Progression and survival results after radical hepatic metastasectomy of indolent advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) supports an aggressive surgical approach

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy for assessing tumor heterogeneity in neuroendocrine tumor metastases to the liver

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) frequently metastasize to the liver, with heterogeneity in tumor grade impacting patient prognosis and treatment. The Ki-67 index, a key prognostic marker, often varies between primary and metastatic sites; however, routine liver biopsy remains controversial. Although percutaneous computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy (PCT-CNB) is safe and effective for focal lesions, its role in detecting intertumor grading discrepancies and survival implications in GEP-NETs is underexplored. Conflicting survival associations with grade shifts have been reported in previous studies. We hypothesized that PCT-CNB could identify clinically significant grading heterogeneity in liver metastases, correlating with survival outcomes, thereby refining risk stratification and therapeutic strategies.

AIM

To investigate intertumor grading heterogeneity in GEP-NET liver metastases via PCT-CNB.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 92 patients with liver metastases from GEP-NETs via PCT-CNB, 76 patient samples from the liver and primary sites, and 16 from the liver and secondary liver sites. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was performed for tissue sampling, and grading classifications were determined. Intertumor grading classification heterogeneity and associated changes in patient survival outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

No procedure-related mortality was recorded during or after biopsy. In 37/92 patients (40.2%), the grading classifications changed: The grading increased from G1 to G2 in 13 patients, from G1 to G3 in 2, and from G2 to G3 in 14; the grading decreased from G2 to G1 in 5 patients, from G3 to G1 in 1, and from G3 to G2 in 2. Patients with G1 or G2 disease had better progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) outcomes than those with G3 disease did (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The 5-year and 10-year OS rates for stable G2 patients were 67.5% and 26.0%, respectively, decreasing to 46.4% and 23.2%, respectively, among G2 patients whose grade increased (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The PCT-CNB of liver metastases from GEP-NETs differed in grade between the liver tumor and primary site/secondary liver metastases. Additionally, when grading increased from G2, the OS rate significantly decreased.

DAXX is associated with early recurrence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after R0 resection

INTRODUCTION

ATRX, DAXX, MEN1, and PTEN mutations are proposed drivers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor tumorigenesis and independent prognostic factors for metastasis and mortality. However, their implications after R0 resection remain debated. Thus, we sought to identify genomic signatures of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor disease-specific mortality and recurrence after surgery for curative intent.

METHODS

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients who underwent whole exome sequencing with available survival data were identified using cBioPortal. Clinicopathologic variables, genomics, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy patients who underwent R0 resection were identified. Forty-five of 70 patients were disease free at last follow-up, whereas 25 of 70 patients had disease-specific mortality or recurrent disease and therefore were categorized as part of the recurrent cohort. There were no significant differences in age (P = .245), sex (P = .201), or median follow-up (38.9 vs 33.7 months, P = .122) between groups. Clinicopathologically, the recurrent cohort had significantly greater tumor size (median 5.0 cm vs 3.2 cm, P = .012) and were more likely to have vascular invasion (88% vs 40%, P = .000), positive lymph nodes (68.0% vs 35.6%, P = .013), and metastatic disease (44% vs 4.4%, P < .000). For both cohorts, most tumors were well or moderately differentiated. Tumor mutation burden was greater in the recurrent cohort (median 0.77 vs 0.43 mutations/Mb, P = .004). DAXX mutations were more frequent in the recurrent cohort (36% vs 11%, P = .026) and in those with vascular invasion (51% vs 92%, P = .010).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrated the prognostic significance of DAXX mutations after curative-intent surgery. Future studies investigating DAXX mutations as a biomarker for aggressive features to guide treatment are warranted.

Surgical microwave ablation of 397 neuroendocrine liver metastases: a retrospective cohort analysis of 16 years of experience

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) constitute a heterogeneous group of malignancies whose incidence has been on the rise over the past two decades, currently documented at 5.25 per 100,000. Liver metastasis develops in over 60% of NET patients. Even after resection recurrence rates are high, underscoring the importance of parenchymal-sparing interventions. In this study, we conducted 105 surgical microwave ablations and examined outcomes related to survival and local recurrence.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent a surgical microwave ablation (MWA) at a single-center, high-volume institution from September 2007 through December 2022 using a prospective database. Primary outcome was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 105 operations were performed on 94 patients, with 397 tumors undergoing MWA. Median tumor size was 1.3 cm (range 0.3-8.0), and the median number of tumors ablated was 2 (range 1-12). Laparoscopic approach was utilized 69.5% of the time. The most common concomitant procedure performed was hepatectomy (33.3%) and cholecystectomy (23.8%). Clavien-Dindo grade III or IV complications occurred in 9 patients (9.6%). Mortality within 30 days occurred in 1 patient (1.1%). The rate of incomplete ablation was 0.3% per tumor. Local recurrence occurred in 2.8% of tumors. Median OS was 9.43 years [95% CI 4.23-14.63 years], with a 5- and 10-year survival probability of 70.2% and 48.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Surgical MWA offers an efficacious, parenchymal-sparing treatment of hepatic metastasis of NET, with low rates of incomplete ablation and local recurrence per tumor.

Adrenal tumors in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms

PURPOSE

To study the prevalence of primary adrenal tumors and adrenal metastases in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and describe these in detail. NENs can be further divided into neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC).

METHODS

A review of medical files was conducted for all patients who underwent a 68Gallium-DOTATOC-PET/CT during 2010-2023 or adrenalectomy during 1999-2023 at the Karolinska University Hospital.

RESULTS

In total, 68Gallium-DOTATOC-PET/CT was performed on 1750 individuals with NEN, among whom 12 (0.69%) had adrenal tumors. Of these, 9 (0.51%) were NEN metastases. Out of 1072 adrenalectomies, 4 (0.37%) showed evidence of NEN metastases. Thus, 16 patients with NEN exhibited adrenal tumors. The adrenal tumors were found on average 5 years after the NEN diagnosis and 19% of the adrenal tumors with simultaneous NEN were benign. Few had all adrenal hormones measured. None had an adrenal insufficiency nor an adrenal biopsy. Another synchronous metastasis was found in 69% at the time of the adrenal tumor discovery. During the median 2-year follow-up, 38% of the subjects had deceased (with the exclusion of individuals presenting supposedly benign adrenal tumors 31%) all due to tumor complications. A comparison between individuals identified through 68Gallium-DOTATOC-PET/CT and those who underwent adrenalectomy revealed a higher prevalence of NETs in the former group and NECs in the latter group.

CONCLUSION

Adrenal primary tumors and adrenal metastases are infrequent occurrences in patients with NEN. Most cases involved the presence of NEN metastasis upon the initial discovery of adrenal tumors. The overall prognosis was found to be favorable.

Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis: Appraisal of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is still in debate. Studies comparing LT with liver resection (LR) for NELM are scarce, as patient selection is heterogeneous and experience is limited. The goal of this review was to provide a critical analysis of the evidence on LT versus LR in the treatment of NELM.

DATA SOURCES

A scoping literature search on LT and LR for NELM was performed with PubMed, including English articles up to March 2023.

