HER-2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

HER2 assessment by silver in situ hybridization: where are we now?

HER2 testing in breast and gastric cancer is critical not only as a prognostic tool but also as a predictive marker for response to the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. Currently, HER2 status is assessed on histological and cytological specimens by conventional validated methods such as immunohistochemistry and FISH, while bright-field in situ hybridization techniques, such as silver in situ hybridization and chromogenic in situ hybridization, may offer performance benefits over FISH. The major points are first, technical issues, advantages and disadvantages relevant to each methods, and their clinical implications and second, the well-known genetic heterogeneity of HER2, and the occurrence of polysomy of chromosome 17. This review aims to summarize the growing body of literature on the accuracy of bright-field in situ techniques, notably silver in situ hybridization, in assessing HER2 status, and to discuss the role of such methods in pathology practice.

Determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer using dual-color silver enhanced in situ hybridization (dc- SISH) and comparison with fluorescence ISH (FISH)

BACKGROUND

The two basic methods that are currently accepted to identify the HER2 status are immunohistochemistry and flyorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) . The aim of this study was to perform the dual-color silver in situ hybridization (dc-SISH) technique as an alternative to FISH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 invasive breast carcinoma cases were assessed for HER2 gene amplification by FISH and dual- color SISH.

RESULTS

Significant correlation was found in the HER2 expression results obtained with the two approaches (p=0.001, p<0.05). The concordance rate was 92.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Foutine practical use of the dc-SISH method, which is much easier to apply, score, and evaluate, has many advantages. HER2 and CEN17 status can be evaluated simultaneously with the newly developed "Dual-Color Probe". All these specifications and the reliable results obtained support the widespread use of SISH technique in clinical practice.

Emerging technologies for assessing HER2 amplification

Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)+ breast cancer are eligible for trastuzumab treatment; therefore, accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential. Until recently, only 2 methods were validated for determining the HER2 status of breast tumors in the routine diagnostic setting: immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Recently, bright-field in situ hybridization techniques such as chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH), which combine features of immunohistochemical analysis and FISH, have been introduced for the determination of HER2 status. These new techniques use a peroxidase enzyme-labeled probe with chromogenic detection, instead of a fluorescent-labeled probe, allowing results to be visualized by standard bright-field microscopy. Thus, the histologic features and HER2 status of a specimen can be evaluated in parallel. Moreover, signals do not decay over time. This review discusses recent publications regarding CISH and SISH testing, including results scoring and concordance between FISH and immunohistochemical analysis.

HER-2 protein overexpressing breast cancer without gene amplification shows higher hormone receptor expression than HER-2 protein overexpressing breast cancer with gene amplification

Cases of breast cancer showing human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) protein overexpression without corresponding gene amplification have been found in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) results. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of cases showing HER-2 protein overexpression breast cancer without gene amplification (IHC3+/FISH-) and compared them to cases showing HER-2 protein overexpression breast cancer with gene amplification (IHC3+/FISH+). This study was conducted on 90 patients with HER-2 IHC3+ breast cancer. The clinicopathological factors analyzed included tumor size, histological grade, nuclear grade, nodal involvement, and hormone receptor status. HER-2 IHC3+/FISH- breast cancer was found in 14 of 84 tumors (16.7%) and showed a statistically significant lower histological and nuclear grade (P = .000) and higher expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PRs) (P = .006) than IHC3+/FISH+ breast cancer. In conclusion, HER-2 IHC3+/FISH- breast cancer could be a subgroup showing lower histological/nuclear grade and higher expression of ERs/PRs.

