Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3: validity of cytologic study, cervicography, and human papillomavirus detection

Improved Rates of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Transmasculine Patients Through Self-Collected Swabs for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing

Introduction: Nearly all cervical cancer cases are caused by one of several high-risk strains of the human papillomavirus (hr-HPV). Transmasculine (TM) individuals (persons who have a masculine spectrum gender identity, but were recorded female at birth) have low adherence to standard cervical cancer screening modalities. Introduction of self-collected vaginal swabs for hr-HPV DNA testing may promote initiation and adherence to cervical cancer screening among TM individuals to narrow screening disparities. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of cervical cancer screening among TM individuals following the introduction of self-collected swabbing for hr-HPV DNA testing in comparison to clinician-administered cervical specimen collection.

Methods: Rates of uptake and adherence to cervical cancer screening among TM individuals were assessed before and after the clinical introduction of self-collected swab testing in October 2017. Rates were compared with the rates of cervical cancer screening among cisgender women at a colocated Comprehensive Health Program during the time period of review.

Results: Of the 121 TM patients seen for primary care in the 6-month baseline period before the October 2017 introduction of self-collected swabbing for hr-HPV DNA testing, 30 (25%) had cervical cancer screening documented in the electronic medical record. Following the implementation of self-swabbing, of 193 patients, 98 (51%) had a documented cervical cancer screening, a two-fold increase in the rates of adherence to cervical cancer screening (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Self-collected swab testing for hr-HPV can increase rates of adherence to screening recommendations among an otherwise under-screened population.

Searching for an ideal cervical cancer screening model to reduce false-negative errors in a country with high prevalence of cervical cancer

The purpose of this study was to develop an ideal cervical cancer screening model to reduce false-negative errors in Korea where there is a high prevalence of cervical cancer. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 33,531 women who underwent routine cervical cancer screening in Korea. Colposcopic examinations were performed after abnormal results on their screening tests. Diagnostic capacities including sensitivity, specificity, and false-negative rate of each screening scenario were analysed at the CIN1 or worse (CIN1+) threshold with colposcopic biopsy results considered the gold standard. A total of 4117 women had valid results for Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology, human papilloma virus (HPV) tests, cervicography, and colposcopically directed biopsy were included in this study. The disease prevalence of CIN1+ was 38.1%. Pap-alone resulted in the highest false-negative rate of 46.9%, followed by HPV-alone at 25.1%, cervicography-alone at 18.7%, Pap/HPV-combined at 15.0%, Pap/cervicography-combined at 6.9% and Pap/HPV/cervicography-combined at 2.9% in a sample of 1570 women with CIN1+ lesions. Therefore, cervicography demonstrated excellent performance for the detection of CIN or cervical cancer and markedly reduced false-negative errors when used in combination with Pap cytology and HPV tests.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? False-negative rate of Pap smears is as high as approximately 40-50%. Limitations of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test have led to the development of new screening programmes for cervical cancer, such as combination screenings with human papillomavirus (HPV) tests or cervicography.What do the results of this study add? Pap-alone resulted in the highest false-negative rate of 46.9%, followed by HPV-alone at 25.1%, cervicography-alone at 18.7%, Pap/HPV-combined at 15.0%, Pap/cervicography-combined at 6.9% and Pap/HPV/cervicography-combined at 2.9% in a sample of 1570 women with CIN1+ lesions.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Cervicography demonstrated excellent performance for the detection of CIN or cervical cancer and markedly reduced false negative errors when used in combination with Pap cytology and HPV tests.

Screening capacity and cost-effectiveness of the human papillomavirus test versus cervicography as an adjunctive test to Pap cytology to detect high-grade cervical dysplasia

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the screening capacities and cost-effectiveness of the human papillomavirus (HPV) test versus cervicography as an adjunctive test to Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology to detect high-grade cervical neoplasia in Korea, a country with a high prevalence of cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Of 33,531 Korean women who underwent cervicography as a screening test for cervical cancer between January 2015 and December 2016, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 4117 women who simultaneously or subsequently underwent Pap cytology, an HPV test, cervicography, and colposcopically directed biopsy. At a threshold of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+), based on colposcopic biopsy, we compared the diagnostic capacities and cost-effectiveness of these screening tools.

RESULTS

The CIN2+ prevalence was 10.8% (446 of 4117 women) and the positive rate of high-risk HPV was 61.0% (2511 of 4117 women). Cervicography as an adjunctive to Pap cytology was a more sensitive test (97.5% vs 93.7%) with a higher odds ratio (15.65 vs 5.86) than the HPV test for detection of CIN2+ (P-value = 0.003). Moreover, the cost of cervicography co-testing was 23% less than that of HPV co-testing, decreasing the cost per patient with CIN2+ lesions from $1474 to $1135.

CONCLUSION

Cervicography and Pap co-testing had superior screening capacity and cost-effectiveness for detection of preinvasive cervical lesions than HPV and Pap co-testing and may be an effective and cost-saving screening strategy in clinical practice in country with a high prevalence of cervical cancer.

The performance of tele-cervicography for detection of preinvasive and invasive disease of the uterine cervix as an adjunctive test to Pap smears

Aim of the study

To evaluate the diagnostic capacity of tele-cervicography for the detection of cervical neoplasia as an adjunctive test with Papanicolaou (Pap) smears.

Material and methods

Pap smear and tele-cervicography were performed on each subject. Histologic results were obtained for all patients.

Results

Of the 863 females who had a tele-cervigram, 252 (29.2%) had a positive result. Of the 60 histologically confirmed cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), 56 (93.3%) were detected by tele-cervicography, including 16 (26.7%) with a positive grade of 1 and 40 (66.7%) with a positive grade of 2. With the positive threshold of tele-cervicography set as any positive grade (P0 to P3), the overall sensitivity was 94.0% (95% CI: 88.0–97.3%), the specificity was 80.9% (95% CI: 80.0–81.5%), and the positive likelihood ratio was 4.94 (95% CI: 4.23–5.77) for the detection of HSILs or cancer. The combination of tele-cervicography with Pap smear testing for the detection of HSILs or cancer resulted in an increase in sensitivity from 84.6% (Pap only: cutoff = atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or more severe) to 98.3% (Pap plus tele-cervicography: cutoff = P0 or more severe).

