hii
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia;
| | - Nancy Guo
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (H.Y.); (M.E.V.); (N.G.); (F.-T.L.)
| | - Paul J. McMurrick
- Cabrini Monash University Department of Surgery, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia; (P.J.M.); (K.O.); (S.W.)
| | - Karen Oliva
- Cabrini Monash University Department of Surgery, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia; (P.J.M.); (K.O.); (S.W.)
| | - Simon Wilkins
- Cabrini Monash University Department of Surgery, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, VIC 3144, Australia; (P.J.M.); (K.O.); (S.W.)
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Nayanendu Saha
- Structural Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY 10065, USA; (N.S.); (D.B.N.)
| | - Dimitar B. Nikolov
- Structural Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY 10065, USA; (N.S.); (D.B.N.)
| | - Fook-Thean Lee
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (H.Y.); (M.E.V.); (N.G.); (F.-T.L.)
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (H.Y.); (M.E.V.); (N.G.); (F.-T.L.)
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia;
- Correspondence: (A.M.S.); (P.W.J.)
| | - Peter W. Janes
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (H.Y.); (M.E.V.); (N.G.); (F.-T.L.)
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia;
- Correspondence: (A.M.S.); (P.W.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lopci E, Hicks RJ, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Dercle L, Iravani A, Seban RD, Sachpekidis C, Humbert O, Gheysens O, Glaudemans AWJM, Weber W, Wahl RL, Scott AM, Pandit-Taskar N, Aide N. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [ 18F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:2323-2341. [PMID: 35376991 PMCID: PMC9165250 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05780-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this guideline/procedure standard is to assist nuclear medicine physicians, other nuclear medicine professionals, oncologists or other medical specialists for recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in oncological patients undergoing immunotherapy, with special focus on response assessment in solid tumors. METHODS In a cooperative effort between the EANM, the SNMMI and the ANZSNM, clinical indications, recommended imaging procedures and reporting standards have been agreed upon and summarized in this joint guideline/procedure standard. CONCLUSIONS The field of immuno-oncology is rapidly evolving, and this guideline/procedure standard should not be seen as definitive, but rather as a guidance document standardizing the use and interpretation of [18F]FDG PET/CT during immunotherapy. Local variations to this guideline should be taken into consideration. PREAMBLE The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association founded in 1985 to facilitate worldwide communication among individuals pursuing clinical and academic excellence in nuclear medicine. The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote science, technology and practical application of nuclear medicine. The Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM), founded in 1969, represents the major professional society fostering the technical and professional development of nuclear medicine practice across Australia and New Zealand. It promotes excellence in the nuclear medicine profession through education, research and a commitment to the highest professional standards. EANM, SNMMI and ANZSNM members are physicians, technologists, physicists and scientists specialized in the research and clinical practice of nuclear medicine. All three societies will periodically put forth new standards/guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and improve service to patients. Existing standards/guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each standard/guideline, representing a policy statement by the EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM, has undergone a thorough consensus process, entailing extensive review. These societies recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires particular training and skills, as described in each document. These standards/guidelines are educational tools designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate and effective nuclear medicine care for patients. These guidelines are consensus documents based on current knowledge. They are not intended to be inflexible rules or requirements of practice, nor should they be used to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the EANM, SNMMI and ANZSNM caution against the use of these standards/guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals considering the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an action differing from what is laid out in the guidelines/procedure standards, standing alone, is below standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the standards/guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines/procedure standards. The practice of medicine involves not only the science, but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible for general guidelines to consistently allow for an accurate diagnosis to be reached or a particular treatment response to be predicted. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these standards/ guidelines will not ensure a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that practitioners follow a reasonable course of action, based on their level of training, current knowledge, clinical practice guidelines, available resources and the needs/context of the patient being treated. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective. The present guideline/procedure standard was developed collaboratively by the EANM, the SNMMI and the ANZSNM, with the support of international experts in the field. They summarize also the views of the Oncology and Theranostics and the Inflammation and Infection Committees of the EANM, as well as the procedure standards committee of the SNMMI, and reflect recommendations for which the EANM and SNMMI cannot be held responsible. The recommendations should be taken into the context of good practice of nuclear medicine and do not substitute for national and international legal or regulatory provisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - R J Hicks
- The Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Medical School, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Iravani
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - R D Seban
