1
|
Busch H, Yasir Ateeque M, Taube F, Wiegand T, Corzilius B, Künze G. Probing Biomolecular Interactions with Paramagnetic Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Chembiochem 2025; 26:e202400903. [PMID: 39803829 PMCID: PMC11907393 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202400903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Revised: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/15/2025]
Abstract
Recent advances in computational methods like AlphaFold have transformed structural biology, enabling accurate modeling of protein complexes and driving applications in drug discovery and protein engineering. However, predicting the structure of systems involving weak, transient, or dynamic interactions, or of complexes with disordered regions, remains challenging. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy offers atomic-level insights into biomolecular complexes, even in weakly interacting and dynamic systems. Paramagnetic NMR, in particular, provides long-range structural restraints, easily exceeding distances over 25 Å, making it ideal for studying large protein complexes. Advances in chemical tools for introducing paramagnetic tags into proteins, combined with progress in electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, have enhanced the method's utility. This perspective article discusses paramagnetic NMR approaches for analyzing biomolecular complexes in solution and in the solid state, emphasizing quantities like pseudocontact shifts, residual dipolar couplings, and paramagnetic relaxation enhancements. Additionally, dynamic nuclear polarization offers a promising method to amplify NMR signals of large complexes, even in complex environments. The integration of AlphaFold protein structure prediction with paramagnetic NMR holds great potential for advancing our understanding of biomolecular interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Busch
- Institute of Technical and Macromolecular ChemistryRWTH Aachen UniversityWorringerweg 252074AachenGermany
| | | | - Florian Taube
- Institute of Chemistry, Department Life, Light & MatterUniversity of RostockAlbert-Einstein-Str. 2718059RostockGermany
| | - Thomas Wiegand
- Institute of Technical and Macromolecular ChemistryRWTH Aachen UniversityWorringerweg 252074AachenGermany
- Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy ConversionStiftstr. 34–3645470Mühlheim/RuhrGermany
| | - Björn Corzilius
- Institute of Chemistry, Department Life, Light & MatterUniversity of RostockAlbert-Einstein-Str. 2718059RostockGermany
| | - Georg Künze
- Institute for Drug DiscoveryUniversity of LeipzigBrüderstr. 3404103LeipzigGermany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ledwitch K, Künze G, Okwei E, Sala D, Meiler J. Non-canonical amino acids for site-directed spin labeling of membrane proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2024; 89:102936. [PMID: 39454307 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024]
Abstract
Membrane proteins remain challenging targets for conventional structural biology techniques because they need to reside within complex hydrophobic lipid environments to maintain proper structure and function. Magnetic resonance combined with site-directed spin labeling is an alternative method that provides atomic-level structural and dynamical information from effects introduced by an electron- or nuclear-based spin label. With the advent of bioorthogonal click chemistries and genetically engineered non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs), options for linking spin probes to biomolecules have substantially broadened outside the conventional cysteine-based labeling scheme. Here, we highlight current strategies to spin-label membrane proteins through ncAAs for nuclear and electron paramagnetic resonance applications. Such advances are critical for developing bioorthogonal spin labeling schemes to achieve in-cell labeling and in-cell measurements of membrane protein conformational dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Ledwitch
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA; Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
| | - Georg Künze
- Institute of Drug Discovery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Elleansar Okwei
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA; Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA
| | - Davide Sala
- Institute of Drug Discovery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA; Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA; Institute of Drug Discovery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Singh B, Mondal A, Gaalswyk K, MacCallum JL, Perez A. MELD-Adapt: On-the-Fly Belief Updating in Integrative Molecular Dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 2024; 20:9230-9242. [PMID: 39356805 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
Integrative structural biology synergizes experimental data with computational methods to elucidate the structures and interactions within biomolecules, a task that becomes critical in the absence of high-resolution structural data. A challenging step for integrating the data is knowing the expected accuracy or belief in the dataset. We previously showed that the Modeling Employing Limited Data (MELD) approach succeeds at predicting structures and finding the best interpretation of the data when the initial belief is equal to or slightly lower than the real value. However, the initial belief might be unknown to the user, as it depends on both the technique and the system of study. Here we introduce MELD-Adapt, designed to dynamically evaluate and infer the reliability of input data while at the same time finding the best interpretation of the data and the structures compatible with it. We demonstrate the utility of this method across different systems, particularly emphasizing its capability to correct initial assumptions and identify the correct fraction of data to produce reliable structural models. The approach is tested with two benchmark sets: the folding of 12 proteins with coarse physical insights and the binding of peptides with varying affinities to the extraterminal domain using chemical shift perturbation data. We find that subtle differences in data structure (e.g., locally clustered or globally distributed), starting belief, and force field preferences can have an impact on the predictions, limiting the possibility of a transferable protocol across all systems and data types. Nonetheless, we find a wide range of initial setup conditions that will lead to successful sampling and identification of native states, leading to a robust pipeline. Furthermore, disagreements about how much data is enforced and satisfied rapidly serve to identify incorrect setup conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhumika Singh
- Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7011, United States
| | - Arup Mondal
- Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7011, United States
| | - Kari Gaalswyk
- Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Justin L MacCallum
- Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Alberto Perez
- Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7011, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Caparotta M, Perez A. Advancing Molecular Dynamics: Toward Standardization, Integration, and Data Accessibility in Structural Biology. J Phys Chem B 2024; 128:2219-2227. [PMID: 38418288 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have become a valuable tool in structural biology, offering insights into complex biological systems that are difficult to obtain through experimental techniques alone. The lack of available data sets and structures in most published computational work has limited other researchers' use of these models. In recent years, the emergence of online sharing platforms and MD database initiatives favor the deposition of ensembles and structures to accompany publications, favoring reuse of the data sets. However, the lack of uniform metadata collection, formats, and what data are deposited limits the impact and its use by different communities that are not necessarily experts in MD. This Perspective highlights the need for standardization and better resource sharing for processing and interpreting MD simulation results, akin to efforts in other areas of structural biology. As the field moves forward, we will see an increase in popularity and benefits of MD-based integrative approaches combining experimental data and simulations through probabilistic reasoning, but these too are limited by uniformity in experimental data availability and choices on how the data are modeled that are not trivial to decipher from papers. Other fields have addressed similar challenges comprehensively by establishing task forces with different degrees of success. The large scope and number of communities to represent the breadth of types of MD simulations complicates a parallel approach that would fit all. Thus, each group typically decides what data and which format to upload on servers like Zenodo. Uploading data with FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) principles in mind including optimal metadata collection will make the data more accessible and actionable by the community. Such a wealth of simulation data will foster method development and infrastructure advancements, thus propelling the field forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Caparotta
- Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
| | - Alberto Perez
- Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abayev-Avraham M, Salzberg Y, Gliksberg D, Oren-Suissa M, Rosenzweig R. DNAJB6 mutants display toxic gain of function through unregulated interaction with Hsp70 chaperones. Nat Commun 2023; 14:7066. [PMID: 37923706 PMCID: PMC10624832 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42735-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular chaperones are essential cellular components that aid in protein folding and preventing the abnormal aggregation of disease-associated proteins. Mutations in one such chaperone, DNAJB6, were identified in patients with LGMDD1, a dominant autosomal disorder characterized by myofibrillar degeneration and accumulations of aggregated protein within myocytes. The molecular mechanisms through which such mutations cause this dysfunction, however, are not well understood. Here we employ a combination of solution NMR and biochemical assays to investigate the structural and functional changes in LGMDD1 mutants of DNAJB6. Surprisingly, we find that DNAJB6 disease mutants show no reduction in their aggregation-prevention activity in vitro, and instead differ structurally from the WT protein, affecting their interaction with Hsp70 chaperones. While WT DNAJB6 contains a helical element regulating its ability to bind and activate Hsp70, in LGMDD1 disease mutants this regulation is disrupted. These variants can thus recruit and hyperactivate Hsp70 chaperones in an unregulated manner, depleting Hsp70 levels in myocytes, and resulting in the disruption of proteostasis. Interfering with DNAJB6-Hsp70 binding, however, reverses the disease phenotype, suggesting future therapeutic avenues for LGMDD1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meital Abayev-Avraham
- Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 761000, Israel
| | - Yehuda Salzberg
- Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 761000, Israel
| | - Dar Gliksberg
- Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 761000, Israel
| | - Meital Oren-Suissa
- Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 761000, Israel
| | - Rina Rosenzweig
- Department of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 761000, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ledwitch KV, Künze G, McKinney JR, Okwei E, Larochelle K, Pankewitz L, Ganguly S, Darling HL, Coin I, Meiler J. Sparse pseudocontact shift NMR data obtained from a non-canonical amino acid-linked lanthanide tag improves integral membrane protein structure prediction. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2023; 77:69-82. [PMID: 37016190 PMCID: PMC10443207 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-023-00412-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
A single experimental method alone often fails to provide the resolution, accuracy, and coverage needed to model integral membrane proteins (IMPs). Integrating computation with experimental data is a powerful approach to supplement missing structural information with atomic detail. We combine RosettaNMR with experimentally-derived paramagnetic NMR restraints to guide membrane protein structure prediction. We demonstrate this approach using the disulfide bond formation protein B (DsbB), an α-helical IMP. Here, we attached a cyclen-based paramagnetic lanthanide tag to an engineered non-canonical amino acid (ncAA) using a copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) click chemistry reaction. Using this tagging strategy, we collected 203 backbone HN pseudocontact shifts (PCSs) for three different labeling sites and used these as input to guide de novo membrane protein structure prediction protocols in Rosetta. We find that this sparse PCS dataset combined with 44 long-range NOEs as restraints in our calculations improves structure prediction of DsbB by enhancements in model accuracy, sampling, and scoring. The inclusion of this PCS dataset improved the Cα-RMSD transmembrane segment values of the best-scoring and best-RMSD models from 9.57 Å and 3.06 Å (no NMR data) to 5.73 Å and 2.18 Å, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn V Ledwitch
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
- Department of Chemistry, Center for Structural Biology, MRBIII 5154E, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
| | - Georg Künze
- Institute of Drug Discovery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jacob R McKinney
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Elleansar Okwei
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Katherine Larochelle
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Lisa Pankewitz
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Soumya Ganguly
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Heather L Darling
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Irene Coin
- Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Science, University of Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Institute of Drug Discovery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koehler Leman J, Künze G. Recent Advances in NMR Protein Structure Prediction with ROSETTA. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24097835. [PMID: 37175539 PMCID: PMC10178863 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24097835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a powerful method for studying the structure and dynamics of proteins in their native state. For high-resolution NMR structure determination, the collection of a rich restraint dataset is necessary. This can be difficult to achieve for proteins with high molecular weight or a complex architecture. Computational modeling techniques can complement sparse NMR datasets (<1 restraint per residue) with additional structural information to elucidate protein structures in these difficult cases. The Rosetta software for protein structure modeling and design is used by structural biologists for structure determination tasks in which limited experimental data is available. This review gives an overview of the computational protocols available in the Rosetta framework for modeling protein structures from NMR data. We explain the computational algorithms used for the integration of different NMR data types in Rosetta. We also highlight new developments, including modeling tools for data from paramagnetic NMR and hydrogen-deuterium exchange, as well as chemical shifts in CS-Rosetta. Furthermore, strategies are discussed to complement and improve structure predictions made by the current state-of-the-art AlphaFold2 program using NMR-guided Rosetta modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Koehler Leman
