Mutations that affect the folding of ribose-binding protein selected as suppressors of a defect in export in Escherichia coli

How Quality Control Systems AID Sec-Dependent Protein Translocation

The evolutionarily conserved Sec machinery is responsible for transporting proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane. Protein substrates of the Sec machinery must be in an unfolded conformation in order to be translocated across (or inserted into) the cytoplasmic membrane. In bacteria, the requirement for unfolded proteins is strict: substrate proteins that fold (or misfold) prematurely in the cytoplasm prior to translocation become irreversibly trapped in the cytoplasm. Partially folded Sec substrate proteins and stalled ribosomes containing nascent Sec substrates can also inhibit translocation by blocking (i.e., “jamming”) the membrane-embedded Sec machinery. To avoid these issues, bacteria have evolved a complex network of quality control systems to ensure that Sec substrate proteins do not fold in the cytoplasm. This quality control network can be broken into three branches, for which we have defined the acronym “AID”: (i) avoidance of cytoplasmic intermediates through cotranslationally channeling newly synthesized Sec substrates to the Sec machinery; (ii) inhibition of folding Sec substrate proteins that transiently reside in the cytoplasm by molecular chaperones and the requirement for posttranslational modifications; (iii) destruction of products that could potentially inhibit translocation. In addition, several stress response pathways help to restore protein-folding homeostasis when environmental conditions that inhibit translocation overcome the AID quality control systems.

The way is the goal: how SecA transports proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane in bacteria

In bacteria, translocation of most soluble secreted proteins (and outer membrane proteins in Gram-negative bacteria) across the cytoplasmic membrane by the Sec machinery is mediated by the essential ATPase SecA. At its core, this machinery consists of SecA and the integral membrane proteins SecYEG, which form a protein conducting channel in the membrane. Proteins are recognised by the Sec machinery by virtue of an internally encoded targeting signal, which usually takes the form of an N-terminal signal sequence. In addition, substrate proteins must be maintained in an unfolded conformation in the cytoplasm, prior to translocation, in order to be competent for translocation through SecYEG. Recognition of substrate proteins occurs via SecA—either through direct recognition by SecA or through secondary recognition by a molecular chaperone that delivers proteins to SecA. Substrate proteins are then screened for the presence of a functional signal sequence by SecYEG. Proteins with functional signal sequences are translocated across the membrane in an ATP-dependent fashion. The current research investigating each of these steps is reviewed here.

The Sec System: Protein Export in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, proteins found in the periplasm or the outer membrane are exported from the cytoplasm by the general secretory, Sec, system before they acquire stably folded structure. This dynamic process involves intricate interactions among cytoplasmic and membrane proteins, both peripheral and integral, as well as lipids. In vivo, both ATP hydrolysis and proton motive force are required. Here, we review the Sec system from the inception of the field through early 2016, including biochemical, genetic, and structural data.

Measuring cotranslational folding of nascent polypeptide chains on ribosomes

Protein folding has been studied extensively in vitro, but much less is known about how folding proceeds in vivo. A particular distinction of folding in vivo is that folding begins while the nascent polypeptide chain is still undergoing synthesis by the ribosome. Studies of cotranslational protein folding are inherently much more complex than classical in vitro protein folding studies, and historically there have been few methods available to produce the quantities of pure material required for biophysical studies of the nascent chain, or assays to specifically interrogate its conformation. However, the past few years have produced dramatic methodological advances, which now place cotranslational folding studies within reach of more biochemists, enabling a detailed comparison of the earliest stages of protein folding on the ribosome to the wealth of information available for the refolding of full-length polypeptide chains in vitro.

