The utility of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia

Surgical Management of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia at Military Treatment Facilities: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), also known as atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), is a precursor lesion of endometrial carcinoma (EC). In endometrial cancer patients, lymph node assessment with biopsy during hysterectomy is part of surgical staging. However, routine lymph node assessment for EIN is inconsistently utilized. This study aims to investigate the surgical management of EIN in the military to inform best-practice guidelines tailored for the Military Health System to avoid delays in care, manage cost, ensure military readiness and optimize clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with EIN treated at 2 military treatment facilities over a 10-year period between July 1, 2013 and July 1, 2023. Pathology reports were queried to identify patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. Patients not surgically managed were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Independent associations were investigated using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

There were 95 evaluable patients with an EIN diagnosis, including 43 (45.3%) patients upstaged to EC based on final pathology (95% CI: 35.0-55.8). Older patients diagnosed with EIN ≥65 years old and those with endometrial thickness ≥15 mm exhibited the highest risk for upstaging EIN to an EC diagnosis. Of the 50 patients who underwent lymph node assessment, none had positive lymph nodes. Patients diagnosed with EIN via hysteroscopy vs. an endometrial biopsy had the lowest risk of being upstaged to EC.

CONCLUSIONS

Upstaging from EIN to EC occurred in 45.3% of the 95 patients emphasizing the value of performing surgicopathologic staging in this setting. In contrast, none of the 50 EIN patients who underwent lymph node resection had positive lymph nodes indicating morbidity risk with low likelihood of clinical benefit. We identified risk factors for upstaging to EC, including age ≥65 years and endometrial thickness ≥15 mm, and confirmed the diagnostic superiority of hysteroscopy. These findings have informed clinical practice guideline recommendations for the surgical management of EIN in the Military Health System.

Sentinel Lymph Node in Endometrial Hyperplasia: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Background/Objectives: Endometrial hyperplasia is a uterine pathology characterized by the abnormal proliferation of endometrial glands, resulting in an increased gland-to-stroma ratio. Complex atypical hyperplasia represents the primary precursor to endometrial cancer. Given the high risk of progression to endometrial adenocarcinoma, the accurate diagnosis and classification of endometrial hyperplasia are crucial. Since the treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia is the same as that for early-stage endometrial cancer (i.e., total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), researchers have questioned whether sentinel lymph node mapping could also have a prognostic role in atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from 2014 to 2025. Of the 65 papers found, 31 relevant articles were selected based on inclusion criteria, focusing on sentinel lymph node staging in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. This review aims to assess whether sentinel lymph node mapping can be routinely used for prognostic and therapeutic purposes in clinical practice. Results: Sentinel lymph node biopsy represents a promising diagnostic technique for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia, reducing the need for invasive procedures and postoperative risks. However, its application requires advanced surgical skills and access to specific technologies, raising ethical and financial concerns, while future studies could improve patient selection and the reliability of the procedure through technological innovations. Conclusions: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a safe and effective method for staging early-stage endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia, with low metastasis rates, but future research should focus on identifying patients who would benefit most from this procedure, considering its costs and required expertise.

Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Concurrent Endometrial Cancer and Risk for Pelvic Sentinel Node Metastases

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Given the risk of a progression, or an undiagnosed endometrial cancer (EC), the treatment of choice is hysterectomy in women with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). The risk of metastatic disease and whether sentinel node (SLN) biopsy should be performed remains unclear. The primary aim of this prospective study was to determine the overall incidence of concurrent EC and the impact of the diagnostic tool used and the type of endometrial lesion. The secondary aim was to investigate the risk of metastatic SLNs.

METHODS

Between July 2019 and May 2024, 98 consecutive women with EIN deemed suitable for robotic surgery and SLN dissection were included in the study. Ultrastaging and immunohistochemistry were performed on all SLNs.

RESULTS

In total, 47% of women with preoperative EIN had EC on final histology; 13% of these had metastatic SLNs and the overall risk of metastases was 6.3%. Women who obtained their diagnosis by an endometrial biopsy had 65% risk of EC. All women with metastatic SLNs had non-polypoid lesions and five out of six obtained their diagnosis through endometrial biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of SLN metastases was 6.3%, all in women with a general endometrial thickening and/or a diagnosis of EIN by office endometrial biopsy, suggesting that SLN detection should be offered particularly to women with EIN who fulfill these preoperative criteria.

Should we prioritise proper surgical staging for patients with Atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH)? Experience from a single-institution tertiary care oncology centre

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the incidence of concurrent endometrial cancer (EC) and lymph node positivity in patients with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia (AEH) who underwent surgical staging with sentinel lymph node evaluation. It also sought to identify the risk factors associated with detecting concurrent endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of AEH.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, involving 54 cases of AEH diagnosed on pre-operative biopsy specimens and undergoing staging surgery between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. The study analysed demographic parameters, clinical presentations, pathological features, and clinical outcomes. Categorical variables were expressed in numbers and percentages, normal distribution data were presented as mean, and non-normal distribution data were presented as median and range.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients diagnosed with AEH underwent surgical staging. The median age was 54 years. Final HistoPathology Report (HPR) showed 48.14 % with AEH and 51.85 % with concurrent EC. Among those with concurrent EC, 96.4 % had type I EC, and one patient was upgraded to type 2 EC. Among them, 17.8 % patients belonged to high-intermediate and high-risk categories. Patients with AEH and concurrent EC were more likely to be diabetic (OR: 3.56, p = 0.04), have a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (OR: 1.47, p = 0.04), exhibit a thickened endometrial lining of ≥9 mm (OR: 3.13, p = 0.05) on ultrasound, and undergo preoperative biopsy at a non-oncology centre (OR: 8.33, p = 0.001) whereas experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding had a substantially lower likelihood (OR: 0.29, p = 0.01) of developing concurrent EC.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed that more than half of patients undergoing staging surgery for AEH were found to be at risk of having concurrent EC in their final HPR. The research also pointed out that surgical staging can help identify both low-risk and high-risk ECs, which may require additional treatment. Higher BMI, diabetes mellitus, and an endometrial thickness of ≥9 mm were identified as significant risk factors for concurrent EC. Additionally, heavy menstrual bleeding was associated with a decreased risk of concurrent EC.

Surgical nodal assessment for endometrial hyperplasia - A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and atypical hyperplasia (AH) are recognized precursors for endometrial cancer (EC). Most current guidelines do not recommend the routine surgical evaluation of lymph nodes (LN), although recent studies indicate increased use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN/AH. We aimed to evaluate the rates of positive LN and its effect on the incidence of upstaging of EIN/AH patients, complications, and adjuvant treatment administration.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE(R) using the OvidSP interface and PUBMED, Embase, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Library. Included were studies investigating lymph node evaluation in patients diagnosed with EIN/AH, presenting results of LN assessment and/or comparisons of hysterectomy results with and without lymph node assessment. This analysis was registered at PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42023443598).

