Interaction of bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein with Escherichia coli sigma70 and its variant

Transcription Initiation by Mix and Match Elements: Flexibility for Polymerase Binding to Bacterial Promoters

Bacterial RNA polymerase is composed of a core of subunits (β β′, α1, α2, ω), which have RNA synthesizing activity, and a specificity factor (σ), which identifies the start of transcription by recognizing and binding to sequence elements within promoter DNA. Four core promoter consensus sequences, the –10 element, the extended –10 (TGn) element, the –35 element, and the UP elements, have been known for many years; the importance of a nontemplate G at position -5 has been recognized more recently. However, the functions of these elements are not the same. The AT-rich UP elements, the –35 elements (–35TTGACA–30), and the extended –10 (15TGn–13) are recognized as double-stranded binding elements, whereas the –5 nontemplate G is recognized in the context of single-stranded DNA at the transcription bubble. Furthermore, the –10 element (–12TATAAT–7) is recognized as both double-stranded DNA for the T:A bp at position –12 and as nontemplate, single-stranded DNA from positions –11 to –7. The single-stranded sequences at positions –11 to –7 as well as the –5 contribute to later steps in transcription initiation that involve isomerization of polymerase and separation of the promoter DNA around the transcription start site. Recent work has demonstrated that the double-stranded elements may be used in various combinations to yield an effective promoter. Thus, while some minimal number of contacts is required for promoter function, polymerase allows the elements to be mixed and matched. Interestingly, which particular elements are used does not appear to fundamentally alter the transcription bubble generated in the stable complex. In this review, we discuss the multiple steps involved in forming a transcriptionally competent polymerase/promoter complex, and we examine what is known about polymerase recognition of core promoter elements. We suggest that considering promoter elements according to their involvement in early (polymerase binding) or later (polymerase isomerization) steps in transcription initiation rather than simply from their match to conventional promoter consensus sequences is a more instructive form of promoter classification.

Architecture of the bacteriophage T4 activator MotA/promoter DNA interaction during sigma appropriation

Gene expression can be regulated through factors that direct RNA polymerase to the correct promoter sequence at the correct time. Bacteriophage T4 controls its development in this way using phage proteins that interact with host RNA polymerase. Using a process called σ appropriation, the T4 co-activator AsiA structurally remodels the σ(70) subunit of host RNA polymerase, while a T4 activator, MotA, engages the C terminus of σ(70) and binds to a DNA promoter element, the MotA box. Structures for the N-terminal (NTD) and C-terminal (CTD) domains of MotA are available, but no structure exists for MotA with or without DNA. We report the first molecular map of the MotA/DNA interaction within the σ-appropriated complex, which we obtained by using the cleaving reagent, iron bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA (FeBABE). We conjugated surface-exposed, single cysteines in MotA with FeBABE and performed cleavage reactions in the context of stable transcription complexes. The DNA cleavage sites were analyzed using ICM Molsoft software and three-dimensional physical models of MotA(NTD), MotA(CTD), and the DNA to investigate shape complementarity between the protein and the DNA and to position MotA on the DNA. We found that the unusual "double wing" motif present within MotA(CTD) resides in the major groove of the MotA box. In addition, we have used surface plasmon resonance to show that MotA alone is in a very dynamic equilibrium with the MotA element. Our results demonstrate the utility of fine resolution FeBABE mapping to determine the architecture of protein-DNA complexes that have been recalcitrant to traditional structure analyses.

Transcriptional control in the prereplicative phase of T4 development

Control of transcription is crucial for correct gene expression and orderly development. For many years, bacteriophage T4 has provided a simple model system to investigate mechanisms that regulate this process. Development of T4 requires the transcription of early, middle and late RNAs. Because T4 does not encode its own RNA polymerase, it must redirect the polymerase of its host, E. coli, to the correct class of genes at the correct time. T4 accomplishes this through the action of phage-encoded factors. Here I review recent studies investigating the transcription of T4 prereplicative genes, which are expressed as early and middle transcripts. Early RNAs are generated immediately after infection from T4 promoters that contain excellent recognition sequences for host polymerase. Consequently, the early promoters compete extremely well with host promoters for the available polymerase. T4 early promoter activity is further enhanced by the action of the T4 Alt protein, a component of the phage head that is injected into E. coli along with the phage DNA. Alt modifies Arg265 on one of the two α subunits of RNA polymerase. Although work with host promoters predicts that this modification should decrease promoter activity, transcription from some T4 early promoters increases when RNA polymerase is modified by Alt. Transcription of T4 middle genes begins about 1 minute after infection and proceeds by two pathways: 1) extension of early transcripts into downstream middle genes and 2) activation of T4 middle promoters through a process called sigma appropriation. In this activation, the T4 co-activator AsiA binds to Region 4 of σ⁷⁰, the specificity subunit of RNA polymerase. This binding dramatically remodels this portion of σ⁷⁰, which then allows the T4 activator MotA to also interact with σ⁷⁰. In addition, AsiA restructuring of σ⁷⁰ prevents Region 4 from forming its normal contacts with the -35 region of promoter DNA, which in turn allows MotA to interact with its DNA binding site, a MotA box, centered at the -30 region of middle promoter DNA. T4 sigma appropriation reveals how a specific domain within RNA polymerase can be remolded and then exploited to alter promoter specificity.

