Deletion and insertion mutants in the structural gene for ribosomal protein S1 from Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 unfolds structured mRNAs onto the ribosome for active translation initiation

Regulation of translation initiation is well appropriate to adapt cell growth in response to stress and environmental changes. Many bacterial mRNAs adopt structures in their 5' untranslated regions that modulate the accessibility of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Structured mRNAs interact with the 30S in a two-step process where the docking of a folded mRNA precedes an accommodation step. Here, we used a combination of experimental approaches in vitro (kinetic of mRNA unfolding and binding experiments to analyze mRNA-protein or mRNA-ribosome complexes, toeprinting assays to follow the formation of ribosomal initiation complexes) and in vivo (genetic) to monitor the action of ribosomal protein S1 on the initiation of structured and regulated mRNAs. We demonstrate that r-protein S1 endows the 30S with an RNA chaperone activity that is essential for the docking and the unfolding of structured mRNAs, and for the correct positioning of the initiation codon inside the decoding channel. The first three OB-fold domains of S1 retain all its activities (mRNA and 30S binding, RNA melting activity) on the 30S subunit. S1 is not required for all mRNAs and acts differently on mRNAs according to the signals present at their 5' ends. This work shows that S1 confers to the ribosome dynamic properties to initiate translation of a large set of mRNAs with diverse structural features.

Genome-wide association study of normal tension glaucoma: common variants in SRBD1 and ELOVL5 contribute to disease susceptibility

PURPOSE

Factors contributing to the development of normal tension glaucoma (NTG), degenerative optic neuropathy characterized by the progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells, optic nerve axons, and visual fields, have not been determined. To identify genetic risk factors for NTG, we performed a genome-wide association study of NTG.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

PARTICIPANTS

The study cohort consisted of 305 Japanese patients with NTG and 355 controls.

METHODS

We genotyped 500,568 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and assessed the allelic diversity among cases and controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Genotypes of 500,568 SNPs.

RESULTS

The 2 most strongly NTG-associated SNPs, rs3213787 and rs735860, are located in an intron of SRBD1 and the 3'-untranslated region of ELOVL5 (P = 2.5 x 10(-9), odds ratio = 2.80 and P = 4.1 x 10(-6), odds ratio = 1.69), respectively. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays showed significantly increased expression of each gene in the white blood cells of subjects harboring the risk allele of these SNPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our genome-wide association study identified SRBD1 and ELOVL5 as new susceptibility genes for NTG. Because SRBD1 and ELOVL5 are reportedly involved in the induction of cell growth inhibition or apoptosis, the regulation of SRBD1 and ELOVL5 cascades may play an important physiologic role in the risk of NTG development.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Ribosomal protein S1 influences trans-translation in vitro and in vivo

When the bacterial ribosome stalls on a truncated mRNA, transfer–messenger RNA (tmRNA) acts initially as a transfer RNA (tRNA) and then as a messenger RNA (mRNA) to rescue the ribosome and add a peptide tag to the nascent polypeptide that targets it for degradation. Ribosomal protein S1 binds tmRNA but its functional role in this process has remained elusive. In this report, we demonstrate that, in vitro, S1 is dispensable for the tRNA-like role of tmRNA but is essential for its mRNA function. Increasing or decreasing the amount of protein S1 in vivo reduces the overall amount of trans-translated proteins. Also, a truncated S1 protein impaired for ribosome binding can still trigger protein tagging, suggesting that S1 interacts with tmRNA outside the ribosome to keep it in an active state. Overall, these results demonstrate that S1 has a role in tmRNA-mediated tagging that is distinct from its role during canonical translation.

Ribosomal protein S1 binds mRNA and tmRNA similarly but plays distinct roles in translation of these molecules

Ribosomes stalled during protein synthesis can be rescued by tmRNA, which acts first as a tRNA and then as an mRNA to direct addition of a C-terminal degradation tag to the nascent polypeptide. Ribosomal protein S1 binds tmRNA, but its functional role in tmRNA-mediated tagging is uncertain. To probe interactions between S1 and tmRNA, truncated variants missing one or more of the six contiguous S1 domains were studied. The third S1 domain (R1) plays a critical role in binding tmRNA and mRNA but requires additional N- or C-terminal S1 domains. The binding of S1 and its fragments to tmRNA and mRNA is positively cooperative, and the essential role of the R1 domain may be to mediate protein-protein interactions. Overproduction of N-terminal fragments of S1 in Escherichia coli displaces endogenous S1 from ribosomes, inhibits general protein synthesis, and slows growth but causes little if any disruption of tmRNA-mediated tagging. Moreover, tagging of proteins translated from model mRNAs with either no or an increased requirement for S1 is indistinguishable. These results raise the possibility that S1 plays little or no role in tmRNA-mediated tagging.

