The utility of methacholine airway responsiveness measurements in evaluating anti-asthma drugs

The effect of deep inhalation on mannitol responsiveness

BACKGROUND

Mannitol inhalation testing is specific for asthmatics with eosinophilic airway inflammation, a factor that has been negatively correlated with the development of deep inhalation bronchoprotection.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of deep inhalations on responsiveness to inhaled mannitol in correlation with the degree of airway inflammation.

METHODS

Twenty participants with stable asthma completed this randomized, crossover study. A screening visit assessed responsiveness to methacholine and airway inflammation through fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measures and sputum induction. Participants next completed two mannitol challenges, one with deep inhalations (standard method) and one with inhalations to half of total lung capacity, and two methacholine challenges, one with tidal breathing (standard method) and one with deep inhalations. Only the inhalation technique for dose administration differed between repeat mannitol or methacholine challenges.

RESULTS

Deep inhalations did not significantly influence the provocative dose of mannitol causing a 15% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second ((P = .73; n = 7) or the mannitol dose-response slope (P = .26; n = 20). Deep inhalations produced significant bronchoprotection against methacholine (P = .03; n = 20). FeNO levels were significantly correlated to sputum eosinophilia (P = .02; n = 15), responsiveness to deep inhalation methacholine (P = .005; n = 20), the dose-response slopes from deep inhalation mannitol (P = .01; n = 20), and the dose-response slope from non-deep inhalation mannitol (P = .005; n = 20).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Deep inhalations did not produce significant bronchoprotection against inhaled mannitol. This result is in agreement with past findings linking airway inflammation with loss of deep inhalation bronchoprotection.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03505489).

Short-term effect of once-daily fluticasone furoate on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in mild asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) decrease airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). Previous studies have generally investigated the effect of ICS on methacholine-induced AHR following weeks or months of medium to high dose treatment.

PURPOSE

The short-term effects of once-daily fluticasone furoate (FF) 100 mcg on methacholine-induced AHR and airway inflammation were examined over the course of one week.

METHODS

Eleven mild asthmatics completed this randomized, double-blind crossover study. Once-daily FF (100 mcg) and identical appearing placebo Ellipta® inhalers were given for 7 days with a 2-week washout. Methacholine challenges were performed before and 24 h after the first, third and seventh doses. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was measured initially and at 7 days.

RESULTS

FF significantly (p = 0.0009-0.0078) increased methacholine PD₂₀ (provocative dose causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s) at all times. Doubling dose shifts (95% CI) were 1.23 (0.60-1.86), 1.17 (0.68-1.67) and 1.44 (0.93-1.94) after the first, third and seventh dose respectively. FeNO (geometric mean, 95% CI) decreased significantly (p = 0.0049) following FF treatment from 37.9 ppb (23.7-60.5) initially to 22.9 ppb (14.8-35.5) at 7 days. Placebo did not affect methacholine PD₂₀ or FeNO.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose FF 100 mcg decreased methacholine AHR at 24 h without significant further improvement with continued daily use over 7 days. The inhibition in AHR after one week of daily dosing coincided with a significant decrease in FeNO at 7 days. Contrary to past assumptions, the ICS FF appears to rapidly reduce AHR to methacholine.

A Dose-Response Study Examining the Use of Methacholine Challenge to Demonstrate Local Therapeutic Equivalence of the Salmeterol Component of Generic Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Combination Products

Background: Asthma is widely treated using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combinations, for example, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FPS) dry powder inhaler, marketed as Advair^® Diskus^®. Some regulators require generics to demonstrate local (lung) therapeutic equivalence (LTE) for each component of the FPS reference, ideally with a dose-response within the approved FPS dose range. We sought to develop a methacholine challenge (MeCh) LTE methodology for assessing the LABA (salmeterol) component of FPS. Methods: Forty-six patients with asthma received single doses of albuterol (active control; 90 or 180 μg), FPS (100/50 or 200/100 μg), and placebo on 5 separate study days. Spirometry and MeCh were performed 1, 6, and 10 hours after study drug inhalation. Primary endpoint was provocative concentration of methacholine producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (PC₂₀). Study entry required screening PC₂₀ ≤8 mg/mL, with a greater than fourfold increase (and PC₂₀ ≤128 mg/mL) after 180 μg albuterol. Results: Both albuterol (90 and 180 μg) and FPS (100/50 and 200/100 μg) significantly increased PC₂₀ compared with placebo (sustained 6 and 10 hours postdose with FPS but not albuterol). The dose-response slopes (95% confidence interval) estimated 1 hour after treatment were 0.374 (-0.068 to 0.815) and 0.310 (-0.135 to 0.754) between low and high doses of albuterol and FPS, respectively, both nonsignificant. Slopes were shallower than those available in the literature for albuterol and formoterol, but similar to those for salmeterol. Conclusions: These data confirm that the bronchoprotective effect of FPS lasts longer than that of albuterol. The shallow dose-response slope we observed for albuterol is contrary to previous reports, probably due to the measurement of PC₂₀ beginning at 1 hour postdose. The results suggest that use of MeCh to assess LTE for salmeterol formulations may be more difficult to accomplish than it is for albuterol and formoterol products.

Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies in asthma

For the first 40 years of the 20th century treatment for asthma occurred in response to an asthma attack. The treatments were given by injection or orally and included the adrenergic agonists adrenalin/epinephrine and ephedrine and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline. Epinephrine became available as an aerosol in 1930. After 1945, isoprenaline, a non-selective beta agonist, became available for oral use but it was most widely used by inhalation. Isoprenaline was short-acting with unwanted cardiac effects. More selective beta agonists, with a longer duration of action and fewer side-effects became available, including orciprenaline in 1967, salbutamol in 1969 and terbutaline in 1970. The inhaled steroid beclomethasone was available by 1972 and budesonide by 1982. Spirometry alone and in response to exercise was used to assess efficacy and duration of action of these drugs for the acute benefits of beta₂ agonists and the chronic benefits of corticosteroids. Early studies comparing oral and aerosol beta₂ agonists found equivalence in bronchodilator effect but the aerosol treatment was superior in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Inhaled drugs are now widely used including the long-acting beta₂ agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, and the corticosteroids, fluticasone, ciclesonide, mometasone and triamcinolone, that act locally and have low systemic bio-availability. Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies permitted direct delivery of low doses of drug to the site of action reducing the incidence of unwanted side-effects and permitting the prophylactic treatment of asthma.

Effect of Study Design on Sample Size in Studies Intended to Evaluate Bioequivalence of Inhaled Short-Acting β-Agonist Formulations

Pharmacodynamic studies that use methacholine challenge to assess bioequivalence of generic and innovator albuterol formulations are generally designed per published Food and Drug Administration guidance, with 3 reference doses and 1 test dose (3‐by‐1 design). These studies are challenging and expensive to conduct, typically requiring large sample sizes. We proposed 14 modified study designs as alternatives to the Food and Drug Administration–recommended 3‐by‐1 design, hypothesizing that adding reference and/or test doses would reduce sample size and cost. We used Monte Carlo simulation to estimate sample size. Simulation inputs were selected based on published studies and our own experience with this type of trial. We also estimated effects of these modified study designs on study cost. Most of these altered designs reduced sample size and cost relative to the 3‐by‐1 design, some decreasing cost by more than 40%. The most effective single study dose to add was 180 μg of test formulation, which resulted in an estimated 30% relative cost reduction. Adding a single test dose of 90 μg was less effective, producing only a 13% cost reduction. Adding a lone reference dose of either 180, 270, or 360 μg yielded little benefit (less than 10% cost reduction), whereas adding 720 μg resulted in a 19% cost reduction. Of the 14 study design modifications we evaluated, the most effective was addition of both a 90‐μg test dose and a 720‐μg reference dose (42% cost reduction). Combining a 180‐μg test dose and a 720‐μg reference dose produced an estimated 36% cost reduction.

Clinical Implications of Oscillatory Lung Function during Methacholine Bronchoprovocation Testing of Preschool Children

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the repeatability and safety of measuring impulse oscillation system (IOS) parameters and the point of wheezing during bronchoprovocation testing of preschool children.