Standardization of HER2 testing: results of an international proficiency-testing ring study

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity in breast cancer is a prognostic factor regarding tumor aggressiveness and a predictive factor for response to trastuzumab (Herceptin). Early and accurate HER2 testing of all breast cancer patients at primary diagnosis is essential for optimal disease management. Routine HER2 tests, such as immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), are subject to interlaboratory variation, and validation by laboratory proficiency testing is important to improve standardization. This study compared immunohistochemistry and FISH testing between five international pathology reference centers. Each center evaluated 20 immunohistochemistry and 20 FISH breast cancer specimens in five testing rounds. In each round, one center selected two sets of four different invasive tumor specimens (set A for immunohistochemistry and set B for FISH) and sent samples to the other four centers in a blinded manner, while retaining samples for its own evaluation. Results were analyzed by an independent coordinator. With immunohistochemistry, there were no differences between the five centers for any of the specimens at the level of diagnostic decision (positive or negative HER2 status). However, differences between laboratories were observed in immunohistochemistry scoring. Of the 20 specimens, four were scored as negative (0/1+) and five as positive (3+) in all centers; eight were negative or equivocal (2+), and three positive or equivocal. After FISH retesting of nine of the 11 equivocal immunohistochemistry cases, consensus was achieved in 15 of 18 (83%) specimens. FISH analysis of set B specimens resulted in consensus between centers in 16 of 20 (80%) specimens (six negative and 10 positive). All four discordant FISH specimens were scored as having HER2:CEP17 ratios within the range 1.7-2.3 by at least one center. Equivocal immunohistochemistry and borderline FISH cases are difficult to interpret, even for highly experienced and validated laboratories, highlighting the need for quality-control procedures.

Evaluation of oestrogen and progesterone receptor status in HER-2 positive breast carcinomas and correlation with outcome

AIM

HER-2/neu amplification occurs in 15-25% of breast carcinomas. This oncogene, also referred to as c-erbB-2, encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor belonging to the epidermal growth factor receptor family. HER-2 over-expression is reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in breast carcinoma patients and in some studies is associated with a poorer response to anti-oestrogen therapy. These patients are less likely to benefit from CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil)-based chemotherapy compared with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate breast carcinomas to determine hormone receptor status and if there is a difference in breast cancer specific survival for HER-2 positive patients.

METHODS

A total of 591 breast carcinomas were evaluated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for oestrogen receptor (ERp), progesterone receptor (PRp) and three different HER-2 antibodies (CB11, A0485 and TAB250). Percentage of tumour cells and intensity of staining for ERp were evaluated using a semiquantitative method.

RESULTS

Of the 591 tumours, 91 (15.4%) showed 3+ membrane staining for HER-2 with one or more antibodies. Of these 91 tumours, 41 (45.1%) were ERp+/PRp+, seven (7.7%) were ERp+/PR-, six (6.6%) were ERp-/PRp+ and 37 (40.7%) were ERp-/PR-. Of HER-2 positive tumours, 5.5% showed >80% 3+ staining for ERp compared with 31.8% of 0-2+ HER-2 tumours; 24.2% of HER-2-positive tumours showed 60% or more cells with 2+ or 3+ staining for ERp. Treatment data were available for 209 patients and no difference was observed in breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) with HER-2 status and tamoxifen.

CONCLUSION

Oestrogen receptor status cannot be used to select tumours for evaluation of HER-2 status, and oestrogen and progesterone receptor positivity does not preclude a positive HER-2 status. There is a higher proportion of ERp negative tumours associated with HER-2 positivity, however, more than 20% of HER-2 positive tumours show moderate or strong staining for ERp. HER-2 positive patients in this study did not show an adverse BCSS with tamoxifen treatment unlike some previous studies.

HER-2/neu expression in locally advanced breast carcinomas: pre-and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Clinical studies have shown a correlation of HER-2/neu amplification/over-expression and favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER-2/neu antibody treatment. However, contradictory findings also have been reported. Some tumors may develop resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy after an initial period of sensitivity. Our study attempts to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on HER-2/neu status in locally advanced breast cancer. Thirty-nine patients with locally advanced breast cancers established by core needle biopsy received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were compared with 60 patients with breast cancers who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. IHC for HER-2/neu was performed on paraffin sections of the core biopsy before treatment and the excised specimen following chemotherapy and scored as Negative (0-1+), 2+ and 3+. The results of the study and the controls were compared and analyzed using Fisher's exact test. HER-2/neu IHC scores decreased in 28.5% (15/39) of patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 11.7% (7/60) of patients in the control (p < 0.013). HER-2/neu IHC status changed from strongly positive to negative (3+ to 0) in five of 39 (12.5%) in the study group and in 2 of 60 (3.3%) in control group (p = 0.104). For patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in whom the tumor becomes refractory to chemotherapy or recurs, repeat testing for HER-2/neu status may be necessary. Elimination of HER-2/neu positive tumor cells may account for the changes in the IHC scores and the development of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Amplification of a 280-kilobase core region at the ERBB2 locus leads to activation of two hypothetical proteins in breast cancer

