1
|
Kim GL, Pyo SW, Kim SH, Song HJ, Choi SY, Yi H, Rhie GE, Chung YS. Serological correlates of protection and long-term efficacy of a novel recombinant protective antigen-based anthrax vaccine in a rabbit model. Vaccine 2025; 57:127212. [PMID: 40347707 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2025] [Revised: 04/30/2025] [Accepted: 05/01/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
Abstract
The novel anthrax vaccine candidate GC1109, composed of recombinant protective antigen, has shown robust antibody responses and safety in preclinical and clinical studies. However, the assessment of GC1109 vaccine efficacy was limited in a rodent model and could not be applied in clinical studies due to ethical issues. In this study, we aim to provide predictive insights for human applications of GC1109 by examining the correlation between anthrax toxin-neutralizing antibodies (TNAs) and protection against Bacillus anthracis infection in rabbit. The threshold level of TNAs necessary for protection was assessed following subcutaneous (s.c) challenge with lethal B. anthracis spores. In addition, the longevity of immunity in GC1109-vaccinated rabbits was investigated. A positive correlation between TNA levels and survival was observed, indicating their potential as a predictor of protection in humans. The 50 % neutralization factor (NF50) value of 0.5 was associated with a 70 % probability of survival, establishing this value as a surrogate marker for protective efficacy. Long-term protection was confirmed, with the GC1109-vaccinated group exhibiting significantly higher survival rates (91.7 %) than the control group (8.3 %) at 12 months post-vaccination. These findings highlight the protective efficacy and durability of GC1109-induced immunity against lethal B. anthracis challenge. The study supports the continued development of GC1109 as a viable anthrax vaccine candidate and underscores its potential for emergency preparedness in Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyu-Lee Kim
- Division of High-risk Pathogens, Department of Disease Diagnosis and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Wook Pyo
- Division of High-risk Pathogens, Department of Disease Diagnosis and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea
| | - So-Hyeon Kim
- Division of High-risk Pathogens, Department of Disease Diagnosis and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Ju Song
- Division of High-risk Pathogens, Department of Disease Diagnosis and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Yoon Choi
- Division of High-risk Pathogens, Department of Disease Diagnosis and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwajung Yi
- Division of High-risk Pathogens, Department of Disease Diagnosis and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea
| | - Gi-Eun Rhie
- Center for Vaccine Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Korea National Institute of Health, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon-Seok Chung
- Division of High-risk Pathogens, Department of Disease Diagnosis and Analysis, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju 28159, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ji J, Tang T, Zhu M, Wu Z, Zhang J, Shi D, Zhu L, Zhang X, Lu X, Chen L, Yao H. Boosting the immune response in COVID-19 vaccines via an Alum:CpG complex adjuvant. Antiviral Res 2024; 229:105954. [PMID: 38964615 DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2024.105954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Selecting appropriate adjuvants is crucial for developing an effective vaccine. However, studies on the immune responses triggered by different adjuvants in COVID-19 inactivated vaccines are scarce. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of Alum, CpG HP021, Alum combined with CpG HP021 (Alum/CpG), or MF-59 adjuvants with COVID-19 inactivated vaccines in K18-hACE2 mice, and compared the different immune responses between K18-hACE2 and BALB/c mice. In K18-hACE2 mice, the Alum/CpG group produced a 6.5-fold increase in anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibody titers compared to the Alum group, and generated a comparable level of antibodies even when the antigen amount was reduced by two-thirds, possibly due to the significant activation of germinal center (GC) structures in the central region of the spleen. Different adjuvants induced a variety of binding antibody isotypes. CpG HP021 and Alum/CpG were biased towards Th1/IgG2c, while Alum and MF-59 were biased toward Th2/IgG1. Cytokines IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α were significantly increased in the culture supernatants of splenocytes specifically stimulated in the Alum/CpG group. The antibody responses in BALB/c mice were similar to those in K18-hACE2 mice, but with lower levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Notably, the Alum/CpG-adjuvanted inactivated vaccine induced a higher number of T cells secreting IFN-γ and IL-2, increased the percentage of effector memory T (TEM) cells among CD8+ T cells, and effectively protected K18-hACE2 mice from Delta variant challenge. Our results showed that Alum/CpG complex adjuvant significantly enhanced the immune response to inactivated COVID-19 antigens and could induce a long-lasting immune response.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Animals
- COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology
- COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage
- Mice
- Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage
- Mice, Inbred BALB C
- Alum Compounds/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Viral/blood
- Antibodies, Viral/immunology
- COVID-19/prevention & control
- COVID-19/immunology
- SARS-CoV-2/immunology
- Immunoglobulin G/blood
- Immunoglobulin G/immunology
- Adjuvants, Vaccine/administration & dosage
- Female
- Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood
- Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology
- Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology
- Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage
- Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology
- Cytokines/immunology
- Humans
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Ji
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Taoming Tang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Miaojin Zhu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Zhigang Wu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Jiale Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Danrong Shi
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Linwei Zhu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xiaodi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Xiangyun Lu
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Zhejiang Toyouvax Bio-pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, 311103, China
| | - Hangping Yao
- State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Henning L, Anderson M, Triplett C, Smith T, Boyce K, Hendey L, Ridenour A, Eng J, Schaeufele D, Wilson E, Sabourin CL, Adams LE, Babas T, Parish L, Wolfe D. Efficacy of different AV7909 dose regimens in a nonclinical model of pulmonary anthrax. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2290345. [PMID: 38115181 PMCID: PMC10760354 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2290345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary anthrax caused by exposure to inhaled Bacillus anthracis, the most lethal form of anthrax disease, is a continued military and public health concern for the United States. The vaccine AV7909, consisting of the licensed anthrax drug substance AVA adjuvanted with CpG7909, induces high levels of toxin neutralizing antibodies in healthy adults using fewer doses than AVA. This study compares the ability of one- or two-dose regimens of AV7909 to induce a protective immune response in guinea pigs challenged with a lethal dose of aerosolized B. anthracis spores 6 weeks after the last vaccine dose. The results indicated that AV7909 was less effective when delivered as a single dose compared to the two-dose regimen that resulted in dose-dependent protection against death. The toxin neutralizing assay (TNA) titer and anti-PA IgG responses were proportional to the protective efficacy, with a 50% TNA neutralizing factor (NF50) greater than 0.1 associated with survival in animals receiving two doses of vaccine. The strong protection at relatively low TNA NF50 titers in this guinea pig model supports the exploration of lower doses in clinical trials to determine if these protective levels of neutralizing antibodies can be achieved in humans; however, protection with a single dose may not be feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Henning
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Tammy Smith
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kevin Boyce
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Alex Ridenour
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jason Eng
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Ehran Wilson
- Battelle Biomedical Research Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Carol L. Sabourin
- Tunnell Government Services, Inc, Supporting BARDA, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lily E. Adams
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) fellow at BARDA, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tahar Babas
- Division of CBRN Countermeasures, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lindsay Parish
- Division of CBRN Countermeasures, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Washington, DC, USA
| | - Daniel Wolfe
- Division of CBRN Countermeasures, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bower WA, Yu Y, Person MK, Parker CM, Kennedy JL, Sue D, Hesse EM, Cook R, Bradley J, Bulitta JB, Karchmer AW, Ward RM, Cato SG, Stephens KC, Hendricks KA. CDC Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Anthrax, 2023. MMWR Recomm Rep 2023; 72:1-47. [PMID: 37963097 PMCID: PMC10651316 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7206a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
