The hypercoagulable state in COVID-19: Incidence, pathophysiology, and management

Hereditary thrombophilia as a possible risk factor for severe disease in COVID-19: a case series

PURPOSE

The risk factors that modulate one's susceptibility for severe COVID-19 have been well documented. Despite this, hypercoagulability remains an often overlooked risk factor for severe disease for COVID-19. Because COVID-19 infection is a risk factor for hypercoagulability, a reasonable presumption/hypothesis is that patients with hereditary thrombophilia would be at a higher risk of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

This case report details two cases where previously unknown hereditary thrombophilias likely contributed to the mortality of COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

The first COVID-19 patient's cause of death was pulmonary thromboemboli from deep vein thrombosis due to heterozygous MTHFR C667T and heterozygous PAI-1 4G/5G mutations. The second COVID-19 patient's cause of death was an acute myocardial infarct due to a coronary artery thrombosis in the setting of heterozygous MTHFR A1298C and homozygous PAI-1 4G/5G mutations. In each case, COVID-19 infection was also considered contributory to death.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of these fatal thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients with hereditary thrombophilias raises questions as to whether this combination of thrombotic risk factors for hypercoagulability may have placed patients at a significant enough risk to experience these fatal thrombotic complications. Thus, while not sufficient alone to prove that SARS-CoV-2 patients with hereditary thrombophilias are at increased risk for thrombotic complications, these two cases indicate that further investigation is warranted into elucidating the relationship between thrombotic risk factors as it may identify an additional high-risk medical condition for COVID-19 and have important diagnostic and therapeutic ramifications.

COVID-19 and acute limb ischemia: latest hypotheses of pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a multi-system disease that can lead to various severe complications. Acute limb ischemia (ALI) has been increasingly recognized as a COVID-19-associated complication that often predicts a poor prognosis. However, the pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms underlying COVID-19-associated ALI remain poorly understood. Hypercoagulability and thrombosis are considered important mechanisms, but we also emphasize the roles of vasospasm, hypoxia, and acidosis in the pathogenesis of the disease. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) pathway, inflammation, and platelet activation may be important molecular mechanisms underlying these pathological changes induced by COVID-19. Furthermore, we discuss the hypotheses of risk factors for COVID-19-associated ALI from genetic, age, and gender perspectives based on our analysis of molecular mechanisms. Additionally, we summarize therapeutic approaches such as use of the interleukin-6 (IL-6) blocker tocilizumab, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, providing insights for the future treatment of coronavirus-associated limb ischemic diseases.

Immunologic and inflammatory consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its implications in renal disease

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic made it critical to understand the immune and inflammatory responses to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It became increasingly recognized that the immune response was a key mediator of illness severity and that its mechanisms needed to be better understood. Early infection of both tissue and immune cells, such as macrophages, leading to pyroptosis-mediated inflammasome production in an organ system critical for systemic oxygenation likely plays a central role in the morbidity wrought by SARS-CoV-2. Delayed transcription of Type I and Type III interferons by SARS-CoV-2 may lead to early disinhibition of viral replication. Cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), some of which may be produced through mechanisms involving nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), likely contribute to the hyperinflammatory state in patients with severe COVID-19. Lymphopenia, more apparent among natural killer (NK) cells, CD8+ T-cells, and B-cells, can contribute to disease severity and may reflect direct cytopathic effects of SARS-CoV-2 or end-organ sequestration. Direct infection and immune activation of endothelial cells by SARS-CoV-2 may be a critical mechanism through which end-organ systems are impacted. In this context, endovascular neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and microthrombi development can be seen in the lungs and other critical organs throughout the body, such as the heart, gut, and brain. The kidney may be among the most impacted extrapulmonary organ by SARS-CoV-2 infection owing to a high concentration of ACE2 and exposure to systemic SARS-CoV-2. In the kidney, acute tubular injury, early myofibroblast activation, and collapsing glomerulopathy in select populations likely account for COVID-19-related AKI and CKD development. The development of COVID-19-associated nephropathy (COVAN), in particular, may be mediated through IL-6 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling, suggesting a direct connection between the COVID-19-related immune response and the development of chronic disease. Chronic manifestations of COVID-19 also include systemic conditions like Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) and Adults (MIS-A) and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), which may reflect a spectrum of clinical presentations of persistent immune dysregulation. The lessons learned and those undergoing continued study likely have broad implications for understanding viral infections' immunologic and inflammatory consequences beyond coronaviruses.

Epidemiology, clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with Covid-19 and acute limb ischaemia - A single center study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, clinical and paraclinical characteristics and outcomes of Covid-19 positive patients presenting in the Emergency Department (ED) with and treated for acute limb ischaemia (ALI) during a 2-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in the ED of St. Spiridon County Clinical Emergency Hospital in Iasi, north-east region of Romania. The patients included in this study presented in the ED between March 1st, 2020 and February 28th, 2022 with ALI and Covid-19.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total number of 141018 patients were evaluated in our ED, 8578 (representing 6,08%) patients being diagnosed with Covid-19. Of them, 98 (1.14% of all with Covid-19) presented ALI. The mean age was 70.9 ± 10.23 and 67.3% of the patients were males. At admission, 57% of patients had Covid-19-related pneumonia, identified on X-ray or CT scan. Of all patients, 81 (82%) were diagnosed with ALI in lower limbs with 10% of them having affected both limbs. 95% of the patients presented comorbidities, the main being cardiac (85%), diabetes mellitus (37%), vascular (24%) and neurological (22.6%). Non-survivor patients were more likely to have Covid-19 pneumonia on chest X-ray or CT scan, 92% versus 44% (OR 15, CI 3.3; 68, p < .01), lymphopenia 96% versus 70% (OR 10.2, CI 1.30; 80.9, p < .01), a NLR over 9.77% versus 30% (OR 7.5, CI 2.6; 21.4, p < .01), acidosis 65% versus 33% (OR 3.8, CI 1.4; 9.7, p < .01), abnormal AST, 69% versus 29% (OR 5.4, CI 2; 14.5, p < .01) and secondary amputation, 38.5 versus 11.1% (OR 5, CI 1.7; 14.7, p < 0.1). Overall, the mortality rate was 26.5%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of ALI in patients infected with Covid-19 who were evaluated in our ED was 1.14%. The highest mortality rate was probably related to Covid-19 pneumonia. We observed that patients with Covid-19 pneumonia, lymphopenia, a NLR >9, metabolic acidosis, increased AST at ED admission and secondary amputation had a higher mortality.

Impact of COVID-19 in the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and clinical outcomes in cancer patients: a cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of VTE and clinical outcomes in a cohort of cancer patients and COVID-19 infection, and to establish possible predictive factors of VTE.

METHODS/PATIENTS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to determine the incidence of VTE and mortality in 118 cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to August 2020. We calculated individual Khorana Risk and CATS-MICA scores in order to evaluate their utility to identify risk of VTE or death. Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon or Student's T test, and categorical variables were compared using the Chi-Square or Fisher's exact text among patients with and without VTE. A Log-Rank test was performed to detect mortality differences between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients were included. VTE global incidence was 4.2% (n = 5), and mortality 25.4% (n = 30). Obesity (p = 0.05), recent chemotherapy (p = 0.049) and use of steroids (p = 0.006) were related to higher risk of VTE in the univariate analysis, although they were not confirmed in the multivariate analysis as independent risk factors. Statistically significant differences in all-cause, COVID-19-related and cancer-related mortality according to the Khorana risk score (KRS) were observed. CATS-MICA score (CMS) also showed statistically significant differences in mortality between low- and high-risk patients. Prediction of risk of VTE development with these scores showed a tendency towards significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, VTE incidence was similar to previously reported in the general population with SARS-CoV-2 infection. KRS was associated with overall and specific-cause mortality, and might be a useful prognostic tool in this setting.

Hemostatic Profile and Serum Levels of Interferon Gamma-Induced Protein 10 (IP-10) in Neonates Born to Mothers with COVID-19 During the Peripartum Period

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised significant concerns regarding its potential impact on maternal and neonatal health. This study aimed to investigate the immunologic and hemostatic profiles of neonates exposed to SARS-CoV-2 during the peripartum period (0-14 days prior to delivery). This retrospective study included 28 neonates born to COVID-19-positive mothers during the peripartum period and a control group of 54 neonates born to mothers who never tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy. Arterial blood samples were collected from all neonates on the second day of life for the simultaneous assessment of full blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), and Interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) levels, as well as Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) tests (EXTEM, INTEM, and NATEM). Neonates born to COVID-19-positive mothers and those born to COVID-19-negative mothers exhibited similar coagulation profiles based on ROTEM analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that peripartum COVID-19 infection was associated with higher IP-10 levels in neonates (coefficient: +16.8, 95% CI: +9.0 to +24.6, p < 0.0001). Our study findings suggest that the presence of immunologic disturbance in neonates is related to recent peripartum exposure to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, as evidenced by increased IP-10 levels in blood samples obtained from neonates born to SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers. However, peripartum exposure to maternal SARS-CoV-2 did not appear to disrupt the hemostatic profile of the exposed newborns based on ROTEM test results.

