1
|
Yin ZZ, Gao YX, Zhao ZM, Hu MG, Tang WB, Liu R. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for sporadic benign insulinoma: Short- and long-term outcomes. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:399-405. [PMID: 37423832 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery is the optimal treatment for insulinoma. The present study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for sporadic benign insulinoma. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery for insulinoma at our center between September 2007 and December 2019 was conducted. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative follow-up results were compared between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were enrolled, including 36 with laparoscopic approach and 49 with robotic approach. Enucleation was the preferred surgical procedure. Fifty-nine patients (69.4%) underwent enucleation; among them, 26 and 33 patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic surgery, respectively. Robotic enucleation had a lower conversion rate to laparotomy (0 vs. 19.2%, P = 0.013), shorter operative time (102.0 vs. 145.5 min, P = 0.008) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.0 vs. 8.5 d, P = 0.002) than laparoscopic enucleation. There were no differences between the groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, the rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula and complications. After a median follow-up of 65 months, two patients in the laparoscopic group developed a functional recurrence and none of the patients in the robotic group had a recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Robotic enucleation can reduce the conversion rate to laparotomy and shorten operative time, which might lead to a reduction in postoperative hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhu-Zeng Yin
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Yuan-Xing Gao
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Zhi-Ming Zhao
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Ming-Gen Hu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Wen-Bo Tang
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China; Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China; Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Razjouyan H, Maranki JL. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for the Management of Pancreatic Duct Leaks and Fistulas. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2024; 34:405-416. [PMID: 38796289 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic duct (PD) leaks are a common complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis, trauma to the pancreas, and pancreatic surgery. Diagnosis of PD leaks and fistulas is often made with contrast-enhanced pancreatic protocol computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with MRCP. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with pancreatic duct stenting in appropriately selected patients is often an effective treatment, helps to avoid surgery, and is considered first-line therapy in cases that fail conservative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadie Razjouyan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Health, 500 University Drive, HU850, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Jennifer L Maranki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Health, 500 University Drive, HU850, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aoyama S, Ohmura Y, Takeda Y, Katsura Y, Kinoshita M, Shinke G, Kihara Y, Yanagisawa K, Katsuyama S, Ikeshima R, Hiraki M, Sugimura K, Masuzawa T, Hata T, Murata K. Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients: A retrospective study. Asian J Endosc Surg 2024; 17:e13331. [PMID: 38866420 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous studies have not evaluated the surgical difficulty of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of elderly age on the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy, focusing on surgical difficulty. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer at Kansai Rosai Hospital between September 2012 and December 2023. Perioperative outcomes were investigated between the elderly (>75 years) and non-elderly (≤75 years) groups. RESULTS Fifty-six patients were included: 26 and 30 in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. The median operative time was significantly shorter in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group (324 vs. 414 min, p = .022), but other surgical outcomes were not significantly different including oncological factors. The median difficulty score was similar between the elderly and non-elderly groups (6 vs. 7, respectively; p = .699). The incidences of postoperative complications and pancreatic fistulas were not significantly different in the elderly and non-elderly groups (23% vs. 43%, p = .159, and 19% vs. 36%, p = .236, respectively), even though analyzed in subgroups with low-to-intermediate or high difficulty score. CONCLUSIONS The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer were not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients, even when surgical difficulty was considered. This surgical procedure can be safe and feasible for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Aoyama
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Ohmura
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yoshiteru Katsura
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Kinoshita
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Go Shinke
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yukari Kihara
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | | | - Ryo Ikeshima
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Hiraki
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keijiro Sugimura
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Toru Masuzawa
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Taishi Hata
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kohei Murata
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hughes DLL, Hughes A, Gordon-Weeks AN, Silva MA. Continuous drain irrigation as a risk mitigation strategy for postoperative pancreatic fistula: a meta-analysis. Surgery 2024; 176:180-188. [PMID: 38734504 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula serves as the principle cause for the morbidity and mortality observed after pancreatectomy. Continuous drain irrigation as a treatment strategy for infected pancreatic necrosis has previously been described; however, its role adter pancreatectomy has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to determine whether continuous drain irrigation reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS A meta-analysis of the pre-existing literature was performed. The primary end point was whether continuous drain irrigation reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy. The secondary end point evaluated its impact on postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS Nine articles involving 782 patients were included. Continuous drain irrigation use was associated with a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pancreatic fistula rates (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.40 [0.19-0.82], P = .01). Upon subgroup analysis, a significant reduction in clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was also noted (odds ratio 0.37 [0.20-0.66], P = .0008). A reduction in postoperative complications was also observed-delayed gastric emptying (0.45 [0.24-0.84], P = .01) and the need for re-operation (0.33 [0.11-0.96], P = .04). This reduction in postoperative complications translated into a reduced length of stay (mean difference -2.62 [-4.97 to -0.26], P = .03). CONCLUSION Continuous drain irrigation after pancreatectomy is a novel treatment strategy with a limited body of published evidence. After acknowledging the limitations of the data, initial analysis would suggest that it may serve as an effective risk mitigation strategy against postoperative pancreatic fistula. Further research in a prospective context utilizing patient risk stratification for fistula development is, however, required to define its role within clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L L Hughes
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Aron Hughes
- Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Alex N Gordon-Weeks
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A Silva
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Pastena M, Bannone E, Fontana M, Paiella S, Esposito A, Casetti L, Landoni L, Tuveri M, Pea A, Casciani F, Zamboni G, Frigerio I, Marchegiani G, Butturini G, Malleo G, Salvia R. Thirty-day prevalence and clinical impact of fluid collections at the resection margin after distal pancreatectomy: Follow-up of a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2024; 176:189-195. [PMID: 38729888 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative fluid collections at the resection margin of the pancreatic stump are frequent after distal pancreatectomy, yet their clinical impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the 30-day prevalence of postoperative fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy and the factors associated with a clinically relevant condition. METHODS Patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of parenchymal transection with either reinforced, triple-row staple, or ultrasonic dissector underwent routine magnetic resonance 30 days postoperatively. Postoperative fluid collection was defined as a cyst-like lesion of at least 1 cm at the pancreatic resection margin. Postoperative fluid collections requiring any therapy were defined as clinically relevant. RESULTS A total of 133 patients were analyzed; 69 were in the triple-row staple transection arm, and 64 were in the ultrasonic dissector transection arm. The overall 30-day prevalence of postoperative fluid collections was 68% (n = 90), without any significant difference between the two trial arms. Postoperative serum hyperamylasemia was more frequent in patients with postoperative fluid collections than those without (31% vs 7%, P = .001). Among the postoperative fluid collection population, an early postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio 14.9, P = .002), post pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (odds ratio 12.7, P = .036), and postoperative fluid collection size larger than 50 mm (odds ratio 6.6, P = .046) were independently associated with a clinically relevant postoperative fluid collection. CONCLUSION Postoperative fluid collections at the resection margin are common after distal pancreatectomy and can be predicted by early assessment of postoperative serum hyperamylasemia. A preceding pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis and/or postoperative pancreatic fistula and large collections (>50 mm) were associated with a clinically relevant postoperative fluid collection, representing targets for closer follow-up or earlier therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo De Pastena
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. https://twitter.com/MatteoDePastena
| | - Elisa Bannone
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. https://twitter.com/BannoneElisa
| | - Martina Fontana
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Casetti
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Landoni
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Tuveri
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Pea
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. https://twitter.com/Totuccio1983
| | - Fabio Casciani
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Zamboni
- Section of Radiology University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy. https://twitter.com/Gio_Marchegiani
| | | | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy. https://twitter.com/gimalleo
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Codjia T, Hobeika C, Platevoet P, Pravisani R, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Marique L, Cros J, Cauchy F, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A. Distal Pancreatectomy for Body Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Is Splenectomy Necessary? A Propensity Score Matched Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4611-4620. [PMID: 38526834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15220-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of splenectomy for body localization (≥ 5 cm from spleen hilum) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (B-PDAC) is uncertain. This study assessed spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) results for B-PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This single-center study included patients who underwent SPDP (Warshaw's technique) or distal splenopancreactomy (DSP) for B-PDAC from 2008 to 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to balance SPDP and DSP patients regarding sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), body mass index (BMI), laparoscopy, pathological features [American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/tumor node metastasis classification (TNM)], margins, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies. RESULTS A total of 129 patients (64 male, median age 68 years, median BMI 24 kg/m2) were enrolled with a median follow-up of 63 months (95% CI 52-96 months), including 59 (46%) SPDP and 70 (54%) DSP patients. A total of 39 SPDP patients were matched to 39 DSP patients. SPDP patients had fewer harvested nodes (19 vs 22; p = 0.038) with a similar number of positive nodes (0 vs 0; p = 0.237). R0 margins were achieved similarly in SPDP and DSP patients (75% vs 71%; p = 0.840). SPDP patients were associated with decreased comprehensive complication index (CCI, 8.7 vs 16.6; p = 0.004), rates of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF, 14% vs 29%; p = 0.047), and hospital stay (11 vs 16 days; p < 0.001). SPDP patients experienced similar disease-free survival (DFS, 5 years: 38% vs 32%; p = 0.180) and overall survival (OS, 5 years 54% vs 44%; p = 0.710). After matching, SPDP patients remained associated with lower CCI (p = 0.034) and hospital stay (p = 0.028) while not associated with risks of local recurrence (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.28-2.62; p = 0.781), recurrence (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.61-1.78; p = 0.888), or death (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.68-2.11; p = 0.556). CONCLUSION SPDP for B-PDAC is associated with less postoperative morbidity than DSP, without impairing oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Codjia
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
- UMR Inserm 1275 CAP Paris-Tech, Hôpital Lariboisière, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Platevoet
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Riccardo Pravisani
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Béatrice Aussilhou
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Lancelot Marique
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Jérome Cros
- Department of Pathology, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Quero G, Laterza V, Schena CA, Massimiani G, Lucinato C, Fiorillo C, Mezza T, Taglioni F, Menghi R, Di Cesare L, Biffoni B, De Sio D, Rosa F, Tondolo V, Alfieri S. Prolonged pre-firing pancreatic compression with linear staplers in distal pancreatectomy: a valuable technique for post-operative pancreatic fistula prevention. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:184. [PMID: 38862717 PMCID: PMC11166744 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03350-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the main complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential benefit of different durations of progressive stapler closure on POPF rate and severity after DP. METHODS Patients who underwent DP between 2016 and 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and divided into two groups according to the duration of the stapler closure: those who underwent a progressive compression for < 10 min and those for ≥ 10 min. RESULTS Among 155 DPs, 83 (53.5%) patients underwent pre-firing compression for < 10 min and 72 (46.5%) for ≥ 10 min. As a whole, 101 (65.1%) developed POPF. A lower incidence rate was found in case of ≥ 10 min compression (34-47.2%) compared to < 10 min compression (67- 80.7%) (p = 0.001). When only clinically relevant (CR) POPFs were considered, a prolonged pre-firing compression led to a lower rate (15-20.8%) than the < 10 min cohort (32-38.6%; p = 0.02). At the multivariate analysis, a compression time of at least 10 min was confirmed as a protective factor for both POPF (OR: 5.47, 95% CI: 2.16-13.87; p = 0.04) and CR-POPF (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.19-5.45; p = 0.04) development. In case of a thick pancreatic gland, a prolonged pancreatic compression for at least 10 min was significantly associated to a lower rate of CR-POPF compared to < 10 min (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION A prolonged pre-firing pancreatic compression for at least 10 min seems to significantly reduce the risk of CR-POPF development. Moreover, significant advantages are documented in case of a thick pancreatic gland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Quero
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Vito Laterza
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Massimiani
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Chiara Lucinato
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Teresa Mezza
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy
- Pancreas Unit, Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, CEMAD Centro Malattie dell'Apparato Digerente, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Flavia Taglioni
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Roberta Menghi
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy.
