Effects of lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate on plasma lipids and lipoproteins, coagulation factors, and carbohydrate metabolism

The impact of medroxyprogesterone acetate on lipid profiles in Women: A time and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The effect of MPA on the lipid profile and CVD risk is still controversial; hence, this comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to assess the effect of MPA on lipid profiles in women.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed/Medline, and Embase, up to October 20, 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis approach based on the DerSimonian and Laird method was used to compute the combined estimates of the intervention's impact on the lipid profile.

RESULTS

35 eligible studies with 58 arms were included in our meta-analyses analysis. Combined effect sizes suggested a significant effect of MPA on total cholesterol (TC) levels (WMD: -3.43 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -5.38 to -1.48, p < 0.001), HDL-C levels (WMD: -3.34 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -3.77 to -2.91, p < 0.001), and triglyceride (TG) levels (WMD: -9.13 mg/dL, 95 % CI: -10.92 to -7.33, p < 0.001). The subgroup meta-analysis revealed a more substantial reduction in TC in studies with dosages > 2.5 mg/day (WMD: -4.10 mg/dL), mean participant age lower than 60 years (WMD: -3.80 mg/dL), mean BMI lower than 25 kg/m2 (WMD: -5.61 mg/dL), duration of intervention of 12 months or more (WMD: -3.98 mg/dL), and when the baseline TC value was equal to or greater than 200 mg/dL (WMD: -4.13 mg/dL).

CONCLUSIONS

The current meta-analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in TC, TG, and HDL-C levels and a non-significant increase in LDL-C levels after MPA administration in women.

Impact of estetrol (E4) on hemostasis, metabolism and bone turnover in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effects of estetrol (E4) on hemostasis, lipids, carbohydrate metabolism and bone turnover in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Participants (n = 180, age 43-64 years) received E4 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Changes from baseline at week 12 were evaluated versus placebo for hemostasis parameters, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), lipids, carbohydrate metabolism and bone markers.

RESULTS

Changes for hemostasis parameters were minimal with a small increase only in the normalized activated protein C sensitivity ratio in the E4 15 mg group versus placebo. SHBG increased in the E4 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg groups versus placebo. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased in all E4 groups; changes were not consistent for other lipids. Significant decreases versus placebo were seen for insulin resistance (E4 10 mg group), hemoglobin A1c (E4 15 mg group) and type 1 collagen C-terminal telopeptide (E4 10 mg and 15 mg groups). Small decreases in osteocalcin in the E4 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg groups were significant versus the increase observed in placebo.

CONCLUSION

E4 had limited impact on hemostasis and potentially beneficial effects on lipids, carbohydrate metabolism and bone turnover.

Change in metabolic parameters and reproductive hormones from baseline to 6-month hormone therapy

Adequate evidence showed hormone therapy (HT) reduces the risk of new-onset diabetes in midlife women by decreasing fasting glucose and insulin. However, the improvement of these diabetic biomarkers varied with each individual in clinical observations. The objective of our study was to investigate potential baseline factors associated with the change of fasting glucose and insulin during HT.A retrospective cohort study was performed among 263 midlife participants aged 40 to 60 years with menopausal symptoms who have received 6-month individualized HT. Demographic information and laboratory indicators including reproductive hormone, lipid profiles, diabetic indicators were collected and measured at baseline and were followed-up. A series of statistical analyses were performed to confirm the effectiveness of HT and compare the baseline factors between participants with different glycemic or insulinemic response. Multivariable linear regression model with stepwise variable selection was further used to identify the associated factor with the change of fasting glucose and insulin.Of all participants, fasting glucose (P = .001) and fasting insulin (P < .001) were significantly decreased after individualized HT. Significant differences in baseline reproductive hormones were observed in participants with different glycemic response to HT (P < .001 for both follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] and estradiol). Stepwise linear regression model showed that in addition to baseline fasting glucose levels, baseline FSH was also independently associated with the change of fasting glucose (β = -0.145, P = .019 for baseline FSH) but not fasting insulin. Greater reduction in fasting glucose in women with higher FSH levels was observed even though they have already been in better metabolic conditions (P = .037).Midlife women with higher baseline FSH levels have greater reduction in fasting glucose but not fasting insulin. FSH could be an independent predictor of glycemic response to HT in peri- and postmenopausal women.

Hormone Therapy in Menopause: Concepts, Controversies, and Approach to Treatment

Hormone therapy (HT) is an effective treatment for menopausal symptoms, including vasomotor symptoms and genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Randomized trials also demonstrate positive effects on bone health, and age-stratified analyses indicate more favorable effects on coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in younger women (close proximity to menopause) than in women more than a decade past menopause. In the absence of contraindications or other major comorbidities, recently menopausal women with moderate or severe symptoms are appropriate candidates for HT. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy trials-estrogen and progestin trial and the estrogen-alone trial-clarified the benefits and risks of HT, including how the results differed by age. A key lesson from the WHI trials, which was unfortunately lost in the posttrial cacophony, was that the risk:benefit ratio and safety profile of HT differed markedly by clinical characteristics of the participants, especially age, time since menopause, and comorbidity status. In the present review of the WHI and other recent HT trials, we aim to provide readers with an improved understanding of the importance of the timing of HT initiation, type and route of administration, and of patient-specific considerations that should be weighed when prescribing HT.

Improving clinical outcomes through attention to sex and hormones in research

Biological sex, fluctuations in sex steroid hormones throughout life and gender as a social construct all influence every aspect of health and disease. Yet, for decades, most basic and clinical studies have included only male individuals. As modern health care moves towards personalized medicine, it is clear that considering sex and hormonal status in basic and clinical studies will bring precision to the development of novel therapeutics and treatment paradigms. To this end, funding, regulatory and policy agencies now require inclusion of female animals and women in basic and clinical studies. However, inclusion of female animals and women often does not mean that information regarding potential hormonal interactions with pharmacological treatments or clinical outcomes is available. All sex steroid hormones can interact with receptors for drug targets, metabolism and transport. Genetic variation in receptors or in enzymatic function might contribute to sex differences in therapeutic efficacy and adverse drug reactions. Outcomes from clinical trials are often not reported by sex, and, if the data are available, they are not translated into clinical practice guidelines. This Review will provide a historical perspective for the current state of research related to hormone trials and provide concrete strategies that, if implemented, will improve the health of all people.