RESULTS

International guidelines recommend LR for NELM in resectable, well-differentiated tumors in the absence of extrahepatic metastatic disease with superior results of LR compared to systemic or liver-directed therapies. Advanced liver surgery has extended resectability criteria whilst entailing increased perioperative risk and short disease-free survival. In highly selected patients (based on the Milan criteria) with unresectable NELM, oncologic results of LT are promising. Prognostic factors include tumor biology (G1/G2) and burden, waiting time for LT, patient age and extrahepatic spread. Based on low-level evidence, LT for low-grade NELM within the Milan criteria resulted in improved disease-free survival and overall survival compared to LR. The benefits of LT were lost in patients beyond the Milan NELM-criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

With adherence to strict selection criteria especially tumor biology, LT for NELM is becoming a valuable option providing oncologic benefits compared to LR. Recent evidence suggests even stricter selection criteria with regard to tumor biology.

Review of Merkel cell carcinoma with solitary pancreatic metastases mimicking primary neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) but metastases to the pancreas are very rare. There are only a few cases of isolated metastases of MCC to the pancreas. Because of this rarity, it can be wrongly diagnosed as a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas(pNET), especially the poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) subtype, in which the treatment is vastly different than that of MCC with isolated metastases of the pancreas.

METHODS

An electronic search of the PubMed and google scholar databases was performed to obtain the literature on MCC with pancreatic metastases, using the following search terms: Merkel cell carcinoma, pancreas, and metastases. Results are limited to the following available article types: case reports and case series. We identified 45 cases of MCC with pancreatic metastases from the PubMed and Google Scholar database search and examined their potential relevance. Only 22 cases with isolated pancreatic metastases were taken for review including one case that we encountered.

RESULTS

The results from our review of cases of isolated pancreatic metastases of MCC were compared to the characteristics of the poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNEC). We found the following: (a) MCC with isolated pancreatic metastases occurred at an older age than PNEC and with male gender predominance (b) Most of the metastases occurred within 2 years of initial diagnosis of MCC (c) Resection of pancreatic mass was the first line treatment in case of resectable PNECs whereas resection of metastases was infrequently performed in MCC with pancreatic metastases.

Evaluation of PD-L1 expression in a large set of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours and correlation with clinicopathological data

BACKGROUND

Targeting programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 is a promising therapeutic approach for many types of cancer in which PD-L1 is overexpressed. However, data on PD-L1 expression levels in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are limited and contradictory.

METHODS

We evaluated PD-L1 expression in 457 archived, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded GEP-NEN samples from 175 patients by immunohistochemistry using the highly sensitive monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody 73-10. The immunostaining was semiquantitatively evaluated using a 12-point immunoreactivity score (IRS) taking both PD-L1-positive tumour cells and immune cells into account. Tumour samples with an IRS ≥ 3 were considered PD-L1-positive. Results were correlated with clinicopathological data and with the expression of several typical markers and receptors for neuroendocrine tumours.

RESULTS

Of the GEP-NEN samples, 73% were PD-L1-positive. The median IRS value across all samples was 4.0, corresponding to low expression. PD-L1 immunostaining was predominantly localised at the plasma membrane of the tumour cells. Positive correlations were observed between PD-L1 expression and tumour grading or Ki-67 index, between PD-L1 expression and the expression of chromogranin A, and between PD-L1 expression and the expression of each of the five somatostatin receptors. PD-L1 expression was lower in tumours with lymph node metastases at diagnosis than in those without regional metastasis and lower in high-stage than in earlier-stage tumours. No association was noted between PD-L1 expression and patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression is common in GEP-NENs and increases with malignancy. Therefore, especially in high-grade GEP-NENs, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis could be a promising additional therapeutic strategy.

Treatment strategies for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are often diagnosed when metastatic. The liver is the main site of metastases. Unfortunately, optimal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases remains a topic of debate. The aim of this study was to make a systematic review of the current literature about the results of the different treatments of neuroendocrine liver metastases.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted for English language publications from 1995 to 2021. Outcomes were analyzed according to survival, disease-free survival, and in the case of systemic therapies, progression-free survival.

RESULTS

5509 patients were analyzed in the review. 67% of patients underwent surgery achieving 5 years overall survival despite only 30% percent without a recurrence. 60% of patients that had received a transplant reached 5 years survival with a low disease-free survival rate (20%). Five-year survival rate was 36.2% for patients undergoing loco-regional therapies.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is the best treatment when metastases are resectable, with the highest rate of survival, although liver transplantation shows good results for patients not eligible for surgery. Loco-regional therapies may be useful when surgical resection is contraindicated, or selectively used as a bridge to surgery or transplantation. Systemic therapies are indicated in patients for whom curative treatment cannot be obtained.

Differenzierte Therapiestrategie bei Lebermetastasen gastro-entero-pankreatischer Neuroendokriner Neoplasien

Neuroendokrine Neoplasien (NEN) bilden eine heterogene Gruppe maligner Tumoren, die überwiegend dem gastro-entero-pankreatischen System (GEP) zuzuordnen sind. Hierbei sind Dünndarm und Pankreas die häufigsten Organe für Primärtumoren, die Leber stellt den dominanten Metastasierungsort dar. Da viele Patient*innen lange asymptomatisch bleiben, führen oftmals zufällig diagnostizierte Lebermetastasen oder ein Ileus zur Diagnose. Die einzige kurative Therapieoption stellt die komplette Entfernung von Primarius und Metastasen dar. Besonders im Falle der metastasierten Erkrankung sollten die vorhandenen Therapieoptionen immer im interdisziplinären Tumorboard mit Spezialisten*innen aus Gastroenterologie, (Leber-)Chirurgie, Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin, Radiotherapie, Pathologie und Endokrinologie evaluiert werden. Durch die Kombination der verschiedenen Therapieverfahren kann auch für Patient*innen mit fortgeschrittener Erkrankung eine jahrelange Prognose bei guter Lebensqualität erreicht werden. Wichtig für die Therapieentscheidung sind neben patientenindividuellen Faktoren der Differenzierungsgrad des Tumors, dessen hormonelle Sekretion, das Metastasierungsmuster und der Erkrankungsverlauf. Die Behandlung von Lebermetastasen umfasst neben den unterschiedlichen chirurgischen Strategien die lokal-ablativen radiologischen und nuklearmedizinischen Verfahren, die als Ergänzung zu den systemischen Therapien zur Verfügung stehen.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm diagnosed by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is a rare condition, and it is difficult to differentiate between primary and metastatic hepatic NENs. Herein, we report a case of primary hepatic NEN that initially mimicked a hemangioma but showed a gradual increase in size on long-term careful observation.

CASE SUMMARY

A 47-year-old woman was incidentally diagnosed with a 12-mm liver mass, suspected to be a hemangioma. Since then, regular follow-up had been carried out. Ten years later, she was referred to our institute due to the tumor (located in segment 4) having increased to 20 mm. Several imaging studies depicted no apparent extrahepatic lesion. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography exhibited significant accumulation in the mass lesion, which made us consider the possibility of malignancy. Left hepatectomy was performed. The histopathological diagnosis was neuroendocrine tumor grade 2, with somatostatin receptor 2a/5 positivity. Postoperative somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) showed no other site, leading to the diagnosis of NEN of primary hepatic origin. The gradual growth of the hepatic NEN over 10 years suggested that it was likely to be a primary liver tumor.