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli", IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.
| | - Ludovica Di Cesare
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Beatrice Biffoni
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Davide De Sio
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Fausto Rosa
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tondolo
- General Surgery Unit, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Via di Ponte Quattro Capi, 39, Rome, 00186, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Gemelli Pancreatic Center, CRMPG (Advanced Pancreatic Research Center), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome, 00168, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neuhaus M, Friedrichs J, Grilli M, Ukkat J, Klose J, Ronellenfitsch U, Kleeff J, Rebelo A. Multivisceral Oncological Resections Involving the Pancreas: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e54089. [PMID: 38861712 DOI: 10.2196/54089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the continuous advancement of cancer treatments, a comprehensive analysis of the impact of multivisceral oncological pancreatic resections on morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival is currently lacking. OBJECTIVE This manuscript presents the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis designed to summarize the existing evidence concerning the outcomes of multivisceral oncological pancreatic resections across diverse tumor entities. METHODS We will conduct a systematic search of the PubMed or MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases in strict accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The predefined outcomes encompass postoperative mortality, postoperative morbidity, overall and disease-free survival (1- to 5-year survival rates), the proportion of macroscopically complete (R0) resections (according to the Royal College of Pathologists definition), duration of hospital stay (in days), reoperation rate (%), postoperative complications (covering all complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification), as well as pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying (all according to the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreas Surgery). RESULTS Systematic database searches will begin in July 2024. The completion of the meta-analysis is anticipated by December 2024. Before completion, the literature search will be checked for new publications that must be considered in the context of the work. CONCLUSIONS The forthcoming findings will provide an up-to-date overview of the feasibility, safety, and oncological efficacy of multivisceral pancreatic resections across diverse tumor entities. This data will serve as a valuable resource for health care professionals and patients to make well-informed clinical decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023437858; https://tinyurl.com/bde5xmfw. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/54089.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maurizio Grilli
- Professional Life Science Information Service, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Endo Y, Noda H, Iseki M, Aizawa H, Inoue K, Maeda S, Kato T, Watanabe F, Rikiyama T. Thick mesopancreas is a novel predictor of surgical outcomes of patients who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:181. [PMID: 38856758 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03357-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mesopancreas resection is a crucial but difficult procedure when performing pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study evaluated the influence of mesopancreas thickness on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS We measured the thickness of the fat tissue on the right side of the superior mesenteric artery from the dorsal margin of the confluence of the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein to the ventral margin of the left renal vein on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography and defined it as the mesopancreas thickness. We evaluated the correlation between mesopancreas thickness and intraoperative and postoperative variables in 357 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. RESULTS Multivariate analysis revealed that a thick mesopancreas was significantly associated with a long operative time (β = 10.361; 95% confidence interval, 0.370-20.353, p = 0.042), high estimated blood loss (β = 36.038; 95% confidence interval, -27.192-99.268, p = 0.013), and a low number of resected lymph nodes (β = -1.551; 95% confidence interval, -2.662--0.439, p = 0.006). This analysis further revealed that thick mesopancreas was a significant risk factor for overall morbidity (odds ratio 2.170; 95% confidence interval 1.340-3.520, p = 0.002), major morbidity (odds ratio 2.430; 95% confidence interval 1.360-4.340, p = 0.003), and a longer hospital stay (β = 2.386; 95% confidence interval 0.299-4.474, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION A thick mesopancreas could predict a longer operation time, higher estimated blood loss, fewer resected lymph nodes, more frequent overall and major morbidities, and a longer hospital stay in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy more precisely than the body mass index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhei Endo
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Noda
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Iseki
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Aizawa
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Koetsu Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shimpei Maeda
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaharu Kato
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Toshiki Rikiyama
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saito R, Kawaida H, Amemiya H, Nakata Y, Izumo W, Furuya M, Maruyama S, Takiguchi K, Shoda K, Ashizawa N, Nakayama Y, Shiraishi K, Furuya S, Akaike H, Kawaguchi Y, Ichikawa D. Clinical significance of postoperative complications after pancreatic surgery in time-to-complication and length of postoperative hospital stay: a retrospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:173. [PMID: 38836878 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03369-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We retrospectively analyzed pancreatectomy patients and examined the occurrence rate and timing of postoperative complications (time-to-complication; TTC) and their impact on the length of postoperative hospital stay (POHS) to clarify their characteristics, provide appropriate postoperative management, and improve short-term outcomes in the future. METHODS A total of 227 patients, composed of 118 pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 109 distal pancreatectomy (DP) cases, were analyzed. We examined the frequency of occurrence, TTC, and POHS of each type of postoperative complication, and these were analyzed for each surgical procedure. Complications of the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification Grade II or higher were considered clinically significant. RESULTS Clinically significant complications were observed in 70.3% and 36.7% of the patients with PD and DP, respectively. Complications occurred at a median of 10 days in patients with PD and 6 days in patients with DP. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred approximately 7 days postoperatively in both groups. For the POHS, in cases without significant postoperative complications (CD ≤ I), it was approximately 22 days for PD and 11 days for DP. In contrast, when any complications occurred, POHS increased to 30 days for PD and 19 days for DP (each with additional 8 days), respectively. In particular, POPF prolonged the hospital stay by approximately 11 days for both procedures. CONCLUSION Each postoperative complication after pancreatectomy has its own characteristics in terms of the frequency of occurrence, TTC, and impact on POHS. A correct understanding of these factors will enable timely therapeutic intervention and improve short-term outcomes after pancreatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Saito
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Kawaida
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Hidetake Amemiya
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Yuuki Nakata
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Wataru Izumo
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Motohiro Furuya
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Suguru Maruyama
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Koichi Takiguchi
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Katsutoshi Shoda
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Naoki Ashizawa
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Yuko Nakayama
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Kensuke Shiraishi
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Shinji Furuya
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Hidenori Akaike
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Kawaguchi
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ichikawa
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, 4093898, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mueller TC, Henselmann M, Reischl S, Jaeger C, Trefzer C, Demir IE, Friess H, Martignoni ME. Associations of body composition parameters with postoperative outcome and perineural tumour invasion after oncological pancreatic resection. BMC Surg 2024; 24:175. [PMID: 38835067 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02457-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is often accompanied by wasting conditions. While surgery is the primary curative approach, it poses a substantial risk of postoperative complications, hindering subsequent treatments. Therefore, identifying patients at high risk for complications and optimizing their perioperative general condition is crucial. Sarcopenia and other body composition abnormalities have shown to adversely affect surgical and oncological outcomes in various cancer patients. As most pancreatic tumours are located close to the neuronal control centre for the digestive tract, it is possible that neural infiltration in this area deranges bowel functions and contributes to malabsorption and malnutrition and ultimately worsen sarcopenia and weight loss. METHODS A retrospective analysis of CT scans was performed for pancreatic cancer patients who underwent surgical tumour resection at a single high-volume centre from 2007 to 2023. Sarcopenia prevalence was assessed by skeletal muscle index (SMI), and visceral obesity was determined by the visceral adipose tissue area (VAT). Obesity and malnutrition were determined by the GLIM criteria. Sarcopenic obesity was defined as simultaneous sarcopenia and obesity. Postoperative complications, mortality and perineural tumour invasion, were compared among patients with body composition abnormalities. RESULTS Of 437 patients studied, 46% were female, the median age was 69 (61;74) years. CT analysis revealed 54.9% of patients with sarcopenia, 23.7% with sarcopenic obesity and 45.9% with visceral obesity. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity were more prevalent in elderly and male patients. Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 67.7% of patients, most of which were mild (41.6%). Severe complications occurred in 22.7% of cases and the mortality rate was 3.4%. Severe postoperative complications were significantly more common in patients with sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity. Visceral obesity or malnutrition based on BMI alone, did not significantly impact complications. Perineural invasion was found in 80.1% of patients and was unrelated to malnutrition or body composition parameters. CONCLUSIONS This is the first and largest study evaluating the associations of CT-based body mass analysis with surgical outcome and histopathological perineural tumour invasion in pancreatic cancer patients. The results suggest that elderly and male patients are at high risk for sarcopenia and should be routinely evaluated by CT before undergoing pancreatic surgery, irrespective of their BMI. Confirmation of the results in prospective studies is needed to assess if pancreatic cancer patients with radiographic sarcopenia benefit from preoperative amelioration of muscle mass and function by exercise and nutritional interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara C Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Martin Henselmann
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Reischl
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Jaeger
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Charlotte Trefzer
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ihsan Ekin Demir
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc E Martignoni
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sato S, Inoue Y, Oba A, Ono Y, Sato T, Ito H, Takahashi Y. Scope transition and early arterial inflow control provide safe and comfortable dissection in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:171. [PMID: 38829557 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03372-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe details and outcomes of a novel technique for optimizing the surgical field during robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) for distal pancreatic lesions, which has become common with potential advantages over laparoscopic surgery. METHODS For suprapancreatic lymph node dissection and splenic artery ligation, we used the basic center position with a scope through the midline port. During manipulation of the perisplenic area, the left position was used by moving the scope to the left medial side. The left lateral position is optionally used by moving the scope to the left lateral port when scope access to the perisplenic area is difficult. In addition, early splenic artery clipping and short gastric artery dissection for inflow block were performed to minimize bleeding around the spleen. We evaluated retrospectively the surgical outcomes of our method using a scoring system that allocated one point for blood inflow control and one point for optimizing the surgical view in the left position. RESULTS We analyzed 34 patients who underwent RDP or R-radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS). The left position was applied in 14 patients, and the left lateral position was applied in 6. Based on the scoring system, only the 0-point group (n = 8) had four bleeding cases (50%) with splenic injury or blood pooling; the other 1-point or 2-point groups (n = 13, respectively) had no bleeding cases (p = 0.0046). CONCLUSION Optimization of the surgical field using scope transition and inflow control ensured safe dissection during RDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoki Sato
- Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Atsushi Oba
- Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ono
- Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sato
- Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Ito
- Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yu Takahashi
- Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Emmen AMLH, Zwart MJW, Khatkov IE, Boggi U, Groot Koerkamp B, Busch OR, Saint-Marc O, Dokmak S, Molenaar IQ, D'Hondt M, Ramera M, Keck T, Ferrari G, Luyer MDP, Moraldi L, Ielpo B, Wittel U, Souche FR, Hackert T, Lips D, Can MF, Bosscha K, Fara R, Festen S, van Dieren S, Coratti A, De Hingh I, Mazzola M, Wellner U, De Meyere C, van Santvoort HC, Aussilhou B, Ibenkhayat A, de Wilde RF, Kauffmann EF, Tyutyunnik P, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study. Surgery 2024; 175:1587-1594. [PMID: 38570225 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European cohort. METHODS An international multicenter retrospective study including patients after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from 50 centers in 12 European countries (2009-2020). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥III). RESULTS Among 2,082 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and 1,076 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. After matching 812 versus 812 patients, the rates of major morbidity (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 4.6%; P = .904) did not differ significantly between robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate (6.7% vs 18.0%; P < .001) and higher lymph node retrieval (16 vs 14; P = .003). Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with shorter operation time (446 minutes versus 400 minutes; P < .001), and lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% vs 11.7%; P < .001), delayed gastric emptying grade B/C (21.4% vs 7.4%; P < .001), and a higher R0-resection rate (73.2% vs 84.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSION This European multicenter study found no differences in overall major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Further, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, shorter length of stay, and a higher R0 resection rate than robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. In contrast, robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate and a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes as compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk M L H Emmen
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/AnoukEmmen
| | - Maurice J W Zwart
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/mauricezwart
| | - Igor E Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Russia
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France. University Paris Cité
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tobias Keck
- Clinic for Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Department of Surgery, HPB unit, University Mar Hospital, Parc Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Uwe Wittel
- Department of Surgery, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francois-Regis Souche
- Department de Chirurgie Digestive (A), Mini-invasive et Oncologigue, Hôspital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Dept. of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Daan Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Regis Fara
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Européen Marseille, France
| | | | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Ignace De Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Michele Mazzola
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Ulrich Wellner
- Clinic for Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Béatrice Aussilhou
- Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France. University Paris Cité
| | - Abdallah Ibenkhayat
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Center Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, France
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pavel Tyutyunnik
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Russia
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ninomiya R, Komagome M, Nagata R, Kimura A, Takemura N, Maki A, Beck Y. Innovative staple line reinforcement and suturing technique: impact on postoperative pancreatic fistula rates in distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:945-947. [PMID: 38594166 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Riki Ninomiya
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
| | - Masahiko Komagome
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Rihito Nagata
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akifumi Kimura
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Takemura
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akira Maki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Beck
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Pediatric Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maino C, Cereda M, Franco PN, Boraschi P, Cannella R, Gianotti LV, Zamboni G, Vernuccio F, Ippolito D. Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12:100544. [PMID: 38304573 PMCID: PMC10831502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Maino
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Marco Cereda
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Paolo Niccolò Franco
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Piero Boraschi
- Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Vittorio Gianotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20100 Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Zamboni
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- University Hospital of Padova, Institute of Radiology, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20100 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Izumi H, Yoshii H, Fujino R, Takeo S, Nomura E, Mukai M, Makuuchi H. Efficacy of Pancreatic Dissection With a Triple-row Stapler in Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:295-300. [PMID: 38736396 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) occur after 20% to 30% of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using triple-row staplers in preventing POPFs. METHODS Between April 2016 and May 2023, 59 patients underwent complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies. There were more females (n=34, 57.6%) than males (n=25, 42.4%). The median age of the patients was 68.9 years. The patients were divided into slow-compression (n=19) and no-compression (n=40) groups and examined for pancreatic leakage. Both groups were examined with respect to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), pancreatic thickness at the pancreatic dissection site, pancreatic texture, diagnosis, operative time, blood loss, presence of POPF, date of drain removal, and length of hospital stay. In addition, risk factors for POPF were examined in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS Grade B POPFs were found in 9 patients (15.3%). Using univariate analysis, the operative time, blood loss, postoperative pancreatic fluid leakage, day of drain removal, and hospital stay were shorter in the no-compression group than in the slow-compression group. Using multivariate analysis, the absence of POPFs was significantly more frequent in the no-compression group (odds ratio, 5.69; 95% CI, 1.241-26.109; P =0.025). The no-compression pancreatic dissection method was a simple method for reducing POPF incidence. CONCLUSIONS The method of quickly dissecting the pancreas without compression yielded better results than the method of slowly dissecting the pancreas with slow compression. This quick dissection without compression was a simple and safe method that minimized postoperative pancreatic fluid leakage, shortened the operative time and length of hospital stay, and reduced medical costs. Therefore, this method might be a clinically successful option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideki Izumi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boyev A, Azimuddin A, Prakash LR, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Lee JE, Snyder RA, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Classification of Post-pancreatectomy Readmissions and Opportunities for Targeted Mitigation Strategies. Ann Surg 2024; 279:1046-1053. [PMID: 37791481 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Within a learning health system paradigm, this study sought to evaluate reasons for readmission to identify opportunities for improvement. BACKGROUND Post-pancreatectomy readmission rates have remained constant despite improved index hospitalization metrics. METHODS We performed a single-institution case-control study of consecutive patients with pancreatectomy (October 2016 to April 2022). Complications were prospectively graded in biweekly faculty and advanced practice provider meetings. We analyzed risk factors during index hospitalization and categorized indications for 90-day readmissions. RESULTS A total of 835 patients, median age 65 years and 51% (427/835) males, underwent 64% (534/835) pancreatoduodenectomies, 34% (280/835) distal pancreatectomies, and 3% (21/835) other resections. Twenty-four percent (204/835) of patients were readmitted. The primary indication for readmission was technical in 51% (105/204), infectious in 17% (35/204), and medical/metabolic in 31% (64/204) of patients. Procedures were required in 77% (81/105) and 60% (21/35) of technical and infectious readmissions, respectively, while 66% (42/64) of medical/metabolic readmissions were managed noninvasively. During the index hospitalization, benign pathology [odds ratio (OR): 1.8, P =0.049], biochemical pancreatic leak (OR: 2.3, P =0.001), bile/gastric/chyle leak (OR: 6.4, P =0.001), organ-space infection (OR: 3.4, P =0.007), undrained fluid on imaging (OR: 2.4, P =0.045), and increasing white blood cell count (OR: 1.7, P =0.045) were independently associated with odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS Most readmissions following pancreatectomy were technical in origin. Patients with complications during the index hospitalization, increasing white blood cell count, or undrained fluid before discharge were at the highest risk for readmission. Predischarge risk stratification of readmission risk factors and augmentation of in-clinic resources may be strategies to reduce readmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nguyen H, Luong TH, Nguyen AK, Nguyen TK. Laparoscopic antegrade spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic vessels: a prospective multi-centre case series (with video). Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:3211-3215. [PMID: 38846863 PMCID: PMC11152876 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with conservation of the splenic artery and vein (Kimura' technique) is considered a technically challenging procedure that requires a high level of expertise in laparoscopic and pancreatic surgery. Methods A prospective descriptive study on 18 patients with laparoscopic "antegrade" spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with Kimura' technique from 2018 to 2023. The perioperative indications, clinical data, intraoperative index, pathological postoperative specimens, postoperative complications, and follow-up results were retrospectively evaluated. Results The mean age was 39.4±13.3. Only 2 male patients accounted for 11.1%. The average operating time is 171±23 min. The average blood loss is 65.7±43 ml. The average tumor size is 4.1 cm. The average hospitalization is 9.4 days. The rate of pancreatic fistula is 66.7%. There is no case of transferring open surgery or blood transfusion during surgery. The results of pathological after surgery there were eight cases of solid pseudopapillary tumors, four cases of mucinous cystadenoma, six cases of neuroendocrine tumors. Conclusion Kimura's technique for laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is safe and feasible, which can be applied to benign tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas. However, this is a difficult technique in laparoscopic surgery that requires surgeons to have a lot of experience and equipment need to be adequate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoang Nguyen
- Department of General Surgery, Hanoi Medical University Hospital
| | - Tuan Hiep Luong
- Center of Digestive Surgery, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - An Khang Nguyen
- Department of General Surgery, Hanoi Medical University Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kimura N, Ishido K, Wakiya T, Nagase H, Odagiri T, Wakasa Y, Hakamada K. Revealing the role of early peripancreatic bacterial contamination and Enterococcus faecalis in pancreatic fistula development after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Implications for useful antibiotic prophylaxis-An observational cohort study. Pancreatology 2024; 24:630-642. [PMID: 38508910 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peripancreatic bacterial contamination (PBC) is a critical factor contributing to the development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Controlling pathogenic bacteria is essential in preventing CR-POPF; however, the precise relationship between specific bacteria and CR-POPF remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PBC and CR-POPF after PD, with a focus on identifying potentially causative bacteria. METHODS This prospective observational study enrolled 370 patients who underwent PD. Microbial cultures were routinely collected from peripancreatic drain fluid on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 6. Predictive factors for CR-POPF and the bacteria involved in PBC were investigated. RESULTS CR-POPF occurred in 86 (23.2%) patients. In multivariate analysis, PBC on POD1 (Odds ratio [OR] = 3.59; P = 0.005) was one of the main independent predictive factors for CR-POPF, while prophylactic use of antibiotics other than piperacillin/tazobactam independently influenced PBC on POD1 (OR = 2.95; P = 0.010). Notably, Enterococcus spp., particularly Enterococcus faecalis, were significantly isolated from PBC in patients with CR-POPF compared to those without CR-POPF on PODs 1 and 3 (P < 0.001), and they displayed high resistance to all cephalosporins. CONCLUSIONS Early PBC plays a pivotal role in the development of CR-POPF following PD. Prophylactic antibiotic administration, specifically targeting Enterococcus faecalis, may effectively mitigate early PBC and subsequently reduce the risk of CR-POPF. This research sheds light on the importance of bacterial control strategies in preventing CR-POPF after PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norihisa Kimura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Keinosuke Ishido
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Taiichi Wakiya
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Hayato Nagase
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Tadashi Odagiri
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yusuke Wakasa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hakamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Farrell MS, Alseidi A, Byerly S, Fockens P, Giberson FA, Glaser J, Horvath K, Jones D, Luckhurst C, Mowery N, Robinson BRH, Rodriguez A, Singh VK, Siriwardena AK, Vege SS, Trikudanathan G, Visser BC, Voermans RP, Yeh DD, Gelbard RB. A core outcome set for acute necrotizing pancreatitis: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma modified Delphi method consensus study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024; 96:965-970. [PMID: 38407209 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) has changed dramatically over the past 20 years including the use of less invasive techniques, the timing of interventions, nutritional management, and antimicrobial management. This study sought to create a core outcome set (COS) to help shape future research by establishing a minimal set of essential outcomes that will facilitate future comparisons and pooling of data while minimizing reporting bias. METHODS A modified Delphi process was performed through involvement of ANP content experts. Each expert proposed a list of outcomes for consideration, and the panel anonymously scored the outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. Core outcome consensus defined a priori as >70% of scores receiving 7 to 9 points and <15% of scores receiving 1 to 3 points. Feedback and aggregate data were shared between rounds with interclass correlation trends used to determine the end of the study. RESULTS A total of 19 experts agreed to participate in the study with 16 (84%) participating through study completion. Forty-three outcomes were initially considered with 16 reaching consensuses after four rounds of the modified Delphi process. The final COS included outcomes related to mortality, organ failure, complications, interventions/management, and social factors. CONCLUSION Through an iterative consensus process, content experts agreed on a COS for the management of ANP. This will help shape future research to generate data suitable for pooling and other statistical analyses that may guide clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Farrell
