Prognostic impact of metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma in the postcytokine therapy era

Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Recent advances in immunotherapy and targeted therapy have resulted in survival rates as high as 90% at 1 year in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients; however, sustained response and ultimate cure is rarely achieved with systemic therapy alone (complete response rates remain <5%), and progression of disease at distant sites is common. Pulmonary metastasectomy is recommended as a component of multimodal management in patients with favorable-risk or intermediate-risk classification and can be associated with excellent survival if complete resection is obtained.

Prevailing challenges in personalized treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has advanced with recent therapies, yet optimizing treatment remains challenging due to disease heterogeneity and the growing number of options. Integrating systemic and local treatments requires a multidisciplinary approach to improve outcomes.

AREA COVERED

This review summarizes recent developments in treatment for mRCC. Upfront immuno-oncology (IO)-based combinations have improved survival, though concerns about overtreatment and toxicity persist. While the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has declined to some extent, it may still benefit well-selected patients. Metastasis-directed therapies, including metastasectomy and stereotactic radiotherapy, provide prognostic value, particularly for oligometastatic lesions or brain metastases. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) holds promise for personalized treatment but is currently limited by the lack of actionable mutations and predictive biomarkers.

EXPERT OPINION

A personalized, multimodal approach is essential for optimizing mRCC management. Careful patient selection is key to balancing the benefits of treatment with the risks of toxicity. While CN and metastasis-directed therapies remain useful in select cases, advancing individualized care requires the development of validated biomarkers and broader application of CGP.

Renal cell cancer treatment: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) surgery-focused consensus update

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2.2% of all malignancies worldwide; however, its mortality rate is not negligible. Surgery is the primary treatment for most nonadvanced cases, with its indications and techniques evolving over the years. To provide an update on RCC management in Brazil, focusing on surgery. The Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group-Genitourinary Section and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group gathered a panel of Brazilian urologists and clinical oncologists to vote on and discuss the best management of surgically resectable RCC. The experts compared the results with the literature and graded them according to the level of evidence. For small renal masses (SRMs; less than 4 cm), biopsy is indicated for specific/select cases, and when intervention is needed, partial nephrectomy should be prioritized. Radical nephrectomy and ablative techniques are exceptions for managing SRMs. Patients with small tumors (less than 3 cm), slow tumor growth, or a risk for surgery may benefit from active surveillance. Localized carcinoma up to 7 cm in diameter should be treated preferably with partial nephrectomy. Lymphadenectomy and adrenalectomy should be performed in locally advanced cases if involvement is suspected by imaging exams. Patients with venous tumor thrombi usually require surgical intervention depending on the extent of the thrombus. Neoadjuvant therapy should be considered for unresectable cases. Even in the era of targeted therapy, cytoreductive nephrectomy still has a role in metastatic disease. Metastasectomy is indicated for most patients with resectable disease. This consensus presents recommendations for surgical treatment of RCC based on expert opinions and evidence from the medical literature. Surgery remains the best curative option for nonadvanced cases, and it still has a role for select patients with metastatic disease.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma

The management of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastases is controversial and occasionally requires multimodality management, including salvage pulmonary metastasectomy after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, limited data are available on these patients. We describe a case series of three consecutive patients who underwent salvage pulmonary metastasectomy after ICIs for oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and discussed the important characteristics of these patients. After salvage pulmonary metastasectomy, none of the patients had recurrent pulmonary metastases, although one of them developed a brain metastasis postoperatively. Our case series suggests that salvage pulmonary metastasectomy after ICIs may control pulmonary metastases in carefully selected patients with oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma, although the management of extrapulmonary metastases may be required after salvage pulmonary metastasectomy.

First-line Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: An International Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but real-world data on sequential treatment are scarce. We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of first-line (1L) systemic therapy following adjuvant immune oncology (IO)-based regimens.