Hormone therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis management

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been used for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis for several decades. However, public concerns were raised over the safety of MHT after the initial report was published in 2002 by the Women's Health Initiative. We conducted a historical review on this subject, primarily focusing on level I evidence from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and summarized high-quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of MHT in management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clinical issues were also discussed on MHT initiation, identification of treatment candidates and treatment duration, as well as discontinuation of MHT.

Clinical pharmacology of progestins

INTRODUCTION

In this paper, we report general pharmacological profile and major biological activities of natural progesterone (P) and progestins. The aim of this article consists of synthesizing the principal aspects of pharmacology and metabolism of P and progestins related to the clinical consequences of their use.

METHODS

We review scientific literature on the topic "Progestins", evaluating the most relevant data from original articles, reviews and meta-analyses.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Progestins represent a specific class of synthetic analogues of P clinically employed (alone or associated with estrogens) to manage several gynaecological conditions, for instance multiple abortions, luteal phase defect, premenstrual syndrome, abnormal uterine bleeding, endometriosis and menopause (for hormone replacement therapy). Besides their use in the field of contraception, many non-contraceptive benefits of estroprogestins are mostly due to the activities of progestins. Pharmacological characteristics, dosage and individual metabolism could be listed among the principal aspects influencing their clinical effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of each progestin according to its pharmacological profile is crucial for the appropriate management of any gynaecological condition. An aware knowledge of these compounds is fundamental to hone medical practice.

A randomized trial on the effect of oral combined estradiol and drospirenone on glucose and insulin metabolism in healthy menopausal women with a normal oral glucose tolerance test

BACKGROUND

Menopause is often associated with a central accumulation of body fat. This provokes insulin resistance. The resulting hyperinsulinemia may increase the risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. Long-term studies indicate that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) reduces insulin resistance. To broaden knowledge of the mechanisms behind the influence of MHT on glucose homeostasis we focused on the direct short-term effects of MHT with oral combined estradiol and drospirenone on glucose and insulin metabolism in healthy postmenopausal women.

METHODS

This randomized, placebo-controlled study recruited 80 healthy postmenopausal women. Women were randomized to treatment with estradiol 1 mg continuously combined with drospirenone 2 mg or placebo for 6-8 weeks. All participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before and after the treatment period. Glucose, insulin, fructosamine and C-peptide levels were measured in serum before and 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 min after a 75-gram oral glucose challenge.

RESULTS

After intervention, significantly higher glucose levels at 120 min (p < 0.024) and 150 min (p < 0.030) were observed in the MHT group compared with the placebo group. These glucose levels remained within the normal range. A significantly lower insulin peak serum level (p < 0.040) and a non-significantly smaller area under the curve (AUC) for insulin levels (p = 0.192) was observed in the MHT group at the end of the study period relative to baseline. No significant change in the insulin AUC in the placebo group was observed. There were no significant differences in fructosamine, HOMA-IR and C-peptide levels between the MHT group and the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

This double-blind randomized study (EC/2008/694) indicates that treating healthy, postmenopausal women with 1 mg estradiol continuously combined with 2 mg drospirenone significantly decreases peak insulin levels and increases peak glucose levels during an OGTT compared to placebo. These glucose levels remained within the normal range.

The Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS): what have we learned?

OBJECTIVE

The Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) was designed to address gaps in understanding the effects of timely menopausal hormone treatments (HT) on cardiovascular health and other effects of menopause after the premature termination of the Women's Health Initiative.

METHOD

The KEEPS was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the hypothesis that initiation of HT (oral conjugated equine estrogens [o-CEE] or transdermal 17β-estradiol [t-E2]) in healthy, recently postmenopausal women (n = 727) would slow the progression of atherosclerosis as measured by changes in carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT).

RESULTS

After 4 years, neither HT affected the rate of increase in CIMT. There was a trend for reduced accumulation of coronary artery calcium with o-CEE. There were no severe adverse effects, including venous thrombosis. Several ancillary studies demonstrated a positive effect on mood with o-CEE, and reduced hot flashes, improved sleep, and maintenance of bone mineral density with both treatments. Sexual function improved with t-E2. There were no significant effects of either treatment on cognition, breast pain, or skin wrinkling. Variants of genes associated with estrogen metabolism influenced the age of menopause and variability in effects of the HT on CIMT. Platelet activation associated with the development of white matter hyperintensities in the brain.

CONCLUSIONS

KEEPS and its ancillary studies have supported the value and safety of the use of HT in recently postmenopausal women and provide a perspective for future research to optimize HT and health of postmenopausal women. The KEEPS continuation study continues to pursue these issues.

Metabolic and cardiovascular effects of TX-001HR in menopausal women with vasomotor symptoms

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of TX-001HR (17β-estradiol [E2] and progesterone [P4] in a single oral capsule) on cardiometabolic markers and outcomes. Methods: Four E2/P4 doses (1 mg/100 mg, 0.5 mg/100 mg, 0.5 mg/50 mg, 0.25 mg/50 mg) were compared with placebo in menopausal women with vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and a uterus in the phase 3 REPLENISH (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942668) trial. Changes in lipid and coagulation parameters and blood glucose from baseline at 6, 9, and 12 months as well as cardiovascular events are summarized. Results: A total of 1835 participants took ≥1 capsule of daily E2/P4; 1684 received E2/P4 and 151 received placebo. No clinically significant changes in lipid parameters, coagulation factors, or glucose were observed between treatment groups. Minimal increases of potential clinical importance were observed in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose at month 12 with E2/P4 (1-4%, 6-11%, and 1%, respectively) and placebo (3%, 7%, and 2%, respectively). One episode of deep venous thrombosis and three cases of cardiovascular disease were observed, similar to expected rates of these events in the general population. Conclusions: In the REPLENISH trial, postmenopausal women with VMS treated with E2/P4 had no clinically meaningful effects on lipids, glucose, or coagulation parameters compared with placebo.

