Improvement in the therapy of multiply injured patients by introduction of clinical management guidelines

Delayed injuries in the emergency department in hospitalised trauma patients

Introduction

Busy emergency departments are associated with medical errors in care and evaluation for unstable trauma patients. Our study aimed to determine the extent, causes and adverse clinical consequences of missed injuries and delayed diagnoses in patients hospitalised with trauma in a Turkish Level 3 emergency department, and provide recommendations for emergency service workers and supervisors to help them reduce the number of injury diagnoses that are delayed.

Methods

In our prospective study, a total of 515 emergency department patients presenting with trauma between 1 July 2014 and 1 July 2015 were examined by an emergency physician and by a consultant, if necessary. Identified injuries were recorded using case forms, and hospitalised patients were discharged when their treatment was completed. After the patients were discharged their files were reviewed again and new injuries, different from those recorded in the case forms, were investigated.

Results

Of the 515 patients included, it was shown that an injury diagnosis had been delayed in 21 (3.9%). Of these injuries, 65% were related to the musculoskeletal system. Insufficient clinical evaluation of 95% of the patients who had a missed injury was identified, and, in 70% of missed injuries, the radiology reports had been delayed or incorrectly completed.

Conclusion

We believe that the delayed injury rate can be reduced in trauma patients with the use of fast and reliable radiological support and the intervention of a multidisciplinary trauma team.

Thoracoabdominal computed tomography in trauma patients: a cost-consequences analysis

BACKGROUND

CT is increasingly used during the initial evaluation of blunt trauma patients. In this era of increasing cost-awareness, the pros and cons of CT have to be assessed.

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to evaluate cost-consequences of different diagnostic algorithms that use thoracoabdominal CT in primary evaluation of adult patients with high-energy blunt trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared three different algorithms in which CT was applied as an immediate diagnostic tool (rush CT), a diagnostic tool after limited conventional work-up (routine CT), and a selective tool (selective CT). Probabilities of detecting and missing clinically relevant injuries were retrospectively derived. We collected data on radiation exposure and performed a micro-cost analysis on a reference case-based approach.

RESULTS

Both rush and routine CT detected all thoracoabdominal injuries in 99.1% of the patients during primary evaluation (n = 1040). Selective CT missed one or more diagnoses in 11% of the patients in which a change of treatment was necessary in 4.8%. Rush CT algorithm costed € 2676 (US$ 3660) per patient with a mean radiation dose of 26.40 mSv per patient. Routine CT costed € 2815 (US$ 3850) and resulted in the same radiation exposure. Selective CT resulted in less radiation dose (23.23 mSv) and costed € 2771 (US$ 3790).

CONCLUSIONS

Rush CT seems to result in the least costs and is comparable in terms of radiation dose exposure and diagnostic certainty with routine CT after a limited conventional work-up. However, selective CT results in less radiation dose exposure but a slightly higher cost and less certainty.

Challenges developing evidence-based algorithms for the trauma reception and resuscitation project

A project based at the Alfred Emergency and Trauma Centre in Melbourne, Australia aimed to standardise trauma resuscitation, documentation and interventions by developing best practice algorithms. The primary study objective was to demonstrate a reduction in management errors using a real-time computer based algorithm (the study group) compared to the control group in an open randomised controlled interventional study. A baseline control group was also used for comparison with usual (current) practice. In order to examine the existing evidence and algorithms in trauma care, nine teams of emergency nurses and doctors were formed. Specific literature searches performed by each team revealed a paucity of evidence supporting clinical practice in the trauma setting for procedures. Subsequently, the multidisciplinary teams worked together and developed algorithms based on best practice. The process revealed three main areas of challenges in the development of algorithms: (i) clinical, (ii) research and (iii) nursing challenges. The completion of the project demonstrated benefits in the real-time computer based algorithm with a reduction in the error rate per patient from the baseline control group to the intervention study group (2.30 vs. 2.13, p=0.04) and error-free resuscitations increasing from 16% to 21.8% (p=.049). This project supported the implementation of a real-time computer based algorithm system with improved protocol compliance and reduced errors and morbidity.

[Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) in the emergency room. Is it suitable as an SOP?]