Amplification of the ERBB2 oncogene at 17q12 is clinically the most relevant genetic aberration in breast cancer and several studies have linked ERBB2 activation to poor clinical outcome. The development of targeted antibody-based therapy for ERBB2-overexpressing tumors and the possible role of ERBB2 as a predictor of chemotherapy treatment response have further emphasized the essential role of ERBB2 in breast cancer. Here, we performed a detailed characterization of the molecular events occurring at the ERBB2 amplicon in primary breast tumors. Analysis of the amplicon structure in 330 breast tumors by fluorescence in situ hybridization to a tissue microarray revealed a 280-kb common region of amplification that contains 10 transcribed sequences, including eight known genes. The expression levels of these 10 transcripts were determined in 36 frozen samples of grade-matched ERBB2-amplified and -nonamplified (as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization) primary breast tumors by using quantitativereal-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. A highly significant association between amplification and expression levels was observed for six of these genes, including ERBB2 and two uncharacterized hypothetical proteins, MGC9753 and MGC14832. These results support the recent findings on the influence of copy number on gene expression levels and highlight novel genes that might contribute to the clinical behavior of ERBB2-amplified breast tumors.

Which breast carcinomas need HER-2/neu gene study after immunohistochemical analysis? Results of combined use of antibodies against different c-erbB2 protein domains

AIMS

Evaluation of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancers is a compelling, routine procedure. The aim of this work was to evaluate which breast carcinomas would really benefit from HER-2/neu gene analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 130 invasive breast carcinomas by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using CB11 and TAB250 MAbs directed against different domains of the c-erbB2 molecule. From this series, we selected 106 cases (32 G1, 36 G2, and 38 G3) in which HER-2/neu gene analysis, using chromogenic in-situ hybridization (CISH), was successful. IHC results were scored using the FDA approved system with three score values: 0/1+ (negative), 2+, 3+ (positive). In addition, we developed a double scoring system with six score values (0/1+ 2+ negative, 3+, 4+, 5+, 6+ positive) obtained by summating the individual scoring values obtained with each MAb. All double scoring negative cases were non-amplified (100% sensitivity), whereas all cases scored 6+ were amplified. Double scoring values and CISH results were then correlated with grade and histological type. G1 ductal carcinomas and carcinomas of lobular and of special histological type did not show HER-2/neu amplification even in the presence of protein over-expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined results of IHC analysis (double scoring values) obtained using MAbs directed against different c-erbB2 domains correctly indicates the HER-2/neu gene status in 57.5% of cases. In addition, simple morphological features such as low grade and special histological type are good predictors of the non-amplification of the HER-2/neu gene in breast carcinoma.

Role of proliferation in HER2 status predicted response to doxorubicin

The role of HER2 in predicting response to doxorubicin (DXR) therapy in breast cancer was evaluated in vivo in a series of breast carcinomas from 220 patients with tumors larger than 2.5 cm and treated with 3 cycles of DXR (75 mg/m(2)) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with HER2-positive tumors were more frequently responsive to DXR treatment compared with HER2-negative patients (p = 0.05; Mantel-Haenszel Chi(2) = 0.009). Progesterone receptor (PgR) negativity, but not mutated p53, was also associated with response to DXR (p = 0.05; Mantel-Haenszel Chi(2) = 0.004). Further analysis of those correlations using breast carcinoma cell lines characterized for different biologic parameters revealed a trend between HER2 positivity/PgR negativity and greater DXR sensitivity, but the strongest direct correlation was found between the proliferation rate and sensitivity to DXR (r = 0.82, p = 0.00009). Neither p53 nor the DXR target molecule topoisomerase-II-alpha was significantly associated with in vitro sensitivity to DXR. Thus, whereas data showed that the major biologic parameter associated with in vitro response to DXR in breast cancer cells appears to be the tumor proliferation rate, HER2 expression together with PgR negativity may serve as the counterpart of the proliferation marker in predicting the in vivo response to DXR.

