CUOG randomized trial of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy: 36-month post-treatment PSA results. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group

Surgical Management and Considerations for Patients with Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Localized high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogenous disease state with a wide range of presentations and outcomes. Historically, non-surgical management with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy was the treatment option of choice. However, surgical resection with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is increasingly utilized as a primary treatment modality for patients with HRPCa. Recent studies have demonstrated that surgery is an equivalent treatment option in select patients with the potential to avoid the side effects from androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy combined. Advances in imaging techniques and biomarkers have also improved staging and patient selection for surgical resection. Advances in robotic surgical technology grant surgeons various techniques to perform RP, even in patients with HR disease, which can reduce the morbidity of the procedure without sacrificing oncologic outcomes. Clinical trials are not only being performed to assess the safety and oncologic outcomes of these surgical techniques, but to also evaluate the role of surgical resection as a part of a multimodal treatment plan. Further research is needed to determine the ideal role of surgery to potentially provide a more personalized and tailored treatment plan for patients with localized HR PCa.

Cancer and Leukemia Group B 90203 (Alliance): Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Localized, High-Risk Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Radical prostatectomy (RP) alone is often inadequate in curing men with clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer (PC). We hypothesized that chemohormonal therapy (CHT) with androgen-deprivation therapy plus docetaxel before RP would improve biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) over RP alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Men with clinically localized, high-risk PC were assigned to RP alone or neoadjuvant CHT with androgen deprivation plus docetaxel (75 mg/m² body surface area every 3 weeks for 6 cycles) and RP. The primary end point was 3-year BPFS. Biochemical failure was defined as a serum prostate-specific antigen level > 0.2 ng/mL that increased on 2 consecutive occasions that were at least 3 months apart. Secondary end points included 5-year BPFS, overall BPFS, local recurrence, metastasis-free survival (MFS), PC-specific mortality, and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 788 men were randomly assigned. Median follow-up time was 6.1 years. The overall rates of grade 3 and 4 adverse events during chemotherapy were 26% and 19%, respectively. No difference was seen in 3-year BPFS between neoadjuvant CHT plus RP and RP alone (0.89 v 0.84, respectively; 95% CI for the difference, -0.01 to 0.11; P = .11). Neoadjuvant CHT was associated with improved overall BPFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.99), improved MFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95), and improved OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.94) compared with RP alone.

CONCLUSION

The primary study end point, 3-year BPFS, was not met. Although some improvement was seen in secondary end points, any potential benefit must be weighed against toxicity. Our data do not support the routine use of neoadjuvant CHT and RP in patients with clinically localized, high-risk PC at this time.

Impact of time to testosterone rebound and comorbidity on the risk of cause-specific mortality in men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Herein, the authors evaluated how the time to testosterone rebound (TTR) after radiotherapy (RT) and 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) impacted the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and cardiovascular-specific mortality (CVM) among men with varying comorbidity extent.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2001, a total of 206 men who were randomized to receive RT either alone or with 6 months of ADT for unfavorable-risk PC and who had a comorbidity score assigned using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 metric comprised the study cohort. Multivariable competing risk regression was used to evaluate the impact of and possible interaction between comorbidity and TTR on PCSM and CVM.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 18.19 years, 30 men (18.6%), 39 men (24.2%), and 92 men (57.1%), respectively, had died of PC, CV disease, or other causes. As TTR increased, PCSM significantly decreased in men with no or minimal (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.53, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34-0.84 [P =.007]) and moderate to severe (AHR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.99 [P = .048]) comorbidity. However, increasing TTR significantly increased the risk of CVM among men with moderate to severe comorbidity (AHR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.40-2.49 [P <.001]), but not those with no or minimal comorbidity (AHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.57-1.29 [P =.46]), leading to a significant interaction between TTR and comorbidity (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that considering an intermittent course of ADT such that the TTR approaches 18 months, instead of continuous long-term administration of ADT, in men with moderate to severe comorbidity and high-risk PC may reduce the increased risk of CVM without increasing the risk of PCSM. Cancer 2018;124:1391-9. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Testicular vs adrenal sources of hydroxy-androgens in prostate cancer

Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) is one strategy for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer; however, the long-term outcomes of NADT with radical prostatectomy including biochemical failure-free survival are not promising. One proposed mechanism is incomplete androgen ablation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency of serum hydroxy-androgen suppression in patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer under NADT (leuprolide acetate plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone) and interrogate the primary sources of circulating hydroxy-androgens using our recently described stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography mass spectrometric method. For the first time, three androgen diols including 5-androstene-3β,17β-diol (5-adiol), 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol (3α-adiol), 5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol (3β-adiol), the glucuronide or sulfate conjugate of 5-adiol and 3α-adiol were measured and observed to be dramatically reduced after NADT. By comparing patients that took leuprolide acetate alone vs leuprolide acetate plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone, we were able to distinguish the primary sources of these androgens and their conjugates as being of either testicular or adrenal in origin. We find that testosterone, 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 3α-adiol and 3β-adiol were predominately of testicular origin. By contrast, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), epi-androsterone (epi-AST) and their conjugates, 5-adiol sulfate and glucuronide were predominately of adrenal origin. Our findings also show that NADT failed to completely suppress DHEA-sulfate levels and that two unappreciated sources of intratumoral androgens that were not suppressed by leuprolide acetate alone were 5-adiol-sulfate and epi-AST-sulfate of adrenal origin.

Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments for patient-centered outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA Compliant)

BACKGROUND

In the context of prostate cancer (PCa) characterized by the multiple alternative treatment strategies, comparative effectiveness analysis is essential for informed decision-making. We analyzed the comparative effectiveness of PCa treatments through systematic review and meta-analysis with a focus on outcomes that matter most to newly diagnosed localized PCa patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of literature published in English from 1995 to October 2016. A search strategy was employed using terms "prostate cancer," "localized," "outcomes," "mortality," "health related quality of life," and "complications" to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective, and retrospective studies. For observational studies, only those adjusting for selection bias using propensity-score or instrumental-variables approaches were included. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratio was used to assess all-cause and disease-specific mortality. Funnel plots were used to assess the level of bias.

