The nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma

Scoping it Out: The Use of Laparoscopy After Penetrating Trauma in Stable Children

INTRODUCTION

In stable children with penetrating abdominal trauma, literature regarding the use of laparoscopy (LAP) remains limited. Given increasing evidence in favor of LAP for selective adult trauma patients, we reviewed contemporary practices and outcomes in pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Programs data was utilized to identify children (<18 years) from 2016 to 2021 with a penetrating abdominal injury who underwent surgery within 24 h of admission. Patients with non-abdominal abbreviated injury score (AIS) ≥3, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 13, or instability using a shock index pediatric adjusted (SIPA) cutoff were excluded. Patients were compared based on whether they had LAP, open, or laparoscopic converted to open (LCO) exploration. Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and complications, including missed injuries.

RESULTS

Among 1945 patients who underwent abdominal surgery for penetrating trauma, 32% were stabbed and 68% had gunshot wounds (GSW). LAP occurred in 235 (12%) and LCO in 145 (7.4%) patients. The proportion of LAP did not change over the study period. LAP was used more in patients presenting with stab wounds than GSW (24 vs. 7%, p < .01). There was higher use of LAP at pediatric centers (p < .01). Although there was no difference in mortality or complications by operative type, open patients were more severely injured, had a longer LOS (p < .01), and had more subsequent procedures (11% of open, 2 % LAP, 7% LCO, p < .01).

CONCLUSION

In stable children with penetrating abdominal trauma, LAP is most often utilized after stabbing and at pediatric trauma centers, but its overall use remains uncommon. LAP patients had lower rates of subsequent procedures and no increase in unexpected operations suggesting low rates of missed injuries. Criteria are needed to identify stable patients presenting after penetrating trauma who can benefit from a LAP approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Selective nonoperative versus operative management of liver gunshot injuries: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Experience accumulated over the last decades suggests nonoperative management (NOM) of civilian gunshot liver injuries can be safely applied in selected cases. This study aims to compare the outcomes of selective NOM versus operative management (OM) of patients sustaining gunshot wounds (GSW) to the liver.

METHODS

A registry-based retrospective cohort analysis was performed for the period of 2008 to 2016 in a Brazilian trauma referral. Patients aged 16-80 years sustaining civilian GSW to right-sided abdominal quadrants and liver injury were included. Baseline data, vital signs, grade of liver injury, associated injuries, injury severity scores, blood transfusion requirements, liver- and non-liver-related complications, length-of-stay (LOS), and mortality were retrieved from individual registries.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 37 underwent NOM and 17 underwent OM. The median age was 25 years and all were male. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding patients' demographics, injury scores, grade of liver injury and associated lesions. NOM patients tended to sustain higher-grade injuries (86.5% vs 64.7%; p = 0.08), and failure of conservative management was recorded in two (5.4%) cases. The rate of complications was 48% with no between-group statistically significant difference. Blood transfusion requirements were significantly higher in the OM group (58.8% vs 21.6%; p = 0.012). The median LOS was seven days. No deaths were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Patients with liver GSW who are haemodynamically stable and without peritonitis are candidates for NOM. In this study, NOM was safe and effective even in high-grade injuries.

Main versus segmental hepatic artery angioembolization in patients with traumatic liver injuries: A Western Trauma Association multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic angioembolization is highly effective for hemorrhage control in hemodynamically stable patients with traumatic liver injuries and contrast extravasation. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the specific location of angioembolization within the hepatic arterial vasculature and its implications on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study across 23 centers was performed. Adult patients undergoing main hepatic artery angioembolization or segmental hepatic artery angioembolization within 8 hours of arrival were included. The primary outcome was liver-related complications, defined as perihepatic fluid collection, bile leak/biloma, pseudoaneurysm, hepatic necrosis, and/or hepatic abscess. Secondary outcomes were liver-related complication interventions, length of stay, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients underwent hepatic angioembolization, with 23 (41.8%) undergoing main hepatic artery angioembolization and 32 (58.2%) receiving segmental hepatic artery angioembolization. Both groups were comparable in age, vitals, mechanism of injury, liver injury grade distribution, and injury severity score (all P > .05). The main hepatic artery angioembolization group had greater rates of overall liver-related complications (65.2% vs 31.2%, P = .039), specifically perihepatic fluid collection (26.1% vs 6.3%, P = .040) and bile-leak/biloma (34.8% vs 12.5%, P = .048). Main hepatic artery angioembolization had greater rates of 2 or more liver-related complications (47.8% vs 9.4%, P = .001) and readmission within 30 days (30.4% vs 9.4%, P = .046). No significant differences were observed in hospital length of stay and mortality (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Main hepatic artery angioembolization is associated with increased rates of liver-related complications, multiple liver-related complications, and readmission within 30 days compared with segmental hepatic artery angioembolization. Thus, main hepatic artery angioembolization should be reserved for use only when segmental hepatic artery angioembolization is not feasible, albeit with significantly increased morbidity.

Less Is More: Dissecting Trauma Centers by Procedural Volume

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the relationship between procedural volume and annual trauma volume (ATV) of ACS Level I trauma centers (TC).

BACKGROUND

Although ATV is a hard criterion for TC verification, importance of procedural interventions as a potential quality indicator is understudied.

METHODS

Patients managed at ACS level I TCs were identified from ACS-TQIP 2017-2021. TCs were identified using facility keys and stratified into quartiles based on ATV into low, low-medium, medium-high, and high volume. TCs were also stratified into tertiles [low (LV), medium (MV), high (HV)] based on procedural volume by assessing annual number of laparotomies, thoracotomies, craniotomies/craniectomies, angioembolizations, vascular repairs, and long bone fixations performed at each center. The Cohen κ statistic was used to assess concordance between ATV and procedural volume.

RESULTS

A total of 182 Level I TCs were identified: 76 low, 47 low-medium, 35 high-medium, and 24 high volume. Long bone fixation, laparotomy, and craniotomy/craniectomy were the most performed procedures with a median of 65, 59, and 46 cases/center/year, respectively. Overall, 31% of HV laparotomy centers, 31% of HV thoracotomy centers, 22% of HV craniotomy/craniectomy centers, 22% of HV vascular repair centers, 32% of HV long bone fixation centers, and 33% of HV angioembolization centers contributed to the overall number of low-medium and low-volume TCs. The Cohen κ statistic demonstrated poor concordance between ATV and procedural volumes for all procedures (overall procedural volume-κ=0.378, laparotomy-κ=0.270, thoracotomy-κ=0.202, craniotomy/craniectomy-κ=0.394, vascular repair-κ=0.298, long bone fixation-κ=0.277, angioembolization-κ=0.286).

CONCLUSIONS

ATV does not reflect the procedural interventions performed. Combination of procedural and ATV may provide a more accurate picture of the clinical experience at any given TC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Preperitoneal pelvic packing in isolated severe pelvic fractures is associated with higher mortality and venous thromboembolism: A matched-cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) has been advocated as a damage control procedure for pelvic fracture bleeding, despite of weak evidence.

METHODS

Matched cohort study, TQIP database. Patients with isolated severe blunt pelvic fractures (pelvis abbreviated injury score [AIS] ​≥ ​3, AIS ≤2 in all other body regions) were included. Patients who underwent PPP were matched to patients with no PPP, 1:3 nearest propensity score. Matching was performed based on demographics, vital signs on admission, comorbidities, injury characteristics, type and timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis, and additional procedures including laparotomy, REBOA, and angioembolization.

RESULTS

64 patients with PPP were matched with 182 patients with No-PPP. PPP patients had higher in-hospital mortality (14.1 ​% vs 2.2 ​% p ​< ​0.001) and higher rates of VTE and DVT (VTE: 14.1 ​% vs 4.4 ​% p ​= ​0.018, DVT: 10.9 ​% vs 2.2 ​% p ​= ​0.008).

