Interferon alpha-2B and ribavirin in combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, interferon alpha therapy: a randomized trial

A statistical method for removing unbalanced trials with multiple covariates in meta-analysis

In meta-analysis literature, there are several checklists describing the procedures necessary to evaluate studies from a qualitative point of view, whereas preliminary quantitative and statistical investigations on the "combinability" of trials have been neglected. Covariate balance is an important prerequisite to conduct meta-analysis. We propose a method to identify unbalanced trials with respect to a set of covariates, in presence of covariate imbalance, namely when the randomized controlled trials generate a meta-sample that cannot satisfy the requisite of randomization/combinability in meta-analysis. The method is able to identify the unbalanced trials, through four stages aimed at achieving combinability. The studies responsible for the imbalance are identified, and then they can be eliminated. The proposed procedure is simple and relies on the combined Anderson-Darling test applied to the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functions of both experimental and control meta-arms. To illustrate the method in practice, two datasets from well-known meta-analyses in the literature are used.

Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The widely-accepted treatment outcome for chronic hepatitis C is the sustained viral response (that is, no measurable viral RNA in blood six months after treatment). However, this surrogate outcome (as well as the previously employed biochemical and histologic ones) has never been validated. This situation exists because there are very few randomized clinical trials that have used clinical events (mortality or manifestations of decompensated cirrhosis) as outcomes, because those clinical events only occur after many years of infection. Patients in whom initial therapy fails to produce sustained viral responses do become potential candidates for retreatment; some of these individuals are not candidates for ribavirin or protease inhibitors and consideration could be given to retreatment with interferon alone.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of interferon monotherapy retreatment in chronic hepatitis C patients and to validate the currently employed surrogate outcomes in this group of patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until 16 August 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials comparing interferon versus placebo or no treatment in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were mortality (all-cause and hepatic), quality of life, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were liver-related morbidity, sustained viral responses, biochemical responses, histologic improvements, and costs. We used both fixed-effect and random-effects model meta-analyses, reporting only the former if no difference existed.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials were identified. Two of them were at low risk of bias (the HALT-C and EPIC3 trials) and included 1676 patients. Both of these trials addressed the role of long-term low-dose pegylated interferon therapy in patients with severe fibrosis (demonstrated on liver biopsy) and were designed to assess the clinical outcomes. The remaining five trials included 300 patients and were at high risk of bias. Based on all trials reporting the outcomes, no significant difference was observed in either all-cause mortality (78/843 (9.3%) versus 62/867 (7.2%); risk ratio (RR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.79; 3 trials) or hepatic mortality (41/532 (7.7%) versus 40/552 (7.2%); RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.63; 2 trials); however, when only the two trials at low risk of bias were combined, all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the recipients of the pegylated interferon (78/828 (9.4%) versus 57/848 (6.7%); RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.96) although trial sequential analysis could not exclude the possibility of random error. There was less variceal bleeding in the recipients of the interferon (4/843 (0.5%) versus 18/867 (2.1%); RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.67; 3 trials), although again trial sequential analysis could not exclude the presence of a type I error and the effect could not be confirmed in a random-effects model meta-analysis. No significant differences were seen with regard to the development of ascites, encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, or the need for liver transplantation. One trial reported quality of life data; the pain score was significantly worse in the recipients of the pegylated interferon. Adverse effects tended to be more common in the interferon recipients; the ones that were significantly more common included hematologic complications, infections, flu-like symptoms, and rash. The recipients of interferon had significantly more sustained viral responses (20/557 (3.6%) versus 1/579 (0.2%); RR 15.38, 95% CI 2.93 to 80.71; 4 trials) and a type I error was excluded by trial sequential analysis. The METAVIR activity score also improved (36/55 (65%) versus 20/46 (43.5%); RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.18; 2 trials). No significant differences were seen with regard to histologic fibrosis assessments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data were limited to patients with histologic evidence of severe fibrosis who were retreated with pegylated interferon. In this scenario, retreatment with interferon did not appear to provide significant clinical benefit and, when only the trials at low risk of bias were considered, retreatment for several years may even have increased all-cause mortality. Such treatment also produced adverse events. On the other hand, the treatment did result in improvement in some surrogate outcomes, namely sustained viral responses and histologic evidence of inflammation. Interferon monotherapy retreatment cannot be recommended for these patients. No clinical data are available for patients with less severe fibrosis. The sustained viral response cannot be used as a surrogate marker for hepatitis C treatment in this clinical setting with low sustained viral response rates and needs to be validated in others in which higher sustained viral response rates are reported.

L-carnitine supplementation improves hematological pattern in patients affected by HCV treated with Peg interferon-α 2b plus ribavirin

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of L-carnitine on alleviating anemia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia, and minimizing dose reductions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in treatment with Interferon α (IFN-α) plus ribavirin.

METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with chronic hepatitis C were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups. group A (n = 35) received Peg-IFN-α 2b plus ribavirin plus L-carnitine, and group B (n = 34) received Peg-IFN-α and ribavirin for 12 mo. All patients underwent laboratory investigations including: red cell count, hemoglobin, white cell count, platelets, bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and viremia.

RESULTS: After 12 mo in group A compared to group B we observed significant differences in AST 108.8 vs 76.8 (IU/L; P < 0.001), ALT 137.9 vs 112.3 (IU/L; P < 0.001), viremia 4.04 vs 2.36 (× 10⁶ copies/mL; P < 0.001), Hb 1 vs 3.5 (g/dL; P < 0.05), red blood cells 0.3 vs 1.1 (× 10¹²/L; P < 0.001), white blood cells 1.5 vs 3 (× 10⁹/L; P < 0.001) and platelets 86 vs 85 (× 10⁹/L; P < 0.001). The end treatment responders were 18 vs 12 (60% vs 44%) and the non responders were 12 vs 15 (40% vs 50%) [odds ratio (OR) 1.65, 95% CI = 0.65-5.37, P < 0.05]. In group A compared to group B there was a significant improvement of sustained virological response in 15 vs 7 patients (50% vs 25%), while the relapsers were 3 vs 5 (10% vs 18%) (OR 3.57, 95% CI = 0.65-19.3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: L-carnitine supplementations modulate erythropoiesis, leucopoiesis and thrombocytopoiesis, and may be useful in patients treated for HCV. L-carnitine treatment offers the possibility of achieving a sustained virological response while preventing overtreatment.

Interferon combination therapy for HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfection

IFN-α has been the cornerstone of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment for over a decade. Yet, rates of sustained virologic response of HCV infection to interferon-based therapy, particularly in difficult-to-treat populations, have been disappointingly low. This is particularly true in HIV/HCV coinfection, in which less than a third of patients typically respond to therapy. New HCV protease inhibitors, most of which will need to be administered with pegylated interferon, are in development, but comprehensive, long-term data for their use in coinfected patients is not yet available. Understanding the basis of this population's poor response to interferon-based therapy is crucial to future exploration of new therapeutic options, immunotherapy and prognosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected population.

Current antiviral combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients who failed to interferon alfa-based treatment

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Interferon-alfa-based therapy is effective in the treatment of Hepatitis C. However, some patients fail to respond and others relapse, after initially responding. Our objective was to assess the efficacy, safety and predictive factors for sustained virological response (SVR) to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients who failed to interferon-alfa (IFNα)-based therapy.

METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive patients who failed to IFNα-based therapy were retreated with peginterferon plus ribavirin. Of these patients, 85% were infected by genotype 1. The primary endpoint was SVR.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of 75 non-responder (n = 54) or relapser patients (n = 21), 50 were previously treated with IFNα-monotherapy and 25 with IFNα plus ribavirin. Global SVR rate was 41.3%: for patients re-treated with IFNα the response was 48% whilst for those retreated with IFNα plus ribavirin, it was 28%. For previous non-responders the SVR rate was 37% and for relapsers it was 52.4%.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Retreatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin is an effective option for some chronic hepatitis C non-responder or relapser patients. Higher SVR rate was achieved in relapsers and in those patients who received IFNα monotherapy previously.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Standard therapy is ribavirin plus pegylated interferon to achieve undetectable level of virus in the blood, but the effect on clinical outcomes is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained loss of hepatitis C virus, liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses of patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. All outcomes were analysed with the random-effects model. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR). We used trial sequential analyses to examine the robustness of our findings.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 randomised trials with 12,707 patients. Most trials had unclear or high risk of bias. We did not find any significant influence of bias on our results but cannot exclude outcome measure reporting bias as many trials did not report on the primary outcomes of this review. Compared with interferon, ribavirin plus interferon had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.75), relapsers (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.70), non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93), and in all patients (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality in all patients (Peto OR, 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.79), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of haematological, dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnoea, fatigue) adverse reactions. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation and dose reductions. Trial sequential analyses confirmed our findings regarding virological effects, but not regarding liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus from the blood. Combination therapy may reduce liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality, but we need more evidence. The number needed to treat to obtain a beneficial effect is considerable considering the increased risk of several severe adverse reactions and costs.

Ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. A high proportion of patients never experience symptoms. Peginterferon plus ribavirin is the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C. However, ribavirin monotherapy may be considered for some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing ribavirin versus no intervention, placebo, or interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained virological response (loss of hepatitis C virus RNA at least six months after treatment), liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Secondary outcome measures were end of treatment virological response, biochemical response (transaminase activity), and histological response. Randomisation methods, blinding, data handling, and funding were extracted as measures of bias control. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We only present the results of the fixed-effect model if both models provide the same result regarding statistical significance. We present data as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 randomised trials with 657 patients. The majority of trials had unclear control of bias. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin had no significant effect on the sustained virological response (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, five trials) or end of treatment virological response (RD 0% 95% CI -3% to 3%, ten trials). Ribavirin had no significant effect on liver-related morbidity plus mortality (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, 11 trials). Ribavirin significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions, including anaemia. Ribavirin significantly improved end of treatment biochemical and histological response but not the sustained biochemical response. Ribavirin was significantly inferior to interferon regarding virological and biochemical responses (five trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin seems without beneficial effects on serum virological response and liver-related morbidity or mortality, and significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions. Ribavirin monotherapy seems significantly inferior to interferon monotherapy. The total number of included patients is small, and more trials are perhaps needed. The use of ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C cannot be recommended outside randomised trials.

Chronic Hepatitis C: Updated Swedish Consensus

In 1999 a Swedish national expert panel published recommendations for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Recently, pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) products have been introduced, and an increased knowledge concerning treatment of acute HCV and HCV-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection has been gained. As a result of this, an update of the Swedish recommendations was developed following an expert meeting in October 2002. The panel now recommends the use of peg-IFN together with ribavirin as the standard treatment. Owing to the excellent response rates in HCV genotype 2 and 3 infections, these patients can be treated for 24 weeks without preceding liver biopsy. For patients with genotype 1 infection (with a slightly below 50% sustained response rate after 48 weeks treatment) and only mild histological disease, treatment can be postponed until future better treatment options become available. In patients who fail to achieve a 99% reduction (2 log drop) in viral titre after 12 weeks of treatment, discontinuation of therapy is recommended. Patients previously treated with IFN monotherapy and not having achieved a sustained virological response are recommended the same combination treatment as treatment-naive patients. IFN monotherapy is recommended in patients with acute hepatitis C. For children with chronic HCV infection, combination treatment is mainly recommended in clinical trials. For HCV-HIV coinfected patients, combination treatment is recommended and preferably given when blood CD4 counts are above 350/ml and before antiretroviral treatment (ART) is needed. Concurrent ART or prominent liver fibrosis requires frequent monitoring because of the increased risk for mitochondrial toxicity and liver failure.

Correlation of serum ribavirin concentration with pretreatment renal function estimates in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving combination antiviral therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin

Serum ribavirin concentration is an important factor in antiviral therapy in combination with peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C in terms of both beneficial and adverse effects. We evaluated whether the serum ribavirin concentration can be predicted on the basis of renal function estimates. Serum creatinine and cystatin C concentrations were measured at the start of treatment in a total of 148 patients with chronic hepatitis C who underwent combination PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) and total clearance of ribavirin (CL/F) were calculated on the basis of the serum creatinine level. The glomerular filtration rate was calculated with two different formulae on the basis of the serum cystatin C level. These values were compared with serum ribavirin concentrations 4 weeks after the start of therapy. The cystatin C level increased with the progression of liver fibrosis, whereas the creatinine level was constant regardless of the degree of liver fibrosis. Significant correlation was not observed between the serum ribavirin concentration and serum creatinine level, cystatin C level, or calculated renal function estimates. However, significant correlation was found between the serum ribavirin concentration and CrCl and CL/F in patients who were given ribavirin >800 mg/day. Overall, renal function estimates do not correlate with the serum ribavirin concentration in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C who undergo combination PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy. Serum creatinine-based renal function estimates might be predictive for the serum ribavirin concentration only in patients with a daily ribavirin intake of 800 mg or more.

Retreatment of chronic hepatitis C in previous non-responders and relapsers

Therapy for chronic hepatitis C has improved dramatically over the past 20 years. Unfortunately, approximately 50% of those treated do not have a durable response to therapy. Non-responders and relapsers after previous interferon-based therapy are particularly challenging with regard to clinical management. This article provides a general overview of the treatment of hepatitis C and reviews present data regarding management of patients with chronic hepatitis C who are non-responders or relapsers after previous treatment. The review ends with the authors' opinion regarding present management of non-responders and relapsers and future emerging therapies.

WITHDRAWN: Ribavirin with or without alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Ribavirin plus interferon combination therapy is presently considered the optimal treatment of interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C, but its role in relapsers and non-responders to previous interferon therapy is not established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin alone or in combination with alpha interferon in interferon naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through searches on electronic databases: The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (August 2001), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001, MEDLINE (1966 - August 2001), and EMBASE (1985 - August 2001). Manual searches of bibliographies and journals were done as well as authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies producing ribavirin or interferon were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials comparing ribavirin with or without alpha interferon versus no intervention, placebo, or alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the 'sustained' (six months after treatment) virological response, and morbidity plus mortality. The secondary outcome measures were the 'end of treatment' and 'sustained' biochemical response, the 'end of treatment' virologic response, histology, quality of life, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight trials in which 271 patients were randomised to ribavirin versus placebo or no intervention and 48 trials in which 6585 patients were randomised to interferon with or without ribavirin. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin monotherapy had no significant effect on the virological response or histology and only a transient effect on the biochemical response. Compared with interferon, combination therapy reduced the risk of not having a sustained virological response by 26% in naive patients (relative risk (RR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.78), 33% in relapsers (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.57-0.78), and 11% in non-responders (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.96). There was no significant effect on morbidity plus mortality (Peto odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI 0.19-1.06). Irrespective of previous therapy, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of not having a sustained biochemical response (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) or improved histology (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56-0.81). Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.52) and several types of adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy increased the number of naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with a sustained virological, biochemical, or histological response, but also the occurrence of adverse events.