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 58 articles, of which 29 were RCTs, 6 were prospective studies, and 23 were retrospective studies. The studies provided moderate data for the patient-centered outcome of mortality. Radical prostatectomy demonstrated mortality benefit compared to watchful waiting (all-cause HR = 0.63 CI = 0.45, 0.87; disease-specific HR = 0.48 CI = 0.40, 0.58), and radiation therapy (all-cause HR = 0.65 CI = 0.57, 0.74; disease-specific HR = 0.51 CI = 0.40, 0.65). However, we had minimal comparative information about tradeoffs between and within treatment for other patient-centered outcomes in the short and long-term.

CONCLUSION

Lack of patient-centered outcomes in comparative effectiveness research in localized PCa is a major hurdle to informed and shared decision-making. More rigorous studies that can integrate patient-centered and intermediate outcomes in addition to mortality are needed.

Intense androgen-deprivation therapy with abiraterone acetate plus leuprolide acetate in patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer: results of a randomized phase II neoadjuvant study

PURPOSE

Cure rates for localized high-risk prostate cancers (PCa) and some intermediate-risk PCa are frequently suboptimal with local therapy. Outcomes are improved by concomitant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with radiation therapy, but not by concomitant ADT with surgery. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa; leuprolide acetate) does not reduce serum androgens as effectively as abiraterone acetate (AA), a prodrug of abiraterone, a CYP17 inhibitor that lowers serum testosterone (< 1 ng/dL) and improves survival in metastatic PCa. The possibility that greater androgen suppression in patients with localized high-risk PCa will result in improved clinical outcomes makes paramount the reassessment of neoadjuvant ADT with more robust androgen suppression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A neoadjuvant randomized phase II trial of LHRHa with AA was conducted in patients with localized high-risk PCa (N = 58). For the first 12 weeks, patients were randomly assigned to LHRHa versus LHRHa plus AA. After a research prostate biopsy, all patients received 12 additional weeks of LHRHa plus AA followed by prostatectomy.

RESULTS

The levels of intraprostatic androgens from 12-week prostate biopsies, including the primary end point (dihydrotestosterone/testosterone), were significantly lower (dehydroepiandrosterone, Δ(4)-androstene-3,17-dione, dihydrotestosterone, all P < .001; testosterone, P < .05) with LHRHa plus AA compared with LHRHa alone. Prostatectomy pathologic staging demonstrated a low incidence of complete responses and minimal residual disease, with residual T3- or lymph node-positive disease in the majority.

CONCLUSION

LHRHa plus AA treatment suppresses tissue androgens more effectively than LHRHa alone. Intensive intratumoral androgen suppression with LHRHa plus AA before prostatectomy for localized high-risk PCa may reduce tumor burden.

Novel approaches in the high-risk prostate cancer patient: Summary of key research presented at AUA 2014

Another topic of focus at AUA 2014 was the subgroup of prostate cancer patients deemed to be at high risk.

[Neoadjuvant before surgery treatments: state of the art in prostate cancer]

GOAL

To study the impact of systemic treatment in neoadjuvant strategy before surgery in prostate cancer.

MATERIALS

Literature reviews with data analysis from PubMed search using the keywords "neoadjuvant", "chemotherapy", "hormonal therapy", "prostate surgery", "radical prostatectomy", but also reports from ASCO and ESMO conferences. The articles on neoadjuvant treatment before radiotherapy were excluded.

RESULTS

First studies with former therapy are more than 15-years-old and with questionable methodology: lack of power to have a clear idea of the impact on survival criteria such as overall survival or relapse-free survival. However, the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy on the classic risk factors for relapse (positive margins, intraprostatic disease, positive lymph nodes) was demonstrated by these studies and a Cochrane meta-analysis. The association with hormone therapy seems mandatory in comparison to treatment based solely on chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Promising data on the use of new drugs and their combinations arise: abiraterone acetate combined with LHRH analogue showed a fast PSA decrease and higher rates of pathologic complete response. Other results are promising with hormonal blockages at various key points.

CONCLUSION

Studies with 2nd generation anti-androgene agents or enzyme inhibitors seem to show very promising results. To provide answers about the effectiveness of current neoadjuvant strategy in terms of survival, other studies are needed: randomized phase III or phase II exploring predictive biomarkers. The design of such trials requires a multidisciplinary approach with urologists, oncologists, radiologists and methodologists.

Overview of randomized controlled treatment trials for clinically localized prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance and the United States preventative task force report on screening?

Prostate cancer and its management have been intensely debated for years. Recommendations range from ardent support for active screening and immediate treatment to resolute avoidance of screening and active surveillance. There is a growing body of level I evidence establishing a clear survival advantage for treatment of subsets of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. This chapter presents a review of these randomized controlled trials. We argue that an understanding of this literature is relevant not only to those considering active surveillance but also to those evaluating the merits of screening. In addition, a number of important evidence-based conclusions concerning what should and should not be done can be gleaned from these trials.

A phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant ketoconazole and docetaxel chemotherapy before radical prostatectomy in high risk patients

PURPOSE

Patients with high risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml, Gleason score greater than 7, or clinical stage T2b or greater) have been shown to have a 30% to 40% biochemical recurrence rate after definitive local therapy. Looking for improvement on these outcomes, we conducted a phase II clinical trial examining the combination of ketoconazole and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant setting before radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. For 12 weeks they were treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and ketoconazole, with dosing based on phase I data. Patients were monitored for tolerance of therapy and dosing adjustments were made for significant toxicities. Radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection was subsequently performed and patients were followed postoperatively for biochemical recurrence.

RESULTS

At a median followup of 18 months 8 patients remained biochemically free of recurrence after surgery alone. An additional 6 patients received salvage therapy and had an undetectable prostate specific antigen. Of the 22 patients 16 experienced National Cancer Institute grade 3 or 4 toxicity at some point during the therapy. However, 16 patients completed all 4 cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant ketoconazole combined with docetaxel has appreciable but acceptable toxicity with 73% of the patients completing all 4 courses of therapy. Of those who underwent radical prostatectomy 36% remained continuously biochemically free of recurrence at a median followup of 18 months.

