Meningococcal B vaccination coverage among older adolescents in the United States

Meningococcal vaccination disparities in the United States (2010-2021): Findings from the National Immunization Survey-Teen and a commercial insurance database

In the United States, while meningococcal vaccines are available and recommended for adolescents and young adults, coverage remains low and disparities persist. We evaluated meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, Y (MenACWY) and B (MenB) vaccine uptake, completion, and compliance using a cross-sectional analysis of National Immunization Survey-Teen (NIS-Teen) data (2015-2021) and a cohort analysis of commercial claims data (2010-2021). Regression models were used to identify factors associated with vaccine uptake. Included in the NIS-Teen MenACWY and MenB analyses were 138,952 and 177,077 patients, respectively. Included in the claims MenACWY and MenB analyses were 953,905 and 818,424 patients, respectively. In 2021, MenACWY uptake was 86.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83.6-88.8%) among ≤13-year-olds (NIS-Teen) and 63.2% (62.8-63.5%) among 11-12-year-olds (claims). MenB was 33.7% (30.5-37.1%) among ≤17-year-olds (NIS-Teen), 41.6% (41.2-42.0%) among 16-18-year-olds (claims), and 15.0% (14.7-15.4%) among 19-23-year-olds (claims). The states with the lowest and highest MenB uptake by ≤17-year-olds in 2021 (NIS-Teen) were Minnesota (10.1% [3.9-23.6%]) and North Dakota (69.9% [52.1-83.2%]). Factors associated with MenACWY uptake included living in a state with a vaccine mandate, Black or Hispanic race (versus White), and well-child visit attendance. Factors associated with MenB uptake included having Medicaid (versus private insurance) and Hispanic race (versus White). The findings suggest that meningococcal vaccination coverage disparities persist across vaccines, age, geography, and race and ethnicity. Higher MenACWY (versus MenB) coverage suggests the benefit of routine recommendations. Annual well-child visits and simplified vaccination schedules could reduce vaccination access barriers.

Epidemiology of invasive meningococcal disease and its sequelae: a population-based study in Italian primary care, 2000-2019

BACKGROUND

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a severe infectious disease. Although effective preventive and therapeutical strategies are available, the fatality rate remains high in the general population, with an occurrence of meningococcal-related severe sequelae involving 10-20% of survivors. Given the crucial role of general practitioners in recognizing and preventing IMD and its related sequelae, we aim to assess the burden of these conditions in primary care.

METHODS

Using an Italian primary care database, the incidence rate of IMD was calculated in the period 2000-2019 by capturing the first diagnosis registered during follow-up. As far as meningococcal-related sequelae are concerned, we identified and clinically evaluated each potential sequela during the first 3 months, from 3 to 12 months, and up to 36 months.

RESULTS

Among 508 patients diagnosed with IMD, 403 (incidence rate: 0.24 per 10,000 person-years) comprised those diagnosed with IMD in patients aged 15 years or older. We ascertained 104 sequelae (20.4%); 76% of them occurred in those aged 25 or older; 42, 27, and 35 were assessed as short-, medium-, or long-term sequelae, respectively. Overall, 4.7% of IMD patients reported physical sequelae, while 12.2% and 5.7% of patients reported neurological and psychological sequelae, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that a substantial proportion of IMD and related sequelae occur in individuals aged over 25, with a non-negligible burden for healthcare systems. As for the paediatric population, effective communication on the relevance of meningococcal vaccination in adults should be proficiently fostered.

Public Health Impact of Introducing a Pentavalent Vaccine Against Invasive Meningococcal Disease in the United States

BACKGROUND

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is primarily associated with five Neisseria meningitidis serogroups: A, B, C, W, or Y. In the United States (US), available vaccines protect against serogroups B (MenB), A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY), and A, B, C, W, and Y (MenABCWY). The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is re-evaluating the adolescent meningococcal vaccination schedule with varying recommendation formats. This analysis aimed to predict which schedule could avert the most IMD cases and have the most positive public health impact (PHI).

METHODS

An epidemiological model compared the 15-year PHI of vaccination schedules using MenB, MenACWY, and/or MenABCWY vaccines versus current US standard of care (SoC). Varying coverage rates reflected routine, shared clinical decision making, and risk-based recommendations. Sensitivity analyses assessed robustness of the results to different inputs/assumptions.

RESULTS

The most positive PHI compared with SoC was observed with one dose of MenACWY at 11 years of age and two doses of MenABCWY (6 months apart) at 16 years of age, assuming routine recommendation and coverage reflecting real-world uptake of MenACWY. This strategy resulted in 123 IMD cases averted (MenB: 59, MenACWY: 64), 17 deaths prevented, 574 life-years saved, and 757 quality-adjusted life-years gained versus SoC. Eliminating MenACWY vaccination at 11 years was found to result in an additional IMD burden.

