The effect of cumulative dosing on the analgesic potency of morphine in mice

OPRM1 Methylation Contributes to Opioid Tolerance in Cancer Patients

Cancer patients in pain require high doses of opioids and quickly become opioid-tolerant. Previous studies have shown that chronic cancer pain as well as high-dose opioid use lead to mu-opioid receptor downregulation. In this study we explore downregulation of the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1), as a mechanism for opioid tolerance in the setting of opioid use for cancer pain. We demonstrate in a cohort of 84 cancer patients that high-dose opioid use correlates with OPRM1 hypermethylation in peripheral leukocytes of these patients. We then reverse-translate our clinical findings by creating a mouse cancer pain model; we create opioid tolerance in the mouse cancer model to mimic opioid tolerance in the cancer patients. Using this model we determine the functional significance of OPRM1 methylation on cancer pain and opioid tolerance. We focus on 2 main cells within the cancer microenvironment: the cancer cell and the neuron. We show that targeted re-expression of mu-opioid receptor on cancer cells inhibits mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity, and prevents opioid tolerance, in the mouse model. The resultant analgesia and protection against opioid tolerance are likely due to preservation of mu-opioid receptor expression on the cancer-associated neurons.

PERSPECTIVE

We demonstrate that epigenetic regulation of OPRM1 contributes to opioid tolerance in cancer patients, and that targeted gene therapy could treat cancer-induced nociception and opioid tolerance in a mouse cancer model.

Morphine dosing strategy plays a key role in the generation and duration of the produced antinociceptive tolerance

Antinociceptive tolerance after repetitive administration of morphine severely limits its clinical use. Despite increased mechanistic understanding of morphine tolerance, little is known about the influence of dosing regimens in its development. We hypothesized that the starting dose of morphine, dosing frequency and dose increments, influence antinociception and the manifestation of antinociceptive tolerance in rats. Male rats were randomly divided into four groups with different intermittent starting-doses of daily morphine (b.i.d.) followed by different increments of single-dose morphine upon development of antinociceptive tolerance, for 2-3 weeks: 2.5 (b.i.d.)→5 → 10→15 mg/kg/day, 5 (b.i.d.)→10 mg/kg/day, 5 (b.i.d.)→15 mg/kg/day, 10 (b.i.d.)→20 mg/kg/day. Antinociception was assessed daily pre-treatment and at several time-points over 2 h post-administration, using tail-flick and hot-plate assays. Tolerance was defined as significant antinociceptive desensitization and was presented as significant reduction of the maximum and total antinociceptive efficacy upon morphine administration. Rats commenced on 2.5 mg/kg/day (b.i.d.) morphine developed tolerance faster than those started on 5 or 10 mg/kg/day (b.i.d.). Comparatively, higher starting and maintenance doses of morphine produced prolonged antinociception and delayed tolerance. Whereas, lower starting and maintenance doses of morphine produced less total antinociception during the course of treatment and did not delay the onset of tolerance, but require smaller dose-increments to reach antinociception after development of antinociceptive tolerance. These results suggest that morphine starting dose, dosing frequency, increments and timing determine the manifestation of antinociceptive tolerance and extent of antinociception. In addition, our results also highlight the need for generally standardized and validated assay protocols and procedures to compare different studies, as a prerequisite to translate pre-clinical results into the clinic.

Analgesic tolerance of opioid agonists in mutant mu-opioid receptors expressed in sensory neurons following intrathecal plasmid gene delivery

Background

Phosphorylation sites in the C-terminus of mu-opioid receptors (MORs) are known to play critical roles in the receptor functions. Our understanding of their participation in opioid analgesia is mostly based on studies of opioid effects on mutant receptors expressed in in vitro preparations, including cell lines, isolated neurons and brain slices. The behavioral consequences of the mutation have not been fully explored due to the complexity in studies of mutant receptors in vivo. To facilitate the determination of the contribution of phosphorylation sites in MOR to opioid-induced analgesic behaviors, we expressed mutant and wild-type human MORs (hMORs) in sensory dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, a major site for nociceptive (pain) signaling and determined morphine- and the full MOR agonist, DAMGO,-induced effects on heat-induced hyperalgesic behaviors and potassium current (I_K) desensitization in these rats.

