Single-phase anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste without dilution: Reactor stability and process performance of small, decentralised plants

Switching from wet to dry anaerobic digestion of food waste with different dilution times under no mechanical mixing condition

Previous research on anaerobic digestion of food waste has primarily focused on either wet or dry anaerobic digestion (AD), typically accompanied by continuous mechanical mixing. However, the necessary dilution rates and the extent of mixing required have yet to be addressed. In this study, we investigated switching from wet to dry AD of food waste without mechanical mixing, employing different dilution rates. Lab-scale anaerobic reactors were operated with dilution rates of 10, 5, and 2 times during Phases I (0-56 days), II (57-121 days), and III (122-209 days), respectively. The methane production rates were not significantly different (p > 0.05) across the dilution rates decreased from 10 to 2 times. Remarkably, the methane production in the anaerobic reactors exhibited fluctuations due to variations in feeding, with the methane production rate ranging from 2.0 to 2.7 g CH4-COD/(L d), without mechanical mixing, as the solids content transitioned from wet to near-dry digestion conditions (15 %, food waste). The distribution of sludge volatile solids concentrations remained uniform in the reactor, even at high solids concentrations of up to 15 %. A dynamic microbial community response to changes in dilution rates, with a shift from aceticlastic to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis pathways. Syntrophic acetate oxidization bacteria (the genus Syner-01 (4.2-8.9 %) and f_Synergistaceae (3.6-4.2 %)) were highly enriched as switching from wet AD to dry AD. The study's findings provide crucial operational insights for anaerobic food waste treatment, potentially resulting in decreased water usage and operational costs, particularly in scenarios with low dilution rates and without mechanical mixing.

A review on biological methodologies in municipal solid waste management and landfilling: Resource and energy recovery

Rapid industrialization and urbanization growth combined with increased population has aggravated the issue of municipal solid waste generation. MSW has been accounted for contributing tremendously to the improvement of sustainable sources and safe environment. Biological processing of MSW followed by biogas and biomethane generation is one of the innumerable sustainable energy source choices. In the treatment of MSW, biological treatment has some attractive benefits such as reduced volume in the waste material, adjustment of the waste, economic aspects, obliteration of microorganisms in the waste material, and creation of biogas for energy use. In the anaerobic process the utilizable product is energy recovery. The current review discusses about the system for approaching conversion of MSW to energy and waste derived circular bioeconomy to address the zero waste society and sustainable development goals. Biological treatment process adopted with aerobic and anaerobic processes. In the aerobic process the utilizable product is compost. These techniques are used to convert MSW into a reasonable hotspot for resource and energy recovery that produces biogas, biofuel and bioelectricity and different results in without risk and harmless to the ecosystem. This review examines the suitability of biological treatment technologies for energy production, giving modern data about it. It likewise covers difficulties and points of view in this field of exploration.

Influence of organic loading rate and temperature fluctuation caused by solar energy heating on food waste anaerobic digestion

Anaerobic digestion, one of the most currently remarkable techniques for biogas production, has provided a method of high organic solid waste disposal. Operating temperature, especially in the winter of northern city, makes biomass degradation less efficient. The microorganisms that take on the role of gas production are greatly affected by temperature. In our study, solar energy was selected for anaerobic digestion and winter was selected as the experimental environment. Anaerobic digestion was performed with solar heating and electric heating separately. Parameters were tested (pH, soluble chemical oxygen demand, total ammonia nitrogen, total volatile fatty acids), and microbial structure was monitored. The volume of methane produced was measured over 60 days. The methane yield differed by 15.92% under different conditions. It is clearly shown that methane yield can be improved by a steady temperature environment. Nevertheless, dominant bacteria and microbial structure did not seem to be much different. This study may provide more energy-saving ideas for winter anaerobic digestion projects in northern regions.

Dry Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Biogas Production Optimization by Reducing Ammonia Inhibition

The aim of this work is to optimize biogas production from thermophilic dry anaerobic digestion (AD) of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) by comparing various operational strategies to reduce ammonia inhibition. A pilot-scale plug flow reactor (PFR) operated semi-continuously for 170 days. Three scenarios with different feedstock, namely solely OFMSW, OFMSW supplemented with structural material, and OFMSW altered to have an optimal carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio, were tested. Specific biogas production (SGP), specific methane production (SMP), the biogas production rate (GPR), and bioenergy recovery were evaluated to assess the process performance. In addition, process stability was monitored to highlight process problems, and digestate was characterized for utilization as fertilizer. The OFMSW and the structural material revealed an unbalanced content of C and N. The ammonia concentration decreased when the optimal C/N ratio was tested and was reduced by 72% if compared with feeding solely OFMSW. In such conditions, optimal biogas production was obtained, operating with an organic loading rate (OLR) equal to 12.7 gVS/(L d). In particular, the SGP result was 361.27 ± 30.52 NLbiogas/kgVS, the GPR was 5.11 NLbiogas/(Lr d), and the potential energy recovery was 8.21 ± 0.9 MJ/kgVS. Nevertheless, the digestate showed an accumulation of heavy metals and low aerobic stability.