METHODS

A retrospective study including patients with recurrent RCC following adjuvant IO across 29 international institutions was conducted. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) on 1L systemic therapy estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Preplanned subanalyses of clinical outcomes by type of 1L systemic therapy, recurrence timing, and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups were performed. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, or corticosteroid use were assessed.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 94 patients were included. Most received adjuvant pembrolizumab (n = 37, 39%), atezolizumab (n = 28, 30%), or nivolumab + ipilimumab (n = 15, 16%). The cohort included 49 (52%) patients who had recurrence within 3 mo of the last adjuvant IO dose, whereas 45 (48%) recurred beyond 3 mo. Bone metastases were significantly higher in tumors recurring at <3 mo (10/49, 20%) than those recurring at >3 mo (1/45, 2.2%; p = 0.008). Most patients received 1L vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy (VEGF-TT; n = 37, 39%), IO + VEGF-TT (n = 26, 28%), or IO + IO (n = 12, 13%). The remaining underwent local therapy. The median follow-up for the 1L systemic therapy cohort was 15 mo. The 18-mo PFS and OS rates were 45% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-60) and 85% (95% CI: 75-95), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32 (42%) patients and included skin toxicity (n = 7, 9.2%), fatigue (n = 6, 7.9%), and diarrhea/colitis (n = 4, 5.3%). Limitations included selecting patients from large academic centers and the short follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A subset of patients with recurrent RCC following adjuvant IO respond to systemic therapies, including VEGF-TT and IO-based regimens. Notably, patients with favorable-risk disease may derive more benefit from VEGF-TT than from IO therapies in this setting. Future approaches utilizing radiographic tools and biomarker-based liquid biopsies are warranted to detect occult metastatic disease and identify candidate patients for adjuvant IO therapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There are limited data on clinical outcomes after the recurrence of RCC tumors following adjuvant immunotherapy. In this study, we find that patients respond to subsequent systemic therapies across different treatment options.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Review of Use in the Primary, Cytoreductive and Oligometastatic Settings

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been increasing in incidence by around 1.5% per year for several years. However, the mortality rate has been decreasing by 1.6% per year, and this can be attributed to stage migration and improvements in treatment. One treatment modality that has emerged in recent years is stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), which is an advanced radiotherapy technique that allows the delivery of high-dose radiation to the tumor while minimizing doses to the organs at risk. SBRT has developed a role in the treatment of early-stage, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive RCC. In localized disease, phase II trials and meta-analyses have shown that SBRT provides a very high probability of long-term local control with a low risk of severe late toxicity. In oligometastatic (OMD) RCC, the same level of evidence has similarly shown good local control and minimal toxicity. SBRT could also delay the necessity to start or switch systemic treatments. Medical societies have started to incorporate SBRT in their guidelines in the treatment of localized disease and OMD. A possible future role of SBRT involves cytoreduction. It is theorized that SBRT can lower tumor burden and enhance immune-related response, but it cannot be recommended until the results of the phase II trials are published.

Multidisciplinary systemic and local therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Systemic and local therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often challenging despite the evolution of multimodal cancer therapies in the last decade. In this review, we will focus on recent multidisciplinary approaches for patients with mRCC.

AREAS COVERED

Systemic therapies for patients with mRCC have been garnering attention particularly after the approval of immuno-oncology (IO) agents, including anti-programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1. IO combinations have significantly prolonged overall survival in patients with mRCC in the first-line setting. Regarding local therapies, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has become less common in the post-Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial era, even though CN may still benefit selected patients with mRCC. In addition, metastasis-directed local therapies, namely metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy, particularly for oligo-metastatic lesions or brain metastases, may have a prognostic impact. Several ablative techniques are also evolving while maintaining high local control rates with acceptable safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Multimodal cancer therapies are essential for conquering complex cases of mRCC. Modern systemic therapies including IO-based combination therapy as well as local therapies including CN, metastasectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and ablative techniques appear to improve oncologic outcomes of patients with mRCC, although appropriate patient selection is indispensable.

Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index on Recurrence after Radical Surgery for High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma

With emerging options in immediate postoperative settings for high-risk renal cell carcinoma (hrRCC), further risk stratification may be relevant for informed decision making. Balancing the benefits and drawbacks of adjuvant immunotherapy is recommended. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in this setting. This bi-institutional retrospective study recruited 235 patients who underwent radical surgery for hrRCC between 2004 and 2021. LIPI scores were calculated based on the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase levels. The association between LIPI scores and local or distant recurrence was analyzed, along with other possible clinical factors. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) period was 36.4 months. Based on the LIPI scores, 119, 91, and 25 patients were allocated to the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. The RFS was significantly correlated with the LIPI scores, and the 36 month survival rates were 67.3, 36.2, and 11.0% in the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. In the multivariate model, the LIPI independently predicted the RFS, along with symptoms at diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pT status, pN status, and tumor grade. The C-index of the LIPI in predicting RFS was 0.63, and prediction accuracy improved with the addition of the LIPI to both GRade, Age, Nodes, Tumor, and the UCLA Integrated Staging System. Conclusively, the LIPI can be a significant prognostic biomarker for predicting hrRCC recurrence, particularly for identifying the highest-risk cohort.

