Effects of erythromycin or rifampin on losartan pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers

Rifampin Drug-Drug-Interaction Studies: Reflections on the Nitrosamine Impurities Issue

Clinical development of new drugs may require dedicated drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies, such as to evaluate the effect of cytochrome P450 3A induction on the pharmacokinetics of investigational drugs. However, as a result of N-nitrosamine impurity findings in marketed rifampin formulations, the application of rifampin in DDI studies has been halted. This mini-review considers the root cause and impact of the nitrosamine impurity as well as alternative options for the continued conduct of DDIs.

Prediction of potential drug interactions between repurposed COVID-19 and antitubercular drugs: an integrational approach of drug information software and computational techniques data

Introduction:

Tuberculosis is a major respiratory disease globally with a higher prevalence in Asian and African countries than rest of the world. With a larger population of tuberculosis patients anticipated to be co-infected with COVID-19 infection, an ongoing pandemic, identifying, preventing and managing drug–drug interactions is inevitable for maximizing patient benefits for the current repurposed COVID-19 and antitubercular drugs.

Methods:

We assessed the potential drug–drug interactions between repurposed COVID-19 drugs and antitubercular drugs using the drug interaction checker of IBM Micromedex®. Extensive computational studies were performed at a molecular level to validate and understand the drug–drug interactions found from the Micromedex drug interaction checker database at a molecular level. The integrated knowledge derived from Micromedex and computational data was collated and curated for predicting potential drug–drug interactions between repurposed COVID-19 and antitubercular drugs.

Results:

A total of 91 potential drug–drug interactions along with their severity and level of documentation were identified from Micromedex between repurposed COVID-19 drugs and antitubercular drugs. We identified 47 pharmacodynamic, 42 pharmacokinetic and 2 unknown DDIs. The majority of our molecular modelling results were in line with drug–drug interaction data obtained from the drug information software. QT prolongation was identified as the most common type of pharmacodynamic drug–drug interaction, whereas drug–drug interactions associated with cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition and induction were identified as the frequent pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. The results suggest antitubercular drugs, particularly rifampin and second-line agents, warrant high alert and monitoring while prescribing with the repurposed COVID-19 drugs.

Conclusion:

Predicting these potential drug–drug interactions, particularly related to CYP3A4, P-gp and the human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene proteins, could be used in clinical settings for screening and management of drug–drug interactions for delivering safer chemotherapeutic tuberculosis and COVID-19 care. The current study provides an initial propulsion for further well-designed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-based drug–drug interaction studies.

Plain Language Summary

Model-based comparative analysis of rifampicin and rifabutin drug-drug interaction profile

Rifamycins are widely used for treating mycobacterial and staphylococcal infections. Drug-drug interactions (DDI) caused by rifampicin (RIF) is a major issue. We used a model-based approach to predict the magnitude of DDI with RIF and rifabutin (RBT) for 217 cytochrome P450 (CYP) substrates. On average, DDI caused by low-dose RIF were twice more potent than those caused by RBT. Contrary to RIF, RBT appears unlikely to cause severe DDI, even with sensitive CYP substrates.

Effect of CYP2C9 genetic polymorphism and breviscapine on losartan pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects

1. Breviscapine was an active ingredient of flavonoid glycosides. Our present study was conducted to evaluate the impact of breviscapine on the pharmacokinetics of losartan and its active metabolite E-3174, and that relationship with the gene polymorphism of CYP2C9 in healthy Chinese volunteers, to provide a basis for clinical rational drug use.2. The genotypes of 217 healthy Chinese subjects were determined using PCR-RFLP. Twelve healthy subjects were selected and were known CYP2C9 genotypes (six CYP2C9*1/*3 and six CYP2C9*1/*1) in a two-phase randomised crossover design study. These subjects were given daily doses of 120 mg (40 mg, three times a day) of breviscapine or a placebo for 14 days, followed by 50 mg losartan on day 15.3. Compared with individuals carrying the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype, the CYP2C9*1/*3 genotype showed an increase in the AUC_(0-36) (833.6 ± 379.8 ng h ml^-1 vs. 526.1 ± 140.1 ng h ml^-1, p < 0.05) and a decrease in the MR (the metabolic ratio of losartan, AUC_E-3174/AUC_losartan) (2.67 ± 1.40 vs. 4.56 ± 0.83, p < 0.05) of losartan during the placebo treatment phase. Individuals with genotype CYP2C9*1/*3 showed a significant increase in AUC_(0-36) (2335 ± 851.8 ng h ml^-1 vs. 1927 ± 949.5 ng h ml^-1, p < 0.05) and AUC_(0-∞) (2363 ± 875.6 ng h ml^-1 vs. 1966 ± 966.1 ng h ml^-1, p < 0.05) of E-3174 after breviscapine treatment compared to the placebo group.4. In healthy subjects, breviscapine had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of losartan. The activity of CYP2C9 enzyme to losartan metabolism was more significant in subjects with CYP2C9*1/*3 than those with CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype.

Verification of a cocktail approach for quantitative drug-drug interaction assessment: a comparative analysis between the results of a single drug and a cocktail drug

A cocktail approach is a method to comprehensively evaluate the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) by co-administering multiple CYP substrates. This is the first report that compares the results from a cocktail study to a single substrate separate administration study (single study) with concomitant administration of CYP inducers/inhibitors. The validity of a cocktail study for use as a quantitative drug-drug interactions (DDIs) assessment was evaluated.We administered a cocktail drug (caffeine, losartan, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, midazolam) with rifampicin, cimetidine or fluvoxamine. A comparative analysis was performed between the results of a cocktail study and single studies. The results of single studies were obtained from a literature review and the trials of single substrate separate administration.A strong positive correlation of the AUC ratio of all drugs between single studies and the cocktail study was obtained. The ratio of AUC change of 12 combinations converged to 0.82-1.09, and 2 combinations ranged between 0.74-1.32.The differences in the degree of interaction between the single studies and cocktail study are acceptable to evaluate DDIs for almost all combinations. Our results indicate that a cocktail study is an adequate and quantitative evaluation method for DDIs.

Inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes in humans: an update

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme family is the most important enzyme system catalyzing the phase 1 metabolism of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics such as herbal remedies and toxic compounds in the environment. The inhibition and induction of CYPs are major mechanisms causing pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. This review presents a comprehensive update on the inhibitors and inducers of the specific CYP enzymes in humans. The focus is on the more recent human in vitro and in vivo findings since the publication of our previous review on this topic in 2008. In addition to the general presentation of inhibitory drugs and inducers of human CYP enzymes by drugs, herbal remedies, and toxic compounds, an in-depth view on tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and antiretroviral HIV medications as victims and perpetrators of drug–drug interactions is provided as examples of the current trends in the field. Also, a concise overview of the mechanisms of CYP induction is presented to aid the understanding of the induction phenomena.

Predicting Interactions between Rifampin and Antihypertensive Drugs Using the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Lack of blood pressure control is often seen in hypertensive patients concomitantly taking antituberculosis medications due to the complex drug-drug interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, it is of clinical importance to understand the underlying mechanisms of these interactions to help formulate recommendations on the use of antihypertensive drugs in patients taking these medications concomitantly. Our objective was to assess the reliability of the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) to predict potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs and thus provide recommendations on the choice of antihypertensive drugs in patients receiving rifampin.

DESIGN

Evidence-based in vitro and in vivo predictions of drug-drug interactions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We systematically evaluated interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs using the theory of the BDDCS, taking into consideration the role of drug transporters and metabolic enzymes involved in these interactions. We provide recommendations on the selection of antihypertensive drugs for patients with tuberculosis. Antihypertensive drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the China National Medical Products Administration were included in this study. The drugs were classified into four categories under the BDDCS classification. Detailed information on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and drug transporters for each antihypertensive drug was searched in PubMed and other electronic databases. This information was combined with the effects of rifampin on CYP enzymes and drug transporters, and the direction and relative extent of the potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs were predicted. Recommendations were then made using the theory of BDDCS. A thorough systematic literature review was performed, and data from all published human studies and case reports were summarized for the validation of our predictions. Interventional and observational studies published in PubMed and two Chinese databases (CNKI and WanFang) through December 16, 2019, were included, and data were extracted for validation of the predictions. Using the BDDCS theory, class 3 active drugs were predicted to exhibit minimal interactions with rifampin. On reviewing case reports and pre-post studies, the predictions we made were found to be reliable. When antituberculosis medications that include rifampin are started in patients with hypertension, it is recommended that the use of calcium channel blockers and classes 1 and 2 β-blockers be avoided. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, olmesartan, class 3 β-blockers, spironolactone, and hydrochlorothiazide would be preferable because clinically relevant interactions would not be expected.

CONCLUSION

Application of the BDDCS to predict interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs for patients with both tuberculosis and hypertension was found to be reliable. It should be noted, however, that based on the CYP enzyme and drug transporter information we reviewed, the mechanisms of all of the interactions could not be elucidated, and the predictions are only based on theory. The real effects of rifampin on antihypertensive drugs need to be further observed. More studies in both animals and humans are needed in the future.

Progress in the Consideration of Possible Sex Differences in Drug Interaction Studies

Background:

Anecdotal evidence suggests that there may be sex differences in Drug-drug Interactions (DDI) involving specific drugs. Regulators have provided general guidance for the inclusion of females in clinical studies. Some clinical studies have reported sex differences in the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates, suggesting that DDI involving CYP3A4 substrates could potentially show sex differences.

Objective:

The aim of this review was to investigate whether recent prospective DDI studies have included both sexes and whether there was evidence for the presence or absence of sex differences with the DDIs.

Methods:

The relevant details from 156 drug interaction studies within 124 papers were extracted and evaluated.

Results:

Only eight studies (five papers) compared the outcome of the DDI between males and females. The majority of the studies had only male volunteers. Five studies had females only while 60 had males only, with 7.7% of the studies having an equal proportion of both sexes. Surprisingly, four studies did not specify the sex of the subjects.

:

Based on the limited number of studies comparing males and females, no specific trends or conclusions were evident. Sex differences in the interaction were reported between ketoconazole and midazolam as well as clarithromycin and midazolam. However, no sex difference was observed with the interaction between clarithromycin and triazolam or erythromycin and triazolam. No sex-related PK differences were observed with the interaction between ketoconazole and domperidone, although sex-related differences in QT prolongation were observed.

Conclusion:

This review has shown that only limited progress had been made with the inclusion of both sexes in DDI studies.

A systematic comparison of the properties of clinically used angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) have become an important drug class in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure and the protection from diabetic nephropathy. Eight ARBs are clinically available [azilsartan, candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, valsartan]. Azilsartan (in some countries), candesartan, and olmesartan are orally administered as prodrugs, whereas the blocking action of some is mediated through active metabolites. On the basis of their chemical structures, ARBs use different binding pockets in the receptor, which are associated with differences in dissociation times and, in most cases, apparently insurmountable antagonism. The physicochemical differences between ARBs also manifest in different tissue penetration, including passage through the blood-brain barrier. Differences in binding mode and tissue penetration are also associated with differences in pharmacokinetic profile, particularly duration of action. Although generally highly specific for angiotensin II type 1 receptors, some ARBs, particularly telmisartan, are partial agonists at peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ. All of these properties are comprehensively reviewed in this article. Although there is general consensus that a continuous receptor blockade over a 24-hour period is desirable, the clinical relevance of other pharmacological differences between individual ARBs remains to be assessed.

Importance of multi-p450 inhibition in drug-drug interactions: evaluation of incidence, inhibition magnitude, and prediction from in vitro data

Drugs that are mainly cleared by a single enzyme are considered more sensitive to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) than drugs cleared by multiple pathways. However, whether this is true when a drug cleared by multiple pathways is coadministered with an inhibitor of multiple P450 enzymes (multi-P450 inhibition) is not known. Mathematically, simultaneous equipotent inhibition of two elimination pathways that each contribute half of the drug clearance is equal to equipotent inhibition of a single pathway that clears the drug. However, simultaneous strong or moderate inhibition of two pathways by a single inhibitor is perceived as an unlikely scenario. The aim of this study was (i) to identify P450 inhibitors currently in clinical use that can inhibit more than one clearance pathway of an object drug in vivo and (ii) to evaluate the magnitude and predictability of DDIs caused by these multi-P450 inhibitors. Multi-P450 inhibitors were identified using the Metabolism and Transport Drug Interaction Database. A total of 38 multi-P450 inhibitors, defined as inhibitors that increased the AUC or decreased the clearance of probes of two or more P450s, were identified. Seventeen (45%) multi-P450 inhibitors were strong inhibitors of at least one P450, and an additional 12 (32%) were moderate inhibitors of one or more P450s. Only one inhibitor (fluvoxamine) was a strong inhibitor of more than one enzyme. Fifteen of the multi-P450 inhibitors also inhibit drug transporters in vivo, but such data are lacking on many of the inhibitors. Inhibition of multiple P450 enzymes by a single inhibitor resulted in significant (>2-fold) clinical DDIs with drugs that are cleared by multiple pathways such as imipramine and diazepam, while strong P450 inhibitors resulted in only weak DDIs with these object drugs. The magnitude of the DDIs between multi-P450 inhibitors and diazepam, imipramine, and omeprazole could be predicted using in vitro data with similar accuracy as probe substrate studies with the same inhibitors. The results of this study suggest that inhibition of multiple clearance pathways in vivo is clinically relevant, and the risk of DDIs with object drugs may be best evaluated in studies using multi-P450 inhibitors.