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Institut Curie, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, Inserm, Institut Curie, 91401, Orsay, France
| | - C Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - O Humbert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
- TIRO-UMR E 4320, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - O Gheysens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A W J M Glaudemans
- Nuclear Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - W Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - R L Wahl
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - A M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N Pandit-Taskar
- Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - N Aide
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Caen, France
- INSERM ANTICIPE, Normandie University, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Menon S, Parakh S, Scott AM, Gan HK. Antibody-drug conjugates: beyond current approvals and potential future strategies. Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2022; 3:252-277. [PMID: 36046842 PMCID: PMC9400743 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2022.00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The recent approvals for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in multiple malignancies in recent years have fuelled the ongoing development of this class of drugs. These novel agents combine the benefits of high specific targeting of oncogenic cell surface antigens with the additional cell kill from high potency cytotoxic payloads, thus achieving wider therapeutic windows. This review will summarise the clinical activity of ADCs in tumour types not covered elsewhere in this issue, such as gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) cancers and glioblastoma (GBM). In addition to the ongoing clinical testing of existing ADCs, there is substantial preclinical and early phase testing of newer ADCs or ADC incorporating strategies. This review will provide selected insights into such future development, focusing on the development of novel ADCs against new antigen targets in the tumour microenvironment (TME) and combination of ADCs with immuno-oncology (IO) agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Menon
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre at Austin Health, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Heidelberg Victoria 3084, Australia;College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Sagun Parakh
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre at Austin Health, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Heidelberg Victoria 3084, Australia;College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre at Austin Health, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Heidelberg Victoria 3084, Australia;College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Hui K. Gan
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre at Austin Health, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Heidelberg Victoria 3084, Australia;College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne Victoria 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Scott AM, Yan JL, Baxter CM, Dworkin I, Dukas R. The genetic basis of variation in sexual aggression: evolution versus social plasticity. Mol Ecol 2022; 31:2865-2881. [DOI: 10.1111/mec.16437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. Scott
- Animal Behaviour Group Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour McMaster University 1280 Main Street West Hamilton Ontario L8S 4K1 Canada
| | - Janice L. Yan
- Animal Behaviour Group Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour McMaster University 1280 Main Street West Hamilton Ontario L8S 4K1 Canada
| | - Carling M. Baxter
- Animal Behaviour Group Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour McMaster University 1280 Main Street West Hamilton Ontario L8S 4K1 Canada
| | - Ian Dworkin
- Department of Biology McMaster University 1280 Main Street West Hamilton Ontario L8S 4K1 Canada
| | - Reuven Dukas
- Animal Behaviour Group Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour McMaster University 1280 Main Street West Hamilton Ontario L8S 4K1 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Parakh S, Lee ST, Gan HK, Scott AM. Radiolabeled Antibodies for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061454. [PMID: 35326605 PMCID: PMC8946248 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have the ability to specifically target tumor-cell antigens. This unique property has led to their use in the delivery of radioisotopes to tumor sites (scintigraphic imaging and radioimmunotherapy (RIT)). The choice of the radionuclide depends on its unique physical properties and intended use. Using radiolabeled mAbs with imaging techniques provides critical data that are essential for predicting side effects and determining an optimal antibody dose and treatment schedule. While RIT has been successful in the management of hematological malignancies, the treatment of solid tumors remains challenging. Various strategies are being investigated to improve the efficacy of RIT in solid tumors. Abstract Radioimmunoconjugates consist of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) linked to a radionuclide. Radioimmunoconjugates as theranostics tools have been in development with success, particularly in hematological malignancies, leading to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) allows for reduced toxicity compared to conventional radiation therapy and enhances the efficacy of mAbs. In addition, using radiolabeled mAbs with imaging methods provides critical information on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutic agents with direct relevance to the optimization of the dose and dosing schedule, real-time antigen quantitation, antigen heterogeneity, and dynamic antigen changes. All of these parameters are critical in predicting treatment responses and identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment. Historically, RITs have been less effective in solid tumors; however, several strategies are being investigated to improve their therapeutic index, including targeting patients with minimal disease burden; using pre-targeting strategies, newer radionuclides, and improved labeling techniques; and using combined modalities and locoregional application. This review provides an overview of the radiolabeled intact antibodies currently in clinical use and those in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagun Parakh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (S.P.); (H.K.G.)
