Utility of Genomic Analysis in Differentiating Synchronous and Metachronous Lung Adenocarcinomas from Primary Adenocarcinomas with Intrapulmonary Metastasis

Differentiating Separate Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas From Intrapulmonary Metastases With Emphasis on Pathological and Molecular Considerations: Recommendations From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee

INTRODUCTION

With the implementation of low-dose computed tomography screening, multiple pulmonary tumor nodules are diagnosed with increasing frequency and the selection of surgical treatments versus systemic therapies has become challenging on a daily basis in clinical practice. In the presence of multiple carcinomas, especially adenocarcinomas, pathologically determined to be of pulmonary origin, the distinction between separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is important for staging, management, and prognostication.

METHODS

We systemically reviewed various means that aid in the differentiation between SPLCs and IPMs explored by histopathologic evaluation and molecular profiling, the latter includes DNA microsatellite analysis, array comparative genomic hybridization, TP53 and oncogenic driver mutation testing and, more recently, with promising effectiveness, next-generation sequencing comprising small- or large-scale multi-gene panels.

RESULTS

Comprehensive histologic evaluation may suffice to differentiate between SPLCs and IPMs. Nevertheless, molecular profiling using larger-scale next-generation sequencing typically provides superior discriminatory power, allowing for more accurate classification. On the basis of the literature review and expert opinions, we proposed a combined four-step histologic and molecular classification algorithm for addressing multiple pulmonary tumor nodules of adenocarcinoma histology that encourages a multidisciplinary approach. It is also noteworthy that new technologies combining machine learning and digital pathology may develop into valuable diagnostic tools for distinguishing SPLCs from IPMs in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Although histopathologic evaluation is often adequate to differentiate SPLCs from IPMs, molecular profiling should be performed when possible, especially in cases with tumors exhibiting similar morphology. This manuscript summarized the previous efforts in resolving the current challenges and highlighted the recent progress in the differentiation methods and algorithms used in categorizing multiple lung adenocarcinomas into SPLCs or IPMs, which are becoming more and more critical in precision lung cancer management.

Next-Generation Sequencing vs. Clinical-Pathological Assessment in Diagnosis of Multiple Lung Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Accurately distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is crucial for tailoring treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. While molecular methods offer significant advantages over traditional clinical-pathological evaluations, they lack standardized diagnostic protocols and validated prognostic value. This study systematically compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of molecular methods versus clinical-pathological evaluations in diagnosing multiple lung cancers (MLCs), specifically focusing on the impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) parameters on diagnostic accuracy. A review of 41 studies encompassing 1266 patients revealed that two molecular methods, Mole1 (manually counting shared mutations) and Mole2 (bioinformatics-assisted clonal probability calculation), both demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy and prognostic discrimination capabilities. Molecular assessment, particularly Mole1, effectively stratified prognosis for MPLC and IPM, leading to significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS: HR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.15-0.39) and overall survival (OS: HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.58). Further analysis suggests that a minimal panel of 30-50 genes may be sufficient to effectively differentiate prognoses. Compared to Mole1, Mole2 demonstrated greater specificity and stability across various panels, achieving AUC values from 0.962 to 0.979. Clinical-pathological evaluations proved unreliable, not only failing to distinguish prognosis effectively but also exhibiting a potential misdiagnosis rate of 35.5% and 33.6% compared to the reference diagnosis. To improve both cost-effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy, bioinformatics-assisted molecular diagnostics should be integrated into multidisciplinary assessments, especially for high-risk cases where diagnostic errors are common.

Diagnosis and management of multiple primary lung cancer

Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC), can be categorized as synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) and metachronous multiple primary lung cancer (mMPLC), which are becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. A precise differential diagnosis between MPLC and intrapulmonary metastases (IPM) is essential for determining the appropriate management strategy. MPLC is primarily diagnosed through histology, imaging, and molecular methods. Imaging serves as an essential foundation for preoperative diagnosis, while histology is a critical tool for establishing a definitive diagnosis. As molecular biology advances, the diagnosis of MPLC has stepped into the era of molecular precision. Surgery is the preferred treatment approach, with stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation being viable options for unresectable lesions. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy can be considered for specific patients. A multidisciplinary team approach to evaluation and the application of combination therapy can benefit more patients. Looking ahead, the development of more authoritative guidelines will be instrumental in streamlining the diagnosis and management of MPLC.

Multiple primary lung cancer: Updates and perspectives

Management of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) remains challenging, partly due to its increasing incidence, especially with the significant rise in cases of multiple lung nodules caused by low-dose computed tomography screening. Moreover, the indefinite pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, and treatment selection add to the complexity. In recent years, there have been continuous efforts to dissect the molecular characteristics of MPLC and explore new diagnostic approaches as well as treatment modalities, which will be reviewed here, with a focus on newly emerging evidence and future perspectives, hope to provide new insights into the management of MPLC and serve as inspiration for future research related to MPLC.

Repeat Next-Generation Sequencing (15-Gene Panel) in Unifocal, Synchronous, and Metachronous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Single-Center Experience

In advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), routine testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) is recommended to identify actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). The therapeutic implications of repeated NGS testing on synchronous and metachronous tumors are unclear. Between February 2017 and October 2020, NSCLC samples from a single institution were reflex-tested using a targeted 15-gene NGS panel (TruSight Tumor 15, Illumina). Thirty-eight patients were identified with multiple NGS results from 82 samples: 11% were from single unifocal, 51% were from synchronous, and 38% were from metachronous tumors. Changes in EGFR, KRAS, PI3KCA, and TP53 variants were found in 22 patients' samples (58%). No changes were seen with longitudinal testing of multiple samples from single unifocal tumors, while changes were observed in 60% of synchronous and 71% of metachronous tumors. Of these, 26% of patients had AGA differences between samples. Acknowledging the limited sample size, a significant difference in overall survival was observed between synchronous separate primaries and metastasis. Repeat NGS testing of synchronous and metachronous NSCLC tumors may identify differing variants in >50% of patients. These changes may reflect separate primary lung carcinomas, tumor heterogeneity among intrapulmonary metastases, and clonal evolution. NGS testing of multiple tumors may enhance the identification of therapeutic targets for treatment decisions.

