An open-label, single-arm study evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) in adults receiving hemodialysis

Hepatitis B vaccination with HepB-CpG in people living with HIV: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

To eliminate hepatitis B virus (HBV) globally, a key focus is preventing new infections among high-risk individuals, including those with HIV. The widespread incidence of HBV and HIV leads to a high rate of coinfection. HIV compromises the immune system, significantly increasing the risk of chronic HBV infection, cirrhosis, liver cancer, and death from liver-related disease among coinfected individuals.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores recent research on the two-dose HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B) vaccine, which is a potential solution to the challenge of suboptimal immune responses to three-dose HBV vaccines (HepB-alum) in people living with HIV (PLWH). We compare the immunogenicity and safety of HepB-CpG in both vaccine-naive and previously vaccinated nonresponding PLWH populations.

EXPERT OPINION

Compared with three-dose HepB-alum vaccines, HepB-CpG offers a more convenient two-dose schedule, which could increase series completion rates. HepB-CpG might be more immunogenic in vaccine-naive and vaccine-experienced PLWH. Both attributes make HepB-CpG a possible future standard of care for adult HBV vaccination in PLWH.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection

The updated EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection provide comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations for its management. Spanning ten thematic sections, the guidelines address diagnostics, treatment goals, treatment indications, therapeutic options, hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, management of special populations, HBV reactivation prophylaxis, post-transplant care, HBV prevention strategies, and finally address open questions and future research directions. Chronic HBV remains a global health challenge, with over 250 million individuals affected and significant mortality due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These guidelines emphasise the importance of early diagnosis, risk stratification based on viral and host factors, and tailored antiviral therapy. Attention is given to simplified algorithms, vaccination, and screening to support global HBV elimination targets. The guidelines also discuss emerging biomarkers and evolving definitions of functional and partial cure. Developed through literature review, expert consensus, and a Delphi process, the guidelines aim to equip healthcare providers across disciplines with practical tools to optimise HBV care and outcomes worldwide.

Comparison of seroconversion rates after hepatitis B vaccination in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and those receiving maintenance hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving dialysis are at an increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection due to a compromised immune system. While HBV vaccination is recommended, the response rate to the standard vaccination regimen (3 doses of 10 µg HBV vaccine) among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or receiving hemodialysis in Japan is unclear. This study evaluated the seroconversion rate, optimal timing, and CKD stage in patients receiving HBV vaccination.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational study conducted from May 2021 to July 2024, patients with advanced CKD not on dialysis and those receiving maintenance hemodialysis at two centers in Japan received 3 doses of 10 µg HBV vaccine at 0, 1, and 6 months. The primary outcome was the seroconversion rate, defined as anti-HBs antibody levels of ≥10 IU/mL, measured 1-3 months after the third dose.

RESULTS

Overall, 113 participants (63 with non-dialysis CKD and 50 with hemodialysis CKD) were included. The seroconversion rates were 64.3% in non-dialysis patients and 54.2% in patients on hemodialysis, with no significant difference (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.28-1.38). Multivariate analysis adjusting for covariates showed no significant difference (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.29-1.91), and sensitivity analysis confirmed this finding.

CONCLUSIONS

The seroconversion rate of the standard HBV vaccination (3×10 µg) was not significantly different from those in non-dialysis patients with CKD. More effective vaccination strategies such as higher doses, third-generation vaccines, or vaccination at an earlier CKD stage are required to improve HBV protection in this population.

The impact of donor hepatitis B virus infection on transplant outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation recipients

BACKGROUND

The use of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive donor kidneys to expand the donor pool has been implemented, but limited evidence exists regarding their impact on transplant outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effects of donor HBV infection on transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Donor and recipient data between 2015 and 2021 were collected. A total of 743 kidney transplant cases were screened, including 94 donor hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)+/recipient HBsAg- (D+R-) and 649 donor HBsAg-/recipient HBsAg- (D-R-) cases. The analysis endpoints included recipient HBV infection, delayed graft function (DGF), peak estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within 12 months, recipient survival, and death-censored graft survival (DCGS).

RESULTS

The D+R- group had a significantly higher risk of HBV infection compared to the D-R- group (6/72 vs. 3/231; relative risk, 6.4; p = 0.007). The risk of HBV transmission decreased significantly with increasing hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer (p for trend = 0.003). Furthermore, the D+R- group did not exhibit an increased risk of DGF compared to the D-R- group (odds ratio, 0.70; p = 0.51) in the multivariable mixed model. Both groups had similar peak eGFR within 12 months (β = 1.01, p = 0.71), and this had no impact on patient survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; p = 0.10) and DCGS (HR, 0.79, p = 0.59) in the shared-frailty Cox model.

