Expert consensus on the use of omalizumab in chronic urticaria in China

Changes in Clinical Trials of Dermatological Drugs in Mainland China Between 2016 and 2022: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Policy reforms in drug regulation and reimbursement have encouraged drug research and development in China. However, there is a lack of insights on industry trends for dermatology research. We aim to describe trends and features of clinical trials for dermatology drugs in China, understand recent achievements, and forecast development trends.

METHODS

Clinical trial records posted on the Registration and Information Disclosure Platform of Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) were screened. All trials for dermatological drugs, posted on platform between 2016 and 2022 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 1172 trial records were identified, among which studies for skin infection, immune-mediated and inflammatory skin disease (IMIDs) and skin malignancy accounted for 48.9% (n = 573), 42.0% (n = 492) and 9.1% (n = 107), respectively. Most trials focused on generic drugs (n = 728, 62.1%). Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) accounted for less than 6% of all trials. The number of trials on dermatology drugs increased sharply from 2016 to 2018 followed by a decline, which is mainly driven by the drop in bioequivalence evaluation (BE) studies for generic drugs indicated for skin infection. A growing trend in the number of trials for innovative drugs was observed. After removing duplicated drugs based on generic name, a total of 607 tested dermatology drugs were identified among which 51.9% were indicated for IMIDs. The number of innovative drugs exceeded generic drugs from 2020 to 2022. The geographic distribution of lead sites (the site where the principal investigator being employed) was uneven, with most of them located in east China. Of 1,068 trials sponsored by Chinese firms, most were BE (n = 692, 64.8%) and generic drugs (n = 722, 67.6%), while among 104 trials sponsored by multinational corporations (MNC), a majority were phase III (n = 53, 51.0%) trials and focused on innovative drugs (n = 94, 90.4%).

CONCLUSION

Findings demonstrated positive consequences of reforms in the healthcare industry in China. Nevertheless, long-term policies are expected to enhance the innovative capabilities of Chinese pharmaceutical companies while ensuring accessible and affordable drug supply with generics, encourage early participation in global drug R&D activities to shorten "drug lag", and promote investment in innovative drugs.

Clinical phenotypes and biomarkers in chronic urticaria

The medical field faces considerable challenges in treating chronic urticaria (CU), which includes both chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria, owing to its varied nature. The complexity of this condition stems from multiple factors: varying disease mechanisms, different ways in which symptoms manifest, and inconsistent treatment outcomes. Although both forms of CU display hives that persist beyond six weeks, they have distinct causes and progression patterns. This study examines CSU specifically, exploring its various manifestations and associated biological indicators. Currently, there is a pressing need to identify reliable, accessible biomarkers for CSU to enhance diagnosis and develop targeted treatments. Better insights into how specific disease patterns are related to biological markers would significantly improve our understanding of CSU development and enhance patient treatment approaches.

A retrospective analysis of factors influencing response to omalizumab treatment in Indian patients with antihistamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) presents as a persistent and distressing condition, with varying treatment responses. Omalizumab, a monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, has shown efficacy in managing antihistamine (AH1)-refractory CSU, but its varied response patterns and associated factors remain understudied, particularly in India.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study involving 81 antihistamine-resistant CSU patients treated with omalizumab at a tertiary care center in Northern India between 2018 and 2023. Baseline characteristics, treatment response, and adverse effects were analyzed. Patients were categorized into various response groups based on treatment timelines and biomarker correlations.

Results

We observed 65% achieved symptom cessation (group 1) following a single omalizumab dose, while 21% responded between second and third doses (group 2). A subset (7.4%) necessitated increased dosing frequency (group 3) for symptom control. Additionally, 6.2% showed persistent symptoms despite increased dosing frequency (group 4), exhibiting distinctive biomarker profiles indicative of an autoimmune endotype. Notably, 27.1% experienced exacerbations during treatment, emphasizing the need for tailored management approaches and response expectations.