A mutation within the β subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase impairs transcription from bacteriophage T4 middle promoters

During infection of Escherichia coli, bacteriophage T4 usurps the host transcriptional machinery, redirecting it to the expression of early, middle, and late phage genes. Middle genes, whose expression begins about 1 min postinfection, are transcribed both from the extension of early RNA into middle genes and by the activation of T4 middle promoters. Middle-promoter activation requires the T4 transcriptional activator MotA and coactivator AsiA, which are known to interact with σ(70), the specificity subunit of RNA polymerase. T4 motA amber [motA(Am)] or asiA(Am) phage grows poorly in wild-type E. coli. However, previous work has found that T4 motA(Am)does not grow in the E. coli mutant strain TabG. We show here that the RNA polymerase in TabG contains two mutations within its β-subunit gene: rpoB(E835K) and rpoB(G1249D). We find that the G1249D mutation is responsible for restricting the growth of either T4 motA(Am)or asiA(Am) and for impairing transcription from MotA/AsiA-activated middle promoters in vivo. With one exception, transcription from tested T4 early promoters is either unaffected or, in some cases, even increases, and there is no significant growth phenotype for the rpoB(E835K G1249D) strain in the absence of T4 infection. In reported structures of thermophilic RNA polymerase, the G1249 residue is located immediately adjacent to a hydrophobic pocket, called the switch 3 loop. This loop is thought to aid in the separation of the RNA from the DNA-RNA hybrid as RNA enters the RNA exit channel. Our results suggest that the presence of MotA and AsiA may impair the function of this loop or that this portion of the β subunit may influence interactions among MotA, AsiA, and RNA polymerase.

Middle promoters constitute the most abundant and diverse class of promoters in bacteriophage T4

The temporally regulated transcription program of bacteriophage T4 relies upon the sequential utilization of three classes of promoters: early, middle and late. Here we show that middle promoters constitute perhaps the largest and the most diverse class of T4 promoters. In addition to 45 T4 middle promoters known to date, we mapped 13 new promoters, 10 of which deviate from the consensus MotA box, with some of them having no obvious match to it. So, 30 promoters of 58 identified now deviate from the consensus sequence deduced previously. In spite of the differences in their sequences, the in vivo activities of these T4 middle promoters were demonstrated to be dependent on both activators, MotA and AsiA. Traditionally, the MotA box was restricted to a 9 bp sequence with the highly conserved motif TGCTT. New logo based on the sequences of currently known middle promoters supports the conclusion that the consensus MotA box is comprised of 10 bp with the highly conserved central motif GCT. However, some apparently good matches to the consensus of middle promoters do not produce transcripts either in vivo or in vitro, indicating that the consensus sequence alone does not fully define a middle promoter.

Mutational analysis of sigma70 region 4 needed for appropriation by the bacteriophage T4 transcription factors AsiA and MotA

Transcriptional activation of bacteriophage T4 middle promoters requires sigma70-containing Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, the T4 activator MotA, and the T4 co-activator AsiA. T4 middle promoters contain the sigma70 -10 DNA element. However, these promoters lack the sigma70 -35 element, having instead a MotA box centered at -30, which is bound by MotA. Previous work has indicated that AsiA and MotA interact with region 4 of sigma70, the C-terminal portion that normally contacts -35 DNA and the beta-flap structure in core. AsiA binding prevents the sigma70/beta-flap and sigma70/-35 DNA interactions, inhibiting transcription from promoters that require a -35 element. To test the importance of residues within sigma70 region 4 for MotA and AsiA function, we investigated how sigma70 region 4 mutants interact with AsiA, MotA, and the beta-flap and function in transcription assays in vitro. We find that alanine substitutions at residues 584-588 (region 4.2) do not impair the interaction of region 4 with the beta-flap or MotA, but they eliminate the interaction with AsiA and prevent AsiA inhibition and MotA/AsiA activation. In contrast, alanine substitutions at 551-552, 554-555 (region 4.1) eliminate the region 4/beta-flap interaction, significantly impair the AsiA/sigma70 interaction, and eliminate AsiA inhibition. However, the 4.1 mutant sigma70 is still fully competent for activation if both MotA and AsiA are present. A previous NMR structure shows AsiA binding to sigma70 region 4, dramatically distorting regions 4.1 and 4.2 and indirectly changing the conformation of the MotA interaction site at the sigma70 C terminus. Our analyses provide biochemical relevance for the sigma70 residues identified in the structure, indicate that the interaction of AsiA with sigma70 region 4.2 is crucial for activation, and support the idea that AsiA binding facilitates an interaction between MotA and the far C terminus of sigma70.

