Genetic analysis of prostatic atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis)

Three-dimensional architecture of common benign and precancerous prostate epithelial lesions

Aims

Many glandular lesions can mimic prostate cancer microscopically, including atrophic glands, adenosis and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. While the characteristic histopathological and immunohistochemical features of these lesions have been well established, little is known about their three‐dimensional architecture. Our objective was to evaluate the three‐dimensional organisation of common prostate epithelial lesions.

Methods and results

500 μm‐thick punches (n = 42) were taken from radical prostatectomy specimens, and stained with antibodies targeting keratin 8–18 and keratin 5 for identification of luminal and basal cells, respectively. Tissue samples were optically cleared in benzyl alcohol:benzyl benzoate and imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope. The three‐dimensional architecture of peripheral and transition zone glands was acinar, composed of interconnecting and blind‐ending saccular tubules. In simple atrophy, partial atrophy and post‐atrophic hyperplasia, the acinar structure was attenuated with branching blind‐ending tubules from parental tubular structures. Three‐dimensional imaging revealed a novel variant of prostate atrophy characterised by large Golgi‐like atrophic spaces parallel to the prostate surface, which were represented by thin, elongated tubular structures on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides. Conversely, adenosis lacked acinar organisation, so that it closely mimicked low‐grade prostate cancer. High‐grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia displayed prominent papillary intraluminal protrusions but retained an acinar organisation, whereas intraductal carcinoma predominantly consisted of cribriform proliferations with either spheroid, ellipsoid or complex interconnecting lumens.

Conclusions

While various prostate epithelial lesions might mimic malignancy on H&E slides, their three‐dimensional architecture is acinar and clearly different from the tubular structure of prostate cancer, with adenosis as an exception.

Molecular evidence supporting the precursor nature of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate is characterized by lobular proliferation of closely packed small acini. It is hypothesized that AAH is a precursor lesion for low-grade prostate cancer arising from the transition zone. Telomere dysfunction is common during malignant transformation of epithelia. In this study, we investigate telomere shortening in AAH (n = 93), high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) ( n = 68), and prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCA) ( n = 70) using quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization. Twenty percent (19 of 93) of AAH specimens, 68% (46 of 68) of HGPIN, and 83% (58 of 70) of PCA showed significant telomere shortening. Thirty-two percent of AAH lesions had α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression, a sensitive and specific marker for HGPIN and PCA. AMACR expression in AAH was seen more frequently in AAH foci with telomere shortening or coexisting PCA. Our findings indicate that a subset of AAH lesions have telomere shortening and AMACR expression, suggesting that these foci may be precursors for PCA.

Precursor Lesions of Urologic Malignancies

CONTEXT

- Precursor lesions of urologic malignancies are established histopathologic entities, which are important not only to recognize for clinical purposes, but also to further investigate at the molecular level in order to gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis of these malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

- To provide a brief overview of precursor lesions to the most common malignancies that develop within the genitourinary tract with a focus on their clinical implications, histologic features, and molecular characteristics.

DATA SOURCES

- Literature review from PubMed, urologic pathology textbooks, and the 4th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. All photomicrographs were taken from cases seen at Weill Cornell Medicine or from the authors' personal slide collections.

CONCLUSIONS

- The clinical importance and histologic criteria are well established for the known precursor lesions of the most common malignancies throughout the genitourinary tract, but further investigation is warranted at the molecular level to better understand the pathogenesis of these lesions. Such investigation may lead to better risk stratification of patients and potentially novel treatments.

Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia (Adenosis) of the Prostate: DNA Ploidy Analysis and Immunophenotype

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate is a microscopic proliferation of small acini that may be mistaken for adenocarcinoma. Although some data suggest that AAH is associated with adenocarcinoma arising in the transition zone, the clinical significance of this lesion is uncertain. Therefore we studied the DNA ploidy pattern and immunophenotype of AAH as compared with nodular hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in 23 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, whole-mounted retropubic prostatectomies. Representative sections were immunostained for keratin 34β-E12, chromogranin, bcl-2, c-erbB-2, ki67-MIB1, and factor VIII (microvessel density). DNA ploidy was determined by image analysis and Feul gen-stained sections. There were rare scattered immunoreactive cells for chromogranin, bcl-2, and c-erbB-2 in nodular hyperplasia and AAH (mainly in the basal cell compartment) and in carcinoma. The ki67-MIB1 labeling index was different between nodular hyperplasia and AAH (p<0.001) and carcinoma (p=0.003) but not between AAH and carcinoma (p=0.203). Microvessel density was different between AAH and carcinoma (p=0.001) but not between nodular hyperplasia and AAH (p=0.105) or carcinoma (p=0.0820). All foci of nodular hyperplasia, AAH, and carcinoma were diploid. Ploidy status and our selected panel of antibodies did not discriminate among these 3 entities reliably.