Conclusion

Omalizumab demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of AH1-refractory CSU, with a good safety profile. This study highlights the complexity of treatment response to omalizumab and the potential utility of biomarkers in guiding personalized therapeutic strategies. Further research into biomarker-based endotypes is warranted to optimize CSU management.

Efficacy and safety of combinations of H1 antihistamines in the treatment of urticaria: A scoping review

The efficacy and safety of combining H1 antihistamines (AHs) for treating urticaria are currently unclear. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of H1 AH combinations in the management of urticaria up to May 2023. The search encompassed databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the China Biological Medicine Database. The inclusion criteria comprised randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised trials (NRTs), case reports, and case series focusing on urticaria treatment. Initially screening 12,887 studies, this review ultimately selected 109 studies involving 11,435 patients. These studies documented 43 different combination treatments across 11 types of urticaria. In comparison to monotherapy, combination therapy exhibited superior efficacy in 94 studies that reported treatment efficacy. Regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 67 studies disclosed ADR incidences, with combination therapy showing lower ADR rates in 32 studies. Additionally, 7 studies reported similar ADR rates between combination therapy and monotherapy with AHs. Common ADRs included symptoms such as drowsiness, nausea, fatigue, dry mouth, dizziness, and headache, while less frequent side effects encompassed hypotension, otitis media, polyuria, rhinorrhoea, abnormal liver function, and rash. ADR rates ranged from 0% to 21% in the treatment group, and from 0.5% to 75% in the control group. Importantly, patients generally tolerated these ADRs well, with symptoms resolving upon discontinuation of treatment. The study's findings suggest that combining AHs leads to enhanced efficacy and reduced safety risks compared to monotherapy in the context of urticaria treatment. These results advocate for considering combination therapy as a viable option in clinical practice, especially for chronic urticaria cases. Nonetheless, caution is advised, and close monitoring for potential ADRs is crucial during treatment.

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-World Study on Effectiveness, Safety and Predictors of Treatment Outcome

Background

Although omalizumab has shown success in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients unresponsive to antihistamines, the exact mechanism of action and predictive markers of response remain unclear.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between baseline levels of biomarkers and clinical parameters with omalizumab response and response rate in patients with CSU.

Methods

This retrospective study included 82 adult CSU patients who received omalizumab 300mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks between January 2022 and December 2023. Treatment response was assessed using UAS7 and DLQI scores at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Responders were defined as patients achieving UAS7 < 7, with early and late responders categorized based on response within or after 4 weeks, respectively. Baseline clinical features and laboratory biomarkers were compared between responders and non-responders.

Results

The overall response rate was 71.95% (59/82), with 23 early responders and 36 late responders. Responders had significantly lower baseline UAS7 (median: 28 vs 35, P < 0.01), DLQI (median: 8 vs 15, P < 0.001), and IL-17 levels (median: 0.53 vs 1.26 pg/mL, P < 0.001) compared to non-responders. Baseline UAS7 > 31, DLQI > 9.5, and IL-17 > 0.775 pg/mL predicted non-response with sensitivities of 78.26%, 100%, and 78.26%, and specificities of 67.8%, 59.32%, and 72.88%, respectively. ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with early response (P < 0.05). Adverse events were reported in 6.09% of patients, including mild injection site reactions and transient urticaria exacerbation, not requiring treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion

This study suggests that omalizumab is an effective and safe treatment option for antihistamine-refractory CSU. Baseline UAS7, DLQI, ASST status, serum total IgE levels, and IL-17 may serve as potential predictors of omalizumab response. Notably, ASST positivity and comorbid allergic diseases were associated with an early response to treatment. These findings highlight the importance of considering individual patient characteristics when predicting the likelihood and timing of response to omalizumab in CSU.