METHODS

Two sets of methacholine challenge were conducted in 36 asthma children. The test was discontinued if there was a significant change in reactance (Xrs5) and resistance (Rrs5) at 5 Hz (Condition 1) or respiratory distress due to airway obstruction (Condition 2). The repeatability of PC₈₀_Xrs5, PC₃₀_Rrs5, and wheezing (PCw) was assessed. The changes in Z-scores and SD-indexes from prebaseline (before testing) to postbaseline (after bronchodilator) were determined.

RESULTS

For PC₃₀_Rrs5, PC₈₀_Xrs5, and PCw for subjects, PC₈₀_Xrs5 showed the highest repeatability. Fifteen of 70 tests met Condition 2. The changes from pre- and postbaseline values varied significantly for Rrs5 and Xrs5. Excluding subjects with Z-scores higher than 2SD, we were able to detect 97.1% of bronchial hyperresponsiveness during methacholine challenge based on the change in Rrs5 or Xrs5. A change in IOS parameters was associated with wheezing at all frequencies.

CONCLUSION

Xrs5 and Rrs5 have repeatability comparable with FEV1, and Xrs5 is more reliable than Rrs5. Clinicians can safely perform a challenge test by measuring the changes in Rrs5, Xrs5, and Z-scores from the prebaseline values.

Comparison of the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 between the AeroEclipse II breath-actuated nebulizer and the wright nebulizer in adult subjects with asthma

RATIONALE

The American Thoracic Society guidelines for methacholine testing for the diagnosis of asthma recommends the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol with the Wright nebulizer, which produces more aerosol than required, generates a small particle size, and requires cleaning between tests.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate methacholine testing using a disposable, breath-actuated AeroEclipse II, which produces aerosol during inspiration and was developed for single-patient use.

METHODS

Forty-six adult subjects with asthma (19 men), aged 27.3 (SD, 9.5) years, with FEV1 98.5 (SD, 18.1) % predicted participated in a randomized, crossover, observational study. Subjects were first screened using the Wright nebulizer, then assigned to 2 minutes of tidal breathing from the Wright or 20 seconds of tidal breathing from the AeroEclipse nebulizer on 2 separate days, in random order. Provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) values were calculated by linear interpolation of log dose-versus-response curves, log-transformed, and compared using paired Student t test and Pearson correlation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The 38 subjects demonstrating reproducible PC20 measurements of within 1.5 doubling concentrations were included in the comparison. The geometric mean methacholine PC20 measured with the AeroEclipse nebulizer was approximately 1 doubling concentration lower than the geometric mean methacholine PC20 of the Wright nebulizer (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two nebulizers was 0.86 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The PC20 measurements using the two nebulizers were highly correlated; however, the PC20 determined with the AeroEclipse nebulizer was significantly lower than those determined using the Wright nebulizer. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01919424).

Aerobic training decreases bronchial hyperresponsiveness and systemic inflammation in patients with moderate or severe asthma: a randomised controlled trial

Background

The benefits of aerobic training for the main features of asthma, such as bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and inflammation, are poorly understood. We investigated the effects of aerobic training on BHR (primary outcome), serum inflammatory cytokines (secondary outcome), clinical control and asthma quality of life (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)) (tertiary outcomes).

Methods

Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either the control group (CG) or the aerobic training group (TG). Patients in the CG (educational programme+breathing exercises (sham)) and the TG (same as the CG+aerobic training) were followed for 3 months. BHR, serum cytokine, clinical control, AQLQ, induced sputum and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were evaluated before and after the intervention.

Results

After 12 weeks, 43 patients (21 CG/22 TG) completed the study and were analysed. The TG improved in BHR by 1 doubling dose (dd) (95% CI 0.3 to 1.7 dd), and they experienced reduced interleukin 6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and improved AQLQ and asthma exacerbation (p<0.05). No effects were seen for IL-5, IL-8, IL-10, sputum cellularity, FeNO or Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 (ACQ-7; p>0.05). A within-group difference was found in the ACQ-6 for patients with non-well-controlled asthma and in sputum eosinophil and FeNO in patients in the TG who had worse airway inflammation.

Conclusions

Aerobic training reduced BHR and serum proinflammatory cytokines and improved quality of life and asthma exacerbation in patients with moderate or severe asthma. These results suggest that adding exercise as an adjunct therapy to pharmacological treatment could improve the main features of asthma.

Trial registration number

NCT02033122.

The effects of an epithelial barrier protective cationic aerosol on allergen-induced airway inflammation in asthma: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Inhaled cationic airway lining modulator (iCALM) is a cationic aerosol therapy comprised of 1.29% calcium chloride dissolved in 0.9% isotonic saline that enhances the biophysical barrier function of the airway lining fluid and primes the host defense response. It's ability to attenuate bronchitis caused by inhaled particles was investigated using an allergen-inhalation model in a proof-of-concept study. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial of 6 mild atopic steroid-naïve asthmatic subjects, 3 doses of iCALM were well tolerated and they attenuated allergen-induced increase in sputum eosinophils, and levels of IL-5, MCP-1 and eotaxin. This study provides an opportunity to investigate the role of enhancing epithelial barrier to decrease airway inflammation provoked by inhaled particles in a variety of airway diseases.

The inverse agonist propranolol confers no corticosteroid-sparing activity in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

The murine asthma model shows that switching off airway β2 receptors with an inverse agonist may confer anti-inflammatory effects as well as corticosteroid-sparing activity. We have assessed for any corticosteroid-sparing effects of propranolol, an inverse agonist, added to low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) compared with higher dose ICS. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial in mild-to-moderate persistent asthmatic patients was performed. After a run-in (2 weeks) on hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) at 100 μg/day (HFA-BDP100), patients received randomized treatments (4 weeks) with propranolol at 80 mg/day plus HFA-BDP at 100 μg/day compared with placebo plus HFA-BDP at 400 μg/day (HFA-BDP400). Propranolol was up-titrated to 80 mg/day over the initial 2 weeks. Tiotropium was co-administered until 5 days before each histamine challenge (the primary outcome). Sixteen patients completed the study [mean age, 38 years; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), 86.4%; histamine provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20), 1.39 mg/ml; ICS dose, 406 μg/day]. Histamine PC20 was unchanged by adding propranolol to HFA-BDP100 compared with baseline (HFA-BDP100) {0.17 doubling dilution (dd) difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.58 to 0.92]}, but there was a significant improvement with HFA-BDP400 compared with both baseline [1.05 dd (95% CI: 0.43-1.66); P=0.02], and propranolol+HFA-BDP100 [0.88 dd (95% CI: 0.45-1.30); P=0.006]. Significant improvements were also observed with HFA-BDP400 for exhaled nitric oxide, blood eosinophils, serum eosinophilic cationic protein and asthma quality-of-life questionnaire symptoms compared with propranolol+HFA-BDP100. Salbutamol recovery post-challenge was partially blunted by propranolol (median prolongation 5 min; P=0.002). Domiciliary evening FEV1 also fell with propranolol+HFA-BDP100 [mean reduction from baseline 0.22 litres (95% CI: 0.10-0.34); P=0.012], whereas Asthma Control Questionnaire remained unchanged. In conclusion, the inverse agonist propranolol produced no improvements when given with low-dose ICS, whereas further significant improvements in airway hyper-responsiveness and inflammation were demonstrated with higher dose ICS. Thus, propranolol does not confer corticosteroid-sparing activity in persistent asthma.