- From the Division of General and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.S.F., J.G.), Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery (A.A.), University of California, San Francisco, California; Division of Trauma/Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (S.B.), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (P.F.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam/Free University; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (P.F., R.P.V.), Research Institute; Cancer Center Amsterdam (P.F., R.P.V.), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery (F.A.G.), Institution Christiana Care Health Services, Newark, Delaware; Department of Surgery (K.H.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; National Pancreas Foundation (D.J.), Chicago, Illinois; Department of Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care (C.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery (N.M.), Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina; Department of Surgery (B.R.H.R.), Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; National Pancreas Foundation (A.R.), Rockland, New York; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine (V.K.S.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit (A.K.S.), Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, England; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.V.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine (G.T.), University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Surgery (B.C.V.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (R.P.V.), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery (D.D.Y.), Denver Health, Denver, Colorado; and Department of Surgery (R.B.G.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Koh YX, Zhao Y, Tan IEH, Tan HL, Chua DW, Loh WL, Tan EK, Teo JY, Au MKH, Goh BKP. Evaluating the economic efficiency of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3035-3051. [PMID: 38777892 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10889-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compared the cost-effectiveness of open (ODP), laparoscopic (LDP), and robotic (RDP) distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS Studies reporting the costs of DP were included in a literature search until August 2023. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted, and surface under cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) values, mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated for outcomes of interest. Cluster analysis was performed to examine the similarity and classification of DP approaches into homogeneous clusters. A decision model-based cost-utility analysis was conducted for the cost-effectiveness analysis of DP strategies. RESULTS Twenty-six studies with 29,164 patients were included in the analysis. Among the three groups, LDP had the lowest overall costs, while ODP had the highest overall costs (LDP vs. ODP: MD - 3521.36, 95% CrI - 6172.91 to - 1228.59). RDP had the highest procedural costs (ODP vs. RDP: MD - 4311.15, 95% CrI - 6005.40 to - 2599.16; LDP vs. RDP: MD - 3772.25, 95% CrI - 4989.50 to - 2535.16), but incurred the lowest hospitalization costs. Both LDP (MD - 3663.82, 95% CrI - 6906.52 to - 747.69) and RDP (MD - 6678.42, 95% CrI - 11,434.30 to - 2972.89) had significantly reduced hospitalization costs compared to ODP. LDP and RDP demonstrated a superior profile regarding costs-morbidity, costs-mortality, costs-efficacy, and costs-utility compared to ODP. Compared to ODP, LDP and RDP cost $3110 and $817 less per patient, resulting in 0.03 and 0.05 additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, with positive incremental net monetary benefit (NMB). RDP costs $2293 more than LDP with a negative incremental NMB but generates 0.02 additional QALYs with improved postoperative morbidity and spleen preservation. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggests that LDP and RDP are more cost-effective options compared to ODP at various willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSION LDP and RDP are more cost-effective than ODP, with LDP exhibiting better cost savings and RDP demonstrating superior surgical outcomes and improved QALYs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Liver Transplant Service, SingHealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Yun Zhao
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Ivan En-Howe Tan
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Hwee Leong Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Weiquan Chua
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, SingHealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei-Liang Loh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ek Khoon Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, SingHealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marianne Kit Har Au
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
- Finance, SingHealth Community Hospitals, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
- Finance, Regional Health System & Strategic Finance, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Brian Kim Poh Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Liver Transplant Service, SingHealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fingerhut A, Uranues S, Dziri C, Ma J, Vernerey D, Kurihara H, Stiegler P. Interaction analysis of subgroup effects in randomized trials: the essential methodological points. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12619. [PMID: 38824173 PMCID: PMC11144206 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62896-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Subgroup analysis aims to identify subgroups (usually defined by baseline/demographic characteristics), who would (or not) benefit from an intervention under specific conditions. Often performed post hoc (not pre-specified in the protocol), subgroup analyses are prone to elevated type I error due to multiple testing, inadequate power, and inappropriate statistical interpretation. Aside from the well-known Bonferroni correction, subgroup treatment interaction tests can provide useful information to support the hypothesis. Using data from a previously published randomized trial where a p value of 0.015 was found for the comparison between standard and Hemopatch® groups in (the subgroup of) 135 patients who had hand-sewn pancreatic stump closure we first sought to determine whether there was interaction between the number and proportion of the dependent event of interest (POPF) among the subgroup population (patients with hand-sewn stump closure and use of Hemopatch®), Next, we calculated the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and the "attributable proportion" (AP). The p value of the interaction was p = 0.034, the RERI was - 0.77 (p = 0.0204) (the probability of POPF was 0.77 because of the interaction), the RERI was 13% (patients are 13% less likely to sustain POPF because of the interaction), and the AP was - 0.616 (61.6% of patients who did not develop POPF did so because of the interaction). Although no causality can be implied, Hemopatch® may potentially decrease the POPF after distal pancreatectomy when the stump is closed hand-sewn. The hypothesis generated by our subgroup analysis requires confirmation by a specific, randomized trial, including only patients undergoing hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump after distal pancreatectomy.Trial registration: INS-621000-0760.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Fingerhut
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
| | - Selman Uranues
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Chadly Dziri
- Medical School of Tunis, Tunis University El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
- Honoris Medical Simulation Center, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Junjun Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Dewi Vernerey
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit, INSERM Unit. 1098, University of Besancon, Besancon, France
| | - Hayato Kurihara
- Emergency Surgery Unit, IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Policlinico Hospital, Via Francesco Sforza, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Philip Stiegler
- Section for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Partelli S, Fermi F, Fusai GK, Tamburrino D, Lykoudis P, Beghdadi N, Dokmak S, Wiese D, Landoni L, Reich F, Busch ORC, Napoli N, Jang JY, Kwon W, Armstrong T, Allen PJ, He J, Javed A, Sauvanet A, Bartsch DK, Salvia R, van Dijkum EJMN, Besselink MG, Boggi U, Kim SW, Wolfgang CL, Falconi M. The Value of Textbook Outcome in Benchmarking Pancreatoduodenectomy for Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4096-4104. [PMID: 38461463 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15114-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite variable that can define the quality of pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate TO after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients who underwent PD for NF-PanNETs (2007-2016) in different centers were included in this retrospective study. TO was defined as the absence of severe postoperative complications and mortality, length of hospital stay ≤ 19 days, R0 resection, and at least 12 lymph nodes harvested. RESULTS Overall, 477 patients were included. The TO rate was 32%. Tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 1.696; p = 0.013], a minimally invasive approach (OR 12.896; p = 0.001), and surgical volume (OR 2.062; p = 0.023) were independent predictors of TO. The annual frequency of PDs increased over time as well as the overall rate of TO. At a median follow-up of 44 months, patients who achieved TO had similar disease-free (p = 0.487) and overall survival (p = 0.433) rates compared with patients who did not achieve TO. TO rate in patients with NF-PanNET > 2 cm was 35% versus 27% in patients with NF-PanNET ≤ 2 cm (p = 0.044). Considering only NF-PanNETs > 2 cm, patients with TO and those without TO had comparable 5-year overall survival rates (p = 0.766) CONCLUSIONS: TO is achieved in one-third of patients after PD for NF-PanNETs and is not associated with a benefit in terms of long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesca Fermi
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe K Fusai
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Domenico Tamburrino
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Panagis Lykoudis
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplant Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nassiba Beghdadi
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Université de Paris-Paris Diderot, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Université de Paris-Paris Diderot, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Dominik Wiese
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Luca Landoni
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Reich
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - O R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Thomas Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jin He
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Pathology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ammar Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Université de Paris-Paris Diderot, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - E J M Nieveen van Dijkum
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sun-Whe Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Christofer L Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery Unit, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ozsay O, Aydin MC, Karabulut K, Basoglu M, Dilek ON. Venous reconstruction thrombosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric/portal vein resection due to pancreatic cancer: an 8 years single institution experience. Acta Chir Belg 2024; 124:200-207. [PMID: 37767719 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2023.2264630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Superior mesenteric/portal vein reconstruction (SMPVR) thrombosis remains a challenging complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy concomitant with venous resection. In this context, we aimed to present our SMPVR experiences and identify potential clinicopathological factors that increased SMPVR thrombosis. METHODS A total of 33 patients who underwent SMPVR during pancreaticoduodenectomy were analyzed. Of these, 26 patients who experienced pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma met our inclusion criteria. Patients' data were compared as classified by SMPVR type and the development of SMPVR thrombosis. All interposition grafts were Dacron in this cohort. RESULTS Types of SMPVR included: tangential resection with primary repair (n = 12); segmental resection with splenic vein preservation and either primary anastomosis (n = 8) or 14 mm tubular Dacron grafting (n = 1); segmental resection with splenic vein division either 14 mm tubular Dacron grafting (n = 2) or 14/7 mm 'Y'-shaped Dacron grafting (n = 3). A total of four patients having 14/7 mm 'Y'-shaped (n = 3) and 14 mm tubular Dacron (n = 1) developed SMPVR thrombosis (p = .001). Dacron grafting (p = .001) and splenic vein division (p = .010) were associated with SMPVR thrombosis. The median time to detection of SMPVR thrombosis was 4.3 months (2.5-21.0 months). The median follow-up time was 12.2 months (3.0-45 months). CONCLUSIONS During pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head ductal carcinoma, extended venous resection requiring SMPVR with 'Y'-shaped and use of Dacron interposition grafts appeared to be associated with the development of SMPVR thrombosis. This result warrants further investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oguzhan Ozsay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Can Aydin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Kagan Karabulut
- Department of General Surgery, Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Basoglu
- Department of General Surgery, Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Osman Nuri Dilek
- Department of General Surgery, Katip Çelebi University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