Preneoplasia in the prostate gland with emphasis on high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

There are a variety of morphological patterns and processes that have been implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), inflammation with or without atrophy, and adenosis (atypical adenomatous hyperplasia) have all been given candidate status as precursor lesions of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Based on decades of research, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HPIN), a proliferative lesion of prostatic secretory cells, has emerged as the most likely morphological pre-invasive lesion involved in the evolution of many but not all prostatic adenocarcinomas. In this manuscript, we briefly discuss other proposed precursors of prostatic adenocarcinoma and then focus on the history, diagnostic criteria and morphology of HPIN. The incidence of HPIN and its relationship to prostate cancer is reviewed. The differential diagnosis of large glandular patterns in the prostate is discussed in depth. Finally, we summarise the recent clinicopathological studies evaluating the clinical significance of HPIN and discuss follow-up strategies in men diagnosed with HPIN.

[Non-neoplastic alterations of the prostate. Why should pathologists know them?]

Non-neoplastic changes in the prostatic gland include inflammatory, atrophic, hyperplastic and metaplastic reaction patterns of the glandular epithelium and the fibromuscular stroma. Furthermore, histoanatomical structures from outside the prostatic gland are sometimes included in biopsy material. Knowledge of the morphological appearance of benign, reactive lesions is important in order to differentiate them from malignancies. To this aim knowing the precise location of tissue sampling as well as ancillary immunohistochemical investigations are often useful or necessary.

Immunohistochemical expression of prostate tumour overexpressed 1 (PTOV1) in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate: additional evidence linking (AAH) to adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Prostate tumour overexpressed 1, PTOV1, was recently identified as a novel gene and protein during a differential display screening for genes overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa). It has been suggested that overexpression of PTOV1 can contribute to the proliferative status of prostate tumour cells and thus to their biological behaviour.

METHODS

PTOV1 and Ki67 were immunohistochemically evaluated in PCa, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and normal-looking epithelium (NEp) of the transition zone (TZ) in 40 radical prostatectomies with pT2a Gleason score 6 PCa (20 with AAH and 20 with HGPIN) and in 10 simple prostatectomies (SPs) (5 with AAH and 5 with HGPIN). The aim was to evaluate PTOV1 protein expression as a marker for tumor development and progression from AAH to PCa.

RESULTS

The proportions of PTOV1 and Ki67 positive cells increased from NEp through AAH and HGPIN to PCa. In particular, the mean Hscore of PTOV1 expression in AAH was 110.90, i.e., close to three times that of NEp (40.76), similar to that of HGPIN (105.61) and lower than that of PCa (137.03). The mean values in AAH and HGPIN associated with cancer in the RPs were slightly higher than in the SPs.

CONCLUSION

Our findings related to PTOV1 expression in AAH, similar to those in HGPIN, provide additional evidence linking AAH to prostatic adenocarcinoma.

The spectrum of morphology in non-neoplastic prostate including cancer mimics

The spectrum of morphology in non-neoplastic prostate includes lesions of prostatic epithelial origin, the most common being atrophy, including partial atrophy, adenosis (atypical adenomatous hyperplasia), basal cell hyperplasia and crowded benign glands, as well as those of non-prostatic origin, such as seminal vesicle epithelium. These lesions often mimic lower-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma whereas others, such as granulomatous prostatitis, for example, are in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, Gleason grades 4 or 5. Diagnostic awareness of the salient histomorphological and relevant immunohistochemical features of these prostatic pseudoneoplasms is critical to avoid rendering false positive diagnoses of malignancy.

Is atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate a precursor lesion?