Combination Therapy of Interferon and Ribavirin Versus Interferon Monotherapy in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of interferon and ribavirin combination therapy (CT) versus interferon monotherapy (IMT) in inducing sustained response in interferon-naïve, relapser, and nonresponder chronic hepatitis C patients. A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database for clinical trials published in the period between 1995 and 2003. A total of 31 randomized trials and 7 nonrandomized trials comparing CT with interferon alone or comparing different dose regimens of CT were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was sustained virological response. The summary estimate of the odds ratio was obtained using the random effect model. The study showed that sustained virological response rate was significantly higher in interferon-naïve, relapser, and nonrespondent chronic hepatitis C patients who were on CT compared to IMT (odds ratio = 3.23, 17.65, and 4.71, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in virological and biochemical responses between different dose regimens of CT. Side effects, dose reduction, and treatment discontinuation rates were significantly higher in patients receiving CT compared with IMT. Treatment with interferon plus ribavirin has a significant benefit on the virological and biochemical response in patients with chronic hepatitis C irrespective to the previous treatment, and it should be considered the treatment of choice in naïve, relapser, and nonrespondent chronic hepatitis C patients.

Treatment of Relapsers after Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C

Sustained virologic response rates are significantly higher in patients who have relapsed after a previous course of therapy compared with patients who did not respond. A meta-analysis of combination therapy in patients who failed IFN monotherapy reported SVR rates of 52% in relapsers to prior therapy and 16% in nonresponders. Similarly, relapsers after combination standard IFN and RBV therapy have higher SVR rates than combination of therapy nonresponders when treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. For this reason, patients who relapse after a previous course of therapy should be considered potential candidates for retreatment. Factors that have been associated with SVR in these patients include genotype non-I, low viral loads, and lesser degrees of fibrosis. The course of treatment in all patients who have relapsed after prior therapy should be reviewed to identify possible reasons for failure to achieve an SVR. In particular, optimal dosing of PEG IFN and RBV and the occurrence and timing of treatment dose reductions during prior therapy should be reviewed. The reasons for dose reduction should be addressed before initiating another course of therapy in an effort to optimize the chance for a SVR. Patients who had dose reduction for depression, anemia, or neutropenia, should be considered for antidepressants, erythropoietin, or, if neutropenia is severe, granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy, respectively, during retreatment. Prolongation of therapy beyond 48 weeks in patients with relapse after a standard course of PEG IFN and RBV may offer a chance of SVR. Novel agents currently in development, including protease and polymerase inhibitors, may prove to be therapeutic options for these patients in the future.

Randomized controlled trial of consensus interferon with or without zinc for chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 2

AIM: The beneficial effect of zinc supplementation on the efficacy of interferon as a treatment for chronic hepatitis C had been demonstrated in hepatitis virus genotype 1b of high viral load. This study focused on patients with genotype 2, which is more sensitive to interferon than genotype 1b, and used consensus interferon (CIFN) with or without zinc.

METHODS: We randomized 83 patients with chronic hepatitis C to CIFN at 18 MIU six times/wk for 4 wk, followed by CIFN at 18 MIU six times/wk for another 20 wk, in combination with polaprezinc 300 mg (regimen A, n = 41) or as monotherapy (regimen B, n = 42). Thirty-one patients in regimen A and 33 patients in regimen B completed the clinical trial; the remaining patients withdrew because of side effects or a transfer to another hospital.

RESULTS: Sustained biochemical response, defined as a normal aminotransferase level at the end of the 6-mo post-treatment observation, was 68% and 69%, and sustained virological response, defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at the end of the 6-mo post-treatment observation, was 54% and 67% for regimens A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION: CIFN treatment combined with zinc did not enhance the effect of CIFN as shown by biochemical, virological criteria. No side effects related to polaprezinc were noted.

Traitements complémentaires de l’hépatite chronique virale C

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy represent the standard-of-care treatment for chronic hepatitis C, that allows to cure more than half of the patients. However, the success of this bitherapy is in balance with numerous side effects, especially hematologic and psychiatric. This review is focused on complementary treatments (erythropoietin, G-CSF, vitamin E, glutathion, ursodeoxycholic acid and antidepressants) likely to bring a benefit in maintaining adequate interferon and ribavirin dosages and in improving quality of life. This analysis has been performed by using the Medline(R) data base and with data from laboratories which commercialized these molecules. Erythropoietin, G-CSF and antidepressants are the best tools to optimize the bitherapy in its dose and its duration while privileging the quality of life of HCV-infected patients.

A randomized trial of pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of combination therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) alpha plus ribavirin (RBV) in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in patients who previously failed combination standard IFN plus RBV or IFN monotherapy has not been well established.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-one CHC patients including virologic nonresponders to combination IFN plus RBV (n = 219) or IFN monotherapy (n = 47), and relapsers to combination therapy (n = 55) were randomized to receive PEG IFN alpha-2b 1.5 microg/kg per wk plus RBV 800 mg per day (Regimen A, n = 160) or PEG IFN alpha-2b 1.0 microg/kg per wk plus RBV 1,000-1,200 mg per day (Regimen B, n = 161) for 48 wks.

RESULTS

Sustained virologic response (SVR) occurred in 16% of the overall study population (Regimen A vs B, 18%vs 13%, p= 0.21), in 8% of the combination therapy nonresponders (10%vs 6%, p= 0.35), in 21% of the IFN monotherapy nonresponders (16%vs 27%, p= 0.35), and in 42% of the combination therapy relapsers (50%vs 32%, p= 0.18). In nonresponders to prior combination therapy, HCV ribonucleic acid levels <100,000 copies/mL at the end of the prior treatment course were associated with an increased SVR compared with levels >or=100,000 copies/mL (21%vs 5%, p= 0.002). In the overall study population, genotype 1 patients had lower SVR rates than others (14%vs 33%, p= 0.01), and African Americans had lower SVR than Caucasians (4%vs 18%, p= 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with PEG IFN alpha-2b plus RBV is more effective in patients who relapsed after combination standard IFN plus RBV than in nonresponders to either combination therapy or IFN monotherapy. There was no significant effect of dosing regimen.

Ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The disease progresses without symptoms for several decades. Ribavirin monotherapy may represent a treatment for some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effect of ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until May 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing ribavirin versus no intervention, placebo, or interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the six months sustained loss of hepatitis C virus RNA in blood after end of treatment and liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures were end of treatment virological response, biochemical response, histological response, and adverse events. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed for all outcomes. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality and relative risks (RR) for the remaining outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 13 randomised trials including 594 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Most trials had low methodological quality. Compared with placebo/no intervention, ribavirin had no significant effect on sustained (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.07, five trials) or end of treatment virological response (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07, ten trials). Ribavirin had no significant effect on liver-related morbidity plus mortality (Peto OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.20 to 19.0, eleven trials). Ribavirin significantly improved end of treatment biochemical and histological response but not sustained biochemical response. Further, ribavirin significantly increased the risk of anaemia. Ribavirin was significantly inferior to interferon regarding virological and biochemical response (four trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that ribavirin versus placebo/no intervention had no significant beneficial effect on virological response and liver morbidity, but may improve biochemical and histological response transiently. Ribavirin increased the risk of anaemia. Therefore, we cannot recommend ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C outside randomised trials.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The disease progresses without symptoms for several decades and most patients are diagnosed based on the presence of hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid and elevated transaminases.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies, until May 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon alone for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the sustained loss of hepatitis C virus and liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality. We separately analysed patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 72 randomised trials with 9991 patients. Most trials had low methodological quality but we did not find any significant influence of quality on our results. Compared with interferon, combination therapy had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.75) and in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.76), relapsers (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.73), and non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94) individually. Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality (Peto OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy also had a significant beneficial effect on the histological response. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of anaemia (RR 10.48, 95% CI 5.34 to 20.55), which occurred in 22% of patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnea, fatigue) adverse events. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus and improving liver histology. This may lead to reduced morbidity and mortality. However, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of several adverse events.

N/A

N/A

Randomized trial of three different regimens for 24 weeks for re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients who failed to respond to interferon-alpha monotherapy in Taiwan

With the favorable result of interferon (IFN)-ribavirin combination therapy for 24 weeks among naive Taiwanese chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients, the optimal regimens of re-treatment for CHC patients who failed initial IFN monotherapy is not well-established. The study evaluated the effectiveness of re-treatment for 24 weeks with 3 different regimens and predictors for sustained virological response (SVR).

METHODS

Total 120 Taiwanese CHC patients (81 males, 70 relapsers, mean age: 48.6 years) who failed initial IFN monotherapy were enrolled. They were assigned randomly (with a ratio of 1:1:2) to receive one of the three regimens for re-treatment for 24 weeks; group A: IFN 6 million units (MU) monotherapy (N=30), group B: combination therapy with ribavirin and IFN 3 MU (N=30) or group C: combination therapy with ribavirin and IFN 6 MU (N=60). The intention-to-treat rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 38.3%. The SVR rate in group C (53.3%) was significantly higher than group A (16.7%, P<0.005) and group B (30%, P<0.05). Drop-out rates were similar between the three groups. Patients achieving SVR had significant improvement histologically. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype non-1b infection, lower pretreatment HCV RNA levels, combined with ribavirin and with higher IFN dose, and relapsers were independent predictors for SVR.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that more than one-third Taiwanese CHC patients achieved SVR after 24 weeks re-treatment and combination therapy, especially with higher dose of IFN, yielded higher efficacy.

A randomized trial of prolonged high dose of interferon plus ribavirin for hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon alone

Retreatment of chronic hepatitis C patients nonresponders to interferon (IFN) alone with the standard dose of IFN [3 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW)] plus ribavirin for 24 weeks has yielded low sustained virological response (SVR), averaging 8%. The aim of the present, open-labelled, randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy of IFN induction therapy followed by prolonged high dose of IFN plus ribavirin in nonresponders. One hundred and fifty-one patients were randomized to receive 5 MU daily of IFN alfa-2b (group 1, n = 73) or 5 MU TIW of IFN alfa 2b (group 2, n = 78) for 4 weeks followed by IFN (5 MU TIW) plus ribavirin (1000/1200 mg/daily) for 48 weeks in both groups. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the sustained virological response (SVR) at 24-week follow-up was 33 and 23% for group 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.17). The overall SVR was 52 and 18% in patients with genotype 2/3 and 1/4, respectively. Among genotype 1/4 patients the SVR was 29 and 11% for age younger or older than 40 years. Compared with genotype 2/3 patients, the risk (95% confidence interval) of nonresponse to retreatment was 3.0-fold (1.17-8.0) in younger genotype 1/4 patients and 8.4-fold (3.0-23.29) in older genotype 1/4 patients. In conclusion these results suggest that retreatment with a reinforced regimen should be focused in nonresponder genotype 2/3 patients and younger genotype 1/4 patients, who are most likely to benefit. Induction therapy does not improve SVR.

Treatment of relapsers after combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C

A significant number of patients with chronic hepatitis C relapse after treatment. As therapy for CHC has improved over the last decade, the issue of retreating patients who did not achieve a sustained virologic response with previous treatment regimens frequently arises. Several studies have assessed the efficacy of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy in IFN and RBV therapy relapsers. Patients who have relapsed after therapy have significantly higher SVR rates than those who are nonresponders to therapy and should be considered candidates for retreatment. Predictors of a favorable response to therapy in naïve patients appear to also predict response to therapy in patients who have relapsed previously.

Changes in haemoglobin during interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus infection

Interferon alpha and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy is associated with decreases in haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations and anaemia. The aim of this analysis was to better characterize the magnitude and frequency of Hb changes and risk factors. This retrospective analysis evaluated treatment-related changes in Hb in 677 patients who participated in either of two interferon alpha-2b plus RBV studies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Study 1 included 192 interferon alpha-naïve patients randomized to receive RBV 1000-1200 mg/day plus interferon alpha-2b 3 million IU daily or three times weekly for 48 weeks. Study 2 included 485 interferon alpha-experienced patients randomized to receive RBV 1000-1200 mg daily plus interferon alpha-2b 3 million IU daily or three times weekly for 4 weeks, followed by three times weekly dosing for 44 weeks. More than 50% of all patients experienced a decrease in Hb > or =30 g/L. Women were 4.4 times as likely as men to experience a Hb level of <100 g/L; however, men were at a 40% higher risk to experience a Hb decline of >30 g/L from baseline. Daily use of interferon alpha-2b did not impact the magnitude of Hb decrease. In this pooled analysis, RBV dose reduction resulted in increases in Hb concentration of approximately 10 g/L. Lower baseline creatinine clearance, higher baseline Hb levels and increased age were independently associated with increased risk of Hb decreases of >27.7%. Lower baseline weight was not associated with increased risk of Hb decrease. Substantial Hb decreases occur frequently with interferon alpha/RBV combination therapy. Sex, the magnitude of the Hb decline and renal function are potentially important factors to consider in patients receiving RBV. Further research is needed to determine the impact on virological response and to develop strategies to manage the medical consequences.