Menopausal hormone therapy and heart disease prevention: desired or valid?

Cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of death for women in older age groups. For many decades, specialists have tried to prevent their development by the use of estrogen. The review of the literature presents current data on the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on the risk of cardiovascular complications. The results of the main randomized clinical and observational studies in this area, conducted over several decades, are discussed. We described the concept of “window of opportunities”, in accordance with which an improvement in cardiovascular prognosis can be expected only at the onset of MHT in women under the age of 60 years in early postmenopause (menopause duration <10 years). There are experimental and clinical data explaining the different effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular prognosis in women of various age groups and different duration of postmenopause. The recommendations given in the review on the use of MHT are based on modern international guidelines.

Ospemifene's effects on lipids and coagulation factors: a post hoc analysis of phase 2 and 3 clinical trial data

Objective:

To evaluate the effect of ospemifene 60 mg on the lipid and coagulation parameters of postmenopausal women using data from five phase 2 and 3 clinical trials.

Methods:

Data for lipids and coagulation factors for 2,166 postmenopausal women were pooled from five randomized, placebo-controlled studies. Lipid and coagulation parameters included in this analysis were total cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), triglycerides, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, antithrombin antigen, protein C Ag, and protein S Ag free.

Results:

Mean percent changes in HDL and LDL were significantly greater with ospemifene versus placebo at month 3 (HDL: 4.4% vs 0.2%; LDL: −5.2% vs 2.4%), month 6 (HDL: 5.1% vs 1.5%; LDL: −6.7% vs 2.4%), and month 12 (HDL: 2.3% vs −1.9%; LDL: −7.0% vs −2.1%; P < 0.05, for all comparisons). Ospemifene significantly reduced total cholesterol at 6 months (−1.8% vs 1.6%; P = 0.0345 versus placebo), and changes in triglycerides with ospemifene were similar to placebo at all three time points. In subgroup analyses based on age, body mass index, and baseline triglyceride level, ospemifene increased HDL and decreased LDL, but had no significant effect on total cholesterol and triglycerides relative to placebo. Ospemifene significantly improved fibrinogen and protein C antigen levels relative to placebo at months 3 (−8.7% vs −0.8% and −2.7% vs 0.5%, respectively), 6 (−6.0% vs 6.7% and −3.6 vs 8.0%), and 12 (−8.7% vs 7.3% and −4.5% vs 6.6%; P < 0.01, for all). The levels of all coagulation factors remained within the normal range throughout the studies.

Conclusion:

Ospemifene 60 mg does not have a detrimental effect on lipid and coagulation parameters of postmenopausal women with up to 12 months of use.

Estrogen therapy for osteoporosis in the modern era

Menopause predisposes women to osteoporosis due to declining estrogen levels. This results in a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) and an increase in fractures. Osteoporotic fractures lead to substantial morbidity and mortality, and are considered one of the largest public health priorities by the World Health Organization (WHO). It is therefore essential for menopausal women to receive appropriate guidance for the prevention and management of osteoporosis. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized controlled trial first proved hormonal therapy (HT) reduces the incidence of all osteoporosis-related fractures in postmenopausal women. However, the study concluded that the adverse effects outweighed the potential benefits on bone, leading to a significant decrease in HT use for menopausal symptoms. Additionally, HT was not used as first-line therapy for osteoporosis and fractures. Subsequent studies have challenged these initial conclusions and have shown significant efficacy of HT in various doses, durations, regimens, and routes of administration. These studies support that HT improves BMD and reduces fracture risk in women with and without osteoporosis. Furthermore, the studies suggest that low-dose and transdermal HT are less likely associated with the adverse effects of breast cancer, endometrial hyperplasia, coronary artery disease (CAD), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) previously observed in standard-dose oral HT regimens. Given the need for estrogen in menopausal women and evidence supporting the cost effectiveness, safety, and efficacy of HT, we propose that HT should be considered for the primary prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in appropriate candidates. HT should be individualized and the once "lowest dose for shortest period of time" concept should no longer be used. This review will focus on the prior and current studies for various HT formulations used for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, exploring the safety profile of low-dose and transdermal HT that have been shown to be safer than oral standard-dose HT.

The effects of progesterones on blood lipids in hormone replacement therapy

The safety of progestogens as a class has drawn much attention after the publication of data from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial, particularly with respect to cardiovascular disease. Depending on the chemical structure, pharmacokinetics, receptor affinity and potency of action, progestogens have a divergent range of properties that may translate to very different clinical effects. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of varied progestogens in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), especially focusing on blood lipids, which are the most important parameters for assessing cardiovascular disease risk.

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Type 2 Diabetes Prevention: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Clinical Implications

Type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. Large, randomized controlled trials suggest that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) delays the onset of type 2 diabetes in women. However, the mechanisms and clinical implications of this association are still a matter of controversy. This review provides an up-to-date analysis and integration of epidemiological, clinical, and basic studies, and proposes a mechanistic explanation for the effect of menopause and MHT on type 2 diabetes development and prevention. We discuss the beneficial effects of endogenous estradiol with respect to insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, and glucose effectiveness; we also discuss energy expenditure and adipose distribution, both of which are affected by menopause and improved by MHT, which thereby decreases the incidence of type 2 diabetes. We reconcile differences among studies that investigated the effect of menopause and MHT formulations on type 2 diabetes. We argue that discrepancies arise from physiological differences in methods used to assess glucose homeostasis, ranging from clinical indices of insulin sensitivity to steady-state methods to assess insulin action. We also discuss the influence of the route of estrogen administration and the addition of progestogens. We conclude that, although MHT is neither approved nor appropriate for the prevention of type 2 diabetes due to its complex balance of risks and benefits, it should not be withheld from women with increased risk of type 2 diabetes who seek treatment for menopausal symptoms.

