Reference material for PSA: the IFCC standardization study. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

Serum Tumor Markers: Past, State of the Art, and Future

Serum determinations of tumor markers are indispensable in the diagnosis and management of cancer, and therefore play an important role in clinical practice. After a short historical survey, we systematically review a number of contemporary aspects of serum tumor markers related to various organ systems, and briefly indicate possible future developments.

Clinical impact of prostate specific antigen (PSA) inter-assay variability on management of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the inter-assay variability of six commercially available prostate specific antigen (PSA) assays, its clinical impact in prostate cancer (PCa) and comparison of automated versus manual assays.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sera from 495 patients (425 with PCa and 70 men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), were measured with six different assays [three automated assays (a-PSA) and three manual ELISA based assay (m-PSA)]. Variability, agreement and bias were measured and compared among assays using Bland Altman plots and Passing and Bablok regression analysis. The possible impact of inter-assay variability on important clinical scenarios was also studied.

RESULTS

All the assays were well correlated (r: 0.88-0.98); however there was significant disagreement and bias between the systems, which were more pronounced among the a-PSA assays. The Bland Altman plot showed that the variability was high between the m-PSA assays and the standard Abbott system with mean difference of 3.8-5.8ng/ml. In contrast, the a-PSA had better agreement with mean difference of 0.8-2.3ng/ml. Beckman Coulter showed the best agreement to the institutional reference (slope-1.097; 95% CI: 1.06-1.14; p<0.05, and intercept-0.20; 95% CI-0.38-0.58; p<0.05, Passing Bablok). It led to significant variability in PCa risk stratification and failure to detect biochemical failure in more than 50% cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The discrepancies between the assays lead to significant clinical misinterpretation with risk group migration and detection of biochemical failure post radiotherapy. There are significant discordances between automated and ELISA based assays.

Serum concentrations of prostate-specific antigen measured using immune extraction, trypsin digestion, and tandem mass spectrometry quantification of LSEPAELTDAVK peptide

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a 34-kDa glycoprotein with chymotrypsin-like enzyme activity that circulates both in free forms and complexed to various enzyme inhibitors including antichymotrypsin and α2-macroglobulin. Prostate-specific antigen bound to α2-macroglobulin is not detected by commercial PSA immunoassays.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a mass spectrometry assay that detects the same forms of PSA as the immunoassays, which could serve as a reference for harmonizing PSA immunoassays.

DESIGN

Prostate-specific antigen was immune extracted from serum, trypsin was digested, and the LSEPAELTDAVK peptide was quantitated on an API 5000 spectrometer. Calibrators were made by adding 10% free and 90% antichymotrypsin-bound PSA to female sera. The assay was standardized to the World Health Organization 96/670 reference standard. Validation of clinical utility and comparisons with 2 immunoassays (Roche cobas and Beckman Access) were performed using frozen sera aliquots from 100 men undergoing prostate biopsy (50 negative, 50 with cancer) and 5 serial samples collected over time from 5 men with advanced prostate cancer.

RESULTS

The antibody extraction efficiency was greater than 99%. The assay has an analytic range from 1.2 to 76 ng/mL, with precision ranging from 8.6% at 1.5 ng/mL to 5.4% at 27 ng/mL. The mass spectrometry assay correlated well with 2 immunoassays. All 3 assays showed statistically equivalent separation of prostate cancer from benign disease using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This mass spectrometry assay can reliably measure PSA concentrations in human serum and could serve as a reference standard for harmonizing PSA immunoassays.

Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards

The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) recommend that a marker of bone formation (serum procollagen type I N propeptide, s-PINP) and a marker of bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, s-CTX) are used as reference analytes for bone turnover markers in clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION

Bone turnover markers (BTM) predict fracture risk, and treatment-induced changes in specific markers account for a substantial proportion of fracture risk reduction. The aims of this report were to determine their clinical potential in the prediction of fracture risk and for monitoring the treatment of osteoporosis and to set an appropriate research agenda.

METHODS

Evidence from prospective studies was gathered through literature review of the PUBMED database between the years 2000 and 2010 and the systematic review of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality up to 2001.