Pathologic Assessment and Staging of Multiple Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas: A Paradigm Shift with the Emerging Role of Molecular Methods

Non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) commonly present as 2 or more separate tumors. Biologically, this encompasses 2 distinct processes: separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs), representing independently arising tumors, and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs), representing intrapulmonary spread of a single tumor. The advent of computed tomography imaging has substantially increased the detection of multifocal NSCLCs. The strategies and approaches for distinguishing between SPLCs and IPMs have evolved significantly over the years. Recently, genomic sequencing of somatic mutations has been widely adopted to identify targetable alterations in NSCLC. These molecular techniques have enabled pathologists to reliably discern clonal relationships among multiple NSCLCs in clinical practice. However, a standardized approach to evaluating and staging multiple NSCLCs using molecular methods is still lacking. Here, we reviewed the historical context and provided an update on the growing applications of genomic testing as a clinically relevant benchmark for determining clonal relationships in multiple NSCLCs, a practice we have designated "comparative molecular profiling." We examined the strengths and limitations of the morphology-based distinction of SPLCs vs IPMs and highlighted pivotal clinical and pathologic insights that have emerged from studying multiple NSCLCs using genomic approaches as a gold standard. Lastly, we suggest a practical approach for evaluating multiple NSCLCs in the clinical setting, considering the varying availability of molecular techniques.

Genomic Staging of Multifocal Lung Squamous Cell Carcinomas Is Independent of the Comprehensive Morphologic Assessment

INTRODUCTION

Morphologic and molecular data for staging of multifocal lung squamous cell carcinomas (LSCCs) are limited. In this study, whole exome sequencing (WES) was used as the gold standard to determine whether multifocal LSCC represented separate primary lung cancers (SPLCs) or intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs). Genomic profiles were compared with the comprehensive morphologic assessment.

METHODS

WES was performed on 20 tumor pairs of multifocal LSCC and matched normal lymph nodes using the Illumina NovaSeq6000 S4-Xp (Illumina, San Diego, CA). WES clonal and subclonal analysis data were compared with histologic assessment by 16 thoracic pathologists. In addition, the immune gene profiling of the study cases was characterized by the HTG EdgeSeq Precision Immuno-Oncology Panel.

RESULTS

By WES data, 11 cases were classified as SPLC and seven cases as IPM. Two cases were technically suboptimal. Analysis revealed marked genomic and immunogenic heterogeneity, but immune gene expression profiles highly correlated with mutation profiles. Tumors classified as IPM have a large number of shared mutations (ranging from 33.5% to 80.7%). The agreement between individual morphologic assessments for each case and WES was 58.3%. One case was unanimously interpreted morphologically as IPM and was in agreement with WES. In a further 17 cases, the number of pathologists whose morphologic interpretation was in agreement with WES ranged from two (one case) to 15 pathologists (one case) per case. Pathologists showed a fair interobserver agreement in the morphologic staging of multiple LSCCs, with an overall kappa of 0.232.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging of multifocal LSCC based on morphologic assessment is unreliable. Comprehensive genomic analyses should be adopted for the staging of multifocal LSCC.

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor may contribute to the occurrence of multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the key genes involved in the development of multiple primary lung cancers.

METHODS

Differential expression analysis was performed, followed by comparing the infiltration levels of 22 immune cell types between multiple and single primary lung adenocarcinomas. Marker genes for epithelial cells with different proportions between the two types of lung adenocarcinomas were identified. The common genes between the marker genes and differentially expressed genes were identified. Finally, the effects of the key genes were tested on the in vitro proliferation, migration and morphology.

RESULTS

The infiltration levels of helper follicular T cells, resting NK cells, activated NK cells, M2 macrophages and resting mast cells were higher in the patients with multiple than in those with single primary lung adenocarcinomas. A total of 1553 differentially expressed genes and 4414 marker genes of epithelial cells were identified. Logistic regression analysis was performed on the 164 resulting genes. The macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression was positively associated with the occurrence of multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas. Moreover, its signalling pathway was the key pathway among the epithelial cells and multiple and single primary lung adenocarcinoma cells, and it was upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma cells. It also increased the expression of lung cancer markers, including NES and CA125, induced morphological changes in alveolar epithelial type II cells, and promoted their proliferation, migration and invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple and single primary lung adenocarcinomas have different tumour immune microenvironments, and migration inhibitory factor may be a key factor in the occurrence of multiple primary lung adenocarcinomas.

Progress in genome-inspired treatment decisions for multifocal lung adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Multifocal lung adenocarcinoma (MFLA) is becoming increasingly recognized as a distinct subset of lung cancer, with unique biology, disease course, and treatment outcomes. While definitions remain controversial, MFLA is characterized by the development and concurrent presence of multiple independent (non-metastatic) lesions on the lung adenocarcinoma spectrum. Disease progression typically follows an indolent course measured in years, with a lower propensity for nodal and distant metastases than other more common forms of non-small cell lung cancer.

