Are we ready for a name change for schizophrenia? A survey of multiple stakeholders

The impact of renaming schizophrenia on destigmatization: The Asian experience

The term "schizophrenia" can indeed carry stigmatizing connotations. Proposals to rename schizophrenia have emerged as a potential strategy to alleviate this stigma, but the impact of such a change is not yet fully understood. In several Asian countries that have adopted a new name for schizophrenia, there is evidence that renaming is associated with improved attitudes towards individuals with schizophrenia and an increased willingness to disclose diagnoses. However, the portrayal of schizophrenia in the media seems unaffected by these name changes. In other countries where "schizophrenia" is still the standard term, alternative names have been suggested, but research on their effectiveness in reducing stigma shows mixed results. Mental health professionals frequently support a name change, recognizing the term's negative implications. However, it is crucial to recognize that a mere semantic revision, devoid of substantial conceptual alterations, may only offer a temporary decrease in stigma. Thus, renaming schizophrenia, coupled with a re-conceptualization of the disorder, may be a constructive step toward reducing its stigmatization.

Linguistic and (micro)cultural differences in the global debate about re-naming 'schizophrenia': A mixed-methods survey from Switzerland

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

This survey explores Swiss mental health professionals', users', and relatives' opinions on re-naming schizophrenia exploiting Switzerland's specific multilingualism to examine possible effects of linguistic and microcultural differences on the issue.

STUDY DESIGN

Opinions on 'schizophrenia' were collected using a self-rated online questionnaire incl. Freetext answers available in the three main Swiss languages, German, French and Italian. It was distributed to the main professional and self-help organizations in Switzerland between June and October 2021.

STUDY RESULTS

Overall, 449 persons completed the questionnaire, 263 in German, 172 in French and 14 in Italian. Of the total sample, 339 identified as mental health professionals, 81 as relatives and 29 as users. Considering the whole sample, almost half favored a name-change with a significant difference between stakeholder- and between language groups. Also, the name 'schizophrenia' was evaluated more critically than the diagnostic concept. Qualitative analysis of freetext answers showed a highly heterogenous argumentation, but no difference between language groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest the attitude towards re-naming might itself be subject to (micro)cultural difference, and they highlight the nature of 'schizophrenia' as not only a scientific, but also a linguistic and cultural object. Such local factors ought to be taken into consideration in the global debate.

A preliminary study examining terminology used by individuals with lived experience describing beliefs about being targeted or harmed by others

While recent studies have prompted re-evaluation of the term "schizophrenia," few have examined the use of terms to describe persecutory ideation (PI) or paranoia. This study examines the preferences and terms used by a cross-diagnostic population of individuals (N = 184) with lived experience using an online survey. Participants most commonly described their PI in terms of the perceived source of threat, followed by clinical language, most commonly variants of "paranoia" and "anxiety." Of five selected terms assessed quantitatively - "anxiety," "paranoia," "persecutory thoughts," "suspiciousness," and "threat thoughts" - participants were more likely to report that "anxiety" aligned with their experience of PI, followed by "suspiciousness." Endorsement of terms more specific to PI was associated with self-report PI severity, while a preference for "anxiety" over other terms was both associated with less severe PI and lower scores on a measure of stigma. These results suggest that the heterogeneity of terms used by individuals with lived experience support a person-centered approach to language describing such experiences.

A 20-year review comparing the use of 'schizophrenia' and 'psychosis' in UK newspapers from 2000 to 2019: Implications for stigma reduction

BACKGROUND

There have been increasing calls for schizophrenia to be renamed to reduce negative associations with the diagnosis. 'Psychosis' is one proposed alternative, yet some research suggests this has greater negative connotations. This study compared the use of both terms within UK newspapers longitudinally to assess which is more negatively portrayed in the media.

STUDY DESIGN

Using LexisLibrary News, six UK newspaper archives were searched for the terms 'schizophrenia' and 'psychosis' in articles published between 2000 and 2019; the included article total was n = 9802. Articles were analysed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software.

STUDY RESULTS

A two-level multilevel model was created of newspaper articles nested within newspapers. Adding predictors revealed that diagnostic term was a significant predictor of the emotional tone of articles (β = -2.30, SE = 0.51, p < .001, 95 % CI -3.30 to -1.30), with 'psychosis' having a more negative tone than 'schizophrenia.' Tabloids were shown to have a significantly more negative tone than broadsheets (β = -9.32, SE = 1.04, p < .001, 95 % CI -11.36 to -7.28), and emotional tone of writing had become more negative over time (β = -0.26, SE = 0.04, p < .001, 95 % CI -0.34 to -0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest 'psychosis' is associated with greater negativity than 'schizophrenia' within UK newspapers, and may be a poor substitute term to reduce stigma. As article tone worsened for both diagnoses over time, increased stigma reduction campaigns are required to target negativity within the media.

