Polypharmacy: A general review of definitions, descriptions and determinants

Polypharmacy and Malnutrition: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study in a Geriatric Population and Implications for Preventive Strategies

PURPOSE

Polypharmacy (PP) and malnutrition are two conditions that frequently occur in older patient groups. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between nutrition and PP in a cohort of older outpatients from Northern Sardinia, Italy.

METHODS

A database of 619 outpatients undergoing a specific drug therapy during the examination was analyzed. A multivariable analysis was performed using a logistic regression model, in which a dichotomized MNA score was the dependent variable, according to several covariates.

RESULTS

Exposure to ≥ five drugs was associated with a higher risk of malnutrition among males and females, as well as a higher risk of overt malnutrition among males and females compared to those exposed to four or fewer drugs. In addition, depression significantly increased the risk of malnutrition in both sexes, whereas cognitive status and comorbidity did not. Moreover, the effect of PP on nutritional status was statistically significant only for the global component of the MNA score.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study detected a significant association between PP and an increased risk of malnutrition. Depressed mood was an additional independent predictor, whereas cognitive status and comorbidity did not reveal a significant association.

Therapeutic and Structural Dimensions in Psychiatric Prescribing: Bridging Psychedelics and Antidepressants

ABSTRACT

As practitioners seek more personalized approaches, exploring how patients' environments, relationship templates, and mindsets factor into symptom burden can help broaden understanding of how psychotropic medications facilitate recovery. Despite increasing focus on medications to provide relief, there is an important and undeniable influence the therapeutic environment has on shaping outcomes, particularly for the patient-clinician alliance. While environmental dimensions are relevant for informing possible placebo or nocebo responses, they also build upon the pharmacodynamic and neurobiological effects of medications. By heightening neuroplasticity, some antidepressants may amplify the effects of nonmedication factors in patients' lives, including the patient-prescriber therapeutic relationship. There are important parallels between antidepressants and psychedelics in emerging literature. For instance, the preparatory and integrative work with a provider can be crucial in determining outcomes. This paper will draw from the extant literature to discuss the therapeutic relationship in psychiatric practice, including in acute care settings and instances in which psychotropic prescribing is a key aspect of treatment.

Mitochondrial dysfunction in drug-induced hepatic steatosis: Recent findings and current concept

Mitochondrial activity is necessary for the maintenance of many liver functions. In particular, mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is required for energy production and lipid homeostasis. This key metabolic pathway is finely tuned by the mitochondrial respiratory chain (MRC) activity and different transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα). Many drugs have been shown to cause mitochondrial dysfunction, which can lead to acute and chronic liver lesions. While severe inhibition of mitochondrial FAO would eventually cause microvesicular steatosis, hypoglycemia, and liver failure, moderate impairment of this metabolic pathway can induce macrovacuolar steatosis, which can progress in the long term to steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. Drugs can impair mitochondrial FAO through several mechanisms including direct inhibition of FAO enzymes, sequestration of coenzyme A and l-carnitine, impairment of the activity of one or several MRC complexes and reduced PPARα expression. In drug-induced macrovacuolar steatosis, non-mitochondrial mechanisms can also be involved in lipid accumulation including increased de novo lipogenesis and reduced very-low-density lipoprotein secretion. Nonetheless, mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent oxidative stress appear to be key events in the progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis. Patients suffering from metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and treated with mitochondriotoxic drugs should be closely monitored to reduce the risk of acute liver injury or a faster transition of steatosis to steatohepatitis. Therapies based on the mitochondrial cofactor l-carnitine, the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine, or thyromimetics might be useful to prevent or treat drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, steatosis, and steatohepatitis.

Operational Definitions of Polypharmacy and Their Association with All-Cause Hospitalization Risk: A Conceptual Framework Using Administrative Databases

Polypharmacy, defined as the concurrent use of multiple medications, increases the risk of various adverse outcomes. However, the variability in definitions across the literature contributes to substantial heterogeneity. Building on the published literature, this study aimed to identify a set of operational definitions of polypharmacy applicable to administrative databases and to assess their association with all-cause hospitalization. Data from the pharmacy refill and hospitalization databases of the Local Health Unit (LHU) of Bergamo, Lombardy, were analyzed. Patients aged ≥40 with at least one reimbursed drug prescription in 2017 were included. Prescription coverage was evaluated using total defined daily doses (DDDs), and all-cause hospitalizations from January to June 2018 were considered. Definitions explored included (i) the WHO's criterion of ≥5 medications by ATC fourth-level code; (ii) the exclusion of prescriptions usually for short-term treatments; and (iii) drugs with cumulative annual DDD ≥ 60. Approaches were assessed annually, quarterly, and monthly, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for hospitalization risk. Among 431,620 patients, the DDD ≥ 60 definition showed the least variability (20.47-21.16%) and identified an older more complex cohort. All definitions showed a dose-dependent association with hospitalization risk. Different definitions of polypharmacy result in varying prevalence, with DDD ≥ 60 being the most consistent. A patient-centric approach is crucial to assess the appropriateness of polypharmacy.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Urinary Incontinence Among Chilean Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

 Systematic reviews of the global prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) have shown an underrepresentation of the South American population. The objective of this study was (i) to determine the prevalence and associated factors of UI among older Chilean community-dwelling older adults and (ii) to analyze the differences between older adults with and without UI.

METHODS

This is an analytical cross-sectional study. A total of 144 community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years and above were eligible to participate in the study. Participants were asked to provide a range of data, including demographic data and anthropometric and self-reported measures. The prevalence of UI was estimated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The analyzed factors included age, sex, weight, height, residence comorbidities, polypharmacy, cognitive function, and activity of daily living (ADL) functionality.

RESULTS

One hundred eight older adults were included in the study. The median age of the participants was 69.0 ± 8.0 years, 84 (77.8%) were women, and 71 (65.7%) lived in an urban residence. The prevalence of UI in the total sample was 48.1% (n = 52). Stress, urge, and mixed types of UI were present in 75 (69.4%), 15 (14.3%), and 18 (16.3%) participants, respectively. Female sex, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypothyroidism were significantly more frequent in older adults with UI (P < 0.05). Correlations ranging from negligible to weak were observed between the presence of UI and the female sex (r = 0.25; P < 0.05), rheumatoid arthritis (r = 0.23; P < 0.05), and hypothyroidism (r = 0.35; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In a sample of community-dwelling older adults, UI was present in 48.1% of the participants. The prevalence of UI was correlated with the female sex, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypothyroidism.

Association between number of medications and indicators of potentially inappropriate polypharmacy: a population-based cohort of older adults in Quebec, Canada

Background

As the number of medications increases, the appropriateness of polypharmacy may become questionable due to the heightened risk of medication-related harm.

Objectives

(1) To investigate the relationship between the number of current medications used by older adults and three indicators of potentially inappropriate polypharmacy: (a) the mean number of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), (b) the average count of drug-drug interactions, and (c) the anticholinergic burden; (2) To characterize the population-based burden of potentially inappropriate polypharmacy by calculating the proportion of individuals with these indicators.

Design

We conducted a population-based observational study using the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System.

Methods

We included all individuals over 65 years insured by the public drug plan on April 1st, 2022. For each individual, we calculated the number of current medications and the number of (a) PIMs (Beers 2019), (b) drug-drug interactions (Beers 2019), and (c) anticholinergic burden (Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale). The association between the number of medications and these indicators was quantified using linear regression. Prevalence with 99% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated.

Results

A total of 1,437,558 individuals (mean age: 75; 55% female) were included, taking an average of 4.9 medications (±4.1). For each additional medication, the mean number of PIMs, drug-drug interactions, and anticholinergic burden increased by 0.11, 0.04, and 0.17, respectively (p-trend <0.0001). Nearly half the population (45.5%; 99% CI: 45.5-45.5) had a regimen containing ⩾1 PIMs, ⩾1 drug-drug interaction, or an ACB ⩾3.

Conclusion

The strong association between the increasing number of medications and reduced polypharmacy quality underscores the importance of medication count beyond therapeutic indications. With widespread medication use, many older adults face quality issues.