GroEL/S substrate specificity based on substrate unfolding propensity

Phage P22 wild-type (WT) coat protein does not require GroEL/S to fold but temperature-sensitive-folding (tsf) coat proteins need the chaperone complex for correct folding. WT coat protein and all variants absolutely require P22 scaffolding protein, an assembly chaperone, to assemble into precursor structures termed procapsids. Previously, we showed that a global suppressor (su) substitution, T1661, which rescues several tsf coat protein variants, functioned by inducing GroEL/S. This led to an increased formation of tsf:T1661 coat protein:GroEL complexes compared with the tsf parents. The increased concentration of complexes resulted in more assembly-competent coat proteins because of a shift in the chaperone-driven kinetic partitioning between aggregation-prone intermediates toward correct folding and assembly. We have now investigated the folding and assembly of coat protein variants that carry a different global su substitution, F170L. By monitoring levels of phage production in the presence of a dysfunctional GroEL we found that tsf:F170L proteins demonstrate a less stringent requirement for GroEL. Tsf:F170L proteins also did not cause induction of the chaperones. Circular dichroism and tryptophan fluorescence indicate that the native state of the tsf: F170L coat proteins is restored to WT-like values. In addition, native acrylamide gel electrophoresis shows a stabilized native state for tsf:F170L coat proteins. The F170L su substitution also increases procapsid production compared with their tsf parents. We propose that the F170L su substitution has a decreased requirement for the chaperones GroEL and GroES as a result of restoring the tsf coat proteins to a WT-like state. Our data also suggest that GroEL/S can be induced by increasing the population of unfolding intermediates.

A selection for mutants that interfere with folding of Escherichia coli thioredoxin-1 in vivo

Escherichia coli thioredoxin is normally a cytoplasmic protein involved in the reduction of disulfide bonds. However, thioredoxin can be translocated to the periplasm when it is attached to a cotranslational signal sequence. When exported to the periplasm, it can partially replace the activity of DsbA in promoting the formation of disulfide bonds. In contrast, when thioredoxin is fused to a posttranslational signal sequence, very little of it appears in the periplasm. We propose that this absence of posttranslational export is due to the rapid folding of thioredoxin in the cytoplasm. We sought mutants of thioredoxin that retarded its folding in the cytoplasm, which we accomplished by fusing thioredoxin to a posttranslational signal sequence and selecting for mutants in which thioredoxin was exported to the periplasm, where it could replace DsbA. The collection of mutants obtained represents a limited number of amino acid changes in the protein. In vitro studies on purified mutant proteins show that all but one are defective in the kinetics and thermodynamics of protein folding. We propose that the slower folding of the thioredoxin mutant proteins in the cytoplasm allows their export by a posttranslational pathway. We discuss some implications of this class of mutants for aspects of the folding pathway of thioredoxin and for its mechanism of export. In particular, the finding that a folding mutant that allows protein translocation alters an amino acid at the C terminus of the protein suggests that the degree to which thioredoxin folds during its translation must be severely restricted.

Use of thioredoxin as a reporter to identify a subset of Escherichia coli signal sequences that promote signal recognition particle-dependent translocation

We have previously reported that the DsbA signal sequence promotes efficient, cotranslational translocation of the cytoplasmic protein thioredoxin-1 via the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. However, two commonly used signal sequences, those of PhoA and MalE, which promote export by a posttranslational mechanism, do not export thioredoxin. We proposed that this difference in efficiency of export was due to the rapid folding of thioredoxin in the cytoplasm; cotranslational export by the DsbA signal sequence avoids the problem of cytoplasmic folding (C. F. Schierle, M. Berkmen, D. Huber, C. Kumamoto, D. Boyd, and J. Beckwith, J. Bacteriol. 185:5706-5713, 2003). Here, we use thioredoxin as a reporter to distinguish SRP-dependent from non-SRP-dependent cleavable signal sequences. We screened signal sequences exhibiting a range of hydrophobicity values based on a method that estimates hydrophobicity. Successive iterations of screening and refining the method defined a threshold hydrophobicity required for SRP recognition. While all of the SRP-dependent signal sequences identified were above this threshold, there were also a few signal sequences above the threshold that did not utilize the SRP pathway. These results suggest that a simple measure of the hydrophobicity of a signal sequence is an important but not a sufficient indicator for SRP recognition. In addition, by fusing a number of both classes of signal sequences to DsbA, we found that DsbA utilizes an SRP-dependent signal sequence to achieve efficient export to the periplasm. Our results suggest that those proteins found to be exported by SRP-dependent signal sequences may require this mode of export because of their tendency to fold rapidly in the cytoplasm.