NCOA6 differentially regulates the expression of the CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 genes

CYP2Cs and CYP3A4 sub families of enzymes of the Cytochrome P450 super family metabolize clinically prescribed therapeutics. Constitutive and induced expressions of these enzymes are under the control of HNF4α and rifampicin activated PXR. In the present study, we show a mechanism for ligand dependent synergistic cross talk between PXR and HNF4α. Two-hybrid screening identified NCOA6 as a HNF4α interacting protein. NCOA6 was also found to interact with PXR through the first LXXLL motif in GST pull down and mammalian two hybrid assays. NCOA6 enhances the synergistic activation of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 promoter activity by PXR and HNF4α in the presence of rifampicin. However silencing NCOA6 abrogated the synergistic activation and induction of CYP2C9 by PXR-HNF4α but not of CYP3A4. ChIP analysis revealed that NCOA6 could bridge HNF4α and PXR binding sites of the CYP2C9 promoter. Our results indicate that NCOA6 is responsible for the synergistic activation of CYP2C9 by HNF4α and PXR and NCOA6 differentially regulates CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 gene expression though both the genes are regulated by the same nuclear receptors.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with vandetanib during coadministration with rifampicin or itraconazole

BACKGROUND

Vandetanib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and rearranged during transfection (RET), is a developmental oncology drug, that is in part metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Clinical studies were performed to assess the potential for 3A4 inhibitors and inducers to affect exposure to vandetanib.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a potent CYP3A4 inducer, rifampicin (Study A), and a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole (Study B), on the pharmacokinetics of a single 300 mg dose of vandetanib in healthy subjects.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Two phase I, randomized, open-label, two-way crossover, single-center studies.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION

Study A: 18 healthy male subjects aged 21-44 years were randomized to receive each of the following two regimens, separated by a ≥6-week washout period: (i) oral rifampicin 600 mg/day on days 1-31 with a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 10; and (ii) a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 1. Study B: 16 healthy male subjects aged 20-44 years were randomized to receive each of the following two regimens, separated by a 3-month washout period: (i) oral itraconazole 200 mg/day on days 1-24 with a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 4; and (ii) a single oral dose of vandetanib 300 mg on day 1.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Blood samples for measurement of vandetanib (both studies) concentrations and its metabolites, N-desmethylvandetanib and vandetanib N-oxide (Study A only), were collected before and at various timepoints after vandetanib administration for up to 28 days (Study A) and 37 days (Study B). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using non-compartmental methods. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 504 hours (AUC(504)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of vandetanib were compared in the presence and absence of rifampicin, and in the presence and absence of itraconazole.

RESULTS

Study A: coadministration of vandetanib with rifampicin resulted in a statistically significant reduction in AUC(504) (geometric least square [GLS]mean ratio [vandetanib + rifampicin/vandetanib alone] 0.60; 90% CI 0.58, 0.63). There was no significant difference in C(max) of vandetanib (GLSmean ratio 1.03; 90% CI 0.95, 1.11). AUC(504) and C(max) of N-desmethylvandetanib increased by 266.0% and 414.3%, respectively, in the presence of rifampicin compared with vandetanib alone. Exposure to vandetanib N-oxide was very low compared with that of vandetanib, but was increased in the presence of rifampicin. Study B: coadministration of vandetanib with itraconazole resulted in a significant increase in AUC(504) (GLSmean ratio [vandetanib + itraconazole/vandetanib alone] 1.09; 90% CI 1.01, 1.18) and no significant change in C(max) (GLSmean ratio 0.96; 90% CI 0.83, 1.11). Vandetanib was well tolerated in both studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to vandetanib, as assessed by AUC(504) in healthy subjects, was reduced by around 40% when a single dose was given in combination with the potent CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin. Because of this, it may be appropriate to avoid coadministration of potent CYP3A4 inducers with vandetanib. Vandetanib exposure was increased by about 9% when it was taken in combination with the CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole. It is unlikely that coadministration of vandetanib and potent CYP3A4 inhibitors will need to be contraindicated.

Effectiveness, safety and cost of drug substitution in hypertension

Cost-containment measures in healthcare provision include the implementation of therapeutic and generic drug substitution strategies in patients whose condition is already well controlled with pharmacotherapy. Treatment for hypertension is frequently targeted for such measures. However, drug acquisition costs are only part of the cost-effectiveness equation, and a variety of other factors need to be taken into account when assessing the impact of switching antihypertensives. From the clinical perspective, considerations include maintenance of an appropriate medication dose during the switching process; drug equivalence in terms of clinical effectiveness; and safety issues, including the diverse adverse-event profiles of available alternative drugs, differences in the 'inactive' components of drug formulations and the quality of generic formulations. Patients' adherence to and persistence with therapy may be negatively influenced by switching, which will also impact on treatment effectiveness. From the economic perspective, the costs that are likely to be incurred by switching antihypertensives include those for additional clinic visits and laboratory tests, and for hospitalization if required to address problems arising from adverse events or poorly controlled hypertension. Indirect costs and the impact on patients' quality of life also require assessment. Substitution strategies for antihypertensives have not been tested in large outcome trials and there is little available clinical or economic evidence on which to base decisions to switch drugs. Although the cost of treatment should always be considered, careful assessment of the human and economic costs and benefits of antihypertensive drug substitution is required before this practice is recommended.

