A late post-vasectomy syndrome

Vasectomy reversal for post-vasectomy pain syndrome

Post-vasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) is a rare, but devastating outcome following vasectomy. Given the widespread utilization of vasectomy for permanent contraception, with more than 500,000 procedures performed annually in the United States, it can be a significant challenge for both patients and providers. Vasectomy reversal is a surgical option for men who fail conservative or medical management. Despite improvements in technique, vasectomy carries some inherent risks making pre-procedure counseling regarding the risks of PVPS paramount. Chronic post-operative pain, or PVPS, occurs in 1-2% of men undergoing the procedure. This review will examine the utility of vasectomy reversal as a means of addressing PVPS.

A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of epididymectomy and vasectomy reversal (VR) in patients with postvasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) who required surgical treatment.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with PVPS who underwent epididymectomy or VR between January 2000 and January 2010 were included retrospectively. Of these, 36 (72.0%) patients completed the study questionnaire. These 36 patients completed the questionnaire either during attendance at the outpatient clinic or during a telephone interview. Twenty patients (22 cases) underwent epididymectomy, and sixteen patients (17 cases) underwent VR. Analyses were performed for (1) preoperative clinical findings, (2) preoperative and postoperative visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) scores, (3) patency and pregnancy rate in VR group, and (4) patient satisfaction with surgical treatment.

RESULTS

The mean age was 48.28 ± 11.27 years, and the mean period of follow-up was 3.58 years (0.15-10.03). The mean VAPS score was 6.78 ± 0.93 preoperatively and 1.13 ± 0.72 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The difference in the mean preoperative and postoperative VAPS scores was 6.00 ± 1.34 (3-8) in the epididymectomy group and 5.50 ± 1.03 (4-8) in the VR group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.227). No significant difference in satisfaction with surgical outcome was observed between the epididymectomy and the VR groups (p = 0.124).

CONCLUSIONS

In PVPS patients requiring surgical treatment, no significant difference was observed between the epididymectomy and VR groups in either the reduction in pain or the degree of patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Selection of the optimal surgical procedure may be dependent on specific patient characteristics.

Orchialgia and the chronic pelvic pain syndrome

This review paper highlights the important health issue of orchialgia and the chronic pelvic pain syndrome. There are a number of specific and non-specific etiologies and different treatment options based on the sub-categorization of orchialgia. The focus of this article is on the specific etiologies of chronic orchialgia as well as non-specific scrotal pain, and the diagnostic evaluation and optimal management of these men. The clinician must be cautious about assuming that orchialgia is constitutive in the chronic pelvic pain syndrome, and must be diligent in ruling out specific etiologies for scrotal pain prior to managing orchialgia as a non-specific chronic pain syndrome.

Critical urologic skills and procedures in the emergency department

The evaluation and management of genitourinary emergencies is a fundamental component of the training and practice of emergency physicians. Urologic procedures are common in the emergency room. Emergency physicians play a vital role in the initial evaluation and treatment because delays in management can lead to permanent damage. This article discusses the most common urologic procedures in which emergency physicians must be proficient for rapid intervention to preserve function and avoid complications. An overview of each procedure is discussed as well as indications, contraindications, equipment, technique, and potential complications.

Efficacy of vasectomy reversal according to patency for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome

This study was conducted to assess outcomes (according to patency) of vasectomy reversal (VR) in qualified patients with postvasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS). A total of 32 patients with PVPS undergoing VR between January 2000 and May 2010 were examined retrospectively. Of these, 68.8% (22/32) completed a study questionnaire, either onsite at the outpatient clinic or via telephone interview. Preoperative clinical findings, preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, patency and pregnancy rate and overall patient satisfaction were analyzed. For the latter, a four-point rating of (1) cure, (2) improvement, (3) no change or (4) recurrence was used. The mean age was 45.09±4.42 years and the mean period of follow-up was 3.22 years (0.74-7.41). Patency rates were 68.2% (15/22) and pregnancy rates were 36.4% (8/22). The mean VAS was 6.64±1.00 preoperatively and 1.14±0.71 postoperatively (P<0.001). The difference in the mean preoperative and postoperative VAS was 6.00±1.25 (4-8) in the patency group and 4.43±0.98 (3-6) in the no patency group (P=0.011). A significant difference in procedural satisfaction with surgical outcome was observed between patency and no patency groups (P=0.014). In conclusion, in PVPS patients requiring VR, a significant difference was observed between the patency and no patency groups in terms of pain reduction and the degree of patient procedural satisfaction.