RESULTS

High levels of BTMs may predict fracture risk independently from bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. They have been used for this purpose in clinical practice for many years, but there is still a need for stronger evidence on which to base practice. BTMs provide pharmacodynamic information on the response to osteoporosis treatment, and as a result, they are widely used for monitoring treatment in the individual. However, their clinical value for monitoring is limited by inadequate appreciation of the sources of variability, by limited data for comparison of treatments using the same BTM and by inadequate quality control. IOF/IFCC recommend one bone formation marker (s-PINP) and one bone resorption marker (s-CTX) to be used as reference markers and measured by standardised assays in observational and intervention studies in order to compare the performance of alternatives and to enlarge the international experience of the application of markers to clinical medicine.

CONCLUSION

BTM hold promise in fracture risk prediction and for monitoring treatment. Uncertainties over their clinical use can be in part resolved by adopting international reference standards.

Prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer in the third millennium: useful or hype?

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in men and the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Although the wide-spread introduction of total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) testing has revolutionized the approach to the managed care of this disease, there are some biological, analytical, clinical, and economical issues that argue against the cost-effectiveness of tPSA-based population screening for early identification of cancer. The on-going standardization/harmonization efforts, along with the outcomes of recent epidemiological investigations, demonstrate that the current tPSA thresholds might be revised and possibly recalculated according to several demographical variables, such as age, ethnicity, genotype, family history, and body mass index. A major shortcoming of tPSA screening is the lack of reliable evidences of reduction in prostate cancer-associated mortality, due to the large lead-time because of the indolent growth rate, the impossibility to differentiate high-grade from indolent cancers, and the treatment-associated morbidity. Since no single tPSA cut-off was proven able to efficiently identify men at higher risk of death, the jeopardy of over-diagnosis and over-treatment is also tangible. The large expenditure is an additional source of concern. Finally, a wide-spread population screening also carries several ethical, social, and psychological implications, which might overwhelm the potential benefits.

Clinical Impact of New Prostate-Specific Antigen WHO Standardization on Biopsy Rates and Cancer Detection

Background: Clinicians may be unaware that replacement of the historical total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) standard with the WHO 96/670 international standard leads to difficulties in interpreting tPSA results. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between the Hybritech and WHO calibrations of the Beckman Coulter tPSA assay, and to assess the impact on prostate cancer (PCa) detection.

Methods: tPSA concentrations were measured in 106 serum samples with both Hybritech and WHO calibrations. The established relationships were used for an in silico experiment with a cohort of 5865 men. Differences in prostate biopsy rates, PCa detection, and characteristics of missed cancers were calculated at biopsy thresholds of 3.0 and 4.0 μg/L.

Results: A linear relationship was observed between the 2 calibrations, with a 20.3% decrease in tPSA values with the WHO standard compared with the Hybritech calibration. Applying the WHO calibration to the cohort of 5865 men yielded a 20% or 19% decrease in prostate biopsies and a 19% or 20% decrease in detected cancers compared with the Hybritech calibration, at a cutoff for biopsy of 3.0 or 4.0 μg/L, respectively. The decrease in detected cancers declined to 9% or 11% if an abnormal result in a digital rectal examination or a transrectal ultrasound evaluation was used as trigger for prostate biopsy (cutoff of 3.0 or 4.0 μg/L, respectively).

Conclusions: Application of the WHO standard for tPSA assays with commonly used tPSA thresholds leads to a significant decrease in PCa detection. Careful assessment of the relationship between the WHO standard and the thresholds used for prostate biopsy is hence necessary.

The Clinical Impact of who Standardization of PSA Assays

The determination of serum level of the prostate specific antigen (PSA) is widely used for detection and management of prostate cancer. Analytical variability between the various PSA assays on the market has been reported. This discrepancy in the PSA results was shown to be related to non-equimolar detection of total PSA (tPSA) but also to a lack of assay standardization and could have serious clinical repercussions on the diagnostic performance of PSA testing. The recalibration of equimolar assays to common reference preparations (tPSA WHO 96/670 and fPSA 96/668) was thought to promote standardization of PSA assays and limit the clinical implication of assay variability. Comparison studies have demonstrated that PSA assay calibration to the WHO standard certainly improves the harmonisation of PSA testing, but differences between assays remain. Recent evaluations of the clinical impact of analytical variations induced by a calibration to the WHO standard reported that 15% to 30% of prostate cancer could be missed if the historical tPSA cut-off was used. In order to avoid unacceptable erosion of the clinical diagnostic performance of PSA determination for the detection of prostate cancer with WHO calibrated assays, it is critical to define new specific clinical decision points.