Menopause, hormone therapy and diabetes

Over the past three decades, the prevalence of diabetes has increased four-fold. Coupled with the global obesity epidemic and aging of the world's population, a perfect metabolic storm is brewing. The influence of menopause and exogenous estrogen and progestogens must be included in this equation. In this review, criteria for diagnosing diabetes and recommendations for screening are described. The reported effects of menopause on diabetes risk in healthy women are reviewed as well as the relationship between established diabetes and the timing of menopause. The effects of menopausal hormone therapies (MHT) on glucose control in women with diabetes and the effect of MHT on diabetes risk in menopausal women without diabetes are described. Evidence-based strategies to prevent diabetes in midlife women are highlighted. The augmenting effect of diabetes on chronic health concerns of aging women, such as cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and cancer, along with current recommendations for screening and prevention are presented. Given the current demographics of today's world, the content of this review may apply to as many as one-third of the average practitioner's postmenopausal patient population.

Progestogen safety and tolerance in hormonal replacement therapy

INTRODUCTION

Today, it is a mandatory practice to prescribe a combination of estrogens and progestogens for menopausal women requiring hormone therapy and with a uterus. The WHI study and its reanalysis demonstrate a big difference in results between the conjugated equin estrogen (CEE) only vs.CEE plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) arms in relation with breast cancer and cardiovascular risk. The conclusion is that risk is clearly higher in the arm with MPA than in the CEE only arm. Although the only progestogen used in the WHI study was medroxyprogesterone acetate, side effects and intolerance have been extrapolated as a class effect to all progestogens. Areas covered: Progestogen tolerance and side effects in hormone therapy were reviewed. For that purpose, a limited literature search was conducted on key resources including Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, ECRI, and major international health technology agencies. Expert opinion: Many of the tolerance effects are based on limited data. There are no double-blind randomized trials comparing long-term safety for breast cancer and cardiovascular risk among different progestogens. Short-term clinical studies, observational, and in animal and in vitro studies indicate that both micronized progesterone and dydrogesterone are the safer progestogens with an acceptable metabolic profile.

Effect of menopausal hormone therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome

The world population is aging, and women will spend an increasing share of their lives in a postmenopausal state that predisposes to metabolic dysfunction. Thus, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in women is likely to increase dramatically. This article summarizes the effects of menopause in predisposing to components of MetS including visceral obesity, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HTN). We also summarize the effects of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in reversing these metabolic alterations and discuss therapeutic advances of novel menopausal treatment on metabolic function.

Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women

BACKGROUND

Evidence from systematic reviews of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women, however the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have had mixed results. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women, and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention. Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to (i) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced (≥ 10 years versus < 10 years), and where these data were not available, use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy (≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age); and (ii) assess the effects of length of time on treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases on 25 February 2014: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS. We also searched research and trials registers, and conducted reference checking of relevant studies and related systematic reviews to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of women comparing orally administered hormone therapy with placebo or a no treatment control, with a minimum of six months follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. We combined results using random effects meta-analyses, and undertook further analyses to assess the effects of treatment as primary or secondary prevention, and whether treatment was commenced more than or less than 10 years after menopause.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six new trials through this update. Therefore the review includes 19 trials with a total of 40,410 post-menopausal women. On the whole, study quality was good and generally at low risk of bias; the findings are dominated by the three largest trials. We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, angina, or revascularisation. However, there was an increased risk of stroke in those in the hormone therapy arm for combined primary and secondary prevention (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.41). Venous thromboembolic events were increased (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.69), as were pulmonary emboli (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.48) on hormone therapy relative to placebo.The absolute risk increase for stroke was 6 per 1000 women (number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) = 165; mean length of follow-up: 4.21 years (range: 2.0 to 7.1)); for venous thromboembolism 8 per 1000 women (NNTH = 118; mean length of follow-up: 5.95 years (range: 1.0 to 7.1)); and for pulmonary embolism 4 per 1000 (NNTH = 242; mean length of follow-up: 3.13 years (range: 1.0 to 7.1)).We performed subgroup analyses according to when treatment was started in relation to the menopause. Those who started hormone therapy less than 10 years after the menopause had lower mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.95, moderate quality evidence) and coronary heart disease (composite of death from cardiovascular causes and non-fatal myocardial infarction) (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.96; moderate quality evidence), though they were still at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.73, high quality evidence) compared to placebo or no treatment. There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group. In those who started treatment more than 10 years after the menopause there was high quality evidence that it had little effect on death or coronary heart disease between groups but there was an increased risk of stroke (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.38, high quality evidence) and venous thromboembolism (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.80, high quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall, for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events.

Hormone therapy and hemostasis among postmenopausal women: a review

OBJECTIVE

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT), which consists of exogenous estrogens with or without combined progestogens, remains the most effective treatment of climacteric symptoms. Depending on its characteristics, it may nevertheless increase the risk of venous thromboembolism, and its effects on hemostasis have been studied for several decades. The aim of this review was to summarize current knowledge on the effects of HT on hemostasis, taking into account the route of estrogen administration, the daily dose and chemical structure of estrogens, and the pharmacologic class of progestogens.

METHODS

Data from randomized controlled trials that included a control group (either placebo or no treatment) were selected, and analysis was conducted on different generations of biomarkers.

RESULTS

Overall, studies showed a hemostasis imbalance among oral estrogen users with a decrease in coagulation inhibitors and an increase in markers of activation coagulation, leading to global enhanced thrombin generation. By contrast, transdermal estrogen use was associated with less change in hemostasis variables and did not activate coagulation and fibrinolysis. No clear difference in HT effects on hemostasis was highlighted between daily doses of estrogens, between estrogen compounds, and between pharmacologic classes of progestogens.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in hemostasis are in accordance with clinical results showing an increased thrombotic risk with oral--but not transdermal--estrogen use.