Findings

A mutant hMOR DNA with the putative phosphorylation threonine site at position 394 replaced by an alanine (T394A), i.e., hMOR-T, or a plasmid containing wild type hMOR (as a positive control) was intrathecally delivered. The plasmid containing GFP or saline was used as the negative control. To limit the expression of exogenous DNA to neurons of DRGs, a neuron-specific promoter was included in the plasmid. Following a plasmid injection, hMOR-T or hMOR receptors were expressed in small and medium DRG neurons. Compared with saline or GFP rats, the analgesic potency of morphine was increased to a similar extent in hMOR-T and hMOR rats. Morphine induced minimum I_K desensitization in both rat groups. In contrast, DAMGO increased analgesic potency and elicited I_K desensitization to a significantly less extent in hMOR-T than in hMOR rats. The development and extent of acute and chronic tolerance induced by repeated morphine or DAMGO applications were not altered by the T394A mutation.

Conclusions

These results indicate that phosphorylation of T394 plays a critical role in determining the potency of DAMGO-induced analgesia and I_K desensitization, but has limited effect on morphine-induced responses. On the other hand, the mutation contributes minimally to both DAMGO- and morphine-induced behavioral tolerance. Furthermore, the study shows that plasmid gene delivery of mutant receptors to DRG neurons is a useful strategy to explore nociceptive behavioral consequences of the mutation.

A large animal neuropathic pain model in sheep: a strategy for improving the predictability of preclinical models for therapeutic development

Background

Evaluation of analgesics in large animals is a necessary step in the development of better pain medications or gene therapy prior to clinical trials. However, chronic neuropathic pain models in large animals are limited. To address this deficiency, we developed a neuropathic pain model in sheep, which shares many anatomical similarities in spine dimensions and cerebrospinal fluid volume as humans.

Methods

A neuropathic pain state was induced in sheep by tight ligation and axotomy of the common peroneal nerve. The analgesic effect of intrathecal (IT) morphine was investigated. Interspecies comparison was conducted by analyzing the ceiling doses of IT morphine for humans, sheep, and rats.

Results

Peroneal nerve injury (PNI) produced an 86% decrease in von-Frey filament-evoked withdrawal threshold on postsurgery day 3 and the decrease lasted for the 8-week test period. Compared to the pre-injury, sham, and contralateral hindlimb, the IT morphine dose that produces 50% of maximum analgesia (ED₅₀) for injured PNI hindlimb was 1.8-fold larger and E_max, the dose that produces maximal analgesia, was 6.1-fold lower. The sheep model closely predicts human IT morphine ceiling dose by allometric scaling. This is in contrast to the approximately 10-fold lower morphine ceiling dose predicted by the rat spinal nerve ligated or spared nerve injury models.

Conclusion

PNI sheep model has a fast onset and shows stable and long-lasting pain behavioral characteristics. Since the antinociceptive properties of IT morphine are similar to those observed in humans, the PNI sheep model will be a useful tool for the development of analgesics. Its large size and consistent chronic pain behavior will facilitate the development and evaluation of surgical intervention and gene therapy. The PNI sheep pain model provides us with the opportunity for multi-species testing, which will improve the success of clinical trials.

Dosing protocol and analgesic efficacy determine opioid tolerance in the mouse

RATIONALE

Analgesic efficacy of opioids and dosing protocol have been shown to influence analgesic tolerance.

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the hypothesis that there is an inverse relationship between analgesic efficacy and tolerance following continuous infusion of opioid analgesics. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that analgesic efficacy plays a minor role in determining the magnitude of tolerance following intermittent or acute administration, and that acute and intermittent administration of opioid agonists produces less tolerance than continuous infusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analgesic (tailflick) efficacy (tau) of etorphine, methadone, oxycodone, and hydrocodone was determined using the operational model of agonism. To induce tolerance, mice were injected with opioid agonists once (acute), once per day for 7 days (intermittent) or continuously infused for 7 days. Dose-response studies were conducted using morphine following treatment.

RESULTS

The order of analgesic efficacy was etorphine > methadone > oxycodone congruent with hydrocodone. Infusion of the higher analgesic efficacy drug etorphine produced significantly less tolerance than the lower analgesic efficacy drugs oxycodone, methadone, and hydrocodone at equi-effective doses. In general, intermittent and acute treatment produced less tolerance compared to continuous infusion even at similar daily doses.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, intermittent and acute opioid agonist administration produces minimal tolerance compared to continuous infusion. Furthermore, there is an inverse relationship between analgesic efficacy and tolerance following continuous infusion. These results suggest that opioid analgesic tolerance may be increased when sustained release dosing formulations or continuous infusions are employed clinically.