Conclusions

The sensitivity of tele-cervicography was higher than that of cytology for the detection of cervical neoplasia, and combining the two tests increased the sensitivity. Tele-cervicography can be considered a useful complementary tool to cytology.

Role of human papillomaviruses in carcinogenesis

The human papillomavirus (HPV) family comprises more than 170 different types that preferentially infect the mucosa of the genitals, upper-respiratory tract, or the skin. The 'high-risk HPV type', a sub-group of mucosal HPVs, is the cause of approximately 5% of all human cancers, which corresponds to one-third of all virus-induced tumours. Within the high-risk group, HPV16 is the most oncogenic type, being responsible for approximatively 50% of all worldwide cervical cancers. Many studies suggest that, in addition to the high-risk mucosal HPV types, certain cutaneous HPVs also have a role in the development of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Functional studies on the HPV early gene products showed that E6 and E7 play a key role in carcinogenesis. These two proteins use multiple mechanisms to evade host immune surveillance, allowing viral persistence, and to deregulate cell cycle and apoptosis control, thus facilitating the accumulation of DNA damage and ultimately cellular transformation. The demonstration that high-risk HPV types are the etiological agents of cervical cancer allowed the implementation in the clinical routine of novel screening strategies for cervical lesions, as well as the development of a very efficient prophylactic vaccine. Because of these remarkable achievements, there is no doubt that in the coming decades we will witness a dramatic reduction of cervical cancer incidence worldwide.

Predictive Value of Class III D Cytological Diagnosis (Munich II, Low and Moderate Dysplasia) and Additional High-risk HPV Testing

The validity of cytological diagnostic procedures for the detection of pre- and early cervical cancer stages is limited due to biological conditions, the uncertainty of cell sampling, and the subjective nature of microscopic assessment. Particularly in class III D cases (Munich II) this can lead to a stigmatization of patients and uncertainty with regard to further clinical follow-up and therapy. Prior to carrying out additional investigations such as high-risk HPV testing or the examination of biomarkers, the positive predictive values of patients with a class III D cytological diagnosis need to be assessed in routine practice. To this end, all relevant data from patients from our practice classed as class III D (pap smears) between 2002 and 2008 (n = 1190; 38.2 % histological diagnosis = therapeutic endpoint) and their current HPV status were recorded. Cytology, histology, persistence, age and follow-up were recorded. The database was used for comparative statistical analysis. Overall, the positive predictive value of conventional pap smear for CIN 2+ was calculated to be 32.3 % (mean follow-up: 39.7 months). The following values were calculated for high-risk HPV testing: sensitivity 94.8 %, specificity 39 %, positive predictive value 42.8 %, negative predictive value 94 %. The additional information obtained from high-risk HPV testing resulted in a significantly better positive predictive value only in patients older than 40 years. However, there was no evidence for an individual risk stratification approach which would reduce uncertainty in the management of III D patients.

Prediction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions using the modified Reid index

BACKGROUND

Colposcopic grading provides an objective and meaningful guide to histologic severity and neoplastic progression of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. The objective of this study was to develop a more efficient and convenient method to overcome procedural complexities involved with the traditional Reid index in prediction of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).

METHODS

The Reid index uses four colposcopic signs (margin, color, vessel, and iodine staining). The proposed modified Reid index system specifically incorporates the location of the lesion within the transformation zone in place of iodine staining. Three hundred women with suspected or abnormal cytologies or abnormal cervicographic findings were evaluated by colposcopy, directed biopsy, and HPV testing by the Hybrid Capture II method, which detects high-risk HPV DNA types.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of high-risk HPV testing for detecting HSIL was 94.4%, the specificity was 65.0%, the positive predictive value was 75.5%, and the negative predictive value was 91.0%. The results of the colposcopic impression using the modified Reid index were superior to HPV testing. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the colposcopic impression for detecting HSIL were 91.3, 92.9, 93.6, and 90.3% respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results strongly indicate that the modified Reid index can accurately predict the histologic grade of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix and can be applied easily and objectively in clinical practice without affecting the diagnostic accuracy of the traditional Reid index.

Detection of high-risk papillomavirus DNA with commercial invader-technology-based analyte-specific reagents following automated extraction of DNA from cervical brushings in ThinPrep media

We compared the performances of the Third Wave Technology Invader method and the Digene Hybrid Capture 2 assay to detect high-risk human papillomaviruses in 87 cervical brushing specimens submitted in Cytyc ThinPrep media. Two different methods for the extraction of DNA from squamous epithelial cells were also evaluated.

Molecular targets in gynaecological cancers

The application of high throughput expression profiling and other advanced molecular biology laboratory techniques has revolutionised the management of cancers and is gaining attention in the field of gynaecological cancers. Such new approaches may help to improve our understanding of carcinogenesis and facilitate screening and early detection of gynaecological cancers and their precursors. Individualised prediction of patients' responses to therapy and design of personalised molecular targeted therapy is also possible. The studies of various molecular targets involved in the various signal pathways related to carcinogenesis are particularly relevant to such applications. At the moment, the application of detection and genotyping of human papillomavirus in management of cervical cancer is one of the most well established appliances of molecular targets in gynaecological cancers. Methylation, telomerase and clonality studies are also potentially useful, especially in assisting diagnosis of difficult clinical scenarios. This post-genomic era of clinical medicine will continue to make a significant impact in routine pathology practice. The contribution of pathologists is indispensable in analysis involving tissue microarray. On the other hand, both pathologists and bedside clinicians should be aware of the limitation of these molecular targets. Interpretation must be integrated with clinical and histopathological context to avoid misleading judgement. The importance of quality assurance of all such molecular techniques and their ethical implications cannot be over-emphasised.

Combining human papillomavirus testing or cervicography with cytology to detect cervical neoplasia

CONTEXT

Cervicography and oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing have been proposed for improving the accuracy of cervical cancer screening.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether cervicography and HPV testing can improve beyond chance the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3 in women with atypical cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions on cytology.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis. Oncogenic HPV testing by Hybrid Capture II assay or cervicography combined with cytology was compared with the reference standard of colposcopy with directed biopsy.