Polypharmacy Associated With the Simultaneous Prevalence of Dry Eye Due to Aqueous Deficiency and Hyposalivation in Adults Over 50 Years Old

Introduction Dry eye and hyposalivation, often linked to Sjögren's syndrome (SS), are prevalent among adults. However, systemic diseases and their associated medications also play a role, as drug interactions can intensify the effects of certain medications. Objective To assess whether polypharmacy is associated with the co-occurrence of aqueous-deficient dry eye (ADDE) and hyposalivation in adults aged 50 years and older without SS. Methods In a convenience sample of 455 adults who attended an optometry clinic, a medical history questionnaire was completed, and tear (Schirmer I) and salivary production (cotton weight test) were evaluated. To investigate the links between dry eye (due to aqueous deficiency and hyposalivation) and various factors (polypharmacy, chronic diseases, age, sex, education, marital status, employment, illicit drug, alcohol, and tobacco use), logistic regression modeling was employed. Then, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained. Results A simultaneous prevalence of ADDE and hyposalivation of 16.7% (n = 76) (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 13.5%-20.4%) and a prevalence of polypharmacy of 23.1% (n = 105) (95% CI 19.4%-27.1%) were found. Subjects with polypharmacy had an 88.0% higher probability of developing ADDE and hyposalivation (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.07-3.29; p = 0.026). Conclusions Polypharmacy increases the likelihood of both ADDE and hyposalivation in individuals without SS. It is important to provide comprehensive and multidisciplinary care to adults, to detect these diseases in time, and to maintain strict control of the medications they need.

Psychotropic drug-induced adverse drug reactions in 462,661 psychiatric inpatients in relation to age: results from a German drug surveillance program from 1993-2016

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice suggests that older adults (i.e., ≥ 65 years of age) experience adverse drug reactions (ADRs) more often than younger patients (i.e., < 65 years of age). ADRs such as falls, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), metabolic disorders, sedation, and delirium are particularly worrisome and often associated with psychotropic drugs.

METHODS

This observational study investigated the risk for psychotropic drug-related ADRs in older (n = 99,099) and younger adults (n = 363,562) in psychiatric inpatients using data from the German pharmacovigilance program "Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie" (AMSP) from 1993-2016. The aim was to assess whether age influenced the risk of specific ADR types and if certain psychotropic drugs posed particular concerns.

RESULTS

The risk for ADRs did not differ between older and younger patients (relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.05). However, older patients had a higher risk for delirium (2.35, 1.85-2.99), hyponatremia (3.74, 2.85-4.90), and orthostatic syncope (2.37, 1.72-3.26), as well as certain types of EPS, e.g., parkinsonism (1.89, 1.45-2.48) and Pisa-/metronome syndrome (3.61, 2.51-5.18). The risk for other ADRs, such as acute dystonia (0.20, 0.10-0.37), akathisia (0.47, 0.29-0.76), liver dysfunction (0.63, 0.48-0.82), weight gain (0.07, 0.04-0.14), sexual dysfunction (0.03, CI 0.00-0.25), and hyperprolactinemia/galactorrhea (0.05, 0.02-0.17) was significantly lower for older patients. Older patients treated with any type of antidepressant drug (1.33, 1.26-1.40)-especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (1.57, 1.26-1.40) and selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (2.03, 1.80-2.29)-and lithium (1.74, 1.52-2.00) had a higher ADR risk than younger patients. Second-generation antipsychotic drugs had a lower (0.74, 0.71-0.77) and low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs a higher (1.19, 1.07-1.33) ADR risk in older patients. The risk for ADRs involving multiple drugs was higher in older patients (1.28, 1.22-1.34). ADRs in older patients were 6.4 times more likely to result in death.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and pharmacists should be aware of the types of ADRs and high-risk drugs across age groups and provide appropriate monitoring. Pharmacovigilance is crucial in psychiatric patients of all ages and should not be neglected, even for drugs generally considered "safe".

Potential drug-drug interactions analysis in Polish pediatric pneumonology units, including cystic fibrosis patients

The lack of data on drug-drug interactions in pediatrics represents a relevant problem in making appropriate therapeutic decisions. Our study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in pediatric pneumonology units, including cystic fibrosis patients. We performed a 6-month prospective observational study during which clinical pharmacists, using the Lexicomp Drug Interactions checker, screened medical records to identify pDDIs. Spearman's rank coefficient, logistic regression, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to identify correlations, analyze risk factors for pDDIs, and compare cystic fibrosis patients with the rest, respectively. Recommendations were provided for the D and X pDDIs categories. Within the 218 patients, 428 pDDIs were identified, out of which 237 were classified as clinically significant. Almost 60% of patients were exposed to at least one relevant interaction. The number of pDDIs correlated with the number of; drugs (rs = 0.53, P <  .001), hospitalization length (rs = 0.20, P <  .01), and off-label medicines (rs = 0.25, P <  .001). According to the multivariate analysis, at least 6 administered medications (OR = 4.15; 95% CI = 2.21-7.78), 4 days of hospitalization (OR = 6.41; 95% CI = 2.29-17.97), and off-label therapy (OR = 3.37; 95% CI = 1.69-6.70) were the risk factor for pDDIs. Despite significant differences in the number of medications taken, comorbidities, and off-label drugs, cystic fibrosis patients were not more exposed to pDDI. Given the lack of data on pDDIs in the pediatric population, the need for close cooperation between clinicians and clinical pharmacists to improve the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy is highlighted.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Nosocomial Infections: An Updated Review for Clinicians

Prevention, assessment, and identification of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) represent a challenge for healthcare professionals, especially in nosocomial settings. This narrative review aims to provide a thorough assessment of the most clinically significant DDIs for antibiotics used in healthcare-associated infections. Complex poly-pharmaceutical regimens, targeting multiple pathogens or targeting one pathogen in the presence of another comorbidity, have an increased predisposition to result in life-threatening DDIs. Recognising, assessing, and limiting DDIs in nosocomial infections offers promising opportunities for improving health outcomes. The objective of this review is to provide clinicians with practical advice to prevent or mitigate DDIs, with the aim of increasing the safety and effectiveness of therapy. DDI management is of significant importance for individualising therapy according to the patient, disease status, and associated comorbidities.

Food Supplements and Their Use in Elderly Subjects-Challenges and Risks in Selected Health Issues: A Narrative Review

The European population is ageing. Food Supplements (FSs) are foods with particular characteristics, consumed by elderly people for various purposes, including combating nutritional deficits. Their consumption in this age group, associated with a high prevalence of polypharmacy, can enhance interactions. Potential drug-food (or food supplements), drug-drug interactions and polypharmacy are common health issues among older adults. The prevalence of polypharmacy is high, and preliminary data also indicate that there is significant FS use, increasing the risk of the duplication of therapies and various adverse reactions as well as drug-FS and FS-FS interactions. Therefore, the intervention of health professionals in mitigating these risks is essential. This review highlights and discusses the association between FSs, polypharmacy, and adverse reactions due to the risk of potential interactions between these products. Moreover, it also provides current scientific evidence regarding the use of FSs by the elderly. A review of the challenges, advantages, and risks of using FSs in elderly people who are malnourished and/or polymedicated, focusing on the good practises needed to support healthy ageing, is presented. In this regard, this paper aims to help health professionals better deal with the issue of the use of multiple FSs and polypharmacy, overcome the malnutrition problem, and improve the health and well-being of older adults.

A new perspective on proteinuria and drug therapy for diabetic kidney disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the leading causes of end-stage renal disease worldwide and significantly increases the risk of premature death due to cardiovascular diseases. Elevated urinary albumin levels are an important clinical feature of DKD. Effective control of albuminuria not only delays glomerular filtration rate decline but also markedly reduces cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality. New drugs for treating DKD proteinuria, including sodium-glucose cotransporter two inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and endothelin receptor antagonists, have shown significant efficacy. Auxiliary treatment with proprietary Chinese medicine has also yielded promising results; however, it also faces a broader scope for development. The mechanisms by which these drugs treat albuminuria in patients with DKD should be described more thoroughly. The positive effects of combination therapy with two or more drugs in reducing albuminuria and protecting the kidneys warrant further investigation. Therefore, this review explores the pathophysiological mechanism of albuminuria in patients with DKD, the value of clinical diagnosis and prognosis, new progress and mechanisms of treatment, and multidrug therapy in patients who have type 2 diabetic kidney disease, providing a new perspective on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of DKD.

Association between polypharmacy and chronic kidney disease among community-dwelling older people: a longitudinal study in southern China

BACKGROUND

Polypharmacy would increase the risk of adverse drug events and the burden of renal drug excretion among older people. Nevertheless, the association between the number of medication and the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains controversial. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between the number of medication and the incidence of CKD in older people.