CONCLUSION

PPP is associated with worse survival outcomes and increased rate of VTE and DVT complications.

Clinical factors and outcomes of spleen-conserving surgery versus total splenectomy in splenic injuries: A nationwide database study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the use of spleen-conserving surgeries, as well as patient outcomes, on a national scale.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study (2010-2015) included patients (age≥16 years) with splenic injury in the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients who received a total splenectomy or a spleen-conserving surgery were compared for demographics and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 18,425 received a total splenectomy and 1,825 received a spleen-conserving surgery. Total splenectomy was more likely to be performed for patients with age>65 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63, p ​< ​0.001), systolic blood pressure<90 (OR: 0.63, p ​< ​0.001), heart rate>120 (OR: 0.83, p ​= ​0.007), and high-grade injuries (OR: 0.18, p ​< ​0.001). Penetrating trauma patients were more likely to undergo a spleen-conserving surgery (OR: 3.31, p ​< ​0.001). The use of spleen-conserving surgery was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.79, p ​= ​0.009) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.72, p ​= ​0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Spleen-conserving surgeries may be considered for patients with penetrating trauma, age<65, hemodynamic stability, and low-grade injuries. Spleen-conserving surgeries have decreased risk of pneumonia and venous thromboembolism.

Diagnostic utility of multidetector CT scan in penetrating diaphragmatic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Penetrating diaphragmatic injuries pose diagnostic and management challenges. Computed tomography (CT) scans are valuable for stable patients, but concern exists for missed injuries and complications in nonoperatively managed cases. The objective of this study was to explore the diagnostic utility of multidetector CT scan (MDCT) in identifying diaphragmatic injuries resulting from penetrating trauma. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, following established guidelines, by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to July 6, 2023. Eligible studies reporting MDCT's diagnostic accuracy in detecting penetrating diaphragmatic injuries were included. Relevant data elements were extracted and analyzed using STATA software. The study included 9 articles comprising 294 patients with confirmed penetrating diaphragmatic injuries through surgical procedures. MDCT's diagnostic performance revealed a pooled sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 56%-87%) and a pooled specificity of 92% (95% CI: 79%-97%) (Fig. two), with significant heterogeneity in both sensitivity and specificity across the studies. The Fagan plot demonstrated that higher pre-test probabilities correlated with higher positive post-test probabilities for penetrating diaphragmatic injury diagnosis using MDCT, but even with negative results, there remained a small chance of having the injury, especially in cases with higher pre-test probabilities. This study highlights MDCT's effectiveness in detecting diaphragmatic injury from penetrating trauma, with moderate to high diagnostic accuracy. However, larger sample sizes, multicenter collaborations, and prospective designs are needed to address observed heterogeneity, enhancing understanding and consistency in MDCT's diagnostic capabilities in this context.

Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography findings for hollow viscus injuries following thoracoabdominal gunshot wounds

BACKGROUND

Selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of abdominal gunshot wounds (GSWs) is increasingly used as computed tomography (CT) has become a diagnostic adjunct for the evaluation of intraabdominal injuries including hollow viscus injuries (HVIs). Currently, there is scarce data on the diagnostic accuracy of CT for identifying HVI. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of different CT findings in the diagnosis of HVI following abdominal GSW.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study was performed from January 2015 to April 2019. We included consecutive patients (≥18 years) with abdominal GSW for whom SNOM was attempted and an abdominal CT was obtained as a part of SNOM. Computed tomography findings including abdominal free fluid, diffuse abdominal free air, focal gastrointestinal wall thickness, wall irregularity, abnormal wall enhancement, fat stranding, and mural defect were used as our index tests. Outcomes were determined by the presence of HVI during laparotomy and test performance characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 212 patients included for final analysis (median age: 28 years), 43 patients (20.3%) underwent a laparotomy with HVI confirmed intraoperatively whereas 169 patients (79.7%) were characterized as not having HVI. The sensitivity of abdominal free fluid was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92-100). The finding of a mural defect had a high specificity (99%, 95% CI: 97-100). Other findings with high specificity were abnormal wall enhancement (97%, 95% CI: 93-99) and wall irregularity (96%, 95% CI: 92-99).

CONCLUSION

While there was no singular CT finding that confirmed the diagnosis of HVI following abdominal GSW, the absence of intraabdominal free fluid could be used to rule out HVI. In addition, the presence of a mural defect, abnormal wall enhancement, or wall irregularity is considered as a strong predictor of HVI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test or Criteria; Level II.

Assessment of Pattern of Abdominal Injury over a Two-Year Period at St Paul’s Hospital Millenium Medical College and AaBET Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Retrospective Study

Background. Globally, injury continues to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality both in developed and developing countries. Abdominal injuries are among the major causes of trauma admissions. This study aimed to assess patterns of abdominal injury at AaBET and St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College. Methods. A cross-sectional study was done on all adult patients who sustained abdominal injuries presented to the emergency department and managed at AaBET and St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College over a two-year period from January 2018 to December 2019. Results. A total of 165 abdominal injured patients presented during the study period. Among those patients, 140 (84.8%) were male, with a male-to-female ratio of 5.61. The mean age of patients was 29.3 years. 85 (51.5%) of the patients sustained penetrating injuries. 53 (32.1%) patients sustained road traffic accidents, 47 (32.1%) had stab injuries, and 34 (20.6%) had gunshots. Thirty-four (20.6%) of the patients were managed conservatively and 79.4% (n = 131) were managed surgically. The commonest complications found were shock (n = 20 (12.1%)), peritonitis (n = 18(10.9%)), HAP (n = 9 (5.5%)), and surgical site infection (n = 4 (2.4%)).The mortality rate was 3.6% (n = 6), of which 4 (67%) had the penetrating mechanism of injury. Conclusion. Abdominal trauma predominantly affects the male and economically productive age. The three main causes of abdominal injuries in this study were road traffic accidents, stab injuries, and gunshots, which require increased public awareness of the need to prevent road traffic accidents and to handle weapons and sharp items properly.

Clinical decision making for abdominal stab wounds in high resourced but low volume centres require structured guidelines to be effective

Aim

The management of abdominal stab wounds (SW) has continued to evolve. The use of CT and laparoscopy has been advocated to reduce the rate of laparotomy. This study reviews our experience with SW in a high income, low volume setting.

Methods

A retrospective study was undertaken from 2006 to 2020 at Waikato Hospital, New Zealand. All adult patients age > 16 years that were admitted following trauma were included.

Results

Seventy three cases of SW were included. Thirty two cases had indications for immediate laparotomy (peritonitis in 15, hemodynamic instability in 13, evisceration in 4). Twenty two underwent immediate laparotomy. Overall, 43 had a positive laparotomy. One had a negative laparotomy. Thirty seven cases had a CT. Laparoscopy was performed in 24 cases, with 23 demonstrating peritoneal breach. Subsequently 9 were converted to laparotomy whilst 15 had full laparoscopic exploration.

Conclusion

The relative rarity of abdominal SW in our environment has resulted in a considerable degree of heterogeneity in our approach to this clinical dilemma. The simplified algorithm we have developed will hopefully facilitate clinical decision making in our institution.

Military training-related abdominal injuries and diseases: Common types, prevention and treatment

Military training is intense, difficult and often dangerous, so all kinds of injuries or diseases frequently occur during training. Most of the previous studies and reviews on military training-related injuries focused on musculoskeletal system, whereas there are no reviews of abdominal injuries and diseases. Although the incidence of military training-related abdominal injuries and diseases is relatively low, the patients' condition is often critical especially in the presence of abdominal organ injury, leading to multi-organ dysfunction syndrome and even death. This paper elaborates on common types of military training-related abdominal injuries and diseases as well as the prevention and treatment measures, which provides some basis for scientific and reasonable training and improvement of medical security.

