Comparison between depot and standard release triptoreline in in vitro fertilization: pituitary sensitivity, luteal function, pregnancy outcome, and perinatal results

Long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger in fertility preservation cycles before chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oocytes/embryo cryopreservation and ovarian function suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (GnRHas) are two established strategies for preserving fertility in patients with cancer, frequently both being offered to the same woman. As the first injection of GnRHa should be administered before chemotherapy, it is usually performed in the luteal phase of the urgent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle. The GnRHa flare-up effect on recently stimulated ovaries may cause ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and this risk may discourage some oncologists to offer an ovarian function preservation method with proven efficacy. We suggest the long-acting GnRHa as an option to trigger ovulation for egg retrieval in oncological patients, whenever ovarian suppression during chemotherapy is planned.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from all consecutive ovarian stimulation cases in oncological patients for oocyte cryopreservation from 2016 to 2021 in a single academic referral center. The COS was performed according to good clinical practice standards. Since 2020 long-acting GnRHa trigger was offered to all patients for whom ovarian suppression after cryopreservation was planned. All other patients served as controls, stratified for the triggering method used: highly purified chorionic gonadotrophin 10 000 UI or short-acting GnRHa 0.2 mg.

RESULTS

Mature oocytes were collected, with the expected maturation rate, in all the 22 cycles triggered with GnRHa. The mean number of cryopreserved oocytes was 11.1 ± 4, with a maturation rate of 80% (57%-100%), versus 8.8 ± 5.8, 74% (33%-100%) with highly purified chorionic gonadotrophin and 14 ± 8.4, 80% (44%-100%) with short-acting GnRHa. No case of OHSS was observed after long-acting GnRHa triggering and by 5 days after egg retrieval most patients had reached luteinizing hormone levels showing suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data show that long-acting GnRHa is efficacious in inducing the final oocytes' maturation, reducing OHSS risk and suppressing ovarian function by the start of chemotherapy.

The follicular-phase depot GnRH agonist protocol results in a higher live birth rate without discernible differences in luteal function and child health versus the daily mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol: a single-centre, retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) has been used in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles for a long time. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly used protocols (follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol and daily mid-luteal long GnRH-a protocol) in normal responders undergoing IVF/ICSI using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

A total of 6,816 infertile women treated within the period from January 2016 to September 2020 were stratified into cohorts. A total of 2,851 patients received the long-acting group (depot GnRH-a protocol), and 1,193 used the short-acting group (long GnRH-a protocol) after the data-selection process. PSM was utilized for sampling by up to 1:1 nearest neighbour matching to adjust the numerical difference and balance the confounders between groups. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Multivariable logistic analysis was used to evaluate the difference between these two protocols in relation to the LBR.

RESULT(S)

In this study, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to create a perfect match of 964 patients in each group. After matching, the blastocyst formation rates, oestradiol (E₂) value on Day hCG + 9, progesterone (P) value on Day hCG + 9, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and LBR were more favourable in the depot GnRH-a protocol than in the long GnRH-a protocol (P < 0.05). However, the moderate or severe OHSS rates were higher in the depot group than in the long group (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in endometrial thickness, luteal support medication, early pregnancy loss rates, mid- and late-term pregnancy loss rates, or foetal malformation rates between the two protocols.

CONCLUSION(S)

Compared with the daily short-acting GnRH agonist protocol, the follicular-phase depot GnRH-a protocol might improve LBRs in normogonadotropic women without discernible differences in luteal function and child health.

Long-term GnRH agonist pretreatment before frozen embryo transfer improves pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following long-term gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pretreatment have better pregnancy outcomes than fresh embryo transfer cycles with long or ultra-long GnRHa protocol in these patients?

DESIGN

This study included 537 women with adenomyosis divided into three groups: (Group A) FET cycles following long-term GnRHa pretreatment (192 patients); (Group B) fresh embryo transfer cycles with the ultra-long GnRHa protocol (241 patients); (Group C) fresh embryo transfer cycles with the long GnRHa protocol (104 patients).