CONCLUSION

A routinely recommended two-dose pentavalent vaccine, with doses administered 6 months apart at 16 years of age, alongside the routinely recommended MenACWY vaccine at 11 years of age, would improve the PHI and benefits of IMD vaccination to society.

Inequalities in the risk and prevention of invasive meningococcal disease in the United States - A systematic literature review

Vaccination remains the most effective strategy to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), with MenACWY, MenB and MenABCWY recommended for adolescents/young adults in the United States (US). However, vaccination coverage remains suboptimal, which could be related to population inequalities. To understand the impact of IMD risk, prevention and control inequalities, a global systematic literature review (Medline, Embase, 2012-2022) was conducted on individual, socioeconomic, and environmental inequalities associated with IMD risk, prevention and control in all ages. Studies on IMD risk (n = 15) and prevention (n = 14) inequalities were identified. IMD incidence proportions were higher in Medicaid versus commercially insured populations, and IMD mortality was higher in poorer neighborhoods. White adolescents, adolescents from lower income families, and with lower maternal education were more likely to receive MenB vaccination; while Black and Hispanic adolescents, and adolescents with higher family incomes, were more likely to receive MenACWY vaccination. Meningococcal vaccination was associated with being up-to-date with other vaccinations, having multiple healthcare/well child visits, having a pediatrician as healthcare provider (HCP), and attending private facilities; while being uninsured was associated with lower vaccination. States with a MenACWY vaccination mandate and higher pediatrician-to-children ratios had higher vaccination rates. Important inequalities were due to individual differences, socioeconomic, and environmental factors. IMD prevention is suboptimal, especially among adolescents/young adults. To improve health equity, health policy makers could ameliorate meningococcal vaccination coverage across the US, with simplified and stronger meningococcal vaccine recommendations from public health authorities, and initiatives to enhance parental/patient and HCP knowledge of IMD and vaccine recommendations.

The impact of regional disparities on the availability of meningococcal vaccines in the US

BACKGROUND

In the United States (US), three types of vaccines are available to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), a severe and potentially fatal infection: quadrivalent conjugate vaccines against serogroups A, C, W, Y (MenACWY), and monovalent vaccines against serogroup B (MenB) as well as a newly licensed pentavalent vaccine (MenABCWY) protecting against serogroup A, B, C, W, and Y. The CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) routinely recommends MenACWY vaccine for all 11- to 12-year-olds with a booster dose at 16 years. MenB vaccination is recommended based on shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) for 16- to 23-year-olds. Recently, the pentavalent meningococcal vaccine (MenABCWY) was recommended by the ACIP. Meningococcal vaccine uptake is suboptimal across the country, particularly among individuals with lower socioeconomic status (SES), despite these recommendations. The objective of the spatial analyses was to assess the relationship between stocking of MenACWY and MenB vaccines, area-level SES, and state-level policies.

METHODS

The number of MenACWY and MenB doses stocked by vaccinators was obtained from IQVIA and the CDC's Vaccine for Children (VFC) program and compiled into a county-level dataset from 2016 to 2019. SES, as measured using the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), state-level school recommendations, and universal purchasing programs were among the main county-level covariates included to control for factors likely influencing stocking. Data were stratified by public and private market. Bayesian spatial regression models were developed to quantify the variations in rates of stocking and the relative rates of stocking of both vaccines.

RESULTS

After accounting for county-level characteristics, lower SES counties tended to have fewer doses of MenB relative to MenACWY on both public and private markets. Lower SES counties tended to have more supply of public vs. private doses. Universal purchasing programs had a strong effect on the markets for both vaccines shifting nearly all doses to the public market. School vaccination strategy was key for improving stocking rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results show that MenACWY has greater stock relative to MenB across the US. This difference is exacerbated in vulnerable areas without school entry requirements for vaccination and results in inequity of vaccine availability. Beyond state-level policy and SES differences, SCDM recommendations may be a contributing factor, although this was not directly assessed by our model.

Awareness, attitudes, and practices on meningococcal serogroup B vaccination in the United States among parents of older adolescents and among young adults

OBJECTIVE

Meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination is recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adolescents and young adults 16-23-years-old under shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, MenB vaccination coverage in this population remains low in the United States (US). We investigated the awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding MenB disease and vaccination among parents of 16-18-year-old older adolescents and among 19-23-year-old young adults.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted in September-October 2022 among parents of older adolescents and among young adults recruited from a US-based patient panel.