AREAS COVERED

Traditional imaging and histopathological analyses of tumor biopsies are frequently unable to fully characterize the disease, prompting interest in molecular diagnosis. We highlight some of the key questions in the field, including accurate definitions to identify and stage MLFA, molecular tests to stratify patients and treatment decisions, and the lack of clinical trial data to delineate best management for this poorly understood subset of lung cancer patients. We review the existing literature and progress toward a genomic diagnosis for this unique disease entity.

EXPERT OPINION

Multifocal lung adenocarcinoma behaves differently than other forms of non-small cell lung cancer. Progress in molecular diagnosis may enhance potential for accurate definition, diagnosis, and optimizing treatment approach.

Comparison of outcome after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of patients with metachronous lung versus primary lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Early-stage lung cancer, primarily treated with surgery, often occur in poor surgical candidates (impaired respiratory function, prior thoracic surgery, severe comorbidities). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive alternative that provides comparable local control. This technique is particularly relevant for surgically resectable metachronous lung cancer, in patients unable to undergo surgery.. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with SABR for stage I metachronous lung cancer (MLC) versus stage I primary lung cancer (PLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

137 patients treated with SABR for stage I non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed, of which 28 (20.4%) were MLC and 109 (79.6%) were PLC. Cohorts were evaluated for differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival, local control (LC), and toxicity.

RESULTS

After SABR, patients treated for MLC have comparable median age (76.6 vs 78.6, p = 0.2), 3-year LC (83.6% vs. 72.6%, p = 0.2), PFS (68.7% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.9), and OS (78.6% vs. 52.1%, p = 0.9) as PLC, along with similar rates of total (54.1% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.6) and grade 3 + toxicity (3.7% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.9). Previous treatment of MLC patients was either surgery (21/28, 75%) or SABR (7/28, 25%). The median follow-up was 53 months.

CONCLUSION

SABR is a safe and effective approach for localized metachronous lung cancer.

Towards the molecular era of discriminating multiple lung cancers

In the era of histopathology-based diagnosis, the discrimination between multiple lung cancers (MLCs) poses significant uncertainties and has thus become a clinical dilemma. However, recent significant advances and increased application of molecular technologies in clonal relatedness assessment have led to more precision in distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPMs). This review summarizes recent advances in the molecular identification of MLCs and compares various methods based on somatic mutations, chromosome alterations, microRNAs, and tumor microenvironment markers. The paper also discusses current challenges at the forefront of genomics-based discrimination, including the selection of detection technology, application of next-generation sequencing, and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). In summary, this paper highlights an entrance into the primary stage of molecule-based diagnostics.

Genomic Profiling With Large-Scale Next-Generation Sequencing Panels Distinguishes Separate Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas From Intrapulmonary Metastases

The distinction between different separate primary lung cancers (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is a challenging but clinically significant issue. Histopathology-based classification is the current practice; however, it is subjective and affected by interobserver variability. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels have been used in lung cancer diagnostics. This study aimed to investigate the value of large-scale NGS panels for distinguishing between SPLCs and IPMs. A total of 32 patients with 69 lung adenocarcinomas were included. Comprehensive histopathologic assessments of multiple pulmonary adenocarcinomas were performed independently by 3 pathologists. The consensus of histopathologic classification was determined by a majority vote. Genomic analysis was performed using an amplicon-based large-scale NGS panel, targeting single-nucleotide variants and short insertions and deletions in 409 genes. Tumor pairs were classified as SPLCs or IPMs according to a predefined molecular classification algorithm. Using NGS and our molecular classification algorithm, 97.6% of the tumor pairs can be unambiguously classified as SPLCs or IPMs. The molecular classification was predictive of postoperative clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival (P = .015) and recurrence-free interval (P = .0012). There was a moderate interobserver agreement regarding histopathologic classification (κ = 0.524 at the tumor pair level). The concordance between histopathologic and molecular classification was 100% in cases where pathologists reached a complete agreement but only 53.3% where they did not. This study showed that large-scale NGS panels are a powerful modality that can help distinguish SPLCs from IPMs in patients with multiple lung adenocarcinomas and objectively provide accurate risk stratification.

CT imaging features regarding ground-glass nodules and solid lesions reflect prognostication of synchronous multiple lung adenocarcinoma

The prognosis of synchronous multiple lung adenocarcinoma (SMLA) dramatically differs due to its nature of multiple primaries or intrapulmonary metastases. This study aimed to assess computed tomography (CT)-reflected SMLA features regarding ground-glass nodules (GGNs) and solid lesions and their correlation with prognostication. One seventy eight SMLA patients who underwent surgical resection were reviewed. According to preoperative CT features, patients were categorized as: multiple GGN (MG) group: MGs without solid lesions; solid plus GGN (SPG) group: one solid lesion and at least one GGN; multiple solid (MS) group: MS lesions, with or without GGNs. Clinical characteristics, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrieved. Largest tumor size (P < .001) and lymph-node metastasis prevalence (P < .001) were different among three groups, which were highest in the MS group, followed by the SPG group, and lowest in the MG group. Besides, the dominant tumor subtype also varied among the three groups (P < .001), while no difference in other clinical characteristics was discovered. DFS was more deteriorative in the MS group compared to the SPG group (P = .017) and MG group (P < .001), while of no difference between the SPG group and MG group (P = .128). Meanwhile, OS exhibited similar treads among the three groups. Besides, after multivariate Cox analyses adjustment, MS versus MG independently correlated with DFS (P = .030) and OS (P = .027), but SPG versus MG did not. In conclusion, preoperative CT-imaging MS lesions reflect advanced disease features and poor prognosis compared to MG and solid lesion plus GGN in SMLA patients who underwent surgical resection.