Associations of ultrasonographic features with scrotal pain after vasectomy

PURPOSE

Scrotal discomfort is a recognized complication of vasectomy, but the natural history and incidence of this problem are uncertain. The typical ultrasonographic changes after a vasectomy primarily include epididymal thickening and epididymal tubular ectasia with diminished blood flow in the epididymis. We prospectively studied the differences in the ultrasonographic features of the testis and epididymis between patients with and those without scrotal discomfort after vasectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively assessed pain scores in 178 men who underwent outpatient bilateral no-scalpel vasectomy at our institution between January 2009 and December 2010. At 2 months after vasectomy, we evaluated the postoperative scrotal pain questionnaire and scrotal ultrasonographic features for patients who returned for semen analysis. On the basis of the scrotal information, we investigated the potential relationships between scrotal pain or discomfort and scrotal ultrasonographic features of both testes and epididymides.

RESULTS

The average age of the 114 men was 36.3 years (range, 29 to 53 years). group 1 (n=23), which reported scrotal pain or discomfort, showed no significant mean differences in the maximal diameter of the head of the epididymis when compared with group 2 (n=91), who had no scrotal pain or discomfort. Also, the width of the body of the epididymis between the two groups showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in ultrasonographic features according to the presence of chronic scrotal discomfort after vasectomy. Therefore, causes of scrotal pain other than obstruction may need to be considered after vasectomy.

Tubular ectasia of the epididymis: a sign of postvasectomy status

PURPOSE

To find out if "tubular ectasia of the epididymis" is suggestive of postvasectomy status.

METHODS

Tubular ectasia of the epididymis is defined as enlargement of the epididymis with multiple interfaces (i.e., a speckled appearance). We found 24 cases exhibiting tubular ectasia of the epididymis over a period of six years. We reviewed the sonographic findings of tubular ectasia of the epididymis and evaluated the prevalence of associated findings.

RESULTS

In 24 patients with tubular ectasia of the epididymis, 16 cases were bilateral, five were right-sided, and three were left-sided. Twenty-one patients had history of vasectomy, of the three remaining cases, 1 had history of inguinal hernia repair, one had prostatitis, and one had undetermined etiology. Associated abnormalities included dilated vas deferens (n = 4), tubular ectasia of the testis (n = 2), large spermatoceles (n = 6), hydrocele (n = 3), and varicocele (n = 4). In 2 cases, spermatic granulomas were suspected.

CONCLUSION

Tubular ectasia of the epididymis is suggestive of postvasectomy epididymis. This sonographic feature is helpful in evaluating a patient with scrotal discomfort. However, this sign can also be associated with other causes of vas obstruction.

Vasectomy-related changes on sonographic examination of the scrotum

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the sonographic changes in the epididymis and testis after vasectomy using state-of-the-art high-resolution equipment.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 30 patients with a history of vasectomy and 30 patients without who were referred for scrotal sonography for various indications over a 1-year period. After excluding findings related to acute pathology, sonographic findings for the epididymis and testis in the 2 groups were tabulated and compared.

RESULTS

The following findings had a statistically higher incidence in the vasectomy group than in the controls: thickened epididymides (53% versus 17%, p < 0.05); epididymal tubular ectasia (43% versus 7%, p < 0.001); and both of the previous 2 findings simultaneously (37% versus 7%, p < 0.01). Sperm granulomas were found in 3 patients in the vasectomy group, and none was seen in the control group. Other findings (eg, epididymal cysts) showed no statistical difference in incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significantly higher incidence of thickened epididymides, epididymal tubular ectasia, a combination of both these findings, and sperm granuloma in the vasectomy group than in the controls. These findings are most likely attributable to postvasectomy obstructive changes and increased intraluminal pressure in the efferent ducts, epididymis, and vas deferens.