Ribavirin upregulates interleukin-12 receptor and induces T cell differentiation towards type 1 in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The mechanisms of ribavirin as an immune modulator have not been fully revealed, contrary to its clinical benefit in chronic hepatitis C. Recently, host immune defense, especially cytotoxic T lymphocytes and T helper cells, have been considered to be closely related to the pathophysiology of chronic viral hepatitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the function of ribavirin in cellular immunity.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and total RNA were prepared from chronic hepatitis C patients. To evaluate the polarization of T helper cells, we performed intracellular cytokine assay and quantified the production of key cytokines. mRNA levels of interleukin-12 receptor (IL-12R), interferon (IFN)-gamma and interleukin-4 (IL-4) were measured by real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

The population of T helper 1 cells increased significantly both in mitogen and hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein stimulated cells with 0.1 microg/mL of ribavirin. However, the population of T helper 2 cells did not seem to be affected by ribavirin. The level of IL-12R beta2 chain mRNA was also upregulated to 130% after 24 h incubation with 0.1 microg/mL ribavirin (P = 0.037), whereas the beta1 chain did not change significantly under these conditions. In addition, 0.1 microg/mL ribavirin could upregulate the levels of IFN-gamma or IL-4 mRNA in some cases.

CONCLUSION

Ribavirin, perhaps by acting directly on CD4+ T cells, induces T cell differentiation towards type 1, depending on the upregulated signal of the IL-12/IL-12R pathway.

Once-weekly epoetin alfa improves anemia and facilitates maintenance of ribavirin dosing in hepatitis C virus-infected patients receiving ribavirin plus interferon alfa

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of epoetin alfa in alleviating anemia and minimizing ribavirin (RBV) dose reductions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection receiving combination RBV/interferon alfa (IFN) therapy.

METHODS

HCV-infected patients who had Hb levels of 12 g/dl or less during the first 24 wk of combination RBV/IFN therapy (n=64) were randomized to treatment with epoetin alfa (40,000 units) s.c. q.w. or to standard of care (SOC) for anemia management (RBV dose reduction or discontinuation, transfusions). Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were changes in Hb level and RBV dosage, respectively, from baseline to week 16 of epoetin alfa therapy. Based on intent-to-treat analysis, the mean changes from baseline Hb levels at week 16 were +2.8 g/dl for epoetin alfa versus +0.4 g/dl for SOC (p<0.0001), and the mean changes in RBV dosage were -34 mg/day for epoetin alfa versus -146 mg/day (p=0.060) for SOC. The mean Hb level at week 16 in the epoetin alfa group (13.8 g/dl) was significantly (p<0.0001) higher than that of the SOC group (11.4 g/dl). At week 4 and subsequently, significantly more patients in the epoetin alfa group did not have RBV dosage reductions (p<0.011). At study end, 83% of epoetin alfa-treated patients maintained RBV dosages of at least 800 mg/day, compared with 54% of patients receiving SOC (p=0.022). Epoetin alfa was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In anemic HCV-infected patients treated with RBV/IFN, epoetin alfa increases Hb levels and maintains RBV dosing. Based on these results, epoetin alfa seems to be promising in the treatment of HCV treatment-related anemia. Further research is warranted to determine the potential impact on outcomes, including quality of life and sustained viral response rate.

Randomized, controlled trial with IFN-alpha combined with ribavirin with and without amantadine sulphate in non-responders with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Efficacy and safety of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)/ribavirin retreatment with or without amantadine sulphate were evaluated in non-responders with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty five consecutive non-responders to previous antiviral treatment(s) with IFN-alpha alone or in combination with ribavirin or amantadine were treated with IFN-alpha 2b 5 MU daily for 4 weeks, 5 MU tiw for 20 weeks, followed by 3 MU tiw for additional 24 weeks combined with ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/d. One hundred fifteen of 225 patients were randomized to receive amantadine sulphate 100 mg bid for 48 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in patients with detectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA at treatment week 24.

RESULTS

An overall sustained virologic response with undectable serum HCV-RNA levels was observed in 49/225 patients (22%). Patients infected with HCV-genotype non-1 (P<0.001), low viremia (P=0.011) and only one previous antiviral treatment (P=0.032) were more likely to respond to antiviral retreatment. There was a trend towards higher sustained virologic response rates in patients receiving triple retreatment compared with those treated with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone (25 versus 18%, P=0.172).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of amantadine was well tolerated and led to an improvement of sustained virologic responses compared with retreatment with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone, in particular in patients with low baseline viremia.

A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of interferon alpha in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of interferon alpha nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C: superior efficacy of high daily dosage of interferon alpha in genotype 1

A randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily (QD) or thrice weekly (TIW) administration of interferon-alpha (IFN) in high doses in combination with ribavirin (1.0-1.2 g/day) in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) who were nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy. Interferon was administered as 10 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 4 weeks, followed by 5 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 20 weeks, and then by 3 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in 142 patients who received at least one dose of medication. One-fourth of the patients achieved SVR, 26% of those treated with IFN QD and 25% of those treated with IFN TIW (P = 0.85). For genotype 1 patients, SVR rates were 32.4 and 15.8% for IFN QD and IFN TIW, respectively, whereas for genotype non-1 patients the corresponding SVR rates were 20.6 and 36.4%, respectively (test of homogeneity: P = 0.031). This finding was further confirmed by multivariate logistic regression analysis where a statistically significant interaction (P = 0.012) was found between treatment and HCV genotype indicating that the IFN QD regimen was superior to IFN TIW among genotype 1 patients whereas, among genotype non-1 patients, the two treatments were similar (odds ratio of SVR in IFN QD vs IFN TIW: 3.33 among genotype 1 patients, 95% CI: 1.00-11.14). In conclusion, re-treatment of patients not responding to previous IFN monotherapy with a combination of high daily dose of IFN with ribavirin may be beneficial for genotype 1 infected patients.

Sustained response to combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to interferon

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The best treatment for chronic hepatitis C patients who do not respond to interferon is still unknown. Reported rates of response to treatment vary as the result of heterogeneous definitions of non-responders and small study size.

METHODS

One hundred nineteen hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive non-responders to high-dose interferon monotherapy received alpha-interferon, 5 MU tiw plus oral ribavirin, 1000-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (Group A, n=74) or alpha-interferon, 5 MU daily for 4 weeks, followed by 5 MU tiw plus oral ribavirin, 1000-1200 mg/day for 44 weeks (Group B, n=45) according to the Institution where they were followed. Persistently normal alanine aminotransferase and negative HCV RNA up to 72 weeks from treatment onset defined a sustained response.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients discontinued treatment (13 developed anemia, two mucositis, one granulocytopenia; two were dropouts), none for serious adverse events. There were 24 (20%) sustained responders, with similar final response rates in Groups A and B. Sustained response was more frequent in patients aged </=40 years (36% vs. 13%; P=0.006) and in those with non-1 genotype (44% vs. 14%; P=0.002). Among genotype 1 patients, the younger ones showed higher response rates (32% vs. 7%; P=0.005). Compared with patients harboring non-1 genotypes, the odds ratio of being a non-responder was 1.68 (confidence interval (CI): 0.53-5.37; P=0.381) in younger genotype 1 patients and 9.53 (CI: 2.84-32; P<0.001) in older genotype 1 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic hepatitis C patients who are non-responders to interferon monotherapy and infected by non-1 genotypes should undergo re-treatment with combination therapy. Treatment should be extended to younger genotype 1 patients who are more susceptible to liver disease worsening because of longer life expectancy and have a higher probability of being long lasting responders than their older counterparts.