Exploring Hypercoagulability in Post-COVID Syndrome (PCS): An Attempt at Unraveling the Endothelial Dysfunction

Background: The lingering effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, collectively known as post-COVID syndrome (PCS), affect a significant proportion of recovered patients, manifesting as persistent symptoms like fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and exercise intolerance. Increasing evidence suggests that endothelial dysfunction and coagulation abnormalities play a central role in PCS pathophysiology. This study investigates hypercoagulability and endothelial dysfunction in PCS through thrombin generation and the von Willebrand factor (VWF)/ADAMTS13 axis. Methods: Plasma samples from 97 PCS patients recruited since October 2020 by the clinical research unit of the Brugmann University Hospital were analyzed. A thrombin generation test was performed on a St-Genesia® analyzer (Stago) using the Thromboscreen kit; VWF antigen was determined on a CS-2500 analyzer (Siemens); and ADAMTS-13 activity was determined using an ELISA kit (Technozym®) on an ElX808 plate reader. Results: Thrombin generation testing revealed elevated thrombin production in PCS patients, particularly when thrombomodulin was included. Although most PCS patients showed normalized VWF/ADAMTS13 ratios, 11.3% exhibited elevated ratios (≥1.5), associated with advanced age. Conclusions: Patients with PCS show a consistent pattern of prolonged thrombo-inflammatory dysregulation, highlighted by elevated in vitro thrombin generation and the persistence of abnormal VWF/ADAMTS-13 ratios in a subset of patients.

Cannula associated deep vein thromboses in COVID-19 patients supported with VV ECMO

BACKGROUND

VV ECMO is increasingly used as a rescue strategy for hypercarbic and hypoxic respiratory failure refractory to conventional management, and more than 14,000 patients with COVID-19 related respiratory failure have been supported with VV ECMO to date. One of the known complications of VV ECMO support is the development of cannula-associated deep vein thromboses (CaDVT). The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of CaDVT in COVID-19 patients supported with VV ECMO as compared to non-COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that due to the hypercoagulable state and longer duration of VV ECMO support required for patients with COVID-19, a higher incidence of CaDVT would be observed in these patients.

METHODS

This is a single center, retrospective observational study. About 291 non-trauma adult patients who were cannulated for VV ECMO and managed at our institution from January 1, 2014 to January 10, 2022 were included. The primary outcome was the presence of CaDVT 24 h after decannulation in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 patients. Our secondary outcome was continued presence of DVT on follow up imaging. CaDVT were defined as venous thrombi detected at prior cannulation sites.

RESULTS

Both groups had a high incidence of CaDVT. There was no significant difference in the incidence of CaDVT in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients (95% vs 88%, p = 0.13). Patients with COVID-19 had an increased incidence of persistent CaDVT on repeat imaging (78% vs 56%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Given the high number of post-decannulation CaDVT in both groups, routine screening should be a part of post ECMO care in both populations. Repeat venous duplex ultrasound should be performed to assess for the need for ongoing treatment given the high incidence of CaDVT that persisted on repeat duplex scans.

Investigation of homocysteine, D-dimer and platelet count levels as potential predictors of thrombosis risk in COVID-19 patients

Thrombosis plays an important role in induction of Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) complications including heart attack and stroke. Reliable biomarkers are needed to predict thrombosis risk for better management and improve patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between homocysteine, a thrombosis-related biomarker, and other thrombosis-related parameters, such as D-dimer and platelet count with disease outcome in COVID-19 patients. This case-control study including 50 intensive care unit hospitalized patients with Covid-19 with a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 50 healthy individuals as a control group was conducted. Both groups were matched for age and body mass index (BMI) and had no history of underlying diseases such as cardiovascular, liver, kidney or smoking. Blood samples were collected from both groups to measure serum homocysteine, platelet count and D-dimer levels. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8.3 software. The study found no statistically significant difference in homocysteine levels between COVID-19 patients and the control group. However, D-dimer levels were significantly higher in the patient group. Platelet count analysis revealed a significant difference between patients who died and those who were discharged from the hospital (P < 0.05). Despite previous studies suggesting a link between homocysteine and thrombosis, this study found no significant difference in homocysteine levels between COVID-19 patients and the control group. The significantly elevated D-dimer levels in the death group patient suggest that D-dimer and thrombocytopenia may be more reliable predictors of thrombosis and worse outcome in COVID-19 patients without underlying diseases.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on incidence of coronary heart disease in Bavaria, Germany: an analysis of health claims data

BACKGROUND

Inconsistent findings about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular disease diagnosis and consultations have been reported internationally. The objective of this study was to analyse the impact of the pandemic period (2020-2021) on the incidence rate of coronary heart disease (CHD) compared with the pre-pandemic period (2012-2019) in Bavaria, Germany.

METHODS

We used health claims data of around 9 million statutorily insured residents (≥20 years) of Bavaria, Germany. We calculated quarterly age-standardised incidence rates for men and women diagnosed with CHD using the European Standard Population 2013. Interrupted time series regression models were used to analyse possible pandemic effects on the CHD incidence rates.

RESULTS

Overall, 797 074 new CHD cases (47% women) were diagnosed from 2012 to 2021. Both pre-pandemic and pandemic incidence rates for women were lower than for men. Regression models showed decreasing incidence rates in the pre-pandemic period in men (-5.2% per year (p.a.), 95% CI: -5.7% to -4.7%) and in women (-6.6% p.a., 95% CI: -7.3% to -6.0%) and seasonal effects (higher in quarter 4 compared with Q1-Q3). During the pandemic period, there was no clear evidence of a level change in the incidence rates both in women and men. However, there are indications of a smaller decline in the incidence during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period, in particular in women (-0.7% p.a., 95% CI: -6.0% to 4.8%) and less prominent in men (-1.7% p.a., 95% CI: -6.0% to 2.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

An overall decreasing CHD incidence rate was observed in men and women in the past decade but no clear impact of the pandemic was seen. These results show the importance of incidence monitoring beyond the pandemics to maintain chronic disease care.

Hypercoagulable Rotational Thromboelastometry During Hospital Stay Is Associated with Post-Discharge DLco Impairment in Patients with COVID-19-Related Pneumonia

Hypercoagulation is central to the pathogenesis of acute and post-acute COVID-19. This prospective observational study explored whether rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), a method that unveils coagulation status, predicts outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We investigated 62 patients using ROTEM that was conducted at enrollment, clinical deterioration, discharge and follow-up visits 1 and 3 months post-discharge. A hypercoagulable ROTEM was more common at clinical deterioration than at enrollment and the levels of hypercoagulable ROTEM indices correlated with the clinical severity score. Hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment was not associated with in-hospital death. Patients with hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment, discharge and 1 month post-discharge had an increased risk of persistent symptoms 1 and 3 months after discharge. Patients with hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment, discharge, and 1 month after discharge were more likely to have lung diffusion capacity (DLco) impairment 3 months after discharge. High levels of hypercoagulable ROTEM indices were associated with the increased risk of persistent symptoms at later stages of the disease. In a multivariate analysis, (i) hypercoagulable ROTEM at discharge and female gender were linked to the presence of symptoms at one month post-discharge, (ii) hypercoagulable ROTEM at one month after discharge was linked to the presence of symptoms at three months post-discharge, (iii) hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment and at discharge and female gender were linked to the presence of impaired DLco at three months post-discharge. Excessive coagulation may contribute to long-COVID pathogenesis and ROTEM findings during hospitalization may predict post-acute-COVID-19 sequelae in patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia.

Post-Acute Sequelae of Covid-19: A System-wise Approach on the Effects of Long-Covid-19

The SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted global health, economics, and society. This review seeks to encompass an overview of current knowledge on COVID-19, including its transmission, pathogenesis, and clinical presentation related to various systems within the human body. COVID-19 is a highly contagious illness that has rapidly spread worldwide. As of August 4, 2023, the WHO reported over 570 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and over 6.3 million deaths. Although the virus is most common in adults, children can also be infected. Respiratory droplets that are produced when an infected person coughs or sneezes are the primary transmission mode for COVID-19. Additionally, the virus can be disseminated via contact with contaminated surfaces or objects, as it can remain viable for several hours or days. SARS-CoV-2 is a respiratory virus that enters cells by bonding with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Once inside the cell, the virus replicates and produces new particles that can infect other cells. Interestingly, the effects of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) encompass more than just respiratory system. The findings presented in the data suggest that PASC significantly impacts multiple organs and their respective physiological processes. In light of these observations, we aim to provide a detailed discussion of the relevant findings in this paper. Through our review, we hope to provide healthcare professionals with a deeper understanding of the effects of PASC on the human body, which could ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes and treatment strategies.

