Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine attacks during the prodrome: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in the USA

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine

We here present evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine. These guidelines, created by the Italian Society for the Study of Headache and the International Headache Society, aim to offer clear, actionable recommendations to healthcare professionals. They incorporate evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials and expert-based opinions. The guidelines follow the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the quality of evidence. The guideline development involved a systematic review of literature across multiple databases, adherence to Cochrane review methods, and a structured framework for data extraction and interpretation. Although the guidelines provide a robust foundation for migraine treatment, they also highlight gaps in current research, such as the paucity of head-to-head drug comparisons and the need for long-term outcome studies. These guidelines serve as a resource to standardize migraine treatment and promote high-quality care across different healthcare settings.

Evaluation of premonitory spontaneous and nitroglycerin triggered symptoms among patients with cluster headache and migraine

BackgroundOur knowledge of the presence and type of premonitory symptoms in patients with cluster headache is limited.MethodsPremonitory symptom presence and type in a clinical cohort of cluster headache and migraine was collated retrospectively from clinical notes, alongside a cluster headache nitroglycerin triggered experimental group and an age-matched migraine nitroglycerin experimental group. Demographic data and premonitory symptoms in cluster headache and migraine patients were analysed. The primary focus was on premonitory symptom presence and phenotype in cluster headache patients, with secondary analysis exploring associated factors and comparing spontaneous and nitroglycerin-triggered symptoms in cluster headache and migraine cohorts.ResultsAmong 164 cluster headache patients, 122/164 (74%) males, aged 45.9 ± 13.8 years (mean ± SD), 66/164 (40%) had chronic cluster headache and 32/164 (20%) had also comorbid migraine. Among them, 85% exhibited premonitory symptoms for which the presence was associated with oxygen treatment. No significant differences were found in symptom frequency between cluster headache and migraine cohorts or within spontaneous and nitroglycerin-triggered symptoms.ConclusionsThis study highlights recognizable spontaneous and nitroglycerin-triggered premonitory symptoms in cluster headache and factors potentially impacting cluster headache management, which may aid in tailoring treatment strategies for both conditions through the use of treatment prediction and early intervention.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted therapy in migraine: current role and future perspectives

Almost 40 years ago, the discovery of the vasoactive neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its role in migraine pathophysiology ushered in a new era in migraine treatment. Since 2018, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP pathway are available for migraine prevention. The approval of these drugs marks a pioneering development, as they are the first pharmacological agents specifically tailored for migraine prevention. Introduction of these agents contrasts the historical reliance on traditional preventive medications initially formulated for other indications and later repurposed for migraine therapy. Although the emergence of evidence on the efficacy and safety of CGRP-targeted mAbs has raised the bar for treatment success in migraine, their efficacy in other headache entities, such as cluster headache, is low to moderate. Small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists called gepants have also been proven to be effective both as acute and preventive migraine treatments. Furthermore, these agents have bridged the traditional categories of acute and preventive treatment strategies. Short-term prevention and treatment during the prodromal phase of migraine represent emerging strategies enabling clinicians to develop treatment approaches designed to meet changing patient needs; however, these strategies still require more formal evidence. Although solid data have been gathered, further research concerning the efficacy and long-term safety of drugs targeting the CGRP pathway and robust pharmacoeconomic evaluations are needed. Finally, randomised withdrawal and switching studies would facilitate the formulation of evidence-based guidance for the discontinuation of and switching between drugs targeting the CGRP pathway.

Headache Care

Primary headache disorders are common within the pediatric population and often lead to disruption in multiple areas of life. It is important to systematically approach patients presenting for the evaluation of headaches to determine if the symptoms originate from a primary or secondary headache disorder. Once a diagnosis is established, patients should be offered treatment to adequately address the headache disorder. Over the last 6 years, multiple new treatment options have emerged, with growing selections available for children and adolescents. In this review, we discuss the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment approach to primary headache disorders.

Characterizing Prodrome (Premonitory Phase) in Migraine: Results From the PRODROME Trial Screening Period

Background and Objective

Limited data are available describing the frequency, severity, and consistency of prodromal symptoms followed by headache. This analysis of the PRODROME trial screening period characterized prodromal symptoms in people with migraine, including the most common symptoms and their severity, and the frequency and consistency with which prodromal symptoms were followed by headache.

Methods

PRODROME was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial conducted in the United States that enrolled adults with 2-8 migraine attacks per month who stated they could identify prodromal symptoms that were reliably followed by a headache. The trial included a 60-day screening period designed to test the predictive validity of "qualifying prodrome events" before the onset of headache. Participants used an eDiary to report qualifying prodrome events, defined as prodromal symptoms whereby the participant was confident a headache would follow within 1-6 hours. This analysis evaluated common prodromal symptoms and their severity, time from prodrome onset to headache onset, and the percentage of participants who identified prodromal symptoms that were followed by a headache ≥75% of the time over the 60-day screening period.