The bacteriophage T4 inhibitor and coactivator AsiA inhibits Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase more rapidly in the absence of sigma70 region 1.1: evidence that region 1.1 stabilizes the interaction between sigma70 and core

The N-terminal region (region 1.1) of sigma70, the primary sigma subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, is a negatively charged domain that affects the DNA binding properties of sigma70 regions 2 and 4. Region 1.1 prevents the interaction of free sigma70 with DNA and modulates the formation of stable (open) polymerase/promoter complexes at certain promoters. The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein is an inhibitor of sigma70-dependent transcription from promoters that require an interaction between sigma70 region 4 and the -35 DNA element and is the coactivator of transcription at T4 MotA-dependent promoters. Like AsiA, the T4 activator MotA also interacts with sigma70 region 4. We have investigated the effect of region 1.1 on AsiA inhibition and MotA/AsiA activation. We show that sigma70 region 1.1 is not required for MotA/AsiA activation at the T4 middle promoter P(uvsX). However, the rate of AsiA inhibition and of MotA/AsiA activation of polymerase is significantly increased when region 1.1 is missing. We also find that RNA polymerase reconstituted with sigma70 that lacks region 1.1 is less stable than polymerase with full-length sigma70. Our previous work has demonstrated that the AsiA-inhibited polymerase is formed when AsiA binds to region 4 of free sigma70 and then the AsiA/sigma70 complex binds to core. Our results suggest that in the absence of region 1.1, there is a shift in the dynamic equilibrium between polymerase holoenzyme and free sigma70 plus core, yielding more free sigma70 at any given time. Thus, the rate of AsiA inhibition and AsiA/MotA activation increases when RNA polymerase lacks region 1.1 because of the increased availability of free sigma70. Previous work has argued both for and against a direct interaction between regions 1.1 and 4. Using an E. coli two-hybrid assay, we do not detect an interaction between these regions. This result supports the idea that the ability of region 1.1 to prevent DNA binding by free sigma70 arises through an indirect effect.

Both regions 4.1 and 4.2 of E. coli sigma(70) are together required for binding to bacteriophage T4 AsiA in vivo

The T4 AsiA is an anti-sigma factor encoded by one of the early genes of Bacteriophage T4. It has been shown that AsiA inhibits transcription from promoters containing -10 and -35 consensus sequence by binding to sigma(70) of E. coli. Binding of AsiA to sigma(70) in vivo, in E. coli, leads to inhibition of transcription of essential genes resulting in killing of the organism. By using various in vitro methods, the region of sigma(70) binding to AsiA have been mapped to domain 4.2. Additionally, mutational analysis of sigma(70) has also identified amino acid residues in domain 4.1 which are critical for interaction with AsiA. Based on NMR studies it has been suggested that either of these regions can bind to AsiA, a conclusion which was supported by high degree of amino acid homology between domain 4.1 and 4.2. However, it is not clear whether under in vivo conditions, AsiA exerts its transcription inhibitory effect by binding to one of these regions or both the regions together. In order to understand the mechanism of AsiA mediated inhibition of E. coli transcription in vivo, in terms of specific binding requirements to region 4.1 and/or 4.2, we have studied the interaction of these sub-domains with AsiA by Yeast two hybrid system as well as by co-expressing and affinity purification of the interacting partners in vivo in E. coli. It was observed that minimum fragment of sigma(70) showing observable binding to AsiA, must possess sub-domains 4.1 and 4.2 together. No binding could be detected in sigma(70) fragments lacking a part of either domain 4.1 or 4.2, in any of the assays. This data was also supported by in vitro binding studies wherein only sigma(70) fragments carrying both region 4.1 and 4.2 showed binding to AsiA. Co-expression of region 4.1 and 4.2 fragments together also did not show any interaction with AsiA. The results presented here suggest that binding of AsiA to sigma(70), in vivo, requires the presence of both sub-domains of region 4 of sigma(70).