The Diagnosis and Treatment Approach for Oligo-Recurrent and Oligo-Progressive Renal Cell Carcinoma

One-third of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) without metastases develop metastatic disease after extirpative surgery for the primary tumors. The majority of metastatic RCC cases, along with treated primary lesions, involve limited lesions termed "oligo-recurrent" disease. The role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and metastasectomy, in the treatment of oligo-recurrent RCC has evolved. Although the surgical resection of all lesions alone can have a curative intent, SBRT is a valuable treatment option, especially for patients concurrently receiving systemic therapy. Contemporary immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies remain central to the management of metastatic RCC. However, one objective of MDT is to delay the initiation of systemic therapies, thereby sparing patients from potentially unnecessary burdens. Undertaking MDT for cases showing progression under systemic therapies, known as "oligo-progression", can be complex in considering the treatment approach. Its efficacy may be diminished compared to patients with stable disease. SBRT combined with ICI can be a promising treatment for these cases because radiation therapy has been shown to affect the tumor microenvironment and areas beyond the irradiated sites. This may enhance the efficacy of ICIs, although their efficacy has only been demonstrated in clinical trials.

Role of Surgery in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Surgery has historically been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but recent clinical trials demonstrated that contemporary systemic therapies alone are non-inferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). Thus, the current role of surgery is not precisely defined. CN remains an appropriate upfront treatment for the palliation of severe symptoms, select cases of metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, for consolidation following systemic therapy, and in the setting of oligometastatic disease. Metastasectomy is ideally utilized to achieve a disease-free state when there is minimal morbidity associated with surgery. Given the heterogenous nature of mRCC, the decision for systemic therapy and surgery should be made through a multidisciplinary approach tailored to each individual patient.

Role of metastasectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved with the development of a variety of systemic agents; however, these therapies alone rarely lead to a complete response. Complete consolidative surgery with surgical metastasectomy has been associated with improved survival outcomes in well-selected patients in previous reports. No randomized control trial exists to determine the effectiveness of metastasectomy. Therefore, reviewing observational studies is important to best determine which patients are most appropriate for metastasectomy for mRCC and if such treatment continues to be effective with the development of new systemic therapies such as immunotherapy. In this narrative review, we discuss the indications for metastasectomies, outcomes, factors associated with improved survival, and special considerations such as location of metastasis, number of metastases, synchronous metastases, and use of systemic therapy. Additionally, alternative treatment options and trials involving metastasectomy will be reviewed.

Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma to Pancreas and Distant Organs 24 Years After Radical Nephrectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is a common urological neoplasm, and even though surgical resection is effective for localized CCRCC, the prognosis of metastatic CCRCC is poor. Currently, there is a paucity of recognized effective therapeutic protocols for metastatic CCRCC.

Case presentation

A 76-year-old Asian man underwent radical left nephrectomy for CCRCC 26 years ago; this patient visited our hospital with abdominal pain due to multiple abdominal metastases 24 years after the nephrectomy. After metastasectomy, he underwent targeted therapy combined with a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, and the current imaging results indicate remarkable tumor remission.

Conclusions

Metachronous pancreatic metastasis from CCRCC after nephrectomy is rare, but clinicians and patients should not ignore this possibility. The combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy can result in satisfactory outcomes in cases where metastatic CCRCC continues to progress despite metastasectomy and targeted therapy. The combination of local and systemic therapy can be an effective therapeutic protocol for metastatic CCRCC, but there is no consensus on suitable therapeutics.

Changes in Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma from the Molecular-Targeted Therapy Era to the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Era

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of changes in the outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma from the molecular-targeted therapy era to the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) era remains limited in the real-world setting.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to clarify outcome changes from the previous molecular-targeted therapy era to the current ICI era in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma using multi-institution real-world data.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 415 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received first-line systemic therapy at five Japanese institutions between January 2008 and August 2021. We divided the patients into two groups based on the treatment era: molecular-targeted therapy era (January 2008-August 2018) and ICI era (September 2018-August 2021). According to the era, progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate from first-line systemic therapy were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, 304 (73.3%) and 111 (26.7%) patients were categorized into the molecular-targeted therapy and ICI eras, respectively. The proportion of patients without prior nephrectomy (p = 0.0030) or those with low Karnofsky Performance Status scores [≤ 70] (p = 0.0258) were significantly higher in the ICI era group. The patients in the ICI era group had significantly longer overall survival (median: not reached vs 23.2 months, p = 0.0001) and a higher objective response rate (47.8% vs 24.7%, p < 0.0001) than those in the molecular-targeted therapy era group, and progression-free survival tended to be longer in the ICI era group (median: 13.3 vs 8.75 months, p = 0.0579). Multivariate analysis further showed that the treatment era (ICI vs molecular-targeted therapy) was an independent factor for overall survival and objective response (both, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present multi-institution real-world data showed the improved outcome of previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the ICI era group compared with that in the molecular-targeted therapy era group. These findings strongly encourage the use of ICI-based treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the real-world setting. Further studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings.