Conjugated estrogen/bazedoxifene tablets for the treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause

Conjugated estrogen/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA) therapy represents a new, progestin-free treatment in the management of postmenopausal health. CE/BZA pairs CE with the selective estrogen receptor modulator, BZA. The rationale for the development of CE/BZA was that BZA, acting primarily as a selective estrogen receptor degrader in uterine and breast tissue, would sufficiently inhibit the proliferative effects of CE on the endometrium. The absence of a progestin would reduce the incidence of uterine bleeding, breast pain and increased breast density associated with progestin-containing hormone therapy. CE/BZA has been evaluated in five multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and active-controlled Phase III trials known as the SMART trials. CE/BZA has been shown to maintain the established benefits of estrogen therapy for treatment of vasomotor symptoms and prevention of a loss in bone mineral density (bone mass), while minimizing certain estrogenic effects, particularly in the uterine endometrium and breast.

Low-dose oral or non-oral hormone therapy: effects on C-reactive protein and atrial natriuretic peptide in menopause

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of oral low-dose and non-oral hormone therapy (HT) on ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein (CRP), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopause.

METHODS

In this randomized, cross-over study, 44 recently postmenopausal women, with no clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease, received oral low-dose HT (estradiol 1 mg + drospirenone 2 mg/day) for 3 months. Forty-two patients received non-oral, conventional HT (1.5 mg/day percutaneous 17β-estradiol gel or equivalent for nasal route) for 3 months followed by 200 mg/day micronized progesterone by the vaginal route (14 days during each menstrual period). After 3 months, patients were crossed over without washout. Post-HT vs. pre-HT measures were determined: lipids, glucose, body mass index, waist circumference, fibrinogen, CRP-stratified levels, and ANP levels. The study was registered at clinical trials.gov (NCT01432028).

RESULTS

The mean age was 51 ± 3 years and the mean time since the menopause was 22 ± 10 months. CRP-stratified high levels decreased in a higher number of non-oral HT patients, who moved to intermediate and low levels (p = 0.02). No effect of HT was observed on ANP levels (baseline 67.4 (18.4-104.5), low-dose oral 43.5 (14.4-95.9), non-oral 39.8 (15.5-67.5) pg/ml). Markers of endothelial function did not worsen with either low-dose oral or non-oral HT: von Willebrand factor (baseline 118 ± 37%, low-dose oral 119 ± 38%, non-oral 108 ± 3%, p < 0.01), fibrinogen (baseline 356 ± 58 mg/dl; low-dose oral 343 ± 77 mg/dl; non-oral 326 ± 71 mg/dl, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose oral and non-oral HT for 6 months had neutral or beneficial effects in recently postmenopausal women with no clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease.

Estrogen, vascular estrogen receptor and hormone therapy in postmenopausal vascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is less common in premenopausal women than men of the same age or postmenopausal women, suggesting vascular benefits of estrogen. Estrogen activates estrogen receptors ERα, ERβ and GPR30 in endothelium and vascular smooth muscle (VSM), which trigger downstream signaling pathways and lead to genomic and non-genomic vascular effects such as vasodilation, decreased VSM contraction and growth and reduced vascular remodeling. However, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), such as the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS), have shown little vascular benefits and even adverse events with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), likely due to factors related to the MHT used, ER profile, and RCT design. Some MHT forms, dose, combinations or route of administration may have inadequate vascular effects. Age-related changes in ER amount, distribution, integrity and post-ER signaling could alter the vascular response to MHT. The subject's age, preexisting CVD, and hormone environment could also reduce the effects of MHT. Further evaluation of natural and synthetic estrogens, phytoestrogens, and selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs), and the design of appropriate MHT combinations, dose, route and 'timing' could improve the effectiveness of conventional MHT and provide alternative therapies in the peri-menopausal period. Targeting ER using specific ER agonists, localized MHT delivery, and activation of specific post-ER signaling pathways could counter age-related changes in ER. Examination of the hormone environment and conditions associated with hormone imbalance such as polycystic ovary syndrome may reveal the causes of abnormal hormone-receptor interactions. Consideration of these factors in new RCTs such as the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS) could enhance the vascular benefits of estrogen in postmenopausal CVD.

Management of osteoporosis and menopausal symptoms: focus on bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogen combination

Loss of estrogen production in women during menopause results in a state of estrogen deficiency which has been associated with multiple problems, including vasomotor symptoms, symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy, bone loss, and difficulties with sleep, mood, memory, and sexual activity. The only treatment option currently available to address multiple postmenopausal symptoms in women with an intact uterus is estrogen/progestin-containing hormone therapy (HT). Concerns surrounding side effects and published data regarding the association of HT with the increased risk for breast cancer have induced a decrease in the number of women seeking, initiating, and continuing this type of therapy. A combination containing bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE) maintains the established benefits of estrogen therapy for treatment of postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms, vulvovaginal atrophy, and osteoporosis, while certain estrogenic effects, such as stimulation of the uterus and breast, are antagonized without the side effects associated with HT. BZA/CE has been evaluated in a series of multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and active-controlled Phase III trials known as the Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART) trials. BZA/CE demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in vasomotor symptoms, vulvovaginal atrophy, and a protective effect on the skeleton. These clinical benefits were associated with an acceptable safety profile and an improved tolerability compared with HT. BZA/CE showed a favorable safety profile on the breast, endometrium, and ovaries. The incidence of venous thromboembolism was low and the risk does not appear to be any greater than for CE alone or BZA alone or greater than HT. The incidence of coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular accidents were similar to placebo. The overall incidence of cancer (including breast cancer) was low and similar to placebo. The SMART trials demonstrate that BZA/CE is an alternative option for treating non-hysterectomized, symptomatic, postmenopausal women.