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3086, Australia
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3086, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Hui K. Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (S.P.); (H.K.G.)
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3086, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Andrew M. Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia;
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3086, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC 3010, Australia
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
McKay MJ, Taubman KL, Lee S, Scott AM. Radiotherapy planning of lymphomas: role of metabolic imaging with PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med 2022; 36:162-171. [PMID: 35028879 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01703-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Accurate target delineation is an absolute requirement for modern radiotherapy planning. Historically, structural imaging modalities have been used for this purpose, but there is a considerable role for functional imaging with PET/CT to contribute in this area. PET/CT's role in radiotherapy planning is well established and its use is indispensable in the clinical management of the lymphomas, particularly Hodgkin Lymphoma. A crucial use of PET/CT is as a baseline scan for delineation of the initial lymphomatous involvement, since this will determine the contouring of the gross-, clinical- and planning-target volumes (GTV, CTV, PTV). This article reviews the principles of contemporary radiotherapy, examines the evidence for the contribution of PET/CT to radiotherapy planning in lymphoma and the practicalities and challenges of applying this powerful technology to this situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J McKay
- Northern Cancer Service, North West Cancer Centre, Burnie, TAS, 7320, Australia. .,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Rural Clinical School, Northwest Regional Hospital, University of Tasmania, Burnie, TAS, 7320, Australia.
| | - Kim L Taubman
- Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincents Hospital, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | - Szeting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Morgana F, Opstelten R, Slot MC, Scott AM, van Lier RAW, Blom B, Mahfouz A, Amsen D. Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Discrete Steps in Regulatory T Cell Development in the Human Thymus. J Immunol 2022; 208:384-395. [PMID: 34937744 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells control immunological tolerance. Treg cells are generated in the thymus (tTreg) or in the periphery. Their superior lineage fidelity makes tTregs the preferred cell type for adoptive cell therapy (ACT). How human tTreg cells develop is incompletely understood. By combining single-cell transcriptomics and flow cytometry, we in this study delineated three major Treg developmental stages in the human thymus. At the first stage, which we propose to name pre-Treg I, cells still express lineage-inappropriate genes and exhibit signs of TCR signaling, presumably reflecting recognition of self-antigen. The subsequent pre-Treg II stage is marked by the sharp appearance of transcription factor FOXO1 and features induction of KLF2 and CCR7, in apparent preparation for thymic exit. The pre-Treg II stage can further be refined based on the sequential acquisition of surface markers CD31 and GPA33. The expression of CD45RA, finally, completes the phenotype also found on mature recent thymic emigrant Treg cells. Remarkably, the thymus contains a substantial fraction of recirculating mature effector Treg cells, distinguishable by expression of inflammatory chemokine receptors and absence of CCR7. The developmental origin of these cells is unclear and warrants caution when using thymic tissue as a source of stable cells for ACT. We show that cells in the major developmental stages can be distinguished using the surface markers CD1a, CD27, CCR7, and CD39, allowing for their viable isolation. These insights help identify fully mature tTreg cells for ACT and can serve as a basis for further mechanistic studies into tTreg development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florencia Morgana
- Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rianne Opstelten
- Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C Slot
- Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumor Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - René A W van Lier
- Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bianca Blom
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ahmed Mahfouz
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands; and
| | - Derk Amsen
- Department of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; .,Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Boktor RR, Lee ST, Scott AM. PET/CT imaging in colorectal carcinoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00033-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
43
|