CONCLUSION

In this case, positivity on PET and postoperative SRS may have helped determine whether the tumor was primary or metastatic.

Determination of surgical margins in laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy of neuroendocrine tumors liver metastases using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of heterogenous tumors originating from neuroendocrine system. Approximately, 40 percent will go through liver metastases, and liver-directed therapy was proved to improve the survival outcome. Parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy is advocated for the resection of NETs liver metastases while the possible relatively low negative margin rate is concerned. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging provides a real-time navigation on determination of surgical margins in colorectal cancer liver metastases. However, there was no previous study that reported the applications of ICG fluorescence imaging in NETs liver metastases. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and security of using ICG fluorescence imaging to determine surgical margins of NETs liver metastases during operation.

METHODS

A retrospective two-arm cohort study was performed on 25 consecutive patients with NETs liver metastases who underwent laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy (LPSH). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not the ICG fluorescence imaging was used. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, pathology results, and surgical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 145 tumors pathologically diagnosed with NETs liver metastases were resected from 25 patients. The pathological results indicated negative margins in all tumors (102/102) in LPSH with ICG fluorescence imaging group. The negative margin rate was significantly higher in LPSH using the ICG fluorescence imaging (100% v.s 88.4%, p = 0.002). Surgical outcomes, including operation time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, and postoperative morbidity, were comparable between LPSH with and without ICG fluorescence imaging groups.

CONCLUSION

ICG fluorescence imaging showed the potential to identify tumor boundaries and determine surgical margins. This technique may serve as a valuable intraoperative navigation in patients with NETs liver metastases.

Adrenalectomy for Secondary Malignancy: Patients, Outcomes, and Indications

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine a multi-institutional experience with adrenal metastases to describe survival outcomes and identify subpopulations who benefit from adrenal metastasectomy.

BACKGROUND

Adrenalectomy for metastatic disease is well-described, although indications and outcomes are incompletely defined.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients undergoing adrenalectomy for secondary malignancy (2002-2015) at 6 institutions. The primary outcomes were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Analysis methods included Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

Of 269 patients, mean age was 60.1 years; 50% were male. The most common primary malignancies were lung (n = 125, 47%), renal cell (n = 38, 14%), melanoma (n = 33, 12%), sarcoma (n = 18, 7%), and colorectal (n = 12, 5%). The median time to detection of adrenal metastasis after initial diagnosis of the primary tumor was 17 months (interquartile range: 6-41). Post-adrenalectomy, the median DFS was 18 months (1-year DFS: 54%, 5-year DFS: 31%). On multivariable analysis, lung primary was associated with longer DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.49, P = 0.008). Extra-adrenal oligometastatic disease at initial presentation (HR: 1.84, P = 0.016), larger tumor size (HR: 1.07, P = 0.013), chemotherapy as treatment of the primary tumor (HR: 2.07 P = 0.027) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 1.95, P = 0.009) were associated with shorter DFS. Median OS was 53 months (1-year OS: 83%, 5-year OS: 43%). On multivariable analysis, extra-adrenal oligometastatic disease at adrenalectomy (HR: 1.74, P = 0.031), and incomplete resection of adrenal metastasis (R1 margins; HR: 1.62, P = 0.034; R2 margins; HR: 5.45, P = 0.002) were associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Durable survival is observed in patients undergoing adrenal metastasectomy and should be considered for subjects with isolated adrenal metastases.

Small Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Whole Gastrointestinal Tract Performed Endoscopic or Surgical Resections Also Show Positive for Lymphovascular Invasion

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs), tumor size and grading based on cellular proliferative ability indicate biological malignancy but not necessarily clinically efficient prognostic stratification. We analyzed tumor size- and grading-based prevalence of lymphovascular invasion in GI-NETs to establish whether these are true biological malignancy indicators.

METHODS

We included 155 cases (165 lesions), diagnosed histologically with GI-NETs, that had undergone endoscopic or surgical resection. Patient age, sex, method of treatment, tumor size, invasion depth, lymphovascular invasion positivity according to Ki-67 index-based neuroendocrine tumor grading, distant metastases, and outcome were evaluated. The primary endpoints were the prevalence of lymphovascular invasion according to tumor size and grading.

RESULTS

Overall, 24.8% were positive for lymphovascular invasion. There was a high rate of lymphovascular invasion positivity even among grade 1 cases (22.8%). The rate of lymphovascular invasion was 3.4% for grade 1 cases <5 mm, with a lymphovascular invasion rate of 8.7% for those 5-10 mm. Lymphovascular invasion ≤10% required a tumor size ≤8 mm, and lymphovascular invasion ≤5% required a tumor size ≤6 mm. A cutoff of 6 mm was identified, which yielded a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 63%. Even small GI-NETs grade 1 of the whole GI tract also showed positive for lymphovascular invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

GI-NETs ≤10 mm had a lymphovascular invasion prevalence exceeding 10%. The lymphovascular invasion impact in GI-NET development is incompletely understood, but careful follow-up, including consideration of additional surgical resection, is crucial in cases with lymphovascular invasion.

How to Manage Small Intestine (Jejunal and Ileal) Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Presenting with Liver Metastases?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (siNENs) are slowly growing tumours with a low malignant potential. However, more than half of the patients present with distant metastases (stage IV) and nearly all with locoregional lymph node (LN) metastases at the time of surgery. The value of locoregional treatment is discussed controversially.

RECENT FINDINGS

In stage I to III disease, locoregional surgery was currently shown to be curative prolonging survival. In stage IV disease, surgery may prolong survival in selected patients with the chance to cure locoregional disease besides radical/debulking liver surgery. It may improve the quality of life and may prevent severe local complications resulting in a state of chronic malnutrition and severe intestinal ischaemia or bowel obstruction. Locoregional tumour resection offers the opportunity to be curative or to focus therapeutically on liver metastasis, facilitating various other therapeutic modalities. Risks and benefits of the surgical intervention need to be balanced individually.

Survey of surgical resections for neuroendocrine liver metastases: A project study of the Japan Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (JNETS)

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Hepatic resection is considered the treatment of choice for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM). However, the safety and efficacy of resection have not been fully evaluated using a large cohort. The aim of the present study was to collect real-world data regarding hepatic resections for NELM.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter survey was conducted. The background characteristics of patients undergoing an initial hepatic resection for NELM, the operative details, pathological findings, and patient outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients were enrolled from 30 institutions. The primary tumor site was the pancreas in 58.6%, and the presentation of NELM was synchronous in 63.1% of the cases. Concomitant resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases was performed for 66.4% of the synchronous metastases, and the 90-day morbidity and mortality rates were 12.6% and 0.9%, respectively. The operations resulted in R2 resections in 26.1% of the cases, and 83.4% of the patients experienced recurrence after R0/1 resections. However, the patients were treated using multiple modalities after R2 resection or recurrence, and the overall survival rate was relatively favorable, with 5-year and 10-year survival rates of 70.2%, and 43.4%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified the tumor grading (G3) of the primary tumor as a significant prognostic factor for both the recurrence-free and overall survivals.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data confirmed the safety of the surgical resection of NELM. Although recurrences were frequent, the survival outcomes after resection were favorable when a multi-disciplinary treatment approach was used.