Diagnostic performance of triple-contrast versus single-contrast multi-detector computed tomography for the evaluation of penetrating bowel injury

PURPOSE

Selecting groups of low-risk penetrating trauma patients to forego laparotomy can be challenging. The presence of bowel injury may prevent non-operative management. Optimal CT technique to detect bowel injury related to penetrating injury is controversial. Our goal is to compare the diagnostic performance of triple-contrast (oral, rectal, and IV) against IV contrast-only CT, for the detection of bowel injury from penetrating abdominopelvic trauma, using surgical diagnosis as the reference standard.

METHODS

Nine hundred ninety-seven patients who underwent CT for penetrating torso trauma at a single institution between 2009 and 2016 in our HIPPA-compliant and institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study. A total of 143 patients, including 15 females and 123 males underwent a pre-operative CT, followed by exploratory laparotomy. Of these, 56 patients received triple-contrast CT. CT examinations were independently reviewed by two radiologists, blinded to surgical outcome and clinical presentation. Results were stratified by contrast type and injury mechanism and were compared based upon diagnostic performance indicators of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value. Area under the receiving operating characteristics curves were analyzed for determination of diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Bowel injury was present in 45 out of 143 patients (10 on triple-contrast group and 35 on IV contrast-only group). Specificity and accuracy were higher with triple-contrast CT (98% specific, 97-99% accurate) compared to IV contrast-only CT (66% specific, 78-79% accurate). Sensitivity was highest with IV contrast-only CT (91% sensitive) compared with triple-contrast CT (75% sensitive), although this difference was not statistically significant. Triple-contrast technique increased diagnostic accuracy for both radiologists regardless of mechanism of injury.

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective single-institution cohort study, triple-contrast MDCT had greater accuracy, specificity, and positive predictive values when compared to IV contrast-only CT in evaluating for bowel injury from penetrating wounds.

The role of leukocytes in predicting whether laparotomy is required in patients with penetrating abdominal stab wound

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the importance of leukocytes, leukocyte subgroups, platelets, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in deciding whether laparotomy is required during observation in patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds who were followed up because there was no indication for an emergency laparotomy.

METHODS

Patients who did not indicate an emergency laparotomy were monitored. After 48 hours from initial hospitalization, patients who did not require laparotomy were discharged nonoperatively. The total leukocytes, leukocyte subsets, platelets, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio of patients who underwent laparotomy during the follow-up compared with those who were discharged nonoperatively. The sensitivity and specificity of these laboratory values in predicting the necessity of laparotomy were calculated.

RESULTS

In the operated group (n = 71), leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio examined during observation were significantly higher (P < .001). Eosinophils and lymphocytes were significantly lower (P < .001) than in nonoperated (n = 476). Based on the deviation in the reference ranges of leukocyte and its subgroups, we report the sensitivity and specificity for predicting the necessity of laparotomy as 86% and 72% for leukocyte, 88% and 75% for neutrophil, 92% and 83% for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and 72% and 77% for platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, respectively. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off value was found to be 4 for neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and 125 for platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (area under the curve/receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.929 and 0.808, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Leukocyte, leukocyte subgroups, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio may be useful to determine if a laparotomy is necessary in patients in whom the necessity of laparotomy is undetermined owing to unclear examination findings.

Radiographic pneumoperitoneum following abdominal stab wound is not an absolute indication for mandatory laparotomy - A South African experience

INTRODUCTION

Pneumoperitoneum on chest radiograph (CXR) following abdominal stab wounds (SW) is generally considered as surrogate evidence of viscus perforation and an absolute indication for laparotomy. The exact yield of this radiographic finding is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on all patients who presented with abdominal SW with no peritoneal signs but had pneumoperitoneum alone who underwent mandatory laparotomy from December 2012 to October 2020 at a major trauma centre in South Africa.

RESULTS

During the 8-year study period, 55 patients were included (91% male, mean age: 24 years). Laparotomy was positive in 67% (37/55). Of the 37 positive laparotomies, 28 (76%) were considered therapeutic and the remaining 9 (24%) were nontherapeutic. The negative laparotomy rate was 33%. A total of 52 organ injuries were identified at laparotomy in the 37 positive laparotomies. Twenty-five per cent (14/55) of patients experienced complications. The complication rate of the subgroup of 18 patients who had a negative laparotomy was 33% (6/18). Two per cent (1/55) of all 55 patients required intensive care admission. The mean length of hospital stay was 6 days. There were no mortalities in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumoperitoneum alone in patients with no peritoneal signs on initial assessment following abdominal SW cannot be considered an absolute indication for operative exploration. Up to one third of patients have no intra-abdominal injuries. This specific subgroup of patients can potentially be managed by a selective non-operative management approach.

Penetrating abdominal trauma in the era of selective conservatism: a prospective cohort study in a level 1 trauma center

BACKGROUND

Global trend has seen management shift towards selective conservatism in penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). The purpose of this study is to compare the presentation; management; and outcomes of patients with PAT managed operatively versus non-operatively.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of all patients Ùpresenting with PAT to Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town from 01 May 2015 to 30 April 2017. Presentation; management; and outcomes of patients were compared. Univariate predictors of delayed operative management (DOM) were explored.

RESULTS

Over the 2-year study period, 805 patients with PAT were managed. There were 502 (62.4%); and 303 (37.6%) patients with gunshot (GSW) and stab wounds (SW), respectively. The majority were young men (94.7%), with a mean age of 28.3 years (95% CI 27.7-28.9) and median ISS of 13 (IQR 9-22). Successful non-operative management was achieved in 304 (37.7%) patients, and 501 (62.5%) were managed operatively. Of the operative cases, 477 (59.3%) underwent immediate laparotomy and 24 (3.0%) DOM. On univariate analysis, number; location; and mechanism of injuries were not associated with DOM. Rates of therapeutic laparotomy were achieved in 90.3% in the immediate, and 80.3% in the DOM cohorts. The mortality rate was 1.3, 11.3 and 0% in the in the NOM, immediate laparotomy and DOM subgroups, respectively. The rate of complications was no different in the immediate and DOM cohorts (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PAT in the absence of haemodynamic instability; peritonism; organ evisceration; positive radiological findings, or an unreliable clinical examination, can be managed expectantly without increased morbidity or mortality.

The Evolution of Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Gunshot Wounds in the United States

BACKGROUND

Surgical exploration for gunshot wounds to the abdomen has been a surgical standard for the greater part of the past century. Recently, nonoperative management (NOM) has been deemed as a safe option for abdominal gunshot wounds (AGWs). The aim of this analysis was to review the utilization of NOM and mortality after AGWs.

METHODS

We performed a 2010-2014 retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality and Improvement Program. We included all adult (aged 18 and older) patients with AGWs. NOM was defined as nonsurgical intervention within the first 6 h. Outcome measures were trends of utilization of NOM and mortality. Cochrane-Armitage trend analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 808,272 trauma patients were identified, and 16,866 patients with AGWs were included. During the study period, the incidence of AGWs increased, whereas the proportion of bowel injury (P = 0.75) and solid organ injury (P = 0.44) did not change. The NOM rate of AGW increased (2010: 19.5% versus 2014: 27%, P < 0.001). This was accompanied by a decrease in mortality rate (11% versus 9.4%, P = 0.01). Likewise, there was an increase in the use of angiography (7.5% versus 27%, P < 0.001) and laparoscopy (0.9% versus 2.6%, P < 0.001). Overall, 9.8% of the patients had failed NOM. There was no difference in mortality in patients who were managed successfully or failed NOM (5% versus 4.6%, P = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

NOM of AGW is more prevalent and is associated with a decrease in mortality rate. Selective NOM may be practiced safely after AGWs.