There is clinical evidence that a standardized management of trauma patients in the emergency room improves outcome. ATLS is a training course that teaches a systematic approach to the trauma patient in the emergency room. The aims are a rapid and accurate assessment of the patient's physiologic status, treatment according to priorities, and making decisions on whether the local resources are sufficient for adequate definitive treatment of the patient or if transfer to a trauma center is necessary. Above all it is important to prevent secondary injury, to realize timing as a relevant factor in the initial treatment, and to assure a high standard of care. A standard operating procedure (SOP) exactly regulates the approach to trauma patients and determines the responsibilities of the involved faculties. An SOP moreover incorporates the organizational structure in the treatment of trauma patients as well as the necessary technical equipment and staff requirements. To optimize process and result quality, priorities are in the fields of medical fundamentals of trauma care, education, and fault management. SOPs and training courses increase the process and result quality in the treatment of the trauma patient in the emergency room. These programs should be based on the special demands of the physiology of the trauma as well as the structural specifics of the hospital. ATLS does not equal an SOP but it qualifies as a standardized concept for management of trauma patients in the emergency room.

The formal requirements of algorithms and their implications in clinical medicine and quality management

PURPOSE

Clinical algorithms contribute to the problem- and priority-orientated management of patients and their disease in healthcare. Algorithms are of particular importance in all aspects of emergency medicine where the fast completion of a complex problem according to a hierarchy is required. The advantages and success of this priority- and problem-orientated concept led to its expansion to other subspecialties in medicine in recent years. However, in spite of algorithms being created based on defined norms, they are frequently violated in the literature, which renders the algorithm useless in a particular case.

METHODS

The present debate addresses these issues and provides the formal criteria and their necessary modification for creating sufficient clinical algorithms. In this context, we also clarify the misunderstandings between step-by-step schemes, decision trees, and algorithms, which are often used synonymously, and discuss their implications in clinical medicine and quality management.

RESULTS

A clinical algorithm can easily be created with the present derivation of the algorithm by its formal mathematical function using the corresponding norms describing specific symbols for a single criterion. Some symbol modifications as well as the usage of checklists to focus on the major criteria led to a rigorous reduction of the algorithm length and results in a clearer arrangement for routine clinical use. In clinical medicine, algorithms cannot only provide a fast access for solving complex problems but must also assure a transparent protocol and democratic treatment such that every patient receives the same quality of treatment. Thus, a treatment by chance can be excluded by standardization, which might impact the overall work needed to guide patients though diagnostics and therapy and may ultimately reduce cost. Algorithms are useful not only for quality in healthcare but also for undergraduate and continuous medical education. From a more philosophical point of view, we can raise the question of whether medical pathways and thereby the medical art should be disclosed to the general public by algorithms. Hippocrates form Kos held the view in the so-called Hippocratic Oath that medical art should only be revealed to medical scholars.

CONCLUSIONS

The present derivation and nomination of the formal requirements may lead to a better understanding of algorithms themselves as well as their development and generation.

[Primary care hospital for a mass disaster MANV IV. Experience from a mock disaster exercise]

BACKGROUND

In Hannover and in nationwide contingency plans there are clear instructions for the medical care of mass casualties which are designed to cope with 50 to a maximum of 200 patients. Disaster simulations and practical exercises in Hannover regarding EXPO 2000 and the FIFA World Cup 2006 showed a very good and effective prehospital treatment and management up to a number of about 200 patients. Due to infrastructural settings a scenario with up to 1,000 (MANV IV) patients in the region of Hannover was beyond the capacity of existing concepts for the management of mass casualties, which comprised initial medical care at the on-site treatment area and subsequent transport to local or regional hospitals for definitive management. A new practicable and well trained model was necessary to improve the hospital admission and primary treatment capacity (Erstversorgungsklinik--EVK). In the case of MANV IV it was proposed that the tasks of on-site treatment area should be concentrated on triage and the stabilization of severely injured victims with immediate transport to special primary care hospitals. The main task of these hospitals was further stabilization of patients for inhospital care or further transport to other special facilities.

METHODS

The main aim of the study was, after the initial trauma scenario, to provide the logistical and personal background for the fastest possible advanced life support and the further treatment of more than 60 severely injured patients at a city hospital with trauma centre level I experience. The timescale from the first alarm until the hospital was ready for action was approximately 60 min. To gain knowledge about the regional implementation of the whole logistic scenario in the case of MANV IV and to practice detailed questioning, a major casualty training was needed. This resulted in a large targeted disaster medical training with a realistic situation simulation on the 25.03.2006 including the Diakoniekrankenhaus Friederikenstift under the aspect of a special primary care hospital (EVK) working at full capacity.