Updates on cytochrome p450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions

Cytochrome P (CYP) 450 is a superfamily of hemoproteins that play an important role in the metabolism of steroid hormones, fatty acids, and many medications. Many agents used for management of cardiovascular diseases are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 enzymes. When two agents that are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 are administered together, drug interactions with significant clinical consequences may occur. This review discusses CYP450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions as well as noncardiovascular drug interactions that produced significant cardiovascular side effects. The principles in predicting drug interactions are also discussed.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4{alpha} regulates rifampicin-mediated induction of CYP2C genes in primary cultures of human hepatocytes

CYP2C enzymes are expressed constitutively and comprise approximately 20% of the total cytochrome P450 in human liver. However, the factors influencing the transcriptional regulation of the CYP2C subfamily have only been addressed recently. In the present study, we used primary cultures of human hepatocytes to investigate the role of HNF4alpha in the pregnane X receptor (PXR)/rifampicin-mediated up-regulation of CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 gene expression. We first identified new proximal cis-acting HNF4alpha sites in the proximal CYP2C8 promoter [at -181 base pairs (bp) from the translation start site] and the CYP2C9 promoter (at -211 bp). Both sites bound HNF4alpha in gel shift assays. Thus, these and recent studies identified a total of three HNF4alpha sites in the CYP2C9 promoter and two in the CYP2C8 promoter. Mutational studies showed that the HNF4alpha sites are needed for up-regulation of the CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 promoters by rifampicin. Furthermore, silencing of HNF4alpha abolished transactivation of the CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 promoters by rifampicin. Constitutive promoter activity was also decreased. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated that silencing HNF4alpha reduced the constitutive expression of CYP2C8 (53%), CYP2C9 (55%), and CYP2C19 (43%) mRNAs and significantly decreased the magnitude of the rifampicin-mediated induction of CYP2C8 (6.6- versus 2.7-fold), CYP2C9 (3- versus 1.5-fold), and CYP2C19 (1.8- versus 1.1-fold). These results provide clear evidence that HNF4alpha contributes to the constitutive expression of the human CYP2C genes and is also important for up-regulation by the PXR agonist rifampicin.

The transcriptional regulation of the human CYP2C genes

In humans, four members of the CYP2C subfamily (CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, and CYP2C19) metabolize more than 20% of all therapeutic drugs as well as a number of endogenous compounds. The CYP2C enzymes are found predominantly in the liver, where they comprise approximately 20% of the total cytochrome P450. A variety of xenobiotics such as phenobarbital, rifampicin, and hyperforin have been shown to induce the transcriptional expression of CYP2C genes in primary human hepatocytes and to increase the metabolism of CYP2C substrates in vivo in man. This induction can result in drug-drug interactions, drug tolerance, and therapeutic failure. Several drug-activated nuclear receptors including CAR, PXR, VDR, and GR recognize drug responsive elements within the 5' flanking promoter region of CYP2C genes to mediate the transcriptional upregulation of these genes in response to xenobiotics and steroids. Other nuclear receptors and transcriptional factors including HNF4alpha, HNF3gamma, C/EBPalpha and more recently RORs, have been reported to regulate the constitutive expression of CYP2C genes in liver. The maximum transcriptional induction of CYP2C genes appears to be achieved through a coordinative cross-talk between drug responsive nuclear receptors, hepatic factors, and coactivators. The transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of the expression of CYP2C genes in extrahepatic tissues has received less study, but these may be altered by perturbations from pathological conditions such as ischemia as well as some of the receptors mentioned above.

Effect of soy extract administration on losartan pharmacokinetics in healthy female volunteers

BACKGROUND

osartan is metabolized by CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 to an active metabolite, E-3174, which has greater antihypertensive activity than the parent compound. Soy extract has been shown to be an activator of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 in vitro. Coadministration of soy extract and losartan may therefore alter the pharmacokinetics of losartan and E-3174.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether, when losartan was used in combination with soy extract, a significant pharmacokinetic interaction would be observed in healthy female volunteers.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy Chinese female volunteers were recruited. In an open-label, 2-phase study, losartan 50 mg was given to each subject, with and without soy extract. Plasma concentrations of losartan and E-3174 were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for 12 and 24 hours, respectively. On day 8 through day 21 of the study, following a 7-day washout period, each subject consumed two 1000-mg Genistein Soy Complex tablets orally after meals, twice daily, for 14 days. On day 22, all volunteers received losartan 50 mg and blood samples were collected again.

RESULTS

All subjects completed the study, without adverse drug effects. Over the 14-day pretreatment period, soy extract did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of losartan or E-3174. The ratio of the area under the curve of the drug and metabolite after losartan administration, with and without soy extract ingestion, was 0.21 +/- 0.05 and 0.23 +/- 0.05 (mean +/- SD), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that a significant interaction between soy extract and losartan is unlikely to occur in females.

Updates on cytochrome P450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions

Cytochrome P (CYP) 450 is a superfamily of hemoproteins that play an important role in the metabolism of steroid hormones, fatty acids, and many medications. Many agents used for management of cardiovascular diseases are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 enzymes.When two agents that are substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of CYP450 are administered together, drug interactions with significant clinical consequences may occur. This review discusses CYP450-mediated cardiovascular drug interactions as well as noncardiovascular drug interactions that produced significant cardiovascular side effects. The principles in predicting drug interactions are also discussed.

Modeling, prediction, and in vitro in vivo correlation of CYP3A4 induction

CYP3A4 induction is not generally considered to be a concern for safety; however, serious therapeutic failures can occur with drugs whose exposure is lower as a result of more rapid metabolic clearance due to induction. Despite the potential therapeutic consequences of induction, little progress has been made in quantitative predictions of CYP3A4 induction-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) from in vitro data. In the present study, predictive models have been developed to facilitate extrapolation of CYP3A4 induction measured in vitro to human clinical DDIs. The following parameters were incorporated into the DDI predictions: 1) EC(50) and E(max) of CYP3A4 induction in primary hepatocytes; 2) fractions unbound of the inducers in human plasma (f(u, p)) and hepatocytes (f(u, hept)); 3) relevant clinical in vivo concentrations of the inducers ([Ind](max, ss)); and 4) fractions of the victim drugs cleared by CYP3A4 (f(m, CYP3A4)). The values for [Ind](max, ss) and f(m, CYP3A4) were obtained from clinical reports of CYP3A4 induction and inhibition, respectively. Exposure differences of the affected drugs in the presence and absence of the six individual inducers (bosentan, carbamazepine, dexamethasone, efavirenz, phenobarbital, and rifampicin) were predicted from the in vitro data and then correlated with those reported clinically (n = 103). The best correlation was observed (R(2) = 0.624 and 0.578 from two hepatocyte donors) when f(u, p) and f(u, hept) were included in the predictions. Factors that could cause over- or underpredictions (potential outliers) of the DDIs were also analyzed. Collectively, these predictive models could add value to the assessment of risks associated with CYP3A4 induction-based DDIs by enabling their determination in the early stages of drug development.