The DsbA signal sequence directs efficient, cotranslational export of passenger proteins to the Escherichia coli periplasm via the signal recognition particle pathway

The Escherichia coli cytoplasmic protein thioredoxin 1 can be efficiently exported to the periplasmic space by the signal sequence of the DsbA protein (DsbAss) but not by the signal sequence of alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) or maltose binding protein (MBP). Using mutations of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway, we found that DsbAss directs thioredoxin 1 to the SRP export pathway. When DsbAss is fused to MBP, MBP also is directed to the SRP pathway. We show directly that the DsbAss-promoted export of MBP is largely cotranslational, in contrast to the mode of MBP export when the native signal sequence is utilized. However, both the export of thioredoxin 1 by DsbAss and the export of DsbA itself are quite sensitive to even the slight inhibition of SecA. These results suggest that SecA may be essential for both the slow posttranslational pathway and the SRP-dependent cotranslational pathway. Finally, probably because of its rapid folding in the cytoplasm, thioredoxin provides, along with gene fusion approaches, a sensitive assay system for signal sequences that utilize the SRP pathway.

Influence of tat mutations on the ribose-binding protein translocation in Escherichia coli

Proteins are exported across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane either as unfolded precursors via the Sec machinery or in folded conformation via the Tat system. The ribose-binding protein (RBP) of Escherichia coli is a Sec-pathway substrate. Intriguingly, it exhibits fast folding kinetics and its export is independent of SecB, a general chaperone protein dedicated for protein secretion. In this study, we found that the quantity of RBP was significantly reduced in the periplasm of tat mutants, which was restored by in trans expression of the tatABC genes. Pulse-chase experiments showed that significant amount of wild-type RBP was processed in a secY mutant in the presence of azide (SecA inhibitor), whereas the processing of a slow folding RBP derivative was almost completely blocked under the same conditions. These results would suggest that under the Sec-defective conditions the export of a portion of folded RBP could be rescued by the Tat system.

The phase property of membrane phospholipids is affected by the functionality of signal peptides from the Escherichia coli ribose-binding protein

We examined the effects of synthetic signal peptides from the wild-type, export-defective mutant and its revertant species of ribose-binding protein on the phase properties of lipid bilayers. The lateral segregation of phosphatidylglycerol (PG) in the lipid bilayer was detected through quenching between NBD-PGs upon the reconstitution of signal peptide into the liposome made with the Escherichia coli inner membrane composition. The tendency of lipid segregation was highly dependent on the export competency of signal peptides in vivo, with a decreasing order of wild-type, revertant, and mutant species. The colocalizations of pyrene-PG with BODIPY-PG were also induced by the signal peptides, confirming the phase separation of the acidic phospholipid. The wild-type and revertant signal peptides predominantly formed alpha-helical conformations with the presence of acidic phospholipid as determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy. In addition, they restricted the motion of lipid acyl chains as monitored by fluorescence anisotropy of DPH, suggesting a deep penetration of signal peptide into the lipid bilayer. However, the alpha-helical content of mutant signal peptide was only about half that of the wild-type or revertant peptide with a significantly smaller degree of penetration into the bilayer. An association of the defective signal peptides into the membrane was affected by salt extraction, whereas the functional ones were not. The aforementioned results indicate that the functionality of signal peptide is accomplished through its topologies in the membrane and also by its ability to induce lateral segregation of acidic phospholipid. We propose that the clustering of acidic phospholipid by the functional signal peptide is responsible for the formation of non-bilayer membrane structure, thereby promoting an efficient translocation of secretory proteins.

Effect of divalent cations on the ATPase activity of Escherichia coli SecA

It was found that Ca(2+) stimulates the intrinsic SecA ATPase activity in the absence as well as in the presence of liposome. On the other hand, Mg(2+), the general cofactor for ATPase, did not affect the intrinsic SecA ATPase but reduced the portion of ATPase activity enhanced by Ca(2+). The enhancement of SecA ATPase activity correlated well with the increase in 8-anilino-1-naphthalene-sulfonic acid binding of SecA, suggesting that increased exposure of hydrophobic residues stimulates the enzyme activity.

