The effect of progesterone supplementation around the time of oocyte recovery in patients superovulated for in vitro fertilization

Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

Progesterone prepares the endometrium for pregnancy by stimulating proliferation in response to human chorionic gonadotropin(hCG) produced by the corpus luteum. This occurs in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. In assisted reproduction techniques(ART), progesterone and/or hCG levels are low, so the luteal phase is supported with progesterone, hCG or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to improve implantation and pregnancy rates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative effectiveness and safety of methods of luteal phase support provided to subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched databases including the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and trial registers. We conducted searches in November 2014, and further searches on 4 August 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of luteal phase support using progesterone, hCG or GnRH agonist supplementation in ART cycles.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently selected trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95%confidence intervals (CIs) for each comparison and combined data when appropriate using a fixed-effect model. Our primary out come was live birth or ongoing pregnancy. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety-four women RCTs (26,198 women) were included. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias in most domains. The main limitations in the evidence were poor reporting of study methods and imprecision due to small sample sizes.1. hCG vs placebo/no treatment (five RCTs, 746 women)There was no evidence of differences between groups in live birth or ongoing pregnancy (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.90 to 3.12, three RCTs,527 women, I2 = 24%, very low-quality evidence, but I2 of 61% was found for the subgroup of ongoing pregnancy) with a random effects model. hCG increased the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (1 RCT, OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.91 to 9.6, low quality evidence).2. Progesterone vs placebo/no treatment (eight RCTs, 875 women)Evidence suggests a higher rate of live birth or ongoing pregnancy in the progesterone group (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.86, five RCTs, 642 women, I2 = 35%, very low-quality evidence). OHSS was not reported.3. Progesterone vs hCG regimens (16 RCTs, 2162 women)hCG regimens included comparisons of progesterone versus hCG and progesterone versus progesterone + hCG. No evidence showed differences between groups in live birth or ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.38, five RCTs, 833 women, I2 = 0%, low quality evidence) or in the risk of OHSS (four RCTs, 615 women, progesterone vs hCG OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.34; four RCTs,678 women; progesterone vs progesterone plus hCG, OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.26, low-quality evidence).4. Progesterone vs progesterone with oestrogen (16 RCTs, 2577 women)No evidence was found of differences between groups in live birth or ongoing pregnancy (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.38, nine RCTs,1651 women, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence) or OHSS (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.63, two RCTs, 461 women, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence).5. Progesterone vs progesterone + GnRH agonist (seven RCTs, 1708 women)Live birth or ongoing pregnancy rates were lower in the progesterone-only group and increased in women who received progester one and one or more GnRH agonist doses (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.81, nine RCTs, 2861 women, I2 = 55%, random effects, low quality evidence). Statistical heterogeneity for this comparison was high because of unexplained variation in the effect size, but the direction of effect was consistent across studies. OHSS was reported in one study only (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.01, 1 RCT, 300 women, very low quality evidence).6. Progesterone regimens (45 RCTs, 13,814 women)The included studies reported nine different comparisons between progesterone regimens. Findings for live birth or ongoing pregnancy were as follows: intramuscular (IM) versus oral: OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.66 (one RCT, 40 women, very low-quality evidence);IM versus vaginal/rectal: OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.5 (seven RCTs, 2309 women, I2 = 71%, very low-quality evidence); vaginal/rectal versus oral: OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.69 (four RCTs, 857 women, I2 = 32%, low-quality evidence); low-dose versus high-dose vaginal: OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.11 (five RCTs, 3720 women, I2 = 0%, moderate-quality evidence); short versus long protocol:OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36 (five RCTs, 1205 women, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence); micronised versus synthetic: OR 0.9, 95%CI 0.53 to 1.55 (two RCTs, 470 women, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence); vaginal ring versus gel: OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.36 (oneRCT, 1271 women, low-quality evidence); subcutaneous versus vaginal gel: OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.14 (two RCTs, 1465 women,I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence); and vaginal versus rectal: OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.54 (one RCT, 147 women, very low-quality evidence). OHSS rates were reported for only two of these comparisons: IM versus oral, and low versus high-dose vaginal. No evidence showed a difference between groups.7. Progesterone and oestrogen regimens (two RCTs, 1195 women)The included studies compared two different oestrogen protocols. No evidence was found to suggest differences in live birth or ongoing pregnancy rates between a short and a long protocol (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.43, one RCT, 910 women, low-quality evidence) or between a low dose and a high dose of oestrogen (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.13, one RCT, 285 women, very low-quality evidence).Neither study reported OHSS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Both progesterone and hCG during the luteal phase are associated with higher rates of live birth or ongoing pregnancy than placebo.The addition of GnRHa to progesterone is associated with an improvement in pregnancy outcomes. OHSS rates are increased with hCG compared to placebo (only study only). The addition of oestrogen does not seem to improve outcomes. The route of progester one administration is not associated with an improvement in outcomes.