Inhibition and induction of human cytochrome P450 enzymes: current status

Variability of drug metabolism, especially that of the most important phase I enzymes or cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, is an important complicating factor in many areas of pharmacology and toxicology, in drug development, preclinical toxicity studies, clinical trials, drug therapy, environmental exposures and risk assessment. These frequently enormous consequences in mind, predictive and pre-emptying measures have been a top priority in both pharmacology and toxicology. This means the development of predictive in vitro approaches. The sound prediction is always based on the firm background of basic research on the phenomena of inhibition and induction and their underlying mechanisms; consequently the description of these aspects is the purpose of this review. We cover both inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes, always keeping in mind the basic mechanisms on which to build predictive and preventive in vitro approaches. Just because validation is an essential part of any in vitro-in vivo extrapolation scenario, we cover also necessary in vivo research and findings in order to provide a proper view to justify in vitro approaches and observations.

Nuclear receptor coactivator 6 mediates the synergistic activation of human cytochrome P-450 2C9 by the constitutive androstane receptor and hepatic nuclear factor-4alpha

Nuclear receptor coactivator 6 (NCOA6) also known as PRIP/RAP250/ASC-2 anchors a steady-state complex of cofactors and function as a transcriptional coactivator for certain nuclear receptors. This is the first study to identify NCOA6 as a hepatic nuclear factor 4alpha (HNF4alpha)-interacting protein. CYP2C9 is an important enzyme that metabolizes both commonly used therapeutic drugs and important endogenous compounds. We have shown previously that constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) (a xenobiotic-sensing receptor) up-regulates the CYP2C9 promoter through binding to a distal site, whereas HNF4alpha transcriptionally up-regulates CYP2C9 via proximal sites. We demonstrate ligand-enhanced synergistic cross-talk between CAR and HNF4alpha. We identify NCOA6 as crucial to the underlying mechanism of this cross-talk. NCOA6 was identified as an HNF4alpha-interacting protein in this study using a yeast two-hybrid screen and GST pull-down assays. Furthermore, we identified NCOA6, CAR, and other coactivators as part of a mega complex of cofactors associated with HNF4alpha in HepG2 cells. Although the interaction of NCOA6 with CAR is specifically through the first LXXLL motif of NCOA6, both LXXLL motifs are involved in its interaction with HNF4alpha. Silencing of NCOA6 abrogated the synergistic activation of the CYP2C9 promoter and the synergistic induction of the CYP2C9 gene by CAR-HNF4alpha. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that NCOA6 can pull down both the proximal HNF4alpha and distal CAR binding sites of the CYP2C9 promoter and provides the basis for the recruitment of other cofactors. We conclude that the coactivator NCOA6 mediates the mechanism of the synergistic activation of the CYP2C9 gene by CAR and HNF4alpha.

Novel CYP2C9 promoter variants and assessment of their impact on gene expression

There are a considerable number of reports identifying and characterizing genetic variants within the CYP2C9 coding region. Much less is known about polymorphic promoter sequences that also might contribute to interindividual differences in CYP2C9 expression. To address this problem, approximately 10,000 base pairs of CYP2C9 upstream information were resequenced using 24 DNA samples from the Coriell Polymorphism Discovery Resource. Thirty-one single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified; nine SNPs were novel, whereas 22 were reported previously. Using both sequencing and multiplex single-base extension, individual SNP frequencies were determined in 193 DNA samples obtained from unrelated, self-reported Hispanic Americans of Mexican descent, and they were compared with similar data obtained from a non-Latino white cohort. Significant interethnic differences were observed in several SNP frequencies, some of which seemed unique to the Hispanic population. Analysis using PHASE 2.1 inferred nine common (>1%) variant haplotypes, two of which included the g.3608C>T (R144C) CYP2C9(*)2 and two the g.42614A>C (I359L) CYP2C9(*)3 SNPs. Haplotype variants were introduced into a CYP2C9/luciferase reporter plasmid using site-directed mutagenesis, and the impact of the variants on promoter activity assessed by transient expression in HepG2 cells. Both constitutive and pregnane X receptor-mediated inducible activities were measured. Haplotypes 1B, 3A, and 3B each exhibited a 65% decrease in constitutive promoter activity relative to the reference haplotype. Haplotypes 1D and 3B exhibited a 50% decrease and a 40% increase in induced promoter activity, respectively. These data suggest that genetic variation within CYP2C9 regulatory sequences is likely to contribute to differences in CYP2C9 phenotype both within and among different populations.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of losartan

Losartan is the first orally available angiotensin-receptor antagonist without agonist properties. Following oral administration, losartan is rapidly absorbed, reaching maximum concentrations 1-2 hours post-administration. After oral administration approximately 14% of a losartan dose is converted to the pharmacologically active E 3174 metabolite. E 3174 is 10- to 40-fold more potent than its parent compound and its estimated terminal half-life ranges from 6 to 9 hours. The pharmacokinetics of losartan and E 3174 are linear, dose-proportional and do not substantially change with repetitive administration. The recommended dosage of losartan 50 mg/day can be administered without regard to food. There are no clinically significant effects of age, sex or race on the pharmacokinetics of losartan, and no dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with mild hepatic impairment or various degrees of renal insufficiency. Losartan, or its E 3174 metabolite, is not removed during haemodialysis. The major metabolic pathway for losartan is by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, 2C9 and 2C10 isoenzymes. Overall, losartan has a favorable drug-drug interaction profile, as evidenced by the lack of clinically relevant interactions between this drug and a range of inhibitors and stimulators of the CYP450 system. Losartan does not have a drug-drug interaction with hydrochlorothiazide, warfarin or digoxin. Losartan should be avoided in pregnancy, as is the case with all other angiotensin-receptor antagonists. When given in the second and third trimester of pregnancy, losartan is often associated with serious fetal toxicity. Losartan is a competitive antagonist that causes a parallel rightward shift of the concentration-contractile response curve to angiotensin-II, while E 3174 is a noncompetitive "insurmountable" antagonist of angiotensin-II. The maximum recommended daily dose of losartan is 100mg, which can be given as a once-daily dose or by splitting the same total daily dose into two doses. Losartan reduces blood pressure comparably to other angiotensin-receptor antagonists. Losartan has been extensively studied relative to end-organ protection, with studies having been conducted in diabetic nephropathy, heart failure, post-myocardial infarction and hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. The results of these studies have been sufficiently positive to support a more widespread use of angiotensin-receptor antagonists in the setting of various end-organ diseases. Losartan, like other angiotensin-receptor antagonists, is devoid of significant adverse effects.