Genetic polymorphisms associated with carotid artery intima-media thickness and coronary artery calcification in women of the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study

Menopausal hormone treatment (MHT) may limit progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but poses a thrombosis risk. To test targeted candidate gene variation for association with subclinical CVD defined by carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) and coronary artery calcification (CAC), 610 women participating in the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS), a clinical trial of MHT to prevent progression of CVD, were genotyped for 13,229 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 764 genes from anticoagulant, procoagulant, fibrinolytic, or innate immunity pathways. According to linear regression, proportion of European ancestry correlated negatively, but age at enrollment and pulse pressure correlated positively with CIMT. Adjusting for these variables, two SNPs, one on chromosome 2 for MAP4K4 gene (rs2236935, β = 0.037, P value = 2.36 × 10(-06)) and one on chromosome 5 for IL5 gene (rs739318, β = 0.051, P value = 5.02 × 10(-05)), associated positively with CIMT; two SNPs on chromosome 17 for CCL5 (rs4796119, β = -0.043, P value = 3.59 × 10(-05); rs2291299, β = -0.032, P value = 5.59 × 10(-05)) correlated negatively with CIMT; only rs2236935 remained significant after correcting for multiple testing. Using logistic regression, when we adjusted for waist circumference, two SNPs (rs11465886, IRAK2, chromosome 3, OR = 3.91, P value = 1.10 × 10(-04); and rs17751769, SERPINA1, chromosome 14, OR = 1.96, P value = 2.42 × 10(-04)) associated positively with a CAC score of >0 Agatston unit; one SNP (rs630014, ABO, OR = 0.51, P value = 2.51 × 10(-04)) associated negatively; none remained significant after correcting for multiple testing. Whether these SNPs associate with CIMT and CAC in women randomized to MHT remains to be determined.

Vascular effects of estrogenic menopausal hormone therapy

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is more common in men and postmenopausal women (Post-MW) than premenopausal women (Pre-MW). Despite recent advances in preventive measures, the incidence of CVD in women has shown a rise that matched the increase in the Post-MW population. The increased incidence of CVD in Post-MW has been related to the decline in estrogen levels, and hence suggested vascular benefits of endogenous estrogen. Experimental studies have identified estrogen receptor ERα, ERβ and a novel estrogen binding membrane protein GPR30 (GPER) in blood vessels of humans and experimental animals. The interaction of estrogen with vascular ERs mediates both genomic and non-genomic effects. Estrogen promotes endothelium-dependent relaxation by increasing nitric oxide, prostacyclin, and hyperpolarizing factor. Estrogen also inhibits the mechanisms of vascular smooth muscle (VSM) contraction including [Ca2+]i, protein kinase C and Rho-kinase. Additional effects of estrogen on the vascular cytoskeleton, extracellular matrix, lipid profile and the vascular inflammatory response have been reported. In addition to the experimental evidence in animal models and vascular cells, initial observational studies in women using menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) have suggested that estrogen may protect against CVD. However, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) such as the Heart and Estrogen/ progestin Replacement Study (HERS) and the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), which examined the effects of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) in older women with established CVD (HERS) or without overt CVD (WHI), failed to demonstrate protective vascular effects of estrogen treatment. Despite the initial set-back from the results of MHT RCTs, growing evidence now supports the 'timing hypothesis', which suggests that MHT could increase the risk of CVD if started late after menopause, but may produce beneficial cardiovascular effects in younger women during the perimenopausal period. The choice of an appropriate MHT dose, route of administration, and estrogen/progestin combination could maximize the vascular benefits of MHT and minimize other adverse effects, especially if given within a reasonably short time after menopause to women that seek MHT for the relief of menopausal symptoms.

Risk stratification of CAD with SPECT-MPI in women with known estrogen status

OBJECTIVE

To compare exercise tolerance testing (ETT) with gated single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) risk stratification in women with an intermediate to high CAD pretest risk and known estrogen status (ES).

BACKGROUND

SPECT-MPI is an effective test for risk stratifying patients with stable angina. However in women, the current guidelines recommend the exercise tolerance testing (ETT) as first line test. Further, the relationship of stress imaging to ES, an independent risk indicator for CAD, is unknown.

METHODS

2,194 women with an intermediate to high CAD pre-test risk were referred for a clinically indicated ETT with gated SPECT-MPI. Duke treadmill scores (DTS) and summed stress score (SSS) were calculated. SSS were classified as normal (SSS < 3), mildly abnormal (SSS 4-8), or moderate-severely abnormal (SSS > 8). The ES was assessed as premenopausal, postmenopausal on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) as ES+ while postmenopausal not on HRT were ES-. An annualized cardiac event rate of a composite of cardiac death, unstable angina (UA) leading to hospitalization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or late coronary revascularization was calculated for all the groups.

RESULTS

The annualized cardiac event rate was 1.3% PPY, 2.1% PPY, and 3.2% PPY for low, intermediate, and high risk DTS (P = .2). Patients with intermediate DTS and mildly abnormal or moderate-severely abnormal gated SPECT-MPI had a significantly higher cardiac event rates (5.3% PPY and 10.8% PPY, respectively) than those with a normal gated SPECT-MPI (1.2%, PPY, P = .01). This was also demonstrated on further Cox-regression analysis. Risk stratification of SPECT-MPI over DTS was independent of ES.

CONCLUSION

Gated SPECT-MPI provides risk stratification beyond standard exercise stress testing for women with suspected coronary artery disease, especially in patients with intermediate DTS and is independent of ES.