An artificial activator that contacts a normally occluded surface of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Many activators of transcription are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that stimulate transcription initiation through interaction with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Such activators can be constructed artificially by fusing a DNA-binding protein to a protein domain that can interact with an accessible surface of RNAP. In these cases, the artificial activator is directed to a target promoter bearing a recognition site for the DNA-binding protein. Here we describe an artificial activator that functions by contacting a normally occluded surface of promoter-bound RNAP holoenzyme. This artificial activator consists of a DNA-binding protein fused to the bacteriophage T4-encoded transcription regulator AsiA. On its own, AsiA inhibits transcription by Escherichia coli RNAP because it remodels the holoenzyme, disrupting an intersubunit interaction that is required for recognition of the major class of bacterial promoters. However, when tethered to the DNA via a DNA-binding protein, AsiA can exert a strong stimulatory effect on transcription by disrupting the same intersubunit interaction, contacting an otherwise occluded surface of the holoenzyme. We show that mutations that affect the intersubunit interaction targeted by AsiA modulate the stimulatory effect of this artificial activator. Our results thus demonstrate that changes in the accessibility of a normally occluded surface of the RNAP holoenzyme can modulate the activity of a gene-specific regulator of transcription.

Transcriptional takeover by σ appropriation: remodelling of the σ 70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by the bacteriophage T4 activator MotA and co-activator AsiA

Activation of bacteriophage T4 middle promoters, which occurs about 1 min after infection, uses two phage-encoded factors that change the promoter specificity of the host RNA polymerase. These phage factors, the MotA activator and the AsiA co-activator, interact with theσ70specificity subunit ofEscherichia coliRNA polymerase, which normally contacts the −10 and −35 regions of host promoter DNA. Like host promoters, T4 middle promoters have a good match to the canonicalσ70DNA element located in the −10 region. However, instead of theσ70DNA recognition element in the promoter's −35 region, they have a 9 bp sequence (a MotA box) centred at −30, which is bound by MotA. Recent work has begun to provide information about the MotA/AsiA system at a detailed molecular level. Accumulated evidence suggests that the presence of MotA and AsiA reconfigures protein–DNA contacts in the upstream promoter sequences, without significantly affecting the contacts ofσ70with the −10 region. This type of activation, which is called ‘σappropriation’, is fundamentally different from other well-characterized models of prokaryotic activation in which an activator frequently serves to forceσ70to contact a less than ideal −35 DNA element. This review summarizes the interactions of AsiA and MotA withσ70, and discusses how these interactions accomplish the switch to T4 middle promoters by inhibiting the typical contacts of the C-terminal region ofσ70, region 4, with the host −35 DNA element and with other subunits of polymerase.

Transcription regulation by bacteriophage T4 AsiA

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA, a strong inhibitor of bacterial RNA polymerase, was the first antisigma protein to be discovered. Recent advances that made it possible to purify large amounts of this highly toxic protein led to an increased understanding of AsiA function and structure. In this review, we discuss how the small 10-KDa AsiA protein plays a key role in T4 development through its ability to both inhibit and activate bacterial RNA polymerase transcription.

Molecular gymnastics: distortion of an RNA polymerase σ factor

A recent structure obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy shows that the binding of a small phage factor to the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase induces an unprecedented remodeling of a region of sigma(70), converting a DNA-binding helix-turn-helix into a continuous pseudohelix. This conformational change suggests how the phage factor can function both as an inhibitor and co-activator of transcription.

An altered-specificity DNA-binding mutant of Escherichia coliσ70 facilitates the analysis of σ70 function in vivo

The sigma subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase is strictly required for promoter recognition. The primary (housekeeping) sigma factor of Escherichia coli, sigma(70), is responsible for most of the gene expression in exponentially growing cells. The fact that sigma(70) is an essential protein has complicated efforts to genetically dissect the functions of sigma(70). To facilitate the analysis of sigma(70) function in vivo, we isolated an altered-specificity DNA-binding mutant of sigma(70), sigma(70) R584A, which preferentially recognizes a mutant promoter that is not efficiently recognized by wild-type sigma(70). Exploiting this sigma(70) mutant as a genetic tool, we establish an in vivo assay for the inhibitory effect of the bacteriophage T4-encoded anti-sigma factor AsiA on sigma(70)-dependent transcription. Our results demonstrate the utility of this altered-specificity system for genetically dissecting sigma(70) and its interactions with transcription regulators.