Histologic changes associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are predictive of nodal metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer

Clinical trials are evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on men with high-risk prostate cancer. Little is known about the clinical significance of postchemotherapy tumor histopathologic features. We assessed the prognostic and predictive value of histologic features (intraductal carcinoma, vacuolated cell morphologic features, inconspicuous glands, cribriform architecture, and inconspicuous cancer cells) observed in 50 high-risk prostate cancers treated with preprostatectomy docetaxel and mitoxantrone. At a median follow-up of 65 months, the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) rates at 2 and 5 years were 65% and 49%, respectively. In univariate analyses (using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests), intraductal (P = .001) and cribriform (P = .014) histologic features were associated with shorter RFS. In multivariate analyses, using the Cox proportional hazards regression, baseline prostate-specific antigen (P = .004), lymph node metastases (P < .001), and cribriform histologic features (P = .007) were associated with shorter RFS. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only intraductal pattern (P = .007) predicted lymph node metastases. Intraductal and cribriform histologic features apparently predict postchemotherapy outcome.

Is biochemical response more important than duration of neoadjuvant hormone therapy before radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer? An analysis of the 3- versus 8-month randomized trial

PURPOSE

To ascertain whether biochemical response to neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before radiotherapy (RT), rather than duration, is the critical determinant of benefit in the multimodal treatment of localized prostate cancer, by comparing outcomes of subjects from the Canadian multicenter 3- vs 8-month trial with a pre-RT, post-hormone PSA (PRPH-PSA) < or =0.1 ng/ml vs those >0.1 ng/ml.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1995 to 2001, 378 men with localized prostate cancer were randomized to 3 or 8 months of neoadjuvant ADT before RT. On univariate analysis, survival indices were compared between those with a PRPH-PSA < or =0.1 ng/ml vs >0.1 ng/ml, for all patients and subgroups, including treatment arm, risk group, and gleason Score. Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was significantly higher for those with a PRPH-PSA < or =0.1 ng/ml compared with PRPH-PSA >0.1 ng/ml (55.3% vs 49.4%, p = 0.014). No difference in survival indices was observed between treatment arms. There was no difference in bDFS between patients in the 3- and 8-month arms with a PRPH-PSA < or =0.1 ng/ml nor those with PRPH-PSA >0.1 ng/ml. bDFS was significantly higher for high-risk patients with PRPH-PSA < or =0.1 ng/ml compared with PRPH-PSA >0.1 ng/ml (57.0% vs 29.4%, p = 0.017). Multivariate analysis identified PRPH-PSA (p = 0.041), Gleason score (p = 0.001), initial PSA (p = 0.025), and T-stage (p = 0.003), not ADT duration, as independent predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSION

Biochemical response to neoadjuvant ADT before RT, not duration, appears to be the critical determinant of benefit in the setting of combined therapy. Individually tailored ADT duration based on PRPH-PSA would maximize therapeutic gain, while minimizing the duration of ADT and its related toxicities.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel in high risk patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Taxane based chemotherapy has activity in advanced prostate cancer but previous studies of neoadjuvant docetaxel demonstrated a prostate specific antigen response with no obvious antitumor activity. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel, Abraxane), a novel nanoparticle based formulation, were assessed in patients with high risk, locally advanced prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had locally advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma, clinical stage cT2b or greater, Gleason score 8 or greater, or serum prostate specific antigen 15 ng/ml or greater without metastatic disease. Patients received 2 cycles of 150 mg/m(2) nab-paclitaxel weekly for 3 weeks during each 4-week cycle, followed by radical prostatectomy with bilateral lymphadenectomy. Efficacy assessments included pathological and prostate specific antigen response.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients completed neoadjuvant therapy and 18 underwent radical prostatectomy. Median pretreatment prostate specific antigen was 8.5 ng/ml and median Gleason score was 8. Despite the lack of complete pathological responses 5 of 18 patients (28%) had organ confined disease and 9 of 18 (50%) had specimen confined disease. Post-chemotherapy prostate specific antigen was decreased in 18 of 19 (95%) patients and median decrease was 2.9 ng/ml (35%, p <0.001). An initial prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy of 0.02 ng/ml or less was achieved in 17 of 18 (94%) patients. There were no significant perioperative complications. Cytoplasmic vacuolization (focal in 10 and extensive in 7) was evident in all but 1 patient (94%). Ten patients (56%) had grade 3 and 1 had grade 4 neutropenia with no febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel was well tolerated. Similar to our experience with neoadjuvant docetaxel there were no pathological complete responses, although a possible histological antitumor effect was observed.

Current perspectives in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PC) continues to be an important world health problem for men. Patients with locally confined PC are treated with either radiotherapy or surgery. However, treatment of more advanced stages of the disease is problematic. Initially, androgen deprivation offers a period of clinical stability, which is however invariably followed by progression to non-responsiveness to hormonal manipulation. Current management of patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) displays modest response rates and achieves only short-term benefit. Recently, knowledge in the complex pathophysiology of advanced PC has led to the identification of mechanisms and target molecules permitting the introduction of new therapies. Consequently, many investigational treatments are ongoing for AIPC in Phase-II and Phase-III trials aiming at the combination of chemotherapeutic regimens along with immunotherapy targeting PC-associated antigens. Other attractive options are gene therapy, as well as the targeting of survival signaling, differentiation, and apoptosis of the malignant PC cells. Further treatment modalities are directed against the tumor microenvironment, bone metastasis, or both. Collectively, the aforementioned efforts introduce a new era in the management of advanced PC. Novel pharmaceutical compounds and innovative approaches, integrated into the concept of individualized therapy will hopefully, during the next decade, improve the outcome and survival for hundreds of thousands of men worldwide.

Usefulness of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha in evaluating the prostatic adenocarcinoma viability following neoadjuvant hormone therapy

BACKGROUND

In prostatic adenocarcinomas (PAs), the androgen up-regulates hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha). It has been reported that the regulation of HIF-1 alpha would become a therapeutic strategy for PAs. This study was designed to elucidate whether or not HIF-1 alpha expression would be associated with PA recurrence after neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT).

METHODS

The 50 radical prostatectomy specimens after NHT were examined as well as needle biopsy specimens before NHT using immunohistochemistry for HIF-1 alpha.

