A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinicopathologic characteristics of cystic versus solid pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

CYSTIC PANCREATIC LESIONS: IMAGING VERSUS ANATOMOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS-HOW TO IMPROVE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cystic lesions are a group of pancreatic neoplasms with different behavior and risk of malignancy. Imaging diagnosis and differentiation of these lesions remain a challenge.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging and post-operative pathologic diagnoses of Pancreatic cystic lesions in a University Hospital of São Paulo State.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with surgically diagnosed Pancreatic cystic lesions were enrolled, as a study cohort from 2009 to 2019. Preoperative radiological and final pathological diagnosis was correlated to measure computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging diagnostic. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, choledochal pancreatic cyst, mucinous cystadenoma, serous cystadenoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, and pancreatic pseudocyst were classified as neoplastic cysts.

RESULTS

It was noted that 27 patients (69.23%) had preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, 11 patients (28.20%) had preoperative computed tomography only, and 1 patient had preoperative magnetic resonance imaging only. The values for diagnoses made only with computed tomography (p=0.47) and from the combination of computed tomography+magnetic resonance imaging (p=0.50) did also point to moderate agreement with the anatomopathological findings. The values pointed to a fair agreement for the diagnosis of mucinous cystadenoma (p=0.3), moderate agreement for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (p= 0.41), good agreement for serous cystadenoma (p=0.79), and excellent agreement for choledochal pancreatic cyst (p=1), pancreatic pseudocyst (p=0.84), and Frantz tumor (p=1) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging have an equivalent diagnostic agreement with an anatomopathological diagnosis for differentiating benign from malignant Pancreatic cystic lesions and in suggesting a specific diagnosis. There is no statistical difference between the use of computed tomography alone and computed tomography+magnetic resonance imaging in the improvement of diagnostic accuracy.

Clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis of purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are heterogenous neoplasms, of which the prognosis varies widely. Purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (C-pNETs) are a small subset of pNETs in which data are extremely rare. This study aimed to compare clinicopathological and long-term survival differences between C-pNETs and solid pNETs (S-pNETs).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 242 patients with pNETs underwent resection in our institution from 2009 to 2019 was conducted. Demography characteristics, clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes of them were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 242 patients (6.6%) were identified as C-pNETs. Compared with S-pNETs, C-pNETs were more frequently non-functional (75% vs 45%, P = 0.02), and the median tumor diameter of C-pNETs was smaller (36 mm vs. 47 mm, P = 0.001). And the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of C-pNETs was significantly lower (31% vs 78%, P = 0.001). Of note, the majority of C-pNETs were well-differentiated with G1 (81% vs 35%, P = 0.001). And there were no G3 (0 vs 7%, P = 0.001) in C-pNETs. No T4 stage or R1/R2 surgical margin detected in C-pNETs. And only one C-pNETs (6%) had regional lymph node metastasis (N) or synchronous distant metastasis (M). Additionally, only one patient with C-pNETs (6%) suffered tumor recurrence, compared with 24 (13%) for S-pNETs. And survival analysis showed the patients with C-pNETs seemed to be with better disease-free survival (P = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

C-pNETs are rare subtype with possibly less aggressive behavior comparing with their solid counterparts. Recurrence and tumor-related death still occurs in patients with resected C-pNETs, although they tend to be with more favorable prognosis.

Contrast Enhanced EUS for Predicting Solid Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade and Aggressiveness

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) behavior assessment is a daily challenge for physicians. Modern PNET management varies from a watch-and-wait strategy to surgery depending on tumor aggressiveness. Therefore, the aggressiveness definition plays a pivotal role in the PNET work-up. The aggressiveness of PNETs is mainly based on the dimensions and histological grading, with sometimes a lack of specificity and sensibility. In the last twenty years, EUS has become a cornerstone in the diagnostic phase of PNET management for its high diagnostic yield and the possibility of obtaining a histological specimen. The number of EUS applications in the PNET work-up has been rapidly increasing with new and powerful possibilities. The application of contrast has led to an important step in PNET detection; in recent years, it has been gaining interesting applications in aggressiveness assessment. In this review, we underline the latest experiences and opportunities in the behavior assessment of PNETs using contact-enhanced EUS and contested enhanced harmonic EUS with a particular focus on the future application and possibility that these techniques could provide.

Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Management

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal cancers, largely related to the difficulties with early detection, as it typically presents in later stages. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are commonly diagnosed as incidental findings on routine imaging. PCN is becoming more frequently detected with the increasing ease and frequency of obtaining cross-sectional images. Certain subtypes of pancreatic cysts have the potential to progress to malignancy, and therefore, clinicians are tasked with creating a patient-centered management plan. The decision of whether to undergo surgical resection or interval surveillance can be challenging given the criteria, including PCN size, pancreatic duct dilation, presence of a mural nodule, and clinical symptoms that play a potential role in risk stratification. Furthermore, the guidelines available from the major gastrointestinal societies all differ in their management recommendations. In this review, we detail an overview of the different types of PCNs and compare major guidelines for both diagnosis and management. We include emerging evidence for next-generation sequencing as well as confocal needle endomicroscopy to aid in the diagnosis and determination of malignancy potential and diagnosis.