Effectiveness of interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C in a clinic setting

AIM

To determine effectiveness of treatment for hepatitis C outside clinical trials, by testing the hypothesis that apparent effectiveness and tolerability of interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin combination therapy would be less in a hospital liver clinic setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of all patients in one centre commencing interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin therapy, but not in clinical trials, between 1998 and 2000.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Effectiveness as sustained virological response (SVR); tolerability as premature discontinuation of treatment.

RESULTS

The 121 patients had similar demographic and viral characteristics as those in Australian trials (age, 44 +/- 10 years; males, 66%; genotype 1, 44%; genotype 3, 36%), but 38% had advanced fibrosis, including 17% with cirrhosis. Sixty (50%) were previously untreated, 38 (31%) had relapsed after initial response (response relapse) and 23 (19%) were non-responders to interferon monotherapy. Sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 53% of patients overall: 47% of patients with genotype 1 HCV, 71% of patients with genotype 3. For patients with genotype 1 HCV, SVR was 43% in those previously untreated, 63% in response relapsers, and 38% in non-responders. Corresponding SVRs for genotype 3 were 65%, 87% and 33%. These results are similar to those obtained in published trials. Only 7% of our patients discontinued treatment because of adverse effects, fewer than reported in most clinical trials. Dose reduction was required in 18% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a hospital clinic setting the effectiveness of interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin combination therapy appears equivalent to published results from clinical trials.

Clinical comparison of high-dose interferon-alpha2b with or without ribavirin for treatment of interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Interferon a with ribavirin combination therapy is effective but still unsatisfactory in the treatment of patients with interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C.

AIMS

To compare, in a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study, high-dose interferon-alpha2b with or without ribavirin in the treatment for interferon-relapsers.

PATIENTS

A total of 52 patients with interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive 24-week treatment with interferon-alpha2b (6 MU three times per week) combined with either ribavirin (1,000 to 1,200 mg per day) or a matched placebo and then followed for an additional 24 weeks.

METHODS

Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. For determining viral concentration, the commercial bDNA Quantiplex hepatitis C virus-RNA 2.0 assay was used. Genotyping was performed by reverse hybridization assay

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, no detectable hepatitis C virus RNA levels were observed in 92% (24/26) of patients on interferon alpha2b/ribavirin and 81% (21/26) of patients on interferon alpha2b/placebo. At the end of the follow-up, a higher sustained virological response rate was seen in patients treated with interferon alpha2b/ribavirin than those treated with interferon alpha2b/placebo (69% vs 23%, p < 0.001). Patients with either initially high levels of viral concentration or with genotype 1 responded poorly. Patients who received interferon-alpha2b/ribavirin treatment and in whom no hepatitis C virus RNA was detected at 4th week after treatment had 90% chance to achieve sustained virological response.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin treatment is highly effective in interferon-relapsed patients.

A randomized 4-arm multicenter study of interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after interferon monotherapy

To determine whether a higher dosage of interferon (IFN) and/or a prolonged time of administration may improve the efficacy of combination therapy, we conducted a 4-arm randomized trial on patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after 1 or more previous treatment courses with IFN monotherapy. Group A (n = 70) received 3 MU IFN alfa-2b 3 times per week plus ribavirin 1,000 mg/d for 12 months; group B (n = 70) received 5 MU 3 times per week plus ribavirin for 12 months; group C (n = 82) received 3 MU 3 times per week plus ribavirin for 6 months, and group D (n = 73) received 5 MU 3 times per week plus ribavirin for 6 months. The primary end point was the clearance of viremia at the end of 6-month follow-up: test results for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA were negative in 54% of group A, 56% of group B, 40% of group C, and 49% of group D patients (P = NS). Among patients with genotype 1 and 4, the sustained response was significantly higher in groups A and B than in group C (45%, 49% vs. 22%, P =.03; group D = 33%, P = NS). In patients with genotype 2 and 3, the sustained virologic response was not affected by the different regimens (group A = 69%, group B = 68%, group C = 62%, group D = 71%, P = NS). In conclusion, duration of therapy rather than IFN dosage is more important in increasing the sustained virologic rate among HCV-positive patients with genotype 1 and 4 relapsing after IFN monotherapy; patients with genotypes 2 and 3 can be effectively retreated with a 6-month course of combination therapy, avoiding unnecessary side effects and waste of resources.

Meta-analysis: combination therapy with interferon-alpha 2a/2b and ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C previously non-responsive to interferon

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of interferon-alpha plus ribavirin treatment for patients not responding to interferon monotherapy is not well established.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with interferon-alpha 2a/2b plus ribavirin by performing a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases for randomized clinical trials of interferon-alpha 2a/2b plus ribavirin was conducted independently by two investigators. Data abstraction was performed. The primary end-point was a sustained virological response. Estimates of the common odds ratio were calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 127 identified studies, 46 were considered for evaluation and 10 were included (1728 patients). The pooled sustained virological response was 12.6% (95% CI, 9.5-16.3%) for combination therapy vs. 2% (95% CI, 0.9-4.0%) for interferon monotherapy, with a common odds ratio of 5.49. Higher doses of interferon, a longer duration of therapy (48 weeks) and genotypes other than 1 and 4 were associated with an improvement in response. More side-effects and discontinuations were observed with combination therapy than with interferon monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-responders to interferon may benefit from re-treatment with combination therapy, especially from a 48-week regimen.

Meta-analysis: ribavirin-induced haemolytic anaemia in patients with chronic hepatitis C

AIM

To use meta-analysis to study the risk of anaemiarelated to ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitisC.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database up to January 2001 was searched for randomized controlled trials of ribavirin (monotherapy or combined with interferon) for chronic hepatitis C. The outcomes evaluated were withdrawal from the study due to anaemia, ribavirin dosage reduction due to a decrease in haemoglobin and haemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL.

RESULTS

Based on 17 studies, the overall risk difference (ribavirin vs. no ribavirin) for anaemia was 0.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04-0.13]. Two Asian studies reported risk differences of 0.29 and 0.22, greater than the pooled risk difference of 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.12) for 15 non-Asian studies. The risk associated with 1 g or more of ribavirin per day was higher (risk difference, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.04-0.14) than that for 0.8 g of ribavirin per day (risk difference, 0.01; 95% CI, - 0.04-0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic hepatitis C patients treated with 1 g or more of ribavirin per day were at a higher risk of developing anaemia. Reported risks were higher among Asian studies, which may be due to differences in study entrance criteria, dosage titration strategy or ethnic vulnerability.