Proof-of-concept evaluation of trough airway hyper-responsiveness following regular racemic or levosalbutamol in genotype-stratified steroid-treated persistent asthmatic patients

Asthmatic patients receiving ICSs (inhaled corticosteroids) may take frequent add-on therapy with salbutamol despite on-demand prescription. Frequent salbutamol use can be detrimental in asthma. The isomeric formulation of salbutamol and the B2ADR (β2 adrenoceptor) 16 genotype may also influence this phenomenon. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, triple crossover, proof of concept trial comparing 2 weeks of regular therapy with inhaled racemic salbutamol [200 μg q.i.d. (four times daily)], levosalbutamol (100 μg q.i.d.) or placebo on trough methacholine PC20 [provocative concentration causing 20% fall in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 s)] 6 h post-dose (the primary outcome) in 30 persistent asthmatic patients (15 who were Arg16 homozygous and 15 who were Gly16 homozygous) all receiving ICSs. There was no worsening of AHR (airway hyper-responsiveness) at trough to methacholine after 2 weeks regular exposure to either racemic (P=0.53) or levosalbutamol (P=0.84) compared with placebo, nor between genotypes-as dd (doubling dilution) difference in methacholine PC20 from placebo [salbutamol/Arg16=0.36 dd [95% CI (confidence interval), -0.43, 1.15]; salbutamol/Gly16=0.01 dd (95% CI, -0.47, 0.49); levosalbutamol/Arg16=-0.01 dd (95% CI, -0.89, 0.87); and levosalbutamol/Gly16=0.28 dd (95% CI, -0.22, 0.77)]. Both active treatments improved morning PEF (peak expiratory flow) in Gly16 (P=0.04 overall) but not Arg16 (P=0.50 overall) patients, whereas evening PEF improved in both Gly16 (P<0.001 overall) and Arg16 (P=0.006 overall) patients. In conclusion, the regular exposure to either racemic or levosalbutamol for 2 weeks added to ICSs did not cause worsening of AHR at trough compared with placebo; with no difference seen between B2ADR 16 genotypes.

Efficacy and safety of RPL554, a dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from four clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Many patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) routinely receive a combination of an inhaled bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory glucocorticosteroid, but those with severe disease often respond poorly to these classes of drug. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a novel inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) and PDE4 inhibitor, RPL554 for its ability to act as a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drug.

METHODS

Between February, 2009, and January, 2013, we undertook four proof-of-concept clinical trials in the Netherlands, Italy, and the UK. Nebulised RPL554 was examined in study 1 for safety in 18 healthy men who were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive an inhaled dose of RPL554 (0·003 mg/kg or 0·009 mg/kg) or placebo by a computer-generated randomisation table. Subsequently, six non-smoking men with mild allergic asthma received single doses of RPL554 (three received 0·009 mg/kg and three received 0·018 mg/kg) in an open-label, adaptive study, and then ten men with mild allergic asthma were randomly assigned to receive placebo or RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) by a computer-generated randomisation table for an assessment of safety, bronchodilation, and bronchoprotection. Study 2 examined the reproducibility of the bronchodilator response to a daily dose of nebulised RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) for 6 consecutive days in a single-blind (patients masked), placebo-controlled study in 12 men with clinically stable asthma. The safety and bronchodilator effect of RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) was assessed in study 3, an open-label, placebo-controlled crossover trial, in 12 men with mild-to-moderate COPD. In study 4, a placebo-controlled crossover trial, the effect of RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory cell infiltration in induced sputum was investigated in 21 healthy men. In studies 3 and 4, randomisation was done by computer-generated permutation with a block size of two for study 3 and four for study 4. Unless otherwise stated, participants and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment. Analyses were by intention to treat. All trials were registered with EudraCT, numbers 2008-005048-17, 2011-001698-22, 2010-023573-18, and 2012-000742-34.

FINDINGS

Safety was a primary endpoint of studies 1 and 3 and a secondary endpoint of studies 2 and 4. Overall, RPL554 was well tolerated, and adverse events were generally mild and of equal frequency between placebo and active treatment groups. Efficacy was a primary endpoint of study 2 and a secondary endpoint of studies 1 and 3. Study 1 measured change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20MCh) in participants with asthma. RPL554 produced rapid bronchodilation in patients with asthma with an FEV1 increase at 1 h of 520 mL (95% CI 320-720; p<0·0001), which was a 14% increase from placebo, and increased the PC20MCh by 1·5 doubling doses (95% CI 0·63-2·28; p=0·004) compared with placebo. The primary endpoint of study 2 was maximum FEV1 reached during 6 h after dosing with RPL554 in patients with asthma. RPL554 produced a similar maximum mean increase in FEV1 from placebo on day 1 (555 mL, 95% CI 442-668), day 3 (505 mL, 392-618), and day 6 (485 mL, 371-598; overall p<0·0001). A secondary endpoint of study 3 (patients with COPD) was the increase from baseline in FEV1. RPL554 produced bronchodilation with a mean maximum FEV1 increase of 17·2% (SE 5·2). In healthy individuals (study 4), the primary endpoint was percentage change in neutrophil counts in induced sputum 6 h after lipopolysaccharide challenge. RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) did not significantly reduce the percentage of neutrophils in sputum (80·3% in the RPL554 group vs 84·2% in the placebo group; difference -3·9%, 95% CI -9·4 to 1·6, p=0·15), since RPL554 significantly reduced neutrophils (p=0·002) and total cells (p=0·002) to a similar degree.

INTERPRETATION

In four exploratory studies, inhaled RPL554 is an effective and well tolerated bronchodilator, bronchoprotector, and anti-inflammatory drug and further studies will establish the full potential of this new drug for the treatment of patients with COPD or asthma.

FUNDING

Verona Pharma.

Inhaled allergen bronchoprovocation tests

The allergen bronchoprovocation test is a long-standing exacerbation model of allergic asthma that can induce several clinical and pathophysiologic features of asthma in sensitized subjects. Standardized allergen challenge is primarily a research tool, and when properly conducted by qualified and experienced investigators, it is safe and highly reproducible. In combination with validated airway sampling and sensitive detection techniques, allergen challenge allows the study of several features of the physiology of mainly TH2 cell-driven asthma in relation to the kinetics of the underlying airway pathology occurring during the allergen-induced late response. Furthermore, given the small within-subject variability in allergen-induced airway responses, allergen challenge offers an adequate disease model for the evaluation of new (targeted) controller therapies for asthma in a limited number of subjects. In proof-of-efficacy studies thus far, allergen challenge showed a fair positive predicted value and an excellent negative predictive value for the actual clinical efficacy of new antiasthma therapies, underscoring its important role in early drug development. In this review we provide recommendations on challenge methods, response measurements, sample size, safety, and harmonization for future applications.

Effect of bariatric surgery on airway response and lung function in obese subjects with asthma

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a risk factor for self-reported asthma and makes asthma management more difficult. The effects of bariatric surgery on asthma in severely obese subjects remain to be documented.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 12 asthmatic patients with severe obesity were evaluated before, 6 and 12 months after bariatric surgery. Each had methacholine inhalation tests, measures of expiratory flows and lung volumes, measurements of C-reactive protein and questionnaires on asthma medication, asthma symptoms and co-morbid conditions. Eleven severely obese patients with asthma (considered as controls) underwent the same evaluations. Primary endpoint was airway responsiveness to methacholine and secondary endpoints were lung volumes and markers of systemic inflammation.

RESULTS

Mean body mass index decreased from 51.2 to 34.4 kg/m(2) twelve months post-surgery. Mean PC(20) methacholine improved from 0.84 to 6.2 mg/ml (P < 0.001); FEV(1), FVC, FRC, FRC/TLC and ERV all improved (P ≤ 0.006). C-reactive protein decreased from 8.6 to 1.7 mg/L (P < 0.001) Asthma symptoms total score was significantly reduced (P = 0.03) and asthma medication needs decreased, ten patients being able to stop all asthma drugs. No significant changes of these parameters from baseline were observed in asthmatic controls. Improvements in airway responsiveness and lung volumes happened in parallel and correlated with reductions of body mass index (r = 0.58, P = 0.049), C-reactive protein levels (r = -0.74, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Airway responsiveness, lung volumes and asthma severity/control markedly improved with weight loss following bariatric surgery in severely obese patients.

Comparing the effects of two inhaled glucocorticoids on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and markers of systemic effects, a randomised cross-over double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Inhaled glucocorticoids are efficient in protecting against asthma exacerbations, but methods to compare their efficacy vs systemic effects have only been attempted in larger multi-centre studies. The aim of the current study was therefore to directly compare the effects of two separate inhaled glucocorticoids, mometasone and budesonide, to compare the effects on the early and late asthmatic responses to inhaled allergen in patients with mild allergic asthma, and sputum eosinophils, and to relate the clinical positive effects to any systemic effects observed.

