Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

Clinical Manifestation, Risk Factors, and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer

SUMMARY

Immune-related adverse effects can lead to damage to various systems of the body, checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis (CIP) is one of the potentially lethal immune-related adverse effects. However, evidence regarding the risk factors associated with CIP is limited. To timely and accurate identification and prompt treatment of CIP, understanding the risk factors for multimorbidity among diverse study populations becomes crucial. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1131 patients with lung cancer receiving immunotherapy to identify 110 patients with CIP, the clinical characteristics and radiographic features of patients with CIP were analyzed. A case-control study was subsequently performed to identify the risk factors of CIP. The median treatment cycle was 5 cycles and the median time to onset of CIP was 4.2 months. CIP was mainly grade I or II. Most cases improved after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or hormone therapy. Severe CIP tended to occur earlier in comparison to mild to moderate cases. The recurrence rate was 20.6% in ICI-rechallenged patients, and patients with relapsed CIP were usually accompanied by higher-grade adverse events than at first onset. Among the 7 patients with relapse, ICI-associated deaths occurred in 2 patients (28.6%). For rechallenging with ICIs after recovery from CIP, caution should be practiced. Male [odds ratio (OR): 2.067; 95% CI: 1.194-3.579; P = 0.009], history of chest radiation (OR: 1.642; 95% CI: 1.002-2.689; P = 0.049) and underlying lung disease (OR: 2.347; 95% CI: 1.008-5.464; P =0.048) was associated with a higher risk of CIP.

Molecular classification and biomarkers of outcome with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: analyses of the CASPIAN phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

We explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial.

METHODS

805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have uncommon associations with cardiotoxicity, yet these cardiotoxic effects are associated with high mortality. An accurate assessment of risk for cardiotoxicity is essential for clinical decision-making, but data from randomized controlled trials often differ from real-world observational studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was performed, including phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs) reporting myocarditis or pericardial disease, myocardial infarction, or stroke with an immunotherapy. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to pool results between ICIs and other cancer therapy in RCTs and OSs. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was followed. In total, 54 RCTs (N=38 264) and 24 OSs (N=12 561 455) were included. In RCTs, ICI use resulted in higher risk of myocarditis (OR, 3.55 [95% CI, 2.10-5.98]), pericardial disease (OR, 2.73 [95% CI, 1.57-4.77]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.03-3.25]), compared with non-ICI (placebo or chemotherapy). In OSs, ICI use was not associated with myocarditis, pericardial disease, or myocardial infarction compared with controls; however, combination ICIs demonstrated higher risk of myocarditis compared with single ICI use (OR, 3.07 [95% CI, 1.28-7.39]). Stroke risk was not increased with use of ICIs in RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated increased risk of ICI myocarditis, pericardial disease, and myocardial infarction in RCTs but not OSs. Results of this study suggest there are differences between ICI cardiotoxicity risk, possibly suggesting differences in diagnoses and management, in clinical trials versus the OSs.

Uncommon Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Case Reports

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to systematically review case reports documenting rare adverse events in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) following the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify case reports detailing previously unreported adverse drug reactions to ICIs in patients with SCLC. The scope of the literature reviewed was restricted to case studies on SCLC published up to 31 December 2023.

RESULTS

We analyzed twenty-four studies on ICI use for patients with SCLC. There were six reports on atezolizumab, four on durvalumab, and three on adverse events from monotherapy with nivolumab. Reports involving combination treatments were the most frequent, with a total of six, predominantly involving using nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab. Additionally, there was one report each on using pembrolizumab, nofazinilimab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, and toripalimab. We collected detailed information on the clinical course, including patient and disease characteristics, symptoms, treatment for each adverse event, and recovery status. Among the patients included in the case reports, 21 out of 24 (87.5%) had extensive-stage SCLC when initiating ICI therapy, with only 1 patient diagnosed with limited-stage SCLC. Respiratory system adverse events were most common, with seven cases, followed by neurological, endocrinological, and gastroenterological events. Three case reports documented adverse events across multiple systems in a single patient. In most cases, patients showed symptom improvement; however, four studies reported cases where patients either expired without symptom improvement or experienced sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to develop reliable biomarkers for predicting irAEs continue, with ongoing research to enhance predictive precision. Immunotherapy presents diverse and unpredictable adverse events, underscoring the need for advanced diagnostic tools and a multidisciplinary approach to improve patient management.

Construction of a prognostic model for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients undergoing immune therapy in northernmost China and prediction of treatment efficacy based on response status at different time points

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recently, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors has significantly improved the survival of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. However, not all patients can benefit from immunotherapy; therefore, there is an urgent need for precise predictive markers to screen the population for the benefit of immunotherapy. However, single markers have limited predictive accuracy, so a comprehensive predictive model is needed to better enable precision immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to establish a prognostic model for immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients using basic clinical characteristics and peripheral hematological indices of the patients, which would provide a strategy for the clinical realization of precision immunotherapy and improve the prognosis of small cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS

This research retrospectively collected data from ES-SCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between March 1, 2019, and October 31, 2022, at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The study data was randomly split into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Variables associated with patients' overall survival were screened and modeled by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Models were presented visually via Nomogram plots. Model discrimination was evaluated by Harrell's C index, tROC, and tAUC. The calibration of the model was assessed by calibration curves. In addition, the clinical utility of the model was assessed using a DCA curve. After calculating the total risk score of patients in the training set, patients were stratified by risk using percentile partitioning. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot OS and PFS survival curves for different risk groups and response statuses at different milestone time points. Differences in survival time groups were compared using the chi-square test. Statistical analysis software included R 4.1.2 and SPSS 26.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 113 ES-SCLC patients who received immunotherapy, including 79 in the training set and 34 in the validation set. Six variables associated with poorer OS in patients were screened by Cox regression analysis: liver metastasis (P = 0.001), bone metastasis (P = 0.013), NLR < 2.14 (P = 0.005), LIPI assessed as poor (P < 0.001), PNI < 51.03 (P = 0.002), and LDH ≥ 146.5 (P = 0.037). A prognostic model for immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients was constructed based on the above variables. The Harrell's C-index in the training and validation sets of the model was 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.93) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.76-0.99), respectively; the AUC values corresponding to 12, 18, and 24 months in the tROC curves of the training set were 0.745, 0.848, and 0.819 in the training set and 0.858, 0.904 and 0.828 in the validation set; the tAUC curves show that the overall tAUC is > 0.7 and does not fluctuate much over time in both the training and validation sets. The calibration plot demonstrated the good calibration of the model, and the DCA curve indicated that the model had practical clinical applications. Patients in the training set were categorized into low, intermediate, and high risk groups based on their predicted risk scores in the Nomogram graphs. In the training set, 52 patients (66%) died with a median OS of 15.0 months and a median PFS of 7.8 months. Compared with the high-risk group (median OS: 12.3 months), the median OS was significantly longer in the intermediate-risk group (median OS: 24.5 months, HR = 0.47, P = 0.038) and the low-risk group (median OS not reached, HR = 0.14, P = 0.007). And, the median PFS was also significantly prolonged in the intermediate-risk group (median PFS: 12.7 months, HR = 0.45, P = 0.026) and low-risk group (median PFS not reached, HR = 0.12, P = 0.004) compared with the high-risk group (median PFS: 6.2 months). Similar results were obtained in the validation set. In addition, we observed that in real-world ES-SCLC patients, at 6 weeks after immunotherapy, the median OS was significantly longer in responders than in non-responders (median OS: 19.5 months vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.033). Similar results were obtained at 12 weeks (median OS: 20.7 months vs 11.9 months, P = 0.044) and 20 weeks (median OS: 20.7 months vs 11.7 months, P = 0.015). Finally, we found that in the real world, ES-SCLC patients without liver metastasis (P = 0.002), bone metastasis (P = 0.001) and a total number of metastatic organs < 2 (P = 0.002) are more likely to become long-term survivors after receiving immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

This study constructed a new prognostic model based on basic patient clinical characteristics and peripheral blood indices, which can be a good predictor of the prognosis of immunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients; in the real world, the response status at milestone time points (6, 12, and 20 weeks) can be a good indicator of long-term survival in ES-SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy.