Integrating Molecular Analysis into the Pathologic Evaluation of Pancreatic Cysts

The development of cross-sectional imaging techniques has enhanced the detection of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). PCLs are found in approximately 2% of the general population, often as incidentally detected lesions on computed tomography or MRI during the evaluation of other medical conditions. Broadly, PCLs are classified as mucinous or nonmucinous. Mucinous PCLs include mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Nonmucinous PCLs include pseudocysts, serous cystadenomas, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, and cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, as well as cystic acinar cell carcinoma, cystic degeneration of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, lymphoepithelial cyst, and others.

Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms

Early detection of high-risk pancreatic cystic lesions enables potentially curative surgical resection, and early detection of lesions without worrisome features may lead to appropriate surveillance. Regrettably, differentiating premalignant and malignant cysts from nonmalignant ones remains challenging. However, emerging additional diagnostic tools, including the needle biopsy with microforceps and needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, are of exciting potential along with cyst fluid analysis".

Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Diagnostic Dilemma

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are typically solid neoplasms but in rare instances may present as cystic lesions. Preoperative diagnosis of a cystic pancreatic lesion is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. We hereby describe an elderly female who came with complaints of abdominal lump. Radiologically, it appeared to be a pancreatic hydatid cyst located at the head of the pancreas, following which resection was done. Histopathological study of the lesion turned out to be a cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Thus, we present this unique case due to its rarity and diagnostic challenge.

Basic pancreatic lesions: Radiologic-pathologic correlation

The basic pancreatic lesions include location, size, shape, number, capsule, calcification/calculi, hemorrhage, cystic degeneration, fibrosis, pancreatic duct alterations, and microvessel. One or more basic lesions form a kind of pancreatic disease. As recognizing the characteristic imaging features of pancreatic basic lesions and their relationships with pathology aids in differentiating the variety of pancreatic diseases. The purpose of this study is to review the pathological and imaging features of the basic pancreatic lesions.

Preoperative risk stratification of lymph node metastasis for non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: An international dual-institutional study

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Although the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) defines malignant potential, preoperative prediction of LNM has not been established for non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (NF-PNEN). We sought to develop a prediction system using only preoperatively available factors that would stratify the risk of LNM for NF-PNEN.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent R0/1 resection of NF-PNEN at Kyoto University (2007-2019) and the University of California, San Francisco (2010-2019). Risk stratification of LNM was developed using preoperative factors by the logistic regression analysis. Long-term outcomes were compared across the risk groups.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were included in this study. Lymph nodes were pathologically examined in 116 patients, 23 (20%) of whom had LNM. Radiological tumor size [1.5-3.5 cm (odds ratio: 13.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.77-398) and >3.5 cm (72.4, 9.06-2257) against ≤1.5 cm], <50% cystic component (8.46 × 10^6, 1.68 × 10^106-), and dilatation of main pancreatic duct ≥5 mm (31.2, 3.94-702) were independently associated with LNM. When patients were classified as the low-risk (43 patients), intermediate-risk (44 patients), and high-risk groups (29 patients), proportions of LNM differed significantly across the groups (0%, 14%, and 59%, respectively). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the low- and intermediate-risk groups were significantly better than that of the high-risk group (5-year RFS rates of 92.2%, 85.4%, and 47.1%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction system using preoperative radiological factors stratifies the risk of LNM for NF-PNEN. This stratification helps to predict malignant potential and determine the surgical procedure and necessity of regional lymphadenectomy.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Malignancy: Assessment, Guidelines, and the Field Defect

The widespread use of high-spatial-resolution cross-sectional imaging has led to an increase in detection of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. These lesions are a diverse group, ranging from indolent and premalignant lesions to invasive cancers. The diagnosis of several of these lesions can be suggested on the basis of their imaging appearance, while many other lesions require follow-up imaging and/or aspiration. The smaller cystic lesions, often branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, have overlapping imaging characteristics that make diagnostic assessment of the natural history and malignancy risk confusing. Expert panels have developed societal guidelines, based on a consensus, for surveillance of these lesions. However, these guidelines are often inconsistent and are constantly evolving as additional scientific data are accumulated. Identification of features associated with increased risk of malignancy is important for proper management. The concept of field defect, whereby pancreatic adenocarcinoma develops at a site different from the site of the pancreatic cyst, adds to the complexity of screening guidelines. As a result of the differences in guidelines, key stakeholders (eg, radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons) must review and come to a consensus regarding which guideline, or combination of guidelines, to follow at their individual institutions. Standardized reporting and macros are helpful for ensuring the uniformity of interpretations. Radiologists play a critical role in the detection and characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions, in the follow-up recommendations for these lesions, and in the detection of associated cancer. An invited commentary by Zaheer is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Management of pancreatic cysts and guidelines: what the gastroenterologist needs to know

The prevalence of pancreatic cysts has increased significantly over the last decade, partly secondary to increased quality and frequency of cross-sectional imaging. While the majority never progress to cancer, a small number will and need to be followed. The management of pancreatic cysts can be both confusing and intimidating due to the multiple guidelines with varying recommendations. Despite the differences in the specifics of the guidelines, they all agree on several high-risk features that should get the attention of any clinician when assessing a pancreatic cyst: presence of a mural nodule or solid component, dilation of the main pancreatic duct (or presence of main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm), pancreatic cyst size ⩾3–4 cm, or positive cytology on pancreatic cyst fluid aspiration. Other important criteria to consider include rapid cyst growth (⩾5 mm/year), elevated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, new-onset diabetes mellitus, or acute pancreatitis thought to be related to the cystic lesion.