RESULTS

There were 606 total participants, including parents of MenB-vaccinated (n = 151) and non-vaccinated (n = 154) adolescents, and also MenB-vaccinated (n = 150) and non-vaccinated (n = 151) young adults. Non-vaccinated cohorts reported low awareness of MenB disease (58.3-67.5%) and vaccination (49.7-61.0%), though awareness was higher among non-vaccinated parents. However, all cohorts reported high interest in learning more about MenB disease and vaccination. Vaccinated cohorts relied on primary care providers (PCPs) to initiate MenB vaccination conversation and had a low awareness of SCDM at 35.1-45.3%, though those aware of SCDM were more likely to participate in decision-making. Barriers to MenB vaccination included lack of PCP recommendation, vaccine side effects, and uncertainty about vaccination need.

CONCLUSIONS

There are gaps in awareness of MenB disease, vaccination, and SCDM among parents and patients in the US, resulting in missed opportunities for discussing and administering MenB vaccination. Targeted education on MenB and vaccination recommendations may increase these opportunities and improve MenB vaccination awareness and initiation.

Meningococcal serogroup B vaccination series initiation in the United States: A real-world claims data analysis

In the United States (US), meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination has been recommended for 16-23-year-olds (preferably 16-18 years) based on shared clinical decision-making since 2015. MenB vaccine coverage (≥1 dose) by age 17 years has been reported, but initiation at older ages and by insurance type is unknown. In this retrospective cohort study, MarketScan claims data were analyzed to assess MenB vaccine series initiation (i.e. receipt of a first dose) during 2017-2020 among US commercially insured and Medicaid-covered individuals aged 16-18 and 19-23 years. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate series initiation at various times from index (latest of 1/1/2017 or 16^th/19^th birthday, depending on the cohort). Multivariable analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with series initiation. Among 1,450,354 Commercial and 1,140,977 Medicaid 16-18-year-olds, MenB vaccine series initiation rates within 3 years of each person's first eligibility were estimated to be 33% and 20%, respectively; among 1,857,628 Commercial and 747,483 Medicaid 19-23-year-olds, 3% and 1%, respectively. Factors identified to be significantly associated with increased likelihood of initiating a MenB vaccine series included co-administration of meningococcal serogroups ACWY (MenACWY) vaccine, younger age, female sex, nonwhite race (Medicaid only), New England or Middle Atlantic location (Commercial only), urban residence, and previous influenza vaccination. MenB vaccine series initiation among the studied US adolescents and young adults was low. There is a need for continued efforts to better understand barriers to the uptake of vaccines that are recommended based on shared clinical decision-making.

Determinants of Meningococcal Vaccination Coverage and Adherence: A Targeted Literature Review Supporting a 16-year-old Healthcare Visit

We conducted a targeted literature review to understand the determinants of meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) and meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination coverage and adherence to vaccination schedules in the USA, and to identify evidence to support improvement of MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage and adherence in older adolescents. Sources published since 2011 were considered, with sources published since 2015 given preference. Out of 2355 citations screened, 47 (46 studies) were selected for inclusion. Determinants of coverage and adherence ranging from patient-level sociodemographic factors to policy-level factors were identified. Four determinants identified were associated with improved coverage and adherence: (1) well-child, preventive, or vaccination-only appointments (particularly for older adolescents); (2) provider-initiated, provider-driven vaccine recommendations; (3) provider education about meningococcal disease and vaccine recommendations; and (4) state-level school-entry immunization policies. This robust review of the literature sheds light on the continued low MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage and adherence among older adolescents (16-23 years of age) compared with that of younger adolescents (11-15 years of age) in the USA. The evidence supports a renewed call to action by local and national health authorities and medical organizations urging healthcare professionals to implement a healthcare visit for 16-year-olds and focus on vaccination as a key component of the visit.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Meningococcal Vaccination Awareness, Delivery, and Coverage in Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review

Vaccines remain a fundamental intervention for preventing illness and death. In the United States, suboptimal vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults has been observed for meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) and serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccines, particularly among marginalized communities, despite current recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases to identify both drivers of, and barriers to, MenACWY and MenB vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults. A total of 34 of 46 eligible studies that presented outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status were selected for review. Results showed MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage in adolescents and young adults is impacted by racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities. Gaps also exist in insurance for, or access to, these vaccines in adolescents and young adults. Moreover, there was variability in the understanding and implementation of the shared decision-making recommendations for the MenB vaccine. Disease awareness campaigns, increased clarity in accessing all meningococcal vaccines, and further research on the relationships between measures of marginalization and its impact on vaccine coverage in adolescents and young adults are needed to reduce the incidence of severe infections.

Public health perspective of a pentavalent meningococcal vaccine combining antigens of MenACWY-CRM and 4CMenB

OBJECTIVES

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a life-threatening disease that can rapidly progress to death or leave survivors with severe, life-long sequelae. Five meningococcal serogroups (A, B, C, W and Y) account for nearly all IMD. Meningococcal serogroup distribution fluctuates over time across the world and age groups. Here, we consider the potential public health impact of a pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine developed to help further control meningococcal disease and improve immunisation rates.