Losartan in cardiovascular disease

Hypertension is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Numerous placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that treatment of hypertension results in substantial reduction of hypertension-related vascular events. The benefit of specific therapies beyond their effect on blood pressure is well established. Losartan is an orally-active, selective, nonpeptide, angiotensin II type 1-receptor antagonist (ARB), and it was the first in this class to be marketed. Several large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated that losartan and other ARBs have benefits in preventing cardiovascular disease. The Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study demonstrated improved outcomes with losartan as compared with atenolol-based therapies in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, mainly because of stroke prevention. The Reduction of End points in Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study demonstrated that losartan prevented the progression of diabetic nephropathy. In this review, evidence from these and other clinical trials with losartan shall be discussed. The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of losartan are described to explain its mechanisms of action. Among the ARB class, losartan possesses certain unique properties, which may enhance its cardiovascular protective effects. These include an increase of urinary uric acid excretion and antiatherothrombotic properties. Potential future roles for losartan and other ARBs shall be discussed, in addition to emphasizing areas in which evidence is currently lacking or indecisive, including head-to-head comparisons of ARBs and the effects of combining an ARB with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

[Antihypertensive drug-drug interactions]

A drug interaction is the quantitative or qualitative modification of the effect of a drug by the simultaneous or successive administration of a different one. Hypertensive patients, mainly the more elderly ones, frequently present concomitant diseases that require the administration of several medicines which facilitates the appearance of interactions. The lack of effectiveness of the antihypertensive treatment is a relatively frequent fact that sometimes is due to interactions of antihypertensive drugs with other treatments. It is difficult to determine the incidence of interactions, but it is related to the number of drugs administered simultaneously. Between 37 and 60% of hospital-admissions are treated with potentially dangerous drug associations and up to a 6% of fatal events are due to this circumstance. Among antihypertensive drugs, diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are less affected by drug-interactions. Lipophilic beta-blockers agents may present some clinical relevant interactions, whereas calcium channel blockers, especially the non-dihydropiridinic ones, are implied in clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions. Among the angiotensin receptor blockers there are differences that would have to be considered when they are used in patients who receive other drugs. Although it is impossible for the doctor to remember all the clinical relevant interactions, it is important to bear in mind their existence and the possible mechanisms of production which can help to identify them and to contribute to their prevention. The most frequent interactions related with clinical problems are the pharmacokinetic ones, mainly those related to the metabolism through the cytochrome P450 system or the presystemic clearance by means of the P-glycoprotein. Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 system may present polymorphisms that can explain the individual differences in the response to drugs or the appearance of drug-interactions.

The nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor cross-talk with hepatic nuclear factor 4alpha to synergistically activate the human CYP2C9 promoter

CYP2C9 is an important human drug-metabolizing enzyme that is expressed primarily in liver. Recent studies in our laboratory have shown that the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) is important in the transcriptional activation of the CYP2C9 promoter by drugs such as rifampicin and that the essential element is a constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)/PXR site -1839 bp upstream of the translation start site. Both CAR and PXR transcriptionally up-regulate the CYP2C9 promoter via these elements. In the present study, we ask whether additional sites in the proximal promoter also play a role in this induction. We identify two proximal hepatic nuclear factor (HNF) 4alpha binding sites at -152 and -185 bp of the CYP2C9 promoter, both of which bind HNF4alpha in gel shift assays and transcriptionally up-regulate this promoter in response to HNF4alpha in HepG2 cells. HNF4alpha synergizes with CAR and with PXR in HepG2 cells treated with rifampicin. The synergy only occurs when the CAR/PXR binding site at -1839 bp is present. Mutation of the two HNF4alpha binding sites differentially prevented up-regulation of CYP2C9 promoter by both CAR as well as HNF4alpha, synergy between the two receptors, and essentially abolished induction by rifampicin in HepG2 cells transfected with PXR. These studies strongly support the hypothesis that there is cross talk between distal CAR/PXR sites and HNF4alpha binding sites in the CYP2C9 promoter and that the HNF4alpha sites are required for maximal induction of the CYP2C9 promoter.

Influence of rifampicin on the expression and function of human intestinal cytochrome P450 enzymes

AIMS

To investigate the potential induction by rifampicin of intestinal CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 using preparations of human enterocytes.

METHODS

Using a multilumen perfusion catheter shed human enterocytes were collected from 6 healthy subjects before and after 10 days of 600 mg day(-1) oral rifampicin administration. The protein expression of CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 as well as that of CYP3A4 mRNA was determined using Western blotting and RT-PCR, respectively.

RESULTS

CYP3A4 mRNA expression in shed enterocytes increased from 74.6 +/- 44.2 to 143.2 +/- 68.4 a.u. (P < 0.05, 95% CI: 21.8-115.3). Expression of CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 increased from 5.1 +/- 0.9 to 10.4 +/- 2.3 pmol mg(-1) protein (P < 0.01, 95% CI: 2.8-7.7) and from 4.2 +/- 1.4 to 5.7 +/- 1.1 pmol mg(-1) protein (P < 0.01, 95% CI: 0.6-2.4), respectively. No significant difference in CYP2D6 expression before and during rifampicin intake was observed. Rifampicin administration also resulted in a significant induction of CYP3A4 protein (34.1 +/- 10.7 vs. 113.9 +/- 31.1 pmol mg(-1) protein (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 51.8-107.6)). Ex vivo incubation of enterocyte homogenates with verapamil resulted in a significantly increased production of the metabolites formed via CYP3A4 (D-617: 125.9 +/- 118.8 vs. 277.2 +/- 145.5 pmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein (P < 0.05, 95% CI: 30.1-272.5); norverapamil: 113.0 +/- 57.9 vs. 398.4 +/- 148.2 pmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein (P < 0.05, 95% CI: 47.2-523.6)).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that shed enterocytes are a useful tool to study the expression, regulation and function of drug metabolizing enzymes. Induction of intestinal CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 might contribute in part to rifampicin - mediated drug interactions, in addition to their hepatic counterparts and intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4.