Results

A total of 920 participants entered eDiary data, with a mean of 5.2 qualifying prodrome events during the 60-day screening period. A total of 4,802 qualifying prodrome events were recorded. The most common prodromal symptoms identified were sensitivity to light (57.2%; 2,748/4,802), fatigue (50.1%; 2,408/4,802), neck pain (41.9%; 2,013/4,802), sensitivity to sound (33.9%; 1,630/4,802), either difficulty thinking or concentrating (30.0%; 1,442/4,802), and dizziness (27.8%; 1,333/4,802). Of all qualifying prodrome events reported, 81.5% (3,913/4,802) were followed by headache of any intensity within 1-6 hours. For each participant, a mean of 84.4% of their qualifying prodrome events were followed by a headache within 1-6 hours, with 76.9% of participants identifying qualifying prodrome events that were followed by headache within 1-6 hours ≥75% of the time.

Discussion

Participants were able to identify migraine attacks in which prodromal symptoms were reliably followed by a headache within 1-6 hours. These findings suggest the potential for initiating treatment during the prodrome to prevent headache.

Trial Registration Information

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04492020. Submitted: July 27, 2020; First patient enrolled: August 21, 2020. clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04492020.

Efficacy of ubrogepant and atogepant in males and females with migraine: A secondary analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Published evidence supporting efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists as acute migraine treatments in males is limited.

METHODS

To fill the gap, we present male and female data from four ubrogepant and four atogepant randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials for acute and preventive treatment of migraine, respectively. Acute outcomes included 2-h pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom (co-primary; headache-phase randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials); absence of moderate-to-severe headache within 24 h (primary; prodrome randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial). Preventive outcome included change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days across 12 weeks (primary).

RESULTS

Pooled data from phase 3 headache-phase ubrogepant randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials showed similar rates of pain freedom (19.4% vs 21.1%) and absence of most bothersome symptom (35.1% vs 39.0%) 2 h post-dose between males and females, respectively. Time course of pain freedom and absence of most bothersome symptom over 48 h was similar between male and female subgroups. Comparable reductions in mean monthly migraine days across 12-week treatment periods were found between males and females treated with atogepant 60 mg once-daily in pooled episodic migraine and chronic migraine randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

In ubrogepant and atogepant randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, although analysis power for males is limited due to small sample sizes, evidence supports similar treatment effects in males and females with migraine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02828020; NCT02867709; NCT04492020; NCT01613248; NCT02848326; NCT03777059; NCT04740827; NCT03855137.

Brain connectivity in individuals with migraine resets during the headache phase: a whole-brain connectivity study

Episodic migraine is reflected by cyclic changes in behavior and cortical processing. We aimed to identify how functional connectivity changes over the entire migraine cycle. By using longitudinal neuroimaging and a whole-brain connectivity analysis approach, we tested 12 episodic migraine patients across 82 functional MRI recordings during spontaneous migraine headaches with follow-up measurements over the pain-free interval without any external stimulation. We found that the functional connectivity linearly increased over the interictal interval. In the prodromal phase, we observed the strongest connections between the anterior agranular insula and the posterior orbitofrontal cortex with sensory, motor and cingulate areas. The strength of the connections dropped during the headache. Peak connectivity during the prodromal phase and its collapse during the headache can be regarded as a mechanism of normalizing cortical processing. We speculate about a malfunction at the molecular level in agranular frontal and insular regions, which needs to be addressed in subsequent studies.

Bridging Gaps in Migraine Management: A Comprehensive Review of Conventional Treatments, Natural Supplements, Complementary Therapies, and Lifestyle Modifications

Background: Migraine, a complex neurological condition, poses significant challenges for both sufferers and healthcare providers. While prescription medications play a vital role in managing migraine attacks, the quest for natural, non-pharmacological alternatives has garnered increasing interest. This review explores the efficacy and safety of natural supplements as treatments for migraine relief, comparing them with conventional prescription medications. Methods: The review delves into herbal supplements, clinical studies on natural remedies, aromatherapy, dietary influences, and lifestyle modifications in the context of migraine management in several databases. Results: The findings shed light on the potential of natural supplements as complementary or alternative approaches to traditional migraine therapies, offering insights into a holistic and personalized treatment paradigm for migraine sufferers. Conclusions: Natural supplements have gained attention as potential treatments for migraine relief, often perceived as safer alternatives to conventional medications.