SETTING

Community family practices.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred four women with low-grade cytologic abnormality.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The gain in accuracy for detecting histologic CIN 2 or 3 or carcinoma. Because an adjunct test may improve sensitivity by chance alone, the sensitivity or specificity if the second test performed randomly was estimated.

RESULTS

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3 was found in 11.8% (36/304) of the women and invasive squamous cell carcinoma in 0.3% (1/304). The sensitivity of cytology for detecting CIN 2 or 3 was 73.0% and increased by 21.6% to 94.6% with the addition of a cervigram showing a low-grade lesion or higher or a positive HPV test result. These gains were reduced to 8.1% and 10.8% above the sensitivities expected if the additional tests performed randomly. The corresponding specificities decreased from 49.1% to 32.2% and 33.0%. There was insufficient power to determine whether observed sensitivities were statistically significantly higher than the expected sensitivities.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive HPV testing or cervicography may provide similar gains in sensitivity, but they can appear misleadingly large if chance increases are not taken into account.

Primary cervical cancer screening by self-sampling of human papillomavirus DNA in internal medicine outpatient clinics

BACKGROUND

We determined whether testing of self-collected vaginal swabs for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA can be used to screen for cervical disease within internal medicine outpatient clinics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, 560 patients visiting two referral outpatient clinics for internal medicine were asked to take an HPV self-sample. Acceptability of self sampling, HPV prevalence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

435 women (78%) performed HPV self-sampling; 1.5% considered self-sampling to be difficult. 134 women (31%) tested positive for high-risk type of HPV. There were significant differences between HPV-positive and -negative women with respect to the following: mean age (42 versus 46 years), number of women aged <16 years at first coitus (35% versus 23%) and history of drug abuse (8.3% versus 2.6%). Colposcopy could be performed for 70 HPV positive women: CIN 1-3 was identified in 24%. Two of 52 women with HPV-negative results undergoing colposcopy had biopsy-confirmed CIN 1. Test performance for detection of CIN 2-3 after correction for verification bias: sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 71%; negative predictive value, 100%; positive predictive value, 10%. HPV persistence was associated with a 5.7-fold risk of CIN 2-3 detection at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-assessment for HPV DNA is an easy, feasible and well-accepted method for HPV testing and for cervical cancer screening in internal medicine outpatient clinics.

Method for testing for human papillomavirus infection in patients with cervical intraepithelial disease

To determine whether DNA detection of high-risk human papillomavirus could represent a reliable screening technique and a useful follow-up method, we investigated the performance of the Hybrid Capture II assay in detecting high-grade cervical lesions. The test positivity at 1.86 pg/ml had a high sensitivity (94.7%) and improved specificity. It was also a suitable follow-up method for detecting the recurrence of cervical intraepithelial disease in patients.

Risk factors for squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) of the cervix among women residing at the US-Mexico border

It is now well established that cervical cancer is caused by oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infections that commonly infect women worldwide. What remains to be understood are the factors that contribute to cervical cancer in the presence of HPV infection. We conducted a case-control analysis of women recruited at the US-Mexico border to simultaneously evaluate factors associated with 3 cytologic outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS/AGUS), low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). A cross-sectional binational study of 2059 women ages 15-79 years was conducted between 1997 and 1998. A significant difference in the distribution of cytologic categories by country was observed (3.0% vs. 0.7% HSIL among Mexican vs. US women, respectively). The only factors independently associated with all 3 cytologic outcomes were HPV infection and viral load. A linear increase in risk with increasing viral load was observed for each of the 3 outcome variables, with the strength of this association increasing with cytology abnormality. In addition to HPV infection, parity and Mexico as a country of residence appear to be associated with LSIL and HSIL, respectively. Factors associated with cytologic outcomes in analyses limited to women with HPV infection were similar to results obtained in models where HPV infection was included as a covariate. Future work is needed to evaluate the predictive value of HPV viral load utilizing more specific and quantitative measures.

Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study

BACKGROUND

Certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are the primary cause of almost all cervical cancers. HPV testing of cervical smears is more sensitive but less specific than cytology for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). HPV testing as a primary screening approach requires efficient management of HPV-positive women with negative or borderline cytology. We aimed to compare the detection rate and positive predictive values of HPV assay with cytology and to determine the best management strategy for HPV-positive women.

METHODS

We did a multicentre screening study of 11085 women aged 30-60 years. Women with borderline cytology and women positive for high-risk HPV with negative cytology were randomised to immediate colposcopy or to surveillance by repeat HPV testing, cytology, and colposcopy at 12 months.

FINDINGS

HPV testing was more sensitive than borderline or worse cytology (97.1% vs 76.6%, p=0.002) but less specific (93.3% vs 95.8%, p<0.0001) for detecting CIN2+. Of 825 randomised women, surveillance at 12 months was as effective as immediate colposcopy. In women positive for HPV at baseline, who had surveillance, 73 (45%) of 164 women with negative cytology and eight (35%) of 23 women with borderline cytology were HPV negative at 6-12 months. No CIN2+ was found in these women, nor in women with an initial negative HPV test with borderline (n=211) or mild (32) cytology.

INTERPRETATION

HPV testing could be used for primary screening in women older than 30 years, with cytology used to triage HPV-positive women. HPV-positive women with normal or borderline cytology (about 6% of screened women) could be managed by repeat testing after 12 months. This approach could potentially improve detection rates of CIN2+ without increasing the colposcopy referral rate.

Epidemiological aspects of cancer screening in Germany

PURPOSE

Since 1971, a statutory early detection programme has operated in Germany which comprises health-insurance-paid annual examinations of the breast, cervix, prostate, rectum, and the skin. Since the programme is conceptualised as opportunistic screening, the attendance rates have been low and only reached about 50% among females and 13% among males by the end of the 1990s. Based on these figures and present knowledge on the efficacy of screening modalities, we assessed past benefits and the future potential of cancer screening in Germany.

METHODS

We used published data on the efficacy of screening procedures and German attendance rates, and internationally available data on incidence and mortality in Germany and, for cervical cancer, in other countries. Incidence and mortality rates have been standardised to the world standard, and screening benefit has been given as the population preventable fraction given in percentage.

