Discrimination between acute rejection and adenoviral enteritis in intestinal transplant recipients

The role of endoscopy in the small intestinal transplant recipient: A review

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is the treatment of choice for patients with intestinal failure who have developed life-threatening complications related to long-term parenteral nutrition. Patients may also undergo ITx as part of a combined liver-intestine or multivisceral transplant for a variety of indications, most commonly intestinal failure-associated liver disease or porto-mesenteric thrombosis. Endoscopy plays a critical role in the posttransplant management of these patients, most commonly in the diagnosis and management of rejection, which occurs in up to 30-40% of patients within the first-year posttransplant. With a lack of noninvasive biomarkers to identify the presence of rejection, endoscopy and biopsy remain the gold standard for its diagnosis. Endoscopic evaluation of the graft is also important in the identification of other complications post-ITx, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft-versus-host disease, and enteric infections. Each patient's posttransplant anatomy may be slightly different, making endoscopy sometimes technically challenging and necessitating clear and frequent communication with the surgical team in order to help identify the highest yield approach. Herein, we review the most common pathologies found endoscopically in the post-ITx patient and describe some of the unique challenges the endoscopist faces when evaluating these complex patients.

The Adenovirus Death Protein - a small membrane protein controls cell lysis and disease

Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) cause widespread acute and persistent infections. Infections are usually mild and controlled by humoral and cell-based immunity. Reactivation of persistently infected immune cells can lead to a life-threatening disease in immunocompromised individuals, especially children and transplant recipients. To date, no effective therapy or vaccine against HAdV disease is available to the public. HAdV-C2 and C5 are the best-studied of more than 100 HAdV types. They persist in infected cells and release their progeny by host cell lysis to neighbouring cells and fluids, a process facilitated by the adenovirus death protein (ADP). ADP consists of about 100 amino acids and harbours a single membrane-spanning domain. It undergoes post-translational processing in endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi compartments, before localizing to the inner nuclear membrane. Here, we discuss the current knowledge on how ADP induces membrane rupture. Membrane rupture is essential for both progression of disease and efficacy of therapeutic viruses in clinical applications, in particular oncolytic therapy.

Brincidofovir as Salvage Therapy for Adenovirus Disease in Intestinal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Adenoviruses are double-stranded DNA viruses that typically cause mild self-limiting respiratory, ocular, and gastrointestinal infections. In immunocompromised patients, especially transplant recipients, the infection can be severe, with dissemination and multiorgan failure. In intestinal transplant recipients, the incidence is as high as 57%. To our knowledge, no standardized guidelines or U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medications exist for the treatment of adenovirus disease.

AIMS

We describe two isolated intestinal transplant recipients who developed adenovirus disease (viremia with viral enteritis) that was managed with a new experimental drug, brincidofovir (an oral lipid conjugate prodrug of cidofovir), as salvage therapy.

RESULTS

The first patient was a 44-year-old woman who developed adenoviral enteritis 1 month after transplantation, which resolved with ribavirin therapy. Two weeks later, the infection recurred, and brincidofovir was initiated. While receiving this therapy for 3 months, she developed severe acute rejection, which was managed with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by infliximab. Eventually, complete resolution of the rejection and adenoviral enteritis was achieved. At 12 months posttransplantation, the patient was healthy and tolerating enteral feeding. The second patient was a 28-year-old man who had undergone isolated intestinal transplantation 6 years before he presented with generalized weakness and an increased ostomy output; he was diagnosed with adenoviral enteritis. Maintenance immunosuppression was reduced, and brincidofovir was started. The infection resolved with a month of therapy. Six months after the infection, he was healthy and tolerating enteral feeding.

CONCLUSION

This is the first publication, to our knowledge, to describe two cases in which brincidofovir was used to successfully treat adenovirus infection in intestinal transplant recipients. Thus, these cases demonstrate that brincidofovir appears to be a safe and effective option in the management of adenoviral enteritis in these patients.

Mucosal Biopsy After Bone Marrow Transplantation

Gastrointestinal mucosal biopsies in the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation setting are challenging because histologic features of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which is treated by increasing immunosuppression, overlap with those of other conditions, such as infection, which can get worse with GVHD treatment. More than one condition can occur at the same time. It is important to understand the histologic features of GVHD, drug toxicity, infection, and clinical factors surrounding patients, including timing of biopsy in relation to transplantation, medication history, and laboratory data. Rendering a correct diagnosis and generating a pathology report with standard language that can direct clinical management ensure proper management.