Contribution of dopamine receptors to periaqueductal gray-mediated antinociception

RATIONALE

Morphine relieves pain, in part, by acting on neurons within the periaqueductal gray (PAG). Given that the PAG contains a subpopulation of dopamine neurons, dopamine may contribute to the antinociceptive effects mediated by the PAG.

METHODS

This hypothesis was tested by measuring the behavioral and electrophysiological effects of administering dopamine agonists and antagonists into the ventrolateral PAG (vPAG). An initial histological experiment verified the existence of dopamine neurons within the vPAG using dopamine transporter and tyrosine hydroxylase antibodies visualized with confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

Microinjection of cumulative doses of morphine into the vPAG caused antinociception that was dose-dependently inhibited by the dopamine receptor antagonist alpha-flupenthixol. alpha-Flupenthixol had no effect on nociception when administered alone. Injection of the dopamine receptor agonist (-) apomorphine into the vPAG caused a robust antinociception that was inhibited by the D2 antagonist eticlopride but not the D1 antagonist SCH-23390. The effects of dopamine on GABA(A)-mediated evoked inhibitory post-synaptic potentials (eIPSCs) were measured in PAG slices. Administration of met-enkephalin inhibited peak eIPSCs by 20-50%. Dopamine inhibited eIPSCs by approximately 20-25%. Administration of alpha-flupenthixol (20 muM) attenuated eIPSC inhibition by dopamine but had no effect on met-enkephalin-induced inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that PAG dopamine has a direct antinociceptive effect in addition to modulating the antinociceptive effect of morphine. The lack of an effect of alpha-flupenthixol on opioid-inhibition of eIPSCs indicates that this modulation occurs in parallel or subsequent to inhibition of GABA release.

Continuous morphine produces more tolerance than intermittent or acute treatment

Dosing protocol and analgesic efficacy have been proposed to be important determinants of the magnitude of opioid tolerance. The present study examined the effect of acute, intermittent and continuous treatment with the low analgesic efficacy agonist morphine on analgesic tolerance. Mice were implanted s.c. with a 25 mg morphine pellet for 1-7 days. Other mice were implanted s.c. with two 25 mg, or one 75 mg morphine pellet for 7 days. The release of morphine from subcutaneous implanted pellets was quantitated using a spectrophotometric assay. In other studies, mice were injected with morphine once (18.5-185 mg/kg/day; approximately 10-100 times ED(50) for morphine analgesia) or once/day for 7 days. Controls were implanted with a placebo pellet or injected with saline. Analysis of drug release from a 25 mg pellet indicated that release was greatest during the first 24 h, declined and then remained relatively constant. The amount of morphine released over 7 days by a 75 mg pellet (23.9 mg) was more than that of a single 25 mg pellet (15.4 mg) but less than two 25 mg pellets (30.8 mg). Following treatment, morphine cumulative dose-response studies were conducted (tail flick). Continuous treatment with morphine using pellet implantation produced a dose-dependent shift in the morphine ED(50) by 3.3, 5.8 and 8.5 fold for one 25 mg pellet, one 75 mg pellet and two 25 mg pellets, respectively. Acute and intermittent morphine administration produced substantially less analgesic tolerance than continuous release of morphine by implant pellets. The maximum shift in the ED(50) was 1.6 for acute treatment and 2.7 for 7 day intermittent treatment; despite a larger total daily dose. The present results indicate that continuous treatment with morphine results in greater analgesic tolerance than acute or intermittent morphine treatment even at comparable daily doses. These results are consistent with the suggestion that intermittent dosing has reduced risk of producing opioid tolerance.

Inhibition of the development of morphine tolerance by a potent dual mu-delta-opioid antagonist, H-Dmt-Tic-Lys-NH-CH2-Ph

Three analogues of the dual mu-/delta-antagonist, H-Dmt-Tic-R-NH-CH2-Ph (R = 1, Lys-Z; 2, Lys-Ac; 3, Lys) were examined in vivo: 1 and 2 exhibited weak bioactivity, while 3 injected intracerebroventricularly was a potent dual antagonist for morphine- and deltorphin C-induced antinociception comparable to naltrindole (delta-antagonist), but 93% as effective as naloxone (nonspecific opioid receptor antagonist) and 4% as active as CTOP, a mu antagonist. Subcutaneous or oral administration of 3 antagonized morphine-induced antinociception indicating passage across epithelial and blood-brain barriers. Mice pretreated with 3 before morphine did not develop morphine tolerance indicative of a potential clinical role to inhibit development of drug tolerance.