METHODS

This study investigates the association between the number of medications and CKD in 2672 elderly people (≥ 65 years older) of the community health service center in southern China between 2019 and 2022. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between polypharmacy and CKD.

RESULTS

At baseline, the average age of the study subjects was 71.86 ± 4.60, 61.2% were females, and 53 (2.0%) suffer from polypharmacy. During an average follow-up of 3 years, new-onset CKD developed in 413 (15.5%) participants. Logistic regression analysis revealed that taking a higher number of medications was associated with increase of CKD. Compared with people who didn't take medication, a higher risk of CKD was observed in the older people who taken more than five medications (OR 3.731, 95% CI 1.988, 7.003), followed by those who take four (OR 1.621, 95% CI 1.041, 2.525), three (OR 1.696, 95% CI 1.178, 2.441), two drugs (OR 1.585, 95% CI 1.167, 2.153), or one drug (OR 1.503, 95% CI 1.097, 2.053). Furthermore, age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), white blood cell (WBC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and triglyceride (TG) were also independent risk factors CKD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The number of medications was associated with CKD in older people. As the number of medications taken increased, the risk of CKD was increased.

Building Medication Profiles in the Elderly: a Qualitative Study Based on Medication Information Literacy in a Long-Term Care Facility

Purpose

Long-term care facilities are increasingly challenged with meeting the diverse healthcare needs of the elderly population, particularly concerning medication management. Understanding medication information literacy and behavior among this demographic is imperative. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to explore medication information literacy and develop distinct medication profiles among elderly long-term care residents.

Material and Methods

In this study, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 32 participants aged 65 or older residing in a long-term care facility. The interviews were designed to explore participants' understanding of medication information, medication management practices, and experiences with healthcare providers. Thematic analysis was employed to analyze the interview data, allowing for the identification of common patterns and themes related to medication-taking behavior among the elderly residents.

Results

The thematic analysis revealed four distinct medication behavior profiles among the elderly long-term care residents: (1) Proactive Health Self-Managers, (2) Medication Information Adherents, (3) Experience-Based Medication Users, and (4) Nonadherent Medication Users. These findings provide valuable insights into the diverse approaches to medication management within long-term care facilities and underscore the importance of tailored interventions to support the specific needs of each profile.

Conclusion

This study highlights the necessity for tailored medication education and support to optimize medication management for the elderly. With the aging population expansion, addressing the unique medication challenges within long-term care facilities becomes increasingly critical. This research contributes to ongoing endeavors to enhance healthcare services for the elderly, striving for safer and more effective medication-taking behavior.

Implementation considerations of deprescribing interventions: A scoping review

Over half of older adults experience polypharmacy, including medications that may be inappropriate or unnecessary. Deprescribing, which is the process of discontinuing or reducing inappropriate and/or unnecessary medications, is an effective way to reduce polypharmacy. This review summarizes (1) the process of deprescribing and conceptual models and tools that have been developed to facilitate deprescribing, (2) barriers, enablers, and factors associated with deprescribing, and (3) characteristics of deprescribing interventions in completed trials, as well as (4) implementation considerations for deprescribing in routine practice. In conceptual models of deprescribing, multilevel factors of the patient, clinician, and health-care system are all related to the efficacy of deprescribing. Numerous tools have been developed for clinicians to facilitate deprescribing, yet most require substantial time and, thus, may be difficult to implement during routine health-care encounters. Multiple deprescribing interventions have been evaluated, which mostly include one or more of the following components: patient education, medication review, identification of deprescribing targets, and patient and/or provider communication about high-risk medications. Yet, there has been limited consideration of implementation factors in prior deprescribing interventions, especially with regard to the personnel and resources in existing health-care systems and the feasibility of incorporating components of deprescribing interventions into the routine care processes of clinicians. Future trials require a more balanced consideration of both effectiveness and implementation when designing deprescribing interventions.

Clinical pharmacist in oncology palliative medicine: drug compliance and patient adherence

OBJECTIVES

Most patients in palliative oncology care are polymorbid and thus treated with multiple drugs. The therapeutic effect and safety of these drugs can be compromised by drug/drug interactions, but also by wider problems such as polypharmacy and compliance. The clinical pharmacist is, therefore, responsible for risk analysis and prevention. Our prospective open label non-randomised clinical study evaluated the importance of a clinical pharmacist in the palliative care team.

METHODS

A total of 250 outpatients were included in the clinical study: 126 women (50.4%) and 124 men (49.6%), with a mean age of 71 years (range 21-94 years; SD 11.9). The patients had the performance status scale 0-3 [Formula: see text]. Clinical examinations were performed on a monthly basis (n=509 check-up visits). The clinical pharmacist prepared an educational chart for all medications used after each visit and evaluated any drug-related problems. Follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

This study found a significant association between drug related-problems and polypharmacy (p<0.001). A low risk of drug-rfelated problems was observed during the initial visit, that is, 68 female (27.2%) and 25 male (10.4%) patients. A greater clinical-pharmaceutical risk was observed among the patients taking antihypertensive drugs (p=0.003) and/or beta blockers (p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the essential role of a clinical pharmacist in oncology palliative care. The feedback obtained from the patients showed a notable improvement in their quality of life. Further, this clinical study confirmed the need for a personalised approach in palliative oncology care.

Evaluation of potentially inappropriate medications for the elderly according to beers, STOPP, START, and Chinese criteria

Objective: Polypharmacy prevalence is increasing worldwide, and it is becoming more popular among the elderly. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) using the Beers criteria (2019 edition), criteria for potentially inappropriate medications for older adults in China (Chinese criteria), Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP), and Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (START) criteria and to identify risk factors associated with PIM use. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study with a sample of 276 inpatients aged ≥65 years old from January 2020 to June 2020. A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze PIMs based on the Beers (2019 edition), Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria. PIMs use was analysed based on four different criteria and logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent factors associated with PIM use. Results: The mean number of medications used by the elderly population was nine (range, 0-28). A total of 252 patients (accounting for 91.30%) took five or more medications and 120 patients (accounting for 43.48%) took 10 or more medications. The prevalence rates of PIMs were 66.30% (183/276), 55.07% (152/276), 26.45% (73/276), and 64.13% (177/276) determined by the Beers, Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria, respectively. The top PIMs screened using the Beers, Chinese, and STOPP criteria were proton pump inhibitors, clopidogrel, and benzodiazepines, respectively. Missed use of ACEI in patients with systolic heart failure and/or coronary artery disease was found to be the most common potential prescription omission (PPOs) analyzed using the START criteria. Logistic regression analysis showed that the strongest predictor of PIMs, as determined by all four criteria, was an increased number of medications (p < 0.001). Age was another risk factor for PIMs based on the STOPP criteria in our study (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIMs were common in our study, and the risk of PIMs correlated with polypharmacy. Application of the Beers, Chinese, STOPP, and START criteria is a useful tool for detecting PIM use.

Differences in healthcare service utilization in patients with polypharmacy according to their risk level by adjusted morbidity groups: a population-based cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Patients with polypharmacy suffer from complex medical conditions involving a large healthcare burden. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and utilization of primary care (PC) and hospital care (HC) and factors associated in chronic patients with polypharmacy, stratifying by adjusted morbidity groups (AMG) risk level, sex and age, and comparing with non-polypharmacy.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study conducted in a Spanish basic healthcare area. Studied patients were those over 18 years with chronic diseases identified by the AMG tool from Madrid electronic clinical record, which was the data source. Sociodemographic, sociofunctional, clinical and healthcare utilization variables were described and compared by risk level, sex, age and having or not polypharmacy. Factors associated with healthcare utilization in polypharmacy patients were determined by a negative binomial regression model.

RESULTS

In the area studied, 61.3% patients had chronic diseases, of which 16.9% had polypharmacy vs. 83.1% without polypharmacy. Patients with polypharmacy (vs. non-polypharmacy) mean age was 82.7 (vs. 52.7), 68.9% (vs. 60.7%) were women, and 22.0% (vs. 1.2%) high risk. Their average number of chronic diseases was 4.8 (vs. 2.2), and 95.6% (vs. 56.9%) had multimorbidity. Their mean number of annual healthcare contacts was 30.3 (vs. 10.5), 25.9 (vs. 8.8) with PC and 4.4 (vs. 1.7) with HC. Factors associated with a greater PC utilization in patients with polypharmacy were elevated complexity, high risk level and dysrhythmia. Variables associated with a higher HC utilization were also increased complexity and high risk, in addition to male sex, being in palliative care, having a primary caregiver, suffering from neoplasia (specifically lymphoma or leukaemia) and arthritis, whereas older age and immobilization were negatively associated.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy population compared to non-polypharmacy was characterized by a more advanced age, predominance of women, high-risk, complexity, numerous comorbidities, dependency and remarkable healthcare utilization. These findings could help healthcare policy makers to optimize the distribution of resources and professionals within PC and HC systems, aiming for the improvement of polypharmacy management and rational use of medicines while reducing costs attributed to healthcare utilization by these patients.