RESULTS

The AWD arena in Hannover was the site of a simulated major casualty event resulting in 620 patients with various penetrating or blunt trauma injuries. Within 60 min of the first alarm call the admission and casualty treatment capacity at the Diakoniekrankenhaus Friederikenstift was increased up to approximately 60 patients including 30 ventilated patients. After initial inspection of 78 patients according to the ATLS criteria advanced life support was performed (airway management, volume resuscitation, basic diagnostic and surgical techniques) by flexible treatment teams (including physicians of all other faculties) in 3 treatment corridors within 135 min. Of the patients 69 were admitted to the wards and intensive care units, 5 were discharged after ambulant treatment and 3 patients were transferred to an eye and ENT hospital. Of the patients 10 had already been intubated on arrival, another 6 patients were intubated in the treatment corridors. Simulations of 4 urgent laparatomies, 2 trepanations, 1 artery seam, osteosynthesis of 3 perforating fractures was performed in the operating theatre. A total of 6 extremity fractures were immobilized by a fixateur externe, 7 chest tubes were placed and 43 surgical wound dressings were performed in the treatment corridors. There was no significant shortage of logistical or personal resources.

CONCLUSION

In a major disaster with more than 200 seriously injured patients the EVK model is a practicable and regional well tried solution that could increase the capacity of hospital admissions and advanced trauma life support, regardless of the type of casualty, season or weather conditions. It is possible to reduce the interval to advanced trauma life support, temporary fracture stabilization (damage control) and definitive surgical care by means of rapid and targeted utilization of resources and manpower. Physicians involved in the initial treatment play a key role and have to be highly trained (ATLS). The EVK model is variable and can easily be established and adapted to regional conditions at basic regional hospitals as well as at level I trauma centers.

[Reality of treatment of osteoporotic fractures in German trauma departments. A contribution for outcome research]

The implementation of clinical pathways has a proven positive effect on the diagnostic workup and initiation of therapy in osteoporotic fracture patients. Unlike in most countries, fracture care in Germany is provided by so-called trauma surgeons. Therefore, it is essential to focus on the trauma surgeon for correct diagnostic workup and therapy initiation after a fragility fracture. A questionnaire was mailed to 409 departments of traumatology inquiring about the existence of a standardized clinical pathway for diagnosis and treatment of patients with fragility fractures. One of the central issues of the survey was whether those pathways comply with national guidelines. Only institutions that stated that they followed a clinical pathway were analyzed. 80% of institutions took part in our survey, 35% of which reported following a defined clinical pathway. Diagnostic workup is in concordance with the national guidelines in 30%, and therapy is guideline-based in 51%, with 12% basing both diagnostic workup and therapy on the guidelines. Thus, the vast majority of German traumatology departments do not follow national guidelines regarding osteoporosis diagnostics and therapy in patients with fragility fractures, leading to a great opportunity to improve fragility fracture care by means of both education and interdisciplinary cooperation.

ATLS(R) and damage control in spine trauma

Substantial inflammatory disturbances following major trauma have been found throughout the posttraumatic course of polytraumatized patients, which was confirmed in experimental models of trauma and in vitro settings. As a consequence, the principle of damage control surgery (DCS) has developed over the last two decades and has been successfully introduced in the treatment of severely injured patients. The aim of damage control surgery and orthopaedics (DCO) is to limit additional iatrogenic trauma in the vulnerable phase following major injury. Considering traumatic brain and acute lung injury, implants for quick stabilization like external fixators as well as decided surgical approaches with minimized potential for additional surgery-related impairment of the patient's immunologic state have been developed and used widely. It is obvious, that a similar approach should be undertaken in the case of spinal trauma in the polytraumatized patient. Yet, few data on damage control spine surgery are published to so far, controlled trials are missing and spinal injury is addressed only secondarily in the broadly used ATLS(R) polytrauma algorithm. This article reviews the literature on spine trauma assessment and treatment in the polytrauma setting, gives hints on how to assess the spine trauma patient regarding to the ATLS(R) protocol and recommendations on therapeutic strategies in spinal injury in the polytraumatized patient.