Vaginal (Crinone 8%) gel vs. intramuscular progesterone in oil for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a large prospective trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of intravaginal and IMP for luteal phase support in IVF cycles.

DESIGN

Prospective trial.

SETTING

Tertiary care private practice.

PATIENT(S)

Women 25-44 years old with infertility necessitating treatment with IVF. From April 1, 2008-April 1, 2009, 511 consecutive patients were enrolled; 474 completed participation, and 37 were excluded for no autologous ET (freeze all, donor recipients, failed fertilization/cleavage). There were no demographic differences between the two treatment groups.

INTERVENTION(S)

Luteal phase support using either Crinone or P in oil starting 2 days following oocyte retrieval.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy and delivery rates stratified by patient age.

RESULT(S)

Overall, patients who received vaginal P had higher pregnancy (70.9% vs. 64.2%) and delivery (51.7% vs. 45.4%) rates than did patients who received IMP. Patients <35 who received vaginal P had significantly higher delivery rates (65.7% vs. 51.1%) than did patients who received IMP. There were no differences, regardless of age, in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, or ectopics.

CONCLUSION(S)

In younger patients undergoing IVF, support of the luteal phase with Crinone produces significantly higher pregnancy rates than does IMP. Crinone and IMP appear to be equally efficacious in the older patient.

Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

Progesterone prepares the endometrium for pregnancy by stimulating proliferation in response to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which is produced by the corpus luteum. This occurs in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. In assisted reproduction techniques (ART) the progesterone or hCG levels, or both, are low and the natural process is insufficient, so the luteal phase is supported with either progesterone, hCG or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Luteal phase support improves implantation rate and thus pregnancy rates but the ideal method is still unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2004 (Daya 2004).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative effectiveness and safety of methods of luteal phase support in subfertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), LILACS, conference abstracts on the ISI Web of Knowledge, OpenSigle for grey literature from Europe, and ongoing clinical trials registered online. The final search was in February 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of luteal phase support in ART investigating progesterone, hCG or GnRH agonist supplementation in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Quasi-randomised trials and trials using frozen transfers or donor oocyte cycles were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data per women and three review authors independently assessed risk of bias. We contacted the original authors when data were missing or the risk of bias was unclear. We entered all data in six different comparisons. We calculated the Peto odds ratio (Peto OR) for each comparison.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies with a total of 16,327 women were included. We assessed most of the studies as having an unclear risk of bias, which we interpreted as a high risk of bias. Because of the great number of different comparisons, the average number of included studies in a single comparison was only 1.5 for live birth and 6.1 for clinical pregnancy.Five studies (746 women) compared hCG versus placebo or no treatment. There was no evidence of a difference between hCG and placebo or no treatment except for ongoing pregnancy: Peto OR 1.75 (95% CI 1.09 to 2.81), suggesting a benefit from hCG. There was a significantly higher risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) when hCG was used (Peto OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.85 to 7.06).There were eight studies (875 women) in the second comparison, progesterone versus placebo or no treatment. The results suggested a significant effect in favour of progesterone for the live birth rate (Peto OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.02 to 8.56) based on one study. For clinical pregnancy (CPR) the results also suggested a significant result in favour of progesterone (Peto OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.29 to 2.61) based on seven studies. For the other outcomes the results indicated no difference in effect.The third comparison (15 studies, 2117 women) investigated progesterone versus hCG regimens. The hCG regimens were subgrouped into comparisons of progesterone versus hCG and progesterone versus progesterone + hCG. The results did not indicate a difference of effect between the interventions, except for OHSS. Subgroup analysis of progesterone versus progesterone + hCG showed a significant benefit from progesterone (Peto OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.79).The fourth comparison (nine studies, 1571 women) compared progesterone versus progesterone + oestrogen. Outcomes were subgrouped by route of administration. The results for clinical pregnancy rate in the subgroup progesterone versus progesterone + transdermal oestrogen suggested a significant benefit from progesterone + oestrogen. There was no evidence of a difference in effect for other outcomes.Six studies (1646 women) investigated progesterone versus progesterone + GnRH agonist. We subgrouped the studies for single-dose GnRH agonist and multiple-dose GnRH agonist. For the live birth, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rate the results suggested a significant effect in favour of progesterone + GnRH agonist. The Peto OR for the live birth rate was 2.44 (95% CI 1.62 to 3.67), for the clinical pregnancy rate was 1.36 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.66) and for the ongoing pregnancy rate was 1.31 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.67). The results for miscarriage and multiple pregnancy did not indicate a difference of effect.The last comparison (32 studies, 9839 women) investigated different progesterone regimens:intramuscular (IM) versus oral administration, IM versus vaginal or rectal administration, vaginal or rectal versus oral administration, low-dose vaginal versus high-dose vaginal progesterone administration, short protocol versus long protocol and micronized progesterone versus synthetic progesterone. The main results of this comparison did not indicate a difference of effect except in some subgroup analyses. For the outcome clinical pregnancy, subgroup analysis of micronized progesterone versus synthetic progesterone showed a significant benefit from synthetic progesterone (Peto OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.96). For the outcome multiple pregnancy, the subgroup analysis of IM progesterone versus oral progesterone suggested a significant benefit from oral progesterone (Peto OR 4.39, 95% CI 1.28 to 15.01).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review showed a significant effect in favour of progesterone for luteal phase support, favouring synthetic progesterone over micronized progesterone. Overall, the addition of other substances such as estrogen or hCG did not seem to improve outcomes. We also found no evidence favouring a specific route or duration of administration of progesterone. We found that hCG, or hCG plus progesterone, was associated with a higher risk of OHSS. The use of hCG should therefore be avoided. There were significant results showing a benefit from addition of GnRH agonist to progesterone for the outcomes of live birth, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy. For now, progesterone seems to be the best option as luteal phase support, with better pregnancy results when synthetic progesterone is used.