Hydromorphone efficacy and treatment protocol impact on tolerance and mu-opioid receptor regulation

This study examined the antinociceptive (analgesic) efficacy of hydromorphone and hydromorphone-induced tolerance and regulation of mu-opioid receptor density. Initially s.c. hydromorphone's time of peak analgesic (tail-flick) effect (45 min) and ED50 using standard and cumulative dosing protocols (0.22 mg/kg, 0.37 mg/kg, respectively) were determined. The apparent analgesic efficacy (tau) of hydromorphone was then estimated using the operational model of agonism and the irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist clocinnamox. Mice were injected with clocinnamox (0.32-25.6 mg/kg, i.p.) and 24 h later, the analgesic potency of hydromorphone was determined. The tau value for hydromorphone was 35, which suggested that hydromorphone is a lower analgesic efficacy opioid agonist. To examine hydromorphone-induced tolerance, mice were continuously infused s.c. with hydromorphone (2.1-31.5 mg/kg/day) for 7 days and then morphine cumulative dose response studies were performed. Other groups of mice were injected with hydromorphone (2.2-22 mg/kg/day) once, or intermittently every 24 h for 7 days. Twenty-four hours after the last injection, mice were tested using morphine cumulative dosing studies. There was more tolerance with infusion treatments compared to intermittent treatment. When compared to higher analgesic efficacy opioids, hydromorphone infusions induced substantially more tolerance. Finally, the effect of chronic infusion (31.5 mg/kg/day) and 7 day intermittent (22 mg/kg/day) hydromorphone treatment on spinal cord mu-opioid receptor density was determined. Hydromorphone did not produce any change in mu-opioid receptor density following either treatment. These results support suggestions that analgesic efficacy is correlated with tolerance magnitude and regulation of mu-opioid receptors when opioid agonists are continuously administered. Taken together, these studies indicate that analgesic efficacy and treatment protocol are important in determining tolerance and regulation of mu-opioid receptors.

The analgesic efficacy of fentanyl: relationship to tolerance and mu-opioid receptor regulation

This study determined if fentanyl analgesic efficacy predicts the magnitude of tolerance and mu-opioid receptor regulation. To estimate efficacy, mice were injected i.p. with saline or clocinnamox (CCAM), an irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist, (0.32-25.6 mg/kg) and 24 h later fentanyl cumulative dose-response studies were conducted. CCAM dose dependently shifted the fentanyl dose-response function to the right. The apparent efficacy (tau) of fentanyl, based on the operational model of agonism, was estimated as 58, indicating that fentanyl is a high analgesic efficacy agonist. Next, mice were infused with fentanyl (1, 2 or 4 mg/kg/day) for 7 days. Controls were implanted with placebo pellets. At the end of 7 days, morphine cumulative dose-response studies or mu-opioid receptor saturation binding studies were conducted. Fentanyl infusions dose dependently decreased morphine potency with the highest fentanyl dose reducing morphine potency by approximately 6 fold. Chronic infusion with fentanyl (4 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced mu-opioid receptor density by 28% without altering affinity, whereas lower infusion doses had no effect. Taken together, the present results strengthen the proposal that opioid analgesic efficacy predicts mu-opioid receptor regulation and the magnitude of tolerance.

Mu-opioid receptor up-regulation and functional supersensitivity are independent of antagonist efficacy

Chronic opioid antagonist treatment up-regulates opioid receptors and produces functional supersensitivity. Although opioid antagonists vary from neutral to inverse, the role of antagonist efficacy in mediating the chronic effects of opioid antagonists is not known. In this study, the effects of two putative inverse agonists (naltrexone, naloxone) and a putative neutral antagonist (6beta-naltrexol) were examined. Initially, peak effect (40 min, naltrexone and naloxone; 70 min, 6beta-naltrexol) and relative potency to antagonize morphine analgesia were determined (relative potencies = 1, 2, and 16, 6beta-naltrexol, naloxone, and naltrexone, respectively). Next, mice were infused for 7 days with naloxone (0.1-10 mg/kg/day), naltrexone (10 or 15 mg s.c. pellet), or 6beta-naltrexol (0.2-20 mg/kg/day), and spinal micro-opioid receptor density was examined, or morphine analgesia dose-response studies were conducted. All antagonists up-regulated mu-opioid receptors (60-122%) and induced supersensitivity (1.8-2.0-fold increase in morphine potency). There were no differences in antagonist potency to produce up-regulation or supersensitivity. These data suggest that opioid antagonist-induced mu-opioid receptor up-regulation and supersensitivity require occupancy of the receptor and that antagonist efficacy is not critical. Finally, the ED(50) to precipitate withdrawal jumping was examined in morphine-dependent mice. Naltrexone, naloxone, and 6beta-naltrexol produced withdrawal jumping, although potencies relative to 6beta-naltrexol were 211, 96, and 1, respectively. Thus, antagonist potency to precipitate opioid withdrawal was related to inverse agonist efficacy. Overall, the estimated relative potency of the opioid antagonists was a function of the outcome measured, and inverse agonist activity was not required for mu-opioid receptor up-regulation and supersensitivity.