Does computed tomography scan add any diagnostic value to the evaluation of stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) scan adds any diagnostic value in the evaluation of stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall as compared with serial clinical examination (SCE).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE via Ovid were systematically searched for records published from 1980 to 2018 by two independent researchers (M.G., R.L.). Quality assessment, data extraction, and analysis were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Mantel-Haenszel method with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as the measure of effect size was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Three studies (1 randomized controlled trial and 2 observational studies) totaling 319 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall laparotomy rate was 12.8% (22 of 172 patients) in SCE versus 19% (28 of 147 patients) in CT. This difference was not significant (OR [95% CI], 0.63 [0.34-1.16]; p = 0.14). Negative laparotomy rate was 3.5% (6 of 172 patients) in SCE versus 5.4% (8 of 147 patients) in CT. The difference was not significant (OR [95% CI], 0.61 [0.20-1.83]; p = 0.37).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis compared SCE with CT scan in patients presenting with stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall and provided level II evidence showing no additional benefit in CT scan. Further observational and experimental clinical studies are needed to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review and meta-analysis, level II.

Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Stab Wounds with Isolated Omental Evisceration is Safe: A South African Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Selective nonoperative management of abdominal stab wound is well established, but its application in the setting of isolated omental evisceration remains controversial. The aim of the study is to establish the role of selective nonoperative management in the setting of isolated omental evisceration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted over an 8-year period from January 2010 to December 2017 at a major trauma center in South Africa to determine the outcome of selective nonoperative management.

RESULTS

A total of 405 consecutive cases were reviewed (91% male, mean age: 27 years), of which 224 (55%) cases required immediate laparotomy. The remaining 181 cases were observed clinically, of which 20 (11%) cases eventually required a delayed laparotomy. The mean time from injury to decision for laparotomy was <3 h in 92% (224/244), 3-6 h in 6% (14/244), 6-12 h 2% (4/244), and 12-18 h in 1% (2/244). There was no significant difference between the immediate laparotomy and the delayed laparotomy group in terms of length of stay, morbidity, or mortality. Ninety-eight percent (238/244) of laparotomies were positive and 96% of the positive laparotomies (229/238) were considered therapeutic.

CONCLUSION

Selective nonoperative management for abdominal stab wound in the setting of isolated omental evisceration is safe and does not result in increased morbidity or mortality. Clinical assessment remains valid and accurate in determining the need for laparotomy but must be performed by experienced surgeons in a controlled environment.

Laparotomy for organ evisceration from abdominal stab wounds: A South African experience

INTRODUCTION

Organ evisceration following abdominal stab wound (SW) is currently considered as an absolute indication for mandatory laparotomy due to the high incidence of associated intra-abdominal injuries, but literature describing the spectrum of organ injury encountered is limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed our experience of 301 consecutive patients who were subjected to mandatory laparotomy over an eight-year period at a major trauma centre in South Africa.

RESULTS

Of the 301 patients with organ evisceration, 92% were male (mean age: 28 years). Ninety per cent (270/301) of the laparotomies were positive (85% (229/270) therapeutic, 15% (41/270) non-therapeutic). The frequencies of eviscerated organs were small bowel (70%), large bowel (26%), and stomach 3%. Three (1%) patients had combined evisceration of more than one of the above organs. The most commonly injured organs were small bowel and large bowel. The mean length of hospital stay was nine days. Seven patients required intensive care admission. The morbidity rate was 21% and mortality was 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The spectrum of injury associated with abdominal SW with organ evisceration is similar to smaller published series. Multiple organ injuries are common. The most commonly eviscerated organs were small bowel, large bowel and stomach, while the most commonly injured organs were small bowel and large bowel.

Selective non-operative management of anterior abdominal stab wounds with emphasis on the value of follow-up abdominal CT scanning

Background and aim

Selective non-operative management of patients with penetrating abdominal stabs is the preferred treatment strategy. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of non-operative management with emphasis on the value of follow-up abdominal CT scanning in management of patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective chart review of stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds. Patients were divided in terms of initial decisions into two groups: laparotomy group and non-operative management group. Abdominal CT scan was performed for patients in the non-operative management group on admission and follow-up CT scanning was performed in cases of clinical and/or biochemical deterioration.

Results

The laparotomy group included 82 patients and 68.2% of them had unnecessary laparotomies. The non-operative management group comprised 97 patients and 90.7% of them did not require subsequent laparotomy. Abdominal CT scan had a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 100% in detection of intra-abdominal injuries. Follow-up CT scanning detected bowel injuries missed by initial CT scan in three patients. The non-operative management group had significantly lower post-operative complication rate than the laparotomy group (4.1% vs. 18.3%), with a significantly shorter length of stay.

Conclusions

Non-operative management is the optimal management strategy for stable patients with penetrating anterior abdominal stab to decrease unnecessary laparotomy rates, hospital stay and costs. Follow-up abdominal CT scanning facilitated the decision making for patients selected for non-operative management and is highly sensitive in the diagnosis of patients who require subsequent exploration.

The diagnostic yield of commonly used investigations in pelvic gunshot wounds

BACKGROUND

Patients who sustain pelvic gunshot wounds (GSWs) are at significant risk for injury owing to the density of pelvic structures. Currently, the optimal workup for pelvic GSWs is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine the diagnostic yield of tests commonly used in the investigation of pelvic GSWs and to develop a diagnostic algorithm.

METHODS

All patients 15 years or older presenting to the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center (January 2008 to February 2015) who sustained one or more pelvic GSWs were retrospectively identified. Patients' demographics, clinical assessment, investigations, procedures, and outcomes were abstracted. The diagnostic yield of computed tomographic (CT) scan, cystogram, gross inspection of the urine, urinalysis, endoscopy, and digital rectal examination (DRE) in the detection of clinically significant injuries to the pelvis were calculated.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy patients were included. Patients with peritonitis, hemodynamic instability, an unevaluable abdomen, or evisceration were taken to the operating room for immediate laparotomy (n = 138 [37.3%]). All others (n = 232 [62.7%]) underwent CT scan and further investigations as indicated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the investigations were CT scan: 1.00, 0.98, 0.74, and 1.00; cystogram: 1.00 for all parameters; gross inspection of the urine: 1.00 for all parameters; urinalysis: 1.00, 0.71, 0.17, and 1.00; endoscopy: 1.00, 0.82, 0.75, and 1.00; and DRE: 0.77, 0.99, 0.77, and 0.99.

CONCLUSION

In the workup of pelvic GSWs, patients with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, evisceration, or an unevaluable abdomen should undergo immediate laparotomy, while all others should undergo CT scan. Computed tomography-positive patients should be managed for their injuries. If the CT is negative, the likelihood of a clinically significant injury is very low. If the CT is equivocal for rectal or bladder injury, endoscopy or cystogram should be used to guide definitive management. There is no role for routine urinalysis or DRE. Further prospective validation of these findings is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Conservative versus operative management in stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: the experience of a Canadian level 1 trauma centre

BACKGROUND

The goal of conservative management (CM) of penetrating abdominal trauma is to avoid nontherapeutic laparotomies while identifying injuries early. Factors that may predict CM failure are not well established, and the experience of CM has not been well described in the Canadian context.