WITHDRAWN: Luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

The aspiration of the granulosa cells that surround the oocyte and the use of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) during assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment can interfere with the production, during the luteal phase, of progesterone, which is necessary for successful implantation of the embryo. Providing hormonal supplementation during the luteal phase with either progesterone itself, or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which stimulates progesterone production, may improve implantation and, thus, pregnancy rates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine (1) if luteal phase support after assisted reproduction increases the pregnancy rate, (2) the optimal hormone for luteal phase support, i.e. hCG, progesterone, or a combination of both, and (3) the optimal route of progesterone administration.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1971 to Dec 2003), EMBASE (1985 to Dec 2003). We handsearched reference lists of relevant articles were scanned, and abstract books from scientific meetings up to December 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of luteal phase support after ART treatment, comparing hCG or progesterone with placebo or no treatment, comparing progesterone with hCG, progesterone plus hCG, or progesterone plus estrogen, or comparing different routes of progesterone administration. Quasi-randomized trials were excluded from the main analyses, but included in a secondary analysis for each comparison.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For each comparison, data on live birth, ongoing and clinical pregnancy per embryo or gamete transfer procedure, miscarriage per clinical pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) per transfer, and multiple pregnancy per clinical pregnancy were extracted into 2 x 2 tables and subgrouped by use of GnRHa in the ovarian stimulation regimen. The odds ratio (OR) and risk difference (RD) were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were included in the review. Luteal phase support with hCG provided significant benefit, compared to placebo or no treatment, in terms of increased ongoing pregnancy rates (odds ratio (OR) 2.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32 to 4.29) and decreased miscarriage rates (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.50), but only when GnRHa was used. The odds of OHSS increased 20-fold when hCG was used in cycles with GnRHa. Progesterone use resulted in a small but significant increase in pregnancy rates (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.79) when trials with and without GnRHa were grouped together, but no effect on the miscarriage rate was observed. No significant difference was found between progesterone and hCG or between progesterone and progesterone plus hCG or estrogen in terms of pregnancy or miscarriage rates, but the odds of OHSS were more than 2-fold higher with treatments involving hCG than with progesterone alone(OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.59 to 5.86). Comparing routes of progesterone administration, reductions in clinical pregnancy rate with the oral route, compared to the intramuscular or vaginal routes, did not reach statistical significance, but there was evidence of benefit of the intramuscular over the vaginal route for the outcomes of ongoing pregnancy and live birth. No significant difference in pregnancy rate was observed between vaginal progesterone gel and other types of vaginal progesterone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Luteal phase support with hCG or progesterone after assisted reproduction results in an increased pregnancy rate. hCG does not provide better results than progesterone, and is associated with a greater risk of OHSS when used with GnRHa. The optimal route of progesterone administration has not yet been established.

Luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

The aspiration of the granulosa cells that surround the oocyte and the use of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) during assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment can interfere with the production, during the luteal phase, of progesterone, which is necessary for successful implantation of the embryo. Providing hormonal supplementation during the luteal phase with either progesterone itself, or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which stimulates progesterone production, may improve implantation and, thus, pregnancy rates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine (1) if luteal phase support after assisted reproduction increases the pregnancy rate, (2) the optimal hormone for luteal phase support, i.e. hCG, progesterone, or a combination of both, and (3) the optimal route of progesterone administration.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1971 to Dec 2003), EMBASE (1985 to Dec 2003). We handsearched reference lists of relevant articles were scanned, and abstract books from scientific meetings up to December 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of luteal phase support after ART treatment, comparing hCG or progesterone with placebo or no treatment, comparing progesterone with hCG, progesterone plus hCG, or progesterone plus estrogen, or comparing different routes of progesterone administration. Quasi-randomized trials were excluded from the main analyses, but included in a secondary analysis for each comparison.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For each comparison, data on live birth, ongoing and clinical pregnancy per embryo or gamete transfer procedure, miscarriage per clinical pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) per transfer, and multiple pregnancy per clinical pregnancy were extracted into 2 x 2 tables and subgrouped by use of GnRHa in the ovarian stimulation regimen. The odds ratio (OR) and risk difference (RD) were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were included in the review. Luteal phase support with hCG provided significant benefit, compared to placebo or no treatment, in terms of increased ongoing pregnancy rates (odds ratio (OR) 2.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32 to 4.29) and decreased miscarriage rates (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.50), but only when GnRHa was used. The odds of OHSS increased 20-fold when hCG was used in cycles with GnRHa. Progesterone use resulted in a small but significant increase in pregnancy rates (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.79) when trials with and without GnRHa were grouped together, but no effect on the miscarriage rate was observed. No significant difference was found between progesterone and hCG or between progesterone and progesterone plus hCG or estrogen in terms of pregnancy or miscarriage rates, but the odds of OHSS were more than 2-fold higher with treatments involving hCG than with progesterone alone(OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.59 to 5.86). Comparing routes of progesterone administration, reductions in clinical pregnancy rate with the oral route, compared to the intramuscular or vaginal routes, did not reach statistical significance, but there was evidence of benefit of the intramuscular over the vaginal route for the outcomes of ongoing pregnancy and live birth. No significant difference in pregnancy rate was observed between vaginal progesterone gel and other types of vaginal progesterone.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Luteal phase support with hCG or progesterone after assisted reproduction results in an increased pregnancy rate. hCG does not provide better results than progesterone, and is associated with a greater risk of OHSS when used with GnRHa. The optimal route of progesterone administration has not yet been established.

Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991-1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983-1999)

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety of ICSI, this study compared data of IVF and ICSI children by collecting data on neonatal outcome and congenital malformations during pregnancy and at birth.

METHODS

The follow-up study included agreement to genetic counselling and eventual prenatal diagnosis, followed by a physical examination of the children after 2 months, after 1 year and after 2 years. 2840 ICSI children (1991-1999) and 2955 IVF children (1983-1999) were liveborn after replacement of fresh embryos. ICSI was carried out using ejaculated, epididymal or testicular sperm.

RESULTS

In the two cohorts, similar rates of multiple pregnancies were observed. ICSI and IVF maternal characteristics were comparable for medication taken during pregnancy, pregnancy duration and maternal educational level, whereas maternal age was higher in ICSI and a higher percentage of first pregnancies and first children born was observed in the ICSI mothers. Birthweight, number of neonatal complications, low birthweight, stillbirth rate and perinatal death rate were compared between the ICSI and the IVF groups and were similar for ICSI and IVF. Prematurity was slightly higher in the ICSI children (31.8%) than in the IVF children (29.3%). Very low birthweight was higher in the IVF pregnancies (5.7%) compared with ICSI pregnancies (4.4%). Major malformations (defined as those causing functional impairment or requiring surgical correction), were observed at birth in 3.4% of the ICSI liveborn children and in 3.8% of the IVF children (P = 0.538). Malformation rate in ICSI was not related to sperm origin or sperm quality. The number of stillbirths (born > or =20 weeks of pregnancy) was 1.69% in the ICSI group and 1.31% in the IVF group. Total malformation rate taking into account major malformations in stillborns, in terminations and in liveborns was 4.2% in ICSI and 4.6% in IVF (P = 0.482).

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison of ICSI and IVF children taking part in an identical follow-up study did not show any increased risk of major malformations and neonatal complications in the ICSI group.

Lower implantation rates in high responders: evidence for an altered endocrine milieu during the preimplantation period

OBJECTIVE

To determine serum E2 and P levels around the time of implantation in normal and high IVF responders.

SETTING

In Vitro Fertilization program at the Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad.

PATIENTS

Twenty-nine women undergoing IVF, who accepted to be studied daily, were classified according to the number of oocytes retrieved in normal (n = 16) and high responders (n = 13).

DESIGN

Prospective study in which blood was drawn daily from the day of hCG administration (day 0) up to 7 days later (day 6).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

In vitro fertilization parameters (number of ampules, FSH-hMG, number of oocytes, fertilization rates, number of transferred embryos, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates); serum E2 and P levels during the 7 days of the study.

RESULTS

Implantation rate was significantly higher in normal (18.5%) as compared with high (0%) responders. Estradiol and P levels were elevated significantly in high responders. The E2:P ratio was significantly different between normal and high responders during the preimplantation period. Pregnancy and implantation rates decreased as serum E2 levels increased on days 4 to 6 of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

A different endocrine milieu between normal and high responders is detected by daily steroid measurements up to the preimplantation period, suggesting that this difference could be responsible for an impaired implantation in high responder patients undergoing IVF. An increase in serum E2 levels seems to be the cause of this difference.