Does surgery provide a survival advantage in non-disseminated poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms?

BACKGROUND

Attributable to the high likelihood of developing distant metastatic disease, resection of poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is generally contraindicated. Some patients with no distant metastatic disease will nonetheless undergo surgical resection and their outcomes are not known. We aimed to determine whether surgery confers survival advantage over systemic therapy alone for patients with non-metastatic poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study (2000-2012) of adults in the California Cancer Registry who had poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (World Health Organization Grade 3) and no clinical evidence of distant metastasis (M0). Patients who underwent surgery were compared with those managed non-operatively. The adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the risk of death.

RESULTS

Among 2,245 patients (45% female, 21% pancreatic, 79% gastrointestinal), 1,549 (69%) were treated with surgery, and 696 (31%) received either systemic therapy or palliative measures alone. Median survival was 31 months after surgery versus 9 months after non-operative therapy (log-rank test, P < .001). Rates of 5-year overall survival were 39% after surgery versus 10% in the non-operative group. Adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, receipt of chemotherapy, and tumor size and location, patients treated with surgery had a 58% lower likelihood of death compared with non-operative therapy (hazard ratio: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.50, P < .001). Restricting our results to those patients who were found to have no distant metastasis intraoperatively (ie, pathologically M0), 5-year survival after surgery reached 44%.

CONCLUSION

While poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms carries a poor prognosis, for patients with no evidence of metastatic disease, resection appears to confer significant improvement in long-term survival. Although caution and an individualized approach in treating poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is advised, future guidelines might reflect this survival advantage.

Currently available treatment options for neuroendocrine liver metastases

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are frequently characterized by a high propensity for metastasis to the liver, which appears to be a dominant site of distant-stage disease, affecting quality of life and overall survival. Liver surgery with the intention to cure is the treatment of choice for resectable neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM), aiming to potentially prolong survival and ameliorate hormonal symptoms refractory to medical control. Surgical resection is indicated for patients with NELM from well-differentiated NEN, while its feasibility and complexity are largely dictated by the degree of liver involvement. As a result of advances in surgical techniques over the past decades, complex 1- and 2-stage, or repeat liver resections are performed safely and effectively by experienced surgeons. Furthermore, liver transplantation for the treatment of NELM should be anchored in a multimodal and multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy and restricted only to highly selected individual cases. A broad spectrum of interventional radiology treatments for NELM have recently been available, with expanding indications that are more applicable, as they are less limited by patient- and tumor-related parameters, being therefore important adjuncts or alternatives to surgery. Overall, liver-targeted treatment modalities may precede the administration of systemic molecular targeted agents and chemotherapy for patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease; these appear to be a crucial component of multimodal management of patients with NEN. In the present review, we discuss surgical and non-surgical liver-targeted treatment approaches for NELM, each complementing the other, with a view to assisting physicians in optimizing multimodal NEN patient care.

A literature-based treatment algorithm for low-grade neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of treatment of liver metastases from low-grade neuroendocrine tumors (LG-NELM) varies significantly due to numerous treatment modalities and the literature supporting various treatment(s). This study sought to create and validate a literature-based treatment algorithm for LG-NELM.

METHODS

A treatment algorithm to maximize overall survival (OS) was designed using peer-reviewed articles evaluating treatment of LG-NELM. This algorithm was retrospectively applied to patients treated for LG-NELM at our institution. Deviation was determined based on whether or not a patient received treatment consistent with that recommended by the algorithm. Patients who did and did not deviate from the algorithm were compared with respect to OS and number of treatments.

RESULTS

Applying our algorithm to a 149-patient cohort, 57 (38%) deviated from recommended treatment. Deviation occurred in the form of alternative (28, 49%) versus additional procedures (29, 51%). Algorithm deviators underwent significantly more procedures than non-deviators (median 1 vs. 2, p < 0.001). Cox model indicated no difference in OS associated with algorithm deviation (HR 1.19, p = 0.58) when controlling for age and tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

This literature-based algorithm helps standardize treatment protocols in patients with LG-NELM and can reduce cost and risk by minimizing unnecessary procedures. Prospective implementation and validation is required.

Surgical treatment for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms, with an estimated annual incidence of 6.9/100 000. They arise from cells of the diffuse endocrine system, which are mainly dispersed throughout the gastrointestinal (GI), pancreatic, and respiratory tracts. The incidence of GI-NETs has recently begun to show a steady increase. According to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 53% of patients with NETs present with localized disease, 20% with locoregional disease, and 27% with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. Surgery is the mainstay for the treatment of locoregional GI-NETs. Endoscopic resection is an option for well-differentiated early GI-NETs, which are thought to very rarely metastasize to lymph nodes. A lesion that is technically difficult to resect via endoscopy is an indication for local resection (partial resection without lymph node dissection). GI-NETs with possible lymph node metastasis is an indication for enterectomy with lymph node dissection. For NETs with metastatic lesions, cytoreduction surgery can control hormonal hypersecretion and alleviate symptoms; therefore, cytoreduction surgery is recommended. The indications for surgery vary and are based on the organ where the NET arose; therefore, an understanding of the patient's clinical state and individualized treatment that is based on the characteristics of the patient's GI-NET is needed. This review summarizes surgical treatments of GI-NETs in each organ.

Repeat hepatectomy for liver metastases from bile duct neuroendocrine tumor: a case report

Background

Primary neuroendocrine tumor (NET) originating from the extrahepatic bile duct is rare, although liver metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic NET is frequently observed. We herein report a case who successfully underwent repeat hepatectomy for liver metastases from bile duct NET grade 2 (G2).

Case presentation

A 75-year-old man presented with jaundice and was suspected of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). He underwent extended left hepatectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection, and hepaticojejunostomy. Pathological findings showed a NET G2 of the biliary tract arising from the common bile duct. Two years and 11 months after surgery, a liver metastasis was detected and hepatectomy was performed. During the surgery, another liver metastasis was detected, and limited liver resection for the two lesions was performed. Pathological findings showed four liver metastases of NET G2. Five years and 4 months after the first surgery (2 years and 5 months after the second hepatectomy), four liver metastases were detected. Thereafter, he received somatostatin analogues for 1 year. Although the size of tumors increased slightly, the number did not change. He underwent limited liver resections and was diagnosed with 7 liver metastases of NET G2. Finally, another hepatectomy (fourth hepatectomy) was performed and long-term survival without recurrence was obtained for as long as 8 years after the first surgery.

Conclusions

Repeat hepatectomy is a good option to obtain long-term survival for liver metastases from bile duct NET G2 in select patients.

Radioembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases is safe and effective prior to major hepatic resection

Background

Radioembolization (RE) is well established in the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases. However surgery is rarely performed after RE, although liver resection is the gold standard in the treatment of localized neuroendocrine liver metastases. Therefore, aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of liver resection after RE in a homogenous cohort.