Different prostate-specific antigen assays give different results on the same blood sample: an obstacle to recommending uniform limits for prostate biopsies

OBJECTIVE

To show the effect of different results for total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) and percentage free/total PSA (%fPSA) obtained with different assays for differentiating between benign and malignant prostate diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were used for tPSA and fPSA levels from 596 patients with prostate cancer (314) or no evidence of cancer (282) within the PSA range 0.5-10 ng/mL, analysed with assays from Abbott (AxSYM), Beckman Coulter (Access), DPC (Immulite 2000), and Roche (Elecsys 2010), and with tPSA and complexed PSA (cPSA) assays from Bayer (ADVIA Centaur), as already reported. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC), specificities at assay-dependent and fixed thresholds, and the percentages of correct classification rates of patients were calculated.

RESULTS

Whereas the areas under the ROC curves were no different among all tPSA assays, the assay-specific thresholds at 90% sensitivity were 2.5-3.1 ng/mL. When using fixed 2.5 or 4 ng/mL tPSA thresholds there was a wide sensitivity range, with significant differences among almost all assays, resulting in significantly different classification rates of patients. These differences were even larger when using fixed %fPSA thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

The current situation of differences among PSA values measured with different assays do not allow the recommendation of uniform PSA limits as biopsy criteria. For that purpose, better harmonization of PSA values between the different PSA test systems must be realized.

Comparison of 6 automated assays for total and free prostate-specific antigen with special reference to their reactivity toward the WHO 96/670 reference preparation

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays have historically produced different results. Our aim was to investigate the comparability of assay results of selected commercially available assay methods designed to measure total, free, or complexed PSA (tPSA, fPSA, and cPSA).

METHODS

We measured tPSA, fPSA, and cPSA in 70 samples and in the WHO PSA 96/670 reference preparation with 6 assays (Beckman-Coulter Access, Abbott ARCHITECT and AxSYM, Bayer Advia Centaur, DPC IMMULITE 2000, and Roche Modular Analytics E170). We also calculated the fPSA/tPSA ratio.

RESULTS

The mean deviations from the expected tPSA and fPSA values for the WHO 96/670 reference preparation were 0.37 (range, 0.01-1.32) and 0.19 (range, 0.05-0.49) microg/L, respectively. When plotted against the expected WHO 96/670 reference preparation value, regression slopes varied from 0.99 to 1.22 and r2 from 0.9996 to 1.000. When total PSA was measured in mixtures of sera with high and low tPSA concentrations, the mean (SD) slope of regression of different assays against an in-house method was 1.04 (0.09). In these specimens, the fPSA/tPSA ratio was 0.11-0.14 with different methods. The tPSA and fPSA values in patient samples measured in different assays and plotted against ARCHITECT gave regression slopes from 0.88 to 0.97. The results of the studied assays for tPSA in serum samples agreed within 15%, from each other, and all results for the WHO 96/670 reference preparation were within 6.8% (confidence interval, 1.7%-15.2%) of the expected value. The results for fPSA were more diverse.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences among PSA assays appear to have decreased since introduction of the WHO 96/670 reference preparation, but further efforts are needed to harmonize fPSA assays.

Engineering Camel Single-Domain Antibodies and Immobilization Chemistry for Human Prostate-Specific Antigen Sensing

The specificity and affinity characteristics of antibodies make them excellent probes in biosensor applications. Unfortunately, their large size, unstable behavior, and random immobilization properties create numerous problems. The single-domain antigen-binding fragment derived from heavy-chain antibodies of camelids (termed VHH) offers special advantages in terms of size, stability, and ease of generating different antibody constructs. In this study, we show the potential of those VHHs in sensing human prostate-specific antigen (hPSA) by SPR technology. Different VHH constructs were immobilized onto commercial and custom-built sensor surfaces by metal chelation, biotin-streptavidin interaction, or covalent coupling. The detection of subnanogram per milliliter hPSA concentrations could be attained on a covalently coupled three-dimensional dextran surface. Moreover, the ratio of different hPSA isoform concentrations could be assessed via a sandwich assay and resulted in the detection of clinically significant antigen concentrations within 15 min. In addition, for the first time, the intrinsic protein stability is presented as an important probe design factor, since our results reveal that higher intrinsic stability offers higher resistance to harsh regeneration conditions. In conclusion, we present VHHs as a novel class of biosensor probes rivaling conventional antibodies and their derived antibody fragments.