Introduction of a treatment algorithm can improve the early management of emergency patients in the resuscitation room

INTRODUCTION

Successful management of emergency patients with multiple trauma in the hospital resuscitation room depends on the immediate diagnosis and rapid treatment of the most life-threatening injuries. In order to reduce the time spent in the resuscitation room, an in-hospital algorithm was developed in an interdisciplinary team approach with respect to local structures. The aim of the study was to analyse whether this algorithm affects the interval between hospital admission and the completion of diagnostic procedures and the start of life-saving interventions. Moreover, in-hospital mortality was investigated before and after the algorithm was introduced.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, all consecutive trauma patients in the resuscitation room were investigated before (group I, 01/04-10/04) and after (group II, 01/05-11/05) introduction of the algorithm. The times between hospital admission and the end of the diagnostic procedures (ultrasound [sono], chest X-ray [CF], and cranial computed tomography [CCT]), and between hospital admission and the start of life-saving interventions were registered and in-hospital mortality analysed.

RESULTS

In the study period, 170 patients in group I and 199 patients in group II were investigated. Injury severity score (ISS) were comparable between the two groups. The intervals between admission and completion of diagnostic procedures were significantly lower after the algorithm was introduced (mean+/-S.D.): sono (11 +/- 10 min versus 7 +/- 6 min, p < 0.05), CF (21 +/- 12 min versus 12 +/- 9 min, p < 0.01), and CCT (55 +/- 27 min versus 32 +/- 14 min, p < 0.01). Moreover, the interval to the start of life-saving interventions was significantly shorter (126 +/- 90 min versus 51 +/- 20 min, p < 0.01). After introducing the algorithm, in-hospital mortality was reduced significantly from 33.3% to 16.7% (p < 0.05) in the most severely injured patients (ISS>or=25).

CONCLUSION

The introduction of an algorithm for early management of emergency patients significantly reduced the time spent in the resuscitation room. The periods to completion of sono, CF, and CCT, respectively, and the start of life-saving interventions were significantly shorter after introduction of the algorithm. Moreover, introduction of the algorithm reduced mortality in the most severely injured patients. Although further investigations are needed to evaluate the effects of the Heidelberg treatment algorithm in terms of outcome and mortality, the time reduction in the resuscitation room seems to be beneficial.

[Management of polytrauma]

The first hours after trauma are decisive. Therefore the treatment chosen demands very strict planning according to concepts of modern quality management. This begins with the fastest possible and most efficient delivery of injured patients to the applicable clinic. Such institutions are permanently ready and have at their service all the necessary diagnostic techniques and surgical and intensive care methods. Effective shock treatment entails standardized procedures accompanied by up-to-date diagnostic and therapeutic measures. After admittance and therapy of life-threatening injuries (immediate measures, damage control surgery), early-stage surgery will follow (soft tissue injuries and fractures). Strategy of damage control orthopedics is growing in acceptance because of the potential danger to life functions due to pro- and anti-inflammatory response induced additional trauma caused by following surgery. Fractures initially stabilized by external fixation can consecutively be treated safely by secondary conversion osteosynthesis. A considerable improvement in quality can be attained through therapeutic procedures approved by all concomitant disciplines and standardized systems with internal and external control methods.

A novel multiple-trauma CT-scanning protocol using patient repositioning

Emergency CT examination is considered to be a trade-off between a short scan time and the acceptance of artifacts. This study evaluates the influence of patient repositioning on artifacts and scan time. Eighty-three consecutive multiple-trauma patients were included in this prospective study. Patients were examined without repositioning (group 1, n=39) or with patient rotation to feet-first with arms raised for scanning the chest and abdomen/pelvis (group 2, n=44). The mean scan time was 21 min in group 1 and 25 min in group 2 (P=0.01). The mean repositioning time in group 2 was 8 min. Significantly, more artifacts were observed in group 1 (with a repeated scan in 7%) than in group 2 (P=0.0001). This novel multiple- trauma CT-scanning protocol with patient repositioning achieves a higher image quality with significantly fewer artifacts than without repositioning but increases scan time slightly.

TRAUMA RECEPTION AND RESUSCITATION

The hospital reception phase of major trauma management requires a great number of expedient decisions. However, despite widely taught programmes advocating a standardized, algorithmic approach to decision-making, there is an ongoing rate of human errors contributing to adverse outcomes. It is now time for a fundamental change in our approach to trauma resuscitation. Point-of-care computer technology linked to real-time decision-making and trauma team coordination may achieve error reduction through standardized decision-making and a corresponding reduction in preventable mortality and morbidity.