Influence of next-generation artificial intelligence on headache research, diagnosis and treatment: the junior editorial board members' vision - part 2

Part 2 explores the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing the complexities of headache disorders through innovative approaches, including digital twin models, wearable healthcare technologies and biosensors, and AI-driven drug discovery. Digital twins, as dynamic digital representations of patients, offer opportunities for personalized headache management by integrating diverse datasets such as neuroimaging, multiomics, and wearable sensor data to advance headache research, optimize treatment, and enable virtual trials. In addition, AI-driven wearable devices equipped with next-generation biosensors combined with multi-agent chatbots could enable real-time physiological and biochemical monitoring, diagnosing, facilitating early headache attack forecasting and prevention, disease tracking, and personalized interventions. Furthermore, AI-driven advances in drug discovery leverage machine learning and generative AI to accelerate the identification of novel therapeutic targets and optimize treatment strategies for migraine and other headache disorders. Despite these advances, challenges such as data standardization, model explainability, and ethical considerations remain pivotal. Collaborative efforts between clinicians, biomedical and biotechnological engineers, AI scientists, legal representatives and bioethics experts are essential to overcoming these barriers and unlocking AI's full potential in transforming headache research and healthcare. This is a call to action in proposing novel frameworks for integrating AI-based technologies into headache care.

Intranasal zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a highly prevalent chronic, inherited neurological condition of the brain which carries a significant level of disability. Despite advances, there is an unmet need for more effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Zavegepant nasal spray is a recent therapeutic option which acts as a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist. The objective is to review the efficacy, safety, and additional results of the most recent trials investigating intranasal zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura. The authors searched PubMed using the keywords 'zavegepant,' 'Zavzpret,' 'migraine,' 'calcitonin gene-related peptide,' 'CGRP receptor antagonists.' This article covers Phase 1, Phase 2/3, and Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal zavegepant for treatment of acute migraine attacks.

EXPERT OPINION

Intranasal zavegepant is an efficacious, safe, and tolerable anti-migraine drug based on clinical trials and clinical experience. It is especially useful for patients who experience attacks of sudden onset, those with nausea or vomiting, or a high cardiovascular risk burden. Dysgeusia was common; future studies are needed to better characterize this adverse event. Head-to-head studies are lacking with other migraine-specific therapies; the decision to treat should be patient-centered, with attack-specific characteristics in mind.

Migraine treatment: Position paper of the French Headache Society

The French migraine management recommendations were published in 2021. However, in the last three years, new data have come to light and new drugs have been approved (eptinezumab, rimegepant and atogepant) by the European Medicines Agency that require us to take a position on their use and to update certain elements of the recommendations. The first important message concerns the position of the French Headache Society on the use of preventive treatments (monoclonal antibodies and gepants) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. In terms of efficacy and safety, and as suggested by other national headache societies, these treatments can be offered as first-line treatment, although the scope defined by the French national health authority for possible reimbursement is limited to patients with severe migraine, at least eight headache days per month and for whom two previous preventive treatments have failed. Another important change concerns the position of topiramate as a preventive treatment for migraine in women of childbearing age. This treatment has been proposed as a first-line treatment for chronic migraine. However, recent pharmacovigilance data have highlighted a potential adverse effect on neurodevelopment in children exposed in utero. As a result, this treatment is formally contraindicated during pregnancy and must be used with extreme caution in women of childbearing age (effective contraception, no therapeutic alternative available and annual follow-up as with valproate). It can therefore no longer be offered as first-line treatment for women of childbearing age.

The prodrome of migraine: mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic strategies

Migraine is a common clinical chronic neurovascular disease characterized by recurrent, mostly unilateral, moderate or severe, pulsatile headache. It can be divided into four clinical stages: premonitory (prodrome), aura, headache and postdrome. The early warning value of the prodrome in migraine has been largely verified in various studies. In fact, the prodrome of migraine has received increasing attention as it can serve as an ideal therapeutic window for early intervention and effective treatment of migraine. In recent years, the pathophysiological and molecular biological mechanisms in the prodromal stage of migraine have been extensively studied, and great progress has been made in understanding the disease. This review paper aims to provide an overview of recent studies mainly focused on the prodrome of migraine, discuss the biological mechanisms underlying the clinical profile, and reveal novel therapeutic strategies for preventing or blocking migraine onset during its prodrome.

The potential role of CGRP in synuclein-associated neurodegenerative disorders

In this hypothesis article, the potential clinicopathological associations of Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide (CGRP) with the development of synuclein-associated neurodegenerative disorders (SAND) are discussed. The presence of α-syn and CGRP in the CNS and the ENS and the intricate role of CGRP and its related pathways in inflammation, apoptosis, metabolism, neuromodulation, and brain-gut communication are analyzed. Since this hypothesis is confirmed, modulating CGRP-potential related pathways may lead to novel disease-modifying therapies.