An B, Yue Q, Wang S, Han W. Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined With Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Reconstruction: Inferior-Posterior "Superior Mesenteric Artery-First" Approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:306-313. [PMID: 38741557 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection and reconstruction is increasingly performed. We aimed to introduce a safe and effective surgical approach and share our clinical experience with LPD with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction. METHODS We reviewed data for the patients undergoing LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction at the First Hospital of Jilin University between April 2021 and May 2023. The inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach was used. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the 2 groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection. RESULTS A cohort of 37 patients with periampullary and pancreatic tumors underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction, consisting of 21 LPDs and 16 OPDs. The LPD group had a longer operation time (322 vs. 235 min, P =0.039), reduced intraoperative bleeding (152 vs. 325 mL, P =0.026), and lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (19.0% vs. 50.0%, P =0.046) compared with the OPD group. The LPD group had significantly shorter operation times in end-to-end anastomosis (26 vs. 15 min, P =0.001) and artificial grafts vascular reconstruction (44 vs. 22 min, P =0.000) compared with the OPD group. There was no significant difference in the rate of R0 resection (100% vs. 87.5%, P =0.096). The length of hospital stay and ICU stay did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (15 vs. 18 d, P =0.636 and 2.5 vs. 4.5 d, P =0.726, respectively). However, the postoperative hospital stay in the LPD group was notably shorter compared with the OPD group (11 vs. 16 d, P =0.007). Postoperative complication rates, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) Grade A/B, biliary leakage, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), were similar between the two groups (38.1% vs. 43.8%, P =0.729). In addition, 1 patient in each group developed thrombosis, with vascular patency improving after anticoagulation treatment. CONCLUSION LPD combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction can be easily and safely performed using the inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach in cases of venous invasion. Further studies are required to evaluate the procedure's long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baiqiang An
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center
| | - Qing Yue
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Shupeng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center
| | - Wei Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, General Surgery Center
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Biesel EA, Kuesters S, Chikhladze S, Ruess DA, Hipp J, Hopt UT, Fichtner-Feigl S, Wittel UA. Surgical complications requiring late surgical revisions after pancreatoduodenectomy increase postoperative morbidity and mortality. Scand J Surg 2024; 113:88-97. [PMID: 37962167 DOI: 10.1177/14574969231206132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomies are complex surgical procedures with considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. Here, we describe complications and outcomes in patients requiring surgical revisions following pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS A total of 1048 patients undergoing a pancreatoduodenectomy at our institution between 2002 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients with surgical revisions were included. Revisions were divided into early and late using a cut-off of 5 days after the first surgery. Statistical significance was examined by using chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS A total of 150 patients with at least 1 surgical revision after pancreatoduodenectomy were included. Notably, 64 patients had a revision during the first 5 days and were classified as early revision. Compared with the 86 patients with late revisions, we found no differences concerning wound infections, delayed gastric emptying, or acute kidney failure. After late revisions, we found significantly more cases of sepsis (31.4% late versus 15.6% early, p = 0.020) and reintubation due to respiratory failure (33.7% versus 18.8%, p = 0.031). Postoperative mortality was significantly higher within the late revision group (23.2% versus 9.4%, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION Arising complications after pancreatoduodenectomy should be addressed as early as possible as patients requiring late surgical revisions frequently developed septic complications and multiorgan failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther A Biesel
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery University Medical Center FreiburgUniversity of FreiburgHugstetter Str. 55 D-79106 Freiburg Germany
| | - Simon Kuesters
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Chikhladze
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dietrich A Ruess
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Julian Hipp
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich T Hopt
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fichtner-Feigl
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Uwe A Wittel
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Madankan A, Jaliliyan A, Khalili P, Eghdami S, Mosavari H, Ahmadi SAY, Izadi A, Hosseininasab A, Eghbali F. Association of preoperative CT-scan features and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:1030-1038. [PMID: 38837835 DOI: 10.1111/ans.19033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a significant complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. CR-POPF is associated with various adverse outcomes, including high mortality rates. Identifying complication predictors for CR-POPF, such as preoperative CT scan features, including pancreatic attenuation index (PAI) and pancreatic duct diameter (PDD), is critical. This systematic review and meta-analysis consolidate existing literature to assess the impact of these variables on CR-POPF risk. METHODS Our comprehensive search, conducted in May 2023, covered PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed cohort studies on pancreaticoduodenectomy, focusing on preoperative CT scan data. Case reports, case series, and studies reporting distal pancreatectomy were excluded. The quality assessment of included articles was done using New-Castle Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5. This study was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (PROSPERO) on 12 May 2023 (registration number: CRD42023414139). RESULTS We conducted a detailed analysis of 38 studies with 7393 participants. The overall incidence of CR-POPF was 24%. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that PDD and pancreatic parenchymal thickness were significantly associated with CR-POPF. CONCLUSION Our systematic review and meta-analysis shed light on CT scan findings for predicting CR-POPF after Whipple surgery. Age, PDD, and pancreatic parenchymal thickness significantly correlate with CR-POPF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Madankan
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Jaliliyan
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pantea Khalili
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shayan Eghdami
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hesam Mosavari
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyyed Amir Yasin Ahmadi
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirreza Izadi
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Hosseininasab
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Foolad Eghbali
- Department of Surgery, Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Rasool-E Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Maehira H, Tani M, Mori H, Ichikawa D, Kawashima M, Tajima H, Nagakawa Y, Makino I, Yagi S. Long-term outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessels preservation or resection: A nationwide survey of the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery. Surgery 2024; 175:1570-1579. [PMID: 38519409 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy is achieved by either splenic vessel resection or splenic vessel preservation. However, the long-term outcomes of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation are not well known. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation. METHODS The study included a total of 335 patients who underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy during the study period and underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging 3 and 5 years after surgery in the Japan Society of Pancreatic Surgery member institutions. We evaluated the diameter of the perigastric and gastric submucosal veins, patency of the splenic vessels, and splenic infarction. Preoperative backgrounds and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS Forty-four (13.1%) and 291 (86.9%) patients underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection and spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation, respectively. There were no significant differences in short-term outcomes between the 2 groups. Regarding long-term outcomes, the prevalence of perigastric varices was higher (P = .006), and platelet count was lower (P = .037) in the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection group. However, other complications, such as gastric submucosal varices, postoperative splenic infarction, gastrointestinal bleeding, reoperation, postoperative splenectomy, and other hematologic parameters, were not significantly different between the 2 groups 5 years after surgery. In terms of the patency of splenic vessels in spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation cases, partial or complete occlusion of the splenic artery and vein was observed 5 years after surgery in 19 (6.5%) and 55 (18.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Perigastric varices and thrombocytopenia were observed more in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel resection, yet late clinical events such as gastrointestinal bleeding and splenic infarction are acceptable for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromitsu Maehira
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan
| | - Masaji Tani
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan.
| | - Haruki Mori
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ichikawa
- First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Mampei Kawashima
- Department of GI and HBP Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tajima
- Department of General-Pediatric-Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Isamu Makino
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation/Pediatric Surgery, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Shintaro Yagi
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation/Pediatric Surgery, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Geng AL, Thota B, Yellanki S, Chen H, Maguire R, Lavu H, Bowne W, Yeo CJ, Nevler A. Impact of antecolic vs transmesocolic reconstruction on delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:824-829. [PMID: 38538477 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. There remains an active debate over the effect of gastrointestinal (GI) reconstruction techniques, such as antecolic (AC) or transmesocolic (TMC) reconstruction, on DGE rates. This study compared the rates of DGE between AC reconstruction and TMC reconstruction after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and classic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained pancreatic surgery database in a single, high-volume center. Demographic, perioperative, and surgical outcome data were recorded from patients who underwent a PD or PPPD between 2013 and 2021. DGE grades were classified using the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgeons (ISGPS) criteria. Postoperatively, all patients were managed using an accelerated Whipple recovery protocol. RESULTS A total of 824 patients were assessed, with 303 patients undergoing AC reconstruction and 521 patients undergoing TMC reconstruction. The risk of DGE was significantly greater in patients who received an AC reconstruction than in patients who received a TMC reconstruction (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.07-2.15; P < .05). In addition, AC reconstruction was shown to have a greater incidence of severe DGE (ISGPS grades B or C) than TMC reconstruction, with approximately a 2-fold increase in severe DGE (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.10-3.45; P < .05). Logistic regression and propensity score matching have found increased DGE incidence with AC reconstruction (OR: 1.69 and 1.73, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Although the correlation between GI reconstruction methods and DGE remains a subject of ongoing debate, our study indicated that TMC reconstruction may be superior to AC reconstruction in minimizing the development and severity of DGE for patients after PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber L Geng
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bhavana Thota
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sreekanth Yellanki
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Ryan Maguire
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Harish Lavu
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Wilbur Bowne
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Charles J Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Avinoam Nevler
- Department of Surgery, Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Joshi K, Espino DM, Shepherd DE, Mahmoodi N, Roberts KJ, Chatzizacharias N, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP. Pancreatic anastomosis training models: Current status and future directions. Pancreatology 2024; 24:624-629. [PMID: 38580492 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and previous research has focused on patient-related risk factors and comparisons between anastomotic techniques. However, it is recognized that surgeon experience is an important factor in POPF outcomes, and that there is a significant learning curve for the pancreatic anastomosis. The aim of this study was to review the current literature on training models for the pancreatic anastomosis, and to explore areas for future research. It is concluded that research is needed to understand the mechanical properties of the human pancreas in an effort to develop a synthetic model that closely mimics its mechanical properties. Virtual reality (VR) is an attractive alternative to synthetic models for surgical training, and further work is needed to develop a VR pancreatic anastomosis training module that provides both high fidelity and haptic feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal Joshi
- Department of HPB surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniel M Espino
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Nasim Mahmoodi
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of HPB surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Nikolaos Chatzizacharias
- Department of HPB surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ricci C, Pecorelli N, Esposito A, Capretti G, Partelli S, Butturini G, Boggi U, Cucchetti A, Zerbi A, Salvia R, Falconi M. Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an Italian survey. Updates Surg 2024; 76:923-932. [PMID: 38662308 PMCID: PMC11130052 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01836-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain (IPD) use in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still controversial. A survey was designed to investigate surgeons' use of IPD in PD patients through 23 questions and one clinical vignette. For the clinical scenario, respondents were asked to report their regret of omission and commission regarding the use of IPD elicited on a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were applied. One hundred three (97.2%) respondents confirmed using at least two IPDs. The median regret due to the omission of IPD was 84 (67-100, IQR). The median regret due to the commission of IPD was 10 (3.5-20, IQR). The CR-POPF probability threshold at which drainage omission was the less regrettable choice was 3% (1-50, IQR). The threshold was lower for those surgeons who performed minimally invasive PD (P = 0.048), adopted late removal (P = 0.002), perceived FRS able to predict the risk (P = 0.006), and IPD able to avoid relaparotomy P = 0.036). Drain management policies after PD remain heterogeneous among surgeons. The regret model suggested that IPD omission could be performed in low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Ricci
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy.