5-gene differential expression predicts stability of human intestinal allografts

In intestinal allografts, endoscopy and histology detect the injury once changes in the bowel wall architecture have occurred. We aimed to identify a molecular signature that could predict early deterioration, within histologically indistinguishable biopsies with "minimal changes" (MC) pathology. Sixty biopsies from 12 adult recipients were longitudinally taken during 8years post-transplant. They were classified as either stable (STA) or non-stable (NSTA) according to the prospectively recorded number, frequency and severity of rejection events of the allograft. In a discovery set of MC samples analyzed by RNA-Seq, 816 genes were differentially expressed in STA vs NSTA biopsies. A group of 5 genes (ADH1C, SLC39A4, CYP4F2, OPTN and PDZK1) correctly classified all NSTA biopsies in the discovery set and all STA biopsies from an independent set. These results were validated by qPCR in a new group of MC biopsies. Based on a logistic regression model, a cutoff of 0.28 predicted the probability of being a NSTA biopsy with 85% sensitivity and 69% specificity. In conclusion, by analyzing MC samples early after transplantation, the expression of a 5-gene set may predict the evolution of the bowel allograft. This prognostic biomarker may be of help to personalize care of the intestinal transplant recipient.

Pediatric intestinal transplantation

The field of intestinal transplantation has experienced dramatic growth since the first reported cases 3 decades ago. Improvements in operative technique, donor assessment and immunosuppressive protocols have afforded children who suffer from life-threatening complications of intestinal failure a chance at long-term survival. As experience has grown, newer diseases, with more systemic manifestations have arisen as potential indications for transplant. After discussing the historical developments of intestinal transplant as a backdrop, this review focuses on the specific pre-operative indications for transplant as well as the great success that intestinal rehabilitation has witnessed over the past decade. A detailed discussion of evolution of immunosuppressive strategies is followed a general review of the common infectious complications experienced by children after intestinal transplant as well as the current long- and short-term results, including a section on new research on the quality of life in this challenging population of patients.

Risks and Epidemiology of Infections After Intestinal Transplantation

Intestinal transplantation has become a well-accepted and successful procedure to save the lives of patients suffering from intestinal failure and who have developed life-threatening complications of parenteral nutrition. Advances in all aspects of care, from the role of multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation services prior to transplant to the development strategies for early recognition of infectious sequelae and even the increasing availability of preventive strategies, have led to improved outcomes and a dramatic decline in infection-associated morbidity and mortality in children undergoing intestinal transplantation. Improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive regimens have been essential components in these improvements, reducing risk of infection through reduction of technical complications and more optimal immunosuppression regimens. In addition, the development of molecular tools for early recognition of viral pathogens and an understanding of the timing and risks for infection have allowed for earlier and more successful treatments. Despite these improvements, infectious sequelae remain an important problem in this population, and additional efforts are needed to further minimize the risk of infectious sequelae in those children requiring this procedure.

Gastrointestinal pathology in transplant patients

The assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) specimens from transplant patients is complicated by the wide range of potentially rare pathologies that may be found in this clinical setting. Acute GI graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is characterized by epithelial cell apoptosis, although there is increasing recognition that acute and/or chronic inflammation may also be present. By contrast, thus far there are no histological features known to be specific to chronic GI GvHD. Mycophenolate mofetil colitis may mimic both GvHD and inflammatory bowel disease, whereas both cytomegalovirus (CMV) and adenovirus infections can cause gland apoptosis. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder should be considered if a Crohn's-like histological picture is seen, and granulomas in biopsies from umbilical cord blood recipients should raise a suspicion of cord colitis syndrome. Finally, the GI tract may be involved directly or indirectly by the disease that originally required haematopoietic stem cell or liver transplantation.