Efficacy and Mechanism of Acupoint Catgut Embedding in the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Protocol for a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease that manifests as itching and wheals, seriously affecting quality of life. Clinical observations and previous research trials have shown that acupuncture is safe and effective for the treatment of CSU. However, there are problems, such as a short duration of action and frequent treatment. Compared with traditional acupuncture, acupoint catgut embedding (ACE) has the advantages of a longer effect and higher compliance. Clinical trials are needed to prove its efficacy and mechanism of action.

OBJECTIVE

This trial aims to provide definitive evidence for the treatment of CSU with ACE and explore the mechanism of ACE.

METHODS

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. In this trial, 108 participants aged 18-60 years with a diagnosis of CSU and no history of ACE will be randomly assigned to 2 groups (1:1 ratio) using the Statistical Analysis System: treatment (ACE) and control (sham ACE). The participants and efficacy evaluators will be blinded to the grouping. Both the ACE and sham ACE groups will undergo acupuncture, but the sham ACE group will not receive catgut sutures. Treatment will be performed twice weekly for 8 weeks, with a 1-week run-in period and a 16-week follow-up period. Twenty patients will be randomly selected to undergo functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after the treatment period. The primary outcome will be the urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7). We will use R (version 4.0.1; R Project for Statistical Computing) to perform ANOVA and independent samples t tests to compare the differences within and between groups before and after treatment by judging the rejection range based on a significance level of .05.

RESULTS

The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Guang'anmen Hospital on September 7, 2022, and has been registered on November 30, 2022. Recruitment began on March 1, 2023. A total of 4-6 participants are expected to be recruited each month. The recruitment is planned to be completed on March 1, 2025, and we expect to publish our results by the winter of 2025. As of November 1, 2023, we have enrolled 25 participants with CSU.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aims to provide definitive evidence for the treatment of CSU with ACE and explore the mechanism of ACE. We hypothesize that wheals and itching will show greater improvement in participants receiving active therapy than in those receiving sham treatment. The limitations of this study include its single-center trial design, small sample size, and short treatment duration, which may have certain impacts on the research results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200066274; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=179056.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/54376.

Meta-analysis of the adoption of omalizumab in the treatment of pediatric allergic diseases

Introduction

Allergic diseases are common chronic conditions in children, omalizumab has a wide range of adoptions in various diseases. A meta-analysis was implemented to demonstrate the efficacy of omalizumab in the therapy of pediatric allergic diseases.

Materials and methods

English databases were searched. The search terms included "Omalizumab", "Children", "Allergic asthma", and "Atopic dermatitis". The literature was screened regarding inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were extracted and analyzed using RevMan5.3.

Results

a total of six suitable studies, comprising 2761 patients, were selected for inclusion. The meta-analysis results implied that at 24 weeks, OR for worsening of symptoms in children was 0.10 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.41), Z = 3.24, P = 0.001 (P < 0.05); at 52 weeks, OR was 0.27 (95 % CI 0.09-0.83), Z = 2.28, P = 0.02 (P < 0.05); and during treatment, OR for adverse events in children was 0.87 (95 % CI 0.60-1.29), Z = 0.68, P = 0.49 (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

the study comprised six investigations that examined the effectiveness of omalizumab in treating pediatric allergic diseases. The findings demonstrated that, in comparison to standard treatment, omalizumab can greatly alleviate allergy-related clinical symptoms in children, slow down disease progression, and has a higher safety profile with fewer adverse reactions. These results have practical implications and highlight the potential value of omalizumab in pediatric allergy treatment.

Real-World Effectiveness of Omalizumab in Chronic Urticaria: A Clinical Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of omalizumab as a therapeutic intervention for chronic urticaria (CU).

METHODS

From March 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023, data on a cohort comprising 96 patients with CU, who underwent treatment with omalizumab at our medical institution's allergy clinic, were systematically compiled. Subsequent to the administration of omalizumab, the therapeutic efficacy was assessed utilizing the 7-day urticaria activity score and the urticaria control test.