Comparison by LC-MS and MALDI-MS of prostate-specific antigen from five commercial sources with certified reference material 613

OBJECTIVE

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) samples from five commercial sources were compared with PSA from the European Commission Community Bureau of Reference, known as CRM 613, using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS).

DESIGN AND METHODS

The effects of storage at various temperatures, multiple freeze-thaw cycles and lyophilization vs. solution storage were investigated.

RESULTS

: CRM 613 and the five commercially available samples varied in their heterogeneity and in the amount of PSA with a molecular mass of 28,430 kDa. Few changes were observed among any of the samples during the stability study or study of the effect of lyophilization and freeze-thaw cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of many of the commercial PSA sources as authentic PSA standards for calibrants for in vitro diagnostic tests could lead to significantly biased PSA measurements. Although all the PSA samples appear to be relatively stable for the time periods and conditions studied, some of the commercially available samples contain limited amounts of PSA and included other unidentified components.

Development of immunoradiometric assay for quantitative determination of free prostate-specific antigen

In this study we reported the development and analytical validation of new assay for quantitative determination of free prostate-specific antigen, fPSA. It is formulated as one step, two-site "sandwich" immunoradiometric assay. Specificity of this assay was achieved by using epitope-1-reactive anti-fPSA antibody as tracer antibody. Assay was calibrated against first international standard 96/668, and its detection limit was determined as 0.08 mg/L. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 3.42-7.53% and 7.04-8.33%, respectively. Measured concentrations of serially diluted serum samples were close to the calculated concentrations, indicating good linearity with recovery percentage ranging from 98.7-107.4%. Analytical performance characteristics of fPSA assay speaks in favor of its use as a reliable tool in laboratory diagnostics relating to prostate diseases.

Evaluation of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for complexed PSA on the Bayer ACS:180 system

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the most important tumor marker for the detection of prostate cancer, exists in serum in a free, uncomplexed form (free PSA [fPSA]), and as bound to protease inhibitors (mainly alpha1-antichymotrypsin [ACT]). The measurement of complexed PSA (cPSA) concentration in serum has been shown to have better sensitivity and specificity than serum total PSA concentration. A new chemiluminescent immunoassay for cPSA for use on the Bayer ACS:180 fully automated system (Bayer Corp, Tarrytown, NY) has been developed and evaluated. The precision of the new assay was <3.9% (within-run coefficient of variation [CV]) and <5.0% (total CV). The analytical sensitivity (95% upper limit of noise at zero calibrator) was <0.03 ng/mL. A comparison of the ACS:180 cPSA results with the cPSA concentrations calculated from the ACCESS (Beckman-Coulter) PSA and fPSA assays yielded the following regression equation: ACS:180 cPSA=0.93* (calculated ACCESS cPSA)+0.43, R=0.993, n=95. The mean dilution and spike recovery for five samples were both 98%. No interference was observed from hemoglobin, triglyceride, or bilirubin (NCCLS protocol). These results indicate that the ACS:180 cPSA assay is precise, and compares well with the calculated cPSA from ACCESS total and free-PSA results.

Prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer staging in a population-based register

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown a relationship between serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and prostate tumour volume. Reports based on selected case series have also indicated that serum PSA may be used for staging, although a varying prevalence of metastasizing tumours complicates the interpretation of these studies. In order to determine the accuracy of the serum level of PSA in predicting the presence of metastases we performed a prospective cohort study of a geographically defined population of men with prostate cancer.

METHODS

Serum level of PSA and the results of investigations for regional lymph node and distant metastases were recorded for all 8328 men with prostate cancer registered in the Swedish National Prostate Cancer Register 1996-1997.

RESULTS

The prevalence of lymph node metastases among men who had undergone lymph node exploration was 4%, 16% and 33% for well, moderately and poorly differentiated tumours. The corresponding prevalence of distant metastases was 12%, 30% and 48%. With serum PSA <20 ng/ml as a cut-off point the negative likelihood ratios for well and moderately differentiated tumours were found to be 0.47 and 0.45 for lymph node metastases and 0.24 and 0.18 for distant metastases, resulting in post-test probabilities >92% for the exclusion of metastases. In men with poorly differentiated tumours, the negative likelihood ratio would need to be even lower to safely exclude disseminated disease.