Posttransplant adenoviral enteropathy in patients with small bowel transplantation

Transplant patients on immunosuppression represent a risk group for opportunistic infections, including adenoviral infections. The clinical and histopathologic findings of posttransplant adenoviral enteropathy in 3 adult intestinal transplant patients are described. The histopathologic pitfalls for the differential diagnosis between intestinal adenoviral enteropathy and acute rejection are discussed. Adenoviral enteropathy is an opportunistic infection that may follow aggressive treatment for small bowel allograft rejection, but which may require no specific treatment. It is associated with mild mixed inflammation in the lamina propria and slight increase of crypt apoptosis, resembling low-grade acute rejection. The identification of characteristic viral inclusions in the surface or crypt epithelium points to the diagnosis of adenoviral enteropathy, in spite of the increased crypt apoptosis.

Respiratory viruses other than influenza virus: impact and therapeutic advances

Though several antivirals have been developed and marketed to treat influenza virus infections, the development of antiviral agents with clinical activity against other respiratory viruses has been more problematic. Here we review the epidemiology of respiratory viral infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts, examine the evidence surrounding the currently available antivirals for respiratory viral infections other than influenza, highlight those that are in the pipeline, and discuss the hurdles for development of such agents.

The value of plasma citrulline to predict mucosal injury in intestinal allografts

Diagnosis of intestinal transplant rejection depends on clinical assessment, endoscopy and most importantly, histology of intestinal biopsies. Plasma citrulline levels (P-Cit) reflect functional enterocyte mass in nontransplant patients and have been evaluated in two small series after transplant. This study was designed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of P-Cit as diagnostic tool for allograft injury, especially to distinguish between viral enteritis and rejection. We prospectively collected 403 P-Cit samples within 24 h of intestinal biopsy in 49 patients. P-Cit levels were correlated with the mucosal damage and histopathological diagnoses. P-Cit levels in bowels with significant mucosal damage (i.e. moderate or severe rejection, viral enteritis, PTLD, ischemia reperfusion injury, allergic enteritis) were significantly lower than in intestines with no or mild injury (i.e. indeterminate or mild rejection, nonspecific enteritis): 22.9 +/- 15.4 versus 38 +/- 23.2 nmol/mL (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of the test were 80% and 58.1% for rejection, and 56.5% and 66% for viral enteritis, thereby unable to distinguish between both entities. In conclusion, P-Cit reflects the extent of mucosal injury regardless of the etiology, but does not seem to be a predictive marker for rejection or viral enteritis, as its values may decline only when diffuse mucosal damage has occurred.

Adenovirus infection within stromal cells in a pediatric small bowel allograft

Adenovirus infection is not uncommon in pediatric small bowel transplant recipients. Histopathologic findings include characteristic epithelial changes of intranuclear inclusions and smudging of nuclei. We present a case of adenovirus within stromal cells of the lamina propria in a biopsy from a small bowel allograft. Immunohistochemistry and double-labeled immunofluorescence were performed using antibodies against adenovirus, CD31, vimentin, cytokeratin, and CD163 on the allograft intestinal biopsy. Electron microscopy was done to confirm the presence of viral particles and to attempt to confirm the origin of the infected cells. The index biopsy showed scant cells within the lamina propria double-labeled with vimentin and adenovirus. Several cells showed predominantly cytoplasmic staining for adenoviral antigen. Intranuclear adenoviral particles were found in several cells of the lamina propria by electron microscopy. A subsequent biopsy showed typical adenoviral intranuclear inclusions within surface enterocytes. Adenovirus may infect stromal cells within the lamina propria. Although the typical location of adenoviral inclusions in small bowel is the surface epithelial cell nuclei, some cases may show inclusions within stromal cells. This observation may be important in the pathobiology of adenoviral infection, especially in the setting of pediatric transplantation. This finding should alert pathologists examining small bowel transplant biopsies, particularly those biopsies with extensive ulceration, to include careful surveillance of the lamina propria.

Infectious risk in pediatric organ transplant recipients: is it increased with the new immunosuppressive agents?

The risk of infection in pediatric organ transplant recipients is determined by several factors, including age, the types of organ transplanted and the immunosuppressive treatment which has dramatically changed over the past 10 yr. Little information has been reported regarding the infectious complications related to the current immunosuppressive protocols used in these children. This paper reviews (i) the immunosuppressive agents, focusing on their mechanisms of action and on the new regimens, (ii) the infections related to excessive immunosuppression and also anti-infectious properties or infectious adverse reactions associated with specific immunosuppressive agents. With the new immunosuppressive protocols, the advances in immunologic monitoring, microbiological diagnosis, anti-infectious prophylactic and preemptive treatments, strategies to minimize the risk of infection related to the immunosuppressive therapy are proposed.