[Management of spine injuries in polytraumatized patients]

The management of spine injuries in polytraumatized patients remains a great challenge for the diagnostic procedures and institution of appropriate treatment by integrating spinal trauma treatment into the whole treatment concept as well as following the treatment steps for the injured spine itself. The established concept of "damage control" and criteria regarding the optimal time and manner for operative treatment of the injured spine in the polytrauma setting is presented and discussed.

Communication during trauma resuscitation: do we know what is happening?

OBJECTIVE

Verbal communication is essential for teamwork and leadership in high-intensity performances like trauma resuscitation. We evaluated communication during multidisciplinary trauma resuscitation.

METHODS

The main trauma room of a level one trauma centre was equipped with a digital video recording system. Resuscitations were consecutively and prospectively enrolled. Patients with revised trauma score (RTS)=12 were resuscitated by a 'minor trauma team' and patients with RTS<12 by a 'major trauma team'. Information transferral from physicians to other team members was evaluated separately for all ABCDE's, according to initiation, audibility and response. The observer was trained and the first 30 video's were excluded.

RESULTS

From May 1st to September 1st 2003, 205 resuscitations were included, 12 were lost for evaluation. The 'major trauma team' resuscitated 74 patients (ISS:21.4). Communication was audible in 56% and understandable in 44% during the primary survey. The 'minor trauma team' assessed 119 patients (ISS:7.4). Communication was audible in 43% and understandable in 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

Communication during trauma resuscitation was found to be sub optimal. This is potentially harmful for trauma victims. Professionals and institutions should be aware that communication is not self-evident. Introduction of an aviation-like communication feedback system could help to optimise trauma care.

Der Würzburger Schockraumalgorithmus

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to show the practicability of a new algorithm in the management of polytraumatized patients based on Advanced Trauma Live Support (ATLS) and using mobile whole body multislice CT (MMDCT) as the primary imaging system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 120 trauma patients referred to the Würzburg University Hospital Trauma Emergency Room were categorized into suspected polytrauma and suspected non-polytrauma groups. The polytraumatized patients were investigated using the Würzburg polytrauma-algorithm including whole body multislice CT with a 16-row-scanner. The algorithm is described. The time for the diagnostic procedure was measured and compared with data from the Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery.

RESULTS

From 120 patients 78 (66%) underwent whole body CT. The diagnostic procedure was quick with significant advantages especially for cranial and trunk diagnostics.

CONCLUSION

The Würzburg polytrauma algorithm worked well. There was excellent cooperation within the interdisciplinary leading team consisting of anaesthesiologists, surgeons, and radiologists. The principles of ATLS could be respected. Mobile whole body multislice CT was an effective tool in the diagnostic evaluation of polytrauma patients.

Early embolization and vasopressor administration for management of life-threatening hemorrhage from pelvic fracture

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective study, we reviewed our protocol for management of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic injury.

METHODS

We managed the patients with the same predetermined plan including controlled hemodynamic resuscitation with early use of vasopressors and pelvic angiography as a first-line treatment.

RESULTS

Of 311 patients with pelvic fracture, 32 hemodynamically unstable patients (10.3%) underwent pelvic angiography, which was followed by embolization in 25 cases. Angiography was successful for 24 patients (96%) and extrapelvic bleeding was diagnosed in 5 patients (15%). Three of six laparotomies performed before angiography were nontherapeutic. One of seven laparotomies performed after angiography was negative.

CONCLUSION

A protocol for management of patients with pelvic injury and hemodynamic instability that is associated with controlled resuscitation including vasopressor and early pelvic angioembolization is effective for treating pelvic hemorrhage and diagnosing extrapelvic hemorrhage. Further studies are needed to confirm the respective place of angiographic and surgical control of bleeding.

[Priority-oriented shock trauma room management with the integration of multiple-view spiral computed tomography]