BACKGROUND

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is highly expressed in prostatic adenocarcinoma. The precursor nature of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) is uncertain.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-one AAH foci from 101 patients who underwent transurethral prostatic resection or prostatectomy were immunohistochemically analyzed for AMACR, high molecular weight cytokeratin 34βE12, and p63 expression by a triple antibody (PIN4) cocktail stain.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight foci (56%) of AAH showed no AMACR immunostaining. Fourteen cases (12%) showed weak AMACR immunoreactivity in 1-9% of lesional cells. Sixteen cases (13%) showed strong immunopositivity for AMACR in >50% of lesional cells. AMACR expression in AAH was significantly higher in cases in which coexisting PCA was present, compared with its expression in AAH foci without coexisting PCA (P = 0.03). Strong diffuse AMACR positivity in over 50% of lesional cells was seen almost exclusively in AAH foci with coexisting PCA (P = 0.002). AMACR expression in AAH showed no correlation with patient age (P = 0.38), specimen type (P = 0.35), prostate weight (P = 0.80), zonal location (P = 0.50), distance to cancer (P = 0.28), Gleason score (P = 0.06), or pathologic stage (P = 0.23). Increased AMACR expression showed a negative correlation with the size of AAH foci (P = 0.03). All AAH lesions showed fragmented basal cell layers, highlighted by p63 and high molecular weight cytokeratin staining.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant percentage of AAH cases show stronger and more extensive AMACR expression when associated with prostatic adenocarcinoma, as compared to AAH foci found without coexisting prostate cancer. Our data provide additional evidence linking AAH to prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Differences in the structural features of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and low-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma

Aim

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) is a small glandular proliferation that has histological similarities with Gleason grade 1 and 2 prostatic adenocarcinoma (PACG1,2). There are no distinct histomorphological criteria distinguishing these two lesions from each other and other small glandular proliferations. Because treatment approaches are different for these lesions, it is necessary to determine histological criteria. The aim of this study is to review the histological features of these two lesions and to define new histological criteria distinguishing AAH from PACG1,2. We, therefore, assessed 18 anatomical and structural parameters.

Materials and Methods

We found 11 AAH (22 foci) and 15 PACG1,2 (22 foci) cases in 105 radical prostatectomy specimens. Basal cell-specific antikeratin was applied to these lesions. We assumed that PACG1,2 lesions did have not basal cells and we grouped the lesions as AAH and PACG1,2 based on this assumption.

Results

We found differences between AAH and PACG1,2 lesions for some parameters including the number of glands, structures such as the main ductus and basal cells. We found similar properties in the two lesions for the following parameters: localization, multiplicity, diameter of the lesion, focus asymmetry, distance between glands, inflammatory cells in and out of the lesions, secretory cell shape on the luminal side, papillary projection towards the luminal side of gland, the shape of the outer gland, the infiltrative pattern of the gland, glandular pleomorphism, biggest gland diameter and median gland diameter.

Conclusion

We determined that concurrent evaluation of histomorphological features was important to differentiate between AAH and PACG1,2.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the prostate: the precursor lesion of prostate cancer

High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a lesion which is widely believed to be a precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correct morphologic identification of HGPIN and an understanding of how this diagnosis affects clinical management in the research setting are necessary as HGPIN is a premalignant lesion with many genetic alterations similar to prostate cancer, but is not yet invasive cancer. As such it is critical to differentiate between benign entities, HGPIN, and prostatic adenocarcinoma for experimental design and data interpretation. This review discusses HGPIN, clarifies the terminology used in pathology reports, and describes the clinical and research implications of this entity.

Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the one well-documented precursor to adenocarcinoma of the prostate. This review article defines both low- and high-grade PIN. Unusual variants of high-grade PIN are illustrated. Benign lesions that may be confused with high-grade PIN, including central zone histology, clear cell cribriform hyperplasia, and basal cell hyperplasia are described and illustrated. High-grade PIN is also differentiated from invasive acinar (usual) and ductal adenocarcinoma. The incidence of high-grade PIN, its relationship to carcinoma (including molecular findings), and risk of cancer on rebiopsy are covered in detail. Finally, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, a controversial entity, is discussed and differentiated from high-grade PIN.