RESULTS

A total of 447 studies were initially identified through database searching. The current analysis includes 7 studies comprising 1791 atypical endometrial hyperplasia patients who underwent hysterectomy with lymph node assessment. The incidence of positive lymph nodes among those who had undergone any LN evaluation was found to be 1.1% (95% CI 0.3%-2%). The rate of positive LNs was 1.4% (95% CI 0.2%-1.9%) among those who had undergone specifically SLN. 319 (44.3%, 95% CI 34%-54.7%) patients of the patients initially diagnosed with EIN/AH (n = 699), were finally upgraded to EC diagnosis. Fifteen percent of the final EC diagnosed patients were treated with adjuvant treatment. No significant difference regarding complication rates was noticed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review indicates that the rate of metastatic LNs is <2% in patients undergoing surgical nodal evaluation for EIN/AH. However, the rate of complication for SLN mapping is low and may have an impact on postoperative therapy decisions in those diagnosed with malignancy.

Risks and benefits of sentinel lymph node evaluation in the management of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

INTRODUCTION

Endometroid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a premalignant lesion to endometrial cancer. Increasing number of gynecologic oncologists are performing sentinel lymph node (SLN) evaluation during hysterectomy for EIN to ensure complete staging if there is cancer on the final specimen. However, there are no clear guidelines and the benefits and risks to performing SLN evaluation for EIN patients are unclear.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review examines the advantages and disadvantages of SLN evaluation for EIN patients and provides an algorithm to assist clinicians in selectively applying the procedure for maximal patient benefit. Relevant articles up to March 2024 were obtained from a PubMed search on SLN use with endometrial pathology.

EXPERT OPINION

Sentinel lymph node evaluation for patients with EIN is safe, feasible, and particularly important for the approximately 10% of patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma on final pathology. However, as most diagnosed carcinomas are low-risk, SLN evaluation would have limited oncologic benefit. While SLN assessment may overtreat most patients with EIN, a significant minority of patients will be improperly staged. We propose an algorithm highlighting the importance of maximal preoperative endometrial sampling and stratifying patients via risk factors to selectively identify those who would benefit most from SLN evaluation.

Utilization and Surgical Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the rate and surgical outcomes of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN).

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study that used the prospective American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Women with EIN on postoperative pathology who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy from 2012 to 2020 were included. The cohort was dichotomized based on the performance of SLN biopsy. Patients' characteristics, perioperative morbidity, and mortality were compared between patients who underwent SLN biopsy and those who did not. Postoperative complications were defined using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

RESULTS

Overall, 4,447 patients were included; of those, 586 (13.2%) underwent SLN biopsy. The proportion of SLN biopsy has increased steadily from 0.6% in 2012 to 26.1% in 2020 ( P <.001), with a rate of 16% increase per year. In a multivariable regression that included age, body mass index (BMI), and year of surgery, a more recent year of surgery was independently associated with an increased adjusted odds ratio of undergoing SLN biopsy (1.51, 95% CI, 1.43-1.59). The mean total operative time was longer in the SLN biopsy group (139.50±50.34 minutes vs 131.64±55.95 minutes, P =.001). The rate of any complication was 5.9% compared with 6.7%, the rate of major complications was 2.3% compared with 2.4%, and the rate of minor complications was 4.1% compared with 4.9% for no SLN biopsy and SLN biopsy, respectively. In a single complications analysis, the rate of venous thromboembolism was higher in the SLN biopsy group (four [0.7%] vs four [0.1%], P =.013). In a multivariable regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, uterus weight, and preoperative hematocrit, the performance of SLN biopsy was not associated with any complications, major complications, or minor complications.

CONCLUSION

The performance of SLN biopsy in EIN is increasing. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for EIN is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and a negligible increased surgical time.

Machine learning for prediction of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictive clinico-pathologic factors for concurrent endometrial carcinoma (EC) among patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using machine learning.

METHODS

a retrospective analysis of 160 patients with a biopsy proven EIN. We analyzed the performance of multiple machine learning models (n = 48) with different parameters to predict the diagnosis of postoperative EC. The prediction variables included: parity, gestations, sampling method, endometrial thickness, age, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, serum CA-125, preoperative histology and preoperative hormonal therapy. Python 'sklearn' library was used to train and test the models. The model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and AUC. Five iterations of internal cross-validation were performed, and the mean values were used to compare between the models.

RESULTS

Of the 160 women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN, 37.5% (60) had a post-op diagnosis of EC. In univariable analysis, there were no significant predictors of EIN. For the five best machine learning models, all the models had a high specificity (71%-88%) and a low sensitivity (23%-51%). Logistic regression model had the highest specificity 88%, XG Boost had the highest sensitivity 51%, and the highest positive predictive value 62% and negative predictive value 73%. The highest area under the curve was achieved by the random forest model 0.646.

CONCLUSIONS

Even using the most elaborate AI algorithms, it is not possible currently to predict concurrent EC in women with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN. As women with EIN have a high risk of concurrent EC, there may be a value of surgical staging including sentinel lymph node evaluation, to more precisely direct adjuvant treatment in the event EC is identified on final pathology.

Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Concurrent Cancer: A Comprehensive Overview on a Challenging Clinical Condition

The present review regarding atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) focused on the main debated factors regarding this challenging clinical condition: (i) predictive variables of occult endometrial cancer (EC); (ii) the rate of EC underestimation according to different endometrial sampling methods; and (iii) the appropriateness of lymph node status assessment. When cancer is detected, approximately 90% of cases include low-risk EC, although intermediate/high-risk cases have been found in 10-13% of women with cancer. Older age, diabetes, high BMI, and increased endometrial thickness are the most recurrent factors in women with EC. However, the predictive power of these independent variables measured on internal validation sets showed disappointing results. Relative to endometrial sampling methods, hysteroscopic endometrial resection (Hys-res) provided the lowest EC underestimation, ranging between 6 and 11%. Further studies, including larger sample sizes of women undergoing Hys-res, are needed to confirm these findings. These data are urgently needed, especially for female candidates for conservative treatment. Finally, the evaluation of lymph node status measured on 660 of over 20,000 women showed a lymph node positivity of 2.3%. Although there has been an increase in the use of this procedure in AEH in recent years, the present data cannot recommend this option in AEH based on a cost/risk/benefit ratio.

Vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of low-risk endometrial cancer: Surgical technique, costs, and perioperative and oncologic results

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe an operative technique for vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and assess the costs, perioperative, and oncological outcomes for this procedure when used in the treatment of patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (LREC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted on patients who underwent VH to treat precursor and invasive endometrial lesions between April 2019 and November 2021 at a single center in São Paulo, Brazil.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 61.9 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 34. Obese patients (BMI ≥ 30) accounted for 77% of the sample. Preoperative functional capacity measures were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1 and ECOG-2 for 91% and 9% of the patients, respectively. The mean operative time and length of hospital stay were 109 min and 1.2 days, respectively. Four patients had a conversion of the surgical route to laparotomy. No major intraoperative complications were observed. Patients who underwent surgical conversion had a greater uterine volume (227 versus 107 mL, p = 0.006) and longer operative time (177 versus 96 min, p = 0.001). The total cost associated with VH was, on average, US$ 2058.77 (R$ 10,925.91), representing 47% of the cost associated with non-vaginal routes. Twenty-eight patients received a definitive diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma; of these, three received adjuvant radiotherapy. The mean follow-up period was 34.6 months for the patients diagnosed with cancer. One case of disease recurrence occurred 16.6 months after surgery, with one death at 28.6 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that VH could be a feasible and cost-effective alternative for selected patients with LREC in low-resource settings.

Sentinel lymph node assessment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases in patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intra-epithelial neoplasia and endometrial cancer in hysterectomy specimens.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023416769). MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus databases were searched from inception until April 2023. The inclusion criteria were patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intra-epithelial neoplasia undergoing hysterectomy who did or did not undergo SLN assessment.

RESULTS

Four studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were non-randomized studies with a total of 10 217 patients, 1044 in the SLN group and 9173 in the non-nodal assessment group. The unilateral and bilateral detection rate was 89% (I2=27.6%, 2 studies, 342 participants, 304 events) and 79% (I2=89.2%, 2 studies, 342 participants, 271 events), respectively. The rate of involved SLNs was 1.6% (I2=0%, 3 studies, 424 participants, 7 involved SLN) and 3.5% (I2=0%, 3 studies, 197 participants, 7 involved SLN) in patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intra-epithelial neoplasia as the denominator and in those with endometrial cancer in the hysterectomy specimen, respectively. The cancer rate in the hysterectomy specimen was 45% (I2=72.8%, 3 studies, 503 participants, 224 events) and the most frequent endometrial cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage was IA in 199 (89.2%) patients. The complication rate was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The rate of SLN metastases in patients with pre-operative atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intra-epithelial neoplasia is less than 2%, suggesting that routine SLN evaluation may not be necessary in this population.

Concurrent Endometrial Cancer in Women with Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia: What Is the Predictive Value of Patient Characteristics?

BACKGROUND

The rate of concurrent endometrial cancer (EC) in atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) can be as high as 40%. Some patient characteristics showed associations with this occurrence. However, their real predictive power with related validation has yet to be discovered. The present study aimed to assess the performance of various models based on patient characteristics in predicting EC in women with AEH.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multi-institutional study including women with AEH undergoing definitive surgery. The women were divided according to the final histology (EC vs. no-EC). The available cases were divided into a training and validation set. Using k-fold cross-validation, we built many predictive models, including regressions and artificial neural networks (ANN).

RESULTS

A total of 193/629 women (30.7%) showed EC at hysterectomy. A total of 26/193 (13.4%) women showed high-risk EC. Regression and ANN models showed a prediction performance with a mean area under the curve of 0.65 and 0.75 on the validation set, respectively. Among the best prediction models, the most recurrent patient characteristics were age, body mass index, Lynch syndrome, diabetes, and previous breast cancer. None of these independent variables showed associations with high-risk diseases in women with EC.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient characteristics did not show satisfactory performance in predicting EC in AEH. Risk stratification in AEH based mainly on patient characteristics may be clinically unsuitable.

Lymph node evaluation for endometrial hyperplasia: a nationwide analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy in the ambulatory setting

BACKGROUND

Given the possibility of occult endometrial cancer where nodal status confers important prognostic and therapeutic data, role of lymph node evaluation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia is currently under active investigation. The objective of the current study was to examine the characteristics related to lymph node evaluation at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy when performed for endometrial hyperplasia in an ambulatory surgery setting.

METHODS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 49,698 patients with endometrial hyperplasia who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy from 1/2016 to 12/2019. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was fitted to assess the characteristics related to lymph node evaluation at hysterectomy and a classification tree model with recursive partitioning analysis was constructed to examine the utilization pattern of lymph node evaluation.

RESULTS

Lymph node evaluation was performed in 2847 (5.7%) patients. In a multivariable analysis, (i) patient factors with older age, obesity, high census-level household income, and large fringe metropolitan, (ii) surgical factors with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and recent year surgery, (iii) hospital parameters with large bed capacity, urban setting, and Western U.S. region, and (iv) histology factor with presence of atypia were independently associated with increased utilization of lymph node evaluation at hysterectomy (all, P < 0.05). Among those independent factors, presence of atypia exhibited the largest association for lymph node evaluation (adjusted odds ratio 3.75, 95% confidence interval 3.39-4.16). There were 20 unique patterns of lymph node evaluation based on histology, hysterectomy type, patient age, year of surgery, and hospital bed capacity, ranging from 0 to 20.3% (absolute rate difference, 20.3%).

CONCLUSION

Lymph node evaluation at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia in the ambulatory surgery setting appears to be evolving with large variability based on histology type, hysterectomy modality, patient factors, and hospital parameters, warranting a consideration of developing clinical practice guidelines.

Incidence of endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia versus atypical endometrial polyp

ObjectiveOur study's primary aim was to compare the incidence of endometrial carcinoma in patients with a presurgical diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia confined to the endometrium (EIN-E) versus endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia confined to a polyp (EIN-P). Our secondary aim was to examine the difference in pathological features, prognostic risk groups and sentinel lymph node involvement between the two groups.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study between January 2014 and December 2020 in a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. The study considered the characteristics of women who underwent hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). We compared EIN-E diagnosed by endometrial sampling via dilatation curettage or hysteroscopic curettage vs EIN-P. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight women were included in the study, of those, 50 were women with EIN-P (EIN-P group) and 38 were women with EIN following an endometrial biopsy (EIN-E group).The median age was 57.5 years (range; 52-68) in the EIN-P group as compared with 63 years (range; 53-71) in the EIN-E group (p=0.47). Eighty-nine percent of the women in the EIN-E group presented with abnormal uterine bleeding whereas 46% of the women in the EIN-P group were asymptomatic (p=0.001). Pathology results following hysterectomy revealed concurrent endometrial carcinoma in 26% of women in the EIN-P group compared with 47% of women in the EIN-E group (p=0.038). Multivariate analysis showed that endometrial cancer was significantly less common in the EIN-P group (overall response (OR)=0.3 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.1-0.9, p=0.03). Eighty-four percent of cancers were grade one in the EIN-P group compared with 50% in the EIN-E group (p=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent endometrial cancer is less frequent with EIN-P than with EIN-E. The high incidence of endometrial carcinoma in both groups supports the current advice to perform hysterectomy for post-menopausal women. Our data does not support performing sentinel lymph node dissection for EIN-P that was completely resected. The benefit of sentinel lymph node dissection for women with pre-operative EIN-E is yet to be determined.

Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: A practice to preserve or abandon?

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes of patients with premalignant endometrial pathology undergoing hysterectomy with or without sentinel lymph node (SLN) removal. Outcomes of interest included surgical adverse events (AEs), cancer status on final pathology, postoperative treatment, and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular risk profiles.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with premalignant pathology on preoperative endometrial biopsy who underwent hysterectomy with or without SLN mapping/excision at our institution from 01/01/2017-12/31/2021. Clinical, pathologic, surgical, and TCGA profiling data were abstracted. Appropriate statistical tests were used.

RESULTS

Of 221 patients identified, 161 (73%) underwent hysterectomy with SLN excision and 60 (27%) underwent hysterectomy without SLN excision. Median age and body mass index were similar between groups. Median operative time was 130 min for those who underwent SLN mapping/excision versus 136 min for those who did not (p = 0.6). Thirty-day postoperative AE rates were 9% (n = 15/161) and 13% (n = 8/60), respectively (p = 0.9). Ninety-eight (44%) of 221 patients had grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer on final pathology (4 [4%] were stage IB or higher). Ten (10%) of 98 patients, all within the SLN group, received adjuvant treatment. Among all patients, of 33 (15%) with TCGA molecular classification data, 27 (82%) had copy number-low, 3 (9%) microsatellite instability-high, 2 (6%) POLE-ultramutated, and 1 (3%) copy number-high disease.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN assessment appears safe, detects a small number of occult nodal metastases for those upstaged, and provides additional staging information that can guide adjuvant treatment. SLN mapping should be discussed in preoperative counseling and offered using a shared decision-making approach.

Is sentinel lymph node assessment useful in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of underlying high-intermediate (high-IM) and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and to assess the impact of the information retrieved from the sentinel lymph node (SLN) on adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy, optional bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and lymph nodes assessment for EIN between December 2007 and August 2021.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty two (162) eligible patients were included, of whom 101 (62.3%) had a final diagnosis of EIN, while 61 (37.7%) were ultimately diagnosed with carcinoma. Out of 15 patients with high-IM to high-risk disease (9.25% of all EIN), 12 had grade 2-3 EC including 8 with >50% myometrial invasion, 2 with serous subtype, 1 with cervical invasion and 2 with pelvic lymph nodes involvement. Of the 3 patients with grade 1 EC, one patient had disease involving the adnexa and 2 patients had tumor invading >50% of the myometrium and with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Ten patients received vaginal brachytherapy after surgery, 3 patients with extrauterine spread were treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy and pelvic external-beam radiotherapy and 2 patients with early-stage serous carcinoma received chemotherapy followed by vaginal brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Information from SLN, even when negative, can be helpful in the management of patients with EC after preoperative EIN, as some patients are found to have high-IM to high-risk disease on final pathology. These patients would require either re-staging surgery or adjuvant external beam radiotherapy, both could be avoided by proper staging.

Clinical, Sonographic, and Hysteroscopic Features of Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosed after Hysterectomy in Patients with a Preoperative Diagnosis of Atypical Hyperplasia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) is a precancerous condition implying a high risk of concurrent endometrial cancer (EC), which might be occult and only diagnosed at postoperative histopathological examination after hysterectomy. Our study aimed to investigate potential differences in preoperative clinical, sonographic, and hysteroscopic characteristics in patients with AEH and postoperative diagnosis of EC.

METHODS

a retrospective single-center study was carried out on a case series of 80 women with AEH undergoing diagnostic workup, including ultrasonography and hysteroscopy, with subsequent hysterectomy. Women with AEH confirmed at the histopathological examination were compared with patients with a postoperative diagnosis of EC.

RESULTS

in our population, EC was diagnosed in 53 women, whereas the preoperative diagnosis of AEH was confirmed in 27 cases. At ultrasonography, women with occult EC showed greater endometrial thickness (20.3 mm vs. 10.3 mm, p 0.001) and size of the endocavitary lesion (maximum diameter 25.2 mm vs. 10.6 mm, p 0.001), and a higher prevalence of irregular endometrial-myometrial junction (40.5% vs. 6.7%, p 0.022) and endouterine vascularization at color Doppler (64.2% vs. 34.6%, p 0.017). At hysteroscopy, patients with occult EC showed a higher prevalence of necrosis (44.2% vs. 4.2%, p 0.001) and atypical vessels (70.6% vs. 33.3%, p 0.003), whereas true AEH mainly presented as a protruding intracavitary lesion (77.8% vs. 50.9%, p 0.029). In EC, subjective assessment by the operator was more frequently indicative of cancer (80.0% vs. 12.5%). No difference was found for clinical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

occult EC in AEH may exhibit some differences in ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic patterns of presentation compared with real AEH, which could prompt a more significant suspect for the possible presence of concurrent EC at preoperative diagnostic workup.

Endometrial Hyperplasia

The objectives of this Clinical Expert Series on endometrial hyperplasia are to review the etiology and risk factors, histologic classification and subtypes, malignant progression risks, prevention options, and to outline both surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. Abnormal uterine and postmenopausal bleeding remain the hallmark of endometrial pathology, and up to 10-20% of postmenopausal bleeding will be either hyperplasia or cancer; thus, immediate evaluation of any abnormal bleeding with either tissue procurement for pathology or imaging should be undertaken. Although anyone with a uterus may develop atypical hyperplasia, also known as endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), genetic predispositions (eg, Lynch syndrome), obesity, chronic anovulation, and polycystic ovarian syndrome all markedly increase these risks, whereas use of oral contraceptive pills or progesterone-containing intrauterine devices will decrease the risk. An EIN diagnosis carries a high risk of concomitant endometrial cancer or eventual progression to cancer in the absence of treatment. The definitive and curative treatment for EIN remains hysterectomy; however, the obesity epidemic, the potential desire for fertility-sparing treatments, the recognition of varying rates of malignant transformation, medical comorbidities, and an aging population all may factor into decisions to employ nonsurgical treatment modalities.

Preoperative detection of occult endometrial malignancies in endometrial hyperplasia to improve primary surgical therapy: A scoping review of the literature

The risk of undertreating occult endometrial cancer is a problem faced by gynecologists when treating endometrial hyperplasia. The objective of this study is to highlight diagnostic adjuncts to endometrial sampling techniques to improve preoperative detection of co-existing cancer. A systematic search of databases till July 2021: PubMed, ISI-Clarivate Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL. A search of the related literature was also carried out. Two authors screened potential studies. Studies were included if they examined the diagnostic performance of any predictors of concurrent cancer in patients diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia. Authors charted variables related to literature characteristics (e.g., authors, year of publication), population characteristics (e.g., preoperative diagnoses), and variables related to our research questions (e.g., postoperative diagnoses, risk predictors). After screening 591 potential studies, 28 studies were included. Studies included the data of 7409 endometrial hyperplasia patients with 2377 concurrent endometrial cancer cases (32.1%). Forty potential predictors of concurrent cancer were investigated. We examined three categories of potential predictors: clinical (22 studies), histopathologic/imaging (16 studies), and molecular (six studies) predictors. The proposed predictors, age, menopausal status, diabetes, WHO and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia histopathologic criteria, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and molecular profiling are promising diagnostic adjuncts.