In major trauma it is essential to immediately recognize and treat life-threatening problems and conditions. Most trauma protocols reserve the use of computed tomography for the secondary survey, as patients cannot be attended to during the examination and must be transferred from the emergency room to the CT suite. The relevant reduction in the scanning time of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) or multislice computed tomography (MSCT) justifies its use as the major diagnostic adjunct for primary trauma survey and initial resuscitation. According to our ATLS((R))-based trauma algorithm, the multidetector scanner situated in the emergency department is utilized immediately after the correction of respiratory problems to detect causes of bleeding or intracranial hematomas. In a prospective series a total of 125 consecutive major trauma patients were evaluated. After focused sonography in trauma (FAST) and plain chest films in intubated patients, whole body MDCT was performed. By retrieving data from our trauma registry and a picture archiving and communication system (PACS), time from trauma room admission to the end of head CT scan for the entire MDCT study and calculation of multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) was analyzed. Additionally, relevant complications such as untreated tension pneumothorax or circulatory arrest during MDCT examination were recorded. The time from admission to the trauma room until completion of head CT scan without contrast was 21:12 min (median, IQR 18:13-27:52). The entire contrast-enhanced MDCT study, including pilot scan and contrast application, required 6:08 min (median, IQR 4:33-8:14) with a total scanning time of 0:59 min (median, IQR 0:55-1:03). MPR calculation of the spine and bony pelvis was performed in 11:37 min (median, IQR 8:03-16:41). A relevant life-threatening complication due to CT scanning during primary trauma survey was not observed in the 125 cases (0/125 CI 95% 0%-3%). Complete diagnostic imaging can be performed within 30 min after trauma room admission by using MDCT. During the primary survey, treatment of the patient is interrupted just for the few minutes of the CT scan and contrast application. An adequate survey of injuries can be achieved earlier and a targeted therapy can be initiated ahead of time. Integration of MDCT scanners in the primary trauma survey provides a high standard of imaging in a very short time without endangering the patient. When dealing with multiple casualties, MDCT could be used also as an accurate and time-efficient means of hospital triage to diagnose and prioritize patients and to plan further surgical interventions and intensive care.

Role of an extended tertiary survey in detecting missed injuries in children

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the incidence of delayed diagnosis of injuries in children. We sought to investigate the role of an extended tertiary survey in pediatric trauma patients.

METHODS

All children that were admitted to The Children's Hospital at Westmead with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >/= 9 were included in the study. The trauma fellow performed the tertiary survey the day after admission. This was repeated after extubation in ventilated patients and in head injury patients when they were more mobile and cooperative.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients satisfied the criteria for the study (50 boys and 26 girls). Age ranged from 1 month to 15 years. The median ISS was 14. Sixteen (16%) of the patients had missed injuries, of which skeletal injuries were the most common (10 of 12). Delayed diagnosis of injury occurred most frequently in children involved in motor vehicle injuries. Sixty-six (66%) of the injuries were detected within the first 24 hours. Inadequate assessment and head injury were the most common contributing factors.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of missed injury (16%) in our study was comparable to reported figures in the adult literature. There was no correlation between missed injuries and intensive care unit stay or ISS. Head injury often delayed diagnosis and thus ongoing evaluation in this group is recommended. Missed injuries did not result in mortality, but there was significant associated morbidity. A tertiary survey should be part of the evaluation of the pediatric trauma patient.

[From clinical guidelines to clinical pathways: development of a management-oriented algorithm for the treatment of polytraumatized patients in the acute period]

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of polytraumatized patients in the acute period is an exemplary model of multidisciplinary cooperation in a very critical timeframe. Implementing standards formulated in the clinical guidelines of the German Association of Traumatology requires a detailed description of "how to do it."

METHODS

Based on the guidelines and validated quality indictors, the optimal standard of care as the goal was defined. A clinical algorithm was developed and personal responsibilities and time limits were clearly assigned to each decision step and action. Checklists, documentation charts, and a full text supplement the algorithm. The complete pathway was adopted by representatives of all occupational groups involved in early trauma care in a consensus process.

RESULTS

Improvement potentials were identified in those areas for which the guidelines did not provide explicit recommendations. These represent the key elements of the algorithm. Pathway-specific review criteria (quality indicators) were defined for scheduled reevaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing clinical guidelines at the local level requires a problem-oriented and management-oriented elaboration towards a clinical pathway as the basis for a quantitative process and cost analysis.

Controversies in emergency radiology. CT versus ultrasound in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma

There has been controversy regarding ultrasonography (US) versus CT in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). Each modality has its strengths and weaknesses. US is fast and allows resuscitative efforts to proceed while the patient is being scanned. However, the sensitivity of US is inferior to that of CT, and there is user variability. CT is better at determining the extent, type, and grade of injury, resulting in a more tailored therapeutic plan and safe conservative management of many patients. However, CT involves ionizing radiation, cannot be performed portably, and requires only visual monitoring while scanning. Given each modality's strengths and weaknesses we conclude that CT is the preferred examination when the BAT patient is stable or moderately stable, enough to be taken to CT. If a BAT patient is unstable, US is beneficial in screening for certain injuries or large hemoperitoneum prior to an exploratory laparotomy.

