Rabies antibody response after two intradermal pre-exposure prophylaxis immunizations: An observational cohort study

Antibody response to rabies pre-exposure vaccination among village health volunteers in a northern region of Thailand

BACKGROUND

Rabies is a lethal, however the disease is preventable through vaccination either before or immediately after an exposure. This study aimed to provide a pre-exposure prophylaxis rabies immunization to village health volunteers (VHV) who provide rabies vaccination for pets and free-roaming dogs in their villages and evaluate the antibody level and adverse effects after vaccination. We also assessed the knowledge related to rabies of these VHVs before field trip for pet vaccination.

METHODS

This study was conducted at Mae Kha sub district, San Pa Tong district, Chiangmai, Thailand between January and March 2020. Consenting participants were interviewed using a questionnaire, received an intradermal two-dose, seven-day pre-exposure rabies vaccination, and sera were tested for anti-rabies antibody levels with the cost effective easy competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CEE-cELISA) before and after vaccination.

RESULTS

A total of 27 VHVs were recruited from 14 villages in Mae Kha sub district. All of them were male and had a median age of 61.5 years (interquartile range: 55-64). After vaccination, seroconversion rate was 92 % (23/25) with a median of 12.4 EU/mL (interquartile range: 8.9-20.1). Two participants who had rabies vaccination one year previously still had adequate levels before receiving a booster dose. All participants did not show any serious adverse reactions after vaccination.

CONCLUSION

A regimen of two-dose, seven-day vaccination series in high-risk health volunteers using an intradermal administration provides a high seroconversion rate, efficacy and safe for pre-exposure vaccination schedule. In addition, rabies-related knowledge should be provided to village health volunteers before their fieldwork.

Rabies exposure in travellers to Asia, the Middle East, Africa, South and Central America-a German Airport study

BACKGROUND

Rabies causes thousands of deaths worldwide and trips to rabies endemic countries are popular. Travellers are often uncertain whether pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is advisable since they find it difficult to estimate the exposure risk during travel and the availability of post-exposure prophylaxis in endemic regions. The aim of this study was to determine the potential rabies exposures in travellers and to assess their knowledge on rabies. Secondly, we explored the access to appropriate post-exposure medical care in respective countries.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study at Frankfurt Airport. Returning adult travellers arriving from Asia, the Middle East, Africa, South and Central America were invited to participate in this questionnaire-based study while waiting in the baggage claim area.

RESULTS

Over a one-month recruitment phase in March 2019, we enrolled 3066 travellers; 2929 were included in the analysis. The gender ratio was balanced; the median age was 42 years (range 18-83 years). Participants arrived from Asia (46%), Africa (29%), Central/South America (13%), the Middle East (8%) and the Caribbean (8%). Forty-five per cent sought pretravel advice and 22% received ≥2 injections of rabies PrEP. Travellers with pretravel advice from tropical medicine specialists reached significantly higher knowledge scores than others. We found that potential rabies exposure occurred in 2.0% (57/2915) of travellers with 31% (13/42) of the contacts being unprovoked; 19% (8/42) of the exposed sought medical care and 3/8 were adequately treated before returning to Germany. Risk factors for animal exposure were: male sex, young age, trips to Asia and a long stay abroad (>4 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 2% of returning travellers (n = 2915) experienced a potential rabies exposure during their journey. A majority of the exposed individuals did not seek medical care; those seeking medical care were often treated inadequately. Rabies information must be emphasised during pretravel counselling and PrEP should be offered generously, especially to travellers with high exposure risks.

Factors influencing the immune response after a single-dose 3-visit pre-exposure rabies intradermal vaccination schedule: A retrospective multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends intradermal (ID) rabies vaccination as a safe and immunogenic alternative to intramuscular administration. The aim of this study is to determine which factors influence the levels of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) after a 3-visit ID rabies vaccination.

METHODS

This is a retrospective secondary data analysis study based on electronic health record vaccination data of Belgian military subjects who received ID rabies Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with a single-dose 3-visit regimen during the period 2014-2017. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors of RVNA level ≥3.0 IU/mL and >10 IU/mL.

RESULTS

The second analysis performed on the 2025 subjects (100% seroconverted with a RVNA ≥ 0.5 IU/mL) shows a significantly better immune response in subjects younger than 30 years compared to all other age-groups, a gender-difference to predict RVNA ≥ 3.0 IU/mL (OR 2.30 [1.26-4.22] comparing "female" to "male") and the influence of the vaccination schedule (OR 2.28 [1.15-4.53] comparing "late - very variable" to "correct" schedule) to predict > 10 IU/ml. Multivariate analysis also demonstrates that a postponed serology control significantly influences the Rapid Fluorescent Focus Inhibition Test (RFFIT).