RESULTS

The total gonadotrophin dose and stimulation duration were significantly lower in Group A than in Groups B and C. The implantation and live birth rates were significantly higher in Group A than in Groups B and C. In the long-term GnRHa pretreatment and FET treatment of Group A, implantation (odds ratio [OR] 1.729, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.073-2.788, P = 0.025), clinical pregnancy (OR 1.665, 95% CI 1.032-2.686, P = 0.037) and live birth rates (OR 1.694, 95% CI 1.045-2.746, P = 0.033) increased and miscarriage rate (OR 0.203, 95% CI 0.078-0.530, P = 0.001) decreased when compared with Group C. Comparison of Groups A and B showed that with the long-term GnRHa pretreatment, FET was a protective factor for live birth rate (OR 1.350, 95% CI 1.017-1.792, P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

FET following long-term GnRHa pretreatment has a better IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome, and a potential benefit in terms of a lower gonadotrophin dose, and a shorter stimulation duration than fresh embryo transfer combined with a long or ultra-long GnRHa protocol.

Timing luteal support in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available published randomized controlled trial data regarding timing of P supplementation during the luteal phase of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).

DESIGN

A systematic review.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Different starting times of P for luteal support.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy (PR) and live birth rates.

RESULT(S)

Five randomized controlled trials were identified that met inclusion criteria with a total of 872 patients. A planned meta-analysis was not performed because of a high degree of clinical heterogeneity with regard to the timing, dose, and route of P. Two studies compared P initiated before oocyte retrieval versus the day of oocyte retrieval and PRs were 5%-12% higher when starting P on the day of oocyte retrieval. One study compared starting P on day 6 after retrieval versus day 3, reporting a 16% decrease in pregnancy in the day 6 group. Trials comparing P start times on the day of oocyte retrieval versus 2 or 3 days after retrieval showed no significant differences in pregnancy.

CONCLUSION(S)

There appears to be a window for P start time between the evening of oocyte retrieval and day 3 after oocyte retrieval. Although some studies have suggested a potential benefit in delaying vaginal P start time to 2 days after oocyte retrieval, this review could not find randomized controlled trials to adequately assess this. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to better define P start time for luteal support after ART.

Depot versus daily administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary down regulation in assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is commonly used to switch off (down regulate) the pituitary gland and thus suppress ovarian activity in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Other fertility drugs (gonadotrophins) are then used to stimulate ovulation in a controlled manner. Among the various types of pituitary down regulation protocols in use, the long protocol achieves the best clinical pregnancy rate. The long protocol requires GnRHa administration until suppression of ovarian activity occurs, within approximately 14 days. GnRHa can be used either as daily low-dose injections or through a single injection containing higher doses of the drug (depot). It is unclear which of these two forms of administration is best, and whether single depot administration may require higher doses of gonadotrophins.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of a single depot dose of GHRHa versus daily GnRHa doses in women undergoing IVF.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (searched July 2012), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2012), EMBASE (1980 to July 2012) and LILACS (1982 to July 2012). We also screened the reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing depot and daily administration of GnRHa for long protocols in IVF treatment cycles in couples with any cause of infertility, using various methods of ovarian stimulation. The primary review outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Other outcomes included number of oocytes retrieved, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, number of gonadotrophin (FSH) units used for ovarian stimulation, duration of gonadotrophin treatment, cost and patient convenience.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed study quality. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per woman randomised. Where appropriate, we pooled studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen studies were eligible for inclusion (n = 1811 participants), 12 (n = 1366 participants) of which were suitable for meta-analysis. No significant heterogeneity was detected.There were no significant differences between depot GnRHa and daily GnRHa in live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.31, seven studies, 873 women), but substantial differences could not be ruled out. Thus for a woman with a 24% chance of achieving a live birth or ongoing pregnancy using daily GnRHa injections, the corresponding chance using GnRHa depot would be between 18% and 29%.There was no significant difference between the groups in clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.23, 11 studies, 1259 women). For a woman with a 30% chance of achieving clinical pregnancy using daily GnRHa injections, the corresponding chance using GnRHa depot would be between 25% and 35%.There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of severe OHSS (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.42, five studies, 570 women), but substantial differences could not be ruled out. For a woman with a 3% chance of severe OHSS using daily GnRHa injections, the corresponding risk using GnRHa depot would be between 1% and 6%.Compared to women using daily GnRHa, those on depot administration required significantly more gonadotrophin units for ovarian stimulation (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.43, 11 studies, 1143 women) and a significantly longer duration of gonadotrophin use (mean difference (MD) 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.84, 10 studies, 1033 women).Study quality was unclear due to poor reporting. Only four studies reported live births as an outcome and only five described adequate methods for concealment of allocation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a significant difference between depot and daily GnRHa use for pituitary down regulation in IVF cycles using the long protocol, but substantial differences could not be ruled out. Since depot GnRHa requires more gonadotrophins and a longer duration of use, it may increase the overall costs of IVF treatment.