Stress and radiation-induced activation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways

Exposure of cells to a variety of stresses induces compensatory activations of multiple intracellular signaling pathways. These activations can play critical roles in controlling cell survival and repopulation effects in a stress-specific and cell type-dependent manner. Some stress-induced signaling pathways are those normally activated by mitogens such as the EGFR/RAS/PI3K-MAPK pathway. Other pathways activated by stresses such as ionizing radiation include those downstream of death receptors, including pro-caspases and the transcription factor NFKB. This review will attempt to describe some of the complex network of signals induced by ionizing radiation and other cellular stresses in animal cells, with particular attention to signaling by growth factor and death receptors. This includes radiation-induced signaling via the EGFR and IGFI-R to the PI3K, MAPK, JNK, and p38 pathways as well as FAS-R and TNF-R signaling to pro-caspases and NFKB. The roles of autocrine ligands in the responses of cells and bystander cells to radiation and cellular stresses will also be discussed. Based on the data currently available, it appears that radiation can simultaneously activate multiple signaling pathways in cells. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species may play an important role in this process by inhibiting protein tyrosine phosphatase activity. The ability of radiation to activate signaling pathways may depend on the expression of growth factor receptors, autocrine factors, RAS mutation, and PTEN expression. In other words, just because pathway X is activated by radiation in one cell type does not mean that pathway X will be activated in a different cell type. Radiation-induced signaling through growth factor receptors such as the EGFR may provide radioprotective signals through multiple downstream pathways. In some cell types, enhanced basal signaling by proto-oncogenes such as RAS may provide a radioprotective signal. In many cell types, this may be through PI3K, in others potentially by NFKB or MAPK. Receptor signaling is often dependent on autocrine factors, and synthesis of autocrine factors will have an impact on the amount of radiation-induced pathway activity. For example, cells expressing TGFalpha and HB-EGF will generate protection primarily through EGFR. Heregulin and neuregulins will generate protective signals through ERBB4/ERBB3. The impact on radiation-induced signaling of other autocrine and paracrine ligands such as TGFbeta and interleukin 6 is likely to be as complicated as described above for the ERBB receptors.

Differential gene expression patterns in HER2/neu-positive and -negative breast cancer cell lines and tissues

Overexpression of the oncogene HER2/neu (c-erbB-2) occurs in up to 30% of breast cancers and is correlated with reduced survival, especially in node-positive disease. The aim of this study was to identify genes associated with the aggressive phenotype of HER2/neu-positive breast cancer cells using cDNA microarrays. RNA was extracted from three HER2/neu-positive and three HER2/neu-negative breast cancer cell lines. Pooled RNA was hybridized in duplicate to the breast specific microarray filters from Research Genetics containing 5184 unique cDNAs. Subsequently, a similar comparison was performed for pooled RNAs from 10 node-positive, ER-positive invasive ductal carcinomas, half of which were HER2/neu overexpressers. In HER2/neu overexpressing breast cancer cell lines, 90 (1.7%) genes were up-regulated and 46 (0.9%) were down-regulated, compared to cell lines with low HER2/neu protein levels. In contrast, in HER2/neu overexpressing primary breast cancers, more genes were down-regulated (N = 132, 2.5%) than up-regulated (N = 19, 0.4%). Many of the differentially expressed genes have previously not been known to play a role in human neoplasia, and some of them may represent novel tumor suppressor or oncogenes. No genes were up-regulated, and only a small number of genes were down-regulated both in cell lines and in carcinomas with high HER2/neu protein levels. These included transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 1, glycogen phosphorylase BB, complement 1q and one EST. The differential expression of select genes was confirmed by Northern blotting (trefoil factor 3) or by immunocytochemistry (glycogen phosphorylase BB, vimentin, KAI1). In an extended validation study, 18 of 41 ER-negative, but none of 46 ER-positive, breast carcinomas were found to express vimentin, and all but one of the vimentin-positive tumors were confined to the HER2/neu-negative subgroup (P = 0.0019). Our findings support an important role of the mammary stroma in determining the clinical breast cancer phenotype.