| | - Nicolò Pecorelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, The Pancreas Institute-University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Surgical Department, HPB Unit Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera Del Garda, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Morgagni e Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Department, The Pancreas Institute-University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- "Vita-Salute" San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Surgical Taskforce of Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Labib PL, Russell TB, Denson JL, Puckett MA, Ausania F, Pando E, Roberts KJ, Kausar A, Mavroeidis VK, Bhogal RH, Marangoni G, Thomasset SC, Frampton AE, Spalding DR, Lykoudis P, Bellotti R, Alhaboob N, Srinivasan P, Bari H, Smith A, Dominguez-Rosado I, Croagh D, Thakkar RG, Gomez D, Silva MA, Lapolla P, Mingoli A, Davidson BR, Porcu A, Shah NS, Hamady ZZ, Al-Sarireh BA, Serrablo A, Aroori S. Patterns, timing and predictors of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: An international multicentre retrospective cohort study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108353. [PMID: 38701690 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) often develop cancer recurrence. Establishing timing, patterns and risk factors for recurrence may help inform surveillance protocol strategies or select patients who could benefit from additional systemic or locoregional therapies. This multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to determine timing, patterns, and predictive factors of recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for dCCA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for dCCA between June 2012 and May 2015 with five years of follow-up were included. The primary outcome was recurrence pattern (none, local-only, distant-only or mixed local/distant). Data were collected on comorbidities, investigations, operation details, complications, histology, adjuvant and palliative therapies, recurrence-free and overall survival. Univariable tests and regression analyses investigated factors associated with recurrence. RESULTS In the cohort of 198 patients, 129 (65%) developed recurrence: 30 (15%) developed local-only recurrence, 44 (22%) developed distant-only recurrence and 55 (28%) developed mixed pattern recurrence. The most common recurrence sites were local (49%), liver (24%) and lung (11%). 94% of patients who developed recurrence did so within three years of surgery. Predictors of recurrence on univariable analysis were cancer stage, R1 resection, lymph node metastases, perineural invasion, microvascular invasion and lymphatic invasion. Predictors of recurrence on multivariable analysis were female sex, venous resection, advancing histological stage and lymphatic invasion. CONCLUSION Two thirds of patients have cancer recurrence following pancreaticoduodenectomy for dCCA, and most recur within three years of surgery. The commonest sites of recurrence are the pancreatic bed, liver and lung. Multiple histological features are associated with recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Lz Labib
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas B Russell
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Jemimah L Denson
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Mark A Puckett
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Keith J Roberts
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ambareen Kausar
- East Lancashire Hospital NHS Trust, Blackburn, United Kingdom
| | - Vasileios K Mavroeidis
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ricky H Bhogal
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gabriele Marangoni
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | - Adam E Frampton
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pavlos Lykoudis
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Parthi Srinivasan
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hassaan Bari
- Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Andrew Smith
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Rohan G Thakkar
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A Silva
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrea Mingoli
- Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Porcu
- Cliniche San Pietro, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Nehal S Shah
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Zaed Z Hamady
- University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Somaiah Aroori
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom; University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kjeseth T, Yaqub S, Edwin B, Kleive D, Sahakyan MA. Peri-firing compression in prevention of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review and a cohort study. Scand J Surg 2024; 113:73-79. [PMID: 37982224 DOI: 10.1177/14574969231211084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) occurs in 20%-40% of patients and remains a leading cause of morbidity and increased healthcare cost in this patient group. Recently, several studies suggested decreased risk of CR-POPF with the use of peri-firing compression (PFC) technique. The aim of this report was to conduct a systematic review to get an overview of the current knowledge on the use of PFC in DP. In addition, our experience with PFC was presented. METHODS The systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Also, 19 patients undergoing DP with the use of PFC at Oslo University Hospital were studied. The primary endpoint was incidence of CR-POPF. RESULTS Seven articles reporting a total of 771 patients were ultimately included in the systematic review. Only two of these were case-control studies examining outcomes in patients with and without PFC, while the rest were case series. These were heterogeneous in terms of staplers used, cartridge selection policy, and PFC technique. Both case-control studies reported significantly reduced CR- POPF incidence with PFC. Eight (21%) of our patients developed CR-POPF after DP with PFC. Only one patient developed CR-POPF among those with pancreatic transection site thickness ⩽1.5 cm. CONCLUSION Evidence on potential benefits of PFC in DP is limited in quantity and quality. Our findings suggest that the use of PFC does not lead to reduction in the incidence of CR-POPF. Yet, there might be a benefit from PFC when dealing with a thin pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trond Kjeseth
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet Sognsvannsveien 20 0372 Oslo Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mushegh A Sahakyan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yamada S, Hashimoto D, Yamamoto T, Yamaki S, Oshima K, Murotani K, Sekimoto M, Nakao A, Satoi S. Reconsideration of the clinical impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A dual-institution collaborative clinical study. Pancreatology 2024; 24:592-599. [PMID: 38548551 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated true indication of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in resectable pancreatic cancer and the optimal surgical timing in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS A total of 687 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Survival analysis was performed by intention-to-treat analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. RESULTS In resectable disease, the NAT group showed better overall survival (OS) compared with the upfront group. Multivariate analysis identified CA19-9 level (≥100 U/mL) and lymph node metastasis to be prognostic factors, and a tumor size of 25 mm was the optimal cut-off value to predict lymph node metastasis. There was no significant survival difference between patients with a tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL and those in the NAT group. In borderline resectable disease, OS in the NAT group was significantly better than that in the upfront group. CEA (≥5 ng/mL) and CA19-9 (≥100 U/mL) were identified as prognostic factors; however, the OS of patients fulfilling these factors was worse than that of the NAT group. CONCLUSIONS NAT could be unnecessary in patients with tumor size ≤25 mm and CA19-9 < 100 U/mL in resectable disease. In borderline resectable disease, surgery should be delayed until tumor marker levels are well controlled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Japan
| | | | | | - So Yamaki
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Japan
| | - Kenji Oshima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Kenta Murotani
- Biostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Japan
| | - Mitsugu Sekimoto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Akimasa Nakao
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Japan; Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Surendran AK, Reddy VN, Vijayakumar C. Multidimensional Nomogram: An Innovative Approach to Predict Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4136-4137. [PMID: 38430427 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15128-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Adwaith Krishna Surendran
- Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
| | - Vineet N Reddy
- Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
| | - Chellappa Vijayakumar
- Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Belfiori G, Crippa S, Pagnanelli M, Gasparini G, Aleotti F, Camisa PR, Partelli S, Pecorelli N, De Stefano F, Schiavo Lena M, Palumbo D, Tamburrino D, Reni M, Falconi M. Very Early Recurrence After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Proof of Concept for a "Biological R2 Definition". Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4084-4095. [PMID: 38459416 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15105-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Very early recurrence after radical surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been poorly investigated. This study was designed to evaluate this group of patients who developed recurrence, within 12 weeks after surgery, defined as "biological R2 resections (bR2)." METHODS Data from patients who underwent surgical resection as upfront procedure or after neoadjuvant treatment for PDAC between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Disease-free, disease-specific survival, and independent predictors of early recurrence were examined. The same analysis was performed separately for upfront and neoadjuvant treated patients. RESULTS Of the 573 patients included in the study, 63 (11%) were classified as bR2. The rate of neoadjuvant treatment was similar in bR2 and in the remaining patients (44 vs. 42%, p = 0.78). After a median follow-up of 27 months, median DFS and DSS for the entire cohort were 17 and 43 months, respectively. Median DSS of bR2 group was 13 months. The only preoperative identifiable independent predictor of very early recurrence was body-tail site lesion, whereas all other were pathological: higher pT (8th classification), G3 differentiation, and high lymph node ratio. These predictors were confirmed for patients undergoing upfront surgery, whereas in the neoadjuvant group the only independent predictor was pT. CONCLUSIONS One of ten patients with "radical" resected PDAC relapses very early after surgery (bR2); hence, imaging must be routinely repeated within 12 weeks. Despite higher biological aggressiveness and worse pathology, this bR2 cluster eludes our preoperative examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Belfiori
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giulia Gasparini
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Aleotti
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Partelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolò Pecorelli
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico De Stefano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Schiavo Lena
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Palumbo
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Tamburrino
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cannas S, Casciani F, Vollmer CM. Extending Quality Improvement for Pancreatoduodenectomy Within the High-Volume Setting: The Experience Factor. Ann Surg 2024; 279:1036-1045. [PMID: 37522844 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the association of a surgeon's experience with postoperative outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomies (PDs) when stratified by Fistula Risk Score (FRS). BACKGROUND Centralization is now well-established for pancreatic surgery. Nevertheless, the benefits of individual surgeon's experience in high-volume settings remain undefined. METHODS Pancreatoduodenectomies performed by 82 surgeons across 18 international specialty institutions (median: 140 PD/year) were analyzed. Surgeon cumulative PD volume was linked with postoperative outcomes through multivariable models, adjusted for patient/operative characteristics and the FRS. Then, surgeon experience was also stratified by the 10, previously defined, most clinically impactful scenarios for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) development. RESULTS Of 8189 PDs, 18.7% suffered severe complications (Accordion≥3), 4.8% were reoperated upon and 2.2% expired. Although the most experienced surgeons (top-quartile; >525 career PDs) more often operated on riskier cases, their experience was significantly associated with declines in CR-POPF ( P <0.001), severe complications ( P =0.008), reoperations ( P <0.001), and length of stay (LOS) ( P <0.001)-accentuated even more in the most impactful FRS scenarios (2830 patients). Risk-adjusted models indicate male sex, increasing age, ASA class, and FRS, but not surgeon experience, as being associated with severe complications, failure-to-rescue, and mortality. Instead, upper-echelon experience demonstrates significant reductions in CR-POPF (OR 0.66), reoperations (OR 0.64), and LOS (OR 0.65) in moderate-to-high fistula risk circumstances (FRS≥3, 68% of cases). CONCLUSIONS At specialty institutions, major morbidity, mortality, and failure-to-rescue are primarily associated with baseline patient characteristics, while cumulative surgical experience impacts pancreatic fistula occurrence and its attendant effects for most higher-risk pancreatoduodenectomies. These data also suggest an extended proficiency curve exists for this operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Cannas
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Fabio Casciani
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wismans LV, Suurmeijer JA, van Dongen JC, Bonsing BA, Van Santvoort HC, Wilmink JW, van Tienhoven G, de Hingh IH, Lips DJ, van der Harst E, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Bosscha K, Stommel MW, Festen S, den Dulk M, Nuyttens JJ, Intven MPW, de Vos-Geelen J, Molenaar IQ, Busch OR, Koerkamp BG, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy but not chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nationwide analysis. Surgery 2024; 175:1580-1586. [PMID: 38448277 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains the leading cause of significant morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has been described to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, but randomized trials on neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma focus increasingly on preoperative chemotherapy rather than preoperative chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy on postoperative pancreatic fistula and other pancreatic-specific surgery related complications on a nationwide level. METHODS All patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included in the mandatory nationwide prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2020). Baseline and treatment characteristics were compared between immediate surgery, preoperative chemotherapy, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The relationship between preoperative chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C) was investigated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 2,019 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included, of whom 1,678 underwent immediate surgery (83.1%), 192 (9.5%) received preoperative chemotherapy, and 149 (7.4%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 8.3% of patients after immediate surgery, 4.2% after preoperative chemotherapy, and 2.0% after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (P = .004). In multivariable analysis, the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.69; P = .033) compared with immediate surgery, whereas preoperative chemotherapy was not (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.25; P = .199). Intraoperatively hard, or fibrotic pancreatic texture was most frequently observed after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (53% immediate surgery, 62% preoperative chemotherapy, 77% preoperative chemoradiotherapy, P < .001). CONCLUSION This nationwide analysis demonstrated that in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, only preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but not preoperative chemotherapy, was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonoor V Wismans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle C van Dongen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C Van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/MarcBesselink
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Anand U, Kodali R, Parasar K, Singh BN, Kant K, Yadav S, Anwar S, Arora A. Comparison of short-term outcomes of open and laparoscopic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:220-228. [PMID: 38384237 PMCID: PMC11128788 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the key worry in the ongoing debate about the safety and effectiveness of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD). Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD), a hybrid approach combining laparoscopic resection and anastomosis with a small incision, is an alternative to TLPD. This study compares the short-term outcomes and oncological efficacy of LAPD vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). Methods A retrospective analysis of data of all patients who underwent LAPD or OPD for periampullary carcinoma at a tertiary care center in Northeast India from July 2019 to August 2023 was done. A total of 30 LAPDs and 30 OPDs were compared after 1:1 propensity score matching. Demographic data, intraoperative and postoperative data (30 days), and pathological data were compared. Results The study included a total of 93 patients, 30 underwent LAPD and 62 underwent OPD. After propensity score matching, the matched cohort included 30 patients in both groups. The LAPD presented several advantages over the OPD group, including a shorter incision length, reduced postoperative pain, earlier initiation of oral feeding, and shorter hospital stays. LAPD was not found to be inferior to OPD in terms of pancreatic fistula incidence (Grade B, 30.0% vs. 33.3%), achieving R0 resection (100% vs. 93.3%), and the number of lymph nodes harvested (12 vs. 14, p = 0.620). No significant differences in blood loss, short-term complications, pathological outcomes, readmissions, and early (30-day) mortality were observed between the two groups. Conclusions LAPD has comparable safety, technical feasibility, and short-term oncological efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utpal Anand
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Rohith Kodali
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Kunal Parasar
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Basant Narayan Singh
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Kislay Kant
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Sitaram Yadav
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Saad Anwar
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| | - Abhishek Arora