RESULTS

The past benefits of the statutory early detection programme ranged around 2.0-6.5%. Since the upper limit was due to generous assumptions regarding efficacy or inclusion of treatment effects, the true value might be closer to the estimates of the effect of cervical cancer screening (2.0-4.7%). The achievable future benefit of exploiting the theoretical potential of more exhaustive screening could provide a further mortality reduction of about 3.4% (50% compliance) or 4.7% (70% compliance).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening partially requires an expensive medical infrastructure and is not without risks for the participants. The overall benefit is critically dependent upon the quality of the programme and its in-time control. Any benefit may be annulled by poor quality while costs are overflowing. Well-organised high-quality screening may be a sound basis for cancer control. To preserve or increase the impact of screening and control its expenses: (a) further research efforts are needed towards new or better targeted screening tools or modalities; (b) the efficacy of new modalities has to be evaluated carefully in advance; (c) the programme has to be reconceptualised as organised screening; (d) in-time quality control based on the collection of the basic performance data must be an intrinsic part of the programme.

Study of viral integration of HPV-16 in young patients with LSIL

AIMS

To investigate the physical status of human papillomavirus 16 (HPV-16) in low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) as a means of determining the percentage of viral integration.

METHODS

Ninety two LSIL/HPV positive Thin Prep(TM) samples were initially tested for the E6 gene by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify the HPV-16 virus. To avoid false positive results, the specificity of the bands obtained from PCR was confirmed by Southern blot hybridisation with internal oligonucleotide probes. Next, a PCR screen for the E2 gene was performed to identify those samples in which the virus was integrated. Viral integration was detected in just over half of them.

RESULTS

Twenty of the 92 samples were HPV-16 positive, as shown by PCR for the E6 gene. Southern blot analysis confirmed that 13 of these samples were positive for the viral E6 gene. Thus, viral integration was detected in just over a half of the samples positive for HPV-16.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that HPV-16 integration occurs in a subset of LSILs. The measurement of HPV-16 integration would be a helpful complementary tool for cytological evaluation in primary cervical screening to identify those patients at risk of developing high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and cervical cancer.

Inclusion of HPV testing in routine cervical cancer screening for women above 29 years in Germany: results for 8466 patients

In a prospective cohort study 8466 women attending routine cervical cancer screening were recruited. Colposcopy was performed on women with any degree of atypia on cytology and/or a positive high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA test (HC2; Hybrid Capture 2((c))), and for a randomly selected sample of 3.4% women with negative findings on both. Quality control included reviews of cytology, histology, colposcopy images and retesting of samples with polymerase chain reaction. Test diagnostic performances were based on 7908 women who had complete baseline and follow-up results. Routine histology identified 86 women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), which was confirmed by review histology in only 46 cases. Sensitivity of routine cytology for the detection of CIN2+ was 43.5%, with a specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.0, 11.4 and 99.7%, respectively. Sensitivity of the HC2 test for the detection of CIN2+ was 97.8%, with a specificity, PPV and NPV, of 95.3, 10.9 and 100%, respectively. No high-grade neoplasia was detected in the randomly selected control group. A negative HPV-test result, even in combination with a positive Papanicolaou (Pap) result, virtually excluded any risk of underlying high-grade disease, but this was not the case for a negative Pap result. These data show that HPV testing is of value for the detection or exclusion of prevalent CIN in a routine cervical cancer-screening setting and could be used for further risk classification of women for follow-up management.

Paying for prevention standardizing the measurement of the value of health care interventions

It is not clear if spending more on tests that enhance the accuracy of Pap smears would lead to a greater reduction in cancer incidence than if the money were spent to include a greater proportion of women in primary screening. The cost effectiveness of tests beyond the Pap smear has not been clearly demonstrated. There is the question of whether cervical cancer incidence can be decreased more by improving the tests for patients who are already screened or by improving access to the unscreened population. Cervical cancer screening represents only one of many public health issues competing for resources. Given that there are choices to be made, the optimal yardstick against which all resource-competing programs are measured should be marginal benefit versus marginal cost.

Evaluation of commercial kits for the detection and typing of human papillomavirus in cervical swabs

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) detection by MY consensus primers amplification within the L1 region and typing of prevalent genital HPVs by reference and commercial sets of probes was compared by PCR-ELISA systems. The specificity of commercial probes used in the L1 HPV Geno-Kit with respect to the reference probes proved to be 100%, with an overall agreement of 97.6%. The discordant results concerned only the detection of HPV 16, both as single genotype present in the sample and as multiple infections. The analytical sensitivity of the commercial probe for HPV 16 proved to be slightly less sensitive than the reference probe in the hybridisation conditions of the PCR-ELISA system. The L1 PCR-ELISA reference system was evaluated further in comparison with commercial E6/E7 consensus PCR and microplate hybridisation by typing kit. Amplified products of both the L1 and E6/E7 consensus regions were also analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis. An overall concordance of 95.2% was found. On account of its specificity and sensitivity the E6/E7 commercial system proved to be particularly useful for diagnostic laboratory, as it detects only the prevalent high risk genotypes. The agarose gel detection can therefore be used as screening test, thus reducing the costs, while the E6 E7 HPV Geno-Kit High Risk can be used when specific typing is required.

Pap test results among low-income youth: prevalence of dysplasia and practice implications

OBJECTIVES

To describe Papanicolaou (Pap) test findings and identify prevalence and correlates of dysplastic cervical abnormalities in low-income adolescent females.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This cross-sectional study included a modified random sample of female students ages 16 to 25 years at 54 U.S. Job Corps centers.

PARTICIPANTS

5,734 female students enrolled in a federal job training program. Admission health records were reviewed and abstracted.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Pap test findings using the Bethesda classifications. Pap smear results indicating dysplasia (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS] with dysplasia) or squamous intraepithelial lesions (low-grade squamous interepithelial lesions [LGSIL] or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HGSIL]). Participants with less severe findings were compared with those who needed follow-up.