METHODS

We searched a Canadian level 1 trauma centre database for all penetrating abdominal traumas treated between 2004 and 2014. Hemodynamically stable patients without peritonitis and without clear indications for immediate surgery were considered potential candidates for CM, and were included in the study. We compared those who were managed with CM with those who underwent immediate operative management (OM). Outcomes included mortality and length of stay (LOS). Further analysis was performed to identify predictors of CM failure.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with penetrating abdominal trauma were classified as potential candidates for CM. Ten patients were managed with OM, and 62 with CM, with 9 (14.5%) ultimately failing CM and requiring laparotomy. The OM and CM groups were similar in terms of age, sex, injury severity, mechanism and number of injuries. There were no deaths in either group. The LOS in the intensive care (ICU)/trauma unit was 4.8 ± 3.2 days in the OM group and 2.9 ± 2.6 days in the CM group (p = 0.039). The only predictor for CM failure was intra-abdominal fluid on computed tomography (CT) scan (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 1.01-28.19).

CONCLUSION

In select patients with penetrating abdominal trauma, CM is safe and results in a reduced LOS in the ICU/trauma unit of 1.9 days. Fluid on CT scan is a predictor for failure.

Ingestion of Metallic Shrapnel by a Bomb-blast Victim: A Case Report and Literature Review

This case report describes an unusual incidence of shrapnel ingestion by a bomb-blast victim with infliction of multiple, simultaneous, penetrating injuries.Consequently, the foreign body that appeared within the lumen of cecum on the computed tomography (CT) scan was thought to have entered through one of these penetrating injuries. A 31-year-old male, who was the victim of a bomb-blast, was brought to the emergency room with multiple, penetrating wounds. The CT scan of the abdomen showed a dense metallic body within the cecum but cecal perforation was not ruled out. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a metallic body within the lumen of the cecum with no gut perforation. The metallic foreign body, which was actually ingested shrapnel, subsequently passed out in the stools. Even with the use of high-tech investigations and diagnostic tools, the clinician was unable to reach a conclusive diagnosis. Therefore, the importance of a thorough and detailed clinical history and physical examination and their interpretation should not be underestimated, and physicians should be open to a wide variety of possible causes.

Penetrating Injuries to the Abdomen: a Single Institutional Experience with Review of Literature

Penetrating abdominal trauma forms an important component of surgical emergencies, most of the victims being young aged in the prime of their life. Over the past century, the diagnosis and management of this common problem has seen drastic changes, finally reaching the destination of selective approach. We present our experience in the management of this group of patients in the rural setup. This is a prospective observational study done at our hospital between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015 including patients who presented with penetrating abdominal injury. The clinical presentation, imaging features, diagnosis, management, and complications of all these patients are analyzed. The mean age was 33.5 years with majority being males. Homicidal stab injuries accounted for most of the injuries (62.5 %). Forty-eight patients underwent laparotomy, and among which, the procedure was therapeutic in 36 patients. Peritoneal penetration was the best predictor of a therapeutic laparotomy with a high sensitivity and positive predictive value (100 and 80 %, respectively). The small intestine was the most commonly injured organ. The mean postoperative stay was 8.25 days, and there was no mortality. Though the management of these patients should aim at minimizing the rate of negative laparotomies, this should not be done at the expense of delayed diagnosis and treatment. Diagnostic laparoscopy may avoid unnecessary laparotomies; however, it requires adequate skills in laparoendoscopy. Management is best tailor made for each individual based on the nature of injury, findings at presentation, and the organ injured.

Serial Clinical Examinations of 100 Patients Treated for Anterior Abdominal Wall Stab Wounds: A Cross Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

The current approach in stab wounds of the anterior abdominal wall is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate serial clinical examinations of patients with abdominal wall stab wounds referred to Poursina Hospital in Rasht.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a cross sectional study, 100 cases with stab wounds to the anterior abdominal wall were examined serially (admission time, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours) after wound exploration. Serial hemoglobin test was performed every 8 hours. Laparotomy was performed in cases who were not hemodynamically stable or who showed symptoms of peritonitis. The results were analyzed with SPSS software version 21.

RESULTS

Ninety-one men (91%) and 9 women (9%) with mean age of 27 ± 10.7 years were included. Coexisting injuries were prevalent in 12 cases. The duration of hospitalization was 1 day in 31%, 2 days in 30%, 3 - 4 days in 32% and more than 5 days in 7%. Late laparotomy was performed 12 hours after admission in 8% of patients due to peritonitis. There was visceral damage in these cases. No mortality occurred. The cost and duration of hospitalization was significantly higher in cases with coexisting injuries and those who underwent laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems serial clinical examinations are safe and decrease the cost and duration of hospitalization in stable patients with anterior abdominal wall stab wounds.

Patterns of retroperitoneal trauma following gunshot violence: A case series

Introduction

Abdominal trauma is defined as any injury to the abdomen and its containing viscera. Common penetrating injuries including gunshot or stab injuries are increasing worldwide. However, retroperitoneal gunshot injuries have a lower incidence than trans-abdominal trauma and can have substantially different outcomes.

Case report

We report a series of three family members involved in gunshot violence over an18-month period. Each sustained retroperitoneal gunshot injuries with varying injuries patterns and treatment courses. Interestingly, one patient had a delayed small bowel perforation on day 6 post injury.

Discussion

Retroperitoneal trauma following gun violence has a lower incidence than trans-abdominal trauma. There is a paucity of literature describing injury patterns following this type of injury and their subsequent management. In the context of penetrating retroperitoneal trauma, the retroperitoneal organs are at risk and therefore serial clinical and/or radiological assessment is necessary. Delayed small bowel injury as a consequence of retroperitoneal gunshot is an unusual finding, with no reports to our knowledge in the literature.

Conclusion

this case series highlight that penetrating retroperitoneal trauma can produce a variety of injury patterns. Therefore a wide clinical acumen is needed to ensure a successful outcome. The trajectory of the bullet may help ascertain potential injuries, but serial assessment and observation are also important. Ultimately, individual cases must be treated accordingly, based on clinical stability, severity of injury and radiological findings. Despite initial stability, patients should always be observed for delayed complications.

Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Stab Wounds

Stab wounds (SW) to the abdomen traditionally require urgent exploration when associated with shock, evisceration, or peritonitis. Hemodynamically stable patients without evisceration may benefit from serial exams even with peritonitis. We compared patients taken directly to the operating room with abdominal SWs (ED-OR) to those admitted for serial exams (ADMIT). We retrospectively reviewed hemodynamically stable patients presenting with any abdominal SW between January 2000 and December 2012. Exclusions included evidence of evisceration, systolic blood pressure ≤110 mm Hg, or blood transfusion. NON-THER was defined as abdominal exploration without identification of intra-abdominal injury requiring repair. Of 142 patients included, 104 were ED-OR and 38 were ADMIT. When ED-OR was compared with ADMIT, abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score was higher (2.4 vs 2.1; P = 0.01) and hospital length of stay was longer (4.8 vs 3.3 days; P = 0.04). Incidence of NON-THER was higher in ED-OR cohort (71% vs 13%; P ≤ 0.001). In a regression model, ED-OR was a predictor of NON-THER (adjusted odds ratio 16.6; P < 0.001). One patient from ED-OR expired after complications from NON-THER. There were no deaths in the ADMIT group. For those patients with abdominal SWs who present with systolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg, no blood product transfusion in the emergency department and lacking evisceration, admission for serial abdominal exams may be preferred regardless of abdominal exam.