Guideline validation in multiple trauma care through business process modeling

Clinical guidelines can improve the quality of care in multiple trauma. In our Department of Trauma Surgery a specific guideline is available paper-based as a set of flowcharts. This format is appropriate for the use by experienced physicians but insufficient for electronic support of learning, workflow and process optimization. A formal and logically consistent version represented with a standardized meta-model is necessary for automatic processing. In our project we transferred the paper-based into an electronic format and analyzed the structure with respect to formal errors. Several errors were detected in seven error categories. The errors were corrected to reach a formally and logically consistent process model. In a second step the clinical content of the guideline was revised interactively using a process-modeling tool. Our study reveals that guideline development should be assisted by process modeling tools, which check the content in comparison to a meta-model. The meta-model itself could support the domain experts in formulating their knowledge systematically. To assure sustainability of guideline development a representation independent of specific applications or specific provider is necessary. Then, clinical guidelines could be used for eLearning, process optimization and workflow management additionally.

Videotape review leads to rapid and sustained learning

BACKGROUND

Performance review using videotapes is a strategy employed to improve future performance. We postulated that videotape review of trauma resuscitations would improve compliance with a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

Trauma resuscitations were taped and reviewed during a 6-month period. For 3 months, team members were given verbal feedback regarding performance. During the next 3 months, new teams attended videotape reviews of their performance. Data on targeted behaviors were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Behavior did not change after 3 months of verbal feedback; however, behavior improved after 1 month of videotape feedback (P <0.05) and total time to disposition was reduced by 50% (P <0.01). This response was sustained for the remainder of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Videotape review can be an important learning tool as it was more effective than verbal feedback in achieving behavioral changes and algorithm compliance. Videotape review can be an important quality assurance adjunct, as improved algorithm compliance should be associated with improved patient care.

Quality of multiple trauma care in 33 German and Swiss trauma centers during a 5-year period: regular versus on-call service

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate process and outcome quality of severely injured patients admitted during on-call (OC) versus regular trauma service (RS).

METHODS

This was a prospective and multicentric analysis of the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society. Patients were evaluated if directly admitted from the scene of accident with an Injury Severity Score of > 15 and if alive on arrival at the emergency department.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of patients were admitted during OC; these patients were significantly younger. Blunt trauma predominated, with a 95% incidence. Falls from great heights were significantly more frequent during RS, whereas motor vehicle crashes predominated during OC. No differences were found for emergency department management (e.g., time to abdominal ultrasound, chest radiograph, or cranial computed tomography). However, time to admission to the intensive care unit was substantially longer during RS. No significant differences were found for outcome parameters such as length of intensive care unit stay, hospitalization time, incidence of organ failure, or mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a constant quality of care provided 24 hours per day, 7 days per week in the participating hospitals. Differences within individual trauma centers were not compared and need to be assessed by internal quality management.

Missed injuries in a level I trauma center

BACKGROUND

Major trauma presents major diagnostic and therapeutic problems. Any delay in providing the treatment necessary may lead to increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged length of hospital stay, and increased cost. This study was undertaken to determine the extent, contributing factors, and implication of missed injuries and relate them to the three surveys in a Danish Level I trauma center.

METHODS

The records of all major traumatized patients admitted to the Odense University Hospital from January 1996 through December 1999 have been studied to determine the extent and type of missed injuries. The initial examination is carried out by the trauma team in the A&E department according to standard protocols. Resuscitation is carried out according to Advanced Trauma Life Support principles and details are documented in the patient journal and in a special trauma journal.

RESULTS

Sixty-four of 786 patients (incidence, 8.1%) had 86 missed injuries. The missed injuries averaged 1.3 injuries per patient. There were 45 male and 19 female patients, with a median age of 33 years (range, 12-81 years). The median ISS was 17 (range, 4-50); 14%, 38%, and 48% of the injuries were missed in primary, secondary, and tertiary surveys, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that missed injuries can occur at any stage of the management of patients with major trauma. Repeated assessments, both clinical and radiologic, are mandatory to diminish the problem. In initial assessment, one still has to treat the greatest threat to life before complete diagnosis of all injuries, but alertness to evolving injuries must remain throughout the patient's stay in hospital.