Liver Enzymes and Inflammatory Markers Among Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Case-Control Study in Telangana

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic originated in Wuhan, China, and swiftly spread across all continents. The respiratory system is the most affected in people who acquire sickness as a result of SARS-CoV-2. However, the virus can also affect other systems. The COVID-19 pandemic has become one of the most fatal infectious diseases in the recent past. Patients present with symptoms of fever, cough, tiredness, loss of taste or smell, sore throat, headache, and diarrhea. Objective This study intends to evaluate how COVID-19 has shown its effects on the well-being of the liver by collecting and correlating the data of the liver enzymes and inflammatory markers among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.  Materials and methods A retrospective case-control study that included 200 patients diagnosed and hospitalized with COVID-19 was compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched healthy control groups without COVID-19 at RVM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (RVMIMS & RC), a tertiary care teaching hospital in Siddipet, Telangana, India. Liver function tests (LFTs) and inflammatory markers were evaluated in both groups.  Results Out of 200 patients, 179 (89.5%) had elevated alanine transaminase (ALT), 191 (95.5%) had elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 33 (16.5%) had elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and 183 (91.5%) showed elevated D-dimer levels. All the patients had elevated interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Conclusion COVID-19 patients have exhibited elevations in liver enzyme panels and inflammatory markers. Further research and follow-up studies may aid in understanding the role of the well-being of the liver in patients affected by COVID-19. Considering the emergence of newer COVID-19 strains, we recommend LFT to patients who test positive for the virus to monitor prognosis and guide treatment protocols through this study.

The D-Dimer to Albumin Ratio Could Predict Hospital Readmission Within One Year in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Purpose

To explore the association of D-dimer-to-albumin ratio (DAR) with hospital readmission within one year in patients with acute exacerbation chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Patients and Methods

From January 2019 to October 2022, 509 patients with COPD were enrolled in Baise People's Hospital for this retrospective cohort study. Baseline data and blood samples were collected, and patients were followed up for one year after inclusion. The AECOPD hospital readmission within one year was the outcome. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were conducted to determine the prognostic performance of DAR for predicting readmission within one year. The relationships between DAR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and AECOPD hospital readmission were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The relationship was further explored in different modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), COPD assessment test (CAT), COPD course, pneumonia, glucocorticoid, antibiotic subgroups.

Results

Totally, 117 (22.99%) COPD patients were hospital readmission due to AECOPD. The area under the curve (AUC) for the DAR was 0.726. DAR ≥2.21 (OR=1.80, 95% CI: 1.05-3.17) was associated with elevated odds of AECOPD hospital readmission within one year. DAR ≥2.21 was related to increased odds of AECOPD hospital readmission in patients of those mMRC ≥2, CAT >20, COPD course <10 years, and pneumonia. NLR ≥3.69 was associated with higher odds of AECOPD hospital readmission in patients of those mMRC ≥2 and COPD course ≥10 years.

Conclusion

In patients with AECOPD, DAR showed a better predictive value in predicting the risk of hospital readmission in patients with AECOPD within one year. The findings of our study might help identify patients with a high risk of readmission within one year and provide timely treatment to prevent the reoccurrence of AECOPD.

Long COVID: A Comprehensive Overview of the Signs and Symptoms across Multiple Organ Systems

Long coronavirus disease (COVID), also known as the post-acute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (PASC), is a significant concern since the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, as it still manifests in individuals with persistent symptoms and complications beyond the acute phase of infection. Defining this disease is challenging, as it manifests as a spectrum of symptoms varying in severity among individuals who have previously tested positive for COVID-19. Long COVID is more prevalent in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and presents in various ways, ranging from pulmonary to extrapulmonary symptoms. This literature review examines the current body of research on long COVID with a focus on its effects on the cardiovascular, hematological, respiratory, renal, and neurological systems with systematically analyzed, peer-reviewed articles retrieved from the PubMed database. There have been several proposed pathophysiological mechanisms by which severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 affects the aforementioned organ systems; however, research on the definite mechanisms is lacking, especially when considering the management of long COVID in the perioperative setting. The impact of post-COVID sequelae necessitates individualized management strategies tailored to each symptomatic profile, particularly in patients with comorbidities. The COVID-19 pandemic affected millions of people and had a profound impact on those who developed PASC, lowering their quality of life and increasing potential surgical risks. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the specific risk factors for long COVID and who is most susceptible to it. Further research is required to fill these gaps and explore potential avenues for preventing PASC.

COVID-19 venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in pediatrics

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines for VTE prophylaxis were established at our institution at the beginning of the pandemic. Patients who had any VTE risk factors in addition to COVID-19 met criteria for anticoagulation prophylaxis. Patients who were diagnosed with MIS-C met criteria regardless of additional risk factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C to determine compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines and to evaluate the incidence of VTE and bleeding events in our population.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Among a total of 678 patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C, 519 (76 %) patients met criteria for VTE prophylaxis and 348 (65.6 %) started prophylaxis. Logistic regression analysis identified a personal or family history of thrombosis or thrombophilia, diagnosis of MIS-C, admission to the intensive care unit, and presence of a central venous catheter as significantly associated with starting VTE prophylaxis. There were 18 patients who developed VTE. Minor bleeding events occurred in 19 patients (5 %), patient important bleeding, no intervention occurred in 8 patients (2 %), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in 8 patients (2 %), and major bleeding in 10 patients (3 %). The incidence of VTE in our patients with COVID-19 and MIS-C is similar to VTE rates at other institutions. We found that universally recognized VTE risk factors were appropriate to include as risk factors for thrombosis in hospitalized children with COVID-19 and MIS-C.

ROTEM and von Willebrand Factor in COVID patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke: A case series: ROTEM and von Willebrand Factor in COVID-19 Related Stroke

OBJECTIVES

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) induces systemic thrombotic complications including acute ischemic stroke. In this case series, we report markers of inflammation, coagulation factors including von Willebrand factor antigen, and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective case series of COVID patients seen at a single comprehensive stroke center between 2020-2022. For patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT), ROTEM data was collected during the procedure and analyzed on ROTEM delta system.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (33.3% female) median age 65-years-old presented with COVID and acute ischemic stroke. Thirteen had LVO. The mean NIHSS was 15 (range 0-35) on admission and 18 (0-42) at discharge. Most were cryptogenic (N=7, 46.7%), followed by cardioembolic (N=6, 40%) and large artery-to-artery embolization (N=2, 13.3%). mRS was < 3 in 8 (53%) patients at discharge. None of the patients were on anticoagulation, and five were on antiplatelet therapy pre-hospitalization. Seven received thrombolytics with alteplase (tPA), and 10 had MT. Baseline platelet count was 102 K/uL (range 102-291 K/uL). vWF was measured in 12 patients, all elevated, with seven having levels >400 (180%). ROTEM data was collected in six patients. Three who received tPA had abnormal EXTEM and FIBTEM data (CT extem > 85secs, A10 EXTEM < 45mm, and A10 FIBTEM < 10mm). Notably, INTEM (CT INTEM >208secs) was abnormal in five of the six patients, two of whom did not receive tPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated vWF antigen levels with abnormal ROTEM data suggests that COVID induces changes in the clotting cascade. More robust research is needed to investigate these findings. Thrombolytics, MT, and antiplatelet agents should be utilized to treat COVID-related ischemic stroke based on current clinical guidelines.

Timing of total joint arthroplasty post-COVID-19: an evaluation of the optimal window to minimize perioperative risks

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are commonly performed orthopedic procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 status on postoperative complications and mortality in patients undergoing THA and TKA.

METHODS

A total of 110,186 underwent either THA or TKA. Patients were grouped based on their COVID-19 status, gathered from the National COVID-19 Cohort Collaborative (N3C) in the 12 weeks preceding surgery and compared for various variables, including age, sex, BMI, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. COVID-19 status was defined as a positive test result that was closest to the date of surgery regardless of testing positive previously. Postoperative complications such as venous thromboembolism (VTE), sepsis, surgical site infection, bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day, and 1-year all-cause mortality were examined. To compare the variables, an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was calculated with a significant level set at P < 0.05. Logistic regression using R programming was utilized for these calculations.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis was performed and rates of VTE (1.02% vs. 3.35%), 30-day mortality (0.25% vs. less than 5%), and 1-year mortality (1.42% vs. 5.43%) were higher in the COVID-19-positive group for THA patients (P < 0.001). For TKA patients, only 30-day mortality was significantly higher in the COVID-19-positive group (P = 0.034). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that a positive COVID-19 diagnosis within two weeks of surgery and a CCI score > 3 were significant predictors of postoperative complications and mortality for both TKA and THA.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a positive COVID-19 diagnosis within 12 weeks of THA or TKA carried a significantly higher risk for postoperative complications and mortality. In addition, a CCI score > 3 is also a significant risk factor. These findings emphasize the importance of vigilant preoperative screening and risk stratification in the era of COVID-19.