Understanding the efficacy and tolerability of migraine treatment: a deep dive into CGRP antagonists

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of the role of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGPR) in migraine pathogenesis ushered in a new era in headache medicine. This evidence led to the development of small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibodies targeting either CGRP or its receptor.

AREAS COVERED

We will present selected aspects of the role of CGRP in the pathogenesis of migraine, the efficacy of CGRP-targeted treatment, and the still-open questions regarding the practical application of CGRP antagonists in headache medicine.

EXPERT OPINION

CGRP-targeting drugs represent a transformative approach to migraine treatment, offering superior efficacy and tolerability compared to traditional therapies, they are a helpful addition to the treatment arsenal but also have their flaws and require further observation. Their availability provides new hope for migraine patients, particularly those who have not responded adequately to conventional treatments. Future directions for migraine care planning, especially for chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache, should include universal access to these specific and effective forms of therapy to prevent complications from the disease and its negative effects in many aspects of a patient's life.

Research trends and hotspots in clinical trials of migraine in the past 20 years: bibliometric analysis

Background

Migraine is a widespread, recurrent primary headache disorder primarily characterized by severe pulsatile headache, typically on one or both sides. It is often accompanied by nausea, vomiting, and hypersensitivity to sound and light. Despite the availability of multiple drugs for migraine management, the condition often becomes chronic due to untimely or irrational drug use, significantly distressing patients and increasing the burden on families and society. Over the past two decades, numerous clinical studies on migraine have been published. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the current status and trends of migraine clinical trials through bibliometric analysis.

Methods

We used visual network tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer to perform a knowledge graph analysis of publications related to migraine clinical trials extracted from the WoSCC.

Results

This study analyzed 1,129 articles published in 389 journals from 61 countries. The number of publications on migraine clinical trials has steadily increased from 2004 to 2023. The United States and Albert Einstein College of Medicine are the leading countries and institutions in this field, respectively. Richard B. Lipton is the most prolific author, making significant contributions to the research. The journal Headache has the highest number of publications and citations in this area. Keywords such as "efficacy," "RCT," "CGRP," "prophylaxis," "disability," "depression," "questionnaire," and "real-world effectiveness" received significant attention.

Conclusion

This study identified reliable research hotspots and provided directions for clinicians. The treatment of migraine continues to be challenging. Future trends may include continued growth in migraine classification, risk factor analysis, and comorbidity studies. Research on CGRP and epigenetics will advance the progress of precision medicine in the migraine field.

Pre-cluster symptoms in a Taiwanese cohort of cluster headache: symptom profiles and clinical predictions

BACKGROUND

Pre-cluster symptoms (PCSs) are symptoms preceding cluster bouts and might have implications for the treatment of cluster headache (CH). This study investigated the prevalence of PCSs, and their utility in predicting upcoming bouts as well as the associations with therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from patients with CH. Each patient received a structured interview and completed questionnaire surveys during CH bouts. In sub-study 1, we cross-sectionally analyzed the prevalence, symptomatology, and predictability of upcoming bouts. Overall, 34 PCSs, divided into seven categories, were queried, including head and neck pain, cranial autonomic symptoms, restlessness, fatigue or mood changes, sleep alterations, constitutional symptoms, and generalized pain. In sub-study 2, we recorded the weekly frequency of CH attacks after the initiation of verapamil concurrently with a 14-day transitional therapy based on the patients' headache diary. A responder to verapamil was defined as a patient who have a reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks 4 weeks after the initiation of verapamil.

RESULTS

A total of 168 CH patients (women/men: 39/129) completed the study. In sub-study 1, we found 149 (88.7%) experienced PCSs, with a median of 24 (IQR 18 to 72) hours before the bouts. Up to 57.7% of patients with PCS reported that they could predict upcoming bouts. Among the seven categories of PCSs, head and neck pain was the most common (81.0%) and was associated with a higher predictability of upcoming bouts (odds ratio [OR] = 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-9.6). In sub-study 2, we found two categories of PCSs were associated with the response to verapamil: sleep alteration (OR = 2.5 [95% CI = 1.3-4.8], p = 0.004) and ≥ 1 cranial autonomic symptoms (OR = 2.7 [95% CI = 1.4-5.1], p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

PCSs were very common in CH and could be used to predict upcoming bouts. Different symptom categories of PCSs may have different clinical implications.