The role of luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of luteal phase support improves pregnancy rate (PR) in infertility.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis of randomized trials of luteal phase support. Search of the National Library of Medicine MEDLINE data base from 1971 using the words luteal, pregnancy, human, and comparative. Bibliography of relevant articles, reviews, and abstracts of scientific meetings were hand searched. All randomized controlled trials of luteal phase support in infertility were included. Luteal phase support for recurrent abortion and nonrandomized trials were excluded. The common odds ratio was calculated for each intervention using the Mantel-Haentzel test. Homogeneity of treatment effect was evaluated using the Breslow-Day test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pregnancy per cycle, rate of spontaneous abortion, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rate.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials met the above criteria. Human chorionic gonadotropin improved PRs in IVF when GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) was used (n = 151) and was superior to P (n = 352). Its benefit in all IVF cycles, however, was not established because of significant heterogeneity of treatment effect. Progesterone improved the PR in all IVF cycles (n = 457). No significant reduction in spontaneous abortion was noted with luteal support (n = 200). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 5% of patients with hCG. Combination of data from trials of luteal support with other infertility therapies was not possible because of the differences in patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis supports the routine use of hCG in IVF cycles using a GnRH-a. Progesterone was also beneficial for luteal phase support in IVF. For other infertility therapy, however, further research is needed to evaluate the role of luteal phase support.

Serum progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic gonadotropin administration and progesterone/oocyte ratios predict in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome

PURPOSE

In gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue-pretreated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles, pregnancy rates are inversely related to serum progesterone levels on the day of administration of human chorionic gonadotropin. The relationship of the progesterone concentration on other days in the periovulatory period to pregnancy rates in such cycles is little studied. We therefore retrospectively analyzed the relationship between progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy in 114 cycles, 28 and 23 of which produced clinical and ongoing/delivered pregnancies, respectively. To assess the effect of the extent of follicular luteinization on success, we also studied the relationship between the progesterone concentration per oocyte retrieved and pregnancy for the day of and day after human chorionic gonadotropin.

RESULTS

Progesterone concentrations on the day after human chorionic gonadotropin were inversely associated with clinical pregnancy by multiple logistic regression analysis (P < 0.05). Progesterone/oocyte ratios were inversely associated with clinical pregnancy (P < 0.05) and ongoing/delivered pregnancy (P < 0.02) for both the day of and the day after human chorionic gonadotropin.

CONCLUSION

The study results extend the window of time during which elevated progesterone concentration is associated with poor outcome to at least 2 days. This finding is consistent with hypothetical mechanisms attributing the link between progesterone concentration and outcome to either endometrial or follicle/oocyte events. The association of lack of follicular luteinization (low progesterone per oocyte ratios) and favorable outcome suggests a predominant effect of progesterone on follicle/oocyte quality. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanisms underlying the association between progesterone and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome.

Infertility treatment: from cookery to science. The epidemiology of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To review the epidemiology of published randomised controlled trials in infertility treatment over the last 25 years, with special emphasis on the number and quality of trials.

DESIGN

Computer literature review by MEDLINE backed up by a manual search of 41 journals. Each trial was classified according to the methodology described and quality criteria. The results were recorded in a computer database. Odds ratios (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated where the data were sufficient.

SUBJECTS

Couples suffering from primary or secondary infertility. The trials studied 33,761 patients overall.

SETTING

Institute of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Leeds.

RESULTS

Five hundred and one randomised trials in male and female infertility treatment were identified between 1966 and 1990. Pregnancy was an outcome in 291 (58%) and these were the subject of detailed analysis. Two hundred and twenty-four (77%) and 67 (23%) 'pregnancy trials' were concerned, respectively, with female and male infertility. Four per cent of the trials were preceded by a sample size calculation, and the average sample size was 96 patients (range 5-933); 700 patients per group would be required to demonstrate plausible success rates for most treatments. The method of randomisation was unstated or pseudo-randomised in 206 (71%) of trials where pregnancy was an outcome. Only 29 (5.8%) of studies were multicentre. The method of confirmation of pregnancy was omitted for 70% of papers. Cross-over design was used in 103 (21%) of cases. Meta-analysis is possible for selected topics such as the use of anti-oestrogens in idiopathic oligospermia and unexplained female infertility. Eight cases of double reporting were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials using randomised methodology were relatively few in comparison with other branches of medicine, although their use is important in the evaluation of treatment for infertility as treatment-independent pregnancy is common. It was encouraging to note that an exponential increase in the use of this methodology occurred during the last three years, especially in association with assisted conception techniques, and meta-analysis has become possible for selected topics. However, many trials suffer from an unrealistically small sample size, inappropriate use of cross-over design or pseudo-randomisation. The trend towards properly controlled studies should be encouraged but these studies should be of improved quality and organised on a multicentre or even international basis.

Therapeutic maturation of endometrium in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To provide an up-to-date review of studies that have examined the relative role of endometrial development in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) treatment in relation to the treatment outcome.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

The most important published studies and personal communications related to this topic have been identified through a computerized bibliographical search (MEDLINE).

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that have evaluated the endometrial maturation in IVF and ET treatment with respect to different treatment protocols of ovarian stimulation. Clinical trials exploring the efficacy of various combinations of hormonal supplementation that aim to improve the endometrial environment and treatment outcome. Publications and personal communications reporting a variety of treatment protocols and drugs utilized for the creation of artificial endometrial cycles in IVF treatment employing donated eggs.