Differences in serum LH and FSH levels using depot or daily GnRH agonists in controlled ovarian stimulation: influence on ovarian response and outcome of ART

PURPOSE

To study effects of endogenous LH levels on ovarian response and outcome in ART cycles a controlled study was performed with two patient groups differing in the intensity of pituitary downregulation.

METHODS

Group I (n = 27) received 3.75 mg of the GnRH agonist triptorelin acetate depot, group II (n = 54) was given 0.1 mg triptorelin acetate daily, followed by ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH.

RESULTS

After downregulation serum LH and FSH levels were significantly lower in group I. Patients of group I needed significantly higher FSH doses to achieve comparable levels of serum estradiol and preovulatory follicles. The number of retrieved oocytes and transferable embryos was lower in group I.

CONCLUSION

Patients with profound endogenous LH suppression by depot GnRH agonists show higher FSH stimulation dose requirements and lower oocyte number and fertilization rate, indicating a need for minimal LH activity in folliculogenesis and oocyte development.

Increased prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in in vitro fertilization pregnancies inadvertently conceived during treatment with long-acting triptorelin acetate

Thirty-five pregnancies were inadvertently conceived during the midluteal application of the long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triptorelin acetate before ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Most of the conceptions occurred before the first or second IVF trial, and were associated with a significantly increased tendency to develop gestational diabetes. No increase in pregnancy wastage or appearance of congenital malformations occurred.

Depot versus daily administration of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary desensitization in assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) has been widely used in cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Among the various types of GnRHa ovarian stimulation protocols, the long protocol presents the best clinical pregnancy rates per cycle initiated (GnRHa administration until the suppression of ovarian activity is evident, within approximately 14 days). There are two types of GnRHa administration that can be used to lead to hypophysis desensitization in the IVF cycle in the long protocol: one consisting of daily GnRHa low doses, and another with the administration of analogues in higher long-acting doses (depot). There are controversies in the data as far as the number of ampoules to be used in the cycles with the depot GnRHa treatment, as well as regarding the number of follicles made available, the number of oocytes, fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the use of a single long-acting depot dose to that of daily GnRHa doses in in vitro fertilization cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's specialised register of trials (searched 15 April 2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (1984 to April 2004), EMBASE (1984 to June 2003), LILACS (1984 to April 2004) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: RCTs comparing depot and daily administration of GnRHa for long protocols in IVF treatment cycles.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

Couples with any cause of infertility. Types of interventions: Ovarian stimulation with human follicle stimulating hormone (hFSH) and/or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and/or recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in IVF treatment cycles. Types of outcome measures: Clinical pregnancy rates per woman, per oocyte retrieval procedure, per embryo transfer, number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte fertilization rates, ongoing/delivered pregnancy rates per cycle started, abortion rates, multiple pregnancy rates, number of ampoules of gonadotropin employed, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) incidence rates, cost analysis and patient convenience.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The reviewers evaluated allocation concealment, classified as adequate, uncertain or inadequate. Two reviewers extracted the data independently. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies, with a total of 552 women, were included and analysed. The studies do not indicate that there is statistically significant difference between the use of depot GnRHa or daily GnRHa in the primary outcome, clinical pregnancy rates per woman (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.37). However, there was sufficient evidence that the use of depot GnRHa for pituitary desensitization in IVF cycles increased the number of gonadotrophins ampoules (WMD 3.30, 95% CI 1.27 to 5.34) and the duration of the ovarian stimulation (WMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.81), as compared with daily GnRHa.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although we recognise that the clinical pregnancy rates per woman are not the ideal primary outcome, we found no evidence of differences between the long protocol using depot or daily GnRHa for IVF cycles. However, the use of depot GnRHa is associated with increased requirements for gonadotrophins and a longer time required for ovarian stimulation. If these differences could be shown to translate into economic benefit, depot GnRHa should increase the overall costs of IVF treatment.