RESULTS

For 71.4% of participants, no abnormalities were found. 15.6% had benign cellular changes, 9.2% had reactive changes, and 9.9% had epithelial cell abnormalities. Of those tested, 5.6% (+/- 0.8%) had dysplastic Pap smear findings, with 0.3% (n = 12) HGSIL. All groups were equally affected, with abnormalities not associated with race/ethnicity, age, geographic region, education level, size of city of residence, or receiving public assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, dysplastic Pap smear results were not uncommon. Findings indicate that Pap screening, alone or in combination with more sensitive tests, can identify cervical abnormalities, including HGSIL, that suggest a need for further evaluation or follow-up.

Use of human papillomavirus DNA testing to compare equivocal cervical cytologic interpretations in the United States, Scandinavia, and the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing may be useful in clarifying equivocal cervical cytologic interpretations. One application might be to standardize the meaning of equivocal interpretations from laboratories in various regions. Because international differences may be particularly marked, international comparisons of emerging data will require clear translations of "equivocal" and similar terms.

METHODS

To perform a three-country comparison, the authors selected a morphologically diverse set of 188 conventional Papanicolaou tests initially classified as "squamous atypia" from a study of more than 20,000 women in Portland, Oregon (1989-1990). Previously, five U.S. expert cytopathologists independently interpreted the slides with screening cytotechnologists' marks in place. For this comparison, one British and two Scandinavian reviewers involved in HPV research reviewed the slides after original marks had been removed. The authors compared all eight reviewers' classifications of negative, equivocal, or abnormal in a series of pairwise comparisons using the kappa statistic. They then compared cytologic interpretations with HPV DNA testing.

RESULTS

Oncogenic HPV DNA detection was significantly associated with increasingly abnormal interpretations for each reader. The British reader tended to rate tests as more abnormal than the American pathologists did, whereas the Scandinavians tended to rate tests as more normal. Reference to the HPV DNA standard clarified the tendency of readers to render systematically more or less severe interpretations. For example, the Scandinavian cytologists discounted subtle (often HPV-associated) changes in favor of cytologic certainty, making HPV triage of equivocal tests less applicable there.

CONCLUSIONS

International research on cytopathology, particularly on the possible uses of HPV DNA testing, will require calibration of local cytologic definitions.

Effects of age and human papilloma viral load on colposcopy triage: data from the randomized Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (ALTS)

BACKGROUND

Testing for oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA at a 1.0-pg/mL threshold represents a promising approach for colposcopy triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), but not for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). Considering age or viral load could improve colposcopy triage.

METHODS

We determined the sensitivity for detecting Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 (CIN3) and cancer and the percentage of referrals for colposcopy using HPV testing and repeat thin-layer cytopathology in 2198 women with ASCUS and in 848 women with LSIL enrolled in ALTS from November 1996 through December 1998. We analyzed results by age and at two thresholds for HPV load and repeat cytopathology.

RESULTS

For ASCUS, the overall sensitivity of HPV testing at 1.0 pg/mL was 96.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 92.8 to 99.5%) and varied minimally with age (range, 93.9% to 97.8%). HPV testing at this threshold would refer 31.2% (95% CI = 28.0% to 34.3%) of women aged 29 years or older as compared with more than 65% of younger women. Among women aged 29 years or older with ASCUS, referral for repeat cytopathology of ASCUS had a sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI = 81.1% to 100.0%) and would refer 50.1% (95% CI = 46.7 to 53.5%). Among all ASCUS, HPV testing using a 10.0-pg/mL threshold decreased sensitivity to 91.5% and referrals to 41.7%. More than 63% of LSIL would have been referred using any strategy achieving 90% sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

For women with ASCUS, HPV testing was highly sensitive for detecting CIN3 and cancer with dramatically fewer referrals of older women. Neither a single HPV test nor repeat cytopathology provides useful triage for women with LSIL.

Cervicography for triage of women with mildly abnormal cervical cytology results

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of cervicography in detecting cervical cancer precursor lesions in women participating in the National Cancer Institute's multicenter atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS).

STUDY DESIGN

Cervigrams were obtained from 3134 women with a referral Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Cervigram and cervical histology results were compared by using cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN 3 disease end points.

RESULTS

Of 3134 women, 444 had histologic findings of more than or equal to CIN 2 and 222 had CIN 3. Cervicography interpretation by using a threshold of greater than or equal to atypical had a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 79.3%, 61.0%, 13.4%, and 97.5%, respectively, for detecting greater than or equal to CIN 3. Cervicography was more sensitive (80.8% vs 57.1%), but less specific (55.7% vs 81.8%), for detecting CIN 3 in women younger than 35 years compared with women 35 years or older, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervicography functioned moderately well at detecting CIN 2 or CIN 3 in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolau smear results. Cervigram sensitivity was better for younger women.

An update on human papillomavirus infection and Papanicolaou smears in adolescents

Human papillomavirus infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections in young women, and may lead to clinical sequelae such as anogenital condylomata and cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Recent data on the biology and natural history of HPV infection in adolescents will have important implications for the development of adolescent-specific protocols for cervical cancer screening and for follow-up of abnormal cytology.

Signal-amplified colorimetric in situ hybridization for assessment of human papillomavirus infection in cervical lesions

Detection and typing of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection may have a major impact in cervical-screening and follow-up. In this study various commercially available techniques for the detection of HPV were evaluated. HPV-status was determined in 86 samples of cervical cancer by PCR and direct sequencing, catalyzed signal amplified colorimetric DNA in situ hybridization (CSAC- ISH) (GenPoint system, DAKO), immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in 12 selected cases also by conventional, non-amplified ISH. Twenty-one samples of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias grade III (CIN III) were investigated by CSAC-ISH, conventional ISH and by IHC, in corresponding PAP smears HPV-detection and typing was performed by CSAC-ISH and Hybrid Capture test II (HC). In additional 20 PAP smears HPV typing was performed using HC and a novel immunocytochemical system for HPV detection and-typing. CSAC-ISH showed good correlation with PCR analysis in cervical cancers: In 87% of PCR positive cases, HPV infection was also detected by CSAC- ISH (66/76). HPV 16 was detected in 75% of PCR-positive cases (44/59), HPV 18 in 71% of PCR positive cases (5/7). CSAC-ISH detected HPV 31 in only 29% of PCR positive cases (2/7), and HPV 33 in 64% of PCR-positive cases (23/36). Nevertheless, CSAC-ISH- false negative cases for HPV 31 or 33 were nearly always combined infections with other HPV types, which were detectable by CSAC-ISH in most cases. CSAC-ISH revealed HPV infection in 20 of 21 HC-positive cervical smears, while in corresponding biopsies (CIN III) CSAC-ISH detected 100% of HPV infections. Conventional, non-amplified ISH showed significantly lower sensitivity compared with CSAC-ISH, and immunocyto- and -histochemistry were of very low sensitivity for detection of HPV. CSAC-ISH is an easy-to-handle method for detection and typing of cervical HPV infection, and shows sufficient sensitivity for clinical practice.

Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPV) are the necessary cause of cervical carcinomas. To determine whether HPR-HPV DNA detection in primary routine screening could represent a sensitive and reliable technique for the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HGSIL), laboratory analysis using 2 cytologic techniques (conventional and liquid-based), HPV testing with Hybrid Capture II assay (HC-II), followed by colposcopic examination of women with abnormal cervical finding and/or persistent HR-HPV infection, was conducted in 7932 women who had routine cervical examination. The sensitivity of HPV testing for detecting a histologically proven HGSIL was 100%, higher than that of conventional (68.1%) and liquid-based (87.8%) cytology. The low specificities of 85.6% and 87.3% of HPV testing slightly increased to 88.4% and 90.1% if HPV testing was reserved for woman >30 years old. The quantitative approach provided by the HC-II assay for the assessment of the viral load was not reliable for predicting HGSIL in normal smears. HR-HPV testing could be proposed in primary screening in association with cytology. With conventional cytology it significantly improves the detection of HGSIL. With the use of the same cervical scrape for HPV testing and liquid-based cytology, HR-HPV testing would allow to select positive samples treated in a second time for cytology which gives a good specificity.

Distribution and viral load of type specific HPVs in different cervical lesions as detected by PCR-ELISA

AIMS

To investigate the distribution and viral load of the most prevalent high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 and low risk HPV types 6 and 11 in a variety of cervical lesions.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy six cytological specimens from women with different cervical lesions were investigated. For an accurate standardisation of the sample, cervical cells were counted and a volume of the cell suspension processed by polymerase chain reaction-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA). Semiquantitative determinations were achieved in relation to an external reference titration curve.

RESULTS

HPV DNA was detected in 60.2% of the samples. HPV-16 was the prevalent genotype (57.6%), followed by HPV-33, HPV-31, HPV-6, HPV-18, and HPV-45. HPV-11 was not detected. HPV-16 showed a pronounced increase in prevalence with the evolution of cervical disease. Semiquantitative evaluation of the results showed that only HPV-16 DNA could reach very high values (> 1000 genome copies/cell) and a very high HPV-16 load correlated with the severity of cervical disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Only HPV-16 load appears to be associated with the severity of cervical disease.

[Human papillomavirus typing in routine cervical smears. Results from a series of 3778 patients]

AIM

As human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a significant risk factor for cervical cancer, the aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of HPV detection techniques in predicting the presence or the development of a high-grade squamous intra epithelial lesion. Additional reasons for carrying out this investigation were as follows. It was considered that the clinical value of HPV typing may have been underestimated in certain previous reports, which based their findings on first-generation assays. Moreover, until the present investigation most studies only investigated the cases with abnormal smear findings and did not include long-term follow-up, nor detailed follow-up of women with a normal smear but positive HPV typing, although this patient subgroup is of particular interest. The patient population included 3778 women who underwent routine cytological cervical screening and who gave their informed consent to participate in this study, consisting of a cervical smear, HPV testing via a second-generation Hybrid Capture II assay (which is more sensitive than first-generation tests, and can detect 18 different HPV types, i.e., 13 oncogenic and five non-oncogenic types); and in the case of abnormal smear findings, colposcopic examination and directed biopsies of the sites of suspected lesions. The women with cytomorphologically normal cervical smears but which who HPV-positive were reexamined six months later.

RESULTS

HPV findings were positive in 66 cases where the initial smear indicated the presence of a high-grade lesion with the diagnosis confirmed by biopsy in 65 cases; in 155 cases (76.1%) where the initial smear indicated the presence of a low-grade lesion; in 44 (57.1%) out of 77 smears indicating the presence of ASCUS-type (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) lesions; and in 366 cases (10.5%) of apparently normal initial smears. After colposcopy and follow-up, a final diagnosis of high-grade lesion was made for 85 patients. All these patients were found to have high-risk (oncogene-positive) HPV at the first examination, but in only 65 cases (76.5%) was the initial smear indicative of a high-grade lesion. Finally, in the patient groups with low-grade or ASCUS-type smear findings or with an apparently normal smear, a high-grade lesion was only found in those patients with persistent high-risk HPV infection. In all, the sensitivity of the Hybrid Capture II assay in detecting high-grade lesions was 100% versus 85.9% for standard cytology. However, its specificity (86.3%) and positive predictive value were not as high as the latter.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that HPV typing via this second-generation assay displays good sensitivity for the detection of at-risk cases, i.e., those involving the presence or development of high-grade cervical lesions. However, a number of issues have to be addressed before HPV typing is adopted in clinical practice, such as the fairly high HPV prevalence in women aged over 60 years, and whether the implications of this are the same as for younger age groups. Also, the present cost of complete typing remains too high for it to be used on a widespread scale. Nevertheless, HPV typing may have a useful role to play in the detection of cervical cancer.

Cancer screening in the elderly population

This article reviews the current state of knowledge regarding cancer screening in the geriatric population. Care of the elderly requires knowledge of underlying physiologic changes, comorbidities, quality-of-life factors, and life expectancies. There is always the danger that ageism may prevent elderly cancer patients from receiving the proper treatment. On the other hand, overzealous treatment can lead to adverse results if elderly patients are not properly targeted based on current evidence of the benefits and risks of specific screening practices.

Screening for cervical neoplasia during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cytology as a screening method for cervical neoplasia in pregnancy and to compare it with cervicography and the acetic acid test (AAT).