Reshaping Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Renal Cell Cancer Patients and Improving Patient Management : Optimal Management for Renal Cell Cancer Patients

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the great success stories in the field of oncology, which was revolutionized with the development of therapies aimed at disrupting crucial pathways. Tumor biology of RCC has provided insight into the disease through elucidation of the role of vascular endothelial growth-factor (VEGF) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Targeted agents against VEGF and mTOR, as well as agents targeting relevant immunomodulatory pathways, have shown clinical benefit for advanced disease. The targeted agents are highly effective in achieving a response and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. These include the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) axitinib and cabozantinib, and programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. There is a wealth of evidence investigating different therapeutic options and combinations for first-line treatment of advanced RCC including the CheckMate 214 study, KEYNOTE-426, JAVELIN Renal 101, and CheckMate 9ER. Dual ICI and combination agents targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) and VEGF, began to demonstrate superiority over previously accepted standards in advanced clear-cell RCC. Data from a number of clinical studies are available to help physicians with evidence-based decisions for the sequence of second-line and future treatments for patients with progressive RCC. In this review, we focus on essentials for clinicians treating patients with clear-cell RCC.

C-reactive protein kinetics to predict recurrence of high-risk renal cell carcinoma after radical surgery

BACKGROUND

With new options in adjuvant settings, clinical biomarkers to predict recurrence after radical surgery for high-risk renal cell carcinoma (hrRCC) are in need but are scarcely investigated. We aimed to verify the predictive value of perioperative C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics on hrRCC recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 154 patients who underwent radical surgery for hrRCC (≥ pT3 and/or N1-2 and M0) at two institutions. Patients were classified into Normal (< 0.5) and High (≥ 0.5) according to their preoperative serum CRP (mg/dL). The High group were further classified into Normalized (< 0.5 at post) or Non-normalized (≥ 0.5 at post), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared between groups. Factors for RFS were further analysed, and Harrell's concordance index (C-index) for the accuracy of predicting RFS was compared with and without the addition of CRP-related variables to pre-existing models.

RESULTS

The RFS was significantly shorter in the High (n = 72, 46.8%) compared to the Normal (n = 82, 53.2%) group (9.7 vs. 66.7 months, p < 0.001). Within the High group, Non-normalized (n = 27, 17.5%) patients showed a significantly shorter RFS compared to the Normalized (n = 45, 29.2%) group (6.2 vs. 20.3, p = 0.009). In the multivariable stepwise analysis, CRP kinetics (hazard ratio 2.15, p = 0.029) effectively predicted RFS while baseline CRP fell short of significance. Higher C-index improvement was observed with CRP non-normalization than the baseline value when added to factors in the Karakiewicz and University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System models.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP kinetics effectively predicted RCC recurrence after surgery and may aid in decision-making for adjuvant systemic therapy.

Metastasectomy in kidney cancer: current indications and treatment approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although systemic agents for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have improved survival, remission and cure for mRCC remains rare with systemic therapy alone. However, there is a body of observational evidence supporting a survival benefit in mRCC among patients who undergo complete surgical consolidation including resection of the primary tumor and all metastatic deposits. In this review, we aim to synthesize recent evidence regarding metastasectomy (MTS), with or without concurrent systemic therapy, in mRCC.

RECENT FINDINGS

MTS is a critical component of mRCC patient care, alongside modern systemic therapy. Presently, there is a robust body of observational data supporting the association between surgical MTS and improved oncologic outcomes, especially when complete MTS is feasible.