Infectious enteritis after intestinal transplantation: incidence, timing, and outcome

BACKGROUND

The study reviews the incidence, timing, and outcome of infectious enteritis (IE) after intestinal transplantation (ITx).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent ITx at a single institution between 1991 and 2003 was undertaken using database and medical records. Standard statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 33 ITx recipients, 13 (39%) developed 20 culture- or biopsy-proven episodes of IE. Recipient demographics included the following: 10 males, median age 34 (10-585) months, 11 liver + intestine grafts, and two isolated intestine grafts. Infections were diagnosed a median of 76 days (32-1,800 days) after ITx. There were 14 viral (one cytomegalovirus, eight rotavirus, four adenovirus, one Epstein-Barr virus), three bacterial (Clostridium difficile), and three protozoal (one Giardia lamblia, two Cryptosporidium) infections. The bacterial infections tended to present earlier than the viral infections, and the most frequent presenting symptom was diarrhea. Complete resolution was achieved in 17 (94%) incidences with the appropriate antimicrobial or conservative therapy. It was interesting that there were seven rejection episodes documented by biopsy at the approximate time of diagnosis of IE. There were two graft losses: one because of adenoviral enteritis and one because of rejection after rotavirus enteritis. Three-year patient survival is 74% with no deaths directly attributable to IE.

CONCLUSIONS

IE can occur in 39% of recipients after ITx. Viral agents are the cause in two thirds of the cases. With supportive care and appropriate treatment, resolution is possible in the majority of cases. Differentiating rejection and infection on histopathology can be difficult and relies on cultures and immunostaining.

Isolated intestinal transplantation: proof of clinical efficacy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Isolated intestinal transplantation has been limited by poor patient and graft survival. If high survival could be achieved and if parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease were reversible, this procedure could be more widely applied, with early liver dysfunction indicating the need for transplant evaluation.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients who had failed parenteral nutrition received 28 isolated intestinal transplants. We analyzed patient and graft survival, the effect of sirolimus on the severity and frequency of rejection, and the reversibility of liver dysfunction after transplant.

RESULTS

Three-year actuarial patient and primary graft survival were 88% and 71%, respectively. Two patients underwent successful retransplants. Twenty-two patients are alive at a mean of 21+/-15 (median 18; range 3-51) months. Actuarial survival with freedom from parenteral support is 81% at 3 years (21 of 26 patients). Actuarial freedom from parenteral support among survivors is 95.5% at 3 years (21 of 22 patients). Early rejection was less frequent with sirolimus (34% vs. 70% without sirolimus) (P=0.007). Moderate and severe rejection was less frequent with sirolimus (1/11 episodes vs. 9/17 episodes without sirolimus) (P=0.05). No grafts were lost after introduction of sirolimus. In all four patients with advanced liver dysfunction, fibrosis and cholestasis regressed within 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

High patient survival and parenteral nutrition-free survival can be achieved after isolated intestinal transplantation. Sirolimus treatment has eliminated graft loss. Parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease is reversible with intestinal transplantation. Refractory liver dysfunction in patients receiving parenteral nutrition should prompt consideration for isolated intestinal transplantation.

Calicivirus enteritis in an intestinal transplant recipient

Protracted diarrhea of uncertain etiology is a significant problem following intestinal transplantation. We report an infant who developed severe secretory diarrhea 178 days after intestinal transplantation that persisted for more than 120 days. Repeated allograft biopsies demonstrated only nonspecific inflammation. Enzyme immunoassay (for rotavirus), culture, and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction [calicivirus (Norwalk-like virus)] were used to identify the allograft viral infection. A heavy density of calicivirus RNA nucleotide sequences (genogroup II, strain Miami Beach) was isolated from the jejunal and ileal allograft. Following a reduction in immunosuppressive therapy, diarrhea and enteritis remitted in association with the disappearance of all calicivirus RNA sequences. Calicivirus may cause severe allograft dysfunction in intestinal transplant recipients.