Incorporating bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens into the current paradigm of menopausal therapy

Many women experience bothersome vasomotor and vaginal symptoms during the menopausal transition. Decreasing levels of estrogens during menopause are also associated with reduced bone density and an increased risk of osteoporosis. Combined estrogen/progestin therapy (hormone therapy) effectively treats menopausal symptoms and prevents bone loss, but has been associated with some safety and tolerability concerns. A novel menopausal therapy is the tissue selective estrogen complex, which pairs a selective estrogen receptor modulator with one or more estrogens. In preclinical studies, the tissue selective estrogen complex partnering bazedoxifene (BZA) with conjugated estrogens (CE) antagonized stimulation of breast and endometrial tissue, reduced vasomotor instability, and preserved bone mass in rat and mouse models. The specific attributes seen with BZA/CE were different from those observed with other selective estrogen receptor modulator/estrogen pairings. BZA/CE has undergone clinical evaluation in the Phase III Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART) trials in postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. Of the various doses of BZA/CE evaluated, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg and 0.625 mg were associated with a low incidence of endometrial hyperplasia (<1%) similar to placebo, and showed significant improvements in hot flushes and vulvar/vaginal symptoms and increases in bone mineral density. BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg and 0.625 mg were associated with a low incidence of breast-related adverse events and demonstrated no difference from placebo in age-related changes in mammographic breast density. Both BZA/ CE doses showed a favorable tolerability profile, with no increases in uterine bleeding or breast tenderness, and had positive effects on metabolic parameters and quality of life. BZA/CE may be a promising alternative to hormone therapy for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and prevention of osteoporosis in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women.

Effect of hormone therapy and calcitriol on serum lipid profile in postmenopausal older women: association with estrogen receptor-α genotypes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of conjugated equine estrogens alone (ET), conjugated equine estrogens + medroxyprogesterone (EPT), calcitriol alone, calcitriol + EPT/ET, or placebo on serum lipid profile and analyze the interaction with estrogen receptor-α gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (ESR-α SNPs) on the response to therapy.

METHODS

A total of 489 postmenopausal women older than 65 years were enrolled into a 3-year double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

RESULTS

In both intent-to-treat and complier (>80% adherent) analysis, there was a significant increase in serum high-density lipoproteins and a significant decrease in serum low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and the LDL/high-density lipoprotein ratio in all hormone treatment groups compared with placebo (P < 0.05). However, serum triglycerides and very low-density lipoproteins increased in the EPT and ET + calcitriol groups versus placebo (P < 0.05). ESR-α SNPs PvuII and XbaI seemed to have a significant effect on the response to treatment. Genotypes containing the p allele showed a significantly greater decrease in serum cholesterol and very low-density lipoprotein than those having the P allele in the ET + calcitriol group (P < 0.05), and those with the x allele had a significantly greater decrease in serum cholesterol in the hormone therapy + calcitriol group at the end of 3 years versus the X allele, and a greater decrease in serum LDL in alleles x versus the X in the ET + calcitriol group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ET with or without progesterone had a favorable effect on lipid profile in postmenopausal older women, and this was dependent on estrogen receptor SNPs--PvuII and XbaI. However, this interaction with ESR-α SNPs needs to be confirmed in larger studies.

Effects of oral estradiol and levonorgestrel on cardiovascular risk markers in postmenopausal women

PURPOSE

This study aimed at investigating changes in postmenopausal women's cardiovascular risk markers induced by hormone therapy regimens of low (1.0 mg) or ultra-low (0.5 mg) doses of micronized estradiol (mE(2)) and levonorgestrel (LNG).

METHODS

Three randomized placebo-controlled trials were reanalyzed with regard to changes in cardiovascular risk markers, such as serum lipids, lipoproteins, and coagulation parameters. Trial 1 (n = 210) was an 8-week study comparing the effects of 1.0 or 0.5 mg of unopposed mE(2) on menopausal symptoms. Trial 2 (n = 194) was a 24-week study comparing the effects of 1.0 mg of mE(2) combined with 10, 20, or 40 μg of LNG on endometrial safety. Trial 3 (n = 195) was a 52-week study comparing the effects of 1.0 or 0.5 mg mE(2) + 40 μg LNG on bone metabolism.

RESULTS

1.0 mg of unopposed mE(2) reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after as little as 8 weeks. 1.0 mg mE(2) for 24 weeks lowered the serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C, whereas the addition of LNG caused decreases in the levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) in a dose-dependent fashion. 1.0 or 0.5 mg mE(2) + 40 μg LNG for 52 weeks also lowered the levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG. Both regimens slightly lowered antithrombin and Protein C activities within normal limits.

CONCLUSIONS

Hormone therapy using 1.0 or 0.5 mg of mE(2) and LNG lowers the serum levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG without significantly affecting coagulation/fibrinolysis parameters.

Skeletal effects of bazedoxifene paired with conjugated estrogens in ovariectomized rats

A novel approach to menopausal therapy is the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) that partners bazedoxifene (BZA) with conjugated estrogens (CE). We examined the effects of daily treatment with BZA 0.3mg/kg, CE 2.5mg/kg, or combined BZA/CE (BZA 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0mg/kg with CE 2.5mg/kg) over 12months on bone mass, bone architecture and strength, and biochemical markers of bone turnover in ovariectomized (OVX) female Sprague-Dawley rats vs OVX control rats. Total cholesterol and uterine weights were also evaluated. All BZA/CE dose combinations prevented ovariectomy-induced increases in bone turnover and significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and tibia compared with OVX controls. All BZA/CE doses evaluated also prevented many of the ovariectomy-induced changes of the static and dynamic parameters of the cortical compartment of the tibia and the cancellous compartment of the L1 and L2 vertebrae. All BZA/CE doses increased biomechanical strength at the lumbar spine (L4) compared with OVX animals. The co-administration of BZA 0.3 and 1.0mg/kg/day with CE 2.5mg/kg/day showed a dose-dependent reduction in uterine wet weight compared with administration of CE alone. All BZA/CE doses significantly lowered total cholesterol levels compared with OVX controls. In conclusion, 12months of treatment with BZA/CE in OVX rats effectively maintained BMD, bone microstructure, and bone quality; and the pairing of BZA with CE prevented CE-induced uterine stimulation.