Alterations in Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets under Immunochemotherapy in Stage IV SCLC Patients: Th17 Cells as Potential Early Predictive Biomarker for Response

UICC stage IV small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy without curative treatment options. Several randomized trials have demonstrated improved survival rates through the addition of checkpoint inhibitors to first-line platin-based chemotherapy. Consequently, a combination of chemo- and immunotherapy has become standard palliative treatment. However, no reliable predictive biomarkers for treatment response exist. Neither PD-L1 expression nor tumor mutational burden have proven to be effective predictive biomarkers. In this study, we compared the cellular immune statuses of SCLC patients to a healthy control cohort and investigated changes in peripheral blood B, T, and NK lymphocytes, as well as several of their respective subsets, during treatment with immunochemotherapy (ICT) using flow cytometry. Our findings revealed a significant decrease in B cells, while T cells showed a trend to increase throughout ICT. Notably, high levels of exhausted CD4+ and CD8+ cells, alongside NK subsets, increased significantly during treatment. Furthermore, we correlated decreases/increases in subsets after two cycles of ICT with survival. Specifically, a decrease in Th17 cells indicated a better overall survival. Based on these findings, we suggest conducting further investigation into Th17 cells as a potential early predictive biomarkers for response in patients receiving palliative ICT for stage IV SCLC.

Nomograms Predict PFS and OS for SCLC Patients After Standardized Treatment: A Real-World Study

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the process of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients from achieving optimal efficacy to experiencing disease progression until death. It examines the predictive value of the treatment response on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of SCLC patients.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis on 136 SCLC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2018. Important prognostic factors were identified to construct nomogram models. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration curves. Survival differences between groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Subsequently, an independent cohort consisting of 106 SCLC patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2021 was used for validation.

Results

We constructed two nomograms to predict first-line PFS (PFS1) and OS of SCLC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the PFS1 nomogram predicting PFS at 3-, 6-, and 12-months were 0.919 (95% CI: 0.867-0.970), 0.908 (95% CI: 0.860-0.956) and 0.878 (95% CI: 0.798-0.958), and for the OS nomogram predicting OS at 6-, 12-, and 24-months were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.736-0.892), 0.819 (95% CI: 0.749-0.889) and 0.809 (95% CI: 0.678-0.941), indicating those two models with a high discriminative ability. The calibration curves demonstrated the models had a high degree of consistency between predicted and observed values. According to the risk scores, patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, showing a significant difference in survival rate. And these findings were validated in another independent validation cohort.

Conclusion

Based on the patients' treatment response after standardized treatment, we developed and validated two nomogram models to predict PFS1 and OS of SCLC. The models demonstrated good accuracy, reliability and clinical applicability by validating in an independent cohort.

Pan-Canadian Analysis of Practice Patterns in Small Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey

Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (SCNECC) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis, with limited data to guide its treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate practice patterns in the management of SCNECC. A 23-question online survey on management of SCNECC was disseminated to Canadian gynecologic oncologists (GO), radiation oncologists (RO) and medical oncologists (MO). In total, 34 practitioners from eight provinces responded, including 17 GO, 13 RO and four MO. During staging and diagnosis, 74% of respondents used a trimodality imaging approach, and 85% tested for neuroendocrine markers. In early-stage (1A1-1B2) SCNECC, 87% of practitioners used a surgical-based approach with various adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments. In locally advanced (1B3-IVA) SCNECC, 53% favored primary chemoradiation, with cisplatin and etoposide, with the remainder using surgical or radiation-based approaches. In metastatic and recurrent SCNECC, the most common first-line regimen was etoposide and platinum, and 63% of practitioners considered clinical trials in the first line setting or beyond. This survey highlights diverse practice patterns in the treatment of SCNECC. Interdisciplinary input is crucial to individualizing multimodality treatment, and there is a need for prospective trials and intergroup collaboration to define the optimal approach towards managing this rare cancer type.

Efficacy and safety of novel immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have an exceptionally poor prognosis and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with etoposide-platinum is recommended as standard first-line therapy. However, which combination pattern is the best still remains unknown. This network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of currently available patterns including an antiangiogenic agent containing regimen and probed into the most appropriate therapy for patients.

METHODS

Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated using R software. The outcomes of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (grade ≥ 3 adverse events [AEs]) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5544 patients were included for analysis. Drug combination patterns included adebrelimab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, serplulimab, benmelstobart plus anlotinib, tislelizumab, tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy. The novel antiangiogenic agent containing regimen benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy showed the highest possibility to present the best PFS and OS versus chemotherapy. Compared with ICI plus chemotherapy, it also achieved significantly better PFS and presented a tendency of OS benefit. As for safety and toxicity, patients treated with benmelstobart + anlotinib + chemotherapy and durvalumab + tremelimumab + chemotherapy suffered a higher likelihood of more grade ≥ 3 AEs without unexpected AEs.

CONCLUSION

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-based combinations are associated with significant improvement in both PFS and OS for treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients. Benmelstobart plus anlotinib with chemotherapy (CT) yielded better survival benefit versus CT alone or other ICIs + CT with caution for more adverse effects along with the addition of an antiangiogenic agent.

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the ongoing, randomised, double-blind phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and cisplatin was associated with significant improvements in overall survival compared with placebo, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in people with advanced biliary tract cancer at the pre-planned intermin analysis. In this paper, we present patient-reported outcomes from TOPAZ-1.

METHODS

In TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235), participants aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and one or more measurable lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the durvalumab group or the placebo group using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. Participants received 1500 mg durvalumab or matched placebo intravenously every 3 weeks (on day 1 of the cycle) for up to eight cycles in combination with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Thereafter, participants received either durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy intravenously every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by disease status (initially unresectable vs recurrent) and primary tumour location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs gallbladder cancer). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed as a secondary outcome in all participants who completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's 30-item Quality of Life of Cancer Patients questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the 21-item Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Quality of Life Module (QLQ-BIL21). We calculated time to deterioration-ie, time from randomisation to an absolute decrease of at least 10 points in a patient-reported outcome that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or the date of death (by any cause) in the absence of deterioration-and adjusted mean change from baseline in patient-reported outcomes.

FINDINGS

Between April 16, 2019, and Dec 11, 2020, 685 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 341 to the durvalumab group and 344 to the placebo group. Overall, 345 (50%) of participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Data for the QLQ-C30 were available for 318 participants in the durvalumab group and 328 in the placebo group (median follow-up 9·9 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·1]). Data for the QLQ-BIL21 were available for 305 participants in the durvalumab group and 322 in the placebo group (median follow-up 10·2 months [IQR 6·7 to 14·3]). The proportions of participants in both groups who completed questionnaires were high and baseline scores were mostly similar across treatment groups. For global health status or quality of life, functioning, and symptoms, we noted no difference in time to deterioration or adjusted mean changes from baseline were observed between groups. Median time to deterioration of global health status or quality of life was 7·4 months (95% CI 5·6 to 8·9) in the durvalumab group and 6·7 months (5·6 to 7·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·12]). The adjusted mean change from baseline was 1·23 (95% CI -0·71 to 3·16) in the durvalumab group and 0·35 (-1·63 to 2·32) in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin did not have a detrimental effect on patient-reported outcomes. These results suggest that durvalumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin is a tolerable treatment regimen in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Continuous immunotherapy beyond progression in clinical practice for small cell lung cancer