Evaluation of diaphragm in penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab injuries: The role of multislice computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

Penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab injuries are accompanied by diaphragmatic injury in 25-30% of cases, about 30% of which later develop into diaphragmatic hernia. This study aimed to determine the role of multislice computed tomography in the evaluation of left diaphragm in patients with penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab wounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study reviewed penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab injuries managed in our clinic between April 2009 and September 2014. The thoracoabdominal region was defined as the region between the sternum, fourth intercostal space, and arcus costa anteriorly and the vertebra, lower tip of scapula, and the curve of the last rib posteriorly. Unstable cases and cases with signs of peritonitis were operated with laparotomy; the remaining patients were closely monitored. Forty-eight hours later, a diagnostic laparoscopy was applied to evaluate the left hemidiaphragma in asymptomatic patients who did not need laparotomy. The preoperatively obtained multislice thoracoabdominal computed tomography images were retrospectively examined for the presence of left diaphragm injury. Then, operative and tomographic findings were compared.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 43 patients, 39 (91%) males and 4 (9%) females of mean age 30 years (range 15-61 years). Thirty patients had normal tomography results, whereas 13 had left diaphragmatic injuries. An injury to the left diaphragm was detected during the operation in 9 (1 in laparotomy and 8 in diagnostic laparoscopy) of 13 patients with positive tomography for left diaphragmatic injury and 2 (in diagnostic laparoscopy) of 30 patients with negative tomography. Multislice tomography had a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI: 48-98%), a specificity of 88% (71-96%), a positive predictive value of 69% (39-91%), and a negative predictive value of 93% (78-99%) for detection of diaphragmatic injury in penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Although diagnostic laparoscopy is the gold standard for diaphragmatic examination in patients with penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab wounds, multislice computed tomography is also valuable for detecting diaphragmatic injury.

The management of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration: The results of a clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The therapeutic approach to abdominal penetrating stab injuries has changed over the years from routine laparotomy to non-operative treatment. In case of organ or omental evisceration, although the laparotomy need is greater, non-operative treatment may be applied in selected cases. The aim of our study was to assess the follow-up and treatment outcomes of patients with organ or omental evisceration due to penetrating abdominal injuries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with organ or omental evisceration due to penetrating abdominal stab injuries were prospectively evaluated between April 2009 and July 2012. Emergent laparotomy was performed in cases that were hemodynamically unstable or had signs of organ evisceration or peritonitis, while other patients were managed conservatively. Patients' follow-up and treatment outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients with organ or omental evisceration were assessed. Six (33.3%) patients underwent emergent laparotomy, and 12 (66.7%) patients underwent conservative follow-up. Three patients in the emergent laparotomy group had signs of organ evisceration, and 3 had signs of peritonitis; five of these 6 patients underwent therapeutic laparotomy and 1 negative laparotomy. In the non-operative follow-up group, therapeutic laparotomy was carried out in a total of 7 patients, 4 being early and 3 late, due to development of peritonitis, whereas 5 (27.8%) patients were managed non-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Although organ or omental eviscerations due to penetrating abdominal stab injuries have a high rate of therapeutic laparotomy, selective conservative therapy is a safe method in selected cases.

Trauma and wound management: gunshot wounds in horses

Bullet wounds in horses can cause a wide array of injuries, determined by the type of projectile, the energy of the bullet on entry, and the type of tissue the bullet encounters. Treatment includes identification of all structures involved, debridement of the permanent cavity, and establishing adequate drainage. Bullet wounds should be treated as contaminated, and broad-spectrum antibiotics, including those with an anaerobic spectrum, are indicated. Although musculoskeletal injuries resulting from gunshots are most common in horses, they carry a good prognosis for survival and return to function.

Current management of penetrating torso trauma: nontherapeutic is not good enough anymore

A highly organized approach to the evaluation and treatment of penetrating torso injuries based on regional anatomy provides rapid diagnostic and therapeutic consistency. It also minimizes delays in diagnosis, missed injuries and nontherapeutic laparotomies. This review discusses an optimal sequence of structured rapid assessments that allow the clinician to rapidly proceed to gold standard therapies with a minimal risk of associated morbidity.

Abdominal trauma in durban, South Africa: factors influencing outcome

Abdominal injury as a result of both blunt and penetrating trauma has an appreciable mortality rate from hemorrhage and sepsis. In this article, we present our experience with the management of abdominal trauma in Durban and investigate factors that influence outcome. We performed a prospective study of patients with abdominal trauma in one surgical ward at King Edward VIII Hospital in Durban over a period of 7 years, from 1998 through 2004. Demographic details, cause of injury, delay before surgery, clinical presentation, findings at surgery, management and outcome were documented. There were 488 patients with abdominal trauma with a mean age of 29.2 ± 10.7 years. There were 440 penetrating injuries (240 firearm wounds; 200 stab wounds) and 48 blunt injuries. The mean delay before surgery was 11.7 ± 16.4 hours, and 55 patients (11%) presented in shock. Four hundred and forty patients underwent laparotomy, and 48 were managed nonoperatively. The Injury Severity Score was 11.1 ± 6.7, and the New Injury Severity Score was 17.1 ± 11.1. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (28%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), with a mean ICU stay of 3.6 ± 5.5 days. One hundred and thirty-two patients developed complications (28%), and 52 (11%) died. Shock, acidosis, increased transfusion requirements, number of organs injured, and injury severity were all associated with higher mortality. Delay before surgery had no influence on outcome. Hospital stay was 9.2 ± 10.8 days. The majority of abdominal injuries in our environment are due to firearms. Physiological instability, mechanism of injury, severity of injury, and the number of organs injured influence outcome.

The principles of non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injury

The selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injury is gaining increasing acceptance. Recognition of the morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with non-therapeutic exploration has provided the impetus for selective management. This review describes the principles of, and evidence for, this strategy. Selective management is widely accepted for the treatment of stab wounds, but the selective management of ballistic injuries, particularly in the military setting, remains contentious. As a result, there are marked variations in the application of this practice. Computed tomography is a prerequisite for the selective management of ballistic injuries, and possibly also stab wounds. Failure of non-operative management, following stab wounds or gunshot wounds, is invariably apparent within 24 hours.

Penetrating wounds to the torso: evaluation with triple-contrast multidetector CT

Penetrating injuries account for a large percentage of visits to emergency departments and trauma centers worldwide. Emergency laparotomy is the accepted standard of care in patients with a penetrating torso injury who are not hemodynamically stable and have a clinical indication for exploratory laparotomy, such as evisceration or gastrointestinal bleeding. Continuous advances in technology have made computed tomography (CT) an indispensable tool in the evaluation of many patients who are hemodynamically stable, have no clinical indication for exploratory laparotomy, and are candidates for conservative treatment. Multidetector CT may depict the trajectory of a penetrating injury and help determine what type of intervention is necessary on the basis of findings such as active arterial extravasation and major vascular, hollow viscus, or diaphragmatic injuries. Because multidetector CT plays an increasing role in the evaluation of patients with penetrating wounds to the torso, the radiologists who interpret these studies should be familiar with the CT findings that mandate intervention.

Do patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds require laparotomy?

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of hemodynamically stable asymptomatic patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds (AASWs) remains controversial. The goal is to identify and treat injuries in a safe cost-effective manner. Common evaluation strategies are local wound exploration (LWE), diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), serial clinical assessment (SCAs) and computed tomography (CT) imaging. Making a decision about the right time to operate on a patient with a penetrating abdominal stab wound, especially those who have visceral evisceration, is a continuing challenge.