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Xia N, Li J, Wang Q, Huang X, Wang Z, Wang L, Tian B, Xiong J. Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive central pancreatectomy versus open central pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-10900-0. [PMID: 38816619 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10900-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central pancreatectomy is a surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant tumors which located in the neck and proximal body of the pancreas that facilitates the preservation of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions but has a high morbidity rate, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness between minimally invasive central pancreatectomy (MICP) and open central pancreatectomy (OCP) basing on perioperative outcomes. METHODS An extensive literature search to compare MICP and OCP was conducted from October 2003 to October 2023 on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Fixed-effect models or random effects were selected based on heterogeneity, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS A total of 10 studies with a total of 510 patients were included. There was no significant difference in POPF between MICP and OCP (OR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.64, 1.43]; P = 0.82), whereas intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 125.13; 95% CI [- 194.77, -55.49]; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (MD = - 2.86; 95% CI [- 5.00, - 0.72]; P = 0.009) were in favor of MICP compared to OCP, and there was a strong trend toward a lower intraoperative transfusion rate in MICP than in OCP (MD = 0.34; 95% CI [0.11, 1.00]; P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in other outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION MICP was as safe and effective as OCP and had less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter length of hospital stay. However, further studies are needed to confirm the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Xia
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiao Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
- Disaster Medical Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiang Wang
- The People's Hospital of Jian Yang City, Jian yang, China
| | - Xing Huang
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Zihe Wang
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Li Wang
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Bole Tian
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Junjie Xiong
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang H, Shen B, Jia P, Li H, Bai X, Li Y, Xu K, Hu P, Ding L, Xu N, Xia X, Fang Y, Chen H, Zhang Y, Yue S. Guiding post-pancreaticoduodenectomy interventions for pancreatic cancer patients utilizing decision tree models. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1399297. [PMID: 38873261 PMCID: PMC11169653 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1399297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently diagnosed in advanced stages, necessitating pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) as a primary therapeutic approach. However, PD surgery can engender intricate complications. Thus, understanding the factors influencing postoperative complications documented in electronic medical records and their impact on survival rates is crucial for improving overall patient outcomes. Methods A total of 749 patients were divided into two groups: 598 (79.84%) chose the RPD (Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy) procedure and 151 (20.16%) chose the LPD (Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy) procedure. We used correlation analysis, survival analysis, and decision tree models to find the similarities and differences about postoperative complications and prognostic survival. Results Pancreatic cancer, known for its aggressiveness, often requires pancreaticoduodenectomy as an effective treatment. In predictive models, both BMI and surgery duration weigh heavily. Lower BMI correlates with longer survival, while patients with heart disease and diabetes have lower survival rates. Complications like delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic fistula, and infection are closely linked post-surgery, prompting conjectures about their causal mechanisms. Interestingly, we found no significant correlation between nasogastric tube removal timing and delayed gastric emptying, suggesting its prompt removal post-decompression. Conclusion This study aimed to explore predictive factors for postoperative complications and survival in PD patients. Effective predictive models enable early identification of high-risk individuals, allowing timely interventions. Higher BMI, heart disease, or diabetes significantly reduce survival rates in pancreatic cancer patients post-PD. Additionally, there's no significant correlation between DGE incidence and postoperative extubation time, necessitating further investigation into its interaction with pancreatic fistula and infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haixin Wang
- Department of Cadre Medical, The First Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Shen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Eighth Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peiheng Jia
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Li
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Xuemei Bai
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Yaru Li
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Kang Xu
- School of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Pengzhen Hu
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, China
- Northwestern Polytechnical University School of Life Sciences, Xi'an, China
| | - Li Ding
- Department of Cadre Medical, The First Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Na Xu
- Department of Cadre Medical, The First Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Xia
- Department of Cadre Medical, The First Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Fang
- College of Mathematics and Systems Science, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
| | - Hebing Chen
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Cadre Medical, The First Medical Centre, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shutong Yue
- College of Mathematics and Systems Science, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Galouzis N, Khawam M, Alexander EV, Khreiss MR, Luu C, Mesropyan L, Riall TS, Kwass WK, Dull RO. Pilot Study to Optimize Goal-directed Hemodynamic Management During Pancreatectomy. J Surg Res 2024; 300:173-182. [PMID: 38815516 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) is a cornerstone of enhanced recovery protocols. We hypothesized that use of an advanced noninvasive intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring system to guide GDHT may decrease intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and improve perfusion during pancreatic resection. METHODS The monitor uses machine learning to produce the Hypotension Prediction Index to predict hypotensive episodes. A clinical decision-making algorithm uses the Hypotension Prediction Index and hemodynamic data to guide intraoperative fluid versus pressor management. Pre-implementation (PRE), patients were placed on the monitor and managed per usual. Post-implementation (POST), anesthesia teams were educated on the algorithm and asked to use the GDHT guidelines. Hemodynamic data points were collected every 20 s (8942 PRE and 26,638 POST measurements). We compared IOH (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), cardiac index >2, and stroke volume variation <12 between the two groups. RESULTS 10 patients were in the PRE and 24 in the POST groups. In the POST group, there were fewer minimally invasive resections (4.2% versus 30.0%, P = 0.07), more pancreaticoduodenectomies (75.0% versus 20.0%, P < 0.01), and longer operative times (329.0 + 108.2 min versus 225.1 + 92.8 min, P = 0.01). After implementation, hemodynamic parameters improved. There was a 33.3% reduction in IOH (5.2% ± 0.1% versus 7.8% ± 0.3%, P < 0.01, a 31.6% increase in cardiac index >2.0 (83.7% + 0.2% versus 63.6% + 0.5%, P < 0.01), and a 37.6% increase in stroke volume variation <12 (73.2% + 0.3% versus 53.2% + 0.5%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Advanced intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring to predict IOH combined with a clinical decision-making tree for GDHT may improve intraoperative hemodynamic parameters during pancreatectomy. This warrants further investigation in larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Khawam
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | | | - Carrie Luu
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Taylor S Riall
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
| | - William K Kwass
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Randal O Dull
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ausania F, Gonzalez-Abós C, Landi F, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Walsh M, Hossain SM, White S, Prabakaran V, Melstrom LG, Fong Y, Butturini G, Bignotto L, Valle V, Bing Y, Xiu D, Di Franco G, Sanchez-Bueno F, de'Angelis N, Laurent A, Giuliani G, Pernazza G, Esposito A, Salvia R, Bazzocchi F, Esposito L, Pietrabissa A, Pugliese L, Memeo R, Uyama I, Uchida Y, Ríos J, Coratti A, Morelli L, Giulianotti PC. Conversion to open surgery in obese patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: results from a multicenter analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)01742-8. [PMID: 38853075 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is considered a standard approach it still presents a non-negligible rate of conversion to open that is mainly related to some difficulty factors, as obesity. The aim of this study is to analyze the preoperative factors associated with conversion in obese patients with MIDP. METHODS In this multicenter study, all obese patients who underwent MIDP at 18 international expert centers were included. The preoperative factors associated with conversion to open surgery were analyzed. RESULTS Out of 436 patients, 91 (20.9%) underwent conversion to open, presenting higher blood loss, longer operative time and similar rate of major complications. Twenty (22%) patients received emergent conversion. At univariate analysis, the type of approach, radiological invasion of adjacent organs, preoperative enlarged lymphnodes and ASA ≥ III were significantly associated with conversion to open. At multivariate analysis, robotic approach showed a significantly lower conversion rate (14.6 % vs 27.3%, OR = 2.380, p = 0.001). ASA ≥ III (OR = 2.391, p = 0.002) and preoperative enlarged lymphnodes (OR = 3.836, p = 0.003) were also independently associated with conversion. CONCLUSION Conversion rate is significantly lower in patients undergoing robotic approach. Radiological enlarged lymphnodes and ASA ≥ III are also associated with conversion to open. Conversion is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes, especially in case of intraoperative hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Ausania
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain; Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolina Gonzalez-Abós
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain; Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Filippo Landi
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain; Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - John B Martinie
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Matthew Walsh
- HPB Surgery Department, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shanaz M Hossain
- HPB Surgery Department, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disease Team, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disease Team, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Department of HBP Surgery, P. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Laura Bignotto
- Department of HBP Surgery, P. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Valentina Valle
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yuntao Bing
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dianrong Xiu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- Division of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, General Surgery Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive, HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - Giuseppe Giuliani
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Graziano Pernazza
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Salvia
- HBP Surgery Department, Policlinico G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Bazzocchi
- Department of HBP Surgery, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Soferenza Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | - Ludovica Esposito
- Department of HBP Surgery, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Soferenza Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Pugliese
- Department of HBP Surgery, Policlinico S. Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Surgery, Acquaviva delle Fonti Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Uchida
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - José Ríos
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Clinic and Medical Statistics Core Facility, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- Division of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, General Surgery Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pier C Giulianotti
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Coinsin B, Durin T, Marchese U, Sauvanet A, Dokmak S, Cherkaoui Z, Fuks D, Laurent C, Magallon C, Turrini O, Sulpice L, Robin F, Bachellier P, Addeo P, Birnbaum DJ, Roussel E, Schwarz L, Regimbeau JM, Piessen G, Liddo G, Girard E, Cailliau É, Truant S, El Amrani M. The impact of cirrhosis on short and long postoperative outcomes after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00203-4. [PMID: 38811323 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of cirrhosis on the postoperative outcomes of distal pancreatectomy is yet to be reported. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of distal pancreatectomy in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study patients with cirrhosis who underwent planned distal pancreatectomy between 2008 and 2020 in French high volume centers. Patients with cirrhosis were matched 1:4 for demographic, surgical, and histologic criteria with patients without cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III). The secondary endpoints were postoperative complications, specifically related to cirrhosis and pancreatic surgery, and survival for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS Overall, 32 patients with cirrhosis were matched with 128 patients without cirrhosis. Most patients (93.5%) had Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. The severe morbidity rate after distal pancreatectomy was higher in patients with cirrhosis than in those without cirrhosis (28.13% vs 25.75%, P = .11. The operative time was significantly longer in the cirrhotic group compared with controls (P = .01). However, patients with and without cirrhosis had comparable blood loss and conversion rates. Postoperatively, the two groups had similar rates of pancreatic fistula, hemorrhage, reoperation, postoperative mortality, and survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years. CONCLUSION The current study suggests that distal pancreatectomy in high-volume centers is feasible for patients with compensated cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Coinsin
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University Hospital, France
| | - Thibault Durin
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University Hospital, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cochin Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- AP-HP, Department of HBP Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- AP-HP, Department of HBP Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Zineb Cherkaoui
- AP-HP, Department of HBP Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cochin Teaching Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, France
| | | | - Cloe Magallon
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille University, department of Oncological Surgery, France
| | - Olivier Turrini
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille University, department of Oncological Surgery, France
| | - Laurent Sulpice
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital, Rennes 1 University, France
| | - Fabien Robin
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital, Rennes 1 University, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France
| | - Piettro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France
| | - David Jérémie Birnbaum
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, France
| | - Edouard Roussel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital and Université de Rouen Normandie, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital and Université de Rouen Normandie, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardie, 1 rue du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Guido Liddo
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Valenciennes Hospital, France
| | - Edouard Girard
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, France
| | | | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University Hospital, France
| | - Mehdi El Amrani
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University Hospital, France.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Khalid A, Amini N, Pasha SA, Demyan L, Newman E, King DA, DePeralta D, Gholami S, Deutsch GB, Melis M, Weiss MJ. Impact of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula on Outcomes in Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Analysis of ACS-NSQIP Data. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00483-9. [PMID: 38821210 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major surgical procedure associated with significant risks, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Studies have highlighted the importance of certain risk factors for POPF, which are vital for surgical decision-making and the management of high-risk PD patients. We aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing PD who met the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery - class D (ISGPS-D) criteria. METHODS This study analyzed ACS-NSQIP data (2014-2021) for patients undergoing ISGPS-D PD, classified as having a soft pancreatic texture and a pancreatic duct ≤3mm. We focused on mortality rates and the correlation between several factors and POPF (ISGPS grade B/C). RESULTS From 5,964 PD patients who met ISGPS-D criteria, the 30-day mortality rate was 1.98%. Males had a higher incidence of POPF (57.42% vs. 47.35%, p<0.001). Patients with POPF experienced significantly higher rates of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa), including thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, delayed gastric emptying, wound disruption, infections, and acute renal failure. There was a marked increase in the 30-day readmission and mortality rates in patients with POPF (30.0% vs. 17.6% and 3.2% vs. 1.4%, respectively; all p<0.001). Multivariate analysis highlighted female sex as a protective factor against mortality (OR 0.47, p<0.001) and extended hospital stay (>10 days) as a predictor of increased mortality risk (OR 2.37, p<0.001). CONCLUSION This study underscores the significant association between POPF and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Future efforts should concentrate on refining surgical techniques and improving preoperative assessments to mitigate the risks associated with POPF in patients with PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Khalid
- Northwell Health, North Shore/Long Island Jewish General Surgery, 300 Community Dr. Manhasset, NY 11030.