CONCLUSION

Gender and age significantly influence the response to ID rabies vaccine. Timing of RVNA determination is important to correctly assess the response to vaccination. A single-dose 3-visit ID rabies PrEP schedule is a dose-sparing effective alternative to the double-dose 2-visit ID schedule. When the minimum time interval between doses is respected, RVNA determination is not necessary.

Epidemiology of rabies cases among international travellers, 2013-2019: A retrospective analysis of published reports

BACKGROUND

Sixty cases of rabies in international travellers from 1990 to 2012 were previously reviewed. We present here an update of rabies cases in international travellers from 2013 to 2019.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the existing literature and collected 23 cases of rabies in individuals who crossed an international border between the time of infection and diagnosis, or who were infected following expatriation or migration.

RESULTS

Most cases were in male adult travellers and diagnosed in Europe and the Middle East, with most exposures in Asia or in Africa. Migrants originating from rabies-endemic low-and-middle income countries and their descendants accounted for two thirds of cases. Other cases were in tourists, business travellers and expatriates. Median travel duration (excluding migration trip) was 60 days (range 7-240 days). Most cases were due to dog bites and most common clinical presentation was furious rabies. In most patients (74%), no rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (RPEP) was administered before rabies symptoms appeared. Other patients received incomplete RPEP series.

CONCLUSION

Rabies should be suspected in any patient with encephalitis or paralysis who travelled to, or migrated from a rabies-endemic country. Comprehensive information about a rabies risk should be given to travellers to rabies endemic countries, notably migrants visiting friends and relatives.

Purified Vero Cell Rabies Vaccine (PVRV, Verorab®): A Systematic Review of Intradermal Use Between 1985 and 2019

The purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV; Verorab®, Sanofi Pasteur) has been used in rabies prevention since 1985. Evolving rabies vaccination trends, including shorter intradermal (ID) regimens with reduced volume, along with WHO recommendation for ID administration has driven recent ID PVRV regimen assessments. Thus, a consolidated review comparing immunogenicity of PVRV ID regimens during pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is timely and beneficial in identifying gaps in current research. A search of seven databases for studies published from 1985 to November 2019 identified 35 studies. PrEP was assessed in 10 studies (n = 926) with 1-3-site, 1-3-visit regimens of up to 3-months duration. Seroconversion (rabies virus neutralizing antibodies [RVNA] ≥ 0.5 IU/mL) rates of 90-100% were reported within weeks, irrespective of regimen, with robust booster responses at 1 year (100% seroconversion rates by day 14 post-booster). However, data are lacking for the current WHO-recommended, 2-site, 1-week ID PrEP regimen. PEP was assessed in 25 studies (n = 2136) across regimens of 1-week to 90-day duration. All ID PEP regimens assessed induced ≥ 99% seroconversion rates (except in HIV participants) by day 14-28. This review confirms ID PVRV suitability for rabies prophylaxis and highlights the heterogeneity of use in the field.

Factors influencing the immune response after a double-dose 2-visit pre-exposure rabies intradermal vaccination schedule: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Double-dose 2-visit intradermal rabies schedules (2²ID) have recently been accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO) as Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). The aim of this study is to determine which factors influence the levels of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) after a 2²ID rabies vaccination schedule.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study based on electronic health record vaccination data of subjects from the Belgian Armed Forces who received the 2²ID rabies PrEP. An antibody titer ≥0.5 IU/mL, measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test, is defined by the WHO as an adequate immune response after PrEP. Logistic regression was performed in order to identify predictive factors of RVNA level ≥3.0 IU/ml and >10 IU/ml.

RESULTS

301 subjects were included. 297 (98,6%) seroconverted with a RVNA ≥ 0.5 IU/ml. Multivariate analysis shows a significant better immune response in the subjects where the second dose was administered later on than on day 7 (RVNA >10 IU/ml (OR: 3.01 [1.36-6.67])). Postponing the timing of the serology control also influenced significantly the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RVNA ≥ 3.0 IU/ml (OR: 0.12 [0.06-0.24]) and RVNA > 10 IU/ml (OR: 0.14 [0.06-0.29])).

CONCLUSION

A 2²ID rabies PrEP vaccination schedule is highly effective and provides an adequate immune response in most subjects in a real live setting. Timing of the second vaccine dose significantly influences the response to ID rabies vaccine. Timing of RVNA determination is important in order to correctly assess the response to vaccination.