Weekly protocol renal transplant biopsies allow detection of sub-clinical acute rejection episodes in patients with delayed graft function

Complications of Percutaneous Kidney Allograft Biopsy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney biopsy is important to guide the management of allograft dysfunction but has a risk of complications. This review aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors of complications after kidney allograft biopsy.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case-control studies indexed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov, limited to the English language, from January 2000 to December 2020, including adult and pediatric kidney allograft biopsies. Primary outcomes were gross hematuria, bleeding requiring transfusion, and major complications (requiring interventions such as blood transfusion or surgical or radiological interventions).

RESULTS

The review included 72 studies (40 082 biopsies). The quality of included studies was suboptimal. Pooled rates of gross hematuria, bleeding requiring transfusion, and major complications were 3.18% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.31-4.19], 0.31% (95% CI, 0.15-0.52) and 0.89% (95% CI, 0.61-1.22), respectively. Gross hematuria rates were lower in high-income compared with middle-income countries (2.59% versus 6.44%, P < 0.01) and biopsies performed by radiology as compared with nephrology departments (1.25% versus 3.71%, P < 0.01). Blood transfusion rates were lower in pediatrics than adults (0.0% versus 0.65%, P < 0.01). Major complications were lower in biopsies performed by specialists as compared with trainees (0.02% versus 3.64%, P < 0.01). Graft loss and mortality were extremely rare. Limitations included missing data, few randomized controlled trials, and possible publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of complications after kidney allograft biopsy was low. Given the low quality of included studies, risk factors for complications should be further examined in future studies.

Evaluation of the Effects of Ischemic Injury and Ureteral Obstruction on Delayed Graft Function in Cats After Renal Autotransplantation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative importance of ischemic injury to delayed graft function (DGF) in cats.

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study.

ANIMALS

Six intact female cats.

METHODS

Cats had renal autograft transplantation without ureteral transection and reimplantation and a contralateral nephrectomy. Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations were measured regularly and abdominal ultrasound was performed before surgery, the day after surgery and twice weekly thereafter. Ultrasound-guided renal biopsy was performed on day 7. Cats were euthanatized on day 21. Histology of the autograft, ureter, bladder, vascular anastomoses sites, and contralateral kidney were performed. Observations were compared with those from an historic group of research cats that had extravesicular ureteroneocystostomy and contralateral nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Five cats completed the study. Serum creatinine and BUN concentrations increased after surgery, peaking at 3.2+/-0.8 and 77.6+/-15.9 mg/dL, respectively, 1-2 days after surgery. Serum creatinine concentration returned to the reference interval by 6 days after surgery. BUN gradually decreased in all cats but did not return to the reference interval by study end. Serum creatinine and BUN concentrations were consistently lower but not significantly so (P=.29 and .56, respectively) compared with the historic ureteroneocystostomy group. No ultrasonographic abnormalities or renal biopsy histologic abnormalities were observed. At necropsy, 1 autograft had generalized interstitial fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Harvesting the renal graft and the ischemia before revascularization causes impaired renal function after engraftment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The process of harvesting and reimplanting the renal graft can contribute to DGF in cats, independent of ureteral obstruction.

Current status of kidney transplant: update 2003

Pediatric transplantation has seen remarkable advances over the past two decades with reduced morbidity and mortality, reduced rejection rates, and improved long-term patient and allograft survival. Infants currently have short-term patient and allograft survival rates better than any other age group; short-term allograft survival rates in CD recipients are equal to those in LD recipients. With decreased rejection, long-term allograft survival is improving dramatically. Transplantation allows for much reduced risks and improved metabolic status, growth and development, and more normal social interactions. The future of transplantation continues to be exciting, with opportunities for reduced immunosuppressive medications and their side effects, and the elusive goal of transplantation tolerance seems within reach.

Recommendations for the outpatient surveillance of renal transplant recipients. American Society of Transplantation

Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Protocol biopsies in the management of renal allograft recipients

The safety of the renal allograft biopsy and the standardization of allograft histopathology interpretation have renewed interest in the protocol biopsy. Recent studies in the areas of 'marginal' donors, surveillance of acute rejection, molecular biology and chronic rejection are discussed.