CONCLUSION

For well to moderately differentiated tumours, further investigations to assess the presence of metastases may be omitted with no great risk for understaging if serum PSA <20 ng/ml.

Prostate-specific antigen as surrogate for characterizing prostate cancer subgroups

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in a population-based cohort of men with prostate cancer vary with age and intensity in the diagnostic activity and to describe the treatment selection processes associated with PSA level.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All men in the Swedish National Prostate Cancer Register diagnosed during 1996-1997 were included. In 1996 the register included 19 counties, covering 61% of the Swedish male population, and in 1997 21 counties with 79% of the Swedish male population.

RESULTS

A total of 8328 men were registered. PSA levels were missing in 341 cases. With increasing PSA there was a shift towards more advanced and poorly differentiated tumours. PSA at diagnosis increased with age, with the exception of patients younger than 50 years who had higher PSA values. The mean logarithm of PSA correlated negatively with the percentage of localized tumours (p < 0.005) and the age-adjusted incidence (p < 0.05) in each respective county in 1997. PSA was higher in men receiving radiotherapy compared with those treated with radical prostatectomy as well as in the group treated with bilateral orchiectomy compared with those receiving GnRH-analogues.

CONCLUSIONS

If PSA is used as a surrogate measure of extent of tumour volume in a population of prostate cancer patients, our findings indicate that age distribution and differences in incidence (possibly due to variation in diagnostic activity) should be taken into account. In our cohort there was a selection process, probably in part guided by PSA level, when choosing type of curative or palliative treatment.

Thiophilic interaction chromatography facilitates detection of various molecular complexes of prostate-specific antigen in biological fluids

BACKGROUND

It is known that total PSA values are often greater than the sum total of free-PSA (f-PSA) and PSA-ACT complex. It is primarily because other PSA complexes are present in the patient serum and currently cannot be quantified. Our studies were aimed in developing methodology that will permit recovery of all molecular forms of PSA from various biological fluids.

METHODS

Thiophilic interaction (3S,T-gel) chromatography procedure was used to isolate various PSA molecular forms present in biological fluids. f-PSA and PSA complexes were shown to have strong affinity for T-gel. PSA forms eluted from the column were analyzed by SDS-PAGE/Western blot and were identified by immunostaining with antibody-specific to PSA and to various protease inhibitors. The identity of PSA complexes was also confirmed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent-assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

One step affinity chromatography procedure (3S,T-gel) was used to isolate different molecular forms of PSA in seminal plasma, patient sera, and in prostate cancer cell culture medium. Seminal plasma was shown to contain f-PSA, PSA-ACT, PSA-A2M, and PSA-PCI. Sera from prostate cancer patients at different stages of the disease contained f-PSA, PSA-ACT, and PSA-A2M. Besides these PSA forms, some patients at late stage of the disease (T3 and T4) also contained two additional PSA-complexes that have not been identified as of yet. Conditioned medium from LNCaP cells was shown to contain f-PSA, PSA-ACT, and PSA-A2M complexes.

CONCLUSIONS

Thiophilic gel has strong affinity for all known molecular forms of PSA present in any biological material. Visualization of PSA molecular forms in Western-blot analysis was feasible only after patient serum was processed through T-gel. Our procedure can be used to screen hybridoma and antibodies specific to the individual PSA complex. The PSA molecular forms isolated from patient serum after T-gel procedure may provide useful internal calibrators, and thus may significantly enhance the reliability of PSA measurements.

Discordant performance of assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen in relation to the early detection of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of applying rigid threshold values in interpreting prostate specific antigen (PSA) results, by selecting and comparing five current methods for measuring free and total PSA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples taken from an ongoing screening study for prostate cancer (total PSA by Tandem-E assay, 17 334 participants; biopsy criterion a PSA of 3.0 microg/L, 4 464 men) from men with a total PSA of 1.0-6.0 microg/L were measured for free and total PSA using the Access, Immulite, Elecsys and Prostatus analysis kits, in two patient groups, i.e. with prostate cancer or no evidence of disease.