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis) of the prostate: a case report with review of the literature

A 62-year-old male presented with symptoms of urinary obstruction and elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level of 3.61 ng/mL. Prostate needle biopsies showed benign prostatic tissue with a focus of crowded glands with minimal cytological atypia, fairly well-circumscribed with infiltrative appearance of glands at the edges. This focus had both small and larger glands with similar histological features. This focus was strongly positive for alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A-racemase (AMACR), but showed scattered patchy staining with basal cell markers (p63 and CK903/34betaE12). Hence, the final histologic diagnosis was benign prostatic tissue with a focus of florid adenosis. Two subsequent follow-up prostate needle biopsies performed six and 12 months later both showed benign prostatic tissue with atrophic changes. This case highlights the utility of these three immunostains (AMACR, p63 and CK903/34betaE12) in the accurate diagnosis of adenosis of the prostate on needle biopsy, and avoiding its misinterpretation as prostate adenocarcinoma.

Mechanisms of Disease: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and other proposed preneoplastic lesions in the prostate

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is the most likely precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma according to virtually all available evidence. This lesion is characterized by cellular proliferations within pre-existing ducts and acini, with nuclear and nucleolar enlargements similar to those seen in prostate cancer, although unlike cancer HGPIN retains a basal-cell layer. The recognition of HGPIN is clinically important because of the strong association between this disease and prostatic carcinoma. The predictive value for cancer of an initial diagnosis of HGPIN on needle biopsy has substantially declined, with values falling from 36% to 21%. A major factor contributing to this decline is related to increased use of needle biopsy core sampling, which has provided the means for many cancers associated with HGPIN to be detected on initial biopsy; repeat biopsy, even with good sampling, does not detect many additional cancers. Other possible findings in the prostate might indicate premalignant disease (low-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atrophy, malignancy-associated changes, and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia or adenosis), but the data for these premalignant diseases are much less convincing than those for HGPIN.

Statistical dissection of genetic pathways involved in prostate carcinogenesis

Molecular markers that could stratify prostate cancer patients according to risk of disease progression would allow a significant improvement in the management of this clinically heterogeneous disease. In the present study, we analyzed the genetic profile of a consecutive series of 51 clinically confined prostate carcinomas and 27 benign prostatic hyperplasias using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). We then added our findings to the existing literature data in order to perform a meta-analysis on a total of 294 prostate cancers with detailed CGH and clinicopathological information, using multivariate statistical methods that included principal component, hierarchical clustering, time of occurrence, and regression analyses. Whereas several genomic imbalances were shared by organ-confined, locally invasive, and metastatic prostate cancers, 6q and 10q losses and 7q and 8q gains were significantly more frequent in patients with extra-prostatic disease. Regression analysis indicated that 8q gain and 13q loss were the best predictors of locally invasive disease, whereas 8q gain and 6q and 10q losses were associated with metastatic disease. We propose a genetic pathway of prostate carcinogenesis with two distinct initiating events, namely, 8p and 13q losses. These primary imbalances are then preferentially followed by 8q gain and 6q, 16q, and 18q losses, which in turn are followed by a set of late events that make recurrent and metastatic prostate cancers genetically more complex. We conclude that significant differences exist in the genetic profile of organ-confined, locally invasive, and advanced prostate cancer and that genetic features may carry prognostic information independently of Gleason grade.

Molecular aspects of diagnostic nucleolar and nuclear envelope changes in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is still diagnosed by pathologists based on subjective assessment of altered cell and tissue structure. The cellular-level structural changes diagnostic of some forms of cancer are known to be induced by cancer genes, but the relation between specific cellular-level structural features and cancer genes has not been explored in the prostate. Two important cell structural changes in prostate cancer-nucleolar enlargement and nuclear envelope (NE) irregularity-are discussed from the perspective that they should also relate to the function of the genes active in prostate cancer. Enlargement of the nucleolus is the key diagnostic feature of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), an early stage that appears to be the precursor to the majority of invasive prostate cancers. Nucleolar enlargement classically is associated with increased ribosome production, and production of new ribosomes appears essential for cell-cycle progression. Several cancer genes implicated in PIN are known (in other cell types) to augment ribosome production, including c-Myc, p27, retinoblastoma, p53, and growth factors that impact on ERK signaling. However, critical review of the available information suggests that increased ribosome production per se may be insufficient to explain nucleolar enlargement in PIN, and other newer functions of nucleoli may therefore need to be invoked. NE irregularity develops later in the clonal evolution of some prostate cancers, and it has adverse prognostic significance. Nuclear irregularity has recently been shown to develop dynamically during interphase following oncogene expression, without a requirement for post-mitotic NE reassembly. NE irregularity characteristic of some aggressive prostate cancers could reflect cytoskeletal forces exerted on the NE during active cell locomotion. NE irregularity could also promote chromosomal instability because it leads to chromosomal asymmetry in metaphase. Finally, NE irregularity could impact replication competence, transcriptional programming and nuclear pore function.