METHODS

Twelve patients with documented early and late asthmatic responses (EAR and LAR) to inhaled allergen at a screening visit were randomized in a double-blind fashion to treatment with mometasone (200 μg × 2 or 400 μg × 2), budesonide (400 μg × 2) or placebo in a double-blind crossover fashion for a period of seven days. Challenge with the total allergen dose causing both an EAR and LAR was given on the last day of treatment taken in the morning. Lung function was assessed using FEV1, and systemic glucocorticoid activity was quantified using 24 h urinary cortisol.

RESULTS

Mometasone and budesonide attenuate both EAR and LAR to allergen to a similar degree. No significant dose-related effects on the lung function parameters were observed. Both treatments reduced the relative amount of sputum eosinophils (%) after allergen. At the dose of 800 μg daily, mometasone reduced 24 h urinary cortisol by approximately 35%. Both drugs were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Mometasone and budesonide are equieffective in reducing early and late asthmatic responses induced by inhaled allergen challenge. Mometasone 800 μg given for seven days partially affects the HPA axis.

Steroid sparing effects of intranasal corticosteroids in asthma and allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Treating allergic rhinitis may have a downstream anti-inflammatory effect on the lower airways. We conducted a dose ranging study in asthma and persistent allergic rhinitis to evaluate if intranasal corticosteroids exhibit a sparing effect on the dose of inhaled corticosteroid.

METHODS

Twenty five participants were randomized to receive two weeks of 100 microg/day (Low dose) or 500 microg/day (High dose) of inhaled fluticasone propionate both with intranasal placebo; or inhaled fluticasone 100 microg/day with intranasal fluticasone 200 microg/day (Combined) in a double-blind cross-over fashion.

RESULTS

Low dose fluticasone produced a shift of 1.20 doubling-dilutions (95% CI, 0.63, 1.77); Combined fluticasone, 1.79 doubling-dilutions (95% CI, 0.77, 2.80) and high dose fluticasone, 2.01 doubling-dilutions (95% CI, 1.42, 2.61) in methacholine PC(20) from respective baselines. There was a significant difference between high and low doses: 0.82 doubling dilutions (95%CI, 0.12, 1.50) but not between combined and low dose 0.58 doubling dilutions (95% CI, -0.78, 1.95). Combined treatment alone produced improvements in peak nasal inspiratory flow (P < 0.001), rhinitis quality of life (P = 0.004) and nasal NO (P = 0.01); reduced blood eosinophil count (P = 0.03), and serum eosinophil cationic protein (P = 0.02). All treatments significantly improved tidal NO, FEV(1) and asthma quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose fluticasone was superior to low dose fluticasone for methacholine PC20, demonstrating room for further improvement. Combined treatment was not significantly different from low dose fluticasone and we could not demonstrate a steroid sparing effect on methacholine PC20. Combined treatment alone produced improvements in upper airway outcomes and suppressed systemic inflammation but not adrenal function.

Prolonged bronchoprotection against inhaled methacholine by inhaled BI 1744, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, in patients with mild asthma

BACKGROUND

Long-acting ss(2)-agonists are an established controller medication in asthma. BI 1744 is a novel L\long-acting ss(2)-agonist with a preclinical profile that suggests 24-hour bronchodilation and bronchoprotection may be achieved.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the bronchoprotective effects of single doses of BI 1744 against methacholine provocation in subjects with mild asthma.

METHODS

Thirty-one subjects with mild asthma were randomized to receive single doses of BI 1744 (2, 5, 10, 20 microg) or placebo on separate days according to a double-blind, 5-way crossover design. Methacholine challenges were performed at 30 minutes and at 4, 8, 24, and 32 hours after each single dose of medication, and the results were expressed as PC(20) FEV(1).

RESULTS

All doses of BI 1744 produced statistically significant increases in the methacholine PC(20) compared with placebo as long as 32 hours. The mean (geometric SEM) methacholine PC(20) 24 hours after dosing with placebo was 1.73 (1.13) mg/mL, which increased after 2 microg to 3.86 (1.14) mg/mL, after 5 microg to 5.67 (1.14) mg/mL, after 10 microg to 9.42 (1.13) mg/mL, and after 20 microg to 13.71 (1.14) mg/mL (all P < .0001). After 32 hours, the methacholine PC(20) value remained significantly increased for all doses. No safety or tolerability concerns were identified.

CONCLUSION

BI 1744 provides significant bronchoprotection against inhaled methacholine for up to 32 hours after single-dose administration.

Benefits of low-dose inhaled fluticasone on airway response and inflammation in mild asthma

RATIONALE

Current guidelines suggest that asthma should be controlled with the lowest dose of maintenance medication required.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of a low dose of inhaled corticosteroid compared to a placebo, on airway inflammation and responsiveness in patients with mild symptomatic asthma.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study, we looked at the influence of inhaled fluticasone propionate 250 microg/day for 3 months followed by 100 microg/day for 9 months on airway inflammation and methacholine responsiveness in non-smoking subjects with mild allergic asthma. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatments; a 2-week evaluation of respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow measurements was done before each visit.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven subjects completed the 3-month study period. Airway responsiveness, expressed as the PC20 methacholine, increased by 0.27 and 1.14 doubling concentrations, respectively, in placebo-treated (n=33) and in fluticasone-treated (n=24) asthmatic subjects (p=0.03). An additional improvement in PC20 up to 2.16 doubling concentrations was observed in the fluticasone-treated group during the 9-month lower-dose treatment (p=0.0004, end of low-dose period compared with placebo). Sputum eosinophil counts decreased after 3 months of fluticasone 250 microg/day compared with placebo (p<0.0001) and remained in the normal range during the 9-month lower-dose treatment. Respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flows did not change significantly throughout the study in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In mild asthma, keeping a regular minimal dose of ICS after asthma control has been achieved, may lead to a further reduction in airway responsiveness and keep sputum eosinophil count within the normal range.

An in vivo and in vitro comparison of inhaled steroid delivery via a novel vortex actuator and a conventional valved holding chamber

BACKGROUND

Valved holding chambers improve delivery of inhaled corticosteroids to the lung but are bulky in design. A novel compact vortex actuator device has therefore been developed.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the in vitro and in vivo performance of a novel compact vortex actuator (the Neohaler [NH]) vs a conventional small-volume valve holding chamber (the AeroChamber Plus [AP].

METHODS

Seventeen asthmatic patients completed the study per protocol, receiving 4 weeks each of 100 microg/d (50-microg formulation) or 400 microg/d (100-microg formulation) of hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via the NH or AP devices in a randomized crossover, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled design. The doubling dilution (dd) shift in methacholine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (primary outcome) was used to evaluate anti-inflammatory effects and adrenal function to measure systemic exposure. The fine particle (<4.7 tm) dose was evaluated using an Andersen Cascade Impactor.

RESULTS

A total of 100 microg of hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via the NH and AP produced 0.95-dd (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.45; P = .006) and 0.45-dd (95% CI, -0.16 to 1.06; P = .83) improvements from baseline in methacholine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between devices: 0.50 dd (95% CI, -0.25 to 1.24; P = .18). At 400 microg/d, 1.08-dd (95% CI, 0.49-1.67; P = .006) and 0.85-dd (95% CI, 0.32-1.39; P = .02) improvements were found for the NH and AP, respectively, with a 0.23-dd difference (95% CI, -0.28 to 0.74; P = .36) between devices. No adrenal suppression occurred with either device. The in vitro fine particle dose was 39.1 microg for the NH and 39.0 microg for the AP with the 100-microg formulation and 26.0 g and 25.2 microg, respectively, with the 50-microg formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivering hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via the NH and AP attenuates asthmatic airway inflammation to a comparable degree and produces a similar in vitro fine particle dose profile.

Combined mediator blockade or topical steroid for treating the unified allergic airway

BACKGROUND

Asthma and allergic rhinitis are manifestations of a single unified allergic airway, for which the best treatment is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the anti-inflammatory efficacy in the unified allergic airway of combined oral mediator antagonism and combined topical steroid.