Methods

From a prospective surgical (n=494) and nuclear medical (n=138) database patients with NELM who underwent liver resection and/or RE were evaluated. Between September 2011 and December 2017 eight patients could be identified who underwent liver resection after RE (mean therapeutic activity of 1,746 Mbq). Overall and progression free survival were evaluated as well as epidemiological and perioperative factors. The surgical specimens were analyzed for necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis.

Results

The mean hepatic tumor load of patients, who had liver surgery after RE, was 31.4% with a mean Ki-67 proliferation index of 5.9%. The majority of these patients (7/8) received whole liver RE prior to liver resection, which did not increase morbidity and mortality compared to a surgical collective. Indications for RE were oncological (6/8) or carcinoid syndrome associated reasons (2/8). Mean overall survival was 25.1 months after RE and subsequent surgery. Tumor necrosis in radioembolized lesions was 29.4% without evidence of fibrosis and inflammation in hepatic tissue.

Conclusions

This is the first study analyzing the multimodal therapeutic approach of liver resection following whole liver RE. This treatment algorithm is safe, does not lead to an increased morbidity and is associated with a favorable oncological outcome. Nonetheless, patient selection remains a key issue.

Prognostic importance of lymph node yield after curative resection of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of lymph nodes (LNs) metastases and the optimum number of LN yield in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP NETs) undergoing curative resection is still debatable. Many studies have demonstrated that cure rate for patients with GEP NETs can be improved by the resection of the primary tumour and regional lymphadenectomy

AIM

To evaluate the effect of lymph node (LN) status and yield on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected GEP NETs.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent curative resection for GEP NETs between January 2002 and March 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Grade 3 tumours (Ki67 > 20%) were excluded. Univariate Cox proportional hazard models were computed for RFS and OS and assessed alongside cut-point analysis to distinguish a suitable binary categorisation of total LNs retrieved associated with RFS.

RESULTS

A total of 217 patients were included in the study. The median age was 59 years (21-97 years) and 51% (n = 111) were male. Primary tumour sites were small bowel (42%), pancreas (25%), appendix (18%), rectum (7%), colon (3%), gastric (2%), others (2%). Median follow up times for all patients were 41 mo (95%CI: 36-51) and 71 mo (95%CI: 63–76) for RFS and OS respectively; 50 relapses and 35 deaths were reported. LNs were retrieved in 151 patients. Eight or more LNs were harvested in 106 patients and LN positivity reported in 114 patients. Three or more positive LNs were detected in 62 cases. The result of univariate analysis suggested perineural invasion (P = 0.0023), LN positivity (P = 0.033), LN retrieval of ≥ 8 (P = 0.047) and localisation (P = 0.0049) have a statistically significant association with shorter RFS, but there was no effect of LN ratio on RFS: P = 0.1 or OS: P = 0.75. Tumour necrosis (P = 0.021) and perineural invasion (P = 0.016) were the only two variables significantly associated with worse OS. In the final multivariable analysis, localisation (pancreas HR = 27.33, P = 0.006, small bowel HR = 32.44, P = 0.005), and retrieval of ≥ 8 LNs (HR = 2.7, P = 0.036) were independent prognostic factors for worse RFS.

CONCLUSION

An outcome-oriented approach to cut-point analysis can suggest a minimum number of adequate LNs to be harvested in patients with GEP NETs undergoing curative surgery. Removal of ≥ 8 LNs is associated with increased risk of relapse, which could be due to high rates of LN positivity at the time of surgery. Given that localisation had a significant association with RFS, a prospective multicentre study is warranted with a clear direction on recommended surgical practice and follow-up guidance for GEP NETs.

Risk factors for short recurrence-free survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) liver metastases: which patients should undergo resection?

Background: In the treatment of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), surgical resection is the first choice if curative resection is expected. However, most patients develop recurrence after resection of liver metastasis. Because one of the benefits of resection is to gain a tumor-free period for the patients, it is important to identify which patients achieve longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) by resection. In this study, the clinicopathological factors associated with RFS after resection of metastatic PanNETs in the liver were evaluated to identify the patient group that is suitable for resection.Methods: Consecutively diagnosed patients with PanNET liver metastasis with resection at our hospital from January 2000 to July 2019 were evaluated. A total of 26 metastatic PanNET patients with primary liver resections were evaluated. The median follow-up time was 48.3 months.Results: There were 18 NET recurrences of the total 26 resections, with a median RFS of 17.9 months. Independent risk factors for short RFS were a high Ki67 index (p = .009) and the number of resected tumors (p = .045). When the cut-off value for the Ki67 index was 5.0% and that for the number of resected tumors was 6, Ki67 > 5.0% tumors had shorter RFS (4.9 months vs. 38.2 months p = .006), and patients with tumors > = 7 tumors had shorter RFS (4.7 months vs. 27.5 months p = .001).Conclusions: These findings indicate that good candidates for resection of metastatic tumors of PanNETs could be patients with low Ki67 tumors and a small number of metastatic tumors.

Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Several important landmark trials have reshaped the landscape of non-surgical management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors over the last few years, with the confirmation of the antitumor effect of somatostatin analogue therapy in PROMID and CLARINET trials as well as the advent of therapies with significant potential such as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTor) everolimus (RADIANT trials) and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177-Lutetium (NETTER-1 trial). This narrative summarizes the recommended management strategies of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. We review the main evidence behind each recommendation as well as compare and contrast four major guidelines, namely the 2016 Canadian Consensus guidelines, the 2017 North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines, the 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and the 2016 European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines. Different clinical situations will be addressed, from loco-regional therapy to metastatic unresectable disease. Carcinoid syndrome, which is mostly managed by somatostatin analogue therapy and the serotonin antagonist telotristat etiprate for refractory diarrhea, as well as neuroendocrine carcinoma will be reviewed. However, several questions remain unanswered, such as the optimal management of neuroendocrine carcinomas or the effect of combining and sequencing of the aforementioned modalities where more randomized controlled trials are needed.

Liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

The prevalence of metastatic disease in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is very high (60-80%) and cancer-related death among these patients is generally due to metastatic disease. Numerous treatment options for cure and disease control have been investigated for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM). Despite the success of liver directed therapy on slowing tumor progression and palliating symptoms, the chance of being cured by liver resection is 40-50% and only roughly 20% of patients have potentially resectable disease. As such, there has been interest in liver transplantation (LT) as a potentially curative option for patients with unresectable disease. Several criteria have been proposed in order to balance long-term outcomes of patients with NELM and the problem of organ shortage including the Milan-NET criteria, the UNOS criteria and the ENETS guidelines. In the most representative studies, recurrence rate after LT has ranged from 30% to 60% with a 5-year OS ranging from 50% to 97%. This large variability is due to the retrospective nature of the studies available, which used different inclusion criteria. As such, outcomes and the prognostic factors associated with LT for NELM warrant further investigation.