A family of anti-sigma70 proteins in T4-type phages and bacteria that are similar to AsiA, a Transcription inhibitor and co-activator of bacteriophage T4

Anti-sigma70 factors interact with sigma70 proteins, the specificity subunits of prokaryotic RNA polymerase. The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma70 protein, AsiA, binds tightly to regions 4.1 and 4.2 of the sigma70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and inhibits transcription from sigma70 promoters that require recognition of the canonical sigma70 -35 DNA sequence. In the presence of the T4 transcription activator MotA, AsiA also functions as a co-activator of transcription from T4 middle promoters, which retain the canonical sigma70 -10 consensus sequence but have a MotA box sequence centered at -30 rather than the sigma70 -35 sequence. The E.coli anti-sigma70 protein Rsd also interacts with region 4.2 of sigma70 and inhibits transcription from sigma70 promoters. Our sequence comparisons of T4 AsiA with Rsd, with the predicted AsiA orthologs of the T4-type phages RB69, 44RR, KVP40, and Aeh1, and with AlgQ, a regulator of alginate production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa indicate that these proteins share conserved amino acid residues at positions known to be important for the binding of T4 AsiA to sigma70 region 4. We show that, like T4 AsiA, Rsd binds to sigma70 in a native protein gel and, as with T4 AsiA, a L18S substitution in Rsd disrupts this complex. Previous work has assigned sigma70 amino acid F563, within region 4.1, as a critical determinant for AsiA binding. This residue is also involved in the binding of sigma70 to the beta-flap of core, suggesting that AsiA inhibits transcription by disrupting the interaction between sigma70 region 4.1 and the beta-flap. We find that as with T4 AsiA, the interaction of KVP40 AsiA, Rsd, or AlgQ with sigma70 region 4 is diminished by the substitution F563Y. We also demonstrate that like T4 AsiA and Rsd, KVP40 AsiA inhibits transcription from sigma70-dependent promoters. We speculate that the phage AsiA orthologs, Rsd, and AlgQ are members of a related family in T4-type phage and bacteria, which interact similarly with primary sigma factors. In addition, we show that even though a clear MotA ortholog has not been identified in the KVP40 genome and the phage genome appears to lack typical middle promoter sequences, KVP40 AsiA activates transcription from T4 middle promoters in the presence of T4 MotA. We speculate that KVP40 encodes a protein that is dissimilar in sequence, but functionally equivalent, to T4 MotA.

Phage T4 early promoters are resistant to inhibition by the anti-sigma factor AsiA

Phage T4 early promoters are transcribed in vivo and in vitro by the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme Esigma(70). We studied in vitro the effects of the T4 anti-sigma(70) factor AsiA on the activity of several T4 early promoters. In single-round transcription, promoters motB, denV, mrh.2, motA wild type and UP element-deleted motA are strongly resistant to inhibition by AsiA. The alpha-C-terminal domain of Esigma(70) is crucial to this resistance. DNase I footprinting of Esigma(70) and Esigma(70)AsiA on motA and mrh.2 shows extended contacts between the holoenzyme with or without AsiA and upstream regions of these promoters. A TG --> TC mutation of the extended -10 motif in the motA UP element-deleted promoter strongly increases susceptibility to inhibition by AsiA, but has no effect on the motA wild-type promoter: either the UP element or the extended -10 site confers resistance to AsiA. Potassium permanganate reactivity shows that the two structure elements are not equivalent: with AsiA, the motA UP element-deleted promoter opens more slowly whereas the motA TC promoter opens like the wild type. Changes in UV laser photoreactivity at position +4 on variants of motA reveal an analogous distinction in the roles of the extended -10 and UP promoter elements.

T4 AsiA blocks DNA recognition by remodeling sigma70 region 4

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA is a versatile transcription factor capable of inhibiting host gene expression as an 'anti-sigma' factor while simultaneously promoting gene-specific expression of T4 middle genes in conjunction with T4 MotA. To accomplish this task, AsiA engages conserved region 4 of Eschericia coli sigma70, blocking recognition of most host promoters by sequestering the DNA-binding surface at the AsiA/sigma70 interface. The three-dimensional structure of an AsiA/region 4 complex reveals that the C-terminal alpha helix of region 4 is unstructured, while four other helices adopt a completely different conformation relative to the canonical structure of unbound region 4. That AsiA induces, rather than merely stabilizes, this rearrangement can be realized by comparison to the homologous structures of region 4 solved in a variety of contexts, including the structure of Thermotoga maritima sigmaA region 4 described herein. AsiA simultaneously occupies the surface of region 4 that ordinarily contacts core RNA polymerase (RNAP), suggesting that an AsiA-bound sigma70 may also undergo conformational changes in the context of the RNAP holoenzyme.

