The first component of complement as a constituent of human salivary sediment

Molecular characterization of complement components (C3, C4, and factor B) in human saliva

A molecular analysis of complement components (C3, C4, and factor B) in human saliva was performed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Complement C3 was detected as a molecule composed of a 115-kDa alpha-chain linked to a 70-kDa beta chain by disulfide bonds, and C3 levels ranged from 0.52 to 15.0 micrograms/ml (n = 15). C4 was detected as a triple-chain molecule (98-kDa alpha chain, 73-kDa beta chain, and 33-kDa gamma chain) linked by disulfide bonds, and C4 levels ranged from 0.086 to 4.8 micrograms/ml. Factor B was detected as a 100-kDa single chain, and factor B levels ranged from 0.042 to 0.62/microgram/ml. The sizes and subunit structures of the complement components in human saliva were compatible with those reported in human serum. The results of a hemolytic assay indicated that the complement molecules in human saliva were functionally active. These complement components may participate in the local immune and inflammatory responses in the oral cavity.

Immune evasion properties of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein gC

Herpes simplex virus type I (HSV-1) glycoprotein gC binds complement component C3b, and purified gC inhibits complement activation. Two HSV strains carrying mutations in the gC gene which rendered them unable to bind C3b were compared with wild-type and marker-rescued viruses to evaluate the role of gC on the virion in protecting HSV-1 from complement-mediated neutralization. The gC mutant viruses were markedly susceptible to neutralization by nonimmune human serum, showing up to a 5,000-fold decline in titer after 1 h of incubation with serum. In contrast, wild-type or marker-rescued viruses showed a twofold reduction in titer. Studies with hypogammaglobulinemic and immunoglobulin G-depleted serum supported the observation that neutralization occurred in the absence of antibody. Neutralization of gC mutant strains by nonimmune serum was rapid; their half-life was 2 to 2.5 min, compared with 1 h for wild-type virus. Ethylene glycol-bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA)-treated human serum or C4-deficient guinea pig serum failed to neutralize gC mutant strains, indicating a role for components of the classical complement pathway. gC had little additional effect on neutralization by the combination of antibody plus complement compared with complement alone. The results indicate that the magnitude of the protection offered by gC-1 is larger than previously recognized; that in the absence of gC-1, complement neutralization is rapid and is mediated by components of the classical complement pathway; and that gC mainly protects against antibody-independent complement neutralization, suggesting a probable role for gC early in infection, before antibodies develop.

Smooth muscle and epithelial cells express specific binding sites for the C1q component of complement

In injury and inflammation, interactions of complement C1q with C1q receptors may provide attachment sites for cell localization and tissue regeneration. Cultured smooth muscle cells (58%), epithelial cells (26%), and endothelial cells (25%) attach to C1q-coated surfaces, while only 6% of cultured B cells (Raji) attach. Endothelial and Raji cells express C1q receptors, but C1q receptors (C1qR) on smooth muscle cells and epithelial cells have not previously been demonstrated. Evidence is provided that smooth muscle cells express an average of 1.5 x 10(6) C1qR/cell (K alpha = 10(8) M-1) and that epithelial cells express an average of 0.7 x 10(6) C1qR/cell (K alpha = 1.4 x 10(8) M-1). Binding properties of C1qR, and immunoreactivity to anti-C1qR antibodies, are characterized. The antibodies specifically recognize a 67-kDa component of smooth muscle cell lysates and inhibit cell attachment to C1q substrates. We conclude that distribution of C1qR may be ubiquitous; binding properties, size, and antigenicity of various C1qR may be related, but adhesive function may be tissue specific.