RESULTS

The therapeutic effects of 50 cases with NHT were assessed as good (20 cases) or poor (30 cases). The recurrence of PA monitored by the serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) levels occurred in 21 cases (42%). The hypoxic status was evaluated to be divided into two categories: weak (16 cases) or strong (34 cases). The recurrence ratio was 30% (6/20) of cases with good response and 50% (15/30) of cases with poor response (p<0.05). HIF-1 alpha expression profiles were as follows: recurrent cases, weak, 19% (4/21); strong, 81% (17/21) (p<0.05); and non-recurrent cases, weak, 41% (12/29); strong, 59% (17/29) (NS). Compared to PAs with weak HIF-1 alpha expression, PAs with strong HIF-1 alpha expression showed higher PSA levels (12.1 ng/mL vs. 25.0 ng/mL, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

HIF-1 alpha is expected to be useful for detection of the viability of PAs after NHT and also for prediction of their clinical outcome. In addition, the expression may contribute to histological identification of the carcinoma cells.

Neoadjuvant therapy and prostate cancer: what a urologist should know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Prostate cancer is curable only when treated at an early stage, when the tumor is still localized to the prostate gland. However, even in apparent cases of clinically localized disease, unsuspected extracapsular disease may significantly increase the risk of primary treatment failure. This risk is especially high if the patient has one or more of the following risk factors: a serum prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/ml, a Gleason score >7, locally advanced disease (clinical stage T3/T4), and extensive disease on prostate biopsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various regimens of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy have produced mixed results and generally have not influenced the rate of disease relapse (defined by prostate-specific antigen level) in high-risk patients with localized prostate cancer. In addition, antiangiogenic agents, gene therapy, molecular targeting agents, and other promising new therapies have been investigated in a neoadjuvant setting with limited results.

SUMMARY

Despite considerable advances, high-risk localized prostate cancer remains an extremely refractory disease. In patients with high-risk prostate cancer, single-modality treatment in the form of surgery offers a 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rate of no better than 50%. To further elucidate optimal treatment regimens for these patients we must actively enrol patients in clinical trials.

Immunological evaluation of neoadjuvant peptide vaccination before radical prostatectomy for patients with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and immune responses of pre-operative personalized peptide vaccine for patients with localized prostate cancer.

METHOD

Ten human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A24(+) patients with localized prostate cancer received weekly personalized peptide vaccine for six times with positive peptides (up to four kinds of peptides) from 16 kinds of vaccine candidates, followed by a retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). Eight patients with localized prostate cancer receiving RRP served as the control group. The serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) precursor analysis by interferon-gamma production, and peptide-reactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were monitored during the treatment. Distributions of CD45RO(+) cells, CD8(+) T cells, and CD20(+) B cells in tissue microarray samples were studied using an immunohistochemical technique.

RESULT

The peptide vaccination was safe and well tolerated with no major adverse effects. Increased CTL response and the anti-peptide IgG titer were observed in the post-vaccination samples in 8 of 10 or 8 of 10 patients, respectively. The intensity of CD45RO(+) infiltrating cells in the vaccination group was significantly larger than that in the control group. CD8(+) T cell infiltration was seen only in the vaccinated group.

CONCLUSION

Increased immune responses, at both the circulation and tumor sites in the vaccinated group, support the further development of personalized peptide vaccines for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Comparative study of the impact of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To comparatively evaluate the effect of 3- versus 8-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) operative and postoperative parameters.

METHODS

We evaluated 55 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by 3-month (25 patients, group-1), 8-month NHT (19 patients, group-2) and non-neoadjuvant therapy (11 patients, group-3) before LRP. Serum PSA levels and prostate volume were measured and evaluated monthly before operation. The operative and postoperative parameters were recorded and compared in the three different groups.

RESULTS

Transrectal ultrasound determined that prostate volume decreased 39.6% in group 1 and 35.4% in group 2 after 3-month NHT and a further 34.4% in group 2 after 8-month NHT. The mean prostate volume was significantly smaller after 8-month than 3-month NHT in group 2 (P < 0.05). Mean serum PSA decreased 97.8% in group 1 and 98.1% in group 2 after 3-month NHT. A further 72.9% PSA decrease was determined after 8-month NHT in group 2. There were no significant differences in the three groups with respect to mean operative time, mean blood loss, transfusion rate, operative difficulty, catheterization time, hospital time and complication rate (P > 0.05, respectively). Positive margin rate was significantly lower in the 3- or 8-month NHT group than in the non-adjuvant group (P < 0.05, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the 3- and 8-month groups with respect to positive margin rate (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prolonged NHT (8-month) did not affect the operative or postoperative parameters. The LRP can be safely performed in patients after prolonged NHT. Prospective randomized studies are required to determine whether prolonged NHT reduces the risk of biochemical recurrence after LRP.

Adjuvant and salvage treatment options for patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

The management of high-risk prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy remains a treatment dilemma. Multimodality approaches incorporating surgery, radiation therapy and systemic agents offer the hope of improved cure rates; however, most randomized studies to date are either immature or negative. The systemic treatment options best studied is androgen deprivation, which has been shown to demonstrate a survival advantage in patients with lymph node-positive disease. Systemic chemotherapy has demonstrated a modest survival advantage in androgen-independent disease. Current studies are exploring its role in the adjuvant and neo-adjuvant setting. Lastly, recent randomized trials have demonstrated a biochemical advantage to adjuvant radiation therapy, but it remains to be seen if this will translate to an improvement is survival end points or if salvage radiation therapy would be just as effective. In this update article, we review the use of external beam radiation therapy and systemic agents in combination with surgery for high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Neoadjuvant therapy before radical prostatectomy: Where have we been? Where are we going?

Prostate cancer is curable only when treated at an early stage, when the tumor is still localized to the prostate gland. However, even in apparent cases of clinically localized disease, unsuspected extracapsular disease may significantly increase the risk of primary treatment failure. This risk is especially high if the patient has > or =1 of the following risk factors: a serum prostate-specific antigen level of >20 ng/ml, a Gleason score of >7, locally advanced disease (clinical stage T3/T4), and extensive disease on prostate biopsy. Various regimens of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, or both have produced mixed results and, in general, have not significantly influenced the rate of disease relapse (as defined by prostate-specific antigen level) in high-risk patients with localized prostate cancer. In addition, anti-angiogenic agents, gene therapy, molecular targeting agents, and other promising new therapies have been investigated in a neoadjuvant setting with limited results. Therefore, this patient population continues to pose a therapeutic dilemma for physicians.

Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Hormone therapy for early prostate cancer has demonstrated an improvement in clinical and pathological variables, but not always an improvement in overall survival. We performed a systematic review of both adjuvant and neo-adjuvant hormone therapy combined with surgery or radiotherapy in localised or locally advanced prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to undertake a systematic review and, if possible, a meta-analysis of neo-adjuvant and adjuvant hormone therapy in localised or locally advanced prostate cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (1966-2006), EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, LILACS, and SIGLE for relevant randomised trials. Handsearching of appropriate publications was also undertaken.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of patients with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer, that is, stages T1-T4, any N, M0, comparing neo-adjuvant or adjuvant hormonal deprivation in combination with primary therapy (radical radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy) versus primary therapy alone were included in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted from eligible studies and assessed for quality, and included information on study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes. Comparable data were pooled together for meta-analysis with intention-to treat principle.

MAIN RESULTS

Men with prostate cancer have different clinical outcomes based on their risk (T1-T2, T3-T4, PSA levels and Gleason score). However, the majority of studies included in this review did not report results by risk groups; therefore, it was not possible to perform sub-group analysis. Neo-adjuvant hormonal therapy prior to prostatectomy did not improve overall survival (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.85, P = 0.69). However, there was a significant reduction in the positive surgical margin rate (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.42, P < 0.00001) and a significant improvement in other pathological variables such as lymph node involvement, pathological staging and organ confined rates. There was a borderline significant reduction of disease recurrence rates (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.0, P = 0.05), in favour of treatment. The use of longer duration of neo-adjuvant hormones, that is either 6 or 8 months prior to prostatectomy, was associated with a significant reduction in positive surgical margins (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.80, P = 0.002). In one study, neo-adjuvant hormones prior to radiotherapy significantly improved overall survival for Gleason 2 to 6 patients; although, in two studies, there was no improvement in disease-specific survival (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.32, P = 0.97). However, there was a significant improvement in both clinical disease-free survival (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.93 to 2.40, P < 0.00001) and biochemical disease-free survival (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.56, P < 0.00001). Adjuvant androgen deprivation following prostatectomy did not significantly improve overall survival at 5 years (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.85, P = 0.2); although one study reported a significant disease-specific survival advantage with adjuvant therapy (P = 0.001). In addition, there was a significant improvement in disease-free survival at both 5 years (OR 3.73, 95%CI 2.30 to 6.03, P < 0.00001) and 10 years (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.15, P = 0.0009). Adjuvant therapy following radiotherapy resulted in a significant overall survival gain apparent at 5 (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.83, P = 0.0009) and 10 years (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.84, P = 0.003); although there was significant heterogeneity (P = 0.09 and P = 0.07, respectively). There was also a significant improvement in disease-specific survival (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.88, P = 0.00001) and disease-free survival (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.05 to 3.12, P < 0.00001) at 5 years.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hormone therapy combined with either prostatectomy or radiotherapy is associated with significant clinical benefits in patients with local or locally advanced prostate cancer. Significant local control may be achieved when given prior to prostatectomy or radiotherapy, which may improve patient's quality of life. When given adjuvant to these primary therapies, hormone therapy, not only provides a method for local control, but there is also evidence for a significant survival advantage. However, hormone therapy is associated with significant side effects, such as hot flushes and gynaecomastia, as well as cost implications. The decision to use hormone therapy should, therefore, be taken at a local level, between the patient, clinician and policy maker, taking into account the clinical benefits, toxicity and cost. More research is needed to guide the choice, the duration, and the schedule of hormonal deprivation therapy, and the impact of long-term hormone therapy with regard to toxicity and the patient's quality of life.

Relationship between changes in prostate cancer cell proliferation, apoptotic index, and expression of apoptosis-related proteins by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and duration of such treatment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationships between changes in the carcinoma cell proliferation index, apoptotic index (AI), and apoptosis-related factors, including bcl-2 and bax, after different durations of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in prostate cancer tissue.

METHODS

Pre- and post-NHT specimens were obtained from 42 patients who had undergone NHT and radical prostatectomy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of NHT: group 1 (3 to 7 months, n = 21) and group 2 (8 to 12 months, n = 21; no randomization). Immunohistochemistry was used to determine the expression of bcl-2 and bax and to determine the proliferation index, and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end-labeling method was used to assess apoptosis and determine the AI.

RESULTS

The median proliferation indexes of groups 1 (1.8%) and 2 (1.6%) were significantly lower than the respective values in the pre-NHT specimens (4.9%, P < 0.01). The median AI of group 1 (2.5%) was greater than in the pre-NHT specimens (1.4%). In addition, the post/pre-NHT AI ratio correlated significantly with the duration of NHT in group 1 (r = 0.58, P < 0.01), but not in group 2. Bax expression increased in a manner parallel to that of the AI.

CONCLUSIONS

NHT suppresses prostate cancer cell proliferation for 3 to 12 months. Although the AI was increased during 3 to 7 months of NHT, no significant difference was found between the pre-NHT levels and those after 8 to 12 months. Our results support the current belief that the optimal duration of NHT is longer than 3 months.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in the treatment of prostate cancer

In 1979, the first prostate cancer patient was treated with a GnRH agonist at the Laval University Medical Center in Quebec City, Canada, thus rapidly leading to the worldwide replacement of surgical castration and high doses of estrogens. The discovery of medical castration with GnRH agonists was soon followed by fundamental changes in the endocrine therapy of prostate cancer. Most importantly, the excellent tolerance accompanying the treatment with GnRH agonists has been a key factor that permitted a series of studies demonstrating a major reduction in the death rate from prostate cancer ranging from 31 to 87% at 5 yr of follow-up in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. In fact, a one third reduction in prostate cancer deaths has been calculated in the metaanalysis of all available studies. The general acceptance of this discovery by patients and physicians is illustrated by world sales above 3.0 billion U.S. dollars in 2003. Although extremely efficient in achieving complete medical castration and well tolerated, with no other side effects than the expected hypoandrogenicity, GnRH agonists should not be administered alone. In fact, shortly after discovery of the castration effects of GnRH agonists, we observed that approximately 50% of androgens remain in the prostate after castration, thus leading to the recognition of the role of adrenal dehydroepiandrosterone as an important source of the androgens synthesized locally in the prostate and in many peripheral target tissues. We therefore developed combined androgen blockade (CAB), whereby the androgens of both testicular and adrenal origins are blocked simultaneously at start of treatment with the combination of a GnRH agonist to block the testis and a pure antiandrogen to block the action of the androgens produced locally. CAB, first used in advanced metastatic disease, has been the first treatment shown to prolong life in prostate cancer. Most interestingly, in 2002, we made the observation that CAB alone given continuously for 6.5 yr or more leads to cure of the disease in at least 90% of cases, thus suggesting that androgen blockade combining a GnRH agonist and a pure antiandrogen could well be the most efficient treatment of localized prostate cancer, and thus offering the possibility of practically eliminating death from prostate cancer.