Diagnostic terms psychiatrists prefer to use for common psychotic and personality disorders

OBJECTIVE

There are ongoing discussions on updating various standard psychiatric terms, including schizophrenia, which can be confusing, and personality disorders, which can be pejorative. To contribute to this process, suggestions and recommendations on terminology were sought from academic psychiatrists with substantial clinical experience.

METHODS

In an online survey, 263 psychiatrists were asked how often they used alternative instead of standard terms for the diagnosis or symptom description of psychotic disorders and DSM Cluster B personality disorders. They were also asked what specific terms they preferred to use. Reasons for their views and choices were obtained.

RESULTS

125 clinicians (48%) responded. Only a minority of clinicians (31%) tended to use the term schizophrenia often, preferring to say psychosis or to refer to thinking and perceptual problems. Even lower proportions of clinicians (7-14%) often use the terms for Cluster B personality disorder subtypes: antisocial, narcissistic, histrionic, and borderline. Alternatives suggested for these disorders included discussing emotional dysregulation, traits of sensitivity and reactivity, and relational difficulties. Reasons cited for choosing alternative terms were to avoid miscommunication (71% of responders) and to avoid offending the patient (78% of responders).

CONCLUSIONS

There are practical alternatives to standard psychiatric terminology that may improve communication with patients and be more respectful choices, as well. The suggestions of the psychiatrists responding to this survey might be of immediate value to others in their practices and might be worthy of consideration by those writing the next versions of the standard manuals, both the DSM and the ICD.

What do psychiatrists think about renaming schizophrenia in Turkey?

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the opinions of psychiatrists in Turkey on whether to change the name of schizophrenia in order to reduce stigma. This cross-sectional survey was conducted with psychiatrists (resident in psychiatry, specialist, and lecturer) in Turkey. An online survey was created via the Google Forms public web address. Online questionnaires were delivered through Google Forms by emailing and messaging on WhatsApp, Telegram, Google and Yahoo groups and asking them to pass the questionnaire to other possible participants in their network. The study was performed between June 20, 2021 and July 10, 2021. 460 psychiatrists participated in the study. Forty-five-point 2 % of psychiatrists think that the name of schizophrenia should be renamed to reduce stigma. Forty-two-point 8 % of those who support the name change state that this change should be done as soon as possible. While 64.1 % of psychiatrists stated that naming the disease with another (new) name instead of schizophrenia could increase the hopes of patients and their relatives for recovery, 12.6 % stated that renaming would not cause any positive or negative changes. There is no statistical difference between psychiatrists who have a relative diagnosed with schizophrenia and psychiatrists who do not, in terms of thinking that the name of schizophrenia should be renamed to reduce stigma. In order to remove the stigma on schizophrenia, many interventions are required in social, cultural, economic and political fields. Renaming schizophrenia may be a good start for interventions.

Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review of Etiopathogenetic, Diagnostic and Treatment Aspects

Although schizophrenia is currently conceptualized as being characterized as a syndrome that includes a collection of signs and symptoms, there is strong evidence of heterogeneous and complex underpinned etiological, etiopathogenetic, and psychopathological mechanisms, which are still under investigation. Therefore, the present viewpoint review is aimed at providing some insights into the recently investigated schizophrenia research fields in order to discuss the potential future research directions in schizophrenia research. The traditional schizophrenia construct and diagnosis were progressively revised and revisited, based on the recently emerging neurobiological, genetic, and epidemiological research. Moreover, innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are pointed to build a new construct, allowing the development of better clinical and treatment outcomes and characterization for schizophrenic individuals, considering a more patient-centered, personalized, and tailored-based dimensional approach. Further translational studies are needed in order to integrate neurobiological, genetic, and environmental studies into clinical practice and to help clinicians and researchers to understand how to redesign a new schizophrenia construct.

Getting Real-er

Dilemmas of diagnostic heterogeneity in psychiatric disorders occur at many levels. Symptoms themselves and the experience of distress with symptoms may differ in nature. Put plainly, one child's sadness is not the same as another's, and the degree to which that young person finds their sadness distressing or impairing may differ from that of their peers.

Eliminate schizophrenia

“Schizophrenia” is used as a unitary diagnostic term for an illness that is extremely heterogeneous in its etiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and trajectory. Furthermore, the presence of psychosis—its hallmark characteristic—can be observed in individuals with other diagnoses, and biologically- and computationally-defined psychosis biotypes differ from those associated with DSM diagnoses and yield different treatment predictions. We argue that schizophrenia is not only stigmatizing as a label, it is not useful as a diagnostic term, a disease concept, or a construct for scientific research. Until we are able to delineate a range of dysfunctions across molecular/cellular and/or macrocircuit levels that map onto psychosis-proneness and indicate optimal treatment pathways, we propose to eliminate schizophrenia and replace it with a new nomenclature as an interim solution. Similar to what is done with other broad descriptive disease concepts in medicine which are defined by hallmark clinical features and then further subtyped (e.g., sickle cell anemia, iron deficiency anemia), we propose that psychosis spectrum illnesses (PSIs) be characterized by their temporal characteristics, relevant modifying/causal and symptom features, and treatment responsiveness.