CONCLUSION

The use of HBsAg-positive donor kidneys appears relatively safe for HBV-immunized recipients in the short term. D+R- does not negatively affect graft function recovery and provides comparable posttransplant outcomes. Maintaining an HBsAb titer over 100 mIU/mL before transplantation is critical to reduce the risk of HBV transmission.

Evaluation of the Potency of Repurposed Antiretrovirals in HBV Therapy: A Narrative Investigation of the Traditional Medicine Alternatives

Hepatitis B is one of the killer communicable diseases, with a global estimation of 1.1 million deaths resulting from liver diseases annually. The search for HBV therapeutics has resulted in repurposing the existing antiretrovirals (ARVs) for HBV treatment, considering their shared common replication mechanisms. This review is aimed at evaluating the potencies of some of the repurposed ARVs used for HBV treatment, analyzing the common mechanisms of viral replications in HBV and HIV, and investigating the potentials of traditional medicines as an alternative treatment for HBV patients. The topical keywords drug repurposing, drug repositioning, antiretrovirals, hepatitis B treatment, HBV, natural products, traditional medicines, title, and abstract were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The advanced search included the five years, 2019-2024. The search result was filtered from 377 to 110 relevant articles. The evaluation reveals that CD4+ T cells are targeted by HIV, while HBV targets the liver with its associated diseases (cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)). Furthermore, treatments with the available repurposed ARVs only prevent or slow down the progression to cirrhosis, reduce the HCC incidence, and can improve the quality of life and increase life expectancy; however, they are not curative for HBV. Traditional medicines/natural product extracts or their phytochemicals exert anti-HBV effects through different mechanisms. Traditional medicines exert improved therapeutic effects when combined properly. The investigation further reveals that consideration of an in silico approach in HBV therapeutics might not only streamline drug development but also contribute to a deeper understanding of viral pathogenesis. Therefore, we recommend the integration of computational drug design methods with traditional medicine and natural product screening for discovering new bioactive HBV drug candidates.

HepB-CpG vs HepB-Alum Vaccine in People With HIV and Prior Vaccine Nonresponse: The BEe-HIVe Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Nonresponse to hepatitis B vaccine is common among people with HIV, resulting in vulnerability to infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Objective

To compare the seroprotection response achieved with a 2-dose (noninferiority, 10% margin) and a 3-dose hepatitis B vaccine with a cytosine phosphoguanine adjuvant (HepB-CpG vaccine) vs a conventional 3-dose hepatitis B vaccine with an aluminum hydroxide adjuvant (HepB-alum vaccine) in people with HIV and prior nonresponse to HepB-alum vaccine.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial included people with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy (CD4 cell count ≥100 cells/μL and HIV RNA <1000 copies/mL) without past or present serological evidence of having HBV or a response to hepatitis B vaccine. From December 2020 to February 2023, 561 adults were enrolled in the study at 41 sites in 10 countries in Africa, Asia, North America, and South America with follow-up for the primary outcome analysis through September 4, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned to receive 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine administered intramuscularly at weeks 0 and 4; 3 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine administered intramuscularly at weeks 0, 4, and 24; or 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine administered intramuscularly at weeks 0, 4, and 24.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a seroprotection response to hepatitis B vaccine (defined as level of antibody titer against hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] ≥10 mIU/mL) at week 12 for the 2-dose regimen (8 weeks after dose 2) and at week 28 for 3-dose regimens (4 weeks after dose 3). Key secondary outcomes included seroprotection response at additional time points, antibody titer against HBsAg, and adverse events within 4 weeks of hepatitis B vaccination.