Is there a role for chemotherapy in prostate cancer?

There is evidence from randomised-controlled trials that patients with symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer may experience palliative benefit from chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and prednisone. This treatment is well tolerated, even by elderly patients, although the cumulative dose of mitoxantrone is limited by cardiotoxicity. Treatment with docetaxel or paclitaxel, with or without estramustine, appears to convey higher rates of prostate-specific antigen response in phase II trials, but is more toxic. Large phase III trials comparing docetaxel with mitoxantrone have completed accrual. There is no role for chemotherapy in earlier stages of disease except in the context of a well-designed clinical trial.

Report of a multicenter Canadian phase III randomized trial of 3 months vs. 8 months neoadjuvant androgen deprivation before standard-dose radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of 3 months vs. 8 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before conventional dose radiotherapy (RT) on disease-free survival using prostate-specific antigen PSA and biopsies as end points for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February 1995 and June 2001, 378 men were randomized to either 3 or 8 months of flutamide and goserelin before conventional-dose RT (66 Gy) at four participating centers. The median patient age was 72 years (range, 50-84 years). The stage distribution was 17% T1c, 35% T2a, 34% T2b-T2c, 13% T3-T4. The Gleason score (GS) was < or =6 in 51%, 7 in 38%, and 8-10 in 11%. The median baseline PSA level was 9.7 ng/mL (range, 1.3-189 ng/mL). Of the 378 men, 26% were low risk (Stage T1c-T2a, GS < or =6, PSA <10 ng/mL), 43% were intermediate risk (Stage T2b or GS 7 or PSA 10-20 ng/mL), and 31% were high risk (Stage T3 or GS 8-10 or PSA >20 ng/mL). The two arms were balanced in terms of age, GS, T stage, risk group, and presenting PSA level. The median follow-up was 44 months (range, 10-84 months), and 361 patients were available for evaluation.

RESULTS

The 8-month arm achieved a lower PSA level before starting RT (0.37 vs. 0.74 ng/mL, p < or =0.001) and had a greater downsizing of the prostate (mean volume 26.6 cm(3) vs. 30.5 cm(3), p < or =0.001). However, the actuarial freedom from failure rate (biochemical by American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition, local or distant) for the 3-month vs. 8-month arms at 3 years was 66% vs. 68% and by 5 years was 61% vs. 62%, respectively (p = 0.36). No statistically significant difference was noted in the types of failure between the two arms (crude final status): biochemical, 22.2% vs. 22.3%; local, 10.2% vs. 6.5%; and distant, 3.4% vs. 4.4% (p = 0.61). Two-year post-RT biopsies were done in 57% (n = 205). Negative biopsies were obtained in 68% of the 3-month and 77% of the 8-month patients; 18% and 14% had indeterminate biopsies and 14% and 9% were positive for residual cancer (p = 0.34) in the two arms, respectively. The median PSA level for nonfailing patients was 0.50 ng/mL in both the 3-months and 8-month arms. A suggestion of improvement was found in the 8-month arm for disease-free survival at 5 years for high-risk patients (39% vs. 52%) but did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

A longer period of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before standard-dose RT does not appear to confer a benefit in terms of disease-free survival or to alter failure patterns. Failure was delayed in the 8-month arm, but this advantage was lost by 5 years of follow-up. A suggestion of benefit was noted with a longer period of hormonal therapy for high-risk patients.

Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203: a randomized phase 3 study of radical prostatectomy alone versus estramustine and docetaxel before radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk localized disease

The purpose of The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203 trial is to determine which of 2 treatment strategies is superior in treating men with high-risk, clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (stage T1 to T3a NX M0), defined as a predicted probability < or =60% of remaining free from disease recurrence for 5 years after surgery. Patients with a > or =10-year life expectancy will be randomized to either radical prostatectomy (RP) alone versus estramustine and docetaxel before RP. Participants will be excluded if they have received prior therapy for prostate cancer (except transurethral resection of the prostate) or are judged not to be appropriate candidates for RP. Eligible patients will be stratified according to their predicted probability of remaining free from disease recurrence at 5 years after surgery (0% to 20%, 21% to 40%, and 41% to 60%) and randomized. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be 6 cycles (1 cycle = 21 days) of estramustine (280 mg tid, days 1 to 5) and docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2). Warfarin (2 mg/day orally) will be given for prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis. Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and RP will be performed within 60 days of registration/randomization for men randomized to the surgery-alone arm. For men randomized to receive preoperative chemotherapy, the surgical procedure will be performed within 60 days of completion of chemotherapy. Patients will be monitored with history review, physical examination, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels every 3 months for the first 3 years after surgery, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and annually thereafter. Biochemical disease recurrence will be defined as a serum PSA level >0.4 ng/mL on 2 consecutive occasions > or =3 months apart after RP. The time of biochemical failure is measured from the date of randomization to the time of the first PSA level <0.4 ng/mL that is confirmed on the second serial PSA. The primary study end point is to determine if early systemic treatment with neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel before RP in patients with high-risk prostate cancer will decrease 5-year recurrence rates when compared with RP alone. Secondary outcomes will include (1) the safety and tolerability of neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel before RP; (2) the impact of this neoadjuvant strategy on pathologic tumor stage, including lymph node and surgical margin status; (3) time to clinically apparent disease recurrence; and (4) overall survival. The impact of RP with and without neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel on the patient's quality of life from pretreatment through year 3 will be assessed. Frozen prostate tissue will be obtained from men undergoing prostatectomy who are enrolled in either the treatment or control arms of the trial. These samples will be analyzed for their RNA expression patterns in order to build outcome prediction models. Furthermore, using array-based methods of expression analysis, the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents and response to chemotherapy may likewise be predicted. The trial will enroll approximately 700 men during a 48-month period. Patients will be observed for 84 months after study closure. The power to detect a 36% decrease in 5-year recurrence rates is 90%.