Boktor RR, Lee ST, Berlangieri SU, Scott AM. Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on treatment of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, negative 131I whole body scan and elevated serum thyroglobulin. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2022; 10:20-27. [PMID: 35083346 PMCID: PMC8742852 DOI: 10.22038/aojnmb.2021.58276.1406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 18F-FDG PET/CT is increasingly performed in patients with differen-tiated thyroid cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on the management of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who had elevated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) and negative 131I whole body scan (WBS). METHODS 67 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma were included in this study. The findings of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging were compared with histo-pathology, follow up imaging, or clinical follow-up results. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT was evaluated for the entire patient group and for those patients with stimulated serum thyroglobulin levels of less than 5, 5-10, and more than 10 pmol/L as well as for local recurrences and metastases sites. The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on therapeutic management was also evaluated. RESULTS 30/67 patients had positive findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT; 28 were true-positive and 2 were false-positive. 18F-FDG PET/CT results were true-negative in 36 patients and false-negative in 1 patient. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 18F-FDG PET/CT were, 96.5%, 94.5%, 95.5%, 93.3%, and 97.2% respectively. Positive 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were directly correlated with stimulated serum thyroglobulin levels, 7.1% had Tg between 5-10, and 92.9% had Tg greater than 10 pmol/L. 18F-FDG PET/CT had a high or moderate impact on treatment management in 28 (41.8%) of patients. CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET/CT is able to improve diagnostic accuracy and have management impact in a therapeutically relevant way in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who present with rising thyroglobulin level, negative 131I WBS, and clinical suspicion of recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raef R. Boktor
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC Australia,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,Corresponding author: Raef R Boktor. Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, 3084, Victoria, Australia.Tel: +61 39496 5714; Fax: +61 39457 6695;
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC Australia,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Andrew M. Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC Australia,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Parakh S, Nicolazzo J, Scott AM, Gan HK. Antibody Drug Conjugates in Glioblastoma - Is There a Future for Them? Front Oncol 2021; 11:718590. [PMID: 34926242 PMCID: PMC8678283 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.718590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and fatal malignancy that despite decades of trials has limited therapeutic options. Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are composed of a monoclonal antibody which specifically recognizes a cellular surface antigen linked to a cytotoxic payload. ADCs have demonstrated superior efficacy and/or reduced toxicity in a range of haematological and solid tumors resulting in nine ADCs receiving regulatory approval. ADCs have also been explored in patients with brain tumours but with limited success to date. While earlier generations ADCs in glioma patients have had limited success and high toxicity, newer and improved ADCs characterised by low immunogenicity and more effective payloads have shown promise in a range of tumour types. These newer ADCs have also been tested in glioma patients, however, with mixed results. Factors affecting the effectiveness of ADCs to target the CNS include the blood brain barrier which acts as a physical and biochemical barrier, the pro-cancerogenic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and tumour characteristics like tumour volume and antigen expression. In this paper we review the data regarding the ongoing the development of ADCs in glioma patients as well as potential strategies to overcome these barriers to maximise their therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagun Parakh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Nicolazzo
- Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Hui Kong Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kong BY, Sim HW, Nowak AK, Yip S, Barnes EH, Day BW, Buckland ME, Verhaak R, Johns T, Robinson C, Thomas MA, Giardina T, Lwin Z, Scott AM, Parkinson J, Jeffree R, Lourenco RDA, Hovey EJ, Cher LM, Kichendasse G, Khasraw M, Hall M, Tu E, Amanuel B, Koh ES, Gan HK. LUMOS - Low and Intermediate Grade Glioma Umbrella Study of Molecular Guided TherapieS at relapse: Protocol for a pilot study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054075. [PMID: 37185327 PMCID: PMC8719186 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Grades 2 and 3 gliomas (G2/3 gliomas), when combined, are the second largest group of malignant brain tumours in adults. The outcomes for G2/3 gliomas at progression approach the dismal outcomes for glioblastoma (GBM), yet there is a paucity of trials for Australian patients with relapsed G2/3 gliomas compared with patients with GBM. LUMOS will be a pilot umbrella study for patients with relapsed G2/3 gliomas that aims to match patients to targeted therapies based on molecular screening with contemporaneous tumour tissue. Participants in whom no actionable or no druggable mutation is found, or in whom the matching drug is not available, will form a comparator arm and receive standard of care chemotherapy. The objective of the LUMOS trial is to assess the feasibility of this approach in a multicentre study across five sites