Advances in the epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: Trends, risk factors, screening, and prognosis

Pancreatic cancer is a malignancy with poor prognosis and high mortality. The recent increase in pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality has resulted in an increased number of studies on its epidemiology. This comprehensive and systematic literature review summarizes the advances in the epidemiology of pancreatic cancer, including its epidemiological trends, risk factors, risk prediction models, screening modalities, and prognosis. The risk factors for pancreatic cancers can be categorized as those related to individual characteristics, lifestyle and environment, and disease status. Several prediction models for pancreatic cancer have been developed in populations with new-onset diabetes or a family history of pancreatic cancer; however, these models require further validation. Despite recent progress in pancreatic cancer screening, the quantity and quality of related studies are also unsatisfactory, especially with respect to the identification of high-risk populations and development of effective screening modality. Apart from the populations with familial genetic risk and those at a high risk of sporadic pancreatic cancer, risk factors such as new-onset diabetes may be a new direction for timely intervention. We hope this work will provide new ideas for further prevention and treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Reappraisal of a 2-Cm Cut-off Size for the Management of Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multicenter International Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize an international cohort of resected cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (cPanNENs) and identify preoperative predictors of aggressive behavior.

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of cPanNENs are unknown and their clinical management remains unclear. An observational strategy for asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2 cm has been proposed by recent guidelines, but evidence is scarce and limited to single-institutional series.

METHODS

Resected cPanNENs (1995-2017) from 16 institutions worldwide were included. Solid lesions (>50% solid component), functional tumors, and MEN-1 patients were excluded. Aggressiveness was defined as lymph node (LN) involvement, G3 grading, distant metastases, and/or recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 263 resected cPanNENs were included, among which 177 (63.5%) were >2 cm preoperatively. A preoperative diagnosis of cPanNEN was established in 162 cases (61.6%) and was more frequent when patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound [EUS, odds ratio (OR) 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-4.77] and somatostatin-receptor imaging (OR 3.681, 95% CI 1.809-7.490), and for those managed in specialized institutions (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.57-6.21). Forty-one cPanNENs (15.6%) were considered aggressive. In the whole cohort, LN involvement on imaging, age >65 years, preoperative size >2 cm, and pancreatic duct dilation were independently associated with aggressive behavior. In asymptomatic patients, older age and a preoperative size >2 cm remained independently associated with aggressiveness. Only 1 of 61 asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2 cm displayed an aggressive behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of cPanNENs is increased by the use of EUS and somatostatin-receptor imaging and is higher in specialized institutions. Preoperative size >2 cm is independently associated with aggressive behavior. Consequently, a watch-and-wait policy for sporadic asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2 cm seems justified and safe for most patients.

The distinctive characteristics of the micro-vasculature and immune cell infiltration in cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Hypervascularity is a main characteristic of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), and cystic PanNETs (CPanNETs) are unique type of PanNETs in which the microenvironment remains unknown. We aim to compare the micro-vasculature features and immune cell infiltration between CPanNETs and solid PanNETs (SPanNETs).

METHODS

Data of 301 SPanNET and 36 CPanNET patients from a high-volume institution were evaluated. CD4, CD8, CD11c, CD15, CD20, CD68, CD34 and α-SMA expression levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescent double staining. The microvessel density (MVD) and microvessel integrity (MVI) were examined.

RESULTS

MVD and MVI expression levels in CPanNETs were significantly higher than those in SPanNETs (p = 0.025 and 0.0092, respectively). CPanNETs had higher proportions of T1 (p = 0.023) and G1 (p = 0.052) than SPanNETs. In SPanNETs, higher MVD occurred in stages T1, N0 and G1 than in the T2/T3, N1 and G2 subgroups. In CPanNETs, CD34-MVD was uncorrelated with the T stage or grade. Higher CD34-MVD, but not MVI, was associated with better DFS (HR 0.3209, 95% CI 0.1259-0.8176, p = 0.004). There were significantly more peritumoral infiltrating immune cells than their intratumoral counterparts (p < 0.001 for each) in CPanNETs and SPanNETs. The mean number of peritumoral CD68 + TAM in CPanNETs was significantly lower than that in SPanNETs (p = 0.008). The counts of other peritumoral immune cells did not significantly differ between CPanNETs and SPanNETs.

CONCLUSIONS

CPanNETs had a microenvironment distinct from that of SPanNETs, including higher CD34-MVD, higher MVI and lower TAM. This specific microenvironment structure may partially help predicting the prognosis of patients with PanNET.