Export and folding of signal-sequenceless Bacillus licheniformis beta-lactamase in Escherichia coli

Two genetically engineered variants of the Bacillus licheniformis beta-lactamase gene were expressed in Escherichia coli. One variant coded for the exo-small mature enzyme without the signal peptide. The other coded for the exo-large mature enzyme preceded by 10, mostly polar, residues from an incomplete heterologous signal. As observed following the extraction by a lysozyme-EDTA treatment, the signal-less variant was exported to the periplasm with nearly 20% efficiency, whereas the variant with the N-terminal extension was translocated to a lesser degree; interestingly, nearly all of the former and half of the latter were extracted by osmotic shock, which may be of importance for our understanding of cellular compartments. The fact that a signal-less protein is translocated with substantial yields raises questions about the essential role of signal peptides for protein export. As folding and export are related processes, we investigated the folding in vitro of the two variants. No differences were found between them. In the absence of denaturant, they are completely folded, fully active and have a large DeltaG of unfolding. Under partially denaturing conditions they populate several partially folded states. The absence of significant amounts of a non-native state under native conditions makes a thermodynamic partitioning between folding and export less likely. In addition, kinetic measurements indicated that these B. licheniformis lactamases fold much faster than E. coli beta-lactamase. This behavior suggests that they are exported by a kinetically controlled process, mediated by one or more still unidentified interactions that slow folding and allow a folding intermediate to enter the export pathway.

How GroES regulates binding of nonnative protein to GroEL

At present, it is still enigmatic how the reaction cycle by which the Escherichia coli GroE chaperones mediate protein folding in the cell is coordinated with respect to the sequential order of binding and release of GroES, nucleotide, and nonnative protein. It is generally assumed that the asymmetric GroEL.GroES complex is the acceptor state for substrate protein. Nevertheless, this species is poorly understood in its binding characteristics for nucleotide and nonnative protein. We show here that this species has a high affinity binding site for nonnative protein. In addition to this, binding of nucleotide to one GroEL ring is strongly favored by GroES binding to the other ring. However, the slow rate of release of substrate protein from the unproductive trans-position kinetically favors the binding of a second GroES, thereby forming a symmetric GroEL14.(GroES7)2 complex and simultaneously ensuring that substrate protein is sequestered in a position underneath GroES. Our results demonstrate that the intrinsic binding characteristics of the trans-bullet complex determine the sequence of events during the reaction cycle.

Escherichia coli SecB stimulates export without maintaining export competence of ribose-binding protein signal sequence mutants

Ribose-binding protein (RBP) is exported to the periplasm of Escherichia coli via the general export pathway. An rbsB-lacZ gene fusion was constructed and used to select mutants defective in RBP export. The spontaneous Lac+ mutants isolated in this selection contained either single-amino-acid substitutions or a deletion of the RBP signal sequence. Intact rbsB genes containing eight different point mutations in the signal sequence were reconstructed, and the effects of the mutations on RBP export were examined. Most of the mutations caused severe defects in RBP export. In addition, different suppressor mutations in SecY/PrlA protein were analyzed for their effects on the export of RBP signal sequence mutants in the presence or absence of SecB. Several RBP signal sequence mutants were efficiently suppressed, but others were not suppressed. Export of an RBP signal sequence mutant in prlA mutant strains was partially dependent on SecB, which is in contrast to the SecB independence of wild-type RBP export. However, the kinetics of export of an RBP signal sequence mutant point to a rapid loss of pre-RBP export competence, which occurs in strains containing or lacking SecB. These results suggest that SecB does not stabilize the export-competent conformation of RBP and may affect translocation by stabilizing the binding of pre-RBP at the translocation site.

Differential effect of precursor ribose binding protein of Escherichia coli and its signal peptide on the SecA penetration of lipid bilayer

Digestion of vesicle-bound SecA by trypsin entrapped within the vesicles showed that refolding precursor ribose-binding protein (pRBP) of Escherichia coli retards the lipid bilayer penetration by SecA while the signal peptide enhances it. This discrepancy was found to be due to reduced SecA binding to the vesicles in the presence of the pRBP while the signal peptide induced a tight binding. Studies on the binding of 1-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonate (ANS) to SecA indicated that SecA assumes more closed conformation upon interaction with pRBP and signal peptide induces more open structure of SecA. Kinetic studies of ANS binding to SecA upon dilution of unfolded pRBP with SecA solution showed an initial fast ANS binding, which was followed by a slow release of ANS. This suggests that first the signal peptide portion of the pRBP binds with the SecA making its structure more open and then the subsequent binding of the mature domain makes the SecA structure more compact. The pRBP enhanced the digestion of SecA added to the E. coli inverted vesicles, suggesting an inhibition of SecA penetration while the signal peptide had an opposite effect, agreeing with the results from the model systems above. When the pRBP and ATP were present together, however, the penetration of SecA increased dramatically underlining the importance of the SecY/E complex for the membrane insertion of SecA.