Application Value of PET/CT and MRI in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Synchronous Multiple Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules

Background

Synchronous multiple ground-glass nodules (SMGGNs) in synchronous multiple lung cancers are associated with specific imaging findings. It is difficult to distinguish whether multiple nodules are primary tumors or metastatic lesions in the lungs. The need for PET/CT and contrast-enhanced brain MRI for these patients remains unclear. This study investigated the necessity of these two imaging examinations for SMGGN patients by means of retrospective analysis.

Methods

SMGGN patients who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from October 2017 to May 2020 and underwent whole-body PET/CT(Cranial excepted) and/or contrast-enhanced brain MRI+DWI were enrolled in this study. We analyzed the imaging and clinical characteristics of these patients to evaluate SMGGN patients’ need to undergo whole-body PET/CT and brain MRI examination.

Results

A total of 87 SMGGN patients were enrolled. 51 patients underwent whole-body PET/CT examinations and did not show signs of primary tumors in other organs, metastatic foci in other organs, or metastasis to surrounding lymph nodes. 87 patients underwent whole-brain MRI, which did not reveal brain metastases but did detect an old cerebral infarction in 23 patients and a new cerebral infarction in one patient. 87 patients underwent surgical treatment in which 219 nodules were removed. All nodules were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma or atypical adenomatous hyperplasia. No lymph node metastasis was noted.

Conclusion

For SMGGN patients, PET/CT and enhanced cranial MRI are unnecessary for SMGGNs patients, but from the perspective of perioperative patient safety, preoperative MRI+DWI examination is recommended for SMGGNs patients.

Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Primary Lung Cancer

With the wide application of computed tomography in lung cancer screening, the incidence of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasingly reported. Despite the established criteria, the differentiation between MPLC and intrapulmonary metastasis remains challenging. Although histologic features are helpful in some circumstances, a molecular analysis is often needed. The application of next-generation sequencing could aid in distinguishing MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis, decreasing ambiguity. For MPLC management, surgery with lobectomy is the main operation method. Limited resection does not appear to negatively affect survival, and it is a reasonable alternative. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become a standard of care for patients refusing surgery or for those with medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. However, the efficacy of SABR in MPLC management could only be found in retrospective series. Other local ablation techniques are an emerging alternative for the control of residual lesions. Furthermore, systemic therapies, such as targeted therapy for oncogene-addicted patients, and immunotherapy have shown promising results in MPLC management after resection. In this paper, the recent advances in the diagnosis and management of MPLC are reviewed.

The Role of Whole Exome Sequencing in Distinguishing Primary and Secondary Lung Cancers

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that presents with multiple lung tumors (MLTs) poses a challenge to accurate staging and prognosis. MLTs that arise as clonally related secondary metastases from a common primary are higher stage and often require adjuvant chemotherapy or may in fact be incurable stage IV lesions. Conversely, MLTs that represent distinct primaries have a better prognosis and may be overtreated if inappropriately classified as related secondaries. Historically, pathologic and radiographic criteria were used to distinguish between primary and secondary MLTs; however, the advent of genomic profiling has demonstrated limitations to these historic classification systems. In this review, we discuss the use of molecular profiling to distinguish between primary and secondary lung cancers, with a focus on the insights gleaned from whole exome sequencing (WES) analyses. While WES is not yet feasible in routine clinical practice, WES studies have helped elucidate the clonal relationship between primary and secondary lung cancers and provide important context for the application of targeted sequencing panel-based analyses.

Integrating NGS-derived mutational profiling in the diagnosis of multiple lung adenocarcinomas

MICROABSTRACT

Integration of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) information for use in distinguishing between Multiple Primary Lung Cancer and intrapulmonary metastasis was evaluated. We used a probabilistic model, comprehensive histologic assessment and NGS to classify patients. Integrating NGS data confirmed initial diagnosis (n = 41), revised the diagnosis (n = 12), while resulted in non-informative data (n = 8). Accuracy of diagnosis can be significantly improved with integration of NGS data.

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing between multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPM) is challenging. The goal of this study was to evaluate how Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) information may be integrated in the diagnostic strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with multiple lung adenocarcinomas were classified using both the comprehensive histologic assessment and NGS. We computed the joint probability of each pair having independent mutations by chance (thus being classified as MPLC). These probabilities were computed using the marginal mutation rates of each mutation, and the known negative dependencies between driver genes and different gene loci. With these NGS-driven data, cases were re-classified as MPLC or IPM.

RESULTS

We analyzed 61 patients with a total of 131 tumors. The most frequent mutation was KRAS (57.3%) which occured at a rate higher than expected (p < 0.001) in lung cancer. No mutation was detected in 25/131 tumors (19.1%). Discordant molecular findings between tumor sites were found in 46 patients (75.4%); 11 patients (18.0%) had concordant molecular findings, and 4 patients (6.6%) had concordant molecular findings at 2 of the 3 sites. After integration of the NGS data, the initial diagnosis was confirmed for 41 patients (67.2%), the diagnosis was revised for 12 patients (19.7%) or was considered as non-informative for 8 patients (13.1%).

CONCLUSION

Integrating the information of NGS data may significantly improve accuracy of diagnosis and staging.

[Multiple synchronous lung adenocarcinoma: Interest of molecular biology for staging]

INTRODUCTION

The presence of multiple synchronous lung tumors is not a rare event. Distinguishing intra-pulmonary metastases from multiple synchronous lung adenocarcinoma is a challenge for pathologists and physicians. We present observation of a patient with three lung tumors corresponding to three adenocarcinomas for which molecular analysis had a significant impact on tumor staging.