Drug interactions with angiotensin receptor blockers

Many patients with high blood pressure receive multiple medications for hypertension and other conditions, placing them at risk for adverse drug interactions. Additionally, as the prevalence of hypertension increases with age, factors like greater frailty, comorbidity of the elderly requiring polypharmacy, and reduced hepatic and renal clearance rates for the elimination of drugs increase the likelihood of drug interactions. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent class of agents for the treatment of hypertension. Due to a favourable side effect profile, this class of drugs deserves increased attention. This article reviews drug interactions of ARBs and suggests measures for reducing the risk of adverse events when drugs are co-administered. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and CINAHL were searched. Reported and likely clinical relevant interactions of ARBs with concomitantly given drugs are summarised in Table 2 and 3. Compared to other classes of antihypertensive agents, the ARBs appear to have a low potential for drug interactions; however, interactions with this class occur and variations within the class have been detected, mainly due to different affinities for cytochrome P450 isoenzymes.

Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions of Gefitinib with Rifampicin, Itraconazole and Metoprolol

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gefitinib (IRESSA, ZD1839), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved in several countries for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Preclinical studies were conducted to determine the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of gefitinib and to evaluate the potential of gefitinib to cause drug interactions through inhibition of CYP isoenzymes. Based on these findings, three clinical studies were carried out to investigate pharmacokinetic drug interactions in vivo with gefitinib.

METHODS

In preclinical studies radiolabelled gefitinib was incubated with: (i) hepatic microsomal protein in the presence of selective CYP inhibitors; and (ii) expressed CYP enzymes. Human hepatic microsomal protein was incubated with selective CYP substrates in the presence of gefitinib. Clinical studies were all phase I, open-label, single-centre studies; two had a randomised, two-way crossover design and the third was nonrandomised. The first and second studies investigated the pharmacokinetics of gefitinib in the presence of a potent CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin [rifampin]) or inhibitor (itraconazole) in healthy male volunteers. The third study investigated the effects that gefitinib had on the pharmacokinetics of metoprolol, a CYP2D6 substrate, in patients with solid tumours.

RESULTS

The results of preclinical studies demonstrated that CYP3A4 is involved in the metabolism of gefitinib and that gefitinib is a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6 activity. In clinical studies when gefitinib was administered in the presence of rifampicin, geometric mean (gmean) maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were reduced by 65% and 83%, respectively; these changes were statistically significant. When gefitinib was administered in the presence of itraconazole, gmean AUC increased by 78% and 61% at gefitinib doses of 250 and 500 mg, respectively; these changes also being statistically significant. Coadministration of metoprolol with gefitinib resulted in a 35% increase in the metoprolol area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration; this change was not statistically significant. There was no apparent change in the safety profile of gefitinib as a result of coadministration with other agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CYP3A4 inducers may reduce exposure to gefitinib, further work is required to define any resultant effect on the efficacy of gefitinib. Exposure to gefitinib is increased by coadministration with CYP3A4 inhibitors, but since gefitinib is known to have a good tolerability profile, a dosage reduction is not recommended. Gefitinib is unlikely to exert a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of drugs that are dependent on CYP2D6-mediated metabolism for their clearance, but the potential to increase plasma concentrations should be considered if gefitinib is coadministered with CYP2D6 substrates that have a narrow therapeutic index or are individually dose titrated.

Normalización del intercambio terapéutico de antagonistas del receptor de la angiotensina-II para el tratamiento de la hipertensión en el medio hospitalario

INTRODUCTION

Standardization of the therapeutic inter change process in the hospital setting by the establishment and spreading of standard criteria has been defined as an activity conducent to increased health care quality, and hence improved patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To establish standardized therapeutic swapping for angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARA-II) in the treatment of blood hypertension, and to evaluate the suitability of therapeutic interchange in an integrated individualized drug dispensation system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Standardized therapeutic inter-change was performed based on therapeutic equivalence criteriafor ARA-Ils such as candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan,olmesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan, according to the pharmacodynamic characteristics, dosage recommendations, pharmacokinetic characteristics and interactions of each one of them. The suitability of therapeutic interchange was assessed in terms of standardization or adaptation to this practice developed by using percentage adherence in the previous 12 months (period A) and during the 12 months following its implementation and spread(period B).

RESULTS

The only ARA-II included in the hospital's pharmacotherapeutic guide is losartan, on which standardized therapeutic interchange for initial and maintenance doses of any drug within this class was based. The overall number of interchanges per-formed was 417-216 during period A and 201 during period B. Implementing therapeutic swapping has significantly increased adherence to explicitly established criteria by 35.2% (95% CI:25.9 to 44.5%). Similarly, during period B a reduction in the variability of therapeutic interchanges among various pharmacists was observed regarding losartan dosage.

DISCUSSION

The standardization of therapeutic interchange procedures for ARA-lls allowed a reduction of the variability seen in this process, and hence the potential for medication-related problems. Another benefit of the spread of therapeutic swapping has been an increased adjustment of medical prescriptions to the hospital's pharmacotherapeutic guide.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with rifampicin : clinical relevance

The antituberculosis drug rifampicin (rifampin) induces a number of drug-metabolising enzymes, having the greatest effects on the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 in the liver and in the small intestine. In addition, rifampicin induces some drug transporter proteins, such as intestinal and hepatic P-glycoprotein. Full induction of drug-metabolising enzymes is reached in about 1 week after starting rifampicin treatment and the induction dissipates in roughly 2 weeks after discontinuing rifampicin. Rifampicin has its greatest effects on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs that are metabolised by CYP3A4 and/or are transported by P-glycoprotein. Thus, for example, oral midazolam, triazolam, simvastatin, verapamil and most dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists are ineffective during rifampicin treatment. The plasma concentrations of several anti-infectives, such as the antimycotics itraconazole and ketoconazole and the HIV protease inhibitors indinavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir, are also greatly reduced by rifampicin. The use of rifampicin with these HIV protease inhibitors is contraindicated to avoid treatment failures. Rifampicin can cause acute transplant rejection in patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporin. In addition, rifampicin reduces the plasma concentrations of methadone, leading to symptoms of opioid withdrawal in most patients. Rifampicin also induces CYP2C-mediated metabolism and thus reduces the plasma concentrations of, for example, the CYP2C9 substrate (S)-warfarin and the sulfonylurea antidiabetic drugs. In addition, rifampicin can reduce the plasma concentrations of drugs that are not metabolised (e.g. digoxin) by inducing drug transporters such as P-glycoprotein. Thus, the effects of rifampicin on drug metabolism and transport are broad and of established clinical significance. Potential drug interactions should be considered whenever beginning or discontinuing rifampicin treatment. It is particularly important to remember that the concentrations of many of the other drugs used by the patient will increase when rifampicin is discontinued as the induction starts to wear off.