Crystallization of the chaperone protein SecB

The secretory protein SecB found in Escherichia coli is a molecular chaperone that binds to precursor forms of a number of proteins targeted for export to the periplasmic space. SecB maintains these proteins in a translocation-competent conformation facilitating the translocation process. The material has been cloned and expressed in E. coli. Crystals have been grown from polyethylene glycol 8000 by vapor diffusion using the hanging drop technique. These crystals are monoclinic, belonging to space group C2 with unit cell dimensions a = 56.0 A, b = 111.1 A, c = 134.7 A, and beta = 104 degrees. The crystals diffract to 8 A resolution on a Rigaku imaging plate detector. Dynamic light scattering experiments suggest that SecB exhibits aggregation behavior with a number of different precipitating agents. These results may explain resistance of SecB to forming ordered crystals.

Synthetic competition between cytoplasmic folding and translocation of a soluble membrane protein domain

In wild-type strains of Escherichia coli, alkaline phosphatase (AP), either when present as a soluble protein or when fused to a membrane protein, is only active after translocation to the periplasm. In thioredoxin reductase (trxB) mutants, however, cytoplasmically localized AP can form disulphide bonds and can reach an active conformation. Once it has folded in the cytoplasm, it can no longer be translocated. On the other hand, when AP is fused to periplasmic domains of a membrane protein, translocation can be more rapid than folding. Thus, expressing hybrids of AP and integral membrane proteins in a trxB mutant generates competition between folding of AP in the cytoplasm and its translocation to the periplasm. The cellular localization of AP can be monitored in phosphoserine phosphatase (serB) mutants causing auxotrophy for L-serine. Cytoplasmically but not periplasmically localized AP can compensate for the lack of SerB, leading to growth on indicator plates. As expected, when AP was fused to cytoplasmic domains of membrane proteins, serB-mediated auxotrophy was abolished. Surprisingly, AP fusions to periplasmic domains exhibited a non-uniform response pattern. Fusions that translocate AP rapidly did not complement the SerB defect, while those that export AP only slowly could do so. The usefulness of these strains for studying a variety of aspects related to membrane protein biogenesis is discussed.

Thermodynamic genetics of the folding of the B1 immunoglobulin-binding domain from streptococcal protein G

A method has been developed to select proteins that are thermodynamically destabilized yet still folded and functional. The DNA encoding the B1 IgG-binding domain from Group G Streptococcus (Strp G) has been fused to gene III of bacteriophage M13. The resulting fusion protein is displayed on the surface of the phage thus enabling the phage to bind to IgG molecules. In addition, these phage exhibit a small plaque phenotype that is reversed by mutations that destabilize the Strp G domain. By selecting phage with large plaque morphology that retain their IgG-binding function, it is possible to identify mutants that are folded but destabilized compared with wild-type Strp G. Such mutants can be divided into three general categories: 1) those that disrupt packing of hydrophobic side chains in the protein interior; 2) those that destabilize secondary structure; and 3) those that alter specific hydrogen bonds involving amino acid side chains. A number of the mutants have been physically characterized by circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance and have been shown to have structures similar to wild-type Strp G but stabilities that were decreased by 2-5 kcal/mol.

Gene fusion analysis of membrane protein topology: a direct comparison of alkaline phosphatase and beta-lactamase fusions

To compare two approaches to analyzing membrane protein topology, a number of alkaline phosphatase fusions to membrane proteins were converted to beta-lactamase fusions. While some alkaline phosphatase fusions near the N terminus of cytoplasmic loops of membrane proteins have anomalously high levels of activity, the equivalent beta-lactamase fusions do not. This disparity may reflect differences in the folding of beta-lactamase and alkaline phosphatase in the cytoplasm.