In non-small-cell lung cancer, continuous immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) beyond progression are often used in clinical practice. On the other hand, there is almost no data on whether the concept of continuous ICIs beyond progression can be adopted in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We describe the effectiveness of continuous ICIs beyond progression in SCLC. Medical courses of SCLC patients treated with chemo-immunotherapy were retrospectively reviewed at our hospital. The study included 36 patients with a median age of 73 years (range 46-83 years) who introduced chemo-immunotherapy between September 2019 and December 2022. Atezolizumab and durvalumab in combination with platinum plus etoposide were administered in 24 and 12 patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 67% and the disease control rate was 86%. The median progression-free survival and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 5.1 and 10.3 months, respectively. The median cycle of ICIs was 5 (range 1-42). The median overall survival was 13.6 months. ICIs were administered beyond progression in 14 (39%) patients: five were treated again with chemo-immunotherapy and local ablative radiotherapy, four with local ablative radiotherapy and continuous ICIs, three with chemo-immunotherapy, and two with continuous ICIs alone. TTF exceeded 12 months in 12 (86%) of the 14 cases, six of which were still on ICIs. Adverse events ≥grade 3 were observed in 21 (58%) patients. A notable TTF suggested a benefit of continuous ICIs beyond progression. The concept could be suitably adopted and provide a favorable prognosis in selected cases of SCLC that were previously regarded as an aggressive malignancy.

A Clinical Analysis of Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatments Combined with Chemotherapy in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Real-world clinical experience of using anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients has rarely been reported. In this study, we aimed to perform a retrospective multicenter clinical analysis of extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line therapy with anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy. Between November 2018 and March 2022, 72 extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line atezolizumab or durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy, according to the cancer center databases of Linkou, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals, were retrospectively included in the analysis. Twenty-one patients (29.2%) received atezolizumab and fifty-one (70.8%) received durvalumab. Objective response (OR) and disease control (DC) rates of 59.7% and 73.6%, respectively, were observed with first-line ICI plus chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.63 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.25-8.02), and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.07 months (95% CI, 15.12-17.0) in all study patients. A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; >4) and a high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration (>260 UL) were identified as independent unfavorable factors associated with shorter OS in the multivariate analysis. Regarding safety, neutropenia was the most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse event (AE), but no treatment-related deaths occurred in the study patients. First-line anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy are effective and safe for male extensive-stage SCLC patients. Further therapeutic strategies may need to be developed for patients with unfavorable outcomes (e.g., baseline high NLR and serum LDH level).

Peripheral NK cells identified as the predictor of response in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Although immunotherapy improves outcomes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), the search for biomarkers predicting treatment success is crucial. Natural killer (NK) cells are potential indicators in various cancers, however, their precise role in ES-SCLC prognosis remains unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 33 patients with ES-SCLC treated with first-line immuno-chemotherapy were enrolled. The peripheral NK cell percentage and its longitudinal dynamics were analyzed using flow cytometry. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated as hazard ratio (HR) and compared statistically.

RESULTS

The median PFS was better in the group with normal baseline NK cell levels than the low group (7.0 vs. 4.6 months; HR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.07-0.41; P < 0.0001), but there was no association with OS (14.9 vs. 10.3 months; HR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.23-1.31; P = 0.171). Furthermore, the NK cell% for 95.0% of patients increased after immunochemotherapy in the clinical response group (P = 0.0047), which led to a better median PFS (6.3 vs. 2.1 months; HR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.05-0.98; P < 0.0001) and OS (14.9 vs. 5.9 months; HR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-1.02; P < 0.0001). Similar trends were observed with NK cell% changes up to disease progression, improving PFS (6.5 vs. 4.3; HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.12-0.92; P = 0.0049) and OS (17.4 vs. 9.7; HR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.17-1.02; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ES-SCLC, the percentage and changes in peripheral NK cells can predict the response to combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and etoposide-platinum in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab plus etoposide-platinum (DEP) showed sustained overall survival improvements in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) compared to etoposide-platinum (EP), but adding tremelimumab to DEP (DTEP) did not significantly improve outcomes. A third-party payer perspective is taken here to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DTEP, DEP, and EP for ES-SCLC.

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness was evaluated by partitioning survival models into 3 mutually exclusive health states. In this model, clinical characteristics and outcomes were obtained from the CASPIAN. Model robustness was evaluated through 1-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Outcome measurements included costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, life-years, incremental net health benefit, and incremental net monetary benefit. The analysis was conducted with a 10-year lifetime horizon in a United States setting.

RESULTS

Compared with EP, DEP, and DTEP were associated with an increment of 0.480 and 0.313 life-years, and an increment of 0.247 and 0.165 QALYs, as well as a $139,788 and $170,331 increase in cost per patient. The corresponding ICERs were $565,807/QALY and $1033,456/QALY, respectively. The incremental net health benefit and incremental net monetary benefit of DEP or DTEP were -0.685 QALYs and -$102,729, or -0.971 QALYs and -$145,608 at a willingness to pay threshold of $150,000/QALY, respectively. Compared with DTEP, DEP was dominated. DTEP and DEP were 100% unlikely to be cost-effective if the willingness to pay threshold was $150,000/QALY. DEP was cost-effective compared to EP when durvalumab was priced below $0.994/mg. Compared with EP, DEP, and DTEP were unlikely to be considered cost-effective across all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

DEP and DTEP were not cost-effective options in the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC compared with EP, from the third-party payer perspective in the United States. Compared with DTEP, DEP was dominated.

Efficacy and safety of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressants combined with chemotherapy in treating patients with small-cell lung cancer (extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer, limited-disease small-cell lung cancer and relapsed small-cell lung cancer) are still unknown, and there are no reports directly comparing the efficacy and safety of other immunotherapies.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Method

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for relevant articles published from inception to November 11, 2020. The risk of bias of the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool. Multiple Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. They conducted data analysis using R Studio and STATA version 15.1. The outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), stability of response (SOR), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (AE grade≥3). A 95% confidence interval (CI) was provided for each estimate.

Results

This meta-analysis included 16 RCT studies with 5898 patients. For OS, relative to chemotherapy (MD=-4.49; 95%CI [-7.97, -1.03]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (MD=-4.62; 95%CI [-9.08, -0.11]), ipilimumab (MD=-4.26; 95%CI [-8.01, -0.3]) and nivolumab(MD=-5.66; 95%CI [-10.44, -1.11]) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (MD=-4.56; 95%CI [-8.7, -0.1]), serplulimab can significantly increase the OS of SCLC patients. There was no significant difference between PFS, SOR and DOR. Analysis of AE showed that different immunotherapy combined chemotherapy regimens were similar to single chemotherapy regarding the overall incidence of AE grade≥3. However, after the cumulative ranking of the common symptoms of different adverse reactions, it was found that nivolumab ranked first in the occurrence probability of anemia (99.08%), fatigue (84.78%), and decreased appetite (89.66%). durvalumab was the most likely in nausea (75.4%). Pembrolizumab (76.24%) was most likely to cause pruritus. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy caused less diarrhea than chemotherapy alone (80.16%).

Conclusions

According to our analysis, serplulimab combined with chemotherapy is more likely to show better efficacy with a manageable safety profile for small-cell lung cancer. However, the evidence for this comparison shows some limitations due to the number of literature.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023486053.

Rethinking strategies in SCLC: Lessons learned from tiragolumab in the SKYSCRAPER-02 study

The addition of tiragolumab, an anti-TIGIT inhibitor, to chemotherapy plus atezolizumab demonstrated promising early results for lung cancer. Unfortunately, the phase 3 study SKYSCRAPER-02 did not confirm the anticipated benefit of tiragolumab combination in recalcitrant small-cell lung cancer,1 reiterating the need for a more accurate population selection in clinical trials.