Analgesic tolerance to microinjection of the micro-opioid agonist DAMGO into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray

Repeated administration of the relatively low-efficacy micro-opioid receptor agonist morphine induces tolerance to its antinociceptive effects. High-efficacy agonists such as D-Ala2NMePhe4,Gly-ol5 (DAMGO) have been shown to be less effective at producing tolerance, suggesting that different neural mechanisms underlie tolerance to these agonists. However, the correlation between agonist efficacy and tolerance development has not been examined within the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vPAG), a brain area known to be crucial for the development of morphine tolerance. The current studies examined whether tolerance to DAMGO occurs within the vPAG, and whether repeated treatment with DAMGO into the vPAG alters the development of morphine tolerance. The results showed that repeated vPAG microinjections of DAMGO induced robust tolerance and cross-tolerance to morphine. Further, co-administration of a low dose of DAMGO with morphine potentiated morphine tolerance. These findings indicate that similar mechanisms underlie tolerance to morphine and DAMGO within the vPAG.

Persistent exercise attenuates nicotine- but not clonidine-induced antinociception in female rats

Exercise decreases the antinociceptive effects of opiate drugs. It has been hypothesized that the exercise-induced attenuation of opiate drug action is the result of the development of cross-tolerance between endogenous opioids released during exercise and exogenous opiates. The present study was designed to evaluate the role of exercise on non-opiate antinociception. Female Long-Evans rats were allowed ad lib access to running wheels. After 3 weeks, antinociceptive responses of animals were measured using the tail flick test following the administration of clonidine or nicotine. Nicotine and clonidine both produced dose-dependent increases in antinociceptive responses. Active animals were significantly less sensitive to nicotine-induced antinociception than inactive animals. There was no difference between the two groups in clonidine-induced antinociception. The results of these experiments suggest that exercise does not attenuate non-opioid, clonidine-induced antinociception. However, exercise does attenuate nicotine-induced antinociception. Therefore, the effect of persistent exercise on analgesic drugs is not specific to opiates.

Morphine analgesic tolerance in 129P3/J and 129S6/SvEv mice

Morphine analgesic tolerance is heritable in both humans and rodents, with some individuals and strains exhibiting little and others exhibiting robust tolerance. 129S6/SvEv and 129P3/J mice reportedly do not demonstrate tolerance to morphine analgesia. Using our laboratory's standard morphine tolerance regimen and a between-subjects design, tolerance developed in the hot plate and tail withdrawal assays as indicated by a change in analgesic efficacy following a morphine challenge dose. Furthermore, the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (dizocilipine) blocked morphine tolerance in 129S6/SvEv and CD-1 mice in the hot plate assay. As previously reported, when a within-subjects design and cumulative dosing was employed, no tolerance was observed in the 129P3/J strain. However, using the same morphine regimen and a between-subjects design, comparable tolerance developed between 129P3/J and C57BL/6J strains following a single challenge dose of morphine. Spontaneous hyperalgesia was observed in the tail withdrawal assay following chronic morphine in C57BL/6J, but not 129P3/J mice. Additionally, morphine-tolerant C57BL/6J mice, but not 129P3/J mice, exhibited a large increase in the frequency of tail flicks during the first second following the baseline nociceptive response which may facilitate detection of the response during the tolerant state. We conclude that the method of tolerance assessment affects the ability to detect tolerance and thus may affect the degree and pattern of heritability of this trait and this could have implications for gene mapping studies.