METHODS

Subjects with asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis entered a randomized double blind crossover study comparing montelukast 10 mg and cetirizine 10 mg to extra-fine inhaled beclomethasone 400 mcg/day and intranasal beclomethasone 200 mcg/day, each taken once daily for 2 months, after 2-week placebo washouts. Measurements were made after each washout and randomized treatment, comprising: methacholine PC20, exhaled and nasal nitric oxide, blood eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein, symptoms, lung and nasal function tests.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients completed per protocol. For PC20 and exhaled nitric oxide, only combined topical steroid produced improvements (P < 0.005) from placebo baseline. Combined steroid was superior by a 0.93 (95% CI 0.14-0.93, P < 0.05) doubling dilution difference for PC20 and a 0.99 (95% CI 0.9-15.1, P < 0.01) doubling difference for exhaled nitric oxide. Both treatments attenuated eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein, and reduced nasal symptoms (P < 0.05). Only steroid improved nasal nitric oxide (P=0.05) and asthma symptoms (P < 0.05). Neither treatment affected lung or nasal function tests.

CONCLUSION

Combined topical steroid and combined mediator antagonism both attenuated systemic inflammation in the unified allergic airway, but only the former reduced bronchial and nasal inflammatory markers. The relevance of this to exacerbations and airway remodelling needs to be defined.

A comparison of 2 extrafine hydrofluoroalkane-134a-beclomethasone formulations on methacholine hyperresponsiveness

BACKGROUND

Small airways inflammation is a recognized pathologic component of asthma, and it is postulated that the observed airway-wall remodeling in small airways could be due to uncontrolled inflammation in airways that are not penetrated by conventional inhaled corticosteroids. Thus, extrafine particle formulations of inhaled corticosteroids are of clinical interest.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2 extrafine solution hydrofluoroalkane-134a formulations of beclomethasone dipropionate (Beclate and Qvar).

METHODS

Fifteen asthmatic patients (mean +/- SEM forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 2.62 +/- 0.21 L; provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 [PC20], 1.06 +/- 0.58) were randomized to completion in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover manner to receive Beclate or Qvar at doses of 100 or 400 microg/d for 2 weeks, with a 1-week washout period before each randomized treatment. Methacholine hyperresponsiveness was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

The 2 formulations were equivalent in terms of predefined equivalence limits of +/- 1 doubling dilution for PC20 at both doses: -0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.77 to 0.27) doubling dilution difference between the 100-microg doses and a 0.26 (95% CI, -0.29 to 0.82) doubling dilution difference between the 400-microg doses for the difference between Beclate and Qvar, respectively. Both formulations, at either dose, produced a statistically significant (P < .05) reduction in mean exhaled nitric oxide levels: 400 microg/d of Beclate, 14.1 ppb (95% CI, 5.6 to 22.6 ppb); and 400 microg/d of Qvar, 14.2 ppb (95% CI, 6.0 to 22.4 ppb). The higher doses produced a statistically significant (P < .05) reduction in early morning urinary cortisol-creatinine ratio (geometric mean fold suppression: Beclate, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.89]; and Qvar, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.79]). Both formulations significantly improved peak expiratory flow, FEV1, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity at the higher doses (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Beclate and Qvar were equivalent for all primary and secondary outcome measures.

Bronchoprotection with formoterol via dry powder and metered-dose inhalers in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Determination of device comparability for new inhaled medications is essential.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the methacholine bronchoprotection afforded by formoterol, 12 microg, delivered via Clickhaler and Aerolizer dry powder inhalers and a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in mild-to-moderate asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Two separate randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover studies were performed. Peak bronchoprotection (30 minutes) was measured after administration of a single dose in a placebo-controlled study (n = 16). First-dose (8 hours) and trough (12 hours) protection were evaluated after 2 weeks (n = 28). Doubling dilution differences (DDD) in the methacholine provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% from baseline were compared, with equivalence defined if the 95% confidence interval was within the predefined equivalence limits of +/- 1.5 DDD (peak) and +/- 1.0 DDD (trough).

RESULTS

For peak single-dose effects, DDD (95% confidence interval) data showed significant protection vs placebo for all devices but no significant differences among active inhalers. For trough first-dose effects, there was significant protection vs baseline for all devices and equivalence for Clickhaler vs Aerolizer (-0.41; -0.85 to 0.04) and Aerolizer vs pMDI (-0.27; -0.66 to 0.13) but not for Clickhaler vs pMDI (-0.68; -1.12 to -0.23). For trough effects after 2 weeks, there was significant residual protection from baseline and equivalence for Clickhaler vs Aerolizer (-0.32; -0.94 to 0.30), Clickhaler vs pMDI (0.34; -0.96 to 0.27), and Aerolizer vs pMDI (-0.02; -0.57 to 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Formoterol delivered by 3 different inhalers exhibited a significant degree of peak and trough bronchoprotection after single and repeated dosing, with most comparisons being within predefined equivalence limits.

Addition of fexofenadine to inhaled corticosteroid therapy to reduce inflammatory biomarkers in atopic asthma

BACKGROUND

We previously showed that H1-antihistamines may shift the PC20 (provocation concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20%) threshold to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge but may paradoxically prolong recovery.

OBJECTIVES

To measure AMP recovery using a constant predetermined AMP PC20 and to evaluate whether fexofenadine use confers add-on effects to treatment with either fluticasone propionate alone or combined fluticasone propionate-salmeterol.

METHODS

Fourteen atopic patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 76%) completed a double-blind, randomized, crossover study consisting of 3-week treatment blocks of either fluticasone propionate-salmeterol, 250 microg twice daily, or fluticasone propionate alone, 250 microg twice daily, in conjunction with either fexofenadine, 180 mg once daily, or matched placebo. Recovery after a predetermined AMP PC20 challenge was measured (primary outcome), along with exhaled nitric oxide levels, plasma eosinophil cationic protein levels, peripheral eosinophil counts, pulmonary function, diary card outcomes, and quality of life (all secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

There were no differences in any of the primary or secondary outcomes when fexofenadine was added to treatment with either fluticasone propionate-salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone. The mean AMP recovery time was 25.0 vs 23.4 minutes for fexofenadine and placebo, respectively, as add-on to fluticasone-salmeterol and 22.5 vs 23.9 minutes, respectively, as add-on to fluticasone alone.

CONCLUSION

Fexofenadine did not affect recovery to a fixed dose of AMP challenge or any other surrogate inflammatory markers when given as add-on therapy to corticosteroid-treatedatopic asthmatic patients.

The effect of reducing the fine-particle mass of salmeterol from metered-dose inhalers on bronchodilatation and bronchoprotection against methacholine challenge: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the clinical relevance of fine-particle mass (FPM) delivered from metered dose inhalers (MDIs) to bronchodilatation and bronchoprotection against methacholine challenge by comparing a marketed chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) formulation of salmeterol with an investigational hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)formulation.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover study in patients with mild to moderate asthma who had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV (1)) of > or =60% predicted and a base-line provocation dose of inhaled methacholine required to produce a 20% decrease in FEV(1) (PD (20) [methacholine]) of < or =3.2 mg. On separate occasions, patients received 2 inhalations of salmeterol 25 microg from either the CFC MDI (FPM 14 microg), the investigational HFA MDI (FPM 7 microg), or placebo via CFC MDI. Serial measurements of FEV(1) were made over 90 minutes after dosing, followed by methacholine challenge. Efficacy end points were PD(20) (methacholine) and FEV(1) AUC (inc) (incremental area under the FEV(1) curve) over 15 to 90 minutes. The study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of the investigational HFA formulation to the CFC formulation in terms of protection against methacholine-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness; for PD(20) (methacholine), noninferiority was predefined as 1.0 doubling dose of methacholine.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 40 patients (65% men; mean age, 36.9 years). Both active treatments were significantly better than placebo in terms of PD(20) (methacholine) (P < 0.001). In the per-protocol population, the mean (SE) difference in bronchoprotection between the CFC MDI and placebo was 2.7888 (0.3432) doubling doses of methacholine (n = 32), and the difference between the investigational HFA MDI and placebo was 1.8268 (0.3418) doubling doses(n = 33). The adjusted mean (SE) treatment difference between the CFC MDI and HFA MDI was 0.9621 (0.3454) doubling doses. The upperlimit of the 95% CI (0.2714-1.6527) was greater than the predefined limit for noninferiority. There was no significant difference in FEV(1) AUC(inc) between formulations (mean treatment difference, 1.895 L . min; 95% CI, -4.893 to 8.684); however, both active treatments were significantly different from placebo (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FPM from different MDI formulations may affect the bronchoprotective properties of salmeterol. In this study, the formulation with the smaller FPM was associated with less-effective bronchoprotection, although there was no difference in bronchodilatation. This study did not demonstrate noninferiority of the investigational HFA formulation to the CFC formulation in terms of protection against methacholine-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Comparison of bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of formoterol delivered by hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon aerosols and dry powder in a double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study

BACKGROUND

In response to the phasing out of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) inhalers, a metered dose hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation, Modulite (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy), to be delivered with a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), has been developed. Modulite is a HFA formulation technology that has been designed to provide stable and uniform dose delivery of HFA-based formulations to enable an easy transition from CFC to HFA inhalers.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the bronchoprotective and bronchodilator effects of a single dose of 12 microg of formoterol from the HFA Modulite inhaler with the Foradil Aerolizer (dry powder inhaler, DPI) and the Foradil CFC inhalers (Novartis Health Consumer, Basel, Switzerland).