METHODS

In a large antenatal clinic in South Africa, 842 women were screened utilizing cytology, cervicography and the acetic acid test simultaneously. The proportion of positive results of the different tests were compared and the agreement calculated by the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

The mean age of the women was 27 years, and 12.5% smoked. Cytological smears were abnormal (low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion and higher degrees of abnormality) in 1.4% of cases, cervicography in 6.3% and the AAT in 14.3% (P = 0.5400). Kappa values were as follows: cytology vs. cervicography 0.01, cytology vs. AAT 0.0 and cervicography vs. AAT 0.2.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of cytology's rather low yield and the small measure of agreement between the tests, cytology should be supplemented by an additional screening test in pregnancy.

Evaluation of a human papillomavirus assay in cervical screening in Zimbabwe

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of an assay for high risk genital human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical screening in Zimbabwe, Africa.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Harare, Zimbabwe.

POPULATION

Zimbabwe women (n = 2,140), 25 to 55 years old, recruited in clinics in Chitungwiza and Greater Harare.

METHODS

Genital specimens were assessed for HPV, using the HPV DNA test Hybrid Capture II (probe B). Further assessment of the women was conducted using colposcopy and biopsy as indicated. High grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were diagnosed in 215 women. Colposcopy and/or biopsy showed low grade lesions in 346 women.

RESULTS

The overall prevalences were: 42 x 7% for HPV, 10% for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 16% for low grade lesions. Prevalence for HPV decreased significantly with increase in age (P for trend < 0 x 0001) and increased significantly with increasing disease severity, from 35% in normal women, to 53% in women with low grade lesions and 81% in women with high grade lesions (P for trend < 0 x 001). In specimens positive for HPV, the amount was 14-fold higher in women with high grade lesions compared with normal women. In screening for high grade lesions the assay for HPV had a sensitivity of 81% (CI 75%-86%); sensitivity for low grade lesions was 64% (CI 60%-68%). Specificity was 62% (CI 59%-64%) for high grade lesions and 65% (CI 62%-67%) for low grade lesions. The positive predictive value was 19% (CI 17%-22%) for high grade lesions and 39% (CI 36%-42%) for low grade lesions.

CONCLUSION

For high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions the sensitivity of the Hybrid Capture II HPV DNA test was high, but the specificity was relatively low. The test may therefore be most useful in conjunction with other screening tests.

Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical cancer of human immunodeficiency virus-infected women, 1990-1998

OBJECTIVE

Women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have an increased risk of cervical neoplasia while the value of cytologic screening is limited due to a high prevalence of inflammatory disease. The study was conducted to determine whether testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA could improve primary screening for cervical cancer of these patients.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-eight HIV-infected women were examined between 1990 and 1998. Ninety-four patients with a total of 279 women-years were eligible for incidence evaluation. Colposcopy, cytology, and HPV DNA testing with the hybrid capture I assay were performed at each visit.

RESULTS

Seventeen cases of high-grade cervical neoplasia were diagnosed at study entry and 13 developed CIN II or CIN III during follow-up. The hybrid capture I assay detected 94.1% of prevalent and 100% of incident high-grade neoplasia, while the corresponding sensitivity of Pap smears using CIN I or worse as the referral criteria was 82.3% for prevalent and 69.2% for incident high-grade neoplasia. Eleven of 13 patients who progressed to histologically confirmed CIN II/III tested positive for HPV DNA at study entry compared with 5/13 women presenting with any degree of cytologic atypia at recruitment. The Pap smears of 36/94 women remained normal throughout the study while 54/94 patients remained negative for high-risk HPV types.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid capture I identified high-grade cervical neoplasia more accurately than the Pap smear and appeared to be beneficial for primary cervical cancer screening in HIV-infected women.

Screening for cancer: future potential

Much progress has been made in cancer screening over the past decade, but a great deal more needs to be done if screening is to make a major impact on worldwide cancer mortality. Where fully implemented, cytological screening for cervical precursor lesions has had a major impact on mortality. However, the cost and required infrastructure levels are high, and new approaches are needed if screening is to be effective in the developing world. Testing for the human papillomavirus and automated liquid based cytology offer great promise to improve quality, reduce overall cost and make screening more viable generally. Breast screening has been less successful, although useful mortality benefits have been achieved in women aged over 50 years. Full implementation in countries that can afford it will save lives, but radical new approaches will be needed to conquer breast cancer. Colorectal cancer screening offers the best hope of a major reduction in cancer mortality over the next decade. Less certainty exists about screening for other major cancers such as lung, prostate and ovary, but a range of potential approaches merit investigation.

Assessing gains in diagnostic utility when human papillomavirus testing is used as an adjunct to papanicolaou smear in the triage of women with cervical cytologic abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to provide simple methods for calculating expected sensitivity and specificity when an adjunctive test is added to a conventional test.

STUDY DESIGN

Use of adjunctive methods for the triage of women with cervical abnormalities produces an apparent gain in sensitivity over Papanicolaou cytologic testing alone. This increase in sensitivity can be misleading, even if deemed significant by results of a statistical test. Combined testing prevents a loss in specificity but sometimes offers no real gain in sensitivity. A nominal increase in sensitivity always occurs by chance whenever an adjunctive test is used in parallel with a conventional one, even if the new test is totally random with respect to the disease being evaluated.

RESULTS

Gains in sensitivity and losses in specificity have to be gauged against expected levels of these parameters when a random adjunctive test is coupled with Papanicolaou screening and not gauged against the performance of cytologic testing alone.

CONCLUSION

We provide simple formulas for calculating the expected sensitivity and specificity in conditions of combination testing to provide more realistic baselines for assessment of the screening efficacy contributed by the adjunctive test.