Results

Of 561 participants included in the analysis (median age, 46 years [IQR, 31-56 years]); 64% were male; 17% of participants were Asian, 42% were Black, and 35% were White), a seroprotection response was achieved in 93.1% who received 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine (n = 174), in 99.4% who received 3 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine (n = 169), and in 80.6% who received 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine (n = 165). The stratified difference in seroprotection response between the 2-dose HepB-CpG vaccine group and the 3-dose HepB-alum vaccine group was 12.5% (97.5% CI, 4.1%-20.9%), achieving noninferiority and indicating superiority. The 3-dose HepB-CpG vaccine regimen was superior to the 3-dose HepB-alum vaccine regimen (stratified difference in seroprotection response, 18.4% [repeated 97.5% CI, 10.4%-26.2%]). By week 12, more than 90% of participants who received HepB-CpG vaccine achieved a seroprotection response. The 3-dose regimen of HepB-CpG vaccine achieved a higher proportion of participants with antibody titer against HBsAg greater than 1000 mIU/mL (78.1%) vs the other 2 regimen groups (26.4% for 2 doses of HepB-CpG vaccine and 35.2% for 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine). No unexpected safety issues were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among people with HIV and nonresponse to prior hepatitis B vaccination, both the 2-dose and 3-dose regimens of HepB-CpG vaccine achieved a superior seroprotection response compared with 3 doses of HepB-alum vaccine.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04193189.

Updated vaccination and screening recommendations for hepatitis B: Implications for pharmacists

The number of new infections of hepatitis B is rising and a large number of cases are undiagnosed. These factors are contributing to hepatitis B-related liver complications, including liver cancer, and deaths that could be prevented. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently updated vaccination and screening/testing recommendations for hepatitis B. The updated recommendations remove the need for risk assessment before screening or vaccination. Pharmacists will play a key role in a concerted national effort to implement these updated recommendations. A multistakeholder advisory council convened by the Hepatitis B Foundation identified key barriers to screening and vaccination. The council also formulated strategies to optimize implementation of the updated recommendations. These strategies include educating pharmacists about the new recommendations and how they will help to reduce the burden of hepatitis B and liver cancer. Pharmacists could explore establishing pharmacy-provider collaborative practice agreements and potentially leverage capacity built with COVID-19 vaccine implementation. Hospital systems and other clinic settings could update their electronic health records to include prompts for hepatitis B vaccination and screening. Pharmacy systems can implement different reminder options to help patients complete the hepatitis B vaccine series. To address a lack of vaccine confidence, pharmacists can emphasize the cancer prevention benefit of hepatitis B screening and vaccination and engage with patients on an individual level to understand their concerns, assess vaccine status, and discuss vaccine recommendations. Effective implementation of the new recommendations will help achieve national and global goals of eliminating hepatitis B as a public health threat by 2030.

Hepatitis B Vaccine: Four Decades on

Hepatitis B virus is a substantial contributor to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) globally. Vaccination is the most effective method for prevention of hepatitis B and its associated morbidity and mortality, and the only method to prevent infection with hepatitis D virus. The hepatitis B vaccine has been used worldwide for more than four decades; it is available in a single- or triple-antigen form and in combination with vaccines against other infections. Introduction of the vaccine and administration at birth led to sustained decline in mother-to-child transmission, chronic hepatitis B, and HCC, however, global birth dose coverage remains suboptimal. In this review we will discuss different hepatitis B vaccine formulations and schedules, vaccination guidelines, durability of the response, and vaccine escape mutants, as well as the clinical and economic benefits of vaccination.

Vaccination for Patients Receiving Dialysis

Vaccinating patients receiving dialysis may prevent morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population. The National Forum of End-Stage Renal Disease Networks (the Forum) published a revised vaccination toolkit in 2021 to update evidence and recommendations on vaccination for patients receiving dialysis. Significant changes in the last 10 years include more data supporting the use of a high-dose influenza vaccine, the introduction of the Heplisav-B vaccine for hepatitis B, and changes in pneumococcal vaccines, including the approval of the PCV15 and PCV20 to replace the PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccines. Additional key items include the introduction of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and a new vaccine to prevent respiratory syncytial virus disease. Historically, influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were routinely administered by dialysis facilities, and because of possible risks of hematogenous spread of hepatitis B, dialysis providers often have detailed hepatitis B vaccine protocols. In March 2021, COVID-19 vaccines were made available for dialysis facilities to administer, although with the end of the public health emergency, vaccine policies by dialysis facilities against COVID-19 remains uncertain. The respiratory syncytial virus vaccine was authorized in 2023, and how dialysis facilities will approach this vaccine also remains uncertain. This review summarizes the Forum's vaccination toolkit and discusses the role of the dialysis facility in vaccinating patients to reduce the risk of severe infections.