Environmental and intraperitoneal ethanol influences morphine antinociceptive effect in mice

The ability of acute environmental or intraperitoneal (i.p.) ethanol to influence morphine antinociceptive effect was studied in mice. In order to induce tolerance to morphine analgesia, mice received daily injections of 10 mg/Kg morphine over a period of 10 days. Mice were divided into three groups: i.p. ethanol (E), environmental ethanol (E*), and control saline (M). During the induction of tolerance these groups were treated identically except on days 1 and 11. On these days, 10 minutes prior to morphine injection, mice received either i.p. ethanol (1g/Kg), environmental ethanol (a bottle of 10% ethanol placed next to the animals cage during the experiments), or an equivalent volume of saline. Analgesia was assessed using a standard hot plate protocol and dose-response cumulative curves for morphine analgesia were obtained on days 1 and 11. On day 1, both the i.p. and environmental administration of ethanol showed similar morphine-potentiation effects [Mean Effective Dose: ED50 (M1)=4.5 mg/kg; ED50 (E1)=2.4 mg/kg; ED50 (E*1)=2.1 mg/kg]. On day 11, control group mice showed a reduction of morphine analgesia at test [ED50 (M11)=14.1 mg/kg]. Mice receiving i.p. and environmental ethanol again showed a leftward shift in dose-response cumulative curves for morphine antinociception with respect to controls [ED50 (E11)=9.1 mg/kg; ED50 (E*11)=4.7 mg/kg]. I.p. ethanol administration at non-antinociceptive doses enhances the morphine antinociception effect similarly in tolerant and non-tolerant (naive) mice. The presence of environmental ethanol can also induce a similar pattern of increase in morphine antinociception effect.

Role of G(i)alpha2-protein in opioid tolerance and mu-opioid receptor downregulation in vivo

Although opioid receptors are G-protein coupled, the role that specific G-protein subunits play in the development of opioid tolerance and the regulation of opioid receptor number is not well understood. In the present study, we used a G((i)alpha2) antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) to examine the contribution of G((i)alpha2) proteins to mu-opioid tolerance and receptor downregulation in the mouse. Mice were injected intracerebroventricularly (ICV) and into the spinal intrathecal space (IT) for 4-5 consecutive days (30 microg/site/day), with an antisense ODN or a mismatch ODN directed at mRNA for the G((i)alpha2) subunit of G-proteins. Controls were treated with dH(2)O. On the second day of ODN treatment continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion of etorphine (200 microg/kg/day) or morphine (40 mg/kg/day + 25 mg pellet) was begun. Control mice were implanted with inert placebo pellets. Three days later, pumps and pellets were removed and mice were tested for morphine analgesia or mu-opioid receptor density was determined in whole brain. Etorphine produced significant tolerance (ED(50) shift = approximately 11-fold) and downregulation of mu-opioid receptors (approximately 25%). Morphine treatment produced significant tolerance (ED(50) shift approximately 9-fold), but no mu-opioid receptor downregulation. Antisense treatment reduced G((i)alpha2) protein levels in striatum and spinal cord by approximately 25%. G((i)alpha2) antisense reduced the acute potency of morphine. G((i)alpha2) antisense blocked the development of tolerance to morphine treatment and reduced the development of tolerance to etorphine treatment. Antisense did not have any effect on etorphine-induced mu-opioid receptor downregulation. In another experiment, 7-day treatment with morphine or etorphine similarly increased G((i)alpha2) mRNA and protein abundance in spinal cord. Overall, these results support an important role for G((i)alpha2)-protein in the acute effects of opioids and opioid tolerance. However, G((i)alpha2) is not required for agonist-induced mu-opioid receptor density regulation in vivo.

Evaluation of muscarinic agonist-induced analgesia in muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice

Centrally active muscarinic agonists display pronounced analgesic effects. Identification of the specific muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) subtype(s) mediating this activity is of considerable therapeutic interest. To examine the roles of the M(2) and M(4) receptor subtypes, the two G(i)/G(o)-coupled mAChRs, in mediating agonist-dependent antinociception, we generated a mutant mouse line deficient in both M(2) and M(4) mAChRs [M(2)/M(4) double-knockout (KO) mice]. In wild-type mice, systemic, intrathecal, or intracerebroventricular administration of centrally active muscarinic agonists resulted in robust analgesic effects, indicating that muscarinic analgesia can be mediated by both spinal and supraspinal mechanisms. Strikingly, muscarinic agonist-induced antinociception was totally abolished in M(2)/M(4) double-KO mice, independent of the route of application. The nonselective muscarinic agonist oxotremorine showed reduced analgesic potency in M(2) receptor single-KO mice, but retained full analgesic activity in M(4) receptor single-KO mice. In contrast, two novel muscarinic agonists chemically derived from epibatidine, CMI-936 and CMI-1145, displayed reduced analgesic activity in both M(2) and M(4) receptor single-KO mice, independent of the route of application. Radioligand binding studies indicated that the two CMI compounds, in contrast to oxotremorine, showed >6-fold higher affinity for M(4) than for M(2) receptors, providing a molecular basis for the observed differences in agonist activity profiles. These data provide unambiguous evidence that muscarinic analgesia is exclusively mediated by a combination of M(2) and M(4) mAChRs at both spinal and supraspinal sites. These findings should be of considerable relevance for the development of receptor subtype-selective muscarinic agonists as novel analgesic drugs.