Chronic testicular pain: an overview

Chronic testicular pain (orchialgia, orchidynia or chronic scrotal pain) is common and well recognized but its pathophysiology is poorly understood. Currently treatment is largely empirical. This article aims to present an overview of its prevalence, possible aetiology and the available treatment options. The contribution of psychological factors is unclear, although some of these patients undoubtedly are depressed. Post vasectomy chronic testicular pain may be due to functional obstruction of the vas, or to spermatic granuloma. The surgical technique used may be relevant and the application of intraoperative local anaesthetic may have a role in reducing the risk. The importance of the sympathetic nervous system and the role of a possible alteration of the adrenergic receptors of the vas deferens in patients with chronic testicular pain are discussed. For patients failing to respond to conservative treatment, microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord, epididymectomy and vasovasostomy have all shown a degree of relief. Unfortunately a small number of patients fail to respond to both conservative and more invasive treatment methods and for them the only available therapeutic option is inguinal orchiectomy.

Early and late morbidity after vasectomy: a comparison of chronic scrotal pain at 1 and 10 years

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and timing of the onset of chronic scrotal pain after vasectomy in two populations at 1 and 10 years after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective questionnaire-based study two groups of men were compared; 460 who had a vasectomy in 1991-92 (group A) and another 460 who had a vasectomy in 2000-1 (group B; 10 and 1 year after surgery, respectively). Data were collected on immediate complications, and the incidence and nature of chronic scrotal pain. Pain severity was graded using a visual analogue score (VAS). Patients were also asked if they regretted having a vasectomy because of pain.

RESULTS

In all, 182 and 220 replies were received from patients in group A and B, respectively. Early complications included haematoma in five (2%) and two (0.9%) patients, respectively, and wound infection in 24 (13%) and 17 (7.7%). Eight patients who had scrotal pain even before vasectomy were excluded from the analysis (two in group A and six in group B). In group A, 25 of 180 (13.8%) had a new onset of scrotal pain of some nature, with eight (4.3%) having a VAS of > 5; one patient had an epididymectomy for this. Three of the 25 regretted having a vasectomy because of pain. In group B, 36 of 214 (16.8%) reported persistent scrotal pain, with 13 (5.9%) having a VAS of > 5. Six of the 36 regretted having a vasectomy because of the pain. The incidence of scrotal pain was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.48, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSION

Chronic scrotal pain after vasectomy is more common than previously described, affecting almost one in seven patients. All patients undergoing vasectomy must receive appropriate preoperative counselling about this. The incidence of this complication does not appear to increase with time.

From the archives of the AFIP: extratesticular scrotal masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation

The extratesticular scrotal contents consist of the epididymis, spermatic cord, and fascia derived from the embryologic descent of the testis through the abdominal wall. As opposed to intratesticular masses, most extratesticular masses are benign. Cystic masses (including hydroceles, epididymal cysts, and varicoceles) are easily diagnosed with ultrasonography (US) and are benign. Epididymitis is a common extratesticular lesion as well as the most frequent cause of an acute scrotum. It may be either acute or chronic and can be potentially complicated by epididymo-orchitis or scrotal abscess. Findings include epididymal enlargement, skin thickening, hydroceles, and hyperemia. The epididymis can also be affected by sarcoidosis, a noninfectious granulomatous disorder. The most common extratesticular neoplasms are lipomas (most often arising from the spermatic cord) and adenomatoid tumors (most often found in the epididymis). Despite their relative rarity, malignant neoplasms do occur and include rhabdomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, mesothelioma, and lymphoma. These tumors are often large at the time of presentation. The US findings of solid masses are often nonspecific. Magnetic resonance imaging can be very helpful in the evaluation of some of these disorders, allowing for a more specific diagnosis in cases of lipoma, fibrous pseudotumor, and polyorchidism.

Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy

OBJECTIVE

To recommend further research on vasectomy based on a systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of vasectomy.

DESIGN

A systematic MEDLINE review of the literature on the safety and effectiveness of vasectomy between 1964 and 1998.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Early failure rates are <1%; however, effectiveness and complications vary with experience of surgeons and surgical technique. Early complications, including hematoma, infection, sperm granulomas, epididymitis-orchitis, and congestive epididymitis, occur in 1%-6% of men undergoing vasectomy. Incidence of epididymal pain is poorly documented. Animal and human data indicate that vasectomy does not increase atherosclerosis and that increases in circulating immune complexes after vasectomy are transient in men with vasectomies. The weight of the evidence regarding prostate and testicular cancer suggests that men with vasectomy are not at increased risk of these cancers.