in Australia, with a view to establishing a national molecular screening platform for patient treatment guided by the mutational analysis of contemporaneous tissue biopsies Methods and analysis This study will be a multicentre pilot study enrolling patients with recurrent grade 2/3 gliomas that have previously been treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy at diagnosis or at first relapse. Contemporaneous tumour tissue at the time of first relapse, defined as tissue obtained within 6 months of relapse and without subsequent intervening therapy, will be obtained from patients. Molecular screening will be performed by targeted next-generation sequencing at the reference laboratory (PathWest, Perth, Australia). RNA and DNA will be extracted from representative formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue scrolls or microdissected from sections on glass slides tissue sections following a review of the histology by pathologists. Extracted nucleic acid will be quantified by Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Library preparation and targeted capture will be performed using the TruSight Tumor 170 (TST170) kit and samples sequenced on NextSeq 550 (Illumina) using NextSeq V.2.5 hi output reagents, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data analysis will be performed using the Illumina BaseSpace TST170 app v1.02 and a custom tertiary pipeline, implemented within the Clinical Genomics Workspace software platform from PierianDx (also refer to section 3.2). Primary outcomes for the study will be the number of patients enrolled and the number of patients who complete molecular screening. Secondary outcomes will include the proportion of screened patients enrolled; proportion of patients who complete molecular screening; the turn-around time of molecular screening; and the value of a brain tumour specific multi-disciplinary tumour board, called the molecular tumour advisory panel as measured by the proportion of patients in whom the treatment recommendation was refined compared with the recommendations from the automated bioinformatics platform of the reference laboratory testing. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the lead Human Research Ethics Committee of the Sydney Local Health District: Protocol No. X19-0383. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, guidelines for Good Clinical Practice and the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007, updated 2018 and as amended periodically). Results will be disseminated using a range of media channels including newsletters, social media, scientific conferences and peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration number ACTRN12620000087954; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Y Kong
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hao-Wen Sim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sonia Yip
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Bryan W Day
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Sid Faithfull Brain Cancer Laboratory, Cell and Molecular Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael E Buckland
- Department of Neuropathology, Brain and Mind Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Roel Verhaak
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Terrance Johns
- Oncogenic Signalling Laboratory, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Cleo Robinson
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marc A Thomas
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Tindaro Giardina
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathon Parkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rosalind Jeffree
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard de Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Hovey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lawrence M Cher
- Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ganessan Kichendasse
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Merryn Hall
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Tu
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benhur Amanuel
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hui K Gan
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre at Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kong B, Sim HW, Amanuel B, Day B, Buckland M, Verhaak R, Yip S, Johns T, Lwin Z, Rosenthal M, Nowak AK, Barnes EH, Scott AM, Parkinson J, Jeffree R, Lourenco RDA, Lau P, Whittle J, Hovey E, Cher L, Kichendasse G, Hall M, Robinson C, Thomas M, Giardina T, Tu E, Khasraw M, Koh ES, Gan H. INNV-08. LOW AND INTERMEDIATE GRADE GLIOMA UMBRELLA STUDY OF MOLECULAR GUIDED THERAPIES (LUMOS) STUDY. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Grade 2 and 3 (G2/3) gliomas are the second largest group of brain tumors in adults. Although the prognosis for G2/3 gliomas at the time of relapse mirror those of glioblastoma, there are few trials in this space.
METHODS
LUMOS was a national multi-center pilot study for patients with relapsed G2/3 gliomas designed to match contemporaneous tissue obtained at the time of disease progression with subsequent targeted therapies. The objective was to establish the feasibility of a precision oncology, umbrella approach to obtain and type tissue within a useful timeframe. As a key feature of LUMOS, a multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Advisory Panel (MTAP) with subspecialty neuro-oncology expertise was formed to interpret the complex genomic information and provide a simplified recommendation to the treating physician.