Endometrial stripe thickness: a preoperative marker to identify patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia who may benefit from sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy

OBJECTIVES

The goal of our study was to identify preoperative factors in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia that are associated with concurrent endometrial cancer to select patients who may benefit from sentinel lymph node (SLN) assessment at the time of hysterectomy.

METHODS

Retrospective single institution cohort study of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia who underwent hysterectomy with or without staging from January 2010 to July 2020. Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Of 378 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, 275 (73%) had endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia and 103 (27%) had invasive cancer on final pathology. Age (p=0.003), race (p=0.02), and hypertension (p=0.02) were significantly associated with concurrent endometrial cancer. The median preoperative endometrial stripe was significantly greater in the endometrial cancer group (14 mm (range 10-19)) than in the endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia group (11 mm (range 8-16); p=0.002). A preoperative endometrial stripe ≥20 mm was associated with double the risk of endometrial cancer on final pathology (crude RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.9) and preoperative endometrial stripe ≥15 mm was 2.5 times more likely to be associated with high risk Mayo criteria on final pathology (crude RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.2). Of those with concurrent endometrial cancer, 5% were stage IB, 29% had tumors >2 cm, and 1% had grade 3 histology. Only 3% of all patients underwent lymph node evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, less than a third had invasive cancer and even fewer had pathologic features considered high risk for nodal metastasis, arguing against the use of routine SLN dissection in these patients. Endometrial stripe ≥15 mm may be a useful preoperative marker to identify patients at higher risk for concurrent endometrial cancer and may be an important criterion for use of selective SLN dissection in carefully selected patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

A Study on the Detection Rates and Location of Sentinel Lymph Node in Patients with Gynecologic Cancers

Introduction

Sentinel lymph node mapping is emerging as an accurate technique to assess the lymph nodal status while reducing surgical and postoperative morbidity. Present study looks into the detection rates and location of sentinel nodes during Sentinel node mapping when Indocyanine green dye was used as a tracer.

Methods

This is a single institutional study with details retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent sentinel node mapping using ICG dye for atypical hyperplasia, endometrial and cervical cancers from February 2015 to April 2020 were included. Location of the sentinel node was taken from the graphical record maintained during surgery. The data obtained are expressed as number and percentage and/or mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Chi-square test was performed to compare categorical variables.

Results

Two hundred and seventy-nine patients underwent sentinel node mapping with ICG dye during this period. Mapping was successful in 270 patients (96.8%) with 85% having successful bilateral mapping. Obturator was the most common location (52%) followed by external iliac (34%). There was no significant difference in detection among patients with BMI less than 30 or more than 30. The detection rate across various histologies of endometrial cancer was also similar.

Conclusion

Sentinel node mapping using ICG dye has got excellent overall and bilateral detection rates making it a valuable tool. Obturator was found to be the most common location for the sentinel node. Mapping using ICG dye yield good detection rates in all histologies of endometrial cancer and in patients with high BMI.

Surgical and oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph node sampling in elderly patients with intermediate to high-risk endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of elderly patients with intermediate to high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing staging with sentinel lymph node (SLN) sampling and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of elderly (>65-year-old) patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer between December 2007 and August 2017. These patients had been treated at a single center in Montreal, Canada. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes of three cohorts undergoing surgical staging in non-overlapping eras: 1) lymphadenectomy, 2) lymphadenectomy and SLN sampling, 3) SLN sampling alone. Using life tables, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests, we analyzed 2-year progression-free survival, overall survival, and disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

Our study included 278 patients with a median age of 73 years (range; 65-91): 84 (30.2%) underwent lymphadenectomy, 120 (43.2%) underwent SLN sampling with lymphadenectomy, and 74 (26.6%) had SLN sampling alone. The SLN sampling alone group had shorter operative times with a median duration of 199 minutes (range, 75-393) compared with 231 (range, 125-403) and 229 (range, 151-440) minutes in the SLN sampling with lymphadenectomy and lymphadenectomy cohorts; respectively (p<0.001). The SLN sampling alone group also had lower estimated blood loss with a median loss of 20 mL (range, 5-150) vs 25 mL (range, 5-800) and 40 mL (range, 5-400) in the SLN sampling with lymphadenectomy and lymphadenectomy cohorts, respectively (p=0.002). The 2 year overall survival and progression-free survival were not significantly different between the three groups (p=0.45, p=0.51, respectively). On multivariable analysis after adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, stage, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion, adding SLN sampling was associated with better overall survival, (HR 0.2, CI [0.1 to 0.6], p=0.006) and progression-free survival (HR 0.5, CI [0.1 to 1.0], p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node-based surgical staging is feasible and associated with better surgical outcomes and comparable oncological outcomes in elderly patients with intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer.

Multimodal MRI-Based Radiomics-Clinical Model for Preoperatively Differentiating Concurrent Endometrial Carcinoma From Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia

Objectives

To develop and validate a radiomics model based on multimodal MRI combining clinical information for preoperative distinguishing concurrent endometrial carcinoma (CEC) from atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH).

Materials and Methods

A total of 122 patients (78 AEH and 44 CEC) who underwent preoperative MRI were enrolled in this retrospective study. Radiomics features were extracted based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. After feature reduction by minimum redundancy maximum relevance and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm, single-modal and multimodal radiomics signatures, clinical model, and radiomics-clinical model were constructed using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to assess the models.

Results

The combined radiomics signature of T2WI, DWI, and ADC maps showed better discrimination ability than either alone. The radiomics-clinical model consisting of multimodal radiomics features, endometrial thickness >11mm, and nulliparity status achieved the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.932 (95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.880-0.984), bootstrap corrected AUC of 0.922 in the training set, and AUC of 0.942 (95% CI: 0.852-1.000) in the validation set. Subgroup analysis further revealed that this model performed well for patients with preoperative endometrial biopsy consistent and inconsistent with postoperative pathologic data (consistent group, F1-score = 0.865; inconsistent group, F1-score = 0.900).

Conclusions

The radiomics model, which incorporates multimodal MRI and clinical information, might be used to preoperatively differentiate CEC from AEH, especially for patients with under- or over-estimated preoperative endometrial biopsy.