CONCLUSION(S)

Publications to date continue to support the conclusion that vasectomy is a highly effective form of contraception. Future studies should include evaluations of the long-term effectiveness of vasectomy, evaluating criteria for postvasectomy discontinuation of alternative contraception for use in settings where semen analysis is not practical, and characterizing complications including chronic epididymal pain syndrome.

Sterilization and its consequences

The purpose of this review is to analyze critically the two techniques of sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation [BTL] and vasectomy) so that a physician may provide informed consent about methods of sterilization. A MEDLINE search and extensive review of published literature dating back to 1966 was undertaken to compare preoperative counseling, operative procedures, postoperative complications, procedure-related costs, psychosocial consequences, and feasibility of reversal between BTL and a vasectomy. Compared with a vasectomy, BTL is 20 times more likely to have major complications, 10 to 37 times more likely to fail, and cost three times as much. Moreover, the procedure-related mortality, although rare, is 12 times higher with sterilization of the woman than of the man. Despite these advantages, 300,000 more BTLs were done in 1987 than vasectomies. In 1987, there were 976,000 sterilizations (65 percent BTLs and 35 percent vasectomies) with an overall cost of $1.8 billion. Over $260 million could have been saved if equal numbers of vasectomies and BTLs had been performed, or more than $800 million if 80 percent had been vasectomies, as was the case in 1971. The safest, most efficacious, and least expensive method of sterilization is vasectomy. For these reasons, physicians should recommend vasectomy when providing counseling on sterilization, despite the popularity of BTL.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader will be able to predict the failure rates and likelihood of successful reversal of tubal ligation and vasectomy; to recall the difference in cost between the two sterilization procedures, and to describe the short-term and long-term complications associated with each of the two methods of sterilization.

Epididymectomy in the management of intrascrotal disease: a critical reappraisal

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome of epididymectomy as a method of treating epididymal pathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients who underwent epididymectomy between 1990 and 1995 were analysed retrospectively; their clinical records were reviewed and their satisfaction with the outcome and relief of symptoms assessed using a questionnaire and/or telephone interview.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with pain were subdivided into three categories depending on the indication for epididymectomy, i.e. post-vasectomy epididymal engorgement (eight patients), complex cystic disease (11) or 'chronic epididymitis' (10). The outcome was satisfactory in 27 of the 29 patients. The best results were obtained in the group who underwent epididymectomy after vasectomy, where seven of eight improved after the procedure. Those with chronic epididymitis had the least favourable outcome, with only seven reporting any improvement in symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Epididymectomy has a valuable role in the management of epididymal pathology in appropriately selected patients.

Cell recruitment to the sperm granuloma which follows vasectomy in the rat

Sperm granulomas are chronic inflammatory lesions at sites of extravasation of spermatozoa from the reproductive tract. Using light and transmission electron microscopy, monocytes were identified in the wall of the early granuloma of the vasectomized rat. Some young macrophages contained sperm fragments and scanning electron microscopy showed them to wrap around, and partially engulf, spermatozoa. T-lymphocytes predominated over B-lymphocytes in the granuloma wall, helper cells being more numerous than suppressor/cytotoxic cells. The percentage of lymphocytes of all classes among the cells of the granuloma wall was higher at 3 months than at 3 weeks and 6 months after vasectomy, reflecting the high immunological activity known to occur at this interval after vasectomy in the rat.

Vasectomy review: sequelae in the human epididymis and ductus deferens

Following vasectomy, spermatogenesis continues, the human epididymis and ductus deferens may distend and leak, and the extravasated spermatozoa stimulate formation of a sperm granuloma. Granulomas may occur at 60% of vasectomy sites and are usually asymptomatic and relieve intraluminal pressure. About 3-5% of patients experience pain. Intraluminal phagocytosis may explain why some reproductive tracts become depleted of spermatozoa. Distension of the epididymis is common after vasectomy and may lead to granuloma formation there. Up to 6% of patients have symptoms, but many with epididymal changes have no discomfort. Most episodes of painful epididymitis and granulomas resolve with conservative treatment, but < 1% require vasectomy reversal or, if this is ineffective, excision of the epididymis and obstructed ductus deferens.