Insights from triggers and prodromal symptoms on how migraine attacks start: The threshold hypothesis

BACKGROUND

The prodrome or premonitory phase is the initial phase of a migraine attack, and it is considered as a symptomatic phase in which prodromal symptoms may occur. There is evidence that attacks start 24-48 hours before the headache phase. Individuals with migraine also report several potential triggers for their attacks, which may be mistaken for premonitory symptoms and hinder migraine research.

METHODS

This review aims to summarize published studies that describe contributions to understanding the fine difference between prodromal/premonitory symptoms and triggers, give insights for research, and propose a way forward to study these phenomena. We finally aim to formulate a theory to unify migraine triggers and prodromal symptoms. For this purpose, a comprehensive narrative review of the published literature on clinical, neurophysiological and imaging evidence on migraine prodromal symptoms and triggers was conducted using the PubMed database.

RESULTS

Brain activity and network connectivity changes occur during the prodromal phase. These changes give rise to prodromal/premonitory symptoms in some individuals, which may be falsely interpreted as triggers at the same time as representing the early manifestation of the beginning of the attack. By contrast, certain migraine triggers, such as stress, hormone changes or sleep deprivation, acting as a catalyst in reducing the migraine threshold, might facilitate these changes and increase the chances of a migraine attack. Migraine triggers and prodromal/premonitory symptoms can be confused and have an intertwined relationship with the hypothalamus as the central hub for integrating external and internal body signals.

CONCLUSIONS

Differentiating migraine triggers and prodromal symptoms is crucial for shedding light on migraine pathophysiology and improve migraine management.

First real-world study on the effectiveness and tolerability of rimegepant for acute migraine therapy in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Rimegepant, a small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is indicated for acute and preventive migraine treatment in the United States and other countries. However, there is a lack of prospective real-world evidence for the use of rimegepant in Chinese migraine patients.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, prospective, real-world study. While taking rimegepant to treat migraine attacks as needed, eligible participants were asked to record their pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms for a single attack at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose via a digital platform. Adverse events (AEs) during the rimegepant treatment period were recorded and analysed. The percentages of participants who experienced moderate to severe pain at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were assessed. Additionally, the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose were analysed. In addition, the total cohort (full population, FP) was stratified into a prior nonresponder (PNR) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of rimegepant for relatively refractory migraine and a rimegepant and eptinezumab (RE) group to observe the effectiveness and safety of the combination of these drugs.

RESULTS

By November 24th, 2023, 133 participants (FP, n = 133; PNR group, n = 40; RE group, n = 28) were enrolled, and 99 participants (FP, n = 99; PNR group, n = 30; RE group, n = 23) were included in the analysis. Rimegepant was effective in treating migraine in the FP and both subgroups, with a significant decreasing trend in the percentages of participants experiencing moderate to severe pain postdose (p < 0.05) and a marked increase in the percentages of participants who reported better/good outcomes in terms of pain intensity, functional ability, and accompanying symptoms at 0.5, 1, 2, 24, and 48 h postdose compared with predose. AEs were reported by 6% of participants in the FP, and all AEs were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real world, rimegepant is effective in the acute treatment of migraine patients in China. The low incidence rate of AEs highlighted the favourable tolerability profile of rimegepant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05709106. Retrospectively registered on 2023-02-01.

Effect of Ubrogepant on Patient-Reported Outcomes When Administered During the Migraine Prodrome: Results From the Randomized PRODROME Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine. The PRODROME trial previously demonstrated that ubrogepant treatment during prodrome prevents the onset of moderate or severe headache. In this analysis of the PRODROME trial, the benefits of ubrogepant treatment during the prodrome on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are evaluated.

METHODS

PRODROME was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial that enrolled adults who experienced 2-8 migraine attacks per month with moderate-severe headache pain. Eligible participants treated 2 qualifying prodrome events, defined as a migraine attack with prodromal symptoms when the participant was confident a headache would follow within 1-6 hours. Participants were randomized to treatment sequence A (placebo then ubrogepant 100 mg) or sequence B (ubrogepant 100 mg then placebo). This analysis evaluated the ability to function normally over 24 hours (secondary end point) and at specific time points after dose (additional end point). Other PRO end points included activity limitation over 24 hours and satisfaction with study medication at 8 and 24 hours.