Prevalence of polypharmacy among older adults in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Polypharmacy is a significant concern for older adults. Taking multiple medicines to prevent and treat comorbidities is very common in older adults, potentially leading to polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is associated with the development of geriatric syndromes, including cognitive impairment, delirium, falls, frailty, urinary incontinence, and weight loss. The prevalence of polypharmacy varies according to the literature. There is a paucity of data regarding the prevalence of polypharmacy among older adults. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy among older adults in Ethiopia. A comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Hinari, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, International Scientific Indexing, Cochrane library and Web of Science, and Google Scholar, was conducted. STATA statistical software (version 17) was used to analyze the data. Forest plot and I2 heterogeneity test were computed to examine the existence of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were done to explore the source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated by using funnel plots and Egger's test. A random effect model was used to determine the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy. After reviewing 123 studies, 13 studies with a total of 3547 older adults fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The result from 13 studies revealed that the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy among older adults in Ethiopia was 37.10% (95CI: 28.28-45.91). A Subgroup Meta-analysis showed that the heterogeneity level was slightly lower among studies done in Oromia region (I2 = 46.62, P-value = 0.154). Higher pooled polypharmacy prevalence was found among older adults with cardiovascular disorders (42.7%) and admitted patients (51.4%). In general, it was found that the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy among older adults in Ethiopia was high. More than one in three older adults take five or more medications at a time. Thus, intervention focusing on rational geriatric pharmacotherapy is significant to prevent unnecessary pill burden, adverse drug events, medical costs, geriatric morbidity, and mortality. Furthermore, enhancing pharmacist roles towards medication therapy management and safety monitoring in older adults is also indicated.

One Size Does Not Fit All: Medication Reconciliation and Review at the Hospital at Home

Mistakes in the medication process are frequent and a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Medication reconciliation (MRec) and medication review (MRev) are the processes of creating the most accurate medication list and adapting it to optimize the effectiveness of medicines and minimize adverse effects. This is crucial in all stages of medical care, especially at discharge. The present study aims to evaluate and describe the process of MRec and MRev, with a focus on deprescribing, that we conduct at the Hospital at Home. We performed a retrospective cohort study including adult patients admitted at our Hospital at Home from 1 November 2022 to 30 April 2023. MRec and MRev were applied during hospitalization, according to patients' characteristics and clinical evolution, and then communicated to patients upon discharge. Our study involved 125 patients, with an average age of 67.6±18.0 years, and half of them had polypharmacy. We discovered discrepancies in 43.2% of patient's medication and did deprescribing in one-third of them. In the deprescribing group, patients were significantly older (mean age, 76.1 versus 66.4 years; p=0.044). It is imperative to create mechanisms to identify patients at a greater risk of adverse drug events and to minimize the burden of care and harms associated with treatments. The Hospital at Home could be an opportunity, although further research is essential.

Trajectories of Benzodiazepine Use among Older Adults from a Concordance-with-Guidelines Perspective: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Benzodiazepines (including zolpidem and zopiclone) are often associated with higher-than-recommended intake and durations of use, especially in older adults. The objective of this study was to characterize trajectories of benzodiazepine use according to recommended patterns in older adults, and to assess predictors of the risk of developing each of these trajectories.

METHODS

Using the French Health Insurance database, we constituted a cohort of adults aged ≥ 65 years who initiated benzodiazepines in 2007 and were followed for up to 8 years. Concordance with benzodiazepine use guidelines was assessed on a quarterly basis according to a "concordance-with-guideline score" with values 1-5. Group-based trajectory modeling was then applied as implemented in the Proc Traj procedure in SAS to define guideline-concordant trajectories based on seven baseline patient-centered characteristics: sex, complementary health insurance coverage, treated alcohol and tobacco use disorder, polypharmacy, hospital stay, and registered chronic diseases.

RESULTS

Among 5080 new users (64.1% women, median age 74 years), six trajectories of benzodiazepine use were identified. Three, representing 70% of users, were concordant with guidelines, whereas three implied non-concordant benzodiazepine use for part or all of the benzodiazepine use follow-up. Polymedicated patients were more prone to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant initially guideline-concordant use, whereas those with a history of long-term disease and hospitalization were more likely to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant use. The number of prescribers during the first quarter, number of daily defined doses, use of loperamide, and use of psychostimulants were associated with a higher risk of developing an initial and persistent non-guideline-concordant use. Treatment initiation by a psychiatrist, initial use of World Health Organization (WHO) step-2 opioids and non-benzodiazepine anxiolytics or sedatives were associated with a higher risk of late non-guideline-concordant use.

CONCLUSIONS

Concordance with guidelines varied over time during benzodiazepine use in older adults. A third of these adults will hypothetically follow one of the identified non-guideline-concordant trajectories, consisting of initial and/or late non-guideline concordance. This was associated with modifiable and nonmodifiable factors that clinicians should be aware of for tailoring the monitoring of patients.

Polypharmacy and Excessive Polypharmacy Among Persons Living with Chronic Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Prevalence and Associated Factors

Purpose

Polypharmacy can be defined as the concomitant use of ≥5 medications and excessive polypharmacy, as the use of ≥10 medications. Objectives were to (1) assess the prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy among persons living with chronic pain, and (2) identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with excessive polypharmacy.

Patients and Methods

This cross-sectional study used data from 1342 persons from the ChrOnic Pain trEatment (COPE) Cohort (Quebec, Canada). The self-reported number of medications currently used by participants (regardless of whether they were prescribed or taken over-the-counter, or were used for treating pain or other health issues) was categorized to assess polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy.

Results

Participants reported using an average of 6 medications (median: 5). The prevalence of polypharmacy was 71.4% (95% CI: 69.0-73.8) and excessive polypharmacy was 25.9% (95% CI: 23.6-28.3). No significant differences were found across gender identity groups. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that factors associated with greater chances of reporting excessive polypharmacy (vs <10 medications) included being born in Canada, using prescribed pain medications, and reporting greater pain intensity (0-10) or pain relief from currently used pain treatments (0-100%). Factors associated with lower chances of excessive polypharmacy were using physical and psychological pain treatments, reporting better general health/physical functioning, considering pain to be terrible/feeling like it will never get better, and being employed.

Conclusion

Polypharmacy is the rule rather than the exception among persons living with chronic pain. Close monitoring and evaluation of the different medications used are important for all persons, especially those with limited access to care.

Potentially inappropriate medications and polypharmacy in the older population: A nationwide cross-sectional study in France in 2019

AIM OF THE STUDY

To assess the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and polypharmacy in adults aged 75 years and over in France in 2019 based on data from the French health insurance claims database, at the national level and by region.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in French adults aged 75 years or over in 2019. We assessed the prevalence of seventeen PIM criteria adapted from the 2015 Beers and STOPP lists, as well as cumulative polypharmacy. Polypharmacy (5 to 9 drugs) and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 drugs) were defined as the average number of drugs dispensed per quarter. The regional analysis used the age- and sex-standardized prevalence.

RESULTS

Of 6,707,897 older adults, 39.6% were exposed to at least one PIM in 2019, 46.7% were exposed to polypharmacy (5 to 9 drugs), and 25.2% to hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 drugs). Benzodiazepine PIMs were the most frequent (26.9%), followed by atropinic PIMs (8.3%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory PIMs (7.8%), concomitant use of three or more central nervous system-active drugs (7.3%), and antihypertensive PIMs (6.0%). There was a gradient in the level of exposure to PIMs according to the level of polypharmacy for every PIM category. We observed regional variations in PIM prevalence, from 36.5% in Pays-de-la-Loire to 44.8% in Hauts-de-France in mainland France.

CONCLUSION

These results show that PIMs concerned more than one in three older adults after age 75 years in France in 2019 and support the need to secure medication use in this population. The reasons for geographic variations in PIM prevalence should be investigated in further studies.

DPSP: a multimodal deep learning framework for polypharmacy side effects prediction

Motivation

Because unanticipated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can result in severe bodily harm, identifying the adverse effects of polypharmacy is one of the most important tasks in human health. Over the past few decades, computational methods for predicting the adverse effects of polypharmacy have been developed.