Transitioning to a Personalized Approach in Molecularly Subtyped Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Lung cancer has become a major public health concern, standing as the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Among its subtypes, small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by aggressive and rapid growth, poor differentiation, and neuroendocrine features. Typically, SCLC is diagnosed at an advanced stage (extensive disease, ED-SCLC), with distant metastases, and is strongly associated with tobacco smoking and has a poor prognosis. Recent clinical trials, such as CASPIAN and IMpower133, have demonstrated promising outcomes with the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line chemotherapy, leading to prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with ED-SCLC compared to standard chemotherapy. Other studies have emphasized the potential for future development of molecularly targeted therapies in SCLC patients, including inhibitors of IGF-1R, DLL3, BCL-2, MYC, or PARP. The molecular subdivision of SCLC based on transcriptomic and immunohistochemical analyses represents a significant advancement in both diagnostic and clinical approaches in SCLC patients. Specific molecular pathways are activated within distinct transcriptome subtypes of SCLC, offering the potential for personalized treatment strategies, such as targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Such tailored approaches hold promise for significantly improving outcomes in SCLC patients.

Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors at different treatment time periods on prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has brought us new hope, but the real-world outcome is relatively lacking. Our aim was to investigate the clinical use, efficacy, and survival benefit of ICIs in ES-SCLC from real-world data analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of ES-SCLC patients was conducted between 2012 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed between groups to evaluate the value of ICIs at different lines of treatment. PFS1 was defined as the duration from initial therapy to disease progression or death. PFS2 was defined as the duration from the first disease progression to the second disease progression or death.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty patients with ES-SCLC were included. We performed landmark analysis, which showed that compared to the second-line and subsequent-lines ICIs-combined therapy group (2SL-ICIs) and non-ICIs group, the first-line ICIs-combined therapy group (1L-ICIs) prolonged OS and PFS1. There was a trend toward prolonged OS in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group, but the significance threshold was not met (median OS 11.94 months vs. 11.10 months, P = 0.14). A longer PFS2 was present in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group (median PFS2 4.13 months vs. 2.60 months, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

First-line ICIs plus chemotherapy should be applied in clinical practice. If patients did not use ICIs plus chemotherapy in first-line therapy, the use of ICIs in the second line or subsequent lines of treatment could prolong PFS2.

The therapeutic effect of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with simple brain metastasis after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy (RT) plus systemic therapy (ST) with RT alone in patients with simple brain metastasis (BM) after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

METHODS

The patients were treated at a single center from January 2011 to January 2022. BM only without metastases to other organs was defined as simple BM. The eligible patients were divided into RT alone (monotherapy arm) and RT plus ST (combined therapy arm). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine factors associated with increased risk of extracranial progression. After 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, two groups were compared for extracranial progression-free survival (ePFS), PFS, overall survival (OS), and intracranial PFS (iPFS).

RESULTS

133 patients were identified and 100 were analyzed (monotherapy arm: n = 50, combined therapy arm: n = 50). The ePFS of the combined therapy was significantly longer than that of the monotherapy, with a median ePFS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-19.8) in combined therapy and 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7-10.7) in monotherapy (P = 0.04). There were no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.057), OS (P = 0.309), or iPFS (P = 0.448). Multifactorial analysis showed that combined therapy was independently associated with better ePFS compared with monotherapy (HR = 0.617, P = 0.034); more than 5 BMs were associated with worse ePFS compared with 1-5 BMs (HR = 1.808, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RT alone, combined therapy improves ePFS in patients with simple BM after first-line treatment of LS-SCLC. Combined therapy and 1-5 BMs reduce the risk of extracranial recurrence.

Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China

OBJECTIVE

The CAPSTONE-1 trial demonstrated that adebrelimab-based immunotherapy yielded a favourable survival benefit compared with chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this immunotherapy in the treatment of ES-SCLC from a healthcare system perspective in China.

DESIGN

The TreeAge Pro software was used to establish a three-state partitioned survival model. Survival data came from the CAPSTONE-1 trial (NCT03711305), and only direct medical costs were included. Utility values were obtained from the published literature. Sensitivity analysis was performed to explore the robustness of the model. The cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy was investigated through scenario and exploratory analyses in various settings.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Total costs, incremental costs, life years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental QALYs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

The basic analysis revealed that the adebrelimab group achieved a total of 1.1 QALYs at a cost of US$65 385, while the placebo group attained 0.78 QALYs at a cost of US$12 741. ICER was US$163 893/QALY. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the model was robust. Results from scenario and exploratory analyses indicated that the combination of adebrelimab and chemotherapy did not demonstrate cost-effectiveness in any scenario.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of ES-SCLC was not economical compared with chemotherapy.

Real-life clinical management patterns in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer across France: a multi-method study

BACKGROUND

We designed this study based on both a physician practice survey and real-world patient data to: (1) evaluate clinical management practices in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) among medical centers located across France; and (2) describe first-line treatment patterns among patients with ES-SCLC following the introduction of immunotherapy into clinical practice.

METHODS

A 50-item questionnaire was completed by physicians from 45 medical centers specialized in SCLC management. Responses were collected from June 2022 to January 2023. The survey questions addressed diagnostic workup of ES-SCLC, chemoimmunotherapy in first-line and second-line settings, and use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) and radiotherapy. In parallel, using a chart review approach, we retrospectively analyzed aggregated information from 548 adults with confirmed ES-SCLC receiving first-line treatment in the same centers.

RESULTS

In ES-SCLC, treatment planning is based on chest computed tomography (CT) (as declared by 100% of surveyed centers). Mean time between diagnosis and treatment initiation was 2-7 days, as declared by 82% of centers. For detection of brain metastases, the most common imaging test was brain CT (84%). The main exclusion criteria for first-line immunotherapy in the centers were autoimmune disease (87%), corticosteroid therapy (69%), interstitial lung disease (69%), and performance status ≥ 2 (69%). Overall, 53% and 36% of centers considered that patients are chemotherapy-sensitive if they relapse within ≥ 3 months or ≥ 6 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy, respectively. Among the 548 analyzed patients, 409 (75%) received chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line treatment, 374 (91%) of whom received carboplatin plus etoposide and 35 (9%) cisplatin plus etoposide. Overall, 340/548 patients (62%) received maintenance immunotherapy. Most patients (68%) did not receive radiotherapy or PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an overall alignment of practices reflecting recent clinical guidelines among medical centers managing ES-SCLC across France, and a high prescription rate of immunotherapy in the first-line setting.

Patterns of Immunoreactivity with TTF-1 Antibodies 8G7G3/1 and SPT24 Suggest Distinct Immunoprofiles Between Most Pulmonary and Nonpulmonary Small Cell Carcinomas

Introduction. Small cell carcinoma can arise from various sites. Herein, we analyze the ability of 2 thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) antibodies (SPT24 and 8G7G3/1) to separate pulmonary from nonpulmonary small cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods. We analyzed 26 pulmonary and 83 nonpulmonary small cell carcinomas, and 14 Merkel cell carcinomas. Each tumor was stained with SPT24 and 8G7G3/1. Extent of nuclear staining was scored as diffuse (>50%), focal (11%-50%), rare (1%-10%), or negative (<1%). Results. All pulmonary small cell carcinomas were positive for SPT24 and 8G7G3/1. Four Merkel cell carcinomas (29%) were positive for SPT24 (ranging from rare-to-diffuse), while 2 (14%) showed rare expression with 8G7G3/1. For nonpulmonary small cell carcinomas, 69 (83%) were positive for SPT24 and 40 (48%) were positive for 8G7G3/1. For SPT24 positive tumors, the extent of 8G7G3/1 expression was equal in 17 (25%) and less in 52 tumors (75%), including 29 (42%) that were negative for 8G7G3/1. No nonpulmonary small cell carcinoma had more staining with 8G7G3/1 compared to SPT24. The differences in staining between 8G7G3/1 and SPT24 in the nonpulmonary cohort were statistically significant (P < 0.0001) with no significant difference between primary and metastatic lesions for 8G7G3/1 (P  =  0.66) or SPT24 (P  =  0.77). Conclusion. Most pulmonary small cell carcinomas are diffusely positive for both SPT24 and 8G7G3/1, whereas most nonpulmonary small cell carcinomas exhibit focal-to-no staining with 8G7G3/1 and significantly less staining with 8G7G3/1 compared to SPT24. However, these trends are not absolute and should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical and radiological findings.