RESULTS

Of 518 randomized participants, 477 comprised the modified intent-to-treat population. After treatment of qualifying prodrome events, a significantly greater ability to function normally over 24 hours was observed for participants after treatment with ubrogepant 100 mg compared with placebo (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% CI 1.40-1.96; p < 0.0001). As early as 2 hours after dose, a greater proportion of ubrogepant-treated participants reported "no disability, able to function normally" compared with placebo (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.32-2.35; nominal p = 0.0001). Ubrogepant administered during the prodrome was also associated with a greater reduction in activity limitations over 24 hours after dose (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.61-2.67; nominal p < 0.0001). At 8 and 24 hours after dose, rates of being "satisfied" or "extremely satisfied" were greater for ubrogepant than for placebo (8 hours: OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.78-3.15; nominal p < 0.0001; 24 hours: OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.78-3.02; nominal p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Ubrogepant 100 mg administered during the prodrome was associated with significantly greater ability to function normally, greater reduction in activity limitations over 24 hours, and greater satisfaction with study medication, compared with placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04492020. Submitted: July 27, 2020; first patient enrolled: August 21, 2020. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04492020.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that taking ubrogepant 100 mg during a migraine prodrome allows more patients to function normally over the next 24 hours.

Resting-state electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography in migraine-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography (M/EEG) can provide insights into migraine pathophysiology and help develop clinically valuable biomarkers. To integrate and summarize the existing evidence on changes in brain function in migraine, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42021272622) of resting-state M/EEG findings in migraine. We included 27 studies after searching MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and EMBASE. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Semi-quantitative analysis was conducted by vote counting, and meta-analyses of M/EEG differences between people with migraine and healthy participants were performed using random-effects models. In people with migraine during the interictal phase, meta-analysis revealed higher power of brain activity at theta frequencies (3-8 Hz) than in healthy participants. Furthermore, we found evidence for lower alpha and beta connectivity in people with migraine in the interictal phase. No associations between M/EEG features and disease severity were observed. Moreover, some evidence for higher delta and beta power in the premonitory compared to the interictal phase was found. Strongest risk of bias of included studies arose from a lack of controlling for comorbidities and non-automatized or non-blinded M/EEG assessments. These findings can guide future M/EEG studies on migraine pathophysiology and brain-based biomarkers, which should consider comorbidities and aim for standardized, collaborative approaches.

Real-world study of adverse events associated with gepant use in migraine treatment based on the VigiAccess and U.S. Food and Drug Administration's adverse event reporting system databases

Background

This study aimed to investigate the real-world profile of adverse events (AEs) associated with gepant medications in the clinical treatment of migraines by analyzing data collected from the VigiAccess database and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. As novel migraine therapies, gepants act by targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, demonstrating effective control of migraine attacks and good tolerability. Nonetheless, comprehensive real-world studies on the safety of gepants are still lacking, particularly regarding their safety in large populations, long-term use, and potential adverse reactions in specific groups, which necessitates further empirical research. Leveraging these two international adverse event reporting system databases, we systematically gathered and analyzed reports of AEs related to gepant medications, such as rimegepant. Our focus encompasses but is not limited to severe, new, and rare adverse reactions induced by the drugs, as well as safety issues pertaining to the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, and renal systems. Through descriptive statistical analyses, we assessed the incidence and characteristics of AEs, compared AEs among gepants, and uncovered previously unknown AE information, all with the goal of providing a reference for the selection of clinical treatment regimens and AE monitoring.

Methods

By extracting all AE reports concerning "rimegepant", "atogepant", and "ubrogepant" from the VigiAccess and FAERS database since its establishment up to 31 March 2024, a retrospective quantitative analysis was conducted. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) method were used to compare AEs among the three gepants.

Results

In the VigiAccess and FAERS databases, 23542 AE reports in total, respectively, were identified as being related to gepant medications. Among gastrointestinal system AEs, rimegepant had the greatest proportion and greatest signal strength; nausea was most severe and had the strongest signal in rimegepant AEs, whereas constipation was most prominent and had the strongest signal in atogepant AEs. In skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, rash and pruritus were more frequently observed with rimegepant, followed by ubrogepant. Alopecia emerged as a novel AE, being more severe in rimegepant and secondarily in atogepant. Regarding cardiac disorders, the three gepants showed comparable rates of cardiac AEs, yet rimegepant exhibited the strongest AE signal. In musculoskeletal and connective tissue AEs, ubrogepant presented the most positive signals for skeletal muscle AEs. Furthermore, among the rare blood and lymphatic system disorder AEs, rimegepant had the highest number of reports of Raynaud's phenomenon and the strongest signal. The study also revealed that while reports of AEs involving liver diseases were scarce across the three gepants, severe AEs were detected in clinical trials, highlighting the need for continued, enhanced monitoring of liver system AEs through large-scale datasets.

Conclusion

Gepant medications exhibit similarities and differences in their safety profiles. Analysis of the two databases indicated the presence of AEs across various systems, including gastrointestinal disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, organ-specific effects, and liver diseases. However, each drug displays distinct incidences and signal intensities for these AEs. Additionally, the study revealed a rare AE in the form of Raynaud's phenomenon. These findings suggest that during clinical use, individualized medication selection and AE monitoring should be based on the patient's physiological condition and specific characteristics.