Evolving Role of Coronary Collaterals in STEMI Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Phases

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition where coronary collaterals can mitigate myocardial damage. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unique challenges in STEMI management, potentially affecting outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy of coronary collaterals during the pandemic compared to the post-pandemic period. A review of 1465 STEMI patients treated at a high-volume tertiary care center from April 2020 to December 2022 was conducted. Collaterals were assessed using the Rentrop classification. In-hospital mortality and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were analyzed based on collateral status and timeframes. During the pandemic, there was a higher incidence of robust collaterals (28.2% vs 23.2%, P = .04), but they were less protective, with similar in-hospital mortality (14.4% vs 8.1%, P = .07) and 1-year MACE rates (21.9% vs 30.4%, P = .09) across groups. Post-pandemic, robust collaterals showed significant protective effects with reduced in-hospital mortality (3.6% vs 7.4%, P = .04) and 1-year MACE rates (17.1% vs 24.9%, P = .03). These findings highlight a dynamic role of collaterals in STEMI management, with the pandemic impairing their functionality. This underscores the need for adaptive STEMI care strategies, especially during global health crises.

Retrospective analysis of ethnic/racial disparities and excess vascular mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic

The Sars coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in increased morbidity and mortality; however, there is limited understanding of how excess mortality is distributed among different racial and ethnic subgroups and vascular diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study design using data from the United States (US) Center for Disease Control (CDC) Wide Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (Wonder) database. The database contains death certificate information for all US residents by cause of death as ascertained by the treating physician. We examined the trends of excess death by vascular disease specific mortality among different racial and ethnicity subgroups. Excess deaths were defined as the difference between observed numbers of deaths in specific time periods and the expected numbers of deaths in the same time periods. We compared mortality rates during the reference period of 2018-2019 (pre-pandemic) with the study period of 2020-2021 (pandemic years). We also compared excess mortality rates among racial and ethnic subgroups (Non-Hispanic white, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic individuals). Vascular disease was categorized by administrative diagnostic codes (ICD10): Vascular disease (I26, I82, I70-73, I74) and its subtypes Arterial thrombosis (I74), venous thromboembolism (I26, I82) and atherosclerotic disease (I70-73).

RESULTS

Compared to 2018-2019, there was a 1.3 % excess mortality associated with vascular disease, a 12.2 % excess mortality due to arterial thrombosis mortality, and an 8.0 % excess mortality due to thromboembolism in 2020-2021. Black individuals demonstrated higher excess vascular mortality (6.9 %) compared to white individuals (-0.3 %) P < .001, higher excess venous thromboembolism mortality (14.1 % vs 5.1 % P = 0.002) and higher atherosclerosis mortality (2.1 % vs -2.6 % P = 0.002). Hispanics compared to white individuals had higher excess vascular mortality (5.1 % vs -0.3 % P = 0.03) and excess venous thromboembolism mortality (24.2 % vs 5.1 % P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant and persistent increase in vascular mortality. Excess mortality has disproportionately affected Black and Hispanic individuals compared to white individuals, highlighting the need for further studies to address and eliminate these health care disparities.

Ocular manifestations of COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to build on our understanding of COVID-19 by detailing a comprehensive look at the prevalence of different ocular manifestations related to COVID-19 infection.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Eligible studies published between June 20, 2021, and May 11, 2023, were retrieved from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases as well as grey literature. Covidence was used to conduct the systematic review. Duplicate records were removed, and 2 independent reviewers screened records for relevance. After screening, a risk-of-bias assessment was carried out. Data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using STATA 14.0. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were computed based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 43 articles with a total of 10,572 subjects. The results showed that COVID-19 patients had a significantly higher prevalence of conjunctivitis (effect size [ES] = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.15), ptosis (ES = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.30), and ophthalmoplegia (ES = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74). Our results also indicate that COVID-19 patients have higher prevalence of cotton wool spots (ES = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.09), retinal hemorrhages (ES = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-0.18), and retinal vein tortuosity (ES = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.35).

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 can exhibit extrapulmonary manifestations, affecting both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Common anterior-segment findings include conjunctivitis, whereas posterior-segment findings may include cotton wool spots, retinal hemorrhages, and retinal vein tortuosity. Improving our understanding of the ocular manifestations of COVID-19 has the potential to facilitate quicker diagnosis and subsequent treatment.

Retinal Microvasculature Changes Linked to Executive Function Impairment after COVID-19

Background/Objectives: Studies using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) have revealed that individuals recovering from COVID-19 have a reduced retinal vascular density (VD) and larger foveal avascular zones (FAZs) than healthy individuals, with more severe cases showing greater reductions. We aimed to examine aspects of the retinal microvascularization in patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) classified by COVID-19 severity and how these aspects relate to cognitive performance. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study included 104 PCC participants from the NAUTILUS Project, divided into severe (n = 59) and mild (n = 45) COVID-19 groups. Participants underwent cognitive assessments and OCTA to measure VD and perfusion density (PD) in the superficial capillary plexus (SVP) and FAZ. Analysis of covariance and partial Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to study intergroup differences and the relationships between cognitive and OCTA variables. Results: Severe PCC participants had significantly lower central (p = 0.03) and total (p = 0.03) VD, lower central (p = 0.02) PD measurements, and larger FAZ areas (p = 0.02) and perimeters (p = 0.02) than mild cases. Severe cases showed more cognitive impairment, particularly in speed processing (p = 0.003) and executive functions (p = 0.03). Lower central VD, lower central PD, and larger FAZ areas and perimeters were associated with worse executive function performance in the entire PCC sample and in the mild COVID-19 group. Conclusions: Retinal microvascular alterations, characterized by reduced VD and PD in the SVP and larger FAZ areas, were associated with cognitive impairments in PCC individuals. These findings suggest that severe COVID-19 leads to long-lasting microvascular damage, impacting retinal and cognitive health.

The association of radiologic right heart strain indices with the severity of pulmonary parenchymal involvement and prognosis in patients with COVID-19

Introduction

It has been demonstrated that an increase in the diameter of the right ventricle or pulmonary artery in COVID-19 patients could be associated with the severity of lung involvement and may lead to unfavorable outcomes, particularly in the presence of pulmonary vascular diseases. This study investigated the relationship between these right heart strain features, the extent of lung involvement, and their prognostic values in patients without vascular comorbidities.

Methods

This study selected 154 consecutive patients with positive chest computed tomography (CT) findings and no evidence of concurrent pulmonary disease. Clinical characteristics and adverse outcomes in in-hospital settings were collected retrospectively. Diameters of cardiac ventricles and arteries, along with lung opacification scores, were obtained using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) findings, and the association of these variables was evaluated.

Results

An increase in pulmonary artery (PA) to ascending aorta (AO) diameter ratio and lung parenchymal damage were significantly and positively correlated (P=0.017), but increased right ventricle (RV) to left ventricle (LV) diameter ratio showed no association with the extent of chest opacification (P=0.098). Evaluating the prognostic ability of both ratios using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis proved no significant class separation in regards to predicting adverse outcomes (PA/AO: OR:1.081, P Value:0.638, RV/LV: OR:1.098, P Value:0.344).

Conclusion

In COVID-19 patients without vascular comorbidities, a higher PA/AO diameter ratio was significantly associated with increased lung involvement severity on CT imaging but not with adverse in-hospital outcomes. Conversely, an increased RV/LV ratio on CTPA did not correlate significantly with adverse outcomes or the severity of parenchymal lung damage.

Low Versus Standard Intensity Heparin Protocols in Adults Maintained on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Patients maintained on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) often require systemic anticoagulation to prevent circuit clotting and systemic thromboembolic complications. The optimal intensity of anticoagulation to balance the risk of bleeding and prevention of thrombotic complications in this patient population is not well described. Objective: To compare bleeding events in patients on ECMO anticoagulated with standard vs low intensity heparin protocols. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adult patients on VA- or VV-ECMO and anticoagulated with low or standard intensity heparin protocols. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding; secondary outcomes included the incidence of minor bleeding, thrombotic complications, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, in-hospital mortality, time in therapeutic range, anti-Xa correlation with aPTT, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, oxygenator exchanges, and rate of protocol switching. Results: A total of 27 patients (14 low intensity, 13 standard intensity) were included. There were six major bleeding events in the low intensity group and four in the standard intensity group (P = 0.69); there were four minor bleeding events in the low intensity group and five in the standard intensity group (P = 0.69). Seven patients in the standard intensity group switched protocols; zero patients in the low intensity group switched protocols (P = 0.002). There were no differences in any other outcomes. Conclusions: There was no difference in the incidence of any bleeding or thrombotic events when using a low vs standard intensity heparin protocol in patients on ECMO. A low intensity heparin strategy for patients on ECMO may be feasible and safe.