RESULTS

Based on the statistical analysis, the mean duration of therapeutic intervention was 2.4 ± 1.3 months, with a corresponding mean cumulative dosage of 765 ± 450 mg. Of the subset of 42 patients with CU who were subjected to a follow-up period exceeding 3 months, it was observed that the treatment led to complete symptom remission, and no instances of recurrence were documented. Notably, there were statistically significant differences in the treatment duration and the cumulative dosage between patients who experienced co-morbid conditions and those who did not (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.280-1.326; p < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.597-2.997). Furthermore, there were significant differences in the treatment duration and cumulative dosage between patients in the combined allergic rhinitis group and those in the non-combined allergic rhinitis group (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.204-1.305; p = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.326-2.860).

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab demonstrates efficacy in the management of CU among Chinese patients by exerting effective symptom control and facilitating the regression of skin lesions. The assessment of its therapeutic efficacy typically requires a 12-week treatment period. Moreover, the co-occurrence of CU with other allergic disorders serves as a pertinent consideration for the adjustment of omalizumab dosing regimens.

Therapeutics of urticaria: Results from a hospital-based multicenter study in China

Background: Therapeutics of urticaria in Chinese outpatients remain to be illustrated.

Objectives: To investigate clinical treatment of outpatients with urticaria, and provide real-world evidence for selection of medication regimens.

Methods: In this hospital-based multicenter study, urticaria outpatients filled in a questionnaire at initial visit and were followed-up (once per week, for 4 weeks).

Results: We recruited 1715 urticaria outpatients and 647 completed 4 week’s follow-up. Their total UAS7 was reduced (27.44 at baseline, 16.87 in 1 week, 12.39 in 2 weeks, 7.21 in 3 weeks, 4.2 in 4 weeks). 71.8% patients recovered from urticaria (therapy was highly effective in 11%, whereas effective in 14.2%). The second-generation H1 antihistamines (sgAHs) (at conventional dose) were the most commonly prescribed drugs, with ebastine, levocetirizine and olopatadine being the leading ones (41.1%, 36.2%, and 16%, respectively). Combinations of several antihistamines (649 cases, 37.8%) at conventional dose were far more common than a single drug at escalated dose (59 cases, 3.4%). The combination of ebastine with levocetirizine was the most frequent options (18.25%, 313 cases), followed by combination of ebastine with compound glycyrrhizin (18.2%, 312 cases). The usage rates of tripterygium glycoside (19.6%), hydroxychloroquine (17.2%) and system application glucocorticoids (5.5%) in angioedema were much higher than in symptomatic dermographism and chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Conclusions: This study identifies curative therapy for Chinese outpatients with urticaria. The sgAHs, especially ebastine, are the most commonly prescribed drugs. Olopatadine has fast-acting and curative effects. Compound glycyrrhizin holds potential as a versatile collaborator. Combinations of several antihistamines at conventional dose is common.

Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Urticaria Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)

BACKGROUND

Management of urticaria can be optimized with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, the quality of recent urticaria CPGs remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and appraise urticaria CPGs worldwide published in the last 5 years.

METHODS

A search for relevant urticaria CPGs was conducted between January 1, 2017, and May 31, 2022, using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Evidence Search, Guidelines International Network, ECRI Guidelines Trust, Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines, Trip Medical Database, and DynaMed. The included CPGs were critically appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument, Lenzer et al's red flags, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria of trustworthiness.