OBJECTIVES

Until the year 2010, our strategy was emergency laparotomy in patients with penetrating anterior fascia and those with visceral evisceration. This survey was conducted towards evaluating the results of emergency laparotomy. So, better management can be done in patients with penetrating abdominal stab wounds.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on patients with abdominal penetrating trauma who referred to Al- Zahra hospital in Isfahan, Iran from October 2000 to October 2010. It should be noted that patients with abdominal blunt trauma, patients under 14 years old, those with lateral abdomen penetrating trauma and patients who had unstable hemodynamic status were excluded from the study. Medical records of patients were reviewed and demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients including: age, sex, mechanism of trauma and the results of LWE and laparotomy. Data were analyzed with PASW v.20 software. All data were expressed as mean ± SD. The distribution of nominal variables was compared using the Chi-squared test. Also, diagnostic index for LWE were calculated. A two-sided P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

During the 10 year period of the study, 1100 consecutive patients with stab wounds were admitted to Al-Zahra hospital Isfahan, Iran. In total, about 150 cases had penetrating traumas in the anterior abdomen area. Sixty-three (42%) patients were operated immediately due to shock, visceral evisceration or aspiration of blood via a nasogastric tube on admission. Organ injury was seen in 78% of patients with visceral evisceration. Among these 87 cases, 29 patients' (33.3%) anterior fascia was not penetrated in LWE. So, they were observed for several hours and discharged from the hospital without surgery. While for the remaining 58 patients (66.6%), whose LWE detected penetration of anterior abdominal fascia, laparotomy was performed which showed visceral injuries in 11 (18%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

All in all, 82 percent of laparotomies in patients with penetrated anterior abdominal fascia without visceral evisceration, who had no signs of peritoneal irritation, were negative. So, we recommended further evaluation in these patients. However, visceral evisceration is an indication for exploratory laparotomy, since in our study; the majority of patients had organ damages.

Extravasated contrast material in penetrating abdominopelvic trauma: dual-contrast dual-energy CT for improved diagnosis--preliminary results in an animal model

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performance of dual-energy (DE) computed tomography (CT) with two simultaneously administered contrast agents (hereafter, dual contrast) with that of conventional CT in the evaluation of the presence and source of extravasation in penetrating abdominopelvic trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional animal care and use committee approval was obtained, and the study was performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. Five rabbits with bowel trauma, vascular penetrating trauma, or both were imaged with simultaneous iodinated intravenous and bismuth subsalicylate enteric contrast material at DE CT. Four attending radiologists and six radiology residents without prior DE CT experience each evaluated 10 extraluminal collections to identify the vascular and/or enteric origin of extravasation and assess their level of diagnostic confidence, first with virtual monochromatic images simulating conventional CT and then with DE CT material decomposition attenuation maps.

RESULTS

Overall accuracy of identification of source of extravasation increased from 78% with conventional CT to 92% with DE CT (157 of 200 diagnoses vs 184 of 200 diagnoses, respectively; P < .001). Nine radiologists were more accurate with DE CT; one had no change. Mean confidence increased from 67% to 81% with DE CT (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In a rabbit abdominopelvic trauma model, dual-contrast DE CT significantly increased accuracy and confidence in the diagnosis of vascular versus enteric extravasated contrast material.

Penetrating diaphragmatic injury: accuracy of 64-section multidetector CT with trajectography

PURPOSE

To (a) determine the diagnostic performance of 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) trajectography for penetrating diaphragmatic injury (PDI), (b) determine the diagnostic performance of classic signs of diaphragmatic injury at 64-section multidetector CT, and (c) compare the performance of these signs with that of trajectography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study had institutional review board approval, with a waiver of the informed consent requirement. All patients who had experienced penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma, who had undergone preoperative 64-section multidetector CT of the chest and abdomen, and who had surgical confirmation of findings during a 2.5-year period were included in this study (25 male patients, two female patients; mean age, 32.6 years). After a training session, four trauma radiologists unaware of the surgical outcome independently reviewed all CT studies and scored the probability of PDI on a six-point scale. Collar sign, dependent viscera sign, herniation, contiguous injury on both sides of the diaphragm, discontinuous diaphragm sign, and transdiaphragmatic trajectory were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV). Accuracies were determined and receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sensitivities for detection of PDI by using 64-section multidetector CT with postprocessing software ranged from 73% to 100%, specificities ranged from 50% to 92%, NPVs ranged from 71% to 100%, PPVs ranged from 68% to 92%, and accuracies ranged from 70% to 89%. Discontinuous diaphragm, herniation, collar, and dependent viscera signs were highly specific (92%-100%) but nonsensitive (0%-60%). Contiguous injury was generally more sensitive (80%-93% vs 73%-100%) but less specific (50%-67% vs 83%-92%) than transdiaphragmatic trajectory when patients with multiple entry wounds were included in the analysis. Transdiaphragmatic trajectory was a much more sensitive sign of PDI than previously reported (73%-100% vs 36%), with NPVs ranging from 71% to 100% and PPVs ranging from 85% to 92%.

CONCLUSION

Sixty-four-section multidetector CT trajectography facilitates the identification of transdiaphragmatic trajectory, which accurately rules in PDI when identified. Contiguous injury remains a highly sensitive sign, even when patients with multiple injuries are considered, and is useful for excluding PDI.

Deriving a prediction rule for short stay admission in trauma patients admitted at a major trauma centre in Australia

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to derive and internally validate a prediction rule for short stay admissions (SSAs) in trauma patients admitted to a major trauma centre.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all trauma activation patients requiring inpatient admission at a single inner city major trauma centre in Australia between 2007 and 2011 was conducted. Logistic regression was used to derive a multivariable model for the outcome of SSA (length of stay ≤2 days excluding deaths or intensive care unit admission). Model discrimination was tested using area under receiver operator characteristic curve analyses and calibration was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic. Validation was performed by splitting the dataset into derivation and validation datasets and further tested using bootstrap cross validation.

RESULTS

A total of 2593 patients were studied and 30% were classified as SSAs. Important independent predictors of SSA were injury severity score ≤8 (OR 7.8; 95% CI 5.0 to 11.9), Glasgow coma score 14-15 (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.8 to 5.4), no need for operative intervention (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.6 to 3.2) and age < 65 years. (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.6). The overall model had an area under receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.87) for the derivation dataset. After bootstrap cross validation the area under the curve of the final model was 0.83 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

We report a prediction rule that could be used to establish admission criteria for a trauma short stay unit. Further studies are required to prospectively validate the prediction rule.

[Management of penetrating abdominal trauma: what we need to know?]

Penetrating traumas are rare in France and mainly due to stabbing. Knives are less lethal than firearms. The initial clinical assessment is the cornerstone of hospital care. It remains a priority and can quickly lead to a surgical treatment first. Urgent surgical indications are hemorrhagic shock, evisceration and peritonitis. Dying patients should be immediately taken to the operating room for rescue laparotomy or thoracotomy. Ultrasonography and chest radiography are performed before damage control surgery for hemodynamic unstable critical patients. Stable patients are scanned by CT and in some cases may benefit from non-operative strategy. Mortality remains high, initially due to bleeding complications and secondarily to infectious complications. Early and appropriate surgery can reduce morbidity and mortality. Non-operative strategy is only possible in selected patients in trained trauma centers and with intensive supervision by experienced staff.

Negative Laparotomy in Trauma: Are We Getting Better?

One of the trauma surgeons’ daily challenges is the balancing act between negative laparotomy and missed abdominal injury. We opted to characterize the indications that prompted a negative trauma exploratory laparotomy and the rate of missed abdominal injuries in an effort to optimize patient selection for laparotomy. At the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, negative laparotomies and missed injuries are consecutively captured and reviewed at the weekly mortality + morbidity (MM) conferences. All written reports of the MM meetings from January 2003 to December 2008 were reviewed to identify all patients who underwent a negative laparotomy or a laparotomy as a result of an initially missed abdominal injury. Over the 6-year study period, a total of 1871 laparotomies were performed, of which 73 (3.9%) were negative. The rate of missed injuries requiring subsequent laparotomy was 1.3 per cent (25 of 1871). The negative laparotomy rate and the rate of missed injuries did not vary significantly during the study period (2.8 to 4.7%, P = 0.875, and 0.7 to 2.9%, P = 0.689). Penetrating mechanisms accounted for the majority of negative laparotomies (58.9%). The primary indication for negative laparotomy was peritonitis (54.8%) followed by hypotension (28.8%) and suspicious computed tomographic scan findings (27.4%). The complication rate after negative laparotomy was 14.5 per cent, and of these, 10.1 per cent were directly related to the procedure. A low but steady rate of negative laparotomies and missed abdominal injuries after trauma remains. Negative laparotomies and missed abdominal injuries when they occur are still associated with significant complication rates and a prolonged length of stay.