Bacteriophage T4 genome

Phage T4 has provided countless contributions to the paradigms of genetics and biochemistry. Its complete genome sequence of 168,903 bp encodes about 300 gene products. T4 biology and its genomic sequence provide the best-understood model for modern functional genomics and proteomics. Variations on gene expression, including overlapping genes, internal translation initiation, spliced genes, translational bypassing, and RNA processing, alert us to the caveats of purely computational methods. The T4 transcriptional pattern reflects its dependence on the host RNA polymerase and the use of phage-encoded proteins that sequentially modify RNA polymerase; transcriptional activator proteins, a phage sigma factor, anti-sigma, and sigma decoy proteins also act to specify early, middle, and late promoter recognition. Posttranscriptional controls by T4 provide excellent systems for the study of RNA-dependent processes, particularly at the structural level. The redundancy of DNA replication and recombination systems of T4 reveals how phage and other genomes are stably replicated and repaired in different environments, providing insight into genome evolution and adaptations to new hosts and growth environments. Moreover, genomic sequence analysis has provided new insights into tail fiber variation, lysis, gene duplications, and membrane localization of proteins, while high-resolution structural determination of the "cell-puncturing device," combined with the three-dimensional image reconstruction of the baseplate, has revealed the mechanism of penetration during infection. Despite these advances, nearly 130 potential T4 genes remain uncharacterized. Current phage-sequencing initiatives are now revealing the similarities and differences among members of the T4 family, including those that infect bacteria other than Escherichia coli. T4 functional genomics will aid in the interpretation of these newly sequenced T4-related genomes and in broadening our understanding of the complex evolution and ecology of phages-the most abundant and among the most ancient biological entities on Earth.

Analysis of regions within the bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein involved in its binding to the sigma70 subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase and its role as a transcriptional inhibitor and co-activator

Bacteriophage T4 AsiA, a protein of 90 amino acid residues, binds to the sigma(70) subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and inhibits host or T4 early transcription or, together with the T4 MotA protein, activates T4 middle transcription. To investigate which regions within AsiA are involved in forming a complex with sigma(70) and in providing transcriptional functions we generated random mutations throughout AsiA and targeted mutations within the C-terminal region. We tested mutant proteins for their ability to complement the growth of T4 asiA am phage under non-suppressing conditions, to inhibit E. coli growth, to interact with sigma(70) region 4 in a two-hybrid assay, to bind to sigma(70) in a native protein gel, and to inhibit or activate transcription in vitro using a T4 middle promoter that is active with RNA polymerase alone, is inhibited by AsiA, and is activated by MotA/AsiA. We find that substitutions within the N-terminal half of AsiA, at amino acid residues V14, L18, and I40, rendered the protein defective for binding to sigma(70). These residues reside at the monomer-monomer interface in recent NMR structures of the AsiA dimer. In contrast, AsiA missing the C-terminal 44 amino acid residues interacted well with sigma(70) region 4 in the two-hybrid assay, and AsiA missing the C-terminal 17 amino acid residues (Delta74-90) bound to sigma(70) and was fully competent in standard in vitro transcription assays. However, the presence of the C-terminal region delayed formation of transcriptionally competent species when the AsiA/polymerase complex was pre-incubated with the promoter in the absence of MotA. Our results suggest that amino acid residues within the N-terminal half of AsiA are involved in forming or maintaining the AsiA/sigma(70) complex. The C-terminal region of AsiA, while not absolutely required for inhibition or co-activation, aids inhibition by slowing the formation of transcription complexes between a promoter and the AsiA/polymerase complex.

The bacteriophage T4 transcription activator MotA interacts with the far-C-terminal region of the sigma70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Transcription from bacteriophage T4 middle promoters uses Escherichia coli RNA polymerase together with the T4 transcriptional activator MotA and the T4 coactivator AsiA. AsiA binds tightly within the C-terminal portion of the sigma70 subunit of RNA polymerase, while MotA binds to the 9-bp MotA box motif, which is centered at -30, and also interacts with sigma70. We show here that the N-terminal half of MotA (MotA(NTD)), which is thought to include the activation domain, interacts with the C-terminal region of sigma70 in an E. coli two-hybrid assay. Replacement of the C-terminal 17 residues of sigma70 with comparable sigma38 residues abolishes the interaction with MotA(NTD) in this assay, as does the introduction of the amino acid substitution R608C. Furthermore, in vitro transcription experiments indicate that a polymerase reconstituted with a sigma70 that lacks C-terminal amino acids 604 to 613 or 608 to 613 is defective for MotA-dependent activation. We also show that a proteolyzed fragment of MotA that contains the C-terminal half (MotA(CTD)) binds DNA with a K(D(app)) that is similar to that of full-length MotA. Our results support a model for MotA-dependent activation in which protein-protein contact between DNA-bound MotA and the far-C-terminal region of sigma70 helps to substitute functionally for an interaction between sigma70 and a promoter -35 element.