[Oligometastases of neuroendocrine tumors-extent of surgery]

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms, which represent complex challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Even in the metastatic stage there are important differences in the type of tumor in comparison to gastrointestinal and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Therefore, the disease courses are substantially different depending on the grade of differentiation. Even in the metastatic stage the 5‑year survival rates of G1 tumors is up to 83%. Approximately 20% of small intestine NETs additionally show hormone activity, which can compromise survival and the quality of life. For individual treatment decisions the special tumor biology of these tumors must be taken into consideration more so than for other tumor entities. Surgery always becomes important for these tumors when a R0 resection appears possible. Oligometastasis of the liver and the lymph drainage system can be meaningfully approached by surgical treatment. In selected patients with an isolated liver involvement, a liver transplantation can be considered; however, even tumor debulking can lead to improvement in the quality of life and survival, especially for hormone active tumors with a carcinoid syndrome which cannot be conservatively controlled. The aim of this review is to present the value of surgical treatment options in the case of (oligo)metastasized NETs.

Treatment with somatostatin analogs induces differentially expressed let-7c-5p and mir-3137 in small intestine neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Distant metastases frequently occur in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. If hepatic surgery is not feasible, patients are treated with somatostatin analogs. However, the underlying mechanisms of action of this treatment remain to be defined. The aim of the present study was to analyze the micro-RNA expression profile inter-individually before and after the treatment with somatostatin analogs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Tumor specimens of all included patients (n = 8) before and after the onset of a therapy with somatostatin analogs were analyzed and a micro-RNA expression profile (754 micro-RNAs) of each probe was generated. This analysis in an intra-individual setting was selected to avoid bias from inter-individual differences. The micro-RNA expression profiles were validated by qPCR. Patients with any other systemic treatment were excluded from the present study.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included in the present study of which all had neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine with diffuse hepatic metastases. Grouped analyses revealed that 15 micro-RNAs were differentially expressed (3 up- and 12 downregulated) after the exposure to somatostatin analogs. Additionally, let-7c-5p and mir-3137 are concordantly regulated in the inter-individually analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study analyzing the individual micro-RNA expression profile before and after a therapy with somatostatin analogs. Data from this study reveal that somatostatin analogs may in part exert their beneficial effects through an alteration in the micro-RNA expression profile.

Outcomes of laparoscopic tumor ablation for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

Since neuroendocrine tumors have an indolent behavior, studies looking at oncologic outcomes should report a long-term follow-up. Over the years, we have been treating selected patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) with laparoscopic ablation (LA) and reported favorable local tumor control. The aim of this study is to see whether this local efficacy translates into long-term oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

This was an IRB-approved study of patients who underwent LA for NELM at a single center. Overall and progression-free survivals were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Study included 58 women and 71 men with a median age of 58 (IQR 47-67) years. Tumor type included carcinoid (n = 92), pancreatic islet cell (n = 28), and medullary thyroid cancer (n = 9). There was a median of 6 (IQR 3-8) tumors, measuring 1.6 (IQR 1.1-2.4) cm. At a median follow-up of 73 (IQR 34-135) months, local liver recurrence per patient, new liver recurrence, and new extrahepatic recurrence rates were 22, 68, and 33%, respectively. Local tumor recurrence per lesion was 5% (n = 42/770). Median overall survival was 125 months, with 5-year, and 10-year overall survivals being, 76%, and 59%, respectively; and median disease-free survival was 13 months, with 5-year, and 10-year progression-free survivals being 26%, and 6%, respectively. On Cox proportional hazards model, overall survival was independently predicted by tumor size, grade, and resection status of primary.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest single-center experience with the longest follow-up regarding the utilization of LA for NELM. Our results demonstrate that in selected patients, LA achieves a 95% local tumor control and 59% 10-year overall survival.

Immune checkpoint markers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia

Cancer immunotherapy has evolved major breakthroughs in the last years. The cell-surface receptor programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), have been detected in various cancer types. However, the analysis on gastroenteropancreatic neoplasia (GEP-NENs) is limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize GEP-NENs with regard to PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). On protein level, we examined TILs, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue of 244 GEP-NENs using immunohistochemistry. Expression levels were correlated with clinicopathological parameters including long-term survival in an observational study. In total, 244 patients could be included. Most of the patients had a NEN of the small intestine (52.5%) or the pancreas (29.5%). All tumors could be graded by their morphology and Ki67 index, with 57.8% G1, 34% G2 and 8.2% G3 tumors. High TILs (19.6%) and high PD-1 (16.1%) expression showed a significant correlation with shorter patient survival (P < 0.05) and with a higher grading. Furthermore, expression of PD-L1 (8.7%) showed a trend to shorter patient survival. High TILs and PD-1 expression are significantly associated with shorter patient survival and higher grading in GEP-NENs. PD-L1 expression showed a trend to shorter patient survival. Immunotherapy might be a promising therapeutic approach in GEP-NENs especially in tumors with high TILs.

Hepatic Resection for Non-functional Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Does the Presence of Unresected Primary Tumor or Extrahepatic Metastatic Disease Matter?

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of unresected primary tumor, as well as extrahepatic metastasis, on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing hepatic resection for non-functional neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NF-NELM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatic resection for NF-NELM were identified from a multi-institutional database. Data on clinical and pathological details, as well as the long-term overall survival (OS) were obtained and compared. Propensity score matching was performed to generate matched pairs of patients.

RESULTS

Among the 332 patients with NF-NELM, 281 (84.6%) underwent primary tumor resection, while 51 (15.4%) did not. Patients who underwent primary resection were more likely to have a pancreatic primary and metachronous NELM. The long-term OS of patients who did and did not have the primary neuroendocrine tumor (NET) resected was comparable on both unmatched (10-year survival rate 66.8% vs. 54.0%, p = 0.192) and matched (10-year survival rate 75.7% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.271) analyses. In contrast, patients with NF-NELM and extrahepatic metastasis had a worse OS following resection compared with patients who had intrahepatic-only metastasis on unmatched (10-year survival rate 37.5% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.002) and matched (10-year survival rate 37.5% vs. 86.3%, p = 0.011) analyses. On multivariable analysis, while resection of the primary NET was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-1.2, p = 0.195), the presence of extrahepatic metastasis was independently associated with long-term risk of death (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-9.2, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

While surgery should be considered for patients with NF-NELM who have an unresectable primary tumor, operative resection of NF-NELM may not be as beneficial in patients with extrahepatic disease.

Combined Volumetric and Density Analyses of Contrast-Enhanced CT Imaging to Assess Drug Therapy Response in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Diffuse Liver Metastasis

OBJECTIVE

We propose a computer-aided method to assess response to drug treatment, using CT imaging-based volumetric and density measures in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and diffuse liver metastases.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with GEP-NETs with diffuse liver metastases were enrolled. Pre- and posttreatment CT examinations were retrospectively analyzed. Total tumor volume (volume) and mean volumetric tumor density (density) were calculated based on tumor segmentation on CT images. The maximum axial diameter (tumor size) for each target tumor was measured on pre- and posttreatment CT images according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progression-free survival (PFS) for each patient was measured and recorded.

RESULTS

Correlation analysis showed inverse correlation between change of volume and density (Δ(V + D)), change of volume (ΔV), and change of tumor size (ΔS) with PFS (r = -0.653, P=0.001; r = -0.617, P=0.003; r = -0.548, P=0.01, respectively). There was no linear correlation between ΔD and PFS (r = -0.226, P=0.325).