Associations of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure and endogenous hormones with diabetes in post-menopausal women previously employed at a capacitor manufacturing plant

There is an increasing body of literature showing associations of organochlorine exposure with risk of diabetes and insulin resistance. Some studies suggest that associations differ by gender and that diabetes risk, in turn, may be affected by endogenous steroid hormones. This report examines the relationships of serum PCBs and endogenous hormones with history of diabetes in a cohort of persons previously employed at a capacitor manufacturing plant. A total of 118 women were post-menopausal with complete data, of whom 93 were not using steroid hormones in 1996, at the time of examination, which included a survey of exposure and medical history, height, weight and collection of blood and urine for measurements of lipids, liver function, hematologic markers and endogenous hormones. This analysis examines relationships of serum polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), work exposure and endogenous hormones with self-reported history of diabetes after control for potential confounders. All PCB exposure groups were significantly related to history of diabetes, but not to insulin resistance as measured by the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in non-diabetics. Diabetes was also independently and inversely associated with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and triiodothyronine (T3) uptake. HOMA-IR was positively associated with body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and inversely associated with sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and T3 uptake after control for PCB exposure. Possible biologic mechanisms are discussed. This study confirms previous reports relating PCB exposure to diabetes and suggests possible hormonal pathways deserving further exploration.

Preventing osteoporosis with a tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) containing bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE)

Hormone therapy classically consists of an estrogen with an added progestin; however, concerns have been raised about the potential negative effects of progestin. The recent realization that estrogen agonist-antagonists or selective estrogen receptor modulators might be paired with estrogens instead of a progestin has led to the development of a novel form of menopausal therapy called tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC). A TSEC is the pairing of a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) with estrogen(s). The TSEC containing conjugated estrogens (CE) and the SERM, bazedoxifene (BZA), has reached clinical development. This short review outlines the effects of this particular TSEC, which maintains or increases bone mass in women at high risk for osteoporosis, and has clinical qualities of a promising new menopausal therapy. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in postmenopausal women showed that, in addition to bone preservation, BZA/CE was shown to relieve hot flushes and treat vulvar-vaginal atrophy and its symptoms, with a good safety and tolerability profile.

A new approach to menopausal therapy: the tissue selective estrogen complex

A new approach to menopausal therapy is the tissue selective estrogen complex or the pairing of a selective estrogen receptor modulator with estrogens. The clinical profile of a tissue selective estrogen complex will result from the blended tissue-selective activities of its components. An appropriate tissue selective estrogen complex may provide the therapeutic benefits of estrogens and selective estrogen receptor modulators with better tolerability and safety than either therapy alone. An ideal menopausal therapy would reduce the number and severity of hot flashes, effectively treat vulvar-vaginal atrophy and its symptoms, prevent and treat menopausal osteoporosis, and have favorable effects on lipoprotein profiles, while at the same time would not stimulate the endometrium, not cause uterine bleeding, not increase the risk of vascular events, not be associated with breast pain or tenderness, and potentially reduce breast cancer incidence. Here, we introduce the concept of a tissue selective estrogen complex and the rationale for its development as a next generation menopausal therapy.

Low-dose estrogen and drospirenone combination: effects on glycoinsulinemic metabolism and other cardiovascular risk factors in healthy postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a daily E2 (1 mg) plus drospirenone oral formulation (2 mg) on glycoinsulinemic metabolism, lipid profile, and endothelial function in symptomatic healthy menopausal women.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind study.

SETTING

Operative Division of Endocrinological Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

PATIENT(S)

Forty postmenopausal women.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomly submitted to receive treatment with an oral dose of E2 (1 mg) plus drospirenone (2 mg) (group A) or placebo (group B).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Hormonal and lipid assessment; evaluation of glucose and insulin metabolism by the clamp test and the oral glucose tolerance test; evaluation of endothelial function by the vascular reactivity test.

RESULT(S)

Total cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and nonesterified fatty acids levels significantly decreased both after 3 and 6 months. No changes in high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a) were found. Treatment resulted in few changes in glycoinsulinemic metabolism. We observed a significant reduction of the area under curve of insulin after 6 months of therapy. Endothelial function was significantly influenced by treatment, and an improvement in both flow-mediated dilatation and nitrate-mediated dilatation values after 6 months was observed.

CONCLUSION(S)

Low-dose E2/drospirenone treatment did not reveal any negative effect on carbohydrate metabolism, acting in a neutral way on insulin sensitivity. The treatment induced favorable changes in lipid profile and showed a significant improvement of vascular reactivity.

Evaluation of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens for the treatment of menopausal symptoms and effects on metabolic parameters and overall safety profile

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) composed of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE) on menopausal symptoms, metabolic parameters, and overall safety.

DESIGN

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase 3 trial (Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy [SMART]-1).

SETTING

Outpatient clinical.

PATIENT(S)

Healthy, postmenopausal women (n = 3,397) age 40 to 75 with an intact uterus.

INTERVENTION(S)

Single tablets of BZA (10, 20, or 40 mg), each with CE (0.625 or 0.45 mg); raloxifene 60 mg; or placebo taken daily for 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Hot flushes, breast pain, vaginal atrophy, metabolic parameters, and adverse events.

RESULT(S)

BZA (20 mg)/CE (0.625 or 0.45 mg) significantly reduced the frequency and severity of hot flushes and improved measures of vaginal atrophy compared with placebo. At week 12, the daily number of hot flushes decreased by 51.7% to 85.7% with all BZA/CE doses vs. 17.1% for placebo. BZA/CE improved lipid parameters and homocysteine levels, did not significantly change carbohydrate metabolism, and had only minor effects on some coagulation parameters. The incidences of breast pain and adverse events were similar between BZA/CE and placebo.

CONCLUSION

The TSEC composed of BZA (20 mg)/CE (0.625 or 0.45 mg) is an effective and safe treatment for menopausal symptoms.