Results

This article presents DPSP, a framework for predicting polypharmacy side effects based on the construction of novel drug features and the application of a deep neural network to predict DDIs. In the first step, a variety of drug information is evaluated, and a feature extraction method and the Jaccard similarity are used to determine similarities between two drugs. By combining these similarities, a novel feature vector is generated for each drug. In the second step, the method predicts DDIs for specific DDI events using a multimodal framework and drug feature vectors. On three benchmark datasets, the performance of DPSP is measured by comparing its results to those of several well-known methods, such as GNN-DDI, MSTE, MDF-SA-DDI, NNPS, DDIMDL, DNN, DeepDDI, KNN, LR, and RF. DPSP outperforms these classification methods based on a variety of classification metrics. The results indicate that the use of diverse drug information is effective and efficient for identifying DDI adverse effects.

Availability and implementation

The source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/raziyehmasumshah/DPSP.

Attitudes of Older Adult Patients and Caregivers Towards Deprescribing of Medications in Ethiopia

Background

Deprescribing is essential for reducing inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy. For a holistic approach, it is essential to know how older adult patients and their caregivers perceive deprescribing.

Objective

To assess the attitude of older adult patients and caregivers towards deprescribing medication at Ambo University Referral Hospital.

Methodology

Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted using the revised Patients' Attitude Towards Deprescribing tool (rPATD). The data was analyzed using the SPSS-25 software. Backward linear regression and logistic regression were used to measure association between outcome and determinant variables. The two-sided P-value ≤0.05 with 95% confidence interval was utilized for reporting significant factors.

Results

One hundred fifty-six (81.3%) of the respondents (ie, 85.0% of older adult and 77.2% of caregivers) agreed to stop one or more of their regular medications if the physician said it was possible despite 98 (51.0%) of them (ie, 49.0% of older adult and 53.3% of caregivers) being satisfied with their/their care recipient's medications. On the overall aggregate mean score, the respondents had a neutral position (2.6-3.59) regarding the burden and concerns of stopping medications whereas the majority of them disagree (1.0-2.59) with the inappropriateness of the medication they were taking and agreed (3.6-5.0) with the need for their involvement in treatment decision making. Concerns about stopping medicine scores (AOR = 0.440, 95% CI = 0.262-0.741, P = 0.035) and perceived levels of medication inappropriateness (AOR = 0.653, 95% CI = 0.456-0.936, P = 0.020) was significantly associated with the willingness to discontinue and overall satisfaction with their medicine regimen respectively.

Conclusion

The majority of older adult patients and caregivers would like to deprescribe if the physicians recommended it. The perceived concerns of stopping and inappropriateness of the medicines were associated with the willingness to deprescribe and overall satisfaction with their medicine respectively. Healthcare providers should prompt the deprescribing process with older adult patients and caregivers by addressing their concerns about stopping medications.

Multimorbidity and polypharmacy in hospitalized older patients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The growing trend of ageing population has become a worldwide concern. In comparison with the youth, older people are more likely to suffer from multimorbidity and polypharmacy, both of which are associated with adverse outcomes and increased healthcare costs. This study aimed to investigate the status of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in a large sample of hospitalized older patients aged 60 years and over.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among 46,799 eligible patients aged 60 years and over, who were hospitalized from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of 2 or more morbidities in one patient during the stay in hospital, and polypharmacy as prescription of 5 or more different oral medications. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship of factors with the number of morbidities or oral medications. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated from logistic regression models to determine the predictors for polypharmacy and all-cause death.

RESULTS

The prevalence of multimorbidity was 91.07% and increased with age. The prevalence of polypharmacy was 56.32%. Older age, polypharmacy, prolonged length of stay (LOS), higher cost on medications were significantly associated with an increased number of morbidities (all P < 0.01). The number of morbidities (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.208-1.229) and LOS (OR = 1.171, 95% CI: 1.166-1.177) were potential risk factors for polypharmacy. As for all-cause death, age (OR = 1.107, 95% CI: 1.092-1.122), number of morbidities (OR = 1.495, 95% CI: 1.435-1.558) and LOS (OR = 1.020, 95% CI: 1.013-1.027) were the potential risk factors, but the number of medications (OR = 0.930, 95% CI: 0.907-0.952) and polypharmacy (OR = 0.764, 95% CI: 0.608-0.960) were associated with a reduction of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Morbidities and LOS might be predictors for polypharmacy and all-cause death. The number of oral medications was inversely associated with the risk of all-cause mortality. Appropriate polypharmacy was beneficial for the clinical outcomes of older patients during hospitalization.

Inappropriate Medications Use and Polypharmacy among Older Adults with Anxiety Disorder

BACKGROUND

Elderly with mental health conditions usually use multiple medications, which predisposes them to inappropriate use of medications, which is defined as medications that should be avoided due to their risk; this outweighs their benefit given that safer alternatives are available. This study aimed to examine potentially inappropriate medication use among older patients with anxiety disorder.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional retrospective study design using twelve months of data extracted from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) database for older adults diagnosed with anxiety disorder and treated in the ambulatory care setting. Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) use was evaluated using the 2019 Beers criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample. Pearson's chi-square tests (for categorical variables) and t-tests (for continuous variables) were utilized to measure the differences in independent variables between patients with and without PIMs. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the associations between PIMs use and identify potential factors for PIMs use among older adults with anxiety disorder. Analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis Software version 9.4 (SAS^® 9.4).

RESULTS

The study sample includes 371 older adults (age ≥ 65 years) with anxiety disorder; their average age was (72.1 ± 5.8) years. PIMs use was highly prevalent among older adults with anxiety (66.6%). About 35.6% of the study sample used one PIM, 22.6% used two PIMs, and 8.4% used three PIMs. The most frequently prescribed PIMs were NSAIDs and gastrointestinal agents. The adjusted regression analysis found that PIMs use was less likely among men than women. In addition, PIMs use was more likely among women with diabetes, cancer, and polypharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies on strategies and interventions rationing PIMs use in older adults with anxiety disorder are necessary given the high prevalence of PIMs and polypharmacy within this population.

[Polypharmacy and Delirium in the Elderly]

Polypharmacy and Delirium in the Elderly Abstract: Delirium often occurs in elderly hospitalized patients. Multimorbidity and associated polypharmacy are known risk factors for developing delirium. Moreover, delirium itself often leads to the prescription of additional drugs. This article aims to enlighten the interrelation of delirium and polypharmacy in the context of recent evidence. It also tries to show possibilities of deprescribing.

The Safety Profile of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in the Standard of Care Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

AIM

We evaluated the safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for their use with other glucose-lowering drugs and drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), in a standard-of-care regimen with maximum tolerated doses, and, respectively, when compared with metformin.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study on 405 patients that were seen in the outpatient clinic of the N Paulescu National Institute for Diabetes Mellitus, Bucharest, Romania, in 2019. Their demographics, metabolic parameters, and medication safety were evaluated at three follow-up visits, from baseline, six months, and twelve months.

RESULTS

Both SGLT-2is and GLP-1 RAs are safe regarding creatinine, eGFR, urea, GOT, and GPT upon the comparison of the data from the six- and twelve-month visits with the initial visit, and also the twelve-month visit with the six-month visit. Moreover, when comparing SGLT-2is and GLP-1 RAs with metformin, there are safety data only for urea.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, both SGLT-2is and GLP-1 RAs, when used in conjunction with other glucose-lowering, blood-pressure-lowering, and lipid-lowering medications, appeared to be safe for the management of T2DM.