METHODS

This was a double blind, double dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study conducted in 38 subjects with mild to moderate asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1] 87.5% predicted). The primary endpoint was methacholine challenge provocative dose required for 20% fall in the FEV1 (PD20) 90 min post dose. Bronchodilation was assessed with spirometry (FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75) and impulse oscillometry (resistance at 5 and 20 Hz, reactance at 5 Hz and resonant frequency) over the 90 min post dose. In a subset of 12 subjects formoterol plasma levels, serum potassium and glucose were determined up to 480 min post dose.

RESULTS

The three formoterol formulations demonstrated significant (P < or = 0.05) improvements in bronchoprotection compared to placebo and non-inferiority of the HFA preparation compared to the CFC and DPI preparations was demonstrated. Geometric mean PD20 values were 0.51 mg with HFA, 0.62 mg with DPI, 0.62 mg with CFC and 0.2 mg with placebo. The log transformed mean differences in PD20 doubling dose between HFA and (a) DPI was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.29, P = 0.57) (b) CFC was -0.28 (95% CI -0.84-0.28, P = 0.57) and (c) placebo was 1.38 (95% CI 0.82-1.94, P < 0.001). Serum potassium, glucose and formoterol plasma profiles were comparable for the CFC, HFA and DPI devices.

CONCLUSION

Our findings of similar efficacy, pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of the HFA formoterol inhaler compared to the CFC and DPI preparations supports the potential use of this novel formulation in the treatment of asthma.

Differential effects of fluticasone and montelukast on allergen-induced asthma

Early asthmatic responses (EAR) and late asthmatic responses (LAR) to allergen are induced by the local release of a series of bronchoconstrictor mediators, including leukotrienes and histamine. Both anti-leukotrienes and other anti-asthma drugs, such as inhaled glucocorticoids, have been shown to reduce both EAR and LAR. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the effects of regular treatment with an oral anti-leukotriene, montelukast (Mont; 10 mg once daily, for 8 days), and an inhaled glucocorticoid [fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg twice daily for 8 days] on the EAR and LAR to an inhaled allergen challenge. Patients with a documented EAR and LAR at a screening visit were randomized to these treatments, or placebo, in a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Allergen challenge at a dose causing both an EAR and LAR was given on the eighth day of treatment. The maximum fall in FEV1 during the EAR was 17.8% during placebo treatment, 8.3% during Mont and 16.3% during FP (P <0.05 for Mont vs placebo). The maximum fall during the EAR was 13.8% during placebo treatment, 11.8% during Mont and 2% during FP treatment (P <0.05 for FP vs placebo and FP vs Mont). PC20 methacholine was significantly higher 24 h after allergen challenge during FP-treatment compared with Mont (P <0.05). Both montelukast and fluticasone reduced the relative amount of sputum eosinophils after allergen compared with placebo treatment. This study shows that anti-leukotrienes are effective to attenuate the EAR, whereas inhaled glucocorticoids are more effective than anti-leukotrienes in attenuating the EARs and improves bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a greater extent. In conclusion, inhaled glucocorticoids have overall greater efficacy than oral anti-leukotrienes to attenuate allergen-induced airway responses in mild asthmatic patients.

The arginine-16 beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphism predisposes to bronchoprotective subsensitivity in patients treated with formoterol and salmeterol

AIMS

The relationship between beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms and bronchoprotective response with long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists is unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from six placebo-controlled randomized studies in corticosteroid treated asthmatics where formoterol or salmeterol were administered over a 1-2-week period, with prior 1-2 week washout, assessing the primary end point of methacholine PD20 and adenosine monophosphate PC20, following first and last dose, expressed as doubling dose difference from placebo.

RESULTS

There was no significant heterogeneity between the different studies. Patients who had homozygous or heterozygous genotypes containing the arginine-16 polymorphism (Arg16-Arg16 or Arg16-Gly16) had greater bronchoprotective subsensitivity compared with the homozygous glycine-16 genotype (Gly16-Gly16), amounting to a mean doubling dose difference of 1.49 (95% CI 0.50, 2.48), after the last dose. Subsensitivity of response was greater with formoterol than salmeterol after the last dose in all genotypes, especially with the arginine-16 polymorphism, amounting to a doubling dose difference of 3.00 (95% CI 1.01, 4.99) between formoterol and salmeterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective analysis showed that the arginine-16 polymorphism was associated with subsensitivity of response for bronchoprotection, which was greater for formoterol than salmeterol. A prospective study will be required in order to further evaluate these findings, particularly to assess whether these differences are mirrored by exacerbations.

Concomitant chronic sinusitis treatment in children with mild asthma: the effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have suggested that aggressive treatment of sinusitis can decrease bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). However, there is still too little evidence to draw this conclusion, and the concept remains controversial.

DESIGN

A prospective, open-label study.

SETTING

University children's hospital allergy and immunology center and radiologic department.

PATIENTS

Sixty-one children with mild asthma and allergic rhinitis participated in the study. Forty-one of these 61 children had sinusitis, and the remainder had no sinusitis. Ten matched, nonatopic, healthy children were used as a control group.

INTERVENTION

Children with chronic sinusitis were placed into two groups. One group was treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate for 6 weeks and then with nasal saline solution irrigation for 6 weeks. For the other group, the treatment order was reversed. Children without chronic sinusitis received nasal saline solution irrigation for 12 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical symptoms and signs of sinusitis, FEV(1), and BHR were analyzed in the patients before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The clinical symptoms and signs of sinusitis, but not FEV(1), showed a significant improvement after antibiotic treatment. After aggressive treatment for sinusitis, it was found that the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) of children with mild asthma and sinusitis was significantly higher after treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that every asthmatic patient needs to carefully evaluate to determine whether the patient has concomitant sinusitis. Respiratory infections that meet criteria for sinusitis, even if they do not exacerbate asthma, should be treated. It is suggested that sinusitis should always be kept in mind as a possible inducible factor for BHR, and that aggressive treatment of chronic sinusitis is indicated when dealing with an asthmatic patient who shows an unpredictable response to appropriate treatment. Moreover, the findings of this study provide more evidence for an association between sinusitis and asthma with respect to BHR.

Effects of montelukast and budesonide on airway responses and airway inflammation in asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids are effective antiinflammatory therapy for asthma; however, they do not completely abolish allergen-induced airway inflammation. Leukotriene modifiers attenuate both early and late allergen responses and have antiinflammatory properties. We reasoned that treatment with budesonide and montelukast in combination might provide greater antiinflammatory effects than either drug alone, and the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of treatment with budesonide and montelukast, alone or in combination, on outcome variables after allergen inhalation. Ten subjects with asthma with dual responses after allergen inhalation were included in this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Outcomes included early and late asthmatic responses, and changes in airway responsiveness and sputum eosinophilia, measured before and after challenge. Treatment with montelukast attenuated the maximal early asthmatic response compared with placebo (p < 0.001) and budesonide (p = 0.002). Both budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, attenuated the maximal late asthmatic response compared with placebo (p < 0.01). Budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, afforded protection against allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (p < 0.05), although the treatment effect of budesonide was greater than that of montelukast (p < 0.05). Treatment with budesonide and montelukast, alone and in combination, also attenuated allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia. Thus, montelukast and budesonide attenuated allergen-induced asthmatic responses, airway hyperresponsiveness, and sputum eosinophilia, although combination treatment did not provide greater antiinflammatory effects than either drug alone.