RESULTS

Both patient groups had equal means for total PSA but not for free PSA. In all, 360 samples from men with cancer and 96 from men with no evidence of disease were analysed. All methods applied to both groups deviated statistically significantly from the Tandem-E result for total PSA, except for the Access kit. There was a close correlation among all the methods (correlation coefficients of 0.89-0.97). There were very discordant results for the combination of the Tandem-E vs Prostatus (8% difference), representing 315 participants at a threshold of 3.0 microg/L. For free PSA (free/total PSA) the situation was worse, with extreme differences of 32% and 36% for both patient groups (Elecsys vs Access).

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on the threshold value applied as an indication for biopsy, when using the total PSA alone or combined with the free/total PSA, care is needed in interpreting patient groups because of the discordance among PSA assays.

Reference Reagents for Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA): Establishment of the First International Standards for Free PSA and PSA (90:10)

Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements in serum by immunoassay are widely used in the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of patients with prostate cancer although the lack of common reference reagents has led in the past to wide differences in estimates. We report here the results of a WHO international collaborative study in which two preparations of PSA representative of the main immunoreactive components in serum, free PSA and PSA 90:10, and a preparation of recombinant DNA-derived PSA were assessed as potential standards for the calibration of diagnostic immunoassays for PSA.

Methods: Coded vials of the candidate materials and serum preparations containing PSA in the clinically important range were provided to the 10 laboratories in the study, and participants were asked to perform PSA assays currently in use in their laboratories. Data from 89 immunoassays by 26 different method-laboratory combinations were contributed to the study and analyzed centrally at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control.

Results: Potency estimates of the preparations relative to the in-house calibrators were in good agreement with the target value of 1 μg of total PSA/vial, the preparation of free PSA giving 1.10 μg/vial (95% confidence interval, 0.99–1.21 μg/vial) and PSA 90:10, 1.11 μg/vial (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.18 μg/vial). No immunoreactivity was detected in ampoules containing the recombinant material. Use of a common standard of PSA 90:10 significantly reduced the between-laboratory geometric coefficients of variation for serum samples included in the study and gave a much narrower range of potency estimates.

Conclusions: The preparation of free PSA was established by WHO as the First International Standard for PSA (free) with an assigned content of 1 μg of total PSA per vial. In addition, the preparation of bound PSA was established as the First International Standard for PSA (90:10) with an assigned content of 1 μg of total PSA per vial.

Ratio of Free or Complexed Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) to Total PSA: Which Ratio Improves Differentiation between Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer?

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of a new assay that measures all forms of prostate-specific antigen complexed (cPSA) to serum proteins except α2-macroglobulin with the assay of free PSA (fPSA) and the corresponding ratios to total PSA (tPSA) to improve the differentiation between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods: Serum samples were collected from 91 men without prostate disease and with normal digital rectal examination (controls), 144 untreated patients with PCa, and 89 patients with BPH. tPSA and cPSA were measured using the Bayer Immuno 1 system; fPSA and the additional tPSA were measured with the Roche Elecsys system.

Results: The median cPSA/tPSA, fPSA/tPSA, and fPSA/cPSA ratios were significantly different between patients with BPH and PCa (78.7% vs 90.7%, 25.5% vs 12.1%, and 36.8% vs 14.3%, respectively; P &lt;0.001). No correlations of cPSA and its ratios to tumor stage and grade were found. ROC analysis showed that cPSA was not different from tPSA (areas under the curve, 0.632 vs 0.568), whereas the cPSA/tPSA ratio was similar to the fPSA/tPSA ratio in increasing discrimination between BPH and PCa patients with tPSA concentrations in the tPSA gray zone between 2 and 10 μg/L (areas under the curve, 0.851 vs 0.838).

Conclusions: Compared with tPSA, the fPSA/tPSA and cPSA/tPSA ratios both improve the differentiation between BPH and PCa comparably and are similarly effective in reducing the rate of unnecessary biopsies, whereas cPSA alone does not have any effect.

New developments in the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen

OBJECTIVE

Analytical evaluation of the calibration of three recently launched assays for the measurement of total prostate-specific antigen, i.e., IMx Total PSA (Abbott), Elecsys PSA (Roche), and IMMULITE 3rd Generation PSA (DPC).