Educational Case: Pancreatic Cystic Disease: A Multimodal Diagnostic Approach to Determine Clinical Management

The following fictional case is intended as a learning tool within the Pathology Competencies for Medical Education (PCME), a set of national standards for teaching pathology. These are divided into three basic competencies: Disease Mechanisms and Processes, Organ System Pathology, and Diagnostic Medicine and Therapeutic Pathology. For additional information, and a full list of learning objectives for all three competencies, see http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2374289517715040 . 1

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Although pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors, their number is increasing with advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Even small lesions that are difficult to detect using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can now be detected with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Contrast-enhanced EUS is useful, and not only diagnosis but also malignancy detection has become possible by evaluating the vascularity of tumors. Pathological diagnosis using EUS with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful when diagnostic imaging is difficult. EUS-FNA can also be used to evaluate the grade of malignancy. Pooling the data of the studies that compared the PNENs grading between EUS-FNA samples and surgical specimens showed a concordance rate of 77.5% (κ-statistic = 0.65, 95% confidence interval = 0.59–0.71, p < 0.01). Stratified analysis for small tumor size (2 cm) showed that the concordance rate was 84.5% and the kappa correlation index was 0.59 (95% confidence interval = 0.43–0.74, p < 0.01). The evolution of ultrasound imaging technologies such as contrast-enhanced and elastography and the artificial intelligence that analyzes them, the evolution of needles, and genetic analysis, will further develop the diagnosis and treatment of PNENs in the future.

Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Represent a Distinct Clinical Entity with Less Aggressive Biological Behaviors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) uncommonly present as cystic lesions. There is a gap in knowledge of their clinicopathological characteristics and biological behaviors. Previous reported studies remained inconsistent and controversial. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinicopathological features of cystic pNET and determine if it represents a distinct clinical entity by comparing its characteristics with those of solid pNETs.

METHODS

Patients with pNETs who underwent surgical resections from January 2014 to April 2019 at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics, clinical characteristics, surgical data, and oncological as well as histological characteristics of cystic pNETs and their solid counterparts were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were included in this study, and 10.7% (13/122) patients were cystic. There is no significant difference between cystic pNETs and solid pNETs in age (43.6 ± 15.8 versus 50.9 ± 14.5 y, P = 0.093) and sex distribution (P = 0.085). Cystic pNETs are more likely to be asymptomatic (61.5% versus 23.9%, P = 0.008) and nonfunctional (92.3% versus 52.7%, P = 0.006) than solid pNETs. However, the tumor size (4.8 ± 4.5 versus 2.8 ± 1.9 cm, P = 0.124), proportion of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (92.3% versus 98.2%, P = 0.289), and tumor location (P = 0.154) are similar in both groups. Compared with solid pNETs, cystic pNETs have a lower Ki-67 index and incidence of liver metastasis, but the difference is not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic pNETs are more likely to be nonfunctional and indolent and seem to exhibit less aggressive biological behaviors than solid pNETs. Conservative approach should be considered for certain selected patients.

Successful Localization and Resection of Small Pancreatic Cystic Insulinoma Using Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging: A Case Report and Literature Review

Pancreatic cystic insulinoma is an uncommon tumor. Perioperative localization remained challenging if the tumor is atypical with cystic feature or in small size. Near-infrared (NIR) imaging is a technique by injecting fluorescent dye intravenously, which accumulates to the target lesion and creating signal by laser sources. The signal helps surgeons to identify the lesion during operation, but little experience has been reported regarding the use of imaging NIR technique for localizing cystic insulinoma. We present a 29-year-old female patient with a symptomatic pancreatic cystic insulinoma (1.2 cm) as assessed by clinical symptom, laboratory evidence, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. With an aid of NIR imaging technique, this cystic tumor was localized easily at operation. Also, the fluorescence imaging visualized the tumor part, guided us to identify the safe margin, and preserved the normal pancreatic structure. Pathologic report confirmed that the tumor was a well-differentiated cystic insulinoma. This case demonstrates that pancreatic cystic insulinoma in small size can be intraoperatively localized by NIR imaging, a relatively safe and easy technique.

Large low-grade cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm

A 58-year-old male was admitted to our hospital for a pancreatic cystic mass. Laboratory examination showed elevated levels of ALT (272 U/L, normal range, 9-50), AST (142 mg/L, normal range, 15-40), GGT (483 IU/ml, normal range, 10-60), AKP (542 U/L, normal range, 45-125), total bilirubin (21.9 U/L, normal range, 5-21), direct bilirubin (12.4 U/L, normal range, <6), CEA (7.21 ng/ml, normal range, 0-5), CA19-9 (58.91 U/ml, normal range, 0-39) and NSE (24.16 ng/ml, normal range, 0-20).

Nondegenerated cystic neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas: a case report

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are typically solid neoplasms but, in very rare cases, present as cystic lesions. We describe a case of a cystic neuroendocrine tumor that developed as a small cystic lesion.

Case presentation

In 2011, a 66-year-old Japanese woman underwent computed tomography (CT) that revealed a cystic lesion in the tail of the pancreas measuring 9 mm. She did not have any symptoms. She underwent a CT scan every year thereafter. The cystic lesion gradually increased and was 40 mm in 2019; endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) was then performed. Cytological examination demonstrated class IIIb adenocarcinoma, and we conducted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Pathological examination showed PNET.

Conclusion

Although cystic change of PNET is generally caused by ischemia or necrosis inside the tumor, in our case, PNET occurred as a small cyst that increased without changing form.