| | - Neda Amini
- Northwell Health, North Shore/Long Island Jewish General Surgery, 300 Community Dr. Manhasset, NY 11030
| | - Shamsher A Pasha
- UT Health San Antonio, Department of Surgery, San Antonio, TX 78229
| | - Lyudmyla Demyan
- Northwell Health, North Shore/Long Island Jewish General Surgery, 300 Community Dr. Manhasset, NY 11030
| | - Elliot Newman
- Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 E 77th St New York NY 10075
| | - Daniel A King
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, 1111 Marcus Ave, New Hyde Park, NY 11042
| | - Danielle DePeralta
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, 1111 Marcus Ave, New Hyde Park, NY 11042
| | - Sepideh Gholami
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, 1111 Marcus Ave, New Hyde Park, NY 11042
| | - Gary B Deutsch
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, 1111 Marcus Ave, New Hyde Park, NY 11042
| | | | - Matthew J Weiss
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, 1111 Marcus Ave, New Hyde Park, NY 11042
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ramírez-Giraldo C, Conde Monroy D, Arbelaez-Osuna K, Isaza-Restrepo A, Sabogal Olarte JC, Upegui D, Rojas-López S. Evaluation of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction scales following pancreatoduodenectomies based on magnetic resonance imaging: A diagnostic test study. Pancreatology 2024:S1424-3903(24)00635-5. [PMID: 38824072 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.05.526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most feared and common complications following pancreatoduodenectomies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of different scales in predicting POPF using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including estimation of the pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture, main duct index, relation to the portal vein, and intra-abdominal fat thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective diagnostic test study was designed. Between January 2017 and December 2021, 133 pancreatoduodenectomies were performed at our institution. The performance for predicting overall POPF and clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS A total of 96 patients were included in the study, of whom 26 patients experienced overall POPF, and 8 patients had CR-POPF. When analyzing the predictive value of each of the different scores applied, the Birmingham score showed the highest performance for predicting overall POPF and CR-POPF with an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.815 (95 % CI 0.725-0.906) and 0.813 (0.679-0.947), respectively. CONCLUSION The Birmingham scale demonstrated the highest predictive performance for POPF. It is a simple scale with only two variables that can be obtained preoperatively using MRI. Based on these results, we recommend its use in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo
- Hospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Grupo de Investigación Clínica, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | | | | | - Andrés Isaza-Restrepo
- Hospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia; Grupo de Investigación Clínica, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Daniel Upegui
- Hospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Susana Rojas-López
- Hospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Carp B, Weinberg L, Fletcher LR, Hinton JV, Cohen A, Slifirski H, Le P, Woodford S, Tosif S, Liu D, Muralidharan V, Perini MV, Nikfarjam M, Lee DK. The effect of an intraoperative patient-specific, surgery-specific haemodynamic algorithm in improving textbook outcomes for hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery: a multicentre retrospective study. Front Surg 2024; 11:1353143. [PMID: 38859998 PMCID: PMC11163073 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1353143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The concept of a "textbook outcome" is emerging as a metric for ideal surgical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an advanced haemodynamic monitoring (AHDM) algorithm on achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. Methods This retrospective, multicentre observational study was conducted across private and public teaching sectors in Victoria, Australia. We studied patients managed by a patient-specific, surgery-specific haemodynamic algorithm or via usual care. The primary outcome was the effect of using a patient-specific, surgery-specific AHDM algorithm for achieving a textbook outcome, with adjustment using propensity score matching. The textbook outcome criteria were defined according to the International Expert Delphi Consensus on Defining Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery and Nationwide Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Pancreatic Surgery. Results Of the 780 weighted cases, 477 (61.2%, 95% CI: 57.7%-64.6%) achieved the textbook outcome. Patients in the AHDM group had a higher rate of textbook outcomes [n = 259 (67.8%)] than those in the Usual care group [n = 218 (54.8%); p < 0.001, estimated odds ratio (95% CI) 1.74 (1.30-2.33)]. The AHDM group had a lower rate of surgery-specific complications, severe complications, and a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) [OR 2.34 (95% CI: 1.30-4.21), 1.79 (95% CI: 1.12-2.85), and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.35-2.46), respectively]. There was no significant difference between the groups for hospital readmission and mortality. Conclusions AHDM use was associated with improved outcomes, supporting its integration in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. Prospective trials are warranted to further evaluate the impact of this AHDM algorithm on achieving a textbook impact on long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradly Carp
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Laurence Weinberg
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Luke R. Fletcher
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Data Analytical Research Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jake V. Hinton
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam Cohen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hugh Slifirski
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Le
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Woodford
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shervin Tosif
- Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Liu
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Marcos V. Perini
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mehrdad Nikfarjam
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dong-Kyu Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jena SS, Mehta NN, Yadav A, Nundy S. Peri-operative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy comparing an isolated Roux loop or single loop for reconstruction: An ambispective observational study. Pancreatology 2024:S1424-3903(24)00636-7. [PMID: 38811279 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.05.527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A post-operative pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. We compared two methods of reconstruction of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, an isolated loop with a single loop, to assess their effects on the incidence and severity of fistula. METHODS The data was collected in an ambispective manner. The drain fluid was sent for amylase measurement on post-operative day 3 and a fistula was defined and classified according to the 2016 modification of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery definition. The patients were divided into the isolated (Group I) and single (Group II) loop groups and compared for the incidence and severity of clinically relevant fistula along with other parameters. RESULTS A total of 349 (Group I: 201, Group II: 148) patients were included in the study. The incidence of clinically relevant fistula was comparable (p = 0.206). Grade C fistula was found to be lower in the group I (7 % vs 11.6 %, p = 0.137), in patients with a soft pancreas (8.5 % vs 18.3 %, p = 0.049) and pancreatic duct diameter less than 5 mm (9.8 % vs 17.2 %, p = 0.036). The operative time was lower in Group I than in Group II (438 min vs 478, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION We found that the incidence of clinically relevant fistula was similar in both the groups but the isolated reconstruction method reduced the incidence of severe fistula. In patients with a smaller pancreatic duct, soft pancreas echotexture and obesity, it provides a safer alternative and can be performed in less time than a single loop reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvendu Sekhar Jena
- Institute of Surgical Gastroenterology, GI & HPB Oncosurgery and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
| | - Naimish N Mehta
- Center for Digestive Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Amitabh Yadav
- Institute of Surgical Gastroenterology, GI & HPB Oncosurgery and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India
| | - Samiran Nundy
- Institute of Surgical Gastroenterology, GI & HPB Oncosurgery and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Uchida Y, Takahara T, Mizumoto T, Nishimura A, Mii S, Iwama H, Kojima M, Kato Y, Uyama I, Suda K. Technical details of robotic pancreatojejunostomy using a modified Blumgart anastomosis: Thread manipulation using gauze and an assisted port. World J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38794794 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS Pancreatojejunostomy is a technically demanding procedure during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). Modified Blumgart anastomosis (mBA) is a common method for the pancreatojejunostomy; however, the technical details for robotic mBA are not well established. During RPD, we performed a mBA for the pancreatojejunostomy using thread manipulation with gauze and an additional assist port. METHODS Patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy at Fujita Health University from November 2009 to May 2023 were retrospectively investigated, and technical details for the robotic-modified Blumgart anastomosis were demonstrated. RESULTS Among 78 patients who underwent RPD during the study period, 33 underwent robotic mBA. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred in six patients (18%). None of the patients suffered POPF Grade C according to the international study group of pancreatic surgery definition. The anastomotic time for mBA was 80 min (54-125 min). CONCLUSION Robotic mBA resulted in reasonable outcomes. We propose that mBA could be used as one of the standard methods for robotic pancreatojejunosotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuichiro Uchida
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | | | - Takuya Mizumoto
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | | | - Satoshi Mii
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Hideaki Iwama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kojima
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Advanced Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Advanced Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Koichi Suda
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Harrison J, Dua MM, Kastrinakis WV, Fagenholz PJ, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Poultsides GA, Visser BC, Qadan M. "Duct tape:" Management strategies for the pancreatic anastomosis during pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00270-8. [PMID: 38796390 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Harrison
- Section of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital, Palo Alto, CA.
| | - Monica M Dua
- Section of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital, Palo Alto, CA
| | - William V Kastrinakis
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Peter J Fagenholz
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - George A Poultsides
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Brendan C Visser
- Section of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Stanford University Hospital, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|