RESULTS

We included 21 urticaria CPGs. Most guidelines reviewed treatment recommendations of chronic spontaneous urticaria. The majority of guidelines were from European and Asian countries with high and high-middle sociodemographic index, written in English, and openly accessible. Seventeen guidelines (81%) had at least 1 AGREE II domain rated poor quality. Applicability, rigor of development, and stakeholder involvement were the 3 AGREE II domains that scored the lowest across guidelines. Appraisal with Lenzer et al's red flags showed that 18 guidelines (86%) raised at least 1 red flag indicating potential bias. The top 3 domains raising red flags were: no inclusion of nonphysician experts/patient representative/community stakeholders, no or limited involvement of a methodologist in the evaluation of evidence, and lack of external review. Based on IOM's criteria of trustworthiness, 20 guidelines (95%) had 1 or more criteria that did not meet best practice standards. The 3 domains with the highest number of best practice standards not met were updating procedures, rating strength of recommendations, and external review. Guidelines scored highest for the AGREE II domains of defining scope and purpose and clarity of presentation, and had the most fully met IOM's best practice standard for articulation of recommendations. However, only 1 urticaria CPG by NICE was identified as rigorously developed across all 3 appraisal tools.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of urticaria CPGs in the last 5 years varied widely. Only the NICE urticaria guideline consistently demonstrated excellent quality, high trustworthiness, and low risk of bias. Use of a rigorous framework to rate certainty of evidence and grade strength of recommendation, involvement of methodologists, stakeholder engagement with external review, and clear guidance for updating can help improve the quality of future CPGs.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of drug therapy for chronic urticaria: a network meta-analysis and risk-benefit assessment

BACKGROUND

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a prevalent chronic skin condition characterized by recurrent wheals. Clinical guidelines recommend multiple drugs for CU treatment. Our study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of drug therapy for CU.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWSs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to assess the response rate, decline in Urticaria Activity Score over 7 Days (UAS7), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and adverse event rates of standard-dose and high-dose H1 antihistamine (H1AH), omalizumab (OMA) 75, 150, and 300 mg, cyclosporine and placebo. The risk-benefit assessment was conducted by probabilistic simulation and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA).

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were identified, including 37 RCTs and 2 RWSs. OMA 300 mg and 150 mg both had significantly higher response rate than standard-dose H1AH (p < 0.05, respectively). OMA 300 mg and 150 mg both consistently led to a huge drop in UAS7 and DLQI compared to standard-dose H1AH and high-dose H1AH (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Regarding risk-benefit assessment, OMA 300 mg emerges as the optimal pharmacological intervention for CU, while OMA 150 mg stands as a secondary alternative compared to H1 antihistamines and cyclosporine.

Clinical Response to Low-dose Omalizumab Treatment in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Retrospective Study of 179 Patients

Omalizumab is effective in chronic spontaneous urticaria unresponsive to antihistamines. Of the licensed dosing schedules, Korean patients prefer a low dose, of 150 mg/month, for financial reasons. However, real-world experiences of low-dose omalizumab consumption have not been reported. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the treatment outcomes and long-term clinical course of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria who were treated with low-dose omalizumab. The study included 179 patients aged ≥ 20 years who were treated with omalizumab 150 mg/month for ≥ 12 weeks. Baseline disease activity was mild, moderate, and severe in 54.7%, 35.2%, and 10.1% of patients, respectively. A complete response was observed in 133 patients at 12 weeks, among whom 88 patients showed early responses within 4 weeks. Overall, 158 patients finally achieved a complete response. Multivariate analyses revealed that baseline disease activity is more likely to be mild in patients who experience early and final complete responses. The absence of atopic comorbidities correlated with an early response. Smoking was associated with a final complete response. This study shows that low-dose omalizumab provides favourable treatment outcomes in antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria. Disease severity, atopic comorbidity, and smoking may be predictive factors for studying the response to omalizumab.

Omalizumab's efficacy and safety against chronic spontaneous urticaria

I have read the article titled, "Efficacy and safety of omalizumab against chronic spontaneous urticaria: Real-world study from China", by Wang et al with great interest. Nevertheless, there are a couple of questions raised in my mind. And clarification of some aspects of the study will help the reader benefit and have a better understanding of the study.