Small Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm with Huge Liver and Bone Metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms occasionally have a cystic component. We herein report a case of multiple hepatic tumors, including a huge one and a 24-mm sized pancreatic cystic lesion. The hepatic tumor showed an enhancement pattern consistent with hepatic adenoma. The pancreatic cystic lesion revealed a thickened outside border and a solid inside component, which was enhanced following a contrast study, suggesting cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm. Surgical resection was performed. After the surgery, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy detected an occult lumbar spine metastasis. Huge multiple liver and bone metastases of the neuroendocrine neoplasm G2 component were seen, with a G1 small primary lesion.

Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: current evidence and guidelines

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are a heterogeneous group of pancreatic cysts that include intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, serous cystic neoplasms and other rare cystic lesions, all with different biological behaviours and variable risk of progression to malignancy. As more pancreatic cysts are incidentally discovered on routine cross-sectional imaging, optimal surveillance for patients with PCN is becoming an increasingly common clinical problem, highlighting the need to balance cancer prevention with the risk of (surgical) overtreatment. This Review summarizes the latest developments in the diagnosis and management of PCN, including the quality of available evidence. Also discussed are the most important differences between the PCN guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association, the International Association of Pancreatology and the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, including diagnostic and follow-up strategies and indications for surgery. Finally, new developments in the management of patients with PCN are addressed.

Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Differential Diagnosis and Cytologic-Histologic Correlation

CONTEXT.—

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are very common, and their detection is increasing with the advances in imaging techniques. Because of the major implications for management, distinguishing between neoplastic and nonneoplastic PCLs is critical. Neoplastic cysts with potential to progress into cancer include mucinous PCLs (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms) and nonmucinous cysts (solid pseudopapillary tumors, serous cystic neoplasms, and neuroendocrine tumors with cystic degeneration). Nonneoplastic cysts with no risk of malignant transformation include pseudocysts, retention cysts, lymphoepithelial cysts, cystic pancreatic lymphangioma, and duplication cyst/ciliated foregut cysts. The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology with cyst fluid analysis in the diagnosis of PCLs has evolved during the last decade; however, a definitive diagnosis on cytologic specimens is hampered by the sparse cellularity and can be challenging. EUS-FNA can play an important role to differentiate low-risk from high-risk pancreatic cysts and to distinguish between patients with cysts who need clinical follow-up versus those who require surgery.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an integrative approach to diagnose pancreatic cystic lesions using EUS-FNA cytology and cyst fluid analysis, along with clinical, radiologic, histologic, genetic, and molecular characteristics.

DATA SOURCES.—

The review and analysis of the latest literature describing pancreatic cystic lesions.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Accurate diagnosis of PCLs requires a multidisciplinary and multimodal team approach, including the integration of clinical findings, imaging, cytology, cyst fluid analysis, and molecular testing.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound using time-intensity curve analysis predicts pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm

PURPOSE

Histological grading is important for the treatment algorithm in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN). The present study examined the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) and time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis of PNEN diagnosis and grading.

METHODS

TIC analysis was performed in 30 patients using data obtained from CH-EUS, and a histopathological diagnosis was made via EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or surgical resection. The TIC parameters were analyzed by dividing them into G1/G2 and G3/NEC groups. Then, patients were classified into non-aggressive and aggressive groups and evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were classified as G1/G2, and four as G3/NEC. From the TIC analysis, five parameters were obtained (I: echo intensity change, II: time for peak enhancement, III: speed of contrast, IV: decrease rate for enhancement, and V: enhancement ratio for node/pancreatic parenchyma). Three of these parameters (I, IV, and V) showed high diagnostic performance. Using the cutoff value obtained from the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the correct diagnostic rates of parameters I, IV, and V were 96.7%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, between G1/G2 and G3/NEC. A total of 21 patients were classified into the non-aggressive group, and nine into the aggressive group. Using the cutoff value obtained from the ROC analysis, the accurate diagnostic rates of I, IV, and V were 86.7%, 86.7%, and 88.5%, respectively, between the non-aggressive and aggressive groups.

CONCLUSION

CH-EUS and TIC analysis showed high diagnostic accuracy for grade diagnosis of PNEN. Quantitative perfusion analysis is useful to predict PNEN grade diagnosis preoperatively.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A distinctive subgroup with indolent biological behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The clinicopathological features and biological behaviors of cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are unclear and controversial. Here we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the unique characteristics of cystic pNETs, to determine whether they represent a distinct clinical entity.

METHODS

We selected comparative studies published since January 2000 that explore the differences between clinicopathological features of cystic and solid pNETs. Demographic information, pathological characteristics, and survival information were analyzed.

RESULT

The 12 selected studies comprised 355 and 1530 patients diagnosed with cystic and solid pNETs, respectively. Compared with solid pNETs, cystic pNETs were less likely to be functional (odds ratio, OR = 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.50, p < 0.00001), more likely to affect males (OR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-2.00, p = 0.0005), and significantly associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (OR = 2.71). Cystic pNETs were more likely to present with G1 and G2 rather than G3 (OR = 1.66). Cystic pNETs were associated with less frequent distant organs and lymph node metastasis, microvascular invasion, perineural invasion, and a low Ki-67 index and mitotic count. There were no significant differences between 5- and 10-year overall survival. However, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 10-year DFS rate of patients with cystic pNETs was significantly higher compared with those with solid pNETs (94.6% vs 83.5%, OR = 3.00; 92.7% vs 63.6%, OR = 5.92, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic pNETs represent a distinct subgroup of pNETs that present with an indolent biological behavior, and patients experience better DFS. Observation and surveillance should be considered in some selected cases.