RESULTS

The GSK MenABCWY vaccine combines the antigenic components of MenACWY-CRM (Menveo®) and 4CMenB (Bexsero®), building on a wide body of clinical experience and real-world evidence. Both approved vaccines have acceptable safety profiles, demonstrate immunogenicity, and are broadly used, including in national immunisation programmes in several countries. Since the advent of quadrivalent vaccines, public health in relation to IMD has improved, with a decline in the overall incidence of IMD and an increase in vaccine coverage.

CONCLUSION

A pentavalent MenABCWY has the potential to provide further public health benefits through practical, broad IMD protection programmes encompassing serogroups A, B, C, W and Y, and is currently in late-stage development.

Making a Shared Decision on Meningococcal B Vaccine: Provider Feedback on an Educational Tool Developed for Use With Patients

BACKGROUND

In 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended Meningococcal B vaccination for healthy 16- to 23-year-olds based on shared clinical decision-making between the patient and the provider. There has been some confusion regarding how to implement this recommendation.

METHODS

Through discussions among the authors, a review of relevant literature, and consultation with vaccine experts, we developed educational materials for providers that included a patient handout to help initiate and guide conversations leading to shared clinical decision-making for the Meningococcal B vaccine. Materials were distributed to 88 health care providers who subsequently completed surveys to evaluate their impressions of the materials and the utility of the materials for clinical practice.

RESULTS

The survey results from the 88 providers revealed that they valued the materials; 93% percent indicated they would share these materials with colleagues, and 95% agreed or strongly agreed that they would share these materials with patient families. Responses to an open-ended question indicate that some providers initiated discussions regarding the Meningococcal B vaccine in ways that truncated conversation rather than encouraging a shared decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the materials developed and implemented for this project support the initiation of, and help standardize provider conversations regarding, Meningococcal B vaccination for healthy adolescents.

A Real-world Claims Data Analysis of Meningococcal Serogroup B Vaccine Series Completion and Potential Missed Opportunities in the United States

BACKGROUND

In the United States, meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccination is recommended for 16-23-year-olds based on shared clinical decision-making. We estimated series completion among individuals initiating MenB vaccination for the 2 available vaccines: MenB 4-component (MenB-4C, doses at 0 and ≥1 month) and MenB factor H binding protein (MenB-FHbp, doses at 0 and 6 months).

METHODS

This retrospective health insurance claims data analysis included 16-23-year-olds who initiated MenB vaccination (index date) during January 2017 to November 2018 (MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database) or January 2017 to September 2018 (MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database) and had continuous enrollment for ≥6 months before and ≥15 months after index. The main outcome was MenB vaccine series completion within 15 months. Among noncompleters, preventive care/well-child and vaccine administrative office visits were identified as potential missed opportunities for series completion. Robust Poisson regression models identified independent predictors of series completion.

RESULTS

In the Commercial (n = 156,080) and Medicaid (n = 57,082) populations, series completion was 56.7% and 44.7%, respectively, and was higher among those who initiated MenB-4C versus MenB-FHbp (61.1% versus 49.8% and 47.8% versus 33.9%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Among noncompleters, 40.2% and 34.7% of the Commercial and Medicaid populations, respectively, had ≥1 missed opportunity for series completion. Receipt of MenB-4C and younger age were independently associated with a higher probability of series completion.

CONCLUSIONS

Series completion rates were suboptimal but were higher among those who initiated MenB-4C. To maximize the benefits of MenB vaccination, interventions to improve completion and reduce missed opportunities should be implemented.

Real-world implementation of 4-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB): implications for clinical practices

INTRODUCTION

Invasive meningococcal disease due to serogroup B (MenB) is an uncommon but life-threatening disease. The 4-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) is the only MenB vaccine with real-world evidence supporting a reduction in incidence without safety concerns.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed recommendations and real-world implementation of 4CMenB in National Immunization Programs (NIPs) and implications for clinical practice through a non-systematic literature search.

EXPERT OPINION

4CMenB is registered in 45 countries, 33 of which recommend it clinically: nine for infants, children, adolescents, and high-risk groups; 11 for infants and high-risk groups; the US for individuals aged 16-23 years and high-risk groups; two for infants; 10 for high-risk groups and/or outbreak control. Dosing schedule varies between countries. To date, nine countries include 4CMenB in their NIP: UK, Andorra, Ireland, Italy, San Marino, Lithuania, Malta, Czech Republic, and Portugal. Australia funds it for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children under 2 years, and high-risk individuals. South Australia funds for all infants and adolescents. Many factors influenced introduction into NIPs: disease burden, public awareness, cost-effectiveness, prior meningococcal vaccination programs, efficacy and safety profile. In the future, more countries might consider including 4CMenB in their NIP due to growing evidence on effectiveness and safety.