Seroconversion following Heplisav-B, hepatitis B vaccine (recombinant), adjuvanted, in patients with end-stage renal disease at an urban safety net hospital

PURPOSE

Heplisav-B is a novel recombinant adjuvanted vaccine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) that has been approved as a 2-dose regimen and shown to have similar seroconversion rates in healthy adults as single-antigen HBV vaccines. More data are needed to determine whether similarly high rates of seroconversion and immunity are observed in immunocompromised patient populations such as in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis.

METHODS

Patients with ESRD who presented for emergency-only hemodialysis and either were HBV vaccine naive or had a hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titer of less than 10 IU/mL received 3 standard 20-μg doses of Heplisav-B at week 0, week 4 (±2 weeks), and week 24 (±2 weeks), with anti-HBs titer measured at week 28 (±2 weeks).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients received at least one dose in the study timeframe, with 24 patients completing the vaccine series and measurement of anti-HBs titer. The mean age of the patients was 46 years, and 58% of patients were male. Of the 24 patients who completed the vaccine series, 20 (83%) seroconverted after the third dose. Three of the 4 patients who did not seroconvert after 3 doses were revaccinated with an additional 20-μg dose, and 2 of the 3 patients had an anti-HBs titer of greater than 10 IU/mL 4 weeks after this dose.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ESRD who received three 20-μg doses of recombinant HBV vaccine had a seroconversion rate of 83%, representing a similar seroconversion rate and fewer doses of vaccine as compared to the standard HBV vaccine regimen for patients with ESRD.

A real world comparison of HepB (Engerix-B®) and HepB-CpG (Heplisav-B®) vaccine seroprotection in patients receiving maintenance dialysis

BACKGROUND

Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) is recommended for dialysis patients. Two reports comparing seroprotection (SP) rates following HepB and HepB-CpG in vaccine-naïve patients with chronic kidney disease enrolled few dialysis patients (n = 122 combined). SP rates in a subset of dialysis patients were not reported or not powered to detect statistically significant differences. SP rates in those requiring additional vaccine series or booster doses are not known.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis including dialysis patients completing HepB or HepB-CpG vaccination between January 2019 and December 2020. Vaccine-naïve patients received a series of HepB or HepB-CpG (Series 1). A repeat series was given to nonresponders (Series 2). A booster regimen consists of one dose of either vaccine. Primary outcome was achieving SP (anti-HBs >10 mIU/mL) at least 60 days after the last HBV vaccine dose for Series 1 and Series 2, and achieving SP at least 3 weeks post-booster.

RESULTS

For Series 1 (n = 3509), SP after HepB vaccination was significantly higher (62.9% versus 50.1% for HepB-CpG; P < 0.0001). Series 2 (n = 1040) and booster (n = 2028) SP rates were similar between vaccines. Patients that received up to four HepB-CpG doses had higher SP rates compared with four doses of HepB (82.0% versus 62.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SP rates in hepatitis B vaccine-naïve dialysis patients administered a recommended four doses of HepB were higher than those recommended two doses of HepB-CpG. SP rates were higher and achieved sooner if HepB-CpG was utilized initially and, if needed, for Series 2. Optimal HepB-CpG dosing deserves further study.

An Evidence-based Practical Guide to Vaccination for Hepatitis B Virus

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is highly infectious, with over 292 million chronically infected people worldwide and up to 2.4 million in the United States. Following infection, clinically silent liver damage can ensue, but symptoms or signs of advanced disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, can take decades to emerge. HBV has the heaviest public health burden of all hepatitis viruses and has now surpassed other major communicable diseases (eg, HIV, diarrheal disease, malaria, tuberculosis) as a leading cause of death globally. Preventing transmission is essential, and efforts are in place to reinforce screening, vaccination, and routine follow-up. Three safe and effective vaccines are available in the United States and other countries for HBV prevention, and the benefits of vaccination in preventing infection and its sequelae have been substantiated. For the first time in over 25 years, a new Food and Drug Administration-approved vaccine is available that offers a high degree of immunogenicity after 2, rather than 3, injections. Persistent challenges include the underutilization of vaccination, choice of vaccine, incomplete vaccinations, varying needs in different populations, management of nonresponders or those with undocumented or incompletely documented vaccination courses, and questions about whether and when booster injections may be needed. A panel of US academic hepatologists with expertise and experience in preventing and managing HBV infection have collaborated to write this practical clinical paper intended to guide clinicians in vaccinating for HBV and address questions that regularly arise in the clinic.