Flipping a genetic switch by subunit exchange

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein is a multifunctional protein that simultaneously acts as both a repressor and activator of gene expression during the phage life cycle. These dual roles with opposing transcriptional consequences are achieved by modification of the host RNA polymerase in which AsiA binds to conserved region 4 (SR4) of sigma(70), altering the pathway of promoter selection by the holoenzyme. The mechanism by which AsiA flips this genetic switch has now been revealed, in part, from the three-dimensional structure of AsiA and the elucidation of its interaction with SR4. The structure of AsiA is that of a novel homodimer in which each monomer is constructed as a seven-helix bundle arranged in four overlapping helix-loop-helix elements. Identification of the protein interfaces for both the AsiA homodimer and the AsiA-sigma(70) complex reveals that these interfaces are coincident. Thus, the AsiA interaction with sigma(70) necessitates that the AsiA homodimer dissociate to form an AsiA-SR4 heterodimer, exchanging one protein subunit for another to alter promoter choice by RNA polymerase.

The Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.anti-sigma 70 AsiA complex utilizes alpha-carboxyl-terminal domain upstream promoter contacts to transcribe from a -10/-35 promoter

During infection of Escherichia coli, the phage T4 early protein AsiA inhibits open complex formation by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme Efinal sigma(70) at -10/-35 bacterial promoters through binding to region 4.2 of the final sigma(70) subunit. We used the -10/-35 lacUV5 promoter to study the properties of the Efinal sigma(70). AsiA complex in the presence of the glutamate anion. Under these experimental conditions, inhibition by AsiA was significantly decreased. KMnO(4) probing showed that the observed residual transcriptional activity was due to the slow transformation of the ternary complex Efinal sigma(70). AsiA.lacUV5 into an open complex. In agreement with this observation, affinity of the enzyme for the promoter was 10-fold lower in the ternary complex than in the binary complex Efinal sigma(70).lacUV5. A tau plot analysis of abortive transcription reactions showed that AsiA binding to Efinal sigma(70) resulted in a 120-fold decrease in the second-order on-rate constant of the reaction of Efinal sigma(70) with lacUV5 and a 55-fold decrease in the rate constant of the isomerization step leading to the open complex. This ternary complex still responded to activation by the cAMP.catabolite activator protein complex. We show that compensatory Efinal sigma(70)/promoter upstream contacts involving the C-terminal domains of alpha subunits in Efinal sigma(70) become essential for the binding of Efinal sigma(70). AsiA to the lacUV5 promoter.

Mapping the molecular interface between the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase and T4 AsiA

Bacteriophage T4 antisigma protein AsiA (10 kDa) orchestrates a switch from the host and early viral transcription to middle viral transcription by binding to the sigma(70) subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase. The molecular determinants of sigma(70)-AsiA complex formation are not known. Here, we used combinatorial peptide chemistry, protein-protein crosslinking, and mutational analysis to study the interaction between AsiA and its target, the 33 amino acid residues-long sigma(70) peptide containing conserved region 4.2. Many region 4.2 amino acid residues contact AsiA, which likely completely occludes the DNA-binding surface of region 4.2. Though none of region 4.2 amino acid residues is singularly responsible for the very tight interaction with AsiA, sigma(70) Lys593 and Arg596 which lie outside the putative DNA recognition element of region 4.2, contribute the most. In AsiA, the first 20 amino acid residues are both necessary and sufficient for interactions with sigma(70). Our results clarify details of sigma(70)-AsiA interaction and open the way for engineering AsiA derivatives with altered specificities.

The bacteriophage T4 anti-sigma factor AsiA is not necessary for the inhibition of early promoters in vivo

Bacteriophage T4 early promoters are utilized immediately after infection and are abruptly turned off 2-3 min later (at 30 degrees C) when the middle promoters are activated. The viral early protein AsiA has been suspected to bring about this transcriptional switch: not only does it activate transcription at middle promoters in vivo and in vitro but it also shows potent anti-sigma70 activity in vitro, suggesting that it is responsible for the shut-off of early transcription. We show here that after infection with a phage deleted for the asiA gene the inhibition of early transcription occurs to the same extent and with the same kinetics as in a wild-type infection. Thus, another AsiA-independent circuit efficiently turns off early transcription. The association of a mutation in asiA with a mutation in mod, rpbA, motA or motB has no effect on the inhibition of early promoters, showing that none of these phage-encoded transcriptional regulators is necessary for AsiA-independent shut-off. It is not known whether AsiA is able to inhibit early promoters in vivo, but host transcription is strongly inhibited in vivo upon induction of AsiA from a multicopy plasmid.