DESIGN AND METHODS

For accuracy assessment two reference materials were applied namely, Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator and Certified Reference Material 613 Prostate-Specific Antigen. Dilutions of these preparations were analyzed with all assays. In addition, clinical specimens from known prostate cancer or benign prostate hyperplasia patients and samples taken from an ongoing prostate cancer screening study were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Application of the Stanford Calibrator revealed results well within 10% of the calculated values for all assays. Regarding the CRM Calibrator only the IMx Total PSA proved to approach the line of identity. The IMMULITE results differed about 40% and the Elecsys about 18% from the calculated values. The comparison with clinical specimens showed statistically different results for the combination IMMULITE-IMx and for IMMULITE-Elecsys. The regression lines for both collections were: y(IMx) = 0.86x(IMMULITE) +0.12 (n = 104, r = 0.970, Sy/x = 0.883 microg/L) and y(Elecsys) = 0.98x(IMMULITE) +0.38 (n = 97, r = 0.976, Sy/x = 0.733 microg/L). In the lower measuring range (PSA <5.0 microg/L) as measured with the screening samples (n = 43), these differences were less pronounced.

CONCLUSION

In analytical sense a difference was found for both reference preparations in the assays studied. Clinically, despite improvements in methodology, results for total prostate-specific antigen are still not interchangeable. The possible consequences need to be elaborated.

Effect of the Ratio of Free to Total Prostate-specific Antigen on Interassay Variability in Proficiency Test Samples

Background: Up to sevenfold differences were observed between total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) methods for New York State Proficiency Test samples prepared with seminal fluid PSA in human female serum. Because the PSA was mainly in its free form under these conditions, we wanted to determine whether a defined mixture of free and complexed PSA would reduce the interassay differences.

Methods: We prepared a series of five solutions of 60 g/L bovine serum albumin with 10 μg/L total PSA consisting of varied proportions of free, noncomplexible PSA, and α1-antichymotrypsin (ACT)-complexed PSA from 0% to 100%. Two hundred seventy laboratories measured the total PSA in these samples, and 16 laboratories also analyzed the samples for free PSA. The results were used to calculate free/total PSA ratios.

Results: Interassay CVs for total PSA measurements were ∼7% at 10–15% free PSA but became gradually larger as the free/total PSA ratio increased. Measured free-PSA concentrations were similar within each sample (mean CV, 12%), and the results were relatively independent of the proportion of free PSA in the samples. Twofold discrepancies between actual and expected ratios were observed with some methods at 100% free PSA and to a lesser degree at 30% free PSA. At 100% free PSA, the relatively higher total-PSA values measured by nonequimolar methods yielded low free/total PSA ratios of 50–60%. In contrast, the lower total PSA values obtained by equimolar methods yielded ratios close to the expected 100%.

Conclusions: Preparing proficiency test samples with a 10:90 mixture of free, noncomplexible PSA:PSA-ACT is a viable alternative to the use of seminal fluid PSA. Furthermore, the method used to measure total PSA may have a substantial impact on the calculated proportion of free PSA and hence may have clinical relevance.

On the standardization of total prostate-specific antigen: an exercise with two reference preparations

In this study, 112 serum samples were analyzed for total prostate-specific antigen with three well-established assays i.e. Tandem R and Tandem E (both from Hybritech Inc., San Diego, USA) and Prostatus Free/Total from Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland. Thirty-two samples were collected from prostate cancer patients, 32 from patients with benign prostate hyperplasia and 48 from men participating in a screening study for prostate cancer. The aim of the study was to compare the results before and after recalculation with the data obtained with two reference preparations for total prostate-specific antigen: Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator and Certified Reference Material 613 Prostate-Specific Antigen. Comparing the actual results revealed almost perfect correlations between Tandem R and Tandem E and between both Tandem assays and Prostatus. We observed statistically significant differences in accuracy between Tandem R and Tandem E: y(Tandem E)= 1.05 x(Tandem R)+0.07 and between Tandem E and Prostatus: y(Prostatus)= 0.94 x(Tandem E)+0.02 In both comparisons prostate-specific antigen values ranged from 0-40 microg/l. Recalculation with both reference preparations did not solve these discrepancies. One exception was the combination Tandem R and Tandem E. The application of either reference preparation solved the differences in accuracy here. In conclusion, even after recalibration, assays for total prostate-specific antigen are still not completely interchangeable.