Academic neurology in the UK: a plea to turn away from the precipice

Devine et al. argue that recent changes to clinical neurology training in the UK have the potential to exacerbate an existing crisis in academic neurology, and discuss what might be done to remedy the situation.

Situational prevention: Pharmacotherapy during periods of increased risk for migraine attacks

The small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants) are the only drug class with medicines indicated for both the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Given this dual capacity to both treat and prevent, along with their favorable tolerability profiles and lack of an association with medication-overuse headache, headache specialists have begun to use gepants in ways that transcend the traditional categories of acute and preventive treatment. One approach, called situational prevention, directs patients to treat during the interictal phase, before symptoms develop, in situations of increased risk for migraine attacks. Herein, we present three patients to illustrate scenarios of gepant use for situational prevention. In each case, a gepant was started in anticipation of a period of increased headache probability (vulnerability) and continued for a duration of 1 day to 5 consecutive days. Although this approach may expose patients to medication when headache may not have developed, the tolerability and safety profile and preventive effect of gepants may represent a feasible approach for some patients. Situational prevention is an emerging strategy for managing migraine before symptoms develop in individuals who can identify periods when the probability of headache is high. This paper is intended to increase awareness of this strategy and stimulate future randomized, placebo-controlled trials to rigorously assess this strategy.

Extended Phenotyping of Migraine in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Specialist Children's Headache Clinic

BACKGROUND

The pediatric migraine phenotype may exhibit differences to adults, leading to diagnostic challenges. We aimed to perform a cross-sectional systematic study to characterize the extended phenotype of pediatric migraine.

METHODS

New migraine patients presenting to the Children's Headache Clinic were included (n = 105). Data were collected via a detailed symptom questionnaire at the first clinical encounter and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Cohen kappa (k), Spearman correlation (ρ), and Poisson and binomial logistic regression models within SPSS.

RESULTS

Patients were 65% female and aged five to 17 years (median 14, interquartile range [IQR] 11 to 15), with a mean disease duration of 4.7 years (S.D. 2.8). Monthly headache frequency was 1 to 30 days (median 30, IQR 12 to 30). Attack duration varied between 2 and 168 hours (median 12, IQR 5 to 72). The majority (81%) experienced bilateral headache. Premonitory symptoms (PS) were reported by 93% (range 0 to 7; mood change and tiredness most commonly), cranial autonomic symptoms (CAS) by 58% (range 0 to 6; pallor and lacrimation most commonly), and premonitory CAS by 23%. Vertigo (53%) and allodynia (16%) were present. The laterality of headache and CAS showed agreement (k = 0.5, P < 0.001). For every year of disease duration, 1.07 times more PS were reported (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.12, P < 0.001). The number of CAS (odds ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.8, P = 0.01) significantly predicted allodynia.

CONCLUSIONS

Children display a more enriched PS phenotype with disease chronicity. CAS and allodynia may be markers of central sensitization with shared neurobiological mechanisms in the absence of peripheral nociceptor activation.

Intervening in the Premonitory Phase to Prevent Migraine: Prospects for Pharmacotherapy

Migraine is a common brain condition characterised by disabling attacks of headache with sensory sensitivities. Despite increasing understanding of migraine neurobiology and the impacts of this on therapeutic developments, there remains a need for treatment options for patients underserved by currently available therapies. The first specific drugs developed to treat migraine acutely, the serotonin-5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT1B/1D] receptor agonists (triptans), seem to require headache onset in order to have an effect, while early treatment during mild pain before headache escalation improves short-term and long-term outcomes. Some patients find treating in the early window once headache has started but not escalated difficult, and migraine can arise from sleep or in the early hours of the morning, making prompt treatment after pain onset challenging. Triptans may be deemed unsuitable for use in patients with vascular disease and in those of older age and may not be effective in a proportion of patients. Headache is also increasingly recognised as being just one of the many facets of the migraine attack, and for some patients it is not the most disabling symptom. In many patients, painless symptoms can start prior to headache onset and can reliably warn of impending headache. There is, therefore, a need to identify therapeutic targets and agents that may be used as early as possible in the course of the attack, to prevent headache onset before it starts, and to reduce both headache and non-headache related attack burden. Early small studies using domperidone, naratriptan and dihydroergotamine have suggested that this approach could be useful; these studies were methodologically less rigorous than modern day treatment studies, of small sample size, and have not since been replicated. The emergence of novel targeted migraine treatments more recently, specifically calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists (gepants), has reignited interest in this strategy, with encouraging results. This review summarises historical and emerging data in this area, supporting use of the premonitory phase as an opportunity to intervene as early as possible in migraine to prevent attack-related morbidity.