Imaging and Biomarkers: The Assesment of Pulmonary Embolism Risk and Early Mortality

Background and Objectives: Pulmonary embolism (PE) incidence has been increasing in the last 10 years. Computed thoracic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) had a major role in PE diagnosis and prognosis. The main purpose of this study was as follows: the prognostic value of a CTPA parameter, pulmonary artery obstruction index (PAOI), in PE risk assessment and the predictive accuracy of biomarkers, D-dimer and cardiac Troponin T (c-TnT), in 7-day mortality. A second objective of the research was to investigate the relationship between imaging by PAOI and these biomarkers in different etiologies of PE. Materials and Methods: This study comprised 109 patients with PE, hospitalized and treated between February 2021 and August 2022. They had different etiologies of PE: deep vein thrombosis (DVT); persistent atrial fibrillation (AF); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation; COVID-19; and cancers. The investigations were as follows: clinical examination; D-dimer testing, as a mandatory method for PE suspicion (values ≥500 µg/L were highly suggestive for PE); c-TnT, as a marker of myocardial injury (values ≥14 ng/L were abnormal); CTPA, with right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) signs and PAOI. Treatments were according to PE risk: systemic thrombolysis in high-risk PE; low weight molecular heparins (LWMH) in high-risk PE, after systemic thrombolysis or from the beginning, when systemic thrombolysis was contraindicated; and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in low- and intermediate-risk PE. Results: PAOI had a high predictive accuracy for high-risk PE (area under curve, AUC = 0.993). D-dimer and cTnT had a statistically significant relationship with 7-day mortality for the entire sample, p < 0.001, and for AF, p = 0.0036; COVID-19, p = 0.003; and cancer patients, p = 0.005. PAOI had statistical significance for 7-day mortality only in COVID-19, p = 0.045, and cancer patients, p = 0.038. The relationship PAOI-D-dimer and PAOI-c-TnT had very strong statistical correlation for the entire sample and for DVT, AF, COPD, and COVID-19 subgroups (Rho = 0.815-0.982). Conclusions: PAOI was an important tool for PE risk assessment. D-dimer and c-TnT were valuable predictors for 7-day mortality in PE. PAOI (imaging parameter for PE extent) and D-dimer (biomarker for PE severity) as well as PAOI and c-TnT (biomarker for myocardial injury) were strongly correlated for the entire PE sample and for DVT, AF, COPD, and COVID-19 patients.

Endovascular Intervention for Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion Following COVID-19 Pneumonia: Two Case Reports

COVID-19 patients may experience acute mesenteric ischaemia. Identifying acute mesenteric ischaemia is challenging, particularly as initial symptoms are often vague and easily overlooked. Early detection and immediate intervention to restore blood flow can prevent these severe consequences. Presented in this report are two cases of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) thrombosis following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. CT scans demonstrated SMA thrombosis in both patients, with no evidence of bowel necrosis. Endovascular intervention with self-expanding stent placement was performed after angiographic confirmation of the diagnosis. At 6-month follow-up, both patients remained asymptomatic on dual antiplatelet therapy. Atypical gastrointestinal manifestations in COVID-19 patients should raise suspicion for uncommon complications, such as SMA thrombosis. For SMA occlusion without associated bowel necrosis, endovascular therapy represents a viable treatment approach.

Emergency Abdominal Surgery in Children With COVID-19: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Propensity Score Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Evidence suggests that coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with increased perioperative mortality in adults. We hypothesized that children with COVID-19 had worse outcomes after emergency surgery compared to children without COVID-19.

METHODS

Children <18 y who underwent emergency abdominal surgery were included in the 2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric database. Children with COVID-19 diagnosed preoperatively were identified. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed, matching demographic and clinical factors. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were assessed. Due to event rarity, a composite outcome for postoperative morbidity was also assessed. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests identified differences between groups. Logistic regression identified the odds of the composite morbidity outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 13,619 children (median age 10.8 y, interquartile range: 6.4-14.2) underwent emergency abdominal surgery, of whom 224 (1.6%) had COVID-19. The majority were female (58.2%), White (61.3%), and non-Hispanic (53.4%). On unadjusted analysis, there was an association between COVID-19 status and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P < 0.01). A greater proportion of COVID-19-positive children had dirty/infected wounds (30.4% versus 22.2%, P < 0.01). Also, a greater proportion of COVID-19-positive children suffered cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1.3% versus 0.2%, P < 0.01). Matched cohorts of 224 COVID-19-positive and 224 COVID-19-negative children did not differ by demographic or clinical factors (P > 0.05). Propensity score matching did not reveal significant differences in postoperative morbidity or mortality. Children with COVID-19 did not demonstrate increased odds of morbidity analyzed as a composite outcome (odds ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.29-1.48, P = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to findings in adults, COVID-19 was not associated with worse clinical outcomes in children undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.

Impact of Hemoglobin Levels on Composite Cardiac Arrest or Stroke Outcome in Patients With Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

Anemia has been associated with an increased risk of both cardiac arrest and stroke, frequent complications of COVID-19. The effect of hemoglobin level at ICU admission on a composite outcome of cardiac arrest or stroke in an international cohort of COVID-19 patients was investigated.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected database.

SETTING

A registry of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs at over 370 international sites was reviewed for patients diagnosed with cardiac arrest or stroke up to 30 days after ICU admission. Anemia was defined as: normal (hemoglobin ≥ 12.0 g/dL for women, ≥ 13.5 g/dL for men), mild (hemoglobin 10.0-11.9 g/dL for women, 10.0-13.4 g/dL for men), moderate (hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 and < 10.0 g/dL for women and men), and severe (hemoglobin < 8.0 g/dL for women and men).

PATIENTS

Patients older than 18 years with acute COVID-19 infection in the ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 6926 patients (median age = 59 yr, male = 65%), 760 patients (11.0%) experienced stroke (2.0%) and/or cardiac arrest (9.4%). Cardiac arrest or stroke was more common in patients with low hemoglobin, occurring in 12.8% of patients with normal hemoglobin, 13.3% of patients with mild anemia, and 16.7% of patients with moderate/severe anemia. Time to stroke or cardiac arrest by anemia status was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression with death as a competing risk. Covariates selected through clinical knowledge were age, sex, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and cardiac or neurologic conditions), pandemic era, country income, mechanical ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Moderate/severe anemia was associated with a higher risk of cardiac arrest or stroke (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05-1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In an international registry of ICU patients with COVID-19, moderate/severe anemia was associated with increased hazard of cardiac arrest or stroke.

Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy Associated with COVID-19 Pandemic: A Real-world Observation Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and retinal imaging features of Chinese patients with acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) associated with COVID-19.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

METHODS

Retinal imaging, including color fundus photography, near-infrared imaging (NIR), swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and Humphrey perimetry, were conducted for each case.

RESULTS

All cases were included within the first three months following the pandemic outbreak. A total of 12 male patients (36.36 %) and 21 female patients (63.64 %) were prospectively recruited, and 29 cases (87.88 %) were bilaterally affected. The median interval between the onset of fever and the appearance of ocular symptoms was two days (range, 0.5-5.0 days). Apart from the outer retinal changes typical of AMN, changes in the inner retinal layers were observed, including intraretinal hemorrhage (8.06 %), cotton wool spots (9.68 %), and paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) (8.06 %). Smaller retinal inner nuclear layer hyperreflective speckles (RIHS) (41.94 %) were identified as a distinguishing feature from typical PAMM. Voids of vessel signals were found in the superficial (11.54 %), intermediate (82.69 %), and deep capillary plexus (98.08 %), and in the choriocapillaris (19.23 %) on OCTA. Humphrey perimetry illustrated central, paracentral, and peripheral scotomas. The occult lesions associated with AMN, PAMM, and some of the RIHS illustrated by OCT were visualized topographically and further confirmed by OCTA as perfusion defects.

CONCLUSION

An increase in AMN cases correlated with the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Additional features, including widespread inner retinal perfusion deficits, were observed and may serve as potential biomarkers for systemic microcirculation dysregulation in COVID-19.

Pulmonary Embolism: A Complication of COVID-19 or Drug Abuse?