Six versus four or five cycles of first-line etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis of a prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

The recommended treatment for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is a combination of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) chemotherapy, typically administered over 4-6 cycles. Nonetheless, the optimal duration of chemotherapy is still not determined. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC who received either 6 cycles or 4-5 cycles of EP chemotherapy combined with TRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we utilized data from our prior prospective trial to analyze the outcomes of 265 LS-SCLC patients who received 4-6 courses of EP combined with concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated TRT between 2002 and 2017. Patients were categorized into two groups depending on their number of chemotherapy cycles: 6 or 4-5 cycles. To assess overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), we employed the Kaplan-Meier method after conducting propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Among the 265 LS-SCLC patients, 60 (22.6%) received 6 cycles of EP chemotherapy, while 205 (77.4%) underwent 4-5 cycles. Following PSM (53 patients for each group), the patients in the 6 cycles group exhibited a significant improvement in OS and PFS in comparison to those in the 4-5 cycles group [median OS: 29.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.6-53.1 months) vs. 22.7 months (95% CI, 20.8-29.1 months), respectively, p = 0.019; median PFS: 17.9 months (95% CI, 13.7-30.5 months) vs. 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.8-14.2 months), respectively, p = 0.006]. The two-year and five-year OS rates were 60.38% and 29.87% in the 6 cycles group, whereas 47.17% and 15.72% in the 4-5 cycles group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC who were treated with EP regimen chemotherapy combined with TRT exhibited notably enhanced survival when administered 6 cycles of chemotherapy, as compared to those who underwent only 4-5 cycles.

Nintedanib plus Chemotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer with Comorbid Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Rationale: A fatal acute exacerbation (AE) occasionally develops during chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with comorbid idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).Objectives: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of carboplatin, etoposide, and nintedanib combination therapy for unresectable SCLC with comorbid IPF.Methods: The NEXT-SHIP study is a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial for unresectable SCLC with IPF (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials registry number jRCTs031190119). The patients received carboplatin, etoposide, and nintedanib (150 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint was the incidence of IPF-AE at 28 days after the last administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and the sample size was set at 33 (5.0% expected, 20.0% threshold).Results: A total of 33 patients were registered; 87.9% were male, the median age was 73 years, the median percentage forced vital capacity was 85.2%, and 51.5% had honeycomb lungs. The median observation period was 10.5 months. The incidence of IPF-AE at 28 days after the last administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy was 3.0% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-13.6). The objective response rate was 68.8% (95% CI, 50.0-83.9). The median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 4.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-5.5) and 13.4 months (95% CI, 8.1-21.6), respectively. The most common adverse event of grade 3 or higher was neutropenia (81.8%), followed by leukopenia (39.4%) and thrombocytopenia (30.3%).Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint regarding the incidence of IPF-AEs with promising results for efficacy. Carboplatin, etoposide, and nintedanib combination therapy may be one of the standard treatment options for SCLC with comorbid IPF.Clinical trial registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031190119).

Durvalumab plus carboplatin-etoposide treatment in a patient with small-cell lung cancer on hemodialysis: a case report and literature review

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus carboplatin-etoposide treatment in patients with extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) on hemodialysis. Here, we present a case of a 67-year-old man with pleuroperitoneal communication on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis who was diagnosed with ED-SCLC based on a cytological analysis of the peritoneal fluid. He was switched from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis and received durvalumab (1500 mg/body on day 1) plus carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 5, 125 mg on day 1) and etoposide (50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 3) as first-line therapy. During the first cycle, grade 2 anemia, grade 3 neutropenia, and grade 3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred; therefore, durvalumab and reduced doses of carboplatin and etoposide were administered. No other severe adverse events occurred, and a partial response was observed after four cycles. Our findings indicate that durvalumab plus carboplatin-etoposide treatment is safe and effective even in patients on hemodialysis.

Phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of 45 Gy versus 30 Gy thoracic radiation for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): Study protocol

BACKGROUND

Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) has previously shown benefit to patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who respond to chemotherapy. However, the optimum dose of cTRT is unknown. The purpose of this randomized trial is to compare the efficacy of 45 Gy in 15 fractions with 30 Gy in 10 fractions cTRT in ES-SCLC.

METHODS

This phase III, multicenter, randomized trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different cTRT dose in ES-SCLC. Eligible patients with pathologically confirmed ES-SCLC who responded to 4-6 cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) or carboplatin (EC) chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive either 30 Gy in 10 fractions (standard dose) or 45 Gy in 15 fractions (high dose) cTRT. The primary endpoint is 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), 2-year local control (LC) and treatment related toxicity as measured by adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).

DISCUSSION

The present study is the first randomized phase III trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of higher versus lower dose cTRT in ES-SCLC, providing evidence for future clinical practice in prolonging survival of patients with ES-SCLC.

M, Gross CP, Slotman BJ, Chiang AC, Park HS. Differential Effect of Consolidative Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Sex

Purpose

The landmark randomized trial on chest irradiation in extensive disease small cell lung cancer (CREST) demonstrated that consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (cTRT) improved overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after initial chemotherapy (chemo) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, with potentially increased benefit in women compared with men. It is unknown whether similar findings would apply after chemoimmunotherapy became the standard first-line treatment. In this analysis, we report national practice patterns and survival outcomes of cTRT according to patient sex.

Methods and Materials

We included patients from de-identified electronic health record-derived database diagnosed with stage IV small cell lung cancer (2014-2021) who completed 4 to 6 cycles of first-line systemic therapy (platinum-doublet chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy). We evaluated OS and PFS using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with receipt of cTRT as an independent variable and stratified by sex. As a sensitivity analysis, we weighted the models by the inverse probability of receiving cTRT.

Results

A total of 1227 patients were included (850 chemotherapy, 377 chemoimmunotherapy). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients who did and did not receive cTRT. Among women, cTRT was associated with superior OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87) and PFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.82) compared with those not receiving cTRT. Conversely, no OS or PFS benefit with cTRT was observed in men (OS HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.80-1.31; PFS HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.85-1.47). Findings were similar in weighted analyses.

Conclusions

The survival efficacy of cTRT may be moderated by sex, with female patients appearing more likely to benefit than male patients. These findings reflect sex-based survival trends with similar effect sizes to those observed in the CREST trial. Although the underpinnings of this association need to be elucidated, stratification by sex should be considered for randomized-controlled trials studying cTRT in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

PD-L1 inhibitors combined with whole brain radiotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer brain metastases: Real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have demonstrated that brain metastases patients may benefit from intracranial radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, it is unclear whether this treatment is effective for patients with small cell lung cancer brain metastases (SCLC-BMs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study by analyzing medical records of patients with SCLC-BMs from January 1, 2017 to June 1, 2022. Data related to median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were enrolled, of which 60 received WBRT and 49 received WBRT-ICI. Compared to the WBRT alone cohort, the WBRT-ICI cohort showed longer mOS (20.4 months vs. 29.3 months, p = 0.021), mPFS (7.9 months vs. 15.1 months, p < 0.001), and iPFS (8.3 months vs. 16.5 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, WBRT-ICI cohort had a better response rate for both BMs. (p = 0.035) and extracranial diseases (p < 0.001) compared to those receiving WBRT alone. Notably, the use of WBRT before ICI was associated with longer mOS compared to the use of WBRT after ICI (23.3 months for the ICI-WBRT group vs. 34.8 months for the WBRT-ICI group, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that WBRT combined with immunotherapy improved survival in SCLC-BMs patients compared to WBRT monotherapy. Administering WBRT prior to ICI treatment is associated with improved survival outcomes compared to WBRT following ICI treatment, for patients with SCLC-BMs. These findings highlight the significance of conducting further prospective researches on combination strategies of intracranial radiotherapy and ICI in SCLC-BMs patients.

Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second or further-line therapy for extensive disease small cell lung cancer: a phase 2 investigator-initiated non-randomized controlled trial

Background

Treatment options remain rather limited for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) patients in second or further-line setting.

Methods

The phase 2 investigator-initiated non-randomized study enrolled patients who had disease progression on at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. Participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg on day one and oral daily anlotinib 12 mg on days 1-14 once every three weeks per cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04055792).

Findings

Forty-two patients were enrolled between August 29, 2019 and December 26, 2021 at Henan Cancer Hospital in China. 37 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The median follow-up was 24.8 months (IQR: 16.9-28.2). The median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.0-7.3). The OS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 7.1-18.2). The ORR was 56.8% (21/37, 95% CI: 40.0-73.5) and the DCR was 89.2% (33/37, 95% CI: 78.7-99.7). Forty patients (40/42, 95%) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were reported in 39 patients (39/42, 93%), while grade 3 or higher irAEs occurred in 11 patients (11/42, 26%). The most frequent irAEs were hypothyroidism (16/42, 38%), elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (15/42, 36%) and elevated creatine kinase MB (15/42, 36%). The most frequent grade 3 or higher irAEs were elevated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (5/42, 12%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (3/42, 7%).

Interpretation

Sintilimab plus anlotinib demonstrated promising antitumor activities as second or further-line therapy for ED-SCLC and had manageable toxicities. The findings support further randomized controlled trials of this combination regimen for ED-SCLC.

Funding

Henan Province Health and Youth Subject Leader Training Project, Henan Health Science and Technology Innovation Talents, ZHONGYUAN QIANREN JIHUA, Henan International Joint Laboratory of drug resistance and reversal of targeted therapy for lung cancer, Tumor Research Fund of Anti-Angiogenesis Targeted Therapy of China Anti-Cancer Association.

Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become the standard of care in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Although immune-related adverse events have been reported to influence prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients, few studies have investigated the prognostic value of immune-related adverse events in small cell lung cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the prognosis of patients who developed immune-related adverse events after first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We enrolled 90 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment from September 2019 to December 2022 in six hospitals in Japan. The patients were categorized into groups with and without immune-related adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 23 patients with and 67 without immune-related adverse events. Seventeen patients had grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events, and nine (including overlapping cases) had grade ≥3. The most frequent immune-related adverse event was a skin rash. The median survival time was 22 months in patients with immune-related adverse events and 9.3 months in patients without immune-related adverse events. The hazard ratio was 0.40 (95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.83, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that immune-related adverse events are associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Serplulimab monotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a case report

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with limited treatment options, especially for extensive-stage (ES) patients. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with ES-SCLC and asymptomatic brain metastasis who opted for immune monotherapy with serplulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody). After four cycles, the patient achieved a confirmed partial response and a progression-free survival of over 1 year. Moreover, we observed a consistent decline in tumor biomarkers, and brain MRI indicated reduced metastatic activity. Remarkably, the patient tolerated the treatment well, with only mild diarrhea. This case highlights serplulimab's potential as a first-line treatment in select ES-SCLC patients, emphasizing the importance of further research on immunotherapy predictive biomarkers.

Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Currently, there is a lack of well-established markers to predict the efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are associated with prognosis in several tumors, whereas their predictive role in SCLC remains unclear.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, involving extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) patients who received first-line chemoimmunotherapy between January 2020 and December 2021. Peripheral blood biomarkers were extracted from medical records and their correlation with prognosis and immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) was analyzed.

Results

A total of 114 patients were included. Patients with a low PLR, high ALI and high PNI had prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those with a high PLR, low ALI and low PNI. Patients with a low NLR, low PLR, high ALI and high PNI had prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to those with a high NLR, high PLR, low ALI and low PNI. Cox regression model showed that PNI was an independent risk factor for both PFS and OS. ROC curve showed that PNI outperforms NLR, PLR and ALI in predicting both PFS and OS. The PNI-based nomogram demonstrated strong predictive capability for both PFS and OS. In addition, there was a significant correlation between PNI and IRAEs.

Conclusion

A high baseline PNI might be associated with improved prognosis and the occurrence of IRAEs in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Systemic Sclerosis in the Treatment of a Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient with Durvalumab: A Case Report

As one of the key cancer treatment measures, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of various cancers, including malignancies previously thought to be untreatable. Immune checkpoint inhibitors work by targeting the dysfunctional immune system, to enhance cancer-cell killing by CD8-positive T cells. Despite the beneficial effects of ICIs, these treatments are also linked to a novel class of side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Immune-related adverse events can affect multiple organ systems, such as endocrine, neurological, gastroenteric, dermatologic, ocular, hepatic, renal, and rheumatic ones. While variable in severity, irAEs can be associated with significant morbidity, mortality, cessation of ICI treatment and can be potentially life-threatening sometimes. Among varieties of irAEs, dermatological manifestations are frequently reported, since they can be easily observed. Here, we present a case of a 74-year-old patient with widespread fibrosis of skin, eventually diagnosed as diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis after the treatment with durvalumab for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Prompt recognition and treatment of immune-checkpoint inhibitors-associated systemic sclerosis may help enhance tolerance to ICIs and ensure better performance in treating tumors.

Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical classification utilizing biopsy specimens in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), together with cytotoxic chemotherapy (chemoimmunotherapy), have been adapted for the initial treatment of extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), they have achieved limited success. In ED-SCLC, a subtype of SCLC, the expression of immune-related molecules and clinical data are not well understood in relation to ICI treatment efficiency.

METHODS

We examined lung biopsy specimens from patients diagnosed with ED-SCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy or chemotherapy. SCLC subtype, expression of HLA class I, and infiltration of CD8-positive cells were examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Subsequently, the association between clinical factors, IHC results, and progression-free survival or overall survival was assessed.

RESULTS

Most of the cases showed the achaete-scute homolog 1 (ASCL1) subtype. Among the 75 SCLC cases, 29 expressed high levels of HLA class I, while 46 showed low levels or a negative result; 33 patients were characterized as CD8-high, whereas 42 were CD8-low. In the chemoimmunotherapy cohort, multivariate analysis revealed a correlation between CD8-high and improved survival. Specifically, patients in the CD8-high group of the chemoimmunotherapy cohort experienced enhanced survival compared to those in the chemotherapy cohort, which was attributed to ICI addition. IHC subtype analysis demonstrated a survival advantage in the SCLC-I and SCLC-A groups when ICI was combined with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the predictive value of IHC-classified subtypes and CD8-positive cell infiltration in estimating outcomes for patients with ED-SCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy as a first-line therapy. These findings have practical implications for daily clinical assessments and treatment decisions.

Immune heterogeneity in small-cell lung cancer and vulnerability to immune checkpoint blockade

Atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1), combined with carboplatin and etoposide (CE), is now a standard of care for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). A clearer understanding of therapeutically relevant SCLC subsets could identify rational combination strategies and improve outcomes. We conduct transcriptomic analyses and non-negative matrix factorization on 271 pre-treatment patient tumor samples from IMpower133 and identify four subsets with general concordance to previously reported SCLC subtypes (SCLC-A, -N, -P, and -I). Deeper investigation into the immune heterogeneity uncovers two subsets with differing neuroendocrine (NE) versus non-neuroendocrine (non-NE) phenotypes, demonstrating immune cell infiltration hallmarks. The NE tumors with low tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) but high T-effector signals demonstrate longer overall survival with PD-L1 blockade and CE versus CE alone than non-NE tumors with high TAM and high T-effector signal. Our study offers a clinically relevant approach to discriminate SCLC patients likely benefitting most from immunotherapies and highlights the complex mechanisms underlying immunotherapy responses.