Hysterectomy with a General Gynecologist vs. Gynecologic Oncologist in the Setting of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a hysterectomy, which has a 43% risk of concomitant endometrial cancer on final pathology. General gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists perform hysterectomies; however, patients who have a hysterectomy for EIN with a general gynecologist and are found to have cancer may require a second surgery by a gynecologic oncologist to complete staging. There is current ongoing discussion regarding whether patients with EIN should be provided the option to receive the initial hysterectomy with a gynecologic oncologist.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand if patients with EIN should be initially referred to a gynecologic oncologist for treatment, we examined the cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy by general gynecologists versus gynecologic oncologists for patients with EIN.

STUDY DESIGN

We created a decision-analytic model using TreeAge Pro software to compare outcomes between patients with EIN undergoing hysterectomy by a general gynecologist versus a gynecologic oncologist. Our theoretical cohort contained 200,000 patients, an estimate of the number of individuals diagnosed with EIN each year in the United States. Outcomes included costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), primary lymph node dissection (LND), secondary LND, surgical site infection, and perioperative mortality. We assumed that surgical morbidity and mortality were the same under generalist and specialist care and applied costs of travel and lost work for those seeing a gynecologic oncologist. We performed univariable sensitivity analyses as well as multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis to assess the model's robustness given the uncertainty of model inputs.

RESULTS

In our theoretical cohort of 200,000 patients with EIN, hysterectomy with a gynecologic oncologist was associated with a decrease in 10,811 second surgeries for LND, 87 surgical site infections, and 9 perioperative mortalities. When hysterectomy was performed by a general gynecologist, 9 fewer patients had a LND due to perioperative mortalities that occurred prior to LND with a gynecologic oncologist. Hysterectomy with a gynecologic oncologist was the dominant, cost-effective strategy as it saved $116 million and increased QALYs by 180. In our univariable analyses, hysterectomy with a gynecologic oncologist was cost-saving and increased QALYs over a wide range of probabilities and costs for LND, surgical site infection, and perioperative mortality. However, hysterectomy with a gynecologic oncologist is only a cost-effective and cost-saving saving strategy in just over 50% of multivariable simulations, demonstrating that that there is significant uncertainty in the model's cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

In our model, hysterectomy with a gynecologic oncologist for patients with EIN was associated with cost savings and increased QALYs. Our study supports that patients undergoing hysterectomy for EIN at institutions using Mayo criteria to determine need for lymphadenectomy may benefit from surgery with a gynecologic oncologist rather than a general gynecologist to reduce costs and adverse events associated with a second surgery.

Executive Summary of the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference

Evidence for uterine cancer prevention, diagnosis, and special issues from the Uterine Cancer Evidence Review Conference is summarized.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognized the need for educational materials for clinicians on the prevention and early diagnosis of gynecologic cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in evidence review from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and content experts from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review relevant literature, best practices, and existing practice guidelines as a first step toward developing evidence-based educational materials for women's health care clinicians about uterine cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at a virtual meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in January 2021. This article is the evidence summary of the relevant literature and existing recommendations to guide clinicians in the prevention, early diagnosis, and special considerations of uterine cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps are noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy at robotic-assisted hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer

Lymph node (LN) evaluation in endometrial cancer is controversial. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows for an accurate nodal assessment while minimising the risks of a full pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). The aims of this study are to examine the characteristics and peri-operative outcomes of women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) ± SLNB or PLND; to examine the utilisation, feasibility and role of SLNB and compare their peri-operative outcomes. Retrospective cohort study from December 2018 to February 2021 of women who underwent RAH ± LN assessment for endometrial cancer or AH. 115 women underwent RAH. 59% had SLNB, 29% had no LN assessment, and 12% had PLND. The final diagnosis was mostly early stage low-grade disease; Stage 1A-50%, Grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC)-56%. The detection rate was 90%. There was a statistically significant trend towards performing SLNB over time (P value 0.004). There was a statistically shorter length of stay, less estimated blood loss, and shorter surgical duration in the SLNB cohort, compared to the no LN assessment cohort (P values 0.02, 0.01, and 0.03, respectively). There was statistically significant less estimated blood loss and surgical duration in the SLNB compared to the PLND cohort (P values 0.03 and 0.001, respectively). SLNB at RAH was utilised and feasible. It was safe with a low complication rate and had advantages compared to PLND cohort. SLNB should be considered in suitable selected women undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer or AH.

The utilisation of sentinel lymph node biopsy for endometrial cancer in Australia and New Zealand

AIMS

The aim of this study was to identify to what extent the sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique is utilised by gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand, identifying the techniques used, any barriers to uptake, and management of isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and micrometastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an online survey of all practising gynaecological oncologists in Australia and New Zealand. They were asked whether they utilised SLN biopsy and in what circumstances, how they managed non-mapping and how their multidisciplinary team managed small volume disease. Those who did not were asked to identify their concerns with the procedure, reasons for non-uptake and their alternate technique.

RESULTS

We surveyed 63 gynaecological oncologists of whom 59 were practising, and 48 (81%) responded. Six members (11%) do not utilise SLN biopsy, and 42 (89%) do. Areas where clinicians differ in practice are those areas that are most controversial and include the use of SLN biopsy in complex atypical hyperplasia, the management of ITCs and micrometastases and procedures on unilateral or bilateral non-mapping. Those who do not utilise the technique cite concerns about the false-negative rate, equipment and training issues.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilisation of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer is well established in Australia and New Zealand, with similar practices and concerns to those of other international groups.

Uptake and Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Women With Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the utilization, morbidity, and cost of sentinel lymph node mapping in women undergoing hysterectomy for complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

METHODS

Women with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia who underwent hysterectomy from 2012 to 2018 in the Perspective database were examined. Perioperative morbidity, mortality, and cost were examined based on performance of sentinel lymph node mapping, lymph node dissection or no nodal evaluation.