First polar body morphology before ICSI is not related to embryo quality or pregnancy rate

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between the first polar body (1st PB) morphology and the fertilization rate, cleavage rate, embryo quality, pregnancy and implantation rate.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on 167 consecutive cycles undergoing assisted reproduction with ICSI. The 1st PB morphology was evaluated at the moment of ICSI in the 596 injected oocytes and it was coded as intact or fragmented. The fertilization rate, cleavage rate, embryo quality (three grades), pregnancy rate, implantation rate and the time elapsed between oocyte retrieval and ICSI were evaluated. The 1st PB morphology was checked twice (denudation and ICSI) in a random sample of 180 oocytes in order to verify the effect of the in vitro culture.

RESULTS

No significant relationship was found between the 1st PB morphology and the fertilization rate (P=0.703), cleavage rate (P=0.055), embryo quality (P=0.673), pregnancy rate (P=0.201) and implantation rate (P=0.511). A significant positive relationship (P=0.006) was found between the frequency of the 1st PB fragmentation and the time elapsed between denudation and ICSI. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P=0.008) when oocytes were injected between 5 and 7 h after retrieval rather than earlier or later.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the embryo quality, pregnancy rate and implantation rate are not related to the 1st PB fragmentation. The time which elapses between the oocyte retrieval and ICSI should be maintained at approximately 6 h in order to obtain optimal results.

GnRH analogs: depot versus short formulations

Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) are widely used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for assisted reproduction (ART). Two different formulations are now available: short formulations and depot formulation. Some authors have suggested that depot GnRH-a induce a too high pituitary suppression and have put forward protocols using reduced GnRH-a doses. A reduced dose of daily triptorelin is enough for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation but provides no significant improvement in IVF cycle outcome when compared with depot formulation in normally responding women. However, it seems to improve ovarian response and overall results in poor responding patients. Low doses of short GnRH-a allow shorter treatment, requiring lower amounts of gonadotropins. This possibility should be considered in view of its economic advantage.

Oocyte cryopreservation in oncological patients

The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in oncological patients may reduce their reproductive potential. Sperm cryopreservation has been already used in men affected by neoplastic disease. Oocyte cryopreservation might be an important solution for these patients at risk of losing ovarian function. A program of oocyte cryopreservation for oncological patients is also present in our center. From June 1996 to January 2000, 18 patients awaiting chemotherapy and radiotherapy for neoplastic disease were included in our oocyte cryopreservation program. Our experience documents that oocyte storage may be a concrete and pragmatic alternative for oncological patients. The duration of oocyte storage does not seem to interfere with oocyte survival as pregnancies occurred even after several years of gamete cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen.

Depot versus daily administration of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary desensitization in assisted reproduction cycles

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) has been widely used in cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Among the various types of GnRHa ovarian stimulation protocols, the long protocol presents the best clinical pregnancy rates per cycle initiated (GnRHa administration until the suppression of ovarian activity is evident, within approximately 14 days). There are two types of GnRHa administration that can be used to lead to hypophysis desensitization in the IVF cycle in the long protocol: one consisting of daily GnRHa low doses, and another with the administration of analogues in higher long-acting doses (depot). There are controversies in the data as far as the number of ampoules to be used in the cycles with the depot GnRHa treatment, as well as regarding the number of follicles made available, the number of oocytes, fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the use of a single long-acting depot dose to that of daily GnRHa doses in in vitro fertilization cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant RCTs were identified by electronic search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Types of studies: The study analyses RCTs comparing depot and daily administration of GnRHa for long protocols in IVF treatment cycles.

TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS

Couples with any cause of infertility. Types of interventions: Ovarian stimulation with human follicle stimulating hormone (hFSH) and/or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and/or recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in IVF treatment cycles. Types of outcome measures: Clinical pregnancy rates per woman, per oocyte retrieval procedure, per embryo transfer, number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte fertilization rates, ongoing/delivered pregnancy rates per cycle started, abortion rates, multiple pregnancy rates, number of ampoules of gonadotropin employed, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) incidence rates, cost analysis and patient convenience.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The reviewers evaluated allocation concealment, classified as adequate, uncertain or inadequate. Two reviewers extracted the data independently. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies, with a total of 552 women, were included and analysed. The studies do not indicate that there is statistically significant difference between the use of depot GnRHa or daily GnRHa in the primary outcome, clinical pregnancy rates per woman (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.37). However, there was sufficient evidence that the use of depot GnRHa for pituitary desensitization in IVF cycles increased the number of gonadotrophins ampoules (WMD 3.30, 95% CI 1.27 to 5.34) and the duration of the ovarian stimulation (WMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.81), as compared with daily GnRHa.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although we recognise that the clinical pregnancy rates per woman are not the ideal primary outcome, we found no evidence of differences between the long protocol using depot or daily GnRHa for IVF cycles. However, the use of depot GnRHa is associated with increased requirements for gonadotrophins and a longer time required for ovarian stimulation. If these differences could be shown to translate into economic benefit, depot GnRHa should increase the overall costs of IVF treatment.

Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival

The success of human oocyte cryopreservation depends on morphological and biophysical factors that could influence oocyte survival after thawing. Various attempts to cryopreserve human oocytes have been performed with contrasting results. Therefore the effect of some factors, such as the presence or absence of the cumulus oophorus, the sucrose concentration in the freezing solution and the exposure time to cryoprotectants, on human oocyte survival after thawing were investigated. The oocytes were cryopreserved in 1,2-propanediol added with sucrose, using a slow-freezing-rapid-thawing programme. After thawing, the oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the outcomes of insemination and subsequent embryo development were also recorded. The post-thaw cryosurvival rate was not different for the oocytes cryopreserved with their cumuli partially removed mechanically (56%) when compared with those cryopreserved with their cumuli totally removed enzymatically (53%). On the contrary, a significantly higher survival rate was obtained when the oocytes were cryopreserved in the presence of a doubled sucrose concentration (0.2 mol/l) in the freezing solution and the survival rate was even higher when the sucrose concentration was tripled (0.3 mol/l) (60 versus 82% P < 0.001). Furthermore, a longer exposure time (from 10.5 to 15 min) to cryoprotectants, before lowering the temperature, significantly increased the oocyte survival rate (P < 0.005). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection produced a good fertilization rate (57%) of thawed oocytes and a high embryo cleavage rate (91%) and a satisfactory embryo morphology was observed (14 and 34% for grade I and grade II embryos respectively).

Clinical experience and applications of oocyte cryopreservation

Oocyte cryopreservation is a viable solution for the ethical problems related to embryo storage, and the only available technique for preservation of fertility in women who have to undergo chemo- or radiotherapy. The main problems with oocyte cryopreservation are concerned with the survival rate and the fertilization rate. Recently the introduction of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) led to an increase in the fertilization rate. The success achieved with the first case treated encouraged us to set up a clinical trial on human oocyte cryopreservation. In the first stage of the study, 23 women with tubal infertility were enrolled. Superovulation was induced and 375 oocytes were retrieved; of these 338 oocytes were frozen. The survival rate was 59.5% and was independant of the duration of cryopreservation or the presence of cumulus. The normal fertilization rate was 64.4%, and only 7.5% of fertilizations were abnormal. A total of 90.8% of fertilized oocytes cleaved. A mean of 3.1+/-1.3 embryos per patient were transferred. Three pregnancies were achieved. In the second stage of our investigation, more patients were enrolled and similar results were observed. Sixteen pregnancies were achieved. A further stage of the investigation involved the fertilization of frozen oocytes with frozen sperm and even these resulted in a pregnancy. Our study demonstrated that pregnancies can also be achieved when frozen eggs are fertilized by testicular and epididymal sperm. As a consequence of the success of our investigations, a program of oocyte cryopreservation for oncological patients has been initiated in our centre. In our opinion, oocyte cryopreservation is, at present, a safe and efficient technique as documented by the birth of several healthy children.

Comparison of a single half-dose, long-acting form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRH-a) and a short-acting form of GnRH-a for pituitary suppression in a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation program

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of a single low-dose leuprolide acetate depot (LA depot) and leuprolide acetate (LA) on pituitary down-regulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

An IVF unit of an academic medical center.

PATIENT(S)

Women who underwent COH and IVF-ET.

INTERVENTION(S)

Pituitary down-regulation with half-dose LA depot (1.88 mg sc, group 1) or LA (0.5 mg/d sc, group 2) was started on menstrual days 21-23.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The concentrations of estradiol (E(2)), FSH, LH, gonadotropin dosages, the numbers of oocytes retrieved, oocytes fertilized and embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates of the two groups were compared.

RESULT(S)

A total of 289 patients in group 1 and 158 in group 2 were included. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in baseline concentrations of E(2) and FSH, concentrations of E(2), FSH, and LH during hCG administration, gonadotropin dosage, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of oocytes fertilized and embryos transferred, and pregnancy rates.

