Early and Late Humoral Rejection: A Clinicopathologic Entity in Two Times

Early Versus Late Acute AMR in Kidney Transplant Recipients-A Comparison of Treatment Approaches and Outcomes From the ANZDATA Registry

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of kidney allograft failure and demonstrates different properties depending on whether it occurs early (<6 mo) or late (>6 mo) posttransplantation. We aimed to compare graft survival and treatment approaches for early and late AMR in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

Transplant characteristics were obtained for patients with an AMR episode reported to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry from January 2003 to December 2019. The primary outcome of time to graft loss from AMR diagnosis, with death considered a competing risk, was compared between early and late AMR using flexible parametric survival models. Secondary outcomes included treatments used, response to treatment, and time from AMR diagnosis to death.

RESULTS

After adjustment for other explanatory factors, late AMR was associated with twice the risk of graft loss relative to early AMR. The risk was nonproportional over time, with early AMR having an increased early risk. Late AMR was also associated with an increased risk of death. Early AMR was treated more aggressively than late with more frequent use of plasma exchange and monoclonal/polyclonal antibodies. There was substantial variation in treatments used by transplant centers. Early AMR was reported to be more responsive to treatment than late.

CONCLUSIONS

Late AMR is associated with an increased risk of graft loss and death compared with early AMR. The marked heterogeneity in the treatment of AMR highlights the need for effective, new therapeutic options for these conditions.

Comparative Analysis of Determinants and Outcome of Early and Late Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (ABMR)

Introduction

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is one of the major determinants of graft survival. Although diagnostic precision and treatment options have improved, response to therapy and graft survival has not improved very significantly. The phenotypes of early and late acute ABMR differ in many ways. In this study, we assessed the clinical characteristics, response to therapy, DSA positivity, and outcomes of early and late ABMR.

Methods

During the study period, 69 patients with acute ABMR diagnosed on renal graft histopathology were included with a median follow-up of 10 months after rejection. Recipients were stratified into early acute ABMR (<3 months of transplant; n = 29) and late acute ABMR (>3 months of transplant; n = 40). Graft survival, patient survival, response to therapy, and doubling of serum creatinine were assessed and compared between the two groups.

Results

Baseline characteristics and immunosuppression protocols were comparable between the early and late ABMR groups. Late acute ABMR had an increased risk of doubling of serum creatinine than the early ABMR group (P = 0.002). Graft and patient survival were not statistically different between the two groups. Response to therapy was inferior in the late acute ABMR group (P = 0.00). Pretransplant DSA was present in 27.6% in the early ABMR group. Late acute ABMR was frequently associated with nonadherence or suboptimal immunosuppression and low DSA positivity (15%). Infections such as CMV, bacterial, and fungal infections were similar in the earlier and late ABMR groups.

Conclusion

Late acute ABMR group had a poor response to anti-rejection therapy and also an increased risk of doubling of serum creatinine compared to the early acute ABMR group. There was also a tendency toward increased graft loss in late acute ABMR patients. Late acute ABMR patients are more frequently associated with nonadherence/suboptimal immunosuppression. There was also a low incidence of anti-HLA DSA positivity in late ABMR.

Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.

Reflections on the usefulness of extracorporeal photopheresis in renal transplant rejection: A concise review of the involved mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives

Renal rejection clinically represents a major cause of graft dysfunction and sadly the loss of the renal transplant. This is despite the considerable progress in immunosuppressive therapy. It is strongly believed that the complex immunologic network underlying the response against major histocompatibility molecules (MHC) is responsible for rejection, an unresolved issue that is, in part, not inhibited by the current prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective cell therapy approach that was successfully used in immunomodulating heart rejection, acute and chronic GvHD, lung rejection and some selected autoimmune diseases. In this concise report we provide a brief review on the mechanisms of action and the use of ECP in acute and chronic renal allograft rejection.

Bortezomib may stabilize pediatric renal transplant recipients with antibody-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND

Current therapeutic strategies to effectively treat antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are insufficient. Thus, we aimed to determine the benefit of a therapeutic protocol using bortezomib for refractory C4d + AMR in pediatric kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

We examined seven patients with treatment-refractory C4d + AMR. Immunosuppression included antithymocyte globulin or anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody for induction therapy with maintenance corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitor, and anti-metabolite. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated by the Schwartz equation, biopsy findings assessed by 2013 Banff criteria, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA) performed using the Luminex single antigen bead assay were monitored pre- and post- bortezomib therapy.