OBSERVATION

Three suspect lesions were discovered in a 61-year-old patient, a smoker, in each lobe of the right lung. Right pneumonectomy with lymph node dissection was performed. Pathological examination showed that each tumor was in fact an adenocarcinoma. In order to more precisely indicate tumor staging, molecular analysis was performed with next generation sequencing showing a different point mutation in a driver gene on each tumor. The final diagnosis is that the three tumors are distinct synchronous tumors, which must be staged separately.

CONCLUSIONS

In modern-day practice of thoracic oncology and of surgical pathology, molecular biology represents a complement for tumor staging in the event of multiple lung tumors.

Genetic and immune characteristics of multiple primary lung cancers and lung metastases

Background

To explore the genetic and immunophenotyping heterogeneities between patients with intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) or multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC).

Methods

Whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA‐seq) were performed on the tissue and blood samples of IPM and MPLC patients to comprehensively analyze the clonal evolution, molecular typing and immunophenotyping.

Results

There was no significant difference in genetic mutation, tumor mutational burden (TMB) value and mutant allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) value between IPM and MPLC patients. Notably, the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) appeared in all IPM patients, while there was also no significant difference between the two groups. In addition, expression of immune checkpoint‐related genes including CTLA‐4, BTLA, TIGIT and HAVCR2 in the MPLC group was significantly higher than those in IPM group. At the same time, 86 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were observed between IPM and MPLC patients with transcriptome sequencing, of which 56 DEGs were upregulated and 30 were downregulated in the IPM group compared with the MPLC group. The cluster analysis revealed that the 86 DEGs could be distinguished in IPM and MPLC samples. Moreover, only the infiltration levels of CD56dim natural killer cells in the IPM group was significantly higher than that in the MPLC group, and the infiltration levels of the remaining 27 immune cell subsets were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

IPM and MPLC are roughly similar in genetic and immune characteristics indicating that genomics alone may not be able to effectively distinguish between IPM and MPLC, which still needs to be comprehensively evaluated with clinical manifestations, imaging, and pathological characteristics.

Oligometastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus: Current Understanding, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive cancer of increasing incidence and is associated with poor prognosis. The early recognition of synchronous and metachronous oligometastasis in esophageal adenocarcinoma may allow for prompt intervention and potentially improved survival. However, curative approaches to oligometastatic esophageal disease remain unproven and may represent an area of emerging divergence of opinion for surgical and medical oncologists. We sought to identify the current understanding and evidence for management of oligometastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma by performing a thorough review of the available literature.

Case Report: A Rare Case of Metachronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancers in a Patient With Successful Management by Switching From Anti-PD-1 Therapy to Anti-PD-L1 Therapy

Without global standard diagnostic criteria, distinguishing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) from intrapulmonary metastasis or histologic transformation has been a big challenge in clinical practice. Here, we described a rare case of metachronous adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a patient who developed drug resistance to pembrolizumab. Both DNA-sequencing and RNA-sequencing were performed on primary adenocarcinoma and resistant lesions. Through the comparison of primary adenocarcinoma and novel lesion mutation profiles, along with bioinformatic estimation of immune proportion by using RNA sequence data, we revealed the origin and tumor microenvironment of the two lesions. No shared mutations were detected between lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and SCLC from the same patient, suggesting these two lesions might be from separate primary lung cancers. Compared to LUAD, SCLC showed a relatively cold microenvironment, including negative PD-L1. The patient obtained durable clinical benefits upon treatment with atezolizumab, without experiencing immune-related adverse events. Disease progression should be monitored with prompt re-biopsy and molecular profiling to spot a potential histologic change and to shed light on therapeutic alternatives. The use of atezolizumab, either alone or in combination with other agents, may be a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with both LUAD and SCLC.

Does histological assessment accurately distinguish separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases? A study of paired resected lung nodules in 32 patients using a routine next-generation sequencing panel for driver mutations

AIM

Various approaches have been reported for distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases in patients with two lung nodules. The aim of this study was to determine whether histological assessment is reliable and accurate in distinguishing separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases using routine molecular findings as an adjunct.

METHODS

We studied resected tumour pairs from 32 patients with lung adenocarcinomas in different lobes. In 15 of 32 tumour pairs, next-generation sequencing (NGS) for common driver mutations was performed on both nodules. The remainder of tumour pairs underwent limited NGS, or EGFR genotyping. Tumour pairs with different drivers (or one driver/one wild-type) were classified as molecularly unrelated, while those with identical low-frequency drivers were classified as related. Three pathologists independently and blinded to the molecular results categorised tumour pairs as related or unrelated based on histological assessment.

RESULTS

Of 32 pairs, 15 were classified as related by histological assessment, and 17 as unrelated. Of 15 classified as related by histology, 6 were classified as related by molecular analysis, 4 were unrelated and 5 were indeterminate. Of 17 classified as unrelated by histology, 14 were classified as unrelated by molecular analysis, none was related and 3 were indeterminate. Histological assessment of relatedness was inaccurate in 4/32 (12.5%) tumour pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

A small but significant subset of two-nodule adenocarcinoma pairs is inaccurately judged as related by histological assessment, and can be proven to be unrelated by molecular analysis (driver gene mutations), leading to significant downstaging.

Multiple Primary Lung Cancers: A New Challenge in the Era of Precision Medicine

With the widespread implementation of lung cancer screening, more and more patients are being diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). In the era of precision medicine, many controversies remain in differentiating MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis and the optimum treatment choice, especially in patients exhibiting similar histology. In this review, we summarize common diagnostic criteria and novel discrimination methods with a special emphasis on the emerging value of broad panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the diagnosis of MPLCs. We then discuss current advances regarding therapeutic approaches for MPLCs. Radical surgery is the main treatment modality, while stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is safe and feasible for early-stage MPLC patients with inoperable tumors. In addition, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, particularly epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are emerging therapeutic strategies that are still in their infancy. Characteristics of both genomic profiles and tumor microenvironment are currently being evaluated but warrant further exploration to facilitate the application of targeted systematic therapies in MPLC patients.