CONCLUSION

The changes of volume and density derived from CT images of all lesions showed a good correlation with PFS and may help assess treatment response.

Surgical Approaches to the Management of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

Surgical approaches to hepatic metastases occupy an important role in the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and may have curative or palliative intentions. Resection of hepatic disease with curative intent is the only modality offering potential cure for patients with liver metastases; however, only a minority of patients are eligible. Regardless of resection margin, disease recurrence almost invariably occurs and novel adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapies are mandated to be included within multimodal treatment concepts. Liver transplantation in meticulously selected patients may be associated with excellent outcomes, but unfortunately demands on donated organs limit the wider utilization of this approach.

A Systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of palliative primary resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm with liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Role of palliative pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) resection (pPanNEN-R) is controversial. This study was designed as a meta-analysis of studies which allow a comparison of pPanNEN-R and non-surgical management (PanNEN-nR).

METHODS

All published studies until 2017 allowing for the comparison of pPanNEN-R and PanNEN-nR were reviewed. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes measures included postoperative morbidity, reoperation, readmission, length of hospital stay (LOS), and quality of life (QoL). Risk of death was compared by computing the odds-ratio (OR), while 5- and 10-year OS using weighted mean differences.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included. A total of 885 patients were included, of whom 252 (28%) underwent pPanNEN-R and 633 (72%) underwent PanNEN-nR. Overall quality of included studies was fair. The risk of death was significantly reduced in patients who underwent pPanNEN-R compared to those who underwent PanNEN-nR (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.65). Data on postoperative morbidity, reoperation, readmission, LOS, and QoL were not adequately reported therefore a meta-analysis for the secondary outcomes was not performed.

DISCUSSION

pPanNEN-R in patients with unresectable LM seems to be associated with a better OS compared to non-surgical management but the limitations of included studies does not allow firm conclusions.

Hepatic neuroendocrine tumour: Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker of prognosis associated with tumour grade and overall survival

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the correlation between grade of hepatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) according to the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and to assess whether ADC value can predict overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of hepatic NETs.

METHODS

The study included 63 patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with diffusion-weighted images for the evaluation of hepatic NETs. The correlation between qualitative and quantitative MR imaging findings, including ADC values, and WHO classifications was assessed. The association between ADC value and OS was analyzed.

RESULTS

The ADC values and WHO classification of hepatic NETs were moderately negatively correlated in a statistically significant manner (ρ = -0.57, p < 0.001). The OS rates were significantly different according to the ADC value (low ADC vs. high ADC, p = 0.006) as well as WHO classifications (G1+ G2 vs. G3, p = 0.038). However, multivariate analysis revealed that the only independent predictor for OS was a low ADC value (hazard ratio: 3.37, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant correlation between the ADC value of hepatic NETs and the WHO tumour grade. Additionally, the ADC value of a hepatic NET might be more accurate than the current WHO tumour grade for predicting OS.

KEY POINTS

• ADC values of hepatic NET and WHO tumour grade were negatively correlated. • Lower ADC values of hepatic NET were significantly correlated with worse OS. • ADC value might be more accurate than WHO grade for predicting OS.

IMP3 expression in small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms: a new predictor of recurrence

PURPOSE

Small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms are heterogeneous neoplasms arising from endocrine cells of the intestinal mucosa. Ki-67 is the main determinant of prognosis in neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the search for new prognostic makers represents a key point with regard to small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms. The oncofetal protein IMP3 plays a role in cell growth and its expression has a prognostic value in lung neoplasms.

METHODS

From January 1998 to August 2015, all the consecutive small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms patients suitable for surgery were included: 51 patients (32 males, median age 68 years) had small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms classified according to the WHO 2010 classification. In all the cases IMP3 expression was evaluated on primary tumors and, when available, on nodal and distant metastases. The medical records and pathological slides of these patients were used to determine the clinical characteristics, pathological diagnoses, and outcome information.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year and 10-year survival rate were 53.9 and 42% respectively. At Cox proportional hazards regression grading was the major factor influencing both OS and progression-free survival at univariate (p = 0.0002 and 0.0051, respectively) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.0004 and 0.0043, respectively). Also IMP3 expression at the nodal metastases resulted a factor significantly associated with progression-free survival at both univariate (p = 0.0066) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.0059, HR 3.58). IMP3 expression did not correlate with the Ki-67 (p = n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, IMP3 at the nodal site resulted to be associated with low progression-free survival in small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms, independently of the Ki-67 index. We suggest that the integration of IMP3 and Ki-67 would help better stratify the risk of progression in small-intestine neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Is there still a role for the hepatic locoregional treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the era of systemic targeted therapies?

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) frequently present with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis and the liver is the most frequent site of spreading. The early identification of metastatic disease represents a major prognostic factor for GEP-NENs patients. Radical surgical resection, which is feasible for a minority of patients, is considered the only curative option, while the best management for patients with unresectable liver metastases is still being debated. In the last few years, a number of locoregional and systemic treatments has become available for GEP-NEN patients metastatic to the liver. However, to date only a few prospective studies have compared those therapies and the optimal management option is based on clinical judgement. Additionally, locoregional treatments appear feasible and safe for disease control for patients with limited liver involvement and effective in symptoms control for patients with diffuse liver metastases. Considering the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing the locoregional treatments of liver metastatic NEN patients, clinical judgment remains key to set the most appropriate therapeutic pathway. Prospective data may ultimately lead to more personalized and optimized treatments. The present review analyzes all the locoregional therapy modalities (i.e., surgery, ablative treatments and transarterial approach) and aims to provide clinicians with a useful algorithm to best treat GEP-NEN patients metastatic to the liver.

Role of surgical resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases

It is widely accepted that the indications for hepatectomy in colorectal cancer liver metastases and liver metastases of neuro-endocrine tumors result in relatively better prognoses, whereas, the indications and prognoses of hepatectomy for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM) remain controversial owing to the limited number of cases and the heterogeneity of the primary diseases. There have been many publications on NCNNLM; however, its background heterogeneity makes it difficult to reach a specific conclusion. This heterogeneous disease group should be discussed in the order from its general to specific aspect. The present review paper describes the general prognosis and risk factors associated with NCNNLM while specifically focusing on the liver metastases of each primary disease. A multidisciplinary approach that takes into consideration appropriate timing for hepatectomy combined with chemotherapy may prolong survival and/or contribute to the improvement of the quality of life while giving respite from systemic chemotherapy.