CONCLUSION(S)

Single half-dose LA depot offers a useful alternative for pituitary suppression in ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Triptorelin acetate administration in early pregnancy: case reports and review of the literature

When using a long protocol with cycle day 23 gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a) administration, an elevated estradiol level or a missed period 10-14 days after initiating pituitary downregulation should alert the physician to the possibility of a pregnancy. We report 4 pregnancies occurring during pituitary downregulation with Triptorelin acetate in 366 in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles resulting in 3 deliveries of 4 normal neonates at term and 1 first trimester abortion. This supports published data reporting a 1% spontaneous pregnancy incidence in women undergoing pituitary desensitization GnRH-a during the luteal phase prior to planned IVF treatment, a 15.9% abortion rate and a 1.7% malformation rate. Our cases together with other published data suggest that pregnancy outcome is not adversely affected by GnRH-a administration during the luteal phase of the conception cycle. However, long term follow-up of these babies is still lacking and the number of reported cases is too small adequately to rule out the possibility of any detrimental effect related GnRH-a administration in pregnancy.

Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes

OBJECTIVE

To describe the first birth achieved after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of cryopreserved human oocytes.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

University of Bologna Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology Unit, IVF and Infertility Center.

PATIENT(S)

One patient undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval followed by oocyte freezing. Artificial preparation of the endometrium with E2 and P, oocyte thawing, and ICSI.

RESULT(S)

Four of 12 cryopreserved oocytes survived; using ICSI, 2 underwent normal fertilization but only 1 cleaved. One good-quality 4-cell embryo was transferred. A single gestation was confirmed by ultrasound at the 7th week. Amniocentesis was performed at the 16th week and demonstrated a normal female karyotype of 46,XX. After a normal pregnancy, a healthy female infant was born at the 38th week of gestation.

CONCLUSION(S)

The combination of ICSI and oocyte cryopreservation is a new tool in assisted reproductive technology.

Births after transcervical gamete intrafallopian transfer with a falloposcopic delivery system

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficiency of a new delivery system to perform transcervical GIFT.

DESIGN

Evaluation of pregnancy rate (PR), miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and delivery rate.

SETTING

Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology Unit, Infertility and IVF Center.

PATIENT(S)

Twenty-five patients with patent tubes documented by laparoscopy plus falloposcopy.

INTERVENTION(S)

Superovulation was induced with GnRH analogue and FSH. Under laparoscopic control, transcervical cannulation of the tube was done using a linear everting catheter incorporating direct falloposcopic vision of the tubal lumen. Two lengths of everting catheter (3 and 6 cm) were used providing either isthmic-ampullary or midampullary placement of the inoculum. A comparison was done in terms of ease of access and transfer, falloposcopic observations, and PRs between the groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Efficacy was established by evaluating the PR, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and delivery rate.

RESULT(S)

The PR was 28% (with no differences between the lengths of everting catheters). No ectopic pregnancies occurred. The abortion rate was 28.6% and the delivery rate was 20%. Neither tubal perforation nor other complications occurred during the procedure.

CONCLUSION(S)

Falloposcopic GIFT is safe and efficient and may be a less invasive alternative than laparoscopic transfer.

Comparison between depot leuprorelin and daily buserelin in IVF

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of depot and daily forms of GnRH analogs in IVF programs.

METHODS

One hundred seventeen patients undergoing IVF, with no severe male factor, were randomized between two treatment groups. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (60 patients) with a single IM injection of leuprorelin (3.75 mg), and in group 2 (57 patients) with buserelin (0.3 mg SC twice daily). In a subgroup of 10 patients (5 for the depot form and 5 for the daily form) several GnRH tests were performed to investigate pituitary desensitization.

RESULTS

No differences were found in the time to reach desensitization. Resumption of pituitary activity occurred in 7 days with the daily form and in about 2 months with the depot form. No significant differences were found in the stimulation pattern, oocyte quality, percentage of fertilization. The pregnancy rate per transfer was slightly, but not significantly, better in the depot group (29.4% vs 25.9%). Implantation rate (11.9% vs 12.3%) and the percentage of miscarriages (26.6% vs 28.5%) were similar.

CONCLUSION

Depot and daily forms of GnRH analogs are equally effective in superovulation induction for IVF. Considering improved patient compliance and preference, depot forms are advantageous.