RESULTS

Seven patients (86 % male, 86 % with ≥6/8 HLA mismatch, and 14 % with pre-formed DSA) age 5 to 19 (median 15) years developed refractory C4d + AMR between 1 and 145 (median 65) months post-transplantation. All patients tolerated bortezomib. One patient had allograft loss. Of the six patients with surviving grafts (86 %), mean pre-bortezomib eGFR was 42 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and the mean 1 year post-bortezomib eGFR was 53 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Five of seven (71 %) had improvement of histological findings of AMR, C4d staining, and/or acute cellular rejection. Reduction in HLA DSAs was more effective for class I than class II.

CONCLUSIONS

Bortezomib appears safe and may correlate with stabilization of eGFR in pediatric kidney transplant patients with refractory C4d + AMR.

Therapy Modalities for Antibody Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of our study was to determine the effectiveness of immunoglobulin, rituximab and plasmapheresis in renal transplant patients with antibody mediated rejection (AMR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen renal transplant patients with AMR were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 33.9 ± 10.3 years and 10 (71.4%) of them were male. Lymphocyte cross match was negative for all patients and 10 (71.4%) of them were living donor transplants. Six patients were administered tacrolimus, three patients cyclosporine, two patients everolimus, and three patients sirolimus for immunosuppression. The patients with AMR were administered IVIG, rituximab and plasmapheresis.

RESULTS

Patient survival rate was 100%, graft survival rate after AMR was 50% in the first year and 33% in the 2nd and third years. AMR developed 31.9 ± 25.9 months after transplantation. Seven (50%) patients lost their grafts. Delayed graft function was observed in 28.6%, chronic allograft dysfunction in 78.5%, diabetes after transplantation in 14.3%, and cytomegalovirus infection in 7.1% of the patients. At the last follow-up, the mean blood creatinine was 3.1 ± 1.4, the mean proteinuria was 2300 (1300-3300) mg/day and the mean GFR was 34.5 ± 17.6 ml/min. C4d was positive in peritubullar capillaries in all patients, while neutrophil accumulation in peritubular and glomerular capillaries was observed in 8 patients. Chronic allograft vasculopathy was observed in 12 patients.

CONCLUSION

AMR leads to progressive loss of renal function and has low graft survival. More effective treatment alternatives are needed for this clinical issue.

Late antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts: outcome after conventional and novel therapies

BACKGROUND

Although several strategies for treating early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplants have been investigated, evidence on treatment of late AMR manifesting after 6 months is sparse. In this single-center series, we present data on 23 consecutive patients treated for late AMR.

METHODS

Late AMR was diagnosed using Banff 2007 criteria along with presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and acute rise in serum creatinine (SCr). Response to therapy was assessed by improvement in SCr, histologic improvement, and decline in DSA strength.

RESULTS

Overall, 17% (4/23) had documented nonadherence while 69% (16/23) had physician-recommended reduction in immunosuppression before AMR. Eighteen patients (78%) were treated with plasmapheresis or low-dose IVIg+rituximab; 11 (49%) with refractory AMR also received one to three cycles of bortezomib. While there was an improvement (P=0.02) in mean SCr (2.4 mg/dL) at the end of therapy compared with SCr at the time of diagnosis (2.9 mg/dL), this improvement was not sustained at most recent follow-up. Eleven (48%) patients had no histologic resolution on follow-up biopsy. Lack of histologic response was associated with older patients (odds ratio [OR]=3.17; P=0.04), presence of cytotoxic DSA at time of diagnosis (OR=200; P=0.04), and severe chronic vasculopathy (cv≥2) on index biopsy (OR=50; P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

A major setting in which late AMR occurred in our cohort was reduction or change in immunosuppression. Our data demonstrate an inadequate response of late AMR to current and novel (bortezomib) therapies. The benefits of therapy need to be counterweighed with potential adverse effects especially in older patients, large antibody loads, and chronic allograft vasculopathy.