SUMMARY

Among a retrospective, observational body of literature, MTS is associated with improved oncologic outcomes. However, it is impossible to discern to what degree these findings are biased by favorable tumor biology and patient selection, as opposed to being related to surgical MTS itself.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors following the surgical resection of renal cell carcinoma spinal metastases

The efficacy of surgical resection in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is an active and important research field in the postcytokine era. Bone metastases, especially in the spine, compromise patient performance status. Metastasectomy is indicated, if feasible, because it helps to achieve the best clinical outcomes possible compared with other treatments. This study examined the postoperative survival and prognostic factors in patients who underwent metastasectomy of spinal lesions. The retrospective study included 65 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas who were operated on by spinal metastasectomy between 1995 and 2017 at our institution. The cancer‐specific survival times from the first spinal metastasectomy to death or the last follow‐up (≥3 years) were determined using Kaplan‐Meier analysis. Potential factors influencing survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. Planned surgical resection of all the spine tumors was achieved in all patients. Of these, 38 had complete metastasectomy of all visible metastases, including extraspinal lesions. In all patients, the estimated median cancer‐specific survival time was 100 months. The 3‐, 5‐, and 10‐year cancer‐specific survival rates were 77%, 62%, and 48%, respectively. The survival times after spinal metastasectomy were similar in both cytokine and postcytokine groups. In multivariate analyses, postoperative disability, the coexistence of liver metastases, multiple spinal metastases, and incomplete metastasectomy were significant risk factors associated with short‐term survival. Complete metastasectomy, including extraspinal metastases, was associated with improved cancer‐specific survival. Proper patient selection and complete metastasectomy provide a better prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

The effect of metastasectomy on overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Metastasectomy (MTS) is a treatment option for patients diagnosed with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). Nevertheless, the benefits of MTS as they pertain to survival remain controversial. This systematic review aims to compare the survival outcomes of patients who underwent MTS, as well as discover which clinical factors were related to the results.

METHODS

From their inception up to August 2020, a systematic review of the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and Web of science databases was performed. Studies which reported outcomes on patients who underwent MTS for the treatment of mRCC were included. The sites, times, amount, histology types of metastasis, and prior nephrectomy were also analyzed. The primary efficacy end point was Overall Survival (OS). A meta-analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratio, 95% confidence intervals, and I² values. Forest plots were constructed for each analysis group.

RESULTS

The systematic review and reference list search identified 294 articles, with 17 meeting studies as inclusion criteria. The MTS group showed a competitive advantage in OS, in that the non-MTS group was negatively associated with an overall survival rate (HR [non-MTS vs. MTS] = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.59-2.92, P< 0.001). Moreover, patients treated with the most recently available target therapy without MTS showed a significantly increased risk compared with the MTS group (HR = 1.82, 95% CI:1.23-2.70, P= 0.003). Additionally, meta-analysis revealed HR elevating in patients with nonlung only metastasis (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.55-2.26, P< 0.001), synchronous metastasis (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.10-1.49, P= 0.001), and multiple metastases (HR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.64-2.59, P< 0.001). Clear-cell type mRCC (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.82, P= 0.0006) and prior nephrectomy (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.91, P= 0.03) were positively associated with a better overall survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

MTS is a treatment option for mRCC patients with prolonged overall survival time. The operation has additional advantages, particularly in patients with lung only metastasis, asynchronous metastasis, fewer metastasis sites, clear-cell type mRCC, and the patients who had received nephrectomy.

Next Steps: Sequencing Therapies in Metastatic Kidney Cancer in the Contemporary Era

Systemic therapy for first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma has evolved toward immune checkpoint blockade combinations incorporating a PD-1/L1 inhibitor along with CTLA-4 inhibition or VEGF-targeted therapy. The new treatment paradigm that integrates immunotherapy for treatment-naïve advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma creates a new therapeutic challenge for clinicians including the optimal way to integrate multidisciplinary care involving surgery, radiotherapy, and application of contemporaneous systemic treatment in subsequent lines of therapy following discontinuation of combination therapy. We outline the available data for the multidisciplinary management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, systemic therapy options in the post-immune checkpoint blockade setting, and novel therapies in development for advanced renal cell carcinoma. We provide practical considerations to assist clinicians in treatment choice and map future directions for progress.

Current role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Historically, immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was considered the standard of care in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who were fit enough to undergo surgery. Recently, 2 randomized controlled trials, SURTIME and CARMENA, have questioned the role of immediate CN and initiated an ongoing debate on the proper indications and timing of CN. Although some patients still benefit from immediate CN, other patients require immediate systemic treatment, and some of them might benefit from deferred CN in the absence of disease progression. This study provides an overview of the history of CN, an in-depth analysis of SURTIME and CARMENA, and highlights the current indications for performing immediate or deferred CN.