Pancreatic cystic lesions: risk stratification and management based on recent guidelines

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) can present complex diagnostic and management challenges with uncertainty as to the most appropriate investigations, interventions and surveillance. Guidelines have been developed to aid decision making, including the European Study Group, American College of Gastroenterology and International Study Group guidelines. This paper presents issues relating to risk stratification and the appropriate management of patients with PCLs, reviewing these recently published guidelines. While there are similarities across these expert guidelines, there are notable differences in terms of features associated with increased risk of malignant transformation, the most appropriate imaging modality and timing of interval imaging. Where variations exist, this reflects differing interpretations of a limited evidence base, and decision making will likely evolve further as experience with these guidelines develops.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A more favorable lesion?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are predominantly solid lesions with malignant potential. Cystic PNETs are a small subset in which data are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and biologic differences between cystic and solid PNETs.

METHODS

Patients with PNETs undergoing pancreatectomy between 1988 and 2016 at a high-volume center were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

347 patients with PNETs were identified; 27% (n = 91) were cystic. Patients with cystic PNETs were generally older (59 vs. 55 years, p = 0.05). Cystic PNETs were more commonly non-functional (95% vs. 82%, p = 0.004), asymptomatic (44% vs. 28%, p = 0.009), and located in the pancreatic body/tail (81% vs. 60%, p < 0.001) than solid PNETs. Although cystic and solid PNETs had similar sizes and pathologic stage at the time of resection, Ki-67 proliferation index (Ki-67 ≤ 9%: 98% vs. 85%; p = 0.007), and histologic grade (grade I: 84% vs. 59%; p = 0.009) had less aggressive features in cystic PNETs.

CONCLUSION

In addition to reporting a higher than previously published incidence of cystic PNET (27%), this study found significant differences in multiple clinicopathologic variables between cystic and solid PNETs. Cystic PNET may be a distinct and possibly less aggressive subtype of PNET yet have similar pathologic stage, recurrence, and survival to solid PNETs. Cystic PNETs require further attention to better understand the true natural history.

Clinicopathological characteristics of non-functioning cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The biological features of cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of non-functioning PNETs (NF-PNETs) with a cystic component.

METHODS

The medical records of 75 patients with NF-PNETs who had undergone resection in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological factors were compared between PNETs with and without a cystic component. Expression of somatostatin 2 receptor (SSTR-2) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Cystic PNETs were diagnosed in 14 patients (19%). The proportion of men was significantly higher for cystic than solid PNETs (79% vs. 44%, P < 0.05) and cystic PNETs were significantly larger than solid PNETs (25 mm vs. 17 mm, P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of lymph node metastases (14% vs. 10%, P = 0.64), hepatic metastasis (7% vs. 3%, P = 0.54), or disease-free survival rate (both 86%, P = 0.29) between PNETs with and without a cystic component. SSTR-2 expression was more frequently observed in PNETs with a cystic component than in those without (100% vs. 70%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although cystic PNETs were larger upon diagnosis than solid PNETs in this study, prognosis after surgical resection did not differ significantly between these types of PNET. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and somatostatin analogues may be more useful for diagnosing and treating cystic PNETs, respectively.

Current indications and yield of endoscopic ultrasound and ancillary techniques in pancreatic cystic neoplasms

An increase in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasm has been described lately. Surgical treatment or surveillance is advised depending on the type of lesion diagnosed. The most accurate diagnostic approach is needed to make the best therapeutic decision. Endoscopic ultrasound is a very valuable tool in the evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasm. It generates high-quality images and allows the possibility of sampling the cystic fluid for cytology, microbiological and molecular evaluation. Even with this evaluation, the sensitivity of this approach is not always adequate. New technological resources have been developed to try to improve the diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic cystic neoplasms. The two most promising techniques are needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy allows a microscopic evaluation of mucosal glands and vascular pattern, to differentiate mucinous from non-mucinous lesions. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound is used for the vascular evaluation of the microcirculation of the cyst wall and mural nodule, mainly to make the difference between malignant nodules and mucus plugs. A combination of these different diagnostic techniques can improve the diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic cystic neoplasms to offer the adequate therapeutic decision.

Lymphadenectomy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Why are we still debating?

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (PNEN) are rare tumours exhibiting very heterogeneous behaviour. For these reasons, studies with high level of evidence are lacking. Whether lymphadenectomy should be performed for PNEN is a matter of debate. In this review, we perform a critical analysis of the available literature regarding the clinical significance of lymphnode metastases, the importance of lymphadenectomy, and the implications on disease-specific survival.

Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies

INTRODUCTION

Recently, there have been a number of advances in imaging pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), as well as other neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which have had a profound effect on the management and treatment of these patients, but in some cases are also associated with controversies. Areas covered: These advances are the result of numerous studies attempting to better define the roles of both cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, with or without fine-needle aspiration, and molecular imaging in both sporadic and inherited panNET syndromes; the increased attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with tumor classification or have prognostic value; the rapidly increasing use of molecular imaging in these tumors and the attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with treatment/outcome results. Each of these areas and the associated controversies are reviewed. Expert commentary: There have been numerous advances in all aspects of the imaging of panNETs, as well as other NETs, in the last few years. The advances are leading to expanded roles of imaging in the management of these patients and the results being seen in panNETs/GI-NETs with these newer techniques are already being used in more common tumors.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cPNETs): a systematic review and meta-analysis of case series

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors represent 13% of all neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this study is to analyze the phenotype and biologic behavior of resected cystic neuroendocrine tumors. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted until September 2016 using a search in Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE with the terms "cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasm", "cystic islets tumors" and "cystic islets neoplasms". From the 795 citations recovered 80 studies reporting on 431 patients were selected. 87.1% (n = 387) were sporadic tumors and 10.3% (n = 40) corresponded to multiple endocrine neoplasia endocrine type 1. Were diagnosed incidentally 44.6% (n = 135). Cytology was found to have a sensitivity of 78.5%. Were non-functional tumors 85% (n = 338), and among the functional tumors, insulinoma was the most frequent. According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, 87.8% were limited to the pancreas (I-IIb), and 12.2% were advanced (III-IV). Disease-free survival at 5 years in stages (I-IIIa) and (IIIb-IV) was 91.5% and 54.2%, respectively; and was significantly lower (p = 0.0001) in functional tumors. In patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia there was a higher incidence of functional (62.5%) and multifocal (28.1%) tumors. Disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 60%. Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors exhibit phenotypical characteristics which are different to those of solid neuroendocrine tumors.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Pathogenesis and Malignant Potential

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal cancers despite extensive research. Further understanding of precursor lesions may enhance the ability to treat and prevent pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) with malignant potential include: mucinous PCLs (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasm), solid pseudopapillary tumors and cystic neuroendocrine tumors. This review summarizes the latest literature describing what is known about the pathogenesis and malignant potential of these PCLs, including unique epidemiological, radiological, histological, genetic and molecular characteristics.

c-Met affects gemcitabine resistance during carcinogenesis in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is thought to develop from histologically identifiable intraductal lesions known as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs), which exhibit similar morphological and genetic features to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Therefore, a better understanding of the biological features underlying the progression of PanIN is essential to development more effective therapeutic interventions for PDAC. In recent years, numerous studies have reported that MET proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (c-MET) is a potential marker of pancreatic cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs have been revealed to initiate and propagate tumors in vitro and in vivo, and are associated with a chemoresistant phenotype. However, in vivo models using a xenograft approach are limited. In the present study, the morphological phenotype, molecular alteration and biological behavior of neoplasia in Pdx-1Cre/+, KrasLSL-G12D/+ and Metflox/flox and wild-type mice was analyzed. The results demonstrated that while oncogenic KrasLSL-G12D/+ increased PanIN initiation and significantly decreased survival rate compared with wild-type mice, no additive effect of c-Met receptor signaling on PanIN progression or prognosis was observed. Following gemcitabine administration, c-Met inhibition in Kras LSL-G12D/+ mice significantly decreased the total surface area of PanIN lesions and the number of anti-proliferation marker protein Ki-67 positive cells occupying PanIN lesions compared with Met+/+ mice. In conclusion, complete inhibition of the c-Met signaling pathway with chemotherapy may be useful for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms

Evidence-based guidelines on the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) are lacking. This guideline is a joint initiative of the European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas, United European Gastroenterology, European Pancreatic Club, European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, European Digestive Surgery, and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. It replaces the 2013 European consensus statement guidelines on PCN. European and non-European experts performed systematic reviews and used GRADE methodology to answer relevant clinical questions on nine topics (biomarkers, radiology, endoscopy, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), serous cystic neoplasm, rare cysts, (neo)adjuvant treatment, and pathology). Recommendations include conservative management, relative and absolute indications for surgery. A conservative approach is recommended for asymptomatic MCN and IPMN measuring <40 mm without an enhancing nodule. Relative indications for surgery in IPMN include a main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter between 5 and 9.9 mm or a cyst diameter ≥40 mm. Absolute indications for surgery in IPMN, due to the high-risk of malignant transformation, include jaundice, an enhancing mural nodule >5 mm, and MPD diameter >10 mm. Lifelong follow-up of IPMN is recommended in patients who are fit for surgery. The European evidence-based guidelines on PCN aim to improve the diagnosis and management of PCN.

Neuroendocrine neoplasm of pancreas with cystic degeneration mimicking mucinous cystic neoplasm

Endoscopic ultrasound is increasingly being used for evaluation of pancreatic diseases and pancreatic tumors. Among various pancreatic cystic lesions, cystic degeneration of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm is of the challenge in making diagnosis. Although unique characteristic of each type of pancreatic cystic lesions has been proposed abundantly, typical morphology of cystic degeneration of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm is still unclear. We, herein, reported a case of 66-year-old woman who was incidentally found to have a cystic lesion in the tail of pancreas upon screening transabdominal ultrasonography. A well-defined cystic lesion with rim calcification was noted on subsequent abdominal computed tomography. Endoscopic ultrasound revealed a markedly thick-wall cystic lesion containing solid nodule inside which was not enhanced following contrast-enhanced study. A mucinous cystic neoplasm was suspected and the patient was proceeded with distal pancreatectomy. A definite diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasm was confirmed after staining with synaptophysin and chromogranin A. We performed a meticulous review on current literatures focusing on endoscopic characteristics of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with cystic degeneration.