RESULTS

Ovarian stimulation frequently adversely affects the process of endometrial maturation. Various kinds of hormonal supplementation, used in clomiphene citrate- and/or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)-stimulated cycles have not improved treatment outcome. Human chorionic gonadotropin or natural progesterone (P) supplementation administered after controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone and hMG effectively corrected the luteal phase defect and resulted in an improved conception rate. The endometrium of agonadal women is highly conducive to hormonal manipulation. All estrogen preparations used effectively promoted endometrial growth and proliferation. Natural P is superior to synthetic progestins for induction of receptive secretory endometrium.

CONCLUSION

The development of adequately receptive endometrium is a major factor determining the outcome of IVF and ET treatment.

Endometrial receptivities after leuprolide suppression and gonadotropin stimulation: histology, steroid receptor concentrations, and implantation rates

The effect of markedly supraphysiologic levels of E2 and P4 on the endometrium was assessed by examining endometrial histology, E2 and P4 receptor concentrations, and embryo implantation rates in IVF cycles with and without leuprolide use. Results suggest that 1) the high ovarian response common in leuprolide pretreated cycles can advance endometrial histology, but only up to a certain limit, 2) P4 greater than 25ng/ml or E2 greater than 200pg/ml on the day of transfer was associated with non-lagging endometria, 3) implantation rate in high response cycles is not impaired and may be increased, 4) earlier P4 supplementation in low response cycles may be beneficial, 5) extraordinarily high response (E2 greater than 5000pg/ml) may be detrimental to implantation, and 6) the optimal histology for implantation appears to be at least day 16.

Effect of estrogen on human endometrial epithelial cell growth and differentiation in vitro

Although physiologic parameters regulating endometrial proliferation and secretory maturation during the normal menstrual cycle are well characterized, cellular and molecular interactions directing these events under the influence of a changing hormonal milieu remain unclear. In the present study, the effect of estradiol on the growth and acquisition of differentiated function of purified endometrial epithelium was examined in an established model. Epithelial cells were isolated with high purity from human endometrial biopsies. When cultured on a biomatrix bed, cells established a polarized monolayer with gland-like invaginations. Cells isolated throughout the menstrual cycle were cultured under serum-free conditions, with or without estradiol, and secretion of tumor-associated epitope TAG-72 was monitored by radioimmunoassay. Under steroid-free conditions, cells exhibited a distinct proliferative interval, followed by the acquisition of TAG-72 epitope secretory capability. Although estradiol had no apparent effect on proliferation or spatial organization of epithelial cells, a striking inhibition of TAG-72 epitope secretion was evident. This observation is believed to represent a direct effect of estradiol on endometrial epithelial cells in this model.

Evaluation of luteal support therapy in a randomized controlled study within a gamete intrafallopian transfer program

A randomized controlled study of luteal support therapy (using intramuscular injections of progesterone and/or human chorionic gonadotropin) was conducted in a trial designed to minimize variables that might adversely affect the change of pregnancy. After applying rigid selection criteria, 207 women were recruited into one of four groups. Mathematical modeling was applied to the results to determine if there were degrees of improvement in uterine receptivity relative to various grades of embryo quality ("E" factor). Although the trial size was insufficient to enable the detection of significant improvements in the pregnancy rates that ranged from 27.5% for non-treatment to 41.2% for those receiving combined treatment, the birth rates were significantly better with luteal support (11.8% versus 29.4%). Similarly, the overall implantation rate just failed to reach statistical significance for luteal support, but the ongoing implantations were significantly better (3.6% versus 9.0%). Data modeling indicated that luteal support, particularly with the combined regimen, could improve the ongoing implantation rate by up to 2.5-fold when the E factor was poorest.

Induction of ovulation for assisted reproduction programmes

The decision to use enhancement of the natural ovarian/menstrual cycle to attempt collection of several oocytes during IVF and GIFT cycles has dramatically increased the pregnancy rates. Furthermore, the recovery of multiple fertilizable oocytes allows for cryopreservation of extra or surplus pre-embryos (or embryos), with the consequent reduction in the risk of multiple pregnancies and the improvement of the cumulative pregnancy rate following IVF and GIFT cycles. Here, we have reviewed the underlying physiological mechanisms in the natural ovarian-menstrual cycle. Subsequently, we have analysed the more frequently utilized ovarian stimulatory regimens with special emphasis on the use of gonadotrophins. Several conclusions may be drawn from the experience to date with these methods of ovarian stimulation. Primarily, lower doses of medication, when used appropriately, may result in a more favourable outcome. Most significant, it seems to be beneficial to tailor the dosages and timing of drug administration to the patient's individual response to medication. Because ovarian stimulation therapy is difficult to manage, a major challenge in reproductive endocrinology has been to develop stimulation protocols that would 'ideally' synchronize the development of a cohort of follicles. The development of GnRH analogues (agonists and antagonists) and the experience (both in women and macaques) gained so far when these drugs are used in combination with gonadotrophins, have helped both in the understanding of the underlying physiology and in the improvement of clinical results.