Cyclosporine immunosuppression does not prevent the production of donor-specific antibody capable of mediating allograft vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Late cardiac graft rejection, primarily mediated by allograft vasculopathy (AV), remains a major limitation to cardiac transplantation, even in the face of significant calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppression. The role played by alloantibody in AV is unclear. Evidence that CNI immunosuppression suppresses CD4(+) T-cell function would suggest that antibody production and effector function would be severely limited in CNI-treated patients. In this study we examine the capacity of CNI-treated animals to develop effective alloantibody that can mediate AV.

METHODS

Wild-type (WT) B6 mice were alloimmunized using donor splenocytes or a fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched allogeneic abdominal aortic graft in the presence of CNI immunosuppression (30 or 50 mg/kg/day cyclosporine A). Anti-serum was harvested and tested using complement-dependent in vitro cytotoxicity assays. Anti-serum was passively transferred to immunodeficient RAG1(-/-) recipients of allogeneic grafts. C4d deposition was quantified in the allografts from WT recipients.

RESULTS

CNI immunosuppression did not prevent the development of alloantibody in response to either immunization method (p < 0.05). Passive transfer of anti-serum generated AV lesions in immunodeficient graft recipients and mediated complement-dependent destruction of donor cells (p < 0.05). C4d deposition was localized to the media of grafts of CNI treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

CNI therapy does not prevent the production of alloantibody with the capacity to mediate AV. C4d deposition in the media suggests a role for medial smooth muscle cell loss in antibody-mediated AV lesion development in our model.

Late acute kidney transplant rejection: clinicopathological correlates and response to corticosteroid therapy

Acute rejection is a major cause of kidney allograft dysfunction. It is important to distinguish between cellular and antibody-mediated rejection to guide the treatment strategy. The management of acute antibody-mediated rejection includes aggressive therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. C4d staining of peritubular capillaries has emerged as a valuable tool in identifying antibody-mediated rejection. Late acute rejection has a worse prognosis than early acute rejection. The clinical and pathological features of late acute kidney allograft rejection are not fully understood. We studied the clinicopathological correlates of late acute rejection in our patient population. During an 8-year period, all patients who had late acute rejection (6 months posttransplant) were identified. Patients with severe chronic changes and transplant glomerulopathy were excluded. Patients were divided into C4d+ and C4d- groups [corrected]. Histopathological features and treatment response were evaluated. Nine patients met inclusion criteria (4 C4d+, 5 C4d-). Maintenance therapy consisted of mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, and low-dose prednisone. All patients received intravenous methlyprednisolone or high-dose oral prednisone as antirejection therapy. Seventy-five percent of patients in the C4d+ group and 80% of patients in the C4d- group had a clinical response to antirejection therapy. The majority of C4d+ patients with late acute rejection who were treated with corticosteroids alone responded to treatment. The study raises the possibility that a subset of C4d+ patients with acute rejection who do not have severe chronic changes might respond to corticosteroid therapy alone.

Proteomic profiling of renal allograft rejection in serum using magnetic bead-based sample fractionation and MALDI-TOF MS

Proteomics is one of the emerging techniques for biomarker discovery. Biomarkers can be used for early noninvasive diagnosis and prognosis of diseases and treatment efficacy evaluation. In the present study, the well-established research systems of ClinProt Micro solution incorporated unique magnetic bead sample preparation technology, which, based on matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), have become very successful in bioinformatics due to its outstanding performance and reproducibility for discovery disease-related biomarker. We collected fasting blood samples from patients with biopsy-confirmed acute renal allograft rejection (n = 12), chronic rejection (n = 12), stable graft function (n = 12) and also from healthy volunteers (n = 13) to study serum peptidome patterns. Specimens were purified with magnetic bead-based weak cation exchange chromatography and analyzed with a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer. The results indicated that 18 differential peptide peaks were selected as potential biomarkers of acute renal allograft rejection, and 6 differential peptide peaks were selected as potential biomarkers of chronic rejection. A Quick Classifier Algorithm was used to set up the classification models for acute and chronic renal allograft rejection. The algorithm models recognize 82.64% of acute rejection and 98.96% of chronic rejection episodes, respectively. We were able to identify serum protein fingerprints in small sample sizes of recipients with renal allograft rejection and establish the models for diagnosis of renal allograft rejection. This preliminary study demonstrated that proteomics is an emerging tool for early diagnosis of renal allograft rejection and helps us to better understand the pathogenesis of disease process.