A case of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with multiple cystic components of various sizes

The patient was a 51-year-old woman who, while undergoing a thorough health checkup, was found to have a tumor (measuring 60 mm in diameter) in the tail of the pancreas by abdominal ultrasonography. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed delayed contrast enhancement; the tumor also contained numerous low-absorption areas showing poor contrast enhancement. On magnetic resonance imaging, the tumor was visualized as having high signal intensity areas inside the tumor on T2-weighted images. Positron emission tomography revealed an abnormal accumulation in the area corresponding to the tumor. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a relatively hyperechoic solid area, with a number of echo-free areas of various sizes that assumed a honeycomb appearance. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration was carried out targeting the solid area within the tumor, which led to a diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET). Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed that the tumor was composed of numerous cysts of various sizes and solid components. The cysts contained no evidence of necrosis or bleeding. Immunohistochemically, the cystic as well as solid components were CD56 (+), synaptophysin (+) and chromogranin A (+) with MIB1 labeling index of 5%. On the basis of these findings, the final diagnosis was PNET (G2).

Laparoscopic splenopancreatectomy for an endocrine tumor with cystic changes: a case report

The biological behavior of a cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasm is less aggressive than that of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, and its prognosis is better. Limited surgery should be considered for cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasms that are not accompanied preoperatively by lymph node or distant metastasis.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: Degree of cystic component predicts prognosis

BACKGROUND

Although most pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are solid, approximately 10% are cystic. Some studies have suggested that cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are associated with a more favorable prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors who underwent operative resection between 1999 and 2014 at a single academic medical center was performed. Based on cross-sectional imaging performed before operation, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were classified according to the size of the cystic component relative to the total tumor size: purely cystic (100%), mostly cystic (≥50%), mostly solid (<50%), and purely solid (0%). Clinicopathologic characteristics and recurrence-free survival were assessed between groups.

RESULTS

In the study, 214 patients met inclusion criteria: 8 with purely cystic tumors, 7 with mostly cystic tumors, 15 with mostly solid tumors, and 184 with purely solid tumors. The groups differed in terms of tumor size (1.5 ± 0.5, 3.0 ± 1.7, 3.7 ± 2.6, and 4.0 ± 3.5 cm), lymph node positivity (0%, 0%, 26.7%, and 34.2%), intermediate or high grade (0%, 16.7%, 20.0%, and 31.0%), synchronous liver metastases (0%, 14.3%, 20.0%, and 26.6%) and need for pancreaticoduodenectomy (0%, 0%, 6.7%, and 25.0%), respectively. No cases of purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were associated with synchronous liver or lymph node metastasis, intermediate/high grade, recurrence, or death due to disease. Among patients presenting without metastatic disease, 10-year recurrence-free survival was 100% in patients with purely and mostly cystic tumors versus 53.0% in patients with purely and mostly solid tumors; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors demonstrate a spectrum of biologic behavior with an increasing cystic component being associated with more favorable clinicopathologic features and prognosis. Purely cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may represent 1 subset that can be safely observed without immediate resection.

Morphological differentiation and follow-up of pancreatic cystic neoplasms using endoscopic ultrasound

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a key modality for the evaluation of suspected pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), as the entire pancreatic gland can be demonstrated with high spatial resolution from the stomach and duodenum. Detailed information can be acquired about the internal contents of the cyst(s) [septum, capsule, mural nodules (MNs)], its relation with the main pancreatic duct (MPD), and any parenchymal changes in the underlying gland. PCNs comprise true cysts and pseudocysts. True cysts can be neoplastic or nonneoplastic. Here, we describe serous cystic neoplasm (SCN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) as prototype neoplastic cysts, along with nonneoplastic lymphoepithelial cysts (LECs).

Clinicopathological Significance of CDKN2A Promoter Hypermethylation Frequency with Pancreatic Cancer

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients is very poor, with a 5-year survival of less than 6%. Previous studies demonstrated that the loss of function of CDKN2A is mainly caused by the hypermethylation of CDKN2A gene promoter; however, whether or not it is associated with the incidence of pancreatic cancer still remains unclear. In this study, we systematically reviewed the association between CDKN2A promoter methylation and pancreatic cancer using meta-analysis methods. The pooled data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2. Fourteen studies eligible studies, including 418 pancreatic cancer, 155 pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs) and 45 chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients were analyzed. We observed that the frequency of CDKN2A methylation was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer patients than in normal healthy controls, the pooled OR = 17.19, 95% CI = 8.72–33.86, P < 0.00001. The frequency of CDKN2A methylation was also significantly higher in PanINs patients than that in normal individual controls, OR = 12.35, 95% CI = 1.70–89.89, P = 0.01. In addition, CDKN2A methylation was associated with worse survival in pancreatic cancer, HR = 4.46, 95% CI = 1.37–14.53, P = 0.01. The results strongly suggest that CDKN2A methylation is correlated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. CDKN2A methylation plays a critical role in pancreatic carcinogenesis and may serve as a prognostic marker.