Our patient was a young male who had presented to the emergency room with complaints of shortness of breath for three days. His workup was suggestive of a pulmonary embolism. The patient had a history of COVID-19 pneumonia six months prior to this admission, from which he recovered completely. He denied use of recreational marijuana (smoking or edibles initially) but later accepted to smoking marijuana. In fact, he had increased the dose and frequency over the last six months. The COVID-19 infection had a strong impact on his mental health, which pushed him to increase marijuana use. Our case report highlights drug abuse as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism, confounded by the recent COVID-19 infection.

Cardiovascular abnormalities of long-COVID syndrome: Pathogenic basis and potential strategy for treatment and rehabilitation

Cardiac injury and sustained cardiovascular abnormalities in long-COVID syndrome, i.e. post-acute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have emerged as a debilitating health burden that has posed challenges for management of pre-existing cardiovascular conditions and other associated chronic comorbidities in the most vulnerable group of patients recovered from acute COVID-19. A clear and evidence-based guideline for treating cardiac issues of long-COVID syndrome is still lacking. In this review, we have summarized the common cardiac symptoms reported in the months after acute COVID-19 illness and further evaluated the possible pathogenic factors underlying the pathophysiology process of long-COVID. The mechanistic understanding of how Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) damages the heart and vasculatures is critical in developing targeted therapy and preventive measures for limiting the viral attacks. Despite the currently available therapeutic interventions, a considerable portion of patients recovered from severe COVID-19 have reported a reduced functional reserve due to deconditioning. Therefore, a rigorous and comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program with individualized exercise protocols would be instrumental for the patients with long-COVID to regain the physical fitness levels comparable to their pre-illness baseline.

90-Day Complication and Readmission Rates for Geriatric Patients With Hip Fracture at Different Time Points From COVID-19 Positivity: A Database Study

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric patients with hip fracture are at risk of having COVID-19 while needing fracture treatment. Understanding the associated risks of variable timing of COVID-19 before surgery may help direct care algorithms.

METHODS

Geriatric patients with documented hip fracture surgery were identified within the PearlDiver M157 database. Patients with a preoperative COVID-19 diagnosis were classified based on time from diagnosis to surgery: ≤ 1 week, > 1 to ≤ 4 weeks, > 4 to ≤ 7 weeks, > 7 to ≤ 10 weeks, and > 10 to ≤ 13 weeks. The association of COVID-19 diagnoses with 90-day complications was evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 263,771 patients with hip fracture were identified, of which COVID-19 within 13 weeks of surgery was documented for 976. On multivariable analysis, patients with COVID-19 infection within ≤ 1 week preoperatively demonstrated increased rates of minor adverse events (odds ratio (OR) = 1.50), all adverse events (OR = 1.59), sepsis (OR = 1.70), and pneumonia (OR = 2.35) (P ≤ 0.0007 for each). For time points greater than 1 week, there were no differences in complication rates.

DISCUSSION

Patients with COVID-19 within 1 week of hip fracture surgery demonstrated greater odds of 90-day complications. Reassuringly, patients with COVID-19 diagnoses more than 1 week preoperatively were not associated with increased odds of any assessed complication.

COVID-19 shed light on Virchow's law of thrombosis

Virchow's law of thrombosis states that thrombosis in a vessel occurs as a combination of the following: (i) injury to the vessel wall, (ii) stasis of blood flow, and (iii) blood hypercoagulability. Injury to the wall includes infection/inflammation and/or injury to the resident cells of the wall. We postulate that in COVID-19, the SARS-CoV-2 virus directly infects the alveolar type II cell or directly or indirectly infects/injures the pericyte, promoting inflammation and interaction with endothelial cells, thereby causing a cascade of events leading to our observation that thrombosis occurred within the walls of the pulmonary vessels and not in the lumen of the vascular circulation.

Accuracy of routine laboratory tests to predict mortality and deterioration to severe or critical COVID-19 in people with SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients with COVID-19 disease who will deteriorate can be useful to assess whether they should receive intensive care, or whether they can be treated in a less intensive way or through outpatient care. In clinical care, routine laboratory markers, such as C-reactive protein, are used to assess a person's health status.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of routine blood-based laboratory tests to predict mortality and deterioration to severe or critical (from mild or moderate) COVID-19 in people with SARS-CoV-2.

SEARCH METHODS

On 25 August 2022, we searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, encompassing searches of various databases such as MEDLINE via PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, medRxiv, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies of all designs that produced estimates of prognostic accuracy in participants who presented to outpatient services, or were admitted to general hospital wards with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and studies that were based on serum banks of samples from people. All routine blood-based laboratory tests performed during the first encounter were included. We included any reference standard used to define deterioration to severe or critical disease that was provided by the authors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from each included study, and independently assessed the methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies tool. As studies reported different thresholds for the same test, we used the Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operator Curve model for meta-analyses to estimate summary curves in SAS 9.4. We estimated the sensitivity at points on the SROC curves that corresponded to the median and interquartile range boundaries of specificities in the included studies. Direct and indirect comparisons were exclusively conducted for biomarkers with an estimated sensitivity and 95% CI of ≥ 50% at a specificity of ≥ 50%. The relative diagnostic odds ratio was calculated as a summary of the relative accuracy of these biomarkers.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified a total of 64 studies, including 71,170 participants, of which 8169 participants died, and 4031 participants deteriorated to severe/critical condition. The studies assessed 53 different laboratory tests. For some tests, both increases and decreases relative to the normal range were included. There was important heterogeneity between tests and their cut-off values. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias or low concern for applicability for all domains. None of the tests included in this review demonstrated high sensitivity or specificity, or both. The five tests with summary sensitivity and specificity above 50% were: C-reactive protein increase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio increase, lymphocyte count decrease, d-dimer increase, and lactate dehydrogenase increase. Inflammation For mortality, summary sensitivity of a C-reactive protein increase was 76% (95% CI 73% to 79%) at median specificity, 59% (low-certainty evidence). For deterioration, summary sensitivity was 78% (95% CI 67% to 86%) at median specificity, 72% (very low-certainty evidence). For the combined outcome of mortality or deterioration, or both, summary sensitivity was 70% (95% CI 49% to 85%) at median specificity, 60% (very low-certainty evidence). For mortality, summary sensitivity of an increase in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was 69% (95% CI 66% to 72%) at median specificity, 63% (very low-certainty evidence). For deterioration, summary sensitivity was 75% (95% CI 59% to 87%) at median specificity, 71% (very low-certainty evidence). For mortality, summary sensitivity of a decrease in lymphocyte count was 67% (95% CI 56% to 77%) at median specificity, 61% (very low-certainty evidence). For deterioration, summary sensitivity of a decrease in lymphocyte count was 69% (95% CI 60% to 76%) at median specificity, 67% (very low-certainty evidence). For the combined outcome, summary sensitivity was 83% (95% CI 67% to 92%) at median specificity, 29% (very low-certainty evidence). For mortality, summary sensitivity of a lactate dehydrogenase increase was 82% (95% CI 66% to 91%) at median specificity, 60% (very low-certainty evidence). For deterioration, summary sensitivity of a lactate dehydrogenase increase was 79% (95% CI 76% to 82%) at median specificity, 66% (low-certainty evidence). For the combined outcome, summary sensitivity was 69% (95% CI 51% to 82%) at median specificity, 62% (very low-certainty evidence). Hypercoagulability For mortality, summary sensitivity of a d-dimer increase was 70% (95% CI 64% to 76%) at median specificity of 56% (very low-certainty evidence). For deterioration, summary sensitivity was 65% (95% CI 56% to 74%) at median specificity of 63% (very low-certainty evidence). For the combined outcome, summary sensitivity was 65% (95% CI 52% to 76%) at median specificity of 54% (very low-certainty evidence). To predict mortality, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio increase had higher accuracy compared to d-dimer increase (RDOR (diagnostic Odds Ratio) 2.05, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.24), C-reactive protein increase (RDOR 2.64, 95% CI 2.09 to 3.33), and lymphocyte count decrease (RDOR 2.63, 95% CI 1.55 to 4.46). D-dimer increase had higher accuracy compared to lymphocyte count decrease (RDOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.80), C-reactive protein increase (RDOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.65), and lactate dehydrogenase increase (RDOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.90). Additionally, lactate dehydrogenase increase had higher accuracy compared to lymphocyte count decrease (RDOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.49). To predict deterioration to severe disease, C-reactive protein increase had higher accuracy compared to d-dimer increase (RDOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.50). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio increase had higher accuracy compared to d-dimer increase (RDOR 2.77, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.84). Lastly, lymphocyte count decrease had higher accuracy compared to d-dimer increase (RDOR 2.10, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.07) and lactate dehydrogenase increase (RDOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.26).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory tests, associated with hypercoagulability and hyperinflammatory response, were better at predicting severe disease and mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 compared to other laboratory tests. However, to safely rule out severe disease, tests should have high sensitivity (> 90%), and none of the identified laboratory tests met this criterion. In clinical practice, a more comprehensive assessment of a patient's health status is usually required by, for example, incorporating these laboratory tests into clinical prediction rules together with clinical symptoms, radiological findings, and patient's characteristics.