Chronic kidney disease and vaccinations-A practical guide for primary care providers

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are susceptible to infectious organisms in part due to the many facets of uremia-associated immune deficiency. Vaccination plays a crucial role in curbing vaccine preventable infection in patients with CKD and Kidney transplant recipients. Vaccination should be done early in the course of CKD or prior to kidney transplantation when possible. It is incumbent upon all healthcare providers to not only stay abreast of the rapidly evolving evidence and recommendations regarding this area but to also continue to update clinical practice regarding vaccines for long-recognized infectious threats, such as pneumococcal disease and chronic hepatitis B infection, to mitigate the burden of infectious diseases on this particularly vulnerable patient population.

Development of Cancer Immunotherapies

Cancer immunotherapy, or the utilization of components of the immune system to target and eliminate cancer, has become a highly active area of research in the past several decades and a common treatment strategy for several cancer types. The concept of harnessing the immune system for this purpose originated over 100 years ago when a physician by the name of William Coley successfully treated several of his cancer patients with a combination of live and attenuated bacteria, later known as "Coley's Toxins", after observing a subset of prior patients enter remission following their diagnosis with the common bacterial infection, erysipelas. However, it was not until late in the twentieth century that cancer immunotherapies were developed for widespread use, thereby transforming the treatment landscape of numerous cancer types. Pivotal studies elucidating molecular and cellular functions of immune cells, such as the discovery of IL-2 and production of monoclonal antibodies, fostered the development of novel techniques for studying the immune system and ultimately the development and approval of several cancer immunotherapies by the United States Food and Drug Association in the 1980s and 1990s, including the tuberculosis vaccine-Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, IL-2, and the CD20-targeting monoclonal antibody. Approval of the first therapeutic cancer vaccine, Sipuleucel-T, for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and the groundbreaking success and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in the last decade, have driven an explosion of interest in and pursuit of novel cancer immunotherapy strategies. A broad range of modalities ranging from antibodies to adoptive T cell therapies is under investigation for the generalized treatment of a broad spectrum of cancers as well as personalized medicine. This chapter will focus on the recent advances, current strategies, and future outlook of immunotherapy development for the treatment of cancer.

[Hepatitis B vaccines-history, achievements, challenges, and perspectives]

Die ersten Impfversuche gegen das Hepatitis-B-Virus (HBV) erfolgten 1970, noch bevor die Natur des dafür verwendeten „Australia-Antigens“ bekannt war. Bald darauf wurde dieses Antigen als Hüllprotein des HBV erkannt (HBV Surface Antigen, HBsAg), dann aus HBV-haltigem Plasma gereinigt und später gentechnisch in Hefezellen hergestellt. Die hohe Wirksamkeit des HBsAg-Impfstoffs wurde vielfach bewiesen, insbesondere bei Neugeborenen von HBV-infizierten Müttern, die sonst fast immer chronische HBV-Träger werden. Auch bei älteren Kindern und Erwachsenen schützt die Impfung und wird seit 1984 weltweit angewendet, was zu einer ungefähr 10-fachen Abnahme der HBV-Infektionen bei den Geimpften geführt hat.

Es gibt dennoch verschiedene Herausforderungen bei der Hepatitis-B-Impfung. Bei Neugeborenen von hochvirämischen Müttern kann die Impfung versagen. Bei verringerter Immunkompetenz kann die Bildung schützender Antikörper ausbleiben, aber auch bei Risikofaktoren wie höherem Alter, Rauchen oder Übergewicht. Frühe Impfstudien belegten, dass Impfstoffe mit dem HBsAg-Subtyp adw2 auch gegen HBV mit anderen HBsAg-Subtypen schützen, neuere Beobachtungen zeigen aber, dass die Schutzwirkung gegen heterologe Subtypen schwächer ist. Gelegentlich werden auch Escape-Mutationen beobachtet.

Die meisten jetzigen Impfstoffe beruhen auf dem Kenntnisstand vor 40 Jahren und könnten wesentlich verbessert werden. Eine Einbeziehung der bislang fehlenden PräS-Domänen der HBV-Hülle in die Impfstoffe würde die wichtigsten schützenden T‑ und B‑Zellepitope einbringen. Die Expression in Säugerzellkulturen verbessert die native Faltung der neutralisierenden HBsAg-Epitope und die Verwendung von regional vorherrschenden HBsAg-Subtypen würde die Schutzwirkung erhöhen. Optimale Adjuvanzien oder Epitopträger könnten die Immunogenität auch für eine HBV-Immuntherapie steigern.