Ability of MBP or RBP signal peptides to influence folding and in vitro translocation of wild-type and hybrid precursors

Maltose-binding protein (MBP), whose export in E. coli is dependent upon the chaperone SecB, and ribose-binding protein (RBP), whose export is SecB-independent, have been used to generate hybrid secretory proteins. Here, in vitro techniques were used to analyze MBP, RBP, RBP-MBP (RBP signal and MBP mature), and MBP-RBP (MBP signal and RBP mature). In protease-protection experiments, RBP folded considerably faster than MBP, RBP-MBP, or MBP-RBP. Only the folding properties of proteins containing the MBP mature moiety were influenced by SecB. In post-translational translocation assays, MBP exhibited the highest translocation efficiency. The hybrids RBP-MBP and MBP-RBP showed intermediate levels, and RBP translocation was not detected in these assays. These experiments demonstrate the influence of the signal peptide in determining folding properties and translocation efficiency of precursor secretory proteins.

Expression of Escherichia coli SecB in Bacillus subtilis facilitates secretion of the SecB-dependent maltose-binding protein of E. coli

Less than 20% of the Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) synthesized in Bacillus subtilis is exported. However, a portion of the secreted MBP was processed cotranslationally. Coexpression of SecB, a secretion-related chaperone of E. coli, stimulated posttranslational export of MBP in B. subtilis but inhibited its cotranslational processing. Export of a SecB-independent MBP-ribose-binding protein hybrid precursor was not enhanced by SecB. A slowly folding MBP derivative (MBP-Y283D) was more efficiently secreted than wild-type MBP, suggesting that the antifolding activity of SecB promotes posttranslational secretion of MBP in B. subtilis.

D-ribose stabilizes precursor and mature ribose-binding proteins of Escherichia coli

Heat- and guanidine hydrochloride-induced unfolding and refolding of precursor as well as mature ribose-binding proteins of Escherichia coli were studied in the presence of D-ribose using intrinsic tyrosine fluorescence and circular dichroism. The precursor and mature proteins have shown virtually identical unfolding-folding behavior. It was observed that D-ribose refolds partially unfolded precursor and mature ribose binding proteins into native structure and decreases the unfolding rate of the these proteins. The conformational stabilities of these proteins were found to increase with increasing D-ribose concentration.

Protein export in Escherichia coli

The export of protein from Escherichia coli has been studied by genetic, biochemical and biophysical techniques. These studies have defined a number of steps in the export pathway and have identified the cellular components required for the translocation process. New information is presented on the function of some of these components.

Ribose and glucose-galactose receptors. Competitors in bacterial chemotaxis

The periplasmic ribose and glucose-galactose receptors (binding proteins) of Gram-negative bacteria compete for a common inner membrane receptor in bacterial chemotaxis, as well as being the essential primary receptors for their respective membrane transport systems. The high-resolution structures of the periplasmic receptors for ribose (from Escherichia coli) and glucose or galactose (from both Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli) are compared here to outline some features that may be important in their dual functions. The overall structure of each protein consists of two similar domains, both of which are made up of two non-contiguous segments of amino acid chain. Each domain is composed of a core of beta-sheet flanked on both sides with alpha-helices. The two domains are related to each other by an almost perfect intramolecular axis of symmetry. The ribose receptor is smaller as a result of a number of deletions in its sequence relative to the glucose-galactose receptor, mostly occurring in the loop regions; as a result, this protein is also more symmetrical. Many structural features, including some hydrophobic core interactions, a buried aspartate residue and several unusual turns, are conserved between the two proteins. The binding sites for ligand are in similar locations, and built along similar principles, although none of the specific interactions with the sugars is conserved. A comparison shows further that slightly different rotations relate the domains to each other in the three proteins, with the ribose receptor being the most closed, and the Salmonella glucose-galactose receptor the most open. The primary axis of relative rotation is almost perpendicular to that which describes the intramolecular symmetry in each case. These relative rotations of the domains are accompanied by the sliding of some helices as the structures adjust themselves to relieve strain. The hinges which are responsible for most of these relative domain rotations are very similar in the three proteins, consisting of a symmetrical arrangement of beta-strands and alpha-helices and two conserved water molecules that are critical to the hydrogen bonding in the important interdomain region. A region of high sequence and structural similarity between the ribose and glucose-galactose receptors is also located around the intramolecular symmetry axis, on the opposite side of the proteins from the hinge region. This region is that which is altered most by the relative rotations, and is the location of most of the known mutations which affect chemotaxis and transport in the ribose receptor.