Outpatient gamete intrafallopian transfer: a clinical analysis of 710 cases

From February 1986 to June 1989 445 infertile couples were treated with a total of 710 treatment cycles involving laparoscopic gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). The median age of the female partner was 33.5 years (range, 24 to 49 years) and the median duration of infertility was 4 years (range, 2 to 20 years). The final outcome of all 217 clinical pregnancies is known. There were 150 live births among which all but one baby survived, comprising 112 singleton births, 28 twin births, nine triplet births and one quadruplet birth. There were no still births, but there were two premature, multiple live births (one triplet, one quadruplet) among which no babies survived the neonatal period. Overall, 40 of the 152 potentially viable pregnancies were multiple (26.3%). Three of 206 potentially viable babies were born with congenital anomalies (1.5%). There were 50 clinical spontaneous abortions (24.8% of uterine pregnancies), one termination of pregnancy for Down's syndrome, and 14 ectopic pregnancies rate was 30.6% per laparoscopy and, among 740 initiated cycles, a live and surviving birth-per-initiated-cycle rate of 20.2%, or 33.7% to date per couple entering the programme. The 710 laparscopies resulted in two serious complications (0.3%), one of which required laparotomy. Eight other patients were admitted to hospital for rest and observation because of painful ovarian enlargement in the luteal phase. The total inpatient admission rate was 1.4%. Outpatient laparoscopic GIFT under general anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure when conventional treatment for infertility has been unsuccessful.

The luteal phase in polycystic ovary syndrome during ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin with and without leuprolide acetate

Little data exist on the effects of adjunctive therapy with leuprolide acetate (LA) in the luteal phase of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG). Additionally, it is not known whether gonadal steroid concentrations in the luteal phase of induced cycles in PCOS are predictive of pregnancy. In this prospective, randomized study comparing cycles using hMG alone (n = 26) with cycles using hMG with LA (n = 33), no differences were noted between treatment groups in progesterone (P), estradiol (E2), and P:E2 ratios on luteal days 3, 6, and 9. When all treatment cycles were pooled, there were no differences in P, E2, or P:E2 ratios, comparing conception and nonconception cycles. We conclude that adjunctive therapy with LA in PCOS patients undergoing ovulation induction with hMG does not alter the luteal phase concentrations of P, E2, and P:E2. Furthermore, no correlation was found between the serum concentrations of these luteal phase steroids and cycle fecundity.

Luteal support after luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist for in vitro fertilization: superiority of human chorionic gonadotropin over oral progesterone

It has been reported that the pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization (IVF) after pituitary desensitization with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LH-RH-a) is twice as low if the luteal phase is not supported. We therefore tested the respective advantages of luteal support using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, 1,500 IU three times) and progesterone (P, micronized, oral administration, 400 mg/d) after 171 embryo transfers (ET) in which the cycle was stimulated with the LH-RH-a triptoreline. The type of luteal phase support was randomly selected except when the estradiol level exceeded 2,700 pg/mL. The clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate were significantly higher using hCG (after the transfer of 3 embryos, 45% and 43% with hCG versus 23% and 17% with P). The same results were noted for the embryo implantation rate per ET (19% of embryos are viable after 6 months of pregnancy after hCG versus 7.5% after P). Adequate luteal support, therefore, significantly improves the results of IVF when LH-RH-a are used. The poor results obtained with P in this study might be related to its poor bioavailability after oral administration.

Effect of preovulatory progesterone administration on the endometrial maturation and implantation rate after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

Fifty-two women, who had 62 ovum aspiration cycles, received a progesterone (P) supplementation of 100 mg/day that was initiated 10 hours before human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration and was continued over the following 6 days. Forty-eight women who had 74 ovum pick-ups, but did not get P, served as controls. Forty-four (84.6%) women of the treatment group, and 40 (83.3%) of the controls had ovum fertilization and embryo replacement. The fertilization and cleavage rates and the mean number of replaced embryos per embryo transfer (ET) cycle did not differ between the groups. Endometrial biopsies, from treatment group women with no fertilized eggs, which were taken 48 hours after ovum pick-up, mostly revealed an "advanced endometrial dating," in relation to the "day of hCG." Pregnancy rate per ET cycle for the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the controls; 41.2% versus 23.3%, respectively. It is concluded that the higher pregnancy rate resulted from an improvement in uterine receptivity.

Human chorionic gonadotropin, estradiol, and progesterone profiles in conception and nonconception cycles in an in vitro fertilization program

In 22 consecutive in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with purified follicle-stimulating hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), estradiol (E2), and progesterone (P) were measured every 3 days during the luteal phase. All serum measurements were normalized to the day of hCG administration (day 0). There was a total of nine pregnancies; two were biochemical pregnancies, whereas 7 of the 22 women had clinical pregnancies (31.8%). Of these, two miscarried and five had term pregnancies (three singleton, two twin). Conception cycles could be differentiated from nonconception cycles by serum E2 levels on day 8 (P = 0.035), by hCG levels on day 11 (P = 0.03), and by P levels on day 14 (P = 0.001). From days 8 to 11, hCG levels plateaued in conception cycles and decreased in nonconception cycles. However, during that period, E2 and P fell in both groups of women. This decline in sex steroids, which was observed in both conception and nonconception cycles, may well negatively influence endometrial development during the peri-implantation period and compromise conception, resulting in failure to conceive, biochemical pregnancy, and early miscarriage.