The last RNA-binding repeat of the Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 is specifically involved in autogenous control

The ssyF29 mutation, originally selected as an extragenic suppressor of a protein export defect, has been mapped within the rpsA gene encoding ribosomal protein S1. Here, we examine the nature of this mutation and its effect on translation. Sequencing of the rpsA gene from the ssyF mutant has revealed that, due to an IS10R insertion, its product lacks the last 92 residues of the wild-type S1 protein corresponding to one of the four homologous repeats of the RNA-binding domain. To investigate how this truncation affects translation, we have created two series of Escherichia coli strains (rpsA(+) and ssyF) bearing various translation initiation regions (TIRs) fused to the chromosomal lacZ gene. Using a beta-galactosidase assay, we show that none of these TIRs differ in activity between ssyF and rpsA(+) cells, except for the rpsA TIR: the latter is stimulated threefold in ssyF cells, provided it retains at least ca. 90 nucleotides upstream of the start codon. Similarly, the activity of this TIR can be severely repressed in trans by excess S1, again provided it retains the same minimal upstream sequence. Thus, the ssyF stimulation requires the presence of the rpsA translational autogenous operator. As an interpretation, we propose that the ssyF mutation relieves the residual repression caused by normal supply of S1 (i.e., that it impairs autogenous control). Thus, the C-terminal repeat of the S1 RNA-binding domain appears to be required for autoregulation, but not for overall mRNA recognition.

The effect of ribosomal protein S1 from Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus on protein synthesis in vitro by E. coli and Bacillus subtilis

We have designed a set of nine plasmids containing the Bacillus pumilis cat gene with one of three Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequences (weak, strong or stronger) and one of three initiation codons (AUG, GUG or UUG). These constructions have been used to determine the effect of ribosomal protein S1, SD and initiation codon sequences and Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 on translation in vitro by E. coli and B. subtilis ribosomes. Translation of these nine constructions was determined with three types of ribosomes: E. coli containing ribosomal protein S1, E. coli depleted of S1, and B. subtilis which is naturally free of S1. E. coli ribosomes were able to translate all nine transcripts with variable efficiencies. B. subtilis and S1-depleted E. coli ribosomes were similar to each other and differed from non-depleted E. coli ribosomes in that they required strong or stronger SD sequences and were unable to translate any of the weak transcripts. Addition of S1 from either E. coli or Micrococcus luteus, a Gram-positive bacterium, enabled S1-depleted E. coli ribosomes to translate mRNAs with weak SD sequences but had no effect on B. subtilis ribosomes. AUG was the preferred initiation codon for all ribosome types; however, B. subtilis ribosomes showed greater tolerance for the non-AUG codons than either type of E. coli ribosome. The presence of a strong or stronger SD sequence increased the efficiency by which E. coli ribosomes could utilize non-AUG codons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spatial organization of template polynucleotides on the ribosome determined by fluorescence methods

The spatial organization of template polynucleotides on the ribosome and the dynamics of their interaction with 30 S subunits have been studied by fluorescence spectroscopy. The topography of the mRNA in the ribosome has been determined using singlet-singlet energy transfer. This method has allowed us to estimate distances between donors and acceptors of energy which have been linked to the terminal residues of template polynucleotides (poly- and oligo(U) and oligo(A] and 16 S RNA or to SH-groups of ribosomal proteins S1 and S8. The dynamics of mRNA-ribosome interaction have been investigated by the fluorescence stopped-flow technique. It has been shown that the binding to the 30 S subunit of poly(U) with length much shorter (16 nucleotides) than that covered by the ribosome is greatly enhanced by protein S1. However, the final position of oligo(U)16 on the 30 S subunit, which probably includes the ribosomal decoding site, proves to be quite different from that occupied by oligo(U)16 on a free protein S1. Interaction of oligo- and poly(U) with the 30 S subunit occurs in at least two steps: the first one is as fast as the interaction of poly(U) with free S1, whereas the second step represents a first-order reaction. Therefore, the second step may reflect some rearrangement of the template in the ribosome after its primary binding. It is suggested that protein S1 in some cases may fulfill the role of a transient binding site for mRNA in the course of its interaction with the ribosome. The general shape of the template in the mRNA binding region of the ribosome has been studied using various synthetic ribopolynucleotides and has been shown to be similar. It can be represented by a loop(s) or "U-turn(s)". On the basis of estimation of distances from the ends of poly(U) to some well-localized points on the 30 S ribosomal surface, a tentative model of mRNA path through the ribosome is proposed.

Identification of functional regions in the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1 using monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies specific for defined regions of E. coli ribosomal protein S1 were used in a R17 mRNA-directed protein synthesis assay to reveal functionally important sites of the protein. Two distinct sites for mRNA binding were identified in the regions 349-437 and 438-547 located in the C-terminal domain of protein S1.