The Long-Term Cardiovascular Impact of COVID-19: Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has resulted in a substantial global health crisis, with effects extending far beyond the acute phase of infection. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the long-term cardiovascular impact of COVID-19, focusing on the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches, management strategies, and future research directions. SARS-CoV-2 induces cardiovascular complications through mechanisms such as inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and direct myocardial injury, leading to conditions like myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmias, and thromboembolic events. These long-term effects, collectively called "long COVID" or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), present significant challenges for healthcare systems and patient management. Diagnostic approaches include imaging techniques and laboratory tests to identify and monitor cardiovascular complications. Management strategies emphasize a holistic approach, incorporating pharmacological treatments and lifestyle modifications. Special attention is required for vulnerable populations, including those with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. Ongoing research is essential to understand the full spectrum of long-term cardiovascular impacts and to develop effective treatments. This review highlights the critical need for continued vigilance, multidisciplinary care, and research to address the cardiovascular sequelae of COVID-19 and improve long-term health outcomes for survivors.

Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation, Therapeutic Trends, and Outcomes in Arterial Thrombosis Complicating Unvaccinated COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review

Data on characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus (COVID)-19 patients complicated with arterial thrombosis (AT) are scarce. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review (PRISMA, PROSPERO statements; PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) to identify risk factors, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. We included publications from December 2019 to October 2020. Groups: (a) ischemic stroke, (b) thrombotic storm, (c) peripheral vascular thrombosis, (d) myocardial infarction, and (e) left cardiac thrombus or in-transit thrombus (venous system thrombus floating or attaching to the right heart). We considered 131 studies. The most frequent cardiovascular risk factors were: hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. A high proportion presented with asymptomatic, mild, or moderate COVID-19 (n = 91, 41.4%). We identified a high percentage of isolated ischemic stroke and thrombotic storm. Groups with higher mortality rate: intracardiac thrombus (1/2, 50.0%), thrombotic storm (18/49, 36.7%), and ischemic stroke (48/131, 36.6%). A small number received thromboprophylaxis. Most patients received antithrombotic treatment. The most frequent bleeding complication was intracranial hemorrhage, primarily with isolated stroke. Overall mortality was 33.6% (74/220). Despite a wide range of COVID-19 severity, a high proportion had AT as a complication of non-severe disease. AT can affect different vascular territories; mortality is associated with stroke, intensive care unit stay, and severe COVID-19.

Unraveling the enigma of long COVID: novel aspects in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment protocols

Long COVID, now unmistakably identified as a syndromic entity encompassing a complex spectrum of symptoms, demands immediate resolution of its elusive pathogenic underpinnings. The intricate interplay of diverse factors presents a complex puzzle, difficult to resolve, and thus poses a substantial challenge. As instances of long COVID manifest by repeated infections of SARS-CoV-2 and genetic predisposition, a detailed understanding in this regard is needed. This endeavor is a comprehensive exploration and analysis of the cascading pathogenetic events driven by viral persistence and replication. Beyond its morbidity, long COVID, more disabling than fatal, exacts one of the most substantial tolls on public health in contemporary times, with the potential to cripple national economies. The paper introduces a unified theory of long COVID, detailing a novel pathophysiological framework that interlinks persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, autoimmunity, and systemic vascular pathology. We posit a model where viral reservoirs, immune dysregulation, and genetic predispositions converge to perpetuate disease. It challenges prevailing hypotheses with new evidence, suggesting innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The paper aims to shift the paradigm in long COVID research by providing an integrative perspective that encapsulates the multifaceted nature of the condition. We explain the immunological mechanisms, hypercoagulability states, and viral reservoirs in the skull that feed NeuroCOVID in patients with long COVID. Also, this study hints toward a patient approach and how to prioritize treatment sequences in long COVID patients in hospitals and clinics.

Targeting Myeloid Differentiation Primary Response Protein 88 (MyD88) and Galectin-3 to Develop Broad-Spectrum Host-Mediated Therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2

Nearly six million people worldwide have died from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Although COVID-19 vaccines are largely successful in reducing the severity of the disease and deaths, the decline in vaccine-induced immunity over time and the continuing emergence of new viral variants or mutations underscore the need for an alternative strategy for developing broad-spectrum host-mediated therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2. A key feature of severe COVID-19 is dysregulated innate immune signaling, culminating in a high expression of numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and a lack of antiviral interferons (IFNs), particularly type I (alpha and beta) and type III (lambda). As a natural host defense, the myeloid differentiation primary response protein, MyD88, plays pivotal roles in innate and acquired immune responses via the signal transduction pathways of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), a type of pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs). However, recent studies have highlighted that infection with viruses upregulates MyD88 expression and impairs the host antiviral response by negatively regulating type I IFN. Galectin-3 (Gal3), another key player in viral infections, has been shown to modulate the host immune response by regulating viral entry and activating TLRs, the NLRP3 inflammasome, and NF-κB, resulting in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and contributing to the overall inflammatory response, the so-called "cytokine storm". These studies suggest that the specific inhibition of MyD88 and Gal3 could be a promising therapy for COVID-19. This review presents future directions for MyD88- and Gal3-targeted antiviral drug discovery, highlighting the potential to restore host immunity in SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Thromboinflammation in COVID-19: Unraveling the interplay of coagulation and inflammation

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has not only challenged global health systems but also spurred intense scientific inquiry into its pathophysiology. Among the multifaceted aspects of the disease, coagulation abnormalities have emerged as a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. From endothelial dysfunction to dysregulated immune responses, various factors contribute to the hypercoagulable state seen in severe COVID-19 cases. The dysregulation of coagulation in COVID-19 extends beyond traditional thromboembolic events, encompassing a spectrum of abnormalities ranging from microvascular thrombosis to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Endothelial injury induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection triggers a cascade of events involving platelet activation, coagulation factor consumption, and fibrinolysis impairment. Moreover, the virus direct effects on immune cells and the cytokine storm further exacerbate the prothrombotic milieu. Unraveling this intricate web of interactions between viral pathogenesis and host responses is essential for elucidating novel therapeutic targets and refining existing management strategies for COVID-19-associated coagulopathy. In the quest to unravel the complex interplay between coagulation and COVID-19, numerous clinical and laboratory studies have yielded invaluable insights into potential biomarkers, prognostic indicators, and therapeutic avenues. Anticoagulation therapy has emerged as a cornerstone in the management of severe COVID-19, although optimal dosing regimens and patient selection criteria remain subjects of ongoing investigation. Additionally, innovative approaches such as targeting specific components of the coagulation cascade or modulating endothelial function hold promise for future therapeutic development.

Vascular Consequences: A Case Report on Posterior Circulation Infarction as a Sequela of COVID-19

This case report presents a posterior circulation infarction in a previously healthy 39-year-old male, three months post-severe COVID-19. He presented with right-sided homonymous hemianopia and elevated inflammatory markers and D-dimer levels. Imaging revealed an acute left occipital infarct. Such post-COVID-19 posterior circulation strokes are rare. This report discusses the pathophysiology, optimal anticoagulation therapy for COVID-19-related thrombotic complications, and early predictor models. This case underscores the need to recognize thromboembolic events as potential late sequelae in severe COVID-19 cases.

Evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic ability of ischemia modified albumin in COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Patients with COVID-19 can rapidly deteriorate and develop acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Prominent features of the disease include severe inflammation, endotheliitis, and thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic effectiveness of ischemia modified albumin (ΙΜΑ) in a cohort of COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test, who were hospitalized specifically for COVID-19. The outcomes of interest were progression to severe acute respiratory failure during the index hospitalization defined as partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen lower or equal to 150, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and in-hospital mortality. Admission IMA levels were determined using the commercially available "IMA Assay Kit" method (Abbexa LTD, Cambridge, UK). Adults without SARS-CoV-2 infection were used as controls.

RESULTS

135 COVID-19 patients and 64 controls were included. Admission IMA levels were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients compared to controls [[24.38 (11.94) ng/ml vs. 14.69 (3.52) ng/ml, p < 0.01]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of admission IMA showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 94% (p < 0.0001) for COVID-19 diagnosis (cut-off value: 17.5 ng/ml; sensitivity: 90.37%; specificity: 87.5%). Admission IMA was also associated with mortality (AUC: 68%, p = 0.01). However, it was not associated with severe acute respiratory failure (AUC: 47%, p = 0.53) or ICU admission (AUC: 58%, p = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Admission IMA was significantly increased in COVID-19 patients and was associated with in-hospital mortality.