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C

Relatively few patients (< or =20%) with chronic hepatitis C achieve a sustained virological response after interferon-alpha monotherapy. Hence, alternative treatment strategies such as the addition of the broad spectrum antiviral agent ribavirin to interferon-alpha-2b have been investigated. Combination therapy with subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2b [3 million units (MU) three times per week] plus oral ribavirin (1000 to 1200 mg/day) has proven effective in several well designed trials of 24 to 48 weeks' duration in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C. Compared with interferon-alpha-2b (3 or 6 MU three times per week) with or without placebo, combination treatment with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin significantly enhanced end-of-treatment and sustained virological and biochemical response rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients [sustained virological response rates in treatment-naive recipients (6 to 19% vs 31 to 43% of patients); sustained overall (virological plus biochemical) response rates in nonresponders to (1 vs 14%) or relapsers (4 to 5% vs 30 to 44%) after previous interferon-alpha monotherapy]. Forty-eight weeks of combination therapy was superior to 24 weeks in treatment-naive patients infected with hepatitis virus C (HCV) genotype 1, whereas response rates were similar at 24 and 48 weeks in those infected with other HCV genotypes. Furthermore, there were marked improvements in histological inflammatory scores in patients who responded to treatment with either interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin or interferon-alpha-2b alone. Although adverse events associated with either drug during combination therapy occurred frequently, these were generally mild to moderate in intensity and were consistent with those reported for each individual agent. Twenty-six percent of patients required dosage modifications of one or both drugs during combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is an efficacious first- and second-line therapy in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C, significantly improving sustained virological and biochemical responses versus interferon-alpha-2b monotherapy. The tolerability profile of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy is consistent with the individual profiles of these agents with no evidence of additive effects. The place of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy in relation to newer agents, including pegylated interferons-alpha and other multidrug regimens, remains to be determined in this rapidly evolving area of therapeutic management. Currently, combination therapy with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated liver disease, and is an option for use as second-line therapy in those who have relapsed after, or failed to respond to, previous treatment with interferon-alpha.

Consensus interferon for chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1 who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination: an Italian pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of consensus interferon in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1 who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, combination therapy with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin.

DESIGN

Open label pilot study.

METHODS

Twenty-four chronic hepatitis C outpatient non-responders to (12 cases), or relapsers after (12 cases), standard combination therapy were treated with consensus interferon (9 microg five times per week) for 36 weeks. The patients were followed up for a further 24 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the rate of sustained virological response.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response was observed in 33% of previous non-responders and in 42% of previous relapsers. Improvement of the histological score was documented in 80% of previous non-responders and in all previous relapsers who showed undetectable levels of hepatitis C virus RNA at the end of treatment. Logistic regression analysis showed that sustained virological response was associated with a hepatitis C viral load of 2 x 106 copies/ml or less, with an inflammation score of 7 or less and with an estimated duration of disease of 10 years or less. The treatment was well tolerated with an 83% compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus interferon given at a dose of 9 microg five times per week for 36 weeks may offer a good chance of sustained virological response in a subset of patients who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, standard combination therapy. However, a larger randomized trial is required to assess the efficacy of consensus interferon before its use can be advocated for the treatment of such patients.

Does interferon and ribavirin combination therapy increase the rate of treatment response in children with hepatitis C?

BACKGROUND

Interferon-alpha was the first accepted treatment of chronic hepatitis C. In recent years, adding ribavirin has produced better response rates in adult patients than monotherapy with interferon-alpha. Whether adding ribavirin also improves treatment results in pediatric patients remains unclear.

METHODS

Twelve patients were given 3 million U/m 2 subcutaneous interferon-alpha three times weekly and 15 mg/kg oral ribavirin daily, and 10 patients were given only 3 million U/m 2 subcutaneous interferon-alpha three times weekly for a total of 12 months.

RESULTS

The dropout rate was 22.8% (25% for patients receiving combination treatment versus 20% for those receiving monotherapy). At the end of treatment, viral clearance was achieved in 50% of the patients who received combination treatment versus 30% of those who received monotherapy. After 12 months of posttreatment follow-up, sustained response rates were 30% and 41.7%, respectively. Of those who responded to treatment, 66.7% had received ribavirin whereas 37.5% of nonresponders had received ribavirin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Adding ribavirin to interferon treatment improved end-of-treatment response rates in children with chronic hepatitis C. Tolerance of treatment was similar to tolerance of monotherapy. However, studies of greater numbers of pediatric patients with longer follow-up periods are necessary to determine prolonged sustained response.

Interferon-alpha plus ribavirin for 12 months increases the sustained response rates in chronic hepatitis C relapsers

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and tolerability of combination therapy for 12 months have not been evaluated sufficiently in chronic hepatitis C relapsers to interferon.

AIMS

To evaluate the sustained response to interferon plus ribavirin for 12 months in chronic hepatitis C relapsers.

METHODS

We included 55 chronic hepatitis C relapsers in a 12-month treatment protocol with interferon (3 MU thrice weekly) plus ribavirin (1-1.2 g/day). The effectiveness was evaluated using serum aminotransferase and hepatitis C virus RNA levels, alanine aminotransferase normalization and viraemia clearance after 12 months, defining the end-of-treatment response, and 6 months after completion of therapy, defining the sustained response. Adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

End-of-treatment response and sustained response were achieved in 47 (85%) and 37 (67%) patients, respectively; there were 10 (21%) relapsers after combination therapy. Predictive factors of sustained response included the genotype (non-1 95% vs. 1 48%; P < 0.001), lower viraemia (503 917 +/- 553 230 vs. 901 393 +/- 548 267 copies/mL; P < 0.005), higher alanine aminotransferase levels (137 +/- 75 vs. 103 +/- 41 IU/L; P < 0.05) and a lower gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase/alanine aminotransferase ratio (0.30 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.49 +/- 0.39; P < 0.05). Tolerance to therapy was good, with no withdrawals.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon plus ribavirin treatment for 12 months in chronic hepatitis C relapsers yields high sustained response rates and is well tolerated. The sustained response is related to a non-1 genotype, lower baseline viraemia, higher alanine aminotransferase level and a lower gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase/alanine aminotransferase ratio.

Management of viral hepatitis C

The hepatitis C virus was first identified in 1989. It causes chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Global anti-HCV prevalence is 1-3%. Contaminated blood product, dirty needles and instruments, and injection drug use are the main parenteral routes of transmission. Cultural practices, such as acupuncture, tattoo, body piercing and scarring, also play a role. Universal precaution is the mainstay for prevention before vaccine is developed. Therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with interferon (IFN) is not satisfactory. Non-response and early relapse reduce sustained response (SR). In 1997, National Institute of Health consensus recommended IFN therapy only for selected patients with compensated CHC, raised ALT and moderate to severe histologic disease activity; 15-20% SR is expected. Major advances in CHC therapy is combination therapy. Ribavirin in combination with IFN significantly increases SR to 30-40%. Even patients with high viral load, genotype 1, significant fibrosis or cirrhosis respond better. EASL and APASL Consensus in 1999 recommended IFN-ribavirin combination as the first line therapy. Recent data on pegylated IFN showed very encouraging results. Combined with ribavirin, 60% SR was achieved. It benefits patients with severe bridging necrosis and also cirrhosis. However, 23-27% of patients receiving combination therapy with either IFN type, experienced adverse events and required therapy discontinuation. Many important issues remained unsolved. Therapy for children, the elderly, patients with comorbidity and extra-hepatic syndromes need to be addressed. Therapy is too expensive and not affordable to the majority of patients in developing countries.