Multiple organ failure still a major cause of morbidity but not mortality in blunt multiple trauma

BACKGROUND

Multiple organ failure (OF/MOF) was found to be the major complication after blunt multiple trauma during the last 25 years and was correlated with a high mortality rate. Recently, several publications reported a decreased ARDS-related mortality, but there is little information about mortality rates from posttraumatic MOF. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of MOF-related death after blunt multiple trauma during the last 25 years.

METHODS

Blunt multiple trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 points were included in this evaluation. According to the year of trauma, the population was divided into five groups: years 1975-1980 (n = 317), years 1981-1985 (n = 308), years 1986-1990 (n = 246), years 1991-1997 (n = 368), and years 1998-1999 (n = 122). Main outcome measurements were death, cause of death, and length of ICU stay. Patients dying within the first 24 hours after trauma were excluded. All data indicated in the Results section are presented as mean +/- SEM. Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA. Ordinal variables were analyzed by chi2 contingency table analysis and, if significant, subsequently by Fisher's exact test (two-tailed test, p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Mean ISS remained unchanged between 1975-1980 (ISS 29 +/- 1) and 1998-1999 (ISS 31 +/- 1) (p = 0.56). During the observation period, the mean age increased from 33 +/- 1 years (1975-1980) to 40 +/- 2 years (1998-1999) (p = 0.03). The overall incidence of OF/MOF slightly increased from 25.6% (1975-1980) to 33.6% (1998-1999) (p = 0.1). Length of ICU stay was not different between 1975-1980 (LOS: 14 +/- 1 d) and 1998-1999 (LOS: 19 +/- 2 d) (p = 1.0). The overall mortality decreased significantly, from 28.7% (1975-1980) to 13.9% (1998-1999) (p < 0.001). While the mortality due to severe head injuries remained unchanged (1975-1980, 8.2%; 1998-1999, 9.0%) (p = 0.85), mortality due to OF/MOF decreased significantly (p < 0.001), from 18.0% (1975-1980) to 4.1% (1998-1999). The age of patients dying from OF/MOF increased significantly (p = 0.04) during the observation period, from 44 +/- 3 years (1975-1980) to 63 +/- 6 years (1998-1999).

CONCLUSION

Although MOF incidence remains unchanged, there is a significant fall in MOF-related mortality in patients with severe trauma, and death from single organ failure is virtually absent. Severe brain injury is now the leading cause of death in patients with severe multiple injuries admitted to the ICU.

Outcome of adolescent trauma admitted to an adult surgical intensive care unit versus a pediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Institutional protocol designates the adult trauma service as the primary manager of all adolescent traumas (age 14-18 years) unless admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) occurs. In the PICU, primary care becomes the responsibility of the pediatric intensivist, with trauma service as a consultant. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in the management of adolescent trauma between the pediatric intensivist in the PICU, and the adult trauma team in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

METHODS

From January 1993 to January 1998, the medical records of all adolescent trauma patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management were reviewed. Depending on bed availability, patients younger than 16 were admitted to the PICU, and those 16 or older to the SICU. Demographic data obtained were age, sex, race, mechanism of injury, length of stay (LOS), ICU length of stay, days on mechanical ventilation, intubation, tracheotomy, intracranial pressure monitor, and Swan-Ganz catheter placement. Home discharge, rehabilitation placement, and death were recorded. Morbidity was measured using Injury Severity Score methodology, Pediatric Trauma Score, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality.

RESULTS

One hundred nine completed records were reviewed (SICU, n = 58; PICU, n = 51). There was no statistical difference in sex, race, mechanism of injury, ICU LOS, tracheotomy, and intracranial pressure monitor placements. There was no difference in morbidity, as measured by Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality score or in outcome measurements (death, rehabilitation placement). SICU patients were older (SICU, 16.9 +/- 1.0 years; PICU, 15.4 +/- 1.0 years; p < or = 0.1 Mann-Whitney U test), more likely to be intubated (SICU, n = 42; PICU, n = 24; p < or = 0.05 Fisher's exact test), more likely to have pulmonary artery catheter placement (SICU, n = 7; PICU, n = 0), and had longer LOS (SICU, 12.2 +/- 10.6; PICU, 9.8 +/- 14.1; p < or = 0.03 Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSION

Adolescent trauma patients admitted to the PICU were less likely to be intubated or have a Swan-Ganz catheter placed. They had decreased LOS and days of mechanical ventilation. There was no difference in outcome measurements.