Interaction of the envelope glycoprotein of human immunodeficiency virus with C1q and fibronectin under conditions present in human saliva

Human saliva has been shown to reduce the infectivity of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) particles in vitro. The factors in human saliva involved in this inhibition of HIV infectivity are unknown, although the salivary sediment of normal individuals has the major HIV neutralizing activity. Interestingly, the first complement component (C1) has been detected on the surface of the salivary sediment in the whole saliva of normal individuals. At the relatively low ionic strength of saliva, we determined that purified human C1q bound with high affinity to the envelope glycoprotein of HIV. Normally, the interaction of the C1q globular heads with immune complexes causes C1 activation. However, direct interactions between C1 and rgp120 (or rgp160) did not lead to C1 fixation, as determined by hemolytic studies with rate-limiting levels of C1, nor did rgp120 cause C1 activation as determined by activated C1s-mediated C4 conversion in normal human serum. Using ELISA, it was observed that intact C1, with the C1r2C1s2 tetramer associated with the collagen-like stem of C1q, did not bind to immobilized rgp120, whereas free C1q did bind. In addition, digestion of the C1q stem portion with collagenase completely eliminated its binding to rgp120. These findings suggest that the collagen-like stem region of C1q, rather than the globular heads, may participate in the binding to the envelope glycoprotein of HIV. Fibronectin, which is present in submandibular saliva, appeared to bind to rgp120 and to enhance the interaction of C1q with rgp120. It is conceivable that C1q and fibronectin, in binding and sequestering HIV particles (i.e. to the salivary sediment), may play an important role in the reduction of HIV transmission via saliva. Further studies will be needed to test the latter speculation.

The interaction of salivary secretions with the human complement system--a model for the study of host defense systems on inflamed mucosal surfaces

When complement first contacts salivary secretions, as when gingival crevicular fluid first meets saliva at the gingival margin, complement function is enhanced. The immediate potentiation of the complement system at equal volume ratios of serum to saliva is due to several factors, including the lower ionic strength of saliva when compared with serum and the presence of certain salivary glyproteins such as the nonimmunoglobulin agglutinins that appear to simultaneously activate C1 and affect (sequester) certain complement control proteins, such as Factor H. This initial potentiation of the complement cascade by saliva may aid in defending the area immediately above the gingival crevice from oral microbiota that are being coated with a combination of serous exudate components and salivary components. As serum becomes much more diluted with saliva (i.e., crevicular fluid moves away from the supragingival area), the acidic proline-rich salivary proteins (APRP) begin to disrupt the unbound C1q-C1r2-C1s2 macromolecular complexes. Thus, the APRP along with other C1 fixing substances in saliva appear to restrict complement function, but only when the ratios of saliva to serum exceed 250:1. Since certain salivary glycoproteins bind to viruses, the potentiation of the complement system by saliva may also play a role in neutralizing certain viral infections on mucosal surfaces where tissue transudates containing complement begin to contact mucosal secretions such as saliva. Again, the ratio of serous fluid to mucosal secretion appears to be an important factor. This article also discusses some of our preliminary data and speculations concerning the binding of the self-associating high-molecular-weight nonimmunoglobulin salivary agglutinins (NIA) with the envelope of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the possible cooperative role of C1q and fibronectin in aiding neutralization of HIV infectivity.

Detection of high-risk groups and individuals for periodontal diseases: laboratory markers from analysis of saliva

The use of saliva as a source of components that may identify subjects at risk of developing destructive periodontitis, or provide markers of disease potential or activity, has been reviewed. It was concluded that bacteria, their constituents or products are unlikely to be rewarding and that host-derived salivary factors such as enzymes cannot identify risk, as deficiency states for these do not exist. Secretory IgA, plasma IgA and IgG isotype levels and specific antibodies may be associated with risk, but probably only if levels fall below those which are protective or a specific antibody response is absent. More work is needed to distinguish between monomeric and dimeric IgA antibodies and to identify IgG antibodies in longitudinal clinical studies. In general, although saliva may prove to be useful as a source of indicators of current disease activity or as a means of assessing responses to treatment, it is unlikely to provide evidence for the existence of risk factors.