Trial of support treatment with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase after treatment with buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin in women taking part in an in vitro fertilisation programme

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of support with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase in women taking part in an in vitro fertilisation programme after buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin were used to hyperstimulate their ovaries.

DESIGN

Controlled group comparison.

SETTING

Outpatient department of a private hospital.

PATIENTS

115 Women with indications for in vitro fertilisation, all of whom had at least one embryo transferred.

INTERVENTIONS

After suppression of the pituitary with buserelin the ovaries of all the women were stimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophin on day 4 of the luteal phase. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (10,000 IU) was given to induce ovulation, and oocytes were recovered 34 hours later. Embryos were transferred 46 to 48 hours after insemination. Women who had received the 10,000 IU of human chorionic gonadotrophin on a date that was an uneven number (n = 61) were allocated to receive support doses of 2500 IU human chorionic gonadotrophin three and six days after that date. The remaining 54 women did not receive hormonal support.

END POINT

Determination of the rates of pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS and main results--Support with human chorionic gonadotrophin did not significantly alter the progesterone or oestradiol concentrations in the early or mid-luteal phase. The mean (range) progesterone concentrations in the late luteal phase in women who did not become pregnant were, however, significantly higher in those who received support (16(9-110) nmol/l nu 8(4-46) nmol/l), and the luteal phase was significantly longer in this group (14 days nu 12 days). The rate of pregnancy was significantly higher in the women who received support than in those who did not (25/61 nu 8/54).

CONCLUSIONS

When buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin are used to hyperstimulate ovaries support with human chorionic gonadotrophin in the luteal phase has a beneficial effect on in vitro fertilisation.

High progesterone/estradiol ratio in follicular fluid at oocyte aspiration for in vitro fertilization as a predictor of possible pregnancy

Eighteen women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures were studied. All had optimal (900 to 1600 pg/ml) peak serum estradiol (E2) response to the same stimulation regimen with clomiphene citrate and menotropins; fertilization rate was above 64%; and two to four embryos in two to eight cell stages were replaced in each patient. All were considered to have optimal chances for conception. The authors compared progesterone (P), E2, and P/E2 ratio in serum and follicular fluid (FF) at the time of oocyte aspiration in eight patients who conceived (group I) and ten who did not (group II). Mean serum P and E2 levels and serum P/E2 ratio were not significantly different between the groups. In contrast, mean FF P concentrations (ng/ml) were significantly (P less than 0.05) higher in group I (9721 versus 5385), as was FF P/E2 ratio (19.0 versus 11.8; P less than 0.02). There was no significant difference in mean FF E2 concentrations between the groups. These data indicate that in IVF cycles with optimal serum E2 response to the stimulation protocol, FF P and P/E2 ratio at the time of oocyte aspiration may be predictive of subsequent implantation and pregnancy.

A randomized trial of human chorionic gonadotropin support following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

This article reports on the effects of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on progesterone (P) and estradiol (E2), luteal phase length, and conception in 116 cycles treated by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). In 60 cycles, the luteal phase was supported by hCG, 1500 IU three times at 2-day intervals from the day of ET. The remaining 56 cycles served as controls. hCG significantly increased the P level (93 +/- 53 versus 62 +/- 46 ng/ml), the P/E2 ratio, and the luteal phase length (17.4 +/- 1.3 versus 12.2 +/- 1.7 days). However, the total pregnancy rate did not significantly differ between the two groups, though the pregnancy rate after transfer of two or three embryos was slightly higher in the hCG group (26.9 versus 22% in the control group), as was the rate of implanted embryo per transferred embryo after transfer of two or three embryos (25 versus 15.3%). It was concluded that, while hCG increased the magnitude and duration of the luteal P secretion, it did not clearly improve the pregnancy rate.

Endometrial biopsy at the time of embryo transfer: correlation of histological diagnosis with therapy and pregnancy rate

Biopsy to assess the state of the endometrium was performed in 27 patients prior to embryo transfer. Of the 24 classifiable biopsies, 15 (63%) were secretory and 9 (37%) were proliferative. In the nine women in the latter category, in vitro fertilization (IVF) resulted in four preclinical pregnancies and five failures. In the 15 women with secretory endometrium there were 11 pregnancies (3 preclinical, 6 abortions, and 2 term). This study demonstrates that endometrial biopsy at the time of embryo transfer does not exclude viable pregnancy. The presence of a proven secretory endometrium may also be an important factor in determining the successful outcome of IVF.