Developments in targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide

INTRODUCTION

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapy has revolutionized migraine treatment since its first approval in 2018. CGRP-targeted therapy includes monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and gepants, which modulate trigeminal nociceptive and inflammatory responses, alleviating pain sensitization involved in migraine pathogenesis. CGRP-targeted therapy is effective not only for migraine but also for other chronic headache disorders that share the CGRP pathway.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the latest developments and evidence for CGRP-targeted therapy for episodic migraine and chronic migraine. In addition, the authors discuss the emerging evidence on response prediction, menstrual migraine, vestibular migraine, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, post-traumatic headache, and the relationship between selected migraine comorbidities and CGRP.

EXPERT OPINION

Since the launch of CGRP-targeted therapy, many practical issues have been raised. Generally, it's safe to combine CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants; this is an excellent option for patients with partial response. When considering stopping CGRP-targeted therapy, although a disease-modifying effect is likely, the optimal time for discontinuation remains unknown. Finally, beyond migraine, CGRP-targeted therapy may be used for other chronic pain disorders and psychological comorbidities.

Pharmacological management of migraine: current strategies and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a complex neurological disorder that affects a significant portion of the global population. As traditional pharmacological approaches often fall short in alleviating symptoms, the development of innovative therapies has garnered significant interest. This text aims to summarize the current pharmacological options for managing migraine and to explore the potential impact of novel therapies.

AREAS COVERED

We focused on conventional treatments, emerging therapies, and novel compounds in clinical development, including therapies targeting the trigeminovascular system, cannabis-based therapies, hormonal and metabolic therapies, and other options. English peer-reviewed articles were searched in PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov electronic databases.

EXPERT OPINION

Several novel treatment options for migraine have become available in recent years. Emerging pharmacological therapies targeting the trigeminovascular system, cannabis-based therapies, hormonal and metabolic interventions, and other emerging treatment modalities, may prove to be valuable for the treatment of migraine. Further research, clinical trials, and substantiated evidence are necessary to validate the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these therapeutic options.

Pathophysiology of Migraine

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the current understanding of migraine pathophysiology through insights gained from the extended symptom spectrum of migraine, neuroanatomy, migraine neurochemistry, and therapeutics.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Recent advances in human migraine research, including human experimental migraine models and functional neuroimaging, have provided novel insights into migraine attack initiation, neurochemistry, neuroanatomy, and therapeutic substrates. It has become clear that migraine is a neural disorder, in which a wide range of brain areas and neurochemical systems are implicated, producing a heterogeneous clinical phenotype. Many of these neural pathways are monoaminergic and peptidergic, such as those involving calcitonin gene-related peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide. We are currently witnessing an exciting era in which specific drugs targeting these pathways have shown promise in treating migraine, including some studies suggesting efficacy before headache has even started.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Migraine is a brain disorder involving both headache and altered sensory, limbic, and homeostatic processing. A complex interplay between neurotransmitter systems, physiologic systems, and pain processing likely occurs. Targeting various therapeutic substrates within these networks provides an exciting avenue for future migraine therapeutics.

Acute Treatment of Migraine

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with migraine require acute treatment for at least some attacks. This article reviews the approach to the acute treatment of migraine, migraine-specific and nonspecific treatment options, rescue treatment and options for management in the emergency department and inpatient settings, and treatment during pregnancy and lactation.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Triptans, ergot derivatives, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have historically been the main acute treatments for migraine. The development of new classes of acute treatment, including the small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants) and a 5-HT1F receptor agonist (lasmiditan), expands available options. These new treatments have not been associated with vasospasm or increased cardiovascular risk, therefore allowing migraine-specific acute treatment for the more than 20% of adults with migraine who are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. Neuromodulation offers a nonpharmacologic option for acute treatment, with the strongest evidence for remote electrical neuromodulation.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The number of available migraine treatments continues to expand, although triptans are still the mainstay of migraine-specific acute treatment. There is no one-size-fits-all acute treatment and multiple treatment trials are sometimes necessary to determine the optimal regimen for patients. Switching within and between classes, using the maximum allowed dose, using combination therapy, and counseling patients to treat early are all strategies that may improve patient response to acute treatment.

How early can we treat migraine attacks? A perspective based on prodrome

Treating migraine attacks early at the onset of a headache is a common proven strategy. But does this strategy work before headache onset? In the PRODROME trial, Dodick et al. showed that ubrogepant taken during the prodrome can prevent headache attacks and reduce functional disability.1.