Extratesticular lesions: a radiological and pathological correlation

It is often difficult to make an exact pathological diagnosis of extratesticular lesions detected on ultrasound. This study aimed to clarify the sonographic criteria required for a more accurate diagnosis by performing a correlative study of the ultrasonographic findings and pathologic diagnosis. Of the 268 scrotal ultrasound examinations with extratesticular lesions reviewed, 81 had the diagnosis confirmed on pathological or clinical grounds. The major pathological entities reviewed in the study were epididymitis, hydrocele, cystic lesions of the epididymis, post-vasectomy lesions and solid extratesticular lesions. The sonographic appearances in both acute and chronic epididymitis were reviewed. Clinical epididymitis had a typical clinical presentation and distribution confined to the epididymal tail and ductus deferens. This should allow a specific diagnosis to be made. Cystic lesions of the epididymis included true epididymal cysts and spermatoceles, but these entities were not distinguishable from each other sonographically. Late complications of vasectomy have been recognized clinically as the 'Late Post-Vasectomy Syndrome', and the pathological changes have also been described. In this study the corresponding sonographic appearances of sperm granulomata, dilated efferent ducts and spermatoceles are documented. Most solid extratesticular lesions are areas of fibrosis termed 'fibrous pseudotumours', but adenomatoid tumours and papillary cystadenomata are the most common neoplastic lesions. By obtaining pathological correlations for many sonographic extratesticular abnormalities, we have clarified a number of issues and made several new observations.

Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal

Vasectomy remains the safest method of birth control and there is much to commend it in the setting of a stable family relationship. However, some aspects of this operation have been wrongly presented in an attempt to widen its popularity and increase public acceptance. A simple procedure it may be but it is not totally free of complications; sometimes the operation has to be repeated and rarely it may reverse spontaneously even after the most stringent precautions. The family planning officer who counsels a prospective candidate and the surgeon who undertakes the procedure must ensure that these facts are understood by the patient with crystal clarity and that this fact is duly recorded on a signed and witnessed permission slip. Any organization which includes vasectomy in its programme of family planning should include advice and referral for vasectomy reversal in exactly the same way that the pill may be stopped or a coil can be removed. Fertility can be successfully restored by vasovasostomy in 50% of men who wish to have their vasectomies reversed, which often is due to a change in circumstances beyond their direct control.

Testicular denervation. A new surgical procedure for intractable testicular pain

Chronic testicular pain has many different aetiologies. Identification and treatment of an underlying problem resolve the issue in most cases. However, a proportion of patients with chronic testicular pain have no demonstrable aetiological factor and pose a difficult treatment problem. All of these patients are initially treated by non-surgical measures. Various operations advocated in the literature for non-responders include epididymectomy, scrotal orchiectomy and inguinal orchiectomy, all of which have a significant failure rate. We describe a hitherto unreported operative procedure in a series of 4 patients, with immediate and lasting relief of their pain.

Chronic testicular pain following vasectomy

The incidence of chronic testicular pain following vasectomy has not been previously assessed. We have carried out a survey by postal questionnaire and telephone interview of 172 patients 4 years after vasectomy to assess the incidence of chronic testicular pain. Significant early post-operative complications occurred in 6 patients (3.5%): 2 infection, 3 haematoma and 1 orchitis. Chronic testicular discomfort was present in 56 patients (33%), considered by 26 (15%) to be troublesome but not by the other 30 (17%). Testicular discomfort related to sexual intercourse occurred in 9 cases (5%). Of the 9 patients who had sought further medical help only 2 had had further surgery (1 an epididymectomy and 1 excision of a hydrocele). Only 3 patients regretted having had the vasectomy because of chronic pain. On ultrasound examination, epididymal cysts were a common finding on both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients following vasectomy. Prior to vasectomy, all patients should be counselled with regard to the risk of chronic testicular pain.

Epididymectomy for post-vasectomy pain: histological review

Fifteen epididymectomies were performed on 10 patients with post-vasectomy pain and 12 specimens were available for histopathological review. The findings were compared with those in 2 groups in which epididymectomy was performed for chronic epididymo-orchitis and epididymal cysts. The results showed that 50% of the post-vasectomy group were cured by simple epididymectomy. Pathological findings revealed features of long-standing obstruction and interstitial and perineural fibrosis which may have accounted for the pain. It is important to recognise this late complication of vasectomy and, if surgery is to be performed, to include all of the distal vas and previous vasectomy site in the excision.