Involvement of SecB, a chaperone, in the export of ribose-binding protein

Ribose-binding protein (RBP) is an exported protein of Escherichia coli that functions in the periplasm. The export of RBP involves the secretion machinery of the cell, consisting of a cytoplasmic protein, SecA, and the integral membrane translocation complex, including SecE and SecY. SecB protein, a chaperone known to mediate the export of some periplasmic and outer membrane proteins, was previously reported not to be involved in RBP translocation even though small amounts of in vitro complexes between SecB and RBP have been detected. In our investigation, it was shown that a dependence on SecB could be demonstrated under conditions in which export was compromised. Species of RBP which carry two mutations, one in the leader that blocks export and a second in the mature protein which partially suppresses the export defect, were shown to be affected by SecB for efficient translocation. Five different changes which suppress the effect of the signal sequence mutation -17LP are all located in the N domain of the tertiary structure of RBP. All species of RBP show similar interaction with SecB. Furthermore, a leaky mutation, -14AE, generated by site-specific mutagenesis causes reduced export in the absence of SecB. These results indicate that SecB can interact with RBP during secretion, although it is not absolutely required under normal circumstances.

1.7 A X-ray structure of the periplasmic ribose receptor from Escherichia coli

The X-ray structure of the periplasmic ribose receptor (binding protein) of Escherichia coli (RBP) was solved at 3 A resolution by the method of multiple isomorphous replacement. Alternating cycles of refitting and refinement have resulted in a model structure with an R-factor of 18.7% for 27,526 reflections from 7.5 to 1.7 A resolution (96% of the data). The model contains 2228 non-hydrogen atoms, including all 271 residues of the amino acid sequence, 220 solvent atoms and beta-D-ribose. The protein consists of two highly similar structural domains, each of which is composed of a core of parallel beta-sheet flanked on both sides by alpha-helices. The two domains are related to each other by an almost perfect 2-fold axis of rotation, with the C termini of the beta-strands of each sheet pointing toward the center of the molecule. Three short stretches of amino acid chain (from symmetrically related portions of the protein) link these two domains, and presumably act as a hinge to allow relative movement of the domains in functionally important conformational changes. Two water molecules are also an intrinsic part of the hinge, allowing crucial flexibility in the structure. The ligand beta-D-ribose (in the pyranose form) is bound between the domains, held by interactions with side-chains of the interior loops. The binding site is precisely tailored, with a combination of hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic and steric effects giving rise to tight binding (0.1 microM for ribose) and high specificity. Four out of seven binding-site residues are charged (2 each of aspartate and arginine) and contribute two hydrogen bonds each. The remaining hydrogen bonds are contributed by asparagine and glutamine residues. Three phenylalanine residues supply the hydrophobic component, packing against both faces of the sugar molecule. The arrangement of these hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic residues results in an enclosed binding site with the exact shape of the allowed sugar molecules; in the process of binding, the ligand loses all of its surface-accessible area. The sites of two mutations that affect the rate of folding of the ribose receptor are shown to be located near small cavities in the wild-type protein. The cavities thus allow the incorporation of the larger residues in the mutant proteins. Since these alterations would seriously affect the ability of the protein to build the first portion of the hydrophobic core in the first domain, it is proposed that this process is the rate-limiting step in folding of the ribose receptor.

Biogenesis of outer membrane protein PhoE of Escherichia coli. Evidence for multiple SecB-binding sites in the mature portion of the PhoE protein

Efficient in vivo translocation of the precursor of Escherichia coli outer membrane protein PhoE across the inner membrane is shown to depend on SecB protein. A set of mutants, carrying internal deletions in the phoE gene, was used to locate a possible SecB-binding site and/or a site that makes the protein dependent on SecB for export. Except for two small mutant PhoE proteins, the in vivo and in vitro translocation of all mutant proteins was more efficient in the presence of SecB. The interaction of SecB protein with wild-type and mutant PhoE proteins, synthesized in vitro, was further studied in co-immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-SecB protein serum. The efficiencies of co-immunoprecipitation of precursor and mature PhoE were very similar, indicating the absence of a SecB-binding site in the signal sequence. Moreover, all mutant proteins with deletions in the mature moiety of the PhoE protein were co-immunoprecipitated in these assays, albeit mostly with reduced efficiency. Taken together, these results indicate the existence of multiple SecB-binding sites in the mature portion of the PhoE protein.