Mu-opioid receptor down-regulation and tolerance are not equally dependent upon G-protein signaling

In the present study, the contribution of pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive G(i/o)-proteins to opioid tolerance and mu-opioid receptor down-regulation in the mouse were examined. Mice were injected once intracerebroventricularly and intrathecally with PTX (0.1 microg/site). Controls were treated with saline. On the 10th day following PTX treatment, continuous subcutaneous infusion of etorphine (150 or 200 microg/kg/day) or morphine (40 mg/kg/day+25 mg slow-release pellet) was begun. Control mice were implanted with inert placebo pellets. Pumps and pellets were removed 3 days later, and mice were tested for morphine analgesia or mu-opioid receptor density was determined in the whole brain, spinal cord, and midbrain. Both infusion doses of etorphine produced significant tolerance (ED50 shift=approximately 4-6-fold) and down-regulation of mu-opioid receptors (approximately 20-35%). Morphine treatment also produced significant tolerance (ED50 shift= approximately 5-8-fold), but no mu-opioid receptor down-regulation. PTX dramatically reduced the acute potency of morphine and blocked the further development of tolerance by both etorphine and morphine treatments. However, PTX had no effect on etorphine-induced mu-opioid receptor down-regulation in brain, cord, or midbrain. These results suggest that PTX-sensitive G-proteins have a minimal role in agonist-induced mu-opioid receptor density regulation in vivo, but are critical in mediating acute and chronic functional effects of opioids such as analgesia and tolerance.

Wheel running attenuates the antinociceptive properties of morphine and its metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide, in rats

Recent work has shown that chronic exercise is associated with a reduction in the pain-relieving actions of opioid drugs in experimental animals. To determine whether this reduction represents an interaction between exogenously administered opioids and the endogenous opioid system, or is the result of altered drug pharmacokinetics, the antinociceptive actions of morphine and its metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), were compared in active and inactive female Long-Evans rats. Active animals were housed in running wheels and inactive animals in standard laboratory cages for 3 weeks preceding determinations of antinociception using the tail-flick test. At the end of the 3-week period, active rats were running the equivalent of 9-11 km a day. Antinociceptive responses, determined following subcutaneous injections of either morphine (0.625-20 mg/kg) or M6G (0.3-10.0 mg/kg), were significantly reduced in active rats relative to inactive rats. This reduction was manifested by both a lower magnitude of antinociception, and a shorter duration of antinociception after drug administration in active compared to inactive rats. This reduction was not associated with alterations in the estrous cycle or with differences in body weight between the active and inactive animals. The present results support the hypothesis that cross-tolerance develops between endogenous opioid peptides released in response to exercise and exogenously administered opioid drugs.

mu-Opioid receptor downregulation contributes to opioid tolerance in vivo

The present study examined the contribution of downregulation of mu-opioid receptors to opioid tolerance in an intact animal model. Mice were implanted subcutaneously with osmotic minipumps that infused etorphine (50-250 microg/kg/day) for 7 days. Other mice were implanted subcutaneously with a morphine pellet (25 mg) or a morphine pellet plus an osmotic minipump that infused morphine (5-40 mg/kg/day) for 7 days. Controls were implanted with an inert placebo pellet. At the end of treatment, pumps and pellets were removed, and saturation binding studies were conducted in whole brain ([3H]DAMGO) or morphine and etorphine analgesic ED(50)s were determined (tail-flick). Morphine tolerance increased linearly with the infusion dose of morphine (ED(50) shift at highest infusion dose, 4.76). No significant downregulation of mu-receptors in whole brain was observed at the highest morphine treatment dose. Etorphine produced dose-dependent downregulation of mu-opioid receptor density and tolerance (ED(50) shift at highest infusion dose, 6.97). Downregulation of mu-receptors only occurred at the higher etorphine infusion doses (> or =150 microg/kg/day). Unlike morphine tolerance, the magnitude of etorphine tolerance was a nonlinear function of the dose and increased markedly at infusion doses that produced downregulation. These results suggest that mu-opioid receptor downregulation contributes to opioid tolerance in vivo. Therefore, opioid tolerance appears to rely upon both "receptor density-dependent" and " receptor density-independent" mechanisms.