Changing trends in the pattern and outcome of stab injuries at a North London hospital

OBJECTIVE

To study the incidence, pattern and outcome of stab injuries attending a North London Teaching Hospital over a 3-year (2006-2008) period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of collected data from the Hospital database was conducted. The database contains comprehensive medical records for all patients attended by the trauma team for deliberate stab injuries. It is updated by the surgical team after each admission. All patients with deliberate penetrating injury who were attended by the service between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008 were identified. Patients who died in the prehospital phase, those managed exclusively by the emergency department and limb injuries without vascular compromise were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Six hundred and nineteen patients with stab injuries (following knife crime) from North London attended the Hospital in the above period. One hundred and thirty-seven paients required surgical admission. Two were cases of self-inflicted knife injuries. Over the 3-year period the percentage of victims below 20 years of age is increasing. Ninety-three percent of knife crime occured between 6 pm and 6 am; recently moving toward week days from weekend period.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rate of penetrating injuries (stab injuries) is slowly declining. Timely cardiothoracic support facility is vital in saving lives with major cardiac stab injuries. Although alcohol drinking restriction has been lifted, most cases of stabbings are still occurring out-of-hours when surgical personnel are limited.

Prospective evaluation of selective nonoperative management of torso gunshot wounds: when is it safe to discharge?

BACKGROUND

Selective nonoperative management (NOM) has been increasingly used for torso gunshot wounds (GSWs). The optimal observation time required to exclude a hollow viscus injury is not clear. The purpose of this study was to determine the safe period of observation before discharge.

METHODS

All patients aged 16 years and older sustaining a torso GSW undergoing a trial of NOM were prospectively enrolled (January 2009 to January 2011). Patient demographics, initial computed tomography (CT) results, time to failure of NOM, operative procedures, and outcomes were collected. Failure of NOM was defined as the need for operation.

RESULTS

A total of 270 patients sustained a GSW to the torso. Of those, 25 patients (9.3%) died in the emergency department and were excluded leaving 245 patients available for the analysis. Mean age was 26.5 years ± 9.9 years (16-62 years), 92.7% (227) were men, and mean Injury Severity Score scale was 13.8 ± 11.3 (1-45). Overall, 115 patients (46.9%) underwent immediate exploratory laparotomy based on clinical criteria (72.2% had peritonitis, 27.8% hypotension, 10.4% unevaluable, and 4.3% evisceration), and 130 patients (53.1%) underwent evaluation with CT for possible NOM. Of those, 39 patients (30.0%) had a positive CT and were subsequently operated on. All had significant intra-abdominal injuries requiring surgical management. A total of 91 patients (70.0%) underwent a trial of NOM (47 had equivocal CT findings and 44 had a negative examination). Of these, 8 patients (8.8%) failed NOM and underwent laparotomy (all had equivocal CT scans). Two patients had a nontherapeutic laparotomy; the remainder had stomach (50.0%), colon (25.5%), and rectal (12.5%) injuries. The mean time from admission to development of clinical or laboratory signs of NOM failure was 2 hours:43 minutes ± 2 hours:23 minutes (0 hour:31 minutes-6 hours:58 minutes). All patients failed within 24 hours of admission.

CONCLUSION

In the initial evaluation of patients sustaining a GSW to the torso, clinical examination is essential for identifying those who will require emergency operation. For those undergoing a trial of NOM, all failures occurred within 24 hours of hospital admission, setting a minimum required observation period before discharge.

Nocturnal Violence: Implications for Resident Trauma Operative Experiences

Trauma centers face novel challenges in resource allocation in an era of cost consciousness and work-hour restrictions. Studies have shown that time of day and day of week affect trauma admission volume; however, these studies were performed in cold climates. Data from 2000 to 2010 at a Level I trauma center were reviewed. Demographic, injury severity, and injury timing from 23,827 trauma patients were analyzed along with their emergency department disposition (operating room, intensive care unit, ward) and final outcome. Nighttime arrivals (NAs) accounted for 56.6 per cent and daytime arrivals accounted for 43.4 per cent of total admissions. The increase in NAs was most pronounced during the period from midnight to 6 AM on weekends ( P < 0.05). Also, the period from midnight to 6 AM on weekends showed a significantly increased proportion of penetrating trauma ( P < 0.01). Similarly, there was an increased rate of trauma arrivals needing emergent operative intervention in the period between midnight and 6 AM on weekends when compared with any other time period ( P < 0.01). In a southern Level I trauma center, patient volume varies nonrandomly with time. Emergent operative intervention is more likely between midnight and 6 AM, the peak time for penetrating trauma. Because resident operative experience is maximized at night and on weekends, coverage during these periods should remain a priority for residency programs.

Imaging vascular trauma

Background

Over the past 50 years the management of vascular trauma has changed from mandatory surgical exploration to selective non-operative treatment, where possible. Accurate, non-invasive, diagnostic imaging techniques are the key to this strategy. The purpose of this review was to define optimal first-line imaging in patients with suspected vascular injury in different anatomical regions.

Methods

A systematic review was performed of literature relating to radiological diagnosis of vascular trauma over the past decade (2000–2010). Studies were included if the main focus was initial diagnosis of blunt or penetrating vascular injury and more than ten patients were included.

Results

Of 1511 titles identified, 58 articles were incorporated in the systematic review. Most described the use of computed tomography angiography (CTA). The application of duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging/angiography and transoesophageal echocardiography was described, but significant drawbacks were highlighted for each. CTA displayed acceptable sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing vascular trauma in blunt and penetrating vascular injury within the neck and extremity, as well as for blunt aortic injury.

Conclusion

Based on the evidence available, CTA should be the first-line investigation for all patients with suspected vascular trauma and no indication for immediate operative intervention.

Abdominal gunshot wounds: multi-detector-row CT findings compared with laparotomy: a prospective study

The purpose of this study was to access the accuracy of multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in diagnosing injuries in hemodynamically stable abdominal gunshot wound victims (AGWV). Triple-contrast MDCT was performed in hemodynamically stable AGWV during a 20-month prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Thirty-one patients (30 males, 1 female; mean age, 24.3 years) were evaluated by two radiologists for evidence of injury to solid and hollow organs, vascular structures, urinary bladder, diaphragm, fractures, and general findings (free fluid, pneumoperitoneum, and mesentery lesions). All of the patients underwent laparotomy, and prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. No statistically significant differences between radiologists were found. All of the solid and hollow organ lesions, vascular lesions, and general findings were detected. One of the four urinary bladder lesions was missed by MDCT, leading in this case to a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 96.4%, and accuracy of 96.8% (p = 0.001). One of the eight diaphragm lesions was missed by MDCT, and its sensitivity was 87.5%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, negative predictive value was 95.8%, and accuracy was 96.8% (p < 0.001). Fractures were diagnosed in 74.4% of the patients (24 of 31). Fourteen (43.2%) patients demonstrated non-therapeutic laparotomy, in which minor lesions could have been managed conservatively. We concluded that MDCT is an accurate imaging method in evaluating selected AGWV, providing trusted information for emergency room physicians.