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY 10010, USA
| | - Georg Künze
- Institute for Drug Discovery, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Brüderstr. 34, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Härtelstr. 16-18, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Delhommel F, Martínez-Lumbreras S, Sattler M. Combining NMR, SAXS and SANS to characterize the structure and dynamics of protein complexes. Methods Enzymol 2022; 678:263-297. [PMID: 36641211 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2022.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules is essential to decipher the molecular mechanisms that underlie cellular functions. The description of structure and conformational dynamics often requires the integration of complementary techniques. In this review, we highlight the utility of combining nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy with small angle scattering (SAS) to characterize these challenging biomolecular systems. NMR can assess the structure and conformational dynamics of multidomain proteins, RNAs and biomolecular complexes. It can efficiently provide information on interaction surfaces, long-distance restraints and relative domain orientations at residue-level resolution. Such information can be readily combined with high-resolution structural data available on subcomponents of biomolecular assemblies. Moreover, NMR is a powerful tool to characterize the dynamics of biomolecules on a wide range of timescales, from nanoseconds to seconds. On the other hand, SAS approaches provide global information on the size and shape of biomolecules and on the ensemble of all conformations present in solution. Therefore, NMR and SAS provide complementary data that are uniquely suited to investigate dynamic biomolecular assemblies. Here, we briefly review the type of data that can be obtained by both techniques and describe different approaches that can be used to combine them to characterize biomolecular assemblies. We then provide guidelines on which experiments are best suited depending on the type of system studied, ranging from fully rigid complexes, dynamic structures that interconvert between defined conformations and systems with very high structural heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Delhommel
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Bavarian NMR Center, Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Santiago Martínez-Lumbreras
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Bavarian NMR Center, Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Michael Sattler
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany; Bavarian NMR Center, Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sala D, Del Alamo D, Mchaourab HS, Meiler J. Modeling of protein conformational changes with Rosetta guided by limited experimental data. Structure 2022; 30:1157-1168.e3. [PMID: 35597243 PMCID: PMC9357069 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Conformational changes are an essential component of functional cycles of many proteins, but their characterization often requires an integrative structural biology approach. Here, we introduce and benchmark ConfChangeMover (CCM), a new method built into the widely used macromolecular modeling suite Rosetta that is tailored to model conformational changes in proteins using sparse experimental data. CCM can rotate and translate secondary structural elements and modify their backbone dihedral angles in regions of interest. We benchmarked CCM on soluble and membrane proteins with simulated Cα-Cα distance restraints and sparse experimental double electron-electron resonance (DEER) restraints, respectively. In both benchmarks, CCM outperformed state-of-the-art Rosetta methods, showing that it can model a diverse array of conformational changes. In addition, the Rosetta framework allows a wide variety of experimental data to be integrated with CCM, thus extending its capability beyond DEER restraints. This method will contribute to the biophysical characterization of protein dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Sala
- Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Saxony 04103, Germany
| | - Diego Del Alamo
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Hassane S Mchaourab
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Jens Meiler
- Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Saxony 04103, Germany; Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Magi Meconi G, Sasselli IR, Bianco V, Onuchic JN, Coluzza I. Key aspects of the past 30 years of protein design. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS. PHYSICAL SOCIETY (GREAT BRITAIN) 2022; 85:086601. [PMID: 35704983 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ac78ef] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Proteins are the workhorse of life. They are the building infrastructure of living systems; they are the most efficient molecular machines known, and their enzymatic activity is still unmatched in versatility by any artificial system. Perhaps proteins' most remarkable feature is their modularity. The large amount of information required to specify each protein's function is analogically encoded with an alphabet of just ∼20 letters. The protein folding problem is how to encode all such information in a sequence of 20 letters. In this review, we go through the last 30 years of research to summarize the state of the art and highlight some applications related to fundamental problems of protein evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Magi Meconi
- Computational Biophysics Lab, Center for Cooperative Research in Biomaterials (CIC biomaGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Paseo de Miramon 182, 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Ivan R Sasselli
- Computational Biophysics Lab, Center for Cooperative Research in Biomaterials (CIC biomaGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Paseo de Miramon 182, 20014, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
| | | | - Jose N Onuchic
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Department of Physics & Astronomy, Department of Chemistry, Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251, United States of America
| | - Ivan Coluzza
- BCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, Bld. Martina Casiano, UPV/EHU Science Park, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain
- Basque Foundation for Science, Ikerbasque, 48009, Bilbao, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tran MH, Schoeder CT, Schey KL, Meiler J. Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook. Front Immunol 2022; 13:859964. [PMID: 35720345 PMCID: PMC9204306 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Although computational structure prediction has had great successes in recent years, it regularly fails to predict the interactions of large protein complexes with residue-level accuracy, or even the correct orientation of the protein partners. The performance of computational docking can be notably enhanced by incorporating experimental data from structural biology techniques. A rapid method to probe protein-protein interactions is hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). HDX-MS has been increasingly used for epitope-mapping of antibodies (Abs) to their respective antigens (Ags) in the past few years. In this paper, we review the current state of HDX-MS in studying protein interactions, specifically Ab-Ag interactions, and how it has been used to inform computational structure prediction calculations. Particularly, we address the limitations of HDX-MS in epitope mapping and techniques and protocols applied to overcome these barriers. Furthermore, we explore computational methods that leverage HDX-MS to aid structure prediction, including the computational simulation of HDX-MS data and the combination of HDX-MS and protein docking. We point out challenges in interpreting and incorporating HDX-MS data into Ab-Ag complex docking and highlight the opportunities they provide to build towards a more optimized hybrid method, allowing for more reliable, high throughput epitope identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minh H. Tran
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Center of Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Clara T. Schoeder
- Center of Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Institute for Drug Discovery, University Leipzig Medical School, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kevin L. Schey
- Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center of Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
- Institute for Drug Discovery, University Leipzig Medical School, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miao Q, Nitsche C, Orton H, Overhand M, Otting G, Ubbink M. Paramagnetic Chemical Probes for Studying Biological Macromolecules. Chem Rev 2022; 122:9571-9642. [PMID: 35084831 PMCID: PMC9136935 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Paramagnetic chemical probes have been used in electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy for more than four decades. Recent years witnessed a great increase in the variety of probes for the study of biological macromolecules (proteins, nucleic acids, and oligosaccharides). This Review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing paramagnetic chemical probes, including chemical synthetic approaches, functional properties, and selected applications. Recent developments have seen, in particular, a rapid expansion of the range of lanthanoid probes with anisotropic magnetic susceptibilities for the generation of structural restraints based on residual dipolar couplings and pseudocontact shifts in solution and solid state NMR spectroscopy, mostly for protein studies. Also many new isotropic paramagnetic probes, suitable for NMR measurements of paramagnetic relaxation enhancements, as well as EPR spectroscopic studies (in particular double resonance techniques) have been developed and employed to investigate biological macromolecules. Notwithstanding the large number of reported probes, only few have found broad application and further development of probes for dedicated applications is foreseen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Miao
- Leiden
Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden 2333 CC, The Netherlands
- School
of Chemistry &Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi’an710021, China
| | - Christoph Nitsche
- Research
School of Chemistry, The Australian National
University, Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
| | - Henry Orton
- Research
School of Chemistry, The Australian National
University, Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide & Protein Science,
Research School of Chemistry, Australian
National University, Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
| | - Mark Overhand
- Leiden
Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden 2333 CC, The Netherlands
| | - Gottfried Otting
- Research
School of Chemistry, The Australian National
University, Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
- ARC
Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide & Protein Science,
Research School of Chemistry, Australian
National University, Sullivans Creek Road, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
| | - Marcellus Ubbink
- Leiden
Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden 2333 CC, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McCoy M, Fradera X, Reutershan MH, Machacek M, Trotter BW. NMR Data-Driven Docking of HDM2-Inhibitor Complexes. Chembiochem 2022; 23:e202100570. [PMID: 35104390 DOI: 10.1002/cbic.202100570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
We present an automated NMR-guided docking workflow that can be used to generate models of protein-ligand complexes based on data from NOE NMR experiments. The first step is to generate a number of intermolecular distance constraints from experimental NOE data. Then, the ligand is docked on an ensemble of receptor structures to account for protein flexibility, and multiple poses are generated. Finally, we use the NOE-based constraints to filter and score docking poses based on the percentage of NOE constraints that are consistent with protein-ligand interatomic distances. This workflow was successfully used during a Lead Optimization project to generate models of synthetic PPI inhibitors bound to the HDM2 protein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark McCoy
- Merck and Co Inc, Merck Research Laboratories, 2000 Galloping Hill Road, 07033, Kenilworth, UNITED STATES
| | - Xavier Fradera
- Merck: Merck & Co Inc, Merck Research Laboratories, UNITED STATES
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hou XN, Tochio H. Characterizing conformational ensembles of multi-domain proteins using anisotropic paramagnetic NMR restraints. Biophys Rev 2022; 14:55-66. [PMID: 35340613 PMCID: PMC8921464 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-021-00916-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been over two decades since paramagnetic NMR started to form part of the essential techniques for structural analysis of proteins under physiological conditions. Paramagnetic NMR has significantly expanded our understanding of the inherent flexibility of proteins, in particular, those that are formed by combinations of two or more domains. Here, we present a brief overview of techniques to characterize conformational ensembles of such multi-domain proteins using paramagnetic NMR restraints produced through anisotropic metals, with a focus on the basics of anisotropic paramagnetic effects, the general procedures of conformational ensemble reconstruction, and some representative reweighting approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Ni Hou
- Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan
| | - Hidehito Tochio
- Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Müntener T, Joss D, Häussinger D, Hiller S. Pseudocontact Shifts in Biomolecular NMR Spectroscopy. Chem Rev 2022; 122:9422-9467. [PMID: 35005884 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Paramagnetic centers in biomolecules, such as specific metal ions that are bound to a protein, affect the nuclei in their surrounding in various ways. One of these effects is the pseudocontact shift (PCS), which leads to strong chemical shift perturbations of nuclear spins, with a remarkably long range of 50 Å and beyond. The PCS in solution NMR is an effect originating from the anisotropic part of the dipole-dipole interaction between the magnetic momentum of unpaired electrons and nuclear spins. The PCS contains spatial information that can be exploited in multiple ways to characterize structure, function, and dynamics of biomacromolecules. It can be used to refine structures, magnify effects of dynamics, help resonance assignments, allows for an intermolecular positioning system, and gives structural information in sensitivity-limited situations where all other methods fail. Here, we review applications of the PCS in biomolecular solution NMR spectroscopy, starting from early works on natural metalloproteins, following the development of non-natural tags to chelate and attach lanthanoid ions to any biomolecular target to advanced applications on large biomolecular complexes and inside living cells. We thus hope to not only highlight past applications but also shed light on the tremendous potential the PCS has in structural biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Müntener
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 41, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Joss
- Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, St. Johanns-Ring 19, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Häussinger
- Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, St. Johanns-Ring 19, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Hiller
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 41, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koehler Leman J, Lyskov S, Lewis SM, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Alford RF, Barlow K, Ben-Aharon Z, Farrell D, Fell J, Hansen WA, Harmalkar A, Jeliazkov J, Kuenze G, Krys JD, Ljubetič A, Loshbaugh AL, Maguire J, Moretti R, Mulligan VK, Nance ML, Nguyen PT, Ó Conchúir S, Roy Burman SS, Samanta R, Smith ST, Teets F, Tiemann JKS, Watkins A, Woods H, Yachnin BJ, Bahl CD, Bailey-Kellogg C, Baker D, Das R, DiMaio F, Khare SD, Kortemme T, Labonte JW, Lindorff-Larsen K, Meiler J, Schief W, Schueler-Furman O, Siegel JB, Stein A, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Kuhlman B, Leaver-Fay A, Gront D, Gray JJ, Bonneau R. Ensuring scientific reproducibility in bio-macromolecular modeling via extensive, automated benchmarks. Nat Commun 2021; 12:6947. [PMID: 34845212 PMCID: PMC8630030 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27222-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Each year vast international resources are wasted on irreproducible research. The scientific community has been slow to adopt standard software engineering practices, despite the increases in high-dimensional data, complexities of workflows, and computational environments. Here we show how scientific software applications can be created in a reproducible manner when simple design goals for reproducibility are met. We describe the implementation of a test server framework and 40 scientific benchmarks, covering numerous applications in Rosetta bio-macromolecular modeling. High performance computing cluster integration allows these benchmarks to run continuously and automatically. Detailed protocol captures are useful for developers and users of Rosetta and other macromolecular modeling tools. The framework and design concepts presented here are valuable for developers and users of any type of scientific software and for the scientific community to create reproducible methods. Specific examples highlight the utility of this framework, and the comprehensive documentation illustrates the ease of adding new tests in a matter of hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Koehler Leman
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| | - Sergey Lyskov
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Steven M Lewis
- Cyrus Biotechnology, 1201 Second Ave, Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
- IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Rebecca F Alford
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Kyle Barlow
- Graduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Ziv Ben-Aharon
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, POB 12272, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
| | - Daniel Farrell
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jason Fell
- Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - William A Hansen
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
| | - Ameya Harmalkar
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Jeliazko Jeliazkov
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Georg Kuenze
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Institute for Drug Discovery, Medical School, Leipzig University, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Justyna D Krys
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Center, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ajasja Ljubetič
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Amanda L Loshbaugh
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Biophysics Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Jack Maguire
- Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Rocco Moretti
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Vikram Khipple Mulligan
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Morgan L Nance
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Phuong T Nguyen
- Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Shane Ó Conchúir
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Shourya S Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Rituparna Samanta
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Shannon T Smith
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Frank Teets
- Department of Bioochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Johanna K S Tiemann
- Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N., Denmark
| | - Andrew Watkins
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Hope Woods
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Brahm J Yachnin
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
| | - Christopher D Bahl
- Institute for Protein Innovation, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | | - David Baker
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Rhiju Das
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Frank DiMaio
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Sagar D Khare
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08904, USA
| | - Tanja Kortemme
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
- Biophysics Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Jason W Labonte
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
- Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N., Denmark
| | - Jens Meiler
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Institute for Drug Discovery, Medical School, Leipzig University, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - William Schief
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
- IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center, Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Ora Schueler-Furman
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, POB 12272, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
| | - Justin B Siegel
- Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Amelie Stein
- Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen N., Denmark
| | - Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy
- Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Brian Kuhlman
- Department of Bioochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Andrew Leaver-Fay
- Department of Bioochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Dominik Gront
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Center, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
| | - Richard Bonneau
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