Long-term followup of a randomized trial of 0 versus 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen ablation before radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

In 1992 we initiated a national randomized prospective trial of 3 months of cyproterone acetate before radical prostatectomy compared to prostatectomy alone. Initial results indicated a 50% decrease in the rate of positive surgical margins. This decrease did not translate into a difference in prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression at 3 years. This report is on the long-term outcome (median followup 6 years) of this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, open label trial compared 100 mg cyproterone acetate 3 times daily for 3 months before surgery to surgery alone. Randomization occurred between January 1993 and April 1994. Patients were stratified according to clinical stage, baseline serum PSA and Gleason sum. A total of 213 patients were accrued. Biochemical progression was defined as 2 consecutive detectable PSAs (greater than 0.2 ng/ml) at least 4 weeks apart, re-treatment or death from prostate cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 34 (33.6%) patients undergoing surgery only and 42 (37.5%) patients given neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) had biochemical recurrence during the median followup of 6 years. Despite the significant pathological down staging in this study, there was no significant difference in number of patients with no evidence of biochemical disease (bNED) survival (p = 0.732). A bNED survival benefit favoring NHT was seen in men with a baseline PSA greater than 20 (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 years of followup there was no overall benefit with 3 months of NHT. Improved bNED survival was seen in the highest risk PSA group (PSA greater than 20). The possibility that high risk patients may benefit from NHT warrants further investigation.

Pathological effects of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy help predict progression of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether pathological changes following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) prior to radical prostatectomy have any value as predictors of progression in prostate cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a study of 100 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy following NHT. We used the Japanese general rule as the criterion to assess the biochemical recurrence rate and pathological changes after NHT.

RESULTS

In terms of preoperative risk factors, the probability of recurrence was significantly higher for patients with more than 20 ng/mL of pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or a Gleason score of 7 or higher for biopsy specimens. We defined these pretreatment findings as high-risk factors. Among 65 patients with high-risk factors, patients with a post-NHT pathological effect of grade 3 according to the Japanese general rule showed no recurrence, whereas patients with a grade 0 had a poor prognosis. Patients with a PSA nadir 0.5 ng/mL or less tended to have a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Despite preoperative high-risk factors, patients showing good pathological effects after NHT tend to have a favorable prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Therefore; assessment of the pathological effects of NHT using the Japanese general rule as the criterion proved to be useful for the prediction of biochemical recurrence.

Management of high-risk localized prostate cancer: the integration of local and systemic therapy approaches

Using a combination of PSA, Gleason score, and clinical stage, it is possible to identify a group of patients with prostate cancer who have a high risk of relapse following initial treatment (e.g., radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy). For these patients, multi-modal therapy may result in improved outcomes. We reviewed published literature to identify methods to identify high-risk patients as well as options for adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy to reduce risk of disease recurrence. At the present time, the most promising adjuvant therapy is hormonal therapy following radiotherapy for locally advanced disease (T3-T4, or N1). In phase III trials in these patients, survival is improved. For all other applications, including adjuvant and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, the benefits are unclear. Perhaps most promising at this time, and the subject of a current phase III trial, is the utility of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients. It will be through the conduct of phase III trials that the benefits of multi-modal therapy will be evaluated. Patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy or surgery should be offered participation in these clinical trials.

Pathologic effects of neoadjuvant cyproterone acetate on nonneoplastic prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma: a detailed analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens from a randomized trial

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT; androgen ablation) is used prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) in an attempt to pathologically "downstage" prostatic adenocarcinoma and ultimately to improve disease-free survival. This study describes the pathologic effects of NHT with the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate, 300 mg/day for 12 weeks, on the RP specimens from men with clinically localized (stage T1 or T2) prostatic adenocarcinoma. There were 101 men in the pretreatment group (CPA) and 91 men in a control group who were treated with surgery alone. The prevalence and extent of morphologic effects were recorded for the nonneoplastic prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive adenocarcinoma. The commonest effects on the nonneoplastic prostate were atrophy and basal cell hyperplasia and prominence. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was more commonly identified in the surgery alone group than the CPA group (p <0.01). In the CPA group, flat and low tufted patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia predominated. Following NHT, the adenocarcinoma showed characteristic morphologic alterations, including reduction in cytoplasmic quantity, cytoplasmic vacuolation, nuclear pyknosis, reduced gland diameter, and mucinous breakdown. In many cases there was prominence of collagenous stroma, obscuring malignant glands. Compared with the surgery alone group, the CPA group RP specimens had a significantly lower mean specimen weight (40.3 g vs 46.5 g, p = 0.025) and less tumor extent by several measures. Organ-confined tumor (stage pT2, margin negative) was found in 41.6% of the CPA group compared with 19.8% of the surgery alone group (p = 0.0017). The overall rate of margin positivity was lower in the CPA group (27.7% vs 64.8%, p = 0.001). We consider that the difference in margin positivity is the result of tumor shrinkage with a decreased likelihood of sampling in routine sections. There was no significant difference in the rate of extraprostatic extension between the two groups. There was elevation of the Gleason score in the RP specimens versus baseline biopsy in 60% of the CPA group compared with 33% of the surgery alone group (p = 0.02). The higher rate of elevation in the CPA group largely resulted from an increase in primary or secondary Gleason score 5 tumor, a morphologic artifact introduced by NHT. Because of this, we recommend not giving a Gleason grade to RP specimens following NHT. Monotherapy with CPA has similar pathologic effects on benign and malignant prostate tissue as does dual agent androgen blockade. Prolonged follow-up of these patients is required to determine if NHT with CPA leads to improved disease-free survival.

Three-month neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy: a 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcome, assessed as the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA), of a mature (more than half the events recorded) prospective randomized study with a median follow-up of 82 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy, as this has been suggested to decrease the rate of positive surgical margins (i.e. provide greater potential to completely excise the tumour).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1991 to March 1994, 126 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were randomized between direct radical prostatectomy or a 3-month course of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue before surgery. The patients were followed by PSA determinations and a value of > 0.5 ng/mL used to define progression.

RESULTS

The incidence of positive surgical margins decreased from 45.5% to 23.6% (P = 0.016) with hormone treatment. Despite this there was no difference in PSA progression-free survival at the last follow-up; it was 51.5% for those undergoing radical prostatectomy only and 49.8% for those who received hormonal pretreatment (P = 0.588).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy offers no benefit to the patient and cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.