Current and future management of chronic spontaneous urticaria and chronic inducible urticaria

Background: Chronic urticaria (CU), characterized by ≥6 weeks of intense pruritus, remains a debilitating condition for patients. New and safe treatments are needed to manage CU recalcitrant to standard therapy. Objective: A review of the current literature of standard and novel therapeutics in the management of CU was conducted. Methods: A literature search via a medical literature data base and clinical trial data base was conducted to identify treatment options for CU and current clinical trials. Results: Second-generation antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine remain the most proven therapeutic options for CU. Dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, tezepelumab, and CDX-0159 are all undergoing clinical trials for CU. Although ligelizumab demonstrated initial promising results, a phase III study was discontinued due to a nonsuperior clinical impact compared with omalizumab. Conclusion: Novel therapies are needed for the treatment of recalcitrant CU. With a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of CU, promising therapeutics are in clinical trials for CU.

Biologicals in Treatment of Chronic Urticaria: A Narrative Review

Chronic urticaria is a common inflammatory skin disease affecting around 0.5-1% of the world's population. The disease has a chronic indolent course which significantly affects the patient's quality of life. Urticaria pathogenesis involves cross-linking of immunoglobulin E (IgE) on mast cells causing degranulation which occurs by various pathways which leads to development of wheals and angioedema. The first-line treatment for chronic urticaria is non-sedating second-generation H1 antihistamines (AHs). After the advent of anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab, the response rate in resistant urticaria has improved significantly without any major adverse events. Other biologicals such as anti-IgE, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-1, anti-IL-17, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are under trial. These biologicals have better efficacy and safety profile as compared to conventional immunosuppressants. Even with the advances in the last decade, recurrence after stopping the therapy is common, and there is a need for better understanding of the pathogenesis and the drugs acting on the key pathways involved in urticaria. In this review, we provide the role of several biologicals in the treatment of chronic urticaria.

Integrated Bioinformatics and Validation Reveal IL1B and Its Related Molecules as Potential Biomarkers in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Background

The etiopathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) has not been fully understood, and there has been extensive interest in the interaction between inflammatory dermatosis and pyroptosis. This study intends to investigate the molecular mechanism of pyroptosis-related genes in CSU via bioinformatic ways, aiming at identifying the potential key biomarker.

Methods

GSE72540, the RNA expression profile dataset of CSU, was utilized as the training set, and GSE57178 as the validation set. Differently expressed pyroptosis-related genes (DEPRGs), GO, KEGG, and DO analyses were performed. The hub genes were explored by the protein–protein interaction analysis. Moreover, CIBERSORT was employed for estimating immune cell types and proportions. Then, we constructed a DEmRNA–miRNA–DElncRNA ceRNA network and a drug–gene interaction network. Finally, ELISA was used for gene expression analysis.

Results

We recognized 17 DEPRGs, whose enrichment analyses showed that they were mostly enriched in inflammatory response and immunomodulation. Moreover, 5 hub genes (IL1B, TNF, and IRF1 are upregulated, HMGB1 and P2RX7 are downregulated) were identified via the PPI network and verified by a validation set. Then immune infiltration analysis displayed that compared with normal tissue, CSU owned a significantly higher proportion of mast cells activated, but a lower proportion of T cells CD4 naive and so on. Furthermore, IL1B was statistically and positively associated with mast cells activated in CSU, and SNHG3, the upstream factor of IL1B in the ceRNA we constructed, also related with mast cells in CSU. Further analysis exhibited that the protein subcellular localization of IL1B was extracellular, according with its intercellular regulation role; IL1B was significantly correlated with key immune checkpoints; and the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway was the mainly involved pathway of IL1B based on the couple databases. What is more, the result of ELISA of CSU patients was the same as the above analyses about IL1B. In addition, the drug–gene interaction network contained 15 potential therapeutic drugs targeting IL1B, and molecular docking might make this relationship viable.

Conclusion

IL1B and its related molecules might play a key role in the development of CSU and could be potential biomarkers in CSU.