- Department of Computer Science, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cucuzza S, Güntert P, Plückthun A, Zerbe O. An automated iterative approach for protein structure refinement using pseudocontact shifts. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2021; 75:319-334. [PMID: 34338940 PMCID: PMC8473369 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-021-00376-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
NMR structure calculation using NOE-derived distance restraints requires a considerable number of assignments of both backbone and sidechains resonances, often difficult or impossible to get for large or complex proteins. Pseudocontact shifts (PCSs) also play a well-established role in NMR protein structure calculation, usually to augment existing structural, mostly NOE-derived, information. Existing refinement protocols using PCSs usually either require a sizeable number of sidechain assignments or are complemented by other experimental restraints. Here, we present an automated iterative procedure to perform backbone protein structure refinements requiring only a limited amount of backbone amide PCSs. Already known structural features from a starting homology model, in this case modules of repeat proteins, are framed into a scaffold that is subsequently refined by experimental PCSs. The method produces reliable indicators that can be monitored to judge about the performance. We applied it to a system in which sidechain assignments are hardly possible, designed Armadillo repeat proteins (dArmRPs), and we calculated the solution NMR structure of YM4A, a dArmRP containing four sequence-identical internal modules, obtaining high convergence to a single structure. We suggest that this approach is particularly useful when approximate folds are known from other techniques, such as X-ray crystallography, while avoiding inherent artefacts due to, for instance, crystal packing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Cucuzza
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Güntert
- Institute of Biophysical Chemistry and Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093, Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Chemistry, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, 192-0397, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Andreas Plückthun
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Zerbe
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gaalswyk K, Liu Z, Vogel HJ, MacCallum JL. An Integrative Approach to Determine 3D Protein Structures Using Sparse Paramagnetic NMR Data and Physical Modeling. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:676268. [PMID: 34476238 PMCID: PMC8407082 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.676268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Paramagnetic nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods have emerged as powerful tools for structure determination of large, sparsely protonated proteins. However traditional applications face several challenges, including a need for large datasets to offset the sparsity of restraints, the difficulty in accounting for the conformational heterogeneity of the spin-label, and noisy experimental data. Here we propose an integrative approach to structure determination combining sparse paramagnetic NMR with physical modelling to infer approximate protein structural ensembles. We use calmodulin in complex with the smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase peptide as a model system. Despite acquiring data from samples labeled only at the backbone amide positions, we are able to produce an ensemble with an average RMSD of ∼2.8 Å from a reference X-ray crystal structure. Our approach requires only backbone chemical shifts and measurements of the paramagnetic relaxation enhancement and residual dipolar couplings that can be obtained from sparsely labeled samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Gaalswyk
- Department of Chemistry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Zhihong Liu
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Hans J. Vogel
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Seffernick JT, Lindert S. Hybrid methods for combined experimental and computational determination of protein structure. J Chem Phys 2020; 153:240901. [PMID: 33380110 PMCID: PMC7773420 DOI: 10.1063/5.0026025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Knowledge of protein structure is paramount to the understanding of biological function, developing new therapeutics, and making detailed mechanistic hypotheses. Therefore, methods to accurately elucidate three-dimensional structures of proteins are in high demand. While there are a few experimental techniques that can routinely provide high-resolution structures, such as x-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and cryo-EM, which have been developed to determine the structures of proteins, these techniques each have shortcomings and thus cannot be used in all cases. However, additionally, a large number of experimental techniques that provide some structural information, but not enough to assign atomic positions with high certainty have been developed. These methods offer sparse experimental data, which can also be noisy and inaccurate in some instances. In cases where it is not possible to determine the structure of a protein experimentally, computational structure prediction methods can be used as an alternative. Although computational methods can be performed without any experimental data in a large number of studies, inclusion of sparse experimental data into these prediction methods has yielded significant improvement. In this Perspective, we cover many of the successes of integrative modeling, computational modeling with experimental data, specifically for protein folding, protein-protein docking, and molecular dynamics simulations. We describe methods that incorporate sparse data from cryo-EM, NMR, mass spectrometry, electron paramagnetic resonance, small-angle x-ray scattering, Förster resonance energy transfer, and genetic sequence covariation. Finally, we highlight some of the major challenges in the field as well as possible future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T. Seffernick
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Steffen Lindert
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
HSP40 proteins use class-specific regulation to drive HSP70 functional diversity. Nature 2020; 587:489-494. [DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2906-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
21
|
Softley CA, Bostock MJ, Popowicz GM, Sattler M. Paramagnetic NMR in drug discovery. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2020; 74:287-309. [PMID: 32524233 PMCID: PMC7311382 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-020-00322-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The presence of an unpaired electron in paramagnetic molecules generates significant effects in NMR spectra, which can be exploited to provide restraints complementary to those used in standard structure-calculation protocols. NMR already occupies a central position in drug discovery for its use in fragment screening, structural biology and validation of ligand-target interactions. Paramagnetic restraints provide unique opportunities, for example, for more sensitive screening to identify weaker-binding fragments. A key application of paramagnetic NMR in drug discovery, however, is to provide new structural restraints in cases where crystallography proves intractable. This is particularly important at early stages in drug-discovery programs where crystal structures of weakly-binding fragments are difficult to obtain and crystallization artefacts are probable, but structural information about ligand poses is crucial to guide medicinal chemistry. Numerous applications show the value of paramagnetic restraints to filter computational docking poses and to generate interaction models. Paramagnetic relaxation enhancements (PREs) generate a distance-dependent effect, while pseudo-contact shift (PCS) restraints provide both distance and angular information. Here, we review strategies for introducing paramagnetic centers and discuss examples that illustrate the utility of paramagnetic restraints in drug discovery. Combined with standard approaches, such as chemical shift perturbation and NOE-derived distance information, paramagnetic NMR promises a valuable source of information for many challenging drug-discovery programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte A Softley