Unexpected encounters: high prevalence of synchronous primary lung cancers in a tertiary academic center

Background

Accurate staging of lung cancer is paramount for directing treatment. After an internal audit suggested a higher than expected rate of synchronous multiple primary lung cancers (SMPLC), we have sought to evaluate the prevalence of SMPLC at our single, large academic center.

Methods

From January 2019 to September 2019, patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics, pre- and post-op imaging, 30-day morbidity and mortality, as well as pathological findings were reviewed. SMPLCs were defined using modified Martini criteria.

Results

Among 83 patients who underwent surgical resection for primary lung cancer with the intention of cure, 17 (20.5%) had pathologically confirmed SMPLC’s, 53 (64%) were single primary lung cancers, and 13 (16%) had metastatic lesions from primary lung cancer or extra-thoracic cancers. Mean length of stay was 2 days with no mortalities. Of the SMPLC group, 9 (53%) had previous extra-thoracic neoplasms, compared with 8 (15%) in the single primary group. Four (24%) had a history of resected lung cancers more than 2 years previously, and were participating in lung cancer surveillance programs.

Conclusions

The rate of SMPLC at our institution appears to be considerably higher than traditionally reported. Failure to recognize the high incidence of synchronous primary lung cancers exposes patients to the risks of under treatment and poor outcomes.

Genetic features and application value of next generation sequencing in the diagnosis of synchronous multifocal lung adenocarcinoma

The present study aimed to elucidate the genetic features of multiple lung cancer (MLC) and identify effective molecular markers for diagnosis using next generation sequencing (NGS). The present data may also inform patient treatment and prognosis. A total of 35 lesions were obtained from 17 patients with MLC. Based on lesion histology and NGS, 13 cases of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) were identified and 4 cases were classified as intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM). All 4 patients with IPM exhibited an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and synchronous mutation of at least one tumor suppressor gene. The frequency and percentage of EGFR mutations, accompanied with tumor suppressor genes, were significantly higher in patients with IPM compared with MPLC. Furthermore, a high EGFR-heterogeneity score and male sex were risk factors of IPM occurrence. There were significant differences in mean EGFR mutation abundance alone, mutations of tumor suppressor genes and mutations of EGFR combined with tumor suppressor genes between patients with adenocarcinoma (ADC) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). In conclusion, histological characteristics combined with genetic alterations may be an effective method for the diagnosis of MPLC and IPM, and NGS may serve as a useful diagnostic tool. MLC exhibited unique molecular characteristics, including higher rates of EGFR mutations, EGFR driver mutations accompanied with tumor suppressor gene mutations and the absence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations, which may help distinguish between patients with MPLC or IPM. The present study hypothesized that the mean frequency of EGFR mutations, mutations of tumor suppressor genes and mutations of both EGFR and tumor suppressor genes may serve an important role in the development of AIS to ADC. The results of the present study highlight the potential underlying mechanisms of lung ADC development, which may assist with future elucidation of effective treatments to prevent the progression of lung cancer.

Classifying multiple lung cancers using morphological features: a meta-analysis

Multiple lung cancers may be intrapulmonary metastases or multiple primaries. Management and prognosis of both entities are different and make the pathologist's role challenging. In fact, distinguishing both entities may be difficult especially when the tumors present the same microscopic subtype. The microscopic diagnoses of these tumors have been improved based on the 2015 WHO classification. The aim of the authors was to assess the diagnostic value of morphologic features in comparison to the gold standard test represented by molecular testing in the distinction between intrapulmonary metastases and multiple lung primaries. To retrieve all eligible articles, PubMed and Embase databases and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched from 1999 to 2020 with limitation to French andEnglish language. The Meta-Disc software 5.1.32 was used to conduct this meta-analysis. The pSEN, pSPE, NLR, PLR, and DOR with the 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The area under the SROC was calculated based on the SEN and SPE of each study. Q test and I² statistics were carried out to explore the heterogeneity among studies. P value <.1 for q test or I² value >50% represented substantial between-study heterogeneity. Meta-regressions were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity if necessary. Twelve eligible articles with 309 patients were included. pSEN was estimated to 65% with I-square estimated to 53%. pSPE reached 49% with I-square estimated to 56%. PLR was estimated to 1.23 with I-square estimated to 33%. NLR was estimated to 0.65 with I-square estimated to 23.1%. dOR was estimated to 2.13 [1.07-4.25] with I-square estimated to 26.5%. AUC was estimated to 0.63. The meta-regression analysis showed non-significant effect of the WHO classification, next-generation sequencing, or nucleotide-specific sequencing with p reaching respectively 0.38, 0.06, and 0.36. These results highlight that morphologic features may be useful in the diagnosis of multiple lung cancers especially when dealing with surgical specimen. The mild heterogeneity observed in this meta-analysis may be due to other covariates that were not described in the different articles including the sample nature.

Synchronous Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

OBJECTIVES

To determine concordance/discordance between morphology and molecular testing (MT) among synchronous pulmonary carcinomas using targeted next generation sequencing (NGS), with and without comprehensive molecular review (CMR), vs analyses of multiple singe genes (non-NGS).