Evaluation of Drug Interactions in Hospitalized Patients with Respiratory Disorders in Greece

Background: Patients with respiratory disorders often have additional diseases and are usually treated with more than one medication to manage their respiratory conditions as well as additional comorbidities. Thus, they are frequently exposed to polypharmacy (≥5 drugs), which raises the risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this work, we present the results regarding the prevalence of DDIs in hospitalized patients with respiratory disorders in Greece. Methods: A 6-month descriptive single-center retrospective observational study enrolled 102 patients with acute or chronic respiratory disorders. Clinical characteristics and medication regimens were recorded upon admission, hospitalization, and discharge. The prevalence of DDIs and their clinical significance was recorded and analyzed. Results: Unspecified acute lower respiratory tract infection (25%), exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (12%) and pneumonia (8%) were the most frequent reasons for admission. Cardiovascular disorders (46%), co-existing respiratory disorders (32%), and diabetes (25%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Polypharmacy was noted in 61% of patients upon admission, 98% during hospitalization, and 63% upon discharge. Associated DDIs were estimated to be 55% upon admission, 96% throughout hospitalization, and 63% on discharge. Pharmacodynamic (PD) DDIs were the most prevalent cases (81%) and referred mostly to potential risk for QT-prolongation (31.4% of PD-DDIs) or modulation of coagulation process as expressed through the international normalized ratio (INR) (29.0% of DDIs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) DDIs (19% of DDIs) were due to inhibition of Cytochrome P450 mediated metabolism that could lead to elevated systemic drug concentrations. Clinically significant DDIs characterized as "serious-use alternative" related to 7% of cases while 59% of DDIs referred to combinations that could be characterized as "use with caution-monitor". Clinically significant DDIs mostly referred to medication regimens upon admission and discharge and were associated with outpatient prescriptions. Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with respiratory disorders often experience multimorbidity and polypharmacy that raise the risk of DDIs. Clinicians should be conscious especially if any occurring arrhythmias, INR modulations, and prolonged or increased drug action is associated with DDIs.

Medication adherence with fixed-dose versus free-equivalent combination therapies: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: We conducted a large-scale meta-analysis and subgroup analysis to compare the effect of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy with that of free-equivalent combination (FEC) therapy on medication adherence. Methods: Studies published in Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Embase up to May 2022 were identified according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary assessed outcomes were the medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC). We investigated the probability of being adherent to the prescribed treatment (MPR or PDC ≥80%) or the average estimate of these two parameters. Studies reporting such results were included in this meta-analysis. The summary measures were reported as the risk ratio (RR) and the weighted mean difference (MD) with 95% of confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. The quality of the cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Of the 1,814 screened studies, 61 met the predefined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis of the results showed that compared to FEC, FDC significantly improved the medication compliance of patients by 1.29 times (95% CI:1.23-1.35, p < 0.00001). I² of 99% represent high heterogeneity across studies. The mean difference in medication adherence between FDC and FEC was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06-0.14, p < 0.00001) with an I² estimate of 100%. Subgroup analyses were performed for studies that reported adherence outcomes according to disease type, period of evaluation and compliance indicators. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to exclude the results of low-quality studies, as well as studies in which there was ambiguity in the method of calculating the estimator. Conclusion: Analysis of the assessed parameters for the intention-to-treat and subgroup populations suggests that FDC can improve adherence to treatment and its advantages over FEC may increase over time. Further research is needed to better understand how medical conditions affect the impact of reduced pill burden on adherence, particularly in diseases other than cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Deprescription of aspirin for primary prevention is uncommon at discharge in hospitalised patients with gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend against aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in individuals with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). It is unknown how often patients on primary prevention aspirin hospitalised with GIB have aspirin discontinued at discharge.

AIMS

To determine the rate of aspirin deprescription and explore long-term outcomes in patients taking aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

METHODS

We evaluated all patients hospitalised at Yale-New Haven Hospital between January 2014 and October 2021 with GIB who were on aspirin for primary prevention. Our primary endpoint was the frequency of aspirin deprescription at discharge. Our secondary endpoints were post-discharge hospitalisations for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or GIB. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

We identified 320 patients with GIB on aspirin for primary prevention: median age was 72 (interquartile range [IQR] 61-81) years and 297 (92.8%) were on aspirin 81 mg daily. Only 25 (9.0%) patients surviving their hospitalisation were deprescribed aspirin at discharge. Among 260 patients with follow-up (median 1103 days; IQR 367-1670), MACE developed post-discharge in 2/25 (8.0%) with aspirin deprescription versus 37/235 (15.7%) with aspirin continuation (log-rank p = 0.28). 0/25 patients with aspirin deprescription had subsequent hospitalisation for GIB versus 17/235 (7.2%) who continued aspirin (log-rank p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention was rarely deprescribed at discharge in patients hospitalised with GIB. Processes designed to ensure appropriate deprescription of aspirin are crucial to improve adherence to guidelines, thereby improving the risk-benefit ratio in patients at high risk of subsequent GIB hospitalisations with minimal increased risk of MACE.

Polypharmacy among older adults in Brazil: Association with sociodemographic factors and access to health services

Background

Polypharmacy is common among older adults and is of public health concern, since pharmacological therapy influences the quality of care for older individuals. Few studies have addressed its prevalence and correlates in low or middle-income countries. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy in a representative sample of the Brazilian older population and its association with sociodemographic conditions and factors related to access to health services.

Methods

Cross-sectional study with data from the last National Health Survey, conducted in 2019. The dependent variable was polypharmacy (five or more medications) and independent variables were: sociodemographic characteristics, general health conditions and access to health services indicator.

Results

The prevalence of polypharmacy was 19.2%. Polypharmacy was higher among those aged 80 years and over compared to those aged 60-69 years (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.47; 95% CI: 1.30; 1.66); individuals with complete elementary education (PR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.13; 1.60) versus those who did not go to school; with 3+ chronic diseases (PR 11.14; 95% CI: 7.94; 15.63); those with limitations in basic activities of daily life (PR 1.49; 95% CI: 1.35; 1.63) and possession of private medical health insurance (PR 1.32; 95% CI 1.19; 1.46). Being in a marital relationship was inversely associated with polypharmacy (PR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80; 0.96).

Conclusion

Polypharmacy affects a significant proportion of the Brazilian older population and is associated with sociodemographic factors and access to health services.

Polypharmacy Pattern in Iran: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Large Prescription Database

Background

Polypharmacy is a significant patient safety concern.

Objectives

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of polypharmacy, its continuity and associated factors, and common medication classes among a large outpatient population in East Azerbaijan province, Iran.

Methods

A retrospective prescription data analysis was performed. The cohort included all ≥ 20 years old subjects with at least one prescription filled during the main three-month study period (2020 March 1 - 2020 May 31). Polypharmacy was defined as being exposed to more than four different medications during the main study period, and continuous polypharmacy was defined as being exposed to more than four medications during both the main study period and follow-up period (2020 October 1 - 2020 December 31). The frequency and prevalence of polypharmacy, along with predictive factors, were estimated. We performed multivariate logistic regression and estimated odds ratios (ORs) to investigate the risk factors for polypharmacy.

Results

307,820 patients included (mean age 49.8 years, 62.9% female, mean drug use 3.7 (SD = 2.6). Polypharmacy was observed in 28.3% (CI: 28.1 - 28.4), of which 36.6% experienced continuous polypharmacy. The odds of being exposed to polypharmacy increased with being female, increasing age, and exposure to chronic conditions. The groups of medications most utilized by polypharmacy patients were those indicated for gastro-esophageal reflux diseases, beta-blocking agents, antidepressants, blood glucose-lowering drugs, and antithrombotic agents.

Conclusions

Strategies should be formulated to inform healthcare policymakers and providers about the magnitude of the polypharmacy phenomenon, associated factors, and the common medication classes involved.

Factors related to polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy for the elderly: A nationwide cohort study using National Health Insurance data in South Korea

Polypharmacy may cause adverse health outcomes in the elderly. This study examined the prevalence of continuous polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy, factors associated with polypharmacy, and the most frequently prescribed medications among older adults in South Korea. This was a retrospective observational study using National Health Insurance claims data. In total, 7,358,953 Korean elderly patients aged 65 years and older were included. Continuous polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy were defined as the use of ≥5 and ≥10 medications, respectively, for both ≥90 days and ≥180 days within 1 year. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted with adjustment for general characteristics (sex, age, insurance type), comorbidities (12 diseases, number of comorbidities, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [ECI] classification), and healthcare service utilization. Among 7.36 million elderly patients, 47.8% and 36.9% had polypharmacy for ≥90 and ≥180 days, and 11.9% and 7.1% of patients exhibited hyper-polypharmacy for ≥90 and ≥180 days, respectively. Male sex, older age, insurance, comorbidities (cardio-cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, depressive disorder, dementia, an ECI score of ≥3), and healthcare service utilization were associated with an increased probability of polypharmacy. The therapeutic class with the most prescriptions was drugs for acid-related disorders (ATC A02). The number of outpatient visit days more strongly influenced polypharmacy than hospitalizations and ED visits. This study provides health policymakers with important evidence about the critical need to reduce polypharmacy among older adults.