Interferon for interferon nonresponding and relapsing patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Interferon monotherapy leads to sustained virologic clearance in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Studies have yielded conflicting results regarding retreatment with interferon in nonresponders and relapsers.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of retreatment with interferon in chronic hepatitis C nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified through electronic databases, manual searches, authors, and pharmaceutical companies (August 2001).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing interferon versus control or different interferon regimens in chronic hepatitis C patients being nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was failure to achieve a sustained virologic response defined as positive serum hepatitis C virus RNA at least six months following treatment. Secondary outcomes included liver-related morbidity, mortality, biochemical responses, adverse events, and histology.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten randomised trials involving 686 nonresponders and eight trials involving 484 relapsers were included; their methodological quality was poor. In nonresponders, interferon reduced the risk of not achieving an end of treatment biochemical response compared with no treatment (relative risk [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.91); however, virologic responses were not reported. In a post hoc subgroup analysis, doses greater than 3 million units (MU) three times weekly offered no advantage compared with 3 MU three times weekly for biochemical sustained response. Failure to obtain a virologic sustained response was less likely with 48 than 24 weeks of therapy (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96). Adverse events did not differ significantly regardless of treatment dose or duration. In relapsers, none of the trials compared interferon with no treatment. In a post hoc analysis, doses greater than 3 MU three times weekly were no more effective in achieving a virologic sustained response than 3 MU three times weekly. Compared with 24 weeks, treatment durations of 48 weeks were less likely to fail to achieve a virologic sustained response (RR 0.69, 95% CI Random 0.51 to 0.95), but associated with more frequent dosage reduction (RR 9.07, 95% CI 1.20 to 68.63). No data regarding clinical outcomes or histology was available in either patient group.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment with interferon leads to sustained virologic clearance in a minority of chronic hepatitis C patients with nonresponse or relapse following interferon monotherapy. Treatment durations of 48 weeks are superior to 24 weeks, but doses greater than 3 MU three times weekly are no more effective. No data exists regarding the effect on clinical outcomes.

Management strategies for ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia in the treatment of hepatitis C: clinical and economic implications

OBJECTIVES

Recently published studies have demonstrated increased efficacy and cost-effectiveness of combination therapy with interferon and alpha-2b/ribavirin compared with interferon-alpha monotherapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Combination therapy is associated with a clinically important adverse effect: ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia (RIHA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the direct health-care costs and management of RIHA during treatment of CHC in a clinical trial setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to synthesize information on the incidence and management of RIHA. Decision-analytic techniques were used to estimate the cost of treating RIHA. Uncertainty was evaluated using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

RIHA, defined as a reduction in hemoglobin to less than 100 g/L, occurs in approximately 7% to 9% of patients treated with combination therapy. The standard of care for management of RIHA is reduction or discontinuation of the ribavirin dosage. We estimated the direct cost of treating clinically significant RIHA to be $170 per patient receiving combination therapy per 48-week treatment course (range $68-$692). The results of the one-way sensitivity analyses ranged from $57 to $317. In comparison, the cost of 48 weeks of combination therapy is $16,459.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct cost of treating clinically significant RIHA is 1% ($170/$16,459) of drug treatment costs. Questions remain about the optimal dose of ribavirin and the incidence of RIHA in a real-world population. Despite these uncertainties, this initial evaluation of the direct cost of treating RIHA provides an estimate of the cost and management implications of this clinically important adverse effect.

Combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin for hepatitis C: practical treatment issues

Combination therapy with ribavirin and interferon (IFN)-alpha for 6 to 12 months is currently the treatment of choice for chronic hepatitis C infection. The overall sustained response rate to treatment, defined as loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from serum 6 months after completion of treatment, is 40%. The indications for treatment are serum HCV RNA positivity, abnormal serum transaminases and the presence of portal fibrosis and/or moderate/severe inflammation. Response rates are lower in genotype 1 than in genotype 2 or 3 and in the presence of a high viral load. Anaemia is the most common adverse event and is due to ribavirin; neuropsychiatric adverse effects due to IFNalpha lead to premature cessation of therapy in 10 to 20% of patients. The current recommended dose of interferon is 3MU given subcutaneously 3 times a week. However, it is likely that longer-acting pegylated interferons, which may be more effective and can be administered once weekly, will in the future replace currently used IFNalpha.

Successful treatment of severe respiratory papillomatosis with intravenous cidofovir and interferon alpha-2b

In contrast to uncomplicated juvenile laryngeal papillomas which may regress spontaneously, papillomatosis involving pulmonary parenchyma is associated with a poor outcome. This report represents the case of a 34 yr-old female in whom respiratory papillomatosis resulted in voice problems and recurrent pneumonias due to bronchial obstruction. A computed tomographic scan of the chest showed worsening bilateral round cavitating consolidations. Bronchoscopy revealed polypoid lesions of the right vocal cord and the midtrachea which were confirmed as squamous papillomatosis by histology. Interferon (IFN)alpha-2b treatment was inefficient as was cidofovir monotherapy on a maintenance basis. Six months of IFN-alpha-2b and cidofovir in combination led to a complete macroscopic disappearance of the laryngeal lesions and to an impressive regression of the tracheal papillomas and of the intrapulmonary consolidations. These data provide support that severe respiratory papillomatosis can be safely treated by interferon alpha-2b and cidofovir in combination. Probably the same mechanisms as in ribavirin plus interferon alpha-2b, in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C, are responsible for the therapeutic success in this case.

Prevalence of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C in people with severe mental illness

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed seroprevalence rates of HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) among individuals with severe mental illness.

METHODS

Participants (n = 931) were patients undergoing inpatient or outpatient treatment in Connecticut, Maryland, New Hampshire, or North Carolina.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HIV infection in this sample (3.1%) was approximately 8 times the estimated US population rate but lower than rates reported in previous studies of people with severe mental illness. Prevalence rates of HBV (23.4%) and HCV (19.6%) were approximately 5 and 11 times the overall estimated population rates for these infections, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated rates of HIV, HBV, and HCV were found. Of particular concern are the high rates of HCV infection, which are frequently undetected. Individuals with HCV infection commonly fail to receive appropriate treatment to limit liver damage and unknowingly may be a source of infection to others.

Retreatment for 24 vs 48 weeks with interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C patients who relapsed or did not respond to interferon alone

We assessed the efficacy of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin over 24 or 48 weeks for the retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed or did not respond to a previous course of IFN. One-hundred and twenty patients (69 non-responders and 51 relapsers) were randomly assigned to receive IFN-alpha2b (3 million units thrice weekly) plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg per day) for 24 weeks (group A: 58 patients) or 48 weeks (group B: 62 patients). Treatment was discontinued at week 12 if the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level remained elevated. The rate of sustained response was 15.5% in group A and 37.1% in group B (P = 0.013). Relapsers treated for 48 weeks had a sustained response rate of 66.6% compared with a sustained response rate of only 25% in those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.004). Moreover, a sustained response was seen in 14.3% of non-responders treated for 48 weeks and in 8.8% of those treated for 24 weeks (P = 0.71). Fifty-three per cent of patients with a normal ALT level and undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at week 12 had a sustained response compared with 14% of those who were HCV RNA positive at week 12 (P < 0.001). Independent predictive factors of sustained response were: therapy for 48 weeks (P = 0.0026), relapse after IFN treatment (P = 0.0006), loss of HCV RNA at week 12 (P = 0.0008) and HCV genotype non-1 (P = 0.024). Hence, in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to a previous course of IFN monotherapy, combination therapy with IFN plus ribavirin for 48 weeks seems to be more effective than IFN plus ribavirin for 24 weeks.