METHODS

Results of morphologic and MT assessment were classified as concordant, discordant, or indeterminate. For discordant cases, comprehensive histologic assessment (CHA) was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-seven cases with 108 synchronous tumors were identified and underwent MT (NGS, n = 23 and non-NGS, n = 24). Histology and MT were concordant, discordant, and indeterminate in 53% (25/47), 21% (10/47), and 26% (12/47) of cases, respectively. CHA of the 10 discordant cases revised results of three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is discordance between histology and MT in a subset of cases and MT provides an objective surrogate for staging synchronous tumors. A limited gene panel is sufficient for objectively assessing a relationship if the driver mutations are distinct. Relatedness of mutations require CMR with a larger NGS panel (eg, 50 genes).

Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing Unambiguously Distinguishes Separate Primary Lung Carcinomas From Intrapulmonary Metastases: Comparison with Standard Histopathologic Approach

PURPOSE

In patients with >1 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), the distinction between separate primary lung carcinomas (SPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastases (IPMs) is a common diagnostic dilemma with critical staging implications. Here, we compared the performance of comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) with standard histopathologic approaches for distinguishing NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We queried 4,119 NSCLCs analyzed by 341-468 gene MSK-IMPACT NGS assay for patients with >1 surgically resected tumor profiled by NGS. Tumor relatedness predicted by prospective histopathologic assessment was contrasted with comparative genomic profiling by subsequent NGS.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with NGS performed on >1 NSCLCs were identified, yielding 76 tumor pairs. NGS classified tumor pairs into 51 definite SPLCs (median, 14; up to 72 unique somatic mutations per pair), and 25 IPMs (24 definite, one high probability; median, 5; up to 16 shared somatic mutations per pair). Prospective histologic prediction was discordant with NGS in 17 cases (22%), particularly in the prediction of IPMs (44% discordant). Retrospective review highlighted several histologic challenges, including morphologic progression in some IPMs. We subsampled MSK-IMPACT data to model the performance of less comprehensive assays, and identified several clinicopathologic differences between NGS-defined tumor pairs, including increased risk of subsequent recurrence for IPMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive NGS allows unambiguous delineation of clonal relationship among NSCLCs. In comparison, standard histopathologic approach is adequate in most cases, but has notable limitations in the recognition of IPMs. Our results support the adoption of broad panel NGS to supplement histology for robust discrimination of NSCLC clonal relationships in clinical practice.

Synchronous multiple lung cancers presenting as multifocal pure ground glass nodules: are whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography and brain enhanced magnetic resonance imaging necessary?

Background

Multifocal ground glass nodules (GGNs) represent a special radiological pattern indicative of synchronous multiple lung cancers (SMLCs), especially adenocarcinoma. However, the necessity of performing whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) scanning and brain enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a staging workup for multifocal pure GGN (pGGN) patients remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of these two imaging scans for patients with multifocal pGGNs.

Methods

This retrospective study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. The study cohort was retrospectively selected from patients with multifocal pGGNs who underwent whole-body PET-CT examinations and/or brain enhanced MRIs between January 2010 and February 2019 at our institution. The additional value of the two exams for detecting nodal and distant metastases was evaluated.

Results

In total, 73 patients (male-to-female ratio, 20:53; median age, 57 years) with multifocal pGGNs who underwent whole-body PET-CT (55 patients) and/or brain enhanced MRI (25 patients) were enrolled. No clearly metastatic lesions were detected. Among the enrolled patients, 53 (128 pGGNs) underwent complete surgical resection. All pGGNs were adenocarcinomas and/or preneoplasias, and no lymph node metastases were found on final pathology. Whole-body PET-CT and brain enhanced MRI added no definite benefit compared with chest CT alone before surgery.

Conclusions

Whole-body PET-CT scans and brain enhanced MRIs are not necessary for patients with multifocal pGGNs.

Using Genomics to Differentiate Multiple Primaries From Metastatic Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Genomic technologies present a promising mechanism of resolving the clinical dilemma of distinguishing independent primary tumors from intrapulmonary metastases in NSCLC. We evaluated the utility of discordant mapping somatic junctions from chromosomal rearrangements in diagnosing metastatic disease compared to the current standard histologic review.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mate-pair sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from 76 distinct tumors from 37 cases of multiple lung cancers. Discordant mapping junctions and chromosomal copy levels were assessed for each tumor. Blood-derived DNA was available on 22 of these cases for germline assessments. A lung cancer next-generation sequencing panel was additionally performed on tumor pairs from 17 patients.

RESULTS

Whereas mate-pair sequencing was able to classify lineage in all tumor pairs, histologic review appeared to misclassify lineage in 9 of 33 (27%) same-histology tumor pair comparisons. Based on disagreement between the reviewing pathologists, histopathologic lineage was classified as indeterminate in seven cases. In two cases where pathologists agreed on a metastatic call, no shared junctions were found suggesting independent primaries. Although germline junctions passing algorithmic filters were common, on average less than three were present and all had predictable structures of small focal rearrangements or transposons. Evaluation of shared chromosomal copy changes and driver mutations through a lung cancer next-generation sequencing panel, while informative, were nondefinitive in calling lineage in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The highly unique nature and prevalence of chromosomal rearrangement in lung cancers provide a useful and definitive technique for calling lineage in multifocal lung cancer.

Clinical analysis of 56 cases of simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral synchronous multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Bilateral synchronous multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma (BSMPLA) is a rapidly increasing disease for which timely and accurate treatment is required. We describe our experience which we hope to establish optimal therapeutic options for patients with BSMPLA.

Methods

This study aimed to explore the feasibility and safety of simultaneous bilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in 56 patients who received histological diagnoses of BSMPLA at our hospital between January 2016 and January 2018. In this retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes, we observed no serious postoperative complications or perioperative death.