Contemporary patterns of androgen deprivation therapy use for newly diagnosed prostate cancer

Although once reserved for the management of metastatic prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is being used increasingly to treat lower stages of disease. We sought to assess patterns of ADT use in a contemporary cohort of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had > or =12 months of follow-up evaluation were identified in a national disease registry of patients with prostate cancer. The patterns of ADT use, both primary and secondary, were characterized and stratified by risk according to prostate-specific antigen levels, clinical stage, and Gleason score. In a cohort of 1485 men, 46% underwent ADT at some point during their treatment: 41% as primary therapy (either sole therapy or neoadjuvant therapy), and 5% as secondary therapy. In all, 50% of men receiving initial ADT had low- or intermediate-risk disease characteristics. Among patients treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy, neoadjuvant ADT was administered in 20% and 48% of patients, respectively. Secondary hormonal manipulation was observed in 5% and 7% of patients treated initially with surgery or radiation, respectively. ADT is commonly used to treat men with prostate cancer. Much of the use of ADT is in men with low- and intermediate-risk disease characteristics. The appropriateness of such therapy requires further study, including its effect, not only on disease endpoints, but also on resource utilization and health-related quality of life.

Preoperative neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal therapy in prostate cancer: the Canadian experience

The goal of radical prostatectomy is the complete removal of all cancer cells--no more, no less. Unfortunately, this is not always possible, especially in men with higher risk pathologic features. It is recognized that preoperative staging underestimates the extent of disease in < or =66% of cases, and that positive margin rates may be as high as 30% to 60%. Over the past 7 years in Canada, researchers have been investigating therapies that optimize the complete extirpation of all cancer cells with a minimum of morbidity and mortality. An example of this therapy is the combined modality approach of shrinking the prostate and tumor with androgen withdrawal therapy before surgical removal. The availability of potent, reversible, and well-tolerated forms of medical castration, and the sensitivity of serum prostate-specific antigen as a marker of response to therapy, makes neoadjuvant hormone therapy before localized therapy possible and appealing. In this article, we will review the Canadian experience, from the laboratory to the clinic.

Duration of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before radical prostatectomy and disease-free survival in men with prostate cancer

There is little evidence that neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) of 3 months' duration before radical prostatectomy (RP) favorably influences disease-free survival. However, recent data suggest that prolonged treatment may improve outcome. We conducted a prospective cohort study to determine whether ADT of either standard or prolonged duration before RP influences the risk of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure. We followed 756 men treated for prostate cancer by RP between 1991 and 1998 in Quebec City. Of these, 240 received combined neoadjuvant ADT for either </=92 days (129 men) or >/=93 days (111 men), and 516 were treated by RP alone. Multivariate Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of PSA failure (>0.3 ng/mL) associated with treatment regimen controlling for age, clinical stage, grade, and initial PSA level. The median duration of follow-up was 4 years. Compared with men treated by RP alone, those who received neoadjuvant ADT for >/=93 days had an HR of PSA failure of 0.60. The inverse association with the risk of PSA failure became statistically significant from the third year on, reached its greatest magnitude after 4 years, and was still present 8 years after RP. No association was observed for ADT of </=92 days. These results suggest that neoadjuvant ADT before RP has a real, delayed, and persistent effect on disease-free survival, if and only if ADT is prolonged beyond 3 months.

Expression of p21 predicts PSA failure in locally advanced prostate cancer treated by prostatectomy

The management of prostate cancer is based on several clinicopathological criteria. The ability to determine the tumor's biological potential is one goal of tumor markers in order to identify patients who may require more intensive treatment strategies. The purpose of our study was to determine if p21/(WAF1/CIP1) expression can predict biochemical failure in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). We used immunohistochemistry to analyze patterns of p21 expression in a population of 296 patients with locally advanced (pT3) prostate cancer treated by RRP. Results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and time to PSA failure. For the entire cohort of 296 patients, after adjustment for prognostic factors, p21 expression was associated with an increased risk of PSA failure (relative risk [RR] = 1.48) of statistical significance at a median follow-up of 54.5 months. Other parameters that independently predicted the risk of PSA failure included lymph node metastasis and seminal vesicle involvement. Because neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) is known to lead to involutional changes in prostatic carcinoma, we performed multivariate analyses after stratifying for NHT prior to surgery. Among the 172 patients treated by RRP alone, p21 expression was an independent predictor of PSA failure (RR = 2.30), as were lymph node metastases (RR = 3.19) and pathological grade 5-7 and 8-10 (RR = 2.87 and 3.50, respectively). p21 over-expression is an independent predictor of PSA failure in pT3 patients treated by radical prostatectomy, especially if they did not receive NHT. This tumor marker may help clinicians identify patients who may require adjuvant treatment strategies following radical prostatectomy.

Effect of complete androgen blockade on pathologic stage and resection margin status of prostate cancer: progress pathology report of the Italian PROSIT study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the pathologic stage and surgical margin status in patients undergoing either immediate radical prostatectomy or surgery preceded by 3 or 6 months of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (NHT) in a prospective, randomized study.

METHODS

Four hundred thirty-one men with prostate cancer were enrolled in the Italian randomized prospective PROSIT study. The whole-mount sectioning technique was used. By May 1999, the reviewing pathologist had evaluated 303 specimens. One hundred seven patients were untreated before radical prostatectomy was performed, and 114 and 82 patients had been treated for 3 and 6 months, respectively, with complete androgen blockade.

RESULTS

Pathologic organ-confined disease was found in 63.1% of patients with clinical Stage B disease treated with 6 months of NHT versus 61.0% after 3 months of NHT and 37.5% after immediate surgery. Among patients with clinical Stage C tumors, pathologic staging found organ-confined disease in 62.5%, 32.1%, and 11.1% of patients after 6 months of NHT, 3 months of NHT, and immediate surgery, respectively. Three months of NHT produced a significant increase in negative margins both in patients with clinical Stage B and C disease, but the addition of another 3 months of treatment did not significantly improve this result. A lower degree of benefit was observed in patients with clinical Stage C tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that complete androgen blockade before surgery is beneficial in men with clinical Stage B disease. The effects are more pronounced after 6 months of NHT than after 3 months.