Drug interactions with angiotensin receptor blockers: a comparison with other antihypertensives

The ever-increasing introduction of new therapeutic agents means that the potential for drug interactions is likely to escalate. Numerous different classes of drugs are currently used to treat hypertension. The angiotensin receptor blockers offer one of the newest approaches to the management of patients with high blood pressure. Compared with other classes of antihypertensive agents, the angiotensin receptor blockers appear overall to have a low potential for drug interactions, but variations within the class have been detected. Losartan and irbesartan have a greater affinity for cytochrome p450 (CYP) isoenzymes and, thus, are more likely to be implicated in drug interactions. There is pharmacokinetic evidence to suggest that such interactions could have a clinical impact. Candesartan cilexetil, valsartan and eprosartan have variable but generally modest affinity and telmisartan has no affinity for any of the CYP isoenzymes. In vitro studies and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation can provide evidence for some interactions, but only a relatively small number of drug combinations are usually studied in this way. The absence of any pharmacokinetic evidence of drug interaction, however, should not lead to complacency. Patients should be made aware of possible interactions, especially involving the concurrent use of over-the-counter products, and it may be prudent for all patients receiving antihypertensive treatment to be monitored for possible drug interactions at their regular check-ups. The physician can help by prescribing agents with a low potential for interaction, such as angiotensin receptor blockers.

Induction of Human CYP2C9 by Rifampicin, Hyperforin, and Phenobarbital Is Mediated by the Pregnane X Receptor

Human CYP2C9 is important in the metabolism of numerous clinically used drugs such as the anticoagulant warfarin, the anticonvulsant phenytoin, antidiabetic drugs such as tolbutamide and glipizide, the hypertensive agent losartan, and numerous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Several studies have reported that certain drugs such as rifampicin and phenobarbital induce CYP2C9, but the molecular basis for this induction remains unknown. In the present study, we demonstrate that the human pregnane X receptor (hPXR) mediates induction of CYP2C9 by the prototype drugs rifampicin, hyperforin (found in St. John's Wart), and phenobarbital. Deletion and mutagenesis studies with luciferase reporter constructs showed that a functional PXR-responsive element located -1839/-1824 base pairs upstream from the translation start site was the primary binding site mediating the rifampicin induction of CYP2C9. This site was previously described as a constitutive androstane receptor-responsive element (CAR-RE). Mutational analysis of 3- and 12-kilobase CYP2C9 promoter fragments indicated that this proximal binding site was essential for rifampicin inducibility, although a cooperative effect could be attributed to a second CAR-RE located at -2899/-2883. In summary, we have demonstrated rifampicin induction of CYP2C9 promoter constructs that is consistent with the magnitude of induction of CYP2C9 protein and mRNA reported in vivo and in primary human hepatocytes, and we have identified the cis-element essential for this response. This is the first report to demonstrate that the nuclear receptor PXR mediates induction of CYP2C9 with rifampicin, phenobarbital, and hyperforin.

Simultaneous determination of losartan and EXP3174 in human plasma and urine utilizing liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

Losartan is an orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of hypertension. EXP3174 is an active metabolite, which contributes to the overall activity of losartan. Analytical methods for the simultaneous determination of losartan and its active metabolite EXP3174 in human plasma and urine with limited plasma sample size have been developed and validated to support a pediatric clinical program. In both methods, analytes are extracted from the matrixes by liquid-liquid extraction and separated using reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) with a Turbo ionspray (TIS) interface in multiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode is used for detection of the analytes in both methods. The plasma method has a lower limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 1 ng/ml with a linearity range of 1-500 ng/ml for losartan and EXP3174 using 100 microl of plasma. For the urine method, the LOQ for both losartan and EXP3174 is 2 ng/ml using 0.5 ml of urine, and the linearity range for both analytes is 2-1000 ng/ml. Validation procedures have proven that both methods are robust, accurate, and reproducible. Both methods have been used to assay clinical samples and provided satisfactory results.

Losartan and E3174 pharmacokinetics in cytochrome P450 2C9*1/*1, *1/*2, and *1/*3 individuals

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if differences in the pharmacokinetics of losartan and its pharmacologically active E3174 metabolite exist among individuals expressing the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9*1/*1, *1/*2, and *1/*3 genotypes.

DESIGN

Single-dose pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

University general clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Fifteen healthy volunteers, five from each genotype: CYP2C9*1/*1, *1/*2, and *1/*3.

INTERVENTION

A single oral dose of losartan 50 mg.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma and urine samples were collected for 24 hours, and losartan and E3174 pharmacokinetic data were compared across the three genotypes. Orthostatic blood pressure was measured over 12 hours after dosing. No significant differences were observed among the three groups in losartan or E3174 area under the plasma concentration-time curve, losartan or E3174 elimination half-life, or losartan oral clearance. A significant association between CYP2C9 genotype and losartan to E3174 formation clearance was observed, such that 50% of the variability was accounted for by the genotype. No significant relationship between that genotype and blood pressure was observed at any time.

CONCLUSION

Differences in the pharmacokinetics of losartan and its active E3174 metabolite were not observed in healthy subjects with the genotype of CYP2C9*1/*2 and *1/*3 compared with those expressing *1/*1. Alterations in losartan dosing in CYP2C9*1/*2 and *1/*3 individuals does not appear necessary.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers in heart failure

Heart failure remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, despite major advances in therapy. Angiotensin II, the principal mediator of the renin-angiotensin system, exerts both short-term (e.g., hemodynamic, renal) and long-term (e.g., inflammation, cardiac remodeling) effects in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. The effects of angiotensin II appear to be more completely inhibited by angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which act at the subtype 1 receptor level, than by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors because pathways other than that of ACE contribute to the generation of angiotensin II. Evidence demonstrates that ARBs, when added to conventional treatment for patients with heart failure, are associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality as well as an improvement in quality of life. Clinical trials of ARB therapy indicate that these agents are generally well tolerated, both alone and in combination with other neurohormonal inhibitors. The current role of ARBs in heart failure is as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate therapy with an ACE inhibitor. A number of ongoing clinical studies are likely to further define or expand the role of ARBs in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.