D-dimer - a multifaceted molecule

D-dimer, a universally unique marker for fibrin degradation, is generated through the enzymatic interplay of thrombin, factor XIIIa, and plasmin. The emergence of D-dimer-containing fibrin molecules occurs in both intravascular and extravascular spaces during pivotal physiological processes like haemostasis, thrombosis, and tissue repair. Given the inherently physiological nature of fibrin formation and fibrinolysis, basal levels of D-dimer fragments are present in plasma. Beyond its role as a marker of routine physiological processes, aberrations in D-dimer levels are indicative of a spectrum of conditions, both non-pathological and pathological. The clinical utility of D-dimer has been firmly established, particularly in scenarios like venous thromboembolism (VTE), pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Additionally, recent applications have extended to assess the prognosis of COVID-19. While D-dimer is commonly associated with thrombotic conditions, its elevation is not confined to these conditions alone. Elevated D-dimer levels are observed across various diseases, where its significance extends beyond diagnostic indicators to prognostic implications.

Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) in Inflammation and Disease: A Unique Inflammatory Pathway Activator

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a unique protease binding receptor, now recognized as a key regulator of inflammation. Initially, uPA/uPAR was considered thrombolytic (clot-dissolving); however, recent studies have demonstrated its predominant immunomodulatory functions in inflammation and cancer. The uPA/uPAR complex has a multifaceted central role in both normal physiological and also pathological responses. uPAR is expressed as a glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked receptor interacting with vitronectin, integrins, G protein-coupled receptors, and growth factor receptors within a large lipid raft. Through protein-to-protein interactions, cell surface uPAR modulates intracellular signaling, altering cellular adhesion and migration. The uPA/uPAR also modifies extracellular activity, activating plasminogen to form plasmin, which breaks down fibrin, dissolving clots and activating matrix metalloproteinases that lyse connective tissue, allowing immune and cancer cell invasion and releasing growth factors. uPAR is now recognized as a biomarker for inflammatory diseases and cancer; uPAR and soluble uPAR fragments (suPAR) are increased in viral sepsis (COVID-19), inflammatory bowel disease, and metastasis. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the structure, function, and current studies examining uPAR and suPAR as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. Understanding uPAR is central to developing diagnostic markers and the ongoing development of antibody, small-molecule, nanogel, and virus-derived immune-modulating treatments that target uPAR.

A systematic review of thromboembolic complications and outcomes in hospitalised COVID-19 patients

Thromboembolic (TE) complications [myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE)] are common causes of mortality in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Therefore, this review was undertaken to explore the incidence of TE complications and mortality associated with TE complications in hospitalised COVID-19 patients from different studies. A literature search was performed using ScienceDirect and PubMed databases using the MeSH term search strategy of "COVID-19", "thromboembolic complication", "venous thromboembolism", "arterial thromboembolism", "deep vein thrombosis", "pulmonary embolism", "myocardial infarction", "stroke", and "mortality". There were 33 studies included in this review. Studies have revealed that COVID-19 patients tend to develop venous thromboembolism (PE:1.0-40.0% and DVT:0.4-84%) compared to arterial thromboembolism (stroke:0.5-15.2% and MI:0.8-8.7%). Lastly, the all-cause mortality of COVID-19 patients ranged from 4.8 to 63%, whereas the incidence of mortality associated with TE complications was between 5% and 48%. A wide range of incidences of TE complications and mortality associated with TE complications can be seen among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Therefore, every patient should be assessed for the risk of thromboembolic complications and provided with an appropriate thromboprophylaxis management plan tailored to their individual needs.

Reconstructive Limb Salvage After COVID-19-Induced Gangrene and Amputation

This case series describes the clinical course and reconstructive methods utilized for patients with diabetes and significant gangrene and necrosis following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. COVID-19 produces mainly respiratory symptoms but has a variety of atypical presentations and sequelae. Serious complications are increased in patients with underlying medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus. By generating a prothrombotic milieu, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) increases the risk for arterial and venous thromboses. Inflammatory damage and micro-thromboses are thought to contribute to acro-ischemia, colloquially known as 'COVID toes,' which presents cutaneously as chilblain-like lesions. Necrosis can be severe and devastating, often resulting in major amputation. Two exemplary case reports are presented herein: first, a 57-year-old female presented for vascular evaluation with pedal gangrene to the midfoot one month after developing painful discoloration in her right toe. After angioplasty restored pedal blood flow, she received a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) with a local tissue flap. Second, a 41-year-old female presented for vascular evaluation with extensive pedal gangrene three months after hospitalization for COVID-19. After arteriotomy improved pedal blood flow, she underwent a Lisfranc amputation followed by superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap reconstruction. Sufficient evidence suggests that COVID-19 impairs microcirculatory function and can be especially detrimental in diabetic patients. Reconstructive techniques in patients with severe gangrene with COVID toes help patients regain functionality.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Amputation and Mortality Rates in Patients with Acute Limb Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Since the inception of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, healthcare systems around the world observed an increased rate of Acute Limb Ischemia (ALI) in patients with a COVID-19 infection. Despite several pieces of evidence suggesting that COVID-19 infection may also worsen the prognosis associated with ALI, only a small number of published studies include a direct comparison regarding the outcomes of both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ALI patients. Based on the above, a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature were conducted, evaluating differences in the incidence of two major outcomes (amputation and mortality rate) between patients concurrently affected by COVID-19 and negative ALI subjects. PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Embase (OVID) databases were scrutinized from January 2020 up to 31 December 2023, and 7906 total articles were recovered. In total, 11 studies (n: 15,803 subjects) were included in the systematic review, and 10 of them (15,305 patients) were also included in the meta-analysis. Across all the studies, COVID-19-positive ALI patients experienced worse outcomes (mortality rates ranging from 6.7% to 47.2%; amputation rates ranging from 7.0% to 39.1%) compared to non-infected ALI patients (mortality rates ranging from 3.1% to 16.7%; amputation rates ranging from 2.7% to 18%). Similarly, our meta-analysis shows that both the amputation rate (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.68-3.17; p < 0.00001) and mortality (OR: 3.64; 95% CI: 3.02-4.39; p < 0.00001) is significantly higher in COVID-19 ALI patients compared to ALI patients.

Predictive value of admission D-dimer levels in patient with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19: a second-wave prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of admission D-dimer levels for in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 and acute ischaemic stroke.

DESIGN

Cohort (prospective).

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital in the capital city of Indonesia conducted from June to December 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

60 patients with acute ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 were included. Patients were classified into D-dimer groups (low and high) according to a 2 110 ng/mL cut-off value, determined via receiver operating characteristic analysis.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with admission D-dimer levels as the major predictor. Secondary outcomes included associations between other demographic and clinical variables and the admission D-dimer value. Kaplan-Meier method was used to carry out survival analysis, with univariable and multivariable Cox regression performed to assess the association of D-dimer levels and other confounding variables (including demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters) with in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The findings demonstrated an association between elevated admission D-dimer levels (≥2 110 ng/mL) and an increased likelihood of death during hospitalisation. The adjusted HR was 14.054 (95% CI 1.710 to 115.519; p=0.014), demonstrating an increase in mortality risk after accounting for confounders such as age and diabetes history. Other significant predictors of mortality included a history of diabetes and increased white blood cell count.

CONCLUSIONS

Admission D-dimer levels may be a useful predictive indicator for the likelihood of death during hospitalisation in individuals with COVID-19 and acute ischaemic stroke.

Tiny Tummies, Big Challenges: A Case Series of Neonatal Gastric Perforations

The main aim of this article is to highlight the clinical features indicating gastric perforation in neonates so that prompt surgery can provide a good outcome for an otherwise fatal condition. Data was collected retrospectively from all neonates who presented to our tertiary care institute with subsequent diagnosis of gastric perforation from January 2020 to December 2023 (three years). Simple statistical analysis involving sums, means, averages, and percentages was used. Five neonates were operated over a period of three years with a diagnosis of gastric perforation. Two of them were spontaneous. Of the remaining three, each one was associated with malrotation, prematurity, and COVID-19. All five cases could be diagnosed with the finding of free gas in the peritoneum on the abdominal radiograph. Overall mortality was 60% (three of five neonates). Neonatal gastric perforation typically occurs in the first week of life, specifically within the second to seventh day. Symptom onset is usually sudden, with abdominal distension as the first sign, with acidic contents causing severe peritonitis and rapid progression to sepsis and shock. Early diagnosis with subsequent timely resuscitation and surgical repair is crucial to good outcomes. Massive pneumoperitoneum on abdominal radiographs with typical signs in a neonate should raise suspicion of gastric perforation, especially in the first week of life.