Results

Four and 28 patients respectively underwent bilateral lobectomy and lobectomy with contralateral sublobar resection, whereas the remaining 24 patients underwent bilateral sublobar resection. Sublobar resection means anatomical segmentectomy or wedge resection. The mean postoperative hospital stay duration was 5.39±2.67 days. Postoperative complications comprising persistent air leakage for more than 5 days was observed in 8 (14.2%) of 56 patients. No severe postoperative complications or deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that simultaneous bilateral VATS is feasible, safe, and reproducible. This therapeutic strategy appears to confer considerable benefits on patients with BSMPLA.

Precision Medicine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Standards in Pathology and Biomarker Interpretation

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a prominent example of precision medicine among solid tumor malignancies. Clinical management of NSCLC now depends on surgical, chemotherapeutic, and radiation treatment regimens based on pathologic findings and clinical staging as well as targeted therapies based on molecular profiling. As molecular testing becomes increasingly important, preserving tissue for this purpose while rendering an accurate histologic diagnosis becomes a key consideration, particularly in advanced-stage NSCLC, in which small biopsy samples or aspirates are often the only specimen available. Next-generation sequencing panels are a powerful method of providing information relevant for both standard-of-care and investigational treatment options. However, taking advantage of the abundance of information gleaned from these panels requires careful annotation, prioritization, and reporting of molecular findings and their clinical significance. Although molecular profiling has traditionally relied on direct sampling of neoplastic tissue, blood-based diagnostics now offer the potential to provide some clinically useful information noninvasively.

Comparative mutational evaluation of multiple lung cancers by multiplex oncogene mutation analysis

In patients presenting with synchronous or metachronous multiple lung cancer (MLC), it is important to distinguish between multiple primary lung cancer (MP) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IM). The present study was aimed at investigating the mutational profiles of synchronous/metachronous MLC and to compare the classification of paired tumors by multiplex gene mutation analysis with the histopathological evaluation. We carried out targeted sequencing of 20 lung cancer-related oncogenes using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 82 tumors from 37 MLC patients who underwent surgical resection at our department. The patients were diagnosed as MP or IM cases based on the Martini and Melamed criteria, histopathological and gene mutational evaluations. Matching mutations between paired tumors was observed in 20 (54%) patients, who were diagnosed as IM cases by mutational evaluation. Patients who could not be clearly diagnosed by histopathological evaluation were classified as equivocal cases. Among the histopathological IM cases (n = 7), six (86%) were confirmed as IM cases also by mutational evaluation, and most of the paired tumors of these cases (n = 5) harbored multiple matching mutations. Among the histopathological MP cases (n = 17), mutational evaluation yielded a discordant diagnosis in eight (47%) cases. Of these, the paired tumors of four cases harbored multiple matching mutations, suggesting that the mutational diagnosis might be more suitable in these patients. Our findings suggest that multiplex mutational analysis could be a useful complementary tool for distinguishing between MP and IM in addition to histopathological evaluation.

Hybrid Capture-Based Tumor Sequencing and Copy Number Analysis to Confirm Origin of Metachronous Metastases in BRCA1-Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma Harboring a Novel YWHAZ-BRAF Fusion

Biliary tract cancers such as cholangiocarcinoma represent a heterogeneous group of cancers that can be difficult to diagnose. Recent comprehensive genomic analyses in large cholangiocarcinoma cohorts have defined important molecular subgroups within cholangiocarcinoma that may relate to anatomic location and etiology [1], [2], [3], [4] and may predict responsiveness to targeted therapies in development [5], [6], [7]. These emerging data highlight the potential for tumor genomics to inform diagnosis and treatment options in this challenging tumor type. We report the case of a patient with a germline BRCA1 mutation who presented with a cholangiocarcinoma driven by the novel YWHAZ-BRAF fusion. Hybrid capture-based DNA sequencing and copy number analysis performed as part of clinical care demonstrated that two later-occurring tumors were clonally derived from the primary cholangiocarcinoma rather than distinct new primaries, revealing an unusual pattern of late metachronous metastasis. We discuss the clinical significance of these genetic alterations and their relevance to therapeutic strategies.

KEY POINTS

Hybrid capture-based next-generation DNA sequencing assays can provide diagnostic clarity in patients with unusual patterns of metastasis and recurrence in which the pathologic diagnosis is ambiguous.To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a YWHAZ-BRAF fusion in pancreaticobiliary cancer, and a very rare case of cholangiocarcinoma in the setting of a germline BRCA1 mutation.The patient's BRCA1 mutation and YWHAZ-BRAF fusion constitute potential targets for future therapy.

[Multiple lung carcinoma: Primary or intrapulmonary metastasis?]

Multiple lung carcinomas are 5 to 11,5% of lung carcinomas. The distinction between primary lung carcinomas from carcinomas with intrapulmonary metastasis is essential for optimal patient management. The histopathological analysis is very useful but it has to be completed by genotypic assessment using molecular biology (NGS). Molecular biology can also identify genetic alterations with therapeutic implications. We present the case of a patient with a history of surgery for multiple lung carcinomas diagnosed from 2013 to 2017.

Different EGFR gene mutations in two patients with synchronous multiple lung cancers: A case report

Routine clinical and pathological evaluations to determine the relationship between different lesions are often not completely conclusive. Interestingly, detailed genetic analysis of tumor samples may provide important additional information and identify second primary lung cancers. In the present study, we report cases of two synchronous lung adenocarcinomas composed of two distinct pathological subtypes with different EGFR gene mutations: a homozygous deletion in exon 19 of the papillary adenocarcinoma subtype and a point mutation of L858R in exon 21 of the tubular adenocarcinoma. The present report highlights the clinical importance of molecular cancer biomarkers to guide management decisions in cases involving multiple lung tumors.