A Novel Nomogram to Predict the Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Liver Resection for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: an Analysis of the Italian Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis Database

Even though surgery remains the only potentially curative option for patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases, the factors determining a patient's prognosis following hepatectomy are poorly understood. Using a multicentric database including patients who underwent hepatectomy for NELMs at seven tertiary referral hepato-biliary-pancreatic centers between January 1990 and December 2014, we sought to identify the predictors of survival and develop a clinical tool to predict patient's prognosis after liver resection for NELMs. The median age of the 238 patients included in the study was 61.9 years (interquartile range 51.5-70.1) and 55.9 % (n = 133) of patients were men. The number of NELMs (hazard ratio = 1.05), tumor size (HR = 1.01), and Ki-67 index (HR = 1.07) were the predictors of overall survival. These variables were used to develop a nomogram able to predict survival. According to the predicted 5-year OS, patients were divided into three different risk classes: 19.3, 55.5, and 25.2 % of patients were in low (>80 % predicted 5-year OS), medium (40-80 % predicted 5-year OS), and high (<40 % predicted 5-year OS) risk classes. The 10-year OS was 97.0, 55.9, and 20.0 % in the low, medium, and high-risk classes, respectively (p < 0.001). We developed a novel nomogram that accurately (c-index >70 %) staged and predicted the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for NELMs.

Management of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas (WHO G3): A tailored approach between proliferation and morphology

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) of the pancreas are defined by a mitotic count > 20 mitoses/10 high power fields and/or Ki67 index > 20%, and included all the tumors previously classified as poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas. These latter are aggressive malignancies with a high propensity for distant metastases and poor prognosis, and they can be further divided into small- and large-cell subtypes. However in the NEC category are included also neuroendocrine tumors with a well differentiated morphology but ki67 index > 20%. This category is associated with better prognosis and does not significantly respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which represents the gold standard therapeutic approach for poorly differentiated NEC. In this review, the differences between well differentiated and poorly differentiated NEC are discussed considering both pathology, imaging features, treatment and prognostic implications. Diagnostic and therapeutic flowcharts are proposed. The need for a revision of current classification system is stressed being well differentiated NEC a more indolent disease compared to poorly differentiated tumors.

Long term results of hepatic resection or orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases from gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Hepatic metastases are one of the most important prognostic factors for survival among patients affected by gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The present study aims to evaluate the impact of surgery, including hepatic resection or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), on the outcome of patients affected by hepatic metastases from NETs, in terms of overall survival (OS). In this multicentric retrospective study, data was collected on 26 patients, who underwent surgery for hepatic metastases from NETs in two Italian University Clinics between January 1990 and December 2012; of which, 22 patients underwent hepatic resective surgery and 4 patients OLT. Hepatic metastases were synchronous in the 53.8% of cases and metachronous in the 46.2% of cases. The median number of resected hepatic metastases was 3. Surgical radicalness (R0) was reached in the 84.6% of cases. In total, 57.7% of patients had a recurrence, 66.7% of which were intra- and 33.3% extra-hepatic. The OS of patients that underwent hepatic resections and OLT was 44.9% [95% confidence interval (CI95), 26.0-77.7%] and 50% (CI95, 12.5-100.0%) at 5 years, respectively. Although the data regarding the survival of patients receiving surgery for hepatic metastases from NETs are encouraging, randomized clinical trials are necessary to more adequately evaluate the effect of surgery on survival of this group of patients.

Hepatectomy for liver metastases in non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine cancer patients. The survival benefit in primary unresectable cases

BACKGROUND

Although liver resection is widely accepted as a potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases, there is an ongoing debate on the indications for hepatectomy for the treatment of liver metastases from non-colorectal primary tumors. The number of candidates for hepatectomy for non-colorectal liver metastases may increase due to advances in chemotherapy; however, the factors related to prognosis after hepatectomy for non-colorectal liver metastases have yet to be clearly elucidated.

METHODS

The clinical outcomes of 59 patients who underwent hepatectomy for non-colorectal liver metastases at a single institute were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate after hepatectomy for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases was 30%, and 8 patients (gastric cancer (n = 2), ovarian cancer (n = 2), uterine cancer (n = 2) and breast cancer (n = 2)) survived for 5 years. The 5-year disease-free survival rate after hepatectomy was 28%. The postoperative morbidity rate was 25%; however, there were no cases of in-hospital mortality and no patients suffered liver failure. The presence of bilateral liver metastases was identified to be an independent predicting factor for poor prognosis by a multivariate analysis (P = 0.049). The survival rate of the conversion cases (initially unresectable and converted to resection after chemotherapy) was not inferior to that of primary resectable cases in terms of either overall survival or disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that hepatectomy for liver metastases from non-colorectal tumors is safe and that it may be a promising strategy for prolonging survival and achieving a cure.

When should a liver resection be performed in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours? A systematic review with practice recommendations

AIM

To determine the benefits and risks of hepatic resection versus non-resectional liver-directed treatments in patients with potentially resectable neuroendocrine liver metastases.

METHODS

A systematic review identified 1594 reports which alluded to a possible liver resection for neuroendocrine tumour metastases, of which 38 reports (all retrospective), comprising 3425 patients, were relevant.

RESULTS

Thirty studies reported resection alone, and 16 studies reported overall survival (OS). Only two studies addressed quality-of-life (QoL) issues. Five-year overall survival was reported at 41-100%, whereas 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 5-54%. We identified no robust evidence that a liver resection was superior to any other liver-directed therapies in improving OS or PFS. There was no evidence to support the use of a R2 resection (debulking), with or without tumour ablation, to improve either OS or QoL. There was little evidence to guide sequencing of surgery for patients presenting in Stage IV with resectable disease, and none to support a resection of asymptomatic primary tumours in the presence of non-resectable liver metastases.

CONCLUSION

Low-level recommendations are offered to assist in the management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases, along with recommendations for future studies.

Curative versus palliative surgical resection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

The role of surgical therapy in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is unclear. In this study, the results obtained with curative or palliative resection, by reviewing recent literature and performing a meta-analysis, were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published between January 1990 and October 2013 were performed. Studies that evaluated the different survival between patients treated by curative or palliative surgical resection of hepatic metastases from NETs were considered. The collected studies were evaluated for heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality. To calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) estimate and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI), a fixed-effects model was applied.

RESULTS

After the literature search, 2,546 studies were found and, among 38 potentially eligible studies, 3 were considered. We did not find a significant longer survival in patients treated with curative surgical resection of hepatic metastases when compared to palliative hepatic resection HR 0.40 (95% CI: 0.14-1.11). In one study, palliative resection of hepatic metastases significantly increased survival when compared to embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Curative and also palliative surgery of NETs liver metastases may improve survival outcome. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed to elucidate this argument.

Surgical treatment of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Liver metastases occur in 75% to 80% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and are considered significant adverse prognostic indicators. Management of NETs liver metastases is challenging and requires aggressive therapy. Currently, there are many therapeutic options for metastatic NETs. However, there is considerable controversy regarding the optimal management. Although complete surgical resection remains the optimal therapy, a variety of other minimally invasive surgical and medical options are available, this includes thermal ablative techniques (e.g., radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryotherapy), embolization using transcatheter embolization, chemoembolization, or radioembolization, and medical therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, biotherapy with somatostatin analogues and interferon). Currently there is no evidence-based data directly comparing surgical versus alternative liver-directed treatment options. An aggressive surgical approach, coupled with additional liver-directed procedures is often recommended as it extends the overall survival. Optimal patient care should be directed by a multidisciplinary team to assure that all treatment options are explored for decision-making while treating this aggressive disease.