Benign mimickers of prostatic adenocarcinoma

The diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, especially when present in small amounts, is often challenging. Before making a diagnosis of carcinoma, it is prudent for the pathologist to consider the various benign patterns and processes that can simulate prostatic adenocarcinoma. A useful method of classifying benign mimickers is in relationship to the major growth patterns depicted in the classical Gleason diagram. The four major patterns are small gland, large gland, fused gland and solid. Most mimickers fit within the small gland category and the most common ones giving rise to false-positive cancer diagnosis are atrophy, post-atrophic hyperplasia, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and seminal vesicle-type tissue. A number of other histoanatomic structures such as Cowper's gland, verumontanum mucosal glands, mesonephric glands and paraganglionic tissue may be confused with adenocarcinoma. Additionally, metaplastic and hyperplastic processes within the prostate may be confused with adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, inflammatory processes including granulomatous prostatitis, xanthogranulomatous prostatitis and malakoplakia may simulate high-grade adenocarcinoma. Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis), a putative precursor of transition zone adenocarcinoma, has overlapping features with low-grade adenocarcinoma and may cause problems in differential diagnosis, especially in the needle biopsy setting. The pathologist's awareness of the vast array of benign mimickers is important in the systematic approach to the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Knowledge of these patterns on routine microscopy coupled with the prudent use of immunohistochemistry will lead to a correct diagnosis and avert a false-positive cancer interpretation.

[Association of renal carcinoma and the exposure to ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident]

After the nuclear accident of Chernobyl, in the population of zones contaminated the malignant renal tumors was increased from 4.7 to 7.5 per 100,000 of total population. Cesium 137 (137Cs) constitutes 80-90% of the internal exposure of these people as well as eliminated through kidneys becomes an important risk factor. We present a case of a patient, residing in radiocontamined area, who consulted for abdominal pain and left flank mass. We review relevant literature and the management of these patients.

Expression of alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate, also known as adenosis, is characterized by a proliferation of prostatic glands with abnormal architectural patterns, but without significant cytologic atypia. In some cases it may be difficult to distinguish AAH from prostatic carcinoma. Additionally, it is not clear whether AAH is a precursor lesion of prostatic adenocarcinoma. P504S, a protein highly expressed in prostatic adenocarcinoma, has been recently shown to be a marker of prostate cancer. The goal of this study is to examine the expression of P504S in AAH by immunohistochemistry. A total of 80 prostate specimens, including 40 cases of AAH (prostatectomy N = 30, biopsy N = 6, transurethral resection N = 4), 20 cases of prostatic adenocarcinomas, and 20 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia, were studied. Immunohistochemistry for a prostate cancer marker alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) and a basal cell-specific marker 34betaE12 was performed in all the cases. The 34betaE12 stain confirmed the presence of patchy basal cells in all 40 cases of AAH. P504S was undetectable in the majority of AAHs (33 of 40, 82.5%), focally expressed in four of 40 (10.0%), or diffusely positive only in three of 40 (7.5%) cases of AAH. Interestingly, two of seven P504S-positive AAHs were found adjacent to adenocarcinoma. In contrast, all benign prostatic hyperplasias (20 of 20, 100%) were negative for P504S, and all 20 cases of prostatic carcinomas (100%) showed a diffuse P504S staining pattern. These findings suggest that AAH is a heterogenous entity. The biologic significance of P504S expression in a small subset of AAH remains to be determined. Because most cases of AAH are negative for P504S, immunostaining of P504S is also of diagnostic value in distinguishing the majority of AAHs from prostatic adenocarcinoma.