RESULTS

Among 10,266 women, sentinel lymph node mapping was performed in 620 (6.0%), lymph node dissection in 538 (5.2%), and no lymphatic evaluation in 9,108 (88.7%). Use of sentinel lymph node mapping increased from 0.8% in 2012 to 14.0% in 2018, and the rate of lymph node dissection rose from 5.7% to 6.4% (P<.001). In an adjusted model, residence in the western United States, treatment by high-volume hospitals and use of robotic-assisted hysterectomy were associated with sentinel lymph node mapping (P<.05 for all). The complication rates were similar between the three groups. The median cost for sentinel lymph node mapping ($9,673) and lymph node dissection ($9,754) were higher than in those who did not undergo nodal assessment ($8,435) (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Performance of sentinel lymph node mapping is increasing rapidly for women with complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia but is not associated with increased perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Pelvic lymphadenectomy provides prognostic information for those diagnosed with endometrial (womb) cancer and provides information that may influence decisions regarding adjuvant treatment. However, studies have not shown a therapeutic benefit, and lymphadenectomy causes significant morbidity. The technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), allows the first draining node from a cancer to be identified and examined histologically for involvement with cancer cells. SLNB is commonly used in other cancers, including breast and vulval cancer. Different tracers, including colloid labelled with radioactive technetium-99, blue dyes, e.g. patent or methylene blue, and near infra-red fluorescent dyes, e.g. indocyanine green (ICG), have been used singly or in combination for detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the identification of pelvic lymph node involvement in women with endometrial cancer, presumed to be at an early stage prior to surgery, including consideration of the detection rate.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1946 to July 2019), Embase (1974 to July 2019) and the relevant Cochrane trial registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of tracers for SLN assessment (involving the identification of a SLN plus histological examination) against a reference standard of histological examination of removed pelvic +/- para-aortic lymph nodes following systematic pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PLND/PPALND) in women with endometrial cancer, where there were sufficient data for the construction of two-by-two tables.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (a combination of HN, JM, NW, RG, and WH) independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, classified studies for inclusion/exclusion and extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We calculated the detection rate as the arithmetic mean of the total number of SLNs detected out of the total number of women included in the included studies with the woman as the unit of analysis, used univariate meta-analytical methods to estimate pooled sensitivity estimates, and summarised the results using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

The search revealed 6259 unique records after removal of duplicates. After screening 232 studies in full text, we found 73 potentially includable records (for 52 studies), although we were only able to extract 2x2 table data for 33 studies, including 2237 women (46 records) for inclusion in the review, despite writing to trial authors for additional information. We found 11 studies that analysed results for blue dye alone, four studies for technetium-99m alone, 12 studies that used a combination of blue dye and technetium-99m, nine studies that used indocyanine green (ICG) and near infra-red immunofluorescence, and one study that used a combination of ICG and technetium-99m. Overall, the methodological reporting in most of the studies was poor, which resulted in a very large proportion of 'unclear risk of bias' ratings. Overall, the mean SLN detection rate was 86.9% (95% CI 82.9% to 90.8%; 2237 women; 33 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). In studies that reported bilateral detection the mean rate was 65.4% (95% CI 57.8% to 73.0%) . When considered according to which tracer was used, the SLN detection rate ranged from 77.8% (95% CI 70.0% to 85.6%) for blue dye alone (559 women; 11 studies; low-certainty evidence) to 100% for ICG and technetium-99m (32 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). The rates of positive lymph nodes ranged from 5.2% to 34.4% with a mean of 20.1% (95% CI 17.7% to 22.3%). The pooled sensitivity of SLNB was 91.8% (95% CI 86.5% to 95.1%; total 2237 women, of whom 409 had SLN involvement; moderate-certainty evidence). The sensitivity for of SLNB for the different tracers were: blue dye alone 95.2% (95% CI 77.2% to 99.2%; 559 women; 11 studies; low-certainty evidence); Technetium-99m alone 90.5% (95% CI 67.7% to 97.7%; 257 women; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence); technetium-99m and blue dye 91.9% (95% CI 74.4% to 97.8%; 548 women; 12 studies; low-certainty evidence); ICG alone 92.5% (95% CI 81.8% to 97.1%; 953 women; 9 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); ICG and blue dye 90.5% (95% CI 63.2.6% to 98.1%; 215 women; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence); and ICG and technetium-99m 100% (95% CI 63% to 100%; 32 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Meta-regression analyses found that the sensitivities did not differ between the different tracers used, between studies with a majority of women with FIGO stage 1A versus 1B or above; between studies assessing the pelvic lymph node basin alone versus the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node basin; or between studies that used subserosal alone versus subserosal and cervical injection. It should be noted that a false-positive result cannot occur, as the histological examination of the SLN is unchanged by the results from any additional nodes removed at systematic lymphadenectomy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic test accuracy for SLNB using either ICG alone or a combination of a dye (blue or ICG) and technetium-99m is probably good, with high sensitivity, where a SLN could be detected. Detection rates with ICG or a combination of dye (ICG or blue) and technetium-99m may be higher. The value of a SLNB approach in a treatment pathway, over adjuvant treatment decisions based on uterine factors and molecular profiling, requires examination in a high-quality intervention study.

Preoperative Factors of Endometrial Carcinoma in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinicopathological preoperative factors associated with concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients undergoing surgical management of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

METHODS

The records of all patients who underwent hysterectomy for preoperatively diagnosed atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a tertiary care hospital from April 2017 to April 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients were extracted. Patients who did not undergo hysterectomy or who had evidence of simple hyperplasia or carcinoma on initial biopsy were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed. A multivariate regression model for progression to endometrial carcinoma was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included. Of these patients, 19 (15.1%) had a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma, whereas 86 (68.2%) retained the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 21 (16.7%) were found to have no residual atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were 6.1 times higher (95% CI 1.32-27.68) if they had an endometrial stripe thickness >1.1 cm and 13.5 times higher (95% CI 3.56-51.1) if there was histological suspicion of carcinoma. The odds of a patient being diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were significantly lower if the patient had an initial diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia in a polyp (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02-0.34).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that an endometrial stripe thickness >1.1 cm, a histological suspicion of carcinoma on preoperative pathology, and the absence of polyp involvement on initial diagnosis are the strongest predictors of endometrial carcinoma at the time of hysterectomy in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

Controversies in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Gynecologic Malignancies

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy represents an evolution in the advancement of minimally invasive surgical techniques for gynecologic cancers. Prospective and retrospective studies have consistently shown its accuracy in the detection of lymph node metastases for endometrial and cervical cancers. However, consistent with any emerging surgical technique in the early phases of adoption, new questions have arisen regarding its application and impact. This paper served as a scoping review to identify the key controversies that have arisen in the field of SLN biopsy for endometrial and cervical cancers.

DATA SOURCES

Several key controversies were identified, and PubMed, the Cochrane Library (cochranelibrary.com) advanced search function, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were searched for supporting evidence. These included search terms such as "the accuracy of SLN biopsy for high grade endometrial cancer or cervical cancers >2-cm," "cost effectiveness of SLN biopsy for gynecologic cancers," "clinical significance of low volume metastases in endometrial cancer," "morbidity of SLN biopsy for endometrial and cervical cancer," and "impact on cancer survival of SLN biopsy for endometrial and cervical cancer."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected for review if they included significant numbers of patients, were level I evidence, or were prospective trials. Where this level of evidence failed to exist, seminal observational series that were published in high-quality journals were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Similar studies were listed and subcategorized and cross-compared, excluding those that included repeated analyses of the same patient populations. The relevant clinical trials or observational studies were clustered and reviewed for each chosen controversy. Adequate evidence supports the accuracy of SLN biopsy in the staging of high-grade endometrial cancer and cervical cancer, and it seems to be a cost-effective strategy for invasive endometrial cancer. Conclusive evidence was lacking with respect to the oncologic outcomes related to SLN biopsy, the impact on patient morbidity, and whether clinicians should treat isolated tumor cells in SLNs with adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy is an accepted staging strategy for cervical and endometrial cancer surgery; however, controversies remain in how it can be applied with the most safety and efficacy. These ultimately need to be resolved with further clinical trials and observations of larger series of patients.