RESULTS
Ten patients (median age 42: range 32-62; four G2 astrocytoma, one G3 astrocytoma, three G2 oligoendroglioma, one G3 oligodendroglioma, one mixed tumor) were enrolled in the study. Eight patients had biopsies within 6 months of study entry whilst two underwent a biopsy during the study. All patients had potentially targetable alterations (10 IDH, 3 FGFR, 2 PIK3K, CCND3, NRAS, CDK4, PRPRZ1-MET fusion and MET amplification). Matched therapies were delivered for two patients via compassionate access outside the study. The median turnaround time (TAT) of MTAP reports was 6.2 weeks (range 4.2-9.7 weeks) but 4.6 weeks when lag time for shipping was removed.
CONCLUSION
LUMOS confirmed that this design was feasible with good turnaround times. The MTAP facilitated education and support for treating physicians. Thes findings support moving to a larger study using contemporaneous and longitudinal tissue samples matched with targeted therapies as part of a comprehensive umbrella study design. Delivery and interpretation of molecular data is a challenge shared across oncology which may be mitigated with a neuro-oncology specific molecular tumor board.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Kong
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Hao-Wen Sim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Bryan Day
- Sid Faithfull Brain Cancer Laboatory, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Roel Verhaak
- The Jackson Laboratory For Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
| | - Sonia Yip
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Zarnie Lwin
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark Rosenthal
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Elizabeth H Barnes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Lau
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - James Whittle
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Hovey
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Merryn Hall
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Cleo Robinson
- Molecular Anatomical Pathology, PathWest, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Marc Thomas
- Molecular Anatomical Pathology, PathWest, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Tindaro Giardina
- Molecular Anatomical Pathology, PathWest, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Emily Tu
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Hui Gan
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Koh ES, Francis RJ, Ebert M, Gan H, Lee ST, Lau E, Moore A, Grose A, Rossi A, Ng SP, Yap J, Ly T, Lin P, Pinkham MB, Ngai S, Yu C, Gorayski P, Le H, Kirkwood ID, Vallat W, Syed F, Krishna D, Khan S, Gill S, Thomas E, Back M, Barnes EH, Moffat BA, Scott F, Adda L, Foroudi F, Lourenco RDA, Nowak AK, Bailey DL, Scott AM. NIMG-49. A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTRE TRIAL OF FET-PET IN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS - THE TROG 18.06 FIG STUDY: KEY ASPECTS OF IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY CREDENTIALING. Neuro Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab196.547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
The FIG study is a prospective non-randomised study now recruiting up to 210 newly diagnosed GBM participants across ten Australian sites. Study outcomes will address the role of [18F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET-PET) in radiotherapy (RT) planning, evaluation of post-treatment changes versus disease progression and prognostication. We describe here the methodology and preliminary outcomes for site credentialing. Eligible participants with GBM undergo FET-PET imaging at three time-points: FET-PET1-post-operative pre-chemo-RT, FET-PET2 acquired one month post-chemo-RT and FET-PET3 (+/-FDG-PET) triggered when clinical and/or radiological (MRI) progression is suspected. Dynamic and static FET-PET images are analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. Radiotherapy is as per standard care with the treating Radiation Oncologist (RO) blinded to FET-PET1. Site nuclear medicine (NM) physicians are required to delineate a biological target volume (BTV) based on FET-PET1 with hybrid RT volumes derived post-hoc. Pre-trial NM quality assurance comprises certification from the Australasian Radiopharmaceutical Trials Network encompassing FET-PET radiochemistry Quality Control and PET camera calibration. Site and central integrated workflows incorporating multi-modality image registration, target volume/region of interest contouring and analysis have been developed. NM benchmarking involves delineation of FET-PET BTVs in 3 cases with another 3 cases addressing response criteria interpretation harmonized across FET-PET, FDG-PET and MRI. Site ROs complete 3 cases involving standard and hybrid target volume delineation based on pre-derived FET-PET volumes. All NM and RO credentialing cases undergo central expert review. To date, of six sites which have submitted full credentialing data, 19/21 RO and 6/6 planning cases were passed. Of 72 NM cases, 18/72 (25%) required resubmission, primarily related to ensuring standardisation of background regions and time activity curve interpretation. The FIG study will be pivotal in establishing the role of FET-PET in GBM management. The robust NM and RO credentialing program will build capacity and expertise in FET-PET production, acquisition and image interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eng-Siew Koh
- Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Martin Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Hui Gan
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Dept. of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Grose
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Alana Rossi
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - June Yap
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tam Ly
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Lin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Stanley Ngai