- Biomolecular NMR and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Department Chemie, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85747, Garching, Germany
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Mark J Bostock
- Biomolecular NMR and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Department Chemie, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85747, Garching, Germany
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Grzegorz M Popowicz
- Biomolecular NMR and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Department Chemie, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85747, Garching, Germany
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Michael Sattler
- Biomolecular NMR and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Department Chemie, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstraße 4, 85747, Garching, Germany.
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leman JK, Weitzner BD, Lewis SM, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Alam N, Alford RF, Aprahamian M, Baker D, Barlow KA, Barth P, Basanta B, Bender BJ, Blacklock K, Bonet J, Boyken SE, Bradley P, Bystroff C, Conway P, Cooper S, Correia BE, Coventry B, Das R, De Jong RM, DiMaio F, Dsilva L, Dunbrack R, Ford AS, Frenz B, Fu DY, Geniesse C, Goldschmidt L, Gowthaman R, Gray JJ, Gront D, Guffy S, Horowitz S, Huang PS, Huber T, Jacobs TM, Jeliazkov JR, Johnson DK, Kappel K, Karanicolas J, Khakzad H, Khar KR, Khare SD, Khatib F, Khramushin A, King IC, Kleffner R, Koepnick B, Kortemme T, Kuenze G, Kuhlman B, Kuroda D, Labonte JW, Lai JK, Lapidoth G, Leaver-Fay A, Lindert S, Linsky T, London N, Lubin JH, Lyskov S, Maguire J, Malmström L, Marcos E, Marcu O, Marze NA, Meiler J, Moretti R, Mulligan VK, Nerli S, Norn C, Ó'Conchúir S, Ollikainen N, Ovchinnikov S, Pacella MS, Pan X, Park H, Pavlovicz RE, Pethe M, Pierce BG, Pilla KB, Raveh B, Renfrew PD, Burman SSR, Rubenstein A, Sauer MF, Scheck A, Schief W, Schueler-Furman O, Sedan Y, Sevy AM, Sgourakis NG, Shi L, Siegel JB, Silva DA, Smith S, Song Y, et alLeman JK, Weitzner BD, Lewis SM, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Alam N, Alford RF, Aprahamian M, Baker D, Barlow KA, Barth P, Basanta B, Bender BJ, Blacklock K, Bonet J, Boyken SE, Bradley P, Bystroff C, Conway P, Cooper S, Correia BE, Coventry B, Das R, De Jong RM, DiMaio F, Dsilva L, Dunbrack R, Ford AS, Frenz B, Fu DY, Geniesse C, Goldschmidt L, Gowthaman R, Gray JJ, Gront D, Guffy S, Horowitz S, Huang PS, Huber T, Jacobs TM, Jeliazkov JR, Johnson DK, Kappel K, Karanicolas J, Khakzad H, Khar KR, Khare SD, Khatib F, Khramushin A, King IC, Kleffner R, Koepnick B, Kortemme T, Kuenze G, Kuhlman B, Kuroda D, Labonte JW, Lai JK, Lapidoth G, Leaver-Fay A, Lindert S, Linsky T, London N, Lubin JH, Lyskov S, Maguire J, Malmström L, Marcos E, Marcu O, Marze NA, Meiler J, Moretti R, Mulligan VK, Nerli S, Norn C, Ó'Conchúir S, Ollikainen N, Ovchinnikov S, Pacella MS, Pan X, Park H, Pavlovicz RE, Pethe M, Pierce BG, Pilla KB, Raveh B, Renfrew PD, Burman SSR, Rubenstein A, Sauer MF, Scheck A, Schief W, Schueler-Furman O, Sedan Y, Sevy AM, Sgourakis NG, Shi L, Siegel JB, Silva DA, Smith S, Song Y, Stein A, Szegedy M, Teets FD, Thyme SB, Wang RYR, Watkins A, Zimmerman L, Bonneau R. Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. Nat Methods 2020; 17:665-680. [PMID: 32483333 PMCID: PMC7603796 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 484] [Impact Index Per Article: 96.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The Rosetta software for macromolecular modeling, docking and design is extensively used in laboratories worldwide. During two decades of development by a community of laboratories at more than 60 institutions, Rosetta has been continuously refactored and extended. Its advantages are its performance and interoperability between broad modeling capabilities. Here we review tools developed in the last 5 years, including over 80 methods. We discuss improvements to the score function, user interfaces and usability. Rosetta is available at http://www.rosettacommons.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Koehler Leman
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Brian D Weitzner
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Lyell Immunopharma Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Steven M Lewis
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jared Adolf-Bryfogle
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nawsad Alam
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Rebecca F Alford
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Melanie Aprahamian
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - David Baker
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kyle A Barlow
- Graduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Barth
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin Basanta
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Biological Physics Structure and Design PhD Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian J Bender
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kristin Blacklock
- Institute of Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Jaume Bonet
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Scott E Boyken
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Lyell Immunopharma Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Phil Bradley
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chris Bystroff
- Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
| | - Patrick Conway
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Seth Cooper
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bruno E Correia
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Brian Coventry
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rhiju Das
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Frank DiMaio
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lorna Dsilva
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roland Dunbrack
- Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander S Ford
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brandon Frenz
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Darwin Y Fu
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Caleb Geniesse
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Ragul Gowthaman
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Gray
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Program in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dominik Gront
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sharon Guffy
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Scott Horowitz
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
- The Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Po-Ssu Huang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Thomas Huber
- Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Tim M Jacobs
- Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - David K Johnson
- Center for Computational Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Kalli Kappel
- Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John Karanicolas
- Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hamed Khakzad
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute for Computational Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- S3IT, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karen R Khar
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
- Center for Computational Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Sagar D Khare
- Institute of Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Center for Integrative Proteomics Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Firas Khatib
- Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, USA
| | - Alisa Khramushin
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Indigo C King
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Kleffner
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian Koepnick
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tanja Kortemme
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Georg Kuenze
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Brian Kuhlman
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Daisuke Kuroda
- Medical Device Development and Regulation Research Center, School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jason W Labonte
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, PA, USA
| | - Jason K Lai
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gideon Lapidoth
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Andrew Leaver-Fay
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Steffen Lindert
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Linsky
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nir London
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Joseph H Lubin
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sergey Lyskov
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jack Maguire
- Program in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lars Malmström
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute for Computational Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- S3IT, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Enrique Marcos
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine Barcelona, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Orly Marcu
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nicholas A Marze
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jens Meiler
- Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Departments of Chemistry, Pharmacology and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Institute for Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rocco Moretti
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Vikram Khipple Mulligan
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Santrupti Nerli
- Department of Computer Science, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Christoffer Norn
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Shane Ó'Conchúir
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Noah Ollikainen
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sergey Ovchinnikov
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael S Pacella
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Xingjie Pan
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hahnbeom Park
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ryan E Pavlovicz
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Manasi Pethe
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Center for Integrative Proteomics Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Brian G Pierce
- University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, Rockville, MD, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Kala Bharath Pilla
- Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Barak Raveh
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - P Douglas Renfrew
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shourya S Roy Burman
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aliza Rubenstein
- Institute of Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Computational Biology and Molecular Biophysics Program, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Marion F Sauer
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Andreas Scheck
- Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - William Schief
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ora Schueler-Furman
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yuval Sedan
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Alexander M Sevy
- Chemical and Physical Biology Program, Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nikolaos G Sgourakis
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Lei Shi
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Justin B Siegel
- Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
- Genome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Shannon Smith
- Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yifan Song
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Cyrus Biotechnology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amelie Stein
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Szegedy
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Frank D Teets
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Summer B Thyme
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ray Yu-Ruei Wang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrew Watkins
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Lior Zimmerman
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Ein Kerem Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Richard Bonneau
- Center for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
- Department of Computer Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
- Center for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Structural proteomics, electron cryo-microscopy and structural modeling approaches in bacteria-human protein interactions. Med Microbiol Immunol 2020; 209:265-275. [PMID: 32072248 PMCID: PMC7223518 DOI: 10.1007/s00430-020-00663-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
A central challenge in infection medicine is to determine the structure and function of host-pathogen protein-protein interactions to understand how these interactions facilitate bacterial adhesion, dissemination and survival. In this review, we focus on proteomics, electron cryo-microscopy and structural modeling to showcase instances where affinity-purification (AP) and cross-linking (XL) mass spectrometry (MS) has advanced our understanding of host-pathogen interactions. We highlight cases where XL-MS in combination with structural modeling has provided insight into the quaternary structure of interspecies protein complexes. We further exemplify how electron cryo-tomography has been used to visualize bacterial-human interactions during attachment and infection. Lastly, we discuss how AP-MS, XL-MS and electron cryo-microscopy and -tomography together with structural modeling approaches can be used in future studies to broaden our knowledge regarding the function, dynamics and evolution of such interactions. This knowledge will be of relevance for future drug and vaccine development programs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Integrative Structural Biology of Protein-RNA Complexes. Structure 2020; 28:6-28. [DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2019.11.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|