The anti-sigma factors

A mechanism for regulating gene expression at the level of transcription utilizes an antagonist of the sigma transcription factor known as the anti-sigma (anti-sigma) factor. The cytoplasmic class of anti-sigma factors has been well characterized. The class includes AsiA form bacteriophage T4, which inhibits Escherichia coli sigma 70; FlgM, present in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, which inhibits the flagella sigma factor sigma 28; SpoIIAB, which inhibits the sporulation-specific sigma factor, sigma F and sigma G, of Bacillus subtilis; RbsW of B. subtilis, which inhibits stress response sigma factor sigma B; and DnaK, a general regulator of the heat shock response, which in bacteria inhibits the heat shock sigma factor sigma 32. In addition to this class of well-characterized cytoplasmic anti-sigma factors, a new class of homologous, inner-membrane-bound anti-sigma factors has recently been discovered in a variety of eubacteria. This new class of anti-sigma factors regulates the expression of so-called extracytoplasmic functions, and hence is known as the ECF subfamily of anti-sigma factors. The range of cell processes regulated by anti-sigma factors is highly varied and includes bacteriophage phage growth, sporulation, stress response, flagellar biosynthesis, pigment production, ion transport, and virulence.

Stimulation of bacteriophage T4 middle transcription by the T4 proteins MotA and AsiA occurs at two distinct steps in the transcription cycle

The bacteriophage T4 encodes proteins that are responsible for tightly regulating mRNA synthesis throughout phage development in Escherichia coli. The three classes of T4 promoters (early, middle, and late) are utilized sequentially by the host RNA polymerase as a result of phage-induced modifications. One such modification is the tight binding of the T4 AsiA protein to the sigma70 subunit of the RNA polymerase. This interaction is pivotal for the transition between T4 early and middle transcription, since it both inhibits recognition of host and T4 early promoters and stimulates T4 middle mode synthesis. The activation of T4 middle transcription also requires the T4 MotA protein, bound specifically to its recognition sequence, the "Mot box," which is centered at position -30 of these promoters. Accordingly, the two T4 proteins working in concert are sufficient to effectively switch the transcription specificity of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Herein, we investigate the mechanism of transcription activation and report that, while the presence of MotA and AsiA increases the initial recruitment of RNA polymerase to a T4 middle promoter, it does not alter the intrinsic stability of the discrete complexes formed. In addition, we have characterized the RNA polymerase-promoter species by UV laser footprinting and followed their evolution from open into initiating complexes. These data, combined with in vitro transcription assays, indicate that AsiA and MotA facilitate promoter escape, thereby stimulating the production of full-length transcripts.

Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T4 AsiA

The 10 kDa bacteriophage T4 antisigma protein AsiA binds the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase promoter specificity subunit, sigma 70, with high affinity and inhibits its transcription activity. AsiA binds to sigma 70 primarily through an interaction with sigma 70 conserved region 4.2, which has also been implicated in sequence-specific recognition of the -35 consensus promoter element. Here we show that AsiA forms a stable ternary complex with core RNA polymerase (RNAP) and sigma 70 and thus does not inhibit sigma 70 activity by preventing its binding to core RNAP. We investigated the effect of AsiA on open promoter complex formation and abortive initiation at two -10/-35 type promoters and two "extended -10" promoters. Our results indicate that the binding of AsiA to sigma 70 and the interaction of sigma 70 region 4.2 with the -35 consensus promoter element of -10/-35 promoters is mutually exclusive. In contrast, AsiA has much less effect on open promoter complex formation and abortive initiation from extended -10 promoters, which lack a -35 consensus element and do not require sigma 70 conserved region 4.2. From these results we conclude that T4 AsiA inhibits E. coli RNAP sigma 70 holoenzyme transcription at -10/-35 promoters by interfering with the required interaction between sigma 70 conserved region 4.2 and the -35 consensus promoter element.

The bacteriophage T4 AsiA protein: a molecular switch for sigma 70-dependent promoters

The AsiA protein, encoded by bacteriophage T4, inhibits Esigma70-dependent transcription at bacterial and early-phage promoters. We demonstrate that the inhibitory action of AsiA involves interference with the recognition of the -35 consensus promoter sequence by host RNA polymerase. In vitro experiments were performed with a C-terminally labelled sigma factor that is competent for functional holoenzyme reconstitution. By protease and hydroxyl radical protein footprinting, we show that AsiA binds region 4.2 of sigma70, which recognizes the -35 sequence. Direct interference with the recognition of the promoter at this locus is supported by two parallel experiments. The stationary-phase sigma factor containing holoenzyme, which can initiate transcription at promoters devoid of a -35 region, is insensitive to AsiA inhibition. The recognition of a galP1 promoter by Esigma70 is not affected by the presence of AsiA. Therefore, we conclude that AsiA inhibits transcription from Escherichia coli and T4 early promoters by counteracting the recognition of region 4.2 of sigma70 with the -35 hexamer.