Tislelizumab Plus Platinum and Etoposide Versus Placebo Plus Platinum and Etoposide as First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage SCLC (RATIONALE-312): A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) prognosis remains poor. The phase 3 RATIONALE-312 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC.

METHODS

RATIONALE-312 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in the People's Republic of China. Eligible patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive four cycles of tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo, with etoposide plus carboplatin or cisplatin intravenously every 3 weeks, followed by tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo as maintenance. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety.

RESULTS

Between July 22, 2019 and April 21, 2021, 457 patients were randomized to tislelizumab (n = 227) or placebo (n = 230), plus chemotherapy. Baseline demographics were generally balanced between arms. At the data cutoff (April 19, 2023), the median study follow-up was 14.2 months (interquartile range: 8.6-25.3). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited a statistically significant OS benefit versus placebo plus chemotherapy (stratified hazard ratio = 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.93]; one-sided p = 0.0040; median: 15.5 [95% CI: 13.5-17.1] versus 13.5 mo [95% CI: 12.1-14.9], respectively). Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the tislelizumab versus placebo arm (stratified hazard ratio = 0.64 [95% CI: 0.52-0.78]; p < 0.0001; median: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.3-5.5] versus 4.3 mo [95% CI: 4.2-4.4], respectively). Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 86% of patients in each treatment arm and were mostly hematologic.

CONCLUSIONS

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited statistically significant clinical benefit and manageable safety compared with placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ES-SCLC.

A Systemic Immune Inflammation Index and PD-L1 (SP142) Expression as a Potential Combined Biomarker of the Clinical Benefit of Chemo-Immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background: No studies have identified combined biomarkers that may be more reasonable for the assessment of current chemo-immunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Methods: This study was conducted to investigate a combined biomarker with prognostic or predictive value in ES-SCLC. We determined the best independent prognostic biomarker among the four complete blood-count-derived inflammatory biomarkers (CBC-IBs). Subsequently, we analyzed the prognostic or predictive value of combining this independent CBC-IB with PD-L1 (SP142) expression. We prospectively assessed the SP142 analyses in tumor samples at diagnosis. Results: All in all, 55 patients with ES-SCLC were classified into four groups according to the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) (low/high) and SP142 (positive/negative). The best survival was observed in the low-SII/ SP142-positive group, whereas the worst survival was observed in the high-SII/SP142-negative group (p = 0.002). The combined SII-SP142 biomarker was better for predicting both survival and disease progression in patients with ES-SCLC. Conclusions: The combined SII-SP142 biomarker can be readily and universally obtained at a low cost in clinical practice, without requiring advanced genomics technology or specialized expertise. Although further studies are needed to confirm that the combined SII-SP142 biomarker is widely applicable, it should help clinicians to identify the best patients for combined chemotherapy with atezolizumab in ES-SCLC.

Focused ultrasound-assisted delivery of immunomodulating agents in brain cancer

Focused ultrasound (FUS) combined with intravascularly circulating microbubbles can transiently increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to enable targeted therapeutic delivery to the brain, the clinical testing of which is currently underway in both adult and pediatric patients. Aside from traditional cancer drugs, this technique is being extended to promote the delivery of immunomodulating therapeutics to the brain, including antibodies, immune cells, and cytokines. In this manner, FUS approaches are being explored as a tool to improve and amplify the effectiveness of immunotherapy for both primary and metastatic brain cancer, a particularly challenging solid tumor to treat. Here, we present an overview of the latest groundbreaking research in FUS-assisted delivery of immunomodulating agents to the brain in pre-clinical models of brain cancer, and place it within the context of the current immunotherapy approaches. We follow this up with a discussion on new developments and emerging strategies for this rapidly evolving approach.

Sterotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in a Multicentric Series of Oligometastatic SCLC: The SAMOS Cohort

AIMS

SCLC is the most aggressive lung cancer histology with a 5-year OS <10%. At the diagnosis, almost two-thirds of the SCLC an Extended Disease presentation. Two randomized studies (CASPIAN and ImPower133) demonstrated an OS improvement, when immunotherapy was prescribed as maintenance therapy after standard chemotherapy. To date, SABR has had a limited indication in managing metastatic SCLC, although recent reports proposed it as a valid treatment option in selected patients. We propose a retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated with SABR for oligometastatic SCLC.

METHOD

Data of patients affected by oligometastatic-SCLC treated with SABR between 2017 and 2022 in 11 Italian centers were collected. Clinical and therapeutic variables together with OS and time to next treatment were analyzed. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve were calculated, and log-rank test were applied. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 93 patients and 132 metastatic lesions were analyzed. The median age was 64 years (36-86) and all but 1 had Performance Status 0 or 1. Fifty-two patients presented ED at diagnosis. The first line treatment was radiochemotherapy in 42%, CHT alone in 24% and CHT-IO in 28%, others treatment accounts for 4% and only 2% of patients underwent best supportive care. Of the 132 lesions treated with SBRT 55 were in brain, 27 in lung, 11 in liver, 10 in lymph nodes, 8 in bones and 20 in adrenal gland. Median OS was 14 months, 1 year-OS and 2 years OS were 53% and 27%, respectively. The median TtNT was 14 months for the entire population. Of all the analyzed variables only, the anatomical site of the metastases and their number showed statistical significance in the univariate analysist, confirmed in the subsequent multivariate.

CONCLUSION

SABR seems to play a role in delaying further systemic lines in oligometastatic disease and to extend the use of ongoing treatment in oligoprogressive state. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Delta Radiomics Model for the Prediction of Overall Survival and Local Recurrence in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the validity of CT-based delta radiomics signatures in predicting overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients after chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively enrolled 136 SCLC patients were split into training and testing cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from CT images before, after the second, and the fourth cycle of chemotherapy. Delta radiomics features were obtained by calculating the net changes of features. Three radiomics signatures (R1, R2, and R3) and three delta radiomics signatures (R21, R31, and R32) were developed. The best signature was defined as the radiomics risk signature (RRS). The significant clinicoradiological factors and RRS of OS or LR were applied to build the combined model. RRS was also investigated in the subgroups based on stage and treatment regimens, respectively.

RESULTS

Delta radiomics models presented improved performance. R32 signature demonstrated the highest C-indices in the training and testing cohorts, with C-indices of 0.850 and 0.834 in the OS arm, and 0.723 and 0.737 in the LR arm, respectively. The incremental performance was observed after the clinicoradiological characteristics integrated into the RRSOS, with C-indexes of 0.857 and 0.836, respectively. Furthermore, the stratified analysis also confirmed the ability of RRS based on the stage and treatment regimen subgroups in the OS and LR arms, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Delta radiomics signatures could improve the personalized prediction of OS and LR at the early stage of chemotherapy in SCLC patients. R32 signature performed the highest performance.

Using MRI radiomics to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy for brain metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) are common in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in these patients is uncertain. In this study we aimed to develop and validate a radiomics nomogram based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for intracranial efficacy prediction of ICIs in patients with BMs from SCLC.

METHODS

The training and validation cohorts consisted of 101 patients from two centers. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), logistic univariate regression analysis, and random forest were applied to select the radiomic features, generating the radiomics score (Rad-score) through the formula. Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, a nomogram was created by the combined model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were used to assess the performance of the nomogram. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted based on the nomogram scores.

RESULTS

Ten radiomic features were selected for calculating the Rad-score as they could differentiate the intracranial efficacy in the training (area under the curve [AUC], 0.759) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.667). A nomogram was created by combining Rad-score, treatment lines, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The training cohort obtained an AUC of 0.878 for the combined model, verified in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.875). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed the nomogram was associated with progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0152) and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) (p = 0.0052) but not overall survival (OS) (p = 0.4894).