This report updates previous CDC guidelines and recommendations on preferred prevention and treatment regimens regarding naturally occurring anthrax. Also provided are a wide range of alternative regimens to first-line antimicrobial drugs for use if patients have contraindications or intolerances or after a wide-area aerosol release of Bacillus anthracis spores if resources become limited or a multidrug-resistant B. anthracis strain is used (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al.; Workgroup on Anthrax Clinical Guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:e130687; Meaney-Delman D, Rasmussen SA, Beigi RH, et al. Prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:885-900; Bradley JS, Peacock G, Krug SE, et al. Pediatric anthrax clinical management. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1411-36). Specifically, this report updates antimicrobial drug and antitoxin use for both postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and treatment from these previous guidelines best practices and is based on systematic reviews of the literature regarding 1) in vitro antimicrobial drug activity against B. anthracis; 2) in vivo antimicrobial drug efficacy for PEP and treatment; 3) in vivo and human antitoxin efficacy for PEP, treatment, or both; and 4) human survival after antimicrobial drug PEP and treatment of localized anthrax, systemic anthrax, and anthrax meningitis. Changes from previous CDC guidelines and recommendations include an expanded list of alternative antimicrobial drugs to use when first-line antimicrobial drugs are contraindicated or not tolerated or after a bioterrorism event when first-line antimicrobial drugs are depleted or ineffective against a genetically engineered resistant B. anthracis strain. In addition, these updated guidelines include new recommendations regarding special considerations for the diagnosis and treatment of anthrax meningitis, including comorbid, social, and clinical predictors of anthrax meningitis. The previously published CDC guidelines and recommendations described potentially beneficial critical care measures and clinical assessment tools and procedures for persons with anthrax, which have not changed and are not addressed in this update. In addition, no changes were made to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations for use of anthrax vaccine (Bower WA, Schiffer J, Atmar RL, et al. Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019. MMWR Recomm Rep 2019;68[No. RR-4]:1-14). The updated guidelines in this report can be used by health care providers to prevent and treat anthrax and guide emergency preparedness officials and planners as they develop and update plans for a wide-area aerosol release of B. anthracis.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sabra DM, Krin A, Romeral AB, Frieß JL, Jeremias G. Anthrax revisited: how assessing the unpredictable can improve biosecurity. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1215773. [PMID: 37795173 PMCID: PMC10546327 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1215773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
B. anthracis is one of the most often weaponized pathogens. States had it in their bioweapons programs and criminals and terrorists have used or attempted to use it. This study is motivated by the narrative that emerging and developing technologies today contribute to the amplification of danger through greater easiness, accessibility and affordability of steps in the making of an anthrax weapon. As states would have way better preconditions if they would decide for an offensive bioweapons program, we focus on bioterrorism. This paper analyzes and assesses the possible bioterrorism threat arising from advances in synthetic biology, genome editing, information availability, and other emerging, and converging sciences and enabling technologies. Methodologically we apply foresight methods to encourage the analysis of contemporary technological advances. We have developed a conceptual six-step foresight science framework approach. It represents a synthesis of various foresight methodologies including literature review, elements of horizon scanning, trend impact analysis, red team exercise, and free flow open-ended discussions. Our results show a significant shift in the threat landscape. Increasing affordability, widespread distribution, efficiency, as well as ease of use of DNA synthesis, and rapid advances in genome-editing and synthetic genomic technologies lead to an ever-growing number and types of actors who could potentially weaponize B. anthracis. Understanding the current and future capabilities of these technologies and their potential for misuse critically shapes the current and future threat landscape and underlines the necessary adaptation of biosecurity measures in the spheres of multi-level political decision making and in the science community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dunja Manal Sabra
- Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker-Centre for Science and Peace Research (ZNF), University of Hamburg, Bogenallee, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sharma S, Bahl V, Srivastava G, Shamim R, Bhatnagar R, Gaur D. Recombinant full-length Bacillus Anthracis protective antigen and its 63 kDa form elicits protective response in formulation with addavax. Front Immunol 2023; 13:1075662. [PMID: 36713362 PMCID: PMC9877290 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1075662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Bacillus anthracis is the causative agent for the lethal disease anthrax, primarily affecting animals and humans in close contact with an infected host. The pathogenicity of B. anthracis is attributed to the secreted exotoxins and their outer capsule. The host cell-binding exotoxin component "protective antigen" (PA) is reported to be a potent vaccine candidate. The aim of our study is to produce several PA constructs and analyze their vaccine potential. Methods We have designed the various subunit, PA-based recombinant proteins, i.e., full-length Protective antigen (PA-FL), C-terminal 63 kDa fragment (PA63), Protective antigen domain 1-domain 4 chimeras (PA-D1-4) and protective antigen domain 4 (PA-D4) and analyzed their vaccine potential with different human-compatible adjuvants in the mouse model. We have optimized the process and successfully expressed our recombinant antigens as soluble proteins, except full-length PA. All the recombinant antigen formulations with three different adjuvants i.e., Addavax, Alhydrogel, and Montanide ISA 720, were immunized in different mouse groups. The vaccine efficacy of the formulations was analyzed by mouse serum antigen-specific antibody titer, toxin neutralization assay, and survival analysis of mouse groups challenged with a lethal dose of B. anthracis virulent spores. Results We have demonstrated that the PA-FL addavax and PA63 addavax formulations were most effective in protecting spore-challenged mice and serum from the mice immunized with PAFL addavax, PA-FL alhydrogel, PA63 addavax, and PA63 alhydrogel formulations were equivalently efficient in neutralizing the anthrax lethal toxin. The higher levels of serum Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines in PA-FL addavax immunized mice correspond to the enhanced protection provided by the formulation in challenged mice. Discussion We have demonstrated that the PA-FL addavax and PA63 addavax formulations exhibit equivalent efficiency as vaccine formulation both in a mouse model of anthrax and mammalian cell lines. However, PA63 is a smaller antigen than PA-FL and more importantly, PA63 is expressed as a soluble protein in E. coli, which imparts a translational advantage to PA63-based formulation. Thus, the outcome of our study has significant implications for the development of protective antigen-based vaccine formulations for human use against the lethal disease anthrax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shikhar Sharma
- Laboratory of Malaria & Vaccine Research, School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India,Department of Oncology Science, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States,*Correspondence: Shikhar Sharma, ;
| | - Vanndita Bahl
- Laboratory of Malaria & Vaccine Research, School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Gaurav Srivastava
- Food Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Risha Shamim
- School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Bhatnagar
- Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| | - Deepak Gaur
- Laboratory of Malaria & Vaccine Research, School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liao J, Zhuo X, Pan B, Zou Y, Chai X, Wu Q, Yu S, Pan W, Zhao Q. Synthesis and preliminary immunologic properties of di-/trisaccharide-conjugates related to Bacillus anthracis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2022; 76:128986. [PMID: 36113670 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2022.128986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Herein, the di- and trisaccharide mimics of the hexasaccharide antigen related to Bacillus anthracis were synthesized and covalently coupled with carrier proteins, such as keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and bovine serum albumin (BSA), to form the corresponding glycoconjugates 1-6. 2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-benzyl thioglycoside and 2-deoxyl-2-phthalylamino-3,4,6-tri-O-benzyl thioglycoside were applied as glycosyl donors to guarantee α or β-configuration of the newly formed glycosidic bonds. Glutaraldehyde was used as a homobifunctional cross-linker for high-efficiency coupling. The synthetic KLH-glycoconjugates 2, 4 and 6 were also used to vaccinate female Balb/c mice and the preliminary results of ELISA uncovered that all three KLH-conjugates could induce immune responses and generate oligosaccharide-specific total IgG antibodies. The trisaccharide 8, the glycosyl part of glycoconjugate 4, is of great immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China; School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Xiaobin Zhuo
- School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Bo Pan
- Department of Dermatology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, China
| | - Yan Zou
- School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Xiaoyun Chai
- School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Qiuye Wu
- School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Shichong Yu
- School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Weihua Pan
- Department of Dermatology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, China.
