Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of inactivated poliovirus vaccine with or without E.coli double mutant heat-labile toxin (dmLT) adjuvant in healthy adults; a phase 1 randomized study

Safety and immunogenicity in humans of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli double mutant heat-labile toxin administered intradermally

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) diarrhea is associated with a high burden of disease globally, for which no licensed vaccine is available. A Phase 1, double-blind, dose-escalation (0.1-2.0 µg) study was conducted to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of double mutant heat-labile toxin LTR192G/L211A (dmLT) delivered intradermally (ID) to healthy adults. Subjects received up to three immunizations at three-week intervals. The vaccine was safe, although it induced mild local and some gastrointestinal adverse events, as well as frequent hyperpigmentation at the injection site. High levels of serum IgG and IgA, LT neutralizing antibodies, and IgG and IgA antibodies in lymphocyte supernatant were elicited post-vaccination, most prominently at the largest dose (2.0 μg). Rates of responses were the highest in subjects who received the largest dose (2.0 μg) and multiple immunizations. The ETEC dmLT vaccine was safe and highly immunogenic, inducing long-lasting systemic and mucosal responses when administered by the ID route. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT02531685.

Enterovirus Antibodies: Friends and Foes

Enteroviruses (EV) initiate replication by binding to their cellular receptors, leading to the uncoating and release of the viral genome into the cytosol of the host cell. Neutralising antibodies (NAbs) binding to epitopes on enteroviral capsid proteins can inhibit this infectious process through several mechanisms of neutralisation in vitro. Fc-mediated antibody effector functions such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis have also been described for some EV. However, antibody binding to virions does not always result in viral neutralisation. Non-neutralising antibodies, or sub-neutralising concentrations of antibodies, can enhance infection of viruses, leading to more severe pathologies. This phenomenon, known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection, has been described in vitro and/or in vivo for EV including poliovirus, coxsackievirus B and EV-A71. It has been shown that ADE of EV infection is mediated by FcγRs expressed by monocytes, macrophages, B lymphocytes and granulocytes. Antibodies play a crucial role in the diagnosis and monitoring of infections. They are valuable markers that have been used to establish a link between enteroviral infection and chronic diseases such as type 1 diabetes. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies targeting enteroviral proteins have been developed and shown to be effective to prevent or combat EV infections in vitro and in vivo. In addition, vaccines are under development, and clinical trials of vaccines are underway or have been completed, providing hope for the prevention of diseases due to EV. However, the ADE of the infection should be considered in the development of anti-EV antibodies or safe vaccines.

The synergy of recombinant NSP4 and VP4 from porcine rotavirus elicited a strong mucosal response

Porcine rotavirus (PoRV) is one of the main pathogens causing diarrhea in piglets, and multiple genotypes coexist. However, an effective vaccine is currently lacking. Here, the potential adjuvant of nonstructural protein 4 (NSP4) and highly immunogenic structural protein VP4 prompted us to construct recombinant NSP486-175aa (NSP4*) and VP426-476aa (VP4*) proteins, combine them as immunogens to evaluate their efficacy. Results indicated that NSP4* enhanced systemic and local mucosal responses induced by VP4*. The VP4*-IgG, VP4*-IgA in feces and IgA-secreting cells in intestines induced by the co-immunization were significantly higher than those induced by VP4* alone. Co-immunization of NSP4* and VP4* also induced strong cellular immunity with significantly increased IFN-λ than the single VP4*. Summarily, the NSP4* as a synergistical antigen exerted limited effects on the PoRV NAbs elevation, but conferred strong VP4*-specific mucosal and cellular efficacy, which lays the foundation for the development of a more effective porcine rotavirus subunit vaccine.

Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine: Recent Developments and the Tortuous Path to Global Acceptance

Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), available since 1955, became the first vaccine to be used to protect against poliomyelitis. While the immunogenicity of IPV to prevent paralytic poliomyelitis continues to be irrefutable, its requirement for strong containment (due to large quantities of live virus used in the manufacturing process), perceived lack of ability to induce intestinal mucosal immunity, high cost and increased complexity to administer compared to oral polio vaccine (OPV), have limited its use in the global efforts to eradicate poliomyelitis. In order to harvest the full potential of IPV, a program of work has been carried out by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) over the past two decades that has focused on: (1) increasing the scientific knowledge base of IPV; (2) translating new insights and evidence into programmatic action; (3) expanding the IPV manufacturing infrastructure for global demand; and (4) continuing to pursue an ambitious research program to develop more immunogenic and safer-to-produce vaccines. While the knowledge base of IPV continues to expand, further research and product development are necessary to ensure that the program priorities are met (e.g., non-infectious production through virus-like particles, non-transmissible vaccine inducing humoral and intestinal mucosal immunity and new methods for house-to-house administration through micro-needle patches and jet injectors), the discussions have largely moved from whether to how to use this vaccine most effectively. In this review, we summarize recent developments on expanding the science base of IPV and provide insight into policy development and the expansion of IPV manufacturing and production, and finally we provide an update on the current priorities.

Recent advances in enterotoxin vaccine adjuvants

Enterotoxin adjuvants have been researched for their ability to promote immunity to co-delivered antigens. Outside of cholera vaccines, however, these proteins have yet to be included in any currently licensed vaccines. They include molecules derived from the bacterial toxins of Vibrio cholerae, cholera toxin, or Escherichia coli, heat-labile toxin, such as detoxified mutants or subunits. This class of adjuvants is distinguished by their delivery possibilities, which include parenteral injection, skin applications, or direct mucosal administration by oral, sublingual, or nasal routes. In addition, inclusion of an enterotoxin adjuvant is associated with development of multifaceted cellular and humoral immune responses to vaccination. Here, we review exciting progress in the past few years in clinical trials for safety and efficacy, preclinical vaccines studies, and new mechanistic insights for enterotoxin adjuvants. This includes recent reports of their use in vaccines targeting microbial infections (bacterial, viral, parasitic) or substance abuse drugs.