Overexpression of type 7 adenylyl cyclase in the mouse brain enhances acute and chronic actions of morphine

The mechanisms by which morphine-induced analgesia and tolerance and physical dependence on morphine arise have been the subject of intense study, and much work has pointed to the involvement of cAMP-mediated events in the neuroadaptive phenomena leading to morphine tolerance and/or dependence. We overexpressed an opioid receptor-stimulatable form of adenylyl cyclase (type 7) in the central nervous system of mice and demonstrated significant effects of this manipulation on the animals' acute response to morphine, the development of morphine tolerance, and development of sensitization to morphine. Measurements of the acute analgesic response to morphine demonstrated that the ED(50) values for the transgenic mice were significantly lower than the ED(50) values determined for the "wild-type" animals. During chronic treatment with morphine, the transgenic mice developed tolerance more rapidly than the wild-type mice, and transgenic animals of the C57BL/6xSJL background showed a larger sensitization to morphine's effects on locomotor activity than did wild-type mice of the same background. These results indicated that cAMP-generating systems may simultaneously modulate the development of tolerance and sensitization. Interestingly, the signs of physical dependence on morphine in the transgenic mice did not differ from those in their wild-type litter mates, indicating that separate mechanisms may modulate opiate tolerance and opiate dependence.

The effects of antisense to Gialpha2 on opioid agonist potency and Gialpha2 protein and mRNA abundance in the mouse

In this study, mice received a single intracerebroventricular (i.c.v. ) injection of an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) directed towards the mRNA of Gialpha2. Controls received a saline or a nonsense ODN injection. The subsequent effects on protein levels and mRNA of Gialpha2 were determined in mouse striatum, as well as, the effect on opioid ([d-Ala2, d-Leu5]-enkephalin; DADLE) inhibition of cyclic AMP (cAMP) formation in striatum and morphine analgesic potency. At 48 h after treatment, maximal inhibition (Emax) of cAMP formation was significantly reduced for the antisense group compared to controls. Antisense ODN treatment only changed the Emax and did not significantly alter the IC50s of the dose-effect curves for inhibition of cAMP formation. Antisense ODN, but not nonsense ODN, significantly reduced morphine's analgesic potency by >2-fold, 48 h following treatment. Using a quantitative immunoblotting procedure, antisense treatment was shown to decrease striatal Gialpha2 protein 48 h after antisense injection, while there were no changes in protein levels at 2, 12 and 24 h. In contrast, no changes in Gialpha2 mRNA in mouse striatum were noted at any time after antisense treatment. Taken together, these data suggest that Gialpha2 mediates opioid-induced analgesia and opioid inhibition of cAMP production in the mouse. These data also suggest that antisense reduces target protein by a mechanism independent of changes in mRNA abundance.

Acute ethanol exposure decreases the analgesic potency of morphine in mice

Chronic (7 days), forced ethanol drinking can decrease the analgesic potency of opioid agonists in mice. In the present study, the effect of short-term ethanol treatment was examined using forced ethanol access and ethanol injection protocols. Mice were given forced access to 1, 3 or 7% (v/v) ethanol for 24 hr and then tested for s.c. morphine analgesia using the tailflick assay. Controls had access to water. Another group of mice was injected i.p. with 2.5 g/kg ethanol or water 4 times over a 21 hr period and tested 3 hr after the final injection for morphine analgesia. Other mice were injected once i.p. with 1, 2 or 3 g/kg ethanol or water and tested 24 hr later using the tailflick. In the forced access study, ethanol dose-dependently decreased morphine's analgesic potency with the highest dose (7%) producing a 1.6-fold shift in the ED50. This decrease in morphine potency was similar to that found in a related study using 7% ethanol for 7 days (1.8-fold shift). Repeated ethanol injections significantly reduced the analgesic potency of morphine (1.9-fold shift), whereas, a single injection of 1, 2 or 3 g/kg ethanol did not alter the potency of morphine. Control studies indicated that neither 24 hr water nor food deprivation affected morphine potency. Overall, these data show that sustained exposure to ethanol over a 24 hr period will dose-dependently decrease morphine's analgesic potency.