Screening for cancer: future potential

Much progress has been made in cancer screening over the past decade, but a great deal more needs to be done if screening is to make a major impact on worldwide cancer mortality. Where fully implemented, cytological screening for cervical precursor lesions has had a major impact on mortality. However, the cost and required infrastructure levels are high, and new approaches are needed if screening is to be effective in the developing world. Testing for the human papillomavirus and automated liquid based cytology offer great promise to improve quality, reduce overall cost and make screening more viable generally. Breast screening has been less successful, although useful mortality benefits have been achieved in women aged over 50 years. Full implementation in countries that can afford it will save lives, but radical new approaches will be needed to conquer breast cancer. Colorectal cancer screening offers the best hope of a major reduction in cancer mortality over the next decade. Less certainty exists about screening for other major cancers such as lung, prostate and ovary, but a range of potential approaches merit investigation.

Is human papillomavirus testing of value in clinical practice?

The objective of this review was to evaluate the current status of human papillomavirus testing in predicting the presence of high-grade or invasive disease in the cervix in women with Papanicolaou smears reported as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. This is a review of many of the studies already published evaluating the utility of human papillomavirus testing as part of the triage for patients whose Papanicolaou smears were reported as ASCUS or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Two triage approaches for follow-up of such patients are presented, and recommendations are made as to which is most cost-effective and safe. Data related to human papillomavirus testing were obtained with both currently available commercial kits for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus and the polymerase chain reaction. There was variation in results reported, possibly related to populations studied. The approach to management by cytologic screening and colposcopy, when indicated, appeared over the long term to be equal to human papillomavirus testing. In our opinion current human papillomavirus testing is of little clinical use to the practitioner. Its use should be limited to appropriately designed and implemented research studies.

Cervicography screening for cervical cancer among 8460 women in a high-risk population

OBJECTIVE

Cervicography was evaluated as a primary screening method for cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Cervigrams of 8460 women were taken on enrollment into a population-based study of cervical neoplasia. Cervicography results were compared with a referent diagnosis determined by histologic analysis and 3 cytologic tests, and with the performance of conventional cytologic evaluation.

RESULTS

Cervicography identified all 11 cancers, whereas cytologic testing missed 1. Cervicography yielded sensitivities for detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or cancer of 49.3% overall (specificity, 95.0%), 54.6% in women younger than 50 years of age, and 26.9% in women 50 years of age and older. Cytologic testing yielded sensitivities for detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or cancer of 77.2% overall (specificity, 94. 2%), 75.5% in women younger than 50 years of age, and 84.6% in women 50 years of age and older.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytologic testing performed better than cervicography for the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Cervicography performed marginally better than cytologic testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancer. Cervicography is not recommended for postmenopausal women.

Distribution of 14 high risk HPV types in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia detected by a non-radioactive general primer PCR mediated enzyme immunoassay

AIM

To evaluate the presence of high risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) in cervical smears showing intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

METHODS

The presence of 14 high risk HPV was evaluated in 114 cervical smears with CIN of different degrees, by comparing a non-radioactive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with conventional PCR followed by radioactive Southern blot hybridisation. General primer PCR amplicons detecting low risk and high risk HPV were typed for 14 different high risk HPV types (HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) by a non-radioactive PCR-EIA. Virus load of HPV 16 positive CIN was assessed using the semiquantitative PCR-EIA.

RESULTS

Histological evaluation confirmed CIN I in 49 cases (mean age 29.0 years, range 17 to 52), CIN II in 31 cases (mean age 30.8 years, 18 to 54), and CIN III in 34 cases (mean age 31.1 years, 16 to 57). The non-radioactive PCR-EIA showed an overall agreement rate of 90% (kappa value 0.75) when compared with conventional general primer PCR followed by radioactive Southern blot hybridisation. High risk HPVs were detected in 47% of CIN I, 77% of CIN II, and 97% of CIN III (p < or = 0.02). HPV types 39, 51, 56, and 58 were found in CIN I exclusively (between 2% and 8%). HPV 16 and HPV 31 were detected in 12% and 2% of CIN I, 35% and 21% of CIN II, and 74% and 13% of CIN III, respectively (p < or = 0.03 and p < or = 0.04). The virus load estimated by the semiquantitative PCR-EIA of HPV 16 was similar in CIN I, CIN II, and CIN III.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCR-EIA has high clinical sensitivity for detecting CIN II/III (90%). There was a significantly higher prevalence rate of HPV 16 and 31 in CIN III than in CIN I and II.

Colposcopic appearance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is age dependent

OBJECTIVE

We investigated to determine whether colposcopic, histologic, and virologic parameters of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia are influenced by a patient's age.

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort of 967 women with a mean age of 37.1 years underwent screening for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by colposcopy, cytologic examination, and testing for high-risk human papillomaviruses with the Hybrid Capture System (Digene, Silver Springs, Md) and a general primer and type-specific primer polymerase chain reaction system. Cervicography was used for documentation and reproducible evaluation of the colposcopic appearance of the cervix. In 86% of patients with trivial colposcopic changes of doubtful significance (100/116) and 89% of patients with colposcopic changes consistent with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (89/99), punch biopsy specimens were taken for histologic evaluation.

RESULTS

In patients with trivial colposcopic changes of doubtful significance, histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was almost as frequent (32%, 37/116) as in patients with colposcopic changes consistent with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (43%, 43/99, difference not significant). The ratio between colposcopic evidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and trivial colposcopic changes was 1.9 in patients <35 years old with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, versus 0.5 in patients >/=35 years old with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (P =.005). Patients with trivial colposcopic changes of doubtful significance were older (median age 36 years) than were patients with colposcopic changes consistent with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (median age 29 years, P =. 008). In patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who had no or trivial colposcopic changes, the thickness of neoplastic epithelium was smaller (P =.008) and the number of cellular layers was lower (P =.01) than in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia who had colposcopic changes consistent with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. In patients <35 years old the rate of positive results for a high-risk human papillomavirus (P <.005) and the viral load (difference not significant) were higher than in women >/=35 years old. The rate of positive results for high-risk human papillomaviruses differed independently of age among patients with normal colposcopic findings, patients with trivial colposcopic changes of doubtful significance, and patients with colposcopic changes consistent with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (P <.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In women >/=35 years old cervical lesions associated with intraepithelial neoplasia are thinner and thus less colposcopically conspicuous than those in women <35 years old. Patients >/=35 years old with acetowhite cervical lesions consistent with trivial changes of doubtful significance should therefore undergo punch biopsy for histologic evaluation.