CONCLUSION

A radiomics nomogram model for predicting the intracranial efficacy of ICIs in SCLC patients with BMs can provide suggestions for exploring individual-based treatments for patients.

Atezolizumab-Induced Type 1 Diabetic Ketoacidosis in a Patient With Small Cell Lung Cancer and Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

In this report, we present a case of a 70-year-old male with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who developed type 1 diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) following treatment with atezolizumab plus chemotherapy. Despite well-controlled T2DM with oral hypoglycemic agents, the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) led to rapid deterioration into insulin-dependent status due to ICI-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Vigilant monitoring for hyperglycemia and timely intervention is crucial during ICI therapy, considering the potentially life-threatening complications. Although the patient achieved extended progression-free survival (PFS) post-treatment, re-administration of atezolizumab resulted in a bullous pemphigoid-like rash, necessitating discontinuation of the drug and corticosteroid treatment. The impact of recurring immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on treatment efficacy warrants further investigation.

Nano-enhanced immunotherapy: Targeting the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment (TME), which is mostly composed of tumor cells, immune cells, signaling molecules, stromal tissue, and the vascular system, is an integrated system that is conducive to the formation of tumors. TME heterogeneity makes the response to immunotherapy different in different tumors, such as "immune-cold" and "immune-hot" tumors. Tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells are the major suppressive immune cells and their different phenotypes interact and influence cancer cells by secreting different signaling factors, thus playing a key role in the formation of the TME as well as in the initiation, growth, and metastasis of cancer cells. Nanotechnology development has facilitated overcoming the obstacles that limit the further development of conventional immunotherapy, such as toxic side effects and lack of targeting. In this review, we focus on the role of three major suppressive immune cells in the TME as well as in tumor development, clinical trials of different drugs targeting immune cells, and different attempts to combine drugs with nanomaterials. The aim is to reveal the relationship between immunotherapy, immunosuppressive TME and nanomedicine, thus laying the foundation for further development of immunotherapy.

Long-Term Survival and Stable Disease in a Patient with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Treatment with Carboplatin, Etoposide and Atezolizumab

Survival beyond 2 years is rare in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with chemotherapy alone. We describe a patient with ES-SCLC who was treated with carboplatin, etoposide and the programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor atezolizumab in the IMpower133 study (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02763579) and who achieved exceptionally long-term survival. Treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC (n = 403) were included in the IMpower133 study, and the identified patient had been randomised to the investigational treatment arm, where patients received induction therapy with carboplatin and etoposide plus atezolizumab for four 21-day cycles, followed by ongoing maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. The patient had achieved a partial response after induction therapy, and then received seven cycles of atezolizumab maintenance therapy until immune-related toxicities necessitated discontinuation. The patient was alive with an ongoing response and excellent performance status more than 6 years after starting treatment and 5 years after discontinuing atezolizumab maintenance. In conclusion, this patient with ES-SCLC from the IMpower133 study is a rare example of ongoing survival more than 6 years beyond diagnosis and the start of treatment with first-line atezolizumab. This demonstrates the potential durability of response with immunotherapy.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Programmed Death Protein 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. The present meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies were identified through searches of databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as prominent oncology conferences. The search was conducted from the inception of the databases up to January 31, 2024. A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Among these studies, six were randomized trials, while four were observational studies. The pooled meta-analysis showed that PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are more effective in improving overall survival and progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone. However, when comparing PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding overall survival and progression-free survival. It is important to note that there is no head-to-head trial comparing these two interventions in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Therefore, future prospective trials are needed to define optimal therapeutic approaches in this patient population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with lung cancer having chronic interstitial pneumonia

Background

In interstitial pneumonia (IP)-associated lung cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (ICIP) is common with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of ICI treatment for patients with lung cancer with IP.

Methods

This multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted from June 2016 to December 2020 in patients with primary lung cancer with IP who received ICI treatment.

Results

A total of 200 patients (median age 70 years; male/female, 176/24) were enrolled from 27 institutions. ICIP occurred in 61 patients (30.5%), pneumonitis grades 3-5 in 32 patients (15.5%) and death in nine patients (4.5%). The common computed tomography pattern of ICIP was organising pneumonia in 29 patients (47.5%). Subsequently, diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) pattern was observed in 19 patients (31.1%) who had a significantly worse prognosis than those with a non-DAD pattern (median progression-free survival (PFS) 115 days versus 226 days, p=0.042; median overall survival (OS) 334 days versus 1316 days, p<0.001). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in approximately 50% of patients. Patients with irAEs (n=100) had a better prognosis than those without irAEs (n=100) (median PFS 200 days versus 77 days, p<0.001; median OS 597 days versus 390 days p=0.0074). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 41.3% and 68.5%, respectively.

Conclusions

Although ICI treatment was effective for patients with lung cancer with IP, ICIP developed in approximately 30% of patients. Patients with irAEs had a significantly better PFS and OS than those without irAEs.

Prognostic implications of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy: A multicenter, real-world study

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are closely related to the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, but their effect on extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains uncertain.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in ES-SCLC patients treated with first-line atezolizumab or durvalumab and platinum-etoposide. Clinical data from three hospitals were analyzed. Significant risk factors for survival were identified using descriptive statistics and Cox regression. Homogeneity was assessed using t-tests or nonparametric tests. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed an association between high NLR level and median PFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 300 ES-SCLC patients were included in the study. Cox regression analysis revealed that an elevated NLR level after the second treatment cycle (defined as NLRT2) was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Stratifying patients based on median NLRT2 showed significant differences in both PFS (HR: 1.863, 95% CI: 1.62-2.12, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 2.581, 95% CI: 2.19-3.04, p < 0.001) between NLR ≥ 1.75 and NLR < 1.75 groups. mPFS and mOS were 8.2 versus 6.1 months and 13.7 versus 9.5 months, respectively. NLR was also associated with treatment efficacy and occurrence of irAEs. Further stratification based on NLR and irAEs showed that in the NLR < 1.75 group, patients with irAEs had prolonged mPFS and mOS. In the NLR ≥ 1.75 group, only mPFS showed a significant difference between patients with and without irAEs.

CONCLUSION

NLRT2 and irAEs can predict the prognosis of ES-SCLC patients with first-line ES-SCLC receiving PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy.

Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Serplulimab, a Novel Anti-PD-1 Antibody, in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Solid Tumors: A Phase I Study

BACKGROUND

Serplulimab is a novel, recombinant, humanized, monoclonal, anti-programmed death 1 antibody with a similar or better affinity and pre-clinical antitumor activity than pembrolizumab and nivolumab.

OBJECTIVE

This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study evaluated serplulimab in patients with advanced solid tumors. The second interim analysis of the dose-finding phase is reported here.

METHODS

Adult patients with histologically confirmed metastatic/recurrent solid tumors who had progressed on, or were intolerant to/clinically unsuitable for standard treatment, were enrolled. Four intravenous serplulimab dose levels were evaluated: 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks in 28-day cycles for up to 2 years. Primary endpoints were the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and the maximum tolerated dose.

RESULTS

By 27 July, 2020 (data cut-off), 29 patients with stage IV disease (34.5% with lung cancer) received one or more doses of serplulimab. One (3.4%) patient had completed treatment and 26 (89.7%) had discontinued from the study. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Twenty-two (75.9%) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events related to serplulimab, most frequently nausea (24.1%), with no notable differences in incidence between dose cohorts; of these, grade ≥ 3 events occurred in four (13.8%) patients. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrated minimal accumulation of serplulimab after repeated administration. Functional programmed death 1 blockade was observed across dose levels. Objective response and disease control rates were 8.0 and 60.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serplulimab was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity. These data support further study of serplulimab in larger patient populations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03468751 (19 March, 2018).