- Department of Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Christopher Yu
- Department of Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ian D Kirkwood
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, SA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Wilson Vallat
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, SA Medical Imaging, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Farhan Syed
- Canberra Region Cancer Centre, Canberra Health Services, Woden, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Dayanethee Krishna
- Medical Imaging Department, Canberra Hospital, Canberra Health Services, Woden, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Shahroz Khan
- Medical Imaging Department, Canberra Hospital, Canberra Health Services, Woden, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Suki Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth H Barnes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bradford A Moffat
- National Imaging Fellow, MBCIU, Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fiona Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Farshad Foroudi
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Dale L Bailey
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Scott AM, Czernin J. Perspectives on Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine: A Conversation Between Andrew Scott and Johannes Czernin. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1492-1494. [PMID: 34725232 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johannes Czernin
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Scott AM, Dworkin I, Dukas R. Evolution of sociability by artificial selection. Evolution 2021; 76:541-553. [PMID: 34605553 DOI: 10.1111/evo.14370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
There has been extensive research on the ecology and evolution of social life in animals that live in groups. Less attention, however, has been devoted to apparently solitary species, even though recent research indicates that they also possess complex social behaviors. To address this knowledge gap, we artificially selected on sociability, defined as the tendency to engage in nonaggressive activities with others, in fruit flies. Our goal was to quantify the factors that determine the level of sociability and the traits correlated with this feature. After 25 generations of selection, the high-sociability lineages showed sociability scores about 50% higher than did the low-sociability lineages. Experiments using the evolved lineages indicated that there were no differences in mating success between flies from the low and high lineages. Both males and females from the low lineages, however, were more aggressive than males and females from the high lineages. Finally, the evolved lineages maintained their sociability scores after 10 generations of relaxed selection, suggesting no costs to maintaining low and high sociability, at least under our settings. Sociability is a complex trait, which we currently assess through genomic work on the evolved lineages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Scott
- Animal Behaviour Group, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Ian Dworkin
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Reuven Dukas
- Animal Behaviour Group, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Hricak H, Ward ZJ, Atun R, Abdel-Wahab M, Muellner A, Scott AM. Increasing Access to Imaging for Addressing the Global Cancer Epidemic. Radiology 2021; 301:543-546. [PMID: 34581630 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021211351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hedvig Hricak
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (H.H., A.M.); Center for Health Decision Science (Z.J.W.) and Department of Global Health and Population (R.A.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Mass (R.A.); International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria (M.A.W.); Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.)
| | - Zachary J Ward
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (H.H., A.M.); Center for Health Decision Science (Z.J.W.) and Department of Global Health and Population (R.A.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Mass (R.A.); International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria (M.A.W.); Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.)
| | - Rifat Atun
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (H.H., A.M.); Center for Health Decision Science (Z.J.W.) and Department of Global Health and Population (R.A.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Mass (R.A.); International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria (M.A.W.); Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.)
| | - May Abdel-Wahab
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (H.H., A.M.); Center for Health Decision Science (Z.J.W.) and Department of Global Health and Population (R.A.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Mass (R.A.); International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria (M.A.W.); Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.)
| | - Ada Muellner
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (H.H., A.M.); Center for Health Decision Science (Z.J.W.) and Department of Global Health and Population (R.A.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Mass (R.A.); International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria (M.A.W.); Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.)
| | - Andrew M Scott
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 (H.H., A.M.); Center for Health Decision Science (Z.J.W.) and Department of Global Health and Population (R.A.), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Mass (R.A.); International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, Vienna, Austria (M.A.W.); Tumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.); and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (A.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|