Dysfunction and remodeling of the mouse airway persist after resolution of acute allergen-induced airway inflammation

The mechanisms underlying airway hyperresponsiveness remain unclear, although airway inflammation and remodeling are likely important contributing factors. We hypothesized that airway physiology would differ between mice subjected to brief or chronic allergen exposure, and that these differences would be associated with characteristic inflammatory markers and indices of airway remodeling. BALB/c mice were sensitized to ovalbumin and studied at several time points following brief or chronic allergen challenge protocols. By measuring airway responses to methacholine, we demonstrated increases in maximal inducible bronchoconstriction that persisted for 8 wk following either brief or chronic allergen challenge; we also observed increases in airway reactivity, although it was only in chronically challenged mice that these changes persisted beyond the resolution of allergen-induced inflammation. Using airway morphometry, we further demonstrated that increases in maximal bronchoconstriction were associated with increases in airway contractile tissue in both models, and that chronic, but not brief, allergen challenge resulted in subepithelial fibrosis. Our observations that different aspects of sustained airway dysfunction and remodeling persist beyond the resolution of acute inflammatory events support the concept that remodeling occurs as a consequence of allergic airway inflammation, and that these structural changes contribute independently to the persistence of airway hyperresponsiveness.

Airway hyperresponsiveness: using bronchial challenge tests in research and management of asthma

Bronchial challenge tests have been standardized in detail during the past two decades. They are providing relevant pathophysiological and clinical information about patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), by allowing the measurement of the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness, which includes an increased sensitivity as well as increased maximal response to bronchoconstrictor stimuli. There are various types of challenges, to which the responses are not interchangeable. Responses to so-called "indirect" challenges are largely dependent on the state of activation of inflammatory or resident cells within the airways, and the state of activation can vary rapidly, either spontaneously or through intervention. Responses to "direct" challenges are dependent on less variable, rather chronic features of airways inflammation or remodeling. Bronchoprovocation tests provide integrated information about multiple pathophysiological pathways within the airway. This is in contrast to the measurements of cells, mediators, or cytokines in biological fluids, which provide only very specific information on selected inflammatory pathways. It has recently been shown that the outcome of asthma can substantially be improved when long-term treatment is not only guided by symptoms and lung function, but also by the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness to direct stimuli. Taken together, current data warrant a broader usage of bronchoprovocation tests in the research as well as clinical management of asthma and COPD. In asthma, it allows selective, individually targeted therapy of the patient as opposed to the currently recommended regimens that are (increasingly) unselective in their approach. The potential benefits of monitoring other phenotypic disease markers is currently under investigation.

Allergen-induced increases in bone marrow T lymphocytes and interleukin-5 expression in subjects with asthma

Inhaled allergen challenge of subjects with atopic asthmatic increases bone marrow eosinophil progenitor cells. Interleukin-5 (IL-5) specifically induces growth and maturation of eosinophils. This study examined the effect of allergen challenge on the number of bone marrow total and CD3+ cells expressing IL-5 protein and IL-5 mRNA in subjects with asthma who developed either allergen-induced isolated early responses, or early and late asthmatic responses (dual responders). At 24 hours after allergen challenge, dual responders had significantly greater blood and airway eosinophilia compared with early responders. There were significant increases in the percentage of bone marrow CD3+ cells (p < 0.005) in both groups. However, there were significant differences in the increases in bone marrow IL-5 mRNA+ (p < 0.005), CD3+ (p < 0.005), and IL-5 mRNA+ CD3+ (p < 0.005) cells between the dual and early responder groups. These results suggest that, in subjects with atopic asthma, inhaled allergen causes trafficking of T lymphocytes to the bone marrow, and that in subjects who develop late responses and greater blood and airway eosinophilia after inhalation of allergen, there is a significant increase in the ability of bone marrow cells, particularly T lymphocytes, to produce IL-5.

The trials and tribulations of IL-5, eosinophils, and allergic asthma

Eosinophils have been suggested to be part of the pathologic process that characterizes asthma, and their recruitment into the upper or lower airways appears to be essential for the clinical manifestations of allergen inhalation. IL-5 is a cytokine necessary for the development, differentiation, recruitment, activation, and survival of eosinophils. Allergen inhalation increases the production of IL-5 in the airways as measured in bronchoalveolar lavage cells and induced sputum. The relationship between IL-5 and the development of airway eosinophilia has been firmly established in IL-5 transgenic mice, with allergen challenge models in IL-5-deficient mice, and in mice treated with blocking anti-IL-5 antibodies. In addition, an accumulation of evidence suggests that treating mice with anti-IL-5 blocking antibodies prevents allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. A recently reported study examined the effects of treatment with a humanized anti-IL-5 mAb (SB-240563) on allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in atopic subjects. The authors of the study concluded that their results call into question the role of eosinophils in mediating the allergen-induced late asthmatic response and airway hyperresponsiveness; however, because of methodologic limitations, the study cannot be used either to support or to refute the concept of an important role for eosinophils in causing allergen-induced changes in airway function.

The reproducibility and sample size requirements of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction measurements

Dry air exercise challenges are frequently used to screen medications that have potential utility in the management of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). The purpose of this study was to determine the reproducibility of three outcome measurements made using such challenges, and sample size requirements for drug evaluation studies based on these outcomes. Forty adult subjects with asthma, who tested positively on a screening exercise challenge, were subjected to two further identical challenges, separated by 1 to >35 days. Outcome measurements included the maximum per cent fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), after exercise (% fallmax), and the area under the per cent fall in FEV1/time curve for 30 min (AUC30) and 60 min (AUC60) after exercise. The reproducibility of these outcomes, as assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients was 0.72, 0.53 and 0.35 for % fallmax, AUC30 and AUC60 measurements, respectively. The sample size requirements to demonstrate an attenuation of EIB equivalent to a 50% reduction in % fallmax was 9, 14 and 19 subjects for the % fallmax, AUC30 and AUC60 responses, respectively (90% power). It is concluded that the maximum percentage fall in forced expiratory volume in one second has greater reproducibility and results in greater power in clinical trials than area under the curve measurements. Sample size calculation curves are provided which may be used in study design and interpretation of published studies.

Development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness during childhood

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) produces the characteristic pathological abnormalities seen in asthma and clearly plays a central role in the pathophysiology of asthma. The presence of BHR has been demonstrated in infants with asthma, as has the possibility of BHR persisting through the childhood period. The level of BHR may not only reflect the state of the airways, as a marker of airway dysfunction, but may also predict the persistent prognosis of the disease. Thus, measurement of BHR may provide important information about the symptoms and lung function in children with asthma. In view of multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, BHR does not seem to have a single cause. Many potential confounding variables, such as age, gender and genetic status, and some environmental factors, such as allergens, infections, and pollutants, could be responsible for the establishment of childhood BHR. There may be differences between the mechanisms that induce transient BHR and the mechanisms that induce persistent BHR. Also, there may be differences between the causes that induce BHR in the infantile period and the causes that maintain persistent BHR during childhood asthma. There is also disagreement as to the most suitable method to measure BHR in children, especially in infants. The assessment of BHR in young children has not been uniformly successful, and measurements of BHR changes over the childhood period (are associated with a number of problems. To resolve these problems, there may be two ways to study childhood BHR. One is to use age-matched specific techniques to clarify the precise BHR in each age group; the other is to use simple techniques that can be performed over the childhood period on a large number of subjects. In studies of infantile respirator, dysfunction the ultimate goal is to establish a simple, noninvasive method by which measurements of respiratory function may be obtained in infants. Further investigations and acceptable methods will be needed to clarify, the mechanisms involved in the establishment of asthma throughout the childhood period.