Lymph node metastasis probability in young patients eligible for conservative management of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a rare condition in young women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of pelvic lymph node (LN) metastasis in young women with EC who are candidates for conservative management.

METHODS

Using the SEER database, a population-based analysis was conducted to identify women <45 years with grade 1, 2, or 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma stage IA (FIGO 2009) who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy with at least ten LNs removed. The LN macrometastases rate based on conventional histological diagnosis was analyzed according to tumor grade and myometrial invasion (MI) on final histology.

RESULTS

A cohort of 1284 women was analyzed. The LN metastasis rates were: 2/414 (0.5%) grade 1 EC without MI, 5/239 (2.1%) grade 2 or 3 EC without MI, 5/308 (1.6%) grade 1 EC with MI, and 14/323 (4.3%) grade 2 or 3 EC with MI. Tumor size was not correlated with LN metastasis probability.

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients eligible for conservative management have a low rate of LN macrometastasis, especially in stage IA without MI grade 1 EC. A systematic lymphadenectomy should not be performed in these patients. Prospective study evaluating the sentinel LN mapping in conservative management of EC could be performed to assess the LN micrometastasis rate.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes

OBJECTIVES

It is unclear if sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with improved surgical outcomes compared with lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer. In this study we aimed to compare peri-operative surgical outcomes and treatment-related morbidity in patients who underwent robotic-assisted sentinel lymph node biopsy versus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy or hysterectomy alone for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Records were reviewed of consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages I-III endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2016. For the purpose of this analysis we focused on the actual patients who had sentinel node biopsy only (ie, excluding those who had an associated lymphadenectomy either for failed mapping or during the learning curve). We also excluded patients who had para-aortic lymph node dissection from the lymphadenectomy group. Perioperative and 30-day surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent sentinel lymph node assessment and those who had pelvic lymphadenectomy or hysterectomy alone, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting derived from propensity scores was used to minimize allocation bias in the comparison of outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 621 patients were analyzed: 188 (30.3%) with sentinel lymph node biopsy, 198 (31.9%) with pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 235 (37.8%) with hysterectomy alone. Inverse probability of treatment weights analysis balanced for baseline characteristics (age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson co-morbidity index, parity, prior cesarean section, and previous abdominal operation) showed no significant differences in intra-operative and post-operative complications, re-admissions, and re-operations between the groups. Compared with pelvic lymphadenectomy, the sentinel lymph node biopsy group had a shorter mean operative time (138.0 vs 222.8 min, p<0.001) and less median blood loss (50 vs 100 mL, p<0.001). Sentinel lymph node biopsy also was not associated with worse morbidity compared with hysterectomy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy reduces operative times and improves peri-operative surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted staging for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer without worsening the morbidity of hysterectomy alone.

Preoperative predictors of endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, also known as complex atypical hyperplasia, is a precancerous lesion of the endometrium associated with a 40% risk of concurrent endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy. Although a majority of endometrial cancers diagnosed at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia are low risk and low stage, approximately 10% of patients ultimately diagnosed with endometrial cancers will have high-risk disease that would warrant lymph node assessment to guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Given these risks, some physicians choose to refer patients to a gynecologic oncologist for definitive management. Currently, few data exist regarding preoperative factors that can predict the presence of concurrent endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Identification of these factors may assist in the preoperative triaging of patients to general gynecology or gynecologic oncology.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preoperative factors can predict the presence of concurrent endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; and to describe the ability of preoperative characteristics to predict which patients may be at a higher risk for lymph node involvement requiring lymph node assessment at the time of hysterectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy for pathologically confirmed endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia from January 2004 to December 2015. Patient demographics, imaging, pathology, and outcomes were recorded. The "Mayo criteria" were used to determine patients requiring lymphadenectomy. Unadjusted associations between covariates and progression to endometrial cancer were estimated by 2-sample t-tests for continuous covariates and by logistic regression for categorical covariates. A multivariable model for endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy was developed using logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

Of the 1055 charts reviewed, 169 patients were eligible and included. Of these patients, 87 (51.5%) had a final diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/other benign disease, whereas 82 (48.5%) were ultimately diagnosed with endometrial cancer. No medical comorbidities were found to be strongly associated with concurrent endometrial cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer had a thicker average endometrial stripe compared to the patients with no endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy (15.7 mm; standard deviation, 9.5) versus 12.5 mm; standard deviation, 6.4; P = .01). An endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm was associated with 4.0 times the odds of concurrent endometrial cancer (95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.0), controlling for age. In all, 87% of endometrial cancer cases were stage T1a (Nx or N0). Approximately 44% of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and an endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm met the "Mayo criteria" for indicated lymphadenectomy compared to 22% of endometrial cancer patients with an endometrial stripe of <2 cm.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial stripe thickness and age were the strongest predictors of concurrent endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Referral to a gynecologic oncologist may be especially warranted in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia patients with an endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm given the increased rate of concurrent cancer and potential need for lymph node assessment.

Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Endometrial Cancer Update 2018

There are no established data about lymphadenectomy during treatment of endometrial cancers (ECs) and to what extent lymphadenectomy should be performed. In addition, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy increases the intraoperative and postoperative complications. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has the lowest costs and highest quality-adjusted survival. SLN is the most cost-effective strategy in the management of low-risk ECs. Women staged with SLN mapping were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment compared with women staged with systemic lymphadenectomy. This review article designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the methods of SLN detection in ECs.

Does surgical treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia require referral to a gynecologic oncologist?

Patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia in the United States are commonly referred to a gynecologic oncologist, given a moderate risk of concurrent carcinoma. However, selective referral of patients to nononcologic gynecologic surgeons for surgical treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia may offer increased access to care without compromising clinical outcomes. Nononcologic surgeons who consider providing surgical treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia must be able to offer minimally invasive surgery when appropriate and have sufficient surgical volume to deliver optimal clinical outcomes. Patients considering referral to a nononcologic surgeon must be thoroughly counseled regarding the risk of occult malignancy, the possibility of a second surgery for lymph node evaluation and/or oophorectomy, and the risk of morbidity that may accompany a second surgery. Available data suggest that approximately 2-6% of patients will have postoperative risk factors meriting consideration of a second surgery. Patients who are high-risk surgical candidates or who may desire nonsurgical or fertility-sparing treatment should universally be referred for consultation with a gynecologic oncologist.