Geographic Variation in Top-10 Prescribed Medicines and Potentially Inappropriate Medication in Portugal: An Ecological Study of 2.2 Million Older Adults

Multiple medication intake by older adults is considered a serious public health concern since it is associated with increased risk of adverse drug reactions and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). This study described the top-10 prescribed active substances considering geographical distribution and PIM prescription in older adults. A cross-sectional ecological study using data on the active substances prescribed to people aged 65 years or older during 2020 was conducted. Information on active substances and the respective defined daily doses (DDD) stratified by age group, sex and region were collected from a Portuguese health administrative database. The average number of prescribed packages and DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day of top-10 active substances were assessed. This study included a total of 2,228,090 older adults (58% females). The furosemide and atorvastatin were the active substances with higher prescription rates (mean DDD/1000 inhabitants/day) in all ARS in both males and females, in comparison with the other top-10 active substances. Our results showed geographic differences in prescription, illustrated by more prescriptions in ARS North and Centre and fewer prescriptions in ARS Algarve. In females, two out of the 10 most prescribed active substances were PIM (benzodiazepines and opioids). Geographic disparities in PIM prescription across Portuguese regions were also observed. This study shows that drugs for the cardiovascular system were the active substances most prescribed to older adults. The prescription of benzodiazepines and opioids, classified as PIM, among females, alerts officials to the need of health policies to decrease inappropriate medication. The observed geographic differences in the 10 most prescribed active substances and in PIM prescription emphasized the importance of investing in medication optimization across the Portuguese regions.

Assessment of Polypharmacy, Drug Use Patterns, and Associated Factors at the Edna Adan University Hospital, Hargeisa, Somaliland

Polypharmacy is the use of multiple drugs by a patient at the same time and is common in the elderly. To our knowledge, drug use patterns in Somaliland are rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate polypharmacy, drug use patterns, and their predictors at the Edna Adan University Hospital in Hargeisa, Somaliland. A retrospective cohort analysis of 1140 medical records and prescriptions over a year from August 28, 2019, to August 27, 2020, was reviewed. The data completeness and consistency were checked and entered with the SPSS version 25.0. The association between total polypharmacy and different variables was analyzed using multivariable binary logistic regression and expressed as an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). In addition, the World Health Organization's core drug use and facility indicators were used to assess the drug use patterns. The overall polypharmacy in this study was 71%. Statistically significant association was observed between the polypharmacy and variables such as age (P = 0.01; OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.9-6.1), chronic illness (P = 0.01, OR = 8.6, 95% CI = 5.1-14.7), and comorbidity (P = 0.01, OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.1-12.9). However, the ward admitted/visited and gender did not have a statistically significant association with polypharmacy. There was overuse of brand drugs (63.9%) and antibiotics (55.2%), while the use of injectables (19.9%) was within the acceptable range. Polypharmacy and overuse of brand drugs and antibiotics were prevalent in the study setting. Essential drugs list, formularies, and treatment and regulatory guidelines are needed in place to ensure appropriate drug use.

Polimedicación y calidad de vida en el envejecimiento

La población mundial está en constante envejecimiento, aunque la esperanza de vida se está incrementando gracias al desarrollo de los avances de la medicina. No obstante, una mayor expectativa de vida no se relaciona directamente con una mayor calidad de vida, ya que en la actualidad existen factores como la polimedicación que se acompaña de una incidencia de la morbimortalidad en el envejecimiento. De ahí, la importancia de proporcionar herramientas que contribuyan a las buenas prácticas para que la atención del adulto mayor contribuya a un envejecimiento saludable.

Comparison of the prevalence and nature of potentially inappropriate medication use in geriatric outpatients between tertiary and community healthcare settings: a multicenter cross-sectional study

Background Geriatric outpatients with polypharmacy have a high risk of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use. Aim To identify differences in both prevalence and patterns of PIMs and drug-related problems (DRPs) in older outpatients who visited the tertiary hospitals (THs) and community health centers (CHCs) and analyze associated factors. Method A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in five THs and five CHCs from September 2018 to November 2019 in Beijing, China. Data were collected from outpatients aged ≥ 65 years with chronic diseases and polypharmacy. PIMs were evaluated using the 2015 and 2019 Beers Criteria and the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. DRPs were classified using the Helper-Strand DRP Classification. The prevalence and types of PIMs and DRPs were compared, and relevant factors were analyzed. Results The prevalence of PIMs based on the 2015 Beers Criteria was higher in patients from the THs, while PIMs based on the 2019 Beers Criteria did not show a significant difference. PIM prevalence based on STOPP Criteria and DRPs was higher in patients from CHCs. Visiting CHCs was an independent factor of PIMs based on the 2015 Beers Criteria (OR 0.774, 95% CI 0.604-0.992) and the STOPP Criteria (OR 2.427, 95% CI 1.883-3.128), and DRPs (OR 3.612, 95% CI 2.682-4.865). Conclusion Differences in PIM and DRP might be due to the patients and settings. Specific measures to improve the appropriateness of medications in both settings should be used.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in older and frail patients with atrial fibrillation

Elderly and frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of thrombotic events, bleeding, and death compared to their counterparts, making their management challenging. With the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the past decade, the risk:benefit balance in such high-risk patients with AF has tipped in favor of treating these patients with anticoagulation, and in most cases with a NOAC instead of a VKA. In patients ≥75 years of age with AF, each of the 4 approved NOACs reduced stroke or systemic embolism and vs warfarin in their landmark clinical trial and lowered mortality. However, only apixaban and edoxaban significantly reduced major bleeding vs warfarin. A similar pattern was seen in even older cohorts (≥80 and ≥85 years). Among patients age ≥80 who are not candidates for oral anticoagulants at the approved dose, edoxaban 15 mg may be a reasonable alternative. In elderly or frail individuals who are on multiple comedications (particularly if ≥1 moderate or strong cytochrome P-450 inhibitor), only edoxaban consistently reduced major bleeding compared to warfarin. Regardless of the specific OAC selected, appropriate dosing in the elderly (who frequently qualify for dose reduction per the prescribing label) is critical. In elderly and frail patients with AF, factors that may modify the efficacy-safety profile of specific oral OACs should be carefully considered to permit the optimal selection and dosing in these vulnerable patients.

Combine and Conquer: With Type 2 Diabetes Polypharmacy Is Essential Not Only to Achieve Glycemic Control but Also to Treat the Comorbidities and Stabilize or Slow the Advancement of Diabetic Nephropathy

The concept of polypharmacy in the type 2 diabetic patient is both historic and redundant. A combination of three or more medications usually at doses which are less than those utilized for monotherapy is efficacious not only in the therapy of hyperglycemia but also in the therapy of the comorbidities of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. In addition, multiple medications are now accepted as being necessary to reduce albuminuria and decelerate the decline in renal function in the patient with diabetic nephropathy.

Decreasing trends in potentially inappropriate medications in older people: a nationwide repeated cross-sectional study

Background

Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) and polypharmacy are widely used indicators of suboptimal prescribing for older people. The aim of this study was to describe the changes in the prevalence of PIMs and polypharmacy among people aged 75 years and over between 2011 and 2019 in France.

Methods

PIMs and polypharmacy were assessed among people aged 75 years and over every two years between 2011 and 2019 using the French health insurance data system. Sixteen PIM criteria from the 2015 Beers and STOPP lists were assessed. Polypharmacy (5 to 9 drugs) and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 drugs) were defined based on the average number of drugs dispensed per quarter. The Annual Percent Change (APC) and 95%CI were assessed using linear regression models after standardization of the prevalence on age and sex.

Results

The study population included 5,777,645 individuals over 75 years old in 2011 and 6,328,155 in 2019. The prevalence of PIMs decreased from 49.6 to 39.6% over the study period (APC: − 1.19% [− 1.35;-1.04]). Of the sixteen indicators assessed, the prevalence of thirteen decreased between 2011 and 2019. Benzodiazepines were the most frequent PIMs (34.7% in 2011 to 26.9% in 2019), followed by anticholinergic drugs (12.1% in 2011 to 8.3% in 2019), oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (11.4 to 7.8%), and PIMs related to antihypertensive drugs (7.4 to 6.0%). Overall, women and individuals aged 85 years and older were more likely to receive PIMs. The prevalence of hyper-polypharmacy decreased from 30.5 to 25.9% over the study period.

Conclusion

This study, which is the first to assess the change in prevalence of PIMs and polypharmacy over time from comprehensive health data in France, highlights that PIMs and hyper-polypharmacy declined between 2011 and 2019. However, PIMs remains frequent for older people and often involves benzodiazepines.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02568-1.