New considerations about measuring airway hyperresponsiveness

Measuring airway responsiveness to inhaled bronchoconstrictor stimuli, such as methacholine or histamine, has become an important tool in the diagnosis of asthma. This is measured by patients inhaling increasing doses or concentrations of the bronchoconstrictor stimulus until a given level of bronchoconstriction is achieved. Inhaled allergens initiate processes that increase airway inflammation and enhance airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Studies using inhaled allergen challenges have provided insight into how changes in airway hyperresponsiveness are regulated by induced inflammatory processes. These changes in airway hyperresponsiveness (1-2 doubling doses) have been shown to be of much smaller magnitude than those demonstrated when asthmatics with stable airway hyperresponsiveness are compared to normals (4-8 doubling doses). These allergen-induced changes would be of little relevance in subjects with normal airway responsiveness, because they would not increase the degree of airway responsiveness into the asthmatic range. They are, however, important in asthmatics who already have airway hyperresponsiveness because they are similar to changes associated with worsening asthma control. It is likely that the mechanisms responsible for the changes in airway hyperresponsiveness following experimental allergen exposure are similar to those producing transient worsening of control in asthmatics. Nevertheless, it is unlikely that the mechanisms of the transient allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness will explain the underlying mechanisms of the persistent airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients when compared with normal individuals.

Calculation of provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1): comparison of lowest vs highest post-challenge FEV(1)

BACKGROUND

Considerable, unexamined controversy exists surrounding the use of the highest vs the lowest FEV(1) for calculating the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) during direct bronchoprovocation challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the PC(20) calculated using the lowest FEV(1) post-diluent and post-histamine/methacholine vs the PC(20) calculated using the highest FEV(1) post-diluent and post-histamine/methacholine.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of 225 challenges: 75 research methacholine challenges, 75 research histamine challenges, and 75 clinical methacholine challenges. For each test, the PC(20) was calculated twice, first using the lowest post-diluent FEV(1) to the lowest post-histamine/methacholine FEV(1), and then using the highest to the highest.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficients for methacholine research, histamine research, and methacholine clinic challenges were 0.99, 0.98, and 0.95, respectively. The PC(20) calculated using the lowest to lowest FEV(1) was slightly and significantly lower in all three groups (paired t test p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PC(20) values calculated using the highest FEV(1) are almost identical to the PC(20) values calculated using the lowest FEV(1). The difference, although clinically irrelevant, holds statistical significance.

Dose-response evaluation of the therapeutic index for inhaled budesonide in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma

PURPOSE

Inhaled corticosteroids have beneficial effects on pulmonary function and inflammation in patients with asthma, but they also cause systemic adverse effects, such as adrenal suppression. We evaluated the therapeutic index of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients by comparing their dose-response effects on lung function, surrogate markers of airway inflammation, and tests of adrenal function.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

After a 10-day placebo run-in, we evaluated the effects of 200 microg, 400 microg, and 800 microg of inhaled budesonide, each dose given twice daily sequentially for 3 weeks in 26 patients, aged 35 +/- 12 years (mean +/- SD), with mild-to-moderate asthma. Measurements were made of bronchial reactivity, exhaled nitric oxide (a marker of airway inflammation), spirometry, serum eosinophilic cationic protein concentration, and 10-hour overnight urinary cortisol excretion. Plasma cortisol levels were measured at 8 AM and after stimulation with human corticotropin releasing factor.

RESULTS

For measurements of pulmonary function and exhaled nitric oxide, there was a plateau in the mean response to budesonide between 400 microg (low dose) and 800 microg (medium dose) per day, whereas for eosinophilic cationic protein and bronchial challenge, maximal benefits occurred between 800 and 1,600 microg (high dose) per day. Effects on plasma cortisol levels showed maximal suppression at 1,600 microg of budesonide per day. The proportion of patients with an optimal therapeutic index, in terms of a good airway response (fourfold decrease in bronchial hyperreactivity) and minimal systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), was similar at low-dose (46%) and at high-dose (52%) budesonide. The proportion of patients with a suboptimal therapeutic index, a good airway response with a marked systemic response (overnight urinary cortisol greater than 20 nmol), increased from 4% at low dose to 38% at high dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma, there were dose-related effects of budesonide on surrogate markers of inflammation (bronchial hyperreactivity and serum eosinophilic cationic protein), although higher doses were associated with adrenal suppression and a decrease in the therapeutic index.

Comparison of the relative efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients

Studies performed on airway smooth muscle in vitro have indicated that salmeterol is a partial agonist on the beta2-receptor in comparison to formoterol. In the present study we evaluated whether these pharmacological differences between salmeterol and formoterol also are applicable to asthmatic patients. The protective effects by increasing cumulative doses of formoterol (12, 60, 120 micrograms) and salmeterol (50, 250, 500 micrograms) on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction were evaluated in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled design. Patients were regularly treated with salbutamol 200 micrograms twice daily during the study period, to avoid variability in beta2-adrenoceptor tolerance. S-potassium, heart rate corrected Q-T interval (Q-Tc), and tremor score were followed as measures of systemic effects. Formoterol dose-dependently protected against methacholine responsiveness (4.6 doubling doses after 120 micrograms). Salmeterol, however, showed a flatter dose-response curve, and a significantly weaker maximal protective effect (2.8 doubling doses after 250 micrograms). Formoterol caused a significantly higher tremor score and a larger drop in S-potassium than salmeterol at the highest doses. These data show that salmeterol is a partial agonist on the beta2-receptor in relation to formoterol in human airways in vivo. Further studies are required to document the clinical consequences of this finding, for example in severe asthmatic patients.

Selective airway responsiveness in asthma

Hyperresponsiveness of airway smooth muscle accounts for the susceptibility of asthmatic subjects to diverse bronchoconstrictor agents. It is widely presumed that hyperresponsiveness is not spasmogen selective. Hence, inhalation of methacholine is used routinely for clinical assessment of asthma and for evaluation of anti-asthma drugs. Comparative studies employing multiple spasmogens have revealed hyperresponsiveness to be markedly spasmogen selective. Because of this pronounced heterogeneity of hyperresponsiveness, sensitivity to methacholine cannot provide a reliable index of responsiveness. Development of exceptional hyperresponsiveness to bradykinin and to peptidoleukotrienes during allergic and other reactions could warrant the development of specific antagonists for asthma therapy. These issues are discussed here by Brian O'Connor, Simon Crowther, John Costello and John Morley.

Pranlukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates allergen-induced early- and late-phase bronchoconstriction and airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND

The cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of allergen-induced airway responses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of pretreatment with the cysLT receptor antagonist pranlukast on allergen-induced early asthmatic responses (EARs) and late asthmatic responses (LARs) and on allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR).

METHODS

Ten atopic, nonsmoking patients with mild asthma and previously demonstrated early- and late-phase allergen-induced asthmatic responses participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, comparing treatment with either 450 mg pranlukast given twice daily or placebo for 5.5 days. A methacholine challenge was performed before administration of medication, and the result was expressed as the PC20. An allergen inhalation challenge was performed on the morning of the fifth day of treatment 2 hours after administration of medication. Methacholine challenges were also performed 2 hours after medication on days 4 and 6 (24 hours before and 24 hours after allergen administration) to examine allergen-induced AHR.

RESULTS

Pranlukast attenuated allergen-induced early responses, late responses, and AHR. The mean (SEM) maximal percent fall in FEV1 from baseline during the early response was 30.0% (5.1%) during placebo treatment and 15.5% (3.5%) during pranlukast treatment (mean difference, 14.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3 to 23.7; P = .007), with a mean protection afforded by pranlukast of 48.3%. The mean maximal percent fall in FEV1 during the late response was 34.7% (5.3%) during placebo treatment and 24.0% (4.4%) during pranlukast treatment (mean difference, 10.7%; 95% CI, 4.1 to 17.3; P = .006), with a mean protection afforded by pranlukast of 30.8%. The mean allergen-induced shift in PC20 was -1.76 (0.32) doubling doses during placebo treatment and -0.38 (0.31) doubling doses during pranlukast treatment (mean difference, -1.38 doubling doses; 95% CI, 0.44 to 2.32; P = .012), with a mean protection afforded by pranlukast of 78.4%.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that pranlukast can attenuate allergen-induced early and late airways responses and AHR and adds further support for an important role for the cysLTs in mediating allergen-induced asthmatic responses.