| | - Qingjie Zhao
- School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, 325 Guohe Road, Shanghai 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vaccines. SIDE EFFECTS OF DRUGS ANNUAL 2022. [PMCID: PMC9646283 DOI: 10.1016/bs.seda.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The safety of COVID-19 vaccines, as was the case last year, remains a large part of the focus in this volume. COVID-19 placed a large magnifying glass on both vaccines, specifically vaccine safety. This was most readily apparent as the number of records in VAERS ballooned to about 10 times the size from 2020 to 2021 (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2022) [S]. While we have added and/or improved VAERS during COVID-19, including adding or improving other vaccine safety surveillance tools like v-safe and vaccine safety datalink (Blumenthal, Phadke, et al., 2021) [MC], there is still room for improvement in these pharmacovigilance tools (Rizk et al., 2021) [r]. A major global initiative in this realm is the Global Vaccines Safety Blueprint 2.0 (GVSB2.0) (Organization, 2021, pp. 2021–2023) [S]. We wholeheartedly endorse these initiatives, which could significantly improve vaccine safety. As noted in past SEDA issues, clinicians should be mindful of the risks of AEs and SAEs associated with each individual vaccine.
Collapse
|
9
|
Schneider JC, Chen HC, Bautista E, Retallack D. Safety and immunogenicity of Px563L, a recombinant anthrax vaccine candidate, in a two-dose regimen for post-exposure prophylaxis in healthy adults. Vaccine 2021; 39:6333-6339. [PMID: 34544599 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Px563L is a next-generation anthrax vaccine candidate consisting of a protein subunit, mutant recombinant protective antigen SNKE167-ΔFF-315-E308D (mrPA), and liposome-embedded monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) adjuvant. Px563L has the potential to deliver an improved safety and immunogenicity profile relative to the currently licensed vaccine, which is produced from filtered B. anthracis culture supernatants. We conducted a Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study in 54 healthy subjects to evaluate Px563L at 3 dose levels of mrPA (10, 50, and 80 mcg). For each dose level, 18 subjects were randomized in an 8:8:2 ratio to Px563L (mrPA with adjuvant), RPA563 (mrPA only) or placebo (saline). Each subject received an intramuscular (IM) injection on Day 0 and Day 28. Primary safety and immunogenicity analysis was conducted after all subjects completed the Day70 visit, a duration deemed clinically relevant for post-exposure prophylaxis. Long-term safety was assessed through Day 393. Vaccinations with Px563L at all dose levels were well-tolerated. There were no serious adverse events or adverse events (AE) leading to early withdrawal. In all treatment groups, most AEs were due to injection site reactions, and all AEs at the 10 and 50 mcg dose levels were mild. For the primary immunogenicity endpoint (protective toxin neutralizing antibody 50% neutralization factor [TNA NF50]), titers started to increase significantly after the second administration of Px563L, from Day35 through Day70, with the geometric mean and lower bound of the 95% confidence interval exceeding 0.56, a threshold correlating with significant survival in animal models of anthrax exposure. In conclusion, Px563L, administered as two IM doses 28 days apart, was well-tolerated and elicited a protective antibody response starting at seven days after the second vaccination. These findings support the continued development of Px563L in a two-dose regimen for anthrax post-exposure prophylaxis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02655549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hubert C Chen
- Pfenex Inc, 10790 Roselle St, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Edgar Bautista
- eBio Consulting, 10790 Roselle St, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Diane Retallack
- Ligand Pharmaceuticals, 10790 Roselle St, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vaccines. SIDE EFFECTS OF DRUGS ANNUAL 2021. [PMCID: PMC8488686 DOI: 10.1016/bs.seda.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In this volume of the Side Effects of Drugs Annual, although other vaccines will be covered, the safety of COVID vaccines is the focus as COVID-19 has led to heightened attention on vaccine safety in general. As such, this chapter will be more relevant than ever before. As noted in past SEDA issues, clinicians should be mindful of the risks of AEs and SAEs associated with each vaccine.
Collapse
|