Chronic polypharmacy at all age: A population-based drug utilization study

Polypharmacy is a growing concern often described only in older people by cumulating all drugs taken. We aimed to describe chronic polypharmacy in France, regardless of age. A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed using the 1/97th representative sample of the French health insurance nationwide database (EGB). All subjects alive on January 1, 2015, and covered by the French healthcare insurance were included, and their information collected until December 31, 2015, or date of death. Drug exposures were estimated from drug dispensing dates and treatment durations. Chronic uses of drug were defined as drugs used daily for more than 6 months. Chronic polypharmacy corresponded to the exposure to five chronic uses of drug or more. In 2015, information of 584 862 subjects was collected (mean age: 42.2 years). Prevalence of chronic polypharmacy was 5.6% and incidence 1.1%. Prevalence of chronic polypharmacy increased noticeably from 0.2% for subjects aged 18 to 40 years to a maximum of 29.2% for subjects aged 80 to 90 years and then decreased to 23.6% for subjects aged 90 years and more. Lipid-modifying agents were the most frequent drugs involved in chronic polypharmacy (10% of exposure). According to age, the most important differences between the younger and older people were found for cardiovascular drugs (43.5% vs. 45.7% of exposure, respectively) and nervous system drugs (13.7% vs. 11.5% of exposure, respectively). This population-based study showed increasing of chronic polypharmacy and evolution of chronic drug patterns with age.

Prevalence of Polypharmacy, Hyperpolypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Older people often receive multiple medications for chronic conditions, which often result in polypharmacy (concomitant use of 5‒9 medicines) and hyperpolypharmacy (concomitant use of ≥10 medicines). A limited number of studies have been performed to evaluate the prevalence of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older people of developing countries. The present study aimed to investigate regional variations in the prevalence of polypharmacy, hyperpolypharmacy, and PIM use in older people (60 + years) in India. Methods: Studies were identified using Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases published from inception (2002) to September 31, 2020. Out of the total 1890 articles, 27 were included in the study. Results: Overall, the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy was 49% (95% confidence interval: 42-56; p < 0.01), hyperpolypharmacy was 31% (21-40; p < 0.01), and PIM use was 28% (24-32; p < 0.01) among older Indian adults. Polypharmacy was more prevalent in North-east India (65%, 50-79), whereas hyperpolypharmacy was prevalent in south India (33%, 17-48). Region-wize estimates for the pooled prevalence of PIM use in India were as follows: 23% (21-25) in East, 33% in West (24-42), 17.8% in North (11-23), and 32% (26-38) in South India. The prevalence of PIM use in adults aged ≥70°years was 35% (28-42), in those taking more medications (≥5.5/day) was 27% (22-31), and in adults using a high number of PIMs (≥3) was 29% (22-36). Subgroup analysis showed that cross-sectional studies had a higher pooled prevalence of polypharmacy 55% (44-65) than cohorts 45% (37-54). Hyperpolypharmacy in inpatient care settings was 37% (26-47), whereas PIM use was higher in private hospitals 31% (24-38) than government hospitals 25% (19-31). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy are widely prevalent in India. About 28% of older Indian adults are affected by PIM use. Thus, appropriate steps are needed to promote rational geriatric prescribing in India. Systematic Review Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier [CRD42019141037].

A multidimensional measure of polypharmacy for older adults using the Health and Retirement Study

Polypharmacy is commonly defined based on the number of medications taken concurrently using standard cut-offs, but several studies have highlighted the need for a multidimensional assessment. We developed a multidimensional measure of polypharmacy and compared with standard cut-offs. Data were extracted for 2141 respondents of the 2007 Prescription Drug Survey, a sub-study of the Health Retirement Study. Latent classes were identified based on multiple indicators of polypharmacy, including quantity, temporality and risk profile. A four-class model was selected based on fit statistics and clinical interpretability: 'High risk, long-term' (Class 1), 'Low risk, long-term' (Class 2), 'High risk, short-term' (Class 3), and 'High risk for drug interactions, medium-term, regular' (Class 4). Classes differed regarding sex, cohabitation, disability and multimorbidity. Participants in the 'low risk' class tended to be male, cohabitating, and reported fewer health conditions, compared to 'high risk' classes. Polypharmacy classes were compared to standard cut-offs (5+ or 9+ medications) in terms of overlap and mortality risk. The three 'high risk' classes overlapped with the groups concurrently taking 5+ and 9+ medications per month. However, the multidimensional measure further differentiated individuals in terms of risk profile and temporality of medication taking, thus offering a richer assessment of polypharmacy.

Polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review of definitions, epidemiology and consequences

BACKGROUND

The number of older adults has been constantly growing around the globe. Consequently, multimorbidity and related polypharmacy have become an increasing problem. In the absence of an accepted agreement on the definition of polypharmacy, data on its prevalence in various studies are not easily comparable. Besides, the evidence on the potential adverse clinical outcomes related to polypharmacy is limited though polypharmacy has been linked to numerous adverse clinical outcomes. This narrative review aims to find and summarize recent publications on definitions, epidemiology and clinical consequences of polypharmacy.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was used to identify recent publications on the definition, prevalence and clinical consequences of polypharmacy using their respective common terms and their variations. Systematic reviews and original studies published between 2015 and 2020 were included.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three definitions of polypharmacy and associated terms were found. Most of them are numerical definitions. Its prevalence ranges from 4% among community-dwelling older people to over 96.5% in hospitalized patients. In addition, numerous adverse clinical outcomes were associated with polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

The term polypharmacy is imprecise, and its definition is yet subject to an ongoing debate. The clinically oriented definitions of polypharmacy found in this review such as appropriate or necessary polypharmacy are more useful and relevant. Regardless of the definition, polypharmacy is highly prevalent in older adults, particularly in nursing home residents and hospitalized patients. Approaches to increase the appropriateness of polypharmacy can improve clinical outcomes in older adults.

The Burden of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Chronic Polypharmacy

We aimed to describe the burden represented by potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in chronic polypharmacy in France. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using data from the French National Insurance databases. The study period was from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016. Chronic drug use was defined as uninterrupted daily use lasting ≥6 months. Chronic polypharmacy was defined as the chronic use of ≥5 medications, and chronic hyperpolypharmacy as the chronic use of ≥10 medications. For individuals aged ≥65 (older adults), PIMs were defined according to the Beers and Laroche lists, and for individuals aged 45-64 years (middle-aged) PIMs were defined according to the PROMPT (Prescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People's Treatments) list. Among individuals with chronic polypharmacy, 4009 (46.2%) middle-aged and 18,036 (64.8%) older adults had at least one chronic PIM. Among individuals with chronic hyperpolypharmacy, these figures were, respectively, 570 (75.0%) and 2544 (88.7%). The most frequent chronic PIM were proton pump inhibitors (43.4% of older adults with chronic polypharmacy), short-acting benzodiazepines (older adults: 13.7%; middle-aged: 16.1%), hypnotics (6.1%; 7.4%), and long-acting sulfonylureas (3.9%; 12.3%). The burden of chronic PIM appeared to be very high in our study, concerning almost half of middle-aged adults and two-thirds of older adults with chronic polypharmacy. Deprescribing interventions in polypharmacy should primarily target proton pump inhibitors and hypnotics.

Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in Treatment of Schizophrenia; Should or Should Not?

Antipsychotics have been utilized as the standard treatment for schizophrenia regardless of illness phase where antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is routinely recommended as the gold standard rather than antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP). However, approximately 20 to 40% of patients with schizophrenia do not respond to APM based on randomized controlled clinical trials and large practical clinical trials indicating that the subgroup of patients with schizophrenia would need differential treatment approaches beyond traditional treatment strategies such as APM. Numerous studies have supported the use of APP in particular for patients with certain clinical situations including: failure to show efficacy or tolerability from treatment with APM, need for different treatment for targeting specific symptom domains, severe illness, failure to treatment with clozapine, skepticism about following treatment guidelines, or cross titration periods. Furthermore, recent large cohort studies and practical clinical trials have proposed more benefits of APP rather than APM in terms of rehospitalization, mortality, and specific symptoms. APP has recently become more widely utilized and recognized as one of the next treatment strategies to clinicians for patients with schizophrenia. Some experts have already proposed the revision of treatment guidelines incorporating APP as evidence-based treatment option for certain patients with schizophrenia. Taken together, APP now deserves an evidence-based and acceptable treatment strategy, not an empirical or preferential treatment approach for treatment of schizophrenia in contemporary clinical practice.